skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe just don't buy a Kindle in the first place if this is your outlook?
Goodness what’s disturbing thing about the wasps. I needed to read something like this if I was ever to earth another fig. Thank you!
I don't know much about kernel security dev, let alone plain kernel dev, so take what I said and about to say with a (big) grain of salt.

Indeed, it seems there's a similar issue with traditional syscalls. I suppose that a larger attack surface means more potential vulnerabilities. The whole buffer must be considered "unsafe" by the kernel. I don't know how that structure is allocated, if it can be relocated to some other existing area to trick the kernel into doing IO there or something else.

I really don't have a clear picture of what could be done, so it might just be my paranoid sense tingling. I definitely should be more trustful wrt what's done by the kernel devs, they know their craft.
Hrm, kind of suggests the PAE function would be a useful library on its own in a range of places.
Hybrid event platforms to consider in 2021
Engineers and scientists are generally considered a "resource". The winning power takes them, if needed.

Scientists are generally not considered a threat to power (unlike high-ranked officials). For example, Piotr Kapitsa had his arguments with Lavrentiy Beria and Stalin. Instead of death (delivered for much smaller insubordination) he was gifted a rifle:

"Beria summoned Kapitsa who amazingly refused him: “If you want to speak to me, then come to the Institute.” Beria ate humble pie and took a hunting rifle as a peace offering. But Kapitsa refused to help anymore."
Well, as a confirmed remainer and someone who will never forgive Johnson for stabbing us in the back, eh. The act required him to send a letter, which he did. Frankly, it's a silly and spurious requirement. It didn't require him to want an extension, or bar him for saying he didn't think it was a good idea.

Parliament can't directly negotiate treaties with foreign powers. It's just not possible, that's a function of the executive. Parliament can approve or disapprove of such treaties but can't determine what the executive wants to do. The same goes for the referendum and is why it was a stupid idea. No referendum can require parliament or the government to want to do something, or specify exactly and unambiguously how they should go about doing something they don't want to do.
I am new to UI/UX. Is it comparable to bootstrap? How is it actually different from the CSS and UI component libraries?
This is correct.

The "middle class" is quite a recent invention; it arrived with the Industrial Revolution, and is largely Victorian in origin. The growth of commerce prompted a demand for large numbers of clerical workers: people who wore suits and ties to work, and lived in their own homes in the suburbs. These were not aristocrats moving down the scale; these were aspirational working-class folk, who wanted to separate themselves from their background.

Most of us are now pretty-much middle-class. Regional accents have softened; we're all familiar with middle-class manners and customs; farming and manufacturing nowadays employ very few workers. Most of us are more-or-less clerical workers now.
Lets see:

- Boeing has feedback from every aircraft, maintenance data and data from every crash. They've been building planes for 104 years.

- And the plane has A SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE, of a sensor that need to be replaced regularly , as their maintenance data would show. That killed 500 people, grounded the entire fleet for two years and coat them billions.

I work in corporate, we consult other corporates. Stop peddling this dangerous fantasy that every decision is based on data, or is even made by an expert in the area.
An unexpected benefit to legalizing and taxes drugs: lower incentive for drug dealers to Jack up the price of houses!
Sounds to me like a side effect of an A/B test.
Any of the big players could keep up if they wanted to, it's just that none of them have an incentive too.

* MS cares a little bit about the web because they have a few web apps that are pushing the envelope, but they really don't benefit from a powerful browser as much as Google does (at least yet). The #1 reason they have a browser is to push Bing.

* Amazon's websites (twitch, Amazon Prime Video..) could probably run on IE6.

* Apple's revenue stream would get hurt by people moving to the web.

* Facebook... well it's complicated. For now they've been doing a good job with their VR browser, but in the long term they will likely pull an Apple and make it not possible for VR website to be as good as the VR apps purchased through the oculus store.

(I don't know enough about all the big Chinese players)
Official press announcement of judgment (German): https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilung...

Core point: Terms and Conditions must be balanced against the rights of the user per the "good faith" principle, especially when there is a conflict with the basic right of free speech.

I think the specific way in which the court has tried to enforce this is maybe a bit toothless, but to me the important aspect isn't the judgment itself but what its reasoning implies: that the terms of agreement with Facebook do conflict with freedom of speech meaningfully, at least in Germany, and while the terms do win out, they don't do so unconditionally but have to remain proportional and account for the interests of the user in good faith.
Won't any amount of lethality preclude some transmission?
Are you by chance thinking of MVC?

MVU is more towards functional rather than imperative programming.
Unless you own more than one home, or want to extract your equity as debt then increasing housing prices are paper wealth you will never be able to realize until death.

Why. Because while your home went up, so did everyone else's, you still need a place to live so if you sold your home you could only buy another home that was of equal value to your current home thus making it is net transfer not a gain...
Attending public school in the UK (and acquiring said public school accent and manners and customs) is such a massive advantage that it is probably the single thing that I could do to ensure my children have every opportunity they could possibly have in their lives.
Using western propaganda to strengthen a western propaganda point.

There are lots of communist party members in lots of organisations. Just like there are lots of republicans in organisations.

But the premise that you are trying to support is: ccp “controls” all the companies. Not: ccp membership can be found in lots of companies.
This looks awesome. Definitely will use it in my next project. Great work!!!!!
The i860 was lovely! I wrote some software for an i860-based hypercube back in the day, and it was the fastest thing on earth.

The reason it never went mainstream is easy enough to explain: expensive chips and (for the hypercube) a very different programming model.
Why do courts have the power to tell me what I will publish on my website?
> A third option is to try and reduce concentration in major cities, and attract people to regional areas where housing supply and demand are better matched and prices are much lower.

In Canada there is essentially no where that fits this description if you look at price to income ratios. The price increases in tiny towns in the middle of nowhere have increased as dramatically as in major centres, from a lower starting point. The locals earn far less and cannot keep up with the prices.
I'm a fan of raising my legs and propping the laptop up against my knee. Comfortable typing angle and my head can rest on a very small pillow so I am no craning my neck forward.
Maybe it's A/B testing? if so, I'm in the same "sAQA" bucket ...
Replace "programming" with "maths" or "physics". Does the article make no sense? Exactly.

All intellectual pursuits are indeed hard and require a large amount of dedication and some natural talent to reach any amount of ability. We are standing on the shoulders of giants that we must comprehend. It took thousands of years and some of the brightest minds humanity produced to invent Calculus, why would it be so easy and intuitive for others to grasp without putting in the work?

Craftsmen in the old ages were always highly prized, since learning a skill to a degree you're actually useful is always hard. Anyone can learn how to make Excel formulas, but only a tenth of those would ever be able to reach the skill level to make an Excel clone. We don't say building rockets is easy because people are able to build bottle rockets, do we?
Wait till you hear about the recession we're having in Lebanon
If you have to extract a key to do what you're doing, then you should stop and think if you were intended to do this and if you think it's therefore a honest thing to do.
The stupid thing is there is a lot of land still, just need to look at the space between Albany and Silverdale, all rural, and yet it’s only Silverdale north that is being developed. Likewise inner city suburbs have a NIMBY problem where it’s taken ages to finally change planning permission / zoning rules to build up. For example some areas on the shore only recently allowed 3-6 story multiple occupant dwellings. We need not just more housing, but denser (quality) housing in the inner areas. Doesn’t have to be all high rises either- look at Paris and their 6 story height limit. Can be done properly.
When did postmodernists infiltrate the ACM?
Doesn't the restrict keyword solve this?
Just FYI, infected vaccinated people have same levels of virus as unvaccinated people, and transmit the virus at the same rate. Best way to “stay away from unvaccinated people” is to just get yourself vaccinated and call it a day. If someone is immunocompromised they are not safe near vaccinated people either.

https://www.businessinsider.com/cdc-fully-vaccinated-people-...
The position of all people is equal before the law. A statement therefore ought to be treated in the same way whether it targets group x or group y.

> When people make statements about whites or males, it is generally not about all males.

That's neither here nor there. This is to be interpreted based on the actual statement. "immigrants blah blah" targets immigrants as a group in the same way as "white males blah blah" targets white males as a group. If the rest of the statement is the same in both cases and unacceptable then both statements are equally unacceptable.

axiosgunnar above has a point that the same statement targeting "white males" instead of immigrants would have been equally unacceptable, and would have fallen equally foul of the law.
Rørlegger Oslo er din partner I Oslo og omegn – Rørleggeren Oslo AS
Equality in particular is a tricky subject with languages that have reference types and subtypes.

Even C# and Java define equality between all types ("5".Equals(5) is false, not an error).

Still, I wasn't trying to defend dynamic typing over static typing, just pointing out how to conceptualize the dynamic language decision in terms of type theory, to point out that it's not surprising.
It's normal here in Canada. Not just fast food. In a sit-down restaurant with wait staff, refills for coffee are usually included, as well. And a glass of tap water is almost always free.

In a sense, I'm amazed anyone pays! These drinks are approximately the cost of the water and no one wants to lose a customer over $6 because they were thirsty and got upset at the surprise on the bill. A flat, relatively high but known cost might be better marketing. "No surprises" is the American fast food recipe for marketing/brand success, really.
You just critiqued the author for assuming he know whether the decision was made on data.

Now youare assuming its about homelessness - you dont know that homelessness was even considered in any way when this decision was made, so this entire critique is baseless.

For all we know someone wanted to look like their are innovating, and got some brownie point for their end of year
Sounds like the large buddhist numbers like the 不可説不可説転 (unexplainable unexplainable turn).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_large_numbers?wprov...
In my experience the worst response is to say you are a computer programmer, that will kill the conversation.
The problem you see talked about in CACM over and over again is that admissions to undergraduate CS are unstable. Students hear it is a hot field one moment, the next they hear you will be age discriminated against at 29.

ACMers want student to be less fickle and don’t get that if they’d made alliances with working developers to advance our mutual interests they’d benefit too. (E.g. those students would hear better stories.)

As it is you get articles like this that miss the point over and over again.
- I think the article didn't really say all that much.

- A generic statement like "programming is hard" or "programming is easy" isn't useful to anyone.

- I personally find it very difficult to extrapolate to other people. If something comes easily to me, I probably wouldn't even notice or consider that it's difficult for other people.
Luckily Astartes was not shut down but absorbed: https://twitter.com/astartes40k/status/1369666193989111808?s... hope the creator gets to achieve what he hopes to do with GW.
May be they should help these people instead https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8
If you search online for articles in many different languages, going like "you wouldn't believe whats inside there, you will never eat this again", spreading fud you would think like me something is up.
> I've always been baffled by why Google search — the flagship product by the world's largest tech company — has so many totally undocumented features.

If I can speculate on their overall behavior, there's no intent behind this. They are relatively decentralized, and everyone is throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks.

To have a feature known you need concerted effort by design teams to make it accessible, marketing to make it known and so on. There's nothing of the sort with Google.
I honestly don't see a way out until boomers start dying. The 2030s will probably see a large decline in the housing market
DEC was part of HP at that point, so it was the HP leadership that made the decision to ditch Alpha.
C is very "pointer heavy", and much code involves chasing linked lists and the like. This tends not to suit VLIW well.

Modern languages like Rust tend to produce more instructions for the same high-level logic, but those instructions are easier to schedule for superscalar CPUs. It typically ends up as a bit of a wash on CISC processors, but could be better than C/C++ on VLIW.

I guess we'll never know now...
I work from bed on my Macbook Air M1. I just can't do the same on my other laptops it's just to hot on my tummy. For me this is the first true 'tummytop-laptop'.
Some of them do get seriously ill and/or die.

It seems, vaccinated suffer less symptoms or onset is later. However, they seem to have higher viral loads. This gives them more chances to mingle while they are infected but unaware of it.

It's an analogy. It's not perfect.

> Mary Mallon, the first known case of a healthy carrier in the United States, was proven responsible for the contamination of at least one hundred and twenty two people, including five dead [5].
Your app sounds convenient but doesn't play market already have several apps that can show you the prices of cryptocurrencies in real-time?
> How long will we be living in a masked world?

Forever, because too many self-centered people refused to do the few simple things it would have taken to get the situation even remotely close to under control. It's already gone on longer than it needed to, and because of human selfishness it's almost certainly just going to get worse.
I also think that documentation implies long-term support, and a commitment not to change the expected behavior. Any time you document something, you are telling people that this is not only the way that the software works now, but also the way that you intend it to work in the future. That established intent seems anathema to Google's culture, with the amount of churn and project cancellation that exists.
Identifying Deepfake Data Sources with AI-Based Tagging
That's cool!

C++ had support for partial applications with templates (std::bind iirc), and it was possible to implement closures as objects with the () operator implemented. Now it has support for closure with a dedicated syntax.

It would be possible to do something similar in C - a closure is just a function pointer and a bunch of parameters bundled together, but I don't think there's enough flexibility in the language to make it look like regular function calls.
I question the premise of this article:

> Why does it seem routinely acceptable—arguably fashionable—to make such a general and definitive statement [as "programming is hard"] ?

The implicit premise in ^^^^ is that people call programming "hard" more often than they call other fields "hard". I disagree.

Consider the following statements:

* teaching school is hard

* practicing law is hard

* playing the piano is hard

* playing baseball is hard

* painting is hard

* accounting is hard

* working retail is hard

* writing is hard

*none* of those statements strike me as less likely than "programming is hard". Pretty much everything (done decently) is fairly hard, and thus saying so does not seem remarkable.
How can you say "I assume" things which are literally SAID in the parent comment? Do you know what "assume" means?

As for the "all we know" thesis, for all you know the Sun might not rise tomorrow. But odds are it will. And therefore all thought process and decision making is made on odds. Not on absolute, perfect certainty.

And the odds are that management decisions at McDonald's have a higher quality data sourcing and analysis process, and have spent more time figuring a problem out, than bunch of random people on Hacker News, who spoke about McDonald's that day simply because they saw a tweet about it.

But of course, "for all we know" maybe the Einstein of fast food is here among us, so who knows?!
There are hundreds of thousands buildings like that. The threat of potential consequences causes construction companies to mostly do a good job, so that out of those hundreds of thousands of buildings we rarely see any toppling with people in it.

On the other hands developers are disincentivized to ship perfect working code. It happens every time they are told "Just fucking ship it!" and when they colleagues are rewarded for delivering imperfect code on time.
"I know some devs will say that if they told me what was the cause then I could work around that"

> Sir, why am I in jail?

> if we told you the law, you could work around it.
Definitely putting on my fireproof suit here, but consider it possible that

(a) The web is a failure

and

(b) Chrome monopoly is the best outcome for the web.

OK, obviously the web is great, I'm using it right now, and it hosts millions of useful websites, so why is it a failure?

Consider the simple act of buying something. To make a purchase on the web, I have to type in a 16 digit credit card number, 3 digit CRC number, expiry date, name and address. Every single time. After 30 years of the web, nobody has figured out a way to make this securer or simpler. Well, no, I'm sure many have figured out a way, but nobody has implemented it.

By contrast, on my phone, I can buy with a simple fingerprint check. Apple provides that service, I find it valuable, and the firms in Apple's walled garden of apps find it valuable too.

Why is payment easy on iPhone? Because Apple, as monopoly provider of that walled garden, makes a profit from making it easy.

Why is payment hard on the web? Because there is nobody to make a profit from making it easy.

In short, the web's infrastructure is a massive public good, and like many public goods, in the absence of government coercion it is underprovided.

Web payment is just one example, and I'm sure there are others, but it's an important one. The lack of a decent payment infrastructure leads to pathologies. When paying for content is a hassle, people give away free content and use alternative monetization strategies like advertising - so we get Facebook, "you are the product" and manipulation by algorithms. When paying for items is a hassle, it's easier to just use Amazon who have stored your credit card already - so we get a huge ecommerce monopoly.

If Google effectively owned the web, change would happen faster; users would be more satisfied; web development would get easier instead of being a mass of horrible hacks around 30 years of legacy standards.

There'd still be competition. Apple, Google and Facebook would compete as platforms. That's an oligopoly, but platforms are natural oligopolies - nobody wants 1000 different platforms.

Conclusion: Chrome's dominance is probably efficient.
There are better ways to split a string on spaces in Bash than calling external tools. For example, the following will split the line as intended, and put the results in variables:

read name state roles ages version <<< "$result"
in about one year: 38% of the home workers have serious back pains.
FORTRAN or any language with lots of arrays and matrices.
> They should force Apple to allow alternative engines to Webkit, thus enabling much stronger competition to Safari and to native Apps on Apple mobile devices.

The ironic part here is that back in 2007-2013 Microsoft was sued by the European Union [1], and was forced to implement a downloader GUI that offers a randomized overview of available Browsers [2]; and their website/download links.

Back then Microsoft's defense was that an enduser could just install another Operating System on the hardware if they didn't want to be forced to use Internet Explorer.

And now, 10 years later, here we are, where Apple absolutely controls the Hardware _and_ the Software. Yet the European Union does seemingly nothing against it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Commission

[2] (with screenshots) https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-fined-731m-by-eu-in-...
Curious if you looked into Editor.js at all when building?

Im in the middle of sizing up text editors myself, seems like editor.js would require less work, but wondering if I’m missing any red flags and should go with Slate or tiptap (prosemirror) instead.

At some point down the road I’d love to implement collaborative editing.
Well the most widespread around the world is the Smyrna variety. So...
Mimecast Releases Its CyberGraph AI Email Security Tool
UDT: High-performance data transfer protocol for transferring large datasets
In Romania at least, the English taught in school is American English, not British English.
This isn't a vegan thing, it's just the nirvana fallacy and it is everywhere.
Maybe https://duckduckgo.com/?q=worms+eating+polysterene ?
Is there anywhere in the English-speaking world where a voice crack is called differently?

In general, the various flavors of English that you showed are extremely close to each other, especially when looking at the standard/official language from each country (which is implied when you say American English or Australian English). There is much more variation in more localized versions of the language, such as Cockney.
Which is my point. They are doing what’s best for their bottom line, not engaging in some nebulous form of class warfare.
>but why would you want to release new features for it?

Why not?

FreeDOS got even a package manager ;)

And TK4- gets new features too....like tcp/ip
Those observations pertain specifically to developers who howl about vague technical debts. Those tend to be juniors.

Seniors point out specific issues with specific consequences and lay out specific actions to resolve/mitigate. The term “technical debt” isn’t usually needed in that case.

Technical debt terminology is a fig leaf for “I dont understand and I wont put in the effort to learn”.
It says so in the ruling: § 307 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BGB

The published terms of service were invalid because they unreasonably disadvantage the users of the network contrary to the requirements of good faith.