skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Then they aren't 99% of the way. I do not like statements like this. 99% of what?
Sure not buying Apple is always a solution but if we're continuing the pizza analogy then surely a restaurant that would refuse to bring you an extra plate and tableware would be considered to have bad service?
That doesn’t work for a personal account.
You can take K&R C from my cold, dead hands.

There was no header file hell. Often you didn't need a single header to be included in your code: most functions returned int (or nothing), and if you needed something that returned double, you could just say so.

I remember being excited about function prototypes, but something was irretrievably lost at that point. The primal elegance of C as it was conceived by its creators is long forgotten now.

(If you want, you can still experience it with the Tiny C Compiler that seems to continue to understand K&R C code just fine.)
> What insurance company and what state?

You didn't tell us where in the EU, so why does it suddenly matter where in the US?
MC Hawking was wrong! He said "The earth is a not a closed system; it's powered by the sun!"

Anyway, that's not so much a misconception as it just terrible vocabulary.
You probably want to read the follow-up:

- How was it?

- Underwhelming. Hot and sweaty face, battery nearly dead, impossible to drink coffee or water. So I guess there is only upside :)
Where on earth did you get that notion from? Just because you use a particular phrase does not make it the only or the definitive version.

On a lark, for a lark, as a lark, larking about, and so on are all common. It's not some obscure quotation or meaning, it's just a simile comparing with the bird (perceived as happy).
The Unix philosophy includes the use of software libraries in one's programs, albeit only resorted to when truly necessary. That often involves resorting to many of these tricks, usually for the sake of greater software reuse.
Number one selling EV in China is a 'kei car':

https://insideevs.com/news/525542/china-wuling-hongguang-sal...
Throwing random percentages is silly. In reality, these vehicles have only been tested within a very tight scope, in near-controlled conditions in Arizona, California, etc. with very specific conditions for their operations.

I would consider it 99% complete when I can pull up a map, point to any stretch of drivable road in the United States and ask it to autonomously operate there.

Specifically, there's an especially tricky road in I-35N in Texas where the lane markings come ago, yellow shoulder markings _merge_ into barriers, and the road condition is so bad that the steering rack will _turn_ by itself(!). We're not even close to calling this thing autonomous. If and when it gets to that point, I would consider it "99%" complete.

In reality though, I really see this tech being viable in continued controlled conditions. Maybe there will be a point when certain lanes will become dedicated "autonomous lanes", where they're completely isolated from the rest of traffic, come with special markings and sensor suites to assist driveler-less cars operate efficiently.

As long as the chaotic human element is ever present, regardless of how well they model these systems, it will fail to cope with the massive amount of discontinuous information humans inject into a situation (swerving into a lane, road rage, cargo suddenly coming loose from a truck, etc.)

Oh, and have we tested these things during winter? :p
I agree to a point. You need to do a good job of screening beforehand, because there's no shortage of "developers" who are applying for jobs they aren't qualified for and seeing what sticks. I'm speaking from the perspective of a small company, where we have a shorter, flatter process, so it may make more sense when it's a longer, more extensive process.
What? Pure fucking hubris.
Very clickbait-y title; it's more like "rural abandoned houses in need of repair [...]", def not the central Kyoto depicted in the header image.
So if you are "doing the crime" leave your electronics behind?
Ok, but supposing what you say is true, they are junk science when it comes to forensics. There is research on capturing the full 3D structure of fingerprints to actually capture the uniqueness of a fingerprint[0]. But even if the 2D scan is enough not every scanner is capable of collecting that structure.

Given how much R&D goes into making better fingerprint scanners, it seems odd to then claim that a fingerprint taken off of a victim has anything near that level of detail. I guess its sound to say that it may be used as a piece of evidence to further narrow down the target, but its completely disingenuous to claim that it's sound evidence.

[0]: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9160923
One counterargument is that many employees in finance are required to disclose outside business activity. From FINRA's perspective, getting paid to do an interview would be covered since it is remuneration that could be a conflict of interest with the current employer.

I.e., the employee would have to let his employer know that he got paid to interview somewhere else! Failure to disclose would result in disciplinary action from regulators, possibly leading to a suspension from the industry.
Why are you comparing apples to oranges? Would it be meaningful to compare a diesel truck company with a jet fuel plane manufacturer?
When it's your phone.
What Programming Books Are Developers Reading?
However the IRS states all income above $10 "must" be reported by the recipient.
> There are no news articles that explain how anyone will be falsely accused for having pictures of their own baby.

Umm... hash collisions that everyone keeps warning about is not enough?, all the discussions so far, I'll just go ahead and assume your comment here is in bad faith.

> The system is even resistant against intentionally created false positives.

Famous last words... Here's one of the top posts for reddit.com/r/apple

https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/p930wu/i_wont_be_pos...

Here's a really high quality collision: https://github.com/AsuharietYgvar/AppleNeuralHash2ONNX//issu...

Here's 2 totally different images off by a single BIT: https://github.com/AsuharietYgvar/AppleNeuralHash2ONNX//issu...

Here's a dog and a kid colliding: https://github.com/AsuharietYgvar/AppleNeuralHash2ONNX//issu...

It took a few days after extracting the model to show how flawed it is... Apple's only 'security' feature here was obscurity...

It's so broken the person doing analysis above stopped as Apple will only change the hash function to include his pictures as training data instead of fixing the whole system.

Are you still convinced?

Having a second 'perceptual' hash doesn't really add much value... I'm not an expert, here's a better view on why: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28243031

Also funniest bit from that on how broken it is

"Finding a SHA1 collision took 22 years, and there are still no effective preimage attacks against it. Creating the NeuralHash collider took a single week."
Pay them a reasonable hourly rate for the time this consumes. A good rule of thumb for any sort of short-term contract work is to take the annual salary and divide by 1000. Definitely don't pay them less than the long-term hourly rate, which is salary divided by 2000. So if your desired applicant pool is getting $200k, offer them $100-200/hour.
It's not reported.

Through I have heard that VW isolates cells a bit more then some older EVs which could mean you might be able to cool down the "battery pack" enough to prevent the fire from "jumping" over to other cells.
National Health Expenses, 1960-2018: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2019/045-508.pdf

Linked from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/health-expenditures.htm

In 2018, hospital care is about 33%. Professional services (physician and clinical services, 20%, dental services, and other) is about 26%. Retail medical products is 12% (prescription drugs, 9%).

Net cost of health insurance is 2.6%, which is "Difference between premiums earned and benefits incurred. This is the amount of health insurance spending attributed to nonmedical benefit expenses such as administrative costs, additions to reserves, rate credits and dividends, premium taxes, and profits. This category includes the net cost for private health insurance companies that insure enrollees in Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and workers’ compensation (health
portion only)."

It would be nice to have a breakdown of hospital budgets, but I cannot find any.
Agree with you but sooner or later people are going to have to account for the real costs. “Cheap” doesn’t account for the hidden cost to the environment. Small engines, counterintuitively, generally pollute much more per mile than larger engines.
Shouldn't be a problem with Starlink, $100/month for 50-100Mbps.
If ammonia-powered ships are visiting a port, then that port and any nearby cities need an evacuation plan in case of an ammonia leak.
Right now, our roads are only designed to be human-readable.

But what if machines become the dominant drivers? We need to make the roads machine readable: Road signs redesigned 'QR Code' style, maybe even some kind of wireless broadcast system to communicate traffic light changes.
De jure, no.

De facto, VISA gift cards.
Oil leaking on to an exhaust manifold count?

https://money.cnn.com/2015/10/27/autos/gm-recall-fire/

As someone else mentioned, I wasn't trying to argue either car catches fire more or less. The parent was suggesting ICE cars catching fire while parked practically never happens, when millions of ICE cars in the last few years have been recalled for such things. Lots of people have had their houses burn down from ICE cars being parked inside. A parked car catching fire isn't something new to battery vehicles.
That's kind of mincing words: arguing that the Central Dogma isn't an incomplete description of the information system, it's just a complete description of the information of a subsystem.
I bought a Model Y last year, in spite of my range anxiety. My first road trip alleviated that concern for me. Range anxiety is real, though. While I think the need for a "super long range" model isn't necessarily needed, it can go a long way to solving the short-term dilemma in consumer mindsets.
I think you're conflating issues with the institution of policing within the United States with the behavior of individual police officers. Without getting into the politics or philosophy of the comportment or purpose of a police force, there are some things in situations like this that are fact:

1. Police officers (and more importantly, prosecutors) are incentivized to make arrests and have those arrests stick.

2. It's a well understood psychological phenomenon that individuals are much more lenient of their own actions. They call this attribution theory in psychology [1].

3. While policing is a risky job, it comes with privileged treatment, powers, and trust that a common citizen does not have. As such, and as public servants, we hold those with these powers to a higher degree of responsibility and behavior than those without such powers. To hold police accountable, we need a minimum level of oversight and control. Historically, this has either not happened or been circumvented by way of police unions establishing ill-advised contracts with the local governments they work with. [2]

I'll agree on points that individual police officers aren't evil, but I'd need a lot of convincing to believe that many policing organizations within the United States are not being held accountable to an acceptable level; nor are they being trained in ways that encourage appropriate interactions with the public they serve.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_(psychology)

[2]: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?arti...
He does not look dishonest. He looks like the hero we all deserve. Dial it back a bit, would you?
I imagine that if a company is paying, it would increase the level of entitlement on their part.
Veritasium also tested different versions of the thumbnail. Here's a snapshot of when the thumbnail said "It's important; I'll explain with data:" https://i.stack.imgur.com/XuUES.png

I saw the video shortly after it was released, and I thought it was ironic the video had a relatively weak thumbnail and title.
Shame seeing Twitter going the way of pinterest.

I’ll assume the rest of the thread is just as informative.
Something about type constraining auto just seems funny. I can see how it's useful from an error minimization / code clarity standpoint, but it almost seems counter to the point of even using auto.
I wonder if any notable sites forgot to turn off their WAP/WML interfaces.
I think that's why the article proposes adding command line options and alternative APIs to output JSON objects not forcing all things the use objects all the time.

For any serious data retrieving or scripting the light object wrapping will be superior. For quick one off use maybe the plain text option will be quicker to reason about.
> A family friend’s daughter broker her arm in Mexico on vacation. Total cost to be seen and casted? $73 cash.

One of the issue is that a most of the healthcare issues that young, healthy people run into are surprisingly cheap. But the big costs come from chronic and elderly care. Who are the people who can't afford it. So it always seems like young, healthy people can get a better deal, but then who will pay for them when they're old?
With $450,000 as yearly pay i should give up being a software developer. Alameda even has a violent crime rate of half the US average.

https://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-Alameda-California.htm...

I do wonder if the pay negatively affects the confrontations that the individual officer will risk, e.g. let a suspect escape due to not having good enough backup.
The problem isn’t interurban driving. It’s driving to the countryside. Drive to Grass Valley for a weekend and then to the countryside from there or drive to lake Sebago and drive to the countryside from there. That’s what people in metro areas do for their weekend jaunts. Go to a nice place far from the urban area then want to explore the countryside surrounds there.

There may be areas where that works but I think the anxiety for that is reasonable.
Copyright Bouke van der Bijl

I do not give anyone permissions to use this tool for any purpose. Don't use it.

I’m not interested in changing this license. Please don’t ask.
Low-effort==half assed.
My bet is that the user research would say the cast majority of iPhone usage is indeed personal, but that a major amount if iPad usage is shared, especially among children (and even moreso in poorer areas where an iPad-per-child isn't affordable). And I'd bet Apple knows this, but wants to maintain the fiction to encourage more sales.

It's like Amazon waiting forever to include Chromecast functionality to sell more Fire Sticks. I understand, but it's still degrading the user experience, and that just grates my cheese.
The idea that the Github terms of service negate "All rights reserved" in any public repository is a bold claim indeed.
This may be legally impossible to do for someone who's already employed. You can make the claim that it makes your interview more "valid" (although, I still think that you would be testing for the wrong things and focusing on what 1 person can deliver alone is a bad metric), but not more "inclusive".
I'm not entirely convinced about the rationale for hydrogen, but I'll play devil's advocate. If you burn the CH4 at the place of extraction, then you need a way to transport the electricity. This is a hard problem. You can instead ship the natural gas via pipes (or LNG) to some other place, close to the consumer, where it will be burned in a power plant. For this option, there will be leaks proportional to the distance the gas is shipped. A pipeline 100km long will leak 10 times more than a pipeline 10km long. When the famed analysis that claimed 3.5% average CH4 leakage came out, they simply did not consider the length of the pipe. If you instead immediately convert the CH4 into H2, and ship that via pipes, then you have no reason to have CH4 leaks beyond a tiny amount associated with the extraction itself (which would be there even if you decide to convert the gas into electricity on the spot). So, all in all, there's a case to be made that the conversion of CH4 into H2 would result in great reductions in overall greenhouse gas emissions.
I believe that the electric companies and charging networks won’t let a good market go unaddressed.
I'm not saying there isn't a good reason for a phobia--there usually is, whether a physical or emotional reaction. If the word doesn't fit here, that's fine, but "one of the worst experiences of my life" is pretty strong language, and I don't think it's a stretch to describe such a reaction as a disability.

The real point of contention is the extent to which the parent apparently believes their disability should be accommodated by society.

I have a few allergies myself, including to cats. I consider allergies, like I have, to be a very mild form of disability. I take some responsibility for my own very mild disability by packing an inhaler and antihistamines when I travel.

What I don't do is go around insisting that everyone else keep their animals away from me.

Now, does this mean that I believe everyone who fancies flying with a cat should be allowed to do so? Certainly not. There's a balance between those two extremes.

> preference of convenience and slight increase in comfort

That's a bit of a strawman itself don't you think? No, I don't think everyone should be allowed to fly with their pets simply because they prefer to. But your description certainly doesn't fit my friend, nor does it give adequate credit to the extent to which many people's companions help them with emotional and mental barriers to travel, such as agoraphobia.

So if the question involves a fantasy battle between @subjectsigma and my friend, then my desire would be for my friend to be allowed to bring her companion, and @subjectsigma to bring an inhaler and antihistamines. Just like I do.
I agree with you, but I'll throw in a few things on why I still want longer range cars (I currently own a 2018 long range model 3).

The first big thing is shorter stops. A 500 mile range battery can charge at a higher rate for longer than a lower range battery. Where you might need to go up to 90% to get to the next charger, a bigger battery means that you actually only need to hit 60 or 70% in order to get to that next stop. That means a longer time charging at 250kW which ultimately gets you further for the same time spent.

Now, for total trip time, maybe this matters less. However, for a charging infrastructure it means that you are cycling through cars more frequently. That means during holidays you have less cars that need to charge and when they do charge they need to charge for a shorter period of time, relieving congestion.

The other thing, and this may just be my neck of the woods, is tesla really needs to do a better job at charger placement. In the west, a lot of the chargers are in bad spots. They are often in hotel parking lots or general mall spots. This means that while at a gas station you might walk out, use the restroom or grab a snack, at a lot of these charge locations you are stuck in the car. You need to make a seperate stop to do all that.

We need more gas stations installing chargers. But if they do that, they'll probably want to do CCS and not Tesla... which means tesla needs to come out with a CCS1 adapter for the US.

None of this has made road trips in the Tesla terrible. I've done a 2000 mile trip and it really wasn't all that bad. That said, I'll certainly opt in for a larger battery pack when they are available.
Evolution is now accepted by a majority of Americans
Mirror: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1429464889307762688.html
The trick is not having a rural landscape at all. The most depopulated parts of my country would be considered urban in the US lol. Industrial estates, railways, highways...
I feel like one of the things a "Definitive Guide" to this feature needs to make clear, and maybe even emphasise, is a key way these are different than say Rust type Traits.

Concepts, just like the SFINAE and constrexpr hacks you should discard in their favour, are about only what will compile and you, the C++ programmer, are always responsible for shouldering the burden of deciding whether that will do what you meant even if you have no insight into the types involved.

Example: In C++ the floating point type "float" matches a concept std::totally_ordered. You can, in fact, compile code that treats any container of floats as totally ordered. But of course if some of them are NaN that won't work, because NaNs in fact don't even compare equal to themselves. You, the C++ programmer were responsible for knowing not to use this with NaNs.

Whereas, Rust's floating point type f32 implements PartialOrd (saying you can try to compare these) but not Ord (a claim that all of them are totally ordered). If you know you won't use NaNs you can construct a wrapper type, and insist that is Ord and Rust will let you do that, because now you pointed the gun at your foot, and it's clearly your fault if you pull the trigger.

This is a quite deliberate choice, it's not as though C++ could have just dropped in Rust-style traits, but I think a "Definitive Guide" ought to spell this out so that programmers understand that the burden the concept seems to be taking on is in fact still resting firmly on their shoulders in C++.

The other side of this is, if you wrote a C++ type say Beachball that implements the necessary comparison operators the Beachball is std::totally_ordered in C++ 20 with no further work from you to clear up this fact. Your users might hope you'll document whether Beachballs are actually totally ordered or not though...

I think this will likely prove to be a curse, obviously its proponents think it will work out OK or even a blessing.
Every time he was “convicted”, the prosecution was found to be in blatant violation of laws on appeal. They intimidated witnesses, kept black people off the jury, and more. So no, he was never rightfully convicted! The prosecution broke so many laws, way more than Curtis Flowers ever did! And they just did it over and over again for 20 years. None of them have faced any consequences. They effectively imprisoned an innocent man for 20 years because they didn’t like him. And big surprise, Curtis is black.
I'm sure that most criminals know to either turn phones off or leave them behind, and if they don't they surely will if this kind if thing becomes more widespread. This seems like a system designed to ensnare innocents.
Blinkist
This seems like a related question: what is the high-level process for building a JIT compiler? Specifically, where does the output of the compiler actually get stored, how does it get marked as executable, and how does it get "fed" into program execution?
Scrap the whole thing and start over.

Deliveries should be done by autonomous air drops.

Transportation by autonomous aircraft.
You are repeating a false statement.

https://www.nytimes.com/section/corrections

https://www.washingtonpost.com/policies-and-standards/#corre...

Repeating a falsehood, regardless of the Bellman's assertion, does not make it true.[1]

You seem to very badly want to believe a thing regardless of its actual existence. This will likely lead to problems for you eventually, if not already.

________________________________

Notes:

1. http://unpress.bandersnatch.org/carroll,lewis/snark.html
I didn't condemn them, I was just providing data for comparison, which the previous commenter asked for.