skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Have someone somewhere remote-control the cars when they get on a construction site.
Is there still a chance of an eBPF based effort (bpfilter) making nftables unnecessary in the near future?
Although at first I wanted to give the benefit of the doubt by thinking maybe it was made by someone named Chad or whatever, the name of their newest release ("MegaChad") points toward it being a reference to Chad Thundercock, a fictional character in a series of 4chan memes popular among members of the "incel" community. Probably not something a "serious" or "professional" project would choose.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/virgin-vs-chad

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/gigachad
This is a bit of a confusing take if you're using ag subsidies as evidence to keep the govt out of chip manufacturing but now denying that the subsidies aren't bad.

>The nightmarish results of agricultural subsidies in the US is an excellent reason to not involve the government

This sure sounds like you think it's a claim of subsidies being bad policy.

>The made claim was that the ineptitude and mishandling of agricultural subsidies is reason to reconsider

How do you combine the view that "ag subsidies aren't bad" with "the government shouldn't be in the business of managing subsidies" when the definition of subsidy involves the government? At first take, this comes across as back-peddling to avoid dogmatic cognitive dissonance.

But I'll be generous and assume you did not mean that ag subsidies are bad in and of themselves, but the way they are handled is poor. So what do think is a more proper way to handle them? Should the focus be on different products? If so, which ones?

The point has already been made that ag subsidies are operating as intended and the downsides you refer to are downsides of abundance. I have a feeling that most people who have actually lived with food scarcity would find them preferable to the actual "nightmarish results" of too little food.
>> with fiat money there is no reason for anyone to pay income taxes

Well you immediately give one reason people pay income taxes, so government can control behavior. Another is that the current income tax regulations provide the government with a justification for massive invasions of your privacy. These are both compelling features of an income tax.
Plenty of exploitative, capitalist, anti-consumer, business models are successful.
Thank you (and others) for taking the time to write suggestions but I’m more concerned with ethics and the law. Google doesn’t have the right to publish the photo of the wrong person next to my book and I hope they don’t do it again.
Yeah it doesn’t make sense as the x in 5x I would have thought repetesents a multiplication rather than (divide)

It would make more sense for me to say a fifth, or 1/5
I've just put Guix on a new desktop and have been really enjoying it. Required a bit of work, but I love anything Lisp related so it has been a joy to do the hacking. Also, a great and active community for its size, very helpful group.
Yes there was an explosion in SPACs and that died down back to normal levels but even before that plenty of companies that are performing very well went public via a SPAC. Saying it's "never reputable" is just wrong.

If somebody thinks all SPACs are pump and dumps they probably only learned about them recently through the media
How about employers stop scamming the people they depend on. Has anyone ever thought of that? Free market capitalists are now bitching that there's a market equilibrium for labor that doesn't factor in "fear of abject poverty." Cry me a fucking river.
'Inflation' is not the price increase of a single thing to demand/supply.

Inflation is the systemic increase in all costs of what a household would buy as money itself become less valuable.

Prices 'inflating' on a single product because there's a shortage of... base materials or whatever is not inflation as an economic term.
If you solve a puzzle then you will unlock the seed phrase for $250 in BTC
The wallet in question: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/bc1qg3qw7fhj5q7q6cxlafnangs3adey065pycdvcv

Just because I wanted to do something fun I put $250 bucks in a brand new wallet and I hid the seed phrase in a document. There should be enough clues to figure it out if you want to spend the time looking through. I have no idea if I made this hard or easy, it could take someone 5 minutes or it could take 5 days.

If you are interested head over to this link: https://fymhotsauce.rocks/blogs/news/solve-my-puzzle-and-win-250-in-bitcoin

TO THE MOON!!!

No purchases or anything required, just a fun giveaway that will require you to use your brain. If people really enjoy this I plan on doing more like it as I had a fun time planning it out.
That's nothing. As I said, compare Doom (1993) vs Max Payne (2001).

Or just a smaller gap. Doom (1993) vs Quake II (1997).

Night and day.

By comparison, kid, today you should be able to play a FULLY raytraced new release of AC or Watch Dogs with crazy photo-realist graphics (superior to even Forza 5) at least at 1080p.

Because that was the gap between a 1993 PC and a "Multimedia PC" with a Voodoo and MMX Pentium, if not a Pentium II which would curb-stomp the 486.

Oh, and we are emulating the PSX with VGS from Connectix, so add PS4 emulation on top of that with a mid-range PC from today.
It used to be true, 20 years ago. It hasn't really been true for at least a decade. RFID access control is really cheap and basically all buildings have it now. You could of course tailgate someone but that's crossing a line you probably don't want to cross.

I'm not sure why you'd bother though for computer science. There are plenty of very high quality lectures online.
Roblox exploiting young game devs according to startling exposé
They should switch their provider. That's prohibitive.
> businesses will look to technology to augment and/or replace labor whenever they can

But a big part of "can" is whether or not the solution using technology is cheaper than the solution without it. And a big part of that is the cost of human labor. If human labor is more costly, it is more likely that a technology solution that allow more value to be produced with the same human labor will be cost effective. Conversely, if human labor is cheap, plenty of technology solutions that would allow more value to be produced with that labor simply don't make business sense--you'd be spending more for the same output.

So while it's true that businesses are always looking for uses for technology, regardless of the current labor market, whether or not they actually end up implementing them does depend in large measure on the current labor market.
The chokepoint isn't the government in this case, but rather the major card brands (Visa, MasterCard, American Express). In the US, these brands have embedded morality clauses that prohibit these payments from riding their rails[1].

That being said, most US debit networks (Star, Pulse, Coop, etc) don't have these restrictions. It does damage the user experience to limit your card acceptance to most debit cards.

1 - https://thehill.com/policy/technology/548279-mastercard-upda...
This seems to be in keeping with the general theme of things.
> This could be via AI, or other automation systems.

All of which require chips that even companies like Toyota can't get enough of to maintain their production goals. When Toyota says, "Yeah, this chip shortage sucks, we're going to be 40% lower in monthly production," you know it's not just a few people suffering gaming GPU shortages.
We've built the world's most expensive Uber driver... in misreading, my subconscious espousing wisdom.
Even better, you can just bake that metadata into the column headers. CSVs have no mechanism or widely accepted habit on skipping over entries - it's safer and more portable to bake any control data you need into the place reserved for it - the header line.
It’s up to them how they make money, but framing it as a “survival” tactic is frankly pathetic. Admit it is easy money as your own boss, but don’t try to play victim at the same time.
It does not investigate archive.org (although it did use it to track changes in the archives that were studied).
Related: The last time I've checked a standard Ubuntu does not have RAM compression (ZRAM) enabled by default (unlike current Windows and Mac which have that for years). It helps a lot with programs like browsers.
Same. I ran Linux 0.12 on my 386sx 16mhz in my dorm and it changed my life (literally).
Oh boy... I'm just here from watching WEF videos on YouTube. I'm gonna go hide in a cave now.
I agree with you that MSFT using their own file format is not abusive, but it's also true that Word has traditionally (say, last 20 years) had a MUCH MUCH larger market share than anything that came before.

Its closest real competitor was WordPerfect, but by the time the world shifted to Windows versions of thing (ie, not DOS versions), WP's goose was cooked and the only real player in offices was Word.

It's not that way now because of inroads made by online tools / web-native things that make traditional document production less important than it used to be, but they're still the 400 pound gorilla. They're just not really a monopolistic gorilla.
Human Resources :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNZ7oto4z4A
It started with Reagan. People just didn't realize that it was the boiling frog scenario. It won't end with MTG and Boebert.
FTC says Facebook has been a monopoly ‘since at least 2011’
One of the other issues is that we have very few dual expertise scientists/experts. Someone who is a domain expert in both battery manufacturing and AI, for example, needs to be the person in charge of using AI to predict battery problems. However, domain expertise is difficult and time-consuming to acquire. In a metrics-obsessed organization, the time to develop expertise is considered non-productive, so nonsense propagates.
Fixed-income products are generally priced in yield, even though the actual agreements mention dollars. The futures for treasury bonds are literally denominated in yield points, but most (fixed-income) things it's more "people denominate in USD and think in yield".

That is, everyone trading bonds/certain commercial real estate/mortgages/preferred stocks/etc. converts them to a % return, with different yields falling in different risk categories. So you might get 3% on a relatively safe commercial bond, 10% lending to Turkistan, 4% on a property in the middle of a desirable city, 13% if it's filled with asbestos and shut down by the city.

It would be possible to price a mortgage in any continuous ratio between USD/Bitcoin, though I suspect the imputed interest rates for an already-low mortgage rate would make it undesirable. Someone would just have to punch current prices into a spreadsheet to see how it affects the yield.

I would expect Bitcoin specifically to have a high interest rate holding a long position(since Bitcoin people want high leverage), and the short position to have an implied positive yield. So banks should want to price in Bitcoin since they like leveraged low-risk low profit. But I haven't looked at a price chart for that assumption.
It is at the intersection of pornography and parasocial online relationships (seen in Youtube, Twitch and other influencers), both extremely profitable. Looking at some of the revenue breakdowns the fees to message are just as significant as subscription costs.

On average I don't think it is particularly healthy to replace real social/ sexual relationships with parasocial ones and I think that is the primary use for these services. For the most part they lack real meaningful intimacy which is a significant benefit that real relationships provide. I don't think many who maintain healthy social and romantic relationships are the majority of users of the platform.
With coc.vim/Native-LSP I hardly feel the need for an "IDE" experience. I had troubles (and almost switched back) with autocompletion and syntax detection before LSP but now I think it's at par with most IDEs.
Right, you want to wrap this code, exactly like Rust.

The point isn't that this is impossible it's that in both cases you want to write a wrapper to use them ergonomically in your modern software, C++ doesn't magically make 1980s code more respectful of object lifetime management than you'd think by reading Stroustrup's book at the time just because modern C++ (and the modern edition of the book) spends more time on this problem.

I think Jason Turner put together a little example about this type of wrapping as the more sane way forward for people who've persuaded themselves they can't stomach a C++ ABI change because they have binaries with no source or their system is too complicated to re-test. Maybe as a C++ Weekly.
> You've cost Apple time and money by making them review each such fake report.

Ok, but… how do I profit? If I wanted to waste Apple employee time, I could surely find a way to do it, but why would I? The functioning of society relies on the fact that people generally have better things to do than waste each others time.
Well, all of them have been forced to curtail some kinds of content in response to outside pressure as well. OnlyFans is just unique in being all-in on this one kind.
If it can happen to porn it can happen to crypto. History is a pendulum. Those who believe otherwise may be right, but nobody is right forever.
I had fun with this. It’s not very accurate but at least it seems to get the basic food group right 50% of the time. I would add a keep searching button and use it to train the images better. That is probably a lot of work though.
The hubris of the title distracts from the achievement. Still curious how it fairs pumping gas and driving in the snow; two simple things many urban drivers can do.
People walk about 3 miles per hour which is faster than wildfires advance and noticeably faster than panicked people driving cars in gridlock. Camp fire was another time where many of the dead were found in their cars.

Maybe we should discuss whether the state of California should permit the development of dispersed towns where it's literally impossible for everyone to get up and leave, but it's probably neither here nor there with respect to Waymo. I would expect ten thousand Waymos to be able to get out of town in a relatively orderly and timely fashion, while ten thousand meat-driven cars in the same place and time is almost always an epic cock-up.
Sure, and what? My point was that left on its own, cryptocurrency is clearly on a trajectory to a permanent place in the financial system. Idk if it's good or bad, but it's happening unless global regulators all coordinate to impose extremely draconian measures to stop it. Otherwise, the technological and financial elements clearly have staying power.
I'm over here using Alt+Tab on Windows 10 with my arrow keys. Not sure why it isn't working for you.

I thought you were getting to the fact that "show desktop" isn't one of the options in Windows 10 Alt+Tab, which is something I really miss from Windows 7. Literally just now I was wishing it was still around. I know you can Win+D but sometimes you're just cycling through and realize you want to see the desktop.
Quake killed Cyrix - much of the grunt of quake was written in hand coded assembler optimised for the pentium.
Yeah, it's not a practical way to use your iPhone. For all practical purposes, Apple has unrestricted ability to push updates to iPhones.
Not wanting to admit that she knows perfectly well what it is she is doing, seems to be the obvious explanation. Like, what else could it be; how could one not understand that this must be it?
Wow - interesting story.
Hello,

Sorry about this. How can I reach you privately? I need your email addresses so that we can remove it from our communication line moving forward.

PS: I work at Sourcegraph.
> two countries

1. USA

2. UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand

Pick one from the first list, and one from the second list
Would you please contextualize your product against Apple Card Family?
This depends on the CNI plugin you're using. In particular, Cilium implements the entire firewall in eBPF.
Ad hominem is an appropriate form of reasoning in this case, although in context you might pronounce it "cui bono." It's reasonable to expect that when a group pushes a policy, the details of the policy will be engineered to serve their goals, and the policy will be tweaked over time to serve their goals better. Corporations want to make them happy so they can do business in peace. What will make them happy? Will it make them happy if most porn is created by workers who enjoy robust assurances that their autonomy, consent, and medical safety will be respected? Or would they regard that as a nightmare of legitimized industrial-scale psychological harm to women?

In porn as in abortion, prohibitionists are numerous and committed enough to be a force to reckoned with, but they strategically justify their work using reasons that the rest of society finds persuasive. Anti-abortionists believe that abortion is inherently wrong, but they talk about women's safety while they shut down clinics.

The difference is, the groups who care about the safety of women will look at the details and say, the effect of this supposed "reproductive safety" bill is that thousands of women will lose access to legal abortion. Even if it targets shortcomings at poorly staffed, decrepit facilities, they won't support it if it actually makes women less safe. Overall, will shutting down OnlyFans payments make things better or worse for the women on it? People who aren't asking that question don't actually care.
The title of this seems... precarious. Wouldn't a better title be something along the lines of...

> Epic alleges Google considered [a] coordinated, multinational, hostile takeover attempt [of their business]

... given legal proceedings seem to be on-going?

Also, from TFA:

> In a statement, a Google spokesperson said, "As we have stated previously, Epic's lawsuit is baseless and mischaracterizes our business conversations. Android provides more choices in mobile devices for developers and consumers."

(@dang, not urgent, but thoughts?)
Seems like long term the human race is going to lose this ability if something serious is not done to reduce the complexity of building these things. This pandemic has shown that everything is super fragile and with Climate Change on the horizon I cannot believe they decided to build this damn thing in Arizona of all places. Maybe the collapse people were right and we should be working on CollapseOS

[1]: https://collapseos.org/
Google knows that it is wrong according to this article, but they still comply.
Note - there's several levels of caching at wikipedia. Even if those pages aren't in cdn (varnish) cache, they may be in parser cache (an application level cache of most of the page).

This amount of activity really isn't something to worry about, especially when taking the fast path of logged out user viewing a likely to be cached page.
A few weeks back I sent money to someone on the Solana network and they saw it in their wallet before I could say I pressed send. That’s fairly valuable.
How do I maintain referential integrity?
Now they have to compete with much more deeply entrenched and successful rivals like Patreon, I think they won't be long for this world, unless they can offer creators a better deal than Patreon because they started out as adult its hard to then shed that association.
Super-cool vendor lock-in strategy, and neatly, the unwritten terms of service "host your new content here, we have X videos of you doing Y, Z,,," and it is totally normal and ok now.
/s
I much prefer ingesting CSVs into LibreOffice since it's a lot more upfront about what encoding it's going to try and use and the delimiter it has chosen - and those choices are extremely easy to modify and flexible. Excel also has a habit of utterly clobbering character encoding on export - once you start seeing umlauts and cedillas in your text you'll notice that Excel has a really bad habit of chosen latin-1.
There were many examples of voyeur, creepshot, revenge and ex-partner videos.

None of which had the consent of all parties involved.
>a lot of men don’t think rationally about sex, and I think that has various societal causes

Really? I don't think so. My understanding is that sexual activity (or lack thereof) affects hormonal balance and that in turn affects mood. To make a very blunt example, if someone isn't getting any and the fake interaction provided by OF makes them feel better, do we really need to look for a societal explanation? If I give you a painful but harmless electric shock and you try desperately to get away, do I need to posit that it's because you've been culturally conditioned to be afraid of electric shocks?
This sure feels like an awfully idealized thought exercise of the classroom experience.
Did you include the time it takes to buy solana on an exchange and the time it takes to sell solana on another exchange and settlement periods on both sides? You said send money, which solana is not so you should include the whole process.

Instant payments have been available through the world for ages, SEPA for instance and soon RTP in the US but that value doesn’t accrue to the underlying currency. That makes the service valuable not the medium.

Not to mention square cash and Venmo. The value is captured in the equity of the companies not in dollars. Now you could tell me solana is both like paying someone in square shares via square cash but now you’ve got a security on your hands and about 1000 more problems.
Graphics buffers and kernel drivers. But NetBSD can be slimmed down in a really hard way. You just build the devices for your hardware and nothing more.
This is akin to dictatorship.
Faster 125 FPS, 165B version

<canvas id=c><svg onload=setInterval("for(c.width=64,i=4096;i--;)c.getContext('2d').fillRect(X=i&63,Y=i/64|0,1,Math.sin(Math.hypot(X-32,Y-32)/2-++t/4e4)/4+.5)",t=8)>
> number one regret

This is sometimes phrased as an absolute: no one says they did not work hard enough.

But if you have a great vision which could be of service to others -- aka valid dream -- you could regret not working hard enough.

But a dream might usually be orthogonal to "time at the workplace".
Whoa I'd be very interested to read more about this, if possible.
The author of this series has done an excellent job breaking down some of key aspects of React's rendering into good explanations with some nifty illustrations.

As linked in this article, folks might also be interested in my very extensive post "A (Mostly) Complete Guide to React Rendering Behavior" [0], which goes into a lot more detail on the nuances of this.

I also generally recommend reading some of Dan Abramov's posts that explain how and why React works, including the "Complete Guide to `useEffect`" [1], "React as a UI Runtime" [2], and "Before You memo()" [3]. Finally, it's worth noting that some of React's batching behavior will change in React 18 to always batch renders even across event loop ticks - see the React 18 Working Group post on "Automatic Batching for Fewer Renders" [4] for details.

FWIW, some of this material is being incorporated into the upcoming React docs rewrite [5], which I'm really excited to see go live.

[0] https://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2020/05/blogged-answers-a-...

[1] https://overreacted.io/a-complete-guide-to-useeffect/

[2] https://overreacted.io/react-as-a-ui-runtime/

[3] https://overreacted.io/before-you-memo/

[4] https://github.com/reactwg/react-18/discussions/21

[5] https://github.com/reactjs/reactjs.org/issues/3308
Aye, I rarely touch desktop stuff these days. Most of my efforts now get deployed into our Azure environments these days, which I have to confess I bloody love. I used to work for an ISP and Webhoster back in the 2000's building out provisioning and billing apps. With Azure I sure don't miss having to manage fleets of physical servers any more, even the big iron VM boxes we ran.