skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe it should be - though I've not done it myself. One example I found was https://dev.to/stack-labs/securing-access-to-aws-iam-roles-f....

In addition, you can just assign IAM roles to the runner EC2 instances themselves, placing ALL of the authentication and authorization in AWS rather than in GitLab. Then the runner will only be able to access the things that you allow through its IAM policy.
The distubuted deeplearning framework OneFlow v0.5.0RC just came out
When was this? Based on https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2005/06/28Apple-Takes-Podcast..., it looks like Apple added podcast support to iTunes in 2005. The iPhone wasn’t released until 2007 and the App Store didn’t exist until 2008.
> See that's the bubble ;) If you work at a company who makes archival, language-detection and ocr you will see C/C++ Haskell and OCaml..well and perl in no time.

I think your scenario sounds a lot more like a bubble. It's certainly my experience that very few people have encountered Haskell whether in a university setting or a professional setting. Yes, there are some niches where Haskell is "not rare" (especially the programming language theory corner of computer science departments), but in general I think it's quite rare.
There is no way to have a fair App Store where the organization approving your app is the same organization creating apps to compete with you.

This is a fundamental, existential problem with the App Store model.

You can't compete with Apple; they simply will not let you.
A very entertaining video about the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy5xLVx2NGY
Tracking [0] is frequently used by skydivers after close freefall formation manoeuvring ('relative work') to increase their horizontal separation before deploying their canopies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracking_(skydiving)
Everyone loves high taxes until it's them being taxed.
The Vigilante Group of New Yorkers Who Hunt Rats at Night 2018
Not so - the recent Israeli data is mostly about people catching covid classic and being protected against delta. Natural seems to cope with variants better, probably because it exposed you to the whole virus, not just the spike protein.
Why Are So Many Young Men Giving Up on College?
Yep, images last touched in 2016: https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/blob/main/public/book/en/...
Wave: Building a Cashless Africa
Globally, climate change drives a willingness to change lifestyles
Tell HN: Are you sure you understand 'indemnity'
Just wanted to give the kind souls of HN a heads-up since remote work is becoming more popular. It's worth checking your contract for clauses about "hold liable" and "indemnify".

I had foolishly assumed I understood "indemnify" to mean "you can't seek money from us if we damage you" whereas it actually means "we will sue you into the ground if we feel like it".

Since international remote work often involves operating as a contractor for the company in question they might give you a generic contractor contract where you are assumed to have Liability/Errors & Omissions insurance but if you're working for a single company you may not.
> Simply remove the auth header and you are root. remotely. on all machines. Is this really 2021?

Is that accurate? Is this some kind of joke?
I hope a large company comes and helps him out with this case. It will affect many companies.
At least they're trying. The status quo isn't working. If you have a better suggestion, I'm sure they'd love to hear it.
Do you know, whether anyone of the approaches (yours or one of that you mention in the links) has had any kind of practical success, or maybe has been adopted by some community?
I mean, it's nice to generalize, but did it help anyone yet? like practically (e. g., did epidemiologists or biologists or math. modellers adopted any of the approaches?)
This article is about previous infection.

Is there data comparing previous infection to vaccine in terms of contagious properties listed above?
Raycast is good too.
Scaling technology to close healthcare’s tech equity gap
The same can be said on “old” propaganda.
I feel like it's missing the whole question of what to do if you'll be hitting water instead of dirt, trees or snow. I've heard speculation that you could improve your odds of surviving by e.g. throwing down a pair of keys or similar to break the surface tension right before you hit the water, but I'd like to see that investigated further.

Also, no matter the landing zone, it seems like you should try to minimize your landing speed by maximizing drag until the last moment, then switch to a position from which to execute a five-point-landing (or going through the water surface with feet first) - I'd be interested in strategies for how to successfully execute that.
So why has there never been a horde of torches and pitchforks outside Castle Xbox, PlayStation and Nintendo yet?

And don’t squeeze out that “cOnSoLeS aReNt cOmPuTeRs” bullshit. They’re closer to computers than a goddamn wristwatch.
The rejection was because Apple never allowed keyboard apps on the watch. The idea of bringing a full keyboard to the watch isn't exactly the groundbreaking innovation many people here are acting like it is. Do people really think Apple stole the idea from this guy?
> good incentive for:
> - people who excel at business to stay.

I use to believe what you're saying. In fact I often quoted very similar lines in arguments.

The more I've made, the higher up I've moved, the more senior executives I've worked closely with, the less I believe it though. Most "Sr. Execs" have just put in time, had some luck & networked well.

Higher salaries are rarely the incentive to become amazing at something. If you become amazing at something, usually you just love that type of work. Money as an incentive, for anyone who is living comfortably, has shown time & time again to not be a great incentive. Many people now are preferring remote work over higher salaries. Time > Money.

In middle & upper class incomes, the only thing I've seen higher salaries encourage are fast track MBAs and butt kissing.

Those in the upper income have done very well by encouraging favorable tax laws on themselves. They donate to politicians. They receive favorable tax breaks through real estate, capital gains, avoiding FICA tax of 15.3%, business deductions, low interest loans, etc. If you donate & network enough, you can also get some nice business contracts from the government.

> good incentive for:
> - lazy people to work instead of relying on welfare.

Welfare is not for the lazy. It's for the burdened & hopeless. It's also to keep people well off enough to work but not go around stealing & attacking people out of hunger. It's like trying to dig out of a hole with a shovel while wealthy people are driving tractors & digging your hole deeper. Cheap labor is what makes wealthy people wealthy. A CEO can hire cheap labor, the govt will tax them "FICA" & income tax. The CEO will take their money in stock, so no "earned income" & no "FICA". If they do take an income, FICA is only on a small portion of their salary. The CEO can also get almost interest free loans on that stock, so no need to even sell stock & pay any tax.
The documentation says master: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-init#Documentation/git-init.txt... but "may be subject to change"

When running "git init" on a fresh install, you also get a hint that the branch name may change. So I think they are still working on changing it to main upstream: https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.762.git.1605221038.gitgitga...
Best to store it in GNU Info format.

https://xkcd.com/912/
>But I really don't like the idea that all (most?) DApps are based on Ethereum and require huge amounts of Gas to run. Can't we have DApps without Blockchain/Ethereum?

Previous generation dapps were mostly on Ethereum because it was the only real solution available. But the ecosystem is maturing, there are chains that consume so little gas it's effectively a negligible cost, and more and more dapps are making use of them. Not to mention that Eth 2.0 is coming soon™.
It’s not a revision trouble, is a codec trouble. You can have Bluetooth 8.2 but if Apple headphones and devices support only AAC256, there’s nothing much to do…
Lack of negative unit or integration tests.
> One of the problems is moon dust. There's a lot of it. If you build a big parabolic dish on the moon, you'll need some way to either remove dust or prevent it from accumulating in the first place.

Moon doesn't have atmosphere, so once you've built the dish and cleaned it, it should stay clean unless a meteorite strikes nearby.
Don't miss Episode IV, where the Privateers do the AMOS Run in just one parsec and destroy the War Link in the grand finale – epic!
Back in the day when the Linux kernel was first written there was a huge argument between Linus and Andrew Tanenbaum about whether or not the micro or macro kernel road was the superior one.

Tanenbaum argued that a microkernel was lighter, and could switch context faster than a macrokernel (the likes of which UNIX was typically reincarnated with). Linus argued that throughput, not latency is what matters to end users. At that time your typical OS switched tasks 18.5 times per second and Linux did substantially better than that. Case closed, the throughput argument won.

But now, many years later the consequences of that mean that we are switching contexts orders of magnitude slower than we could have because the context contains a lot more information than it strictly speaking has to. My own QnX clone switched 10K / second on a 486/33, and yes, the IPC mechanism meant that throughput suffered but for real time applications with a lot of the hard stuff in userspace context switches are far more important than throughput (and incidentally, also for perceived responsiveness of the OS and apps).

The latency numbers are excellent from the perspective of very forgiving applications, a typical DAW runs with 1K or even larger sample buffers which is acceptable, but for many real time applications that is an eternity and so those are not typically built using Linux as the core but some dedicated RTOS.

edit: I had 100K / second before, this was in error. It's been 30 years ;)
I agree with this sentiment; I suspect these companies want to look proactive to fend off government regulation.
Modern mov files are just mp4 containers.
Adjusting inflation pressure is a feature. I run my tires higher than the vehicle recommendation but still below the sidewall limit for improved fuel economy. Airing down for sand is a thing too.
Computably countable is also a correct term. In line with this approach to computability theory: http://math.andrej.com/asset/data/synthetic-slides.pdf

It shows that the unsolvability of the halting problem follows from:

- The computable uncountability of N^N, which can be proved using an identical argument to the one Cantor used to prove the set-theoretic uncountability of N^N.

- The computable countability of the partial maps from N to N.

If the halting problem were solvable, then the second bullet point would contradict the first. So it's essentially a weird twist on set theory that uses constructive logic.
Given a constant shape and density, terminal velocity goes up proportionally to the square root of the length of the object. Unless the object your grabbing is noticeably less dense than you are, which I'd guess wouldn't be true for the seat row, you're better off separated.
You want something that will act as a crumple zone and slow your final crash. So seats would be better than a wide sheet of iron of the same mass. At the last moment (and not before) stand on the seat and follow the roll the crash up your body advice.
Folding Keyboard for Your Needs
Is it just me or is Xcode one of the worst IDEs going? I mostly use AppCode, but will begrudgingly jump into Xcode to adjust schemes, debug memory leaks, add image assets, etc. But it is a truly awful piece of software. It seems that with every year, Apple fails to improve Xcode in any meaningful way.
I have Kevlar reinforced tires on my ebike. It's expensive.
I'd agree with you 100% conceptually, if not for the fact I've been personally left to improve the security on every phone and computer I've been offered by the market since my birth.
This assumes that the us has an unlimited ability to monetize its debt. If this is not true than there could be a hard landing for federal borrowing. This was briefly tested in the 1970s when the carter administration issued debt in foreign currency.

The fed could find itself in the position of fighting a structural imbalance such that for every dollar lent to the government the deficit increases by 1.X dollars. This would be the case under rampant corruption, rampant inflation, or an economy collapsing.
Thanks, that's an interesting tool.

But geezus, it's daunting to address SSH weaknesses unless you know ssh and it's configuration top to bottom. I don't! And I am not afraid to admit it. I just use ssh "as-is" on mainstream platforms, for example, whatever Amazon gives me on lightsail linux images or windows-10 or whatever's on my Mac and hope for the best.

I mean, there's 4 different groups of algorithms to think about: "Key Exchange", "Server Host Key", "Encryption" and "MAC". Each with a bunch of choices, all different, all consisting of mouthfuls of impossible to remember complicated names.

The sshcheck tool indicates that one of these is "insecure" because it may be "broken by nation states". What does that _really_ mean for a business or individual? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There are others which are labeled as "weak" so what does that mean? That it might someday be broken by nation-states?

I think it's still useful, however. Why wouldn't you want to have the most secure ssh connections if it's just a matter of configuration?

Ultimately, someone who uses the report from sshcheck has to decide whether it's worth it to google around, spend a solid 30 minutes or so, and figure out how to change their "out-of-the-box" ssh config to get a fully secure report from sshcheck.
I'm with you, I also found Turing's argument that his machine model captures all of computation very convincing and pointed that out in another thread.

However, for this argument to work, we need to accept both that all computation is captured by Turing machines, and also that what Turing machines do is in fact computable. In essence, Turing machine <=> realizable machine. Maybe some people are more impressed by one, others more by the other direction of that double implication.
Just because a corporation have loads of money doesn't mean they will not lowball offers.
Turing Oversold
It depends on who you ask! If you ask the mugger, he will likely say that you did have a choice.
Is there a reason they don't just have more bathrooms? A 5 minute walk to the bathroom seems further than you would walk in any mall.
As a Rubyist who only uses Python casually, it's neat to learn this difference! You can write very similar code in Ruby but such default objects appear to be created fresh on initialization avoiding the problem.
This might sound very naive but there is a huge worker shortage out there, so if working in an Amazon warehouse is so bad why do people do it?
Good summary. It left out the benefits of always wearing a Mjolnir Mark VI power armor with an active microfusion core; the hydrostatic gel layer and surface-range energy shielding can protect the wearer from phenomenal kinetic impacts, while the armor-lock system guards the joints and other sensitive anatomic structure from contusion or rupture. Plus, the built-in transponder will minimize the time for emergency first-response / evac forces to locate the crash site and assist in resuscitation and vertical recalibration (always oddly necessary in those suits; I don't know why they don't just put some glue on that vertical toggle switch to keep it from flipping so often).

Don't leave home without it.
I honestly could not tell you, but that's a 'whataboutism' argument, we are not talking about Xbox, PlayStation or Nintendo here. But to the extent that they determine what can and can not be shipped on their platform they are - to me - just as much a walled garden.
Do you mean exercise of options and sales of shares? Because otherwise this strategy is only available to the business owner(s). Thx, tax strategy newbie.
They do, but there's a limit to how much recursive embedding the average reader can cope with, especially if the writer embeds a lot of modifying clauses in the middle of the main clause so the reader is left waiting for information they need to make sense of the sentence as a whole.
It’s not totally flat. Flat where appropriate. Documents should be flat. Shadows are for things that appear on top of other things. There’s a message on the left that says, “Hi there! Can I share a cool thing I’m working on with you?” This has a shadow, because it appears on top of the document.
One does not give money one doesn't have.

For many people, 100% of the available properties in that estate agent's window are too expensive, not just the 12 bedroom places. These people will probably never be able to buy anywhere useful, and they are not renting the places in the window either. They rely on a less formally advertised market of lower price rentals.

Then there are the people for whom a maxed out mortgage would only just cover the bottom rung prices if they could get such a mortgage, but they can't so they have to rent, perversely at a monthly price higher than the mortgage would be. They don't gain equity for their payments, which harms their financial and housing security later in life, and limits their access to other credit. They don't know what they will do at retirement when they can no longer afford the rent, which is currently 50% of their income.

Then there are a few people who can afford the not-bottom prices. These people mostly already have a home, and are a minority.

For the first two groups, renting is their only option, and renting in some countries sucks for many reasons. Insecurity, no location stability (random evictions are common and new options limited), no equity, regular home inspections, often not even allowed to decorate, no home improvements (solar, windows, kitchen etc).
"especially in the Anglosphere".

Just like the Wright brothers. And on and on and on. It pays off if you control culture.
Well, you would be wrong. Because this AI predicts self-reported race, not ancestry.

Think about what this means People who have, say, three black great-grandparents and five white ones, will vary widely in how black they look, and this likely affects how they identify. But there are also invisible markers of ancestry - of the sort you would expect maybe were visible only on an X-ray if you looked carefully. Those could easily break the other way. You could easily get someone who looked white (and thus, probably identified as white), but were "black on the inside", in terms of their less visible characteristics.

Yet the algorithm sees through all that, and manages to see what you feel like? Correctly classifying Shaun King as black and Tom Jones as white? From a 8x8 X-ray picture?

The people who insist that "race is real" should be the most confused by these results, since we know how fuzzily identity is coupled with ancestry, especially in the main groups studied here, black and white Americans.

I'm much more prepared to believe, for instance, that there is something catastrophically bad going on in medical image dataset collection, than I am that self-ID race is nebulously predictable from almost nothing.
Larger discussion:

Is this what being a hacker is now?

Knowing your project is going to get stomped out with uncompetitive practices from day 1,

still doing and carrying it all the the way through to court with a big player?
Oh god, I hoped you were kidding. But you were not ...
Ok, let us talk about it.

1. how do you calculate that profit?

1.a. given that you could do it by yourself, why do we work for a company instead of running a business ourselves? are you sure you are not missing some variables there?

2. does the employer have any additional risk? In my country, for example, firing a person is quite a bit of money. This is effectively an insurance to pay for the worker, besides the taxes they already pay (a penalty for the economic activity, basically, or, as I think of it: a theft)

3. do I do work for my employer forced by them or I chose to work there because it is my best alternative without coactively forcing someone to do something they do not want? Of course we always want higher salaries. But taxes do not work like this: in taxing systems you do not have a choice to pay or not to pay, you pay and that's all the story. You also have no word on where your money goes or any control over it. The people who manage it do not pay penalties for mismanaging it. In private companies I can assure you this is much more sensitive and you are much more careful with what you do than in public instances.

Please, let us keep the conversation rational. I would like you to discuss this topic rationally. Because I would really like to understand it.

P.S.: noone explained me yet why taxes are not theft. For me they are, I said, because they are coactively putting penalties on something you produce. Coactively, not even by mutual contract as in the case you mention from the employer. Of course we want more from the employer and the employer more of us, but, at the end, this is a mutual contract, not a do it or I put you in jail.
5) diverse

...and then you've got something.

I'm actually surprised that I've never seen a tire with some kind of closed-cell super lightweight foam, some kind of aerogel maybe. I suppose the problem in that case is that you can't spread heat throughout the whole interior.

Which makes me wonder, how do they radiate heat on this Michelin? Does it stick around the outer surface and that's it? Do the 'spokes' bear it away somehow?
For reference[1].

Apple also managed to cause lasting damage to HTC as a brand when they ventured into the US. I don't HTC ever recovered from that, although it might not have been the only problem they had.

[1] https://morningconsult.com/opinions/apple-v-samsung-scotus-s...
OMG I LOVE MUDKIPS (UNF UNF UNF)
Yes, but the GP was talking about drag, so I responded to that.
s3fs[1] to avoid the complexity in the first place.

More discussion on Stackoverflow:

- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941

- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9158294

[1]: https://pypi.org/project/s3fs/
In summary few things you can do to increase the odds of surviving.

I can't help but feeling panic and hopeless if I were in that situation because THERE'S NO UNDO BUTTON / CANT SAVE-AND-RELOAD, you have to do it right at first attempt! Can slide to forest? Whoops I just missed it.
I think they aren't allowed to use the tracking cookies before you've given permission.
FWIW, the IANA media type registry [1] lists "File extension(s)" under "Additional information" for some of the media types, so it may make sense to speak of filename extensions associated with registered media types. Though given the initial odd wording, it could be anything.

Edit: as for what's actually used, looks like [2] it's the ruby mime-types gem [3], which is based on both IANA registry and various other recommendations [4], AIUI.

[1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xht...

[2] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/65954/...

[3] https://rubygems.org/gems/mime-types

[4] https://github.com/mime-types/mime-types-data
Ah, that's interesting - and that would have to be a very strong "good luck with that" case.

My S105G is a carrier device (Telstra), but as you say they're moving to not lock them down anymore which is a lot nicer experience.
And unlike Dark Sky there is no iPad version of the native weather app.