skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I understand what you are talking about, but this is not how rules apply to stores' apps.
(not sure about App Store, I'm mainly working with Google Play).

You can read the legal part of Google Play, starting from section 8 and to the end. https://play.google.com/about/developer-distribution-agreeme...

TLDR: it's your responsibility to observe any regulation change and decision by google in your app. Suppose any content got banned on the platform by "applicable law" in any country's jurisdiction. In that case, you must apply this decision to your app because, legally, you must inherit all Google's decisions.
If you don't do that, your app can get takedown without any notice.

I'm not sure when Google changed its policy about Crimea. I can verify it from my ex-company experience and legal department. Around 2015 our application got takedown without any details because we provide access to people who live in Crimea. Still, after our legal department contacted Google, they answered that it's our responsibility to observe these decisions and apply them.

Durov didn't wait for a takedown and applied app stores' decision to Telegram. Anyway, I think his message about this "silent day" is stupid, and the worst thing that can happen for Telegram is probably takedown for Russian users in stores for a few weeks.

I just checked now, and you have access to this bot if you are registered with any other phone number except these from Russia. My Ukraine and US numbers work fine with the bot.

UPD.: To clarify, I don't say everything happened because of this Google legal agreement, I'm not so into everything in Russia politics, Telegram, etc.
It's my stupid opinion on the whole situation, with assumptions based on my experience. Take it with a grain of salt.

There was news about Russian investments in Telegram and agreements between Telegram and the Russian government, so maybe it's part of agreements, nothing more.
We experienced a lot of problems with when trying to manage standard configurations of hundreds of AWS VPC's ranging in age from 3 days old to 6 years. Accounts built years ago using older terraform would have to be handled completely differently because inevitable TF template drift and TF versions made each upgrade path unique. Not insurmountable by any means but also not trivial. Just sharing my experience.
you could actually read the essay, for a start:

We should remember that expressions of variant sexuality are not only a form of individual expression, but also a public good. Many asexual people and families enjoy seeing leather in Pride. Leather contingents demystify the community, reduce social stigma, create opportunities to meet and talk with kinksters, and help people discover new desires. Public floggings can balance misconceptions that impact is “just about pain,” and illustrate the possibility for emotional connection. Public bondage can be an art installation. In my personal experience marching and performing scenes in public, people on the street are far more curious, supportive, and delighted to see pups in hoods and men in rope than the present discourse would have us believe.

Finally: as several of the accounts in this history demonstrate, one’s own feelings about sexual displays can change dramatically over time. What was frightening or disgusting one year can be freeing, erotic, or beautiful the next. This points to the possibility of Pride as more than a space where we impose the standard norms of an imagined unitary public. As a polyvocal celebration, Pride offers us the chance not only to express ourselves, but also to see others’ expressions of a broad range of queer identities. With a little patience we can rejoice in others’ kaleidoscopic queerness—and sometimes, if we’re lucky, discover new aspects of our selves.

The history of Pride is also extensively discussed and cited heavily. Scolds of your tone are at least as old as pride, and still about as tone-deaf as ever.
While I agree with those points, my understanding is that the evidence is actually rather thin right now.

About the only pattern that has consistently played out, is nations getting cocky and then getting smashed.

And this doesn't address the end game. Vaccines are about the only route that makes sense. The rest seems to be akin to thinking condoms alone could solve STDs. They definitely help. They aren't getting is to the end, though.
Homeless people move to CA because it has great weather and social services and so its great to be homeless there compared to other places. Homeless people are rational so that's where they go.

The crucial fact, though, is that none of these great conditions in CA do anything to actually get people out of homelessness, they just subsidize homelessness and make it easier to be homeless. So naturally, homeless people being rational, the effect of these policies is to increase homelessness overall.

There are people who are legit mentally ill and somehow as a society we've decided that the best we can do is have them live like dogs, scrounging around and shitting in the streets.

There are other people who just really like heroin and would rather do heroin than anything else and california is the probably the best place in the world if that's what you want to do.

A truly humane homeless policy would institutionalize mentally ill people, not subsidize drug addicts, and help people on the edge of homelessness find jobs and housing.
Good point. it doesn't imply though that the 4am worker would be left doing nothing. He could well be providing another service less wastful, day time, for 8 dollars per hour or more, or less. Unless or course those who want to buy stuff at the gas station at any hour of the night would not trade that convenience for any other service they aren't getting yet.
I've wondered that myself. But I have found some commonalities:

1. I like movies with witty dialog

2. I like movies with characters that are ambiguously good and bad, not good vs bad

3. I don't like movies that push an agenda, message, morals or propaganda

4. I don't want to sit through a movie about someone dying of some horrible disease
> Consent is key to healthy BDSM practice, but the public did not consent to seeing these sexual displays (...). By wearing leather harnesses and chaining each other up in broad daylight, kinksters have unethically involved non-consenting bystanders in a BDSM scene for their own (likely sexual) gratification.

Do young people have such a warped view of consent now that wearing a leather harness in public is considered "unethically involving non-consenting bystanders in a BDSM scene"?? Ahh, the culture of "I am a greater victim than thou" hath no boundaries.
Similar assertion (i.e., money is created by commercial banks) is made in this book too [1]. It is in the context of working of The Federal Reserve. The author worked is a former fed trader.

> the deposit created is taken, sent elsewhere and reduces a loan somewhere.

Sure, but that doesn't imply the converse (i.e., a loan is made from deposit), does it?

> they all have over a trillion dollars of deposits at 10-15 bps which they then lend at a few %.

It is not clear (to me at least) if the money they lent out is indeed from the deposits they took.

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/56863052-central-banking...
There are several factors at play:

- The bias against sufficient provisioning exists regardless of scale or growth rates. Housing tends to be underprovisioned when it serves as an asset, whether at the individual or institutional scales.

- Infinite expansion of housing stock isn't necessary. In mostt cases only a small fraction of existing housing stock need be added. California has a homeless population of roughly 170,000 (https://www.usich.gov/homelessness-statistics/ca/) on a given night.

That's a large number, yes. It's also less than 1/2 of one percent of the total population of the state.

The incremental housing need is small. It's localised. Those constraints of which you write will not be even remotely approached in addressing the housing needs of even 10x or 100x this number of people. Adding a small amount of additional housing at affordable rates in high-demand markets will address the housing problem nearly completely.

(There may also be some additional services for the addicted, mentally ill, disabled, elderly, and young. That's independent of the housing issue itself.)

But adding a few percent to the housing stock will have an immense impact on the very thin trade of that asset, plunging prices, and hence household and family wealth, as well as real estate, mortgage, bank, and financial derivative asset values. Given the utter dismanteling of defined-benefit pensions and the importance of real estate appreciation to family retirement planning, and the role of the financial sector in politics, the resultant political pressure is immense.

That covers your first two points.

For your fourth: yes, I fundamentally agree, that's what I just argued above, and it's a core aspect of the present homelessness crisis. Given that landlords can also drive evictions at will (effectively creating demand), the market is further unbalanced.

The geographic structure of the market is a non-issue when present low densities and low marginal change requirements (as discussed above) are factored in. SF Bay Area housing demand could be addressed with improved transit, increased densities, and stronger tenant protections with only modest increases in total housing stock.
We don't make mass market shoes in the US anymore, they're all specialty products now.

I'm trying to support US manufacturing where I can, but as far as I can tell, the choice to outsource was made to increase margins, not because of rising costs.
Accessibility Statements, What they are
I am very much still living this, Couchsurfing got more difficult to use and a lot of people don't use it because of the so called "pay wall" but luckily alternatives are there and will hopefully with more posts like this get more traction... I like Trustroots most
what woud be a lean alternative for microservices to spring boot?
That’s cool ! I love when I’m reminded that we don’t know everything about anything. And I love it even more when it’s on topics you learn (and take for granted) in school.
Most of the countries with state run daycare have even lower fertility than US has. I don’t think there is a single country with all of: government childcare, high female labor market participation, and above replacement fertility. If anything, the correlation is opposite: the more subsidized the childcare is, the fewer children are born.
The old Accidental Black Mirror.
Institutions are error correction. We can form a less biased system out of constituent parts each of which is more biased than the whole.
The biggest real-world benefit of Kotlin is nullity prevention and immutables (of which Optional is a corollary).

It's not clear whether Loom will be a big hit. Personally, I think the Actor model is the best application level concurrency "primitive", and Loom is just about fibers & continuations, both of which are parts of Actors but aren't really Actors themselves.
You kind of did precisely just that in your response to my comment here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28585422

You're grossly overstating constraints and the absolute and relative quantities of housing which must be added.
The whole paper is discussing bottlenecks, path optimisation between resources, and impacts of those on overall throughout. It's not a simple loadbalancing question being answered
Uhhhhhhhh... the golden ratio.
Yeah, I'd totally agree with that. I liked that movie since Strange's arc was mostly about him conquering his inner turmoil, and because as powerful as Strange is, he has to use his brain to prevail.
Java is not expressive enough to do without reflection for some complex problems. I suppose you might resort to code generation instead?
That's exactly correct!
> having a big CGI fight at the end

Before CGI, it was always the "climactic fight in the darkened warehouse" finale. It would go on and on, the machinery would get turned on at some point, the bad guy would have to be killed several times, etc. Oh, for a movie where people don't keep fighting after massive blows to their head, or are little affected by a shot in the shoulder, etc.
No, it wouldn't. No matter how good, it's still just an image. What I learned is that there's a lot more to a painting than just the image.
Spy tech that followed kids home for remote learning
I appreciate that.

It was truly as uplifting as it could be.
I started reading it and then realized how long it was and that I don't care enough about the subject to read all of that. I'm going to go fist my girlfriend in public and it'll be ok because I'm just expressing myself, right?
That’s your takeaway from this article?
The author also seems to think DSL means "descriptive languages" and that Helm "even" supports kubernetes, when in fact it's only for that technology.
Well, the point is, right now, when a fintech partners with a bank, they still have to go through an extensive due diligence process and conform to all the regulations that are relevant to them because the bank is still on the hook from a regulatory viewpoint.

For example, let's say you're a fintech like Chime, which partners with The Bancorp Bank and Stride Bank to actually store deposits. When you open an account at Chime, Chime is responsible for just as much required KYC (Know Your Customer regulations) for account holders as if you opened directly with a bank. The partner banks demand periodic audits of the KYC processes because if anything is deficient, it's the bank's charter that is on the line.
The best resource I know of is the book Drawdown, edited by Paul Hawken, available in print or online. It includes short essays on things we can do and includes impact rankings and cost savings for each.

One of the many things I like about it is that it points out that most things we can do to address climate change save money. Continuing down the path we're on is not only morally reprehensible but financially self-destructive as well.

https://drawdown.org
Netflix has appliances installed at exchange points that caches most of Netflix. Each appliance peers locally and serves the streams locally.

The inbound data stream to fill the cache of the appliance is rate limited and time limited - see https://openconnect.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/3600356180... The actual inbound data to the appliance will be higher than the fill because not everything is cached.

The outbound stream from the appliance serves consumers. In New Zealand for example, Netflix has 40Gbps of connectivity to a peering exchange in Auckland. https://www.peeringdb.com/ix/97

So although total Netflix bandwidth to consumers is massive, it has little in common with the bandwidth you pay for at Amazon.

Disclaimer: I am not a network engineer.
Maybe dumb question, but does p-2-p work on native TV apps, chromecast, etc ? I know it does if you run a client app on Windows or Mac
I was wondering who they were and why they were self-saboting. Then I saw that it's a channel with 20 subscribers on youtube with view numbers in the single digits for some videos. So somebody went from not being watched on youtube, to not being watched on peertube.

How did this even make it to the front page?
> Combine that with the fact that access corruption is rampant in Western societies - and the way to succeed is to take excessive risk, woo gatekeepers, execute, and get lucky.

Can you name one country in the world where it is not true?
UBI can't work - the math doesn't work. The pandemic trillions weren't paid for, and that's not enough for UBI.
I see.

It’s a bit sad that everyone is so hung onto full-auto driving and car subscription models, that no one is trying to make current things more practical.

I’m not even talking about gas cars, is there an EV car that can park itself at charger and charge without human being involved?
Condoms bought time to come up with a treatment for HIV in the same way that masks bought time for us to arrive at vaccines, no?
> So I'm pretty sure it's allowed as we're too big to not have this checked by legal.

You mean your big enough that legal answered "In the unlikely event that an employee knows their rights, we can afford to get sued"?

I second that this is immensely illegal in Germany.
The El Pais has a live cam:

https://elpais.com/videos/2021-09-19/video-la-erupcion-del-v...
talk about a hard-to-take-seriously, unhelful comment, at the top no less... so reactionary, no suggestions, just complaints... perhaps just a little charity would suggest that the mere framing of a problem helps people further frame solutions, that more than one post just might be warranted for such an encompassing topic.

in any case, rather than obsessing over irrelevant minutiae as the mediopolitical machine has done over the past 2 years to their own substantial benefit, what we should have done is simple: (1) quarantine the elderly with their caregivers (well-supported/-compensated, on a rotating basis), (2) be mindful only of long, close indoor exhaust-sharing (not incidental/public contact), and (3) quarantine when sick. but otherwise, get on with life absent economic ravagement, mass psychosocial injury, increased socioeconomic inequality, and depressed health and welfare. then when the vaccines came, (4) supply (not mandate) them to the vulnerable and the risk-averse.

this is basically what sweden did except for #1, which is where their mortality rates took a big hit. this approach is well supported by the available scientific evidence, unlike most of what we did, but it has no mediopolitical support, which is why it's so woefully under-considered and under-recommended.
Atlas Shrugged. I remember when my kindle got from 49% to 50%, the quote "Life is too short to read a bad book." popped into my mind and I deleted the book.
In terms of LACP in general, not for hw TLS. For HW TLS, the keys and crypto state are NIC specific.
> Your entire post is dripping with an urban elitism

That is kind of ironic, since I am isolated in a deeply blue area in a deeply blue workplace that eschews the local orthodoxy

The difference is that I don't assign an urban or rural divide around this. I've lived in the sticks where first responders were an hour away, in the city, suburbia, and warzones. But, it was never locale only that divided those who wanted weapons vs those that did not. There were other divides there, mainly a cognitive and worldview one.

Many of my friends have had weapons, for both reasons of upbringing, hunting, and also, experience in the combat arms.

However, I would be remiss not to realize some of the underlying reasons for the high crime in the close-enough-to-be-concerned urban blight which made itself into so many rap songs. I am not deluded - there is a vast difference in opportunities, and good/bad influences in varying locations. Due to good fortune, I happened to be in an area that pushed people towards better choices. But, many people I knew did not have that good fortune, and so were more inclined to a different path merely because of that. They were not forced to make a series of bad decisions, but the opportune to become was definitely readily available.

> and does not show any hint that you might consider someone else's point of view.

I consider everyone's views, since, they are up front everyday. For the most part, the Uniparty is split into two dominant factions with subcliques from there on out. I am neither.

I try to balance my perspectives in both the company I keep, and the echo chambers from which I drink. I value what other perspectives bring to the table and how they think about things. While I might not share all of them, and I maintain a measure of independence, I deeply appreciate other worldviews.

> Please do the same.

I do.

> Enjoy that coffee

Oh I definitely shall. That is a bonus!
> Run kTLS workers, RACK / BBR TCP pacers with
domain affinity

TCP BBR is in the FreeBSD upstream now? Cool.
What's "object-oriented" about that code? I'm suspicious of vague labels like "OOP" and "FP", but even some of the Java docs call Java's streams "functional-style".

https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/stream/p...
The distinction is one of granularity.
We test on production traffic. We don't have a testbench.

This is problematic, because sometimes results are not reproducible.

Eg, if I test on the day of a new release of a popular title, we might be serving a lot of it cached from RAM, so that cuts down memory bandwidth requirements and leads to an overly rosy picture of performance. I try to account for this in my testing.
You could add a link to IPFS Lite ("IPFS Lite node with modern UI to support standard use cases of IPFS
") on F-Droid. Seems actively updated, can anone vouch for its quality?

Source: https://gitlab.com/remmer.wilts/ipfs-lite

F-Droid: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/threads.server/
That site has lot of good information on auto repair and I'll be looking around there. One search I did on the site.

site:cartalk.com cx-5 > repair cost

I got some results that relate to the repair question. Thanks. I'll be looking more here to learn what I can.
It's a mantra at this point that polarization has gotten out of control, but one of the biggest effects it seems to have is this reverse-psychology effect

I'm in a big American city, and I remember that until the online kids and snarky liberals started moralizing about mask protocol, there wasn't as much resistance to wearing masks among right-wing crazies.

I remember when there was that controversy about 5G networks interfering with bird migration patterns and meteorology, but as the fringe conspiracy crowd started spinning up crazy theories about how 5G was going to brainwash or sterilize or force-feminize people over the airwaves or whatever it was, most people I knew stopped talking about it, seemed to forget that they had ever thought it concerning. It reminded me of the time people were worried about pollutants causing hormonal changes in indicator species, and then Alex Jones started talking about how "they're turning the frogs gay" and the meaningful version of that discourse vanished too.

I view the same kind of thing as happening here, as well as a lot of other places. It's made me wary of the sport of finding what crazy things my political enemies believe to make fun of them, because it seems like the net effect of this is creating "opposite" erroneous beliefs with no evidence
Stop SMOKING BENEFITS and stop smoking tips
First off, I like this article’s format, presenting a summary of the arguments and discussing each one in a very succinct and effective manner. It is refreshing compared to lengthy articles that just use up space without giving the reader substance.

For me, the third point (unknown long term effects of vaccines) is why I don’t think vaccines should be mandated or coerced by inconveniencing or excluding the unvaccinated from everyday spaces and activities. Ultimately this is a pandemic of the unhealthy or elderly. The IFR for those under 50 is incredibly low, and studies show that 80% of those with severe cases are obese or overweight or otherwise unhealthy. Why is it appropriate to force a medical procedure onto everyone instead of asking these specific populations to stay home and restrict themselves?

Plus if everyone who is young and healthy simply gets COVID, we will have high antibody prevalence and that will reduce transmissions, making it easier for everyone else to re-enter society. This feels so plainly logical to me that I can’t help but view heavier measures as just overreach used to normalize governmental intervention and also ease in otherwise unpopular policies (unemployment stimulus, child tax credit, eviction bans, etc).
This is a neat experiment, kind of making Rust look more like f# or haskel. I admit that Rust can get a little verbose, so I'm happy to see folks taking a fresh perspective towards it.

While I like `^` for marking mutability, other things might not need to be so abstract (`=:` instead of `fn`) or re-purposed, like using `|i|` for loops instead of a Rust closure.