skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just a heads up,
a sister comment already pointed out the biggest "danger", but not what that means for your webapp:

Google will penalize your domain strongly as soon as anyone used your service for malicious content.
You might even get blocked entirely if you are particularly unlucky.

That's also the reason why GitHub pages is hosted under github.io instead of GitHub.com for example.
How does this principle work when two sides have differing opinions on what constitutes the greater aggression (IE abortion where a woman's rights over her body are up against the question of when human life begins)

Vaccines.. at what level of disease severity should the government forcibly inject the entire populace with a vaccine to ensure that no one can aggress on another by infecting them (on purpose or accidentally).

If one jumbo jet passenger has a severe peanut allergy and other opens a bag of peanuts, is it an act of aggression?
I found when losing weight that the first 20 pounds was easy. After that every half pound was a major mental challenge to keep going. Then COVID-19 hit, I stress ate, my activity level fell to virtually 0, and yeah. Back to -0 from where I started. Time to start over.
I totally agree with your take, except maybe:

> That said, Æ should probably be allowed

This may cause all sorts of issues, from typing a letter to issuing a passport.

Else than that, exactly what I was thinking.
His posts are very hit or miss and the one linked in this thread is unfortunately a huge miss. He describes nondeterministic automata (and pretends he doesn't) and gives them way too much significance. Even the 'computational paradigm' he's saying it replaces is only a paradigm in Wolfram's mind

The 'applications' section at the end is just ramblings at best and borderline crankpotty at worst. Which is weird since he is undeniably smart and educated, maybe an overflow?
For sure, and as much as I loathe Ben Shapiro's smugness, and by extension, his "news" outlet, I'd be remiss if I didn't also point out how it's happening elsewhere from the other side of the aisle, too.
Which debugger do you use because I live in JetBrains tools and their debugger front-end support for conditional or on exception break points is phenomenal
I am not sure why do you want to keep pushing your idea.

I was born in China. I searched around for 2050 and all it shows was reach socialism modernization. The key is modernization. Not socialism.

Socialism as a social and economic order already reached it's height before 1980s...
The worst part they tried to spin me all sorts of nonsense "oh the hoses were too short because your 2013 uses parts from the 2014 because it was probably one of the last ones they made" and crap like that.
the "british" style also introduces an ambiguity. Did the original quote contain the puncutation, or does it derive from the outside context?

It's pretty clear to me that the correct method (on the grounds of respecting source material) is: "punctuation inside, if it comes from the source, punctuation outside if it's from the outside context".

And there are times when quotes aren't even direct quotes, they could be scare quotes. Why the hell would you ever put punctuation inside of a scare quote? I don't think any american would do this.

E.g.:

Dough is pronounced like "doe." -- TERRIBLE. Stab my eyes out.

Dough is pronounced like "doe". -- sensible.
Teach an elementary school kid yet another wrinkle in the English language around where they should punctuation marks? No thanks.
By all means then, please enlighten me with something to back up your claims other than "trust me, and you're just ignorant if you don't".
The problem with that metaphor was that real life firefighters don't work like that. And it breaks that metaphors.
You can't just completely divorce the racial overtones of WHY those children ended up in graves though. It's an important part of the history.
Re 3: Michelin has a "track connect" for their track tires ( https://www.michelinman.com/auto/why-michelin/technological-...)

I haven't used it, and most serious track rats have a separate data system so the track connect features are potentially redundant, but I assume that it's an MVP of what a consumer product might look like in the future.
That's one part of the answer.

The other is that you can use Inferrd from your notebook and have it running in 1mn.
> Usually you can make an educated guess about where $X is

Can you? I'm currently looking for a mid-senior level software job and don't feel confident at all I know salary ranges at any of these companies, except the huge ones on levels.fyi and Blind.
Show HN: Rotating any LTSpice symbol i.e. .asy file
You are welcome, did it for purely selfish reasons though ;) I want to be healthy and ate the cheapest organic meat i could find since i thought: I need B12. Now i just take supps for it.
I'd love so much for more companies to recognize & deliberately guard their worker's ability to screw around & try shit.

20% time remains one of the only examples I can think of, where the individual is empowered to do what they think is right or interesting.

business & product management organizations usually has a very distinct chain of command, but to workers, things are much more flat & egalitarian; a land of ideas & capabilities. and while the business has big overarching goals & objectives, it lacks the savvy to understand the complexity & on the ground truth of what it has & the tactical potentials that it encounters minute-by-minute; it rarely tries to set itself up to capitalize on the insight & intuition & beliefs of it's (knowledge and other) workers.

trying to inform the business of one's value, to convince them of your purpose, is a huge colossal tax. that drift, that distance, that business's unknowability of what it's workers know (knowledge workers in particular), is a huge source of tension & dissonance for workers everywhere. since the business can't know our particular work, can't join us slogging through & wrestingling mightily with systems, the least they can do to show respect is make a gesture to give us some autonomy, to let us demonstrate our mastery of these complex environments we've worked on, to seek our own purposes that we think can aid our environment and perhaps our business.

making tech debt tickets & adding them to the backlog is one way to get opportunity done. but i have huge respect for the flash of inutition & drive, as a core way that shits get done, and trying to unleash & tap that most raw human power is something that is deeply interesting to me, and something i see almost all businesses everywhere as deeply deeply deeply misaligned to, & often structured harshly against. this article was a bit slow, neandering, but a fun & refreshing read for me, that ponders situations outside of what we've ended up at, the point we all seem to now inhabit together. thanks.
These NGI grants come around quite regularly. I'm sure they have a newsletter. :)
WSJ's editorial pages have a long and storied history of supporting conservative positions that are utterly disconnected from reality, for example on climate change or the Iraq war. These are not trivial matters that we should quickly forgive them over.
I think all of the problems they have are earned. They've got, what, 3 billion users? How many 9s (99.99999) effective does the solution need to be to wrangle edge cases? Moderation is an eternal issue.
This is possibly a move in the right direction. The problem, as I have learned, is that SO is 100% useless (not 99%, actually 100%) when trying to learn anything related to the web. Any question I as a beginner have is already answered, and the answer is almost certainly wrong or suboptimal.

Thankfully there are lots of other good resources, most notably MDN.

The only solution I see is to give web questions a lifetime of something like two years.
For those who are looking to similar tooling in back end space, check

- https://undo.io/ (It can also support Golang https://docs.undo.io/GoDelve.html)

- Mozilla RR https://rr-project.org/

- GDB https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/news/reversible.html

Unfortunately, works only in Linux.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_travel_debugging
You're thinking of their opinion section. The reporting is solid.
The average person making $180k in SF is not much better off than someone making $100k in Dallas.

In Dallas, you'd be called upper middle class. In SF, people lecture you that you're "rich".

Post-tax, the difference is only ~$45k. Your rent is going to be an extra ~$20k. Your cost of living is going to be an extra ~$10k.

Okay, so you've got an extra ~$15k, maybe 20% more purchasing power. But this only works if you're single.

If you have kids or a dependent, you're going to lose all of that to rent and expenses (and probably more).

And, until this year, it's not like you could just take your $180k job to somewhere cheaper. If you got a job somewhere cheaper, you'd get paid less to where it wouldn't make much of a difference financially.

Really - the only benefit is how regressive the 401k system is. You can dodge taxes on your high marginal tax rate in SF. So you're much more likely to contribute to your 401k - which will almost certainly work out for you in the long run.

In the short run, you're likely to pay for it significantly with a reduction to your quality of life.
The hiring team and the HR team have different local incentives. The hiring team just needs a position filled within a specific budget. The HR team is doing its best to manage company wide expenses. So it is worth it to them to take a crack at reducing the cost of a hire.

If you can identify a company's inconsistencies in policies or behavior, you can identify different sets of incentives different parts of the company are under.
> One does not give money one doesn't have.

Off base opener, becuase that is exactly how buying property works in the majority of cases.

Ohterwise we agree the problem is people are too poor, it is affordability that is the issue. There are plenty of houses, but not enough money.

Building more studio flats in battersea that cost 750k solves the 'supply' issue, but it is supply that is really useless.
I'd be surprised if that's allowed here, certainly quickly checking a few - including supermarket own brand, i.e. the cheapest - none lists ingredients other than milk (or derivatives, incl. simply 'butter') and optionally salt.

Sounds more like margarine to me, to have additives like colouring. 'Pale white' and I doubt I'd even recognise it as butter - probably assume it was lard. From 'sticks' I think this is the US, though there's at least one French brand that does sell it like that as well as the normal (to me) block or tub (more common in France in my experience, but some here too).
This is very reasonable. I wish all small software shops acted like this. Reminds me of REAPER program which also has a reasonable pricing model like this giving you unlimited time to try and buy it once it's useful to you.
Not really. spiped is more an equivalent to mutual SSL (aka "Client certs SSL"). It basically just encrypts and mutually auths individual connections.

It works at the TCP level, not the IP level.
It just required too much finicking with. With an iPhone, it's been a phone/camera and I don't need to spend any time messing with it.

I ran (and contributed to!) LineageOS^WCyanogenmod for years and years. It was great.

I can see myself returning to LineageOS (or similar), as iOS is getting quite buggy and I am put off by the wealth of gestures. It seems like whenever I use the iPhone, I accidentally swipe into some other screen. It's like slipping on banana peels.
When I visited Bletchley Park a few years ago, I got into a conversation with one of the docents about the film and it was clear that they had a very low opinion of it there. Turing deserved a better film.
It sounds to me like he's claiming credit for ideas behind weather modeling used as much as 20 years earlier, and fractal curves that were being clearly talked about in the previous decade.
> Is there some way to structure the markets

Most of the prediction markets I've seen use sets of binary options that are complete an mutually exclusive. The entity that handles the market would only sell you for, say, $1, a complete set of those binary options.

So you could not buy "A", you could buy a pair made of a copy of "A" and a copy of "not A". If the oracle knows that "A" is true with p ~ 1, they would know that "A" is underpriced (it should be ~$1) and "not A" is overpriced (it should be ~$0), so they would buy ~infinitely many pairs of "A" and "not A".
I have something similar for my mountain bike, CushCore. They don't replace inner tubes (tubeless setup) but they do add a lot of protection, dampening and deflection.
Timezone-viz – Exploring 120 years of timezones
There's precisely zero protection; it behaves a lot more like an embedded system. It might be nice to reuse some of the old tutorials for this, but I'm not sure if that wouldn't be too specific.
That sounds greate
If it's of any interest to anyone I recently did a podcast with Prof Robin Hanson too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIbOUjplFus [2hr 48min video]
I'm still a little confused. It seems like Turing came up with something that works, and clearly fulfills precisely what Godel and Church and Turing were all looking for; but it also seems like it's a mathematically inelegant solution. Is it possible that in the future we'll find a way to show that Gödel's mu-recursive functions or Church's lambda calculus also precisely describe 'what a machine can do'? If so, it seems that from a mathematical standpoint, either of those would be a better foundation to start from. (I'll totally agree that from a teacher's perspective, the Turing machine is the better explanation.)
Numerous scandals in european soccer. an endemic problem in any big popular sport, really.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_football_bribery_scanda...

https://www.dw.com/en/police-expose-european-soccer-bribery-...

etc etc etc
I guarantee you that if you look at the job title "Vice President" at, say, JP Morgan's Corporate and Investment Bank you're going to see total compensation that ranges over an order of magnitude.
Great. First saw one in Elm years ago, someone already mentioned prior art by Bret Victor though. Glad to see an agnostic tool for everyone.
You are in good company:

«Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? There is more hope of a fool than of him.»
‭‭Proverbs‬ ‭26:12‬ ‭

This chapter was probably written around 2700 or so years ago according to my reading of Britannica :-)
“Houses nearby highways are low value because the owners are too lazy to manicure their lawns” is an explanation I don’t buy one bit. It’s too “just so” for my tastes, and it also contradicts my own personal experience of having my house value go up despite us purposefully killing the yard. Home values change for a lot of reasons outside the owners control; blaming it on the owners for not caring sufficiently about curb appeal doesn’t hold water.

A more likely explanation is that living near a highway sucks. Very few people want to hear traffic noise from their back yard, let alone smell exhaust fumes while trying to grill outside. People who can afford to will pay a premium for a quiet and peaceful backyard, and houses with traffic noise close to them will command a lower price to compensate for the lowered quality of life. The fact that we see a similar effect near airport runways is a supporting data point.

I would in fact argue that you’ve got causation backwards. The curb appeal of houses near the highway is low because the home values are low. The people who live there are aware that nothing they can do will push the home value up because of the highway, or they lack the time and resources to focus on a manicured lawn.
If I recall correctly, this is the same man who said:

'I’m not a medical professional, so I can’t speak much to medical solutions.'

and in spite of this, proceeded to suggest we intentionally infect people at the outset of the coronavirus.

Claiming, falsely:

'As of yesterday total known deaths were 1384, a number that’s had a six day doubling time lately. At that rate, in four months deaths go up by a factor of a million, which is basically the whole planet. So unless growth rates slow by over a factor of four, there’s probably not time for a vaccine to save us.'

You'll have to forgive me if I don't take any of his claims about the future organization of society seriously, as he seems to lack something critical ever time he tries to imagine how people other than him might behave.

Also this:

'To me as a youth, I think the theory that many men want to have sex with men looked like a conspiracy theory: implausible, with no direct evidence shown, & the sort of thing people would want to claim even if not true. I now believe, though I've never seen very direct evidence.'

Truly a bizarre way to conceptualize the world.
I was wondering how this data was gathered since to my knowledge China has been pretty secretive about their space missions (compared to NASA at least). It looks like the data came from here http://www.r00t.cz/Sats/Tianwen1 and I think its surprising how easy it was to break down the data. I would have assumed it would have been heavily obfuscated / encrypted.
NASA selects five companies to mature lunar landing
> I don't see why it is redundant

Can you construct a pair of sentences where the potential ambiguity would be meaningful and not trivially resolved with context?
For every action, there must be an equal but opposite reaction.
I's only 2 points for an accepted answer, don't worry about it.
I find it hard to disagree with any or that! Admittedly I was just thinking user experience, false positives and programming when I mulled it over in my head.

I tried Locals, Gab (in their less controversial, earlier life while they still had an app store app), Parler, Bitchute, Rumble, Minds, MeWe.

I generally found that the experience is the exact opposite of Big Tech where you often get lost in the information presented to you and very often it’s low quality or annoying unless you go there to specifically watch or read or see something.
> Outside internet protocols, applications, and appliances, what's been invented since the late 1960s?

Do digital innovations not count as innovations? By that definition of course the digital revolution has not produced any meaningful innovation

Naturally, the industrial revolution has innovations that were related to industry while the information revolution has had innovations that are related to information.
This looks fantastic. Can't wait to try it out.

I want this to succeed, so I want the company to succeed. On that note I think you guys should change up your pricing.

Seems like there's too big a gap b/w the free forever (individual) and $20/mo/user for team.

I'd love to pay for this as an individual at a smaller amount - like $10/mo - for a few extra features. Or maybe reduce the functionality of free forever.
I agree with your arguments completely, and I've come to similar conclusions (except with dat and ipfs) when I decided how to build my peer to peer web browser network.

Unfortunately, in the real world peer to peer is a different problem due to carrier-grade NATs everywhere. I have to implement malware-like exfiltration and smuggling techniques in order to build an end to end encrypted network, because pretty much down the infrastructure is unreliable and manipulated by ISPs wherever they can, including unencrypted DNS or even DNS via TLS ports being blocked completely off the internet. [1]

Without those protocol in protocol techniques there'll always be a single point of failure, like with all "dApps" that are actually just gatekeepers on a centralized domain as a point of entry for their network. Those usually can be blocked off so easily that it's ridiculous to call them decentralized.

Somehow, between the 2000s and now, the internet got so crippled for endusers that it boggles my mind how that happened without resistance.

[1] https://github.com/tholian-network
I would really love to see these stats broken out by the type of update. Non-breaking changes (UI, interface, or otherwise) and transparent updates (filling some security holes, UI tweaks / alignment, performance, etc), though I wouldn't quite know how to mechanically label updates myself.

Basically, I'm advocating for slower user facing releases in general. We're getting overwhelmed on the flip side here.
Yes, points are accrued over time and never go away unless the source of the points (i.e. upvotes) goes away.
Yeah, it's too bad nobody will be working on that issue over the next 15 years.

My gas car has a range of ~400 miles, then requires a ~10 minute stop. A lot of the experiences in this article linked below don't seem showstoppingly different to me, as my appetite for hours behind the wheel in a day is rarely > 10 hours.

Fun read: https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a36877585/ev-1000-11-e...
Salary is a negotiation and companies will low ball you as much as they can. I don’t see how this helps productive people.
So basically "How much daily misery can we put our users through algorithmically before they break down and uninstall"? Why does anyone who is sufficiently aware of this still use Facebook? Not even as an ethical question, why use something that makes your life miserable?
I am an engineer working in the tire industry (throwaway is needed here). The Michelin "Tweel" IP was actually acquired when Michelin bought BF Goodrich 31 years ago. Goodrich developed the concept as a replacement for compact spare tires, doing the initial R&D in the 1980s. Every 3--5 years Michelin has a press release like this, and the technology is always 3--5 years away from release. Currently the US DOT and it's equivalents abroad are still in the rulemaking phase regarding airfree technologies, so there's that, too.
I assume he means this, where Apple banned a podcast app because it "duplicated existing functionality".

https://www.networkworld.com/article/2346233/apple-shows-tru...
Old news with a catchy new name "futarchy".

In 2005 when I joined Google, they actually HAD prediction markets (no $$ involved) on business questions like "Gmail will have 50 million 7-day actives on April 1." It seemed so hip and with-it. Top management can get the real truth about things, rather than just asking their underlings!

The markets didn't take off, they withered. AFAIK they don't have them anymore. A friend of mine actually created an open source project for setting up your own prediction market. We can ask him how many users he got.

We've had betting markets on politics for a long time, too. I lost a few dollars on Amy Klobuchar in the 2020 primaries, although I had a 3x profit for a while (didn't sell, damn it).

So the interesting question isn't "is this a good idea?" but "why hasn't it taken over the world already?"

=====
"Richard: Do you put futarchy in a larger intellectual tradition? Because a lot of people when they're coming up with an idea... Did you come up with this term by the way?

Robin: Yeah, and I've been ridiculed for it."
woah, super interesting. you should test ZGC as well.
How common is sex trafficking?
I'd love to talk to the folks that work at the outrage porn outlets. Are they true believers doing whatever it takes? Actually think they print news? Just in it for the money?

How honed is the writing and how is that done? How do advertisers (the point of the exercise after all) respond? How has it all changed over time? How do people become writers, how much of it is done programatically?

It's a small thing, but something I'm struck by is how little international news is out there anymore.
Since everyone may have different bathroom timing needs, how does one develop a policy that accounts for that, but doesn't just let someone go sit on the toilet for half an hour playing on their phone?
This is a fantastic idea: That there are life forms that could be neutrino based!
Now I'm even more excited.

Replay Team - please consider charging a reasonable amount ($10/mo) for individuals/small teams. I want this to be viable as a business.