skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This was also the success secret of the early church. The apostles and shepherds who visited believers in other cities brought with them such social proof in the form of a written letter.
I think your characterization isn't exactly correct, they've declined to implement some features, but they've also implemented a lot of other ones.

>What is missing here isn't a lack of time or a lack of technical skill. It's a lack of effective project management, a lack of direction, and an inability to delegate.

Please don't do this, this is splitting hairs. Some people don't have the project management skills to do that. I've read your other posts, if you have the project management skills, then you'd be a great candidate to step in and do that. If you don't, then this still isn't helping the problem. The productive thing to do would be to find a capable project manager.
TVMosaic CE (Community Edition) server released as open source by DVBLogic
> After that you have to choose a framework, because Java applications are very framework-heavy ones. And that's where most of complexity comes from. People usually use Spring these days, so that's probably would be the most reasonable choice. There's no easy path, you'll struggle a lot and that's unavoidable. Modern Java Frameworks are full of hard to grasp concepts, tricky magic code and 20-year old roots buried in the depths of stacktraces.

Honestly that does not sound like a culture/ecosystem it is pleasurable to work within. Why wouldn't people choose something more modern and lightweight than Spring?
It's reasonable to assume that any photo sharing app checks EXIF data (and uploads it), including geotags. For some people this is something they want, as some people want the app to be able to show that info or be able to search their library by date/location.

If the app does not explicitly say it does not, I'd assume it does. I don't know if facebook/instagram has said if they do or don't.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer but vaccine passports treat me like I am (anaphylactic)
Too bad a lot of the links does not work anymore.
I've already voiced my opinion on COVID safety previously so I'll only address one point but it's a major one, which is there's a fundamental difference in circumstance between the normal risks one takes or is exposed to in a regulated society and those one experiences in a disease pandemic.

In a regulated working society one has grown up learning to live with a range of known risks one is likely to experience such as it's safer to use a pedestrian crossing with lights than to risk running a busy road - and one uses one's own autonomy to keep safe and out of trouble in this environment. That's how life is normally barring any force majeure/acts of God or some totally unexpected wayout/rare
catastrophe occurring. Even then, you still have your autonomy to sum the situation up and then try to make the most of your terrible predicament.

The difference with a pandemic is that when others act irresponsibility, don't wear masks, ignore vaccination drives etc., they take away your autonomy to act in the best way you think fit for your own safety. (Why? Because the intrinsic nature of a pandemic is to spread invisibility from person to person and the only effective means of control is for everyone to act in a coordinated way to break the cycle - that's not just my opinion, it's the best advice from multiple experts.)

Violators who don't conform to the rules reduce your ability to act to the lowest common denominator - to the level of their bad behavior whether you like it or not. They are endangering you, your life and or your family's life in ways that you have no control over and they have no right to do that.

Even if the risk is minimal then these rules violators still have no right frighten those who don't share their view and who continue to think the risk is sufficiently high to continue protecting themselves against the disease. (Compare this to a person walking down a busy street brandishing an AK47 - right, you'd have him lock up ASAP. In effect, that's what's happening when people don't play by sensible rules.)

And that's the way it ought to be until the medical officials or the best scientific advice available according to society's rules (i.e.: not from some untried science) gives the all clear. At that point, society has no further obligation to continue to honor the wishes of any who still remain worried.

That's the way it's been in past pandemics going back to the Plague/Black Death and earlier and I'd suggest that's also the way it'll be in the future irrespective of loud vocal complaints from those who value their safety less than the majority do.

When you take away people's autonomy to act in what they believe is in their own best interests and safety or you trample over their rights with impunity then you are acting like the stormtroopers of the 1930s. Either anarchy has broken out or authoritarian rule has taken over completely. There are no ifs and buts about it, democracy's failed.

Unfortunately, there has been too much air time given to stories like this where those involved are sounding off and doing so without sufficient forthought or are doing so for shellfish/self-centered motives.
> Your logic is absolutely drenched in bias. It makes me curious what you do for a living and where you’re from.

... Yes, let's do talk about bias.
Their football program makes more than double the profit of Gatorade royalties, though.
Haven't checked but couldn't you make one that does and compare data usage volume?

But "listening, on everyone" and "all the time" are not necessary assumptions.
I was about to quibble with

> Females have a biological incentive to be more choosy than men as their reproductive investment is much higher

until I saw you had also written

> If each woman and each man can only choose one partner, i would expect the choosiness of men and women to become much more equal

which is the missing piece I was going to add.

> In reality we know that humans historically have not really been monogamous creatures, even in societies that are nominally so.

But, to shift emphasis a little, in those societies, many many people really were monogamous, there absolutely were, and are, functioning lifelong pair-bonds, there were men who devoted a lot of themselves to being good husbands and fathers, and, I'd like to think, there still can be. But yes, such men will need to be choosy, because they're making the biggest investment of their lives.
10 and 7 day listings, with full refund if they're over.

That's to England, and it does work. I've used it a lot since the flu made it essential.
What an incredible career!
https://xkcd.com/1053/

I assume there is some selective reading and most articles referring to Terraform have a cloud or hashicorp reference in the title. If you don't care about either, you don't read the Terraform things on HN.
This is not necessarily true, beyond the fact that you must pay to live no matter what. If you have one person making, say, $300k/year and another making $60k/year, together you share a bedroom, share a fridge, share a stove, share a living room, etc. Your total costs could lower than they would be otherwise.
I'm a huge fan of git education. From a computer science standpoint, git is very clever but not particularly hard to understand. From a usage standpoint, although it's gotten better over the years, I still wouldn't call it user-friendly. I'd like to see more competing implementations out there. I'd like to see better git libraries for application support. I'd like to see libraries that support alternatives to flat file repo representations.
You definitely should. date-fns is similar to the lodash/ramda, in the sense that it's a bag of functions which handle dates. This makes it very easy to compose different date handling situations.
that does something entirely different.

maybe actually learn to program sometimes, then you will figure out what it does.
Not really. Apple taught the world the word "skeuomorphic", making fake paper and leather and metal for their apps.

Also, Apple famously used the OP's bomb icon whenever Mac OS plunged forward into a crash.
I hope they use some of that money for a study regarding the nutritional value of Gatorade fed plants.
If CPU == core thread, then yes.
Say you want first-class currying and function composition. You expect this coming from any functional language and now you don't have that ability without introducing another compiler or third-party library. Do you want algebraic data types and pattern matching? You can sort of fake it, but it's certainly uglier. Do you want managed IO or immutability? Well, you can code it by convention but it's hard to enforce it and many of the libraries you consume won't be following those conventions.

In this sense, where these features are not the default and aren't first-class, will almost likely never be idiomatic because to TypeScript because there's too much friction compared to something from the ML families or the LISPs. In trying to add types to JavaScript, as a result you keep a lot of that same friction as JavaScript. I'm not saying it doesn't have a place--it's clearly super popular--but I do think it does not offer a good experience for someone looking for FP-style programming. It's really odd to see job postings with an FP team, Haskell on the back-end, and then TypeScript on the front-end... it just doesn't match, and there were other good options, even if it requires writing some libraries for these communities.
Thank you for helping me understand the issue with default parameter values in a variadic language like JS, which probably makes a nonstandard currying with an execution signal more applicable.

I've created a curry which will only execute when called with no arguments, ie. sum(1)(2)(3)() = 6

This is like you mentioned, a much better suited technique of currying for a language like JS:

const curry = fn => {
const curried = (a,...x) => x.length === 0 ? fn(...a) : curried.bind(undefined, [...a, x[0]])
return curried.bind(undefined, [])
}

// equals 15 because default c=10
curry((a,b,c=10)=>a+b+c)(2)(3)()

We can also apply the same idea of an empty call as a signal to the multi-argument currying variation.
I'd love to know what you think. And please keep reading. Because I apologize and stand corrected. Apparently partial application is single use, unlike currying. Essentially a fixed point. I have learned something today. I apologize for being so hard headed. Thank you for putting up with me and correcting me. The wikipedia article on currying confused me with regard to partial application but then I read the partial application wiki article and what you are saying clicked.

It seems like there are 3 techniques here.

Multi argument currying.
Single argument currying.
And partial application (aka binding)

And too many references called the former the latter, hence my confusion.
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/17/business/17bank.html

It was right to stop them then, and it is right to stop them now.
No, land is not fungible but also the volumes occupied over land are not fungible.

You cannot simply build vertically indefinitely and/or at almost-linear cost. There are a million constraints.

Not to mention the geographic limitations of the market. You cannot buy a house or land in a cheaper country/city and teleport it to your city. Relocating comes with all sort of burdens, from getting visas to leaving friends/partners/family/job behind, to language barrier.
All of this makes housing extremely non-fungible.

Finally, people in need of housing are under extreme pressure not to be homeless, while those who own 20 apartments can easily keep 1 unoccupied if that means pushing up the market value of all apartments in the long term.

This asymmetry is what makes the market speculative and exploitative.
Why was your office getting so many bomb threats?
As a european I wouldn't pay twice for american made shoes, while I (and many people) routinely pay a premium for italian and french made shoes. The problem is that made in america is not considered premium for clothes the same way that made in italy or france is.
Amazon offers something not has fancy (but maybe more flexible?)

VT1 instances can support streams up to 4K UHD resolution at 60 frames per second (fps) and can transcode up to 64 simultaneous 1080p60 streams in real time.

One thing is that a place like netflix has got to have a LOT of target formats (think of range of devices netflix delivers to). ASICS sometimes struggle when faced with this needed flexibility.
Wow, I never zoomed in on that. I've been using that as clip art in my slides for years now. You should work for CSI
Currying is useful, especially if you are doing point-free style functional programming or just functional programming in general. its a useful tool with a time and a place, I don't get all the "currying hate."
You need to annualize that 3% to make it comparable. A grocery store isn’t buying everything at the start of the year and selling it at the end. If they do 12 inventory turnovers in a year, that 3% margin becomes a 36% return for the same amount of capital.
uh,they do say "Regions of parameter space to the right of the red contour are excluded." you can see for yourself where mosto of the miniBoone resylts lie. By the way, why not link the preprint? https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01177

The existence of a contradiction with other experiments was also something that was reported at the time:

> Despite the affirmation of LSND’s 20-year-old results, physicists have not concluded that there is a fourth neutrino species. The findings directly contradict those by a diverse set of experiments, including the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search, the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment, and the IceCube Neutrino Observatory

https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.2018061...
I was quite sure that this depiction of a bomb was based on 18th century grenades, which were spherical and had a string fuse. The word ‘grenade’ even comes from pomegranate, due to the visual similarity. It seems like this depiction may have originated a little further back than the American Civil War.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grenade

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomegranate
How do you know nothing goes back to the cloud, like metadata?
It would be even better if you could somehow tell it it should have control over the entire account, so that anything (entire resources I mean, not just changed properties) created outside terraform would be destroyed.

In terms of API use though I suppose that'd be quite expensive to plan - listing every possible AWS resource (in every region!) for example.
A relationship is a noun and not a verb because it is formed into something stable the people in it can commit to, and because our limits into knowing another person's heart and mind are so profound, and feelings change with, for example, external events, committing to shared goals and life is more realistic than one irrational human to another. Free love isn't free for all.
The example is still relevant, say if your program has no OS.
I don't understand. Some of our most trusted news sources told us that a lab origin was debunked.

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/22/841925672/scientists-debunk-l...
What the Wall Street Journal Got Wrong About Facebook
Compile time verification of correct syntax and spelling is important aspect
This FAQ is about Java SE builds, not the OpenJDK builds.

Java is Still Free (2019)
https://medium.com/@javachampions/java-is-still-free-2-0-0-6...

I don't know if there is a more recent version
That says the analysis is done locally. It does not say nothing goes to the cloud.
Mastering Flutter Zones
The users cannot do anything with the funds outside of what is dictated by the contracts, and there are various forms of incentives for executing specific contract actions for varying amount of actors.

I.e. if you want to borrow stablecoins against ones assets on aave, you must deposit up to 150% (and the limits of how much one can borrow are up to 100% of the value of the assets) of those assets and they will be liquidated if you do not pay back the debt before its due.

There more complex examples than this. Law doesn't stop people from breaking laws or not upholding contracts in the same way that code on the evm doesn't force users to interact with it (people break laws and get arrested after the fact and get liquidated all the time).
Based on free Github:

Github Check Runs API
Github Applications
Security scanning, vulnerability alerting
Packages Registry that's reliable

The kind of integrations that Github offers for pull requests in general is miles away from Gitlab. Some of the things I mentioned above are possible in Gitlab but only on the highest tier and still then the UI integration isn't a great.
VaultBoot: “Next-Gen” Firmware Security
To me it is hillarious that the thing called "Smart Vote" (the one that was banned) means actually "vote for whoever you are told to vote for by the Navalny team". I only found it out a few days ago.
This doesn't sound really smart to me at all. Quite the opposite. "Mindless vote" would be more correct. It doesn't care about the candidate's person, political agenda, views, biography, anything. It doesn't care about the party you are told to vote for, either. You should just vote for X or Y, for party X or party Y, and that's it :)
Obj-C's flexibility is great, but it's also one of the language's weaknesses. Having worked on Apple platform projects for over a decade, I've seen some truly insane Obj-C code — bad casting, no null checks, and a variety of different types of incidentally working but incorrect code, among other things. It's a wonder that some of those projects ran at all.

But I suppose that's down to the skill of the developer more than it is the language itself. In the right hands, Obj-C is powerful for the same reasons… the compiler gets out of your way and lets you write.
That's a good and subtle question, with multiple relevant answers:

1) As _Microft says in a sibling reply, the reason is because for this type of experiment, the researchers were studying short-baseline oscillations. A curious property of neutrinos is that they oscillate -- we interact with them through their "flavor", but they propagate through space in a mixture of flavor eigenstates, so a neutrino that is created as an electron-type neutrino can interact later as a muon-type (or tau-type) neutrino.

LSND and MiniBooNE study short-baseline oscillations, where L/E (the distance travelled divided by the particle energy) is very small, a few meters on a ~1MeV neutrino. By comparison, almost all the (vast number!) neutrinos that pass through each of us each second come from much farther away. Most of them come from the Sun, so their origin is distributed over a sphere 100x the diameter of the Earth (and, to make matters worse, something called the MSW-effect scrambles things further). So, people who study these effects either build an accelerator or snuggle up next to a reactor.

In principle, one could use the existing neutrinos from the Sun to do this sort of experiment, but one would need a material capable of blocking all of, say, the electron-type neutrinos from the Sun. If such a thing existed, we could place a detector a few meters away from that filter and watch for electron-type neutrinos to reappear. Alas, the only known material perhaps capable of achieving such a task exists for a fraction of a second inside core-collapse supernovae -- the extremely dense infalling matter is so dense that it can actually trap some of the outgoing neutrinos.... until the neutrino pressure blows it apart.

2) In this specific case, the experiments were originally done with muon anti-neutrinos. The easiest way to get those is with a particle accelerator.

3) One can also attempt to get at this sort of thing (though the approach has different sensitivity/systematics) through reactor-neutrino experiments, as one of the downvoted posts below suggests. For the shortest baselines, though, there's probably really nothing like a beam-experiment.

4) (an aside) One thing that Hossenfelder doesn't really address in the article: There are still systematic-uncertainty questions around LSND and Mini/MicroBooNE. The modern experiment has addressed many of them, but not all. The experiments are difficult and the anomalies have their quirks. Yes, the combined result reaches a statistical power of ~6-sigma, but I don't think you'll have to look too far to find credible experimentalists who have concerns about the result.

This is in contrast to something like the Higgs, where the discovery was fairly clean and simultaneously confirmed by two groups. LSND was huge news back in the day, but the difficulty/expense of replication and the substantial experimental challenges mean that the situation remains fairly murky.
However, floppy disk icons also survive in Linux, android and web apps, at least in those which save is an explicit GUI action, so it's really only Apple thats the outlier here
> it is not the law that precautions must be taken against every peril that can be foreseen by the timorous

Great quote
No policy is the best policy when things get too complex. You dont even have to analyse it too deeply.

But you know the chimp troupe will then start crying about how timid leaders are and brave leaders get propped up who dig the hole deeper.
"That 20 dollar bill lying on the ground in front of me clearly does not exist. Somebody would have picked it up already!"
See? Rust's original syntax isn't that bad!
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/08/a-decade-and-a-half-...
And it's often a random 5 days, maybe 6. You never know. It's hard to overstate how burdensome that is.
You have to calculate the amount of data provided from all users in this case + storage + processing power to do all of that. It’s probably more than you would expect too.

The second point is why would a company do that? If the NSA or whomever wants to snoop on you, they’ll drop malware on your phone, subpoena your iCloud backups etc. not try to coerce a company to record people’s conversations when said company has no desire to do so.
>Australia has no home nuclear capability and wanted to be able to do some of the maintenance locally.

That's premised on whether France would have been willing to sell that capability to AUS, and for what price, vs the price (economic and military) of French nuclear maintenance, vs buying diesel.

That equation is easily changed by a competing US/UK offer, be it technology sharing/ training for AUS to gain dinners nuclear maintenance capabilities, or that by being more politically aligned with the US/UK, relying on a foreign country for maintenance isn't as much of a military risk.

>This may be a precursor to increased US naval presence/base in Australia.

I suspect the opposite. What does the US gain by naval presence in Australia (vs Guam or Okinawa or Philippines, etc) besides an additional layer of rapid response in the region? AUS & US already partner in most things that would make a larger military presence in AUS beneficial.

Whereas equipping AUS provides a potential partner for any international rapid response needed in the region. And I think for most incidents that would merit a US/UK rapid response in the region (ie China), AUS would have an equal or greater interest in responding to it.

The other advantage is logistical- if the US and UK deal involves sharing industrial capabilities with AUS, it gains the US and UK likely use of those AUS capabilities and facilities in the event of conflict, instead of having to return to the US/UK.

AUS gains technological and economic benefits, while US and UK get backup maintenance and repair facilities on the other side of the world, without having to pay for a base or for a contractor's presence. (Maybe you'd consider this increased US naval presence.)
How to Whiten Teeth Using Baking Soda – Epic Health Coaching
To be fair I also heard 10-15 on the first pass and then had to think about it for a second.