skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nice new findings in the dictionary!

What do you mean by having 'th' as a phoneme? If you mean the sound "θ", I don't think any of the words are pronounced with one in Finnish, typically. Rather, they have a "t" sound followed by a "h", or just a "t".
Regarding your first point (and I think some of the commenters in that thread also address this already) is that as long you don't have uncommitted changes, you're safe. You're right that a lot of git-commands mess with uncommitted changes in hard-to-recoverable ways, but once changes are committed, there's almost no way to mess anything up, you can always go back to the previous state (git reflog <branch> telling you which commit that was).

Regarding the second point - if you have a rebase-based work-flow, you will encounter this problem less often (or not at all).

For your third point - what helped me a lot is to actively distinguish between commits and the working tree, and making myself aware that branches really are just "pointers" to commits (obviously, but somehow, actively thinking about it made the intent of git commands a lot easier to understand). Also, most git commands are just combinations of other commands. git reset is just moving the pointer (--soft without touching the working tree, --hard will do so), rebase is essentially a hard-reset with consecutive cherry-picks afterwards, and so on.

Also, an eye opener for me personally has been that e.g. an interactive rebase with squash towards a branch that is strictly ahead of you except for the commits you want to rebase is essentially just a "git reset --soft <target>", and then recommitting everything with a fancy commit-message. This and similar mental gymnastics with git-commands has helped me a lot; most of them really are quite sane (except for all those crazy options), "git checkout" is really the odd-one-out of the bunch (and "git pull" a combination of things that should never have been combined in the first place).
The farmers will either adapt or their business will fail. There’s gonna be a lot of wasted, rotten meat.
Having been through two Perforce -> git transitions of medium sized repos with a few dozen people contributing and being the person with the most git knowledge in the group to be called in when people new to git mess things up: these GUI git clients are ok if you know what you are doing and what the consequences of checking various checkboxes are. They are not conducive to people learning how the tool git works and how to use it to solve real world problems. The command line is a great way to learn git and then fundamental understanding can be used to reverse engineer what GUIs do under the hood.
The project I'm currently the "lead developer" on never had a PM, so we directly communicate with users/customers. Often we are able to implement changes and make them available in a test environment within the hour - people are amazed, because they're used to everything taking days at the very least, usually weeks or months, with a lot of stuff never being fixed and so on.
But that's just turtles all the way down. The Fed can mine that forked chain even more easily than the original one.

When one actor has a money printer they can use the permissionless, decentralized nature of the bitcoin network as a weapon. It's a vulnerability they can exploit.
Noob is just a contraction of Newbie.
Newbie -> Newb -> Noob. It's still used interchangeably with Newb.
well there are lots of demonstrations in Europe against vaccine mandates, ofc it ain't on TV wink wink
No. I managed to comply with GDPR with 2 hours work on my eCommerce site.
But in the long term the market would determine a fair price. Assuming demons are rational economic actors, that is.
I'm more inclined to blame the US government for a lackadaisical approach to privacy over here. I'd love GDPR-style protections for the apps and sites I use; implementing them on our apps was a pain, but made me jealous.
Ns-3 – a discrete-event network simulator for Internet systems
You understand that isn't the same mathematically as reversing the hash? If you farm the set of all possible x and try them to see what works you do not have an inverse function in your hands.
https://apnews.com/article/lifestyle-business-health-califor...

I saw this though memeorandum.com (still goin', still heavy on the right wing sources)
Is there such a myth that’s widely held?

I find Google incredibly useful, but I’ve never considered them anything close to infallible.
I find it selfish that someone expects me to treat them like a teammate when they can’t be bothered to show up.
Huh! You left out the most funky part: you wrote a FIX parser in Typescript.

What are people using it for? To make web apps and just not have to roll their own wrappers around FIX/FIX-derived data? (That is, if all back ends are used to speaking FIX, it’s nicer to have the front end and web serving tools also just speak it?).
What would you recommend using instead of git?

(Myself, I've been heard complaining that git is overly complex, but the source code control systems that I used to use before git include Subversion, CVS and various Rational products and I have no desire to go back to any of them.)
> Finding _an x_ for your y is not the same as finding _the x_.

Not in all cases, but in the case of NFTs and other cryptocurrencies, it is. If a second private key fulfills all constraints of the original one (like size and all computed results so far), it is functionally equivalent to the original one.
The grain of salt to add is that rates are dependent on reporting, just like rates of a disease are dependent on diagnosis.

In my part of the US, the rate of “burglar bars” on windows have slowly gone down and I see no uptick. This leads me to give credence the “crime down” hypothesis based on people’s behavior at scale.

On the other hand I see more preparation for civil disaster and disorder. Firearms may be more part of that story than a reflection of people’s thoughts about the potential for victimization during a “normal” day.
Chicago has strict gun laws. Illinois doesn't.

The trouble with a raw list of stats is that there's no context; why are all these shootings happening? They don't all or even mostly seem to be armed robbery.
This is really convoluted. There is a $3 app from the App Store called iVerify that checks. [1]

1. https://www.iverify.io/
Tech companies?
You have no rights in front of a cop. You only have rights in front of a judge. A cop can break every single one of your rights as they want, including kill you. It's frankly the most absurd system to ever exist. Your rights should exist well before it makes it to court (if you want to wait that long...if you get a court date). This whole system that cops can escalate your punishment and practically ruin your life financially is the greatest injustice in criminal justice system of the US. But talk of worker protections and limiting police powers is evil rhetoric here among the actual ruling class.
My grandfather went to school until he was 14, but he was also highly literate, had a keen technical insight, and was generally fairly smart.

He wasn't unhappy in life, or the way his career as a factory worker turned out. At least, as near as I can determine those kind of things: he was an old-fashioned kind of man who didn't have a heart to heart with his grandchildren. He never ate pizza in his life, and refused to eat it when I offered to take him out to try it.

But at the same time I've always felt he could have achieved much more if he continued school. The reason he didn't was because his family was poor and another child working was needed to put bread on the table. A big reason this mandatory schooling exists is for these kind of reasons.

That being said, I do think there's too much emphasis on degrees; not having a college degree is almost something you're embarrassed of. My brother did basically a useless "animal care" study because he felt like he had to do A study (note: it's not a useless education, but there are tons of people doing it and very few jobs, almost no-one who graduates gets a job in that field and the impression I had from his friends is that it's mostly the kind of thing people do when they don't know what else to do).
> That includes, btw, respect for the opposite point of view, since curiosity is somewhere short of certainty.

Noted! I will endeavor to be more curious and less certain.
What about staging lines to the index? I tried ‘git add -i’, but it feels pretty clunky compared to selecting some lines with a mouse in git-gui.
Thanks so much for holding Cloudflare accountable for this. It's upsetting that they had so much input from you leading up to it and now they're dropping the ball. A lot of accessibility stuff and mission statements just honestly amounts to virtue signalling with companies and sad to see that's the case with Cloudflare so hope they step up. It shouldn't have to get to the point where they're sued but I feel like more often than not that's the only thing that changes things like this.
> Since then it seems like editors/ides have advanced and eaten emacs’s lunch

Is that true? I know that popular editors have tons of extensions available (with VSCode leading the pack), but is any other editor as programmable and user-tweakable as Emacs? I think Atom was an attempt in that spirit, but its momentum was completely killed by VSCode.

As an example, which other app will let you link to emails, or specific locations in code, in your organizational tool?

I feel that Emacs puts the user in the driver's seat in a way that almost no other piece of modern software even comes close. The only comparable, in my mind, is the *nix/GNU ecosystem, and that's about as ancient as Emacs.

----

PS: One more option that hasn't been mentioned yet is Neorg (Org+Neovim). Was on HN recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27802153
This happens in the crypto currency space all the time. I have friends that have launched very thought out projects that they spend a significant amount of time on. Then they’ll launch some meme project and it will do 1000x better. It’s certainly a weird feeling.
Thanks! Mothballs might keep me away as well, though. I assume some of the smell would "soak in".
> fully vaccinated people who get infected

Emphasis added. These are a smaller percentage than unvaccinated people who get infected. So if you cherry-pick that group (who got vaccinated then got infected) and then say "look, it's the same as the unvaccinated", well that's not giving an accurate picture.

> latest data from the article is proving that natural immunity (which is lifelong and protects against variants) is king.

For the benefit of people reading this, this idea that "natural is better" does not appear to be correct:

"The evidence shows that protective antibodies generated in response to an mRNA vaccine will target a broader range of SARS-CoV-2 variants ... compared to antibodies acquired from an infection."

https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2021/06/22/how-immunity-genera...

"Vaccination offers longer, stronger immunity"

https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/why-covid-19-vaccine...

"Why a vaccine can provide better immunity than an actual infection"

https://theconversation.com/why-a-vaccine-can-provide-better...
One of the very few things from C that I miss in C++ is anonymous structs and enums. I really don’t understand why they are not allowed.

That is, C style enums don’t have to have a name but “type safe” (enum class) ones do. One classic use is to name an otherwise boolean option in a function signature; there’s typically no need to otherwise name it.

C++ incompatibly requires a name for all struct and class declarations, again a waste when you will only have a single object of a given type.
Most of the authors I linked here are not linked with Luciferianism. They deal with occult 'rituals' in order to gain a certain result - wealth, love, happiness, destruction of enemies, getting more opportunities. So you can expect to find a lot of rituals that aid you in getting those results. The work is not philosophical or analytical - but result oriented.

Here is the link to 'Liber Azerate' in English : https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmUHcdL7U78k1FiQbh5aC4JKVf...

And here is the link to 'Liber Anaxeiraxz'(another good book) - https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmT7m33x9munihmnAXxqth5mWP...
Keep in mind the new standard sets breeding sow's enclosure to be no less than 24 sqft, (think 6x4 feet). I think it's a reasonable and humane standard to be met. It's a good thing the industry is under pressure due to this, and the benefits here outweigh the consequences of pork shortage and higher prices.
Over-engineering (the root of all evil) (2016)
Given the stigma attached to summoning demons I would expect a dearth of accurate historical documentation. Practitioners would have taken pains not to leave evidence of their activities.
That’s great for you, doesn’t mean companies want or need to comply. They’ve decided that it’s more worthwhile to block the EU instead of invest in complying with the GDPR. The EU knew this would happen.
Yeah, what the actual fuck. This really makes me question the audience on this site...

Does anyone have any alternatives to hacker news? Preferably ones with more skeptics than there are occultist and "demonologist" morons?

Fucking bizarre.
Morality is not universal. Life is a series of trade-offs. It is impossible to live without causing suffering to other creatures. Others choose differently from you. All of those are coherent.
The return on investment in physical presence is conversations that aren’t mediated by Zoom. If you’re going to have a rule of using Zoom anyway, there’s no point.
Lots of ways to make it less risky too.

E.g. asking existing employers to step down to part time or going on contract while taking on part time contracts elsewhere. When I took my first contract (currently back on full time), I took a 40% contract and negotiated with my then-boss to step down to 60%, which let me build up a bigger cushion first before I went onto contracting full time.

Critical that people don't underestimate the multiple they should be asking for, though, and actually set aside enough money and ensure they're properly insured etc.
I am happy for them and can live fine without any sites that have blocked me like this so far.

> economically nonviable,

Please remember: Google was a massive success long before they started tracking people all over the web.

This isn't about being economically viable. This is to spite people because they are not content with not being able to squeeze the last few cents out each of us.
Show HN: A parallel snapshot testing framework in Rust
Earth's energy imbalance removes almost all doubt from human-made climate change
I’m seeing the meat departments of grocers in western Nevada and Arizona becoming very busy, and lots of small vans in their parking lots around opening time.
People grow, things change, totally unexpected things occur. In an infinitely variable world data, is just one indicator.
People use nodejs in finance backends too. Its async operators make it easy to munge different data streams together and fan in/out results.
They're several years old, but Duy Nguyen who invented them hasn't been around that much recently, which is why they're still marked "experimental".
Walls have never been fool proof, though that doesn't mean building them is a waste of time.
I think it's great that he's accomplished this -- but he acts like he inventing Consulting, and is the first to live a beach life (or whatever one's paradise is) as a result. That's been a thing for decades now, especially for that 30-45 year old sweet-spot-o-life phase he's in. I'm glad for him, sincerely, regardless.

However, he does deserve to get bitten by clients who read his article and get offended by the (very immature and very unprofessional) condescension towards clients and their "silly ideas" that he _blogs_ about.
Pro-tip, don't buy exotic ammunition that was never actually sold to the general public from dodgy guys on the internet. That youtuber who nearly blew his face off recently with his 50cal wasn't the victim of expired ammunition; his ammunition was almost certainly counterfeit and "handloaded" with the wrong powder or far too much powder.

In old ammunition, the primary concerns are the corrosive residue the ammunition will leave behind, rounds that won't go off at all, or rounds with a delayed reaction ("hangfire".) Hangfires can be dangerous if they go unnoticed, but aren't spontaneous "gun explodes in your face" events. You're also fairly likely to experience hangfires and rounds that simply don't work when shooting new production cheap 22lr; rimfire is notoriously unreliable and when rimfire ammunition is made cheap, you'll encounter 'duds' often enough. If you're at a gun range just trying to have fun, this is generally little more than an annoyance.

Centerfire ammunition is more reliable in general. With ancient centerfire ammunition, you have to wonder whether the ammunition was ever any good in the first place. A century ago, there were plenty of companies/countries making really shitty rifle ammunition that you might still find for sale today. That ammunition was never good at the time, and age hasn't made it any better. But some companies/countries were also making perfectly good ammunition a century ago, and that ammunition is generally just as reliable today as it ever was. But it will leave behind hydrophilic corrosive salts in your gun, so maybe think twice before shooting lots of it then neglecting to clean your gun.
So more knives results in escalation as opposed to one-way knifing or victimization in other ways?
I'm mildly amused that your set of commands can't actually commit anything other than a brand-new file!

I will admit that I'm a lazy git user, and do most of my commits with `git commit -a`, rather than `-am` since I do try and give a short paragraph explaining the reasoning behind whatever the title message claims is the purpose of the commit.

I do run `git diff` first to see what I've changed, and if the diff has unrelated changes in different files I'll usually break it up into separate commits.

Decent introductory list, though. It won't surprise you that I think diff should be learned immediately; whether or not you need rebase depends on the conventions of the codebase, and if someone can learn it later they should, it can get tricky.
Sidenote: This seems to advertorial from TSMC.
Are you thinking sanctions for states who prohibit cannabis trade?
If anyone is wondering what sort of writing would get you canceled in the US in the 1970s, this is a decent example.

Source: I'm old enough to have been able to understand news stories of the 1970s as they were being published.
I've used git for over a decade, and I can't think of anything new I've learned in the past 4 years.

And that last new thing was when git added worktree, which I don't actually use, but I learned about.

Contrast that with almost any other program....it's impressive.
What prevents the Fed from operating as many nodes as they need to overrule the "honest" node operators?
Carnot cycle, isn't it? Not great for efficiency, probably less than 50% round trip.
Your post comes off as snooty but I think it would go a long way if you just replaced "educated" with "better informed." "Better informed" is just another way of phrasing the thesis of your post, that HN readers tend to not like crypto projects and they're rational/correct. "Educated" vaguely implies formal education and has more of a judgmental quality.

[Edit: mimixco edited his post and it's better now although still a strong claim :) .]
No doubt it could happen but I agree with you. This entire post is very odd and makes absolutely no sense at all.
I'm confident that there are many, many people who would choose to continue living with no permanent home (tent, RV, etc) and spend their UBI on oxy, meth, heroin or crack.
Many of us don't complain about being blocked, we just poke fun at the ridiculously dishonest way they phrase it.
And that's totally valid. gitk is my main experience with visual git tools and using it gives a ton of information that is not only visually nice to look at, but also pretty easy to navigate. But gitk isn't always the most available and sometimes I just need a quick look at the history. They're all just tools in the toolbox, but even knowing the tool exists is a first step.
Admittedly I didn't and will not read TFA, but this title... like yeah, "internal resistance" is what laziness and lack of discipline feel like from the insider! Those aren't the only possible attributions but they sure are common ones. (I speak from experience, both personal and otherwise.)
Your delta by itself doesn't really matter to anyone but yourself but all those deltas add up over time and I think accelerated. Bad reputation gets around. I swore them off myself.
Yes, the critical point for condensation of CO2 is 31 C:

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/physics/chapter/13-5-phase...

However, I imagine you could wait for your too-hot-to-condense gas to cool and condense. That would probably be vastly more efficient than adding refrigeration.

It would depend on the materials used for the pressure tank, whether you can add more surface area and the external temperature.

You could even put the CO2 Tank under water in a deep lake/ocean. Then you don't have to have such thick materials to contain the pressure. The CO2 could be dissipating its heat and pressurizing as you pump it down (use a flexible tube so the water is compressing the CO2). For the return journey, use a rigid pipe so it doesn't lose energy pushing outward on a flexible pipe.
Just checked; it isn't. DDG works fine of course.
> Gold was chosen by the market as the best monetary medium.

The same market has also accepted:

> and the continuous debasement of dollars has somehow been accepted as feature, not a bug. Every decade unto infinity, dollars will become worth less.

As well as accepting a host of other things beyond paper notes redeemable for x.

> Nobody chose fiat.

The shareholders of the federal reserve branches did…

> but I fear these gains hide the weaknesses in our monetary systems.

I don't have that fear, the market will adapt with the times based on demand and risks individual actors perceive relative to the power they have to make their desires a reality, rather than some hypothetical idealized scenario we can carve out in our minds about how it "should" be.

Some to this day only do commodity (i.e. certain multi party tested quality of gold and oil) settlement with other actors, others are okay with rehypothicated UST's and AAPL paper, and others are ok with BTC/ETH/USDT/beenie baby tokens/etc.
> Does anyone know why this happens?

Where to start?

Every organization that grows suffers from this.

At some point as you’ve noticed the ones that rise to the top excel at consolidation of power and expanding influence, by projecting success and gaining a network of support by carving out influence to cronies.

Part of this is because it’s necessary: The skills for building and running a small company isn’t the same as for a large one.

But this is where things fall apart: The same skills that took the small org to a large organization is also more rewarding and remains more rewarding
than the core skills and values that was fundamental to the business in the first place.

The few orgs that succeed tend to keep someone who could be or was part of the core workforce calling the shots.

Even this isn’t a guarantee of success though (disruption). Sun Microsystems didn’t lose their way, but they didn’t adopt.
Looks like https://pablo.rauzy.name/teaching/2016-2020.html#ddll (via profile)