skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> From our experience, hiring by building product predicts on-the-job performance really well.

> the truth is that we're just two young guys who are hacking up stuff in their home office

This context really changes the blog post
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28266708
Curious if anyone on here has tried if they like it?

Curious what the touch pad is like too.
Just disconnect the antenna?
It's a bit better but one process can only process one request at a time. You need a lot more processes compared to a http framework processing http requests in parallel.
I prefer the same notetaking app Feynman used… paper, something to write with, and your brain.

Or you can go digital and develop someone else’s brain (or something else’s).
And to further add, electrified energy end use cases can benefit from the decreasing costs of solar and wind as prices drop and deployment increases overtime. An ICE vehicle can not get any cleaner or more efficient after it rolls off the lot!
Odd. What locale are you using? Should work fine with C or en_UTF8, per the readme.
So their plan is to go into cities one by one, map out the terrain to the centimeter and have a few thousand engineers support each region in which they operate?

I don't even know what their plan is. Do they want to sell cars, operate trucks, license out the software, have robo-taxis?
The thing which always gets me about evolution, is that if you think about the dynamics of any population with selection and the ability to mutate it requires a real intellectual effort to not see how it makes sense.

The Atlantic Ocean is a wonderful thing
I didn't need to log in: I got the rest of the thread by following the link "see rest of this thread". That link though is easy to miss, what with being somewhere mid-page and being surrounded by elements that are visually much louder, and I, too, wish that no one here would submit or upvote links to Twitter.
I think it's hardly enforceable in a world where real estate can be owned by legal entities, which can be set-up on paper in seconds.

Besides, in a free market it should not matter to prices whether I own two properties, or me and my brother (acting individually) own a property each, the market will set prices and neither of us can with one or two or 200 properties.

Of course there's a limit to this logic, which is when you own so much you have a monopoly, but there's no entity that I'm aware of that has a monopoly in residential real estate or anything close to it.
I was just thinking about a fanny pack with faraday shielding sewn into the fabric. Kinda like PacSafe products.
People working in these areas are why we have things like 5 day work weeks (instead of having to work 6 or 7 days) and human rights. Why do you find them useless?
Wtf is "homocide" though?
It's based on PAM (pluggable authentication module) which should exist on MacOS and BSDs as well.
Thank you, means a lot.

Property valuations can be roughly split into land/location value and building/improvements value. By renting location I just mean the portion of the total rent that is attributed to location value, not improvements value.
Rent control = higher rent. Every. Time.
> It has no place in todays world except of educational use.

That's overly strong. I will create a CGI app every now and then. I can use basically any language I want. Not a lot of thought has to go into it. As the article says, it's a simple approach that makes sense for those of us that aren't so familiar with web development (we're usually making those apps for ourselves). In particular, the "you can never have too many dependencies" philosophy of modern web developers is strange to me.
Which book would you recommend?
Having a large amount of gold sitting around is also a big liability too, so the analogy works in more than one way.
https://archive.is/iQDTa

https://web.archive.org/web/20210822180323/https://www.nytim...
> However, if you want to take things to the next step and have better relations with people around you, do care about their feelings and use techniques to have them feel better - but out of empathy and not out of responsibility or guilt.

This might be a very stupid question… Aren’t responsibility and guilt and empathy somehow very intertwined? At least you’re probably empathetic if you feel guilt or responsibility, right?
It might be just me, but I think reading hard sci-fi is much more educational and memorable, not to mention entertaining, than non fiction

Spoilers for Three Body Problem:
For instance, I can never forget the way the Alcubierre drive is explained in the final book, or the benefits of particle accelerator with the circumference of the asteroid belt
If you don't have to pay rent...
Sorry, but that's a bit childish.

My co-workers are not my social group except for the time I put in at work. That's the beginning and the end of my relationship with them and it's like that for most people who have families of their own. Our relationships are as organic as they can be in a work environment, we don't bullshit each other, and while a toxic relationship with a co-worker might drive someone away, no amount of hand-holding and friendship-having is going to stop someone for leaving for a pay increase. At some point, all business relationships end and all you're left with is what you managed to earn with your time and effort.
Well, I thought the purpose of linking in git submodules was to compile the source code and then use it. The "using it" is not granted by the GitHub license. Did I misunderstand your original point? If not, the verbiage "use this project via git submodules" which uses the word "use" was the source of my confusion.

Was someone disputing the right of OP to share a link to the blog post or the repository?
Tesla Model S has highway range of 320 miles on flat terrain with perfect weather.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a36302930/tesla-model-s-lo...
My anecdata isn’t so specific, and supports the bias of the claim:

In the early 2000s I spent a cumulative ten months out so bicycling along Japan, attending graduate school, and being well-cared-for by strangers (I’m a male from the US with Western European ancestors). Several hosts who had ancestors from the mainland (Korea, China) said life in Japan was the more difficult for it.
I use fastmail but I’m guessing proton is more likely to roll out that feature before any other paid email/etc provider. It would be nice :)
I'll always have a soft spot for Classic ASP[0]. Makes me dream of a simpler time developing CRUD apps.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Server_Pages
That makes sense. Certainly lots of journalism is bad. I haven’t read the article actually. I’ve just watched the two hour presentation by Tesla as well as their past presentations. I am a robotics engineer and I’ve been trying to understand how best to make an “animal like” brain system for an autonomous robot in the real world. I have been pleased with how much Tesla shared about their system and I think their extremely powerful hardware and their neural network approach is ideal for solving this problem. So I’m very happy with what they’ve come up with and I’m happy that it will push competitors to do the same as I think very large neural networks might be needed to solve general purpose robotics.

So all in all I think the chip is very good and I think they are on a path to success. Whatever the article says to hype it up doesn’t change the value of what Tesla has done in my eyes.
Is your ORM open source?
Intel already has a fab which makes it's own chips. They can print, their problem is the design process on smaller nodes.
They weren't very fast at buying those machines. TSMC bought more.
"premature optimisation is the root of all evil" for sure, but getting a denial of service by the Google bot scanning your website, someone running Apache Bench from a smartphone on a GPRS network, or an unfortunate infinite loop client side (it happens) is not great.

I think it's fine to play with CGI to learn, but I wouldn't push that to production.
Hitching your future to hydrogen

This is absolutely baffling to me, given, as you noted, generation, transport, and fueling issues.

Stevie Wonder would have no problem seeing the problem with hydrogen, and yet Toyota still can't see it?
On public transport? Where people are getting on and off the train or bus every few minutes and you don't have a closed system?

I don't know about the specifics of UV air filters but I'm not sure they'd be an alternative in this particular scenario. They seem to be more useful in situations where the same people are in the same room for a prolonged period of time.

I'm all in favour of small, incremental improvements. Those can be a huge contributing factor, so we don't have to wield the blunt instrument that is lockdowns anymore.

Using air filters probably is more of such an additional improvement, rather than a complete solution in its own right.
The lithography is just a step of the process. I'm just a layman but there's a lot of chemistry involved in just the processing of materials like coating and etching the wafers, particle bombardment, etc. Even the conditions and environment in which the lithography is done makes a big difference.
More commonly (at least in the UK) known as "giant hogweed" - they are very toxic and unpleasant.
(By the way, I’m writing this from a place of exhaustion and disappointment with the industry, rather than just knee jerk negativity.)

Although I do think it’s worthwhile to try to think and communicate as clearly as possible, over the years I’ve learned in this industry that 90% or more of coworkers and managers are not going to put the same effort into it. You can do everything right and the majority of the time it won’t matter. The only thing that (almost) guarantees good relationships with management is to just do whatever they want even when it is leading the company to ruin, never voice your objections, etc.

There is no common goal with most managers because they don’t usually care about the success of the company, just their own personal success. And with most coworkers, few want to do things better more than they want to just have an easy ride.

If anyone is aware of an environment where meritocracy exists in this industry I’d love to know about it. Where, where can I find a company that cares about making money by providing value? (Obviously some attention is paid to this to make enough money to keep the company going, but it’s second to the higher goal of accumulating their personal status and wealth, and there is misalignment between that and actually delivering value due to usually poor leadership at the top and poor investor oversight.)

Maybe it’s all just a consequence of capital concentration. There are plenty of companies that could be out competed but competitors just won’t be funded, except if they are run by other connected people who don’t have the talent to out compete the existing ones.
> programming's foundations are crumbling

That's also correct, and has been for some time (it got worse on each tech boom). This may just be a special case of that.
Searching a big DB is one way to use fingerprints. It is a crappy way, though.

Another way fingerprints are used is to compare fingerprints found at a crime scene to people who have been identified using other methods that have nothing to do with fingerprints.

E.g., if you have someone murdered in his office when working late at night, and security cameras show that five other people were in the building at the time of the murder, and you are able to get a good set of fingerprints off the murder weapon you don't need a database. You take the fingerprints from all five of those other people, and if one is a very good match and four do not match, you concentrate most of your effort on the one that matched.

It's actually quite similar to how DNA evidence has been used and misused. I don't know how they compare DNA nowadays, but when DNA evidence was first making waves getting people convicted they only compared two DNA samples at a few points. For a given sample there would likely be several people in the country that matched.

That's fine if used right, like fingerprints in the earlier murder hypothetical. Narrow it down to only 5 people who could have committed the crime, get a DNA sample from the crime scene that must be from the criminal, and if that matches exactly one of those 5 suspects it is strong evidence they are the criminal.

Have no suspects yet, run that same sample through a database, get exactly one match, and conclude that must be the criminal. Totally bogus. A lot of people were convicted in the early days of DNA matching that way.

The database method can be made sound, but only if the database includes everybody. Match against a database that includes everyone, only get one hit, and you've probably got your criminal. But if the database includes everyone you are likely to get several matches.

As I said, that was how it used to be. I know DNA sequencing has gotten faster and cheaper over the years, but I have no idea if routine forensic DNA matching now matches enough to make matches unique except in the case of identical siblings.
>> There are no news articles that explain how anyone will be falsely accused for having pictures of their own baby.

> Umm... hash collisions that everyone keeps warning about is not enough?

No they are not enough. Hash collisions alone don’t cause the system to detect CSAM, even if they are generated intentionally.

If you don’t know this, then you simply don’t understand how the system works.

> all the discussions so far, I'll just go ahead and assume your comment here is in bad faith.

What part is in bad faith?

>> The system is even resistant against intentionally created false positives.

> Famous last words...

All of those links show the same thing. That it’s possible to manufacture hash collisions.

Nobody is debating that point.

Not one of those links explain how a photo of your baby would trigger the system.

> Are you still convinced?

Yes.

> Having a second 'perceptual' hash doesn't really add much value...

Does it not? Can you explain why it doesn’t?

> I'm not an expert,

I guess that means you can’t explain what you are saying because you don’t understand it.

> here's a better view on why: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28243031

That comment is incoherent, and not an explanation of a vulnerability.

> Also funniest bit from that on how broken it is
"Finding a SHA1 collision took 22 years, and there are still no effective preimage attacks against it. Creating the NeuralHash collider took a single week."

This quote demonstrates why we can reject that comment.

They appear to know the difference between a perceptual hash and a cryptographic hash from their earlier statements, and yet here they compare them as if they are expected to behave in a similar way.

Nobody who understands how perceptual hashing works would expect there not to be collisions or to think there was a meaningful comparison with SHA-1. The system doesn’t rely on the hash to behave like a cryptographic hash because it is not one.

Either that commenter is confused, or being deliberately misleading. Let’s assume they are just confused.

I have to assume you don’t know the difference between a cryptographic hash and a perceptual hash otherwise you wouldn’t have quoted this.
It seems like this has been with us since there has been science, certainly Galileo paid a certain price and many others paid a price for Lysenkoism. It's certainly sad what can be done "in the name of science" and in denial of science (or service of psuedoscience).

I agree with the author's discussion of the complexity of individuals, their beliefs, and their contributions. The desire to simplify a narrative about a person's value or intent common and even effective, but still dangerous. That can be a simplification mores over different times or cultures. One of the best cures I've seen is travel (outside your cultural sphere), but that's not likely to be universally available any time soon.

What I don't really see is that scientists themselves share a greatly disproportionate responsibility or blame for the current situation, which seems historically fraught. Media (social and otherwise), "news", and advertising on the other hand...
DHH on rewriting codebases from scratch (2015)
Physics Girl just made a video comparing hydrogen fuel cell and batteries. The weight to energy ratio makes it extremely clear to me that there is a place for both. As far as blue hydrogen vs. green hydrogen I don’t know the details.

https://youtu.be/dWAO3vUn7nw
At least in northern Virginia it sprouted shoots all spring and summer and it was not in a wet/non draining area or an area we ever watered.

Maybe different species have different growing characteristics but the one we had was awful and constantly was trying to creep from the side of the back yard into the main lawn area.
"Sandwich Technique"

All you ever need to know.
> On Thursday, the US Federal Aviation Authority proposed more than $500,000 in new fines against rule-breaking travelers

Is that the same thing as the headline?
Or you just take any random smartphone and just set up what you need. Maybe even use a second phone solely for that purpose. Then it can sync your contacts and also run Uber or a Maps app.

A maps app can be quite a life safer, also in the literal sense if you get lost in the wilderness or in a dangerous area.

If you feel like you can't resist the urge to install other apps, just turn on child protection mode, and let somebody you trust set the pin.
New fake chips scam: 74 CMOS rebadged as 74 TTL
Little early to be making this claim... give it a chance to set in.
Could you go 10 feet? I think the best thing to do to sneak out would be to put on a few of the correct type of items to make facial recognition difficult, and have enough options you could pop into a shop and discreetly change outer layers while exiting different doors (where possible) to slow the tracking down.
That's a good critique! Looking at historical data it seems like "commonly above $300,000" would be more accurate. It's worth saying that listed police salaries are far below these numbers and the officers get there through overtime and other extra payments. Thus the use of 'common' instead of average because you have to look back at what people were actually paid.

Edit: I can no longer edit my original post so this will have to do.

https://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/search/?a=alameda...
> Have you also found other videos by the author to be "10 minutes of tiddly little bits of information"?

Yes. His videos are personable and pleasant to watch, but information sparse. They are more likely to leave me with the feeling of learning something than they are to impart lasting knowledge (ironically, I believe this is a problem he has discussed before, I guess that much stuck with me at least.)
Re: 1. I can only speak to the company I saw up close, Mitsuba [1]. They are already very sophisticated on all fronts you've described: mechanical, electrical, material. Even software. If I had to guess, they're licking their lips at the kinds of higher margin products that electric cars might represent for their business. And they're not alone in their capabilities among Japanese parts suppliers.

[1] https://www.mitsuba.co.jp/en/

Re: 2 and 3. I'm sure you're correct. But we're talking about salesmanship here. Logic and facts don't always have a buyer. They would need to find ways to sell those used cars to potentially skeptical markets abroad, in huge volume, where they've already got a great racket with ICE cars.
Last year I did a week-long work trial for a popular product startup. I will never do it again, reasons:

* The interview pressure of knowing you’re being assessed based on every interaction and piece of output, but for an entire week.

* A week isn’t enough time to truly assess what it’s like to work with someone…

* …yet, is long enough such that it’s only a viable option for people with capability to dedicate a week. Which basically means the unemployed, or those working at companies where they can take a week off at short notice.

* The tax situation can be complicated, which adds to the stress of it all.

My anxiety and stress levels have never been higher, and this was after being laid off and a subsequent 6 months of unemployment. If they hadn’t decided against hiring me (apparently my code and product mindset were great, but I didn’t work fast enough), I was ready to decline them on the basis of concluding that this approach to hiring (it was mandatory) was inhumane.
This is not how GAAP accounting works.
Yup they could turn state's witness or blackmail you. Plus they'll want a cut of the spoils if there are any. Better to establish a pattern of leaving your phone untouched at home. Assuming you're planning it ahead of time that is.
Let me reframe the economy for you with an analogy.

Imagine wealth as a fluid. When it's in your account, it resides in a bulb. Connected to these bulbs are pipes connecting you to each person or business's bulb you transact with. Each transaction is facilitated by applying vacuum to transfer a small amount of fluid from bulb to bulb.

In this thing, you have entities that have many more or much larger bulbs than others, with more powerful vacuums that increase in size with the amount of capital they have at their disposal.

Every time you add a bunch of fluid to the system for everyone, you still have all the same networks for extraction in place, and no ability to prevent those connections from just extracting more.

Rent, in particular, is special. Realistically speaking, the pipe that extracts rent to your landlord is not just a transaction facilitator, but is an important mechanism for ensuring that your landlord's wealth relative to the rest of the system is maintained. So in a way, the amount getting extracted will always scale once your landlord is made aware of a global infusion of working fluid to everyone, otherwise, the "value" of their real estate is "diminished" in light of the global infusion.

Real estate as financial instrument is weird like that. Unfortunately, attempts to control that reactive rent adjustment are fraught with side-effects, because when your entire basis for free market economics is that greed and wealth accumulation (considered axiomatic human vices) can be put to productive use by leaving things alone, as evidenced by any attempt to do otherwise having undesirable outcomes, see the history of centrally managed economies.

At least that's as far as I've cared to read up on the matter. After a while trying to get to the bottom of it though, you realize once economics abstracts away any complexities around money moving => physical things happening, it might as well be pontificating on the weather for the questionability of measures involved.

This is a sign of me hitting the absolute depth of my understanding and needing to do more digging to potentially get further but not being capable of devoting the time at the moment.
“Zombie Apocalypse” in AWS ToS 42.10
You said it yourself: GitHub users can use GitHub projects on GitHub. Git submodules stay on GitHub, so it's allowed.

> you grant each User of GitHub a nonexclusive, worldwide license to use, display, and perform Your Content through the GitHub Service and to reproduce Your Content solely on GitHub as permitted through GitHub's functionality (for example, through forking)

You can run the code on GitHub Codespaces & GitHub Actions, you can fork the code to make changes, and you can dynamically link/embed the code in other projects on GitHub through git submodules.
Stream and Download. Unlimited Acce
Maybe add a 2019 on the title?

Feels strange to read on the title header: PRODUCTIVITY TIPS AND APPS by PRODUCTIVITY HUB like if it was an original article from the website but at the very end there is the note 'All Rights Reserved for Dave Bailey'
without any link to the original source:

https://medium.dave-bailey.com/the-essential-guide-to-diffic...

which is taken from Dave Bailey website (https://www.dave-bailey.com/go)