skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
CUDA-streams probably already use io_uring under the hood.

The issue is that a CUDA-stream based execution kernel will spend lots of time pulling from the queue and spinning up threads (sound like a familiar problem?).

Instead: you sidestep this issue with persistent kernels: you launch exactly the number of kernels that matches your GPU-size, and then pass data to those kernels through an alternative means.

-------

The future of I/O is going to be atomic-operations across PCIe with stronger-and-stronger coherency models. PCIe 3.0 introduced atomic-PCIe commands. PCIe 4.0 strengthened them. PCIe 5.0 is rumored to have even stronger coherency rules and "coherent grids" are being seriously discussed / implemented in high-speed computers (see Compute eXpress Link, or CXL)

Any serious I/O (and GPUs will be part of that I/O future), will likely use PCIe atomics in some regards, quite similar to atomic-compare-and-swaps that the CPU does already between their cores.

I/O is becoming indistinguishable from memcpy + atomics.

-------

EDIT: In effect, I'm saying that GPU-programmers are more concerned about GPU-efficiency rather than CPU-efficiency. Sure, the CPU is less efficient spinning on these memory-reads/writes. But the GPU is where the bulk of the calculations are happening. Therefore, it behooves the architect to optimize the GPU (even if the CPU ends up slightly less efficient).

Whatever argument you have about "queues being more efficient in hypothetical architecture", the GPU has more calculations and more cores to feed (aka: far more overhead when it comes to Amdahl's law). That means you want to apply those principles first to the GPU, and then the CPU "makes up for it", so to speak.
My rabbits can do this too. The noteworthy thing to me is that they're very good at discerning which side to pull even when encountering new doors. That is, they seem to understand the relationship to the hinge.
Why did people believe that?
Project managers like the pretty inline previews! Security? Pssh that's just for nerds.
My understanding is (mind you this is from readings years ago) that the cert after the CCNA (i.e. CCNP) are increasingly difficult. Not sure they're particularly useful for employment as a developer, but for Network engineers I imagine so.
nums.iter().take_while(|x| x <= 10)
> Mailchimp began by offering email marketing solutions, and evolved into a global leader in customer engagement and marketing automation fueled by a powerful, cutting-edge AI-driven technology stack.

Why does mail sender (SPAM as a service?) need "AI"?
How to Parse Any Website?
Hey! My name is Daniil Okhlopkov and I'm a parsing expert. I've created a ton of non-robust scripts which helps me to come up with this scalable approach.
There's an entire "gray market" of exploit brokers. NSO group is one of the many players. There's a good chance this is an off-the-shelf exploit.

The podcast Darknet Diaries had an episode about the topic recently: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/98/

(that episode is tied to this book: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1635576059/ about the topic)

Also, I like that podcast in general - highly recommend it if you're into infosec stuff!
There are actions you can take to reduce your negative impact.
For example, you reduce your ecological footprint by reducing or eliminating meat from your diet. In the net it reduces the amount of farmland your existence requires--remember, those animals you eat need to eat things too, and plant -> you is a much more efficient way of converting farmland into sustenance than plant -> animal -> you.
Facebook shouldn't be expected to clean up the messes they create because it's hard?
Wouldn't it work with a newer kernel though, too?
I've even emailed them again to remind them that I have no issue with them hosting and branding the app
Outside of the Facebook issue, can you ever really automate solutions for managing society-scale interactions while still being fair to people?

If you happen to become a similar edge case to a celebrity but actually adding a fix to the problem you also suffer bumps into corporate budgetary restrictions (you’re not worth it but the celebrity is so the solution is to just add them to a no mod whitelist while you suffer), is that fair? What are the social and societal consequences of this?
dragged kicking and screaming into the future (present).

this is all calibrated political games to win/keep GOP voters.
That browser (which can be seen on the page linked by GP) is astounding for its size.

Out of curiosity, what are currently the most minimal, "graphic" (i.e. not Links-like), browsers available today? Any Open Source ones?
I'm skeptical about the methodology here.

The Stack Overflow Developer Survey [0] is my go-to source for this kind of thing, and it has very different results. Of course, it's measuring overall popularity while W3Techs is looking at "server side programming languages for websites."

Here's how the ranks compare:

Language W3Techs Stack Overflow
PHP 1 11
ASP.NET 2 8 (C#)
Ruby 3 17
Java 4 5
Scala 5 26
JavaScript 6 1
static files 7 2 (HTML/CSS)
Python 8 3
Cold Fusion 9 N/A
Perl 10 27
Erlang 11 35
Miva Script 12 N/A

[0] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2021?_ga=2.2362093...
Where did this cockamamie idea originate of using an antiparasitic product for a viral infection?

The National Geographic has a summary here:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-shaky...

Under "What triggered the ivermectin frenzy".

Firefox Reader Mode vanquishes the nag dialog.
Maybe only perspective. In my view, car manufacturers should be competing with other car manufacturers, rather than independently operated dealerships. If a dealership provides a value to consumers then it should survive. If not, then the consumers are better off without them.

At the very least, I would like the option to buy directly, since I probably don't use the services provided by the dealership anyway.
> Only through laywers

Of course they will only talk via lawyers! That's what they have to do to make sure that all communication is clear, documented, and not misinterpreted (by either party). Once the problem escalates to be a legal dispute, this is the only way communication can happen.

And as soon as this escalates to a lawsuit, the existence of the dispute will be public.

>If PEU can hold trademarks, why can't Fundación?

No one is saying that they/you can't hold trademarks. You just can't register ones that would be confusing to the public (which is the purpose of trademarks -- to avoid public confusion). And honestly, even the domain name postgr.es is confusing.

From the PostgreSQL EU website (as linked by you), these are their specific trademarks:

PGConf, PGDay, Postgres Conference, PostgreSQL Conference

These don't seem to be confusing about what the database itself is called, or how the project is managed. Trying to trademark "PostgreSQL" and "PostgreSQL Community" is way too confusing with respect to the primary project. You're basically trying to take over the global naming rights for the entire project. Whatever the relationship is between Postgres Core and PostgreSQL EU (and it is a bit opaque), that's not for you to judge and it has no bearing on what rights you feel Fundación has to the trademark "Postgres" or "PostgreSQL".

One reason why you're getting slammed so hard on this is that these have been hard learned lessons in the FOSS community over the past few decades. Trademarks are one of the few FOSS-compatible ways to protect projects, names, and publicity -- especially against commercial entities that may not have the best intentions. They must be defended in order to protect these projects.

And I'm sorry, but the global stability of the Postgres project is far more important than whatever good intentions you had.
Giving employees equity is a form of funding. If a company is bootstrapped and profitable, they can just pay employees money instead. In theory this should mean Mailchimp employees were paid more money than employees doing similar work where they were given stock options.
>Windows 11 is a step back from more granular control considering there is no longer the option to change defaults by protocol. Instead, you need to go through multiple apps to see which protocols each app supports rather than going straight to the protocol/file type you want to change the default for.

haven't had a Windows machine for a couple years so I'm wondering - is there still a registry and are protocols still registered in it? I'm obviously not thinking about everyday users going through that to change permissions, just thinking about me.
Here's ranking of top people for this kind of job

https://ctftime.org/

Members of those teams are often Security Engineers at e.g Google, Banks, computer emergency response team (CERT) and so on.
Apple specifically introduced BlastDoor framework to combat this, so NSO shifted their attacks around decoding, avoiding BlastDoor.
Meat accounts for nearly 60% of all greenhouse gases from food production
> People who make that much and more use more infrastructure

I really don't know how you can say this without defense.

I assume that poor rural americans use the most tax-payer funded resources per capita. Building roads and infrastructure just to service a few people seems most infra usage per person. Those aren't rich working professionals.

Or maybe people in hurricane zones use the most infrastructure. All those dams/levies/bridges through swamp lands of Louisiana. Considering how often the get rebuilt (even if just once a decade).

Surely, over the next 100 years the americans in hot/low lying areas will use most infrastructure thanks to global warming and sea level rise.
It is a fact that anybody could live somewhere, for example Palestine, for a year or a decade, and then at any later time encounter a reason to make up stories about events set there. That is the origin story of probably tens of thousands of novels, good and bad. I could recommend a few.

Thus, it strikes me as very weird to object to such a historical possibility (except on theological grounds, which are out of scope here).

You could reasonably object that the evidence would better place the origin of the cult in some other Roman city, such as Antioch or Alexandria, and I know of no evidentiary reason to prefer one over another. Romans did get around.
Ironic that a company named "Intuit" is buying a company with one of the least intuitive UIs I've ever used for email distribution.
I think it would be better to limit discussion to the original thread
I was impressed with how fun, simple and easy-to-use mailchimp seemed to be.

Good to see that rewarded!
She let’s you use her service as she sees fit. Best you can do is embarrass her, which is in the works.
You're correct. The Youtuber is James Stephanie Sterling. She called it the "Youtube Deadlock" mechanic. Though the trick seems to be less successful now.
Best of luck for your recovery. It sounds like it's "Mild" only in the "You're not about to die just yet" sense.

Delta is a cruel variant. I hope all of your family recovers also.
Apple should know who works for NSO Group. It should block every single account of every single person working for that org. Same goes for their families.

Google should do the same for Android.

You do not fight organizations like that by fighting "organization". You make it very difficult for people who work for those organizations to participate in a society that relies on what they actively work on breaking. In fact, you tell Israeli government that unless they put a leash on its dog and lock it up in its backyard, you will start disabling accounts of every single person in Israeli government. When the government leaders cannot work their iphones, they will ensure that NSO does not touch Apple's products.
I loved Dillo but its development seems stuck. As a replacement I use netsurf.
They are sovereign nations, but often use a state compact. This "loophole" exists because of what was done to Native Americans.
The namespace is pixi which is what people will be searching.
This is not just programmers by the way. I know of people in other professions doing this. And as long as there isn't a conflict based on anything you signed or company policy I'm not sure a company has recourse beyond terminating you

Again, I don't do it because I can't handle the stress of two jobs, but I don't begrudge those who can
> We've come to the point now that much of the prophylaxis, and outpatient treatment protocols for Covid are being actively suppressed on social media, and in the MSM, despite them being an adjunct, rather than a replacement for vaccination.

Do you have some examples/evidence of this?
A science fiction story about a group of machine learning data labelers who get outsourced to neural interface outfitted livestock sounds promising.
Before coming down with anxiety (it's health anxiety and not really social anxiety or anything like that), i wasn't always teh most aware of my emotions. But since, I'm pretty sensitive and aware and always kinda checking-in with myself.

And one thing I've noticed is that after years and years of online interaction, much of it on Reddit, Twitter, a little Tumblr, and a tiny tiny tiny bit on Instagram - is that the more i interact on these things, the more anxious and just generally stressed that I am.

I feel increasingly alone in the world - i feel that when i lean left, when i lean right, within fandoms of this or that, within FOSS communities, or just in general.

But then I talk to the people in my actual life - wife, parents, neighbors, and sure - we're all different in a variety of ways, but the in person evokes more of a connection even if the people around me aren't all rubberstamping my views and tastes.

I'm very addicted to the dopamine rush of the upvote. It feels like i'm a petty or a small person to admit that, but I am. Quitting social media has been harder than giving up tobacco (smoked for 15 years), or energy drinks (drank for almost 20 years). I've given up most recreational drinking - no problem.

But the rapid fire nature of social media.. that hole that it fills when you in these moments where you're bored but don't really have time to ramp up into anything important.... for instance - i have a hard time just stopping/starting books or long form articles. If i watch a video - i want to watch it all the way through. If i want to listen to a record - all the way through. If i get into a project, i want to make some kind of headway. Social media fills up the 10 min here, 15 min there and by the time you're sucked back in you're devoting time to it that you COULD devote to something worthwhile.

The thing that sucks is i feel disconnected from what's going on - with entertainment, with politics, with everything. I always go back and say "this time i'll be more balanced" but i never am. It's like an alcoholic saying "ok, but just one drink".
Its an interesting and creative strategy to a law from a bygone era currently abused to keep Tesla out of the market. Not only that, its investing in an economy that doesn't typically receive investment outside of gambling.
Print Moby-Dick in just 15 pages
You're creating an instance of an app class, calling methods on it, and passing objects in that method (string and lambda are objects).

I just feel like the term OOP can't win here. If it's concise people will just claim it's FP.
Can the religious be like "yeah my religion doesn't allow it"? or actually like have to give proof
"most of the spread by vaccinated people happened when they had symptoms"

Sounds like there is still a cultural / communication issue where people are not getting tested or self-isolating when sick.
> The act of smoking is the statement. And so is your insistence on pretending not to understand that. Not a pretty one.

You're the one pretending. There's a difference between these 2 things:

1) Taking actions (like smoking) that put others at some level of risk

2) Thinking that placing any level of harm onto others is justifiable as long as it's profitable

You know very well there's a difference between those things, and yet you're pretending to not understand, while claiming that I'm "pretending not to understand".

Or are you claiming that the average smoker cares so little about fellow humans that they'd be willing to push a person over a cliff ("any level of harm") in order to steal a half-empty beer can from them ("a profit")? Even if we assume a situation where they would be guaranteed to profit the half-empty beer can, I think it's safe to say almost no-one would think this level of harm would justify this level of profit.

Yes, a smoker will put your life at risk by smoking near you. In related news, a driver will put your life at risk by driving near you. Doesn't mean that smokers or drivers will do literally any level of harm to humans in order to gain the tiniest of profit to themselves.
> Ivermectin tablets are approved by the FDA to treat people with intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms. In addition, some topical forms of ivermectin are approved to treat external parasites like head lice and for skin conditions such as rosacea.

I wish people would stop making the claim that it's "just a horse dewormer" when even the FDA says it has some uses in humans. Whether or not it is effective against COVID19 is a valid issue, but trying to portray the whole drug as something else just makes your opponents jump to conclusions when they find it does actually work in certain situations/diseases.
Biomining
It may not seem right, but it wouldn't be the first time.

For example It's a Wonderful Life went into the public domain in 1974 when copyright registration was not renewed. After which it became popular on TV. But it went back under copyright when the USA signed the Berne Convention in 1989. And starting in 1993 Republic Pictures began collecting royalties from TV networks that showed it.
> As evidenced by the fact that he would open his own stall and then let a certain set of horses out.

Was the set independent of what stalls they were in? Or were they always in the same stalls? If the latter, it could just be that he knows he can open some stalls more readily than others.
Smart kids should skip high school (2015)
The levenshtein distance is still just 1 insertion so search results will likely be mixed.
Would turning off iMessage protect from this? Or would the iPhone still process the GIF through SMS somehow...?
Redundancy is your friend. If you are serious about data retention, you should be storing your most important data offsite. If you are serious about privacy, this may require backing up to a hard drive and physically storing that offsite yourself.
That’s them! I could remember the details just not the name, they rely primarily on Patreon supporters for their revenue.

EDIT: changed pronouns, been a while since I last looked into this creator.
Yes sending emails yourself is just as impossible as hosting a payment processor yourself.

Even though all the docs and technology is there, you really can't do it without the help of a big company like Amazon due to the following reasons:

- almost all residential ips are blocked.

- most data center ips are mostly blocked because there are like 100s of blacklists and every blacklist has it's own unique way of getting delisted.

- every big email provider has its own version of FBL and it's often a big black box. For example till date gmail won't even give Amazon access to its fbl(1)

- spam filtering is not an exact science and while there are things like spf, dkim, dmarc etc to ensure the authenticity of message at the end of the day it all comes down to your reputation as a sender and managing it is nothing short of a full time job.

(1) https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=257487
> So if I record a song in a studio I shouldn't be paid because it is easy to copy that recording?

Your work is valuable and you should be compensated for it. I just think that should somehow happen before you create the valuable data, not after.

Trying to sell copies of that data in a world where data is trivially copied and distributed worldwide just doesn't sound like a good idea to me. It was a good idea before computers and networks existed.
This kinda feels like one of those acquisitions where all the special sauce that makes the acquired company a great company is the exact opposite in the acquiring company.

That is, from all I've heard, Mailchimp is a great company to work at, and the founders definitely had the "scrappyness" that let them become so successful without VC funding, and their customers really like them too.

Intuit, on the other hand, is basically the poster child for "regulatory capture" company. Also, since employees don't have equity (though I'm assuming they'll get fat bonuses for this), it's bound to cause some level of strife in the company.
Great resource thanks for sharing. Lots of titles and resources that I have never considered. Super useful :)
If you are concerned about part and maintenance costs, then a car favored by tuners is a pretty good bet for repair. Its amazing the amount of parts you can get for the Honda Civic.

Given some of the manufactures are starting to sell crate electric motors, I am a lot more interested in the Ford F-150 Lightning and anything Honda builds than Tesla given the repair stories of time and expense.
> ... we can certainly replicate them in a lab...

Well, maybe we can. But, for instance, a cow that is finished entirely on pasture--a good deal of its nutritive quality comes from the grasses it eats. Where does that nutrition come from in lab-grown meats? Do we have a source for the exact same nutrients as are provided by air, water, and sunlight and grow easily and freely all over many otherwise unusable bits of land?

Where are the inputs to the lab coming from?

It seems kind of like the lab-grown meat maximalists are thinking that Dow Chemical and its brethren can synthesize all the nutrients that are required and known in, say, beef, and just break out the beakers and Breaking Bad them into existence.

As a long-time software engineer who has a deep respect for complex systems, this is totally insane to me. That the lab-grown meat maximalists think we can supplant this incredibly complex system, from sun to leaf to calf to beef, in some Dow Chemical-inputs and a factory, is absolutely insane.

Remember, from Black Swan by Taleb: Up until the 60s, scientists didn't think that fiber was a useful part of our diet. This lead to the notion that fruit juice was equivalent to whole fruit, from a dietary perspective. This contributed in some part to the obesity epidemic.

The idea that we already do know exactly what makes meat so tasty and healthy is suspect, the idea that we can replicate this exactly like burning CD-ROMs in a meat CD-Burner is just off the wall.
Stop peddling this idiotic pseudoscientific drivel designed to misinform people.
I think the OP's post was made in the form of "100% de-hydrated desert dessicated sarcasm".
Jerk grade reliability, this stuff will explode if stepped on
Like Ford did in Turkey/Baltimore (updated per comment below) with the Transit Connect import tariff circumvention, makes me wonder if Tesla built a "factory" on tribal lands to circumvent the 200,000 EV federal tax credit limit as a separate manufacturer that licensed the technology and bought the parts from Tesla, Inc, and did some "final assembly" nonsense like put the rear seats in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Transit_Connect#Tariff_ci...
Define "corporate language". All of those languages are more or less completely dominated by a single corporate sponsor with a significant portion of the decisions and discussions being done internally, so the potential for drama to spill out is a bit less.
If you want to mix and match effects without regard to order of composition, that's what Lawvere theories are for (commonly known as 'algebraic effects'). You're right that monads don't give you this, but there are ways of describing these patterns without resorting to "procedural" idioms.