skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My 2 cents: as someone who’s helped many new developers get comfy with our big codebase, I find this interesting. Right now I get to see what they’ve done only after they committed so it’s often not the best time. Being able to watch earlier is a good idea.

Now, I don’t think you can keep all states of the code (or history is going to be completely unreadable), so you still need some idea of a commit so that people can state “I’m done”.

And then you still need the concept of branches, cause otherwise you pick up people’s changes and they break your copy.

So all in all, it should look very much like git.

Then, you’re going to have an extremely hard time getting people off git.

Maybe, and that’s just an idea here. This could be developed on top of git. Where you’re ide live-syncs your changes to a “.live” version of the branch you’re on. Then people interested could subscribe to that live branch, and would get the live syncs in their IDE. And when the actual commit happens, you can then discard all that happened in the “.live” branch.

Probably not the feedback you wanted, though...
It seems like there is still no mass market EV at a mid level price range (25-40K) USD that is able to compete with Tesla Model 3. As much as I am sceptical of Tesla's market cap, these setbacks by GM and Toyota prove that Tesla indeed has a 10 year technological advantage compared to other car manufacturers.
It's a matter of degree, definitely not a binary. I replied to you because of the comments I saw, yours were at least a degree worse.
In the US at least, Bachelor's is much more common than a Master's. It depends on the area of study I bet. The views I grew up around about education treated Master's as a waste of money with a "go PhD or get a job after the 4 year bachelor" prevailing theme.
Just research the "smallpox" tech-tree and watch the americas depopulate (/s I think, I haven't actually played any paradox games)
Working out would raise your testosterone levels. Losing weight would happen in the kitchen though. Weight is a bad metric though, since muscles is heavier than fat.
All good!

Well in Go the assumption is that you jump to interface{} (equivalent to Object in Java or void* in C) when you start having these kind of problems, but there is a performance penalty in doing that, which shouldn't be there if generics are present (and makes the code DRAMMATICALLY worse with all the casting)
I upvoted this but meant to say earlier, I appreciate you taking the time to ack a mistake and say so. It makes the internet a better place!
its a shame that a corp like microsoft has nerfed the oculus to require a facebook account. and on top of that use shitty 2fa
you sound like you're too smart for generics.
Details about a few known attempts:

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/54in5s/the_nsa_has_t...
Not particularly, no.

Of course there are always fluctuations and it's hard to separate out randomness from trends.
>The OpenBSD bug on Xenocara which allowed root needed more code, not less.

X was considered and still is a "hack".

>So this is the case with pledge(4) and unveil(4), you need (a little) more code in onder to sandbox setuff properly.

You don't write a graphical subsystem and then tries to sandbox it. Sadly nix advocates won't ever understand this logic.

>NT4 was much more complex than W98SE, yet NT4/w2k was much better on multitasking (by a huge margin). I've seen w98se crawl even with a Pentium 4 and 512MB of RAM with just 3 IE windows open back in the day, while 2k flied.

Let me compare apples with pears, i mean two different approach for OS development which have almost nothing common except the w32 stuff, and let me conclude the newer is better.
I don't really see your point.
This is the site which convinced me to sign up for Patreon, because I couldn't read his articles and not want to support him.
These twitter rolls now require an app or a login. For those of us who desire neither, stop posting this content-- please.
The original commenter said "Prop 22 was intended to be almost impossible to overturn, requiring a higher bar for amendment than even the state constitution, and only permitting the legislature to amend it if the amendment was "consistent with" Prop 22"

I am talking about that being a disingenuous interpretation considering other propositions do not allow the legislature to to amend their measures at all.
That's an interesting concept.

Thinking about it for a bit, I'm sadly hesitant that it might need to be built as a browser extension or mobile app, rather than a website, because none of these services provide programmatically-accessible (even read-only) feeds of what you're looking for, so you'd need to scrape everything. This brings up two issues: 1) the headache of IP ratelimiting (and/or flat-out IP bans from trigger-happy systems optimized for fighting fraud/bots hosted on cloud infrastructure). IIUC there are proxy services that you can outsource the workaround problem to, but this is awkward to get behind in the face of 2), which is that users would need to input their actual usernames and passwords so that the service could request the account page with the details on it in order to scrape the data.

Given that these are broadly web services poked at via HTTPS, you could potentially get everything you needed from a browser extension (as long as the service doesn't require you to set any HTTP headers that extensions aren't allowed to touch).

The second possibility is using an app. Writing a thin layer that lets you craft custom HTTPS/whatever requests from a WebView would probably be the most straightforward approach.

The main issue with both the extension and app approaches is that they code-dump both the idea and methodology of "here is how to do X" into the hands of the IQ-99 skiddie group (especially with an extension). So now you have more people running around scraping pages and whatnot and trying to figure out how to weaponize everything. Probably won't go anywhere (in terms of producing actual attacks), but the noise may potentially make your life harder.

The least-complex solution seems to just be a giant boring list of links, for example:

- https://myaccount.google.com/permissions

- https://twitter.com/settings/connected_apps, https://twitter.com/settings/connected_accounts

- https://github.com/settings/apps/authorizations, https://github.com/settings/applications, https://github.com/settings/installations, https://github.com/settings/apps, https://github.com/settings/developers, https://github.com/settings/tokens

Hmm, that's kind of all over the place for some things. A single aggregate view that combines everything could definitely be very interesting...
because we’re, or at least I am, inherently lazy. i would rather pay a markup on a playstation digital download that would allow me to not move from the couch. i’m a pretty active person outside the couch. the bad news is that they know this :)
Julia Evans' article on writing a brag document (listing your accomplishments) might be helpful.

https://jvns.ca/blog/brag-documents/

Discussed here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20665225
Scrappy Start Up Tools
Given how many people can't resolve http://ai or http://ai., there's your answer as to why they shouldn't switch to that.
I really don't understand the antipathy towards systems like this. Even at their worst they are 5 to 10 times safer then human drivers. That's the point. That's the only point that should matter. I understand people want some robocar utopia but it doesn't all happen at once. I will happily take a 10x reduction in driving deaths.
Then you can implement it, correct?
Again: That really is a favourite interview. I'm familiar with Nelson's work. I agree with many of his views, differ strongly on others.

I also stand by what I said: it's easy to focus on what you know, and to ignore or discount foreign experiences, whether local or distant, or future or past.

One of Nelson's problems is that he's not an effective communicator when talking to the general public. He has advanced ideas. He certainly feels strongly about them. Some are valid, though I suspect others ... not quite so much.

In particular he falls into one of the classic technologist's fallacies: seeing the potential benefits of a tool, process, or technology, but not its drawbacks. Most especially the emergent drawbacks. If you look at the contemporary litany of complaints about technology (spam, advertising, censorship, propaganda, surveillance, manipulation, clickbait, adware, attention fragmentation, an ever-expanding security attack surface and threat model, platform complexity, an obsolescence treadmill, fragile systems, business-model / monetisation challenges, etc., etc.), I think you'll find that Nelson didn't anticipate them, and even now doesn't much address them. These are inherent to the type and level of technology we've adopted.

By contrast, the limits of paper reduce much of that.

The limits of paper do pose numerous other challenges. This is a trade-off.

But that is my point: to consider the specific affordances and drawbacks of each approach, to look closely at the overall structure and system, and to think critically about which of those aspectare truly valuable, and which constitute blocks too true value (to the end-user, as opposed to value-extraction by a hardware vendor or service provider).

My comment above does have its cheeky aspect. But I'm completely serious about the overall point: that there's a blindness to the unfamiliar, and that it works both ways.

Maybe in another 20--30 years you'll have a better understanding of this.
I used code from: https://endler.dev/2017/go-vs-rust/ good point, I overlooked that.

Anyway in Go (ironically because of lack of generics) if you use any numeric type other than int, int64, float64 you will be in the word of hurt. Rust doesn't have that issue.

So in practice you will likely use int, and I suppose you can add an assertion.

BTW: I only see that it would remove 3 lines though, where are the other 3?
It also depends on your use case. Kubernetes and its pile of code generators will be much much simpler.
As it rightfully should. God forbid people start returning Result[T] types instead of (T, error) and splintering the ecosystem.

Option types are pointless if you don't have exhaustive pattern matching to ensure correctness.
The langage which already had generics except special-cased to builtins the langage authors really wanted to be generic and they know better than the peons so they have the intellectual capacity to make this determination?
I consider 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year horizons and report all 3. For people pushing things around you expect to see it more on these short/medium term horizons.

example:
https://duedilly.io/asset/SAVA/
I have neither the app not a login, and could read it just fine.
I'm able to read just fine without login. Firefox for Android in private mode, uBlock Origin.
If you're really concerned about "clever developers", maybe you ought to ask for the removal of reflect and ast, because they've both been used to be way too clever about solving the same issue.
That quote from the Post article completely mischaracterizes what the judge actually wrote (https://a.qoid.us/uv6f2a9c1458eb949d.pdf):

> If Section 7465 had not been included, the Legislature could amend Proposition 22 by a simple majority vote according to each house's rules, followed by a popular referendum. With Section 7465 enacted, the Legislature can still amend Proposition 22 by a simple majority vote according to each house's rules, followed by a popular referendum. All Section 7465 provides is another way to amend the initiative statute, albeit one that is difficult to the point of near impossibility.

> To the degree that Section 7465, subdivisions (a) and (b), attempt to apply conditions to amendments proceeding under Article II Section 10, subdivision (c)'s majority-vote-then-referendum procedure, they are unconstitutional. To avoid the constitutional conflict, the Court should narrowly construe the "seven-eighths majority" and "consistency" requirements only to the non-referendum procedures in Section 7465, subdivisions (a) and (b).
You’re standing on the shoulders of a lot of giants, telling them you’re coming for them. Where do you thing the leverage is here? Those guys are driving cars and writing JavaScript automatically. Tuning NN knobs can also be done automatically. It often is.

We could all do with a little more humility here. We’re surrounded by insane skills who write the simple knobs we get to turn.
I find this formula unintuitive (for starters I had to google what alpha and beta was). Does it have a name so I can look it up?
So 99% of DDs are long and I didn't want to get sidetracked trying to build a guessing system since many Reddit posts delete their contents (the titles are not removable which helps me).

For that reason I auto-classify as bullish but there's a report page that anyone can click to report mis-classified posts.

Thank you!
I've encountered unbearable mosquito scenarios in Florida, but also Colorado, Asia, Australia, etc. Recently in Broome, Western Australia, a brisk walk wouldn't stop them from biting through clothes - my legs were riddled with bites and my scalp was covered with their bodies and my blood. That was on par with the Everglades in Florida. Horrific.

But noseeums (biting midge or sand fly in Australia) are possibly worse. You don't see, hear or really feel them biting you, but then later the itch endures for a couple of weeks afterwards. Last couple of times, I thought often that having my skin surgically removed would be preferable to another week of the itching.
I thought regulation of marketing was more in the FTC's wheelhouse.
You can simply ignore it and move on
I agree. It’s true for all languages. I once had to untangle a small Java app that had about five packages with two classes per package (I refactored it into a single package).

Some people will abuse generics, no doubt, just like my colleague abused packages. But Go has such a strong culture around idiomatic code that I’m not too worried that generics are the end of the world. In fact, I don’t like keywords like “append” and I’m hopeful generics will replace them.

TBH I was more upset about the Go 1.17 ability to panic during a type conversion from slice to array pointer. That one really grates my gears.
I don't mean to be negative only, and appreciate your reply.

But I know what happens in real codebases. Before long, scammy tutorials pop up showing Go as an essentially dynamic language, and that's what bootcampers write. As of today, they are forced to write simple, boring code.

I never mind a carefully added thing, for carefully thought of situations, as this probably was.

The problem is that I see the abuse from here. And even if not abuse, it changes how you approach problems. And approaches matter as much or more then spec.

I knew a person who insisted on a lot of things when working in a Go code base...one of which was mixed typed tuples. It was ugly, awful code of interfaces all the way down. It's ugly and Go let you know that. A voice of reason would say...what are you doing? That's not how you do it in Go.

Readability goes beyond the syntax. It's a mindset. And now it's not.
I don't follow. I use unsigned ints in Go all the time. I've never been in a world of hurt with them. Mandatory explicit integer conversions (and the way Go consts work) are something Go gets right.
> * I replied once and then sent a similar response to 3 people*

So.. you rebutted the same point 4 times, which is about 5...
> As for generics, Go’s lack of function overloading and arg default values is really interesting. It ensures that a function is always easily found as it’s the only thing in the module with that name. I’ll be curious to see if generics are easier to follow without function overloading.

There are already a number of langages with generics and without overloading (or defaults). Haskell, ocaml, rust, …
> At a recent conference she attended of state highway safety officials, most said they thought some models could operate themselves.

The claims being made (by manufacturers) might be misleading, sure.

However, state highway officials, in charge of investigating these exact systems, should have at the very minimum, an intermediate level understanding of the very system they will bring a judgement upon.
As “mind-bogglingly theoretical” as quantum physics, indeed! A similar new framework describing biological systems as “information flow” is discussed in Quanta’s wrap-up of the biggest things in biology 2020.[1] These lines of thought seem to also lead to those kinds of superficially dismissible but ontologically interesting questions as: Is America the country an organism? Is America ‘alive’?
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpDsA7SE-3c
I remember reading the Market Wizards books and this would come up often in the interviews. Some felt strongly about it, some didn't think much of it. It depends on the person.
I've been in the industry for several years and had the same reaction when I first starting seeing wallstreetbets posts. For a while I even thought it stood for "double down" when it seemed like these were encouraging posts. Good point from you and the parent commenter -- I'll make that clearer.
I get those three banners in the bottom, with cookies, login and such.
But I can still view all content in a regular mobile webbrowser.
You would use a slice as your non-associative container, and you would write a loop over it. You just wouldn't use a linked list.
It's a fake reason because it's not a flaw in the proposition. For Proposition 22 to be ruled unconstitutional based on its unusually-generous legislative amendment requirement, the ruling would have to state that the California proposition system itself is unconstitutional, because that system specifies a legislative amendment requirement that is much, much stricter.
Yeah, this is unlikely to be Avis itself, but some employee scam. Newark NJ is shady AF.
Downtime is one thing, data loss is another. Easy to redeploy elsewhere, but backups/etc were all on heroku-linked services.

I'll definitely be updating the thread with however the now-started legal process plays out.
You can do this in any shell already by placing the other language in a separate executable file.
With everything in the same file the risk of ignoring the separation of concern principle (each unit should do one thing and do it well).
I don't think anyone should downvote expressing an opinion, at least when it's done without toxicity like you did. Ok, that "delusion" remark was a bit toxic. But anyway.

Here's my opinion: i3 is vastly superior to anything macos is offering in the desktop space in terms of usability. Sure, wrestling with minutae like proper font rendering and DPI settings is a huge pain, but a) some distros do those things for you and b) if you're not a serial distro hopper / manic reinstaller, those things don't have to be done too often.

I genuinely think it's an UX upgrade. And I've been using macs almost exclusively for 5 years now.

The bad things of Linux are still bad: subsystems get replaced all the time (often with just minimal technical justification), and the replacements are usually (if you compare them to Macs) alpha quality for a long time. And the integration is lacking. Notable contemporary examples: oss/alsa/pulseaudio/jack/pipewire and x11/wayland. This is something I truly don't miss when using macs. Almost everything else I do miss.
I did consider beta adjusting performance and may do this in the future -- it does require more infra set up (ex. computing historical betas for these posts back in time).

Since my target demographic in this case was people on Reddit following trading advice I wanted to keep things straightforward first and slowly over time introduce those educational components to get it closer to how the industry thinks about it.
Nice. Drew may come off really harsh in discussions, but he does so many things that benefit others. Hm, that reminds of a guy from finland that announced his side project somewhere.
> the genomics and bioinformatics communities have developed specialized workflow definition languages like WDL, Nextflow, CWL, and Snakemake.

It's funny, but after many years in the field, and many generations of workflow definitions, I'm still now happy with any of the options. Snakemake is the closest to being usable for me for both prototyping and longer term work does, but they are all still fragile and inflexible in weird ways.

It's a tough problem to solve, which I think is evidenced by the large number of solutions. I've even tried looking outside at non-bioinformatics tools and never been very happy. And for all their flaws, the bioinformatics tools are better at typical bioinformatics workflows than tools developed for other domains.
I may have overstated it. Some people are indeed going to be annoyed by a socially awkward person, sure. But by and large, the vast majority of people really are kind hearted and sympathetic. More importantly, humans are generally too self-focused to even care much at all about someone else's social awkwardness. One of the keys to confidence is to stop worrying about what people think about you. It helps knowing that most people don't really think much at all about you. But it's hard. It's not even 100% possible for most of us. But there's a positive feedback loop in letting yourself off the hook for being how you are.
c# was also released without generics, they wanted it out the door and the generics were not ready. They landed in 2.0.
Except the ones that make them big $$$. Same with banks. It’s never about anything moral or legal.

It’s always a risk-reward issue. Banks are more than happy to work, as long as they can profit enough
There is no source, if it was true children simply wouldn't have died in numbers high enough to detect so far.
TCP is a wrong choice for datacenters in every way
Does Go generics have type erasure? If not, OP can expect and even better journey.
https://viewfromthewing.com/hertz-glitch-is-falsely-reportin...

„Hertz Is Falsely Reporting Cars Stolen, Landing Renters in Jail”

That must be something similar
The fact that companies can overtly introduce laws for their own benefit and directly advertise to voters is both disgusting and an improvement on the federal system of lobbying and campaign finance.

Why exactly is it OK for unions to do the same, then?

Because I'm sure the answer will involve downvotes, I'll make it clear from the outset that I'm honestly asking in good faith, and not attempting to use leading questions to push any particular agenda.
Salary Negotiation Tips