skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think these requirements are very reasonable and we have an existence proof that it is doable.

I know that Apple supports its hardware for seven years in California (and not other US states as far as I know) due to state law. I can’t imagine other manufacturers are immune to this same law.

I’m not holding Apple up to be some paragon of virtue, but it was easy for me to find what they write on the subject: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201624
I partially agree, and partially disagree. No i don't expect volunteer sysadmins to take huge risks for me. However, i expect huge organizations like Protonmail who claim to care for privacy to do just that.

Moreover, the risks in this case are not big because this is a clear case of political repression and any form of judicial scrutiny would have raised considerable eyebrows.
10 Hardest Materials on Earth
One could be extremely generous and assume that the LPs date from before Amazon sprawled into so many market segments (ie. it looks rather different if the noncompete only constrains a former employee from working for other online book retailers).

Is there a revision history for the LPs? In fact, have they ever been revised at all?
I meant user config sorry.
Between fedora and docker, it didn't help, that docker made a first release for current fedora version always about a month before fedora was going to make a new release (i.e. with fedora's 6 month release cycle, the corresponding docker release for that fedora version was 5 months late).
Here are some more recent photos of the crew inside the cupola in Hawthorne.

https://twitter.com/inspiration4x/status/1433192632457564160
Another strawman.

I’m not exactly sure why you think I would care so much about your opinions to be ‘the arbiter of truth’ for any topic. You’ve made claims that are clearly erroneous and I’ve been pointing them out to the passing reader, so they are not waylaid. I won’t comment on the correct interpretation of ‘free will’ since I myself don’t know, and decline to pretend to know.
Wow, that's quite a career change! Thanks for the insight!

Personally, the one thing that saved me from going crazy during the pandemic were precisely those standup meetings (via Zoom) – otherwise I probably wouldn't have had any human interaction for months. But I suppose it all depends on who your colleagues are.
> they say it's legislator's job to fix it.

This response from the courts is maddening to me, since the courts invented QI. It’s your damn problem, clean it up yourself!

I mean, at this point I’ll take anyone who will clean it up, but it’s such a shameful passing of the buck.
There was a "nuclear anxiety" [1] back in the cold war days. History repeats

"mere threat of nuclear war has been exacting a serious toll on the human race "

[1] https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-abstract/52/4/557/19107...
While I have no data to discuss the second item, regarding the first item you seem to be misinformed. PM did _not_ cooperate with a random foreign police. PM had to execute on _their local authorities_ order, and judicial oversight was present - three authoritative entities in two countries had to approve the order. If this is not judicial oversight then my imagination fails to suggest what could serve as such oversight. And in their clarification PM state that there was no possibility to challenge the order in court (maybe because the order came from a court already?).
Certain behaviors (such as occupy other people's property) do not suddenly become legal/ethical just because you have a climate activism agenda in your head.
... if the application was written recently. Get something from last year on your 'now' computer and let the suffering begin. Without a docker setup, I really find node horrible vs let's say .NET Core, Java/Closure or Go. But ymmv. A project I inherited has node_modules of 780MB with 150k files with many deprecated and vulnerable ones in them pinned versions: I would not call that easy. I never had that with .net: usually you need a few nugets and if you update them, they still work. That I would call easy. I have used both (and java for over 20 years) for 10+ years, I just do not like the ecosystem (or language but that is ok with typescript and purescript and cljs): I have to anyway.
I see where you're coming from, but Youtube isn't nearly as opaque as Tiktok. You can actually search for videos on youtube, typically content is longer and has a higher production quality which reduces probability of doom-scrolling. As someone else mentioned, TikTok is intentionally designed to be addictive and gamified, much more so that youtube or facebook.

And, objectively speaking, the US government is far preferable to the CCP. The US has it's issues and has made mistakes in the past, the CCP is still putting Muslims in concentration camps and exercises regular authoritarian controll over it's citizens. Militarily, the US is allied with most EU powers (including France) and generally has good intentions for it's allies. China, on the other hand, finds itself on the outside of most alliances, and considering that even their own people are treated poorly, I can only imagine that their intentions for others are not positive.

American tech companies take your data and sell it to advertisers, I don't like it, but they do. The US government only accesses it if they have a reason to do so and subpoena the specific information needed. The Chinese government? I have no doubt that they're collecting data for much more nefarious purposes. Intelligence indicates that they've been improving their military forces massively in the last several decades. It wouldn't be hard for them to subtly start slipping in propaganda into the tiktok feeds of countries they intend to invade, and then they'll have local-national support.

I think it's easy to look at this and say objectively that it's worse. If Youtube or Facebook were owned by France or Germany I would hold the same belief that tiktok is worse. It's not fear of some mysterious "other", but fear of a proven enemy to freedom and human rights, China.
They would also seize the $9000, $900 and maybe even $90 if they could get away with it without doing too much work. After all their department gets to keep 80% of it and a $72 bonus for a bit of paperwork sounds good, a few of those and they can upgrade the coffee machine.
In case you live in an US style suburb detached single family home lifestyle, I feel like suburb living contributes far more greenhouse gases than a short flight, since living in dense communities reduces how far all mass has to move, and suburb living increases how far all mass has to move.
You're getting downvoted not because you're wrong about what that symbol is, but because you're immediately leaping from 'someone makes a light hearted comparison on twitter' to 'someone is spreading misinformation'.

Honestly, there's really no need to take a throwaway tweet so seriously.
Excuse me, but to hell with this logic.

While you agree it is not a crime, the reality of enforcement measures like this means it de facto is considered one in the gestalt of law enforcement. It should not ever be construed as suspicious to carry around large quantities of cash. It is not acceptable to see someone with over 2000 dollars in cash, and assume they are up to something.

People are losing sight of the fact that financial privacy was the default for much of history, and the new phenomena of financial surveillance since the 2000's is absolutely a governmental power play, utilizing the financial system as a tool for soft power projection in that the hand that defines the set of transactions that can be conveniently done wields an immense amount of power and influence in people's day to day lives.

This is a shining example of how the United States has abandoned any semblance of being a fundamentally high trust society anymore.
My question, maybe a bit more meta - is why not instead work on features for matrix and a client like element?

As if the world needs yet another slack-like.

xkcd_15_competing_standards.png
> - host -> seat yourself sign

> - server -> pager, bus your table, ordering tablet

> .... They just haven't been widely deployed enough to become a norm.

Attempts to revive the Automat (a century-old concept along those lines) haven't gone so well in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automat

FEBO does this in the Netherland. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEBO , though also with in-person ordering.

> observed successfully in action

And failed in action.
> but I went so far as comparing the GZIP output of calling `for ()` vs `forEach`, etc

AFAIK Google Closure Compiler [1] does similar things automagically.

[1] https://github.com/google/closure-compiler
There's no guarantee in general that a pill will have its active ingredients distributed evenly throughout. Although they're not often carried in stores, there are versions of melatonin that come in 0.5mg doses.
No, it's not an aberration. Cops in various departments around the country take classes to do this most effectively.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=asset+forfeiture+classes&t=lm&ia=w...
Motors can get well above 95% efficiency, even at a wide range of speeds and torques.

Eg. See https://cdn.motor1.com/images/mgl/y83JG/s3/tesla-motor-effic...
No, OP is clearly saying that this instance of civil forfeiture theft is less outrageous (a “worse example”) than others because the victim was acting suspicious.
I am not sure that doing a find/replace of "degrowthers think" with "degrowth theory says" would really contribute make the debate less polarized. Maybe.

There are reasons to labeling people other than those you suggest. For example, maybe it simply was the first way to express his argument that came to mind. Or maybe, identifying a group of people who think X can be part of the debate. For example, suppose libertarians are all funded by billionaires. That might suggest a motivation for libertarian thought. You couldn't know this without identifying the people who are libertarians.

Lastly, it's often good that people have to "pick a side". Do you think we should aim to stop economic growth, or don't you? It's good that you should come to a clear position on this topic. Unclear positions might be nuanced, yes. But they might also be based on unclear thinking, or a desire to please everybody.
The problem will get worse if you ban advertising. The money that went to advertising will just shift to “influencers”, which is even less authentic.
Oh really? are u playing stupid or what? there's a massive alternative of protonmail just to know, I2P is example.
Plus one flagship phone neglects the largest portion of the market who want cheaper phones
> you have to tie the bill of rights in knots to justify civil asset forfeiture as constitutional

There is unfortunately some pretty deep precedent for states (note: less so the U.S. government) holding property while disputes around it were adjudicated, in some cases going back to the founding of our republic. For details look at the opinions in the cases IJ has previously filed.

The fact that the DEA ignored the 90-day timeline for filing a case, on the other hand, may be material if it can be shown to form a pattern of behaviour…
This may well be the case, as most police requests do. However, you're probably aware that these requests are somewhat-automatically approved by judges who have no time to examine them all, want to stay cozy with law enforcement (have very friendly relationships with prosecutors, despite that being against the separation of powers), and are counting on hosts to protest illegal requests.
They need probable cause to bring in a dog. He should have refused to allow them to search his vehicle or answer any of their questions.
> And yes, that website says they can search with probable cause, and it doesn't say that being suspected of having cash doesn't count.

“probable cause” is of a crime; possession of cash is not a crime.
It must also be noted that the vast majority of these deals aren't homes on the market for locals, they're existing investor real estate.

Sometimes you see articles stating '25% of all homes last year were bought by investors', but failing to mention that 20% of that 25% were homes sold by investors, too. i.e. company A selling to company B, an apartment block fully rented out. Sometimes company A and B are part of the same group structure, and they're simply restructuring. And so really the percentage of investors buying homes that could otherwise be bought by citizens, is actually only 5%.

Secondly, there's a lot of international capital flowing in because capital is extremely mobile and knows no borders. It doesn't mean foreigners own the real estate. Everytime a Dutch investor (e.g. a Dutch pension fund) buys real estate, it typically finances it with a combination of its own money and borrowed money, and the borrowed capital is typically raised on international financial markets.

I find the news is quite unsophisticated in detailing these nuances, and typically chooses the most incendiary headline that they can get away with.

e.g. "25% of homes bought by foreign investors." or hell even "50% of real estate bought by foreign investors", instead of 5% of available homes bought-up by Dutch pension funds", all three statements could be based on the same data-set.
Throwaway.

As the manager of various accounts used by environmental and social activists on Protonmail, this is really bad.

I understand they have to follow Swiss law, but surely there are higher standard and processes than: police forward foreign request. Don't challenge or question, just do task required.

Interpol requests are not as universally recognized as what some people here are alluding to. Countries can file these requests with interpol but it's up each country to determine if they act or recognize the request.

If the Chinese government files 500 requests via interpol and the swiss police merely pass them on the proton, will proton mail automatically comply and install malware on their client on targeted accounts?

I hope this is not the case but I expect this to be clarified. On th face of it, organizing an occupy protest hardly seems to pas the bar of "serious criminal cases"
> I don't see how consumers and society benefit

Actually, you do see. The price of your phone would be higher if Qualcomm had to hire competent engineers to make properly designed kernel changes for their hardware.
If it would make you feel better , just fork it and rename it ‘bootlicker’
Magic of compartmentalization of concerns.

It turns out that getting a bunch of programmers to do careful modifications to some C code base over a couple of months is more work than getting great many thousands of people across multiple companies to manufacture, distribute and sell new hardware to millions of customers.
> That's an incorrect assumption if you haven't audited the code.

Even without an audit, the odds of a Rust project being memory safe are so much higher than in comparable languages.

Furthermore, Rust makes auditing so much easier by allowing you to concentrate on unsafe blocks.
"sorry we don't have IP logging. Requiring us to do so is an undue burden in costs and would threaten our customer base, costing us far more money. If you want to log addresses that's the states responsibility."

They may very well lose, the problem is how much they willfully comply, and then lie or ommit the truth.
Helpful links, looks like failure to sanitize input. Classic.

But on the “attacks coming from”, I’ve never understood putting stock in these. Aren’t these all going to be proxies and botnets?
The only issue here, is that Proton said on their homepage that they don't log IP, but they in fact do it when asked by the police. Vote will not impact that.

Anonymity doesn't exists for GAFA or Big governments on internet that's all, if you are not happy with that, you can vote as you want it will not change. But anonymity in society will soon stop existing as well. With all cameras that we have everywhere, we just need the Chinese facial recognition system and that will be the end. That's how it is.
Location: Argentina

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: Kotlin, Java, Python, SQL, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Snowflake, several AWS services, Airflow, Kafka, MLOps tooling (DVC, MLFlow, serving)

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mndominguez/

Email: mndominguez621 ((at)) google mail

5+ years of experience as an engineer working in the Fraud Prevention space, primarily on Payments, designing and implementing end-to-end systems (backend, data ingestion, ML models in production). Previously some (2 years) full stack experience.
While the idea that companies are held responsible for all theyr actions are good, there is one big problem. If the rist of failure of a product is to large, companies build shell companies that can go bancrupt. It is done so in oil shipment companies and i am sure there are other good examples. Nothing has been done against that even after huge oil leaks where the responsible companies have been very obvious.

(I do agree to longer enforced support on devices nevertheless)
Similarly I used to have an issue with the number of projects submitted to /r/golang that are “a whatever server written in go”. If I wanted to see a new whatever server I would be looking elsewhere and wouldn’t particularly care what language it’s implemented with.

Nowadays I’ve come around to appreciating the opportunity to see what other gophers are doing. I usually skip over those posts but occasionally I look at the code and learn something new.

Even when I’m dealing with compiles binaries, I slightly prefer something written in a language I’m familiar with just so there’s a better chance I will be able to diagnose any bugs I encounter.
I am honestly wondering more about your specific use case. Does the CPU cost outweigh the storage cost? Is it a timing problem (speedup) or are you at such large scale (on premise)?

Maybe where I'm getting at is, I can think of 99 problems but docker gzip ain't one :) how was this a priority (at some point)
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
Approval of their government compared to what? What is the alternative? Chaos?

In a democracy you have many parties and points of view which would naturally lead to lower popularity as it spreads over many ideas. Each takes turns and this system renews ideas.
Well when did you ever hear of a space agency bothering?

Jokes aside, I hadn't heard the term before and from what I could guess/infer didn't see how it could be a measure between two places: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta-v
> It is unclear, however, if civil asset forfeiture is unconstitutional. (“Unreasonable” is a big word.)

I disagree. I think it’s plain as day that civil asset forfeiture as currently practiced is unconstitutional. The only thing unclear is whether the Supreme Court will recognize it as such
I didn't take dog pills and also didn't get COVID. Anecdotes are fun.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

Eschew flamebait. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents.
> these requests are somewhat-automatically approved by judges

You said there was no judicial oversight. That is false. The claim that Swiss judges want to stay cozy with law enforcement requires a lot more support.
Again, in a life cycle analysis, energy use from utilisation is dwarfed by energy used during production. With IoT the number of chips will keep increasing and that's what determines the total energy (carbon) footprint, which is not the same as your electricity bill.
> if you use Discord, you don't care about the backend, it doesn't run on your machine

Right, but for a self hosted project this might of interest.
The issue isn’t your grammar — you were perfectly clear, and everyone understands what you were saying. We just disagree with it. This is a textbook example of abusive civil forfeiture.
> Strings theories and quantum field theories are different way to talk about the exact same thing

While I've heard about dualities between different string theories, this is news to me. Could you elaborate in how far QFT (as a meta theory) "contains" string theory?
Maybe there should be a jQuery Nano with just the most commonly used methods.
How much higher though? If you were to take the total extra expenditure on increased salaries for those engineers, and divide by the number of phones produced, the result is what? A dollar?
Both are planned features
> Because putting this description into a doc/MATHS.md file inside the repo itself is too easy.

Agreed. Even a link to Wikipedia would be useful: 𝜑-calculus is not the easiest thing to search for, and I'm certainly not going to sign up for a Telegram account just to find out what this is all about.
> "In terms of the situation, we started the project when none of us even knew what federation was, so it was never even considered from the start."

Well, yes, it is honest, but it also is disturbing - which other well-known network principles were unknown to them?
Thanks for the detailed write up. Quite a few actionable ideas for me to experiment with. This is helpful!
I don't disagree, but they certainly do not belong to politicians.
Right, if you trust that they only store the encrypted version. But the comment at the top of the thread is talking about logging once the police are interested in you. At that point they can log anything you send to them (or somebody else sends to them), including plaintext emails.
While dance content is the most popular, the system that recommends videos allows a factor of magnitude more niches than other platforms. In no way is TT limited to dance. Within the first day I stopped seeing dance content. If you want to post stuff that would do well here, it would do well on TikTok.
>I'm not sure you understand my point. All the companies this article is talking about are listed and have shareholders. It's not about publicly listed versus anything else, it's about the different results from listed companies with different governance models.

I don't get it. Aren't all publicly listed companies supposed to maximize shareholder value? Or are you saying that it only applies to s&p 500 companies?

>That aside, if I bought a share in every company that was in the S&P 500 in 2013 and tracked their returns to now, only half of those shares would still even be in the S&P 500. The return on those that dropped out of it aren't reflected in the S&P 500 results, but they still matter from the POV of long term shareholder returns.

I fail to see how this matters "from the POV of long term shareholder returns". Even passive investment funds engage in rebalancing, which specifically mitigates the issue you described (ie. holding onto losers and not investing in new entrants).

>Anyway investors in index funds aren't owners of the underlying shares and don't have any relationship with those companies. The article is about that notional ownership relationship between shareholders and companies, so index funds just aren't relevant to this discussion even if their performance was relevant (it isn't) or meaningful with respect to individual share ownership (also not).

I fail to see why it's not relevant because you own the shares through an index fund. The incentives are still aligned the same way: Shareholder value => etf value => investor value.