skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're basically dumping down a database to the web browser, including all of the internal metadata that's likely irrelevant to rendering the HTML.

For example, user role memberships:

{
"id": "c80b68c5-09ae-4a50-a447-df7c5a4a6d01",
"type": "user",
"attributes": {
"username": "kinshiki",
"roles": [
"ROLE_MEMBER",
"ROLE_GROUP_MEMBER",
"ROLE_POWER_UPLOADER"
],
"version": 1
}
}

Also record timestamp dates like created/changed, along with contact details that may be revealing sensitive info:

"attributes": {
"name": "SENPAI TEAM",
"locked": true,
"website": "https:\/\/discord.gg\/84e3j9b",
"ircServer": null,
"ircChannel": null,
"discord": "84e3j9b",
"contactEmail": "senpai.info@gmail.com",
"description": null,
"official": false,
"verified": false,
"createdAt": "2021-04-19T21:45:59+00:00",
"updatedAt": "2021-04-19T21:45:59+00:00",
"version": 1
}

But let's just go back to your response:

> Most of it is page filenames which indeed could be made optional

Do that! If you strip them out, the 529 kB document shrinks to 280 kB, which hardly seems worth the hassle, but when gzipped, this is a miniscule 13 kB! This is because those strings are hashes, which significantly reduces their compressibility compared to general JSON, which usually compresses very well.

It's basic stuff like this that can make a website absolutely fly.

Avoid giving computers unnecessary, mandatory work: https://blog.jooq.org/many-sql-performance-problems-stem-fro...
I'm not changing context or attempting to argue in bad faith. The statement is just asinine and delusional with regards to American culture at least.

You sound like you have some preconceived notion of you or your friends being wronged by women or something that I'm not going to be able to shake or have a reasonable discussion about.

I will however say, in words that may appease your ideology - it's honestly never been easier to get a banging hot girlfriend than in the current climate. You literally just have to not be completely fucking weird, have a hint of how to dress in something that compliments your figure, have the smallest standards of 21st century developed country hygiene, and one ever so slightly interesting hobby. Seriously, women will throw themselves at you.

But keep telling yourself what you want to think and reinforcing your views. I've honestly felt nothing but bad for women in STEM lately after an internship as a MechE in a fairly large and well known company. The older men acted fucking disgustingly towards the female interns, when all they're trying to do is make a career in STEM.
> With digital data, companies are forced to scan my data in their storage to see if it's copyright infringing or CP or others.

I don't think they are. What Apple & friends are doing is voluntarily. There's no requirement for e.g. your webhoster do scan your data, or your email provider to scan your emails. Case in point: ProtonMail doesn't, and they're not violating the law by not doing so.
It's more accurate to say that Universities and Colleges are extinct so the story should be what is taking its place and what are the consequences...

Its just like the Ed loan program..

Many don't realize its a teaching goal tool, those that get that they need to form a business around their brand to pay off the loan win and those that do not lose and society loses.

We should not bet on society losing this time around such as the elites did in the US!
Some credit cards have 0% apr for 12 months though
Electric fields are easy to shield against with a Faraday cage, but magnetic fields are a royal pain. You can use mu-metal shielding, but that's rather expensive and only reduces the magnetic field. Technically, if you wanted to entirely shield from magnetic fields, you'd need to surround the wire with a superconductor, but that requires liquid nitrogen/helium cooling that is out of the scope of most residential work.
The poem is from 1998; while slowly getting in fashion, cell phones were still on the rare side (at least where I live)
Am I safer if I disable iMessage or can the zero-click hacks exploit the Messages app through SMS?
Coca-Cola Factory Dream
Sounds like you'd enjoy OpenFirmware https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Firmware
> Limiting cities (and people) by having them live within their means forces better management.

New York State takes New York City's state taxes and gives a lot of them to a tiny number of upstate voters.

The US government takes New York City's federal taxes and gives a lot of them to do-nothing Republican states.

If New York City were allowed to keep all the state taxes it pays, it would not just "live within its means", it would run a huge surplus.

> the market

Here we are in 2021. "The market" is literally destroying our biosphere, and this only keeps accelerating. Surely no adult believes in the "Invisible Hand" by now?
Americans don't have families anymore? OK, that's news to me, I admit.
If Chomsky’s solutions are bunk, what is the value of his argument?

See also: the last 250 years of economic history.
Switching over to DPDK is waaaaaaaaaaay harder than switching to a new type of socket.
There is a dedicated game like that: https://play.eco/
Indeed, that GUI is awesome.
In Global First, El Salvador Adopts Bitcoin as Currency
The news are the fuel? Right, had reddit banned links to news about 9/11, maybe the US wouldn't have gone to war. It was not the fake WMD's or the lucrative war industry contracts. It was the news reports.

One of the first things the Americans did in Iraq was to shoot at a hotel full of journalists. They killed a Spanish journalist called Jose Couso. His family tried to get justice for 10 years. Even Wikileaks tried to help. They couldn't do anything. He had been effectively silenced and they got away with it. Still, more journalists went and told us what was going on, so you should be thanking the news.

What reddit banned wasn't a smear campaign of fake news. It was an accurate account of something which had happened. They decided the public shouldn't know about it. The only thing that does is people learn about it from media linked to the other side. It just destroys trust. "What else don't they want us to know?" People are going to learn about it anyway. They're just going to read it from a media that's far less sympathetic. So that's a pretty bad own goal. There is no suppressing the news altogether. Can't be done. Have a think about this one.

Hiding stuff and lying is never good for the public. Transparency and truth are good things, even when they don't help your side, because better informed people make better decisions. The trick is to be on the side of transparency and truth, and to update your opinions accordingly, rather than falling in line under a partisan flag or banner and suppressing conflicting evidence.

There is no dogwhistle here. Reddit banned discussion because they're partisan and the news hurt their side. Sorry.

Finally, it's very funny the guy in favour of suppressing the news is calling the guy in favour of transparency and open media a cryptofascist.
God, I look at all those adverts with incredible nostalgia. Whatever their quality, they recall such an era.

I was on the Atari side (mainly for the audio) but the adverts hit home just the same. I recall pouring over those magazines for the specifications.
There are two forms of money in the US economy. There is hard currency which the US does prints and ends up in banks as reserves (if you print it, you go to jail). There is also interest bearing form of money called the US treasury bond. The US prints and spends (though most of the printing is digital) and then sells bonds to convert some of that non-interest bearing money into interest bearing money. It doesn't have do the latter but it does because ... tradition? Also useful for large institutions to have a safe interest bearing asset. Economy likes that sort of thing.
Perhaps frankbreetz works for a company that isn't very cool, making it people's third choice; and a disproportionate number of women got hired by their first or second choice employer.
Because proper EEs draw it in a triangle instead?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Ohm%27s_...
Chaos Theory has got to be one of my favorite games of all time; the movement is sublime, to this day unmatched by other entries in the series.
Clean architecture making Node.js API shine
And yet it wouldn't be out of place either.
Genetics are discussed as social issue instead of as a missing practical technology, only because the tech isnt there yet. But it will be and soon, and once it is the left will embrace it like they did with prenatal vitamins. Embryo genediting and embryo selection works just fine, and the databases required to find polygene traits are beeing created, the techniques required beeing researched. Even today there are dozens of genetic traits that are screened for, and the parents given the choice to abort, or in the case of IVF, to pick another embryo for implantation. And people do abort, if given the screening and the choice. Trisomys like downs are going away in civilized countries, with more than 99% abortion rates. Religion can slow progress down, but nothing, absolutely nothing, will stop parents from wanting the best for their kid, or more specifically the kid they will have. Genetics and the impact on society is a fascinating topic, as is the identification of genetic traits and the experiment methodology. But the popular discussion is profoundly stupid. People seem to forget that we arent discussing how to order the society of the last century, this is all about preparing for the next one. Parents will fight over what skin color their kid will have, and the kid may disagree and change it, but only cultists will fight over if the kid should be in the optimal health, or have a low IQ.
I determined I didn’t want to continue school around 17/18 for a variety of reasons. Some out of my own arrogance and some I still hold to this day. Because of this of course, I didn’t “set myself up” for school so to speak. Didn’t bother with managing good grades, taking standardized tests or building my portfolio with any of the academic or non academic line items schools typically look at.

Flash forward and I start to rethink the decision. I want to go back now, but I’ve attempted multiple times to investigate it and the numbers never work. Because I didn’t play my HS years correctly, the bureaucracy will not let me in, regardless of the things I’ve accomplished in the years since. Additionally the price is just so prohibitive, combined with the fact that I would get next to no aid and even a standard State school would be ridiculously expensive. These are just a handful of the issues though. Let’s not even bring up how I would need a simultaneously drop out of the workforce, suddenly turning the financial burden into Tuition/Books/Fees + everything needed to survive.

I’m really convinced that universities in the US do not want non traditional students at all. Obviously there are some programs that target them, but are often limited. I.e. you have to be part of the right demographic, be limited in the areas you can study. A notable state university near me offers over a dozen online Bachelors programs, but not a single “useful” degree, they’re all BA’s in subjects that people in HN mock. Other seem to cobble together “made up” degrees, which are bachelors that don’t have a traditional or on-campus equivalent and seem to be not particularly useful for employment in attempt to scam poorer, non-credentialed people out of their money.

I could still probably go back, but since I can not hack my way out of the bureaucracy or financial cost, majority of the value proposition would be completely dead by the time o could manage it.
Zero Length Regular Expression (2010)
Probably something that uses tamper-proof hardware and blockchain tech to have a trustless ledger of pollution from the source, so that negative externalities of pollution can be properly attributed to their makers/sources.

We need to have the cost of pollution properly factored in to the price of things, to the taxes individuals pay, etc... so that they are offset.
> I’ve taught mathematics at community colleges for over 20 years and I’m absolutely convinced that not all people can learn algebra or calculus.

That a well-informed position believes that not (almost) everyone who is attending a college can learn single-variable algebra is fairly depressing.
> You don't get rid of terrorism by choosing a power structure where terror is the norm.

Terrorism is using violence to achieve political aims.

If state is built on terror and control, then others can't use it against it, since state has near monopoly on that.
All I remember was that it was a thread on https://www.reddit.com/r/HFY/
> for something more senior you'd need to at least look at grad rates further back

Sure. They have never dipped as low as 15% which is why I used it as very safe and generous number. Here's one source.

https://www.aps.org/programs/education/statistics/womenmajor...

> if not what happens to people once in industry

Indeed. What happens to people after they get a job is a relevant factor. It would be interesting to see both dropout rates over a career lifetime and if senior level women in tech are concentrated in a group of companies known to be good to work at via the whisper network.

Even age is a factor. Most folks don't stick with their CS job until retirement age, although some are smart enough to save and retire before that age. Age discrimination is not exactly rare though.

I have no idea where I'd get that kind of data or if it even exists, but maybe someone else does.

Given that kind of data, an industry with a constant deficit of qualified senior level candidates would do well to improve that situation by figuring out how to reduce the dropouts.
They just take the path of least resistance
I'm unaware of any social circles use the term "toxic masculinity" and are not using it to smear men. People outside of those bubbles do not use the term at all, probably because its pretty offensive to males.
I'm a BBC Micro fan myself, but the most impressive 8 bit micros I've ever come across are the Fujitsu FM 77:

http://museum.ipsj.or.jp/en/computer/personal/0017.html
It’s going to make a splash.
Given we have a fixed amount of effort to apply to scrutinizing superficially reasonable but deeply poor arguments, we should focus on those that -- if false -- have the most deleterious effect on utility, broadly defined. If social equity is a component of the utility function, and I think for many it is, then power-preserving arguments would be such a target.

This could really be articulated in any way you choose, but no it doesn't follow that "we should be more skeptical of arguments that facially seem to support the powerful at the expense of the weak" is an irrational or wrong position.
You left out raising taxes.
It's not about liking or not liking. Legitimacy in this sense is about whether those governments genuinely represent the people they rule. There exist governments that I strongly disagree with and dislike, but which do legitimately represent their people.
How do you think NFTs will die out?
Building Peepflix, A social platform for movie lovers. Suggestions are welcome
I'm not even saying my approach is "the best" but that there is no silver bullet. Different people and teams will benefit from different styles and approaches. Pluralism in thought and design is better for finding good approaches to things.

If people prefer Odin's approach of Zig's approach or vice versa, that's fine and more power to them.
> The behavior geneticist Kathryn Paige Harden is waging a two-front campaign: on her left are those who assume that genes are irrelevant, on her right those who insist that they’re everything.

Try to have a nuanced view on covid mitigation strategies and you'll feel the same way. Even on HN which encourages rationality.

There are lot of very polarized topics where it's pretty much impossible to have a rationale conversation. I have the feeling pretty much everybody choose what they want to believe and then build a rationalization to justify their views. Pretty depressing.
There were no leaps of logic made by me. I never indicated or said anything about genetics. I said that it’s clear some people can’t learn algebra and gave an extreme example of such a person by saying that an intellectually disabled person can’t learn algebra. I then said that I’m convinced that there is some level of “intelligence” required to learn algebra.

I said absolutely nothing about what percent of people this is true for and absolutely nothing about why this is true. I brought it up in the context of the article because saying that not everyone can learn algebra is as taboo in education as the thought that genetics plays a role in poverty and success in life in psychology. My reason for thinking this is responses like yours.

There are clearly people who can’t learn algebra: intellectually disable people are such an example. I believe some level of “intelligence” is require to learn algebra.

How can you conclude from what I’ve written that I haven’t thought much about my belief? How can it appear I have an axe to grind from what I’ve written? You have formed an image of me that is wildly incorrect. Do you initially assume that everyone who thinks not everyone can learn algebra has an axe to grind?
Curl|Bash Script Analysis
> Inflation punishes responsible savers.

You know that this is false, why say so?

Putting your money under a mattress is not responsible, putting it on an investment which will accrue interest is, and imagine what. That interest will compound not only from inflation but ensuring good gains
From my experience (and similar to your conclusion), the "death" is an economic factor: when the fix has a higher monetary cost than a replacement.

My nearly 300.000 km vehicle costed thousands per year in maintenance, and a moderate crash sealed its "death".

Obviously a car in the same condition in a poor country could be fixed by a low-wage worker with used parts for another 100.000 km.
I live in the NYC area and I can tell you no one cares about jaywalking.
> Driving engagement is necessary for a business period, no matter how they're funded.

Wikipedia is doing fine without driving engagement though.
Ivermectin is bunkk get over it and get vaccinated.
https://libwebsockets.org/git/libwebsockets/tree/minimal-exa...

I'd prefer this well written and working minimal example (one of many) to API documentation 99 times out of 100.
This would probably increase resell value of your old devices so most of the cost would be returned if you resell your device.
This is a complete misunderstanding caused by not readinf the first half of the first sentence of the comment.

The full sentence:

> The good thing about the fact that Atlassian offers both on-prem and cloud versions of their offerings is, everyone is now aware of the awful engineering practices that underpin their products.

I.e., because the software is available for on-prem deployment, we have experience deploying, managing and debugging it, and therefore know that it is garbage, and we can apply this knowledge to conclude that their cloud offering is garbage.

It does not say the product is garbage because of a CVE.
For the general population this probably applies, but in the case of this exploit it looks like it's targeted at specific individuals. If you were someone being targeted by an oppressive government, for example, you might be a bit more cautious when clicking on suspicious-looking incoming media so I think the suggestion has value.
Which makes them bad at PR, no?
I studied CS at a different university in UK and we used Prolog for one module on AI or perhaps machine vision. I really enjoyed working with it. This was 15 years ago. Looking through their current curriculum I can't see prolog being mentioned anymore. Shame!
The thing is, you don't need to know in detail how a car works to see that car A is faster than car B or that that self-driving car crashes less than that other one.

Similarly, you can tell how much of intelligence is genetic for a given environment (and the "for a given environment" bit is forgotten by so many) by comparing clones (identical twins) to non-clones (non-identical twins).

Additionally, sometimes even if you don't understand about how anything happens you can still influence the result. E.g. you don't need to know anything about protein expression and brain development to breed more docile foxes. (Not that I would recommend trying breeding experiments on humans)
How to Build Your Own Real Time Streaming Platform on Alibaba Cloud?
When the entire OS is written entirely in Rust or Go from the kernel on up, and all applications are also written in the same language.

Oh, and the silicon itself becomes adapted to the paradigms presented by those programming languages, since C was designed to work on the existing silicon. Forcing entirely new hardware designs to meet an evolving and always-changing software paradigm is an expensive proposition in a commodity market and it will take either a lot of central control and will power or a lot of time.
Well, probably ask your brother again, because All Engines Out is required for a pilots license in the US and most other countries. Even Helicopter pilots have to train in the simulator for engine failure (autorotation landing).

It must come up in training atleast once and every aircraft has an "all engine failure" checklist for this exact situation (The FAA recommended the addition of a "all engine failure at low altitude" checklist as well, which I believe has occured).

Either your brother is incorrect about the simulator requirement, forgot about it or is flying a two-seater Cessna.

You can verify this also by watching some of the videos of popular pilots on youtube such as Mentour of 74Crew.
It is widespread in big-tech.

This is an-ex Google engineer talking about one he saw and created a video about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pizXzR7ZQ8Q
How many CS jobs are even in the "the industry" though? Home Depot, Walmart, and Nestle are examples of massive companies that do not aspire to be Facebook or anything like it, but who hire lots of software engineers. Most companies are not tech companies, although a handful of tech giants have done very well.
If it worked before the date, it'll keep working after unless there was some other reason for it to be added (an API shutdown deadline for example) which prevents it from working anyway.
You don't have to pay me anything to use those domains. However, to use a .com domain name you need to go through a registrar who will charge you a yearly fee.

You can read more about registering domain names at ICANN [1].

[1] https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/register-domain-name-2...
IME, women - more than men - tend to naturally flow to where there's maximal social acceptance & minimal risk.

This tends to be after the wave of early risk takers made it such.

Example: We're seeing more % women entering the crypto space every year.
It didn't but it's a very beautiful bandaid. So beautiful in fact people might ignore that it is hiding a scar.
This is the funniest thing I've read on Hackernews in a while.
> humans generally like to organise things hierarchically

People like doing that until they have sufficiently essential complexity that it breaks down, then they hate it with passion.
Kaggle has competitions for games and many people use RL there. Looking through their solutions might be of use to you.
Fear Is the Mind Killer; Or, the Bene Gesserit Guide to Managing Anxiety
No. There's a reason it's not called N100.
If you're Iranian by blood, binance can't provide service to you