skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Having used `gitless` a while ago as my main interface I strongly disagree. Having a distinction between my working tree and things I'm actually considering to commit is a luxury you only really start to miss when it's gone. IMO gitless makes it way too easy commit too much. Also it's "feature" of keeping uncommitted changes local to the branch is just weird. If I want to make a branch specific change, I create a commit. This has the big advantage that it actually forces the user to add a message what the change is about, so if something else comes up I know what was going on when coming back to it later. It's not like this has to be a formal commit message, after all the commit can be dropped again later. Otherwise you end up being surprised by old experiments when switching to branches you haven't used in a while. If I just switch branches then the most likely reason for that is that I want to move the changes.
Maybe my memory is fuzzy about the exact workflow, in any case you can check

"Microsoft MakeCode: from C++ to TypeScript and Blockly (and Back)"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGhhV2kfJ-w

and the respective C++ FFI,

https://makecode.com/simshim
It'd be useful if you linked to them.

Here's a human study referring to their safety.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/
Sunglass Wars Part II: Blenders Eyewear vs. Shady Rays (August Update)
Moiré no more (How to de-moiré a halftoned photo)
Thank you! I might wind up trying this, it's an old computer my wife used to one imaged, I've been wanting to make it bootable for the nostalgia effect that it would produce. I just want the least amount of damage to the OS as possible. Getting the files is one thing, being able to boot it, is something far more interesting.
https://www.ukclimbing.com/forums/

If you're into rock climbing, mountaineering, walking, etc. Discussion can get a bit "robust" but there are some super-helpful people on the UKC forums.

Also sections for cycling, photography, skiing, etc.

I'm not sure what software they run: probably fairly custom. The platform had a big refurbishment a year or so ago.
I feel like misaligned incentives are the real problem here - what if libraries banded together and paid authors directly for books?

Or maybe we need a publisher more like PBS or BBC with more of a public interest perspective?
Show HN: Scientists hate him – we built a 10x cheaper CDN with 500k PoPs
Is there any infinite scrolling website that works smoothly on mobile devices?
Because if people consume more, they would pay more and wealthier people generally consume more.

The problem with income tax is that low income people risk being put in jail if they can't pay their taxes. And rich people can easily avoid income tax anyway (e.g. earn 1 USD a year from the job and get paid in stock or donate most income to a foundation that is in their own control).

An extra tax on luxury goods (private airplanes, yachts) would also be ok by the way.
What exactly do you need examples of?

There have already been cases of people having their YouTube and Gmail accounts blocked because of their politics[0] and app stores are notorious for banning apps (and thus businesses) that allow access to legal but politically-unpopular speech[1][2]. You might argue that this censorship is a positive thing, or at least legal, for these platforms to do, but I don't know why you would call my concerns "fake FUD".

I admit I was using the phrase "I don't like your face" as it's a provocative idiom, but this article is about a technology which stores pictures of people's faces, and is activated by a picture of their face, so the real issue is that companies might react negatively to what's behind someone's face — that is, their opinions and beliefs — and lock them out of this facial recognition ecosystem.

[0] https://torontosun.com/2017/08/01/free-speech-advocate-jorda...

[1] https://reclaimthenet.org/google-chrome-web-store-bans-disse...

[2] https://www.insideedition.com/unjected-dating-app-created-fo...
yeah thats right, lick the boot right there, you missed a spot, yeah that's right.
> If Xi was so unconfident in his legacy that he could not find a worthy successor in the usual amount of time, what did that say about him?

It takes a long time to elaborately enshrine yourself into the history of a nation as old and massive as China. Xi - as with essentially all dictators - lies whenever he pretends it's not about him. He has persistently taken actions all along the path to glorify himself at the expense of others (including past Chinese leaders). Xi isn't interested in the sort of legacy you build in a mere two terms, that's why he was unwilling to give up power. It had nothing to do with being concerned about finding a worthy successor, that wasn't a consideration at the time (Xi had no intention to give up power at two terms, regardless of successors). I think ideally he'd like to surpass Mao in historical importance, although he'll settle for being perceived a peer. If Xi is assessing what that will take, there's little question in entails conquering Taiwan and overall it'll take decades of imprinting himself onto the nation. National cultural transformations derived from your vision of how things should be are long processes.
It's worth it for someone. I've had people break into my car for 3 quarters and a half ounce of super glue.
I did cover that—it's irrelevant, because Rails in particular is much worse, at similar levels of neglect or incompetence, than lots of other frameworks+languages. It's a joy to build with from scratch, and it's fine as long as your team is steady, disciplined, quite good, and mainly focused on your Rails codebase (that is, it doesn't go for long stretches without eyeballs on it and effort going into keeping it up). Deviate from that ideal state and it starts to turn awful in a hurry—and of course other languages and frameworks do, too, but the curve for Rails codebases that fall of that ideal plateau of quality is much harsher than most.
You are posting misinformation. I would encourage everyone to get vaccinated if they can. But according to the CDC the fatality rate for people in the 18-49 age group is only 0.06%. And the deaths are mostly people with serious co-morbid conditions. The risk is nowhere near as high as BASE jumping.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burd...

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.11.002
He's always right in the long run.
Drawbackwards | Remote-First (Phoenix, AZ) | Front-End/UI Developer (React) | Part-Time/Full-Time Contractor
Drawbackwards is a UX design & development agency in Tempe, AZ.

We're looking for a React/Typescript & UI developer to join our 5-person development team building a new large-scale, greenfield product. Our design team provides thoughtful, comprehensive and high-fidelity mockups in Figma for pixel-perfect implementation. The team follows async-first communication/development practices, is highly supportive and egoless, focusing on the work and results first.

Please feel free to email seanc@drawbackwards.com with a little background on yourself.
The late build of Longhorn that leaked back in the day performed so poorly that it took forever just to boot on the computers of the era.

I have no doubt the usual Microsoft politics of the era applied as well.
Too much complexity with garbage excuses. A lot of the web is like that now.

You can't link to a specific tweet. 'Nuff said
DockStation – developer-centric application for managing Docker projects
Well you can, but the point of React is to abstract the view from the platform, not much more.

You can use something like Solid or JSX lite to maintain standard components that are compatible with most of those frameworks and web components.
They set aside the money after they were found in violation but before they found out the amount. It isn't like they set aside the money and then went and intentionally broke the law.

You can argue whether the violation was intentional or not, but setting aside money to pay a fine after you have been found guilty is not a signal that they intentionally broke the law.
> Ideally iOS and Android would simply expose native apis via browser and allow one to toggle access to said apis per site.

Not when the different stores are so lucrative. Imagine that initially Jobs wanted people to stick to web apps and reserve native apps for Apple teams. fast foward 13 years, Apple made billions with their appstore.
It's not a strawman. Look around you: every prestige media outfit is leaning towards authoritarianism. You might think that these ideas are just coming from a few wackos with weird ideas, but by the time an idea gets to NPR, it's well within the Overton window of proposals that the decision-makers in our society consider reasonable. And terrifyingly, outright totalitarianism is now on the table in the west.

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/20/925755387/unfettered-free-spe...

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/npr-trashes-free-speech-a-brie...

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/what-covid...
It's all about how other clients treat branches and tags.

Once you've pushed a tag, no other clients will be willing to update their definition of that tag unless the users on those other devices force the issue.

So operationally, "tags are immutable once pushed" is a pretty reasonable way to look at things.

Remotely pushed branches of course also won't allow you to do anything but append without forcing on remote clients, so mutable and immutable isn't quite right, here.

So I guess I agree with your original contention, branches are mutable-and-you-can-ride where ride means "the remote client's porcelain will be happy with append mutations".
This helps put into words my feelings toward immortality. A life without end would be as monstrous as a sculpture whose height or width never ends!
The sensors could detect a solid object, the issue seems to be that the sensors will detect many things and the AI or the hardware is incapable to handle the amount of sensors data.

Though the Google car seems to have strong enough hardware to keep track of many vehicles and objects at a big enough distance to not be surprised if something appears or disappears for a frame.

Not sure what people want for a sensor, to detect and label the objects for you? or calculate velocities and predict the future? That seems to be the software developers job but you might need competent people and not throwing big data into a black box and retrain until it mostly works.
>> Then I learned that all of the world and US corporations, financial and political elite depended or were heavily invested in China.

Yeah, the US essentially handed China a modern industrial economy. This was done by outsourcing production (viewed as menial labor) to lower cost countries and focusing on your "core business". The MBAs in the 90s actually believed it's possible to do that while limiting the suppliers technological capabilities. They were wrong. Even when it became more clear, they had to keep doing it because costs and competition meant death to companies that tried to reverse it. Then Trump came along with an IDGAF attitude and pointed out that we're getting "a raw deal". Not many in the business world disagreed, and now measures are being taken to undo it. It has to be undone at the national level so the playfield is even for everyone as it shifts. Biden has not reversed many Trump initiatives in this area but also doesn't talk about it because politics.
https://www.crossdressers.com/forums/ are still around, and still providing a good resource for CDs and nascent trans women.
Testing software that interacts with hardware in the real world is hard, especially when that hardware's location/battery life/etc effects behavior. Having an easy way to simulate complex situations and quickly jump from scenario to scenario is important, that's why we've been working on lastmile-cli. To allow for easy exploratory testing of all the different real world scenarios you can get into on our bikes and scooters.
A single neuron has somewhere on the order of 5x10^16 atoms in it. There's no rule that says it couldn't potentially use a large fraction of those atoms for its functionality. That's your upper bound on computational complexity.
This is also how I think about things. I exist here and now. My children exist here and now. We are happy. It ends. Sure. Just like you say, an object also ends (at its borders). But that doesn’t change the fact that this moment will forever be a part of the universe.
I like Nomad, but I wish useful features weren't locked in a paid version.
I figure I may as well preempt the inevitable low effort comments pointing out he said that quote in defense of federal taxation.

Yes, that's where that particular quote comes from but Franklin said the above quote a million different ways in various correspondence about all sorts of subjects.
These types of attack are known as Van Eck phreaking

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Eck_phreaking
how about z3ta == zeta
Post is currently awaiting moderator approval on Reddit. Is there a different link available instead?
> > You can do all sorts of "monopolistic abuse" on your platform as long as it is small and inconsequential.

> This statement feels like an oxymoron.

Only if one lacks the imagination to expand "monopolistic abuse" (note the quotes) into "abuse that would be 'monopolistic' if the perpetrator were big enough".
Make Tea Not Love

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uel1vfAQ52M
Who’s welcoming atrocities? I’m just observing that people are idiots, and it seems to be getting worse.

There are probably things we can do as a society (improve education being one) that might help.

But no, any observation that large groups people are unable to parse the modern world and come to reasonable conclusions simply must be because that person wants to implement newspeak and purge any that disagree.

Helpful.
Whether the view is abstracted from the platform and whether you have native access to apis are separate issues.

Even if you use web components that doesn’t change the fact that web apps don’t have access to native apis without compilation.
Docker on an M1 Mac is inconsistent too. Generally it works fine but not always. It uses qemu and doesn't always surface qemu errors when you're building images (you can see the errors when you're running containers, so less of a problem there). They complete build "successfully" and look like valid images when they aren't. I've had multiple k8s deployments fail locally on minikube and on GKE/EKS because of bad images built by Docker on my M1 Mac. The solution is generally rebuild until it works or use my 10 year old Intel-based Mac, but those are bad solves.

Docker shouldn't be charging anyone for that inconsistent experience.
This sounds exactly like Singularity http://singularity.hpcng.org/
Marginalizing easily targeted minorities is page one of totalitarian playbooks.
The positions of all carriers are being tracked at any time. Antiship ballistic missiles are faster than antisattellite missiles.

That said, there are many other possible ways of getting the positions of a carrier, from basic submarines to suicide drones.
This is impressive, though would be even more so if they could figure out how to do the reverse and arbitrarily plant bits in the memory of an air-gapped, uncompromised machine.
I got a degree in philosophy many years ago. I then got into and dropped out of a Ph.D program in same. I think there's enormous value in learning the history of thought, particularly from a critical angle. I don't think there is very much value in modern academic philosophy. To paint an overly general negative picture (please take with a grain of salt):

First, some of the scholars I met along the way were absolute saints, and spending time reading and writing with them made the whole journey worthwhile. They modelled patient, intense curiosity and scholarship, and they left an indelible impression on the students who learned from them.

For the most part, though, the field seems borderline intellectually bankrupt. The way modern academic philosophy functions is very odd. Researchers are stuck in tiny little pigeon-holes trying to churn out papers on the next fad in their discipline. There isn't a lot of critical reflection about whether topics are likely to be fruitful, or even what the goal of philosophical research is. The main "method" of analytic philosophy ("Conceptual Analysis") is at best a dull joke, at worst a weird mixture of hubris and narcissism... but that doesn't seem to bother anyone. The "philosophy of x" disciplines have some gems but tend on the whole to depend upon a very cartoonish or superficial understanding of 'x', and tend to lag way behind the disciplines they should be leading. They almost never contribute back to x.

The field is at its best when it promotes deep reading, curiosity, patience, and intellectual humility. It does sometimes do this. Much of the time it promotes a mixture of artificial rigour, sophomoric egotism, and not a whole lot else.

Like anything else in life it is what you make of it. For myself, the relationship I built with philosophical literature continues to be rewarding (even in my day job as an engineer). The mistakes I made along the way were my own.

I think the best way to engage with philosophy in 2021 is to really give oneself time to read and go down a rabbit hole, and if one can, talk with people. I wouldn't read very much recent analytic philosophy, and would avoid the traditional "Epistemology/Metaphysics/Ethics/Logic/etc." structure like the plague.
The Royal Manticoran Navy forums and RPGNet are the two I spend the most time on.
Not really as you'll have to do that work anyway if it doesn't exist. It's better to do a small extension than to duplicate all of your other shared code just to do that change.

Most of the time there will already be a 3rd party extension,
but it's really easy to make them. You will need some slight native experience, but you would need more for a full native app.

With Titanium it wasn't easy to do these extensions, with RN you have direct access to the native platforms and code. You can go as native as you want in one or all platforms while sharing the code you want to.
I wonder if a hard-stop could actually focus our attention on a concrete goalpost: instead of having an indefinite future, we would have a fixed timespan before us that’s much longer than our current planning horizon.
Docker recently change the terms of the Desktop product for commercial use. Relevant section of the changes being:

* The existing Docker Free subscription has been renamed Docker Personal. Docker Desktop remains free for personal use, education, non-commercial open source projects, and small businesses (fewer than 250 employees AND less than $10M USD in annual revenue).

* Commercial use of Docker Desktop in larger enterprises (more than 250 employees OR more than $10 million USD in annual revenue) requires a Docker Pro, Team or Business subscription for as little as $5 per user per month.

I figured I would share a tool that I've used for a while that is FOSS and superior to the first part product (in my opinion).
> If you tried to do this before cookies, when people put a product into a shopping cart on the first page they visited, as soon as they click on anything else, the browser would think this was a completely new visit, and... well... your shopping cart would be empty.

It's worth pointing out that instead of cookies we could have gone with a system where the client (browser) kept a copy of all the state and returned it to the server on every request. The cookie-based session state management was chosen because it was decided it was too inefficient to pass the entire state back and forth between the client and server.
If you cared about performance/benchmarks you'd switch to a multithreaded/parallel alternative and have the compute finish in 1/16th of the time on a 5950X.

Matlab/simulink make pretty heavy use of multithreading:
https://www.mathworks.com/discovery/matlab-multicore.html

Even Excel runs its computations in parallel these days.
KDE seems to have a choice of 3 programs for that on the project, but at least on my Debian they weren't installed by default with the minimum KDE. Maybe they come in the full installation.
Imagine being a loser with endless pointless comments like this lol. get a life bro you don't know shit rofl
> You can't link to a specific tweet. 'Nuff said

What? https://twitter.com/Twitter/status/1433462575438643206
Location: Dallas, TX

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: Javascript, Typescript, HTML, CSS, React, Java, C#

Résumé/CV: http://michellephillips.me

Email: michellenicolephillips A T gmail
You've cherry picked an outlier. How many non-crazy conservative pundits or politicians can you name who opposed the Patriot Act, or the formation of Homeland Security, or the expanded powers given to cops and federal agencies? How many prominent conservatives spoke out in defense of Edward Snowden? Was it conservatives or liberals in the media who risked their lives and careers to organize and document the information he released?

During the Bush era, the opposition to the authoritarian trajectory of the war on terror was largely from liberals, although it was often strictly partisan. Conservative media completely fell in line with the Bush administration. I thought this would change when Obama was elected, but it didn't, and authoritarianism remained a driving force in conservative politics and media throughout Trump's presidency.

COVID-19 has brought some more conservatives onto the anti-authoritarian side for sure. But I'm not confident this is a durable change.
No science is ever truly settled so let's just listen to what our neighbor posted on Facebook.
100k a day i don't think they care what people call them.
Almost all the "left wing" continued on with the war on terror and upped the anty in some cases. Obama essentially doubled down on what Bush did and Biden sure didn't oppose it.

It might do you some good to go back and look at who supported all of it in the beginning. It certainly was not some right wing only endeavor. There were very few politicians opposed to any of it.
Attacks like this have been in use since long before that leak.

See all the Sandisk U3 drive based badusb payloads that people could cleverly hide into all sorts of form factors.
The difference between being able to describe a neuron's behavior and being able to simulate that behavior is the difference between being able to say "ten trillion trillion PN junctions" and being able to build a working computer that fits that description.
Aren't the majority of book copyrights owned by publishers?

All the same, I'd expect the answer to your question is "no". I think authors usually make most of their income from the advance before the book is even written. I'm sure they make some income from royalties, for at least some books, but it probably does drop off by the 20 year mark for most books.
I’d be happy to share them, I am in batch 4 so I probably won’t get my Framework laptop till late October early November.

Issues with Apple’s philosophies aside, the M1 Air is the best laptop I’ve ever had. By far. The battery life and standby time are endless. I tend to only use it for 20 minutes on the weekdays and a charge lasts me all week, with slightly heavier usage on the weekends.

I don’t expect the Framework laptop to win in all categories (battery life, overall level of polish) but I think it will be very rewarding to build and take care of, and I plan to run Linux on it which I think will be a great opportunity for me to grow my skills, and also give me the opportunity to vote with my wallet for the change I want to see in the world.
You're not making a stealth carrier. You can't hide a carrier.

And no, China doesn't need an F35 analog. They need frontal stealth and they can operate from runways. The game is the SCS, not CONUS.