skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This keeps getting repeated with nothing to back it up. Can you give very concrete examples that apple can do that Linux isn't doing?
Let me give you the old belichick speech: just Do Your Job. Control what you can control, don’t worry about the rest. You aren’t competing with this guy, and if he wants to do the lions share of the work you might as well let him and just focus on the things you want to do.
Ada was not meant to fill a gap where suitable alternatives didn't exist. It was meant to unify, under one language, DOD projects. DOD leadership was concerned about the variety of languages in use in software systems, Ada was designed to become a single language to replace others.
A lot of windows are small and temporary.

In this case the attacker could have served anything out of the S3 bucket and conducted full blown phishing (google.ar, coinbase.ca), and generated valid certificates.

It's a big deal the order of operations here and the risk MarkMonitor introduced to all their clients.
AIP is an operational concept, not a specific technology. Several different types of power sources have been used. The most common approaches today are fuel cells and Stirling engines, both of which rely on fuel and liquid oxygen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air-independent_propulsion
And then when things like dependent types get involved, I'm betting that the amount of bugs greatly decreases, even more than that.
Let's be real they won't be far from Japanese shore in the near future.

(and the batteries can always be upgraded)
How to set up terms with a stranger cofounder?
I am planning on joining a startup as a cofounder. Founder mostly has sales and marketing skills. I am joining as COO and will be focusing on fundraising, operations and growing the company. We don't know each other at all and not surprisingly, we both are cautious.
The founder started it a year ago, has launched a basic product, and has had some revenue. Founder wants to get cofounders to start fundraising and needs complementary skills. Founder was proposing 5-10% equity after working together for a few months.
I was going to propose the following terms for a letter of Intent.
1) 1% equity for first 2 months (if either of us decide to not work together before end of 2 months, founder doesn't need to give me anything).
2) Renegotiation of equity and rewrite of LOI after 2 months including setting up vesting for all co-founders (including founder).
Is this fair? Right now, as a consultant I make about $1000/day which I would be giving up to join startup full time and would be taking on costs of moving to SF and living there (will be important for networking for fundraising). Is there anything I can do to protect myself and not waste my time while still being fair (eg. ask for consultant rate of $x/day after funds are raised if founder doesn't want me as cofounder)? Anything else I can do to protect both parties in this situation where we don't know each other well?
>Lol you think Apple wouldn't be aware of this

That...was like the whole point of my comment. Of course they're aware, and of course they aren't going to criminalize their users. This either isn't real, or Apple is going to figure something out to make it so this isn't a problem. What they can do to not criminalize their users is the really interesting question.

BTW, disabling illegal transmitting gear makes no difference to most authorities when importing. The only way to guarantee you won't get busted is to not import it in the first place.
Yes, and what you’re describing as “code first” I define as myopic / inexperienced / single minded engineers.

Maybe the broader frame is to say there’s two perspectives to hold: the perspective of the user and the perspective of the code. Each orientation has its own set of supporting skills. Good developers are strong in one of those perspectives, but need other people on the team to balance them out. Excellent developers are strong in both, and can switch between them based on the immediate needs of the company and project.
Almost all laptop performance is constrained by heat, heat makes user's palm hot, and its fan must be near the user. So it's fair to focus on heat for laptop.

But gaming console is designed to not to thermal throttled and no boost (or little boost), and console is some feet away from user, so the heat importance is different.
Nice clickbait
So "moving the goalposts" is a strategy that anti-vaxxers have been known to employ to try to stay relevant.

The first posts about Ivermectin claimed it itself was a miracle drug. One major retraction later, apparently now it only works when taken with hydroxychloroquine, or whatever new drug cocktail is supposed to make it work.

When that's disproven, it will be it needs to be taken 6 months before infection or whatever new drug needs to be taken, and the goal posts keep getting pushed back.

What's worse is this style of "dying-on-your-hill" argumentation prevents people from actually getting the vaccine. It's more important to be right these days, then for people to be vaccinated.
It might be a good idea not to travel outside your home country with an iPhone or other Apple tech, because you don't necessarily know what kinds of photos or other digital files a country's government would object to. The picture of the man against the tanks is a good example.

Indeed, you don't necessarily know what photos are on your phone.
Or use CloudFront with an S3 bucket as backing for this use case, like you'd expect? CloudFront has domain name verification.
Everything old is new again, and again, and again, and again... then, 40 years later (roughly 2 human generations) again and again...

Just for fun I looked up the history of clip-art :

https://solomon.io/brief-history-of-clip-art/

It's not quite as technical as I'd like, but a good overview :)
Logging is not a policy requirement of the trust stores.

It's a condition for your certificates to work in some popular browsers (notably Chrome and Safari) but not a policy requirement.

This is on purpose. Google themselves for example will get a certificate issued, say, today, for shiny-new-google-product.example and then only at the last moment do they log that certificate when spinning up the web site https://shiny-new-google-product.example/ to launch shiny-new-google-product -- you can't find out about it in the CT logs because it wasn't in there earlier.

Now, the readily available and especially free certificates most people use are logged before issuance as you describe using the poisoned "pre-certificate" feature from RFC 6962 (in theory this will one day be replaced by a 6962bis actual pre-certificate document rather than poisoned X.509 certs) but that is not at all mandatory, it's just convenient because it requires no workflow changes. You get a certificate, it's a bit bigger (it has SCTs baked inside it) and it just works.

If you do things the hard way, you must ensure your server application software understands what SCTs are and can send them to clients as necessary. You save some bytes talking to clients that don't want the SCTs, and you get to have this just-in-time logging behaviour if you want that.

The other reason it isn't against policy to issue without logging is that some archaic systems that are subject the Web PKI rules but aren't actually talking to the public Internet, and especially to web browsers, do not have logging, it's not a thing for them. This will probably go away in the next few years, these systems age out, but they still existed when I last looked.
"Draw dropping"! Jaw! :- )
> An additional problem here is that there’s no standard way to represent EXPLAIN queries across systems so that makes an additional barrier to entry unfortunately.

What so you mean by this?
>> Not sure how to put this, but I really really hope that if a year from now we are faced with a new virus strain that evades current vaccines ('likely', as Pfizer CEO puts it), nobody is going to trawl HN submission stories and smugly point fingers to those that 'hawked' vaccines.

WTF? You really want people to die just so you can be right?
How to Cleanup AWS CloudFormation Stacks from CLI
> It's not a reliable source for deep analysis of defense procurement policy.

Then by all means link to whatever better source you're using to base your arguments.
Great write-up. Thought provoking and something I definitely have seen. I'm a little more on the product side ... However I might suggest a slightly better prism to shine the op's light through to suss out nuances:

- time frame: the more immediate your attention the more code emphasis you have. The more depth first the more code like you are. The more senior you are the more product you might be because you're able to see beyond the day to day noise.

- TQA v SQA: (Total quality attribute v substitute quality attribute): in fact neither code or a product emphasis can win because in truth the two are interrelated. Tqa is to product what sqa is to code.

Example:

The NYTimes buys rolls of paper to print newspapers with. They notice supplier A's rolls rip in the press which requires downtime to fix with subsequent spend of resources to remediate and greater effort to meet deadline. When NYTimes phones A you hear a guy yelling: your rolls suck. They are constantly ripping apart in our press (product or tqa complaint: roll should not rip).

To fix A is going to have to trace the tqa to it's sqas:

- what's average paper thickness? How much does it vary? Where? Why?

- how long did we bleach it because that may increase chance of tears. Maybe bleaching makes the paper brittle

- how hard does the press pull on the paper? Maybe it's too tough on the paper?

- is the roll sufficiently protected? Maybe shipping or storage knicks it and sets up failure in the machine?

- etc

So yah better have tqa on the brain. Customers do. And customers write checks or don't if dissatisfied. But better have sqa on the brain because that's how tqa (product failures) are fixed.

So? Teams in which persons fixate on sqa (code) or tqa (product) is the real poison. The more my counterpart cares about code only the more I have to care about product and vice versa. We'll wear each other out.

Therefore I might need a code first person to spend a little more time typing up usecases so we can see how better to architect and better see how features interact. I might need a product person to be more insistent on more thorough unit testing and less complicated class apis.
You could try "Thinking Physics," available from Amazon (or LibGen)

https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Physics-Understandable-Pract...
It's political advocacy disguised as news. And like 95% of news today, it's fear/outrage journalism: "here's something you should be worried/angry about, even though you can't do anything about it".
Nature of the workload certainly matters a lot, and for a lot of work GPUs do memory bandwidth isn't always the limiting factor (though it often is, that's why consumer grade GPUs have 12GB of ram and beefier systems grade GPGPUs/TPUs have 40+GB of memory).

Datastructure and locality matters a lot for GPGPU programming. While PCI-Express is really fast, it's got a lot of latency and is limited.
I suspect what happened (as the author of the post) is that given the IP address is from Akamai, they misconfigured Akamai to naively proxy the traffic towards S3.

S3 will just pick a bucket based on the Host header in the request, and it seems like Akamai just proxied that from the client.
Hopefully just taking some time off for the holidays
My view on it is quite different. You have this idea of yours, you have the historic idea that children are still property of parents in an important way, there's the historical guarding of female chastity/purity and you have the idea that its a protection against very likely abuse of power. I don't take a gender neutral view on this issue either so a male doing this would be quite different. But society unnecessarily creating these circumstances would still count as alleviating.
Nice to see something like this built in Go, my personal favourite language to code in.

Does this support Wayland? It's not clear, I can see someone has raised the question in an issue.

I've been using kitty for a while which supports GPU rendering and has Wayland support too.
A type error isn't some kind of punishment, it's a discussion with the compiler. Type errors are good -- they mean that there's a discrepancy with your idea of the program that you're writing, and the way that you've actually written it, and a good typechecker will help you track down that discrepancy.

So when GHC says "you're doing side effects outside of IO", it's not trying to harsh your vibe. It's explaining to you the inconsistency between your program and the "type" (description) that you've written for it. You might not want to have to explain yourself to the compiler, and that's fine -- go write in an untyped language instead. But it's hardly authoritarian to offer a different way of programming.

(Keep in mind that typechecking meets many of the same needs that debugging does. For someone who already tries to typecheck in their head to ensure that their programs are correct, having an explicit, external typechecker can be a relief. That might not be you, but it's at least some people; when I program in Lisp I'm always running into problems that a typechecker would have solved at compile time, and I find that frustrating. To each their own.)
> Land ("location") is a scarce economic good, with different locations being valuable for different purposes. Rendering it revenue-neutral would lead to misallocation.

This is the core of your misunderstanding. Yes, location is a scarce economic good. Rendering the ownership of it (rent collection) revenue neutral, while keeping the utilization of it (productive activity at a location) totally untaxed, is how to guarantee correct allocation. Those who can be most productive at a given location will come to utilize it.

Allowing the monopolistic ownership of location without utilization to be profitable is what leads to misallocation. Those rich enough to bid for a location will collect rent from those who productively utilize it.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Everybod...
> Surely you see the problem here? If still not, then replace "Women" with an ethnicity or race in that statement.

You can also do this with all the negative statements made about men every day. You'll quickly get banned from HN. Women already get special treatment.

And by "ethnicity or race" I assume you mean "ethnicity or race that's not acceptable to make fun of", because people make negative statements about whites or asians/indians all the time.
I think both sexes exist as guards in female prisons. You would not manidate all guards to be under 13 for fear of underaged sex.

The entire ordeal brings up a different point. What if the guard had a baby. Would the state be forced to pay child support?
Salmon Trees
What do you think the public reception would’ve been if this technology had been available last year, and multiple jurisdictions published hashes of images from the riots at the capitol?

Or maybe, more directly, what do you think Apple employees reviewing these hits would do if those types of images started showing up in the triage list.
What proof of surface tension are you referring to?
Congrats on the launch! Are you guys are from Kerala by any chance? എന്റെ ("ente") means "mine" in Malayalam.
In this case it isn't placebo, I take two pills once per day in the morning. If I back it off to 1 pill my pressure readings increase accordingly after a few days.

Something or a combination of things in this pill is helping my levels stay in acceptable bounds.
If I'm drawing an analogy here, owning your server and hosting your own services is like having your own house and having a SAAS is like renting a house.

A lot of people want to own their house while too many service/hardware providers are trying to be your landlords.

This is a cool idea but I think having a mandatory subscription killed it for me. It does not even provide an illusion that I can still have my own services intact and running indefinitely no matter what happens to or at the service provider. This is especially crucial when you consider how much of a pain switching email is.

Do I move out of Google just to be dependent on another company that requires a subscription for the illusion of owning my data? On top of that I have to deal with all the hassle that comes with it? I don't think so.
I may be at fault for citing Wikipedia, but I think this supports the idea that it was developed to fill a gap:

> In the 1970s the US Department of Defense (DoD) became concerned by the number of different programming languages being used for its embedded computer system projects, many of which were obsolete or hardware-dependent, and none of which supported safe modular programming. In 1975, a working group, the High Order Language Working Group (HOLWG), was formed with the intent to reduce this number by finding or creating a programming language generally suitable for the department's and the UK Ministry of Defence's requirements. After many iterations beginning with an original Straw man proposal the eventual programming language was named Ada. The total number of high-level programming languages in use for such projects fell from over 450 in 1983 to 37 by 1996.

> The HOLWG working group crafted the Steelman language requirements, a series of documents stating the requirements they felt a programming language should satisfy. Many existing languages were formally reviewed, but the team concluded in 1977 that no existing language met the specifications.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_(programming_language)

(I admit being a little tired to examine a primary source this Sunday. )
You have, say, 10 different drugs you might use along with Ivermectin in a "multi-drug regime". From these 10 drugs, you can generate 10-choose-4 = 5040 different 4-drug regimes. As many as you please, effectively.

Assuming Ivermectin is useless, and your study is p95, how many false positives do you expect to get?
Spend Management for Startups (2020)
Ayahuasca actually is different. There is no noticeable tolerance, unlike most other psychedelics.
Shrinking PlayStation is tradition for Sony, but I believe they mostly did when their chips are also shrunk. Possibly they found that current cooling solution is a bit overkill. Personally I prefer overkill.
If they cared, a reasonable choice would be to lean on the Web PKI. It is usual in the Web PKI for the leaf certificates to be certified both to identify a server (which is what is ordinarily done) and to identify a client. The only name usually provided for the subject is a DNS name, but in this case that's exactly the identity we want to prove.

That is, you'd prove you control www.example.com to AWS the exact same way www.example.com proves it is www.example.com to a web browser.
Ahh, sure, that'll do it.

That's quite a big oops. I'd love to see the panicked messages on their internal slack as they figure out what they did.
too bad they backed off the claim. That would be a good one to take to court.

Imagine them pulling out evidence to show they faked the moon landings.
No point you have made here suggests to me that we should worry or fight any less.
For something to be considered clickbait it generally needs to be significantly deceptive.
Agreed. Some new languages actually have the inherent capacity to be much more boring than incumbents, once the requisite work has been done to flesh out their ecosystems and make them familiar to people.
What exactly do you think publishing hashes of Jan 6 pics would achieve?

The photographers posted them publicly on Facebook and Twitter. That’s how we have them in the first place.

The problem wasn’t knowing who took the photos, it was knowing who was in the photos. And that needs facial detection, which this system can’t do.
This is by design. For some ideological reason it looks like the biggest fear of bank execs is to depend on talented developers.
The prospect of a developer or team that completely crushes deadlines and deliver beyond expectations is horrifying to banks.
They find far more palatable to pay tens of millions every year to IBM, Microsoft, Oracle and even far less known and ancient entities than, horror of horrors!!! Have to pay FAANG salaries! This is absolutely a no-no for bank bureaucracies
IF ivermectin were an actually useful treatment (huge IF), and it were actually deployed at scale, you would see an immediate rise in ivermectin resistant virus. Antivirals are very different from vaccines. They hit one target at one place in on specific binding mode, and it is easy to mutate so that the antiviral doesn't work. A vaccine produces a different repertoire of antibodies in every single person. No single mutation or even group of mutations affects the immune response in the same way from one person to another. It's bad luck that delta got so "lucky" in its enhanced transmissibility, but the vaccines are still effective against delta. An antiviral will not be effective against the next variant that comes after the antiviral is launched. Vaccines are the answer. If we need a slightly tweaked new booster for delta or lambda or whatever is next, I'm getting that and staying away from ivermectin et al.
My default methodology is Product-First, but I’ve worked on some projects where I behaved Code-First. My absolute favorite thing is to solve customer problems with high quality engineering. There are some customers I did not want to help — because of personal indifference to the customers and their goals. I still wanted a paycheck so I dived deep into thinking about clever abstractions or tried to cram in some new technology. I was engineering for engineering’s sake.

I’m lucky now to be working on projects and teams I care about, and I think first about what type of problem I should be solving, and then I think about what type of engineering would best solve that problem.
Mmoball Madden NFL 22 – All Madden NFL 22 Coins on Mmoball Store
You're begging the question by assuming the thing you're trying to prove.

If a bed is taken up by anyone then it is unavailable to someone else. They only get given out because someone needs it (medically). They are not given out because you deemed certain reasons good reasons and other people cannot have them because you deemed them bad reasons. Those beds are serving a use that is decided by medical need, a reasonably objective standard.

As I wrote, I didn't think you could make you statement balance consistency with morality but you've actually gone beyond that by seeming not to care about either.
Not directly competing with Helm, but we at Hoppy Network provide a static IP over WireGuard. It came out of a desire for "truly private email". We provide:

Clean IPv4 + IPv6 address, Reverse DNS, unblocked ports, unfiltered ICMP

It's priced reasonably to keep bad actors out:

https://hoppy.network

We have a $60/year plan in the works, which will be available before the end of this year.
I mean, have you done much embedded systems dev? What good is crypto mining when the device dies in an hour?
Apple has been reportedly exploring the "extreme sports" market recently.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-26/apple-con...
What do you think of the fact that 100K SLC used to be the norm, 2-bit MLC has an endurance of 10K, 3-bit "TLC" (awful misnomer) gets ~1K, and 4-bit "QLC" (even worse misnomer) in the low hundreds from what I've heard (they are very secretive about it)? That's an exponential decrease in reliability for a mere multiplicative increase in capacity.

"The new product stores 4x as much but lasts less than 1/100th as long" doesn't sound good, but that's the reality of what NAND flash industry is like. Meanwhile what little SLC is still available but priced far above what the cost/capacity would suggest, encouraging use of the cheaper and less reliable stuff. Manufacturers playing tricks with things like "SLC cache" and the like. Doesn't that seem suspiciously like planned obolescence?