skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wouldn't go so far as to say "buy Intel stock" because institutional investors have likely already adjusted to the announcement and it's likely priced in.

That said, I think government encouragement is a critical piece of the puzzle and should derisk this operation. The recent supply shocks to the computer industry, when component prices and lead times shot up independent of any geopolitical conflicts (other than COVID), must have been a wake-up call to many that the US's relative lack of foundry capabilities has real strategic implications.
Sounds like a nightmare - if Amazon did accept BTC, if you purchased something in BTC would Amazon send you a 1040 at the end of the year for capital gains? If you made returns you could see capital losses? Would they be obligated to send you BTC or the denominated fiat in USD (or whatever currency) at the time of purchase. If they can choose then obviously they're going to choose such that it's in their advantage.

I'm not sure if it's still the case, but it used to be that on eBay it was a nightmare to do a similar thing with foreign currencies. You'd have a foreign transaction fee and an additional currency conversion fee.

Some people complained additionally that when you received a refund it was received in the seller's currency so you had to pay again to have it converted back to the original currency.
It's unclear if you are saying if that already works but yes that would be sufficient. =D
As an American, I hadn't heard of the Nayirah testimony. Not surprising in the least. And I think you meant to write "1898" there.
Yea unfortunately I know how detailed the SF-85 is. Luckily it was a public trust specifically for IT stuff not the full blown one but I think the only difference was it looked at 7 year history vs lifetime.
I'm not a professional photographer. I was a digital photography enthusiast from nearly the beginning.

I kept taking photos on an SLR for a while in parallel with digital photography, then I gradually switched over to all digital. Then I stopped taking photos with a purpose built digital camera and started focusing on the photos I can take with my iPhone.

I worked really hard to drive all the digital images I have into iCloud, whether they originated on an iOS device or not. I have a decent collection of photos that came from Kodak PhotoCDs. I could have a lot more photos available in my iClod collection if I invested in a negative scanner.

My biggest use cases for face recognition are for life milestone events for other people. Weddings, graduations, funerals. People who know me often ask me to look for photos of loved ones if we've been at events together.

I could do more than I am doing with the technology. But what I can do without too much effort sometimes surprises me.
You're damn right grep was a bad example. And I don't know of anyone building good tools just to "get a language in front of people."
Per the OP, it sounds like they're taking more conservative/incremental steps now, and their previous fault was that they were too ambitious and tried to do too much at once.

My understanding is Intel's rivals also took a more incremental development process, which basically allowed them to capitalize on Intel's missteps.
If you want a "truly American" company (not TSMC or Samsung), Intel is the only option. The question is whether that's important or not.
no, it traces back to the same thing pretty much, but in modern Polish it's indistinguishable from ż (ž?)
I assume that long time ago it went like this r' -> ř -> řż -> ż, which effectively removed the foundational r-ness of the thing.

Off the top of my head, the Polish language has lost the phonetic distinction between

rz and ż -> ż,

h and ch -> ch,

u and ó (flat u vs long o) -> u

In some regional dialects near southern/eastern borders you could still find some of these distinctions, but in modern Polish it's gone.

at a glance shit looks unnecessarily confusing especially for non-slavic foreigners, but once you look more into it explains many things and helps greatly with writing of related words, declination and conjugation, eg where grammar mandates sound substitution (assuming you are Czech you are probably aware of this effect already)
For example there are clusters of sounds that often change one into another.

g/h/ż are one such cluster of closely related sounds

noga (leg, noun) vs nożny (adjective)

drugi (second) vs druh (friend, companion) drużba (guy helping the newlyweds with wedding)

Sapieha (noble name of Ukrainian origin) vs Sapieżanka (daughter of Sapieha)

rz/r:

drzewo (tree) vs drewno (wood)

ch/sz is another:

mucha (fly) -> muszka (diminutive)

ó/o/e is another:

bóg (god) vs bożek (lesser god)

pióro (feather) vs pierzyna (bed cover stuffed with feathers)

It also helps seeing similarities between Slavic languages, as this stuff preserves a ton of the common roots. Any Slav seeing 'góra' will know what's up, not so much with phonetically equivalent 'gura'.
Missinglettr Review 2021 – Grow Your Social Presence the Smart Way
Very interesting! But the price seems steep for what appears to be only an incremental improvement over using OS tools to search computer contents and you email's search feature to find messages, etc. Unifying it may be a nice convenience, but I'm not convinced per the price. Still, there's a 14 day free trial, so I'll try to prove myself wrong.
That's what modern airline cabins look like, with a screen in front of each seat, and a headset on each pair of ears. Even some business class cabins (I don't fly THAT often but I watch travel vlogs).
There is no way that AI will be better than us at math in a couple of decades.
Tons of stuff isn’t TS or even Secret. There are a lot of public trust checks with varying degrees of questions.
All public. At this point if the data doesn't exist, we're out of luck.

I don't anticipate wall art being lucrative enough to commission our own scans. For areas the size of what we tend to map you need an airplane, a drone would take weeks to survey some of them.
Semi-unrelated:

I’ve been eyeing the Pinephone for quite some time now. Do you use yours as a daily driver? Or have you paired it with an a more-mainstream iPhone/Android?

I’m currently using an iPhone as my social circle uses primarily uses iMessage and I’ve found it hard to migrate. As a secondary device for debugging, testing, and a “burpsuite playground” I’m using an extremely cheap Nokia I picked up a few years ago.

I think a Pinephone would be cool to replace the Android I have.
I'm not too familiar with the physics side of things, so maybe I'm misunderstanding the notion of gauge symmetry, but even in the absence of matter I think there is a U(1) gauge symmetry present. The homogeneous Maxwell's equations are expressed purely in terms of the curvature F of the connection, if I remember correctly. So you might add a flat U(1)-connection to A without changing the equations of motion.

As for the math: the key point is that the metric is globally defined on the spacetime manifold M. I agree that the A_\mu transform as the coefficients of a differential form (A is a connection after all), but the notation elides the fact that the A_\mu are defined only on U. They depend, in particular, on the choice of local gauge s:U \to P. So the question about covariance (or globalization or coordinate-independence or whatever you want to call it) of both sides of the equation g_{\mu\nu}=A_\mu A\nu very much involves the question of local gauge transformations.

Either the principal bundle is assumed to be trivial, in which case there exists a global gauge and the connection A can be identified with a global 1-form on M (connections form an affine space modeled on such 1-forms; a gauge effectively converts this affine space to a vector space by choosing an origin), or we need to check that the right-hand side A_\mu A_\nu is indeed a symmetric two-tensor on M. The latter is not clear to me.

I admit I haven't looked at the paper carefully, and physicists typically don't approach things in such an explicitly mathematical way. So perhaps there's some (physical?) justification for why that equation typechecks. I don't quite see it though.
That's shockingly low given the amount I hear renewables pitched as a cure for climate change.

Not that they don't help, but if we woke up tomorrow to a completely renewable global grid, looks like we'll have barely made headway into ending climate change.
“If you’re poor just make more money”
Bitcoin is bad but all of those were solved years ago by BitPay.
> This is nearly universally an answer to the request" tell me you don't understand something you think you understand without telling me that you don't understand something that you think you understand"

I have no idea what this means, sorry.

> The ramp isn't steep. It's just that if you think you're on it but aren't, then the second floor looks like a wall

I'm not sure what this is meant to mean. Could you be less cryptic? Thanks.
If you have the output

h = SHA-256(k || m1)

you can easily compute a function `F(h, m2)` such that

SHA-256(k || m1 || m2) = F(h, m2)

allowing you to forge a verifier for `m1 || m2` under `k` for any `m2` you wish without actually knowing `k`.
I just turned 50 and I have cable TV for the first time now since I lived with my parents in the 80's. Maybe along with your eyesight and your hearing when you turn 50 you start to lose that part of your mental reasoning that tells you cable TV is a bad idea.

Seriously though, I got tired of switching to different streaming providers when one of them suddenly lost access to some specific content that I was interested in. Cable now is just another streaming content provider.
There are full height cubes, half height and cubes with "visibility shields" or whatever they call them.

I think the half height ones are a decent compromise. You stand up and you can see the people around you. If you sit, you have your privacy. With stand up desks this can be different, but you can orient desks so that people aren't looking at you from behind.

I can see where if a team grew organically that an open office can work --but you never know when that will change (team changes, management changes, etc.)
Sure - some problems being solved right now:
What problems does DeFi solve? There are a few straightforward ones when looking at financial systems -

Inefficiency - Banks and financial institutions spend billions on opex (ex. BoA spent $53 billion on SG&A and occupancy/equipment in 2020). Well written protocols and decentralized trust can increase efficiency and collapse this number

Permissioned access - For better or for worse, anyone can create financial products and a whole market for it without asking the SEC

Opacity - Instead of using paper/hidden digital ledgers, open source contracts lets one easily follow money flow through code and transactions

Access - Turns out the world is very big and lots of people are either locked out from traditional financial institutions or their preexisting ones just really suck.

(some examples taken from article https://parthchopra.substack.com/p/part-2-why-defi-is-not-a-...)
The point I am trying to make is that this lifestyle is not well supported by this planet.
For speculation.
If you don't categorize bookmarks anyway, Pocket and equivalent might be all-around better than bookmarks.
Bitcoin mining can serve as a price floor to incentivize green energy production - ex. An otherwise unprofitable solar farm could be profitable because instead of peak production getting sent to the grid at low or negative rates, they can mine Bitcoin and monetize that energy that doesn't have other demand.

This is certainly not universally the case at the moment. It is probably offsetting in the majority of cases currently. But I bet there are a non-zero number of renewable energy products that were able to get greenlit purely because crypto mining can function as a buyer of last resort, and this number will continue increasing.

Bitcoin mining uses a higher proportion of green energy than most other industries though, so I think this energy use criticism is pretty shallow. Some people just don't like Bitcoin and so are enthusiastic to have a reason to complain about it that doesn't require any critical thinking about energy markets. These people believe Bitcoin is entirely worthless, so they'd complain about any level of energy usage, because there is no upside in their calculus.
A better analogy is... You have a 6:30 demo and if it burns the entire company down and gives everyone cancer... you can just shrug your shoulders and say oh well our bad, and then make a swimming pool out of your money...

You're trying to justify something totally insane.

Also your back of the napkin calculations for total deaths are way off. Under 50% of the country is vaccinated and we're not even at a fraction of that. 5 million is very sensational.
Assuming that the world will eventually transition to 100% renewable energy, it's not unreasonable to estimate the eventual total market size to be higher than the world's nightly power consumption.
Zotero is great for this.
set up a webdav docker container and you can sync it easily too
Although there is a lot of memorization required, especially at top-level play (opening theory and your opponent’s preference, as well as preparation), the most beautiful aspects of chess are brilliancies involving quiet positional moves or explosive piece sacrifices that seem unbelievable at first. Search for “Stockfish NNUE sacrifice” on YouTube to see examples, or the AlphaZero vs. Stockfish playlist on chess.com’s YouTube channel.
Having watched the Webcast it didn't sound that conservative!

7,4,3,20A in 4 years.
Yeah I get it: it's a fun hack to learn about GPIOs and REST APIs. But it's a solution to a lack of self-discipline, which I find offputting.
“This is good for Bitcoin”
Some (unsolicited) advice (this is HN after all): there’s a typo in this post (human's should be humans). There are other more subtle grammar issues in the post, too. Some of the language on the front page could be tightened up too.

The product looks awesome though. I’d probably buy one if I lived in the US.
> ... they are high resolution elevation models that we've used GIS software to light and create hillshade.

> ... These images are not traditional maps, but a map is a depiction/representation, which these are. Anyway, "map" is certainly shorter than "visual representation of a geographic area" so it's what we go with.

Okay, that makes sense to a certain degree. Seems what you are doing is innovative enough that it deserves a new category of "map".

Have you considered transfering your methods from the macro to the micro world? If I understand it correctly, you could in principle inverse the zoom factors, like using the elevation model of a coin combined with texture data and a lighting model and printing a much larger version of it on a canvas.
Webull isn't mobile only.
I agree there is a lot of this in the space, but if you look past the laser eyes, there is some really awesome stuff happening in defi.
Are the maroon notebooks gone yet?
A raw piece of imagesetter film behind glass or acrylic and in front of a white background would probably look pretty cool (great contrast), although you'd have some mechanical challenges getting it mounted without bubbles. It may require a fairly thick piece of glass to get enough pressure in the center, and it may require a bezel so you can clamp/glue it to the backing securely.
>I think they do have the cash reserves to back the stable coin

They haven't completed an audit, have they? If someone starts an audit, they're admitting that it's necessary, and if they quit halfway with some lame excuse, how is there any chance they are legit and actually have the reserves they claim? There is just no innocent explanation I can imagine.
What's funny is that this rumor started as a joke on Twitter, was picked up by some UK newspaper (iirc) and then spread through the media
The fact that they've replaced their CEO with a highly-respected (within the company) former engineer and they've been rehiring a lot of other veteran former employees who were involved in many of their historical successes is certainly a good sign.

It's still a tall order, but my reading is that they seem to be doing all the right things. And they certainly aren't short of cash to invest with.
> It's cool that you are able to use bayesian models & kalman filters to decide whether you should try diet X, or whether someone is lying, or if crypto is a sound investment, or whether to take an umbrella with you when going out today.

This part isn't dichotomous, it's just a strawman (something that I'm guessing would go into the "overgeneralizing" bucket in the linked article).

I didn't say you had to use fancy math to live your life. I replied to your statement that one had to use distorted reasoning, and cited the existence of two named techniques (about reasoning from limited evidence) as a fun way of making the point.

My point wasn't about what you said anyway, it was that you were shouting and flaming about it using exactly the techniques the linked article was noting are on the rise. You see that, right?
We have different capacities. That is why some become a GM at 12 and some are stuck an IM for life. And it extends beyond just being a GM or not. No one atm is as good as Magnus Carlsen for example, yet have been training at even younger ages.
There's a bit divorced from reality, and there's implausible.

Amazon was a bit divorced from reality as well for most of its history. They had extraordinary continued sales growth to fuel that divorce, to underpin those high expectations, along with a quasi segment monopoly. That held up for a time. However it began to stall as online retail growth rates began to falter (look at Amazon's stock from 2011-2015, nice but nothing crazy while still carrying a ridiculous multiple; that's the result of retail profit & margin reality setting in). And then they started publishing AWS results and its software-like margins, and eventually the hyper margin ad business; kaboom goes the stock, due to that earnings growth and its forward expectations.

What's the Tesla AWS / Ad explosion? There isn't one. They don't have a business like that, where they'll get to print monopoly-like software profits. Amazon blazed a new path with AWS that they got to own as they went. Tesla has to take auto share from companies like BMW, Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, Daimler, VW, Ford, GM, etc. as they go (to say nothing of the Chinese EV makers that will eventually dominate that domestic market and gradually push outward globally). Entirely different context.

Tesla is an increasingly boring automaker, nothing more. EVs are just vehicles, they don't come with 4x or 6x the margins of ICE vehicles that Mercedes or BMW produce. The best case scenario, realistically, is that Tesla becomes Toyota or Daimler. That will be an astounding outcome, to get there and then hold that ground against that much competition. There's no AWS business coming to save their valuation. Batteries are not a stellar business, the solar business sucks big time (just look at the solar companies, their earnings and their market values), and the big rig business is also not at all spectacular.

Tesla also is not going to own the luxury market, they're horrible at making luxury vehicles. Daimler & Co will continue to dominate luxury vehicles. Tesla had its shot, a huge headstart, at conquering luxury EVs and entirely failed to put a big enough stake into the ground, they're out of time (look at what their high-end segment of sales is worth today or yesterday, it's a pittance despite the huge headstart; they've done a terrible job there).

The Cybertruck isn't going to take over the truck market.

What's left? The Model 3 has to conquer planet Earth in four to five years. Everyone has to buy one. It's not going to happen.

I defended Tesla for most of a decade on this forum. When a lot of people here said Tesla would never produce the Model 3 at scale, I argued against that skepticism across numerous threads over and over again; it was obvious it could be done. There's a difference between recognizing Tesla wasn't going to go bankrupt a few years ago for example (an easy argument I took up across numerous threads), and buying into really really crazy forecasts that are well outside of the realm of believable. There's being objective about what's actually likely, plausible, and just frothing at the mouth on bubble kool-aid.
In the great scheme of military spending things, 10 billions is small change.
You are agreeing with my point. Sorry I left the sarcasm tags off my comment. Climate has often been confused with weather, and the BBC should not be claiming "drought" based upon such a short interval.
I may be wrong. It happens a lot! But I think Arrow's vision encompasses compute, not just a data format and data interface.

https://www.slideshare.net/wesm/pycon-colombia-2020-python-f...

Slide 43: The "Arrow C++ Platform" encompasses a "Multi-core Work Scheduler" and a "Query Engine"

Slide 38: "It would be more productive (long-term) to have a reusable computational foundation for data frames"

Again, I agree that, today, it's more data format, and the shared compute stuff is more a vision.

EDIT: See also https://ursalabs.org/tech/
A healthy friendship outside the workplace is maybe 25 hours per month of contact, at the upper end. That's meeting frequently for meals and spending 25-50% of weekends together. If you manage to have 3 of those, that's 75 hours a month of being around other people. Still quite far from the 160 built into an office job.

I don't think friendship is a substitute for the socialization an office provides. A roommate situation might be, but that has other serious challenges.
came to look for this comment. Maemo -> Meego -> Mer -> Sailfish.... now this. I guess this one runs like a un-opinionated Debian but for mobile.
Wow, this article is so right. Excuse me while I invest in <Coin named after meme based on another meme> with 1000%+ yield that comes from []. Tether? Never heard of it. Also, ignore the millions being lost in scams (https://www.rekt.news/).
Cyanotypes are so much fun. Had good results printing digital negatives on transparencies. It’s easy to do and watching the picture appear is very rewarding. Here’s some examples: https://www.kevan.tv/art/cyanotypes/
Have you never heard of the 5th Ammendment?