skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Those migrants typically don't qualify for asylum and are basically not allowed in the first place. They are just navigating the system for as long as they do not get expelled, which is impossible in some cases.

It is beyond me why you would give these people the right to work.
This reminds of Magic Leap. 3 billion dollars invested in a 3D render.
No. Lol!

Exposure to a deadly respiratory virus is several orders of magnitude more risky than exposure to “disembodied” viral proteins or mRNAs in a vaccine.

You would have to see several orders of magnitude increase in protection for this question not to be totally insane.
Your situation is is very similar to how mine was. I recently changed jobs after being on the same team for almost a decade.

It's honestly a bit rough having to rebuild relationships. I'm working in completely new technologies, which is one of the reasons I decided to move, but it's kind of difficult to go from a place of 100% trust of your peers to uncertainty about how they perceive you.

I've still been seeing some of my old team on weekends.
My memory still works. Ignore the 90s look of the site. The Chapter is called "DeLorme inspired six week hypertrophy cycle". I do seven and then one deload week at 30% of the current load, i think i should reschedule and decrease the load. DuckDuckGo gives plenty of results on forums too.

https://www.dragondoor.com/b31/

https://smile.amazon.com/Beyond-Bodybuilding-Strength-Traini...
The spike protein is under selective pressure. It needs to bind to ACE2 in order to reproduce. This constrains its mutational landscape. The viral envelope, for example, isn't similarly constrained and can undergo neutral drift. It would probably be wasted effort to target these with subunit or mRNA vaccines. This isn't an argument for challenging vaccinated people with Delta, but suggests there's room for a live attenuated or whole inactivated vaccine booster.
> generous capacity of the host population is extinguished

I don't doubt there is a lot of individual generosity in people. However, the assumption that social benefits are profitable and very open to immigrants to people is very wrong. Life on social benefits is hard, and immigrants don't live in luxury. Hell, a lot of immigrants have to live illegally due to racist "asylum" policies (you cannot apply for asylum as citizen of a country which is not recognized to be unsafe by your host country, or rather you can but you can be almost certain it will be refused).

I don't disagree that helping remote communities overcome their problems in an autonomous manner would help, in place of the current neocolonial theft and NGO industrial complex which creates dependency schemes instead of developing local autonomy.

But in the end, who are you to judge where someone should be allowed to live? Was someone in charge of judging whether you are allowed to reside where you live currently? Do you think it's a fair mechanism? If so, why is it only applied to people from the global south moving to the global north, and never the other way around?
christ. The fact that this question has been asked in mainstream media, is shocking enough.

the fact its BBC... I'm astounded.
How could they?
By moving people with covid to other states, or importing medical personnel and equipment. Do so aggressively enough and you can keep capacity available.
I would highly advise against that! Protein metabolism creates acidic byproducts. Your bloods ph must stay the same no matter what. If you don't counter those, your body will take calcium from your bones to level it. A diet high in protein needs to be balanced with vegetables and fruit. [edit]Counterintuitively even sour fruit is metabolized basically. The most alkaline food spinach is not without pitfalls though. High consumption over time will net you kidney stones.[/edit]
I think contracting is essentially a business in itself.
We have swallows, bats, and more dragonflies than you can imagine.

Thanks for the suggest, but it is just hopeless.
It's an economic relationship. Pretending that it's not is manipulative
I live in Canada and health authorities are making the same error. July cases lower than March/April so they relaxed. But summer is supposed to be low.

All stats in August 2021 are worse than August 2020 despite vaccinations. Not an optimistic setup for winter.
Them being allowed to stay is not my point. My point is that IF they are in the country they will do something. If you do not allow them to work, they will do other things.

Either have proper borders around Europe, push them out instantly etc. or allow them to work. But don't complain about them dealing drugs. It is not the underlying problem here, just a logical consequence.

Side note: Just legalizing marihuana would also work.
There are so many companies out there profiting from selling weapons, destroying the environment and misusing cheap labour in awful dictatorships. But these are issues Mastercard and Visa don‘t seem to care about at all. Where is the NYT article pointing out these issues?
This is the case with almost anything - every addictive thing is addictive to varying degrees. The fact that many people are able to enjoy let’s say, alcohol responsibly doesn’t make it less intrinsically addictive to the other folks. And let’s take another example - sugar. I have a serious weakness for it. I just can’t stop with one of anything sweet. It’s better if I just don’t eat any of it. But that’s the addict in me talking, and I shouldn’t extrapolate my experience to the rest of society who are able to enjoy sugar responsibly.

That’s where i disagree with your characterisation of the difference between chess and slot machines. It depend entirely on the person involved. Folks who can enjoy responsibly shouldn’t penalised because there are others who can’t.

Btw, if you disagree with my characterisation of sugar as addictive, you don’t need it to survive. It’s perfectly possible to live on protein and fat alone. The withdrawal from sugar is painful, but it’s doable.
Web makes it super easy to build custom components compared to something like Qt, GtK or even UIKit. One of the reasons why web UIs are common is that people want more than tables buttons and forms.
Last I've been to Munich public services seemed not to be dismantled. Munich has other problems: it's too successful and attracts people and investors.
Are you claiming the vaccine has zero known risks? Surely not.
One thing left out of the article is whether we should be vaccinating people to discourage spread simply to keep the risk of a much worse variant from randomly occurring low.
> Pure math is vulnerable to missed preconditions/unknown unknowns, with potentially catastrophic ramifications

Interestingly I see the opposite. I expect the replica to be full of dangerous approximations: scaled weight of the stones not realistic, friction of the material not taken into consideration, earthquake ground vibrations not properly emulated by just shaking plates, etc
And as we all know, everything between Google and Apple has remained exactly as it was in 2010
Let’s be honest here. Would your third cousin do all of that for you? No, ok, so let’s not pretend all family equates to yourLoving SO, siblings or parents level of impact on your life. There are people with family who abused them in their childhood, with family members who are objectively terrible people. There are brothers and sisters who hate each other with a passion but still both show up to their cousins wedding and act nicely.

Family only means that there is a bond between you that cannot be ignored independent of what you think of the people. And that being the case these are people you try to make the best of the relationships with because you know they’ll show up in you life no matter if you like it or not.

The comparison with co-workers is quite on point.

If you want space from your co-workers quit. Because no matter how long and technically complex your education is, no matter if you are a wold leading expert in a narrow field, getting along with people is a core competence for anyone who doesn’t either run their own one-man gig, or work in dark basement of an organization where everyone has given up on communicating through any other means than email.
> What languages in your opinion have good, non-tacked-on generics?

It's cliche, but it's clear that generics like Result ( https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/result/ ) and Option ( https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/ ) are fundamental to Rust's design from the start.

> some pretty successful languages that gained generics after maturity

I'm very familiar with C#, of course it is a "pretty successful language", no kidding. I did not say otherwise, I said that there are "compromises" associated with adding generics in V2.

And there are: e.g. starting with collection types, interfaces and base types in pairs, such as List<T> and List, IList<T> and IList, IEnumerable<T> and IEnumerable, etc ad nauseam. Then Delegates that precede Func<T> and Action<T>.

I suggest that you reread my comment above; the point is not just that adding generics later causes complication (historic record is clear that it does).

The point is that generics were _not_ proven in mainstream OO programming when c# 1.0 was released in 2002, but this has changed; now they are. Designs done in the last few years can avoid this complication: Ether your language wants them from the start, or it intends other ways to deal with the same kinds of problems.
I would like to see less BBC articles here.
Living location is not a type of good that can be chosen freely, it's a necessity. Hence free markets don't really apply here.
Sure, I meant that it was the natural successor not only because of the name (that was clearly chosen for that).
Not only do you have the problem of different 'it's referring to different things, I think there's also an element of adding unnecessary cognitive load at a time where cognitive load is already high. Even if there's only one pronoun and one possible thing that the pronoun could refer to, your brain still needs to do the cognitive lookbehind to interpret the sentence.
China allows couples to have third child to avert a demographic crisis
I find it odd that an article written about scale, and not just scale but the biggest scale, didn't include a photo that demonstrates... relative sizes.

The official page demonstrates relative size at quick glance (I guess they do use fingernails and dinnerplates but eh):
https://cerebras.net/chip/
Backlink Guides per Week
In addition what everyone else responded, even if it turns out to currently be legal, it doesn't mean it should be legal.
> Murder seems to be very looked down upon in most cultures and is not generally accepted.

Mostly for people’s in-groups. The care goes down as in-group association goes down.

—-

America, Europe/NATO, and other allied countries have unnecessary “wars” and conflicts and use things like drones to murder people. Drones killing people randomly isn’t war a lot of the time.

Murder definition is silly. Says “unlawful” killing of someone. Who determines what’s lawful when the countries included at the beginning do stuff overseas? Obviously some will consider all the killing done as murder.

It’s not hard to say we (as in the west) murdered Yemenese, Afghans/Pakistanis (the drones attacking people), Palestinians, and more in recent years. Then we have the big name ones like murdering the Iranian general a year ago.

via equity, alliance, and diplomatic and financial support. Not directly, but murder charges in most countries can be charged to people who aren’t directly doing the killing too
This is really cool to see. Just to help people with some context, this vaccine is 2 milligrams per shot (which is equal to 2000 micrograms). I am unsure if they use an adjuvant or not (seems like they don't).

The reason they need to use so much material is the immune activation doesn't line up with spike protein expression and presentation. This is because the plasmid has to be turned into mRNA by the cell that takes it up. By the time the mRNA is being read to make the protein, the initial immune activation by the DNA itself is already waning.

The concomitant signalling (immune activation to trick the body to think it's an actual infection, and detection of the foriegn spike protein at the time and place) is essential for robust immune response against the target. This is why the mRNA vaccines can use 100 micrograms and 30 micrograms (Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech, respectively)--the innate immune activation caused by the mRNA itself occurs in at the time and space as antigen (spike protein) expression and presentation.

I wish them luck with this, but I don't believe outside of an emergency this technology will be robust enough compared to mRNA, viral-vector, and traditional vaccines.

One more thing, they detect plasmid for a month at the injection site (in non-clinical study) and nearly a month in the blood. That is a concern to me, but not a huge concern. (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.26.428240v1)
The question asked by the article is sensible. The uncertainty explored is whether, having had an initial vaccination, future natural infection would produce a better defence against variants than booster shots that target the spike protein alone.
I really cannot overstate how stupid it would be to lose your job over this. What, exactly, do you think the vaccine is going to do to you?
> For instance, robots with wheels would struggle with stairs.

Just ask the Daleks.
Just from experience of the looks you get trying to buy a coffee or lunch using a credit card in Germany.

Didn't they make the €500 note basically just for Germany?
I'm not really understanding this. Does he believe that USA somehow holds the world together, and there would be chaos without USA?

Anyway, governments can't really stop people from using Bitcoin. It will eventually lead to governments losing their ability to fund themselves with inflation and violence, and they are forced to fund themselves with taxation. This way Bitcoin takes power away from governments, and the endgame will be that governments will have to adopt Bitcoin standard and use bitcoin as their reserve currency. Whoever does it first, wins.
Seconding the parent commenter’s request! No idea what’s easy or hard for you to implement in terms of UI or functionality, but it would be great to be able to exclude either the top N most-mentioned stocks (via a slider, with text listing them) or specific stocks by entering their symbols.

Regardless of whether you end up doing this, great work and thank you!
> I've (read) a bunch of french journal clippings about first diaspora italians

Correct. And yet, they integrated.

Also see: Asians in the US. Especially those that migrated before WWII. (Or Italians or Irish, of course)
The CDC vaccine safety page: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/ad...

The vast majority of these events are happening at or below the level of "background noise", meaning people are indeed getting sick and dying after taking the vaccine, but that it is highly unlikely to be the vaccine's fault.
Almost all respiratory viruses are "deadly". This article brings up children. For whom the virus is almost never deadly.

These vaccines pose a higher risk than reward for children and healthy young people. Myocarditis often results in permanent heart damage. It's not something you just get over and move on with. For a young person, this is effectively a permanent disability.
I'm downvoting your comment because it's irrelevant, probably wrong, and downright boring to complain about downvotes in the first place, even more so about shilling.

I am not affiliated with either company.
Yeah, right. Instead of just getting rid of the moskitos, let's introduce a spider that likes human blood, but is currently unable to get it directly. No chance for that one to go wrong...
It's a well known fact that it's a red flag and you should move on to different direction if they mention they're like a family. Employment is a business relation based on a contract agreement of both parties. That's it.

I was interviewing with a company and was genuinely interested in the position until they mentioned they were like a family. Sent them a not interested email after the meeting.
AI Competes Against Humans in the Medium Writers Challenge
I've been studying this for a few years and the consensus seems to be that the causation is bidirectional.

It's definitely true that getting fat constricts your airways. When you lose weight, your tongue actually gets smaller, letting through more air. This is basically the same idea as losing weight in your feet and your shoes fitting differently -- weight gain or loss happens all over.

But the converse is also a problem: when you can't breathe at night, your body is under stress, and that can lead to overeating during the day.

There is some connection between the hormones lectin and ghrelin and lack of sleep. Not sure what the best reference is but I googled and found a few articles:

https://medsleep.com/sleep-deficits-may-lead-weight-gain/
Make money online with these 2 successful strategies
> I've still been seeing some of my old team on weekends.

I think this is the key to it right here. The ones you chose not to leave behind were friends, not peers. After almost a decade, they probably are more family than friend. The rest of them though? Not even close.
I believe that there are many in between the two extremes you mention for whom the draw of connection is far from benign, which is why I would not be so dismissive of addiction concerns.
I'd do that for some of the people I've worked with. One of them offered to let me live with him for a couple of weeks, others I've helped move house, or offered to invest in their businesses.

The problem here is confusing the destination with the journey. I'm not loyal to them because top-down management told me they were family, I'm loyal to them because top-down management created an environment where I went to the pub with the same great people every couple of Fridays for years.

EDIT: They also know damn well what the difference is between things I want and things the company wants, and prioritise the former while ignoring the latter.
> Companies transferring encrypted data are not responsible for its contents. Full stop.

Come on and be honest, do you really thing anyone, no matter if they where a cs PhD or a primary school dropout would share the opinion that an app that knowingly provided communications services to al qaeda during planning and execution of 9/11 could excuse themselves with “well the traffic was encrypted so w didn’t do anything wrong”

You cannot completely ignore the fact that bot ethics and politics are human construct and while we have “free speech” that does not in any way mean that you are free to speak anything free from consequences or free from judgement.
This (ironically). I often start enforcing a "no pronouns" rule for myself and others when conversations and concepts get more complicated. It (the rule) is awkward at first but makes a big difference in mutual understanding.
> Sadly even worse than clojure's which is already not great.

I thought Clojure's immutable collections were generally considered good. What else would you consider "great"?

Edit: or was that a complaint about the quality of the documentation, not the quality of the immutable collections?
It's not a recent thing. I faced the problem 3 years ago. I used to use Google Docs for a lot of things, but it falls apart under many conditions. Microsoft makes the best ones. It runs smoothly and it's free too. Eventually I just bought MS Word because being cheap with a word processor was not worth the trouble.
Thanks a lot. I never heard about Public Suffix List.

From their guidelines: "We do not accept entries whose sole purpose is to circumvent Let's Encrypt rate limits. They have a form you can use."

So probably the best way to go is to talk to LetsEncrypt about lifting limits.
> The second ones are the ones causing problems.

That can be expected from people who went through various forms of traumas and insecurities. The same is usually said of people from poor neighborhoods, with the same kind of disdain.

Social problems are not solved by repression. 60 years ago, there were just as many racist comments pointing out how polish/spanish/italian immigrants were dangerous and not integrating in society. But 60 years ago, the economy was booming and the industry couldn't afford to discard workers; as a consequence, noone was forced a life of insecurity and most people had general faith in the system that if they worked hard enough they could enjoy their life.

Today it's much harder to find a job, especially without a recognized diploma (even janitors and cashiers are expected to have diplomas nowadays) and working very hard every day is not guaranteed to get you out of misery. "Migrants" as you call them, or most of them any way, are very much looking for a job and denied the opportunity. I know quite a lot of illegal immigrants here in france (sans-papiers) and they're always looking for an opportunity to work (they don't have the same social benefits french people and asylum seekers do) and it's very often, either they work very hard for little pay on construction sites or in kitchens (think 10h works 60€ pay) or the boss won't even pay them after weeks of work (that is VERY common in the restauration industry).

This is a hard reality we can't ignore if we try to understand the situation. Give people decent situation and opportunities, and you'll see they'll integrate just fine. Only people who've been denied justice turn to antisocial behavior... that's a very well studied problem in social sciences since way before this latest immigration wave started. Remember that for a very long time, the nobles of Europe claimed to be of a different species (the blue blood) and that workers were genetically programmed to be aggressive, stupid and hard-working.

> maybe its just because they behave like assholes

Take anyone and treat them bad, they'll either become ultra servile, or start behaving like assholes. The same is true with immigrants, which fall into both categories.
There is a risk of creating variants by mass vaccination. If everyone has a uniform defense generated by a vaccine, this creates selection pressures for a variant that is able to maneuver around the vaccine induced immunity.
It shows that the changes were never as fast as now and still could be dangerous if humans were there.
Heh. It seems that all the jobs that explicitly say they are a family are the dysfunctional kind, but the jobs that do have the best qualities of a family don't need to say so. Maybe I'm overgeneralizing a bit, but "we're a family" has always been a giant red flag for me.
First thing I thought of when you said that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYAw79386WI

Done properly, it's an amazingly powerful way of explaining things.
It's more than possible, it's actually likely given Israel's soaring number of breakthrough cases in an almost entirely vaccinated population.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/08/grim-warning-israel-...

The vaccines have applied selective pressure to create super strains. It won't be long before we have a covid strain akin to airborne AIDS. I'd say it's prudent to have a good N100/P100 respirator for if and when that time comes.

The polio vaccine is nearly 100% effective. That's the difference here - the covid vaccines have efficacies as good as Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan ;-)
I shudder to think what Rust would look like without generics.
What does that have to do with generics? Surely they’d have written the same bad code monomorphised?
They sort of mention that in the breadth section. The idea is that natural immunity may target more than just the spike proteins the vaccine focuses on so may actually target more variants. One can imagine a scenario where continued (not initial) vaccination actually contributes to a longer spread with weaker immunity so more chance for variants to develop. Not saying this is 100% the case, but interesting article I’d like to see more data on.