skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
functionally it's the same if you look at cash flows - the title to machines matters usually only if the supplier you are funding into is substantially smaller than you are. TSMC is large as well, so they don't need to do the title dance on any specific equipment.
I tend to agree. And it may vary by person. A lot of people can't truly work for hours on end. A bit of variety in the day can be good.

I wouldn't say that "meetings" are by any means the only or most helpful kind of variety, but if you need to do them anyway, a few per week is not the worst thing in the world.

(And by a few I do mean a few... less than 10 definitely, and ideally well under)
Safari isn't killing the web, trying to turn the browser into the defacto computing platform is.
"What would happen if someone blew up the mining company office due to a "paperwork oversight"?"

46,000 years from the company's last use, right? I mean, just to make the comparison complete.
I recommend Joanna Russ' How to Suppress Women's Writing for more tips on how to deny women's presence.
Vaccinated people catch and spread COVID just like the unvaccinated. The vaccines don't seem to affect transmission at all. Consider Iceland. It has a highly vaccinated population (>70%, supposedly the herd immunity threshold), yet is now seeing a third wave of the same magnitude as prior waves anyway. It seems the cause may be that the vaccines don't create mucosal immunity like natural infection would. The vaccines are now posited to be beneficial because they reduce symptoms, but not because they reduce spread.

Note: this makes vaccine passports useless. It also means that unvaccinated people cannot be blamed for anything except, perhaps, hospital load, because even if you hypothesise some sort of 'second order effects', vaccinated people contribute to the evolution of new variants to the same extent.

"We may need to reintroduce some lockdown rules"

Why? Lockdowns have no effect on anything, it is proven beyond doubt these days. Plenty of studies show that now.
Yes, and it was repealed by the 21st amendment. This was done because it is a violation of peoples' rights.
> There are obviously some confounding factors involved.

In the study, or in the anecdotes you're familiar with? People are ashamed of their weight, and also ashamed of caring about their weight, so I'd expect a significant degree of selection bias because we're more likely to hear about diets that work than those that don't.
Why Is the FDA Attacking Ivermectin, a Safe, Effective Drug?
Would they be able to tweak this potential booster shot to better target current variants and their descendants? Is there any need to do so?

How much about the current vaccine can possibly be changed without major regulatory hurdles or manufacturing blockers?
In summary:
A.) Pfizer is raking in over $33 billion from vaccine sales.
B.) Due to the PREP Act, they are completely immune from lawsuits arising from any form of complications arising from those vaccines.
C.) If you don't take this vaccine, you may lose your job[0].
D.) If you don't take this vaccine, you may be barred from normal everyday social activities[1][2].

I can't be the only one who is incredibly uncomfortable about society going down this path.

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27986160
[1]: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/italy-widens-green-pass...
[2]: https://www.sfchronicle.com/food/restaurants/article/San-Fra...
I have been doing computer work for over a decade. no discernible health effects. That could change, but I would say it is less risky than a manufacturing job. The data clearly shows that some jobs have a higher risk of occupational injury than others.
By "donating heavily" you mean $56k across dozens of officials.
It's not even complicated at this point, just delegate an prefix in daemon.json and it'll all work automatically, even better if you use compose.
> What makes you think lead paint tastes sweet?

Every time lead paint is mentioned it seems to state the taste.
It’s in the Wiki as well.

Lead acetate seems to be the sweet compound, and it even gets called sugar of lead.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_paint

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead(II)_acetate
You sounds like someone who is in a abusive relationship and should get out.

Look for remote jobs, send out your resume non-stop.

Being worried about getting fired because you are looking is insane. Companies generally won't contact your current employer without a heads up.
Most bus transit systems are in process to convert their fleet to EV. Most today don't run diesel, but CNG.
It's complicated.

I.e. it's not uncommon for you password to be used to decrypt an encryption key which then lives in RAM and is used to decrypt data. So as long as you "just" have a TPM then it's not preventing that attack wrt. full disk encryption. For it to do so you need either a secure module on you hard-drive (and trust that module) or need to pipe all disk I/O through the TPM (and hope it's fast enough). Through there are (should be?) some hybrid models.

Anyway you can combine both a TPM and a external password (in different ways depending on how the encryption is done).

One additional common reason against using a TPM for full disk encryption is if you want to make data recoverable even if you TPM (motherboard/cpu) fires itself.

I would say for most companies the benefits of requiring a password (or better HSK + PIN) for boot instead of only a TPM are outweighing the risk of a RAM removal attacks. Especially if combined with intrusion detection and short times between suspend and full (non hybrid) hibernation.
The CD version would have saved you a bunch of time, too. It was also fun to have the CD around even after the installs because it had a couple of bonuses (given all the extra space it had) like the "classic" videogame Hover! [1] and the music video of Weezer's Buddy Holly.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hover!
So for the med nerds in here, what would this mean for someone that have something like a dysmorphia or other distortions around eating disorders.

Is there a distinction between those visual distortions and a less structured one?
I fully disagree. This is important topic and they definitely have first hand expert knowledge.

It is up to us (meaning our governments) to require proper documentation for this and make our own minds based on it.
Oak flat in Arizona seems sacred to the longtime local inhabitants, rio tinto’s “oops were sorry we blew up your sacred site” about Australia doesn’t seem sincere given they have spent years trying to implode oak flat and are still at it.

But hey Arizonans will get a handful of jobs for a couple decades while the mineral wealth that belongs to Americans is funneled to a select few.
We're at a point where this old saw needs to be retired.

Yes, if a system is storing your biometric data remotely, then it can't be changed and it's a username, not a password.

But modern biometrics don't work that way, at all. The biometrics is stored client-side (hopefully securely and considerable effort is made to realize that hope), and it is used to access a private key which signs a challenge.

The biometric can be revoked, the private key can be revoked, all of these things can be changed by the user.

So let's say someone busts my fingerprint out of the TouchID secure enclave. That's not great (nor is it easy!), but they don't have an ability to generate a private key with it which Apple will recognize: that requires my password.

So I can generate a fresh key, confirm it with my password, and now my copy of the biometric works and theirs doesn't.

Edit: "courts or police can compel your fingerprint but not your password" is a completely different argument, and the solution is a way to rapidly lock out biometric authentication so that the password is a hard requirement. It also doesn't apply in a number of jurisdictions.

As a practical matter, actors who are unwilling to reach for the rubber hose can't get a password, while a fingerprint just requires the willingness to manhandle someone without injuring them, and that much is basically universal.
This same conversation has been trying to be had for existing medication Ivermectin, except little money to be made with it so the industry has been suppressing it and dismissing it nudging government institutions, who seem to rely on what pharma says, to also dismiss/ignore it.
* Authentification -> Authentication

* Infrastucture -> Infrastructure

* Dasbhoard -> Dashboard
Show HN: One widget for all your needs Feedback, Tickets and Guides
It also makes me wonder why many of the US chip plant plans are in Arizona.
This is the same idea cash flow wise - front load cash for a supplier so you have capacity / get production.

You'd only do title on actual specific equipment if the supplier was a fair bit smaller than you are normally - but the transaction / cash flow story is the same. Upfront cash to help supplier deliver your supply reliably and at scale you need.
And unfortunately too many news outlets are reporting whatever Pfizer says as if it were the CDC or impartial scientists when that clearly is not the case.

Pfizer worked on boosters before the emergence of the Delta virus and already started pushing for the use of boosters when there was little evidence of significant benefits.

It would be great if the news stopped parroting the Pfizer press office.
I asked almost this same question over on lobste.rs a little while back - https://lobste.rs/s/25b3x5/how_do_you_archive_mail
For any meeting I schedule, in addition to having sent the agenda over email, I always kick off the meeting with "Here's what I want to get out of our time together: <spiel goes here>..." and then some variation of "Does that seem like the right set of things to talk about?"

The last 2 VPs I've been under have had similar takes on meeting attendance: don't feel obliged to continue in a meeting if it's not providing value to you and you aren't providing value to it. This is, admittedly, way easier in COVID, where you can just drop off without much notice. But there's a polite way to do this in person (send an IM message to the meeting organizer politely saying you have other commitment/need to work on a near term delivery, and excuse yourself from the room).

Depending on the situation, I've found your-mileage-may-vary with trying no meeting days. Currently, as a principal engineer at a big tech company, it pretty much doesn't work. At smaller companies (or in smaller teams) I've found it works better.
Something like half of the comments are recommending using a password for the FDE key instead of the TPM. I thought that it wasn't normally recommended to use a hand-entered key directly, since they wouldn't be expected to have enough entropy for FDE. The better solution would be to store it on a TPM behind a password, where the password check happens inside the TPM, and it can destroy the FDE key after too many wrong attempts. And uh, not send the password unencrypted to the OS over an interface that can be tapped with electrical leads on the motherboard.
Moving closer to family so I need to change job. Applied to quite a few programming jobs in the nearby city. After probably 10-15 unsuccessful technical interviews with leetcode I've decided to go back to IT.

Now that I have kids and a house I don't want to spend hundreds of hours to learn this completely separate skill (leetcode) that I rarely if ever will get to use in my job and get no joy from.
It's a really good page, too. Just across the street was the best smell & taste in all of spacetime, the original Espresso Vivace roastery...
I'm not sure why the article segues into talking about SEO content farms. They will continue regardless of whether a publisher chooses to show personalized / invasive ads or not.

My feeling that the worst ads are not ones that track you, but the generic "outbrain" ads that are pure clickbait. Stop those ads please.
I once had a ragtime jam session in a pub with one of the wurzels. Ooo arr ooo arr!
Are you 1) pretty young or 2) pretty physically active otherwise?
As one of the tweets responding to that asked, where's the study? All I see is a media man trying to do media man things.
It is interesting though that we don't consider things like lead and radiation to be "infections".

Is the difference between an infection and poisoning replication?
Anti-vaxxers are setting the stage for enormous profits for big pharma by creating the conditions for breeding new variants that will require more big pharma to combat them.

I feel my grandkids will grow up in a world quite different from mine, where travel and experiences will be gated and limited by fear of contagious disease. That sucks and didn't need to happen.

Thought experiment for anti-vaxxers - what if there was technology that could scan the virus particles coming into your body, and the ones coming out, and identify whether you - yes YOU - were the person responsible for creating a new variant?

What if more technology could then detect that the dangerous variant that you incubated had wafted out of your nostrils and into the body of your elderly neighbor, killing her?

With your alleged focus on self responsibility, would you take your punishment if you personally were responsible for thousands of deaths?
If it was ADE wouldn't they be suffering acuter symptoms?
What does it mean to compare "loads" of "viral titers"?

What is ADE?

How does this square with the fact that the disease is making non-vaccinated people far more ill at far higher rates than vaccinated?

The tweet says that vaccinated folks "could be carrying higher levels of virus than previously understood", not higher levels than unvaccinated individuals.
Making your target, getting a bonus
The author's excitement is premature. The TREAT Study is patiently dismembered - on methodological grounds - by Sigma Nutrition, who are not zealots for TRE (or any magical thinking, for that matter).

Starts at 5.15

https://sigmanutrition.com/episode355/
I'm not a scientist - I'm actually an ex-philosophy student.

I guess part of my feeling is, sure, science has problems (every scientist will tell you that) but are there better institutions to give us actionable information in the middle of a pandemic? My feeling is no. So, even if I accept your diagnosis of science as "groupthink, politics and power games", I'd say that's just humans. All institutions, all fields are like that. Nonetheless, science has a pretty good record for delivering more or less solid consensus assessments, so even if it does need some reform, I think it's a pretty reasonable bet that the consensus is more or less on the money.
Based on the wording from your website it looks like it will suffer the exact problem GP is talking about. Can Ethical Ads reliably display ads for sim racing / gaming gear on a page about F1 2021 the game, and motorsport merch for a page about Formula 1 the sport?

Don't rely on your algorithms. Let the page owner ultimately decide what gets advertised.
80-20 cycling is important, but discharge rate is as well.

If each cell in a 15kw battery discharges at 1c to move a car, each cell in a 45kw battery discharges at .33c.

Same goes for charging.

Might be diminishing returns, but discharge rates over 1c harm longevity.

https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1397110
Good for you, but wait till it's been 25.
If it were legal to sell such artifacts, museums and collectors around the world could bid up the prices, making them much more profitable than the iron ore Rio Tinto could otherwise extract, strongly motivating them toward recovery.

The natives of that land would probably be deprived of their exclusive access, and private buyers could hide their own collections from the world. But most public buyers and many private ones would be very motivated to share these precious items with the world, scientifically and culturally. The publicity increases their resale value if nothing else.

How many ancient artifacts are hidden away because they are illegal to own? I might or might not have owned such an arrowhead once. If I did and still did that could make it something I had to hide. The pool of artifacts available to archaeologists and museums may well be smaller due to such perverse incentives.

I know people who make home displays of arrowheads and potshards they've found. But others, not wanting to openly break federal law, keep them hidden in drawers. The law effectively hides away evidence of the ancient people that came before us. If they removed the threat we could openly celebrate them instead.

The artifacts that were destroyed were priceless. If they had prices, they probably would be high, and so would be carefully preserved instead.
It is not obvious we need booster vaccinations. There's simply not enough data yet to call this "obvious". Even "likely" is a stretch. Time will tell how long effective immunity lasts, but we absolutely do not know that number yet.

EDIT: To be fair, it is at least likely that high-risk individuals may need boosters. Israel is already distributing them. But the idea that we will need an annual COVID shot, or that most people will need any additional shots at all, is entirely speculative. The annual shot idea is especially dubious because I think people infer this from the flu, which mutates far more rapidly than this coronavirus.
Refresh a few times, it seems to present examples randomly, and some are much more close up than pixel-wide.

Regardless, consider the job of the lifeguard: They don't have the benefit of clear close-up sight of all swimmers. If you can't spot the drowner when you know there will be one, imagine how much more difficult it is for a lifeguard who doesn't know when a crisis will occur.

Unless you're willing to go to lifeguard school, learn to train yourself on the hard-to-spot examples without explanatory details: you'll be a lot more likely to gain a potentially life-saving skill.
Gawker Is Back
Which would make sense - the scale of these orders / capital commitments is enormous and this allows Apple to get value for its cash and use that as a competitive advantage against random joe blow companies without nearly the capital resources apple brings.
It’s incredible that we even have to state that. This leaves a bad taste in my mouth, full stop.

I got the vaccine, and am shocked that I may need to comply with another dose or “booster” shots.

I’m trying my hardest to be a team player but I’m incredibly concerned that one side would be OK with “Life-Saving-Vacinne-as-a-Service” for the low cost of x$ per month, for an unknown amount of time, and the other side is cool with ignoring it completely.

Who will ultimately be right is anyone’s guess, but with all the stories about bullshit “variants”and vaccinated people still getting fucked, I have a depleted confidence “in the science”. The same “science” that got us in here in the first place via “Gain of Function” research.
New find shows animal life may have existed millions of years before
This is my experience as well! I usually reflect on my unpopular comments and realize I could have been more considerate or worded things less rashly... Or my viewpoint is just unpopular.

I find it genuinely difficult to relate to the other comments on here equating downvotes to oppression or even violence.

If anything, my hope would be that Hacker News becomes MORE strictly moderated via downvotes, and maybe even starts banning some non-tech oriented politics. Now shower me with downvotes, 500+ karma daddies, to show the little ones it is okay.
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/242427/is-nativ...

> [...] it appears that OpenZFS encryption is far stronger than LUKS or VeraCrypt encryption.

> LUKS and VeraCrypt use the XTS mode of encryption, which is not authenticated, and is vulnerable to some limited recovery of information when an attacker can have access to the encrypted data at different times. On the other hand OpenZFS encryption is authenticated and at the state of the art. Also, you should take care to disable compression when encrypting with OpenZFS.
i agree with you in principle, but (there’s always a but) there are other more impactful things that can be done to cut down carbon emissions (modern cars are already stupid-efficient).

Who has the mora authority to declare that Toyota should roll over and die to attain some goal that may or may not be achievable?
C and D seem fine to me. It's necessary to protect everyone else. A and B are the problem. The US government should have limited Pfizer's profit margin, and they should be using the money saved to cover people's medical costs for complications arising from the vaccine (removing the need to sue).
Do you mean Teredo?
And if that's still not you then you probably are using/reusing a secure password that thankfully seems to be accepted by most sites!
I wouldn't say "remarkably little". There's "relatively little", esp. compared to Rails. I'd even say there's little magic compared to Django.

But try to peek under the hood of Phoenix.Helpers someday...
And also, don't ask too many questions about how Ecto drivers work... I tried writing an ecto driver once and gave up. Props to the people who made the Sqlite3 driver.
As others have said, perhaps Tauri would work better (and save you from neverending complaints from the anti-electron brigade)
He's referring to replication in the nasal passage[1], which was already expected[2] and has nothing to do with overall viral titers in the blood stream nor with ADE. ADE would have been detected long before the first trials from last year ended (see tylerhou's comment).

"As the Associated Press notes, Walensky cited data from the last few days, still unpublished, taken from 100 samples from vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with COVID infections. They found that the amount of virus in the noses and throats of vaccinated infected people was nearly "indistinguishable" from what was found in unvaccinated people, confirming what some experts have suspected."

1. https://sfist.com/2021/07/27/cdc-confirms-that-viral-loads-i...

2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33320052/
The fastlane involves interviewing for jobs when you already have a job, to get ongoing signals of what others think you are worth as well as getting counteroffers to blindside your current employer in matching or beating.

Never interview for jobs when you don't have a job, if you can help it.

In tech this is even easier because some companies allow for standing offers that can last a year (despite other companies bluffing with 24 hour exploding offers), or they have matchmaking that last upwards of a year as well.

So you can literally keep your job or be laid off and the next employer never even knew but you already had the offer from them.
Sentry has become impossible to self host
Dante, one of the harshest imaginations to ever write itself into a poem believed that, for instance, depression was a sin meriting eternal punishment by drowning over and over in a pool of filth and kept from rising to the surface by the pressure of cannibals possessed with rage devouring each other just above them, forever, and at best they could bubble or gurgle up, because they cannot speak as their mouths are filled with slime, the sigh that ‘Tristi fummo ne l’aere dolce che dal sol s’allegra’. In the linked essay the author makes out Dante to be an advocate of new age positivity, something more commensurate with Snow White than Satan.
If the reason they do these things is for money (which I think is fair to assume) then money is clearly an effective incentive. The fines just have to make it unprofitable.
From Monolith to Microservices: Reducing the Migration’s Pain Points
Looks cool, if a little pricey.

What's keeping me from using serverless for more general purpose SaaS is that there is absolutely no good answer for background jobs. Sure, you can plug in some external CRON service, use GitHub Actions, or maybe use something like quirrel.dev. But none of that comes close to "rails g job example" (or your favourite frameworks equivalent).

Good luck with your project, though!