skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, it's like advocating to get rid of log statements because they are like an overflowing sewer of data obscuring and distracting from the real cause of the bug. But you can't even figure out if there's a message in the log because it takes an hour to sort through the firehose of messages you know aren't relevant, but there they are, filling up your logs.

The above goes double if you're running Java and your logs include stacktraces spanning 300 lines.
They are allowed to sell chips outside of china with Arm IP licensed from Arm China
From 2007.

The Conclusion is that they don't know but people worry.
Yes, ansible in general is painfully slow; I guess I assumed "painful" meant hard to write
FreeBSD’s PF avoided this. The downside is obviously the lack of nice new things like ‘rdr-to’ rules, but FreeBSD PF is also SMP-capable as of FreeBSD 10.0 (a long time ago) so its a fair trade imo
> My phone has the bare minimum things on it I need to get by. I turn everything off I can. I've railed about location tracking because I know how it works, but damn it, I am not going to mount an all-out war against all my devices and fill my house with an armory of tech. I don't really want to live like that. I want to live like it was the 1990s, maybe, when a PC was just a thing at my desk and it didn't watch me. I guess. That's not coming back now.

This is what I'm planning to personally do. My next phone will probably be only able to make calls and send messages and if I need to use the internet then it will be from the computer. I don't want access to the internet all of the time and I feel my life will be better and filled with more life affirming activities because of it.

At home the router stays off all of the time unless I need to connect. Most of my life is offline anyway. When someone says send me an email and I say I'll write you a letter and deliver it, you'd be surprised what gets done.

I feel that choices about whether to use technology are important and I always ask myself would this improve my life, and most of the time the answer is no. I know my priorities are different to most people but I think I am okay with that. I don't feel like I am missing out on anything and actually gain time, well-being and peace of mind instead.
They're finally trying, but last I checked it remains incredibly polluted.
> embarrassed

That’s a shame because it seems like you did the smart and effective solution without wasting your time. A/B testing isn’t needed if the signal is clear enough (¡parachute testing!), and it is hard to get enough samples for a weak signal. Good on you.
Great, so I know exactly what I'm looking at. But it's not showing me anything I need to know to figure out why half the company is yelling at the team in Slack that something is terribly broken.
Do you mean discord? That sounds like why I prefer discourse/phpbb/etc. over things like Twitter and discord.
Yes absolutely but people don’t realize how much it works against them; this kind of thing should be illegal in my oppinion. If we care about protecting the investors and making a fair market at least. This is beyond a hidden fee, this is almost stealing the customer’s purse
It really feels like the rest of the world refuses to even try and prevent China from taking over everything.
Viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals
I think the homeless dude passed out covered in (presumably his own) shit at the Stonestown muni stop not 2 hours ago would disagree with you
I got a Flexispot EC 3 standing desk with 55”w x 28”d curved front top (curved front tops are no longer offered) and added one of their monitor arms. Paid about $525 for the desk and $80 for the arm. I’ve used it for about 15 months and it is fabulous. If I did it again I get the newer EC-4 base (wasn’t available at the height of covid) and motor to be able to lower the desk another couple inches when sitting.

They have other less expensive options too.
No actually, I think Tesla is one of the few foreign companies who has been able to operate there without the JV requirement.

Edit: backing this up with a link https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/greggardne...
Are you saying Brussels didn't care because the problem went to a Flemish area? Almost unbelievable to hear about prejudice from a place like Brussels.
> That's just your opinion, there's no such thing as a blessed license scheme by the community. GPL is a perfectly valid choice if you feel like it

I didn't state an "opinion." I'm stating an observable fact. And don't paraphrase what I said - my words are right there and you don't need to play games with what I said or didn't say: I never said anything was "blessed," I merely pointed out that by and large, the Rust community has - whether you like it or not - mostly settled on MIT/Apache 2.0 (as in, the de facto license). I even couched my statement very carefully as referring to "foundational" crates, even though - as a matter of fact - it applies to the majority of published open source crates regardless of whether or not you consider them "foundational."

You can see for yourself with this breakdown of crates on crates.io by license (scroll all the way to the right): https://gist.github.com/passcod/2e1983ce415b32bdf3a0

Different languages/communities built around common languages or frameworks tend to "settle" (there's that word again) on different licenses. These are typically (but not necessarily) the licenses that the language/framework itself is licensed under. In rust's case, the majority of what you might consider "foundational" crates - i.e. crates that are intended for consumption by the broader community to build the basis of other projects in the same way that you would depend on the standard library itself, be they runtimes, util libraries, etc. have, by and large, accepted either MIT or dual-licensed MIT/Apache2.0 as the default to start with, unless there's a compelling reason (such as starting a business around it!) to do otherwise. There's nothing wrong with picking a different license, it's just less likely for the community to converge around a more strictly licensed option. That's just the way the world works.
Photo of back of head desired.
Yeah, thought so. Good luck and hope you time it right when you exit and when get back in at the bottom, if you decide to reenter, of course.
the passed out homeless dude covered in (presumably his own) shit at the Stonestown muni stop not 2 hours ago would disagree with you.
How did you read that into my comment? There certainly are human rights. The UDHR just doesn't protect them nearly as well as it should. Eliminating the limitations that articles 29 and 30 impose on the rights enumerated in the rest of the document would be a good start, along with certain other contradictions (articles 22, 23, 24, 25, 26.1-2, 27.2, and 28—you can't have a natural right to services which someone else would have to provide to you; that implies slavery, which is contrary to article 4) and some irrelevant commentary (articles 13.3, 25.2) about the authors' preferences about how society is organized which has no bearing on human rights. But the first 20 articles are mostly fine. They should have just stopped there.
This is a thing that should not ("in the name of all that is holy") have been done; but being done, cannot but be admired.
I had exactly the same thought when I lived in SF.

They’d adopt policies that would make tons of sense in Alabama.
The entire board voted with SoftBank to kick this dude out. He literally refuses to step down. There would have to be a lengthy court battle which the board doesn't want.
Title of link: Behold The Shit Map: Mapping San Francisco’s 132,562 Cases Of Human Feces

http://www.abcbusinessnews.com/2019/04/behold-the-shit-map-m...

I reported some shit for the city to clean up. They never cleaned it up. It just sat there for weeks decaying. After weeks, there was only a little bit left... probably ended up on someone's shoe.

Early in the pandemic, the city looked worse. Now it looks somewhat cleaner but still depopulated.

There are some tourists but surprisingly many of the people walking around at Bay Area locals. The tourists are still so few that you can recognize them upon seeing them again.
Yes. All companies that operate in China have to be 51% domestically owned. Often they're setup so the parent company keeps all of the IP but as the Arm situation shows, that only gives the parent so much power.
> The Chinese government will ensure that no Western competitor will "win" in China. Period.

Isn’t it the MO of any country that wants to go ahead ?

Wasn’t born during the period, but I know of the US’ Japanese bashing in the 80s and pulling all the levers to stop foreign companies from getting dominant in the car market. As far as I know Toyota & co had to bring manufacturing to the US to get a foothold, and I get the feeling China has just made that a policy from the start instead of going throught all the cycle.
How GNU Guile is 10x better – #4 will shock you
It's the long game. The value of being an ally of China outweighs the costs of these individual situations.
Do we know if there were any drunk people on the titanic as it sank?
I 100% agree that the person in the car is only thinking of themselves and wants traffic time reduced.

But I don't think that is the goal of the people building the highways. They are thinking of how to maximize the economic output of a city + connect people to areas they currently have no access to. In your example it is a huge win for the city that new houses can be built in areas that have quick access to the highway and therefore the city. You (the incumbent) may not benefit but the number of people that now have a similarly nice experience to the people that already live close enough to the city to have access will increase.
Only if the comment is about the screenshot itself though. https://youtu.be/1Jwo5qc78QU has some sad explanation.
So China invented paper, printing and gunpowder.

That’s pretty significant IP theft… no one talks about it.
It’s probably loaded into the image Iceberg-style. Git is just a backend to persist to, that way.
Does it literally have no presence outside of Tor? Most people really don't want to download an extra browser just to see a random software project.
Well, at least the ARM Mothership has refused to send any of the new chip designs over the China wall . . . all ARM China has got is old stale garbage now.
Can you be more specific? The short lifetimes of these certs should also help with that right?
> This is difficult to parse in my Western mind.

>How do you live and decide with a government over you that can grab control at any time they wish?

You don't. That's why chinese millionaires/billionaires are parking (at least some of) their wealth outside of china so it's safe from expropriation by the chinese government. Also, this isn't limit to china. It's the default state of affairs when rule of law and property rights isn't respected (ie. most developing countries).
I'm having trouble pointing the camera.
This might turn some up: https://nobsgames.stavros.io/

I’ve purchased a few from that list and they were indeed no-BS games.
> There have been many reports concerned with China's aggressive efforts at stealing IP for at least 10 years that I'm aware of, probably more like 20.

Over 20 sounds about right. Definitely since Clinton was in office. The number of times that satellite designs were ripped off was memorable.

There's still various articles that haven't been lost to bitrot.

https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/98-485.html

This was hilarious because Congress was asking if the US military was straight up sharing. The reported US designs ending up in Chinese hands was of notable concern to draw a few inquiries.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/missi...
et al
That's an incredible demand of Gore. Who was he going to drop out for? Bill Bradley?? Bradley couldn't beat Gore in a single state in the primaries. It's not like the Dems had a deep bench in 2000.

And what did Nader achieve by staying in? Did the Democrats move left? No, the lesson they took was to move right. Did the Greens get 5% nationally and get matching federal funds, which was their stated goal? No, thank God.

Nader threw the election to Bush for nothing. He is a narcissist who only paved the way for Jill Stein and her Russian connections to spoil the 2016 election.
Not exactly the case as the western bloc has more middle-class consumers.
You are correct my brother got denied top secret clearance despite being active duty military because his wife is from a Caribbean nation. To get the right clearance is hard.
This seems good, but an uncomfortable truth is that many diasporans (especially working class) are often tax averse to put it politely, meaning they dont want to report their assets especially the money they send back home (which is part of why they send it back home). I assume with a solution like this, e.g. for people living in the US, you'd be mandated to collect SSN and report assets. That would increase their reported wealth in the US.
we need a tefreshed x220 with touch screen
I’m in a similar situation except I’m still in a HOCL city (Sydney) and it’s really starting to grind on me. What do you like about Brisbane?
Because Chinese law allows what dude was doing, a court battle would have been futile.
You're not alone my friend, I also have my old but powerful gaming notebook as a Proxmox host, and I'd very much like to be able to bring it to LAN parties and just boot a Windows 10 and play Age of Empires II while maintaining all my VMs intact.
Forgive me if I'm missing your joke, but most of the American public did think that way. Most of the American public was against war until Japan attacked America. And responding to an attack is not what I would call being "world police". Nor is going to war with Germany after Germany declared war on America.

This is why America entered the war so late. If America were thinking of itself as world police at the time, why did it take America so long to actually go to war?
The proposed plan for monetizing this relies on a misunderstanding (deliberately crafted by Apple) of the app store changes. If you obtain contact information from within the app, you can't use that information to steer monetization.

Here's a quote from the new policy:

> Developers cannot use information obtained within the app to target individual users outside of the app to use purchasing methods other than in-app purchase (such as sending an individual user an email about other purchasing methods after that individual signs up for an account within the app). Developers can send communications outside of the app to their user base about purchasing methods other than in-app purchase.
No, I mean Discourse. Discord is even worse in that department, and has its own problems.
But the Chinese ownership could replace the board, right?
The US is waking up from a post-cold war reality. In the 1980s a consensus formed that.

1. US military and economic power meant that countries could be relied on to follow US influenced IP laws or be excluded from the global market.

2. US military and economic power was large enough and benign enough that no major trading partner would pose an existential military or political threat - validated by the economic rise of Germany and Japan.

These two ideas powered US and to a lesser extent European outsourcing for the next 40 years. Very few executives believed that there was a serious risk of their outsourced manufacturing or outsourced engineering firm becoming independent - and they certainly didn't think through the reality that in such an event the holding firm would not have the capital or knowledge to compete against the newly formed firm.

The reality is that the US and Chinese economic spheres are likely to fracture in whole or in part. China owns the factories and the IP, the Chinese military is increasingly capable of achieving any military goal they are likely to have against the US military using indigenous military hardware.

There is no reason the Chinese authorities would not support subsidiaries and joint ventures becoming independent by eliminating legally ambiguous joint ventures and Variable Interest Entities, forcing sales of Chinese assets to Chinese investors, or simply creating new legislation to free such entities from foreign corporations.

I fear that the US has been so focused on outsourcing for the last 40 years that it's forgotten how unusual of a relationship outsourcing was in the first place, and why it wasn't done for most of the industrial era.
That... doesn't give me much optimism. They were asked about wind but they answered the question they wish they'd been asked (fog).
In case you aren't aware, the reason we have intellectual property is because we have 300 years of human history showing that countries without intellectual property never innovate anything. The countries of the world adopted intellectual property rights, even though the nobility of Europe resisted for over a century, because they were forced to just to keep up with Britain.

We also have 300 years of history showing what happens to countries who adopt policies that China do (it used to be called Mercantilism). It has always been an excellent system for copying superior countries and catching up with them. It is also an excellent system for launching economic (and real) warfare against your enemies, but in the end it always leads to stagnation (which in turn leads to these kind of countries using their state power for the only thing it is really good for - war).

History shows that this will be the path China takes. We can only hope China begins to suffer from the stagnation part before they destroy the world.
Yeah, that would be a few millenia patent. Its really a false equivalency..
It's probably tied to internet culture/subculture - VR Chat is still a pretty niche thing, most people don't own VR headsets. A lot of people owning a headset and interested in participating in a virtual world intersect with online subcultures and Otaku subculture.
"My main issue is with the West being completely oblivious to it."

We are not oblivious.
`` and '' is just unparsed markup.
Working on something for hackers who hate marketing: wax.run

Basically outsourced growth
I really really doubt that.
I just so happened to be reading the Wix developer agreement today and they explicitly disallow using their API if your primary purpose is to migrate users off of Wix. So that's nice.
Tor onion addresses would work fine I think.
Yes. Of course, you need to be logged in on another device to do that.
Sorry. I quoted a somewhat non-controversial source, then didn't pick up that you were rightfully describing that UDHR is weak, not prescribing that human rights are obsolete unless we all just take the vaccine.
Too bad ARM. You got what you asked for dealing with China
A lot of companies prey on uniformed seniors, and the disabled.

A relative works with people with slight Develmental Disabilities, and his clients are targeted by the same apps. It's almost like they have a sucker's list of emails?

I know 501c3's pay for lists of individuals who are easy targets.

That Cars for kids is playing right now on my radio. A few years I researched it, or as much as I could on the internet. All that money, and 1 four bedroom ranch style house in the Sierra Foothills.

And I can't even watch those Humane Society commercials.

I once heard Shriner's hospital has enough money in their war-chest to last another 20 years, even allowing for expensive breakthroughs in medicine.

I sometimes wonder if morals are completely absent in most entities.
If you don't mind me asking, what's the competition? Do you mean you have a bespoke bash stack or you're using chef, capistrano, etc.?
Nelson is brilliant- i've enjoyed his blog tremendously over the years.

Especially his posts on how to properly think about testing.
- https://blog.nelhage.com/post/testing-and-feedback-loops/
I've been using TheBrain for about 5 years & am mostly happy with it. It is a bit pricey though! The unique visual is an almost most for me. I'm willing to try Obsidian, but I think I'd need TheBrain's unique visual to make it work for me.

https://www.thebrain.com/
You do risk jinxing it. Once people believe high level of inflation are coming, they move wealth out of fiat for other assets. That leads to inflation. And it cycles in on itself.

The classical example is the Weimar Republic. The government printed money to get out of financial problems, but that initially led to inflation, not hyperinflation. What led to hyperinflation was when people started dumping papiermarks for other assets.

Imagine: You believe the US will see 50% inflation, and Canada will see 5%. What do you do? Swap all your USD for CAD before that happens. What does that do? Devalue the dollar. Now, everyone expects 60% inflation. People start investing in stocks, property, or just about any other store of value. That devalues the currency. And so on.

All inflation requires is a sudden loss of faith.
> Remember that nobody was threatened or, as a result, morally offended by China until the last few years when we figured out we couldn't keep them at the bottom of the value chain forever.

No. Not really. Just stating things doesn't make them true.

You should ask China's neighbors (esp. India) whether they felt threatened before.

Also read this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_warrior_diplomacy

Why do you think emperor for life Xi Jinping is going to be more fair than his more "democratic" predecessors?
Recent Afghanistan Events – one historian's perspective (ignore first ~3 para's)
Demonstrating really different representations is a good indicator that ensembles are worth trying.
2015: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/05/discovered-disease-w...

> The World Health Organization (WHO) mostly works to reduce the physical toll of disease. But last week it turned to another kind of harm: the insult and stigma inflicted by diseases named for people, places, and animals. Among the existing monikers that its new guidelines “for the Naming of New Human Infectious Diseases” would discourage: Ebola, swine flu, Rift Valley Fever, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and monkey pox.
No one talks about it? China inventing paper, printing and gunpowder is something every school child knows. I think I've heard about it about a million times. These facts are common knowledge; certainly paper and gunpowder.

Printing is an odd example; the reason Gutenberg was influential is not the reason most people think. He did not invent movable type. He invented systems for mass producing movable type, particularly technology for casting type blocks out of metal, instead of carving them out of wood. So yes, movable type was invented in China. But no, Gutenberg's contribution was not "stealing from the Chinese" (as has become popular to claim on the internet these days...) The root of this particular misconception is the general public's general ignorance of printing technology.
I know. Let’s excuse the rules when it doesn’t convenience us.

How about using drug addiction to force trade… then complaining that party doesn’t follow the trade rules?

I love how we talk about how “China doesn’t follow the rules”… and completely ignore the context of how they were dragged into the game unwillingly
ARM HQ and Chinese fund Hopu tried jointly to replace the CEO of ARM China who is refusing to step down. The ARM China board voted 7-1 to fire him but he controls the company seal.
Many of the techniques discussed are documented in my Julia implementation of the fastest string sorting algorithm https://www.codementor.io/@evalparse/julia-vs-r-vs-python-st...
And the rest are Indians. Americans just don’t have the work ethic drilled into them to pull this off en masse.
I wish new applications from now on are file based, be it json, csv, xml, toml, html, yaml, md, etc for longevity. There are huge numbers of applications that don't need ACID and aggregation across organization.