skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A normal contract would surely suffice.

"The United States Government will give $1B to the first company or person to demonstrate a safe and effective treatment that halts or reverses the effects of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy[1] using treatments with existing FDA approval."

[1] My Dad has it. It sucks. 0/10 do not recommend. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_supranuclear_palsy
Because arguments such as "You will regret on your deathbed not going BTC when it could go to $1M" is not an argument, it's something worse than ad hominem - it's snake oil / infomercial marketing masquerading as reason. At least ad hominem is honest.

Consider the inanity of BTC trading at $1M, something so utterly volatile couldn't feasibly be used as a currency, for much the same reason we cannot use it now, it's deflationary: nobody wants to spend it, they want to hold it and believe in magic. That's the last thing you want in a currency, it means circulation dries up.

BTC has already killed itself as a currency for reasons obvious before it's inception.

Chiming in on boards with 'to the moon' / 'don't lose out' / 'you too could be a millionaire' rhetoric is not helping.
Ending up with a significantly higher salary than your peers isn't always the best outcome either. It sets expectations that you may not be able to meet.
"I told you so" never felt so good.
That was NOT Mueller's conclusion. That was Bill Barr's politically motivated summary of the Mueller report. Mueller concluded there was contacts between Trump campaign and the Russians government but it wasn't enough evidence to successfully prosecute. The actual Mueller report says:

>As explained in Section IV above, the Office’s investigation uncovered evidence of numerous links (i.e., contacts) between Trump Campaign officials and individuals having or claiming to have ties to the Russian government. The Office evaluated the contacts under several sets of federal laws, including conspiracy laws and statutes governing foreign agents who operate in the United States. After considering the available evidence, the Office did not pursue charges under these statutes against any of the individuals discussed in Section IV above—with the
exception of FARA charges against Paul Manafort and Richard Gates based on their activities on behalf of Ukraine.

>One of the interactions between the Trump Campaign and Russian-affiliated individuals—the June 9, 2016 meeting between high-ranking campaign officials and Russians promising derogatory information on Hillary Clinton—implicates an additional body of law: campaign finance statutes. Schemes involving the solicitation or receipt of assistance from foreign sources raise difficult statutory and constitutional questions. As explained below, the Office evaluated
those questions in connection with the June 9 meeting [REDACTED]. The Office ultimately concluded that, even if the principal legal questions were resolved favorably to the government, a prosecution would encounter difficulties proving that Campaign officials or Investigative Technique individuals connected to the Campaign willfully violated the law.

>Finally, although the evidence of contacts between Campaign officials and Russia affiliated individuals may not have been sufficient to establish or sustain criminal charges, several U.S. persons connected to the Campaign made false statements about those contacts and took other steps to obstruct the Office’s investigation and those of Congress. This Office has therefore charged some of those individuals with making false statements and obstructing justice.
We would be remiss not to mention patio11's excellent (if long) Salary Negotiation blog post[1] from years ago. Still holds up.

I took a negotiation class last year, and it was pretty eye-opening. One of the things we discussed is how not every negotiation is an adversarial one. In fact, most negotiations are cooperative! In most cases, neither person wants the other to walk away.

Let me put it this way: I'm a hiring manager. I want to hire you. You want to accept the job [for the right amount of money]. We have a mutual goal. It doesn't have to be power plays from either side.

Look, it's not my money. What do I care if you make an extra 10K or 20K or get a sign-on bonus or not? It's not a zero-sum game for me. I don't make less money because you make more money; I'm hiring you to solve a problem I have. If giving you an extra 10K is what I need to do to get your brain into my codebase to produce code, then BY ALL MEANS, HAVE AN EXTRA 10K.

(Yes, yes, my department does have a budget, and while there's usually a little wiggle room around salary ranges, I can't just pay you a bajillion dollars. But in my experience in Silicon Valley, there's almost always a will to hire great candidates, and if my budget is $200K and it takes $210K to get you in the door, I've yet to be told no.)

TL;DR: this advice is decent, but at the end of the day, the simplest thing to do is just say, "That's a great offer, and for an additional 10K, I'll sign right now." Nine times outta ten that'll work.

[1] https://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/01/23/salary-negotiation/
It's a Chrome design flaw.
Mobile Chrome tries to guess what is "main content" and shrinks other text.

It looks better in Firefox.
One giant leap for tortoise-kind
Since 2001, and through the other numerous times that this this argument(s?) has been posted on HN (thank you @dang for the links) - how have things changed for the better?

Its time to stop thinking that posting "arguments against" something is somehow equivalent to making a difference, and start making a difference for real.
I hate every detail of this.
Count how many times she has appeared on HN. And make a prediction on how many times she will appear in future.

Corporations are full of well programmed hyper efficient mindless corporate robots who keep the factory lights on. They are all interchangable and no one gives a shit which of them is in charge.

The type of people who smash glass ceilings arent robots. This is another Kamala Harris or Sheryl Sandberg.
Yeah same. Once I’m on a certain train of thought I can’t stop. Those are the days where I have 5am commits because I never went to bed lol

No one is demanding I do that though. They’d probably think I’m crazy tbh
I de-mystified this by considering the boys as a spiral. Move the wheel, the spiral increases by one node.

In summary, this puzzle is puzzling because we are given a wheel and keep thinking 'circle' instead of, "is it actually a wheel, or not?"
That is not how I was using it when I introduced the term to this sub-thread.
Good for her. Good for anyone. AMD has been spectacular. Calling it breaking through any kind of ceiling is almost inappropriate. It’s refreshing to see this kind of press in the wake of great things instead of disseminated by her publicist to get her to the next rung somewhere.
The environmental impacts and animal welfare are probably an issue for many consumers, so even if can't tell the difference they might be fooled into thinking their cow had a free pasture or something.
Fun fact. In Sweden, telling something truthful can be libel. A Swedish politician was sentenced for libel for pointing out, in a Facebook post, that a legal representative in a civil lawsuit she was involved with had earlier had been sentenced for a crime of sexual nature involving children. (I can't recall the details). This was a true fact, but since she said it with the intent to defame (according to the court) she was sentenced for defamation.
Jeez, how'd I get $1200? $1600, yeah, thanks.

If your monthly bills are $100 below what you make, then it makes sense that an extra $133 will shift you from "guess I'll skip dinner" to "I don't have to skip dinner", at least until costs change or some financial shock like a car repair comes up. Still others hopefully went from just being able to cover the monthly bills to that + saving for unexpected expenses.

Some people are fine with none, some people need much more, but across a large set of people, some percentage of people will go from below the bar we've defined to above, or above more often than before.

We definitely haven't come close to fully eliminated poverty, but if measurably fewer children are undernourished (or whatever metric we use) that's pretty nifty.
> We have statutes of limitations on various crimes because we have this idea historically that if enough time passes, you should not be held responsible for stupid mistakes you made in your youth. People can change, if they are given the chance to change.

That's not the main reason for statutes of limitation.

A statute of limitations is a law that forbids prosecutors from charging someone with a crime that was committed more than a specified number of years ago. The main purpose of these laws is to ensure that convictions are based upon evidence (physical or eyewitness) that has not deteriorated with time. [1]

[1]https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/time-li...
Fairytales about lab leaks won't absolve us of our abject failure to deal with this novel pathogen, nor will they help us prepare for the next.
https://www.cold-takes.com/this-cant-go-on/ has some interesting ideas that agree with you.
https://archive.fo/yFias
For mature software, Vim.

For new software, I'd say 1Password. It's amazing how well it syncs with everything, across Firefox and Chrome, and how it handles not just usernames and passwords but gives a secure way to share secret plain text files, scan QR codes and more.
Music artists too. Can't forget them. (speaking as a music artist myself who despises the NFT gimmick)
Either that or we have changed enough that we are now capable of being creative, in terms of both art and theorizing about prehistory. Personally I think it's the latter.

If we were capable of appreciating art 200,000 years ago, we also must have been incredibly lazy. How could well over another 150,000 years pass before we left signs that we were improving our technology? It doesn't make any sense.
Stossel has always been a hardcore libertarian. It's one of the reasons he's so great. Even if you don't agree with everything he says he presents an underrepresented point of view in journalism.
You can avoid that just using SSE to notify (no data) the frontend to rerender, you can still render everything in the backend.
It fails to establish that this is unique to a blockchain: we do, after all, have decades of experience building distributed applications and it’s not like banks haven’t issued loans before and the hypothetical benefits have to be weighed against the added costs of relying a very slow, expensive database with no mechanism to correct bugs or fraud.
Why would they plug them in the evening though? If you're using the car, you're likely to be parking it at a place with a high car density (e.g. a large parking garage or an employer's parking lot), where chargers can be deployed cheaply.

If you have a short commute, you might also not care how fully charged your car is as long as it is enough. So you may specify that you want a state of charge of 50-80% at the end of the day, and the grid can decide when to charge your car. It won't be enough to smooth out all the fluctuations in renewable generation, but it surely will help.

10 million cars (~20% of the cars existing in Germany) attempting to charge is at least 10 GW of load that can be shed when necessary, and significantly more than that in load that you can sink when there is excess power (I'm assuming each car needs to charge e.g. 10 kWh over 10 hours). Wikipedia says the total Regelleistung (operating reserve?) in Germany is 12.5 GW (7 GW in one direction, 5.5 in the other) and that this is responsible for 40% of the cost of the grid fees.
It's nary impossible to judge founders, even investors are not very good.

I think that 'heat' is probably the best way to judge: if they are growing, they have a good product, customers like it, and they're not paying substantially more for customer acquisition - and it's a large market - then that's a good sign.
From the text of the bill it appears the tax break is specifically exempting gas that would otherwise have been flared or vented from a current productive facility. It doesn’t look like mining facilities setup on would be shut in wells qualify.
I'm terribly disappointed that my favorite couch is missing, the Dromminge. Looks like this:

https://offerup.com/item/detail/33576960

I still have mine, almost 20 years later. It's currently my 4yo's bed.

What really surprised me though is that Ikea apparently has another item called Dromminge. It's a wall lamp that looks like a balloon:

https://www.ikeaddict.com/ikeapedia/en/Product/40330895/ca-e...

Why on earth would they recycle the name? Did they run out of Swedish words? What does it mean?
> That was NOT Mueller's conclusion.

Don't spread misinformation, that was a DIRECT QUOTE from the Mueller report: "Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities." You can see it in [1] or [2] or in the report itself.

So there were a few contacts. So what? Presidential campaigns talk to a lot of people and don't vet them all in advance.

As your own quote says: "After considering the available evidence, the Office did not pursue charges under these statutes against any of the individuals discussed in Section IV above—with the exception of FARA charges against Paul Manafort and Richard Gates based on their activities on behalf of Ukraine [not Russia]."

1: https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/what-the-mueller-report-sa...

2: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2019/apr/...
From [1]: Modern historians and geographers have disputed the veracity of the map and the described voyages, with some accusing the younger Zeno of forgery.
> It even says in the article that the child is awake, so I don't see why you couldn't spook or tickle them into action.

I was expecting the neurologist to perform a drop test [1], but the closest to this in the article is:

> [Dr. Olssen] lifted Nola’s arm to show me how limp it was. The arm dropped unceremoniously onto the bed when let go.

Could this be a failed drop test?

Also see: Asylum seekers with apathetic refugee children [2]

[1] https://www.aafp.org/afp/1998/0515/p2485.html A few bedside tests are often helpful in patients with suspected pseudoneurologic syndrome. The first is a drop test: the clinician drops the “paralyzed” arm over the patient's face. In pseudoneurologic syndrome, the “paralyzed” arm will not strike the patient's face when dropped (i.e., a near miss). Second, the clinician can test weakness with painful stimulation. Unexpected painful stimuli to the affected extremity may cause a purposeful withdrawal response.

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asylum_seekers_with_apathetic_...
> I’m confused because black people still get murdered by cops all the time

Black people mostly get murdred by other black people: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-...
So, at least in my industry (softwares development in trading) your bonus can be more than your salary, so while they won’t pull the offer, it can have longer effects.

I agree with the above poster which is, if you’re happy, take it. The great part about America and especially developed, if you become unhappy there’s 100 other jobs waiting.
please send me some good sites which produce unbiased analysis, thanks.
I don't want to diminish the work of "epidemiologist"'s but they aren't virologists. They're ultimately specialised statisticians and shouldn't have any say in how or what research is carried out.
> which in general is better at recognizing faces than humans

Do you have anything other than an assertion for that?
The parent posted relevant details to the case at hand.

Your comment doesn't really add to the conversation and suggests that your opinion as a middle-schooler 20-years ago about a video that has nothing to do with this case is a more important thing for us to consider. I disagree.
> Back in 1985 I was pretty much a lone voice expressing the potential for studying complexity in science

James Gleick in his book Chaos Making a New Science somehow notes quite a few people’s efforts that predate 1985 without noting him.
Well sure, you have to back it up.
(1) Be great at your job.
(2) Make sure you're getting paid well for it.

Nobody else is going to make sure you're paid what you're worth. Which is much more than
median salaries if you have skills.
Uitwaaien: The Dutch invention you never knew you needed
Regarding 3., the reason it is being ignored is because it may dampen uptake of the vaccine by people who had already had and recovered from COVID. You probably were already aware this was a reason but just to clarify and in case. It's probable that being vaccinated can improve on your natural immunity[1], though since natural immunity can be comparable to or better than immunity from vaccination, it shouldn't be considered necessary in my opinion. At least in Israel, their Health Ministry is recommending people who have already had COVID need only get one dose, as a compromise.[2]

[1]: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v...

[2]: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israeli-study-recovered-...
It's only a matter of time before this is made illegal because it's intention is to purposely evade, distort, confuse or interfere, much like a radar detector would.

I have no idea why these one-off "hacks" are posted, or why anyone would think painting a bulls eye like this on yourself is somehow an intelligent solution. They will just attach a face reader along with an ALP reader and at that point good luck.

The more I look at this, the more it seems like apparel for people who don't know what controlled opposition is.
This is worth something.

I worked at a blue chip and we hired young devs with 2 years experience at major banks and they were clueless. I don't think they actually did anything. Worse, they didn't realize that they didn't know how to do anything. It was bizarre.

That said, it makes it hard to work in a normal corp, you have to find a special place to work where at least the pace is 'just right' i.e. you get to actually do thing, but they're not going to push you into the ground with too much work and stress.
I was unimpressed too; when I posted that snippet there were no other comments and I figured it'd help others judge whether it was worth the read.
The SEC has provided us with a handy framework to help analyze whether or not a digital asset is likely to meet the Howey Test, you can try it out at https://www.sec.gov/files/dlt-framework.pdf

>C. Reasonable Expectation of Profits Derived from Efforts of Others

There is no expectation of profits from Tether tokens. In fact, you are guaranteed to lose money to inflation even if everything works out perfectly.
I've owned both a Microsoft Surface laptop and currently own an XPS 15. Both of them I have had the same thing happen where they are in "sleep" mode and have woken up. I'll have them in a bag and open them up and it's really cooking inside the laptop sleeve and the laptop and bag are quite warm. Honestly the amount of heat there I wouldn't be surprised if there have been fires from this kind of stuff.

Basically if I know I won't be using my laptop for a bit and am putting it in a bag I always make sure to turn it off now.
Good to hear.

There may well be starving children in the EU, but there certainly are not posters on bus shelters solicitating donations to feed starving children in the EU.
The linked references in the article say this is what they're doing.
We use Apache Kafka at our company. It's one of the most popular streaming platforms in the world at the moment.

https://kafka.apache.org/
you can task.yield aswell.
Who said there are different expectations?
Ask HN: How to market a cross country team?
A bit of an odd question for HN, but how do I make good marketing for a high school cross country running team?

I’m on a team, and they would like for me to design a poster for making people interested. The team isn’t good at making itself appear appealing (they exclusively use Comic Sans in every document) and I’m not looking to change that. I just want to understand how people work and apply those skills.

Peter Thiel says that marketing is really important to startups. The skills required to make something attractive seem to extend past startups and into understanding how social structures and people work. Basic competency in this seems required to have conversations that make people think I’m not a robot.

To rephrase this: how do people work? and what makes them find something interesting or cool?

Thanks!
That's not my job, sorry.
Ban or heavily tax all proof-of-work cryptocurrency mining in the US. Bitcoin is causing major environmental impacts (both with emissions and e-waste), and better solutions exist, such as proof-of-stake. Society should not have to pay for the environmental externalities of bitcoin speculators.
I bought at $2
Only a virologist should tell another virologist what to do. Got it.
You don't have to blame the defunding movement for the rise in homicide rates to wonder if the people in charge thought it through.

The scariest part about having my city's police force defunded (aside from cops not wanting to work here anymore) is the realization that my city council members are strongly influenced by the news cycles. News cycles can be tampered with. Truly, what is the news, but a way to tamper with our opinions? Opinions can be changed through repetition, and rage can be incited seemingly with little effort.

The modern warfront in the United States is our news feed. You can't exactly waltz an army into a country that's packing nukes. What you can do is hire an army to sway public opinion in a country in order to weaken them. Who knows, maybe next time we'll defund our military.
True, there would have to be some requirement that they keep, say, at least 30% of their net worth invested in govt debt for 10yrs after they leave office. To better incentivize them to manage it for the long term rather than short term.
Wow. I didn't realize that this is such a huge space. I thought Climeworks was basically the only company that actually has a working product already.

Is there a way to invest into the space through some form of managed fund? I have no way of evaluating the economics of any of the companies, but would like to park some of my money by investing in this sector (both hoping for an at-least-comparable-to-market return and wanting to support the development of the technology, while being OK with accepting extra risk - basically, I'm willing to donate to carbon capture and sequestration in the form of accepting a worse point than other investments on the risk/reward curve).
"We can't develop proper end to end pipeline, so we killed it and patted ourselves on the backs".
I think it's a strong move to give away so many tools for free and consolidate their income to align so closely with the charity's goals, and while time will tell, I think charities will find this works well for them.

I'm invested in their success.
The monasteries of Ireland and Scotland survived the crisis and disorder of the Migration Period and re-christianized the Continent from the 8th century onwards. Yes, some texts from antiquity have come down to us only as palimpsest, but the classical writers were copied.
I heard that first he went half way to the new world, then half of that distance, then half of that distance...and never made it in the end.
Eh, regardless of what you think of the source, it's backed by hard, verifiable evidence.

Peak Prosperity was not about prepping much at all until Covid, as far as I know. Dr. Martenson started pushing home gardening and stocking up when covid hit--in fact, he started saying such things in like February 2020--pretty prescient.
Nope, a panel of virologists and related researchers with the same scientific understanding in the field should make these decisions.
Electron 15.0.0 Released