skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is also something what happens to Apple Music. My friend recently got family and he had extra logins so I join his group with my iphone but my wife has android. Lo and behold they actually have an Apple music app on android. Try as I may i cannot get her logged into it. What i had to do is use another iPhone, sign in and accept the Apple music sub on the iPhone before it would work on the Android. Luckily I still have a collection of iPhones or no Apple music for android ppl.
How many ways can you call a single function? Like, it may be called from a loop, with a quickly changing variable that may change type here or there (especially with weak typing), and you really can’t just say that “I tested it with this one data and it worked”.
This is long, but it's addressing the same questions as Gibbon's six-volume famous Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire in a considerably more readable way.
You're joking, of course. I suppose the downmods are because it's a slightly distasteful joke.
IMHO, anything that not enough people can find interesting and engaging should be automated — injury risk is also a great reason to automate something. Of course, there is a cost involved, so we shouldn't expect any of it to happen overnight.

While your point is true that every profession has an injury risk, it's the type of comment that misses the point: there is a significant difference in those stats, and by trying to equate them, you are purposely watering down the significance of one where injuries are more prevalent (or at least harder).

It's a response similar in style to deflecting from attempts to solve one crisis by introducing another crisis.
I loved https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Hutchinson#Fractured_Euro...
for the unexplained but totally compelling technology. Full of thrilling intrigue.
Once again: UI should not be aware that routing is happening. It makes the UI less reusable.
It's a $5 microcontroller and 1 bit display. The cost of this isn't in the BOM

The cost is in the development of the included games, which I'm willing to bet few people are going to be actively interested in ever single game.

I'd much prefer to see a $50 version that I could buy the games I want to, rather than a $180 version and being forced to buy every game as part of the purchase price
It's not in support of drunk driving, but in support of equal treatment of drivers.

Someone may be (by government standard) "drunk" and drive better than a Tesla on auto-pilot or another person who hasn't tasted alcohol. Yet she can get criminalized.
Authenticator generates 2-Step Verification codes in the browser
Blizzard North more or less dissolved 18, and officially defuncted 16 years ago.
When applying this to software and you have a complex system there is a lot to learn from Joe Armstrong's excellent paper:

https://erlang.org/download/armstrong_thesis_2003.pdf

As well as from the way the Erlang language and runtime are organized.
What happens when Apple stops being on fire, and you are trapped in their ecosystem and can't get out? I won't argue that Apple makes the nicest and most comfortable golden cuffs, but in the end they're still chains.
Well no wonder. Just because it's late doesn't mean that Aulus Didius Gallus doesn't want his fruit of the vine.
> Don’t use apple SSO because apple might not exist one day?

There might be a day when Apple is not _my_ cell phone platform. Even now I have an Android phone and iPad and I prefer to have access to same services from both.
I tried looking up things like "Thomas Payne" and "Common Sense" but nothing quite matched what you seem to be driving at. Is there something obvious I'm missing, or do you have a link for where to start looking further?
I'm saying there is a moral framework that supersedes a legal one, and I reject the "dictionary.com" definition as the conical definition.

From the Oxford dictionary, there is more to the meaning than your shallow lawful vs unlawful demarcation line:

. a. The most heinous kind of criminal homicide; also, an instance of this. In English (also Sc. and U.S.) Law, defined as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought; often more explicitly wilful murder.
In OE. the word could be applied to any homicide that was strongly reprobated (it had also the senses ‘great wickedness’, ‘deadly injury’, ‘torment’). More strictly, however, it denoted secret murder, which in Germanic antiquity was alone regarded as (in the modern sense) a crime, open homicide being considered a private wrong calling for blood-revenge or compensation. Even under Edward I, Britton explains the AF. murdre only as felonious homicide of which both the perpetrator and the victim are unidentified. The ‘malice aforethought’ which enters into the legal definition of murder, does not (as now interpreted) admit of any summary definition. Until the Homicide Act of 1957, a person might even be guilty of ‘wilful murder’ without intending the death of the victim, as when death resulted from an unlawful act which the doer knew to be likely to cause the death of some one, or from injuries inflicted to facilitate the commission of certain offences. By this act, ‘murder’ was extended to include death resulting from an intention to cause grievous bodily harm. It is essential to ‘murder’ that the perpetrator be of sound mind, and (in England, though not in Scotland) that death should ensue within a year and a day after the act presumed to have caused it. In British law no degrees of guilt are recognized in murder; in the U.S. the law distinguishes ‘murder in the first degree’ (where there are no mitigating circumstances) and ‘murder in the second degree’ (though this distinction does not obtain in all States).

https://www.oed.com/oed2/00153783
You specifically called it out as being "inaccessible" (ie, difficult to understand) to non-native speakers (of English).

Also, "a11y" looks too much like the English word "ally". That, IMO, is more likely to cause reading difficulties, particularly with non-native speakers and people with dyslexia.
True. But they said “divorces”, I’m disputing that part. They have no support for the rest either.
>>Productivity is increasing, but wages are decreasing.

Wages have increased more in the last 30 years than at any time in history:

https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2016/0207/Progress-in-the-gl...
Getting around those places once you've used the train will absolutely require a car and none of them have Uber or an equivalent.
Screenshots of woodwork?

Edit: sorry that was unreasonably snarky. I know you're looking for pictures. The CNC-milled kind that I am talking about are easy to find. Google image search 'curved handrail cnc.' I'm actually having a hard time finding pictures of classic steam-bent curved handrails amongst tons of content marketing from bendywood and contractors. If you happen to tour an antique house with curved, wooden handrails, study the way they look. it's usually one long beam, maybe with carved, ornamental caps at the end. I don't really know when the change took place, but if you look at any house built at least since the nineties, the handrail (if not painted) will look like a bunch of disjoint blocks stuck together.
It is known that HDD are negatively affected by vibration, so one of possible causes is that used for Seagate chassis are bad at dumping vibration from HDDs or chassis fans cause a vibration.
If I type too fast or if something is slowing down my computer-from-hell then it launches a Google search. So I almost always type 'new' to have some leeway.
If you have bugs in an app or website people get mildly annoyed, if you have bugs in a bricklayer a building can fall down. The cost benefit calculation is very different
> Yes, that system is discussed in the article, and it looks like it doesn't work very well. I doubt it can keep up with human labor.

It works poorly, therefore bricklaying has been automated. The programmers won. The bricklayers won too. It's only Grakel with his weird bet that lost.
Does this mean that AI facial recognition evidence is inadmissable in court?
I'm the opposite.
I NEVER use a third party login, my it be Apple, Google, Facebook or whatnot.
If your website/app doesn't offer their own independent login, I don't even think once whether I really need it.
I think this is noisy.

f(x: a, y: b): c = ...

I think this is nice.

f :: a -> b -> c
f x y = ...

Signatures are useful as self-documentation, and keeping them separate makes that easy to scan.

It also comes down to the compiler. If you're "annotating" your code with type "sugestions," but don't get any ironclad guarantees from it, then it's reasonable to question whether it's even worth the effort. I may be misremembering things, but "typed" versions of Python and Scheme aren't particularly rigorous.
Well, yes, sort of. Threatening to murder a public figure (or worse, murdering) is terrorism in the way that it discourages others to become public figures. Which in turn gnaws on a certain foundation of democracy, which is that everyone should be able to hold public office without fear of violence.

If we don't protect that foundation, only the people whose supporters are doing the threatening will eventually hold public office.
Because Apple prioritizes their customers over developers.

If they didn’t force developers to adopt this, they would never do it as it’s in their interest to harvest the e-mail addresses of their customers.
Yes, hence my opinion that they should have gone through Nuremberg like the rest of the war criminals instead of being given an exemption because their knowledge came in handy. I see them at the same level as the engineers that designed the gas chambers.
I think ultimately static languages will win because:

- Most things you want to express can be expressed in a static language

- Tooling is much easier to build over static languages, and I think automated checkers are the future of rapid development of robust programs

I don't think that OOP languages as they are now (particularly Java 8) are the future, but something with less ceremony like an ML. Java and C# might flourish in the long term by becoming ML languages, but only if they are prepared to remove the cruft.
If he didn't interrupt, In Our Time would degenerate into an academic squabble with subject matter experts going on about abstruse and irrelevant minutia listeners aren't interested in.

Bragg's role is to ensure that the guests don't go down rabbit holes and that the program delivers an overview of a topic. He's the everyman, the listener stand-in. Plus, he is alert for academics who grind political axes or perform for their colleagues, not the general public. Many academics are profound experts on their topic, but terrible at communicating.
Next step is to search for investors.
People don't go out of their way to build complex systems.

What happens is that it starts simple and becomes complex as more features are added often with limitations attached e.g. time, money etc.

So yes this guy migrated from Marketo to Hubspot and it was simple. But the idea it will simply remain that way is laughable.
modern plattenbau is used extensively in Europa. almost all modern construction uses pre made segments.

it doesn't look the same as a Soviet era building project, but the technology and system is roughly the same.
Modern Java is not what people may remember. It has var keyword for local type inference, lambdas, etc.
I know there are plenty here who agree with you, but for at least 98% of the population its just a crappy old technology by company who is charging too much over it. They don't understand technical details and they don't care. A phone who can charge in 30 mins vs 2 hours is a major selling point though.

Most people change phones every 3-4 years due to many reasons, physical attrition of hardware being one of it, battery being another, overall hardware not being good enough (speed, capacity) being another.

Almost nobody cares if they can save 5% of battery over that time by charging slowly. Heck, I know I don't. It would be a different proposition if one would lose say 50% of capacity, but even folks in this thread confirm that's not the case for same hardware.
From your post I get that you don’t particularly care about the users who use you it app as you are not offering any way to transition users.

I think apple cares about their users and platform, they just care about your passion project and I can understand how that triggers you. But the users belong to the apple ecosystem. You are essentially a guest there and more importantly the user has a choice to privacy. Most of my friends buy iPhone because of ApplePay, Sign in, and now throwaway emails. Apple just caters to them and forces all developers to respect that.

As an engineer I never experienced any issues when integrating with Sign in. I’ve used it in 3 apps already in the past 2 years. There was also a very long grace period.
re: your edit

So basically that vaccine didn't work to prevent measles. That's not a long term side-effect. That's a vaccine not working.
Very odd. The version of the article that I see says:

> The nearly 800 pieces “of exceptional rarity and inestimable value”, including stelae, amphorae and other items, came from clandestine excavations in Puglia in Italy’s south-eastern tip, according to the carabinieri in charge of cultural heritage.

Nothing about the collector awaiting trial. The word "trial" doesn't appear on the page that I get to see at all.
No. The original assertion is that monogamous relationships AND marriages breakdown in the first five years at “very high rates”. Marriages do not. And, as you say, if you got married you were probably monogamous for some time before that.

I’m not disputing that humans get together and break up all the time.

It’s unclear that monogamous relationships breakup “at very high rates” due to boredom either. There are many reasons relationships falter, boredom being but one of them.
That depends on the location, no?
What are the key differences? My understanding was that both languages are heavily built around message passing between objects and dynamic dispatch.
wow, where are your startups now, news_hacker? ;)
Understanding the Ethereum Yellow Paper
Yeah, shame on Apple for protecting their user’s privacy. So evil of them to not allow 3rd party developers to harvest user’s e-mail addresses for no reason whatsoever.
Subscription- / paywalled. https://archive.is/z6Jrv
Surely just common sense (amongst people who understand AI, anyway) means that AI facial recognition evidence is inadmissable in court. At best, ignoring privacy issues, it should be used to identify a potential match if the workload is too much for a human, then a human does the verification step on the matched faces.
Maybe true, but “because everyone else is doing it” was never a good defence in the playground and shouldn't be in the adult world either.

If Apple ran off a cliff, would you?
Photos and video are admissible. It would seem fairly dumb to set up cameras for facial recognition and not keep the originals?
Yes, and it appears that they are trying to do this by moving to "Windows Drivers" and other technologies before they are ready to containerize/sandbox everything.
Difference between DevOps, SecOps and DevSecOps
I want to thank you on behalf of Google, Facebook and all third party ad aggregators you selling client tracking and data (including emails). The more app developers will be hostile to their clients, the more profits we can squeeze from our platforms keeping it old new norm. Keep the classy work, don’t forget, it is your app, your rules! Fck users! Fck them hard!
Australia’s own UFO cover-up exposed
> The best way to convince Apple prisoners is to tell them what they need. Trust must only belong to Apple. Give them your money, your will, your worship, your everything. Apple will keep you safe

While I firmly believe anyone's data can be breached, and Apple ain't no exception, it's more likely for a Joe Random Developer to make his unauthenticated document-based database listen on a public IP address than Apple. I say that even taking into account my firm opinion that Apple is very inept at clouds among their peers, evidenced by the atrocious quality of practically all their network-based offerings.

> But Apple developers must be told, threatened, shut down if necessary.

All developers, not only Apple's! At least Apple has some leverage over its paying developers. I wish it started harassing them over unreasonable memory/CPU usage too, but it's hard to do if your own platform is guilty as charged.

> Am I hurting myself? Am I shooting myself in the foot? Probably. But this is war

Petty and reminds me of scaring a hedgehog with a naked butt.
In most major cities the real cost is the land and paperwork to be able to build there. The actual physical materials the building is made of are mostly aesthetic
So the creator/developer of "The King of Organigrams and Family Trees" (that's the title of the app's website (https://www.groupsapp.online)) is complaining that Apple is giving its users the ability to hide their email information, am I right? So isn't this a good thing? For me, it is. I don't want to give away my actual email address. I get too much spam already. So I thank Apple for this feature.

And of course, it's terrible Apple doesn't allow their login button image to be altered so that an average user could quickly identify it as "oh yes, this is Apple". However, I don't see why this could be not good. Also, as an end-user, I don't care if the Apple button is black, the Facebook button is blue, etc.

It seems it's always the others who are wrong (see this: https://javierantonsblog.blogspot.com/2021/07/my-app-just-go...).

I'm not so sure about the app. From these two posts alone, I wouldn't trust this app.
Linux hit 1% on Steam, again
Relevant Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westall_UFO

Nothing to see here folks, Bunkipedia assures us it's an "alleged" sighting that really was a weather balloon.

And doesn't mention any of the witnesses testimony or any of the intimidation and cover up tactics deployed at the time. How can anyone trust Wikipedia or think it's unbiased?
So it's now okay to attack the ruling class and super rich for their CO2 emissions?

I can't keep up. One day, criticism of a celebrity advocating-green from their mega yacht, a politician's energy guzzling mansion, and billionaires flying private jets to meetings in Switzerland about the future of the globe is verboten. The next day some lowly political staffer's old efficient small car is open slather.
Than it’s the age-old war between nominal and structural typing. The latter can be really comfortable and productive, but as you note, it may be less safe (eg. just because I have a next method doesn’t mean I want to make it an iterable or something like that. It can easily break class invariants)
Me either. That would be a weird split test…
That is an amazing find, the detail and coloration preserved in that state. Wow! Thank you for linking this.
To add a point: "simple" can also mean "standardized".

Self-hosted or cloud-hosted Kubernetes is a highly complex system. But using it to power your internal tooling (e.g. Jira, Confluence, GitLab, Jenkins, whatever) over classic, manually-installed-on-VMs deployment has the advantage that you can drop in anyone with experience in Kubernetes to manage your workloads.
it was originally designed to prevent the street brickmen from breaking their backs and knees when building a street.
And this is a risk for the user to take on, night a choice that should be left to a petty developer.
It is not "petty", it is a way to ensure all users get access to a privacy-conscious method of logging in without giving up your privacy to Google or Facebook.

Being this angry at having to give users the option of better privacy really isn't a great look.
Local companies doing construction in Serbia will happily provide you with a plan as well as a building cost ahead of time.

However, plots and legal requirements differ significantly that in urban environments, it's hard to make the most of the plot without going custom (requirement to be that far away from the neighbour and the street, whether you can have windows facing that side or not, what kind of foundation is required by the terrain, etc).
Interesting, for me it is there in the headline article.
Agreed, but apparently the situation was more serious than initially reported, according to the NASA flight director [0] and his interview [1].

[0]: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/sp...

[1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/02/science/nasa-space-statio...
thaumasiotes read this article that includes the trial sentence.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/28/ancient-roman-...

While you pwagland read this article, which does not.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/21/italy-recovers...
Are you confusing live chats to comments? My post (and your parent post) was about the comment section, which is not real-time. You can’t comment under a live event, only in its recording after the event has finished. The live chat section (appearing next to the video in the desktop web UI, not under) is what’s going real-time.
The definition of an End Product by the PTCRB is that it must utilise one of these physical interfaces:

"Physical Interface - If a physical control interface is required for the End Product, it shall utilize one of the following: USB, PCMCIA, Compact Flash, MMC, RS-232 (DE9), or IEEE-1394. No other physical control interfaces are acceptable."

http://www.ptcrb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/PTCRB-PPMD-3...

Curious how an M.2 based connector was allowed here as they are explicitly called out as connectors allowed for PTRCB modules, not end devices.
Yes! In the future, a whole car factory will have only one employee. His job: feed the dog. The dog’s: keep humans away from the machines.

Just as a ship with dozens of people got replaced by 13: the complexity was encapsulated in simpler interfaces.

Diesel motors: just change this lever. Up is fast, down is slow. But it took a century to refine this absurdly complex device until this simple interface became possible.

I think the point here is: don’t build your own diesel motors. It’s unlikely you’ll beat a good model and your interface to it will probably be worst. Remember: people take years learning from their own mistakes to hide the complexity under simpler interfaces layers.

Unless your company IS building diesel motors.