skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you can get medicare for all even with this current shit voting system. Just will take annoyingly long. The better voting is still really important but for this issue less essential. Well done healthcare (and really, the bar is low) will also create more interest in building better institutions in general and so may help electoral reform.
I used to feel the same way, but even the smaller ones are increasingly being co-opted by partisan screechers. Especially in the State/City/Town subreddits.
Absolutely! I live in outskirts and I would LOVE to be able to get a taxi to the pub and back! Unfortunately they don't service me here.
How long has GitHub been running the NPM registry? This is the first I've ever heard of it.
The beginning, like when people were commonly introduced to the concept through the whitepaper and a link to the reference client source? And those people thought "public ledger" meant "governments can’t track how I spend my money"? A short time after the USG shuttered a non-fractional, gold reserve backed, paypal-like financial network? Okey dokey.
Agreed. If you want to manage a lot of people who you don't really "know," then Discord has all sorts of roles and rules you can set up.
https://fortune.com/2013/07/21/inside-rolling-stones-inc-for...
Level 2 is becoming a commodity. Its commercial value will fall to zero very quickly.
Dolt and Images
I see my issues on both Roku and through a separate smart TV, so I'm not convinced that is it.
Exactly. I've found that it's important to probe any hint of discontent. Sometimes it's just a badly-phrased comment, but other times, the employee is (consciously or subconsciously) trying to tell you something.

A phrase I used a lot is "what would you like to differently, or what would you like to learn?" That's often an opening to getting someone the kind of work they'd prefer to do, but are reluctant to bring up.
Oh what a beautiful idea for a short story. Would have been a great writing prompt over in the redditverse probably.

[Edit:]

Could be a crime novel. A classical who-dun-it, but with the need to trackback the route and stuff like this and things happening in between and the data of the car being tampered with or stuff like this.
How do you feel about the 'gotcha' that you're technically making a temporary copy of a program in RAM in order to run it?

My understanding is that this is the critical 'gotcha' that necessitates a license for using software in EU. Copyright was supposed to govern copying, not use. Of course the scope of copyright has been only expanded since then.
Odds are it's about 50/50 regarding lives saved vs. lives cut short.
That's correct. I've done something similar to Minisign. Handling that sort of problem is way beyond what one person can manage anyway. I'm only a student and not even a computer science student.

The recommended way of sharing keys is via social media, GitHub, your website, etc. Unfortunately, Keybase has now been abandoned and was acquired by Zoom, so that's not worth using anymore. However, I don't personally see how this method of sharing is that problematic. I think it does the job sufficiently.

There are no timestamps for signing or encryption, but as you mentioned, you could use the comment functionality to add a timestamp for signatures.

A new standard format would be ideal, but that's probably not going to happen for a long time. I'm also disappointed by the stance on signatures, although there are several other things that are wrong with age, which is why I decided to make my own tool, not that it's perfect by any means either. I like to think I did a much better job documenting things though.
Yep, you have a Developer certificate that signs the binary before it gets sent to the device.

If you're just using the free developer program (by signing into Xcode with your Apple ID), this is all automated and you don't have to get into the nitty-gritty of certificate and profile management (but it's all still accessible if you want to).

There's some big restrictions on the free program though, not least being unable to use certain capabilities in your apps (e.g. multicast mentioned in the OP, but also background modes, push notifications, etc.) Most of these are self-service and don't require asking Apple nicely, but you don't have access to the developer portal so cannot add them to your app.
And that's why the ' character is in ASCII.

Print a lowercase e, backspace, and grave accent ', and you have printed é.

Underscore, ^, and other characters are there specifically for overstriking.

Not many terminals do that any more, though...
Is it not possible for AP to lose the lane lines temporarily and then self correct?
Azure integration is not that great actually. For example .NET 5 support for Azure Functions is a huge breaking change with random issues, missing features and terrible IDE support (you have to launch it through CLI and attach to a PID printed out by the host process to debug a function, you could just debug 3.1 functions) - it's beta quality.

I find this a common theme with Azure support and .NET
A nearby startup went through the evaluation and aim to complete it eventually, some requirements take years to fulfill. They say it's a VC and possibly acquisition poison-pill. All the investors they talked to didn't like the added complexity of B Corp.
It likely was not using any driver monitoring in the provided scenario.
Dot and Images
And you can't use your warnings from the front (well you can but they'll be invisible).

So unless the self-driving vehicle has a routine to activate those on weird slowdown it may be very hard for the traffic coming behind to notice, further increasing the danger.
At the top of this thread, I set out a number of reasons why

a) you are not "fighting a language" by using Rust or Go or Haskell or whatever - in fact you are more able to focus on the problem you want to solve

b) there are many reasons to use such a language, not just security, and all the things you mention - correctness, performance, development velocity, modularity, good design, and robustness to new requirements - are aided by features in newer languages

'pdimitar is making a reasonable argument and your dismissal of it as arrogance is uncalled for. I would encourage you to reread both of those comments carefully.
I'm on board with most of this except the suggestion that rack mounted hardware should be kept where people live.

No.

I can't afford a house but like to tinker with networking. I pay more for weaker equipment so it will be low power/low noise. I'd love to just buy half a dozen used Dell PowerEdges but rack-mounted hardware is insanely loud.

A basement is the ideal spot. Water isn't an issue as long as your rack is not directly under anything that could leak (including on higher floors) and has a palette underneath it. If there is the possibility of your basement flooding more than 2 inches then you have bigger problems you need to address first. Keeping a rack with electronic equipment there will motivate you to do what you should be doing to the place anyway: dehumidifying and managing pests.
Here's the main quote from the article:

“For too long, Apple has evaded public scrutiny. The truth is that for many Apple workers -- a reality faced disproportionately by our Black, Indigenous, and other colleagues from minoritized racial, gender, and historically marginalized groups of people -- the culture of secrecy creates an opaque, intimidating fortress,”
IMHO it is even better than Slack.
I see where you are going, but I'm not arguing that the government won't be willing or able to enforce what transactions are permissible if they can prove the multiplication involved was used to facilitate an exchange.

What I am saying is that governments who are passing laws not to regulate transactions, but to prevent the use of cryptocurrencies in general, will fail due to a first principles analysis of what they'll be trying to do.
Rules of conduct that we all need to know
These stories all seem to ride on similar popular sentiments: 'bad things happened, and rich people were involved, so they should go to jail'. Having read a few of the books cited at the bottom, I have been repeatedly surprised at how these financial disasters came to be; it often seems like the people at the top were deceiving themselves more than anyone else. Bethany McLean's other book, "The Smartest Guys in the Room" (relevant but not cited here) was a particularly good example of this, and I came away from it with a very different view of Enron than I'd had going in.
depends on the therapist and your situation. lots of difficult decisions in life come down to what you personally value. the therapist can talk it through with you, but they can't decide your values for you. on the other hand, if you're depressed and spend most of your time in bed, the therapist might strongly recommend that you try going outside more.
Upstream blockers in scylla + its our biggest dataset, and is a quite large project.
Well, the virus got from (presumably) humans to all of these other species, so it seems not too hard to imagine that it can go back the other way.

In the case of mink in Denmark, they were convinced that new variants that emerged first in the mink had made it back into the human population.
What do you want them to do about that? The vast majority of those popups are already illegal according to GDPR. More legislation wouldn't fix that, I think.
I wonder if Waymo can use street mirrors.
Sure, but even looking at the most corrupt, they have little incentive to enable fraud, crime, and tax evasion by people they're not already in mutually beneficial arrangements with, and none to enable it for people who won't give them a cut.

Do you want to give them a cut?
> Yet, SpaceX has developed three generations of rockets (Falcon 1, 9 and heavy), builds them, launches them, iterates on them, lands them, reuses them, and is now working on a fourth rocket (SuperHeavy).

What does SpaceX have to do with Tesla? They're owned by a billionaire with his attention split, but otherwise are structured differently, are in different industries, and most likely have different cultures.

The cult of worshipping a single person has got to stop.
Ditto, feels fast and has a lot of features but to me the UX is very confusing.
Yeah, for a site like this, it could literally be just adding

max-width: 700px;
margin: 0 auto;

This would make it look great on pretty much all screens.
How is there commercial value if you still need a driver in the car?
Or a Twilight Zone episode.
People at Tesla and other autonomous driving companies, of course are aware and worry about such situations. If you have a few hours and want to see many of the technologies and methods that Tesla is using to solve them, check out Tesla's recent "AI day" presentation. Tesla is quite cool about openly discussing the problems they have solved, problems they still have, and how they are trying to solve them.

An incomplete list includes:

1) Integrating all the camera views into one 3-D vector space before training the neural network(s).

2) A large in-house group (~1000 people) doing manually labeling of objects in that vector space, not on each camera.

3) Training neural networks for labeling objects.

4) Finding edge cases where the autocar failed (example is when it loses track of a vehicle in front of it when the autocar's view is obscured by a flurry of snow knocked off the roof of the car in front of it), and then querying the large fleet of cars on the road to get back thousands of similar situations to help training.

5) Overlaying multiple views of the world from many cars to get a better vector space mapping of intersections, parking lots, etc

6) New custom build hardware for high speed training of neural nets.

7) Simulations to train rarely encountered situations, like you describe, or very difficult to label situations (like a plaza with 100 people in it or a road in an Indian city).

8) Matching 3-D simulations to what the cars cameras would see using many software techniques.
This actually happens more often than, I think, people think about. It makes sense when you stop and realize what percentage of their lives Americans spend in their cars (like the old rule "most accidents happen in the home," with an average daily one-way commute of 27.6 minutes, most Americans spend 2.9% of their lives in their cars, so all else being equal 2.9% of medical emergencies can be expected to happen in cars).

I don't have high-quality numbers, but a low-quality Google search tosses out that 20% of accidents are caused by a participant having a medical emergency and losing control of their vehicle (grain-of-salt: the number is from an injury law firm, so obvious incentive to bias the number).
> "leave me alone, I just want to get my program done, and have it do the right thing, with appropriate performance, quick to build, good modularity, few dependencies, and not having to rewrite it next year. Security is important but does not override all of these other things."

Virtually all of these are debatable, not necessarily factual and definitely not at all monopolized by C -- that's the overarching discussion in this entire HN comment section.

...So writing stuff in Rust means the program has to be rewritten in the next year? Factually not true. What does twisting and misrepresenting things win you here? That's not arguing in good faith.

Also, "doing the right thing" is rich coming from practitioners of a language with a ton of undefined behaviour and zero memory ownership checks. I'm sure you have the best of intentions but there's only so much you can do when the language and the compiler itself are willing to pull part of the rug from beneath your feet. That's why I abandoned C a long time ago.

History is not on your side either, with all the yet-another-buffer-overflow submissions here on HN for the last 2-3 years. Even today we had another part of OpenSSL crapping the bed through a buffer overflow, yet again.

So can Rust programmers make mistakes beyond the memory ownership? Of course! Nobody says the language is immune to bugs in general. What a lot of people say -- and it gets grossly misrepresented at every chance that biased people get! -- is that Rust is immune to a class of bugs. Nothing else.

(As for "forming something with your own hands", I think you should pick up pottery or carpentry as a hobby. There's nothing about "your own hands" in computers, we all step on decades old legacy and nothing is truly built by us alone.)
See the short story "Road Stop" by David Mason, published 1963.

The car called the Traveler, rolling at the stately thirty miles an hour it
always held, was coming down the road now, and the two men stood, watching. The
woman, a little behind them, watched too, her face growing whiter. No one said
anything as the old fashioned car rolled by, straight and steady down the
highway, holding the center of the lane as sharply as it always did.

There was a film of dust inside the windows, though the Traveler was clean and
shining outside. But the film did hide the white bone faces, the despairing
hands that had long ago stopped trying to break through those closed windows.

You can read the whole thing here: https://archive.org/details/1963-01_IF/page/n91/mode/2up?vie...
IMO its a good competitor to slack. They probably make money from businesses too. They have lots of options for permissions/roles and all kinds of API access to write bots for.
It is quite easy to criminalize distribution and possession of digital assets.

Also no one care if you bounce bitcoins between your own wallets, any governments just needs to regulate at the border: retail shops that accept crypto and exchanges of crypto/fiat are very easy to identify and regulate.
Even if that is the case, what is the reason to forbid the access to the camera completely? Just remove the stock camera app with the proprietary algorithms in them. And let other applications access the camera trough the stock Android camera API.

A camera is in the end a sensor that captures some video, why locking down that video stream? I get the algorithms, but leave the raw video stream to be used by other applications.
It isn't possible to not overlook deer because they are often doing things such that you cannot spot them. Unless you mean they won't fail to see a deer 2 meters in front of the car - but it is too late to do anything about it then.
One of the biggest fear that stops me from buying a four wheeler. I have fucking slept on my two wheeler :(

(Yes, it’s a concern and I’ll be a danger to others as well. I feel so comfortable and sleepy on moving vehicles)
Same.

old.reddit.com + RES is still the best Reddit.
Growing is most certainly a trend. It doesn't make it a permanent trend but that is definitely a trend.
lol. :D
If the author reads this:

Thanks a lot.

I have been using some package manager hooks to do roughly the same thing mkinitcpio no natively supports ;=)
Could it be that they just had a different agenda for their art than you do, and that the context and agendas changed over time? I find it more interesting to try to understand their time, to try to learn what their view of art was, what the norms were, what the context, was, and why - rather than try to judge their work by my standards, as if the changes of time have made my way superior.
Sensationalist article based entirely on an off-the-cuff remark made by Carmack while visiting Elon in Boca Chica.
Don't let silly little empirics around traffic fatalities in recent decades get in the way of a good narrative like this one!
No, you aren't; it called "possession of stolen property".

However, Samsung is not the law, first of all. (If they have a court order to disable the equipment, that's fine, I suppose.)

Second of all, these TV's won't be recovered; they will probably just end up in the landfill.

You're not catching the thieves this way.
My understanding is is that group invariance is just another perspective to look at the original non-linear system transformations as compared to the more traditional "on-manifold".

Really it seems like an easier way to derive a system which the observable properties of the system are well defined as compared to worrying about ensuring observability (and unobservability) properties hold through the non-linear linearization process.

There are quite a few groups that use "invariant filters" in robotics (eg [1]), but I always wonder if this could not be addressed through more traditional means (i.e. designing a better state representations or correcting gains in unobservable directions).

Roumeliotis is referring to Stergios [2] or another scholar? Could you provide full names?

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10410

[2] https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=c5HeXxsAAAAJ&hl=en...
Fast, Flexible Summaries with Aggregate Filters in PostgreSQL
My thoughts are that any complaints about negative effects of mining on environment is a fud and clickbait.

This is actually driven by financial firms and politicians who have their own agenda in this game.

And no one from that list is going to prioritize care for environment higher than their own profits and powers.
While this works, I still hate the lie that they have suspended your account for "suspicious activity".

If you're going to require a phone number to read tweets, don't lie about it, just be up front about it.
I'll know that we've achieved full self driving when it can brave thru the streets of a South American city :)
For what it's worth DW is not allowed to broadcast in Germany and therefore relatively unknown amongst Germans.
Exactly, that is how that stuff works. Past patterns in the Ml neural net generated from massive data and training try to figure out the label of things from various sensors, and then given that label, try to figure out other things that might happen based on the label and event stream. These patterns can recognize with a certain probability similar patterns, but they have no way to cope with brand new patterns. Those brand new patterns, although they may only occur 1 out of 100 experiences - or lets say 3 days a year when your're driving, something fully novel occurs, this will kill you if you are relying on FSD. Until the systems try to think like humans, they simply wont.
It's free for the same reason everything is free these days. VC funds anything that will attract a lot of users to mine data from so they can sell the data. Discord didn't do anything that was groundbreaking or even solve a problem that had no solution; they just came along during a time when investors are willing to fund a company operating at a loss for a decade until FANG buys them.

Discord's a pretty good product, and they've got the engineers and money to get better, but the only reason they won is because of timing. Same for Slack; there were identical products to Slack that tried for decades to gain traction, but they weren't free, because that business model didn't exist at the time.
Kubernetes CronJob Timezone support implemented by accident
I literally never claimed that. I said that it isn't the left pushing for censorship from corporations because the left almost entirely hates corporations more than liberals or the political right do.
Exceedingly unlikely unless the lane demarcation is extremely bad. Lane-holding tech is really standard and reliable now (and even if you don't think AP is great, it's not stupider than what ships in mass-market cars).
FYI The actual article is audio/podcast. I skimmed through it and it was considered more effective to go after individuals by civil suite.

My personal understanding is a lot that the fraud was widespread among low level mortgage officers (not sure if that's the right word) who were doing things like exagerating a loan applicants income, assets, etc. These individuals may or may not have known the extent of their crimes and most likely were pressured by institional policies. Also proving that the loan/mortgage officer doctored the application and not the mortgage applicant would be difficult to do but it is easy to prove that the bank itself failed to perform due diligence.
They are not analogous. IRC is a chat protocol with semantics suitable for a chat protocol. HTTP is at this point just a transport level thing for whatever you want to send. It doesn't have any significant semantic implications for sites like Twitter.
I remember a story in Germany the other way around were a Tesla driver detected a car on the highway with an unconcious driver. He set himself in front of the other car, braked and stopped slowly until both cars came to a halt. Both insurances did not want to pay for the damage (voluntarily induced damage and such crap) and Tesla paid the bill for the Tesla driver's repair. [1]

[1 German]: https://www.waz-online.de/Nachrichten/Panorama/Tesla-ueberni...
Note sure about the AGI requirement. The current systems will always need the heavy involvement of human intelligence to be able to rescue stuck cars, drive in new areas or monitor for changing driving conditions and update the driving model. There does seem to be at least some hope these systems will be able to run a true driverless taxi service with minimal geofencing. On the other hand, a human can go to a new country with different road markings, signage, rules, and traffic flows and be able to drive safely pretty much immediately or maybe a quick Google search. That would truly require AGI.
For UK people https://www.bargainhardware.co.uk/ is an _excellent_ source of kit.

Personally I steer away from cisco. Yes, some people in enterprise swear by it, but I _personally_ hate it with a passion. However there is a fucktonne of it on ebay.

I use ubiquiti for APs, but I've not tried their switching. Currently I have some dlink "smart" stuff. Its PoE and has vlans, which is good enough for my purposes. Can do 10gig, not bad for < £120 (second hand)

Firewall, I'm all for pfsense. I've never liked hardware firewall/router appliances. They've always sucked.
And if it turns out the thrashing of said car was an in-cabin fire? You just locked them in.