skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Modern Gulf emirates have a similar ratio of citizens to guest workers. Western profesionnals are treated with respect, but manual workers from India or Philippines are basically slaves in everything but name.

How the history repeats itself, this time among hi-tech skyscrapers.
Many children can't.
I can see where you’re coming from but you have departed into theoretical/philosophical mode that’s not useful.

I really really really can’t know if the sun comes up tomorrow or 100 days from now either, but it is exceedingly likely and the same is true about my previous statement.

Disregard at your own (and all of our) peril.
This isn't a judgment, by the way. I'm naive about this area and genuinely curious.

I've found other buyers outside the US, but I had ethical concerns and decided against them (at a 300K min loss).

What type of buyers exist who are unable to fix the vulnerability (in this case, who are not Apple or the affected vendor or do not collaborate with Apple, etc.) but might be considered ethical to sell to?
I think the longer you go you may develop a different perspective, although it seems you might have a glimmer of it already. The endocannabinoid system biologically encodes salience, and so when you take cannabis everything (especially the internal world of thoughts and ideas) seems interesting and important, often moreso than it would be without the substance interfering with your perception.
Is it still a sentiment if it is bought?
Modern Copenhagen is basically an evolution from "shut up and calculate". It also doesn't given (human/conscious) observers any special role in QM - it is the measurement apparatus that has a special role instead.

Basically the initial approach was ontological: science is about what can be measured, when quantum properties are measured we need to apply the Born rule to predict outcomes, it makes no sense to discuss the scientific properties of what is by definition not measured, so shut up and calculate.

Later, the approach was more metaphysical: since our math doesn't work if we assume that particles have definite properties, we conclude that particles don't have definite properties; instead, when we measure their properties in a particular basis, the particles randomly acquire some definite property with a probability corresponding to the amplitude of the wave function.
Why does YouTube or Instagram tolerate sponsored content?

They don't get a cut from a sponsored video or product placement, and their dominance in the advertising
space means this is also cutting into their ad revenue.
I think the assumption is that if kind slave owner wanted to help change the system, they would probably start by freeing their own slaves.
I think one reason that people hate it, is that "a positive step" does nothing to further radical solutions, and in many cases, harms it.

To use a computer analogy, it's like: the problem is SQL injection. The "positive step" is disallowing special characters in user names. The radical solution is parameterized queries.

Adding in shitty character sanitization technically makes the situation better, but the bandaid-solution might make management less likely to sign off on fixing the actual problem.

(Note: radical in this sense basically means "addressing the root of the problem, transformative, fundamental" and not "fringe ideology," because everybody knows you should use parameterized queries.).
What would happen to a black hole which was charged to 1%?
Copyright as it exists today does an awful lot of exploitation-enabling and innovation-stifling in itself. (And that's ignoring the rest of the IP suite.)
A better (focusing on positives instead of negatives, but the media feeds off of negativity) headline would be "New Bitcoin wallets could save El Salvadorans $400M a year in Western Union fees"
Good morning I am interested in working remotely, I love working on a project with vue and laravel, I have experience working with PHP without the use of Framework, I would like a freelancer job opportunity, working on my favorite technologies. I also know JavaScript Vanilla, Jquery, Docker (little) and other technologies.
Basically nobody does anything altruistically, and it's naïve to think otherwise. Does that matter, though?
Ah, but did you do better because of that condition?

I was a way better undergrad student at year 4 than at year 1 (normally it takes 5 years to complete a BSc where I'm from).
> Sometimes the checkout action fetches the wrong commit!

I'm a product manager at GitHub, and I'm investigating this now. Feel free to drop me an email (ethomson@github.com) if you can share more information about the workflow runs that were affected by this.

> Using autoscaling self hosted runners, it is not currently possible to instruct the agent to finalise the current job but to accept none after it.

We're building this functionality out right now, so that you can have self-hosted runners that will run a single job and we will let you subscribe to webhooks that will let you scale up/down your fleet of runners.
Children shouldn't use social networks without adult supervision.
If your aim is to get education benefits, then you can't quit Amazon anytime you want; you can only quit when you're done with school (typically 4 years)
This reminds of when Angela Merkel and other European leaders criticized American big tech companies that all deplatformed Donald Trump (https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/01/11/problemat...). Apart from the vague reasons Twitter gave for their ban like Trump not attending Biden’s inauguration (https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspensio...), it was a move that highlighted that tech companies are indeed as powerful as governments and must be treated as such, with regulation. For international leaders it highlighted the risks to their own nations due to foreign interference. Although in the US we often think of foreign interference as only something done by other countries like Russia, the reality is that Twitter or other companies modifying information flow across societies is explicitly foreign interference. Finally, it’s also worth considering big tech’s censorship/moderation as equivalent to campaign contributions made in kind. Banning one party and not another or altering the exposure of some perspective is political campaigning. Actions taken to censor politicians or political views should be subject to election funding controls and laws.

All this is to say that despite all my grievances with the Bolsonaro government, I think this particular move to ensure online freedom of speech is justified. Large monopolist technology companies with government-scale power and unregulated privately owned public town squares are fundamentally incompatible with a liberal society.
You can’t just look at electricity consumption. You have to look at total energy consumption. Including the energy necessary to produce the goods you consume. And that is increasing exponentially.

In a way, the US (and Western countries) are outsourcing their energy consumption.
Matrix? No, Thanks
let me give an example of how I wanted to use this. For fun I was working on the backend for Dogehouse (open source clubhouse clone) for a while, and for whatever reason the creator wanted the entire API to go over websockets. Ok, well, sounds like a fun thing to play around with [0]. Maintaining API consistency between the FE and BE was... very challenging, because there was very little discipline in the FE, because it was mostly into/junior programmers with not a lot of experience with API change management and feature discipline, testing, etc. So I really wanted to use AsyncAPI to create a contract between the FE and BE to be able to enforce that discipline - by auto-generating validators that get injected into the code and raise hell if invalid content is pushed by either FE or BE.

It wasn't really ready for that yet at the time, but I think over time AsyncAPI will be the way to go.

[0] in retrospect probably would have been better as a normal MVC app with only the chat and audio parts over ws, but... Again, not my project.
Because there won't be...
Because you aren't being recorded...
Or because only a computer will see the original footage and tag people and blur faces you aren't friends with lol What was it with Google glasses? Glassholes?
Interestingly I have 5 Dell monitors, and 10 Samsungs that are 15 years old. Dells are all still running strong. While the Samsungs have needed replacement Caps, and their DVI ports have flaked out. I did find that if I use the VGA port they will work well though, strange...
Please clarify how Amazon is shitting on your lawn every morning. What specifically does Amazon do to target you to your detriment. Are you upset by their carbon footprint? Do you work for Amazon?

I just don't see the logical progression here. Amazon can still be an asshole and also be doing something positive. Elon Musk is widely known for being an asshole yet most people would say that SpaceX and Tesla are net positives. So it's clear that life isn't so black and white where an entity can only assume one role at a time (Good/Evil). Instead, we all partake in good and evil activities in the micro.

And if the bottom line drives a business then what does it matter if PR drives this decision so long as its a positive move? Why do people have this obsession with purely altruistic acts that don't exist?
> The most energy you can extract from any type of bomb would be if it was converted to energy at 100% efficiency.

Not true, imagine 2 positrons next to each other, the force these particle subject to accelerate to avoid each other is greater than the mass of those positrons itself.

In other words, if you can get accelerated to 0.9999c, you'll possess far larger energy than your rest mass.
I always use the English version of everything simply because error messages in Dutch or any amount of troubleshooting isn't going to helpful at all.

In the Netherlands, almost anyone who has about any device he owns configured in Dutch is almost certainly technically illiterate. People keep everything English not even because the Dutch translation is inferior but because any online documentation one will find is based on the English version. This is so entrenched that any notes I even keep to myself on my computer are in English rather than my native language without even giving it any second thought.

It is honestly somewhat strange and awkward to read technical documentation in Dutch. Many of the translated words they use take a moment for me to figure out since I never heard them in Dutch.
Good. I'd love if we could go further and make requirements to disclaim if a photo's structure has been digitally altered. Combining these two would be very effective in increasing clarity of content online.
> to depriving women of all human rights and treating them as chattel.

A wife was a chattel, as per law, up until the 20th century in a number of European countries.
Oh no I hoped it was about speeding up perf record that is actually a big thorn on my side, one I wrote a specific tool for... Depending on the number of probes you use, perf record can induce large latency hits or reduced throughput. Batching/buffer disk writes solves the problem for me. But I had to redevelop a perf parser to record/compress smarter. And for network streaming (no touching the disk is even better...).
What the world really needs right now is a power efficient, server version of the NUC.

An SoC board that carries a solid GbE NIC with LoM (or perhaps SFP+), a console port, supports ECC SDRAM, no sound hardware, and either no video, or very limited-scope 2D-only GPU. Maybe a couple USB 3.1 ports.

I would buy these in lots of 100, if available.
BTW re:google products, sometimes this is really annoying and not easy to find where to change lang in UI.

A trick that often works: add ?hl=en to the URL.
Most ads include feigned sentiment, in my experience.
You're assuming that the poor person gets immortality too. That's generous. Or even if they do, that they live in conditions that don't result in them dying from unnatural causes. Or just kill themselves because life is awful.

Better 100 good years than 500 bad ones.
Interesting. Remeber where you read the though experiment?
A novel technological approach to vector graphics (“Vector Graphics Complexes”)
How is this on the frontpage of Hacker News? This is just someone going through the tinyrenderer tutorial at https://github.com/ssloy/tinyrenderer/wiki

It hardly qualifies as hacking, and it's definitely not news-worthy.
the former implies the latter through occam's razor.
related: recently published book by same author: https://www.amazon.com/Privacy-Power-Should-Take-Control-ebo...
Many children are "influencers", often with parental support.

It's a very weird world out there.
Some examples.

1. Providing a permission based check to prevent a user from accessing a specific UI page but then failing to secure the back-end API endpoint that supports the UI.

A developer implementing a user story reads the following acceptance criteria, "User without permission X cannot see page Y." and proceeds to prevent the UI page Y from rendering if the user doesn't have permission X. They completely ignore securing the back-end API endpoint as that's not a requirement. Now you have a back-end API endpoint that isn't doing any permission checks and anyone can call it even if they don't have permission X.

2. Allowing different values to be used when checking authorization and subsequently persisting data.

A user posts to a URL to add an item to an order.

URL:

POST /app-web/orders/144/items

PAYLOAD:

{
"item_id":682,
"order_id":555
}

@POST("/orders/{orderId}/items")
public void addItem(@PathParam("orderId") Integer
orderId, OrderItem orderItem) {
checkOwnsOrder(orderId);
repo.create(orderItem);
}

The application logic is written to check that the user has access to the order identified in the URL (144). But the payload has a different order id (555). The application allows the item to be added to the order but in this case the order being altered is order number 555 and not the order that the user originally had the ability to add items to, 144.
> it's definitely theoretically possible.

In theory yes, but in practice: Not so much.

Even if we put aside GP's concerns, shooting big blobs of lava into space would require heating up the lava/rock in the first place. But this process doesn't happen on its own (through thermalization) given the average temperatures on Earth, meaning that the process of moving waste heat (from the environment, i.e. air/ocean) to the lava will once again decrease entropy (of the combined lava + air/ocean system) and you thus need to move the missing entropy elsewhere. (Meaning that you have to do work to accomplish this heat transfer / dethermalization and you will once again incur waste heat.)

Sure, we could also try to tap the heat bath of the Earth's core but then we would build a deep-Earth elevator to transport lava and solid rock (or, say, water) back and forth and GP's concerns apply once more.

There's another option, though: Don't build an air conditioning system/fridge – use thermalization with another (lower-temperature) system. That is, don't take lava (or anything that needs to be heated beyond ambient temperature) – "just" take rock at (Earth's) ambient temperature, move it to a lower-temperature $PLANET and then move cool rock from $PLANET back to Earth. I doubt this would be very efficient/fast, though.

In any case, the difference between the two approaches is that an air conditioner (or a fridge) cools things below ambient temperature and requires additional energy for that (which it will expel as waste heat), while the second approach "simply" moves energy from the heat bath that is Earth to some lower-temperature reservoire (i.e. $PLANET). If $PLANET and Earth were thermodynamically connected not just through the exchange of infrared radiation, this would happen by itself over time through thermalization.
What they're saying is that if staffed remittance locations have been locations for criminals to hang out and rob people, bitcoin ATMs surely will have the same issue.
The issue is that the only way to guarantee no liability is a clean room implementation. It's why most open source reimplementations require no mention or examination of the source/machine code. Google got dinged over a trivial method they copied in their java implementation, even though it was extremely trivial. You can't risk any chance of copying, regardless of how trivial the code.
Rust hasn't magically solved concurrency safety either, as linearity is not enough.

GC'd languages (Java, Go, Haskell etc) are safer than Rust by default, you just have the tradeoff of GC. Note that this isn't always a tradeoff as GCs can outperform static allocation in scenarios like large dynamic heaps.

Haskell is the safest for concurrency because of the strictly typed functional semantics.
PoS FTW
Interesting, would be nice to combine webauthn into this stamp project.
> in the coming years Intel will cease to buy back shares, but will invest in new manufacturing capacities instead.

This is critical for Intel's turnaround. Good to have a CEO that wants to put money into process engineering and capacity than financial engineering to pump up the stock price to meet his personal compensation goals.
Last mobo I bought proudly talked about their "Military Grade Capacitors" which is funny because if you know anything about Military Grade that means "whoever will provide a product that meets minimum spec for the least amount of money"
Introducing javascript into the mix will not make the botnet more difficult to detect. Headless browsers have their own fingerprints which allow defenders to identify them from legitimate traffic. You can spoof the features that headless browsers don't have but that will always be a cat and mouse game.
Well arrays never allocate in the first place, but you'd need some sort of specialized iterator api that either:

- Handles the iterator not being the same size as the array you want to collect the iterator into and turns it into some sort of Result<[T; N], ArrayCollectError>.

- By itself knows the exact size of the iterator as part of the iterator type and thus can ensure via the type system that the iterator has exactly as many elements as the array needs.
For me, there's an extreme reaction to his actions. He is definitely stirring the pot a little much, but does he deserve this treatment?
How does buying used laptops and installing software on them to then sell to yet another party stop manufacturers preventing this in the future? Why can't people just buy the used laptop made by the big manufacturer and install it themselves? Why trust more third-parties than you absolutely have to?
Think about it this way. If a panel of jurists who only half understood the expert testimony saw your code side by side with other code would it look like blatant copying or not?
hey!

I have a question. Are you deploying it to your servers/cloud accounts or clients’ accounts?

Regarding your questions: it is responsibility of the app to build and upload the static assets where needed.

If you want recommendation what to do, I’d say you’ll need a custom dockerfile, install node, run webpack in there and collect static.

If you are not using collectstatic in that process then given the lack of details I’d say why are you doing it in the same repo at all. But again – you provided very little details.

So if it is a website(server rendered pages, SEO is important,etc) - you should have node and do optimisations before pushing to s3.

If it is an app (RIA,SPA) then I’d say don’t mix frontend and backend. Decouple it and ship frontend separately.

Appliku Interface is built and served with Netlify. I still remember those dark times when I had frontend inside the main repo. It was largely inconvenient.

Either way happy to chat about your issues in our discord server. I am more than happy to help you figuring this out.
Define “seek dominance”. Also, look at the EU. They force significant reduction of the carbon based energy by 2030 or something. Some countries (such as Poland) rely heavily on this energy type, but they signed an agreement to stop that. As you can see “humans” don’t have to seek dominance in anything, we just need to cooperate.
Tips to Write Code Faster in Any Programming Language
When I read this, I always think of Congressman Floyd Spence:

The American reaction to a Russian SALT treaty during the Cold War is one well-known example of naïve cynicism in history. Political leaders negotiating on behalf of the United States discredited the offer simply because it was proposed by the Russian side.[1][9]

Former U.S. congressman Floyd Spence indicates the use of naïve cynicism in this quote:

"I have had a philosophy for some time in regard to SALT, and it goes like this: the Russians will not accept a SALT treaty that is not in their best interest, and it seems to me that if it is their best interests, it can‘t be in our best interest."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Na%C3%AFve_cynicism
Why would it matter if the offer was “real”? Google should pay what the employee is worth to them. I say “FB offered me 400k, what’s your offer?”, what’s the point of Google asking for proof? My value to them hasn’t changed. I’d withdraw my application with that as it demonstrates a lack of trust.
This is intellectually lazy. You assume everything good is done in bad faith by people you've labelled "bad" and then judged them to be bad based on acts you've assumed were done in bad faith.

...it's the epitome of bias.
“We've spend the last year moving people out of restaurant and bad retail jobs (there are still some good players there) to much better paying jobs. Everything from logistics, to tech, to healthcare.”

Does your company provide training for these jobs? The comment implies that your company actively moves people from lower wage to high wage. Or are you filling positions with recent college or vocational school graduates?
If "zero worlds" means there is no unified single reality that all physical systems relate to (just like there is no universal frame of reference for motion according to relativity) then I think we're in similar territory.

I'm not familiar with Garret, but Rovelli's book contains a great discussion of the "quantum eraser" experiment in that blog post, where quantum interference causes a split laser beam to recombine in different ways whether or not a detector is present. This is something you can observe with tabletop equipment apparently, a pretty visceral demonstration that quantum phenomena are a real part of our world.
By "context" do you mean your personal bias?
> Faster, more correct float parsing

> The standard library's implementation of float parsing has been updated to use the Eisel-Lemire algorithm, which brings both speed improvements and improved correctness. In the past, certain edge cases failed to parse, and this has now been fixed.

> You can read more details on the new implementation in the pull request description: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86761

There's some pretty big speed improvements there. 3x-10x in the most normal cases, 1600x on some edge cases, and stdlib is now capable of parsing the floats that it never used to be able to.
Like Washington and Jefferson he championed liberty. Unlike them he freed slaves
Facebook, Ray-Ban debut picture-taking smart glasses
Interesting how it's very clearly set in SF. The original movies were all in an anonymous city.
Sponsored content isn't locked in to YouTube

The second they ban it all the creators that can afford to will jump ship. YouTube knows the creators that can afford to jump ship are also the ones keeping their lights on

I have no idea the legal situation but I'd also imagine there'd be a safe harbour challenge in there somewhere too