skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Most cultivated edible plants have been selected against having too many raphides. Though people can still be sensitive to fresh pineapple and kiwifruit which contains proteases that amplifies the damage done by the oxalate needles.

Wild plants, on the other hand , has not been subject to the same selection process and could easily contain a dangerous amount of oxalate.
Hi, Couldn't try as download wasn't available but seems like a great tool from reading other comments. Btw, the GitHub sources are 4 years old and so is the latest release; Are you renewing the project again?

I'm currently brainstorming a notes platform for second order thinking[1], Say like a community submitted scenarios for second-order, third-order thinking. Would Calculist be a good fit for such notes?

[1] https://needgap.com/problems/263-plan-second-order-third-ord... (Disclaimer: My platform)
Again, I’m not here to fight you. I still struggle with addiction, so I’m seeing if I have any insight to offer. The reasons are often so damn simple, but the solutions are the slipperiest of slopes. That’s how we slide into it, for literally the simplest reasons.

Yeah, it could be the nightmares, or it could be something even simpler.
That roster includes O3B mPOWER (SES), Inmarsat, Kuiper (Amazon), OneWeb (UK et al), Guowang (China) and Sfera (Russia). I doubt they are so easily intimidated.
> I feel like there should be some process where you have to put a real website at the domain name in a certain time period or you lose it. And I mean a real website not those godaddy placeholders.

I don't see how that would work; there's so many issues with it. For one, domain prices would have to be radically increased to handle all of the additional labor costs stemming from these manual verifications of domain usage (as you're talking about making a subjective determination rather than a technical one a la "does this domain have nameservers and is it responding over HTTP[S]"). Or, as an alternative, you might need to pay hundreds to thousands of dollars up front to cover the costs of such a claim when initiating it, as currently happens with ICANN UDRP/URS.

Secondly, I own a domain that I've had for well over a decade but which is not currently serving a website because I grew tired of paying the hosting company's fees every year and let it expire. However, I am still using that domain for email. Should I lose that domain? Should I be required to spin up some fake content, but not too fake, just to "park" it correctly? What's the minimum level of BS content I'd have to put up there to not be susceptible to losing it?

And lastly, this just opens huge avenues of abuse in favor of the domain squatters, as it gives them another avenue by which to hijack existing valid registrations from people. E.g. here's some example abuse of an existing ICANN system (UDRP/URS for trademarks): https://domainnamewire.com/tag/reverse-domain-name-hijacking... Add another system to potentially take domains over, but with an even lower bar to use, and you'll see domain hijacking attempts explode in number.

Meanwhile the actual domain parkers will be fine, as they'll improve their website autogeneration scripts just enough (maybe using GPT-3 or similar) to generate plausible content that would meet the bar and doesn't look like a mere parked page.
by independent, do they mean neither American nor Russian?
You’re totally right, Saturn V, Space Shuttle, SLS – all of them are great technology, but financially speaking, they were all doomed from the get go. I weren’t trying to compare NASA and Space X, I was trying to point out that optimistic outlooks on large reusable rockets usually don’t fully consider implications of increased complexity of such project.
Service Reliability Math That Every Engineer Should Know
Now we need to get the Nobel Committee to say they will only read open source papers - this is a valid option as the paywalls have denied most of the world's 'second tier' countries access for their scientists (to say nothing of interested science readers wherever they are) so going open source will only add to the common pool of knowledge
Yeah, I read that over too - crap data in, crap analysis, and crap results out. There's a lot that's wrong with the article:

- Someone else in this thread correctly highlighted that on stackoverflow, for example, simply having one answer to a question puts you in the top 25th percentile. Most accounts are probably idle or passive or abandoned, so using those to get the result is obviously wrong. Maybe, what are the expected earnings for users investing more than 8 hours/week (purchasing equipment, producing content, editing, publishing, marketing)?

- People on this thread need to stop looking at the $145/month figure from the title. It doesn't come from anything. A lot of people are kind of stuck on that. By no means what so ever should it be interpreted as "girls who have only fans make $145/month", which people seem to be doing. Based on the income distribution, virtually no one makes approximately $145/month. It's just an artifact being the quotient of two numbers the author chose. A small-ish proportion of total users make _way more than $145/month_, and a large proportion of the user base (including idle and abandoned accounts) makes pretty much zero. Maybe I'm just broadcasting my lack of statistical knowledge, but I'm struggling to understand what does an average or median even signify for extremely long-tailed, skewed distributions?

- And finally, if one is making a serious analysis - lots of jokes and euphemisms about masturbation and theatrical contempt for the consumers - seem to suggest either discomfort on the part of the author or some kind of motivated reasoning to arrive at their results.
That does seem like an interesting protest vector, though. Generate a bunch of images that match CSAM images but are mundane. Then have everyone download them and send them to their cloud. Someone then needs to spend resources determining that the images are _not_ actual matches. Basically, a DDOS attack on the functionality.
The only example you mentioned that is attributable to government is sex-ed.

Sex education isn't about teaching you how to have sex, it's "here's all the reasons you need to be very careful with sex".

In my classes I learned about many different STI's and the dangers of unprotected sex. Not once was I taught a Kamasutra position or what to do with my fingers.

For younger kids I assume the curriculum would be more about what kinds of behaviors they need to be careful of and immediately warn other adults about.

I suppose the name is very unfortunate because a lot of people seem to think sex-ed is about getting young people to start having sex, when in fact it has the opposite result and we can see it in statistics.
You have to be kidding.
Will insurance really cover a psychiatrist without a diagnosis? I always assumed the doctor was reporting a diagnosis to the insurance company even if they weren't telling the patient.
I read this book: https://www.amazon.com/Computer-Systems-Programmers-Perspect...

While doing these labs: http://csapp.cs.cmu.edu/3e/labs.html

Also a colleague made me watch this from Jack Diederich: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9pEzgHorH0
It’s the breaking down that is challenging, because the breaking down is the work. The correct breakdown is known when the project is completed. Until then, there are only approximate and probably wrong breakdowns.

Ever had a task with 4 seemingly “easy” parts where 3 are easy and it turns out 4 requires a big rewrite because of some hacked put in 8 years ago that are now deeply ingrained assumptions in the code?

Often you are asked to estimate a 10k part project!
So they are in violation of antitrust rules? If space is the future, SpaceX is the railroad and should not grant cheaper rates for cargo from its other businesses.
.com is still preferable if you ever communicate a domain name in a manner where people will type it directly in. If you put an ad on a bus or on TV that says easymoney.io, for example, a large percentage of people will go to easymoney.com in their browser.

If you ever see the copious ads for "free to play, no money" gambling sites during sports events or live broadcasts, and wonder how free-to-play gaming makes enough money for that to be worthwhile, note that the TLD they use for their free version will always be a non-.com TLD, but if you just replace that TLD with .com you'll be met with a full gambling site. One that would be illegal to advertise, and often operate, in the jurisdiction where you're seeing the free to play ads. It isn't accidental.
I invest in domain names, probably about 100. More recently I purchased a few single character emoji domains (specifically country flags just so others couldn’t) and a few “crypto domains” which function as both web 3 domains and plain English ethereum wallet addresses.

About 2 years ago I bought a lot of crypto themed domains seeing some of the secondary sales…the way I saw it if artificial scarcity is what gave cryptocurrency it’s value, then I’d rather invest in domain names that have a real use - like gold digging, the real money being in selling shovels.

I recently listed a few for sale and almost immediately someone bought cryptocomicbook.com for $1,250 which I registered and renewed only once. However I almost feel like that purchase was part of a scam by the domain registrar to encourage me to register more domains through them.

The number of domains is infinite, so the only real way to make money I think is to be able to buy/sell 2N or 3N domains or generic single word domains, but you probably need a big bank roll to get started in something like that, otherwise you just luck out buy owning something like ethereum.com.
I think it's an alignment relative to the ISS (with the visual markers), so there was really no hope of reaching it.
Also interesting! I am still unsure though how losing weight is like climbing mount everest without supplemental oxygen. Can you clarify that part?
Is it possible to use it like

> git swith

instead?
>> in an increasingly zero-sum world

I don't understand this part - what do you mean by that? Why would the world be increasingly zero-sum?
Aaah, the good old "you can create your own platform" argument. Please remind me again how that went for Parler and Gab.
I believe this is possible!

Between my condo and my mall (a five-minute walk in Khlong San) there are two Sewen, one on each side of the street, and then of course the very first shop in the mall is… Sewen.
I could not agree more: this is a good thing. Studies funded by public money should be freely available by default. This is a great decision and I hope major funding agencies in the USA follow this example.

As a practicing scientist, I ostensibly have access to a rich variety of journals from my employer. However, I've found journal access to be difficult during WFH/COVID. My default is to look for an open access paper, before jumping to the digital library. I've also had a few cases where the digital access seemed not to be working, which only put up barriers to my work.
Pretty soon housing your own infra and not using the mandated govt phone could be made a crime.

But think of the children and security of the society. Couple that with constant monitoring of your car and you can be monitored anywhere
To be pedantic, a median is not a ratio. That's the average.
You are not storing passwords in plaintext on their servers. They are very open and document on how it works. Basically you give them fully encrypted information they can‘t use for anything
The self-interest is probably the wrong focus. If you took a million prople in a society and asked that what was in their best interest then you'd likely get similar policies to many modern democractic socialist states, since that's effectively what they do in elections.

If you asked a King or CEO or aristocracy or other small concentrated power what was in their own selfish best interests then you'd end up with slavery/fascism/exploitation like we have through history.

So really its more about distribution of power, since peoples ability to bargain and/or resist co-oercion is reflected in their power/wealth and most of the market power theories rely on distributed wealth while proponents actually work against this.
Well, they did suck most of CO2 out of atmosphere and many times hundred of million years ago:
https://earth.org/data_visualization/a-brief-history-of-co2/
Alternatively, NASA doesn't want to sour the relation with Roscosmos while the investigation is ongoing, and what's said publicly isn't an indication of what happens behind the screens. At this level, there's a lot of politics involved as well.
There's a chance it's using Tauri (rust) https://tauri.studio/en/ if it's truly not using Electron but a similar concept. However WASM builds in Electron would make more sense if they use the term Electron.
Potential evidence the piracy reporting firm was seeding content themselves?
Depends on where we place the goalposts. Abstinence or agency? For some cases, full abstinence is the most effective means to a fruitful life of agency. For others, an appeal to our inherent agency (rather than submitting to the impossibility of control / higher power) is the path, possibly one that returns to moderate use.
Aren’t they based in Canada, not the US?
If you are out there struggling with addiction I would checkout: Naltrexone. Naltrexone binds to the endorphin receptors in the body, and blocks the effects and feelings of alcohol. IMHO: The addict brain needs to be reprogrammed with chemicals - not just 'understanding why' or making macaroni necklaces in rehab. Naltrexone can be used with both opioid and alcohol dependence and is extremely cheap. Once on Naltrexone you can still drink/opioid and you wont get the high. Drinking a beer would be like drinking a Coke on Naltrexone. Pounding down two liters of Coke is gross - and your brain will start to associate that drinking is terrible.
Intimidated? Or maybe if you do the right things SpaceX will bring you trucks full of money to stop.
Everything is hackable.
Connect a computer to the internet and you basically have lost.

We know that today, encryption isn't the final solution when there are hackers and social engineering.
If paying enough to incentivize vendors to share the secret works, and why wouldn’t it, how is that not a ”real” solution?
Ah interesting, I'd forgotten about that. A grand total of 40 domains were transferred through the EBERO process (note: they didn't experience interruption).

I do like this quote from the article:

> In this case, ICANN said that Atgron had failed to provide Whois services as required by contract. The threshold for Whois triggering EBERO is 24 hours downtime over a week.

> However, the situation looks to me a lot more like a business failure than a technical failure.

> Multiple sources with knowledge of the transition tell me that the Whois was turned off deliberately, purely to provide a triggering event for the EBERO failover system, after Atgron’s back-end contract with CoCCA expired.

> The logic was that turning off Whois would be far less disruptive for registrants and internet users than losing DNS resolution, DNSSEC, data escrow or EPP.

It sounds like they creatively used EBERO as the most expedient method to be able to cease hosting .wed, which they had been unprofitable to them owing to the mere 40 total registrations that they had. And they did so in a way that would minimally disrupt their users.

Overall, seeing that EBERO was successfully used strengthens my confidence in the overall safety of new gTLDs. There's way too many of them out there, and they're way too important now as a whole, for anyone to simply just let them vanish out from underneath their users.
Money/Greed attracts a certain type of person who has different values, priorities, and interests.

I think it mostly comes down to that.
Well, in your case, it would still require extensive testing, it's not a flip the coin kind of thing, otherwise you are effectively setting off a nuclear bomb on your homeland.
As deadly weather disasters sweep globe, is a 1.5°C warming target impossible?
Today's analogy is bitcoin...
Will all Bitcoin just be lost one day, because all keys get lost?

I am aware that "there are solutions", but are they (really) enough? Isn't "breaking in" required at some point?

Another endgame for Bitcoin is that all Bitcoin are stolen through the one tool which helps with ("unbreakable") encryption: Hacking / social engineering.

Besides that we hab substantial discussions about why PGP isn't really cutting it for use with email (to cumbersome, at one point you lose your private key, recipient struggles to decrypt, etc.).
I have touches of OCD. It's not all bad (it got me through school and has made me decent at work), though when I was younger I used alcohol a bit to disconnect. Met a great girl, mostly quit alcohol, but that disconnect mechanism transferred to MMOs. Faster forward a year or so and I'm playing MMOs 8+ hours/day and girl leaves. I'm devastated and lost. Walk into work a few days later and give all my MMO accounts (yes, I had multiple accounts for the same game to bot, buff, etc...) to a co-worker, and never played again. Started back down the alcohol path, but this time caught myself and decided to try the gym one day.

20+ years later I still workout almost every single day. I think about how easy it could have been to take a far worse path, but exercise has been my savior. To paraphrase Henry Rollins, 225# is always 225# no matter what else is happening in your life. It is the great constant.
Alcohol is known to suppress dreams. It's a physical mechanism impacting brain function in that regard.

I'm not suggesting "suppressing nightmares about the war" is the reason other people drink. Just that was the reason I believe my own father drank. It's a conclusion that took me a long time to make and it's based on an analysis of the facts of his life.

If you are still struggling with addiction, maybe you don't yet have the answers you need. Maybe the pat answers you are parroting are part of the problem.

They are answers that actively promote a sense of helplessness and actively discourage pinpointing a specific cause. I'm suggesting that's exactly the problem with our current mental models.

Edit: I will also add that suppressing nightmares is about being able to sleep through the night so you can do your job the next day, not necessarily about avoiding negative feelings per se. Plenty of people take sleeping pills and are not characterized as addicts for trying to address their sleep issues so they can function.
No, I'm saying that there's no reasonable lighting system that can approximate even "cloudy country far from the equator" brightness that comes through windows. So if they set the windows up wrong, you can't patch over it with LEDs. Especially for children, whose visual cortexes are still developing, which requires bright light and high contrast.
Curious, how do you solve the chicken egg problem? It's obvious that the current dating app market is weird and broken, but as far as I can tell most apps get either sold or closed before they reach a relevant mass.
Large external funding tends to build corrupt governments due to bad incentives. It's possible that the Afghan government was effectively built to simply appease American advisors and convince them to request more money rather than actually servicing the needs of Afghans.

You don't get a renewed 10 billion dollars in defense grants by showing well maintained equipment and a well disciplined army.
Came to say the same about naming. Just want to add that after the first full naming, they should be shortened as 'G. specie', and not 'Specie' like they do.

With those 2 simple rules you have your needs covered. Corner cases add complicatiins, but unless you are in the bussiness you shouldn't need it.
TBH there isn't even a domestic enforcement of cookie preferences, no one actually gives a damn it seems. Violations of handling personal data – fines do happen for that. Cookies – nope, you won't even get a notice.
Any idea how one makes an offer when the details are obfuscated or hidden behind registrar data?
I see broker services but that seems for commercial needs (and already more than I would want to pay)
(Example: a domain I want is just sitting there. They used to use it but have stopped bothering... maybe now I could make a direct reasonable offer? I don't have any commercial plans so thousands of dollars doesn't work for me. )
JavaScript Age Calculator – Calculate Age from Date of Birth
I guess you don't understand what "sequestering" means.

Sequestering is a process where carbon becomes unavailable for biological processes.

So you have carbon circulating (present in biomass, returned to atmosphere, then back to biomass, etc.) and you have carbon that is not available for circulation.

Carbon in atmosphere is part of circulation. When a supervolcano erupts and emits a bunch of CO2, this adds carbon to atmosphere but then that carbon may very quickly be bound in biomass (for example algae, forests, etc.) This doesn't mean it is sequestered. The algae can die and ferment and forests can burn, releasing CO2 back to atmosphere.

Earth has ability to very quickly bind large amounts of CO2 from atmosphere, true.

But it does not have ability to sequester it, because as long as the carbon is present in biomass, that biomass can burn or rot and change to methane/CO2.

Current coal, oil and gas deposits are due to the fact that at early stages of evolution there was no bacteria that could process some parts of biomass. For example, plants rather than rot would just be covered with more plants and become coal deposits.

Today, it is not possible to form new coal or oil deposits, because any biomass would be quickly digested/fermented/rotted before it could be sequestered.
> Is there any password management application out there that makes sharing passwords or password vaults easy but is also free?

If there isn’t something out there that is free, there are two options:

1. Make one.

2. Stop complaining.
I think random breath testing by police is a better idea.

Your car stopping you from drink driving will false positive too much or just break. Drinkers will just buy older cars anyway. Let’s keep cars simple!
That sounds like absolute torture to him.