skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not hidden. It's just not connected to an internet-style social network. Interest can still spread through word-of-mouth, even if the platform doesn't provide any tools for audience measurement and management. It's akin to a 'zine from the pre-internet days, except it doesn't cost as much money to distribute.

EDIT: A 'zine isn't a perfect analogy, since someone who published it would know how many they printed. A freely copyable newsletter would probably be a stronger analog.
Just use blacklistd [0], on FreeBSD, instead of changing the port. It works with sshd, and it temporarily blocks IPs that are abusive.

[0]: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/firewalls/#firewa...
Because being somewhat of a workaholic or craving power / money / achievement is how they got to be wealthy in the first place. This is roughly akin to asking "why don't strong and fit people stop going to the gym?"
Learning English I found American quotation style very weird. It would be interesing to know if any nother language do something like this and where this traidition comes from. We certainly do not do this in russian and ukrainian I've learned in school.
I can't tell if you are being serious, but just to be clear: I do not think that climate change is "scary because of nukes". Climate change is scary in its own right. Global famine is going to be very unpleasant whether or not it sparks WW3. But we do have nukes, and nukes + climate change could bring about the end of civilization in my lifetime with probability much greater than zero. And, what is scariest of all, most people's behavior indicates that this possibility is not even on their radar screens. Most people are still behaving as if the really serious shit is several generations away. It's not. The wolf is at the door, as you say, much closer to 10 years than 100.
Personally I just go through Wikipedia articles, some are a little short on details but will often enough link you to more I'm depth information.

I end up just jumping from one article to another through the "see also" links and similar accidents

Edit: occasionally you'd also find a podcast episode covering a particular crash or documentaries like air crash investigation or similar
So is it pronounced sequence or like 'seek'?
That's been my experience as well. I see zero value for phd's in my field. I'd rather train up a high school graduate: the high school graduate will take as long to train in most cases.
Alternatives to Adobe Products That Run on Linux
I guess to some extent I can understand some defensiveness of Leibniz, given that he probably deserves a ton of the credit we normally give Newton (and there was actually some bad blood between the two).

But Gödel is incredibly famous, isn't he? I don't see why there's a need to give him more credit.

Also it is weird that this article doesn't have a couple paragraphs on Von Neumann, he's underappreciated and also very cool.
This might happen, the technology to put ads in old and new movies already exist.
> more likely to use libraries rather than reinventing the wheel

I love programming in go, but I disagree with this point. The golang library ecosystem is absolutely less mature compared to C++.

Rust and Go are a pleasure to write in, but they don’t magically fix every problem and frequently CREATE problems because they’re still under development. In this case, the missing auth header vuln has nothing to do with the underlying language.
https://archive.is/Q27ZU
Unless I unnderstood it wrong, you could use a variant of that:

Market 1 has options A, not A. Market 2 has options B, not B. At the end of the trading period, void the "losing" market and reward the winning one. It's trivial to implement if you're using e.g. electronic payments and you forbid "cross" trading between A and B.
Yes, the extra time you get from the chill job can go either way. It's whatever you make of it. If you use the time to learn, you can definitely learn more at a chill job than at a hard job.
They're covering all of their Facebook Files reporting on their daily podcast, The Journal.

https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/the-journal?mod=podcasts_carous...
Just one comment. The word Puu looks and sounds a lot like Poo to me. Not sure I would want to associate that with my employment history.
As with all things on the internet, and especially people complaining loudly about something, there's obviously more to the story. The guy complaining isn't going to tell us the entire unfettered truth and explain why his app needs this network access, and Apple isn't going to say anything because they literally do not care what a bunch of techie people think. The whole story stank of BS from the beginning, but people online love supporting the person who portrays themselves as an underdog battling the big evil company, so they set their critical thinking skills aside and jump on the bandwagon.
Ah Wikipedia, the word of god.
To me it looks wrong to omit a period in a famous short one-sentence statement. To stay within American style, I would rearrange the sentence to end with the quote, "I refute it thus."
If there was no money involved it sounds like Google actually didn't have prediction markets. This is like saying that because nobody will take care of my lawn in exchange for Monopoly money lawn care businesses can't exist. It might be different if people got paid!
You just ignored my points entirely.

If white supremacists keep saying the phrase "googly moogly" to each other and to others; as a way to identify themselves as alt-right, and push it over and over again, it becomes a dogwhistle.

It doesn't matter that minus context, "googly moogly" doesn't mean anything. "Those stupid libs are saying 'googly moogly is racist now! look how far the left has gone! bunch of snowflakes"

This is how dogwhistles literally work, and you have to engage with my point about dogwhistles or else you are simplying not having the conversation at all, you are arguing from a point that has no context or meaning.

It's more important exactly who is using the phrase and why, than what the phrase is.
It's not about the money it's about the process.
What would be extremely funny is if a different group of fake hactivists did a similar hack elsewhere but deliberately added junk data as a way to discredit all hactivism.
Because of a different philosophy (from yours).
C# support isn't great on FreeBSD yet, so probably not.
Imagine that there's a market for which day a politician will die on. Initially, all of these daily contracts are priced very low because there is a very low chance of a politician dying on any given day. So, you buy quite a few of one particular day, and then go kill the politician.
This is probably like what reddit does with its "best" sort option or other sites do with "popular"/"hot"/etc.
Because it's not working that sucks. It's having to work that sucks.
There is actually more meaning to life than earning vast amounts money, and spending it. Once you’ve earned enough, your natural self will seek the next meaning to life
Your browser has time-traveled to the future, but your internet connection is stuck in the present. I imagine that the engineers are working on this.
Deaths involving Covid-19 by vaccination status, England
A better observation to make would be if people who receive a sudden windfall of money stop working.
If the accepted answer is also the one with the highest score, it will still be at the top. If it's not, then that's maybe a signal to read the question and answers more carefully before using them.
I recommend that everyone get vaccinated if they can, but the vaccines aren't 100% effective so we still need other treatments. Some small controlled clinical trials have shown statistically significant benefits from ivermectin. But larger studies will be needed to reach any reliable conclusions.

https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/6/989
I got a new cloud virtual machine and didn't login for 2 hours. When I did the logs showed there were about 50 attempts to login from random IP addresses.

I changed my port to a random 4 digit number. Not a single failed login attempt in 6 months.

Obviously follow good security practices too but I like not have to rotate and filter the logs with yet another tool.
yeah, my mistake, i meant to write copy the public key :D copying by hand is ok but ssh-copy-id is simpler. Can't edit the comment now hmmm...
I've never used gitlab but this issue has definitely caused me to take pause. It sort of feels like "not allowing 'OR' in strings to prevent SQL injection."
Why should the username matter? In my systems, I could have an insane URL like...

https://myservice.com/my.super.duper.crazy-ass.user.name.pdf.exe

and still have it return a proper HTML document that covers that user's profile page. Hell, the username could be some insane zalgo-tier shit and still function properly.

I see some comments defending arbitrary "bandaid" architecture and I think that this is not defensible for something the scale of GitLab. This is basic HTTP stuff.
The debugger in devtools also has these capabilities.
Please offer feedback (be as brutal as you like)
> What's irrational about electric vehicles?

Only considering the upside, instead of the downsides. True, an EV itself has no emissions but, how is that electricity generated, distributed? How are the materials for the batteries sourced (I hope you like strip mining and being beholden to China)? How are end-of-lifed batteries disposed?

I think EVs are the future, but we shouldn't put the cart before the horse on our way to get there. EVs are also already quite a bit more expensive a similar ICE vehicle. They'll only get more expensive if there's a government induced shortage of materials & parts due to a mandate.
When you meet friends, are there never new people around? Do they never introduce you to their other friends? How did people get to know people before FB became big?

There are other websites, where you can find local groups of people. Some also group you into local areas, so you know anyone around there will be living nearby.

I do not see a problem with meeting worthwhile new people.

"FB is the only way." or "there is no replacement" are an illusion.
My recommendation for making Facebook a healthier place: unfollow everyone and everything. There are scripts that will automate this process for you.

Once you have a completely blank slate Facebook feed, you're free. You can proactively look up your friends' activity if you want to, but otherwise you just get the good parts of facebook (like event invites and a chat app) and great meme groups like "This cat is CHONKY" and "Foods with threatening auras."
The answer is always classes, folks. Because once you become a millionaire for the first time, you leave the middle class and realize that you are actually quite poor amongst the millionaire class, so you have to keep working to climb through the ranks of millionaires. It's a recursive algorithm, you see.
Under communist regimes the salaries are dictated by the government, and are publicly known. The idea was to be "fair, and equal".

That is how it supposed to be. Alas, that is not how it ever turns out.

Employees would race to the bottom with performance. Why work hard, when I will get paid the same if I do little?
Result is high rises that sink and collapse, cars that fall apart, medicine that is tainted, etc.

So how would things get done right? Bribery. Bribery became the differentiator.
Officials will only perform their duties if they are bribed.
Workers will only do the job right if they are bribed.

Most post-communist/socialist countries struggle with bribery for generations.

(source: first hands, both hands)
It entirely possible but no one was paying the 91% rate. The broader poor was that these rates weren’t effective. Reported income is highly elastic, according to work by Saez et. al.
It's really difficult to make that kind of change from the rank and file. Once revenue is involved, it's amazing how nervous people get and nobody wants to approve some change that might lose as little as fractions of a percent of the money stream. There has to be a clear, explicit mandate from leadership that acknowledges there will be a revenue hit, and absolves any project members from bad outcomes / or rewards them for participation. I.e. it's hopeless :-)
LeBron has plenty of money. Why is he still playing basketball? :)
> I realized that without any degree I'd have to wait 10 years for stock options while the PhDs would be in almost immediately

I don't see anything in the OP about gating pay-tiers behind arbitrary requirements like having a PhD? Why would a company be forced to do that under this kind of law? You can establish tiers with publicized compensation and still hire the best person for each job; those are independent axes.
GitHub's Pull Requests feature is so friggin' deficient.

I recently discovered that even if you capitulate and try to follow their shitty PR-oriented vision, if you create a repo by importing an existing one, there's no way using github.com to file a PR against the upstream using the import you just created! Same trees (minus the extra branch), but no way to get the site to let you file a PR, because github.com doesn't recognize that your repo is a fork. As if the three-copies approach weren't bad enough (the upstream repo I cloned from; my copy on my local disk containing my commits; and then the third, completely idiotic boondoggle that I'm forced to create in my account's namespace on GitHub to be able to file a PR—which, as stated, doesn't actually work), I had to create another (fourth!) copy by visiting the upstream and explicitly clicking the "fork", and then pushing to that, which magically unlocks the ability to let you specify this fourth copy as the source of the desired changes.
There must be a better word for "enjoy" here.
Its just the behavior of a monopolist where they are making their product line as efficient as possible by milking every last penny out of every single customer.

In a truly competitive ecosystem features that have additional cost would be the only ones that actually cost more, and artificial limits wouldn't work because the vendor with less market share would just throw them in for free.

So you would expect product segmentation along the lines of core counts, dram channels, etc but not really between for example high end desktop/low end server because there would be a gradual mixing of the two markets.

And it turns out the market is still competitive because Arm and AMD are driving a bus through some of those super high margin products that are only artificially differentiated from the lower end parts by the marketing department or some additional engineering time that actually breaks functionality in the product (ecc, locked multipliers, iommu's, 64-bit MMIO windows, etc).
I somehow doubt that Apple users are going to stop using Apple because Woz entertained a fun project that didn't pan out.
That seems like the exact opposite of what the article is saying. The question is, "why don't they stop working"
We have a real societal disconnect and it's clear that we don't communicate enough with our elder generations.

While some people are content to retire and stay home in bed, not having something meaningful to do every day makes quite a lot of people absolutely miserable.
How to Calculate a CIDR
Because nothing in life is guaranteed.
I would like to try it but sadly the only way to register an account is by using google. Thanks no.
Surely the more noble cause for that would be giving more credit to others, rather than attempting to take away credit from a well known figure. This article is somewhat about the other important figures who's knowledge Turing's was built off, but its central point is that Turing gets too much credit.

I understand why he'd care about that if he'd been uncredited and watched peers be overcredited, but I'd hardly call it a noble work, even if it is understandable.
Global Climate Report – August 2021
That's not how that works at all.

Terminal velocity occurs when the drag force balances the gravitational force. So F_d = F_g

F_d is proportional to the area of the object and the velocity squared.

F_g is proportional to the mass.

So, for constant area, at terminal velocity we have v^2 ~ m or v ~ m^(1/2) where "~" denotes a proportional relation.

Thus a heavier object falls at a higher terminal velocity than a lighter one.
The image shows a number of pentagons, so it's not just hexagons unless you consider a pentagon some kind of degenerate hexagon. That said, you can indeed cover a sphere with only hexagons, if you relax the requirement that they all be regular hexagons.
But unlike going to the gym, acquiring a certain level of wealth gives you the means to continue to accumulate wealth. At the point that you're worth $10MM, you could live an upper middle class existence indefinitely with even a fairly pedestrian set of investments.
What is the ideal size for a tiny house?
See the Saez paper from my other comments, it’s a well researched topic. The consensus is that people weren’t paying that rate.
> Historically Asian artists and musicians imitated master's styles. Only after you are fully mastering the previous style, you can add something little of your own.

This sounds euro- or western-centric, which is interesting because it is how we've been taught the world is: everything of highest esteem originated in Europe, and different European cities were the cultural capital of the world at different times in history.

There may be some truth to that, but you're not recognizing the original and creative Asian art that does not imitate or derive from European influences.

My take on this whole AI-created influencer is that younger generations (putting aside race and ethnicity) prize beauty and perfection at the cost of human connection and personal stories in the "art" or "celebrities" they follow or admire.

My background is in the arts. I was taught that during most of the 1900s, art was about the process and what gave it value. The output was just an effect of the process of creation. Why did artists put such value in the process? Because that is precisely what is so hard to replicate. The final result (end product) is easier to mimic. The story behind the art is irreplaceable and as personal as the artist's soul, as trite as that may sound.

I would go as far as to say all artists, including Asian ones, understand this, which is what creates such a huge divide between "real art" and "massively produced art," where the human element is lost and things are produced in a "lab."
You hit the nail on the head. It is so frustrating that every single social movement has to be exclusively focused around some innate quality that cannot be changed. Sex, race, sexuality, everything except class. We spend all this time arguing amongst ourselves instead of collectively asking the ultra-rich why socialized healthcare is too expensive but spending 20 years destroying a country for no reason isn't.

I just don't get how an american leftist can see every single fortune 500 company paying lip service to every single american leftist cause and not wonder if maybe something else is going on. And sure, I'm well aware that it's all meaningless PR maneuvers to curry favor among the public. But I firmly believe that these companies avoid any sort of class-based issue like the plague because that might lead to questions about why corporations can make so much money and pay so little in tax while the rest of us make peanuts and are forced to give the government 1/3 of it.
At my job, we do Java, and it would be wonderful to have something like this. I litter System.err.println around the code then run it so I can better understand the behavior, so the idea of doing the equivalent in a recording would be awesome! I don't know how my colleagues manage with a regular debugger, it's like looking through a pinhole, you only see a tiny part of reality.
Seems like it would be not unreasonable to have some sort of aging built in. Since I suspect reputation is a major factor there utilize all votes for rep, but for answer relevance gradually reduce the impact of votes based on their age. There'd probably need to be a way to mark 'evergreen' or perhaps 'stable' answers where that decay would be slower, or simply allow people to (with limits?) go back and refresh their votes on articles.

Separating historical reputation from answer relevance ranking would be an attempt to reduce the perceived value to individuals of tampering with scores - refreshing a vote on an answer wouldn't impact overall reputation.
That's not possible (and probably ill advised as the watch will usually outlast the phone) - however it is possible to charge your devices from an iPad.
...show me statistics, if this is true we can immediately force people stop eat meat in hospital
> If you find an answer that is quite old, why don't you just scroll down to see if there's a more recent one?

Why are you assuming I don't do that?

Rather than spending my time doing that, why not go to an authoritative, updated source like MDN to begin with?
rich people get rich from other people's work. so if the rich "work" it's to pretend that that isn't the arrangement; to maintain the illusion that they work for their money rather that owning the surplus value created by their workers.
Prediction markets are probably not a panacea, but Google's various internal implementations of them (there have been several 20% attempts) are far from proof of this. If the people making the predictions don't have any actual skin in the game, the economic incentive to be correct is removed. That is the secret sauce that should supposedly make prediction markets more accurate than other forecasting venues.
Thank you so much for these pointers! I'm trying to keep up with the SoTA both in terms of research and production models in ML, and this is super helpful. Best of luck!
Employee Information Use at OpenSea
That answer seems to fail when you look at 2/3 examples just from the masthead (Musk and Zuckerberg). It's possible you could look at your ability to buy literally anything on the planet and feel jealous someone else's infinity is higher than yours, but that seems unlikely.
Apparently it depends which GC is used, so:

> "0.37% faster than Java 16 for ParallelGC"

> "2.41% faster than Java 16 for G1GC (default)"

But as you asked, toy benchmark programs!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28530126
Farming animals is much much worse than killing wild animals. Even when I was a vegetarian for ethical reasons I would eat game, I have no moral objections at all to going out in the forest and shooting a deer for food, but raising pigs in meat factories is horrible.
I find that rich people, like the millionaires and billionaires, are driven people and driven not necessarily only by money. Extreme financial success is but a side effect of whatever is driving them whether it be building a huge company or a revolutionizing and industry.

And if getting rich is not the end game whether entirely or partially then the work is never done. They are still on a mission and there are more challenges and more worlds to conquer.
Is this a parody account? Because you've nailed it
This is when gold was decoupled from the dollar and money printing began.
There are plenty of these in Silicon Valley. Engineers who got rich at FB or Stripe or whatever and don’t work anymore. However because it’s considered déclassé to be in the idle class, they invent some things to put on their LinkedIn like Angel Investor or Startup Advisor.
15 is nothing though.
The Saez paper points out that even among the 0.01% people were avoiding that top rate.
> Our political team is completely immune from this effect because our team is morally superior, more intelligent and better smelling than those people.

You would do well to familiarize yourself with Hannah Arendt, rather than just repeat generalities.

> Kasparov is due for some self-reflection.

That has nothing to do with this quote.