skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m reminded of behavioral studies showing that other primates have an instinctive concept of “fair” and will choose against cooperation if a deal seems unfair to them. I think this was covered in Freakonomics.

How about making a civil law where anybody can sue the owner of a home if it’s not occupied in a way that benefits the community around the home - say with a $10,000 plus court fees and 10% of any residual income minimum for anyone in the community who sues and wins?
Who are you supporting, though? The scientists won't see a single euro of that.

To me, the problem is that the balance is heavily skewed towards the publishers. Scientists provide the articles at no cost (or even have to pay to be published!), reviewers do their work for free, and then you have to pay hundreds of euros for a single copy of a single paper?

While I understand that a paper has some overhead costs, the current fees are inexcusable. Scientists are forced to publish in "high-impact" papers so they can't choose another one, and you can't properly do science without reading papers. This gives the publishers a virtual monopoly - and they seem to be quite happy to squeeze every single euro out of it.

It's just rent-seeking, and I believe it goes against the very nature of science itself.
Fair enough, although I'm not sure this is true at our scale or our product type. When designing products for a 20 year industrial product life you really don't want to gamble on chips staying in production.

Definitely shortages on regulators as well, although that's outside my area.
That is intentional action. Unintentional I think would be stepping on their paws by accident vs intentionally stomping on their paws while looking at them.
> People who need those papers for whatever reason and need to use them/cite them will be forced to purchase them regardless.

No.
You're correct, from the original article he links the token website, and the contract address. As you can see there's basically no liquidity at all, as the last transaction was 2 days ago: https://bscscan.com/token/0xcf0a8ef5ae54b15588b337454c71bb4c...
> I would go as far as saying that people concerned about GoDaddy providing services to anti-abortion groups don't even deserve a website. I work for for a SaaS, on the shop floor (luckily) and I'm offended that someone is intrested if someone wants to know who else is our client any more than the testimonials show.

You're exactly the type of person that GoDaddy needs to aplease. People who care what other people do/care/etc.
In a movie this doesn't work. If only the gun is important a living room would have no furniture, carpet, curtains, etc.
Try https://www.findmyshadow.com/
They’re not assuming that the natural world is stupid. They’re doing what good scientists do, which is to not take for granted that human interpretations of the world are universal/true/even make any kind of sense from the social standpoint of other mammals.
I've never bothered publishing anything, just circumstantially gave a hand several people that have(I don't want my name to pop up in papers for a million and one reasons). I assumed they were since otherwise I saw no logical reason to go for anything other than Arxiv and publish them for free.
All fun and games until you have a car accident and there are no ICU beds available for you. Letting the virus go rampant still affects the vaccinated and the poor few that can't get vaccinated because of underlying health issues.
Automated Refactorings for JavaScript in VS Code
This is a paywalled copy itself, the PDF literally only has the first page.

You can, of course, get the rest from sci-hub.

Is this intended irony?

10.1126/science.352.6285.508
I hear that definition, but in terms of computer science this is not a categorical difference but one on a scale.

Clearly every tracking has to be able to re-localise among frames, otherwise it is not tracking. If you want to make a robust tracking you aim that it won't loose track even if the object is lost or obscured for a few second. These are all tuning parameters and questions of scenario. If you have a strong track of a vehicle with lots of evidence and you have strong priors about the road layout then the vehicle can disappear behind a bus for hours and you will still maintain the information that it is there. If you have a fleeting noisy observation about one pedestrian, and you don't really have a strong motion model about them (Because oh horror, pedestrians sometimes enter unmapped buildings and don't follow strict lanes!) then you might delete their track within seconds after they disappear.

So tracking creates information about objects, and how permanent they are is a tuning parameter. Some companies under some circumstances can choose to make the objects very permanent, some different companies or the same company under different circumstances can have very fleeting objects.

Given this, how much information would you need about the state of every single self driving system to write down a sentence like this confidently: "For a self-driving car, a bicycle that is momentarily hidden by a passing van is a bicycle that has ceased to exist."

I would be cautious writing such a sweeping generalisation even about bakeries and bread making, and that's a technology which has been practiced for thousands of years.

Here is what the author of the article could have done: Pick a specific failure of a specific self driving project and say "sometimes self driving cars struggle with object permanence. " It's not like you have to go far for an example. One of the root causes of the Elaine Herzberg accident was the car's inability to match her track among observations.
24 hours only, then you gotta purchase access again!
> I stop and tell her get how sorry I am, which did not make much sense and probably confuses the cat even more.

Thanks for giving this some thought. Really, it does make sense to your dog or cat.

When cats play, they often will hurt each other a bit as they tumble and play. Same with dogs. Just watch their behavior afterward.

If they really meant to hurt each other, the attack will continue. If it was an accident, they will stop, smell each others' butts, see if everyone was OK, and then either take a rest or get back to playing.

Two of our cats love to toss and tumble every night. If you didn't know, you might think they were fighting. But they are best of friends and love to play like that.

I suppose this is the bottom line (quite literally): if you kick your cat, smell her butt!

No, seriously, you don't need to do that. Cats and dogs have an amazing talent for reading human emotions. So just reassure her that you didn't mean to do it. A little head scratch, pet her, and she will get the message.
Also, disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (aka Tim-Bor / Bora-Care in the US). Roughly: glycol + borax + boric acid.

Spray it on lumber, and it absorbs into the wood, killing termites, powder post beetles, carpenter ants, mold, and algae.

For the lifetime of the lumber, no reapplication necessary.

Cannot recommend it highly enough for exposed crawlspaces / basements in humid climates.
But the Netherlands is small enough that the unaffordable prices in the big cities has pushed most people to the rest of the country basically increasing prices everywhere.
> People who need those papers for whatever reason and need to use them/cite them will be forced to purchase them regardless

What? Will they reject your paper if you don't present a receipt you paid to access it? I published two articles in Physical Review Journals, virtually all papers I cited came from Sci-Hub.

> Generally I like supporting people's hard work even if I can't benefit hugely from it

Scientists won't get a penny of the money you're paying, BTW. It makes no sense to compare it to books.
This got me confused as well. At noon it’s almost always to the south but at sunrise and sunset it will be to the north during the summer. Play with shademap for a bit and you’ll see this effect.

Edit: Think of the sun as following a V shape over the course of a summer day. It rises in the NE moves to S and sets in the NW.
Also in “Russian guns” category: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alekhine%27s_gun
If even the Cosmological constant is debunked,there's truly no rules to what's possible.
Yeah, I think there's a fundamental problem with the implementation -- with small, single-file programs where the code can be written in a chronologically linear manner it works well. But with that there's no need for reordering logic, so much of the more complex parts of weaving are redundant. Scripts, for example, are pretty easy to set up as [for example] markdown files, which works great (particularly in a project that requires a set of helper scripts which need why communicated -- having a set of markdown files in a folder makes it IME much more ergonomic for other devs). Anything larger and it gets increasingly fiddly and (again IME) not worth it.
> only really popular consumer cloud provider with a proper e2e implementation, so they can’t scan photos in iCloud.

This is wrong, photos (and most data on iCloud) is not e2e: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303
I'm pretty sure murica could make the same kind of phones that are built in Japan, South Korea, etc. without costing 10x the South Korean phones. And child labor isn't exactly endemic in all of SE Asia.
I don’t think there is either. It ignores the fundamentally solipsistic nature of “the truth”, and perhaps more importantly the fact that science can’t tell you what values to have, or what concerns to prioritize. It’s a methodology for refining knowledge, not designing a society.

But in the realm of governance, science is frequently used (or perhaps abused) as an unassailable authority to justify a wide variety of policy positions. I generally consider this to be a governance anti-pattern, but so long as science is being used to justify technocratic policy, it should be available for all of us to make our own judgements about.
How would you describe what "belongs" in a proper column? Not just anything that doesn't have a uniform schema?
What we really need is an index of these torrents by DOI, and then ultimately by journal and issue. Are you aware of any work to make this happen?
Right but all those things play a role.
I don't know how the various car teams implement them currently, but I find it hard to believe that this is some novel or SOTA approach for them. Kalman filtering and state space models are explicit object permanence models for tracking objects (relying on the physical location/velocity model to track object locations when observations are missing), used since the 1960s, and that pretty standard material in engineering courses on navigation.
In this case, the "powers that be" is the "ordinary medical approval process".
I think EU citizens have the right to live anywhere in the EU, so while not exactly the same as the US due to language and cultural differences, it might still have a noticeable effect. But I am not well versed in the topic, so I would only be able to guess.
You can get this info with public IP vs common databases like Maxmind
Of course, but I think the point the previous poster was making that even with well-paid jobs well above the average it's very hard to find something reasonable that fits in your budget, which underscores the point that for people at the average it's damn near impossible.
The 1991 Project - Mercatus Center at George Mason University
Ok, I never realized that. I think I need to see it again ...
‘ssh -D’ is your friend :)
Well it's become the exact corporate management hell that the original manifesto authors sought to fight back against. I personally avoid joining teams or companies that drank the kool-aid, and additionally find agile to be a particularly counter-productive way to deliver value to customers quickly. About 7 years or so ago I had the first inkling things were wrong when "Agile Coaches" appeared who were not developers.

It does, at least, facilitate micro management and burnout.
Just because it is simple doesn't mean it is easy ;)
sahil50 posted this 2 months ago:

https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1K1qoUFvqZp1fWbpcKJW...
Her music videos are also awesome :)
The way they compare this literal non-crime to high seas piracy pisses me off to no end. I hate how entrenched this word is. Can't even talk about this stuff without inadvertently reinforcing the propaganda of the copyright monopolists. They did the same thing with the word theft.
So that you can seed it later, very probably
If you are using Rails and jsonb, you may be interested in https://github.com/jrochkind/attr_json (by myself), or https://github.com/madeintandem/jsonb_accessor (an alternative).
Term suggestion: Treating data as a liability.
I agree; I get the impression that physics and math still do things in The Old Way of science; if we still communicated that way, modern physicists would be writing letters to each other critiquing work and offering advice. Somehow the life sciences became stuck in the “publish or perish” mentality.

Just out of curiosity, you mention everyone uses Word in the life sciences—what is used in physics? LaTeX? I also have to use Word, and hate it.
> * On the subject of the first point, I'd argue that piracy affects the overall situation very little. People who need those papers for whatever reason and need to use them/cite them will be forced to purchase them regardless. Similar to software, movies and so on.

Why? I can cite any paper I want in my paper, who checks where and how I read it? People don't even check if I read something at all. Are you implying that it's unethical to cite papers without buying them? Because then you fundamentally disagree with the whole thing. Papers are researched by authors and mostly funded by governments or private grants. These journals are just mooching off the whole thing.
Compared to a small business the "big chains" might be able to operate with smaller profit margins, or have lower non-labor costs, or profit from owned real estate, but it isn't enough for long term viability. Excessive rents are going to turn any neighbourhood into a desert like South Kensington.
Again, is this supposed to be a sarcastic argument against the approach?
Note, looks like oracle cloud has a nice free tier, but that's not a dedicated arm server, but a vm (but still, with 24 cores):

https://www.oracle.com/cloud/free/?source=:ow:o:p:nav:0916BC...

> Infrastructure

> 2 AMD based Compute VMs with 1/8 OCPU* and 1 GB memory each.

> 4 Arm-based Ampere A1 cores and 24 GB of memory usable as one VM or up to 4 VMs.

> 2 Block Volumes Storage, 200 GB total.

> 10 GB Object Storage.

> 10 GB Archive Storage.

Just to compare with Hetzner - you would typically be able to get 16 or 32gb ram, an i7 with 4 cores and 2x1tb disk (no ssd). I'm guessing single core performance might be higher than the arm offering - and a better fit for minecraft.

Ed: although maybe core count would win out with PaperMC?
I'm not the parent commenter, and I'm not a physicist, but this might be a reference to the non-mainstream theories that are often grouped under the heading of "plasma cosmology".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology
> There is no profit in it

I don’t know that I’m 100% convinced by this. Elsevier makes like 40% profit margins, and their primary contribution to researchers is prestige lock-in, basically.

Scientific publishing is in many ways stuck in the previous century. There are plenty of interesting opportunities to build technology to make that entire ecosystem more awesome, especially as funding agencies increasingly require open access publication.

Maybe there’s still not enough to build a stable company, but I took your reaction as a bit fatalistic
Oooh lets rewrite dog firmware and just put the brain in the car

No that's too cruel, cluster up some rats
Hungarian Foods the Whole World Should Know and Love
Those are baseless accusations based on poor understanding of ML.

This behaviour is counterproductive. It is not susceptible to sway me towards your point of view, but instead discredit you and those holding similar opinions.
Goodreads will always win simply because it's where all the users are.

Like reddit or any huge site its usefulness isn't in the presented top layer (recommendations/front page/popular list of x) it's the depth of millions of users.

If you read a relatively obscure book and look it up on goodreads then you read through the reviews to find users who gave a high quality write up and then look at that user's profile. This will lead you to other users and books that are actual quality.

You could create a smaller website with a higher quality surface level but it's going to be infected with the bias of a small "elite" userbase making it a basically useless echo chamber.
I think we’re a pretty innovative generation and we can build technologies that strike a careful balance between protecting personal liberties and keeping our children safe. Both are highly important.

The ‘all or nothing’ ‘here comes the 1984 dystopia’ argument is fear mongering. Let’s give Apple a chance and see if they can pull it off.
For us, a "proper" column is usually something we want to index against. Things like timestamps, user ids, etc. Anything that would be useful for top-level management of whatever has the json tacked onto it.
> This subthread is about downloading from Elsevier directly vs. downloading from SciHub.

The reply was to a comment about downloading from Belarus "where the government apparently tolerates the operation" "of PDF exploits" according to the commenter.
It uses actual rents for renters and owner-equivalent rents for owners. This does not assume at all that people want to rent their whole life. (The main assumption it relies on is that owners do not systematically understate what they think their own house could be rented for.)
Another great visualization: https://observablehq.com/@mbostock/solar-path
If you have ever written a game KI or something alike:

the most simple algorithms (few lines of code) can perceive the observer into thinking there is advanced KI at work.

Same might be the case with natural intelligence.
This is so ignorant I don't even know what to say to you. If you're interested in learning about the connection and evolution you can look into the Marxist Frankfurt school and its influence on modern identity politics.
Kubernetes Controllers Explained
Afraid so.
The rule of thumb I've noticed.

If they use "agile" as a noun, they generally have no idea what they're talking about and you should be careful.
It seems very weird to me that borax is so widely used in contact with humans in a variety of settings like ocular care and anti foot odor, because I use it as a flux in silversmithing and there are warning labels everywhere about the flux that it's reprotoxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic. Anyone knows why is that? Are my labels overcautious?
I’ve always had pets. I currently have two Siamese cats. I’ve accidentally stepped on them, but never intentionally hurt them. All of that is beside my point, though.

What you’re saying is clearly correct. The OP’s post supports this. I was simply telling you why studies like these are necessary: because things that can seem very real can be a case of cognitive bias. A scientist’s job is to gather evidence to reveal whether what we perceive is real or illusion.
> These houses are constructed entirely by companies (or people) for that purpose alone.

So private companies are allowed to engage in rent-seeking behavior but individuals aren't?
> People have been making various grades of hashish for millennia

Hashish is generally made with high-CBD strains (which is partly why hash tends to mong you out more than weed).

It seems there is evidence that CBD moderates the trippy effects of THC, and reduces the propensity of the product to trigger psychotic states in suceptible individuals.

BTW: in my experience, modern weed strains are beaten in terms of hit-per-gram only by the rarest, highest-grade black hash.
When I lived in Dunedin a few years ago I was truly shocked at the state of the houses. I don't think I've ever seen a house in the Netherlands without central heating; but I've never seen a house with central heating in Dunedin, and Dunedin is quite a bit colder than the Netherlands. Isolation and even double glazing seems almost non-existent and wooden houses are the norm.

Don't get me wrong, I really loved living there, and I'd move back in an instant (but work visas are very hard at the moment), but Kiwi houses are the worst and many decades behind Europe.
Fun fact, in the early days of lean manufacturing (of which "just in time" is a part), the practitioners often referred to it as the "fragile production system" for precisely the reasons you mention here. So yes, lean manufacturing is brutally efficient, but incredibly fragile.
John Smith is the stereotypical boring/common name for english speakers, and I was similarly suprised at how many "foreign" names are really just variants of John, so you could have a story in which everyone is called John Smith in different variants (Ivan Kuznets, Juan Herrero, Janek Kawolski, Yahya Haddad, Euan MacGowan etc.)
If the existence of iCloud correlated with a surge in child abuse, maybe you'd have a point. Believe it or not, child abuse predates the iPhone. And "has nude pics" -> "is rapist" isn't exactly sound logic.
Keep in mind, in math and other hard sciences it is not uncommon to cite 50 year old papers which are still highly relevant today (which is less common in biology). Such papers are often behind publisher paywalls since they predate arXiv. So closed access is very much a problem in these fields too.
That’s a fairly reductive definition of ‘will’ if fish can have it.

It is not clear at all your claim is true in the general case, which is the point. Humans differ from fish not in kind, but only in degree, a few hundred million years of evolutionary divergence as the biologists would have it. Unless of course special factors such as a ‘soul’ are assigned to humans and so on.
Not really, its just that it won't be recognized as evidence nor attenuating circumstances if the man become violent and kill or disfigure his partner. It is illegal to provide the test mind you, not to ask for it.

So the reason why it is illegal to provide the test is medical data protection. France is really high on this, the restrictions on processing medical data like diabetes, asthma are probably the strictest in europe - probably for historical/cultural reasons, but i'm not sure and only have circumstential evidence of this (and btw, with the americanisation/globalisation of french society, those cultural reasons will disapear).

The genitical data are even more protected.

And by the way, for us (or at least for people from brittany, i don't know that much people elsewhere), being a father or a grandfather is'nt a genetical thing. The man who share 1/4 of my genes with i call Warren, the one who raised my father and me i used to call grandfather (well, more endearingly than that)
People publish in journals (etc) because of the peer review and reputation. People are much more likely to read, trust, cite a paper that’s been through peer review. Also people are more likely to discover the paper by looking in prestigious venues than if it’s just in the arxiv flood. For promotion and tenure, papers aren’t considered unless they’re published and prestigious venues count much more.
Where are the majority of vaccines produced ending up nowadays? Rich countries placed orders greater than they could possibly use, and now rates of take-up are slowing in those countries. Presumably vaccine is being produced as fast as ever to fulfil those orders. Is Covax actually getting the excess to the rest of the world?
But some of those things that are dropped don't make any sense to have no impact on the characters, like someone having cancer. It's just mentioned and never brought up again.
how long before scihub takes the front seat of publishing papers originally so all you have to do is search and its there. if that model works for everyone and everyone is happy, where does dinosaurs like elsevier stand? i think in the history books