skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> That data is intensely misleading, leading to false interpretations

There is no false interpretation. It's a flatter charge curve with a higher average charge rate. Similar to how the Mercedes EQS charges faster than the Model S Plaid:

https://insideevs.com/news/522577/mercedes-eqs-fast-charging...

> superchargers and CCS2 chargers with the same peak power

But they don't have the same peak power. 350 kW CCS chargers are common. Some are 400 kW. No Tesla charger offers that yet.

Tesla switched to CCS in Europe a long time ago. Tesla ought to switch to CCS in North America too. Cutting your customers off from easy access to an additional 4,550 CCS charging locations is not doing right by your customers:

https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_locations.html
Good answer, I am not opposed and would actually love if the government would start providing funding to small startups so people could take risks. Currently in many cases the ability to take risk is limited to young single people, people with a supportive family or people with a significant financial cushion. Regarding "Democratically decided" spending decisions how would that be accomplished when the country is split almost 50/50 on everything? It changes very quickly if for example 50.1 % of the voting public wants money spent on border walls, police and defense. Is that not the people's will then at that time?
Yep, the program referenced in the blogpost https://github.com/briandfoy/excellent_numbers/blob/master/c... is using GMP's variable-width numbers (mpz_* routines). If you know bit lengths in advance you provide pre-allocated C arrays to mpn_* routines: https://gmplib.org/manual/Low_002dlevel-Functions . This is likely going to be much faster (you avoid bookkeeping and malloc inside mpz_*), and what e.g. libsnark does for its general Fp arithmetic. (E.g. addition becomes https://github.com/scipr-lab/libff/blob/develop/libff/algebr... ) Of course, mpn_* routines still do loops which __int128 ones would presumably unroll but the bulk of the gain should come from reducing mpz_* overheads.
"Managing gigabytes" is one of the standard introductory textbooks. It's quite dated now (published 1994, before Google was started, and hence why it says "gigabytes" rather than "exabytes"), but a lot of the fundamental concepts are the same. At least it'll give you a vocabulary and conceptual framework for thinking about search.
Just because the Fed is the originator of US Dollars (which it isn’t directly — banks do that by lending, but whatever), that doesn’t imply that fiscal and monetary policy are the same thing. They are decisions by different people for different goals. I think the Fed would be surprised to learn that they are responsible for fiscal policy as you assert.

Also, selling Treasuries isn’t “magic”. US Treasuries act as reserves in the banking system, that’s how modern banking works. You would be right to say that the Fed and the Treasury do indeed work together — after all, the US government is unlikely to default on any US-denominated obligation issued by itself — but the level of coordination you’re implying is a fiction.
Try Glitch, I am hosting some websites there, with $10 a month you can host multiple small sites.

Or pay $5 for a Digital Ocean, but probably needs a little bit more configurations
Does anyone know what the coating of 'granite' cookware is made from? On Wikipedia there's nothing, and I've noticed it seems to have replaced non-stick teflon pans in supermarkets. It's usually marketed as 'eco-friendly' and 'PFOA free'. I stayed in a couple of airbnbs that had this type of pans, and they seemed to work just like any other non-stick pan. The base seems to be a mixture of aluminium and steel (as it works on induction).

https://www.amazon.com/Carote-Stone-Derived-Non-Stick-Switze...
not only can deprecate cause depreciation, it can be a synonym for depreciate (in the financial meaning). but depreciate can't be a synonym for deprecate (in the end-of-life meaning).

just one of those fun things that gets thrown in to make sure nobody ever fully understands the english language.
For those who are confused: this allows you to associate a type with a number. You can always retrieve the type you previously stored via decltype(loophole(tag<N>{}))

I was aware that the C++ type checker had memory and even that it was Turing complete. This is still non-intuitive to me. Only an Uber C++ expert who knows exactly what constructs cause the type checker to retain memory would be able to design this.
LOL, thanks for taking the time to read my comment and feedback :)
>What appellate courts have ruled in favor or biometrics being protected?

This article talks about a case in the 11th circuit in 2012 and another in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Commonwealth v. Davis. Apparently the only time you can compel someone to give their password (which biometrics serve the same purpose) is if the state already knows what's on there. It's called "foregone conclusion exception."

Yet if the government can show that it already knows of the existence and the suspect’s possession of the documents at issue—i.e., that these matters are a “foregone conclusion” and thus that the factual assertions implicit in the act of production add “little or nothing to the sum total of the Government’s information”—then “no Fifth Amendment right is touched because the ‘question is not of testimony but of surrender.’”

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10416
Op-eds are supposed to be interesting opinions the editorial board feels are worth sharing. While they may go against the leanings of the editorial board, they should be of the same caliber as what they would write themselves. Publishing an op-ed is an endorsement not necessarily of the article's thesis, but of the quality of the argument in favor of the thesis.

Publishing hot takes devoid of substance and lacking intellectual merit reflects poorly on the institution and the editors who made the call to do so, regardless of what position they advocate.
For me, it works the same way even if others are not involved. If I do a tricky thing in a matter of hours because I got lucky I tend to feel happier about it compared to if I’ve done a simple but mundane thing over the weekend. Perceived complexion brings excitement.
I don't disagree, however, Preston is merely representing the will of his constituents. If I was a NIMBY I would think he was doing a very fine job, and I don't blame him for doing what he was hired to do.

Here's the most frustrating part though: SF has a massive pool of voters that could easily overpower NIMBYs and basically rezone much of it to build as much housing as necessary. IIRC SF is ~2/3 renters, many of which are paying an insane amount in rent — but crucially, many aren't because of rent control.

It seems those that are doing just fine in their rent controlled apartments remain apathetic to the whole situation and aren't lobbying their representatives like the NIMBYs are, and everyone else is paying the price. It's basically "FU, got mine" very much the same way NIMBYs are.

Until this apathy is resolved, nothing else will, unless the state starts to overwrite local control.
Search engines seem to be stuck between serving two roles: 1. An easily accessible directory of mainstream information, and 2. A specialized tool to find the diamond in the rough. It seems like it has to be a tradeoff, it can't serve both roles equally well.
The sizeof() forces instantiation of the template.

The trick is that the template declares a friend function with a body. Being a "friend" declaration, it is not scoped within the template. However, the body is defined within the template and is allowed to use the template's parameters.

The result is that the friend function's definition depends on how the template was instantiated, even though the friend function is not scoped within the template. If you instantiate the template two different ways, the compiler actually complains that the friend function has two different definitions.

What this all means is that you can write some code that instantiates a template, and then later on, you can observe how the template was instantiated. Instantiating a template has a programmatically-observable side effect.

And you can use that to trick the compiler into giving you more information about other declarations. SFINAE on steroids basically.
> But in the absolute, it’s still tiny

No, it's not; its from the global minimum to, while not the historic global maximum, a level clear on the other side of average.

> The other stuff about the fed activities not influencing treasury rates

No one said that. The relation historically is not such that going to a 4-5% fed funds target would double or triple debt service costs.
More reasons why a global search monopoly is suboptimal. Smaller markets like this are just going to get neglected and maintained just enough that a better alternative can't compete. Google search is basically useless for any language other than English.
An interesting exercise that most reasonably competent programmers can do now is to setup their own websearch engine with Common Crawl, Elastic MapReduce, JSoup or Gumbo or equivalent HTML parser, and ElasticSearch. It costs on the order of high-hundreds to low-thousands of $$$ to process the ~2B webpages in the Common Crawl corpus (about half the size of the first tier of Google's index) and stand up an ElasticSearch cluster with it for a few days.

You too can build your very own search engine.
Unfortunately, the result quality is roughly what AltaVista was like in 1995. That is why people keep going back to Google.
Makes sense, does DDG do the same? If yes isn't that against their "We don't track users" mantra? If no how do they improve their results while missing such a powerful signal?
I’ve picked this up for my team after stumbling on an excerpt earlier. While there is still work to be done, the ambitious outline and the current draft definitely have some value to offer for a patient and curious reader. I hope the author will deliver on their goals, but even in this current form, I’m not disappointed in my purchase. I’m submitting here because I believe some HN-love and constructive feedback will likely lead to an even better product.
>Eventually I started making an effort to get back into the groove quickly after interruptions. When I get back to my desk, I pause for a moment and make a deliberate effort to recall where I left off. (...) If I put some minimal effort into it, I can get right back into the task I was working on, even complex ones like debugging complicated programs.

Nobody argued you can't "go right back into it" (e.g. instead of going to check your email or Facebook, or whatever). The problem is not being able to "go back into it", but to "go back into it without having blown mental state".

"Going back right into it" is easy for simple tasks, which don't require building and following an elaborate mental model. It's bad for implementing subtle or complex behavior, debugging, (re-)architecting a system, and so on.

That it's a problem it has been known for half a century, and it's not just about meetings, all kinds of "context switching" hurt developers.

And perhaps it's not that the essay told you "what you wanted to hear at the time", but that it tells you what you don't want to hear at this time :-)
Teaching Tech: 3D Printer Calibration
Maybe move to a different city where people aren't clueless?
Good point, thanks for your advice.
IIRC it's not particles, but combustion/decomposition products.

And no, it's not an issue with using non-engine air for cabin pressurization taking too much weight/power: even a large airplane needs only little actual airflow.
> That's not in his work

No, its pretty directly in his interview response, not his work: “I don't think there's much future in a gal who's thoroughly opposed to having babies.”
They deprecate specific versions of RDS software, forcing upgrades or peril.
We shouldn't put any stock into this yet.

> "The preprint study funded by the companies determined that the vaccine’s effectiveness reached a high point of 96.2 percent within two months after the second dose."

The manufacturers are lobbying hard for booster shots, and there's no reason to trust a pre-print that they funded.

Anyway, I think our next dose in the US will likely be updated for Delta instead of a booster.
diablo 2 is a hack and slash. not a story driven RPG. poor comparison.
I believe it, although only by correlation, of course. Often gay couples can have increased incomes from two male wage earners and a lower percentage of couples with kids.
I genuinely was not sure Google Cloud was going to ever get ipv6. It was starting to seem like they were more likely to fold first. Glad they finally stepped up.
This isn’t a question of cutting it out 100%, the data from Israel has the majority of new cases being those who are vaccinated.
It's a thought, I suppose, but the science is in on the vaccines. It's not in on the case you're talking about, and given the safety & availability of the vaccine it's an easy call.
What does this even mean? They made various demographic buckets, and this particular one had the highest count?
For what it’s worth, the unusually large increase in inflation as measured by CPI seems to be at least partially due to base effects:

https://www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2021/0513

Long story short, we are comparing year-on-year when last year was itself almost as unusual as can be.
After 9/11 there was talk about nobody wanting to work or live in skyscrapers. That the world was forever changed. Nothing really changed except the state gained more power and people lost some power. Last I checked, there were cranes all over manhattan throwing up skyscrapers left and right.

After the 2008 financial crisis, there was talk about breaking apart "too big to fail" banks and reigning in their financial shenanigans and the world was forever changed. Nothing really changed except the banks got bigger and now housing market is the hottest it has ever been.

After the Trump election, there was talk about end of democracy, financial collapse, end of globalization, etc and the world was forever changed. Nothing really changed except the state gained more power, the wealthy got wealthier.

Every few years there is a crisis that is going to change the world forever. After a few months/years, people forget and move on, til the next crisis that is going to end/change the world.

You'll realize this eventually. It's why news really should be taken with moderation. Too much news and it become poisonous and unhealthy for your well being.

Everyone eventually learns that "life goes on". In a few years, covid will seem like ancient history and most people will have moved on to other things.

Life went on after the far deadlier 1918 pandemic. Life went on after ww2. Life went on after 9/11. You'll be alright.
> Amazon’s Kindle e-readers with built-in 3G will begin to lose the ability to connect to the internet on their own in the US in December, according to an email sent to customers on Wednesday. The change is due to mobile carriers transitioning from older 2G and 3G networking technology to newer 4G and 5G networks

Forever was never long, but it keeps gettin' shorter.

https://xkcd.com/548/
That's nice. I have a baby. I don't want to be exposed to unvaxxed people at the office and risk bringing that home to my baby.
This is really confusing for me. The author of the article seems to be making the point that affordable housing is inherently expensive and market rate is inherently cheaper. If I were to follow this line of reasoning, I’d find myself advocating for no affordable housing at all.

But then I read about the issue actually being about housing supply. I somewhat understand that this article is framed in such a way as to seem like it’s about one individual politician, but the points made here seem to be very black and white about the very concept of affordable housing.

It kind of seems that pro- and anti- affordable housing folks are accusing each other of the same thing: valuing their own property value highest.

I’m but a humble country bumpkin that grew up in affordable housing and have very little expertise about “doublespeak” but generally speaking I’ve found that when somebody makes and sells something for less, that means that the price is lower (less money required = lower cost).
I don't know much about MPI, but I thought it related to message passing/distributed workloads rather than arithmetic performance?
> I don't think this analogy holds, there is a difference between beaver and people: the beaver has evolved and performs services in an ecosystem, and that system has evolved around the beaver within some suitable geological timeframe. Humans are destroying the environment far faster than anything can evolve to.

Humans are just a later stage of life's flourishing than beavers:

Eukaryotes have more extropy than prokaryotes; Multicelled organisms have more extropy than single celled ones; Complex mulicelled organisms have more extropy than simple ones; and humans (once they invented farming and writing) have more extropy than complex animals.

The next stage after that -- the stage we're currently in -- is the industrial revolutuon.

The stage after that is the singularity, when AIs will take over.

But it's all life, doing what it does: expanding, controlling resources, reproducing, etc.
What argument..?

The workforce is safer if vaccines are mandated in the office. Indisputable.
> Most managers don’t know how to manage a remote team and their employer still hasn’t trained them.

If a manager is struggling with a remote team, that’s usually a sign that they’re generally incompetent as a manager. There may be a few cases of good overall managers that struggle with remote. But they’re few and far between.

The vast majority of bad remote managers are bad because they’re plain bad managers. It’s not a lack of training. Remote management is pretty much nothing more than basic management 101. Mediocre operators prefer in-office because it’s easier to kludge something that gives off the appearance of actual management.

When a team transitions to full remote, it’s like the tide going out and finding out who’s swimming naked. If companies were sensible, they’d embrace full remote because it quickly reveals where the weak points in the org chart are. And rather than capitulating to demands, any middle manager lobbying for a return to the office is probably a good candidate to trim the fat.
The Tuskegee airmen experiments.

Which confuses two completely different events, the Tuskegee untreated syphilis experiment and the Tuskegee airmen, both over half a century ago.
> The currently estimated IFR across all age groups is around 0.15%, putting it on-par with the flu

Yeah, that's gonna need one hell of a cite. This is false.
It's a higher price with the benefit of world wide roaming without a special plan. There are also some unlimited and multi line plans now.

I've been on Fi for years and its great.
The Civil Rights Act's prohibition of private sector discrimination in "public accommodations" was always a mistake. If there is indeed such a thing as a service that is categorically a "public accommodation" even if a wholly private entity is providing it, then it should be provided directly by the state, or the state should provide some subsidy to select private enterprises in exchange for them entering an irrevocable covenant where they are bound to follow guidelines that advance the public interest.
up to ~15 minutes is not the time it takes to quick format, its the number Iv seen during testing of TRIM, the time it took to internally erase translation table after format command.

There should be NO DATA on the drive if it was really formatted on OS supporting TRIM.
The only thing the absence of that union would have changed would be more money in the owners' pockets. If hiring your parents would be profitable the owners would do it; if not, not, not. That's true regardless of how profitable or not the other employees are.
I built a 50K following in 9 months and it changed my game completely
Illinois legislators approve bill that would decriminalize HIV transmission
I should probably have said "as easily". I doubt anyone knows which group is more exposed, and it's not very important for the argument.

Personally, I expose myself to a lot more virus risks than before I got vaccinated, if you want an opposing argument.
Wow, the Norwegian on those scam web sites is actually perfect. Never seen that before.
I'm down to bang out JIRA tickets from the comfort of my home in exchange for money. But that's as far as it goes. The skeuomorphism of "team" and the skeuomorphism of "culture" are vile.

I'm not going to "mentor" an object on my computer screen as if it were a human being who showed up to be my teammate.
I recently used `git bisect` to find the latest compatible code revision for a DB snapshot by checking the db migrations applied in that snapshot. Bisecting 80K commits takes a few seconds. Magical stuff.
It's not that complex. These people also acted like masks were an affront to their liberties. It's not about the facts, they're delusional.
Beyond Human Endurance
Totally surprised that companies that are Orwellian and anti-science have policies that are Orwellian and anti-science.
The language in those scam articles is actually perfect, first time I've seen that.
That’s awful that the supply is so small. It would be great if there was a big enough supply of affordable housing such that they could do away with the unfair lottery.
>but as far as percent of GDP, the US isn't even the biggest spender

The great thing about statistics is you can maneuver them to support your conclusion. Here's some that support mine: in real numbers, "The United States spends more on national defense than China, India, Russia, United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Germany, France, Japan, South Korea, Italy, and Australia — combined."

https://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison

That's a lot of money to fight pirates.
Why? What makes you believe there is any advantage in these particular individuals?

Frankly, is it coming to the point where we have to say it's too dangerous for men and women to work together? Dangerous for individuals and companies a like.
Immunity
Hack the phone for immunity Apple steals your programs the Government takes Government Money. Rapes young girl and the women in D.C. and uses their power to keep them safe
720-757-6004