skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry, this isn't going to be much help but that kind of intuition only comes with experience.

I can offer some insight, I think.

'at' denotes location or time, you could say 'I am at the hospital' and you mean that you're there but it does not give away involvement, while 'in' does. With 'in' you denote purpose, things are 'in' a box, because they are in storage. You saying 'I am in the hospital' gives away you are a patient, visitor, employee, or you have a particular reason to visit it.

Note that these can mix, saying 'I am at the store' can mean that you're there to buy stuff, but not necessarily. Depends on the context of the conversation and your relationship to the other person.

Most of these (again) come with experience, I think, but the English StackExchange site can offer some more insight I am sure.
I'm missing the relevance here? Are you just trying to point out that MacBooks are also imperfect?

I had a 2017 as well. And before that a 2013. And since then a 2019 16-inch and a 2020 M1. Yes, the 2017 sucked balls in ways that I can't even begin to count. The 2013 was f*cking flawless. I've similarly had almost zero problems with the 2019 16-inch MBP or my 2020 M1. There's just something especially crappy about the 2017s, and I doubt you'd find many people who'd seriously disagree about that.
> Given that many pieces of content posted on Facebook can separately make the same claim, it is not necessary to create a separate claim review article for each post we rate.

I mean they are admitting here that Stossel never made the claim they say he did. Then use all the rest of the article to stretch out that their interpretation of Stossel's "climate change has made things worse but" is actually the same "Not by climate change". Which is obviously untrue.
Starting a greenhouse effect on Mars would help it become more livable by humans.
Had this same problem with another laptop brand too. It was scary.
Not to mention the large amounts of land and water used to raise cattle.
Is your son now a scriptwriter for 'NCIS'?
> 4- the difference between this and other view counts on the platform should be enough.

If the only harm is view counts, it's not going to be a very big award.
For Mars that's not so much of an issue. Even if we did release a lot of methane warming up Mars isn't a bad thing in fact it's something we may try eventually intentionally to make it less inhospitable.
If they were to do it to every post, they probably wouldn't be libeling anyone, but if they do it selectively, I think they may be guilt of libel.

As an example, imagine that Yelp or AngelList posted "beware: this business may be perpetuating a fraud". If they did it to every business, it would be a general warning, not singling it out; but if they did it to a small proportion of businesses, and it turned out that many of the 'targets' were not committing fraud, it would be libel.
On the side note, anybody knows what happened to the prometheus startup [0]? Are they still alive?

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19842240
This is awesome. I always enjoy her articles as they have so much depth.
Of all the ways for a congressperson to transform her access and power into personal wealth, trading on inside information is close to socially optimal. It’s basically victimless (unlike graft), doesn’t necessarily[1] distort incentives toward good policy or law (unlike accepting bribes), and doesn’t impose a direct cost on taxpayers (like increasing salaries).

If we can’t foreclose all of the avenues from power and access to wealth, we should let them have the least harmful one and clamp down on the others. Hell, we should give them a million on margin and at the start of their term.

Note that the simple solution of ‘less venal congresspeople’ is outside feasible region.

[1] obviously concentrated positions could distort policy choices, but they could be prevented from holding more than x% in one name for more than y quarters of disclosure.
"Misleading" seems to be the current politically motivated way to handle the fact checker's tie to either liberal or democratic politics. A fact check should be either true or false.
Sounds like the person who posted that story would fit right in with them.
What this article does is let me take a mental not to take anything too seriously from this source that pops up in the future.
> Clovis-Americans have certain unique rights based on legal theories that their ancestors were the first human occupants of the land

Please point to these rights and legal theories. Do you just mean NAGPRA?

As far as I know, whatever legal rights any native American people have in the Americas at this point in time are based purely on them being here when Europeans arrived near the start of the 16th century.

Whether they had been the occupants for 400 years or 40,000 years wouldn't make any difference to the treaties that were signed (and generally abrogated).
I have a very recent Dell laptop that has terrible standby performance on Linux (as in the battery fully drains in 8-12 hours on standby). Could this be related or is it a Windows only issue?
None of the flags straddle the boundary between the two discs, so it is obvious that no trick is present affecting their apparent count: there are always 13.

The diagram's inner disc contains one complete torso with arms and hands, which holds two flags in either configuration, so "every boy has a flag" is only true if you actually mean "has at least one flag", not if you mean "has one flag".

Since the number of flags is not affected by configuration, one boy not having a flag is unsurprising. There are always 13 flags, so if there are apparently 13 boys, and one is still holding two flags, then someone must necessarily not have a flag.

(In the A configuration, there are actually two boys with no flags. One clutches his head with both hands, holding no flag, and the other, next to the A, is flanked by a floating, detached hand which holds a flag. Therefore, that boy has no hand, and no flag. This severed does not seem essential, either; I believe the picture could be somehow repaired so that the detached hand is reattached. Then in the A configuration would be exactly one boy with no flag, as you say.)
No, b) is easy to understand because a party of the 0.0002% doesn't sell well at all and nobody would vote for that if they said it out loud. The billionaires also tend towards being insane racists, classists, think everyone below them are serfs and that they deserve their birthright, so those viewpoints are perfectly compatible.

If the progressive Democrats could take over the party and control it then I'd agree with you about a), but effectively what the Democrats can do is controlled by Krysten Sinema, not the progressive wing.

And both Trump and the progressive wing of the Democrats shows how untenable the current situation is, and how insufficient the Democratic party has been.

If you start to view the Democratic party (aside from the progressive insurgents) as being bought for by large corporations, and then understand that all the failings and excuses of the Democratic party are really just delivering to the customer what they want, it all makes a lot more sense.

And when it comes to the failings of the Democratic party -- like Krysten Sinema -- the trick is to stop going "oh if only she wasn't in the way we could have fixed everything, we have failed due to this externality" to realize that she's playing the role that the people who have bought the Democratic party want her to play and she's a feature, not a bug. And there's always been an excuse like that for the past 30 years.

Hopefully the progressives do eventually succeed or else we're likely to get some actually competent fascist on the right wing.
This is not good. In the before-times, closing the lid, throwing my laptop in my bag, and commuting happened twice daily. I suppose that I'm extra glad I chose a Mac with my current employer - even if I don't commute daily anymore.
Long is not about format. The content has to be long. This means simple label is wrong. This is a very easy point in my previous comment.
The last link appears to have been published last year and has nothing to do with the lawsuit.
MacBooks have similar functionality ("Power Nap"), which allows for some telemetry (updating your iCloud calendar/drive/mail, MDM telemetry for corporate-owned devices, etc) while asleep. It hasn't been an issue though.
Ongoing related thread:

Fossil footprints reveal humans in North America earlier than previously thought - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28642050 - Sept 2021 (30 comments)
Ah yes... microsoft implementing user-friendly shell commands:

> powercfg /setdcvalueindex scheme_current sub_none F15576E8-98B7-4186-B944-EAFA664402D9 0

> powercfg /setacvalueindex scheme_current sub_none F15576E8-98B7-4186-B944-EAFA664402D9 0
California plans to turn the screws on NIMBY cities
Who would be buying the tether? Every trade on an exchange has two sides, who is going to buy USDT that isn’t worth anything?

For example, the $449 strike SPY call expiring in 27 minutes has a bid of 0.00 and an ask of 0.02, meaning nobody will buy if you try to sell the call, but a market maker will sell you one for 0.02. If tether was worthless, the same situation would happen, people would be willing to buy for 0.00 and sell for a bit more than 0.00
We have a similar system in Germany for local elections. In cities it can get crazy. Here is a a ballot from Frankfurt: https://www.fr.de/bilder/2021/02/11/90200944/25026648-28-lis...
They did not say at any point that climate change is the primary factor. They are rebutting the claim that climate change is not a factor at all, which Stossel does claim in his video (although the fact check was not written to specifically address that video). Stossel also says that climate change has made things worse, but the fact that his video contradicts itself does not make the fact check invalid.
Not longer that your original sentence though.
I’m generally not fond of e2e or even integration testing. At least, I prefer to keep them to a minimum, and use other tools to ensure units interact as expected.

That said, where e2e tests may be valuable but costly as described in the article, it occurs to me that narrower integration tests which invert responsibility may be better. Which is to say:

- Given Service A

- Given Service B which depends on Service A

Integration tests of Service A may provide more value if implemented in Service B. It’s SB, after all, which understands the behavior it expects from SA. (If they’re mutual dependencies, of course the inverse applies as well.)

Of course, this highlights (at least for me) why integration tests should be limited in scope. If both services are well tested at the unit level, you will probably end up with a lot of redundancy between their reciprocal test suites. But at least at the idea level, this feels like a better compromise than expecting Team SA to anticipate all of the subtleties Team SB might have in mind.
if we consume the fuel byproduct, presumably we just end up with co2 in the atmosphere?

It's necessary to compare the two things:

1 - we drill out more fossil fuels and burn it

2 - we convert atmospheric CO2 to fuels and burn it

#2 is theoretically infinite and CO2 levels never increase. #1 is very finite and the longer we do it the higher CO2 levels increase.
The boy who occupies the 4-5 o'clockish space in Configuration A appears to have a fist where half his face should be. I nominate him as the vanisher since there's no fist-face in Configuration B.
Open source software may not be malicious, but any bug in them can be exploited. Eg, one in firefox can cause arbitrary code execution on your computer without any security barrier. And let’s be honest, everything written in C is no life time guarantee on correctness.
> Meanwhile, a lot of users really can't trust their ISP: your "ISP" might be coffee shop, or someone renting on AirBNB, or your friend (as you are at their home or office).

Or your ISP may be one of the big ones - Comcast, Time Warner, etc or whatever they are in other countries, and you may legitimately not trust them either.
Probably not the answer you want to hear... But I push that stuff to AWS S3 website and put a CDN in front for SSL... that's my solution for "easy secure static site" when I don't want to invest more than an hour or so a year on the infrastructure... But obviously that's not for everyone.

Edit: specific to your request, I would probably set up a container pointing to the latest apache build, and write a script to pull the latest image then roll over the container... Don't need to wait for your OS of choice to have the fixed versions... Your never more than a day behind
It was not labeled as false, it was labeled as missing context, and this is the context. You can see the label here: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1015712197...
Before getting kids - might want to analyse what impact the climate crisis will have on your future kids.
VPN A knows there was a request to VPN B, that's it. The request is encrypted on twice the client. VPN A removed it's encryption but is only left with an encrypted request to VPN B. VPN B then removes it's encryption and then forwards the request to fb.com.
I think yes, since that’s what it roughly did normally if you didn’t balance. This was a change in the normal behaviour, so if you ran a study from one week the next you wouldn’t have known that your data would change dramatically without additional screening.
NocoDB is a free & open source Airtable alternative & has received 2 Million+ times within 15 weeks.

Github: https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb

It simply works by transforming any existing databases into smart spreadsheet.

We support Postgres, MySQL, SQL Server & SQLite.

You can create business workflows by connecting to Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord, Twilio, Whatsapp, Email & any 3rd party APIs too. Plus NocoDB provides programmatic access via REST/GQL APIs so that you can build integrations with Zapier / Integromat and custom applications too.

Full disclaimer : Founder here
I'm not sure how someone could watch that video and think "not climate change" was the main takeaway vs "forest management was the more-primary factor, though climate change contributes"

The video talks about how climate change contributed and is getting worse, it just points out that there is a clear policy factor that are the main cause for these factors, and climate change is being used as a political scapegoat to justify policy inaction.
There was a period of time when Apple really seemed to have lost their way with the MacBooks. I had a 2013 that was flawless. Then the lease was up and my company sent me a 2017 model to replace it. That machine was never much good. Randomly slow, awful keyboard, etc. Luckily the battery decided to become a balloon, and so my replacement is a newer 16-inch MBP. The new MBP seems to have addressed all of the stupidity that was going on in 2017 and 2018. And I bought a 2020 M1 MBP for myself, and it has also been quite solid. I don't want to say that Apple necessarily fixed all of their stupidity or really learned anything, but someone there still appears to give a shit.
Quite often there are many vulnerabilities with no ‘fixed-in’ version (as it’s not yet fixed) and this can be for some time.

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/s... is one place to look through in the past I think there was a better link I used to use to find all vulnerable packages which were awaiting a fix - but I can’t seem to find it now.
That’s a bizarre conclusion. Do you not believe in the efficacy of technology like video cameras? In the second case you mentioned it’s easy to imagine they got a full recording of the event and thus had more to work with than half a license plate number.
Because 155 people upvoted it
There are some infamous blog posts that will tell you that 230 protects websites no matter what happens. But when bad things happen and the law protects bad actors, then it's a bad law.
Ah yeah reading a bit closer further down they mention it's a 4 bed system and this is largely an iterative improvement instead of a new system entirely.
But 230 wouldn’t even come into this discussion because the standard of libel for Stossel, as a public figure, is significantly higher. He has to prove that Facebook/the fact checkers had actual malice in stating its claims. Meaning, the Facebook/fact checkers had to be intentionally lying or acting in reckless disregard for whether the statement was true or not.

It’s a more interesting situation if he wasn’t a public figure, but even then, I doubt Facebook would be the one deemed responsible for the so-called libel, it would come down to the fact checked. In fact, in the similar Candace Owens lawsuit (which the court threw out), she sued USA Today and the fact-checking company, not Facebook. And her claims were still thrown out, both because she couldn’t show there was actual malice involved or that the claims that her statement was “false” was untrue. That opinion is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21068070-owens Owens is of course a public figure, but that wasn’t even a large part of the reason her lawsuit was thrown out on its face.

Stossel is getting press time by suing but he’s a public figure and suing Facebook because a fact checking service elicited an opinion/notation that didn’t have the nuance he wanted is laughable.
And you are choosing to ignore the most unsavory aspects that have been raised in the west because your local media has told you otherwise. Its absolutely true! There are very strong analogies here with Holocaust denialism, which some states see as such a problem they outlaw the philosophy!

It is not bigotry to stand up to authoritarianism and human rights abuses. You wield that term bigot to downplay the vast and monstrous human rights abuses occurring in Xinjiang.
Its absolutely nothing to do with race or nationality. There is nothing intrinsic that would permit such actions to be attributed to this. It is not about bigotry. Connecting the two is all part of the metagame in pushing a state propaganda. Make your accuser seem less credible so you never have to address the actual substance of the complaint.

The reported incidents include Forced Labor and Sexual Abuse, Organ Harvesting and Genocide. On mass. This happened. This is happening. There is plenty of neutral international sources on this. Saying it doesn't exist is absurd. There is clear evidence of this!

These are not lies told by the western media, as the Chinese media claims.
These are happening, they have been reported by people that have escaped, they have been raised to the UN. Most of the world has denounced this...
In this case you have a unit which reports directly to the sheriff, who in turn answers to no authority besides the voters. And the people (and journalists) have a very limited ability to audit the inner workings of a police department. With the reforms I mentioned we're adding additional, independent forms of oversight. A regional police administration could be required by law to randomly audit and publish reports on the activities of a local department, and an accreditation board can require their own audits.

Most importantly, is tying accreditation to funding. Officers will report corruption if that corruption could lead to de-crediting, which in turns means layoffs, pay cuts, and reduced equipment. It will even change the incentives for police unions. When police misconduct has the potential to cut into the bottom line of officers, it is in the best interests of unions to also help minimize misconduct. And collective bargaining agreements are with the police departments, not with the accrediting body, meaning unions would have limited influence over certification standards.

Absolutely these sorts of solutions are not a panacea, and there is still plenty of room for things to go wrong. Corruption at the higher echelons of state-wide authorities would have more impact due to this centralization of authority. The accrediting body has to walk a fine line: it needs to be seen as a body of peers by police officers (in the same way lawyers view the BAR association) while at the same time enforcing best practices and leading reforms. There's a balancing act there that has to be done right. And even with all of this corruption can still happen, but it might re-align incentives and work to reduce some of the serious issues we see with America's police forces.
Transformers are pretty huge and expensive to run, LSTMs are lighthweight by comparison.
>Buying one ten-year repairable phone results in you paying for one CPU, one baseband modem, one display driver, ..., ...and two batteries.

Which is it? I need to be able to replace everything or just the battery?

Is there a problem with replacing batteries in current phones? The free phone I got from AT&T came with the battery separate, so that one is fine. I have had third parties replace batteries in iPhones.

>but those come with severe freedom and privacy restrictions

Ironically, I find the opposite is true, because my freedoms and privacy are not violated by Apple, but by the shitware you find on Android phones. And if you mean the "freedom" to choose between paying Apple or Epic, well I prefer the freedom to choose a phone that just works. If you value the "freedom" of paying Epic, then you have the freedom to buy an Android phone. But you don't really want Freedom, you want what you want to apply to everyone else. I choose Apple. You don't have to. Demanding that my preference be eliminated is the antithesis of Freedom.

>their devices are infamously non-repairable

non-repairable by others. I've had iPhones repaired by Apple several times. Like the Epic issue, you could buy an Android phone which would meet all your requirements, but you want an Apple phone, and then complain that it doesn't have the "freedoms" of an Android phone. You seem unable to see that the very reasons why you want the Apple phone are a direct result of the policies you complain about. Put the other way, the reasons you don't want an Android are because they have "Freedom" that allows malware to proliferate, or are "repairable" but manufacturing tolerances caused by having to fit multiple parts from multiple vendors means things break or disconnect or you get a bad batch, and the assembler can't support upgrades to the new OS because it's just too expensive to support all the different combinations of driver binaries, so old, unpatched Android for you forever.

Make your 10 year phone. The company wont be around in 10 years and you'll have a rooted virus fest or a brick. The planet wont be around in 10 years, but fuck me, you'll have done your part right? Look at me and my ten friends! There's gigatons of CO2 to support the internet and mobile phone network, but I replaced my mobile phone battery instead of buying a new phone!
To be clear, if it's a public figure, then just getting the fact checking wrong is not enough to be defamation. There has to be "actual malice" which BASICALLY just means they knew they were wrong or should have known they were wrong. If they can show that they were just following the information that was publicly available then they can make mistakes without losing a lawsuit.
This may very well be the case that it's a non-issue, but an article that only mentions the good parts without even acknowledging potential problems with the solution makes me think "what else did they not mention that a lay-person like me wouldn't know about?".
It's trivial to do public certs with acme.sh, caddy, or certbot so you might as well. For most private networks I think it's fine to use plain HTTP.
They are likely alluding to the trail of tears.
cf. etymology of laconic