skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This falls into the same category as France asserting control over the use of the word 'Champagne'.

People use words. People talk about events and other people. It's part of being alive.
I can think of a couple. DMN kinda does this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_Model_and_Notation

and Drools: https://www.drools.org

There are papers describing using OWL for biz rules, too: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-32689-....

One of the biggest problems (IMHO) in this space (which I've worked in CLIPS-based systems http://clipsrules.sourceforge.net) is that business rules are often not as "logical" as they seem and can cause real problems for novices without formal logic training. Sometimes the business rules aren't even "rules" as such, which makes it really hard to both create and explain.
And for some movies, the theater experience makes it special. Either because of the visual spectacle on a large screen, or the audience reaction. Avengers Endgame on opening weekend was a special experience.
I had a PA-RISC workstation too. No heat problems, but it wasn't particularly fast. But the "superdomes" (Refigerator sized computer in the very cold and loud server room....).

It was weird, I worked on those superdome machines for years without seeing them. and only got to see them when they had to debug some of my serial port code (it turned out the cable was wired wrong...)

HPUX had some really interesting Real Time Extensions. I was on a exploratory group for switching to Linux and scheduling control was going to be a problem (15 years ago...)
Who are you willing to have thrown in jail in defense of that right?
In Germany you do not get all the cases, just the ones the courts deem important enough. E.g. if the ruling is different from earlier ones in some aspect, if it is a higher court or if the case was of particular public interest.
He claimed that he received the DNC and Podesta e-mails from a disgruntled DNC source in a park and forwarded them to WikiLeaks on Assange's behalf. He lacks any credibility. Even Assange had to tell people that "Craig Murray is not authorized to talk on behalf of WikiLeaks," afterwards.
Citizen Kane
zulip maybe ?
> looking back .. minimally satisfies .. is hard to read

Interesting. I wonder if there is an analogy to the first draft of a book. Everything needs "editing" -- that is a given. Some writing only needs line editing; some needs a restructuring, a rewrite, etc.
> You get less in cold weather because a lot of power is diverted to heating the batteries. Even in San Jose, in the winter, charging outside dropped my miles gained to 1 mile per kwh on L1.

When a Tesla is cold it will put an upper bound max on the charging rate but that limit is beyond what L1 is capable of, something like 17 amps. The Tesla will also pre-condition the battery for charging if necessary, it does this in hot or cold weather, and until that's complete the car won't be reporting much of a charge on L1 but that pre-conditioning is less than 30 minutes. When you are sitting in the vehicle, it will use power from the charger rather than the battery and, with climate control, on L1 charging will report a 0-1 mile per hour charge rate.

There are numerous videos on Youtube refuting the claim that you can't charge on L1 simply by plugging the car in and walking away for several hours to demonstrate that the car charges decently on 120v in cold temperatures (-28F).
I had zero symptoms too. I mean, I had very mild tenderness in my arm, but that was a symptom of the muscular trauma from the shot itself, not the actual vaccine.
The reason she’s mentioned in US media now and then rather than the victim and perpetrator is because she’s American and the public will be interested. In the U.K. newspapers talk about Meredith Kercher.

That doesn’t make it right or excuse the dreadful treatment though. I can’t see how using her name to promote the film isn’t slanderous/libellous.
I'm in France and I am 38, working in IT for the last 17 years.

I noticed a positive correlation between salary and skills. The higher the pay, the more I learnt on the job.

But maybe I was just lucky to pick Python before it was cool and just ride the wave.

I took a massive pay cut when I stopped freelancing and started a product company instead, but it was totally worth it in the long run.

Make sure you take a pay cut for the right reasons, and for the right amount.
What do you think dictates the actions we take if not genetics? If your answer is free will, or something similar, I agree you might be right but I don't see how to discuss that further.
> Everything can look really nice "on paper" but you don't know what goes on behind the scenes. I have worked with a lot of different people and I have seen too much crazy shit to fully trust anyone with my important data. A cloud provider may have the best of intentions, but sometimes all it takes is a single grumpy employee or even a minor mistake to do a lot of damage.

OneDrive and Google Drive are both pretty cheap. Is there anything wrong with keeping a backup of your important data in one of them? At a certain point you have to live your life and take a chance. Sure, I never made it to Italy, but I had a 100% safe backup system for my files said noone ever.

> Free Git hosting such as GitHub, GitLab and others can also be utilized for data that you don't mind storing in public. GitLab and other providers does provide free private repositories, just don't rely fully on that.

At this point, it's clear the author is looking for arguments to make. Of course you're not going to dump all your stuff into a GitLab repo in the cloud. You're going to clone it on multiple machines! My important work stuff is under version control and cloned on multiple machines in multiple locations. If that's not good enough, I'll live with the consequences.
I guess we're unlikely to see the forbidden phrases Murray dared to utter, since after all they're forbidden and few HN commentators want to go to prison.
The reason for 1 container, 1 process depends upon architecting your application in such a way that it works with it. Ideally, each application thread is stateless and independent of all others, most or all of them don't require graceful shutdown, and you can encapsulate state elsewhere in persistent volumes. If you're just using a single-node container runtime engine, it's not a huge benefit, but it does make fearless restarts a lot simpler when all you have to do is stop and start the container. Think of Erlang style crash-only programming where crashing is the only way to stop a process.

When you get into multi-node orchestrators, though, then the benefit becomes much more apparent, especially at a scale where nodes are guaranteed to fail every now and again. Rescheduling to another node is then, again, as simple as launch a new container from the same image on a different node. That happens a lot faster if each container only needs to start one process.

It also enables you to practice chaos engineering, which is the practice of intentionally crashing your own containers every few hours. This is a good practice for security, because if an attacker ever gains a foothold in one of your containers, they'll quickly lose it, but also to just force your infrastructure people and application architects to design in such a way that you're guaranteed to be treating servers like cattle instead of pets, because you're constantly killing them and have no choice if you want your application to still work. This ensures what you're deploying is robust and repeatable and doesn't secretly depend on some specific server state an admin achieved at 1 in the morning some random Sunday hopped up on Red Bull that he'll never remember and never be able to recreate.
> The reason is that it's a different kind of practice than day-to-day corporate stuff

With some of these big companies, litigation almost seems like its part of their day-to-day though.
It's unusual, but not the only recent case in the UK. A notorious right wing campaigner called Tommy Robinson was jailed a few years ago (but released), and there was a very unusual case with a juror.

These were both in England, which may explain the 50 year thing.

Edit: actually I'm wrong, the article says:

"Murray is the first person in the U.K. to be incarcerated for media contempt in over a half century."

If we restrict it to what 'media' might mean I suppose Tommy Robinson was freed on appeal. And a Mail journalist got away with a suspended sentence.
It's funny because the first advice is to not group all the problems together near the button, and then the second advice is to not disabling it because the user could have missed something higher up. It sounds like they're fixing a problem that they themselves created. The other advice seems solid though, I especially appreciate the part about adding an icon for colorblind people.
But what if you had a spinning black hole to play with? Couldn't you strategically place a bunch of satellites in various orbits around it and use the frame dragging effects in either direction to manipulate signals into arriving arrive somewhere else at arbitrary times by sending them around often enough?

I can think of two ways in which one would still be limited though. First is that one is limited to dragging signals only as far back as when the necessary machinery was first put in place. This is analog to the limitation of the wormhole time travel hack where you accelerate one close to c, then slow it back down and put it in place again to increase the distance in time to the other end that was stationary the whole time. But perhaps even worse would be the hard limits on how much this could be used before the whole apparatus itself turns into a black hole by the sheer energy being sent back from the far future. it would be like a time lense effectively. Or less spectacularly, it might just get fried. Or perhaps a failsafe would just dump the signal before things get critical. In any case, there would be a limit to how much or from how far in the future one could use such a thing, but other than that it should work, right?
I work remote at an early stage startup, I’m not sure you’re right. It might be faster to work together but only by the amount of time it takes to type. We’re on slack talking all day and have video meeting when needed. We work fast as it is so I’m not sure we’d gain much by being in person (other than social stimulation.)
It's one thing to take some liberties to draw the plot forward (like Alan Turing's brother "dying on a ship" in The Imitation Game), it's a whole other thing to portray someone that's alive and young as (at least partially) responsible for a crime they were fully acquitted of.

I'd say that's more of a conspiracy theory realm than artistic liberties realm.
"Technical debt is the burden that implementation choices may place on future development."

Any choice you make now, may place a burden in some possible future.
Most software jobs don't require the deeper mathematical and technical aspects of a CS degree. The vast majority of developers these days just glue together libraries written by other people[0] and CS doesn't come into play for them.

... but if you find yourself in a career path where you need deeper CS knowledge but don't have it, you will really be up the creek without a paddle.

[0] And by that I mean "libraries written by people who do have CS degrees" or usually at least the equivalent knowledge.
I love b trees :)
What do you use for fertilizer? My tree seems to respond well to bonemeal and this year I have fed it all my discarded banana peels. For my tree these contribute to excellent growth but I still get very few figs.
Really. Why don't you go through all 40 counties one by one and explain why it's a flawed experiment that proves nothing?

You've made up your mind without looking at the evidence, as you've already demonstrated your ignorance of history, and somehow think that qualifies you to reject all of it - without having even considered it. You've proved my point rather nicely I think.
you understns dthe difference between social influence (seeing many obese people makes thst "normal", obese people often have unhealthy nutrition habits leading to corresponding offerings, ...) and a virus infection.

And yes, I am for encouraging healthy lifestyle (while that alone isn't enough as there are genetical predeterminations etc.)
Apple MagSafe Battery Pack Alternatives for iPhone12 in 2021
You weren't there. You can barely claim having a 3rd hand account of the situation. You're a fool who forms strong opinions around assumptions and political spin. You are incorrect.
self-pollinating would be a better description.
Many people choose to live in a city. Not everyone wants to live in the middle of nowhere.
Why do you think it's morally bad what this guy does? Developers make a profit, he basically provides loans to developers, takes on risks.

Prices are too high because there aren't enough units being built, not because folks speculate on new developments.

The rentiers are who do nothing yet they earn extra profit due to market failures. (Usually mandated monopolies or emergent oligopoly markets, see ISPs in the US.)

I agree that the end result of only luxury units being built is disgusting. And I think that's absolutely not an unpopular opinion. But it's this way because society, voters, representatives, local governments, etc.. are stuck in a very suboptimal configuration.

I agree that it should be a basic right.
The judgement is here, page 36 onwards lays out all the articles the petitioner claims had contempt of court, and the courts interpretation of whether they did or didn't

https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-genera...
no sarcasm intended

i know that timing and luck really helped me out and i am grateful for it.

so when people say "wow, you taught yourself programming and now you work as a software engineer at Big Tech Co -- that's impressive" i don't think "it is because i'm awesome!".

i think "i did work hard to get here but i sure had some lucky breaks along the way and if the timing had been different i could be in a very different spot right now".
> some devs will say that if they told me what was the cause then I could work around that

You can publish rules and principles while keeping the precise details of the deliberation confidential.
How is privacy tools operated? What is the organization behind it? Is it a business or a group or volunteers?

I’ve been visiting for years, it’s a good site

Edit: looks like it’s becoming a business?

> The PrivacyTools team is proud to introduce a suite of privacy-centric online services to connect you with other privacy-minded individuals and stay safe and secure online. No advertisers, no Google Analytics, no tracking, no third-party requests of any kind
>Also it is only 8 month sentence, so it won't make any practical difference if some future government post-facto does pardon him.

I imagine it would make some difference for his legacy, to his family, etc.
I've been using just one monitor for the last two years and never once wanted to go back to multiple monitors.

I used to have two external monitors and it was always frustrating to dock/undock and re-arrange my windows. That was why I transitioned. But I've seen no reason or negative impact on my work to drive me to return to multiple screens.

HackerNews often talks about how task switching and multi-tasking negatively affect focus. I wonder if those same people think multiple monitors contribute to either of those. On my screen I only ever have one window; it feels more intentional. On three screens I had email and teams on one, a browser on another, and my IDE on the third. Surely that's more distracting, no?

Initial Google results seem to sing the praises of multiple monitors. Am I truly unproductive on my one screen or have others seen the same benefits? How can "productivity" even be quantified?
If it was a futures contract, the cash and the product would be exchanged at the expiry date. If the cash is provided today in exchange for a product in the future, that is indeed a debt - some kind of zero coupon bond where they payment is in cattle.

But I think you're reading too much into the terminology. The concepts being discussed here really don't have anything to do with finance.
It actually isn't.

The fine is based on last annual turnover, not profit and certainly not future profit. Even if Amazon were taking a loss, they still would be fined this amount.
Matt Damon kinda panics when asked (3:00 mark) - https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1392101154650271749

So there is a lot in what you are saying.

They have not shut the idea down though, because they know it means a lot of money. Just like the people asking know it means money for their ratings.

Amanda Knox has made them a lot of money with this article which has blown it up more.

She has also gotten her blog out and now I'm listening to her podcast. It's her only way to profit on all this.

The movie maker is not in wrong. The movie is about a violent Dad as far as I can see. It's the media who's been here the whole time.
We plan to get rid of this real soon now.

# uname -a
HP-UX antique B.10.20 A 9000/800 862741461 two-user license

# model
9000/800/K380
I'm pretty sure journalists have actually, non-hypothetically caused mistrials in criminal cases through their reporting in the UK and not been jailed for it. In fact as far as I can tell none of the journalists who did this in the UK have been jailed, at least not in the last few decades.
Calling him is a gem is a bit odd given his intellectual gymnastics about the Skripal poisoning (he said they could've been a gay couple and honestly expects people to either believe him or at least not think he's taking the piss).
Wow! Is there anything similar that you know of for Android TV? I would love to have something like this over the stock photo slideshow.
Constant anxiety over everything. Severe depression. Frequent urges to die despite having a good support system, family, and friends. Negative outlook over most things by default, needing constant positive reinforcement
>> I genuinely do not know who I am supposed to have identified or which phrases I published are said to have identified them, in combination with [details] in the public domain.

>> How I genuinely do not know who I am supposed to have identified or which phrases I published are said to have identified them, in combination with [details] in the public domain.

> How on earth is that open and shut?

I don't see how those statements have any bearing on whether the case is "open and shut" or not. You're quoting the defendant, who's almost certainly going to come up with some argument for their own innocence no matter how strong the case is.
Do you know why 4chan evicted Gamergate?
It craftly avoids naming the media barrons though. I completely understand why, but it should be noted.
Quite correct, both sides are clearly visible and there might be some point to using containers anyway.

But there's a bigger issue here. The comments the OP received, are heavily worded to the point that they explicitly state that the article made them angry.

Regardless of whether containers are suitable or not for task X or Y, it is very difficult to have a normal conversation, if one's comments can actually make people angry.
>You can then see that 87 judges of all types totally rejected the ridiculous arguments.

Not one election fraud case was rejected on merit and claims. None were heard. All were denied via process. This isn't a surprise. All lower courts are going to boot them, they aren't the place to hear this, I watched the hearings where the judges rejected and immediately facilitate getting the time sensitive paperwork ready for appeals. The higher courts rejected even the idea of hearing them for various reasons including the establishment right wanted Trump to remain in office as much as the establishment left.

Including the Supreme Court that ruled that potential federal election fraud or process violations in states wouldn't effect another state. So in this case despite Texas correctly pointing out that other states unquestionably and admittedly violated Article2 by approving election protocols without the consent of their legislatures, that Texas had no standing to sue.

This doesn't mean there was fraud. Doesn't mean there wasn't. But in terms of the scotus case, that was bullshit of the century and if you don't understand what happened (McConnell picked "Trump's" judges and McConnell wanted Trump gone as fast as possible) then you will never understand what really happened.

But to just wave your hands and say "They didn't win trial, all fake!" without admitting none were ever heard, is a willfully ignorant view of what happened. Even the courts sympathetic to Trump weren't going to rock the boat like that. It was always going to go to scotus and they signaled bright and early they weren't going to do it.
the best of both worlds would be to work remotely most of the time and have (frequent?) sprints where you get to know your coworkers and also engage in this kind of high bandwidth settings.
Franz Rosenzweig is an unsung Genius
I’ve worked passed midnight maybe twice in my 3 years working at startups. Both times it was because I wanted to get something done not because the founder asked. Some times I wake up in the middle of the night and, with nothing else to do, start working on something but it’s only because I want my equity to be worth something (nothing or everything) as quickly as possible so I can move on: not because I have to do these things.
Abel Wang Is Dead
I take it you dislike native software then...
And nobody cares much outside chrome-web developers, that’s why you only see these articles from them and not users.
One of the brothers is the main developer and ideas guy, the other is more the admin/idea control/art role
Even a single object gets you into the "all I wanted was a banana territory. "

I have a gorilla class and a banana method on the class, can I ever use banana without the gorilla? No. The simple act of having a class screws it all up.

Make the banana a pure function, or one that is defined in terms of a polymorphic parameter that it mutates.

func banana(x: animal){...}

banana(gorilla);

The way to do it via OOP is base class methods and importing the method to all children via inheritance which is just bad and universally reviled among even practitioners of OOP.

class Animal()
{
banana()
}

class Gorilla() : Animal {

}

Technically there are slight fair advantages and disadvantages to the OOP way when you don't account for inheritance and polymorphism but all that is gone once you do account for them.
ProtonVPN gets serious speed boost with VPN Accelerator
Yeah, this is another of those "counterintuitive" takes that are so very popular. Expresses what sounds like legitimate concern about discrimination on the basis of genetics and then "flips the script" halfway through it to tearing down the entire idea of worrying about discrimination. Seductively intellectual nonsense.
Funny enough there’s a meme that illustrates the findings.
I keep the most important pieces on printout in a firesafe lockbox. I don’t have any eventuality for if the firesafe goes at the same time as online failsafes, but I feel like the best approach for those kinds of situations is nihilism.
I'm in the same boat with the addition of a Mumble server. We're always a keypress away from talking to each other.
No mention of Avalonia at all? https://avaloniaui.net/

Unlike Uno, it does not rely on native controls and does its own rendering.
I liked the name Xamarin because it's unique. OTOH Maui is a well-known toponym, reused as a name of many other things.

I really dislike this name overloading. It hampers search. It adds no value. It leads to name clashes.

I much appreciate unique names without much pre-loaded meaning, like Google, or Kodak, or Inkscape, or Linux, or Debian.

Apparently coming up with such a name is hard, though, especially because of a desire to come up with an excellent pun / acronym, and because of the corporate desire to play safe and use a tried name.