skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So Fedora should close up shop, and delete everything?

What if they disagree with your interpretation of the meaning and requirements of the GPL?
How do these things affect weight?

Thermic effect of food, for instance, seems to be the phenomenon where the metabolism increases after a meal. Metabolism is calories-out. So thermic effect of food isn't a refutation of CICO, just a complication. CICO is still the primary mechanism of weight control.

The main actual counterexample to CICO is water retention.
Get That Job at Grab
Indeed, for example this snippet from the Saltstack docs:

>For historical reasons, Salt requires PyCrypto as a "lowest common denominator". However, PyCrypto is unmaintained and best practice is to manually upgrade to use a more maintained library such as PyCryptodome. See Issue #52674 and Issue #54115 for more info

We wouldn't even be having that conversation with Go.

There would be no weird "lowest common denominator" dependency. There would be no concerns about potential conflicts between other crypto libraries, and no choice to make about which "better" library you want to install. Plus of course the 10 other non-crypto dependencies that Salt needs.

All you'd need is a binary, config file(s) and an init script and you'd be good to go.
I used to assume that people, on the whole, were rational and reasonable. I now understand that most people can maintain rationality only for the domains in which they have first-hand experience or education, and otherwise will resort to hearsay, fantastical speculations, conspiratorial thinking, and propaganda of all sorts. It is becoming ever more clear to me that the potential genius of a representative system of government is the chance for citizens to put their trust into informed and reasoned individuals to make decisions in their name. We should elect reasoned people, and review their record, not day to day, but bi-yearly, so that our ignorance does not impede their work. Of course, when the representative system has been distorted as it has, we do not trust or respect our representatives.
I agree, but I am afraid that our two party system, which is incentivized to 'politicize' (I dislike that broad term) everything, it would be quite hard. The one party proposes it, the other party will find "reasons" why it's either government overreach, or discriminatory, or something something something depending on the ideology. Purported ideology. Most likely it's another horse that gets debated in debates about a package of other things.

But yes, I wish we could be as modern as some European countries. I haven't heard of these identity theft issues in France, where everyone has a national identity card.
DTC Sunglass Wars: Blenders Eyewear vs. Shady Rays. Who Is Winning the Battle?
A friend of a friend is a very very popular performer on onlyfans, and my friend noted that she is flush in amazon gift cards (at least when he told me this like 2 years ago). That seems to be the primary mode of payment because it looks innocuous in bank/credit card records.
Thank you for the feedback! We are in the process of launching a new site in the next week or 2 and will make sure this is fixed.
Does this extend to salary, wealth, or other more adult signals of status and achievement, or are those actually the goal?

There are just a few logical steps off the path of social expectation that will lead you to either solipsistic narcissism or the opposite direction to Zen Buddhism. The middle path is there not because we agree with it, but because we can’t decide what we do agree with.
Given the turnover, and a vesting schedule, the net value to the workers probably increased.
How are MVNOs able to offer a lower price than the carriers? I was interested but didn't switch because I was worried they are selling my info or something.
If you say so.

Let's table it.

Anyway.

So... how about them Yankees?
I can't say which distro grandparent is using on their Pinephone, but when they say split-screen they could very well mean, literally, what one would find on a desktop.

While personally, this sounds cumbersome to me, some people have very unusual ways of using their Pinephones. To me, that's awesome - we've settled on "how one uses a mobile phone" based on what Google and Apple have designed. Having new, off-the-wall ideas will lead to some people doing slightly insane things, and I say that in the most positive way possible.

Finally, as long as we're straying firmly off-topic: What some people are doing with their mobile Linux devices always reminds me of an Apple ad [0], from when "Think Different" was still the motto of an underdog.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjgtLSHhTPg
In the rare case I make a call without first asking/warning someone I always follow up with a text (even if I leave a VM) saying "Everything is ok, just let me know when you are free to talk" or something similar.

I absolutely love the transcription service for voicemails on iPhone because it means I can easily scan the contents of the messages of people who don't just text after a failed call.
>How does whatsapp is cheaper than facetime?

Whatsapp ,Skype, Telegram, Google Duo, etc apps work fine on Android phones which are lots less expensive than Apple Devices that are needed for Facetime
At one point a lot of people only got school up to 8th grade. Then eventually everybody is going to school up to the 12th grade. Maybe in the future it will just be customary to go all the way through 4 years of college.
You mean those sanctions that outlawed anyone to have any business with anyone (be they Ukrainian or Russian citizens) residing in Crimea?
I think this is derivative of humans inability to comprehend large numbers.

Do I have enough water for me and my family? Yes, I'm not thirsty and my crops look fine.

Do we have enough water for 10 billion people for the next 150 years? We have no clue.
Nothing in the GPL requires you to give the software to anyone who wants it. It just says that if you do give it to someone, you need to give them the source code too and not impose any restrictions of your own on what they can do with it. There's nothing wrong with what happened here from a software freedom perspective.
Yes, and many of those people are scientists. Skepticism is (or should be) a normal part of the scientific method. Controls and reproducible results need to happen before results can be considered conclusive. I understand that sometimes this is impossible in climate science. Climate change is a fact. Humans being responsible for increasing CO2 levels is a fact. Whether the consequences of raising CO2 levels will be more detrimental than beneficial is yet to be seen. There is little that the western world can do to slow CO2 emission growth. Raising taxes doesn't accomplish much.

Also, accurate observations of Greenland (present day and historical) are available here: http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/
It’s a soft paywall, protected only by cookies and JavaScript, bypass-able by using private browsing/incognito mode. Most news sites are — they give you your first N articles free and try to upsell, with the assumption that few will know to or bother to reset cookies, disable JavaScript or browse privately/incognito. (Surprisingly, the full text of the article is usually in the initial http response and only hidden by JavaScript running in your browser after the fact, based on the presence of a cookie from a prior visit - such a fragile and trusting system, but worth the upsell trade off to them.)

You can also go to https://archive.is and paste in the article url. They generate nice shareable url like this one for this article: https://archive.is/y58Py

Ironically, the Google AMP version of the article will have no paywall at all, and is usually accessible with a slightly modified article url, discoverable via Google search from mobile. In the case of the Washington Post simply appending outputType=amp does the trick. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/08/19/apple-csa...

Reader modes, like Apple’s, frequently, inadvertently, bypass soft paywalls, particularly when set to activate automatically, because they can see the hidden content on the page before it’s hidden.

There are of course browser extensions that automate all of this.

Few news sites use hard paywalls that prevent this. Whether you’re comfortable using private browsing or Google amp and not paying for the article is up to you.
Hopefully in the future website will be able to read our minds and know when not to show modals/banners, I hope the NeuroWeb standard comes soon /s
It almost sounds ironic...and not everyone likes irony.
It's not what they were saying, they said so themselves, but if you think they're related then answer my question. Should you be punished for the actions of your government?
No, I don't think they mean like that because that was an exceptional international scandal while people are normally and consistently afraid of violating ITAR regulations.
...the new CEO is from Bain capital.

That explains the introduction of black-box management-solely-via-P&L. If any position could be automated away, one would think that that sort of CEO could...
rhetorically I might agree but only in the context of obviously misusing the language to make a point.

ethically I don't agree that inaction is as bad as action, only that it's close.

silence could be apathy and apathy + inaction cannot reasonably can be considered violent
The few openings I flipped through all mention SPARQL in an offhand manner, in the sense of "familiarity with query languages and data ontology".
> Race is explicitly about using visible differences to mark a group of people as a “lower” class

A. That is not the usage by definition. That may be your interpretation, but that's not the common usage.

B. That is not the common way to determine race (visible differences). Genetic markers are generally the indicator (eg Ancestry.com).

C. That is not the sole reason (mark people as lower class). There are medical reasons to know the genetic ancestry of your forefathers. The is easily described as "race" and is only useful in a very general practical sense insofar as it narrows the possibilities for investigation into genetic consequences.

If anyone can point out a good reason in using it for more, that isn't looking to justify other or past behavior, I'd be interested in hearing about it. I might have missed something because I really don't think about race too much.
Nothing beats it for data exchange? You must be joking, because if it were remotely true RDF would be in wide use, which is totally not. Except a few niche domains like bioinformatics, it is not used. No killer application use it as a data format, no popular data format is based on it either. Actually I can think of a single data format based on RDF, and the only open-data I know which use it have been converted to it and was simplier to use in their original format.

And for the model: property graph. But yeah, enjoy your Stockholm syndrome with your model where reification is required to annotate an edge. Also even your nickname is an aknowledgment of RDF failure: named graphs (n-quads) were created because RDF triples aren't good enough for modeling data.
Probably falls under "I know it when I see it" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it
> they can choose to not give their number out to people

I assure you, I did not give my number (or email) to the spammers who contact me multiple times a day.

I'm sure they got it from some combination of public databases and data breaches. Like a fingerprint, I can't easily change my contact info, so here we are.

I want the smartphone without the phone. Signal audio is often better quality anyway.

Aside: I want callers who aren't explicitly in my phone's contacts to solve an audio CAPTCHA before my phone accepts their text/call/voicemail. This would not affect family or friends, would provide a path for important calls like medical, financial, or government calls, and would significantly increase the cost of spam.
I don't know about the author but for me it's not about headphones/being handsfree, it's the fact that the majority of phones and networks right now cannot handle both a voice and a data connection at the same time.

There's few things more quietly annoying than having something (internet-reliant) that I was doing be interrupted by a non-VoIP call, especially when it's someone I wasn't expecting a call from.
> Software freedom was always meant to refer to freedom for users, though, not freedom for developers.

Honest question, what is your source for this? Is it opinion or is it part of some declaration from some group?

What happens when a developer is also a user? As I get it, for this particular developer, the end effect is the same.

For me, a developer and a user are one in the same here, just different parts on a spectrum with many shades. I am extremely sympathetic to the author of the article because I really don't agree with the position alleged here:

>They're trying to keep Iranian contributors out of the code base because they fear the Iranian government can lean on him to plant malicious code.

This is not a threat vector, not really. Crytpo has made it that any developer with the skill and will can become the vector for such an attack. We can see this in ransomware readily, with almost weekly articles on how relatively unsuspecting developers are bought up and used to develop/spread ransomware, and I see absolutely no reason why a truly interested government couldn't do the exact same. If it's good enough for the billions of dollars the crypto-gangs are running, I'm sure a government could make it work all the same...

I'm not sure I can see sanctions like this as anything but political posturing, and I question the efficacy of it when in practice, the result is stuff like this that just denies simple freedoms that the US has no right denying to anyone.

Edit: Just to clarify, I am not proposing you are personally responsible for the above claims or expecting you to defend them, my question(s) are in earnest and combined with some personal opinions of course. So if some of the statements seem challenging towards you, it is not intentional, just a late friday post for me.
It's also source-free. Love the flourish at the end with the typical third-wave male feminist line of "this has [probably] gotten sex workers killed" when what really kills sex workers is violent men and poverty/drugs.
Verifying myself: I am y3gits on Keybase.io
Yes by technical I meant people with detailed domain expertise including the law, not computer technologists specifically.

Can you clarify the nature of what you call extra-legal compulsion? (Edit to clarify: what you hear from folks in Apple) Is it the pressure to help stop the transaction of CSAM, a pressure that all image- and video-handling networked software providers experience? Or is it to deploy a client-side scanning service specifically?
In fairness it will.

They'll have twice the listing costs chasing the same client base.
> The moral bias IS entering at the level of the algorithm. In this sense the algorithm is morally baised.

> The moral bias enters when a person takes correlation coefficients to indicate meaning.

Changing your stance within 2 replies is not a good look.
What sort of costs go into these employees? I think I'm missing something, but not very familiar with costs of a worker who:
* has no benefits
* BYOD
* not eligible for benefits (they are explicitly called out in TFA as not eligible to become employees)

Is it just the cost of scheduling these workers?
Cheburashka is on the photo, wearing ClickHouse T-shirt.
In Germany the postal service does what GP described by validating someone's identity for various purposes

> Deutsche Post offers a secure identity check service – to millions of users every year.

> On behalf of your contracting party

> To ensure that only identified persons have access to sensitive services

> To sensitive services including those from the financial services sector (such as opening an online bank account), telecommunications (activating a prepaid SIM card), health care (access to health information) or the mobility industry (including car sharing).

https://www.deutschepost.de/en/p/postident.html
They usually spend less on advertising/store presence/... (e.g. around here the large mobile networks have branded shops and such, the MVNOs almost never have and either sell only online or a supermarket brand and piggybacking on that store network), their plans might have restrictions the main network ones don't have, ...

And in reverse, better brand recognition/(impression of) service quality allows the network operators to charge more and still get customers, the MVNOs need to be cheaper to compete with that.
To deal with this, a DNS entry "Root Domain Controls Wildcarts" could be required for the validation.
If you ever relinquish majority ownership of this company in exchange for funding, it will eventually become "Timeshares But As An App".

Your approach might be more principled than the way timeshare companies operate. But it also sounds like you're leaving a lot of money on the table, compared to the way timeshare companies operate. And investors won't let that continue if you can't convince them that your approach will somehow make more money than timeshare companies.
Right, what you outline here is exactly what I have in mind when I think of monorepo. I actually always assume the CODEOWNER is a mandatory code reviewer in this model. The import rules are less a guarantee since they rely so much on tooling support.
Timeshares have a weird mix of goals:

- Investment opportunity

- Potential rental income

- Personal enjoyment

and as a result seem like they don't really achieve any of those cleanly and this just seems like it kinda swirls those three around in a slightly different manner.

I was really hoping for something that was more of a larger scale investment business or something.
> there's basically no way TNG-era Trek was going to get made today.

I mentioned up thread, but I'd argue the success of Star Wars' Clone Wars animated show proves otherwise.

I think audiences are hungry for people solving problems by sitting around a conference table discussing options from their unique perspectives; especially now.
> It doesn't make you absorb food better, otherwise we would have already evolved to use that absorption process.

This is itself a thought terminating cliche. Has anyone actually checked?
So it being difficult is enough to absolve the company of responsibility?
Home Prices Are Now Higher Than the Peak of the 2000s Housing Bubble
The thread went to pot and I certainly helped that sorry. I'll try to keep it more substantial.
It's just that people are making the most out of social media. Others have decided to make a hustle out of it, and it's not a bad thing as it allows other people to have money to put food on their table.
That's a demand to the vice president, not to the people at the rally.
> The teenagers in the house got in trouble for tying up the line all evening to talk with their friends even after having spent all day with them at school.

They still do this, it's just over FaceTime/Discord/Zoom/etc. Also I don't see the voice->text move as something really that terrible. I have a discord with my close friends and we've essentially left FB groups for this instead. We can all share stuff and consume it on our own timetables instead of having to drop everything and engage at the exact moment someone wants to share. We can always drop into voice/video/screen-share if needed, it's really ideal for me and my friends.
I'm not terribly familiar with the group, but that whole list appears to be ad-hominems demanding absolute purity. Or at the very least should be taken with a large grain of salt.

I suspect the "anti-Semitic" bit comes from the founder comparing abortion to the Holocaust [0], which is... a deeply stretched interpretation.

As far as anti-LGBT goes... yeah, they're a conservative Christian organization, they're not likely to have a Pride float. But it's not a common "anti-" group that goes out of their way to have a Statement of Inclusion [1] included in their FAQs, in my opinion.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exodus_Cry

[1]: https://exoduscry.com/downloads/Statement-of-Inclusion.pdf
Given that legislation will realistically never keep pace with technology, would it be crazy to implement whitelist data collection law, i.e., no data can be collected unless explicitly allowed? Hypothetically, of course — congress actually putting something like this into law is a different story.
The US isn't Venezuela, and the USD isn't the Bolivar.
Ford Is Making an Electric Crate Motor
If you want to see it with this lens, then look at "trending." I don't tend to have an issue with the algorithm - I like that I get amateur science, humor, and puzzles.

I don't use it to watch political content, so I don't get much of it.
I think the phenomenon you're describing is a little tangential to motivation and to the profit sharing suggestion. Personal gain is a good motivator but it's far from sufficient motivation to proactively go and learn a new thing for most people.

In my experience, initiative in even its most short-sighted forms (such as 'encounter problem, see straightforward way to prevent problem from recurring, take action to implement this solution') is quite unusual. True 'long range' initiative, where someone spontaneously identifies desirable but as-yet unreached goals and invents and implements non-obvious plans to attain them, is incredibly rare. No matter how you try to incentivize it most people just don't work like that.

What companies need to do (IMHO) is to recognize this aptitude when it does show up, and give these individuals the freedom to implement their improvements. This will matter more to them than any normal amount of money.
I know a few founders that should read this straight away
I believe you are using the terminology incorrectly. According to Wikipedia, we currently are in an an ice age that began approximately 2.6 million years ago:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_glaciation

Within this ice age, we've had glacial and inter-glacial periods. For example, Europe's "Little Ice Age" was a glacial period within this ice age:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age

Currently, we're in an inter-glacial period.
Not sure if it's a problem of perception or just the lack of legal responsibility. As long as the legal and financial risk isn't owned by the party using the SSN for a purpose they shouldn't (identification), nothing will change.
Has anybody in history ever said "I'm cutting up my MasterCard because this porn site takes it!"

Organizing a boycott like that seems almost impossible. There just isn't enough realistic competition and going back to paper checks is just not happening, especially online.
No technology can enable you to communicate with someone who will not communicate with you. In order to get "actual access" you need a willing participant on the other end of the wire.

The law prohibits transfer "in any manner". Fedora isn't going to implement any of those in violation of the law.
My bad, I think I misinterpreted your question! Each home has a reserve fund that is paid into by all co-owners. For standard fixes/improvements, Ancana will handle the work and pay for it out of the reserve fund.

If a co-owner stops paying their monthly fees, they are in violation of the real estate contract and liable to forfeit their ownership in the home. Similar to someone defaulting on their mortgage.
The expectations I've most commonly encountered are less than two hours for a business IM, or less than 36 hours for an individual-to-individual business email.
headless browser is not the solution because ui may be very brittle. I always have to update my scrappers as people tend to change ui time to time.

Headless browser is only solution if upstream website don't change their ui and is very stable.