skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Generally medical gridlock hasn’t been a problem, but this is a unique case in that ICU beds are filling up in some regions leading to _entirely preventable_ illness and death that is unrelated to covid.

Once that stops happening, I will care significantly less. But if I have the risk of not having an ICU bed if I get into a car crash because people aren’t getting vaccinated, that’s an unacceptable social outcome to me.

My personal take is that insurance should progressively cover less of covid treatment of unvaccinated (by choice- minors and immunocompromised being excluded from this policy) patients until it is having a minimal impact on our healthcare system. If people don’t want to get the vax, that’s fine, but I’m not pooling for your medical bills.

Sure, it could be played into a “forever war” by reducing hospital/ICU capacity, but I don’t really see a benefit to doing that.
> Trying to manipulate populations into a desired behavior by lying to them is, as you point out, counterproductive in the long run.

Manipulating populations is what governments do. Subsidizing milk prices, fining people who litter, inspecting the electrical work in new houses, those are all "trying to manipulate populations into a desired behavior".

As for the "lying" part, I don't see it. What I assume that the antivax side wants is some sort of rule like, "If you get a test showing some level of antibodies, you can be exempt from vaccine mandates" policy. That might be sound policy or it might not, I dunno, but "the government isn't implementing my preferred policy" is very different from "the government is lying".
They took right to choose for myself from me for my own good! Like Abortion, Apple genius telling me I should buy new device because replacing battery will cost the same, or Tesla charging $15K for broken battery cooling pipe, is that what you are saying?

>VRM configuration

New CPUs have same TDP.

>memory trace topology

worked fine with previous CPUs at speed X

>and PCB layers

see above

>> The average AMD 400 Series motherboard has key technical advantages over the average AMD 300 Series motherboard

funny you say that, AMD didnt think so before the backlash https://www.itworldcanada.com/article/amd-zen-3-processors-w...

AMD Zen CPUs are full S0Cs nowadays. What they call "chipset" is just a PCIE connected Northbridge. Everything important is integrated inside CPU. pcie, ram, usb 3.0, sata, HD Audio, even RTC/SPI/I2C/SMBus and LPC are on die. You can make perfectly functional system with just an AMD CPU alone.

How about AMD Smart Access Memory totally requiring 500-series chipset despite being just a fancy marketing name for standard PCI Express Resizable BAR support? Already shipping disabled for 2 prior generations before being announced as 5000 exclusive. Oh, enough uproar and even that crumbles a little bit https://www.extremetech.com/computing/320548-amd-will-suppor... but still linked to "chipsed" while implemented entirely inside CPU.

Or that time x470 was going to support PCIE 4, but then it was made x570 exclusive. Despite the fact "chipset" doesnt even touch the lines between CPU and slots.

oh, but but the bios size limit, we cant support all the CPUs on same motherboard (like they did in Socket A days) ... in a 16MB bios chip? please.
The plugging your ears approach really is preferable, all things considered.
Prototype?
As much as I dislike smoking or obesity, those aren't the main causes of climate change. If we eliminated both of those entirely, today, we'd still have a crisis.

That being said, I'll absolutely agree with the sentiment that "humans will always be human". We're not going to collectively try to fix this until it's too late. That's the saddest part.
not just lying to reporters, but lying under a fake identity and then trying to deny it halfway through. Why would he use a fake identity and then try to cover it up, if he was doing nothing wrong and just going about his business as usual?
Another important thing to ask is the risk of myocarditis due to covid, vs the risk of myocarditis due to the vaccine.
Looking past the eccentricities, he's clearly a nuanced thinker with regard to humanity and human values. This is easy to tell by examining both his viewpoint that the media is being shallow, and that one can't really know this person (Holmes). Protecting those he's closest to, as well.

Watch this guy, he will bare his teeth more often after this event of exposure. He is going to protect her blindspot (frankly: morality in general) with his deepening-fractal viewpoint on right and wrong.
There's vimflowy [1] which which you can try out for yourself using the developers hosting [2] and then if you wish to host if yourself you can using docker [3] . There's also an option to point the developer hosted version at firebase [4] .

[1] https://github.com/WuTheFWasThat/vimflowy
[2] https://www.wuthejeff.com/vimflowy/#
[3] https://hub.docker.com/r/vimflowy/vimflowy/
[4] https://github.com/WuTheFWasThat/vimflowy/blob/master/docs/s...
I suspect the "influencers" and the "productivity gurus" you two are talking about are the same people. A guru is a type of teacher -- the really productive people don't have time to teach anyone other than, at best, their successors.
What exactly is "the" "right" climate?
Young people are also exposed to immense echo chambers that operate as runaway feedback loops, which manipulate their emotions, political views, and so on. This leads to extreme perspectives that are detached from reality. These two paragraphs from the article demonstrate this:

> Positive feelings such as optimism were reported least among the respondents, researchers said. In fact, 77% said that they considered the future to be frightening, and 56% agreed with the viewpoint that humanity is doomed, according to the study.

> For many young people, those feelings of fear and worry affect their ability to function, too, results showed. More than 45% of the respondents said the way they feel about climate change adversely affects their day-to-day lives.

As a UW Professor of Atmospheric Science said (https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2019/08/is-global-warming-exi...), climate change is a problem but not an existential threat. Yet young people seem to think that humanity is doomed. That Professor faced much critique for holding such a balanced and nuanced view, and activists have tried to get him fired. Such aggressive attempts at narrative control, in institutions and social media, leads to extreme views among the young.
Are you sure they weren't there reporting on the jury selection? A bunch of reporters lining up to be juries on the trial while writing articles on it? That doesn't make any sense.
And because they have failed, they will probably handle it poorly with lockdowns. Will the young will be for or against that?
> Average New York City metropolitan area house prices are up 706% since 1980 (or 376% more than US consumer prices, and 326% more than US wages).

Are they just subtracting here? Because that's not how percentages should work.
I don't think the reporters were going to be jurors. I read the article again and it doesn't say that, as far as I can tell.
I sign a contract to import widgets, but they have not been delivered yet. Congress imposes a new widget tariff. Should I be able to import my widgets without paying the tariff?
I have nothing bad to say against the researchers, as I said was likely, and as I ascertained to be the case after that and you commented on, it's just shoddy journalism. RPi is not the interesting part (at a stretch, a proxy for low powered compute?), 'Indian' is not the interesting part (but I can excuse that more readily as similar to 'XYZ university ...') and 'monitor health' is uselessly vague.

(The title could apply to a calorie counting app, running (arbitrarily) on a raspberry pi, for example.)

This valid contribution is dealt disservice with this title, and 'I (OJFord)' commented on that, 'giving', I hope, the suggestion that it might be better.
Drinking milk and consuming various dairy products (kefir, yogurt, cheese, etc.) are strongly associated with "steppe people" which were seen as barbaric (sometimes rightly so), so this perhaps explains some of the points in this post.

I was curious about milk and cheese consumption in Ancient Greece and found the following in the Everyday Life of Greeks and Romans (https://www.google.com/books/edition/Everyday_Life_of_the_Gr...) about Greek desserts:

"Piquant dishes, stimulating the guests to dining, were chosen in preference; amongst cheeses, those from Sicily and from the town of Tromileia in Achaia [in Southern Thessaly http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0064:id=achaia-geo] were particularly liked; cakes sprinkled with salt (epipasta) were another important feature of the Greek dessert" p. 266
>moving somewhere super rural

Why do you think you have to move somewhere super rural? I'm in the suburbs of a major city and decent sized 3 bedroom houses start at ~$200k.
So you understood the sentiment clearly but missed how those were analogies? Weird audience
> Over 100 million Americans have superior antibodies from past covid.

Then they should get antibody tests, and if their level of antibodies is high enough, we should let them do all the same things that vaccinated people can do.

But that's not what I hear. I just hear people ignorantly claiming they are immune because they got COVID (some even never confirmed, just they "think" they had it), without any idea as to what kind of antibodies they have in their blood. While some of them probably are just as immune as vaccinated people, I expect that a significant number of them (especially those who caught COVID earlier in the pandemic) don't have a level of immunity approaching that of a vaccinated individual. So... go get antibody tests, and lobby health authorities to recognize post-infection immunity as valid, assuming it's been tested by a lab.
Love the concept! Will absolutely be checking this out.
What makes you think any of those beliefs are detached from reality?
I'm glad! Look at all this discussion.
His point is more that humans can’t easily change, even if they know the solution.
"A growing portion of my audience was clearly fed up with “productivity,” and they are not alone."
It probably adds some load, but it's a predictable amount spread out across decades, not a giant clump right now. It will consume more healthcare resources, but it's not going to overload the healthcare system and prevent other people from using it.
The raspberry pi will be a very capable CPU for a medical monitoring. The issue is the sensor and the power unit. Isolation is very important and the sensor reading needs to be correct.
This would be a fantastic start: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/sloan-school-of-management/15-s1...
Those perspectives can be said to be extreme, but I’m not seeing you make a case that they are “detached from reality.”
NPR isn’t the source of our anxiety, it’s people that don’t listen or take this seriously that do, like you actually. If you’re not actively trying to fix this, then you are part of the problem.
What makes young people more exposed to echo chambers (and why more immense?) than older adults? Younger people seem to me to be more likely to be exposed to more new people, more new ideas, and more diversity of opinions than adults.
Atheist without kids so I'll live. No skin in the game.

But I was somewhat shocked when I saw people taking their family to see formula 1 cars drive laps in a national park.
When you're not even willing to give up little things like motorsports or plastic straws this planet is about to be recycled.
Parshant Loungani
There are two parts to this. Who decides how much money what you made is worth, which is the market (and what I was referring to), and how much % of that the government takes.
40 million REPORTED COVID infections... Two family members had positive tests REPORTED (they got tested). Three others got symptoms (it WAS COVID) while quarantining but never got tested (therefore never got REPORTED). Only 40% (of those in this household) got REPORTED.
It’s news when we onlookers are weighing up the defendant’s argument that they weren’t trying to do fraud but were instead caught up in an abusive relationship by her boyfriend at the time who was the real fraudster. Having the father of your current boyfriend do more fraud schenanigans on your behalf undermines that defense for me.
Studebaker Dictator
I'm sure people are frustrated, but I wonder what the consensus, if you could fine one, would be.

What exactly are they expecting governments to change? Policy, power generation, transportation, what? And will they accept the necessary or resultant policies and changes?

The above are "easy" if you have a totalitarian regime where what the autocrats say go, goes: China, Saudi Arabia, etc., most other countries are more democratic and it takes time for change to happen.
> God grant me the serenity

> to accept the things I cannot change;

> courage to change the things I can;

> and wisdom to know the difference.

Civilisation as we know it, and perhaps even humanity is in the process of ending. The ending is inevitable, whether it is now or nearer to the heat death of the universe.

If you can personally try and affect change, then you should do it. But more likely, you are a slave to the same system that everyone else is. I'd recommend working on acceptance at this point.
Obesity isn't the main cause, but it is a growing contributor to climate change.
Even if we accept this reasoning (It’s not clear to me that the myocarditis cases are more than ‘call your doc, rest up and take ibuprofen’, and I believe that applies to cases among non-hospitalized COVID patients too), but the last I saw the effective reproduction rate for COVID was >1, so every otherwise healthy kid who gets a ‘head cold’ is also going to pass it on to someone else, right?
Defining "the one single right climate" is hard.

Defining "this change is bad" is substantially easier.

Wet bulb temperatures of 35 degrees C in areas with billions of people and poor power infrastructure to run AC is bad, for example.
They’re talking about corporate profits being funneled to already wealthy shareholders instead of the people responsible for generating the profits.
It's the thing that will most predictably change everything. Anxiety is anticipation with a negative outlook. Living under a power structure that's so inefficacious, and a culture that's so in denial, I think the kids would be crazy to be anything but - not only anxious - but more anxious than the rest of us are.
According to many proponents of CRT or wokeness, absolutely he becomes white. People from typically non-white ethnicities are routinely accused of being white if they adopt cultural traits associated with white people.

And it’s entirely possible that if he was adopted at a young enough age, whatever this AI is detecting would read him as white too, assuming his habits and diet affected his development, as they might.

Indeed that would be consistent with your claim that there is nothing genetic about race.
It's not only not a terrible policy position, natural immunity will turn out in the end to be the ONLY effective thing which gets us to to herd immunity.

At this point I don't understand why this isn't obvious.

You make a targeted vaccine, in this case it will be evaded. We see it right now. That will continue. Natural immunity will cast a wider net and be proven much more effective.
Theranos was not a Silicon Valley darling. I don't think there were any big SV venture funds involved. It was people like Ruport Murdoch, Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, and James Mattis investing and sitting on the board.
Modern MIDI controllers are quite flexible in that regard. Stuff like

https://roli.com/products/blocks/seaboard-block-studio-editi...
https://artiphon.com/pages/instrument1

are designed such that you can easily assign fine-grained inputs on the controller to whatever software parameter you like. Traditional modular required you build a lot of things you'd expect from a physical instrument incrementally, and there's some interesting music that comes from that alone, but it's a real joy to have something you can use to construct, say, lifelike vibrato that responds to multidimensional inputs, without a shitton of work.

much more cost-effective too. you can use a single $300 controller and software to make the same shit that'd require several discrete multi-grand dollar setups if fully implemented in hardware
Only some people fall into the “both sides” trap and start thinking that cynicism is a virtue. It’s unfortunate, as this behavior encourages the very outcome to which you object. It’s much easier to take advantage of people who have given up.
Boomers ruined this world so they can retire…no they won’t even retire.
Indeed why are young people nervous? it's only skyrocketing property prices, gig economy, obliteration of property rights by software, financialization of the economy and ecological collapse. Nothing to be worried about
Right. Also a lower chance of hospitalization and death, therefore preventing hospitals from clogging up.
The 60$ price point as a solid, immovable object appeared during the PS2 era. Everyone was on cheap discs, and it sort of happened.
Ryzen 3100 can do the same, at the same price point, and was released 5 months earlier than 10100F.

Good for Intel for finally catching up?
Looks like just a pretty standard WP frontend. Not really much of value.
I don't know if any of the failed vaccines had antibody dependent enhancement issues but even if not it is a failure of medical ethics to not disclose the risk sufficiently since it was a risk for trial participants. This paper is not expressing concern over approved vaccines.
You just have to kind of laugh at this.. people willing to be this sociopathic for possible minimal gain. Like their risk/reward is completely off-balance because the risk can always be mitigated by having a lot of money.

Reward: some reporters fall for your everyman spiel and manner and write a nicer article about Holmes

Risk: you're found out and... nothing. nothing happens to you because you're rich and its not like your career is in jeopardy.

I guess when you're super rich you never have any consequences to doing stuff like this so why not try it? Worse that can happen is you get an article written about you.
An interesting reference point for exactly when dictators became socially unacceptable in the US (1937)
We all used Unix before we wrote the book -- that's how we knew it sucked, and how to hate it properly.
What are you talking about? Those two things have nothing to do with each other (and this is actually the second time I’ve noticed you dogwhistling).
You keep claiming that 100M+ people in the US already have "superior" antibodies from a past infection, but you've provided no evidence of this.

Just because someone suffered an infection, it doesn't mean they're now naturally immune. That immunity might have worn off, or their illness may not have been severe enough to provoke an immune response that confers as much protection as one of the vaccines do.

I would love to read a study that shows natural, extended immunity in everyone (or even just many or most people) who has been previously infected, but I don't think that study exists, and it's telling that you haven't linked to one.
UV1 Vaccine Plus Pembrolizumab Shows Strong Safety in Metastatic Melanoma
The story of Elizabeth Holmes is obviously more than just whether she will be found guilty or innocent. The story involves the web of connections that allowed her to achieve the dubious things she achieved and wealthy supporters are clearly relevant to that.

Of course, the existence of some powerful supporters conceivably could have an impact on her trial too, even if the simple that his guy showing up by itself probably won't.
Thanks for sharing your viewpoint. The Kondratiev wave theory is interesting, but I don't think that's what the global leadership has their eye on. You also seem a bit tied up in the current crypto mania. I think there's a significant risk that Bitcoin and other decentralized crypto will be simply outlawed due to environmental concerns and the loss of control and enforcement they represent, but who knows. On that note, I rather agree that we have a reckoning coming, but think it will be climate and sustainability related. Money (and debt) is just an abstraction after all. The thing it stands in for largely comes down to energy, which is significantly at risk. I do think there's a growing sense that collectivist societies will cope much better with the environmental consequences of the past 250 years of industrial exponential growth. Like nearly every natural phenomenon, what looks exponential is often an s-curve. Hitting a growth plateau or (or even decline) after several hundred years of growth is bound to be painful. Truly no one knows when the bill will come due, but there is a building sense that it will be within this century. That is the thing global leaders are thinking when they say things like "Great Reset."

If the pandemic taught me anything though, it's that people are incredibly resilient and adaptable. Whatever comes, we will collectively figure it out. Might as well sleep easy.
Ethereum burns $1B of value in 40 days since EIP-1559
Not true. Calories are not created equally in terms of environmental impact.
But I do think it’s quite possible that Pence would have been killed. Or that we would have a (however minor) constitutional crisis if congress certified an election contrary to the states under duress
Perhaps not hard to live on, but it's easy to see how the state taxes away any chance you have to build any semblance of wealth due to the insane cost of living in the Bay.

Basic 1 bedroom apartment rent, at least 45min commute or less to Menlo Park/Palo Alto - $4000/mo

CalTrain/BART/car insurance/bus/Uber - $1000/mo (this is conservative, since car insurance costs more in the Bay since the DA won't enforce anti-theft laws)

Groceries - $400/mo

Utilities and phone bill - $400/mo

Health insurance - $300/mo

Miscellaneous other expenses (e.g. soap, toilet paper, etc.) - $500/mo

CA tax bracket for the 57k-295k income range is 9.3%, so your average rate for that 250k is going to be pretty close to 9%. Your effective federal rate under the new tax plan being discussed in Congress right now is going to come in the mid 30's - let's say 32% to be conservative. Social Security adds 6.2%, Medicare another 1.45% under current rates. CA SDI is another 1%. Total effective rate: 49.65%. Post-tax earnings: $125,875 out of $250,000.

What about your expenses? Well, if you do the math, the above comes out to $79,200/year. You now have $46,000/year to save towards a house... which oh by the way, costs $1.5M at present day for a shack in Fremont. Oh, and forget about having kids too.

Yes, you aren't starving, but considering you're making $250k it's kind of egregious that you aren't able to purchase a run-down house in 30 years from your income. The problem is twofold: the state taxes away half your income so you can't build wealth, and NIMBYs opposing the development of new housing suck away the rest of your income.

And before you say we should be focusing on actual poor people first: perhaps consider that the state clearly has the resources for both?