skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So I guess, in this one particular instance, vaping is helping my health.
You know you could just talk to them in-person?
Ukrainian Judge Involved in Sheremet Murder Case Found Dead Outside Kyiv
If they joined any terrorist network they’re would have been convicted.

As for your constitution - it only matters within US and is void elsewhere. Victims of Guantanamo had been kidnapped outside the US.
The Catholic theological tradition holds that the "form" remains bread, but the "substance" becomes God. It is explicitly not a symbol, it is God. Many of the laity don't understand this or, even if they do, do not think it a necessary article of faith.
Queued the video for watching tonight, but I heard about a local middle school kid making more than his parents by making roblox mods (being one of few top creators).

I hope it gets more kids to try programming, but If you can get compensated it sucks if it isn't reasonable and fair.
Greek was the literate language of the Eastern Mediterranean during Roman times. Roman domination couldn't undo the existing network effects that preexisted there, all the more so that you couldn't be considered to have an education in Rome if you didn't speak Greek. Latin was used but it was essentially restricted to legal and administrative tasks.
3 Themes Surface in the 2021 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies
"Nonfungible tokens (NFTs), digital humans and physics-informed AI join the 25 technology profiles on this year’s emerging technologies hype cycle."
> Pointing out the book was not such a big deal then is like pointing to a fake PhD thesis full of quotes,

I didn't do that, you mis-inferred that from my post.

Funnily enough this is exactly what happened with Baerbocks CV: She didn't "fake" anything there, she e.g. said she studied in Hamburg without saying that she obtained a degree there. And she stated that she was a member of some high profile organisations, which was technically true. In both cases she wasn't lying.
Because of who it is (Sam Atman, formerly head of YC, currently CEO of OpenAI).
That's correct. This is especially noticable with application servers like Jboss that deliver their own libraries in the class path. Needing a slightly higher version of Hibernate is... interesting.
https://archive.is/I1Npb
It’s Election Season in Germany. No Charisma, Please
Right, but you were only having 20 cases per day in march 2020 at the very start of the pandemic as well before any restrictions were in place.

So doesn't look like anything has changed.

I feel bad for you all. All of that for an endemic virus that's never going away.

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-cases
It was a great opportunity to train your discipline. Sorting through personal porn archive involves the hardest control and assessment skills you couldn’t find anywhere else.

I think people store porn as a form of “like” that would be otherwise too cumbersome to implement. What you do like is usually scarce and the big archive is a good training set for the future automated image search technology. Think of it as a web anonymity for the times when all your posts will be analyzed and categorized by software, but in the reverse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bgt1X6qXTKs
>In practical terms: I'm a capitalist. But, I also believe we need moderating forces to tame inequality; some level of which is untenable to the point of actually being anti-capitalist.

So we basically believe the same thing, and have just been arguing semantics. Why does this keep happening!? :P

I guess what threw me off was the idea of economic systems being arbitrary and unconstrained in terms of allocation. This is basically the foundation of Maoism, and the rest follows pretty easily. (If the current method for distributing wealth is just arbitrary, we should immediately redistribute all wealth in order to maximise the common good).
This sounds too good to be true. But if it is true, it's yet another reminder of ageing being "treatable". Perhaps one day, "curable".
I've kept sharing thousands, maybe tens of thousands of torrents over the years, keeping them even across Windows reinstalls. Btw it makes uTorrent start in about a minute.

Point being, not all of these torrents can be shared at the same time, so uTorrent uses some algorithm to cycle over the seeded files in small groups over time. Maybe that's what's happening in this scenario.

Some trackers also have re-seed requests which means that the tracker knows which users downloaded the torrent in the past and when it's no longer seeded and someone requests a reupload, those uses get that request into their inbox, so there's a chance that some of them have kept the files and can thus re-seed the torrent.
This argument really grins my gears.

When does the retail customer ever pay a negative price?
Throughout the last year or so, I've seen multiple people on HN call out polyunsaturated fats, is there a specific reason for that? Google hasn't really turned up anything for me that looked particularly compelling.
Given the extremely large spectrum of "technical content" available for someone to focus on, can you provide more detailed examples of what would be higher quality technical content in your opinion?

BTW, I'm not disagreeing with you at all as I too agree. I'm just wondering what things you also see as missing.

I find most user content is focused on the introductory level, which makes sense if you are attempting to appeal to the largest audiences for income (so not faulting anyone). I often see content on data engineering but most just define "data engineering" and at most talk about things high level Hadoop, Spark, etc. and do not provide any examples/patterns of working with data that is even close to representative to what I do in my day job. The same is true many other technical disciplines too. With a couple notable exceptions on some security topics (such as demonstrating certain exploits), and some hardware topics -- such as Ben Eater's great work (https://eater.net/)
Perhaps within the US. To the rest of the word it’s like talking about assassination of prince Ferdinand without mentioning the World War - what happened next made 9/11 insignificant by comparison.
https://archive.is/t86s5
So I want to add an explanation. As I see from the comments, many of you thought that the PVS-Studio analyzer warns about a function's unused argument. That's not quite so. Or, to be precise, this is so, but the analyzer processes this case smarter than most linters or compilers.

It's a bad idea to program an analyzer so that it just issues a warning to unused arguments. Such analyzer would produce many false positives, which is why many developers don't look at (or disable) these warnings in their compilers/analyzers.

The PVS-Studio analyzer implements sort of empirical "magic". PVS-Studio relies on the fact that there are arguments of the same type and some of them are not used, while the other ones are used several times. At the same time, there are a number of exceptions to the rule. For example, the diagnostic is not triggered if the number of unused arguments exceeds two.

All this allows the V751 diagnostic to issue few false positives, which makes the tool surpass its competitors. To be exact, when developing PVS-Studio, we do not implement rules if we cannot make them better than those of the compilers - https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/0802/ . Thanks to the diagnostic I described above, one can find interesting errors - https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/examples/v751/ .

P.S. The PVS-Studio analyzer also provides a "stupid" version of this diagnostic - V2537 https://pvs-studio.com/en/docs/warnings/v2537/ . It was developed to check code against MISRA C and MISRA C++ standards. But the case above was special and by default this diagnostic was disabled - same as the other ones related to MISRA.
You state that the 5X figure ”means nothing” but don’t follow up with anything relating the the CDC papers to back your opinion.

We can argue all you like about correlations, but when you say “means nothing” you need a bit more data than handwaving at a single measurement.

Everyone understands correlations exist, but you can’t just dismiss their headline “5X” figure without something more substantive.

And please don’t jump to your inference that I was trying to say masks don’t work. HN guidelines: “Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.”. Edit: And to be clear, one minor point I was making was to agree with you that confounding variables exist.

I don’t care about correlations. I do care that you seemed to make a glib dismissal of the original article, and then you are failing to defend your dismissal and simply introducing a range of irrelevancies. Edit: perhaps justify why your opinion means anything compared with the data presented in original paper:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037e1.htm
Nah, you're assuming I'm discussing the case in the article, when in fact I'm just talking about religious belief exemptions in general.
Interestingly, I found the air in Berlin to be much cleaner (easier to breathe, etc.) than it was where I was living in the United States. I found out that the pollution standards for cars in Europe are, by and large, much stricter than elsewhere.

However, on certain days, various tree pollens make the air almost unbreathable, even to someone without allergies or asthma.
The original target was making money and winning elections. That’s not petty politics to you?
The popular paper completely fails to to state sample size or selection. It seems 10+10 mice also were studied. Maybe a little early to call it a breakthrough...
You can wave the encoding away (with a tick-box) but in general, people over-estimate what attackers will "notice".
In cases like this, many are as desperate to get the loot as users are when they get phished. dialogue boxes and browser warning fade into the background as they hit "accept" to move closer to their goal.
Oh, one other exception as others already pointed out, conference talks are also very good. Though I think they miss the heart of your question (I could be wrong).
Maintaining open source is highly taxing, because you're likely doing that alongside your regular work, which is a really piss-poor corporate strategy but common nonetheless.
Unfortunately, I am not versed in linguistics, but I would suppose so, because its etymology [1] based on the words where it's derived from would mean "I am on something" in a literal or more metaphorical sense (could also be used as "I'm focused on something") and it's also widely used almost everyday in the "everyday's bread" way in our most common prayer (we used to sing that every morning at school) while also never being used in any other context except for my first post's phrase.

[1] https://el.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E1%BC%94%CF%80%CE%B5%CE%B9%C...
I have always believed that Hofstadter's (or FARG's) models like copycat or metacat go much further in the direction of AI than any neural network. The results and advances of neural networks in the past decade are impressive, but essentially, they are function approximations (or "stochastic parrots" as mentioned in the article).

Would anybody know if there were further developments of metacat or similar systems? It even would be interesting to combine blackboard systems with neural networks as knowledge sources.
"that speed is relative to what"

To you. There is no such thing as absolute speed. You say cosmic rays are crashing into the earth at 99% the speed of light. The cosmic ray says it is sitting still and you (and the Earth) are approaching it at 99% the speed of light. Some other particle moving at 70% relative to you will give a different speed for the cosmic ray. All of you are right.
This article is about a religion creating benefits for a person, but you don't want that to happen. How is that a dishonest comment?
Using a SQL Injection attack to detect attackers
I'm sure you didn't intend this as an insult but in the context of the comment you were responding to, it could have been expressed more kindly.

Unfortunately, an inflammatory grandiose generalization like "native speakers are the worst at understanding their own language" is likely to derail a thread altogether and turn itself into the (much less interesting) topic, so please let's all try to edit those out of our posts to HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
> Shockingly, Pinky was the one who ultimately answered the question correctly, and it's also shown that Pinky can read, whereas the Brain can barely write his own name.

Pinky doesn't answer the final question:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bgt1X6qXTKs

And I think the way Brain wrote his name was a parody of how Jeopardy guests can get extravagant with their signatures.
If these JARs are on the module path, this problem would be spotted at compile time, resulting in a failure due to the "split package" situation which has been created by having that class in more than one JAR.
Del Mar CeraLift Care Benefits
https://groups.google.com/g/lumiace-cream-reviews/c/iHE9mIaT...
https://groups.google.com/g/del-mar-ceralift-skin-care/c/2Xe...
https://sites.google.com/view/del-mar-ceralift-skin-care/
https://toplhealthnews.blogspot.com/2021/09/how-can-del-mar-...
https://www.homify.in/projects/1039675/del-mar-ceralift-revi...
https://caramellaapp.com/delmarceraliftbuy/0Ujduk9sf/del-mar...
https://promosimple.com/ps/12919/del-mar-ceralift-skin-care
https://telescope.ac/delmarceraliftbuy
https://delmarceraliftskincare.godaddysites.com/
https://delmarceraliftbuy.wordpress.com/
https://delmarceraliftorder.tumblr.com/
https://delmarceraliftbuy.mystrikingly.com/
https://del-mar-ceralift-skin-care-65.webselfsite.net/
https://del-mar-ceralift-skin-care.webflow.io/
https://jiwsojg1.paperform.co/
https://groups.google.com/g/del-mar-ceralift-buy/c/sxOhuXCw_...
https://www.wantedly.com/users/154101556/post_articles/34707...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_S8aV35w48
https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/603727632
https://dribbble.com/delmarceraliftbuy/about
https://www.spreaker.com/show/what-is-del-mar-ceralift
https://www.inkitt.com/delmarceraliftbuy
https://kit.co/delmarceraliftbuy/del-mar-ceralift-does-it-re...
https://missions.me/del-marceralift
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/XC9HRDP
https://del-mar-ceralift-skin-care.company.site/
https://delmarceraliftbuy.gumroad.com/l/delmarceraliftprice
https://bigkis.com/read-blog/13974
https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/author/delmarceraliftbuy/
https://gocrowdera.com/US/self/delmarceraliftorder/Del-Mar-4...
https://educatorpages.com/site/delmarceraliftbuy/
https://paper.li/delmarceraliftbuy
https://influence.co/delmarceraliftbuy
https://www.bonfire.com/store/delmarceralift1/
https://medium.com/@lfkjgkoh/del-mar-ceralift-does-it-really...
https://peatix.com/event/2935587/view
https://muckrack.com/del-mar-ceralift/bio
https://www.emailmeform.com/builder/form/AUcYj7NB2Fd3c
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/delmarceraliftbuy
https://addwish.com/delmarceraliftbuy
https://www.stageit.com/delmarceraliftbuy
https://www.callupcontact.com/b/businessprofile/Del_Mar_Cera...
https://parkbench.com/directory/how-can-del-mar-ceralift-ski...
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/22060740-where-to-buy-d...
https://etextpad.com/lrxsxbu98b
https://www.vingle.net/posts/3995846
https://www.folkd.com/user/delmarceraliftbuy
https://www.smartmoneymatch.com/Del%20Mar%20CeraLift%20Benef...
https://allevents.in/new%20york/advantages-of-del-mar-cerali...
https://kukooo.com/for-sale/art-collectibles/del-mar-ceralif...
https://www.provenexpert.com/del-mar-ceralift-skin-care/
https://bulbapp.com/delmarceraliftprice/
If a diagnostic issues warnings to unused arguments - it's a weak diagnostic. PVS-Studio acts differently. Take a look at my clarifying comment below or above (not sure where it would be when you read it).
but what exactly is their mission other than firefox?
Oh no, I'm sure it's purely by accident that all radio stations only play the same 10 songs (also miraculously whatever is being pushed).

This isn't some hidden secret, it's out in the open. It may not be cash, but more quid pro quo.

The FCC is also supposed to punish tv channels that raise the volume of ads to 2X+ the volume of the content. Every single tv station does this for ads.
Those stats are all point-in-time and the result of very brittle analysis. Not surprisingly, you can therefore find stats that state the opposite.

In the UK this weekend there was a little blowup on Twitter because a TV journalist had his own breakthrough case, which caused him to do some journalism and download the data tables from Public Health England. He was surprised to discover that in the UK the proportion of vaccinated people getting infected is now higher than the proportion of unvaccinated people, i.e. the UK is experiencing the exact opposite of what your stat claims. Actually he was so surprised by this he posted it on Twitter and openly wondered why there was no debate about it, at which point he found out why not: he was mobbed, shouted down and ended up posting a grovelling apology.

https://dailysceptic.org/2021/09/12/robert-peston-shocked-by...

Part of the problem was that his Twitter followers are innumerate. They assumed that this stat was overall percentage of people getting infected, but it's not. It's proportions of both groups. Therefore, the fact that more people are vaccinated than not in the UK is irrelevant. The vaccinated are - at this point in time - getting it more often than the rest. And journalists are afraid to report on it because they get attacked so you just don't know about it.

Reasons? Unclear. Scientists also seem to mostly refuse to do studies that might undermine vaccine messaging. Most likely the vaccine protection wanes so fast that it simply split the delta wave in two, with the unvaccinated getting it first, leading to lots of headlines about "pandemics of the unvaccinated" etc, and then the vaccinated wave coming second, leading to stats like this one which are simply ignored.
The question about human overpopulation is not whether there can be overpopulation, but whether the often popular claim that the earth can not sustain the current or the projected future human population is true. The latter absolutely is debatable - there's no clear evidence that it's impossible (i.e. there's no technically feasible way) to sustain the current or the projected future human population. It absolutely is true that if we maintain the current level of CO2 emissions, it won't be sustainable. But that's not an evidence for overpopulation. If we sustain the current level of pollution, it likely will not be sustainable. But that's once again not an evidence for overpopulation - as we know for most of our resources that there are technical alternatives that can drastically reduce / eliminate them. We know there's more than enough energy. We know how to make our economy carbon-neutral. Most pollution can be controlled. The urban land takes up much less than 1% of the earth land - and we expect the world population to peak around 10B by 2100 (vs 7.7B today). No reason to believe we'll run out of land. There's more than enough headroom to improve the crop yields in poor countries.

In the grand scheme of things, we - humanity - know mostly how to create a sustainable technological system that can support 10B population. Whether our politics will allow us to get to such a system is a entirely different problem, and THAT might be our undoing, but I'd argue that's not really an overpopulation problem.

Also, the population growth is largely a side-effect of demographic transition - https://populationeducation.org/what-demographic-transition-.... i.e. it's a transitional side-effect of reducing the human suffering. The only humane and equitable way to move forward is to accelerate the demographic transition (i.e. improve the economic, health, education, etc, systems of all countries in the world to get them to stage4 at least). And, thus, "keep our numbers down" is not only inhumane or inequitable, that's ineffective - the developed countries already mostly stopped growing - e.g. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251591/population-growt... - and it's mostly the poor countries that are growing - i.e. https://www.statista.com/statistics/264687/countries-with-th... . There's no other humane way to stop poor countries' population growth - the most effective way is to improve their economy, improve their health and healthcare systems, and improve education.
This looks really cool. I kind of liked the idea of Nim from the get-go (I'm a Python guy first and foremost), and liked the idea of a "fast compiled Python", but never enough to make the leap.

Maybe I can write my loops in this and dip my toes this way? Good stuff, I'll be keen to see how it evolves.
So I want to add an explanation. As I see from the comments, many of you thought that the PVS-Studio analyzer warns about a function's unused argument. That's not quite so. Or, to be precise, this is so, but the analyzer processes this case smarter than most linters or compilers.
Continue: https://karpov2007.medium.com/a-few-more-words-about-the-pvs...
"...Participants aged 18 and over, seated on an aircraft, and deemed to be rational decision makers by the enrolling investigator were eligible..."
Expect a big decade for longevity research, AR/VR, psychedelic medicine, cryptocurrency driving major societal change, etc etc.

Now that's an unusual list.

- Longevity research. At some point it should be possible to re-engineer the human genome to produce longer lived people. Retrofitting to old models, though, is less likely to work. Also, what this really means is creating new species. Look at all the trouble we have with race. Wait until we have multiple humanoid species that can't interbreed.

- AR. We're probably going to get AR at an affordable price this decade. The Facebook version will be like "Hyperreality", the Google version will be Glassholes 2.0, and the Amazon version will be Marshall Brain's "Manna". But "at last, the Pokemon will be free to roam the real world!" And maybe someone will figure out how to draw black.

- VR. The year of VR was 2019. We can do it, it just sucks. Except for Beat Saber. Somewhere between 5% to 15% of the population gets nauseated, which is far worse than high-end roller coasters. You can look, point, and shoot, but more than that is hard.

- Psychedelic medicine. Probably not all that helpful. More of an excuse for recreational drugs, like "medical marijuana" was.

- Cryptocurrency driving major societal change. Nah. It's zero-sum. It's not creating any wealth. Great for money laundering, not so useful for anything else.

What are we going to get in the 2020s?

- Electric vehicles everywhere. That's pretty clear.

- Self-driving cars. It's been a long haul, but Google doubles the mean time between disconnects every 18 months by incremental improvement. Getting there, slowly.

- Much faster and more effective vaccine development. Vaccines were kind of a backwater for years, but now they're getting attention. Influenza and HIV might be knocked out this decade. Maybe even make a dent in cancer.

- China 2025. Go read the 14th Five Year Plan, 2021-2025. If you think it's unrealistic, read the 13th Five Year Plan and check off the items completed.

- Energy will be less of a problem as solar, wind, and batteries are deployed. We have the technology, now it's just deployment. The next big problems are in water and metals.
Having an ad hominem alongside a different argument doesn't mean it's not an ad hominem in my book. Why not point out the errors without the additional ad hominem "explanation"?
Seems to be an untested legal question but it's definitely presumptuous on the part of AI researchers to assume that it is fine. Maybe using the dataset to train an AI is fine but I'd say it's pretty clear that distributing the training dataset isn't.

Nobody has sued yet though.