skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's all handled as part of the manifests as well as we can have our clusters pulled if we are caught using non approved containers and they are all scanned when they are brought into the disconnected environment.
it definitely did make it to the front page. there have been several posts with a lot of discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28056296
Yep! Very simple and absurdly cheap to make and program. There are ton of display controllers that have more than enough capability to handle to do this all without needing a separate uC, even.

I think what you're really paying for is the software on the host computer side, and how many companies they've gotten to interface with them.

I'd be willing to bet that streamdeck makes a lot of money off sale of metrics they collect - what programs are running, what games people are playing, what they're streaming, and probably more.
does anyone really think that humanity will be here in 200 years? 500 years? I think that's a real stretch. There are 100 ways we will go extinct, and we don't care about any of them.
This is absolutely awesome. I'm not sure if you're a maintainer of this list, but, this is VERY useful. You just found me a provider who is scratching an itch for a specific niche location which I've had for years. I owe you a beer or three.
and both Firefox and Webkit were in favour of the spec change.

They could oppose, but then Google would just spread propaganda about how their browsers are "less secure" or whatever. There's really no choice for other browsers at this point.

From the point of view of neutrality, the whole "origin trial" thing is seriously messed up. You are effectively having to ask for permission from one megacorp to treat your site differently from others in its browser.
Well, it doesn't have to be finite. Imagine if the Chinese get around to generating electricity from hydrogen fusion, we'll all have "infinite" energy
I want to use an unmodified off the shelf router; I don't want my ISP to provide a router.
It's sad for me because we also miss SoC built with latest TSMC process.
Automated tools will lower the difficulty of coding to the point where it'll be easy to pick up and be massively productive. Developers will be replaced by domain experts becoming productive developers easily with automated tools.
All *nix does this. Also try piping to lp then a device.

Sorry to be cheeky, but welcome to 1977. ;)
Show HN: TamilNet – Optical character recognition for Tamil
No; if we write each other IOUs for a million dollars, our net worth remains the same, right?
Temperature difference is caused by heat. A heat engine converts heat into mechanical work. A Carnot heat engine is an idealized form of heat engine vs say a Diesel heat engine.

You can most certainly convert heat into something else. It's called the law of conservation of energy, not heat, which is just one form of energy.
to keep their costs down via direcr (eg, low salarary) and indirect (eg, chilling effects, market manipulation, etc)
I get that, but we survived the world wars and the cold war, so I hold out some hope.
I can only speak for myself, but I can assure you that on my end it's not contempt in the least bit. Rather, it's excitement at the hope of an amazing future; one in which people who work do so because they choose to, and not because they have to. A future in which we can celebrate life, creativity, hobbies, friends and family, without having to toil away the majority of our waking life to obtain the means of survival.

One can absolutely admire the skill of a bricklayer, while celebrating the eventual fact that bricklayers will not be forced to perform that labor if they don't want to. Those are not mutually exclusive things.

"We haven't automated driving"

One can, today, fly to Phoenix Arizona, download the Waymo app, and summon a self-driving vehicle. Although it would be disingenuous to claim that self-driving is a completely solved problem for ALL use cases, it absolutely is "good enough" for very many of them, and will be scaled out faster than you expect.

"but many more have not and most likely never will be."

Unless there's some yet-to-be-discovered supernatural process at-work inside the human brain, this is just plain false. The human brain is an incredibly complicated machine, and nothing more. It's only a matter of time until we understand, or in the worst case, simulate it with sheer computational power.
You can't help who you're attracted to, and race (which is much more than just color) plays a part in that just like body shape and a million other factors do. Yes, as with anything else involving race, it's a huge source of racist noise, but underneath all that there is still the inescapable fact of it.
If it's from VAERS, the number should have a "correlation does not imply causation" asterisk next to it.
I love Skinny Puppy, though they might distract me from work because I'd have to actively listen to them. Rather, I've been listening to cEvin Key's solo albums, particularly The Ghost of Each Room and The Dragon Experience. They really hit the right kind of atmosphere for me.

If OP is looking for industrial rock/metal, then Fear Factory is classic (particularly Demanufacture). 3TEETH's <shutdown.exe> is pretty nice too. Skinny Puppy's Rabies would also be good since Al produced that and made sure it had loads of his classic Ministry sampled guitar sound.

If you're a fan of Pig, check out Wiseblood's Dirtdish, which is a side project of Foetus. And if you're not familiar with Foetus, then do yourself a favor and listen to NAIL, LOVE, or FLOW very soon (which, while not metal, is still incredible work).

If you're interested in more dark ambient type of industrial, then I'd suggest Lustmord's "Heresy", NON's "Children of the Black Sun", Coil's "The Remote Viewer", Darkrad's "Little Black World", or RU486's "My Head is Buzzing", to name a few.
There's the saying of "if you owe the bank $100k you have a problem but if you owe the bank $100 million they have a problem." You're small enough fish you don't have a nearly dedicated person who's bonus and compensation is tied to keeping you from taking your pile of cash and going somewhere else. Individually your business and risk mean basically nothing to your broker most likely.
Please don't be patronizing.

My point is that "the author used a crappy title" doesn't mean submitters should get a pass on "no linkbait" rule (which as was pointed out, is actually a rule.)
Seriously?

There's lots of them on YouTube. Here's one with two different robots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65YDAXfSAWw
I actually like Jackson Pollock’s art. That’s all I can think of.
If I have multiple billions at stake, I would assume my broker would be even more demanding of responding within a time frame. Note, I'm not calling for automatic liquidation, but rather some timeframe wherein discussions must be held or else the posted collateral is seized.
This video really amazed me in terms of automated game development. My fantasies are something like this and GPT-3 plus a couple decades of progress.

I think we'll get to genuinely open ended sand box games.

https://youtu.be/udPY5rQVoW0
For anyone curious, this seems to be the study: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.4.4.1
Without reading this comment's nickname I already knew it would be... you.

JK, if Multics has TCP/IP and VT100 support (or even raw
serial support), IRC, Gopher, E-Mail, News, and Telnet
clients could be backported perfectly for Multics.

IF there's a Z Interpreter for Tops-20 on the KA10, I think
a computer capable on running Multics should be able to run Zork.
One or more <category> tags can be used in the <channel> and in each <item> to describe their content. They can either be single tags or they can be paths like /publishing or /publishing/rss Each one can have a domain attribute that points at an url that describes the categorization taxonomy. We no longer have such things for RSS I think? I only know of syndic8 but I've never seen it in action.

There is also the <rating> element which is even more exotic. It supplies an advisory label for the content in a feed, formatted according to the specification for the Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS).

You can even run your own rating platform.

The categories are for grouping things. A typical blog would have few of them and many entries in each. The tags are more chaotic. Its fine to have a single article with a tag. The domain attribute is for a web directory (I think?) And with the rating system you can give your own units to a property like how advanced, complex or RSS-ish an article is. (arrogance in nano-Dijkstra)

All of that combined make for the best science fiction story.
I'm using them with SimPy, a discrete event simulation library. It took me some time to understand how it works (not an expert) but I finally managed to simulate several operations of an assembly process. It really made think of concurrency and shared state. I think it's cool to know about this stuff, and I'll probably recognize when to use it in future situations.
I think there's a lot of (very much warranted!) bias against tech within the industry, whether it's Google's treatment of its AI ethics researchers (Gebru, Mitchell), Amazon's fake review problem, or Elon Musk marketing Tesla vaporware (full self-driving by 2018, anyone?).

Meanwhile, non-tech people see a workplace with legendary perks and benefits, cheap products with fast delivery, and luxury cars that double as a form of virtue signaling.
In a quote from the report it says it would have taken two weeks to a month to liquidate their positions just at Credit Suisse.
I've never seen any 'extended punch card', or any machine that could punch a 132-column card.

132 was the line length of IBM line printers, imitated by many other popular brands, including Printronix and DEC. They printed on that wide green-stripe, fan-fold paper, which came in a standard size that fit 132-column printers.
Not to mention that the public in other parts of the world seem quite capable of rubbishing their athletes without much government provocation.
Haha i love the tone deaf, dontgiveashit responses of the chromium team, just trolling devs:

[... Dev engages in paragraphs long rant detailing their intricate use case and why it's so essential not realizing the chrome team doesn't give a shit...]

We implemented an origin trial to temporarily opt out from the blocking. Would this solve your concerns while you migrate your app? If so, please see ...

But if it doesn't solve your concerns, guess yer fresh outta luck there, slick.

but more practically I think the suggestions of developers for a sandbox attribute is a great idea and I don't understand the purpose of this change nor how it seems the community wasn't consulted. But I love how when the pushback from devs happens, it's like because the chrome team failed to anticipate these various valid use cases, they're not even going to acknowledge the dev sentiment as a real thing... Pretty weird dynamic obviously they don't care about consultation I wonder what really drives the development mission?
Why do you change URLs instead of submitting the one you like instead as a regular user and let upvotes decide? I appreciate and am thankful to the effort you put into moderating HN, but the user did not submit this URL and changing it from under them is super weird, even with a comment explaining it. Not only that you changed it to a paywalled link which is simply bad form.
Bulk Loading Data into MySQL
And better heat spreading
TLDR, I don't like the philosophy that a website operator needs to get Google's permission for their site to work in Chrome.

I absolutely agree with you and think that we need a term for (the opposition to) this: browser neutrality.
This has been known to everybody but economists since at least 1972
The limit is very high. Every kW generated by hydrogen fusion is a kW that, by the laws of physics, will eventually be dissipated. Enough exponential growth fusing hydrogen on this planet and the earth would quite literally become a mini sun. That is the theoretical limit referred too.
While I don't agree with him, the use of the downvote/flagging in this whole comment section to silence opposing views is getting out of hand.

Please just show him how he's wrong, and leave the comment.

There are a ton of assertions in here about the evilness of amazon which offer as little or less than his comment, yet are happily upvoted.

When people complain about HN becoming like Reddit, this is what they mean. (yes, I know it's been turning into reddit forever, thanks.
This is how GKE Anthos works on prem
Nobody is going to open up and fix EV's in the near future. When they break down people will be expected to just go buy a new one. Especially if they are much cheaper to produce and buy. If you can buy a car for 3-5k nobody is going to fix them.
I don't think it is contempt. I truly believe most people --event technical folks-- who don't work in robotics and AI lack an understanding of just how difficult it is to build and program a robot that can do what "simple" insects (fly, ant, spider, worm, cockroach, etc.) are able to accomplish. Most of the "impressive" robotics videos we are treated to on YouTube are highly staged, choreographed sequences where one out of N attempts is used as some kind of a PR showcase not even remotely linked to real-world useful capabilities of the robot in display.

I remember how people were amazed when robots like Asimo could not be used during the Fukushima disaster. Anyone who works in these fields, even peripherally, has a very different perspective of reality vs. fantasy and knew the score as it pertained to robots like Asimo, their actual utility and capabilities.
Spyware features found in Chinese state benefits app
Ha ha. I remember people making those claims about 4GLs and visual programming tools 30 years ago. It wasn't true then and won't be true in our lifetimes. Domain experts typically lack the mindset to think through edge cases and failure modes.
If we dial into any number of our "higher level behaviors", you can often go all the way back to "survival". Play is an important part of skill acquisition, and the easiest way to incentivize it is to make it "fun". Naturally, having fun as an evolved trait will lead to behaviors that don't necessarily have an obvious survival benefit.

I'd be more surprised to see a mammal that doesn't at all engage in behaviors purely out of enjoyment.
This is a tired old argument.

Economic growth due to technological advance is completely swamped by economic growth due to increased throughput.

It is the throughput, the increase in entropy, that is at issue. Almost all economic growth comes from increasing the flows from sources to sinks. E.g. Turning coal into CO2
Hack your girlfriend WhatsApp for free
It’s also trivial and easy in Haskell — you just need an instance of `Foldable` or `Traversable` on your collection, and then you can fold or traverse it in a configurable way. Or for recursive structures, use https://hackage.haskell.org/package/recursion-schemes. Or even just pass a traversal function as an argument for maximum flexibility.
For now, there is a lot of 'economy' inside making energy usage more efficient. Like the LED bulb vs the incandescent.
Just search for ‘* awesome list’

https://github.com/magnologan/awesome-k8s-security

(Unaffiliated with above, just popped up for k8s hardening awesome list)
And the diver could have pointed out the issues with it instead telling him to stick it up his ass.
would love to know some offerings that are over the top gratis. some day I intend to write/host my own, but the site I went to in the reader aftermath has slowly ratcheted up their conversion to paid incentives/demands, and now I can't add new feeds.
In this economy I would say it's always good to be actively looking. You don't have to leave your current position to interview somewhere else. In terms of salary, the best way to get a raise of 20% has historically been to change companies, it's rare to get that level of a raise at the same company and would need to be part of a major promotion.
The going rate in my area is only about 10-20% higher than what I've been making working from home the past few years. That's not close to enough to make me consider onsite.

Recently, the situation is even more interesting: remote work has exploded, and now there are at least a few companies willing to pay me 300% or more of what I'm making now, to keep working from home.

Obviously, I'm not complaining. I can't help but wonder, though, what all the people who prefer being in the office are going to do.
See also https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/09/discovering-limits-to-gro...
" all economic activity, whether material or just information, requires energy as an input,"

This is not the issue.

The issue is does increasing economic output, require increasing energy use? The answer is no.

The value unlocked from increasing applied intelligence doesn't require commensurately more energy in all cases.

If we figure out a cure for cancer, it'll likely have nothing to do with increased energy usage.

Maybe we figure out how to control simply and cheaply store CO2 in pellets at the bottom of the ocean. Climate changed solved.

Economic output is just a number, it's how we value the stuff we trade among one another.
This was one of the first posts by Ken that I saw and it got me hooked.

He does such a great job at making tear downs like this interesting and accessible.

He has a great companion article with a cheapo charger for comparison: http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and... and a comparison of an Apple MacBook charger and a knock-off: http://www.righto.com/2015/11/macbook-charger-teardown-surpr...

Really fascinating stuff.
What about the energy use in making LED bulbs vs incandescent?
I have no expertise on this topic so I can't agree or disagree with this analysis, but I'd like to commend you on speaking your thoughts.

Too often I have found HN to downvote a comment that goes against the grain until it's dead - can we not have a civilised discussion around difficult topics?
These jobs are usually slow torture for humans to do. Do them long enough, and your body will break under the sun or you will look like a prune, get back pain or a hump and possibly skin cancer.
Let the robots do them as soon as possible.
I didn't fully read this long post but thank you for replying to what a large large large part of this post is, which is a discussion of tagging.
'Most' and 'never' are strong words. I'd imagine many people thought that in the past about modern automation (and it's well documented).

Things will become automated. That is the natural human progression. We are creative, and their are 7+ billion minds with new giants to stand on the shoulder of every day.

AI, soft/compliant robotics, and globalization are strong unrelenting factors/motivators.
Security mailing lists. GitHub has security alerts. Good old fashioned RSS. For example, rubygems.org supports RSS for releases. GitHub Release pages also support RSS. An easy way to create a shared RSS feeds is to create a #news channel in Slack that has all the feeds.

It can be a pain but that pain might be motivation to not pull in dependencies with little thought.
I work a white collar union job in the US where there is no seniority hierarchy. I assume in most professional type union environments this is the case aside from experience requirements for senior job titles (and, to be fair, these would tend to be more strict than in the nonunion world; if the job spec says 10 years experience, you need 10 years).

To chime in on number 2, again my personal experience is the opposite: incompetence needs to be documented and proven to an arbitrator in the worst case. You can't be "incompetent" because of stack ranking or your boss doesn't like you.

On 3, I can only laugh. Union leadership and my shop steward have no say in my day to day work whatsoever other than as a backstop if management isn't following the contract. Even in this case the expectation is typically do whatever the boss says and grieve it later. Exceptions for safety or serious ethical concerns and that's about it.
That's awesome. I know a lot of work is going into things like P1.

I scale some large K8s in fed (not DOD)... ATO is fun. Actually unsure how I'd position something like OPA (actually envisioned them being key back in '17 when working in the Kessel Run relm... called and they hadnt been exposed to fed at the time).

Legit question / maybe dumb - where is DOD at in general perimeter security. Outside looking in & everything before a container runs - network and to OS primarily, cloud envs as well. A lot of Fed needs help here before they can comprehend even a basic Kubernetes authorization. It's also generally more important (at list from controls perspective) in non DOD environments, than something like security context in pods.
TCP checksums aren't that great, but you've usually also got lower layer CRCs which are much better. Though you can still get tripped up by misbehaving network hardware that corrupts a packet and then masks it by recomputing the CRC as the packet goes out again.
Regarding the story of a long-established company having to adapt to FAANG/post-dotcom pay... I've seen a different response to that.

In this case, I was the prospective new hire, at a well-regarded large company. They had a large number of software developers who'd pulled off some very impressive technical accomplishments (comparing favorably to most any tech company you could think of), and had been doing so since before FAANG... In the offer, they made the level Director, even though the role was non-management hands-on technical IC. And the comp. people had also added an additional incentive program that wasn't standard for this level. I figured that might be to work around the company's pre-FAANG pay grades for software-ish people. The team, business unit, and SVP were great, and I was actually very anxious to move. But then the offer letter came from corporate, and turned out to be laden with surprise clauses (regulatory, etc.), and corporate was unable to provide copies of documents that it referenced as things to which I'd be agreeing. My decision mostly came down to the intuitive (besides the practical costs of the surprise eleventh-hour asks): feeling that I'd be at the mercy of any Kafkaesque bureaucratic accidents of a large institution, more than I think I would be at a certain larger FAANG, while the total comp. wasn't close enough to that FAANG -- so accepting would feel more like being a scared loser, than like willfully investing towards success.

Sounds like Intel's variation of paying close to FAANG might've been the way to get that new hire (despite whatever perceived big-established-company downsides there might've been), but at the cost of demoralizing the existing engineering staff who had pre-FAANG comp. (Who then might feel like the losers.)

Has this problem been solved by any long-established company that has employed top-skilled technical people since before FAANG, without paying competitively?
I'll give you an even better one: locus of control

People with internal locus of control are 5x more likely to use failures as stepping sones toward improvement. I know because we did the research. We use this, among other behavioural traits, to recruit talent.
prompt & confirm are native, and so automatically and correctly work with all your accessibility software.

Most "modern" modals struggle to correctly inform a screenreader, let alone all the other accessibility tools.

So yes, I would say that 'confirm' is a far better way of doing it.