skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
TL;DR

“Visual behavior patterns change before and after AP disengagement. Before disengagement, drivers looked less on road and focused more on non-driving related areas compared to after the transition to manual driving. The higher proportion of off-road glances before disengagement to manual driving were not compensated by longer glances ahead.”
I remember an earnest soccer mom sort asking me what she could do to stop Trumpism in 2017. And I replied that she should move to a blue city in a red state before the 2020 election. She bristled and responded with profanity at the very thought of that. And then walked away in a huff.

So I conclude people are unwilling to walk their talk. You're not wrong though, but all those really cool communities were built by pioneers who did something exactly like the above. The only way to beat the stupid is to infiltrate and vote their insane representatives out of office. As long as the educated are corralled and contained to the coasts, this will just keep getting worse IMO.
Well, I recently found the Cortex-M SoCs to be a blessing in that regard: no MMU, no need to run a fully fledged operating system, but still with LwIP, FreeRTOS&friends, they can handle surprisingly complex software tasks, while the lack of MMU and privilege-separation means that all the hardware: DMA-engines, communication interfaces and accelerator facilities (2-D GPU) are right at the tip of your hands.
Now we are being told the same about phones
>BI should include all consumption

we use Microsoft PowerBI. it work great within the Microsoft ecosystem. if you try to pull data from NetSuite with PowerBI. it went to crap.
World Scores
https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores
The bar code scanner idea (already mentioned by several people) is even better than it sounds. Almost magically good. Much, much better than manual entry.
Apple's consistently demonstrates that their most important customers are their shareholders. They are experts at walking the line between maximizing profits and alienating their regular customers. If they felt that a modular computer would have a higher ROI, they would be all over it.

Honestly, I would not be surprised if Apple 'invented' the idea of 'integrated dongles' before their next keynote so they could sell you a $95 usb 2.0 port.
I don't understand how this meme about "dongles" still exists. You know how I avoided using dongles? I just used USB-C cables.

And for the very few things that don't have a detachable cable, I use a micro USB-C adapter.

It's been several years since the release of the USB-C only MacBook Pros, this shouldn't be an issue if you put in a minimal amount of effort.
Yes on 3.

One way to solve is to automate the action from insight part and inject into users workflow. I am looking at this now with support of senior sales stakeholders.

Simple example:

Client X activity has been trending down vs it's peer group, Call Client X to understand what's going on.
Hydrogen can be piped via exist natural gas pipelines and stored in existing natural gas salt caverns or abandoned oil wells. So all parts of that statement are true.
Not all games are competitive. Sometimes you just achieve what you really are wanting by just playing, having fun, learning something, filling time, reaching a goal that is not maximizing anything, etc.

Even in some competitive ones, you may not want to do what implies winning over all other rivals, they may have a big advantage over you because genetics, money, time, culture or so on, but over yourself. Faster, Stronger and Highest over what you previously did is a mindful way to play some games.
Oh how cool to see the Apollo 11 stamp! I'm having my mom's framed right now after finding it in her basement.
If Macs are doing it, others are soon to follow. Apple has been a trend setter for years. They were belittled for getting rid of the 3.5mm jack, only for flag ship phones to begin doing so.
These look really good. I'll be in the market for a new linux laptop in a couple months and I really want to give System 76 my money because I like what they're doing, but this looks really good.
I'm not sure. I don't eat meat, and slaughter methods are a depressing topic of research. :- )
This question is a bit subtle, it depends on exactly what you mean. You could make a tree using only borrow checked references and the compiler would make sure that parent nodes go out of scope at the same time or before the child nodes they point to, but I don't think that's what you're talking about.

In general, if it's a datastructure where you have to use pointers, you'll have them Box'ed, but you would try to avoid that if you can. In your example of a heap, you'd want to use an array-based implementation, probably backed by a growable Vec, and use indexes internally. A peek function would still return a normal Rust reference to the data, and the borrow checker would make sure that you don't mutate the heap's backing array while that reference was still in use, etc.
I bought one the same day I heard about it via one of Andrew Gallant's Twitter threads [1]. With the exception of the screen (I promised myself my next laptop would be 15" instead of 13"), this is pretty much exactly what I've always wanted in a laptop, and I'm very excited for my October ship date.

[1] https://twitter.com/burntsushi5/status/1433823144649842694
Its good because of the positive externalities it brings

The parent's protesting, while self interested (for their kids) benefited many groups, particularly teenagers and immigrants that often play pickup sports at Pier 40 like touch football, ultimate, or soccer, without park permits (because they can't afford field permits).

So, this is good because Google will bring more security and investment into a forgotten NYC area.

Coincidentally, Pier 40 is also the on-ramp spot where the terrorist truck driver started his post-Halloween drive that killed 8 tourists in the pedestrian walkway. [1]

[1] https://abcnews.go.com/US/witness-describes-chaotic-scene-dr...
Maybe you ought to actually take that poll before you guarantee the results...
Special hardware seems 007 childish to me. What's better, having a high-tech tricked-out phone/laptop, or to just have a random stock Android with an inoffensive sim card in it? It seems obvious to me that if you're being targeted, tailed and tracked and probed, you've already lost.
The quartz shocking was a bit weak as it wasn't clear how they dated it to the same time as the theoretical blast - similarly for the other metal deposits found.

This made their other arguments a little weaker as we as it reduced the temperature evidenced to just that of the melted bricks - which makes it possible that what they found was evidence of contemporary furnaces and/or other fire events/war/etc.

Still pretty compelling overall.

I understand they theorize an airburst, but I wonder if it would be possible to find a "ground zero" for the explosion, and thus more direct evidence.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense too, and you've convinced me that I'm probably being a bit too uncharitable. I totally agree that these things are very hard to write in a way that makes everyone happy.
Their return policy is insanity. While I was okay with the device itself, the lack of search-ability in the notes (GoodNotes on iPad can do it just fine) was a deal breaker for me.

The return process is just stupid. I had about a dozen different issues with the return process and their support is simply awful.

I would not suggest getting one unless you plan to keep it, or write it off as a $600 mistake and keep it anyway.
I guess in light of recent news, they decided they needed an East Coast Halloween Store to guarantee geographical redundancy if something should happen to the West Coast one.
> After seeing the framework, I'm more than a little annoyed that I fell for this.

Me too. An I'm annoyed I fell for the lie that board level repair is impossible. What the manufacturers really should be saying is "it's impossible for us" because it's obviously possible for 3rd parties to do it and make a business out of it.

I'm willing to pay +$100 for something that's assembled with screws instead of glues.
Except that regulatory burdens are the kinds of barriers to entry that prevent a company like Framework from existing in the first place.

That just leaves you with entrenched companies doing the bare minimum for compliance, and lobbying for loopholes to protect their own market positions.
I don't have market analytics, only single cases, but nobody who has ever asked me for help about a computer has wanted to know what the difference is between this 'Intel' part vs 'Celeron' part vs 'AMD', carried on to graphics, disk technology, etc. They typically not only don't indicate a desired minimum amount of memory, but cannot reliably talk about system ram vs storage.

What they want is to know they are getting a good deal and that they aren't buying a lemon, something that cannot meet their needs.

What Apple did is decide they should really distinguish on classes of identifiable hardware differences, eg. a better larger screen for a "pro" class, have good/better/best distinctions within that, and customization for those who are picky.

I assume the intersection between people who have particular hardware requirements and those who do not understand their hardware requirements is extremely small these days. Apple doesn't sell computers which really fall short these days, so I'm able to focus the conversation on usage, user-impacting hardware features, and long-term budgeting (e.g. planning even as far as the replacement for the machine they are buying)
To be fair, if a company wants to produce something that only works on one set of hardware, that should be fine. We simple choose not to use it, right? And many of us /do/ choose to use it? But why do we choose to? Because we find that we're too busy to maintain a Linux-based workstation.

While there are questionable practices by Apple and many other machine producers, what you can't argue against is that in limiting the hardware that MacOS has to work with, they're able to deliver a level of stability and user experience that you don't get with Linux.

Sure, it would be great if we could replace the batteries, if we could upgrade the memory, and easily fix broken parts, but that isn't the company's ethos. The company produces devices that are plug and play, high grade consumer electronics. Nobody forces us to buy these products.

Anyway, that being said, the framework machines look super interesting and if they were UK available, I'd probably get one for a non-critical Linux-based workstation.
DRM on Kindle books has changed and Calibre will no longer convert to EPUB.
I don't care enough but I want someone to fact-check him on the environmental impact of a MacBook worth of cigarettes versus the MacBook itself. It'd be funny if the MacBook is ultimately worse for Nature.
Socialism in its purest form. Get the state to pay for your employees.
Yeah I saw Louis Rossman unbox one and immediately got on the waiting list. My 2013 MBPr is finally going to retire!
I wonder if they will write a TypeScript type checker in rust? TypeScript currently only has one serious implementation that actually checks types (esbuild, for example, does no type checking). Getting another one that's written in rust would be tremendously helpful for type checking times!

But, on the other hand, if they don't write a type checker in rust, we may still need `tsc`. Since Rome won't be written in JS/TS, I worry that calling The official TypeScript compiler from rust may be prohibitively expensive, necessitating users to run a separate `tsc` process. That goes against Rome's goal of having a single AST generated once by a single tool
Kindles have an option to turn on a time estimate for progress through a book which sort of simulates this, but I don't really like it (the constant changing/recalculation is anxiety-inducing).

Really wish they had an option for a small low-resolution visual indication of progress, like most devices do for their battery indicators.
There’s not much the author listed that can’t be applied to typescript or any other JS compatible languages.

Rewriting their JS tools in a language as low level as Rust is asinine.

I have no doubt it’s a weak attempt to indulge in their fanboyism. I wouldn’t be surprised if this change causes massive technical debt, but people seem to love Rust, so there’s gotta be someone for this role.
The "Sir," at the beginning makes it sound like a joke
Yes, you're right. You should never see the test/evaluation dataset during training so it would be impossible to "memorize" the test cases. You would get good near perfect accuracy on the training data, but not the test set. I think the closest analogue would be models that produce conceptual embeddings somewhere in them -- those are kind of like hashes with the property that similar things have similar embeddings. Many classification neural networks kind of operate like that -- the initial layers produce a representation of the data and then the final layer actually performs the classification.
That is correct.

In the worst case, you can always (even on GC'd languages) pre-allocate buffers and do your work without new memory requests. But you need to plan for this, in the same way you'd do in a language without GC.
Looking back, we are responding to a post saying “$200k shouldn't be considered high.” That’s not saying 200+k is Attainable that’s saying 200k is common.

They also say $350k isn't an "incredible" which seems to suggest it’s more than just attainable it’s a reasonable goal.
My laptop has a single thunderbolt port. I use it for my 5k monitor. If that port goes, I need to get a new laptop. (That new laptop will be the Framework laptop, if they offer a 15" hi-DPI option.)

If my laptop was a Framework laptop, I'd just need to buy a pretty inexpensive new port and swap it out. It's a pretty big deal, in my opinion.
As far as I can tell, this laptop has a 55 Wh battery. A macbook pro of the same size (13in) has a 58 Wh battery and the dell XPS 13 has a 52 Wh battery. What am I missing?
Red hat set their user base on fire with their centos debacle whether they admit it or not.
It's actually closer to $0.10/kWh, but we have to account for the cost of upgrades to the infrastructure.
Is it just me that thinks the CSS on this site is poor and makes the site difficult to read? Viewed it on Firefox.
This is a very general statement. I wonder if it’s true?
I suppose it's the correct term but "playing Judo" sounds so weird to me.
There already is one, and it’s used by Deno!

https://swc.rs/
Nearly all the damage was broken windows.

Not relevant to a prehistoric explosion.
I’ve spent the last 10 years of my life building “Big Data” platforms for companies (Kafka, Druid, Hadoop, Databricks, Presto, Teradata, Informatica, MicroStrategy, etc etc) and I still have no idea what people need most of this crap for. There’s so much duplicative functionality, and a basically never ending list of OLAP adjacent products emerging every year. I mean it’s good for me personally, it’s pretty much a gravy train, but I always question if a lot of it is a solution searching for a problem lol
Culturally, the habit of having casual conversations over remote platforms is what was missing from "soft work" being performed remotely.

In the article, they perform an inversion experiment, "What if we all started off working remotely"? but they don't expand the logical conclusion of how companies would innovate if those weak link conversations don't happen.
I think that's actually one of the sweet spots of Rust. I find it way more accessible to web devs, while C++ is scary for me. This in turn allows you to have very performant tools that are easily distributed as a single binary. Go has the same qualities, as ESBuild proved. Both also can be compiled to WASM, so that makes the distribution even easier.
There's a reason why you have to be at HQ to advance your career.
Interesting how you managed to turn "Not sure how true it is" into " they must be wrong". From an expression of incredulity to an expression of certainty. Impressive. Impressively moronic.
You have to learn to read NGO/thinktank language.

Freedom = people do things we approve of

Democracy = people vote for policies we approve of
Getting a "Who's on First" vibe, but I can't quite make it into a real joke...

- "I can't get a p, no matter what I do there's no p at all!"

- "No p?"

- "Nope!"

- "Well if it's a no-op of course there's no p!"

- "It's not a no-op, I'm telling you there's no p!"
I can't help but read this story as a predecessor of "Solaris", where a contact with a planet-size living entity is actually attempted.

I also see here some characteristic traits of Lem's plots: something we are close to but can't hope really attaining (like personally traveling inside a star), the lack of understanding from well-intentioned lay people, and the idea that there are things we try hard to understand but really can't yet by far, like an ancient Greek, even well-educated, won't understand a quantum-mechanical problem.

This, and great storytelling, as usual. I find this translation quite well made. (I wonder though how would the translators wrestle with Lem's word games, like in "Observations on the spot" or "Futurological congress".)
Quite the opposite, it means you can start with plenty of usbA port, and when you don't need them anymore, switch them to usbc, without changing your laptop.

It means when one port wears of, fixing it is easy, cheap, and doesn't immobilize your machine.

It means you can change your port to fit an hdmi or ethernet as needed, without having the stuff coming out your laptop, all ugly and taking space on the desk.
Yeah I mean that seems like a weird narrative. Some people get wealthy because they bought land and then did nothing and held on tenaciously to it even as the rest of society increasingly needed it for something else? How is that a victory for the good guys? That's just rentier capitalism.
And which ideas are those?
This is less an argument for a rewrite than an argument for redesigning parts of your codebase, which can be done much more easily than a complete rewrite.
In my opinion Ubuntu’s success also has a lot to do with ease of usage. Getting into Docker, Kubernetes, etc. years ago it was very clear that development for the whole cloud native ecosystem was happening on Ubuntu just from how easy it was to “apt-get install” everything. I think that focus for development created a smoother user experience that led to enterprise usage as well. Both were solid, both had the tools supported, but one required a little less setup sometimes.
As much as I loved Sam Kinison, I doubt they chose to live in a place that is sand today and will still be sand in 100+ years. But when someone chooses to live in SF, Seattle, or now Austin in exchange for taking a low wage job, they need to own that they are creating their own personal hell to subsidize the lifestyle of the top 5% or so. You can do better than that. This is not a binary problem. It's analog. If enough people leave SF, there will be much furrowing of brows and bellyaching of the wages, but things will improve. That FOMO keeps things status quo is exactly why that's not going to happen. Too bad. I passed on SF for exactly these reasons myself and I'm a techie.
Yes, that's one of the most famous covers. I got that issue and several others free a few years back - there had been a garage sale and they were just giving away everything that was left over. There were boxes & boxes of Byte magazines. I didn't have room for all of them, but I picked out about 6 of them.
Well, the Cell CPU also had DMA engines that were fully integrated into the MMU memory-mapping, so you would have been able to asynchronously do a memcpy() while the CPU's execution resources were busy running computations in parallel.
The modular ports are my least favorite part as well. The fact that you have to buy one USB type c module just to be able to easily plug in your charger is crazy. Another just to have reachable USB port. Maybe 1 or 2 modular spots would be nice, but put in some standard type c ports and monitor connectors without having to pay an upcharge or include at least 2 type c modules free.
Those covers are great! They remind me of the Choose Your Own Adventure book covers from the 80s. I don't know what what style to call those illustrations other than awesome!!!
I’m still enjoying my $250 lifetime print subscription. Wonder if they still offer that.
This is serious.

Sir,
Can't take credit for it (saw it somewhere, and have paraphrased it - see [1] for an older link along the same lines, though unlikely to be the originator).

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/who-moved-my-steering-wheel-s...
The ugly truth of BI tools is that they are of most benefit to the organizations which are least capable of using them.

The goal of properly exploiting BI comes with many prerequisites which sound superficially reasonable but turn out to be decade-long side-quests. Things like having all your data in one data model. Things like understanding where your data comes from, and exactly what it means.

These prerequisites are easy for small orgs, but small orgs benefit least from BI and typically get better bang-for-buck from Excel.

Large orgs find themselves mired in the political meta-problems of meeting those prerequisites, like joining up the fiefdoms that own data sources with the cabals that run data governance and the accountants who want a return on the investment of simplifying a sprawling legacy estate.

BI tools are generally incredibly poor at dealing with the bag-of-spanners heterogeneous data landscapes that exist in these organizations, and their analytics nirvana remains largely unattainable.

The trend that the article describes - towards simpler, composable BI components, each with more modest goals - is progress. It helps move focus away from the relatively-easy problem of visualization, to the rest of the data stack.
This is exactly what happened with my home dashboard.

The initial version, 5 or so years ago (maybe a bit more, I do not remember) was based on a python library (sorry, I forgot the name but it was the major one at the time). It worked fine for a bit but moving to a kiosk browser and vue.js completely changed the game.

The backend was Python, then got replaced by a bus (mqtt) updated via golang microservices (they were in python initially, but then I wanted to learn go)
From the article, a government spokesperson: "We recognize that the vast majority of activity that's happening in the virtual currencies is legitimate activity,"

It seems like collective punishment? I am not sure about this.
GPT-X, DALL-E, and our Multimodal Future
K8s integration sounds useful, there are also many startups in this area, and it's trivial to implement, however please consider that just a workload is requesting 2 CPUs, does not mean you can divide the underlying EC2's price per vCPU or Memory. There is significant overhead running K8s, log collectors, agents, wasted space, and spot instance pricing etc. please be more insightful for that, not just divide by request/limits. Combining these with overall AWS costs would make more sense. However as I said, we tag by service or cost centers, so I would want to associate my Pods and its SQS queue cost together.

Chargebacks in AWS is very complex, i.e in cost explorer net amortized cost vs unblended cost is hard to understand for an average user. It'd be nice if you can have some clarifications on it, what does even amortized mean etc.

We use Cost Explorer API to identify anomalies. Even basic statistics works sometimes. But there is also new native feature that is good enough for us, so we removed that. But it was a very sensitive topic, i.e our S3 usage is steadily increasing %.x per month. Trend & seasonality analysis is a must.

Sorry for my quick and dirty English. This is a hot topic for me and I get excited.