skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Doesn't use python's C API or runtime. So no metaclasses, monkey patching, eval(). All types must be known at compile time or it should be possible to infer them.

There are several challenges to solve - translating stdlib of one language to another (see plugins.py) and bridge semantic gaps (rust doesn't like mutable global state, python has them).
> Can't the issue be avoided by simply launching the application as a non-root user within the container namespace?

Yes, though the issue currently is that with the likes of (rootfull) docker containers, users end up setting docker to not need to call sudo every time. Meaning, if an attacker accesses your workstation (or a server), they will be able to run docker containers as root. This may as well be giving the attacker access to root as you can really easily give yourself full root access if you can launch rootfull containers. Having (rootfull) docker run access is pretty much the same as having root access.
Isn't it just the workers competing in capitalism, albeit in a not so useful way?

They are basically giving a volume discount on their labour in a perceived exchange for something. Like if a company gave away coupons that did not change sales.
I'm not convinced by this. They didn't "decompile" just the AI model, they included logs that are discarded in the "compilation" (a.k.a learning) process.

If the information in the training dataset is vastly reduced in the model, and they needed those logs to get that information back, it means that the training process compressed the dataset into only the relevant information.

You can say that's what humans also do, they compress their experiences by learning, saving only the required information in the required useful form rather than everything else.
Rentech, Simons lose tax fight, agree to pay IRS over $7B
Do they kick them out of a commercial account or a personal account or both?

I’m curious. I can see them not wanting to provide assistance to an illegal business, but what the reasoning behind denying a personal account?
The return link seems to be part of the EU's Galileo GNSS system, which has SAR components to it generally, and this is a new one:

* https://www.euspa.europa.eu/newsroom/news/galileo-return-lin...

Galileo's implementation actually seems to have entered "full operational capacity" a few months ago:

* https://ec.europa.eu/defence-industry-space/galileosar-uniqu...

The US has officially approved use of the appropriate spectrum (406 MHz) as well:

* https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/08/2021-02...
Voice chat definitely started as a core feature of Discord (for gamers) but I think there are a ton of servers now that are almost entirely text chat.
A pile of money doesn't get me from point A to point B (well, I guess if you give a small part of the pile to someone selling transport, it might).

Much better investments in terms of transportation are available than flagship electric vehicles, however.
Isn't it largely user-moderated? Do you believe that model is no longer reasonable for the platform it is trying to be?
Check Out Chinatown Vegas on Google Maps
> FAA representatives were in the control room

Control room doesn't see everything the cockpit sees. Particularly not in a pilot-centered vehicle design like Virgin Galactic's. Having a representative in the room, moreover, doesn't mean it's someone qualified to look for problems. Even if they are, it's a big room with lots going on.
I don’t think that it is. As I understand it the argument in favor of guns is that they would supposedly protect you against someone else with a gun.

I can’t protect myself from someone with a RubberDucky with a RubberDucky of my own. However, knowing that these tools exist and how easy they are to acquire and the ability to try one out for yourself might actually make you think twice about plugging that random cable or USB drive into your box.
James Simons was caught trying to hide $8 Billion dollars, a lot of it Russian money, in Bermuda. Look up the PARADISE PAPERS.

Robert Mercer did stuff just as dirty, but never quite got caught the same way.
That he has also done some very good things isn't a good argument for continuing to tolerate his harmful behaviour after he's been asked to fix it for literally decades, and hasn't.

The guy is, at minimum, a total fucking creep who alienates women from the Free Software movement with his poor behavior.

Furthermore if he's not a closeted pedophile then he sure devotes a lot of energy to defending pedophiles and finding ways to justify having sex with minors.

The FSF is primarily a political advocacy project. Is RMS really who the Free Software community wants representing them to the rest of society?

Really?
Go ahead and try and make a vegetable garden in your front lawn. City inspector will probably cite you in many places in the US. We have the front lawn because we made everything else illegal.
Branson is entering eccentric-pathetic territory. All the other billionaires, evil or otherwise, tend to demonstrate a high level of confidence. Sir Richard is spending his money to s*k his own d*k and he's going to kill people to (ultimately fail to) do it. Additionally, he's throwing up roadblocks for SpaceX, which has demonstrated extreme competence and productivity.
> But Elon said it'll all blow over by May (2020).

So did a lot of people, including myself. I wasn't expecting people/government to react the way they did.
Eye-Fi started as a company making Wi-Fi SD cards in 2005.

Chips have been small for decades. What’s changed over the years is that it’s gotten cheaper and cheaper.
Bug: If you click Reader Mode fast enough, then you can bypass the paywall.
Err, two years ago. Should have 2019 in the title here.
Do you have any citations pointing to where "police are called on someone who grows a garden in their front yard"? Unkempt lawns are definitely a matter of civil penalties in some jurisdiction, but I've never heard of (and frankly would be shocked if there was) a municipality that actually criminalized having an unkempt lawn.
It's worth emphasizing that this is already the 2nd escalation, too.

People who didn't like twitter's policies were smugly told "go start your own twitter". So now we had these Parler guys on AWS, they actually did it, oops, turns out starting your own twitter is also not ok.

I hate to defend Parler, but like you said, first they come for..
If a drone is flying at 10km high, it can only see 357km before the horizon blocks its sight.

The Carrier's AEW in service (E2-Hawkeye) is allegedly able to detect threats up to 550km or so away. (remember: the Hawkeye is also in the air, so it will be peaking out of the horizon long before the carrier is visible)

The escort cruisers allegedly have Raytheon AN/SPS-49, which apparently have 474 km range vs air enemies (other radars / sonars exist for sea). Either way, if the drone can see the Cruiser, the cruiser probably can see the drone. Furthermore, AEGIS cruisers are literally the "shields" of the carrier: deployed in front to kill targets before they detect the carrier. So likely: you're not detecting the carrier first. The first things you detect are the AEGIS escort ships. Nominally, these radar systems are for missile tracking, but they will serve as eyes/ears for the strike group if a squadron of drones is approaching.

The one-two punch of the aerial radar (Hawkeye) + sea-based radar (Ticonderoga AEGIS cruisers) means that its no small feat to "sneak up" upon the carrier strike group.

-----

How long does it take for your drone to travel from 550km away to ~300km, during which it is under threat from at minimum, the escort cruiser? Maybe an airwing or two who could scramble a counter-attack? Its not like your drone is flying straight at the carrier either (you still haven't found the carrier: you only found an escort cruiser. The carrier is likely over the horizon still).

> if your method of evading detection is destroying all available hostile sensor platforms, stealth is superfluous.

Yeah, that's the idea for a Carrier's defenses anyway. The CSG has not only incredible airborne radar systems (E2-Hawkeye), but also incredible ship-based radar systems scanning for this sort of stuff.

That's why stealth aircraft (like F35) are so key for future wars. That's the only way to penetrate the radar coverage. Things like autonomous drones have a control signal that can be tracked, while F35 manned aircraft could go radio silent on their stealth approach (relying upon the human brain in the aircraft to make decisions without any connection to homebase).

Unmanned + Stealth is possible, but its a difficult kind of paradox. A lot of decisions need to be made during radio-silence periods.

You want to win at the sensor war. Detect the enemy before they detect you. Then destroy the enemy's eyes and ears.

----

And then the AEGIS radar systems are also deployed on each Destroyer in the strike group (4 to 9 Destroyers deployed per CSG). That's a lot of sensors your drone squadron has to fly around to successfully find a carrier.
I don’t really buy the moral argument. The government regulates, facilitates and protects the economy in which you work and earn. It creates and acts to protect the value of the currency itself.

The problem with consumption taxes is they can be bypassed in many ways, such as by spending your earnings abroad. I do think income taxes at higher brackets can be counter productive because they also can be bypassed in various ways, but that’s a practical matter not a moral one.

I have links to China and I think the growing implementation and use of income tax in China is a good thing. I hope that it will give Chinese people a sense that they are personally funding government, and that therefore the government should be accountable to them, the people paying its way.

As a citizen I feel a lot more of a direct connection between myself and responsibility for and accountability of government through the income taxes I pay than anything else. I’m proud of my contribution through income tax, but not so much for things like VAT.
I typically browse via my rss reader / feed, so even though I’m here daily, I never see the front page (I do upvote on comment pages however).
In a world where I am the one choosing the locks.

I taught everyone else involved to lockpick in the first place and chose locks well beyond any of our skill levels to pick.
> Hosting the websites of ___________ is something few people would advocate . . .

Tricky part is everyone fills in the blank differently.
Yes - Julia also has a pretty good JIT too, but doesn't have a great story on AOT compiled binaries.

If you're finding it easy to write a quick command line tool in python, but end up rewriting it in another language for size/performance/self contained deployment, this may be a good fit.
Lawns are racist? Sweet. That should be sufficient ammo to cancel them, get on it twitter people
https://archive.is/Ha3VQ
All the security review in the world won't stop a vulnerability elsewhere from replacing `sudo` with an alias in your `.bash_profile`.
Not to be pedantic, but why do you say this? Is it really that visible?
Points for an awesome title.
I remember late 90s early 2000s getting something like that working on pocket pc, though with a pocket access cdb providing the layout
~Four years ago I had an issue with Google Drive deleting things that was solved with zipping with a password. Both the plain files and zipped without password files were removed within a day or so of uploading. This is stuff like FLAC files, PhoenixMiner, and some movies I'd Handbraked from rips. Importantly, none of this was shared- it was all for my own personal use. I've since adopted the thought pattern that everything that is uploaded to a cloud is going to be inspected by people who do not have my best interests in mind, and to encrypt accordingly.
Those references are cringe inducing for a fair number of us English folk as well. You have my apologies for those types.

I'm just hoping this whole Brexit shitshow will teach my country men some humility.
Reddit has a standardized layout, you don't have to learn a new interface. It has single sign on, so you don't have to create a new account to participate in a community (low friction) and it has the people. Also, it has the voting concept which helps filter content so you aren't having to do that yourself by scanning topics.

A "classic forum" trying to get off the ground would be competing with all of that. You could also argue, "why Discord? Why not IRC?" for much the same reasons.
Part of the idea is that this is self-sorting.

NIMBYs are likely not going to move a city built on the foundation of density and easy permitting. Just like people who hate hot climates don't move to Phoenix.

Build certain zoning policies into the city's charter that is hard to change. If NIMBYs move in, then - no, they don't get to change the charter with a simple majority.
> You are being deliberately (maliciously?) misleading and scare mongering here.

...

> people that have returned to the country

I do not know who's being deliberately misleading here.

Please note[1]:

> It will start this week for people returning from New South Wales and Victoria.

> People wanting to return to South Australia and home quarantine will have to apply to SA Health.

So this is clearly applicable to Australian citizens within Australia. Citizens of Australia are not allowed to move freely within Australia. Before an Australian citizen can travel from one part of Australia to another part of Australia, they have to ask the government to allow them to do so. They must accede to the points I listed.

After that the government will expand the program to international travelers.

Once a populace accepts that they are not allowed travel and that the government can arbitrarily place people under house arrest and subject to torture (and knowledge of random intrusions into your life can happen at any time - even during a long, relaxing shower or something is psychological torture), there isn't much that will stop people with the power from expanding their control.

[1]: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-23/how-will-south-austra...
You can't use it without your phone connected (to the same network), which in my case is a no-go.
> I'm sure Chinese manufacturers might feel the same about NIST standards.

Don't count on it. For example have you ever wondered why there isn't a Russian Certificate Authority trusted in the Web PKI? There's no market for one. If you're a Russian, you can see that a Russian CA is obviously subject to control by Putin, which even if you like Putin today doesn't seem like a perpetually great idea, so you would choose some European CA instead. And if you're not a Russian you clearly don't want to trust this CA.

Now, there are some Chinese CAs, but it's again interesting that they're not popular in China. China has a huge population, plenty of potential customers, but somehow even though there is more than one CA in China, very few certificates between them. Similar to the number issued to the Government of Spain (not all companies in Spain, just their government). Same reasoning. Even if I think Xi Jinping is great and I'm a proud Chinese national, a certificate from the US or Switzerland seems like a better choice.

The Americans fall far below the lofty moral standards they set for others [in the other room is my redacted copy of the Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and Interrogation Program, grim reading about American torture even though much of what the senate were shown is redacted], but only at your considerable peril should you would mistake that for meaning their cryptography is no better than whatever home grown offering has been chosen in your country despite their billions spent and their expertise in this domain.
If you want the staff to see this, email them at the contact link below.
Mid/Senior Front End Developer
Working on development of digital products across health, finance, fintech and government (React, Javascript, HTML/CSS)
Maybe it is enough. What sort of market do you work in? And what sort of real attack is coming your way.

An internet air-gap is probably enough for a vast majority of use cases.

There's lots of talk about engineering here along the lines of "good engineering is knowing how to make a bridge barely stand up", but in Security, especially IT sec there's often little discussion about real risk and impact. And striking a reasonable balance.

Places I've worked consider their product and information high security whilst embargoed (mostly financial). The IT security at these companies matched that posture. But people all drank together, shared everything over drinks and had terrible personal security.

I'm not a security skeptic at all, I just think that the simple stuff goes a long way and that it's somewhat unhelpful to compare regular IT use to CIA style IT use.
This is one of the reasons why N95 masks are hard to clean/sterilize AND return them to the original effectiveness. You have to remove the water that has condensed on the fibers. Vacuum pump appears to be an effective method.
To clarify, the FAA is grounding it because it flew outside the flight corridor, which could cause risk to the general public. The FAA grounding has nothing to do with whether there was risk to the occupants or not.
The FAA grounded it because it flew outside the flight corridor, which could cause risk to the general public. The FAA grounding has nothing to do with whether there was risk to the occupants or not.
Yes, in the article it mentions specifically that FAA agents were in the control room and had access to the pilots warnings.

So then it seems more like responding to an article than the facts they saw on the ground

Edit: I'm being downvoted to -3 for reading the article and making an anodyne comment answering a question about it. Cool.
As a kindness, I checked the first page of search results for the unquoted search phrase "arrested for unkempt lawn" for you, which provides several results about several people in several states on the first page; I stopped after the four below, and noted in passing how most of them seem to be regions where classism and/or racism remain prevalent today.

https://www.fitsnews.com/2019/08/21/south-carolina-women-goe...

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-jan-06-me-51449...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2798209/angry-woman...

https://homeimprovementnewsjournal.com/man-arrested-for-shoo...

I invite you to search on your own if you require further evidence, and if you do choose to do so, I hope the search terms above help save you time.
latest podman works with docker-compose OOTB
Beyond dopamine: New reward circuitry discovered
Indonesia has a bilateral agreement for airworthiness with the FAA[1].

[1] - https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/international/bilatera...
There are certainly cities that get built around a single paradigm and when that paradigm shifts, the city falters. Detroit is an example of this. One of the difficulties nowadays is that technology evolves much faster than the foundation that supports the growth of that technology(infrastructure, education, government, policy) and this is ultimately where tech's philosophy of disruption runs against the slow moving philosophy of government.
Except due to distortions and perspective differences, shorter focal lengths are objectively further from matching human vision.

Subjects regularly look much further from the camera than they actually are. Objects at the edge of the frame are weirdly stretched. Whatever is closest to the camera will appear disproportionately large in your final image. Objects in the background are disproportionately small.

Not to mention barrel distortions tend to be much more prominent as focal length is shortened.

Normal focal lengths are the closest to human vision. Wide angle fisheye lenses could be ok with curved media, but otherwise they're just warped.

Considering the area of focus of human vision, along with the fact that we don't see in rectilinear terms, trying to reduce all the aspects of human vision to one factor: field of view... seems foolish at best.

If we viewed photos in some kind of spherical VR space or on curved media, then wider field of view with a fisheye lens could be argued to be more similar to human vision. However, we almost exclusively view pictures as flat sheets of paper or flat rectangular screens.

For those reasons and others, 35-50mm is far more similar to actual human vision.

https://petapixel.com/2012/11/17/the-camera-versus-the-human...

Composition (and thus the number of elements in frame) is a choice that gets made by the photographer, and can be achieved by altering the scene, changing distance, or changing focal length. Having more or fewer elements in frame has nothing to do with mimicking human vision, and whatever focal length you've chosen is a decision you're making for the viewer. If you make a 360° photo, that's still a composition decision you're making on behalf of the viewer, and it directly effects how they consume your work.

Now, if you want your image to be a wider angle, that's fine. That is a legitimate compositional choice... but it is a choice that you the photographer are making. It's not better or worse. Nor is trying to be "closer to human vision" inherently better or worse than any other choice. Knock yourself out with whatever focal lengths suit you.
I'd argue the opposite. Gas-powered leaf blowers are insanely pollutant. Running a gas leaf blower for an hour is equivalent to driving a car for 100 miles [1]

[1] https://sustainability.wustl.edu/rethinking-lawn-equipment-2...
If they use pure noscript with scripts disabled globally, then yes, it’ll just be unable to load the one first-party script.
From what I know, they are still bridging, but in the long run (I assume they are somewhat waiting for stable Dendrite, since Synapse is shit for massive deployments) I believe they want to run an actual homeserver in gitter.im and have a sort of Gitter themed/branded Element client for it.
They live next to a field and mentioned using the lawn as a buffer, twice, in what is assumedly a sort of rural area. Not as the red carpet for a wildlife oasis in paved over suburbia which this sort of advice is inevitably geared towards.

You don’t need to spray for mosquitoes and ticks and ruin the local ecosystem when they’re happy in their field at a healthy distance with a nice, clean lawn in between you.