skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Best Python Framework for Web Development
You can sue. It's unlikely that you would win though.
They should have had either a smaller scope / simpler extension to IPv4 with a better backwards compat story for IPv6 only clients (some have since shown up a bit).

Or really done the reinvent - there were some interesting ideas especially for folks with lots of link handoffs (ie cell phones driving down a road etc) - can't find the write-up quickly.
What exactly do you imagine will happen if your cells run someone else's RNA code?

They already run someone else's RNA code when you get infected by any random virus.
Here's some perspective:

If every single person in the US ran a computer consuming 100W on idle for an entire year, that would add up to around 300 terawatt hours, or about one tenth of the US' electricity consumption that year.
Except that we're seeing a world where folks are sometimes deciding to leave Chrome for Safari (or others).

Even in my non-web-dev circles of average folks, they're saying "I hate Chrome" and going somewhere else for their browser.

Even if Chrome "goes further and further forwards" it won't matter if it becomes the de-facto hated browser over time. Safari is banking on the fact that security and stability are more important than "some new flashy CSS" and it is possible they might succeed by following this strategy.
SD has, for lack of a better term for it, a time problem.

If you post early you will end up +5/-1. If you post late you comment will be stuck at 1. People tend to vote on what they see first too. So the stuff at the top just ends up +5/-1. It does not really signal anything. The cap SD system only works if the group of people posting/voting is small, the story churn is low, and the votes are hard to come by. Soylent added in a disagree vote which was neutral. Which seemed to help some. But they also added in way more votes per cycle. On that board most of the 'disagree' though ends up with people marking -1 troll. Basically they accidently found people want to punish in some way. When the real vote should have been a disagree 0.

Up/down voting seems to work OK. But only if you have mods willing to mod and not push/punish anything.
Yes this seems like a very interesting, important and overlooked issue.
This is a change from the past though. It used to be preferable to have mandates come from the government and not corporations.
Lately, it feels like more and more news publicly attacking Safari appear in Hacker News.

Safari either isn't attacking, protecting or killing the web. It has a different purpose.

Apple's main objective is to sell services and devices. iPhones, iPads and their accessories. Also, Mac laptops/desktops.

As most of us know, they use their Apple Store, with a 30% cut for every transaction to sell their services. If a company doesn't like that they end up in court (Epic vs Apple) or getting special conditions under the table.

Safari is another piece of the iOS/macOS ecosystem to browse the web. They don't have any hurry to implement fancy features like Midi, Bluetooth, Notifications, proper PWA support, CSS rules, JavaScript.
After all, you should have access to those things if you submit your app to their Store and accept their cut.
They implement the features they find interesting or important and that's all. Even the release circle is slower than other browser implementations.
Obviously, allowing other engines can hurt their services division and that's why the alternatives use the provided WebKit on iOS as enforced by the ToS.

As a user Safari is a bliss, but as a web developer is sometimes a pain.

Maybe we should stop supporting Safari on web applications which require non existing APIs with an encouraging message to try Chrome or protest to Apple if you're on iOS.
Yeah I don't know what is up with digitalocean. I can think of several things, like free EDU credit (abused relentlessly, seemingly mostly by CN/IN with fake edu emails or stolen identity ones) and $5 to $10 free trials, though this has been reduced a bit via card requirements.

They do have very long term customers that are abusive as fuck, spray high-PPS port scans and bruteforces out under the false guise of security research (with no IRB, no studies, no affiliation or notice of who they are), pretty much floods that abuse has ignored.
I am saying this as someone who has both shots and generally supports the vaccination.

From what I understand Google is known as a company with a "liberal" culture.

Is demanding employees accept one side of an argument and adhere to it (or face the consequences) contrary to the definition of "liberal"?

That's the problem with Western politics. Liberal vs. conservative is no longer about how permissive we are with ideas and unpopular opinions. It's about what subset of ideas we accept.
While I do very much like that article, and I think it's a viable contender for The One True Way™...

They don't solve it. Those spaces to manually-align things are still potentially skewed because it's not fixed-space.
I'm pretty sure that taking a selfie with the Buddha isn't actually illegal in all that many countries - murder is pretty widely illegal though. I feel like it's actually a pretty good metric for reasonableness.
I thought Google was better than this, guess not.
Are there vaccines widely available in the US whose delivery mechanism was well established before 2020? The J&J vaccines are viral vector, a class of vaccines which has only been approved for human use twice before, in presumably small numbers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_vector_vaccine
Hmm, kind of reads like a worse Rock Paper Scissors - A Method for Competitive Game Play Design ?

https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/130150/rock_paper_sci...

(Mostly worse because he's offering multiple, somewhat idiosyncratic, contradictory and incoherent definitions of "hard" and "soft" counters ?)
can you give us a real world use case?
I checked up on this. Turns out the "-g" option isn't listed in the "-?" help. I guess I didn't look at the man page-- just the "-?" help.
interesting precedent for the future. Whats an 'emergency'? Whats is the point of an FDA review at this point?
That’s a very serious accusation you’re making and it doesn’t agree with anything I’ve read about those models. On the contrary the predictions seem to match observations very well over the last couple of decades. This is not backtesting either which could be dismissed as overfitting - I’m talking literally take a model from 10, 20, 30 years ago and see what it predicted. Do you have any references to what you’re referring to?
They are, just got a mail about it actually: https://i.imgur.com/m9z67mB.png (I have a few cloud and dedicated machines on Hetzner).
Sure, but the harm from COVID is pretty evident in the 600,000 deaths in the states in the past 18 months.

No one has said the vaccine is 100% safe, it does list side effects after all, but this whole notion of "I'm waiting until all the data is out/it's only approved for emergency use" is just nonsensical.
Employers decide that about literally all the characteristics in the hiring process and all the conditions of continued employment. You may don't think it's ok that they get to fire you if you violate the "acceptable use" conditions of their information security policy either, but that doesn't actually matter. Since abiding by the acceptable use terms is (almost always) a condition of continued employment they can and will.
Something that I've learned: nobody owes you an explanation for why they disagree with you, nor are they bound to care whether you learn something.

Furthermore, I would argue that self-reflection about why people might disagree with your viewpoints is a valuable experience in that it provides an opportunity to practice empathy and awareness in how your words are perceived by others.
If all of Google's intelligent employees were to rise up and seize control of the company today, they would enact the same office vaccination requirement that Sundar is announcing here.
Interesting thought. I was also thinking it could be good if you could reify your no-code solution into some sort of generated code, as an escape hatch. I suppose the trick is generating something vaguely sensible.
In addition to all the points that article makes, two more:

1. There are a lot of people that believe they already had Covid, but actually didn't.

2. A "vaccinated or recovered" policy is even harder to enforce, as there are vaccination certificates but no recovery certificates. (Yes, vaccination certificates can be faked, but it seems likely to me that a significant part of the population would be willing to lie but not falsify documents.)
There's some pedantry here.

There is evidence that some people have a mutation that prevents them from getting CJD. The mutation causes a small change in the proteins that CJD prions impact (changing a glycine to valine at a certain part of the protein). The working theory is that that structural change prevents CJD prions from being able to re-form healthy proteins, preventing the spread of the disease. I wouldn't be at all surprised if those proteins are eventually broken down by the body and removed.

All that being said, I don't know if you would even consider it an "infection" if the person is immune to the prions spreading. Prions aren't generally transmissible, so if the prions don't do anything and can't be transmitted... is anything actually wrong? You and I are exposed to tons of bacteria every day, but as long as your body can fight it off (i.e. no symptoms and no transmission), we wouldn't usually call that an "infection". In the same light, presence of abnormal proteins that aren't causing an issue doesn't seem like something we would call an "infection".

There's also the fact that some people inherit the disease (as in their body actually makes the prions itself), which doesn't make any sense in the context of an "infection". It's their own body producing the prions, so in those cases it's a genetic disease, not an infection.
I'm shocked so many people on HN support this. The only way I know to prove someone received a vaccine is for them to turn over their medical history. What if companies start refusing to hire someone because they have a bad medical history (insurance costs anyone)?

I'm sure many people will respond to this saying "they don't need to turn over their full medical history!" but once we turn over a part of it, they will want the next part, and the next, its inevitable. There will always be a safety and security justification.

And what of remote workers? A fully remote employee exposes zero company employees to risk. But they will be mandated to have a vaccine?

Why must we always lose one more right each day?

Edit: Apparently you receive proof of vaccination for the current COVID vaccines in the US. But isn't that still sharing part of your medical history? I have never once been asked a single question about my medical history during a job interview.
If the site has no tracking, how come it shows a GDPR-compliant cookie warning?
Reminds me of a David Graeber article on the violence of bureaucracy. It was the first time in my life that I was convinced of the existence of such invisible threads of brutality.

As then, it's also now very hard for me to remain non-biased: how can ultimatums demanding mass conformity be the only way for such a technically advanced civilization to 'be productive'? What are the serious counterarguments against the idea that even today, huge effort is invested in the subtle yet solid control of the individual?
> not many companies can call shots like this

Nice
- I don't want to eat.

- You need food.

- Well, not _this_ food and not necessarily at this moment in time.

Whether these particular vaccines are saving any lives is an open question. Given that 1) Given the number of deaths in the two major waves in the U.S. (Spring 2020 and Winter 2020-21) and the timing of most of the vaccinations, it is not clear how much of the improvement is due to vaccination and how much of the effect is due to a wave burning out.

Over the long term, are these going to be as effective as measles vaccines? There is no way to know. However, there is some indication that the time between the first and second injection is particularly risky.

Also, I would love to see a breakdown of how many of the "unvaccinated" are people who had their first shot and waiting for the second, or people who had their second shot, but two weeks have not passed.

It is not unreasonable for people to want to wait and see before diving head first into the "volunteer for experimental treatment" end of the pool.
Forks on windows works in ocaml?
You can't be certain until you die (hopefully many, many decades from now) that there were no side effects. But we can be "reasonably certain" based on the sum of knowledge and data we have regarding vaccines in particular and medicine in general. Waiting 3 years, from a scientific perspective, is completely arbitrary. The length of clinical trials is not arbitrary.
You have candidates A, and B and a fringes candidate Ca, Da, and Eb. The "a" and "b" are broadly supportive of A and B, but their own party (think green tends to align with liberal and church goers tend to align with conservative).

Now, a supporter of the A party ideals is faced with "minus vote" B or Eb. And likewise, a supporter of the B party ideals is faced with "minus vote A, Ca, or Da".

And so, instead of getting a relatively moderate A or B, you're much more likely to get an extremist in one of the minor parties.

Consider the "I'm not 100% in favor of B, but I really don't want Ca, or Da to get elected - how do I vote?"

You get into the comparison of voting systems - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_electoral_system...

... and a minus vote system would likely fail a number of the tests. To that end, it would likely result in a worse democracy.

For https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidentia... - consider would the Peace and Freedom party or American Independent Party have won? Are either of their views more representative of California than those of the Democratic Party?

No... I don't think that such a voting system would work.
Probably, but it would be a communal requirement rather than a top-down requirement.
Why are people so obsessed with kids? Afaik, covid is generally much softer on them, older people tend to be in higher danger.
is it because of NAT adoption everywhere?

related: major indian telcos like Jio and Airtel are rolling out CGNAT.
If you are living in the USA why not get the Johnson and Johnson vaccine?
Comcast will happily hand out a prefix delegation larger than a /64 if you ask for it, and set the prefix delegation request to 1 instead of 0.

This is done because many routers were built with bad IPv6 support that requested a /48 even though they only needed a single /64 for a LAN and Comcast was handing out /60's (their largest size) like candy with almost no use.

So my config was to request two prefix delegation, one tagged 0, which would always get a /64, and then one tagged 1 which would get a /60.

Not sure if you still can do it or not, but at one point you could continue to ask for prefix delegations (/60's) and get even more address space.

Here's the dhcp6c.conf:

interface em0 {
send ia-pd 0;
send ia-pd 1;
send ia-na 1;
};

id-assoc pd 0 {
prefix ::/64 infinity;

prefix-interface lagg0 {
sla-id 0;
sla-len 0;
};
};

id-assoc pd 1 {
prefix ::/60 infinity;

prefix-interface vlan10 {
sla-id 1;
sla-len 4;
};

prefix-interface vlan11 {
sla-id 2;
sla-len 4;
};

prefix-interface vlan20 {
sla-id 3;
sla-len 4;
};

prefix-interface vlan21 {
sla-id 4;
sla-len 4;
};

prefix-interface vlan22 {
sla-id 5;
sla-len 4;
};
};

id-assoc na 1 {
};

Note: ia-pd 0 will only ever pull a /64, even if you ask for a /60 all you'll ever get back is a /64. ia-pd 1 on the other hand will allow you to pull anywhere from a /64 to a /60.

Yes, this means you get 16 + 1 /64's to use.

On top of that I pull a single /128 for the external interface of my router.
They could have at least let ipv6 only folks talk to ipv4 more easily. Something like 464XLAT maybe built in out the gate more? You go ipv6 until next hop is IPv4. If you are in IPv4 mapped address space translate to IPv4 there and continue.
You mean like severe cases of COVID? Admission to critical care or death from COVID?
There's no particular reason why PHEVs have to be worse than ICE for cargo space. The new Ford Maverick is designed as a hybrid first, for example. I know they don't have a PHEV version yet, but it's expected to come as one in a future model year.
I don’t think so. Everyone is free to leave if the don’t like the new policies. It’s not like there is a tight market for highly skilled software engineers
> I have some ancient greek pottery that would VIGOROUSLY disagree with you. Also fertility statutes.

a) Those are not pervasive at all. Pottery and statues are expensive and slow to produce and are found only in specific places.

b) Those are all low-level representations with a totally different purpose. A fertility statue is not comparable to a constant stream of young girls in bikini on Instagram.

"Fertility statue addiction" has never been a thing.
If you ever worked in a hospital you will probably have half a dozen booster shots you need to take, unless you get one of those exemptions where you say your god doesn't allow you to believe in science. There is precedent or employers mandating vaccines of their employees.
In the US, "liberal" means left-leaning (compared to the US average).
Markets generally are good for determining allocation of scarce resources. They push people with the ability to substitute to do that, in this case, use ipv6. Pay for ipv4 so nobody takes more than he needs. Imperfect but probably the least bad option, just waiting to get ipv6 over time hasnt worked so maybe scarcity and high prices do it.
I care because despite being vaccinated and having had restrictions lifted, I am once again affected by them because of people that refuse to get vaccinated. If the consequences were siloed to unvaccinated people, I wouldn't care as that's their choice.
Government forces you to pay for the vaccine and then forces the company you work for to take it or lose your job. Liberty is long gone in America. Nothing chaps my ass more than hearing and seeing the "vaccines are free" propaganda. Not to mention the billions government has spent in marketing and advertising on this vaccine. When was the last time government spent trillions to save 600,000 lives?
I faintly remember. I'd probably be interested in having the weirdest irl meet up over a car found with a spare jug of leaded gas. Reliving old smells does so much for creativity
> The only way I know to prove someone received a vaccine is for them to turn over their medical history. What if companies start refusing to hire someone because they have a bad medical history (insurance costs anyone)?

When you're vaccinated, you receive a small official card with the vaccination details. In the United States, the vaccines are free.

This has nothing to do with your general medical history or medical records.
I’d agree that some employers have a vested interested while others do not. Mainly the ones that don’t rely so much on the social aspect to survive like delivery services, streaming services, video games, etc [1]. Goes without saying that to prolong the pandemic prolongs people’s suffering in order to boost one’s bottom line is morally reprehensible.

1: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rohitarora/2020/06/30/which-com...
I disagree. Hydrogen makes is it not easier to be fully independent. I would argue the opposite is more true.
When you need to improve the supply chain for your Food Manufacturing Business?
Right now, it's the top browser engine by a long long way, and its market share is either stable (on desktop) or slowly increasing (on mobile).

I don't think either of our circles are representative of the wider world unfortunately.
How are they going to even know you took the vaccine? Honor system? If they force you to disclose doesn't that break HIPAA? If it doesn't break HIPAA, then doesn't this create a precedent that employers can gain your medical history with arbitrary mandates?

Seems like a lose-lose.
There are multiple videos, in one of them the car is clearly floating.
The fact that these mandates ignore the fact that past infection also provides immunity is frustrating and makes me question what is behind the mandates themselves. A valid test showing the antibodies should be allowed in place of an immunization.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting...
I use nocode tools all the time, just not for building products. They’re great but they are also limited. If you hit any kind of success with your prototype you have to be ready to do it for real.
Clients may not care but the founder or development team may.
One thing I learned in naval aviator swim qual was how easy it is to float for a very long time, given the right technique. (Called a dead man’s float. Link: https://www.sportsrec.com/prone-float-8623477.html )

We naturally try to swim with our heavy head out of the water, but with full lungs most people will easily float for almost an unlimited amount of time, only popping your head up for a breath. Somehow, the more nervous you are, the more you struggle to keep your head out of the water. Learning that I could float like this for hours if needed keeps me calm in the water, I recommend you all try it, and keep it in mind to fall back on if you ever start to panic in the water.
It's how I use it in reverse. I see my number tank and know people on HN don't agree.

What I would like is the ability to hide my score. If I notice the drop I may check a comment to see what the disagreement was, but I stopped after several times of seeing nothing just the downvotes.

Anyway, I don't need my number on every page I visit on HN, and would prefer the ability to hide it.

I'd also love the ability to mute users. Some people post on here way too often for my tastes and always with the same rhetoric. I'm sure others feel the same.

But, it is what it is. Nothing will ever be perfect, and the forced civility reminds me to be more civil IRL and I appreciate that. And it's probably good to see things I don't agree with, echo chambers are bad.
Why not extend it to the end of the year? Delta is not a joke, and the evidence isn't firm that vaccinated people are fully safe against it. It's increasingly looking like there may be similar variants, some even more vaccine resistant.

Given the lack of information, no major company should be committing to the end of WFH until the results are clearer. That definitely isn't going to be the case until well after Labor Day.

I don't understand why the major tech companies are so hellbent on re-opening the offices in the fall. It's like they've drawn a line in the sand and they can't even consider reversing course. Which doesn't even make any sense, because for all intents and purposes they've been doing fine. Most tech company's stock price and profits are above their pre-WFH levels. Surely extending WFH until January isn't going to ruin their business.
Some viruses take decades to show harm as well, e.g. HPV, and there are theories that herpes is involved in Alzheimers.

Maybe we'll realize in a couple of years that even asymptomatic covid harms your heart so much that affected people lose years of their lives? The vaccine seems like the safer choice to me.
I really learned a lesson from this author and article. Probably my first comment here on Hacker News.
Do you really believe Google is ready to lose at least 20% of their staff? That would be a horrible decision especially in the market we are currently in. These people will easily find jobs elsewhere.