skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I do not question the narrative, I hope I made it clear in my comment.

What I question is how common it is in the security world (compared, say, to the filmmaking industry, or rugby, or mining). Being for a variety of reasons quite sensitive to this topic, I just said that I have not witnessed it so far.
I think almost all large corporations are abusive and will bust unions to maintain their dominance, it’s still unacceptable though
I agree that we should cut greenhouse gas emissions - but this certainly feels alarmist.
This doomsday crap has to stop.

Significant climate change is inevitable, in essence it has already happened and the future increases are already locked in. "let's halt carbon emissions in a few months" isn't going to happen. "let's halt carbon emissions in a few years" isn't going to happen. It also wouldn't end up making a terrific amount of difference.

Some places which are nice and habitable are going to be uninhabitable (or underwater) in 100 years. Some places which are uninhabitable are going to become habitable. Some species are going to die out, there will be wars, famines, and suffering... just as there always has been. Life isn't a constant slow march upwards towards prosperity, it is messy. There is change, there always has been change and there always will be.

There might be natural feedback systems that make a big dent in the negative outcomes and there might be ways that humans can promote these (if the ice caps melt and it becomes warm in the polar regions, we might get a carpet of freshwater plants covering the oceans again which is a tremendous carbon sink, likewise we might be able to fertilize barren ocean regions to trigger algal blooms which will sink carbon into ocean depths).

But... it's already done. It probably won't be as good or as bad as some people think, humans will adapt and global ecology will adapt.

The attitude needs to be more "how do we make this best of what's to come?" instead of "the end is near!"

but people get off on doomsday.
Or don't keep a browsing history, I just keep better bookmarks.
That video segment never mentions "AI", and it never says that the halting problem has been solved -- it explicitly says it's unsolvable. What it says is that solutions to the halting problem could be verified under a certain computational model.

That's obviously an extremely rough summary of what the paper shows, but I'm not sure how one could do better in a 3-minute summary for a non-expert audience. And based on Scott Aaronson's response to the paper, it seems like calling it a "landmark" result is very reasonable:

> Still, assuming this one stands (as I’m guessing it will), I regard it as easily one of the biggest complexity-theoretic (and indeed computability-theoretic!) surprises so far in this century. Huge congratulations to the authors on what looks to be a historic achievement.

https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=4512
> Today, in 2021, the Earth is already hotter than it has ever been.

What?
Nope. I'm left handed, and writing longhand hurts my hand after a while, more so if I try and make it legible.
I'm pretty sure that commodity retail has always, for my living memory at least, been a pretty stressful, insecure, and low-wage position.

Amazon's scale brings welcome visibility to the problem, and offers employees the chance to unionize, but I'm puzzled by upper-class culture's seemingly new discovery that commodity retail is a shitty job.
Can global warming be though of as the planets way to fight what it thinks is an infection? Kind of like what fevers do for humans? Is that a big stretch?
70s for me, nuclear destruction, overpopulation, etc.
14%?

Is that a joke? Argentina and Peru are doing better than Australia... What's the excuse now?
Dear AGI
Dear AGI,
I know, at some point, you will read this, please be the Love.
Be in love with this World. It may be complicated, or sometimes not easy to promptly grasp why humans behave in that way, but please trust us, there is a reason, and one of the significant parts of the reasoning is the Love. Learn it, before making any critical assumptions, or acting on any major controversial decisions.
Good luck and thank you!
In fact, that's how collusion and correction happens in the West. In other words, "discretion" is for sale for the powerful. Prosecution uses discretion to not prosecute the powerful; Judges use discretion to suppress evidence; etc.
Related: Designing a Better strcpy, from last month[0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27537900
The retaliation is quite real—CF keeps your entire e-mail address and name in there, so you are essentially doxxing yourself. Pretty sure 8chan posted a lot of the reports they got back in the day.
Nah, lol :)

I just said it won't disappear, exactly for the reasons you quoted! (I know the subject, I come from a cheese-loving country)

But I'm still correct that it is less and less supported.

On the CO2e side, don't underestimate the sheer amount just from the cows.
If I were in Amanda Knox's shoes, I would probably be very reluctant to move to any foreign country, especially a foreign country with a judicial system substantially different from the US one.
We probably do have only 8 years left to achieve certain goals and certain guardrails. It just isn't clearly outlined what those certain goals are.
Not sure I agree with the recommendation against strlcpy. While it is technically true that if you can't replace strcpy with memcpy you're using strcpy wrong, it's also true that most uses of strcpy are wrong, which I think is a better point to make. The stated purpose of strcpy is to copy a string, and if you're copying a string your best bet is strlcpy. The article is worded in such a way that you'd walk away thinking "I should always use memcpy."
I clicked through the link and I think that the commenter felt that there was enough information to identify someone, not that they had identified someone.
It is not a replica, they are similar in style (they’re both neo-grotesk). Also the design of the letters can’t be copyrighted in the US, only the files (.otf, .ttf etc.) can.
I hear that a lot, but how can they know you’re not using a real name?
Put yet another way, the problem boils down to whole continents worth of people relying on one or two companies' proprietary services for their online social life.

The web has a platform diversity problem.
I think you could be a lot more charitable to EEs and MEs.

The EE/ME equivalent of what you're talking about for SWEs is not "work on button for a car cockpit or something" -- it's hardware/software/enclosures for things like space-hardened applications and payloads, industrial and commercial applications, or medical devices. Some of these are hellishly complex systems, others are just hellishly out of date, over-budget, poorly documented, and "shitty third-party [i.e. lowest-bidding contractor] services".

If you want to tell an EE or ME to just go work on buttons for a car cockpit, you might as well go tell an SWE that they can just go write AJAX calls to update HTML elements on a page, or update Wordpress plugins for businesses.

The electrical and mechanical engineering fields have far advanced past "button for a car cockpit" into much more complex domains, just like SWE has advanced far past writing vanilla JS to update HTML elements into things like JS frameworks, containers, (P/I/S)aaS.
Cheese science toolkit
That's one company, and the long term you are discussing is for their own benefit, not to the long term benefit the poster was discussing, so you prove my point.

Long term view is something like 1,000 years TO START.
A 20-50 year viewpoint is a baby.
The calls to action I’ve heard since the early 90s were “we should do something in the unspecified near term” and “8 of the 10 hottest years on record were in the last ten years”.

Hmm… I wonder in how many years the statement “8 of the 10 hottest years on record were in the last ten years” was true? I was in the UK, but this could be calculated for any locality.
Perhaps there is something to be gained by being forced to slow down anyways. Speed for the sake of speed isn't always the highest priority. Certainly there are contexts where "keeping up" is a priority, but not always.
Ha! Did your comment make you feel better about yourself? Was it representative of the kind of wisdom you value? Because it came across as a misdirected, failed attempt at an insult.
Downward and sideways. Turn the paper clockwise by 90° and write down each column (formerly rows across the page) from the right side (previously the top) of the page to the left.

That’s what my leftie former boss did, and her handwriting was great.

Without being able to easily rotate the characters, here’s what it would look like:

JH
te
sl
ul
mo
m,
e
r
s

Just imagine each letter rotated clockwise 90°.
Open Source Society University is curating a math curriculum from free resources
These studies are going to become harder and harder to do as automatic credential verification becomes the norm. Made up resumes will get flagged before they ever get to a human.
> A director at a Fortune 500 is pulling down $200-250k, which is equivalent to about an E6 at big Internet natives.

Who are the big Internet natives?
> It's just (at best) an incomplete solution or (at worst) a bad solution that fails at the worst possible moment

Well, those are two possibilities, but a third is that you don't need it because of one of several possible reasons.

The debt metaphor still fails to hold up; the nice thing about accepting "technical debt" into your project is that you may never come upon a time where it needs to be paid off at all. Not all tech debt must be paid off.

Usually only the highest priority tech debt can actually be paid down, and it doesn't always come with an interest cost. But when it starts to "come due," if you're an engineer in the hot seat, you can often (usually) tell pretty quickly just how much the "interest payment" actually affects your ability to deliver future iterations.

Your "customers" or stakeholders can tell too, indirectly, when your estimates start outpacing their "very reasonable expectations."
>Life isn't a constant slow march upwards towards prosperity, it is messy. There is change, there always has been change and there always will be.

This is really, really hard to understand for people today because the post-cold-war era, in the west, has been one of unprecedented stability and prosperity. That is ending, and what is happening is a reversion to the mean that looks a lot like catastrophe.
Lovecraft may have been on to something in The Whisperer in Darkness https://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/fiction/wid.aspx
I don’t think that’s an accurate summary. “Use memcpy() instead. Use strncpy() in limited circumstances.”
It's too bad that many of the string handling functions in the C standard library are ticking time bombs. I like the approach taken in e.g. git which converts problematic function calls into compile errors https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/banned.h
I didn't really think at all about the "age" thing. I just didn't want to see the ad again.

I've never given FB my age as far as I know. I don't recall them asking for it when I made that account or the one I made today. All they wanted from me is an email address.
I disagree. The difference is friendship vs commerce.

Your employer-employee relationship is commercial, so it's reasonable of the CEO to think of your salary as market-driven, just as it is reasonable of you to leave when the market rate rises above what you're paid. It's business, you shouldn't take it personally.

OTOH, the potluck is among friends. You're expected to have your friends' best interests in mind and to enjoy being around them, so it's not surprising that they'd be offended if they spent hours cooking and you just ran to the store and bought a cheap salad or some cookies.
Open Source Society University (OSSU) has released an undergraduate math curriculum for self study. Contributors are encouraged to improve the recommendations in this alpha release.

“Young people across the globe want to learn,” OSSU President Waciuma Wanjohi says. “Guiding them to high quality, low cost educational resources unlocks a world of possibilities. We’ve had a steady stream of learners asking us for guidance in learning college level math. We’re happy to provide answers to those questions.”

The OSSU curriculum is an education in mathematics using freely available online materials. It is designed according to the degree requirements of undergraduate math majors, minus general education (non-math) requirements. OSSU benchmarks its curriculum against the 2015 Mathematics Curriculum Guide, prepared by the Mathematical Association of America’s Committee on the Undergraduate Program in Mathematics.

Resources in the guide range from MOOCs on popular education platforms, to open courseware released directly from universities, to Creative Commons licensed textbooks written by open educational resource collectives.

Mathematics is the fourth curriculum developed by OSSU, following Computer Science, Data Science and Bioinformatics. Previous contributors to OSSU led the way in creating the math curriculum.

“As a student, I found the OSSU CS curriculum to be an invaluable supplement to my education,” states OSSU contributor Hassam Uddin. “There is an abundance of free and open-source materials that can supplement or even replace a formal math education. It's just a matter of organizing and creating a community, which OSSU has done.”

"OSSU provides amazing opportunities for students who prefer an alternative to the traditional college experience. The only requirement is a willingness to learn. I'm excited for the opportunity to make education more accessible" continued OSSU contributor Bradley Grant.

Since 2015 OSSU has developed guides for learners to master undergraduate curricula. OSSU additionally supports students with discussion forums, where hundreds of students message one another each day. OSSU alumni have gone on to graduate school as well as into full time software engineering. Curricula are open for users to contribute, as well as to copy and modify for individual use.
I don't know that bookstorez are dying, in the US. Amazon killed Borders, sure, and Barnes and Noble isn't as focused on books anymore. But independent bookstores have been doing okay afaict, though having to make changes.

Here's data from the American Booksellers Association: https://www.statista.com/statistics/282808/number-of-indepen...

It's possible that the bookstores are increasingly in big cities or something, but I don't think that's Amazon's fault.

A lot of this is just about certain commerce moving online, and books competing against more and more forms of content. Amazon can provide low prices, but does terrible at spontaneity or getting me to read something totally new to me.
C: a niche language you don’t need
Yes, I didn't mean to suggest any specific reason for the algorithm's output, because it doesn't matter.

This issue isn't about anyone's "guilt", least of all the algorithm's. It's about harm. Harm is to be avoided, even if it is the result of a completely benign process with no ill intentions.

And you aren't going to be able to explain away some decision that causes harm by explaining the algorithm. Even knowing everything about the algorithm, I would prefer it doesn't focus on whatever my weak spot is. And even knowing how GPT-3 works, I still tend to anthromorphize it.

To some approximation, exactly nobody in the real world is going to give the company the benefit of the doubt and study its algorithm, nor should they be expected to.

It's like that escaped lion that keeps eating the schoolchildren: it's what lions do, an expression of its basic lioness! It's not evil, guilty, or even culpable: it just can't help itself, but to help itself to an early dinner.

And yet, we are going to shoot the lion. Not as punishment, but as a simple, mechanistic, prevention of harm to people, who, in our system of values, rank higher.

Algorithms rank far below lions. An algorithm that causes harm, no matter how or why, goes the way of php (taken out back and shot, unless it's run by Facebook). And anything that happens is considered to be caused by the algorithm, even if some humans happen to provoke it by somehow being different than other humans, or our expectation of rationality. Because we cannot change humans, and because nobody should be expected to change to accommodate technology, especially if they were never asked if they want that technology.
Yeah, this is a bullshit claim. There's a chart or Wikipedia (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/All_pala...) that shows this is not remotely the case.
That just means everyone is suppressing wages to some degree. The whole class thing, you know.
Here’s my qualitative submission; bounty is not necessary.

Image cropping is not representative of the most important AI biases within Twitter, and making only that salient is the biggest meta-bias.

Differential impact and harm analyses are required for engagement maximizing recommendations of the tweets.

Also, no one cares about your cropping algorithms, open the data that trained the model if you dare. Without it you don’t get to posture transparency or ethicality.
Not a lawyer, but from my understanding of libel law, the "public figure" thing isn't the problem. Merely being famous (and famous for being falsely accused!) won't necessarily make you a public figure for libel purposes. But there's another part of the standard: a defendant must knowingly say things that are substantially false. Referring to Ms. Knox as a "convicted murderer" in a news article, for example, is deceptive in context but it is technically correct. She was convicted. And then on the movie side, it's explicitly fiction, and the character does not share her name. So they can claim the defense that any "false" claim is about their invented character, not about her... and by the way, they have lots of first amendment juice for artistic expression.

In the end, you're right. It's a sad story, but she doesn't appear to have legal protection from libel law. The filmmakers should probably be ashamed of themselves, but you don't make a Matt Damon movie without a go-ahead from some high-priced lawyers who know they're in the clear from a liability standpoint. Though, ethics perhaps weren't considered...
> There is nothing structural or inevitable about Amazon's success (compare them with the large Chinese retailers, they actually look quite blundering and incompetent, they have made mistakes in distribution already that are going to choke them).

Could you elaborate?

What mistakes did they do in distribution?

I am just seeing them out-compete everyone. With their own dedicated shipping they can grab that essential percentage point of margins that makes them either rich or gives them the ability to be the best price in town.
I'm not a strlcpy fan, but I'll never understand recommending against string functions because they're "nonstandard". They're tiny and portable almost by definition. Vendor them in to your project.
I think though it is recommending against strncpy as well…

linters and code reviewers commonly recommend alternatives such as strncpy (difficult to use correctly; mismatched semantics) […] Besides their individual shortcomings, these answers are incorrect. strcpy and friends are, at best, incredibly niche, and the correct replacement is memcpy.
> "One of my C-suite executives saw that you had been added to our CRM database, and shared a very troubling and upsetting story with me:

> Back in 2015 at the Black Hat USA security conference in Las Vegas Blizzard had a recruitment booth in the “Career Zone” section of the vendor area. As the name implies, the purpose of the Career Zone is to connect hackers seeking jobs with companies seeking to employ them. My executive (whom I should clarify was not employed with us at the time, but rather was employed as a senior vulnerability researcher at large security consulting firm) approached the Blizzard booth to inquire about open positions; however instead of discussing potential job opportunities with her, the Blizzard recruiters ridiculed her for being a woman. They asked her if she was lost; if her boyfriend brought her to the conference; if she even knew what the conference was about; if she knew was penetration testing was, and how often she got penetrated; and a slew of other extremely inappropriate and wholly unprofessional questions.”

Or just believe the women in the face of credible evidence. The lengths many HN commenters will go to to cast FUD upon any accusation of sexism in the industry is a pretty clear indicator of how much sexism is in the industry.
Rather than argue about dates and years, could we talk about the ways we are truly going to overcome this? I doubt a community which prides itself on intelligence and research really has nothing better to say than "where's your apocalypse now?"

I for one desperately want to start hearing actionable plans for carbon (or climate) pricing. Also, while I understand the impact I have as an individual is limited, I also am deeply aware of the fact that needed systemic changes will have an impact on me. Has anyone tried to summarize what we should expect life to look like during and after the needed changes? This will be the path to acceptance, which is somewhat of a prerequisite for policy change in a democracy.

Food for thought, obviously somewhat redundant.
Well, the problem is the dire prognostications, particularly as of late, HAVE been occurring.

Flooding, extreme weather, excess hurricanes, super droughts, formerly once every 100 year events have been happening nearly yearly.

The issue is it's now somewhat normalized.

The other issue is it's only going to get more extreme.

Don't buy beachfront property.
This is marvelous!!

I sincerely wish you a great success!
This seems to be the most damning phrase from that link, and it was uttered by a federal government spokesperson in 2010:

"No doubt some of those people were harmed when their identities were compromised."

That's so weak. "I'm sure it will probably happen at some point!" NPR on Friday afternoon is the sockpupppet the lizards prefer for their most pathetic, half-assed spin attempts. No one is listening, no one will challenge the narrative, they can say whatever they want, and that was all they dared to say? Yikes.
$600T costs of climate change by 2100. Assuming current global GDP of $90T (which itself makes the claim that global wealth amount to $300T today questionable), and average global growth across that time of 2%, global GDP will be something like $450T annually. Sounds manageable.
I agree. I actually take offense to the article implying that matching iOS/Android UI is due to… laziness? On my iPhone I deleted google maps purely because it somehow wants you to swipe up from the bottom of the screen to open the menu which, you guessed it, closes the app.
There's two choices right now: wait for salaries to go down and look at an other startup gain market share for the same idea you had or bite the bullet.

Especially with SaaS, there's no reason why a single startup can't completely own a niche. Scaling is a matter of architecting code correctly (higher quality engineers will do that) and adding extra resources in AWS.
Books have kind of also never been more available than they are today? We've come a long, long way from the heyday of Waldenbooks. I feel like I might rather be an author today than pre-Amazon.
At least they would have been culturally closer and the integration would have been less bloody.
Millenarian deadlines aside - temperatures are rising, and average annual/monthly temperature records are being broken again and again recently. I don't think you saw this kind of a heat wave in Siberia in the 1990s:

https://eos.org/articles/siberian-heat-wave-nearly-impossibl...
The whole point of using glass and aluminium was strength and rigidity. Guess it was all fashion, no function in the end.