skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> For instance, the "it only scans photos uploaded to iCloud" element isn't just an arbitrary limitation that can be flipped with one line of code, as some folks seem to think

It might be a happy incident if their architecture limits this feature to CSAM now, but their ToS are clearly much more general-purpose than that, strategically allowing Apple to pre-screen for any potentially illegal content. If ToS remain phrased this way, surely the implementation will catch up.
> TSA (Thousands Standing Around) is much more effective as a jobs program than a security program in my estimation.

A jobs program for the private screeners that the TSA replaced.

It’s main original purpose (at least, of federalizing screening) was an excuse to transfer liability for future risks away from the airlines, which the airlines explicitly lobbied for in the immediate wake of 9/11.
For a two-body problem the discrepancies between your model and reality increase gradually with time, but it's still possible to predict eclipses decades in advance with a precise albeit imperfect measurement of initial conditions.

With a three-body problem any slight shift causes a wildly different trajectory, bearing no resemblance to the original so your measurements of the initial condition have to be perfect.
And they can always tax again later.
Another one I've heard is that CGNAT shared IPv4 addresses lead to higher hardware requirements to manage that CGNAT. So just by having IPv6 support and having more traffic go through native IPv6 saves ISPs hardware that would've been required to manage the CGNAT.

Found the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75h4gm7t1oI
Tax residency is a very complicated matter but in general, you do not loose tax residency 183 days after leaving.

In Spain, it takes 5 years before losing tax residency after you've left the country.
In France, having your wife and children in France makes you resident even if you don't live there.
In the UK, you can be resident by only spending 15 days in the country if some other conditions are met.

On top of that you have to add the interaction between national law and double taxation agreements between countries.
If they did, they would have done this much sooner.
This is an interesting finding. Animals have culture. And it can disappear. So can human culture. That's good to know. It's part of the human culture that we know that culture can disappear unless we try to preserve it.
It’s possible that this means no employer taxes either, which shields the employing company from having to set up a local tax entity, which is otherwise a huge barrier for US FAANG-type employees as I understand it. I know that I can’t work from any other countries currently, and I’m curious if these types of visas/arrangements would remove that barrier.
The indictment here that Agilebits was willing to go above and beyond to maintain native code on both iOS and macOS yet couldn’t justify it even after going all-in on SwiftUI for iOS is striking. It demonstrates just how hard cross-platform is and how far off Apple are with getting SwiftUI to ubiquity.
Apparently Java still won't have algebraic data types, which are very useful for this kind of code. It does have records, which are like kotlin data classes, a slightly more compact switch statement, and "pattern matching" which isn't actually pattern matching, it just allows you to omit a cast in an if branch if the if condition checks the type using instanceof.
I’m going to send this to my brother, he has been thinking of doing telemedicine and touring the US in an RV, maybe this is even better. Is the internet in Costa Rica as good as the article says?
I am sorry that carrying this discussion won't be productive for me --- and looks like for you as well. I told that there were assumptions, and now there are more of them including the ones about my personality. I hope to have a better discussion in future.
Another huge problem is that companies are handling out IPv6 by bulks of /128 subnets per machine, and many experts encourage “one IP per service on the machine”, adding “it’s good for security since it’s harder to scan all ports of all subnet IPs. So at that pace, I still wonder how IPv6 will not run out of IP as quickly as IPv4.

One IP per server should be the norm.
I always knew the new valium-lgbtq-ceo is going to fuck the company over.
I'm not really blaming trolls for gaming the system. Rather, I'm saying that any ad-based platform will one way or another evolve to have such an UI that encourages trolls, because they help its bottom line.
It depends on the double taxation treaties signed between your country of citizenship and the country where you live. Some will allow you to pay no taxes in your citizenship country, other will ask you to pay the difference, and maybe there are other situations too. You’ll have to check the treaty and/or talk to a specialist.
I’ll be interested to see how React Native on desktop progresses.

The developer productivity and consistency gains of working on one codebase rather than 2 or 3 cannot be argued with, and I’m confident more and more software will be moving in this direction regardless of the opinion of (what is probably) a fairly small number of hardcore users.

However, I do agree that Electron can give a sub-optimal experience compared to a native app in many cases. React Native could potentially provide a good compromise - write your app in JS but it renders using native UI widgets, resource usage is lower because it’s just using a JS engine rather than a full browser.

It would probably be more work than Electon because each platform will have differences in how it renders, but much less work than building separate native apps.

Last time I checked on RN on MacOS (well over a year ago) it was quite immature, but with Microsoft pushing it on both Windows and Mac, it could become a realistic option soon (if it’s not already).

Not sure if there’s anything on Linux? You could maybe fall back to Electron, with the the UI rendered via react-native-web to turn it back to HTML.
The company can record phonecalls with customers as long as the customers agree, which is already being done under the disguise of "improving customer service". The company cannot record all phone calls an employee makes.

The company can simply require all customer communication to go through a proper CRM. This way there is no need to look into an employee's personal inbox.
Not really, though you are probably just making jokes.

"Resources" can surely mean "assets" (note that the relevant resources are selected...), which is not at all diminishing or ghastly, and also honestly means "what is available to fulfil a need". Implication of «expoitation» (or, even farther, "expendability") is not necessary, though "being used" is surely there - but that is the job itself.

"Capital" implies "investment" - what you invest is the principal, "capital", while the additional returns are the secondary part -, not necessarily that «ownership» that implies a loss of freedom: contractually, you allow your employer to make your work part of an investment. Again, it is the job itself. The capital is what you have invested and returns after having brought fruit: again, they are assets.

Terms have broad semantics, it is never a good idea to interpret with partiality. :)

Edit: I am not denying that some employers may de facto as if interpret "resources" and "capital" dishumanly: I am stating that the fault is not in the jargon.
This is assuming that TSMC is naive and gullible enough to strike an agreement with a temporary customer who is more a competitor that results in destroying relationship with long term trusted customers.

As another commenter pointed out it is more for Aurora and is a limited quantity order. And IIRC from articles posted online this super computer GPU samples were fabbed in Intel’s fabs. So I would expect more delays given Intel has to redesign for TSMC flows.
> Apple is really bad at this with the newer MacOS design,

They do, however, provide several options for dealing with this in their Accessibility settings - "Increase contrast", "Differentiate without colour", "Reduce transparency", etc.
> "hundreds and possibly thousands of entities with direct and indirect access to the database can upload SunnyMeadow.jpg labeled as CSAM content, and it's blindly accepted."

According to whom?

> "it is known to be a mess already."

According to whom? You've posted a number of claims about the CSAM database administration process on HN and the one instance where you've cited a source, it's been a junk source.
No, the fundamental difference is that the two-body problem can be solved analytically, you can write down a formula. For three bodies and up you only have numerical solutions, simulations, and they will break down over time.
And they have to compete with other countries.
"Actors is a feature that is part of Swift's Structured Concurrency, bringing a brand new format to write and deal with asynchronous cod" ,

Brand new? I thought Carl Hewitt invented Actors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model
You should read the full article, especially if you're a Democrat.

Democratic party leaders and backers are stunningly corrupt - essentially above the law.

It's been reported that KSA gave the Clinton Foundation over $2 billion to date, which dried up when she lost her last run for office. Hmm.
No that's not it. The two body problem has a closed, analytical solution, the three body one doesn't, so you need to simulate it. It's a fundamentally different approach.
Qualia is not meaningless because we are nothing without it.

Take sensations away and you turn into a vegetable in a couple of hours -- see solitary confinement, isolation tanks and so on.
There are cases in classical mechanics that fail to be deterministic.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/403574/what-situ...
Not sure what the discussion is about, but the restricted approximation only works for "insignificant" masses (e.g. a moon if talking about two big planets and a star). And even then for "short" time periods (a few million years). In larger scales even that mass will (I assume you've heard of the butterfly effect) play role.
> If you are interested to join our Invite only launch plz comment.

This sounds like a low effort way to inflate the discussion numbers and would lead to a thread full of useless comments.

HN aims for high quality thoughtful discourse, please don’t turn it into a Facebook-style thread to manufacture hype for your product.
This manual washing machine has a unique design that addresses a particular use case: helping refugees in humanitarian camps or those in most need.

The machine needs to be simple, robust and easy to repair. The capacity needs to be large enough for a whole family. This is different to the compact, flimsy plastic manual washing machines for small loads or for camping which are designed for occasional use.

The inventor, Navjot Sawhney, studied engineering at university i.e. a real engineer, not a 'software engineer'. I'm sure he's well aware of the physical constraints and engineering challenges in designing the machine. He actually spoke to the people who might use the washing machine to refine and update the design based on their feedback.

And the machine does address rinsing (wringing). The drum mimics a front-loading washing machine: a gentle speed for tumbling clothes as they as washed. Then a switch in gear (or crank) to mimic the spin cycle.

This whole thread is an odd mix of negative presumptions, nit-picks and tangents.
I guess that it is fast because modern browsers are fast, implement good algorithms to repaint just what need to be repainted, and delegate a lot of work to the GPU. Exactly like the Quartz compositor engine.
This would be interesting if it is the case - you remain a tax resident in and employed by a company in your home country, but you live elsewhere. No idea if such a thing is possible. International tax laws are beyond me!
I didn’t change it, I moved my content to Substack (under the name Privatdozent). Cantor’s Paradise is still on Medium
> The market is not normal because countries have invested massive sums of money into these companies without acquiring shares in return (...)

I don't believe this is a fair or accurate description of what really happens.

Countries invest in education and free and open research, countries invest in entrepreneurship and in people launching startups, and countries invest in partnerships between their public research and private companies to foster the creation of added-value products and services.

And in the end those companies pay taxes back to the state, which in Europe (where BioNTech is from) is higher than 20%.

Furthermore, your comment has nothing at all to do with markets. You're trying to pin onto the "market" tag one of the most basic characteristics of social democratic societies, where the state invests in infrastructure and in lowering or eliminating barriers to entry in business.
Thousands of Coinbase users now reporting they cannot access their funds
Better stated, the 2-body problem can be solved with a finite number of standard operations, i.e. a closed-form expression. This solution does not exist for the 3-body problem.
You stated:

> The whole point of immunity is not to get infected/sick in the first place

That is a description of sterilising immunity, which none of the COVID-19 vaccines provide, they attempt to provide acquired immunity. You can't have a whole point where half of it is not true.

The efficacy of the vaccines is measured in several ways, basically on how well they prevent severity of symptoms, e.g. death, needing ICU, hospitalisation, mild symptoms, asymptomatic.

As to this:

> they are vastly preferable to natural infection without vaccination.

that is not settled science, there is still much debate and research going on regarding this point with outcomes that support both "sides" (probably because different people have different immune responses, both could be true in different people), and you've overstated the case by a long way anyway.
Ask HN: Ever built app for entrepreneur for cash and equity and it worked out?
That’s not inherent to IPv6 though, your ISP chose to be more specific in the location data for those addresses. If it’s sufficiently detailed as to “dox” you, maybe ask them not to do that?
Yes there's a surge, the Delta strain at that. Not many are vaccinated because our federal govt. messed up securing enough vaccines, and so there isn't enough for everybody. You know how to pull some strings if you really want the vaccine and aren't within the groups they are curreny allowing to get the vaccine. The Pfizer vs Astrazenica debate is basically still ongoing in the general public as well.

I've noticed a rise of people unashamedly being anti-mask. I've also noticed an uptick of people pushing that vaccines aren't the solution/too risky/too early.
Brands are built with only one thing in mind [Jack Trout]
Yeah seeing as its just a white paper there really isn't much need, and the possibility of retribution is immense on this one. I know a lot of pissed off people, let alone some of the nuts who this is angering and who could dox or do worse to the authors.
The study was funded by Bill Gates.

https://trialsitenews.com/bill-and-melinda-gates-fund-global...
Just add some color code to the cables and I'm sold
That's fine, but keep it on the server I don't want this crap on my phone. I don't want to be guilty until proven innocent.
1Password is going after the enterprise market, and an Electron app makes it easier for them to support multiple platforms as well as chasing that market.

https://support.1password.com/secrets-automation/

https://support.1password.com/events-reporting-splunk/
Mainly thinking of situations where some 9-to-5er entrepreneur has an idea but no tech skills, asks you to build an MVP for cheap + equity, and you did it.

Then either the project failed (prob) or it worked and you either did or did not get something from your equity.

Or, you never did the work or partially did it because you didn't trust the entrepreneur.

etc.

Did you learn anything?

Is this sort of thing ever possible?
macOS used to present that modifier keys dialog as a sheet, visibly attached to the parent window and not in any way shaped or decorated like an independent window, so there were no false signals indicating that it might not be a modal dialog box. The newer trend of shadowing everything except the modal dialog does a better job of indicating that the main window content is temporarily unavailable for interaction, but making the dialog itself appear but not function like a separate window is a step backwards in usability.

(And of course, modal dialog boxes of all kinds are used far more often than they should be. They're not always the wrong choice, but more often than not they're a symptom of poorly thought-out UI design.)
Lots of energy stored in contained hydrogen, that's before counting the fuel.
Could you not potentially infer a lot about a person if they habe X photo content saved - via gathering that data elsewhere?

E.g. a simple one: anyone that may have saved a "winnie the pooh" meme image?

And it's not like Apple's going to publish a list of images that the system searched; though it'd be easy to differentiate between child abuse content vs. other types of images - but would it ever get out of Apple if someone went rogue or was "experimenting" to say "gather stats" of how many people have X image saved?
When they don't have anything to make a living for after they are finished with school, they still don't have a perspective in life.

There is more to sustainably help women than just building schools.
They are still required to hold records if they want any local bank to work with them.
Security and privacy are all about imagining the worst. Anything that can be exploited will be exploited eventually.
I started using Macs 5-6 years ago due to the companies I was working at providing Macbooks and maybe my intuition is ruined by Windows, but I still find Mac very unintuitive and frustrating. I also use Windows and Ubuntu personally and I like both of these more design, smoothness and animation wise.

I feel like everything about the macOS is just weird and the animations are also really weird, like minimizing the window animation - what the hell is that? And it's also weird how icons increase nearby when I hover on something, little things like that feel so off about Mac.

As see on this App, when I hover on the icons in the bottom, they jump bigger and it immediately disorientates me. Like why do that? Am I unable to see the icons in any other way that you have to zoom increase them? And that annoying bouncy animation when those apps require attention.
This ^^^. It’s essentially cash flow towards the country, part of which is spent locally. It’s pretty much tourism on steroids.

And, to make it work, they need to make it very attractive.
Autocorrect errors in Excel still creating genomics headache
I guess it is not the discussions about labor rights that are downvoted, but politically turning it into "capitalism bad, socialism good" when labor rights are not specific to one of these options.

It is similar to people pretending morality exists only within religion, human rights and labor rights are perfectly compatible with capitalism: positive example France, Germany, negative example - all the failed socialism attempts in the past 100 years, from Soviet Russia or North Korea to Venezuela and Cuba.

Note: I see labor rights part of the human rights, not as an economic or government system. I definitely consider "progressive social issues" a fake term trying to suggest the notion that "progressive" is related to real (positive) progress, while "progressive" is a term the socialist movement in USA hijacked for their benefit, completely unrelated to "progress" as in the English language dictionary.
Native will always give the richest user experience, and deliver the most up-to-date tech.

That said, most applications are really windows onto server-based algorithms, so the need for a “pure native” UX is a lot less, these days, than it used to be.

The one big skunk at the hybrid picnic is that we are “dancing with a gorilla.” That means that we don’t get to change the step, or stop, until the gorilla says so.

If we are dependent on any external framework (not just ones like Electron or RN), then we are at their mercy, wrt to adapting to platform and environmental changes.

I know folks that have written code that won’t run on current versions of the OS, because an SDK they use, has not been updated.
Rhabdomyolysis
Thanks for sharing, edited the post.
> GrapheneOS[2] that excludes Google services altogether at the cost of lower app compatibility[3].

It now has https://grapheneos.org/usage#sandboxed-play-services providing broader app compatibility.

That video is quite misleading and it's not the best source for accurate information about GrapheneOS.
Apple has been very obviously going towards a port-free iPhone for a while, this means that they’ll be forced to have a USB-C port, which doesn’t fit with their plans.
The next sentence immediately says:

> Although what Swift brings is new to the language, it's not new to tech itself.

I think it's pretty clear that the author meant "brand new to Swift"?
If you want simple, on-premise S3 compatible storage system and you are happy to take the ops and maintenance upon yourself, it's perfect. Lots of software is S3 compliant, so pointing it at a different server is usually all it takes to connect to Minio.
Have a look at Taekwindow as well, then.

Provides the missing but to me vital functionality of "middle click the title bar to send to the back of the stack".
> Native will always give the richest user experience, and deliver the most up-to-date tech.

Oh yeah, not arguing with that at all. But I think the commercial reality is a lot of companies will think the trade off of using a cross platform framework like Electron is worthwhile, the UX is “good enough” for most users and the development process is much more efficient.

Of course, users might vote with their feet and go to other apps which are native, but I suspect this trend is here to stay and so it’s good to consider what the “least bad” hybrid option is.
This looks to me like the first step to generally get rid of income taxes (taxing people for working instead of for using the resources of the country).
I agree that people should face the consequence of their actions - heinous acts warrant a response.

What I can't get behind, is people sifting through the entire (online and offline) history of people, in the hopes of finding some evidence of wrongdoing, no mater how small or trivial, and then starting a cancel campaign. That kind of behavior is just plain creepy and stalkerish, bordering the psychotic.
Their promise is completely childishly unrealistic, the person who said it should feel ashamed. Does anybody believe they will refuse to use this in <country> if the government demands when it’s a few button clicks of work to do it? When market access is at risk, and with apple’s track record? Or that two countries can’t collaborate to save face while doing this? This promise is so unrealistic that it’s just a lie
Root cause of failure, root cause of success
Amish understand a life-changing truth about technology the rest of us don’t
The other two big barriers which can apply are company taxation (if I am a director/senior manager of a company is there a risk that the Company could become tax resident in Costa Rica?) and regulation (is there a risk that I am doing something illegal in Costa Rica because either I or the Company don't have any local regulatory permission?).

(There is also a company tax issue which I don't think this type of thing can solve, which is the risk of the tax residency or tax status of the Company in its home jursidiction or third countries relying on directors/senior managers physically being located in the home jurisdiction).