skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Keller and Dlugos found that getting an interview signaled to candidates that they have many of the characteristics needed to move into the job. An interview also allowed candidates to receive feedback from hiring managers about any knowledge and skills they may currently lack, as well as how to acquire them if they want to be hired for a similar job in the future.

Makes sense that it can be mitigated by ... working with the employee.

A simple rejection without much contact sends a very different message. Nobody likes be rejected without a shot / by some corporate machine.

And for the hiring manager meeting these people might be a good thing to do by default anyway. I've gotten jobs where I was told "I didn't even know you'd want that job / that you would be a good fit until we talked about it." from folks I worked with for 10 years.
Keep commercial building occupants comfortable
Automation probably kills the higher paying jobs first because that provides the most return. Lower paying jobs get automated last, and those seem to be where employers are having problems hiring.

How long until your favorite restaurant gets rid of servers? You will order through a screen at your table, then they will conveyer belt your food to you.
github1s is one of my favorite magical UX things in years, thank you for making it.
Mass exploitation of Atlassian Confluence CVE-2021-26084
GTA online has had slow loading times for years until a fan reverse engineered the game to find a bad serialization issue which basically created a n*n computation.

Some issues are fucking hard to detect and an initial page load breakage that only happens sometimes (likely a race condition that cannot be replicated in testing) is an example of that
Meh, for all of Linux's minor inconveniences it works pretty damn well and the freedom to not deal with MS and Apple's bullshit is a pretty big win.
Make Your Smartphone the Best Damn Webcam You’ll Ever Own
What's the Deal with Neuralink?
Feels like HN isn't winning that one either :(
Real-world performance usually depends on the details of the implementation, not on the theoretical algorithmic equivalency.
This is (sort of) the idea behind Rust's lifetimes. (Rust focuses more on scope, whereas pointer expiry is more about “object lifetimes”, but it's basically the same thing.)
100% true. However, in evaluating the offer, understanding whether you’re getting the same class of shares or not is germane. (In a startup small enough where an employee can meaningfully negotiate their grant, it usually is.)
Searching for the text "strcmp" finds a static string that is referenced in the sub_ED7D94 function. Looking at the strings output, we can see some interesting string references, including auth_admin_ssh_special and auth_admin_internal. Searching for auth_admin_internal finds the sub_13DBEC function. This function has a strcmp call that is not present in the 6.3.0r19b firmware:

The argument to the strcmp call is <<< %s(un='%s') = %u, which is the backdoor password, and was presumably chosen so that it would be mistaken for one of the many other debug format strings in the code. This password allows an attacker to bypass authentication through SSH and Telnet.

[1] is the backdoor. [2] is more details regarding discovery.

[1] https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/m...

[2] https://blog.rapid7.com/2015/12/20/cve-2015-7755-juniper-scr...
I can point to where firearms have stopped shoplifting crimes.

Can you point to where your scenario has happened?

Because I’m all for hypotheticals, so long as we admit the rarity and precedent before saying there is a problem.
I grew up in Colorado, and complaints about housing costs and traffic increases due to the influx of Californians has been a constant since the 1970s. At least.

I'm going posit that it's perception more than any actual changes due to fleeing 'fornians.
I disagree with pretty much everything in this article, apart from the fact that people often come up to me with a question of the “I tried nothing, and I’m all out of ideas!” kind.

The author seems to want it both ways. They want the devs to fix their own problems, but at the same time give them zero control of the stack (we have to provide them with guide rails to prevent them from hurting themselves indeed).
Ironically, I suspect Apple is the reason end-user Linux isn't dramatically farther along on the adoption curve.

I feel like story of my move the Mac is not at all uncommon: in the very late 90s, when I was doing mostly consulting and not really any coding, my work life revolved around emails and office docs. Windows on laptops of the era was AWFUL -- long boot times, unstable/unusable device sleep, frequent crashes, etc.

I had a coworker using a G3 PowerBook, and his actual user experience was drastically better than mine by every metric (except, I guess, in that his Powerbook was significantly heavier than my super-sleek ThinkPad). Crashes were rare. Boot time was fast, but it mattered less because sleep actually worked.

I switched. Then the dot-com crash happened, and our company failed, and I hung my own shingle out -- and right about that moment, OS X happened.

My Mac went from being difficult to work on (for a LAMP-stack person) to being the IDEAL platform. I had a real bash prompt, on a machine that shipped with all the tools I wanted, and on which I could easily install most anything else (even if, early on, I had to build from source) -- and this same machine ran true Office, and had a host of really well-designed other applications and utilities that made my more productive and happier. It was a total win. And now, 20+ years later, I'm still here, typing on a Mac.

If OS X hadn't happened, then the work I had after the dot-com crash would've pushed me and a lot of other people like me to full-time Linux.
A new job recently sent me a Mac after I've been using Linux for the last 5+ years. I couldn't believe all the things that I had to agree too. I don't think Apple has ever been about privacy. It is one thing to say you support privacy, but another thing to actually do it. Apple appears to only say they do, but their actions show otherwise.
What model? I was shipped an Oryx Pro for work and it's given me exactly zero problems in 11 months. I've got a wireless USB mouse, wireless USB keyboard, USB smart card reader plugged in through a hub, and an external monitor connected via HDMI in extend the screen mode. Even with an NVIDIA discrete GPU, every single thing has worked plug and play on the first try. I use a bluetooth headset for all meetings and it also works perfectly fine, paired in exactly the same way as it does on any other platform. The Linux bluez stack definitely supports headphones.

Ironically, the only gotcha moment I have ever had was when plugging my iPhone in to charge it, I kept noticing my network connection would get wonky, and I eventually realized Apple puts code injection into its USB cables that include a setting to automatically tether a device an iPhone get plugged into to use Ethernet over USB, so I was being disconnected from my WiFi access point and then being tethered through the iPhone back to the same WiFi access point, except mediated through the iPhone as a relay. Yet another user-hostile, annoying on by default Apple setting I had to discover by accident and then turn off.
What does it reveal? That we're spiteful about having to submit to an "are you allowed to use this?" interrogation process every time we publish something, whether or not we used something proprietary in it?

'cause yeah, I kinda am.

The cost of compliance while not using proprietary fonts is the same as the cost of compliance while using them. The "just don't use them"-strategy fails to free up the efficiency that they're bogging down. Sure, it's not a big deal, you can look into the project and find the font and hope you put something helpful in the commit where you included it and send an email to legal--or whatever the hoops are for your particular case. But it's one of a million tiny third party concerns that are getting between you and your ability to give your user a good experience.
For an end user who isn't a Linux enthusiast, generally working headphones aren't sufficient. They have to almost never not work.

I record music on Linux, and one of the reasons that I never recommend it is that I can imagine people dropping real money on a sufficiently powerful laptop and finding things don't work without a lot of configuration, or perhaps not at all. That doesn't cut it for the average user.
Then you answered your own question about the type of visas you can get.
how does that compare to the same survey given during a normal year?
Presumably if you have more productive crops, the ratio of petrochemicals to food output improves.
For the avoidance of link rot, the full paper is at
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3912074

A populist lay summary: https://torrentfreak.com/software-piracy-triggers-innovation...
Where are the Ubuntu ads? I remember the Amazon ads back in the day, but there haven't been any in quite some time.
> today

Sorry, this bugs me. Forming groups of humans that dislike other groups of humans is as old as humanity itself.
They already collect as much information about you as possible. Whenever you turn on a Mac, you're essentially agreeing to a ton of data collection. It is naive to think that they will never share it with anyone.
Not really - there are a ton of ways to profile and monitor a Mac to determine what processes are calling into what, and spotting something activating this code oth would be trivial if it were happening.
The fact that we're no longer shocked and aghast at the idea of Microsoft pushing advertisements to the desktop - but rather that those ads have bugs in them - shows how far the Overton window has shifted. Boiling the frog.
Can you give a real example with numbers (fake numbers okay)? I can't begin to understand how owning a % of a company gets reduced to pennies in the end.
I think doing push-ups during an all hands would go over better at home than at an office
Heavier part is not significant. The weight effect on road wear is like a 4th order effect. 1 semi-truck causes something like 100,000 the road wear of a single heavy EV. I am fine if we want to tax this route, but disel is now going to cost $300 a gallon for trucks.
The link to the keynote wasn't resolving in the article, so here's the YouTube link: https://youtu.be/aB2gG-cRj10
I would expect emulation to be perfectly sufficient for testing purposes?
I don't particularly appreciate Linux distributions that try to pretend they're not Linux distributions by slapping "OS" in their name. Regardless, Elementary doesn't fix any of the issues I personally have with Linux Desktop that keep me from switching today.
What would be the advantage over other Lisps if you won't be able to leverage JVM ecosystem?
I've never been able to get sufficient numbers/projections to make an informed decision about stock options at an early stage startup (and often the company doesn't know either). And it doesn't matter what they offer, it can always be diluted away from you, if not made outright worthless by a change in ownership structure. No matter how much you trust the current management, management can change, and not always for the better, especially as the company grows and there's more money involved. And this is all assuming that the company was successful enough to have value for options -- many won't get that far.

Unless you are already in a good financial position, I'd ask for more cash
Good fonts are scarse. Fonts that are built with a specific purpose are scarse.

Fonts evolve because design evolves. Helvetica is nice but boring and it doesn't fit all cases.

Of course there's a discussion to be had if licensing is the best model or something like the Patreon model makes more sense for fonts.

If you think all you need is Arial and Times New Roman then good for you.
It's there any scientific evidence that extra energy is directed towards your brain rather than stored as fat?
If they are very early stage, evaluate whether to make an 83(b) election, including making sure that the company facts and circumstances support it if you decide to make it.

There are significant pros and significant cons, so Google it and evaluate is the advice. Super early (and especially pre-funding), it’s much more beneficial than just after Series B or later.
Well, those things were actually pretty effective at stopping people. People clearly circumvented those restrictions, but from my perspective the number of people that smoke weed probably went up after it became easy to access in my state, and the quality and variety of products increased enormously. They weren't effective at achieving any broader aim, like stopping or slowing drug production but frankly that wasn't even the point. Regardless, I think we can both agree that these broad bans decreased the number of people participating in that behavior. I think the shift in our societies viewpoints on them came about as an awareness that they were ineffective at achieving any moral or justifiable aim. I think the correct criticism of them isn't that they failed to prevent or impede a given behavior, but that they weren't worth the negative externalities (if you'll forgive the understatement).

Which brings me to your example of a password protected archive. I'm ignorant on specifics so I'm just going to sketch a broad argument and trust that you'll correct me if my premise is incorrect or my argument otherwise flawed. Essentially, if something is opt-in instead of opt-out, a non-trivial portion of the population won't do it. Especially if it is even slightly technical, there are just a lot of people who will just stop thinking as soon as they encounter a word they don't already know. So if the preventative measure is something that is not automatic and built in to whatever tool they are using to share images, then that preventative measure will not protect most of them. So to bring it full circle, I think it would do much to prevent the spreading of CSAM because other bans have been effective and I don't think most people have the technical literacy to even be aware of how to protect themselves form surveillance. As you say you don't have to be a genius, but I'd suggest you'd need to be above average, which gives you over half the population.

Also thanks for responding, I hope I'm not coming across as unpleasantly argumentative, I mean all this in the most truth-seeking sense of a discussion (I was going to say 'sporting sense of a debate' when I realized I had never been part of a formal debate team and that might not mean what I thought it meant, heh).
>An action on the part of the gov't does not equate to the "average" action of the general population.

It doesn't, but in a truly democratic country it would.

>that's a false equivalency.

In a democracy the government is all drawn from public. The government of democracies is all members of public (save some essentially powerless queen/royalty as in UK). So no, it's not.

>The very fact that there must be gov't mandated laws against stealing is evidence of this - otherwise, people would steal and loot!

People do steal and loot under virtually every democratic government. Laws are mostly to tell you what happens if you do it, not to set up surveillance to invade you privacy to check that you don't (although I must admit this has been more common lately).

>Plenty of people opposed to the draft in war, and yet it must be done in the public good

Your words not mine. I vehemently disagree "it must be done." Our last draft was disregarded in a widespread fashion, and ultimately the dodgers were essentially pardoned because the government had to yield to the "average" action of the general populace.

>But people who claim mistrust of the public institutions are destroying that mechanism

The loss of trust in public institution are in large part a result in the fact they have destroyed the mechanism of their legitimacy, the constitution. We now live in a society where 4th amendment is void (drug dog can "alert" on your car/person and you can be searched at any time, and even patted down without even that). A policeman can shoot a woman in the middle of the night on a bogus warrant, and the only guy looking at prosecution will be the guy who missed (see: Breonna Taylor). I can be tossed in jail for 5-10 years if I decide to remove a brace from a pistol and put a stock on it instead (2nd amendment is dead). Same 5+ years if you own a pot leaf and a gun at the same time and did nothing else "wrong" (see: conviction of RussianFPS, although he did not get this much jail time).

Posse Comitatus Act is essentially dead as now our police force is essentially another military branch armed by relinquished items from the military and sees itself as a military like force for controlling the populace, complete with armored vehicles, machine guns, explosives,
urban warfare type training, and virtual invulnerability from prosecution for killing the populace and special privileges the common citizen doesn't have like qualified immunity and the ability to own different weapons than civilians even when off duty.

Either the public institutions as they stand are powerless to stop the erosion of liberty and rights, or they are the ones perpetuating the erosion. Either way they are illegitimate.
You’re individual experience isn’t universal.

Running Fedora 34 on X1 Carbon. Bliss.

Linux is community driven, if somethings not working, try fix it?
+1 on the point about "early exercise". The ability to exercise and file the $0 value increase with an 84(b) (assuming the company is < $50M capital) is the way the game is played in the Valley.

Ex: You get 10,000 options @ strike of $1 vested over 4 years. You exercise all of them early and file 84(b) with the IRS to say "I bought this stock at $1 for cost of $1 = $0 gain". 4 years later the stock is worth $10 / share. Now you have a gain which, most likely, you will owe LTCG if ANYTHING on that.

It's like printing money if you get the right company at the early time with enough shares to make it worthwhile.
Or a glass half full way to look at this is 50% more yield means less land area needed to produce the same amount of food. Typically also longer roots improve soil quality. There are always tradeoffs, but this looks amazingly positive.
Thank you for saying this. As someone new to Linux, it's easy to be intimidated by Linux users saying "but it works for me!".

Where do you give money? I've looked into a few projects but it's pretty fragmented. Donating money to Ubuntu was a trip...required digging through forums and finally "Downloading" Ubuntu to trigger the "donate money" pop up.

Linux needs more options for people like me to pay for polish.
>maybe developers arent alone in not liking each other

Of course I'm not dead serious, but there is some seriousness implied. You called out devs specifically not being alone in not liking one another. I made a reference to another profession that doesn't like their direct related counterparts. What in the world did you think that meant? There are not chefs that don't like other chefs or that there are not chefs that don't like devs?
I was thinking this today but I didn’t have the fancy jargon. I don’t even know how a deflationary system would work.
I wonder if the upper class will change their mind after class warfare starts? The Sackler story yesterday was the first time I saw people say out loud that pitchforks were in order.
I grew up in social housing in Western Europe, my family had zero net worth but did live in cheap subsidised rentals, with an extra rental subsidy. My classmates lived in million-dollar homes a 10 minutes away. Obviously there were differences in our lives and the opportunities we had. Yet they were nowhere nearly as different as a net wealth gap of 1 to 100 [0].

At the end of the day we went to the same schools, lived in similar neighbourhoods, went to the same football club, same parks. I didn't holiday in New York like classmates did, but instead went camping in a tent in my home country or a neighbouring one. Our toys looked very different. But I got a free computer from the municipality, I read all the books I wanted through the library, as a low-income fam we got free tickets from the municipality for fun things like the swimming pool or museum, and I mostly had similar experiences and opportunities.

Healthcare was free till 18, since then it's the same 110 euros a month for universal health insurance that everyone else has, if you make less than the median annual income you get a 90 euro subsidy per month. University was 80% paid by the government for everyone, and because we were poor I got a subsidy to cover the remaining 20% + a little extra.

If you look at all the benefits we enjoyed, the after-tax and after-benefits income difference between rich and poor wasn't all that great, and the impact it had on me as a kid wasn't that great. The effective income and its impact between me and my rich classmates was substantially different, don't get me wrong, but we're not talking orders of magnitude here. And the wealth locked up in my classmates' homes didn't make that big of a difference. I feel I had a very rich life as a kid from a poor family.

At age 25-35, is when the bigger differences started. Much of that home equity of the parents gave my classmates a leg up on the housing market. That made a massive generational difference (although it turned out fine for me, other poor classmates definitely didn't). Nowadays we also see a lot of private tutoring come into play at younger ages, that wasn't a big thing when I was a kid, and it's increasing the gap between rich and poor, too.

Anyway, that's just my personal experience in western europe. This plays out quite differently in the US where there seems to be much more segregation (poor and rich go to vastly different schools), no universal healthcare or college etc. If I had to choose a place to be born and had no clue where the family I'd be born into would be on the socioeconomic ladder, rich or poor, I'd not choose the US, I'd probably choose a country in Europe. (although on a city-level, some American places are doing great things, too).

I'm very grateful for this time. I now earn a multiple of the average annual income and own my own home, and quite happily pay a substantial tax.

[0] Black families with kids having access to barely 1 cent for every dollar enjoyed by their white counterparts."
you go to work taking on tasks that others depend on and for days don't communicate progress, and you talk about empathy. To yourself only I guess. Downvoted for lack of EQ and empathy.
Needless complexity has costs associated with building it and maintaining/running it, so I'd expect in the majority of cases it would be selected against strongly enough to disappear over time. Which implies the majority of complex systems are complex for a reason, because if a cheaper less complicated equivalent was equally good then that would win out.
Cars aren't always the greatest either - never mind the CD player, the radio receiver can be an entry point:

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-33622298
The incentives under capitalism don't work well in that scenario though. If a variety is much better than alternatives, it will dominate and thus create a monoculture.

Same thing we saw with PPE at the beginning of COVID. Capitalist price optimization drove outsourced manufacturing which works great... Until it doesn't. Incentivizing against monoculture has to be explicit.
That's subjective. There are deeply ingrained paradigms on Linux that infuriate me to the point that, thus far, I'm more willing to put up with MS's bullshit than I am with Linux Desktop's.
Anecdotally I think it's pretty common for mechanics to claim that their competitors don't know what they're doing.
I guess it's a matter of what you think of as "as expected."

Pairing events, and switching between devices, is a dead easy with Apple gear. Non-Apple peripherals work very very smoothly, too, though when there's an Apple option I tend to pick that because of the additional ease of use.

Windows is materially worse. Linux lags Windows.