skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There were actually aircraft designed by the US to match the Tu-160

At the risk of “arguing with someone on the internet”, I think you may have your chronology backwards, since it seems the Tu-160 was designed to match the US aircraft you mention.

The Valkyrie was a late 1950’s to early 1960’s design with physical prototypes existing and flying by 1964.

The B-1A design began in 1965, with the first flight in 1974. This would have been the closest western analog to the Tu-160, since the B-1B derivative had a different focus - low-altitude terrain following - since it was believed that the high-altitude/high speed designs like the B-1A were vulnerable to newer Soviet missile designs. Stealth was also becoming increasingly important to US command due to the same concerns about missiles.

The design competition that begat the Tu-160 began in 1972, with a first flight in 1981. I’m not saying it’s not a great plane - by all accounts it is very capable - but US designs were not done in response to it.
The paper linked explains what the “perhaps” are. The website is seemingly trying to drive a narrative that blockchains are unnecessary.
Imagine being incapable of not telling the world that you're a transvestite. Keep it to yourself.
I think people use "permissionless blockchains" when they're referring to Nakamoto Consensus / Proof of Stake / whatever + Blockchain.
Nope. Not there yet. You also have to audit the source and make sure someone hasn’t slipped in a back door or intentionally introduced bug.
Not the operators but the designers!! Yes programmers and engineering. Don't give a pass to the guilty!

But you are right: moral responsibility can ONLY be a human obligation. Machines are incapable of moral judgements - it's the human that created or operate the technology only.

And this is an obvious problem given there will be blind people who can't sense cues that fully-abled people can trivially.
Strictly speaking about data analysis, tidyverse is way better. Even in adjacent spaces such as plotting and interactive data, tools like Shiny [0] are ahead of the Python ecosystem.

R is definitely weird language, not as useful for general purpose computing, and has far less marketshare. But that's kinda the point of pg's essay.

[0] https://shiny.rstudio.com/
That's encouraging. It's hard, and there's a market. If and when they can eliminate the "safety driver", it's real.

DMV has three levels of license for self-driving vehicles.

- "Testing with a driver". This has about the same restrictions as a learner's permit - must have a licensed driver onboard, no vehicles over 10,000 lbs, no carrying passengers for hire. Over 50 companies have that license. Uber flunked this and had their license to drive autonomously revoked in 2016. So Uber went to Arizona and killed a pedestrian. Then Arizona suspended their license and Uber stopped.

- "Testing without a driver". This is tougher to get. There are specific technical requirements. There are communications requirements. A "law enforcement interaction plan" ("How do we stop this thing?") SAE Level 4 or 5 is required; 3 is not good enough. Operation may be restricted to certain types of roads (freeway, campus) and limited in speed. Eight companies have this license now, which is encouraging.

- "Deployment". Only one company has qualified: Nuro, which makes slow-speed shuttle buses. This is the Commercial Drivers License level for self-driving vehicles.

DMV has a staged approach. It seems to work. Companies can test, and failures get reported and publicized. Complaints about the California DMV being too restrictive about testing have subsided. Most of the companies that couldn't meet the requirements are gone.

There's slow, steady progress. Alphabet/Waymo and GM/Cruise are getting close to deployable systems.
Some version of SCO had already made a hash of a multi-vendor datacenter Unix. Before Linux became commercially popular there was a lot of interest in 2nd and 3rd tier vendors in an enterprise Unix that would have enough marketshare to interest ISVs. But the project pretty much flopped.

Linux didn't really have a big effect on SCO until they were already flailing. It was mostly Windows NT that was eating their lunch. SCO tried to claim that it was Linux that caused them to go downhill but the timeframes just don't line up. Source: I spent a lot of time studying this at the time.
Last I checked you didn’t have to install anything. I’m not sure about more advanced usage like screen sharing or how many timing options their are, but for generic “see me, see you” it works fine in the browser.
I'm amazed at the quality of posts in HN when it comes to Bitcoin related but I'm only thinking because people post after missing the boat for the price action and want to belittle it out of emotion.
Long time lurker but I had to create an account to comment. My first job out of college was at Fore Systems/Marconi back in 2000 as a QA tester. One of my first assignments was to test bug fixes for several different uptime issues we had. My favorite was the PNNI 397 day uptime where it would flap a port causing the switch to relearn all its SPVCs.

Fore/Marconi was a great place to work back then but the dotcom bust and the migration to pure IP/MPLS was a death knell to them. My entire division was laid off in Oct of 2001. I was lucky and had jumped ship only weeks earlier.
These Apple privacy ads [1] are not aging well and they aren't even old.

[1] https://youtu.be/lHcf9ZkJ28o
Sitting in a meeting and saying a few words is like 10% of what Zoom can do - there's webinars, breakout rooms, Q&A, polls, moderation, and a lot of other smaller features which are incomplete or unavailable on the web client.
Starting a comment with "careful now" is extremely condescending and disrespectful. Please stop.
Miniature Engineering Craftsmanship Museum
Yes, and, hmm, maybe if $360k of that was in MS stocks it'd seemed more ok? Hmm

At the same time, these discussions about then paying to little aren't good PR either
In order to stop forced Windows Updates, the best solution is to switch to Linux.
The actual story is the opposite of that clickbait headline: the trial hasn't started yet. Which is to say, there isn't a story.

Threads that add nothing new to what has been repetitively discussed countless times are off-topic for HN. When new information appears, then there will be something to discuss.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
Good point, but you can't make money with heliocentrism.
R-36M aka SS-18 Satan. The name says it all.
Of course you do. For fundraising purposes. And for sale purposes.

Nobody wants to say it but a bold founder would raise money as blockchain project, would sell to clients as a blockchain project but would operate it via a common database.

When money comes in , then you can disclose it and say that you did something completely different , VCs and clients would look like fools considering the quality of the product even without blockcahin and everybody would live happily ever after.

Sometimes people who live in hypersocial echo chambers such as the VC party scene or even your amateur Clubhouse angel investor scene, they have to be dragged kicking and screaming out of their ideas which they acquired in the aforementioned hypersocial echochambers. And that is tons of work in and of itsef.

It's much easier to say "Oh yes we are totally commited to blockchain"
The study shows that differences in systems of direction words doesn't really affect spatial reasoning.

Yes, this one study doesn't disprove every aspect of SWH, but it's a good example of how SWH claims, even in the weaker versions, tend to fare when subject to more rigorous investigation & analysis.

What area of thought do you think provides good evidence for (some version of) the SWH?
The Galactic Lottery
Emacs has already been rewritten as a completely modern application in a modern programming language (JavaScript). It's called Visual Studio Code. We can now safely deprecate the original.
In addition to what others have mentioned - you could probably find the session keys in ram - but for a system without debug knobs, injecting your own certificate authority is probably easier.

For stuff using nss(Firefox)/openssl/gnutls - you can usually just ask nicely for a copy:

> The key log file is a text file generated by applications such as Firefox, Chrome and curl when the SSLKEYLOGFILE environment variable is set. To be precise, their underlying library (NSS, OpenSSL or boringssl) writes the required per-session secrets to a file. This file can subsequently be configured in Wireshark

https://wiki.wireshark.org/TLS#TLS_Decryption

https://gnutls.org/manual/html_node/Debugging-and-auditing.h...
Not sure why this got down voted, I was just asking a question. Thanks HN. Seriously though thanks for the responses, I was legit curious what people thought. I'm gonna go watch last black man in san francisco again.
I think that is very wise to avoid that political minefield by making it a little bit more expensive until it's actually production ready.
With open systems and code, you can verify if code is doing the things you expect it to, and if you're paranoid enough, you can choose to build everything from the ground up. If there are enough security conscious people out there for there to be a market for security-focused systems, then companies can come in and offer verified systems and reproducible builds of things those people care about.

With closed systems, the best you can hope for is to treat it like a black box that can and will change out from under you.
> Rust's big innovation is not allowing you to make memory errors (in designated sections of your code)

I’d actually say Rust’s ownership model is its defining feature and big innovation; memory safety without garbage collection was the original goal of the project, but that has arguably actually ended up being more of a side-effect of the ownership model than the actual artefact, from the innovations perspective. Several other languages have been adopting significant ideas from Rust’s ownership model without actually needing it for memory safety.

(Also, some factual clarifications on the wording you used: Rust doesn’t allow you to make memory errors except in areas marked with the “unsafe” keyword—you’re marking small dangerous zones, rather than marking safe zones. But scripting languages are normally memory-safe too, it’s the absence of any garbage collector that makes Rust special there.)
I've never used Wise because it doesn't serve my country. In fact there's no shortage of remittance services besides Wise.

The main problem is that the KYC and risk checks run by european and american companies don't take into account how people relate to each other in Africa and how money flows in the continent. It's possible that one person regularly sends money to several relatives with different names and in different cities in the span of a few weeks. Fraud detectors at the european/american remittance companies don't like that.

Many of us are also living abroad temporarily and want to retire in our home countries. We want to repatriate most the money we earn abroad but banks in the west don't make it easy.
And then actually growing a community that uses your blockchain that you sell all your tokens to as revenue, and then a couple of NFTs

and there’s nothing wrong with that

we are in the money game, this is a way to do that and you can get bankrolled for it
Please expand your acronyms: SME and MNC.
Eventually, Nike missiles had a selectable yield nuclear warhead. The first salvo was set to intercept at 90 miles away, with 40 Kiloton of yield. The next was 45 miles away, and 20 Kiloton, and the "Hail Mary" was directly overhead, with 2 Kiloton yield.
The whole thing was/is a tangled web. I spent months on this case at one point and even I'd have to go back to my notes to reconstruct the whole messy timeline.
Can you link to the book, out of interest?
Oh god. I hadn't thought of this. Really hoping this doesn't go full Weinstein.
> It basically does the same thing as in other editors, just the key binding is different

I think it's the way redo works that's confusing, not necessarily undo itself. The way you have to undo, then use another command so the undos themselves become undoable, and redo by undoing the previous undos. That's not how most editors work.
>m1 Mac.......

M1 is 5nm, those are all factored in 5nm capacity planning. i.e It is part of $delta_X.

>Is there another equally interesting story in the chip fab business that would explain this shortage?

1. I have always thought the toilet roll incident in pandemic would give every one a lesson in commodity and supply chain. The Chip shortage is no different. One can also look Lumber, Steel or any other commodity. But basically instead of having a negative impact on demand, COVID actually make huge increase in demand. PC industry saw ~15% increase than previous projection. One only need to look how a 5% misprojection of Smartphone shipment in ~2018 lead to an avalanche of NAND and DRAM pricing.

2. Old mature node ( sub 28nm node ) has always been in short / tight supply for nearly a whole decade. You just dont hear about it in mainstream media because they are not headline worthy and doesn't drive clicks. Generally speaking the older you are and the more you know about an industry, the more you realise how news are always very late to the cycle.

3. None of these factored in trading. If any market is a simple game of supply and demand one could always balance things out. But you have people betting / trading these commodities. Which are not actually "demand" as in usage but investment. Considering the premium / profit one could gain from chip trading could easily be multiple if not in some cases order of magnitude. This also has a negative feedback loop, as wholesale or channels see difficulty in getting hold of something they will want to stock pile more of it. Something similar to what is described as Bullwhip effect.

4. One often overlooked sector is Crypto. It basically absorb any sort of capacity as long as the Crypto dollar is profitable. Right now this doesn't seems to add much to the constrain. But at one point Crypto players could buy up whole patch of wafer capacity at a much higher premium.

5. Supply will always be much slower to react, the higher capital investment, the more risk there is in over supply. There used to be an old Intel joke about The most expensive Fab isn't leading edge Fabs, but will always be an empty Fab. This is just as true today. It is the same with DRAM and NAND, that is why you see vendors reluctant to build additional capacity until absolutely necessary. ( Whether it is a cartel or not depends on your perspective, so I will leave that part out. But it is absolutely common for any commodity industry to meet and discuss these issues. )
Yet another reason to disable iCloud, if you’re privacy conscious.

Although you’re relying on your recipient disabling it too. So really you have to use something else. Signal, etc.

With that said, I still think an iPhone with iCloud disabled is better than other phones on the market privacy-wise. And for the average consumer, iPhones offer a good tradeoff between privacy and usability.
Vacant Nuance in the Vacant Housing Debate
Every now and then I listen to the recording https://youtu.be/PhhC_N6Bm_s to remind myself that this is water.
There is also a similar site whether the james webb space telescope has launched yet. I can't seem to find the link though.
> huge slum in a 3rd world city with a ridiculously high crime rate.

If you think Sao Paulo is a 3rd world city, then I don't know what you'd bin Naypyidaw or Monrovia into. 4th world maybe?

You'd probably enjoy living in a South Bay suburb. There's lots of pockets of different races and you'd never have to meet anyone outside of that community and you'd have total local control of police response and other things. Crime rates are low and cultural values are homogeneous in the community.
Computers having long uptime used to be considered a novelty, with counters shared on rudimentary websites and even magazines

Now its not even a consideration as it is so commonplace

At one point this was considered a hard problem
It's not in this article but I read it in other on ars that they go to SF because it turns out that they was on too easy roads.
Google does bot detection on a /24 basis. So you were still sharing with 253 other households most likely.
Either way the point stands: Rust’s biggest features are about what you can’t do, not what you can do
The hole in this theory is that, unlike general delivery drivers, almost every restaurant's peak hours are at the same time - meaning that there's no reason to think that the app/website would have fewer idle drivers than the restaurants.

The primary value is the logistics of dealing with governments in order to abuse workers with impunity. If a restaurant tried to claim that their drivers were independent contractors that don't need to be paid between orders, they'd be laughed at. Put a massively funded, massively lobbying intermediary between the driver and the restaurant, and it becomes fine.

edit: I'm sure there's a term for this - labor-laundering?
Do you mean Windows 2000? I didn't think "NT 5" was ever used as a brand?
You can learn yourself, or you can ask an expert. There were plenty of physiologists who could have told investors that it was simply impossible to assay accurate blood levels for most analytes based on a few drops of interstitial fluid. This was well known in the scientific community at the time.
And the resistors? Multi-sourced.
I seem to be getting better at Indian-English-patois

>>> and has more than 2,000 employees and 1.5 lakh clients.

lakh = 100K

So please work out the total customers yourself. Revert back to me when you have the needful done.
Betteridge’s law has never applied so well

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines
This is not a good answer. Do I need to remind you that the result of a search query (which is unknown to user) is not the same as the query itself (which is known)?
Nice!
There is also https://github.com/dkogan/feedgnuplot
How serious is it, really? The vast majority of users will connect to a web server with their IP anyway so I’d assume it’s more a question of weighting it behind other privacy improvements — for example, ad blocking and tracker protection are probably making more of a difference for most people.
Because your example is just a distraction, no one cares about the people just minding their own business not causing any (visible) problems. Almost definitionally when we're talking about this we are talking about the people that are harming others, either directly or indirectly.
This looks like a plausible build for an eager hobbyist. PhD not required. There was an open source AR headset released a few years back and my company put one together with a smattering of off-the-shelf parts and a consumer-grade 3d printer in a few weeks with just a few regular devs with undergrad degrees. The parts list for this device is nothing you can't find on amazon/aliexpress/digikey and it says you can use an Ender or any other FDM printer (no mention of filament, but I'm guessing that means PLA is ok).

https://developer.leapmotion.com/northstar
Loopholes already make E2EE impossible. The "end" of encryption is not the entry point of your device, it's you: the user (more specifically, as close as possible the place where the data is displayed/entered). If there is some additional stage before/after encryption, then it's not end-to-end.
Why not read the post? Because you are technically wrong.

It’s about iCloud backups containing the decryption keys. iMessages are backed up encrypted.
Recent and related, though the headline is terrible:

Online Trolls Just Assholes All the Time, Study Finds - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28334551 - Aug 2021 (27 comments)
Is it true that using WebRTC relies on Javascripts
That's good news for people who have already recovered from Covid. We should definitely take that into account for policies around opening up again, i.e. by treating recovered people like vaccinated people. Beside that it is of little use, is it? "Get Covid to be better protected from Covid" doesn't make a lot of sense to me, at least.
She is doing such a disservice to other women that actually go through abuse. She is pulling all the stops now with the baby and abuse. Is she going to argue she is insane next?
Abba is back – from new music to a Voyage tour with VR
Samsung 980 is rated for 0.3 DWPD. For a 250 GB drive that's 75GB per day. I have a hard time imaging what type of workloads would cause the target audience (ie. surfers/office workers/gamers) would reach that limit on a consistent basis.
This and Bill Watterson’s commencement speech at Kenyon[0] are both things I read a few times a year—-challenging and relatable.

[0] https://web.mit.edu/jmorzins/www/C-H-speech.html
Come on, there are reasonable arguments against Bitcoin.

I fail to understand if you are amazed by the low or the high quality of comments on Bitcoin on HN but if it is the latter, people post insightful things here because they are curious and look into things.
I commend your moral flexibility in associating those names with the term “innocent”.
I use the same service and I think it works, no CRON job failed yet though.
For who has read "Bad Blood", this article doesn't have any new info, does anyone know any new pieces of information?
Regarding 3. Ability to scroll without bringing point along.

You can duplicate the buffer side by side with the original buffer and in each window point will be at a different location. This is fundamentally just better than such a peek mode as you can see two different segments of the same file side by side. If you do want to peek and return you can use goto-last-change to return to where you were last typing. In evil this is bound to g; no idea about a binding in plain emacs but nothing is stopping you from using and binding such a thing.

https://github.com/emacs-evil/goto-chg/blob/master/goto-chg....

You can also use marks in evil m[a-z] to set a mark '[a-z] to go back to that mark. so for example ma 'a to go back.

Consider the alternative. Since you don't want scroll to always leave point behind you must have a special binding to enter peek mode and thereafter you scroll as normal. Then one of two things has to happen. Either you decide point really ought to be here now and you have to hit a key combo bound to end-peek-at-current-location or another key bound to end-peek-return-to-point. I would suggest escape/q for end-peek-return-to-point and return for end-peek-at-current-location. You can also do end-peek-return-to-point if you just start typing obviating the need for an additional binding but I think this would be a little weird because there would be a slight hitch while it pops back to prior location.

The biggest defect with this compared to goto-last-change is that it is ironically given the alternative being part of evil modal. You have to decide to use peek ahead of time and then you have to remember you are in that mode and do something to get out of it should you decide you actually want to do something different like exit with point at the new location. With goto-last-change you don't have to decide ahead of time you can simply decide to go back after the fact without needing to attend to any state in between.

Multiple windows on the same file and marks require attention ahead of time but are far more general and powerful than peeking.

Sometimes what people want and what is most useful are different things. Fortunately Emacs is simple enough and powerful enough for you to implement peek mode trivially if you like but I don't think it would be worth using compared to the alternatives. Logically you could implement it by remembering present point and making local bindings to go back to prior point example esc to go back enter to remove local binding to esc.