skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The other comments point out that you skipped or ignored the relevant sections of the paper, but you also missed this in the abstract:

> Organic farming is less polluting than conventional farming when measured per unit of land but not when measured per unit of output. Organic farming, which currently accounts for only 1% of global agricultural land, is lower yielding on average. Due to higher knowledge requirements, observed yield gaps might further increase if a larger number of farmers would switch to organic practices.

In other words, forcing a ton of farmers to switch to organic farming over night would almost certainly lead to them being much less efficient than average organic farmers.
In 99% of connections, a certificate error should be connection failure. In the 1% where it's the sysadmin forgetting to renew or a dev using a self-signed cert, you can still bypass.
https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/what-we-fund/fellowships/
Sooner or later, every country will implement Internet control to crack down on this. China has lead the way in this. The US elections and the COVID crisis has shown us that this is needed.
jq isn't line-oriented, it's json-oriented. it's operaring on a stream of jsons from stdin, so its query is applied to each json in sequence.

I would expect that htmlq run the query a single time for a single html; just like jquery $('#something') or document.querySelector('#something')
how does this compare to QUIC transport protocol?
They both let you avoid head of line blocking.
>As the country saw an economic boom in the post-LTTE years, it increasingly turned to foreign borrowings through the issue of sovereign bonds. But outside of tourism and certain exports, the country hardly managed to ensure it was attracting enough FDIs and foreign funds to meet its rising debt obligations.

So was this economic boom purely internal demand as a result of the borrowing?
Any reason to not use the Matrix protocol underneath?
>The amount of propaganda on the platform is ridiculous, though very frequently disguised as "news" or "educational".

I certainly don't see that on the youtube channels I frequent, but admit that the 'news' is typically op-ed disguised as news.

An alternative theory is that they (youtube) pushes 'news' since it pays well and is quite popular. 'News' tends to come from official channels over time with a kind of network effect. Those channels are all Pravda. The fact that it's propaganda is not necessarily a youtube choice but a major news organization choice.
In web-terms: a "Homograph Attack" (=> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack)
C was created in response to then dominating practice to use assembler for all kinds of coding tasks (not just “system programming”). I wouldn’t characterize the situation as “doing quite well.” On the other hand, C didn’t take off on IBM System 370 until much later, due to the availability of PL/I.
How does performance compare to a C/C++ UDP implementation?
> Finally, as a user, I prefer Apache over MIT because Apache makes patent rights explicit.

The thing is that you cannot really compare MIT and Apache-2.0 directly because they differ in several ways. It's not just MIT+patent clause.

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. Consult an attorney with experience in copyright law wrt software for legal advice.

Some ways they differ:

1. The MIT license does not mention patents. Apache-2.0 is explicit about patents and has active defenses (patent litigation against the one granting the license leads to immediate termination of the granted patent rights).

2. You must ship the entire license in both cases, but the mode differs. The MIT license makes you include the copyright notice and permission notice. The Apache-2.0 license makes you ship the Apache-2.0 license text in any case; this does not include attribution in and of itself, which it only mandates for redistribution in source form.

3. If you modify Apache-2.0 software, you must make modified files carry "prominent notices" thating that you changed the files (in practice, this raises interesting questions regarding workflows centered around pull requests because PRs necessarily violate the license until merged).

4. MIT license only requires you to carry around the copyright notice and the license (unless the copyright notice refers to an external file, which you must then keep under the same filename because keeping the copyright notice intact is required; fiat-crypto is one of these incredibly creative projects that does this). Apache-2.0 requires you to always also ship a file if it is a "'NOTICE' text file", assuming this means a text file called "NOTICE", you have to ship an extra file, to which you may add your own copyright notices therein.

5. No implied trademark rights on Apache-2.0. The MIT license does not make any effort to talk about trademarks (thus implied trademark licenses, like with implied patent licenses, might be possible); Apache-2.0 does not grant any trademark rights except for the NOTICE file.

If you want something closer to MIT+patent clause, try the Blue Oak Model License.
My weekly review of stock market news sentiment
YouTube Deletes ThelinuxEXP Account
Got any proof of that? Can you decrypt my email that is sitting on their servers? If you are communicating something so precious that not even the sender/receiver and subject line shouldn't be seen then you best not be using ANY EMAIL at all without a couple more layers of security on top of it.
Usage of fertilizers and pesticides also underlies an ideology: Massively importing chemicals to boost agricultural production at the cost of soil depletion, bio accumulation and health risks. At some point, regaining control of land usage becomes a matter of sovereignty.
Interesting ... I wonder what other animals and what capacity they have to learn to mimick language.

Anecdotally, we have a small poodle. She's an unusually vocal dog -- not a guard dog; she rarely barks at people, but we noticed early on that her barking sounds like the word "what", so we've always riled her up by saying "what" to her and watching her repeat. We've noticed if we vary the sounds (two barks, three barks), she'll often concentrate and then reliably repeat the pattern, but it rarely sounds anything similar to the original sound.

Fast forward to two weeks ago when I was recovering from strep throat. I lost my voice but the dog had a lot of energy and wanted to horse around, so I looked at her and said "what", but my "what" was very deep, rumbling and monotone. The dog looked at me for a second, let out a low rumbling growl and said "wha" in the lowest sound she could muster. I laughed, did it again, and she repeated it, successfully, several times in a row (missing one or two).
It would be nice if some addon would intercept video page opening, initiated background download via youtube-dl, and plopped VLC window running the video (as it's downloading) inserted into the page.

I would pay for that
Ah, interesting mention of Ohtipi, thanks! I'll have to dive into the source a bit to see how it feels. Thank you!
What does it have to do with Putin?
But are they vendor locking you like Monsanto is?
I'd use something like this script that you can put together yourself:

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require 'nokogiri'; p Nokogiri::HTML(STDIN.read).css(ARGV[0]).text

Just save it to a file in your /usr/local/bin/hq and do chmod +x !$

Then you can do:

curl -s "https://news.ycombinator.com/news"|hq "tr:first-child .storylink"

It uses Nokogiri[0], which is much more battle tested and works with CSS and XPath selectors.

[0] https://nokogiri.org/tutorials/parsing_an_html_xml_document....
If you work a lot with Linux, you can pretty much count on Perl and awk always being there. So it comes in quite handy to know them.
> Can you provide the legislative history that supports this?

No, I'm not a lawyer/historian.

> According to wikipedia airlines, cell phone companies, cruise ships, and shipping companies operate as common carriers, even though none of them are controlled by monopolies.

Airlines, cruise ships, and shipping companies, do not own the 'land' (in the georgist sense) that they traverse, so they're just completely irrelevant to the discussion.

As for cell phone companies, you may remember that a certain company known as AT&T was famously broken up into dozens of smaller companies (that have since re-congealed). Also those companies are legally required to interoperate with each other, ie: your T-Mobile phone will "roam" on AT&T's network.

> I'm not a libertarian, but I can still see the difference between "it would be really expensive to lay another set of phone lines" and "the state forbids you from laying another set of phone lines".

As far as I'm aware, the state, does not forbid anyone from laying another set of phone lines or railroad lines or roads, for the same reason that it doesn't forbid anyone from violating conservation of energy.
The Linux Experiments YouTube channel has been terminated - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28443244 - Sept 2021 (143 comments)
Every Streaming Company Not Named Apple Receives a Lousy Grade on Privacy
Well, the big one is selecting a parent from the child.
Similar to Apple, Protonmail seems poised to redefine privacy as "privacy from advertisers" rather than "privacy from us too".

I for one am now only using Protonmail through Tor. Recommend Brave users enable "Automatically redirect .onion sites". If a site has an onion service, it will automatically redirect in case you forget.
> A lot of hot people joined the company with designer clothes, even though they didn't have to go through the usual interview process.

That sounds ludicrous. If true, it has to count up there as among the most expensive way to get at "OPP" (in the Naughty By Nature sense). I don't see how the BoD and all sorts of DD processes could have signed off on it. Then again, I simply don't know how politics and power works at those levels, so I'd certainly welcome enlightenment.
Well, I believe that there are many other endeavours under the umbrella of Mozilla Foundation.

Another project (personally I'm more familiar with this) that's not very notorious but has a whole team of researchers is Common Voice, i.e. open-source datasets for training voice tech systems.

From their website : "Mozilla is a global non-profit dedicated to putting you in control of your online experience and shaping the future of the web for the public good." -> https://foundation.mozilla.org/
Microsoft Outlook shows real person’s contact info for IDN phishing emails
Or branding their faces.
Daisugi: The Japanese Forestry Technique
The chosen dependency on Russian gas has less to do with the Energiewende than with geopolitics. There has actually been a reduction in Russian gas supplies since the end of the Cold War. Germany is dependent on gas imports from Russia but less so than many other East European countries. Not to say that there aren't worrying signals, though. Russia has delivered far less gas to Germany this year, while depleting the gas stocked in their gas storage facilities in Germany.
If you have a navy capable causing halt to EU, CN, US, AU, etc you should go ahead and claim an entire island. Maybe collect some taxes, try to get UN recognition…

Operating outside of national protection requires either extremely small scale and high risk or it requires becoming a quasi-nation.
The chip shortage has made a star of this little-known component
That is something I doubt I'll ever sign up for is my email on a blockchain lol unless it's just a hash of the email text or something for "proof" of it's origin/association.
If the crux of the argument is that there are many more simple simulations than complex ones, and therefore we should be in a simple simulation but do not appear to be, then I don't buy it.

So why wouldn't complex life (humans) be correlated with more complex simulations? Anthropic principle of the simulated universe?

Furthermore, the simulation hypothesis has the same get-out-of-jail-free card that creation myths do: There's no reason to think the universe didn't just start half a second ago.

And here we are, fully realized humans with brains, sitting above layers of rock with fossils and below a long train of photons that looks an awful lot like the cosmic microwave background, all just paused, tweaked, and started from T not equal to zero.
That is restricting the conversation to those who finished.

Many young 20's somethings don't complete college, but end up with debt as well.

If the question is whether is a difficult for society to maintain college as a necessity for success, they should be included in the review.
Where do you rate the part of the OS that makes 100,000 types, brands, and models of devices all look about the same to our apps? I always saw hardware compatibility and abstraction as the greatest value proposition, not only for the user but for the PC industry as a whole.
Soviet Submarine K-19
How is the Wireguard VPN set up? Has anyone used Wireguard to set up a VPN into AWS VPCs?
Yes I'm stuck on 90 for this reason.
So your take is:

- we have to make this transition

- if there is any pushback or stumbles during the transition it’s not because the transition is wrong, but because of nefarious forces?
I see, agree.
It's an interesting linguistic video about the letter C, it's not about the PL named "C".
Incidents of people being offended in the past doesn't mean that people aren't more sensitive today than they are now. I think there is a strong argument made in "The Coddling of the American Mind" that overprotective helicopter parenting after the turn of the century, combined with the rise of online echo chambers that provide instant support for any personally held opinion have resulted in a society of individuals who are extremely sensitive and take offense much more easily.
I also have to wonder if the market size for this a truly anonymous email truly is. Who would go out of their way to pay for more expensive email that was untraceable? How many reporters? How many "freedom fighters"? How many large-scale criminal organizations? And does the very fact of using it bring unwanted attention?
See this: https://lightning.network/
I see you are getting a lot of pushback and I think its unwarranted. I agree with you, the phrase is becoming tainted. I would like a way to differentiate between places that are wary of the whims of power and places where opinions are so appalling they can't be a part of polite society. We currently talk about them the same, and there has been an uptick of the latter recently that makes being able to differentiate more relevant.

As a side note its sort of interesting to me how your un-popular, perhaps controversial yet not particularly offensive opinion is going to be censored from this discussion in which people are opposing your perhaps reasonable association with the phrase 'resistant to censorship'. "how dare they voice a dissenting opinion!" they might tell themselves, as they press the little button that will make your words fade away.
The person whose IP they tracked was French.
I've wanted to try out sorting neural net dimensions for visualizations via a travelling salesman problem solver over the correlation matrix among the dimensions. Has anyone tried something like this?
I'm taking this as a pretty good sign. My poorly informed outsider's opinion of Russian local elections prior to this was that organised fraud was so endemic that resorting to such obvious measures would be unnecessary.
I've always assumed this to be the proper way to do things, and it's still what I do when I'm asked to configure a new VM. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
This feels like the “rewrite it from scratch” mistake but instead of software it’s an entire city/society.
Not necessarily exact same, and maybe not necessarily having the same problems (such as corruption).

There is a reason that certain things have multiple implementations compatible at the level of key interfaces but different inside. Examples: cron and anacron, more, less, and bat, different NTP implementations, different syslogd implementations, to say nothing of the variety of DNS, SMTP, and HTTP servers.
Yes, I guess I just cannot relate to the mindset of a person that would be impressed by that.

Another common strategy by established immigrants or children of immigrants I know is to use a new immigrant, usually from their own country found via their own social networks, or maybe even their own distant cousin, and designate them as a manager at the minimum salary for exempt employees ($35.5k) and task them with working 60 hours a week and being on call for the more unreliable lower level employees.

When you dig into it, it is obvious so much of our luxuries are based on others being dealt a shitty hand.
> Each of the major steps have tools available that will do 90% of the work for you. On the lexer/parser side there’s ANTLR4, bison, yacc, flex.

In my experience, those tools will do like 10% of the work of lexing or parsing for you, and you will spend equivalent to 20% of the work understanding how to use them and integrating them. And then you'll find out a sad hand-written recursive descent parser is faster in practice and is what e.g. GCC and clang use.
You realize that the person I'm quoting isn't white, right?

Let's separate the general case from the specific. Generally, we know that representation in the people who make things changes what they make. This is obvious and undeniable. For example, look at ASCII vs Unicode. The Chinese invented movable type 500 years before Gutenberg, so it's not like the idea of printing non-roman characters was novel. In the age of telegraphy, Europeans developed encodings that included umlauts and accents; by 1851 they were merged into International Morse Code.

So why in 1963 was ASCII codified without any of that? And why did that become the dominant standard for an extended period? Because it was mainly Americans in the rooms where the technology was being created.

Similarly, we know that standard color films were developed by white people to represent white people well: https://www.vox.com/2015/9/18/9348821/photography-race-bias

And we all know how this happens. It's the same reason a lot of open-source software is good for a developer audience, not an end-user one: making things means iterating on them until they're good enough for the people involved.

That's the general case, so let's return to the specific case. If you want to prove that ML systems doing racist stuff has nothing to do with who made it, then you can't just handwave it away. You have to show why that specific project was set up so carefully and so well that it would avoid the natural pitfalls of any technology project. And then despite that it went on to do racist stuff. For reasons that you'd then have to explain.
I think arguing about Putin's level of control over Russia is splitting dissidents, I mean hairs. The ability to openly murder and gaslight your opponents, even when they are in other countries, is certainly within tolerances for an "actual totalitarian dictatorship"; Putin has, and flaunts, this ability. Is he publicly directing uniformed thugs to kick down doors and execute people in the streets? Well, no, but not being able to recognize Putin's Russia as a savvy, modern, post-truth translation of that classic dictatorship pattern will be met with me rolling my eyes (and then my whole body, along with some 9mm bullets, out of an upper-storey window, which will be ruled a suicide).
I'm happy El Salvador adopted Bitcoin. Not so much that I think it will transform the economy or even be practical, but that if a nation state adopted it, it'll be harder for governments and international governing bodies to clamp down on crypto in general.

I don't understand why so many people are bearish on this decision. We should encourage more experimentation as long as no one is forced to use Bitcoin.
Well, don’t always attribute to conspiracy that can be readily explained by decenttalized human motivation.

I remember reading books by Serge Lang in my mathematics Ph D courses at NYU. (He had an idiosyncratic approach to complex numbers, entirely basing it on Taylor series and deriving everything that way.)

That same person got heavily involved in debunking or challenging certain mathematical analyses (look at his wikipedia page). Most notable was his denialism of the connection between AIDS and HIV. His arguments mirror much of what is said about coronavirus and vaccine denialists and the Google Books from early 1990s features the same Dr Fauci responding in much the same way about that pandemic.

There is nothing new under the sun. Look at the Anti Mask League of San Francisco during the 1918 Flu pandemic. Same arguments.

There are many books like this, as well as people who are fed up with chemotherapy and publish alternative cancer cures, and so forth. You don’t need George Soros to fund BLM protests and you don’t need a conspiracy to have these people publish either:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter-Duesberg/publicat...

Same goes for people who challenge claims made for macroevolution, etc.
Can this be tunneled inside UDP?
without % it only does the change on the current line; and /g means change all occurrences instead of first (per line)
Yeah, I had the same thought — I'd much rather have an adversarial patch on my phone case than this.
Considering that Ethernet connections are synchronous up/down, I'm not sure what slow uplink has to do with anything.
It's supposed to be "bits of content", it's not jargon. The author's just accidentally a word, we all do it.
It's upsetting to see this flagged for no understandable reason to me other than not liking the scientists rebellion's politics. The documents they leaked are vitally important given the immediate dangers of climate change. Whether you think their philosophy is extreme or not, it can't be denied that suppressing the sharing of leaked information from the IPCC is stifling the understanding to this crisis. Their language is extreme, but that is a result of the inaction and severity of the crisis. We have less than 10 years to completely change the global economic system to stave off the worst possible outcomes, civilization wide collapse. That is extreme, and it does no favors to not be alarmist about a situation so alarming. Maybe you don't agree with them, but instead of harping on their language as proving your point, try reading the report they leaked instead of flagging it
HNs isn’t Twitter, and one of its strengths is being intellectually open and discursive.

What you see as ‘the obviously true thing everyone should accept, positively affirm, and shun dissenters of’ may not be that. At the very least, none of us should expect HNs to be tailored to our particular set of ideological values, no matter how deeply held - imo.
That's the next sentence on the article that I quoted (in the abstract).
Haven't there been studies untangling causation here? Using random events that hit socioeconomic class as a natural experiment?

Adoption studies might also be informative.
> Crop rotation implies the selection and plating of nitrogen fixing crops.

Yes, and and the rate of replenishment, even if you dump many times more soy straw on the fields than you will harvest, will still be microscopic.

It plainly doesn't work for anybody, but people who only farm for themselves. It's a grandly inefficient use of a scarce resource — land.

Even if the soil will be squirming with nitrogen fixing organisms, and nothing else for many years, it's nitrogen intake will be like a single nitrate application, or less.

> Phosphate replenishment can be done by spreading manure

And catch god knows how much food borne diseases in the process. That's disgusting, and absurd in the 21st century.
Isn't it about ~2GB/s vs ~20GB/s? It's really impressive but still an order of magnitude.
Good decision. but there will be a short term impact. theprint.in artciles are generally biased and paid for by the big industry, so don't take it as fact.