skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> the process of "becoming elite" causes the damage. Everyone on our software team was so busy trying to have cross team impact, show their leadership, come up with consequential architecture decisions, and the like - because all that stuff is what you need to be well regarded as a senior type person

Isn’t this the exact reason why Google has such a high rate of churn in its product lineup?
You're confusing Kirby (John Kriby, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kirby_(attorney)) to both Bowsers.
Cute CSS Animations
A FTA TV Transcription Side-Project Becomes a Popular Tool for Journalists
And some were laughing as he announced full autonomous driving next year ... five years ago.
Or lets talk about his Mars settlement.
There a things that are realistic but people thought it's too expensive or too niche and there are things that sound like straight out of science fiction.

Musk is good in the former and not so good in the latter.
Boring corp, modified, will be immensely valuable on Mars, for digging habitats / etc.
While Musk lost some credibility over cryptocurrency related topics, it is important that he manages to repackage these already "thought of" stuff in an almost Steve Jobs sort of fashion and insert into the public consciousness. Apart from the hiring, many companies start up just to get acquired by Tesla, or to compete with them. Which creates the much needed innovation by itself.

I think he uses his media power for a good purpose even if he himself or his company cannot reach such goals, he creates the stepping stones in a future that I really like to see happen.
Microsoft does seem to know how to do this correctly when they have to, as they offer WebAuthn and there is deliberately no way to tell WebAuthn "I know this is outlook.com but I need live.com credentials". So they will bounce you through the right name to make it work. But you're correct that for phishing this habit of making up new DNS names is a problem, ie it convinces the lay person they have no idea and should just fill in their password wherever it's requested.
Humanoid robots might be hard but they've been successfully demonstrated. It might also be argued that machine learning can make complex motions easier than if everything is hand-coded.

The humanoid form factor might be an entirely unnecessary distraction, a robot with more legs or non-human articulations would be just as useful.
Starhopper wasn't even the first design, before that they tried composites and had to scrap that. It really is trial and error.
Perhaps it is easier to apply than injections. Rural India may not have qualified medical personnel.
> It's also not dogmatic. You can use mutable and immutable versions of the same data structure.

However from their description and the complexity promises it looks like the immutable collections are literally just the mutable ones without mutation ability (similar to Java's immutable* wrappers) which greatly limits their effective usefulness.

> Full API is here: https://janet-lang.org/api/index.html

Sadly even worse than clojure's which is already not great.
May I ask what missing fields you are referring to? Why @online/@software/@dataset type in biblatex [1] cannot do the job?

That being said, I think GitHub should acknowledge that it is common for authors to want people cite their paper (or multiple papers) rather than simply the source code. Because this is what counts to the citation in academic. At the same time, there is no reason to not support bibtex/biblatex in addition to the cff.

[1]: See section 2.1.1 in http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/CTAN/macros/latex/contrib/biblate...
Computer Space and beyond: 50 years of gaming
That correlation is somewhat tenuous. Plenty of people with a healthy weight have OSA, but being fat does greatly increase the odds.
On the other hand one can't expect every single blog post, ie. on web service caching or whatever to spend first 50 pages on explaining TCP/IP, DNS, TLS, HTTP, WS protocol upgrade, JSON, JWT and what not.

If one finds too many unknown acronyms flying around and giving headache, it's probably a sign they should step back and sort out fundamentals in their head first?
I think you're the one missing the point. If someone is spending all their time online reading scholarly articles or learning skills nobody is going to accuse them of internet addiction. That does not mean internet addiction is not real.

To make an analogy, lots of people are able to enjoy drinking alcohol without issue, but that doesn't disprove the existence of alcoholism.
Let's compare what I wrote:

> For Proposition 22 to be ruled unconstitutional based on its unusually-generous legislative amendment requirement

with what you wrote:

> does a court ruling that the referendum's result is unconstitutional

Did you forget something?

Ruling that prop 22 is unconstitutional based on a general feature of all propositions which prop 22 partially shares is ruling that the proposition system is unconstitutional.

If you pass a bill of attainder against Bill as a proposition and it gets overruled because bills of attainder are illegal, that says nothing about other propositions. But if you pass a bill of attainder against Bill as a proposition and it gets overruled because propositions are illegal, that invalidates the entire proposition system.
Then maybe Raku would be a thing for you: https://docs.raku.org/language/create-cli
The Shadowy Business of International Education
These don't seem tacked on. They spent so long on them specifically so they don't seem tacked on.

The issue with Go is if you're not shuffling around binary data it has horrible developer ergonomics. Network data is usually untyped, but if you start needing to care about what is in that data and need typed datastructures built around it you stop having fun quick. Same issue with C, really.
Even LGPL seems to have quite some FUD around the compatibility with distributing resulting software in app stores.

This seems to be quite at odds with the (maybe mistaken?) idea of a license that allows embedding a component without "license contaminating" the entire project, but still requires publishing changes to the component itself.

I wonder if there is a license that actually achieves that, without restricting the ability to publish to app stores?
Legit PUBG Mobile Hack for Free Online. Get UC and BP No Survey in PUBG Mobile Generator Script Fully working latest. [MOD] [GENERATOR] [C.ENGINES]
That does not sound pleasant, though it seems they're less painful than needles from a bit of searching around.
But they straight up are on separate planes of existence.

Then again I keep forgetting that I am often talking to people who are so removed from the ill effects of the state that they can even begin to think that a company's actions can ever compare.
I guess Google couldn’t live with merely owning the domain name, but had to own the TLD of the domain as well.
Can’t you bring in liquid oxygen from other areas of the country by truck?
The fact that they don't have a control group of normal BMI OSA patients makes me very skeptical regarding any outcomes.
I think Elon Musk is exploring new stuff to do at Tesla to keep talented AI people in the company and not make them go away and search for new exciting problems to solve.

Even if the robot will never be real, he can keep these people excited and maybe gather new talent
If you don’t narrow it down at all you have a dating site which is showing me a list that’s 50% men, when I’m only interested in women. By similar logic, it makes a lot of sense to further filter down to the types of people I’m likely to be interested in.
Off Topic: How to Host a Website?
We don't 'do' learning. It does us
Why do you act like we have not already started?

You are making the exact same dismissive mistake Elon is making: Just ignoring the existing work, or assuming it is somehow just shoddy.
Why just 2-chain?

If you wanted to predict matches and lengthy coversation between random tinder users (if there was no rigid separation for genders) you'd fail in similar fashion.

Try 3-chain.
ESTree-toolkit: Tools for working with ESTree AST
I think it's not as simple as that. Books don't have the same reward loop as the internet, so they're not "unnaturally compelling" to the same degree.

To give a counter-analogy, at some point slot machines were new, and people might have lumped them in with the same category as chess: a fun game that you can play to pass the time. But eventually it was understood that slot machines have certain intrinsic properties which make them much harder to stop playing than chess for a lot of people, and we ended up regulating them because it was causing harm to society.
From the article:

> the city’s water regulator uses liquid oxygen as part of its process for removing foul-smelling hydrogen sulfide from water pumped in from the Lower Floridan Aquifer.
go docs without the political pandering!
Many of those side bets that "don't work yet" are much newer than Tesla and SpaceX and have had much less effort put into them. Claims that "they will never work" are predicting the future based mostly on personal biases.

For example Hyperloop is just a concept that other people are trying to implement with very limited resources.
That's not the only idea behind the LGPL (v3 especially), so it's not surprising it doesn't fulfill that without restricting other things.

MPL might be more what you are looking for.
Add some birdfeeders around your house, and if swallows start to build their nests on your home, let them. I live next to wetlands, but the birds eat the bugs. Swallows specifically eat over 10,000 mosquitoes a day, so if you get them established on your property, it makes a huge difference.
"I'm getting tired of people dismissing any effort of changing the world."

I am getting tired of people praising Elon joke projects as world-changing.

Its a voice assistant, we already have them, there is nothong world changing. Also Hyperloop is and Boring company are pretty useless, and are likely to stay that way - passenger capacity of every hyperloop design and of the tonnela are pethetic compared to a normal train
To be fair, 'Learn by invention' can be detrimental if one is trying to derive a result which requires significant prior knowledge that the learner lacks. However, quoting a simple physics example of what I mean: One can prove the Work-Energy theorem with simple manipulations of the basic definitions of displacement, velocity and acceleration without having to learn it like a law. One cannot derive Newton's three laws, on the contrary.
I’ve worked in a company like that. Leaving was the best decision I ever made, you can’t explain emotional intelligence to people.
The workplace described in the article absolutely sounds like a hostile environment. The asker’s bosses are using “family” as an excuse to justify working longer hours. Families don’t do that.

That said: Personally, I do want my coworkers and I to be something akin to a family. If I’m going to spend around a third of my life working, I want to do it with a group of people I like and care about.
TBF the float Min/Max issue has nothing to do with generics, there isn't a "floating-point" generic class, and the entire reason why Go has an f64 Min/Max in the first place is that floats are not fully ordered[0], so you "can't" use regular comparisons (which you'd be told to do for integers) and thus you could not have a generic min/max relying on that even if there was one (e.g. in Rust `f32` and `f64` are not `Ord`, which `std::cmp::{min, max}` require, hence both `f32` and `f64` having their own inherent min/max methods).

So what your issue comes down to is Go's designers couldn't be arsed to duplicate the entire `math` package to also work on `float32`. Some members of the community did rise to the challenge[1] tho.

[0] well recent revisions of IEEE-754 have a total ordering predicate but I wouldn't say that it's really useful for such a situation as it positions NaNs on "outside" of the numbers, so a negative NaN is smaller than a negative number and a positive NaN larger than a positive number

[1] https://github.com/chewxy/math32
The four-legged Boston Dynamics robot can walk up/down stairs, is pretty slim and has a robot arm able to reach a bit higher. And there's still a lot of room for improvement.

Even humans can't always reach the highest shelves without a ladder. I'd like to see a humanoid robot successfully climb one up and down while holding an object; that alone would be an insane achievement.

A good humanoid robot costs a ton, to a point where I doubt it'll see much use in normal households. I'd love to be wrong in that aspect, but I haven't yet seen an affordable robot beyond hobby project standards. Imho a humanoid body would be a nice bonus once everything else is working reliably and there's enough demand, not what I'd start out with.
What will the Bot be used for? I can see why it'll be useful in the future when we have AGI. But until then, I don't see what advantage it'll have over things built specifically for a particular job, which is already hard enough to achieve.
The last thing you need for those things is humanoid robots.

Especially with the 2.6 second lightspeed delay in any remote control inputs.
Ironically you have to be careful doing this, as their systems can ban you for too many reports, if they aren't all flagged as 'legitimate' scammers. The last time I filed a report I had this new warning show up at the bottom prior to submission
> And this proposition also (unconstitutionally, apparently) limited how the whole thing could be amended.

The judgment explicitly notes that there is no problem with the proposition limiting how the special amendment procedure written in to the proposition can be used.

Rather, you appear to be thinking of the part of the ruling that overruled the part of the proposition defining the extension of collective bargaining rights to app-based drivers as constituting an "amendment" of the proposition.
But a humanoid is a pretty useless form factor for that kind of work. Humanoid robots are good in the kind of environments where humans evolved, or that they built for themselves.

Asteroid mining is pretty far from that.
JPEG XL is really new, so it would be a lot more surprising if it did have support anywhere yet. Hell, AVIF is pretty new too.
I think it's just lazy to dismiss everyone's criticism as one thing. Sure, there are idiots out on the internet who are going to crap all over what anyone does for literally any reason. However, the people are criticising are actual people and they do actually have arguments that you should think about. Some of those arguments are bad, but a lot of them aren't. When Elon Musk decided he was going to revolutionize travel with the Boring company a load of experts in town planning and infrastructure came out and said - "Hey, we're experts, we understand this problem, you aren't even solving the right problem" and so far, they seem basically correct. The boring company could completely succeed at its goal, and it wouldn't matter.

There are going to be lightweight criticisms of this concept (Musk invites those by making someone dress up in a morph suit and dance like a robot). But there are also going to be more realistic criticisms such as the fact that whilst Humanoid robots have remained science fiction, non-humanoid robots have proliferated massively across industries that were previously fully manual. It'd be great if we could build a humanoid robot to replace all those humans trudging around Amazon fulfillment centres- but we don't need to, because those robots have no reason to be humanoid in the first place.

I'm tired of people pretending that just the aspiration to change the world excuses you from real criticism of your ideas. There are plenty of people out there changing the world- some of them mentioned in the article, and those people actually thought out what they were doing before getting a guy in a morph suit to dance in front of the worlds press. Let's not forget, we're still waiting for the autonomous driving promises Musk has failed to deliver on for years now.
Cosmos DeFi Is Hot and Happening Now
Tunnels are one of the most important things you could build on any planet or satellite like the moon.

Remember there is no atmosphere nor magnetic fields on other planets to protect you from cosmic rays, so a good solution is make people live underground.

Some time ago a teacher offered me to make my Master thesis on that(I did not take it) because there were people already working on this problem.

BTW, places like the moon are very interesting. Because there is no fluid erosion every single grain of sand is extremely abrasive.
> If crypto was actually a viable alternative they wouldn't be doing this.

Adoption is a thing and takes time. Crypto itself is also a technology still in its infancy with at least a decade+ of engineering remaining to begin to resemble something that everyday people can use, but it's already quite promising.
Here we go again on Prop 13.

If you lived through the madness, you would understand. (I can guarantee you were born after, I'm Mad as Hell!, by Howard Jarvis.

Every year taxes went up. Every year politicians squandered away that money on pet projects. Middle class residents feared tax day. I saw my dad cry once, and yes it was when he opened that tax bill from the county.

Prop 13 is the only real thing, in my lifetime, that truly helped the middleclass, and poor.

Yes---things were generally better 30-40 years ago, but don't blame our messed up society on prop 13.

Their are days where I feel we need to get rid of prop 13 for a few years, and let those that weren't born see what happens?

I have never heard anyone who lived through that time criticize prop 13, with the exception of a college professor trying to reel in young students during a lecture, or an upcoming politician trying to get young voters.

Instead of ragging on a prop that helps low/middleclass tax payers; I wish the young would go after how the wealthy around the world are buying up our homes.

With a phone call, or email, and then have the gall to leave them vacant.

To the young professional programmers. Let's be honest. You will be most likely shown the door around 50. If you happened to buy a house, you will eventually cherish prop 13.
Boston dynamics has found machine learning to be minimally useful here, and has had better results hand-coding most things. That’s not to say that is necessarily correct for all scenarios, but BD has lots of extremely smart and motivated people and I would take their results seriously - so at very least it doesn’t seem to be as easy as throwing a big neural net at it, and any machine learning approach will require hard and careful work.

Re: successfully demonstrated, again Boston Dynamics might be the best example. Their bipeds are nowhere near the functionality levels Elon is describing - fine motor skills, vision, even walking (it’s my understanding that Boston Dynamics has to individually tune their bipeds for every course) are years and years away from hitting Elon’s goals at current rate of progress.

Furthermore, the BD bipeds have a battery life of about ten minutes. You need a revolution in either energy storage density or kinematic efficiency or more likely both to get a useful assistant bot out of it.
>Or is my premise or conclusion flawed, especially because I missing prerequisite knowledge?

Pharmaceutical-risk-based arguments aside, India is in a pretty bad spot COVID-wise. A massive proportion of the population is dirt poor (<$1/hr) and the broader society in general don't give a damn about their plight.

They cannot afford to lock down. If they do so, millions will starve to death.

They were literally begging, fighting and worse to get access to oxygen tanks earlier this year. The unlucky ones watched their parents and grandparents asphyxiate in their homes with no access to treatment of any kind.

If this stuff can be produced cheaply, locally and quickly, then it will be lapped up gratefully by the hundreds of millions of poor people who would be dead and buried before they got the opportunity to receive Pfizer or Moderna.

What could or might happen 10 years down the track will be the least of their worries if we see another flare up.
One thing is certain: it can’t (yet) be used as a firefighter.

That is, if it shares the AI stack with Tesla AP.
What is with new programming languages with women's names? It seems a bit cringey to me, like the guy in my first-year cs classes who would name variables after his girlfriend.
All of these are literally senseless for buying porn. Are you seriously telling me you want your family and friends to know when you buy something from OF?

Monero is really the only thing that makes sense here.
Just saying: in Flanders, 'janet' or 'jeanette' is an offensive slur for a homosexual man.
"Humanoid robots might be hard but they've been successfully demonstrated."

None of these robots can hang our laundry to dry, de-bone a chicken or cook a meal. They cannot perform any of the thousands of tasks we perform every day that require dexterity. They have just about mastered locomotion, and that's it.
It's really just an indictment of OnlyFans lacking any imagination, or, well, balls. They are going to crash and burn anyways - they could have at least tried something like this. Instead they will just pathetically fizzle out, desperately clutching to the few pennies they will have left after this, unwilling to take a risk that might reap great reward and actual change.
My issue with pattern 12 (explaining the wrong way without saying it's wrong) isn't that I get confused about what is the right or wrong way of doing something, it's that I'll usually spend the time to actually develop examples, and if I was told up front that I was about to be shown the wrong way I would only read it so I didn't have to bother with the refactor during the learning.
> But rents are high — and rising — in Fürstenfeldbruck.

Why are rents to high? Why are they raising? And _who_ exactly is rising them?

I can't see the economic reason why such a large chunk of income needs to go to "landlords". Rents could just as well be very low, set to extremely reasonable level (they should be negligible, maybe 10% of monthly income at most, really). If you are a land-owner, that's about the level of taxation you see. I just don't see why we accept current state of things as the way to be.
Most people I know have had an issue where they misunderstood what an object in a YAML file is (and therefore did not apply a configuration) or something similar.

Bonus points for mis-editing a kube object (kubectl edit) that you save correctly only to realize that mis-formatted YAML can get thrown away without reporting an error back (looking at you Istio).

And yet people choose it again and again for new projects. Someone must love it given the popularity...
If you look up "covid vascular" you'll find plenty of references. Seeing how it affects most people with chronic conditions associated with such problems (hypertension, diabetes), I'm convinced it's a correct assessment.
A majority is more than half, that is, more than 50%. Everything between 50% and 51% is also more than half. In a state as populus as California, that might actually matter.
>I want to do it with a group of people I like and care about.

So not like my family then?
Anything that increases neck girth and puts weight on your chest
They also weren't discussed. Only mentioned for completeness' sake.
Just don't use the features that you don't like (e.g. the feed) and don't accept random connections. I only accept my colleagues and no one else, even the recruiters.

Keep your profile, and update your status when you want to look for a job. That's the only feature you need from LinkedIn.
I would define a strategy that includes politics. As without the proper support from politics and government, it’s not possible to make things change.

I would look at the biggest problem and tackle it first.