skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>If I customize the screen, can I save the items and positions and reuse that in other stream a few days later?

exactly. everything saved. there are also notions of profiles so all other visual settings (banner/ticker/font/themes etc.) can be saved and re-used

It's slightly confusing and my guess is that people does not care if you or VISA is taking a cut.

>>Do the streamer have to pay upfront? Do streamer prefer to pay instead of "sharing" a part of the donations? (I think this is the twitch model.)

could word that better. meta point is that we do not intermediate between the supporter/community and creator. on twitch and youtube - if you donate - the platform (twitch/youtube) take a cut. that is standard for native donation experience on platforms or on mobile (iOS). we take no cut so max % of funds (minus processing fees which are outside our control) go from community to creator. and this donation/monetization feature is unique to us - > that was the spirit of the post

good questions
I don't recall the objections to inherited wealth as being about "they kept it all in the family" as opposed to "it was only the first born son".

The US has long had profound objections to inter-generational wealth transfer, entirely independent of our conceptions of the relative importance of family vs. individual.
They have already made an EV in the past in 2014 with the Rav4 EV. They certainly can do it, but they are more concerned about the efficiency of which the world is using battery materials.
That sounds good, as long as the bank API for this is open and documented.
agreed, that is certainly the most noteworthy aspect. I can't say im surprised. Financial hegemony is critical for state apparatuses to maintain power. Frankly I'm more surprised it's taken them this long to begin the crusade against crypto currencies. I only expect it to ramp up further.
Yes the first gen iPad Pro can, and the second generation one too. The target user base for Linux on those might be too small though.
I've worked on hard science problems and while it's more bleeding edge it's all very, very slow moving. You're not shipping anything in less than a year, max. And that's OK. It's just very glacial and you go VERY deep into the topic.
As a former democrat, now republican, I am honesty extremely surprised that it's the right being targeted. In 2002, I would have sworn the citizen databases would have been listing leftists. Reality is stranger than fiction.
There is something really strange about a lot of recent Go projects including this one. I can't put my finger on, but the combination of the author and the type of problem they choose to tackle oftentimes seems baffling to me. Most projects seem to be solving a problem that is often misidentified or otherwise badly solved, but somehow the focus ends up being on the code architecture or the UI design. It's like they're trying to solve a problem just for the sake of writing some code and the correct way to use Go idiomatically or something and don't really care about the problem or how well the solution actually works.
Even if brown rice prices were to double, making GABA rice gets the nutrition profile of proper vegetable from a staple.

I wouldn't store the brown rice meant for GABA longer than six months or replace more than half my vegetable intake with it (i.e. one probably shouldn't replace dark leafy greens and/or the broccoli family,) but that is still something like a compensation for 45% inflation in fresh vegetables.
I only mean that how 'well' billionaires personally decide to spend their money might not be a solid barometer for how tax laws should be written.

Point taken tho
The people quoted just seem to want butts in seats so they can feel important. Very few arguments of substance were given aside from “if they dont get face time with their bosses cough me then they may not get promoted and might get fired because I am a power tripping loser whose entire identity is being a manager
After SolarCity acquisition Tesla have quickly moved away from PPA and sales stands at Home Depot.

These days you can order Tesla solar directly from their website, no third parties involved. And, no PPA.
the people calling to ban crypto don't care about the environment, that's just an easy selling point for them to garner public support from people who normally wouldn't care. It's all about control of the financial system
So, Julia is Perl?
I agree for the most part - I don't think that there's any strong conclusions w.r.t. spending here, but an interesting direction for future research.

What I'm struggling with, however, given the assumption above (spending is decoupled from tax revenues), is that while the paper suggests a lack of incentive to cut taxes, it equally suggests a lack of disincentive to cut taxes.
Mein Kampf sold 240,000 copies before he became chancellor, so it seems like it was already an important part of the conversation. I'm not advocating for censorship, but obviously the argument that Mein Kampf is available therefore we should stop trying to limit violent speech is not a good one.
I think this is in the category of compelling if true.

Reported in https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.70801... which notes a potential conflict of interest: three authors (of four) are listed as inventors on a U.S. patent application filed by Houston Methodist Hospital for the device used in this report.

An expanded clinical trial for the oncogmagnetic device is listed at https://www.houstonmethodist.org/research/our-faculty/labs/b...
Is that 750 EUR for an individual or a family? Sounds like a lot.

For comparison in California, a 35-year-old SF resident earning $250k/yr living alone purchasing insurance through the public marketplace can get a Platinum-level Kaiser Permanente HMO plan for around $650/mo (but over $2000/mo for a family of four).

YMMV but I've found KP's service quality to be extremely high, and that plan comes with $0 annual deductible and very low copays.
> I can't put my finder at what's missing

I think I found it. Here, have mine: /s
I don’t know that human calculation is so fundamentally different than computer evaluation, it’s just that it’s much, much slower. The human GM’s eval of any given position, without thinking ahead at all, is probably better than most engines. The problem is that strong evaluation isn’t worth much compared to a weaker evaluation that is nevertheless several candidate moves wider and many plies deeper (you might argue AlphaZero disproves this, but Stockfish was regularly beating the neural network engines even before its own neural network, for example).

Humans see fewer candidate moves. They regularly miss quiet moves that are the strongest. They often calculate to a certain depth (even a very shallow one) and stop based on gut instinct. But it’s still just trees of moves with some eval function.

I don’t think it’s fundamentally that hard to mimic, and it would actually be genuinely interesting for didactic purposes. But for fairly obvious reasons it’s not a priority outside of a couple of projects.
Sadly not - I'd love it to do that, but the Pocket API doesn't make that available.

I've been contemplating building an add-on for Dogsheep that can do this for any given URL (from Pocket or other sources) by shelling out to an archive script such as https://github.com/postlight/mercury-parser - I collected some suggestions for libraries to use here: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1401656327869394945

That way you could save a URL using Pocket or browser bookmarks or Pinboard or anything else that I can extract saved URLs from an a separate script could then archive the full contents for you.
I am a structural biologist studying Archaeal viruses and CRISPR/Cas proteins. From my point of view, AlphaFold has basically just gotten better at multiple sequence alignments. It's not a bad thing, but it's unfortunate useless to me because sequence divergence happens so quickly in the organisms I study that even the best results are still basically made up. It's nice that AlphaFold got better at generating sequence alignments, but it's not a magic bullet (a la folding figured out from first principles.)

Interestingly enough, if I get experimental data of an archeal virus protein, it almost always uses a conserved fold. There's just no evidence at the amino acid level.
Yes.

There is a great deal of written information about Rust-the-language which exists only in compiler comments, RFCs, bug reports and internals.rust-lang.org threads (often slightly stale in all cases).

It's Rust's greatest weakness.

But "every time this comes up" the discussion somehow gets sidetracked into arguments about standardisation, even in cases (such as this thread) when it's clear that what the ranter cares about is accurate documentation.
Excess capital leads to asset bubbles. Non productive. Maybe even anti productive.

Some how we've simultaneously got both surplus capital and huge a decline of new business formation. Coincidence?

My pet theory (hunch) is that transaction costs discourage large funds from making medium and smaller sized investments. The uniqueness of Y Combinator kinda supports this hunch.
Why I've given up pandering to my online audience (and you probably should too)
where i live in Switzerland the prices for:
1. hyundai kona 64kwh (480km range): 33k swiss francs (1 franc ~ 1usd)
2. toyota prius base model: 31k swiss francs
3. tesla model 3: 40k swiss franc

I honestly find no reason to invest in an ice/hybrid when i can get way better warranty on a korean hyundai at similar price or get a tesla for 9k more if i want something very shiny.

Personally i use car sharing here and use couple times a month for electric renault zoe here, which is still way less than what it would cost me to lease or buy any of the cars i mentioned above.
When you subsidize competitors to hydrogen (such as electricity), it punishes hydrogen. Toyota et al are asking to reduce these subsidies.

I don't know whether gas is subsidized or not, but if it is, I agree, remove the subsidy!
Doing nothing is the point; it serves the same purpose as a `void*` in C, except that there are (runtime-) safe ways to take a value out of `interface{}` and back to its concrete type in Go. The most obvious use for it is heterogenous containers.
Covid hyper-inflation has made the possibility of actually living in a higher cost-of-living area mostly unattainable for many.

Working remotely provides the crucial "career hack" of earning that higher cost-of-living salary while actually living somewhere cheaper.

Offshore developers have been doing it for years already.
Maybe it gets harder around june/july/new years, but the rest of the year has very little firework activity.
Does that work in BBEdit?
"I’ve never quite understood why cryptocurrencies are worth anything." The first sentence is the summary of the rest of the article.
Well I certainly don't feel useless lol... People's lives have different paths, but regardless I admire when someone does something cool wrt tech
Are most of the people you know driving 300+ miles regularly?

Even if they are, this is a problem solved by fast charge stations.
He did give a reason why testing has to be done by other people -- which was: if you, the coder, didn't catch the bug, how could you, the test-writer, catch it?

Sounds like you had a bad tester. Opposite of my experience. A good tester is a gift from the Heavens.
You might enjoy the Magic 2.0 book series. A bunch of programmers independently discover that the world is a simulation so they give them selves magic powers and time travel to medieval England to be wizards.
This seems to be intentional:

> Rather than defend ShotSpotter’s technology and its employees' actions in a Frye hearing, the prosecutors withdrew all ShotSpotter evidence against Williams.

Ducking the test and withdrawing the evidence means prosecutors can continue to claim that this stuff hasn't been deemed unreliable by experts.
> Let's hope 4 day work weeks are next. Even if [...] lower comp.

Aka part-time work?
I think bitcoin is dumb, but this makes me want to buy it just to say a big F U to the central banks.

Even stupid fake money should be legal. How authoritarian can we get?
Australia is super common for people to take sickies on fridays or mondays to get long weekends hence the request for mc. While tuesday-Thursday usually not required. Depends on the company tho. Singapore is more strict tho.
Granted, American suburbs are in poor shape. Question is, what is a viable vision for the future? Hong Kong (17.3k people / sqmile) or s'Hertogenbosch (3.6k people / sqmile)?

Packing millions of jobs in a handful of downtown sq miles, and then expecting that all the millions of commuters and their dependents live in a circle with 30 minutes access to downtown by bike cannot be physically satisfied by duplexes. Only a high density setup akin to Hong Kong may work. I know of no one, especially no one with kids, who would rather live in Hong Kong than a low density urban environment like s'Hertogenbosch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_H...
Can you say "Social Media"?!

The connection to anxiety, bullying and depression has already been demonstrated with adult women. It should be a surprise that young girls are worse affected.

Men/boys mostly don't care about social attention and approval in ways that are amped up on Social Media. Yes we are different!
> "lithium mining destroying the environment"

1. Any environmental impact from lithium mining needs to be weighed against the impact of continued extraction and burning of fossil fuels

2. Lithium is recyclable (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1682-5) and there is room for a lot of process improvement in lithium extraction (https://arstechnica.com/cars/2021/07/general-motors-looks-to...)

3. Studies of the lifecycle emissions (emissions including manufacturing) of electric cars consistently find that EVs beat ICE vehicles, and future lifecycle emissions must be considered as a curve, as the percentage of renewables on the electric grid increases and industrial process eventually move away from fossil fuels (https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-how-electric-vehicles-...)
Generally speaking if the US can identify some interest in the case (US customers, for instance) then it can file an indictment. Most first-world countries have extradition treaties with the US, and will definitely ship Paolo over for something like this.
one remember - "magma automation". they were sued to pieces and then bought out
What's your opinion on carbon credits?
Matrix is a protocol, Element is a Slack-like app on Matrix.

It sounds like you have issues with Element as a replacement for Signal, which I totally get, but I think it's worth distinguishing Element from Matrix.

Element being the only full-featured Matrix app hopefully won't always be the case and it's Matrix's express goal to change that. Element is a single reference implementation -- if it's successful it could spawn many others supporting different UIs and use-cases, which we're already seeing with Fluffychat sporting a Signal-like chat interface.

I'm pushing my family and friends to use Matrix because that's the direction I want the world to go (open protocol with many different clients and servers communicating), not because we're already there today.
While everything that has been said about Tether seems valid, not sure what is true and not, it is definitely suspicious. But after reading all comments, I am wondering, isn't the whole financial system also a house of cards? Can we talk about the amount of debt on student loans, credit cards, house loans, those ridiculous low interest rate, the amount of $usd that is being printed and giving it away ?

And all of those financial instruments are controlled by the same people that have been "cracking down on stablecoins/crypto"...

So my question is, who can we trust? we were born with banks around us so we kind of trust them, but can you imagine the level of corruption that existed when they were being created? how many financial institutions disappear with everyones money...

We are just at the early days of crypto, there is people trying to make good things and people trying to make a quick win taking advantage of the current status.

Do your own research, make your own decisions...
> Who's Apple to decide what I consider to be secure or not in my own free will, on my device?

They're deciding what is secure on their platform that they can be held liable for. Once you buy an iPhone, you can do whatever you want to it. You can hack it, you can smash it with a hammer, you can submerge it deep underwater. There's absolutely no one restricting your free will in any way here. What you are doing is, of your own volition, purchasing a device that you know has software that has built in restrictions, that you may or may not be able to bypass, but it wasn't designed to be, and getting upset that it doesn't behave as it wasn't promised.

The car analogy doesn't hold up. It'd be more akin to buying a car with android auto and being really upset that it doesn't run apple carplay.
Some of those 65% (condo and rowhouse owners and places where on-street parking is prevalent) will also need some amount of shared/public charging infrastructure.
Yes, it's about time. These steamy piles need to be banned - it's the only way to cut down on the greed-fueled scams. They solve no problems - despite of their "whitepapers"! They are the Rube Goldberg machine of the 21st century - invented as a honeypot by NSA or as means for the Chinese to export capital.

Note: Dear HODLers, instead of downvoting me, get lives!
My response's more about the dynamic execution side of things (latency & memory bloat of Julia). Static compilation is a whole different topic, but I'm confident that it can be solved with existing LLVM infrastructure (because what's LLVM good at? static compilation!) The hardest part may be how to modify Julia's semantics to fit that paradigm (for instance, the need to introduce "header files" in the language, and all the gnarly details coming with it)
MS Flight Simulator on consoles: Finally, a next-gen game for Xbox Series X/S
Because while people may be rational about their business, they are not rational about their children.

As for not working as hard, plenty of rich people have recently declared the majority of their wealth won't go to their children. So certainly won't have a 'devastating' effect as you claim!
The conclusions about Wireshark vulnerability lifetimes look wrong to me. Average lifetimes are artificially capped around 2 years because of how Wireshark Security Advisory version reporting interacts with their support policy. Real lifetimes might be much higher.

Many Wireshark CVEs with numbers CVE-2018-16058 and lower (up until August 29, 2018) say that 2.2.0 was the lowest affected version. A bunch after that say that 2.4.0 was the lowest affected version. Is it plausible that everything discovered after August 2018 just randomly happened to be in code that was introduced on the 2.4 branch? I feel it's much more plausible that this is just an artifact of the Wireshark support policy. https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LifeCycle says the 2.2 version series hit End of Life on September 7, 2018. When Wireshark reported CVEs after then (such as CVE-2018-19622 up to CVE-2018-19627), I suspect they intentionally didn't list 2.2 affected versions because they weren't supported. So, I disagree that Wireshark advisories "have sufficiently accurate version reporting to calculate lifetime" and I feel that "Of the 509 CVEs in Wireshark, the average and median lifetimes are 1.29 and 1.4 years" may be hugely inaccurate.
I mean, sharing your car is legal but that's not really what Uber ever was.
>In 2002, I would have sworn the citizen databases would have been listing leftists

I'm sure that when Republicans come back into power, the left will be targeted as well.
> "companies have right to challenge those laws or on how practical they are."

Is it not practical for Toyota to only offer electric cars for sale in India by 2030? Is it not practical for Toyota to sell fewer vehicles in India in 2030? To pull out of selling in India entirely? I know the criticism is "it's not practical for India to switch to electric vehicles (and keep everything else the same)" but (a) why is that Toyota's "right to challenge" and (b) why assume everything else has to stay the same? Assume the Indian government democratically chose economic slowdown from reduced vehicle sales but still wants those vehicles which are sold to only be electric, citizens should have the right to challenge that but why should international companies have such a right?
> If you think the most able individuals are creating and running the largest organizations, and know whats best for those organizations, why would you want the state to allocate those resources upon death of the individual?

To prevent the formation of feudalistic aristocracies. There's no difference between empowering bloodlines drawn from wealth or monarchy. You're still going to end up with incredibly corrupt and incompetent people running the show because they didn't earn their position -- they were born into it.

If you actually believe in meritocracy, why do you want to pass on your wealth to your children? If you do that, they won't be able to demonstrate their "individual ability or achievement."
> The US has long had profound objections to inter-generational wealth transfer, entirely independent of our conceptions of the relative importance of family vs. individual.

No it hasn't. If that were true, we would expect strict inheritance laws discouraging wealth transfer. But we've never seen that in the United States.

By and large, people saw individuals as inseparable from their family. Even the most individualistic thinkers of the 18th century would be considered practically Confucians today.

The United States has long embraced the inheritance of wealth. What we reject is the inheritance of title that gives some man authority or primacy over another independent of his own contribution to society as measured by his wealth. In the UK that we left, a commoner could have been richer than an old-money aristocrat, but not be considered his equal due to nepotistic aristocracies.
Ummm… Humans "dealt with disease" before "modern medicine" frequently by dying.
I see one thing missing: the value of the benefit we deliver, must be greater than the cost to develop it.
Even in a biological lab setting, in the past few weeks my productivity has stalled out after going back. Now I have to smile and nod 6-8 hours a day, then go home and actually do my work.
I am a Senior SRE at a FAANG and part of my job is mentoring junior members on the team. In my experience being remote and having tools has made mentoring easier. Between slack and zoom they get to talk to me and I get to send them relevant info that they can look back on for reference.

Also in situations where I may need to show something to a couple people, I have the option to record it. This allows for others to watch who couldn't attend and it can be reference for new members.

When in the office, someone stopping by or having me come to their desk was awkward and there was usually no paper trail to reference.

If I were to go back to the office I would continue mentoring this way as the tools help facilitate the sessions better than sitting at their desk talking to them.
A quirk of our legal system that allows dishonest people to continue with impunity.
I think this is a real conflict. In my opinion (not just mine), the only reason to write type constraints on a method definition in Julia is to control dispatch. Adding types to method arguments for the purposes of documentation is counterproductive to generic programming.
Why is “amazing culture” always parroted by managers who are typically loud and extroverted and think it is amazing because they get to strut around and dash from conference room to conference room.

If people dont want to go back then you by definition do not have an amazing in office culture.

If your culture is predicated on being in person, some less dysfunctional company is going to eat you alive.
Luculent Font