skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And this is what Americans usually believe, Europeans not so much.

And as a European this makes me sad. I hate living somewhere where most people believe government allows them to do things rather than tells them what not to do. It’s a small difference but it’s important.
For me, "crate" is now associated with anything rust (and I'm neither a rust person or a programmer) - if I see crate in relation to tech, "it has something to do with rust."
You should take a look at the late TempleOS. It's not a serious contender but has a lot of interesting ideas in that direction
> Median OF revenue per creator is $180/mo

Many factors can lead to this, but that's not surprising, the law of distributions when it comes to things like this is that there are incredible earners and then a massive drop off and long tail.

> for equivalent of a full time job.

You added this, I don't doubt that some people put in a lot more effort than the monetary amount they get back- but the inverse is also true and no source claims that "you get $180 for a full time workload", because that's impossible to measure at scale.
What is this? Is this an official government policy?
How is a publisher supposed to identify if someone is Maori?
You're so close to having empathy for all people! Just keep going: What if nobody had to justify their existence?

Edit: Downvoters, try a little harder. Engage your emotional core. Really work those empathy centers. Think about it: If nobody had to justify their existence, and people just allowed each other to exist, then we wouldn't have to weigh whether sex workers are more deserving of rights than computer scientists. We could allow both; we could allow everybody.
I wonder how much of the efficiency is due to the height/altitude and how much is due to blade surface area. Does it make sense to build super tall towers to put medium sized wind turbines up higher? Interesting idea
You decontextualize my statement into a categorical disregard of negative rights. That proves nothing, just that you did not consider the context and limitation of the incursion. Or that you didn't consider one of the other points, the inevitable balancing of rights that needs to take place in any system of rights.

You can't simplify this sort of issue, you fundamentally can't. Not every nuance is a slippery slope.
EarthEnable – Low Cost Flooring Solutions in Rwanda
But those are not human rights under the old definition.

Human rights are stuff like the right to dignity, the right of to being compelled to work, the right of not being totured or wrongfully imprisoned.

Humans right are supposed to only include those where you do not need to weight opposing rights. If person A is being tortured that is always a violation of a human right and it is never a violation of a human right not to torture sombody.

Humans right are meant to be a baseline definition of what we must provide to every human on the planet in any situation, whether there is a surplus of food or a worldwide famine, whether we live is a super advance technocracy or a solar flare destroys all electronics.

There are many many rights that are deeply essential in our society that are not human rights
The Three Pillars of WebAssembly
Holy shit. I tried for about 5 minutes this morning by breathing out Q and I can whistle now. Damn thank you.
From the same place you get power when your nuclear powerplant is offline for maintenance?
I'm a real sucker when it comes to love & as a geologist, most of the time I'm hardly around. Even though I'm always away, I never go a day without calling or face timing my wife & kids especially when the network is good at the sites. I noticed my wife started avoiding my calls & one day the strangest thing happened. I called many times and she didn't answer. Minutes later my phone rang & it seemed to be a pocket dialed. To my shock were sounds of my wife moaning.
The next day I was conflicted with how I should confront her so I chose to share my experience with a close friend. My Friend introduced me to a professional guy he met on reddit who knows of his way around the internet. He showed me the mother load. Conversations, voice notes and nude pictures that she shared with her lover (she doesn't even send me nudes & I know how many times I've asked). She was living a secret life. although i am still in shock
I'm just glad i was introduced to THEJAMIEHOOKUP@gmail.com
Very nice! Any known limitations on number of torrents?
In the short term, I'm sure UX designers could provide cross-cultural hieroglyphs. That's basically what they do already. Pre-literate toddlers use iPads. Phones also do have speakers and pretty good text-to-speech. Tap cow icon. ... Robot lady: "The cow says: MOOO".

In the medium to long term, this would only make education more important, especially for women and girls.

Maybe the FedApp could incorporate something like DuoLingo, again incentivized with Fedbucks. People have a way of learning quickly, when they have an incentive.

This would all be a lot more defensible than the Xinjiang method. It's like this: When the Ottoman sultan wanted to neutralize a nephew, he wouldn't throw him in prison; he'd put him in the harem. Instead of a vast open-air prison, this would be a vast open-air harem. (Or work camp? Unclear which.)

...

It is interesting though, this idea that illiteracy can actually be a defense against state coercion/seduction. It's like playing the Chicken game with no brakes: "You have to let me win, because I can't stop."
I've always wondered how these underground kingdoms protect themselves against excessive rainfall?

If there is a cm of water resting on the surface, surely these are completely flooded inside?
You need to look at it slightly differently. The founders aren't looking at the money they can make from the cash cow. Revenue is a long-term earner and requires them to keep being successful for that long term. An exit (via a sale of the business) is the real short-term earner & lets them walk away (m/b)illionaires.

Therefore the game is to optimise valuation - the higher the investment round, the higher the company valuation, and the higher the sale value.

Simple as that.
Show HN: Free Visual Sitemap Generator with Meta Tags from any websites
You can generate visual sitemaps with meta tags from any websites. https://octopus.do/sitemap/resource/generator

For Example:

Apple — https://octopus.do/o2rry7ela2

Slack — https://octopus.do/x846356enwl

Notion — https://octopus.do/b0t9b4184lr
Interesting, I'll forever associate crates with vinyl records and DJing.. and I am a programmer, and not a DJ..

I guess context matters! ;-)
Reminds me how incredibly boring and sparsely informative most conversation is!
Afiu, Apple's NeuralHash uses exact collisions when they do their Private Set Intersection.

The main advantage of using exact collision is that you can then blind the perceptual hash with a cryptographic hash and avoid any leak of information. (Taking for example sha256 of this perceptual hash won't allow any attacker to get any information on the features from the hash, but if the perceptual hash are the same then the input of the sha256 is the same and therefore the output of the sha256 is the same).

This is important because it alleviates the risks of an eventual leaking the database as Apple never touched and compared sensitive content but only cryptographic hashes of the perceptual hashes.

Some other system like PhotoDNA, rely on a euclidean distance between features being less than a threshold to register a match, which allows to quantify how far the image is from CSAM, but mean that the hash leak some information about the original content.
Your friend was working for a bureaucratic company.

Source: I know plenty of engineers without any formal degrees working for big money at real companies.
Thanks for sharing the link, even though it gives me such a bad feeling. I really like Keybase. An important part of my workflow relies on it. So... oh shit.
It does, the US is currently building it's first Jones act compliant Wind Turbine Installation Vessel.

New Details on First Jones Act-Compliant Wind Turbine Installation Vessel:

https://gcaptain.com/new-details-on-first-jones-act-complian...

U.S. Customs and Border Protection Expressly Applies Jones Act to Offshore Wind Projects in U.S. Waters:

https://gcaptain.com/u-s-customs-and-border-protection-expre...
On a related note, the Federation of American Scientists maintains a really fascinating archive of unclassified military documents, which includes a lot of this kind of stuff (plus all sorts of other interesting documents). I think their archive tends towards slightly newer documents though. Or maybe I just haven't skimmed it thoroughly enough.

https://irp.fas.org/doddir/
> It won't catch anything but the dumbest of dumb criminals

Dumb is a pretty accurate description of a large fraction of criminals. For the most part you only get smart criminals when you are talking about crimes where you have to be smart to even plan and carry out the crime.
According to today's NYTimes, the proffered surrender wasnt quite unconditional - the Taliban requested amnesty in exchange for disarming.

Rumsfeld turned them down on the pretense of demanding unconditional surrender. My suspicion is America's persisting collective rage and the firehose of defense spending were beyond anyone's control at that point.
> to phrase it another way, allied forces killed a third as many civilians as the actual Taliban

> According to the United Nations, the Taliban and its allies were responsible for 76% of civilian casualties in Afghanistan in 2009, 75% in 2010 and 80% in 2011.

Interesting. How do you get one third out of those numbers?
You know Devs can relatively easily get around 250k in NY / SF right?

Trades are solid career choices but it's hard work and you expire at about the same rate as a software dev.
https://www.audacy.com/connectingvets/news/inside-america-fa...

This link was posted in another thread and seems to be the source that broke the news today.
How opportunistic. But I suppose one has got to "make a living" somehow...
>They were designed to prevent a "kidnapping" in which a person tries to steal and keep a child

Aren't most of these kidnappings also intrafamilial? Even if you throw out the "parent returns a kid a bit late from an activity" cases, I think there are many more parents trying to take kids to another state to keep them full time despite a custody agreement otherwise than there are strangers just nabbing kids in parks or what have you.
Asking for a raise doesn't get you "flagged as a troublemaker" unless you're really an ass about it.
Joplin is a nice find. I used to use WikiPad religiously until it seemed to go defunct.

I like the idea of Kinopio a lot because I use mindmaps heavily but find the hierarchical structure to be a limitation, this seems more lateral. Only problem is it's hosted, would love something like this in an app, like the aforementioned Joplin.
> This fundamental change is one reason why Windows 11 exists.

they couldn't change the thread scheduler without a new major release?

pull the other one
The underlying question I ask is who set the precedent? Why was the system designed to allow this to happen?
For sure this bill exists because Google and Apple are in the position rather than Samsung and LG.

Regardless, good if it makes meaningful change.
I did not intentionally imply anything here, so if anything I wrote appears to include an implied component, that was not intended and may not represent my opinion.

All I'm saying is that the implementation Apple has described would be constitutionally blocked from being co-opted by US law enforcement. Obviously if there's no end-to-end encryption, any cloud operator could still be coerced into searching for material server side, as that falls under the so-called third party doctrine.
It's literally no different from YouTube/Twitch/etc: people see the big earners and think "hey, I could do that" without realizing it's a pyramid scheme.
No limitations on number of torrents .
A Master's degree is what you make of it. A student who only wants the credential for short-term career purposes can skate through without much work or learning. But if you have it the opportunity to attend then why not put in some effort and learn interesting, challenging topics? I find that usually opens up unexpected opportunities later.

It's a bit silly for employers to focus on arbitrary educational credentials instead of actual ability. But on the other hand for large organizations managing thousands of employees it's challenging to treat everyone as a unique individual. Some level of forced standardization is the only way to make it work efficiently at scale.
Level 4 doesn't necessarily mean just highways - it could also easily include suburbs with well-designed roads that have been mapped in excruciating detail.

You could force the car to avoid certain intersections with lots of close calls, or give the car advance info about unexpected objects detected in the road by cars up ahead, etc. which would make the task a little easier.
This is actually an important question.

First, they probably don't have to pay back with interest. Large investments, provided by upper tier firms are "cheap" atm. For loans that means very low interest. More commonly in tech world, these are equity investments. Investors get shares. Dividends are paid in theory, but not or on a strict schedule and not if the company can't afford it. Increasingly, not at all. If you can be securitized and fed into the "high finance" system, you get to exist in a much more attractive monetary system.

A more pertinent question is "why do they need investment at all?" Assuming they can operate out of revenue, most answers to this question are controversial, one way or another.

One reason is cashing out founders and early investors. OF is popular now, but it could lose popularity. Founders are currently paper millionaires and selling equity gives them an opportunity to sell shares too. Even if the company itself sells all the shares, just having cash in OF's account is a buffer to risk.

A more amorphous set of reasons is "getting in with the in crowd." An equity investment is also a valuation event. It gives shares a market value. Besides allowing founders to sell shares, it also makes it easier to compensate employees with options. The company can use shares to buy other companies. Etc. All this relies on shares having a market value, and selling shares to an institutional investor is a way of doing this.

There's also good reason to establish a relationship with a financial backer. You'd rather talk to a merchant bank when times are good, revenue is flowing and investors want in, not when the company is struggling. In the future, you might need emergency cash on a short turnaround. You might want growth finance... likely for a network that needs to scale. otherwise, you leave opportunities for the competition. You kind of need an institutional backers to help you IPO, or otherwise interact with the financial sector.

A lot of this is pretty speculative, but an OnlyFans backed by Softbank might find it easier to negotiate terms with standard payments providers. It might have an easier path to IPO, etc.

In the old days, when firms built factories and made widgets, it was always big news when a big firm signed with a big bank. This was presumed to be a long term relationship, with the merchant bank funding the company and selling its bonds, leading major investment rounds when needed. These relationships were the bedrock of capitalism. Japan's economy for example, was entirely structured around merchant banks. "Keiretsu" brands like Mitsubishi & Mitsui were basically just a bunch of companies backed by a single merchant bank.
I find that news report to be pretty uncompelling. They are using lots of weasel wording to make it sound like they have evidence of widespread jailbait, bestiality, and incest (a non-issue between two consenting adults), when really they have nothing. They have "leaked documents" suggesting that accounts posting illegal material are warned instead of shut down immediately, and then they give third hand testimony of examples of illegal content moderators have seen. Notice that there is no attempt to quantify the amount of illegal content. But here we are, trembling in our boots about it.

> Christof - not his real name - says on some days, he has viewed up to 2,000 photos and videos looking for content prohibited by the site. He uses lists of keywords to search within bios, posts and private messages between creators and their subscribers.

> He says he has found illegal and extreme content in videos - including bestiality involving dogs and the use of spy cams, guns, knives and drugs. Some material is not actively searched for by moderators as frequently as he believes it should be, says Christof, despite being banned under the platform's terms of service.

Oh! Well if Cristof thinks they aren't doing enough I guess they must be shut down!
CDC: Covid vaccine effectiveness fell from 91% to 66% with Delta variant
Firefox's reader mode can bypass paywalls on many news sites (e.g. The Economist). It's simple to activate; press F9 and then F5.
Nope, not at this time. You can only store the URL itself in a "crate".

Glad you like the name though!
I'm with you! It's possible that at one time I thought as you (also being a music fan), but in the past 5 (?) years you can't trip but to find someone talking about rust in the tech spaces. Not only context, but era (point in time?) as well.
We're talking about drone attacks, not invitations to our lemonade social. It is always malice.

This might help clear it up: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/malice
At a consultancy, credentials you can market when "selling" your consultants is part of the job. Depending on the field, a certain level of accredited knowledge (i.e., from a degree, or certification perhaps) is part of how the bill-rate is justified for employees at given levels.

We don't have an education lock on certain roles/levels at the company I work for, but we do have roles at certain levels that require a given certification no matter how proficient one is in the specified tech. This isn't a small-brain move that misses the forest of knowledge for the trees of credentials, but a recognition that it will be more challenging to staff that employee at a given level without it.
Is there a way to do that where customers / content creators don't eventually hit traditional payment processor / bank?
Why not Osmand? It's FOSS, a bit complex though.
> but this is just plain text with links.

I think this unnecessarily reductive. I disagree for two reasons.

1. Technical. The restrictions are on the protocol side. Not the browser side. It's up to the browser to convert links to "more than" links.

The Lagrange gemini browser is a good example of that. E.g. if it detects a link to an image, it adds that image inline.

2. Behavioural. Protocol restrictions do not immediately equate to inability to be creative. In my short stint in geminispace I've already witnessed some wonderfully creative content, ranging from writing, poetry, ascii art, a tictactoe/chess server, and even interactive fiction games.
Memo to self: if I plan to move to the absolute middle of nowhere and use Starlink to work remotely, I might need a non-Starlink satellite phone to text the office that my ISP is down.
FWIW that's an average not median income with a ton of caveats ^ from the source. I'm confident though that only the first two screens of OF content creators make the bulk of the income though.

^ https://mrq.com/blog/only-fans

> https://ranking-fans.com/ - Seedlist and Fans Sorted by total fans; accounts where fans are not available have been excluded. Many accounts listed as having the most fans are free accounts used by OnlyFans models who also possess paid accounts. However, as fan numbers were only available for the free accounts, these have been disregarded for the purposes of this story. Likewise, "free" accounts where subscription is free but photos provided required payment have been disregarded. Accordingly, the only data shown is for paid accounts with high subscriber numbers. In some cases, models possessed multiple paid accounts. In these cases, only the one with the highest subscriber numbers has been tracked. Monthly earnings are based exclusively on the individual account assuming no media requires additional payment and disregarding tips and similar voluntary costs. Similarly, free trials and discounts have been excluded. Accordingly, all monthly earnings are estimates reflecting the monthly payments of subscribers over the long term.
Society has no duty to protect you either. See Lozito v. New York City.

On July 25, 2013, Judge Margaret Chan dismissed Lozito's suit, stating that while Lozito's account of the attack rang true and appeared "highly credible", Chan agreed that police had "no special duty" to protect Lozito.

(Edit: spelling)
Onyx Boox Nova Air

Is there any variant , version, etc words too?

Like Pro, Ultra, Max, Mark3, ?
Funny how it means completely different things to different people. As a 18 year old I would never think of vinyl records when hearing "crates" :D
Here in the United States, the power to form corporations comes from the state constitutions. The applicable clauses typically require protection of the public interest, or note the power to revoke the charter based on misuse or abuse. This explicit or implicit public obligation is apart from the fiduciary obligation of the corporation's directors and officers. Over time, the presumption has come to exist that the single-minded pursuit of corporate profit is enough to satisfy that obligation, by providing goods, services, and jobs. Now that there is greater awareness of the external costs generated by some corporate activity, this assumption can and should be revisited. The constitutional power to raise the bar on corporate behavior already exists, it's simply dormant in most jurisdictions.
> some reasonable (against forks using their servers) (...) justifications

How is that reasonable in a centralized client-server model? That's precisely what we find unreasonable with Twitter and others shutting down or making life hard for 3rd party clients. Why would it be more acceptable from a free-software service?

The network effect says a centralized protocol like Signal has "zero" value without reusing the same servers. All this because Signal maintainers have an ideological argument against decentralization, which received many great responses including this one from a Jabber/XMPP client developer: https://gultsch.de/objection.html

In all cases, Signal servers control who has an account, what permissions and what can be posted. You can't just extend the protocol to enrich your client by abusing Signal's servers, but you can make your client compatible with Signal protocol (interoperability). Preventing that is rather user-hostile.
For a while I used vimwiki in a drop-down term: guake and yakuake have this as a primary feature, good for gnome/KDE, but if you're using a tiling WM you can use termdrop on most terminal emulators.
Sure, but there you have an argument against economic libertarianism (no taxes) in any case.
Okay, sure, but doesn't that remove my personal responsibility for vaccination? If it's only about my personal disease risk, I can make whatever choice I please.
You shouldn't need to, but on Hacker News I can't say I can fault this caveat getting ahead of some potentially nasty comments, even if in principle I agree it shouldn't need to be said.
Maybe if the property owners were allowed to build more housing the competition wouldn’t be as intense.
That's using the metric system, but he's suing in the US, you have to multiply by Pi and then round up a bit.
Ayn Rand dramatized this in Atlas Shrugged. They also want regulations which hinder competition.
The way the credit bureaus derived scores is automated, so what's the point of the score?
You are assuming that the management is rational at your company. That's quite a big 'if'.