skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well said.

This article did not go over much of the problems with this stuff.

Demons are notoriously child like creatures. Once summoned they will have the human try to put themselves in some position that they believe to be humiliating for the human. They hate the human for being naturally innately better than them even if less powerful.

The article does not go over some of the acts humans are made to do. It’s quite disgusting and vile. It does not go over the nature of demons. It’s quite pathetic. There is zero point in trying to dabble in this. Unless you believe your life cannot get any worse than it is. Occult will help you realize how bad it can really get.
There are constant and flagrant ADA violations - while the lobbying group is not weak the war of attrition is definitely with the employers not the ADA; I have seen so many violations it makes my head spin.
When I've asked the question, the answer offered is that vaccines produce higher antigen levels than natural immunity. However, I don't believe this is evidence that vaccines produce longer lasting immunity.
well, i mean strictly necessary in the eyes of the law. but that's something we won't find out until affected people start suing employers for discrimination or whatever the appropriate claim here is. and until then there will be casualties as you already predict.
To better appreciate the structure of the document the author is dealing with (and to cast a bit of light on which words are variables in the document and which are `jq` syntax.
I offer a shameless plug to a one liner

well,
I would but the result is "too long for a HN comment"
so here a bunch is sniped out of the middle
(unedited the result would currently be 140 lines)

curl -s https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/27941108 | ~/bin/json2jqpath.jq

.
.author
.children
.children|.[]
.children|.[]|.author
.children|.[]|.children
.children|.[]|.children|.[]
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.author
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.children
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.children|.[]
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.author
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.children
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.children|.[]
<snip>
...
</snip>
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.created_at
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.created_at_i
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.id
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.options
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.parent_id
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.points
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.story_id
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.text
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.title
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.type
.children|.[]|.children|.[]|.url
.children|.[]|.created_at
.children|.[]|.created_at_i
.children|.[]|.id
.children|.[]|.options
.children|.[]|.parent_id
.children|.[]|.points
.children|.[]|.story_id
.children|.[]|.text
.children|.[]|.title
.children|.[]|.type
.children|.[]|.url
.created_at
.created_at_i
.id
.options
.parent_id
.points
.story_id
.text
.title
.type
.url

[0] https://github.com/TomConlin/json_to_paths
This already exists - that's how Heaven and Hell keep track of souls.

You know why it's so hot in Hell? Because that's where the exhaust ports of the AC units cooling the soulchain mining servers are.
I tried to take your comment seriously, but 'tech companies that might take power away' part made me laugh. What do you think those tech companies are? Their most advanced technology is a chat app and an online mall.
Shopping for the four of us in this house takes about three man hours a week. Cooking about 15. That is much less than an hour a day per person. If we felt like it we could optimise the shopping even further by only shopping when we were already passing the supermarket on the way to or from work.

If we felt like it we could do the shopping online and cut it down to a few minutes a week.

Cooking Sunday dinner for four today took me less than two hours. Would have been faster if I had not prepared everything from scratch.
That would be better than nothing, and if Cloudflare had done that, I don't think I'd be complaining publicly at this point. But there are still problems with this approach. The ones that come to mind:

1. Assuming the remote service only sends down streaming audio, this doesn't work for blind people that must use a refreshable Braille display, e.g. deafblind people. Perhaps one could hack a way to get their local screen reader to render specific text on the Braille display, but probably not without that screen reader speaking the same text. That leads me to...

2. A blind user is already running a screen reader, with its own text-to-speech engine, configured the way they want it. Adding a remote screen reader to the mix would mean two different TTS engines, and the user would need to have a way of configuring the remote one, e.g. to adjust its speed. For blind people, TTS settings are very personal.

3. The remote screen reader and the local one may clash on keyboard commands. And, depending on the screen reader, this is another thing that the use may have customized already; for example, some screen readers have desktop and laptop keymaps.

4. Also speaking of keyboard commands, some of them might not be implementable in a browser-based application. It's common, at least on Windows, for screen readers to use non-standard modifier keys, e.g. Insert or Caps Lock.
Well, if you're powerful enough you can always fork to create Horcruxes
When I have encountered for the first time ML term I decided to learn what is that new great stuff. To my great surprise this was a typical old new thing called "statistical inference" in the days when I was working as a statistician.

There were a few new things, like ignoring model, choosing right variables, whatever was available was thrown into the equation, if it was clear that such "model" is over-fitted, there were some methods to overcome this by adding some random coefficients to the model that were smoothing it a little.

So, the naming is there... could be modified by adding some clarification that we don't care that much about understanding model we plan to use.
Typically I cold email if a person expresses interest in my product. But then it can simply be called 'reaching out' to prospects.
I think that's too metaphysical a concern for this form of Christianity. There's no "universal truth" component here. This "new testament" Christianity operates in the individual person's mind, so as honest as you can be as an individual, that's the world in which this drama plays out.
I don’t understand how it can ever be secure unless you let some DRM representatives basically come and do inspections.

Fundamentally, you are going to show a video and play an audio stream. Fundamentally, it can be recaptured perfectly because it must be displayed and played perfectly. There is simply no way around it. DRM can only make life hard for the regular Joes.
How is that consumption "unnecessary"? I bet 99% of the people here would not save money or time by working less hours and using that time to cook more often. Time spent cooking, cleaning pans, shopping and sorting/storing groceries etc can easily be >$100/day
The legal situation is akin to speeding. While technically it is illegal to drive 56 in a 55, you won’t get a ticket for it. And lots of places the flow of traffic will be 85 in a 65 and the cops are not about to hold things up.

Same with accessibility only there are powerful economic interests at play too.
> My dress shirts are 20-30 years old. They're not out of style.

They are, you just don't care. Which is OK.
I've seen several posts about Zettelkasten lately. What is it with this whole Zettelkast way of taking notes? How did Zettelkast become so popular out of the sudden?
Part of the context for female gymnasts, especially when you are talking about floor exercises, is other somewhat similar activities such as rythmic gymnastics and even things like ballet. So that is one area where two different worlds are meeting somewhat.

To me even more interesting is that these things can be traced back their origins relatively recently and were specific inventions. It's not as if you have thousands of years of these specific movements being done in this way. It something that was created not too many generations back. And its interesting also because the specific format has become so official and accepted as a given.

But also fascinating is the way that these things track (or lag behind) changing values etc.

What's really interesting to me is the circumstances that allow for new traditions to be invented and become officially sanctioned.

I mean, why are they _officially_ all wearing leotards? Call me crazy, but maybe it's literally because your great uncle Bob or whoever who had some oversight at the time thought it was hotter.
> My job isn’t to use git, it’s to write specialist software.

Part of the job is to know and understand the tools that you need to use to in order perform the duties as part of that job. Saying that it isn't your job to use git is like a surgeon saying it's not their job to learn how to tie sutures when closing up the surgical site after completing the operation.
A screen reader is a two way device since it needs to expose ways to INTERACT with the site and not just read it. I assume there's many different settings for screen readers including voices, speed, ways of interaction with site elements (click, voice command, shortcuts, etc.), etc. It'd be like forcing you to use IE 6 to browse the modern web and then if you're not as efficient as someone on modern Chrome firing you.
I agree that there are ineffiencies everywhere. But does anyone actually teach that market efficiency means you shouldn't try to identify opportunities?

Doesn't market efficiency just say that someone is going to be the one to identify the inefficiency and make a ton of money in the process? The market doesn't become efficient unless people do things.
Indescribable Colors
20 years ago, the science was a lot less conclusive on ADHD. The drugs were far less sophisticated as well. Today, the condition is highly treatable (90%) with medication.
org-roam + org-babel + emacs-jupyter has been my default literate development environment for ~1 year.

This package is a hugely welcome upgrade to org-roam-server, and I'm excited to integrate it with my workflow. Thanks!!
If they learned that they have awful coworkers, they can quit again.

I just don't get the sense of entitlement many people seem to have.
encouraging accessibility is not enforcing accessibility

edit: what i meant here is, instead of making the framework accessible out of the box, Google is trying to shift the responsibility to the developers
You're not wrong, and the answer is that this sort of thing needs to impact their bottom line somehow - either because customers insist on it as part of a purchase checklist, or because the legal system will actually go after violations, or because they'll lose important employees.

I don't have a real sense of which of those is most realistic.
Maybe take it apart piece by piece.

For example, the argument that killing animals for food is immoral. If that’s true then nature is immoral. Perhaps because humans are uniquely sapient, we can avoid this. But that presumes that humans are uniquely superior to recognize this over all other carnivors.
Sad but typical and not just from big "evil" companies (not suggesting that CF is!)

I just ran Jekyll to migrate my Blogger blog to self-hosted and with the default importer and default theme, I clicked the Web Accessibility button and immediately got some several hundred contrast errors (lots of blog post links) and some incorrect heading levels. Just basics but people are too unaware of accessibility requirements that this even happens before a release.

What is missing? Is there not an online checker like w3c does for markup or acid does for browser tests? Oh yes, it is here: https://wave.webaim.org/ and there is also a browser plugin so no real excuses.
Other obvious differences are:

- no beam for men
- Uneven bars versus parallel bars
- no pommel horse for women
- no rings for women
- vault: height of apparatus

There are others (fe code of difficulty is completely different)
You don't even need git at that point. I don't understand why using git if you want a GUI... at this point, put the source code on the company fileserver and adopt "zip versioning", i.e. when you do a new release create an archive named "project-X.Y.z.zip" and archive it on the fileserver. If you need to work on another branch copy the source code directory. Why bother at this point?

I don't understand people that wants to use git but they want do to so with a GUI that abstract everything that git was created to address, and they limit themself to write some code, commit and push. You are not gaining any benefit in using git this way, you are only wasting time to me.

If you choose to adopt git, you learn how to use it, and so you learn the commands (it's not that much effort). In my experience GUI always created problems, especially if someone in a team uses a GUI that creates junk in the repository (like 100 useless merge commits created automatically for things that shouldn't really have been a merge that make git log unreadable...).

Also people that uses GUI typically when they have a problem that the GUI doesn't know how to solve (because they typically implement the basic things and if something goes wrong they can't help you) just deletes the whole repo and clones it again, or worse they try to fix it by pressing random buttons in the GUI and put the repo in a shitty state so another coworker that knows how to use git has to waste his time cleaning up the crap that the fantastic git GUI made.

And I'm not saying that you shouldn't 100% use GUIs. I use the one of VSCode for doing simple things like creating commits, switching branches, and stuff like that. For advanced features like merge, cherry pick, rebase, whatever I use the CLI, I find it more practical.
I learned git with the CLI. Occasionally I will use it.

But I see no reason to not use Jetbrains beautiful beautiful git integration for almost everything. It really is just ... perfect.

But if people want to feel superior by typing commands in a terminal, go ahead.
The pre-announcement [1] lays out at least some of those alternatives. I understand why they chose the approach they did, but they needed to do the work to make it accessible, as I advised them when that post came out.

[1]; https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-and-remote-browser-is...
I see command line switches as an api, and it feels wrong to me to keep aggregating new things without a clean break.

I feel like these things should be versioned in some fashion. Perhaps come up with a clean slate api and enable it via calling git2 or git3 instead of this terrible mish-mash where new commands are constrained by previous bad decisions.

Of course this is not a novel idea, and people attempt this by making their own veneer with a different name… but this has to come from the top for it to be effective. People won’t en masse bother with git2 or git3 if it is not built into the mainline distribution.

I guess I should give it a try a submit a patch.
AMC is the counterargument I was thinking of too. Total shitshow of a cinema chain. Cinemark is the bare minimum experience IMO.
I have external resistance too, in the form of Hacker News articles.
Are screen readers capable of reading interfaces generated with QT or other desktop UI toolkits?

A cursory look at QT's documentation seems to indicate that they are aware of screen readers, but I didn't dig deeply enough to find out if they were compatible by default.

I know VoiceOver on OSX can at least read out the interfaces on the included apps, but I also don't know if that's true for every app---or if it actually extends to the browser and canvas/plugin rendered (flash, java, etc.) interfaces.

As an addendum, I'm pretty hopeful that in this decade we'll get AI vision enabled screen readers so anything that's displayable to a sighted person can also be immediately used with some caveats by someone reliant on screen reader.
Wow, Neeva's business model looks much better for end users. Thanks for the pointer.
From the repo

> In the end, I only extracted about half of the RSA key.

Not a cryptographer, but i thought half the rsa key was all you needed with coopersmith's attack.
Wow, the spelling of this message is a mess, sorry about that.
> For example, a priest once asked the devil to build a bridge over a river, in exchange for the soul of the first one to cross the bridge. The devil upholds his side of the bargain and builds the bridge, but the priest then sends a dog to be the first one to cross it. Realizing he was tricked, the demon throws the dog over the bridge as a consolation prize.

Sounds like the demon won. An evil man exchanges the soul of an innocent for some "free" labor.
Nobody said it is wrong, but a life optimized for work and short-term pleasures is the lifestyle corporations have carved for you. Many people enjoy it, nothing wrong with that. But for some, it is meaningless.
An introductory script showing the jq, REST, and JSON trinity:

https://github.com/DaveJarvis/github-email/blob/master/githu...
> supplement glycine

From the looks of it, the increased consumption of glycine supplements won't affect oxalate. Yes, glycine/oxalate ratio would be improved, but this would not decrease the amounts of oxalate. So the associated problems related to the excess of oxalate would persist.
The people's republic was established in 1949 without improving the standard of living much for the next three decades. Then Deng Xiaoping came along and abondoned organizing the whole sphere of the economy in favor of letting companies produce as much as they could sell. And the US right across the Pacific ocean happened to be very happy to buy cheap goods en masse. Without that foreign money pouring in, it would've been much harder to pay for all that poverty alleviation.

India, too, has had Five Year Plans, but they don't seem to have helped that much. If they could get foreigners to give them more money, though...
It's closed loop but where is it getting the CO2 from for the system?
Floating point is fine for monetary values where you are not performing accounting calculations. Most front-office finance applications work just fine using floating point, there's not much point trying to calculate compound interest, price an option or bootstrap a yield curve using anything but floating point.
> it's not just "use known vulnerabilities on this specific address"

Ok, so they're not blocking complicated attacks. Just automation of attempts to exploit known vulnerabilities. And then their IP is marked as high risk. Rinse and repeat until the majority of TOR nodes are blocked. Definitely can't see that causing issues for TOR (or VPN) users.

Edit: And to comment on this:

> Funnily, there is silence on Fastly's filter

> Cloudflare is used by 80.6% of all the websites whose reverse proxy service we know. This is 17.4% of all websites.

https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cn-cloudflare

> Fastly is used by 5.7% of all the websites whose reverse proxy service we know. This is 1.2% of all websites.

https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cn-fastly
Not really, since that would entail breaking playback on current devices/firmwares.

They can only try again next time (for 8K?).
This problem unfortunately applies to a lot of remote access software, particularly when the web browser is the client.

I know of one company that switched to Web VNC for accessing a specific piece of software. They had a lot of offices and the software was expensive (paid per machine). This way, they could switch to a much smaller number of licenses, letting any employee connect from anywhere and wait in line if necessary. A blind person has lost a job over this.
but the CO2 has to come from somewhere.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but, Oxalates aren't particularly high in the Western Diet.

Cruciferous vegetables seem more a feature of the Mediterranean diet or standard diet?

So I am assuming that the WD is lower in the necessary precursors for glycine production.

Also, I'm assuming that glycine ingested directly would just be metabolized before being used in the liver.

So the best actionable advice I can come up with is probably: "Eat more collagen"
Eight Sleep (YC S15) Is Hiring React Engineers (US Remote)
Appreciate this comment, thank you.

For many years I had a sort of ruthless determination to get ahead and work hard. It mostly helped me back then, as many obstacles then were the sort that could be brute-forced, and it was addictive in a way as well. I could feel myself improving, could see the progress happening etc. I made lots of money for a while, got myself and my husband ahead in life etc.

A few things happened that sort of scuttled my motivation. The intrinsic rewards for the hard work I was doing stopped arriving. In order to keep progressing personally, I would need to engage in ever more competitive search for fun/challenging work. The competitive aspect might have excited me in the past, but I had by then been shafted one time too many by petty politics and discrimination to feel much interest in engaging with that aspect of the industry.

I could keep doing senior engineer work, mobile/backend whatever, and occasionally find some new topic to excite me, but often spend most of the time rehashing similar ideas, or cleaning up other people's messes. So I burned out, took some time to address my depression and have gotten myself back together mentally, for the most part (some amount of madness is crucial to hold onto).

But even now, when I look at new programming things I could work on, I can't help but see them all as simply paths back into a world that has lost its luster, full of people and situations that waste my time and energy. I can still work hard and build good software, but I just don't see why I should when it will inevitably lead me back to a place that almost destroyed me. Maybe that isn't true, maybe I should be better about forgetting the past and not presuming what my new experiences will look like. I'd love to be that foolish again someday, but I just can't afford to take that kind of risk anymore.

My temporary solution has been to work on stuff that isn't programming, to become like a beginner again in some other field. Philosophy, political science, history, anthropology, classic literature and others have been great to explore on my own and I've grown from these explorations. So now I'm getting my rewards from new sources. I still have the urge to make money, like a survival instinct, but I'm fortunate to have a decently stable life raft that I can float on for the time being.
I have nothing against work just being work, but I think there are different types of companies for a reason. If you want work to just be work, you can choose a company that treats work just as work and doesn't expect you to become one big family.

Like if you give the example of young people and old people - fair enough, then maybe young people are better of looking for jobs where they work together with other young people, and people in their 50ies are better off in jobs with other old people.

Ultimately companies are not created for the benefit of employees, but to create stuff. They try to be good to employees to be able to attract and keep talented staff.
AFAICT, about 12% of firearms-owning households have handguns:

* https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/wd98_4-d...

Hunting rifles and shotguns are not registered, but (many) semi-automatic rifles (e.g., AR-15) would have to be registered—as do handguns—so some ratio of licensees-to-'restricted'-class firearms can be estimated.

These restricted-class items can only be used at a licensed range, and so are generally used for fun/target shooting as well as sporting activities (IPSC, IDPA, three-gun).
I never understood why people don't like cubicles or just the office in general.

The only thing I can't stand is the commute and area around the office, unless you are very fortunate to be working in a woodsy location with a lot of parking and open space.
Isn't demanding that non-trivial work is done just to accommodate your class the opposite of discrimination?