skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Thus God is understood as Existence itself, as Being, not a being (you might say that God does not exist, but rather is, or to abuse the terminology, is existence). God is the "to be". This is to be identified with the "I Am" of Exodus 3:14.

That's very interesting, and brings it much closer to a kind of pantheistic or even Vedanta-ish conception of god. But it's also simply not true for the how the vast majority of Catholic priests teach the religion.
I have a script that changes the Terminal to the directory of the frontmost Finder window. Then I use touch to create empty new files.

The script, for whoever's curious: https://gitlab.com/jcfields/shell-scripts/-/blob/master/cdf

Back when I used Windows, I actually used the New > Text Document item discussed in the article all the time. It created an empty, 0-byte file, so I'd rename it to whatever file extension I needed. There was a folder that contained the templates for this menu so you could add or remove blank files for any type, but I only ever used the .txt file one.
Definitely not without asking. But I think giving a yes/no prompt for whether to add the line is reasonable.

One counter-argument might be that if the user doesn’t add it themselves, they’re less likely to remember where it is so they can remove it if needed. However, Homebrew already gives you a command to add it that you can blindly copy and paste, which is already not going to stimulate memory very much. I don’t think the script doing it automatically is any worse, as long as it makes sure to explain what it’s doing – that is, display the line it’s adding and the path it’s adding it to.
It bothers me that the article makes no reference to Wally Funk, the pilot - she's now the oldest person to have gone to space. Maybe it's cheesy of me to get a kick out of 'records' like that, but I enjoy that a lot more than caring about who commissioned the flight.
Difference in the parameters. If immoral activity suddenly isn't immoral or rather "okay" if executed by an "institution" how can a (so called) "terror Group" be judged differently? Why are they responsible for the institutional actions while other institutions (or the people behind them) are not?
Why does Jeff Bezos’s rocket look like that? An inquiry
So, it's an Nx(NxN/2) half grid. This is easily solved on the implementation side by making sure, for example, that the enum values for the second 2 arguments are always in ascending order.
You might still be able to do it in Switzerland?
I wish save/select files depute the system file browser to do that, maybe even reuse recently open window. I was annoyed by 3 distinct file selector with their unique faults in a KDE distro.
Given that they've specifically said "advancement", the original poster must be referring to people which are already working for the stated company and will be skipped for promotion.

I believe they would have grounds to sue for discrimination in such a case though.
It functions in the same way in a sense that it's the current criteria for "acceptable" dehumanization.
SpaceX is a bad replacement for a well-funded NASA with a clear mission that advances human exploration of space, without being beholden to political corruption, and with a driven and dedicated administrator.

Of course, so is NASA itself.
She's achieved a lot more of substance in her life, compared to the big warehouse magnate.
I'm not sure what you think is close to ad hominem, but I'm sorry.

> My perspective from over a decade of software engineering is that you cannot ethically build a (privacy) feature that is "only ever to be opt in only" and not expect (privacy) experts to make a big deal about it ("hey everyone should opt in to this thing that makes your privacy better") and/or encourage other (browser) manufacturers to go ahead and make it default option ("this would make privacy better for non-expert users"). That's not an ethical feature, that's a bait-and-switch no matter what the timescale is between "this feature is opt-in only" and "oh no too many users opted in".

Well I never said it was a particularly "ethical" feature. If they wanted to be ethical they would shut down 90+% of ads.

But you're making a big assumption here, that privacy experts bugging people about it and browsers making it the default would get the same response.

My bet is that privacy experts bugging people about it would have been tolerated just fine, and that most people still wouldn't flip the switch.

But browsers changing the default is qualitatively different from the user being able to set it.

I think your characterization of "too many users opted in" is flat-out wrong. The browser is opting, not the users. And it's not like people were choosing Edge because it would opt them out. That's a completely negligible percent of people.

Another way the two are different is very simple: If you had a big fraction of users manually flipping the switch, and the advertisers tried to cancel the feature because that was too many users, you could mobilize those tens of millions of people into a powerful political campaign to bake DNT into law.

> I believe that entire hype cycle of that feature did far more to setback privacy debates on the web for years than it did to help.

Maybe. But I'd still rather have privacy set back and have sites respecting my do not track header vs. privacy set back and it's completely useless...

As for the rest of your post, I'm confused about what you're accusing the Chrome devs in particular of doing? I agree that they're a big problem, see also flock, but with DNT they're not responsible for what the advertising group does. What could they have done better?
XUL allows too many modification for browser. It increases attack surface, and it makes hard Firefox developer to modify Firefox's internals to improve things.
Estonia is ranked 5th in reading, 8th in maths, and 4th in science, despite having a budget per student lower than OECD average! It's the first non Asian country. What's happening there?
There is no negative vote with a wallet. Only positive and neutral.
SpaceX doesn't seem super interested in science, like you know probes 'n stuff. I would say that NASA was never super interested in reducing the cost to access space though. They complement each other very well.
More a case of "f(n) = 1/randFloat() does not have a well-defined limit as n goes to infinity", so it would be hard to say that it fits in ANY complexity class.

What is, however, clear is that its run-time does not depend on the size of the input. And technically, that means we can find a constant (infinity) that always... But, that is pretty unsatisfying.
This website is unusable and randomly reloads every couple of seconds. (Firefox mobile) Reader mode does not work.
People really are getting fed up with billionaires.

Everyone on HN: how can so many people be wrong?

the self awareness, it's lacking.
Fun fact: PATH_MAX and FILE_MAX are glibc/muslc limitations. The Linux Kernel doesn't have a limit here and will happily let you walk into a directory with a 2GB pathname.

ext4 doesn't limit directory depth; only filename length. A filename can be 255 bytes in ext4. How deep that lies in the filesystem isn't limited.

btrfs has the same filename limit, no underlying limit on directory depth.

And I would most likely guess most filesystems don't because the obvious ways to implement directories don't place limits on that depth.
Yes, exactly this!

Jef Raskin's Humane Interface is like that:

"An end to stand-alone applications - every software package should be structured as a set of tools available to users on any document."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Humane_Interface

I'd love to see a popular device that was done that way round.
To me this isn't really space travel. I think they shd aim at circling the earth at least once.
I don't understand why people dedicate so much of their daily energy hating on billionaires' hobbies. The real waste of resource, in my mind, isn't in billionaires spending their pocket money in space exploration. It's in the millions of average persons dedicating 2 or 3h of their 16h/day budget on negative thoughts about other people's lives, poisoning their mood and ruining the 13 to 14 other hours they have left awake in those days. Whereas a positive outlook on things would probably provide them with a state of mind more fertile for ideas and improvements.

I think a lot more human ingenuity-capacity is wasted in jealousy and resentment of others, than what these billionaires may be spending on their hobbies.

* * *

I think the Blue Origin/Virgin Galactic "buy a tourist flight to space" is not my cup of tea, and I'd rather they were doing actually useful industrious space exploration stuff. But I think their puerile vanity hobbies are also not bad for technological advancements. The engineers working on this are going to develop more skills and knowledge, and that will not be lost. It'd be better if it was to do science or some industry, but it's not a net negative either.
Sound Physicians puts non-physicians in charge of patients at Georgia hospital
I also love searching for books in thrift stores, so much cheaper, and sometimes there are treasures like autographed first editions of Tom Clancy or Oliver Sacks books (which I flipped on eBay for >$100, ka-ching!)

Sometimes I'll also go to the thrift stores, buy some books in good condition that I think will be resellable (usually nonfiction) and sell them to the used bookstore for credit to spend on their better (but pricier) selection.
Create a folder somewhere. Call it "New documents" or something.

Create blank text file(s) of the type you want within that folder. For example, I have a blank.txt which opens in TextMate, a blank.rb which opens in TextMate, and a blank.rtf which opens in TextEdit.

Lock the folder (by selecting it, Cmd-I, check "Locked").

Put the folder in your Dock.

Hey presto. You can now create a blank text file anywhere simply by dragging it out of this folder in the Dock. Because the folder is locked, you won't delete the original - macOS will make a copy for you, every time. Just rename it before opening and you're done.
I guess I'm not even saying it's bad/good faith. I just literally wonder - why not do the obvious thing? A number of years ago I ran into several people trying to sell services predicting stock movements via twitter sentiment. Same thing - if it works just make billions fast using it to take positions. It's not trivially easy to start a hedge fund, but it's not rocket science either. The key ingredient is finding a way to make good returns. These twitter people seemed to have good intent.. it was just strange.
I don’t think people are concentrating into a small number of countries at all. I don’t know where you get your numbers but according to IOM international migration was 280.6 million in 2020, of which 33.8 million were refugees. Most refugees stayed in the geographic region (e.g. a tenth of the entire refugee destination was to Turkey followed by Jordan at 3 million).

True normal migration lead by culture, love, opportunities, etc. is a lot bigger factor in migration then the climate crisis, but those are not the people suffering from hostile border policies (well not on the same scale as refugees) and don’t need the same help to bypass said policies. But it would be foolish to dismiss climate change and not expect the proportion of refugees to go up in the next years compared to other migrants.
Ultimately gitlab has a duty of care to the customers whose code they host. If most of your customers are in the West, and there are persistent security and IP threats from certain national governments, I don't see an alternative here.
I don't think there are any laws preventing that, it's just that businesses may not want to deal with the liability, and it makes you a target.
I envy the billionaire bank balance, but it's not the money that makes you happy (above a certain level) but the options it allows you to do.

obviously people are not keen on the actions /options that JB has choosen to make. Especially when you hear the stories of his employees and how much tax he pays
Last time humans landed on the Moon on 1972. On 2021 we have perfectly egocentric billionaires who muliplied their fortunes on ongoing pandemic... merely lift above the atmosphere.
SpaceX is for profit, so it’s goals need to be profitable monetarily. NASA is government funded so it can focus on important things that may not be profitable monetarily.
That'll be great for Monero and others.
I don't think anyone has ever suggested that Maxwell or Navi were doing tiled deferred rendering, but all evidence (as well as technical documentation) point to them doing tiled immediate rendering. The tests in question rely on an atomic variable to draw only a limit amount of fragments, and it is very clear that rasterization proceeds tile by tile, with obvious geometry binning. Which is the very definition of tiled rendering.

The big difference between a modern desktop GPU and a run-of-the-mill mobile GPU is that the former uses much larger tiles and smaller binning buffers, so you start spilling tiles after just several dozen primitives. Desktop GPUs implement tiling primarily to improve memory access locality. Mobile GPUs on the other hand heavily invest into tiling because it is the basis of their existence, they wouldn't be able to do anything with that low power budget otherwise.

> However, there are mobile GPUs (Qualcomm's Adreno) that
> dynamically switch between tiled deferred mode and immediate > mode on a per renderpass basis

I've seen multiple mentions that Adreno supports TBDR, but no actual evidence for it. When asked, folks usually give me some link or documentation that describes immediate mode tiled rendering. AFAIK, "real" TBDR has only ever been achieved by Imagination and Apple inherited it from it and deployed it at a large scale.
I don't claim to be representative of the general opinion of HN, but my opinion is that a dick measuring contest between billionaires is slightly less worse than a dick measuring contest between parochial and aggressive nation-states.

Unfortunately, space exploration is so expensive and useless* that these are the only two known ways to fund it.

* it appears useless to the people who are funding it, but of course we on HN know better than that
It's a strange, almost comforting feeling?

Knowing that even with the wealth to achieve something that once took entire nations to blast off into space for a few minutes, they're still as doomed as the rest of us to perish on this indifferent rock

No man is an island, even with all the wealth in the world. All that wealth is meaningless when everyone else is gone anyhow
No, sir. I lost all my Monero in an unfortunate boating accident.
SpaceX launching a Tesla into space for a test flight is firstly benefiting SpaceX and then Tesla. It is first and foremost a commercial entity working for profit and not scientific progress. That might be a side-effect, but I wouldn't frame it like that.
I am not talking about cost at all. More about commercial interests vs public interests.

Elon Musks stance on fighting climate change seems to be that we can just solve the problem with technology without doing much about endless consumption and waste, failing that mitigating the issues for whoever can afford to, starting with biohazard mode on your Tesla and ending with escaping to Mars. I don't want all our space tech in the hands of such a person. Happy to see China is still investing more heavily.
If you type a url it'll open it in a browser as well.
There's no "space exploration" to be done 50-70 miles above ground. Billionaires charging other billionaires for 10 minutes above the imaginary "space line" has nothing to do with space exploration.
Any catholic scholars have a vision for how The Church could remove its prohibition against sex (including homosexual sex)?

It seems unlikely to happen soon, but also it seems kind of inevitable. I’d love for this particular wheel to turn faster.

Some fascinating stuff on Wikipedia:

> In February 2019, the Vatican acknowledged that the policy has not always been enforced and that rules had been secretly established by the Vatican to protect non-celibate clergy who violated their vows of celibacy.[2][3][4] Some clergy have also been allowed to retain their clerical state after fathering children.[2][3][4] Some Catholic clergy who violated their vows of celibacy also have maintained their clerical status after secretly marrying women.

> [Pope Francis (current Pope)] commented that celibacy "is a matter of discipline, not of faith. It can change" but added: "For the moment, I am in favor of maintaining celibacy, with all its pros and cons, because we have ten centuries of good experiences rather than failures.... Tradition has weight and validity.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clerical_celibacy_in_the_Cat...
Isn't it in the duty of care of the bank to make sure that the property they give a mortgage on is actually owned by the mortgagee?

I would assume that you should get the land and the bank can then sue the brothers to get their money back. Why should the mortgage be transfered to the original owners, they never agreed to it.
You do realize that making broad sweeping criticizing of an entire group of people based on your personal experiences with a limited amount of members of their group is exactly why these situation happen?

I wish the best for you and nobody should be discriminated for their sexual preference as long as everybody is consenting, and if we want the situation to become better we must all work to improve it, so make you sure you don't do that sort of over generalization and simplification just like you wish people wouldn't do it towards you.
The truth though is that when the generous pandemic stimulus ends, the labor shortage will also end.
Thank you very much! I believe there's much to do, but recently I realized that many commercial software I could rewrite myself (at least core functionalities) by using Nextcloud ecosystem and let people have control of their own data, also - extend capabilities of such commercial software ;) My plan is to add more integrations and features soon!
You could also interpret that as the developer having the right to not take down repositories until legally required to do so.
Just drag-and-drop, you can pick up the current folder in Finder bij dragging it from the titlebar (with a slight delay, else you move the window) and dragging it to any application in the Dock you like (even the Terminal, which will cd into that folder).

The other way around, if you are in a terminal, use the command open[0] to open the current folder in Finder, or a file in the corresponding application.

[0] https://www.unix.com/man-page/osx/1/open/
Damn man, that's terrible. Sorry you had to go through that. I can't imagine how that must have affected you, especially for quite some time going forward. Super rough :\
I use that method or copying an existing item also because I dislike the save process otherwise. Saving something I have open is an instant and silent process. Saving something that's been created new is a pain. I prefer to pick the location via Finder than whatever methods the application has decided might suit me.
> Underrepresented Group This can be defined as a group whose percentage of the population in a given group is lower than their percentage of the population of country, community, organization or otherwise.

So basically they dictate policy based on population representation instead of what's actually coming through education. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
It doesn't do enough. It's so low level that you have to run another OS on top of it. So all it does is provide a virtual machine. Typically people load Linux on top, which means you have all the security holes of Linux. You just get to run a few copies of Linux, possibly at different security levels.

I would have liked to see a secure QNX as a mainstream OS. The microkernel is about 60Kb, and it offers a POSIX API. All drivers, file systems, networking, etc. are in user space. You pay about 10%-20% overhead for message passing. You get some of that back because you have good message passing available, instead of using HTTP for interprocess communication.
Its not my field so i'm not sure im aware of what the best studies are, but some links:

https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ffct-prsn/i...

https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things-about-deterr...
Around here, 16” cheese pizzas have gone from “around $10” just 8 months ago to “around $15”.

Pizza places that would be jammed from 6 to 8 PM with a line for pickup are now ghost towns. The one I was in last night at 8:15, workers outnumbered customers (dine-in plus pickup).

The roast beef place that I’d frequent on a particular errand went from $6.50 for a large roast beef to $9.50. What used to be a 15-deep line at lunch is now “walk straight to the register and order”.

Customers are only willing to pay so much for food. That well isn’t infinitely deep. (Maybe some of the gap is COVID, but people are out doing plenty of other things, other restaurants seem to be doing well, and these places were jammed during the pickup-only phases of COVID, so I think pricing is a significant driver of reduced volume.)
By all means be happy for someone nice getting to do a cool thing, but it’s quite naive to be bothered by someone not mentioning this token gesture born of pure PR.
The developer could've actually robbed Muse Group offices for all I care, it doesn't justify threats like that. What the fuck?
I can only compare the USA and The UK but my experience is that the customer/server relationship in the USA often takes on a “master/subservient” tone whereas in the UK that kind of behaviour would be considered “posh” and somewhere between laughable and despicable by the majority.
FreeFlix HQ APK v4.7.0 Free Download for Android (Mod, Pro Unlocked)
At eery restaurant job I worked and every restaurant job anyone in my family worked, the management was poor. Their worst sin was writing the schedule last minute every damn week and wielding it like a weapon. Get on the wrong side of the boss and you get the worst shifts posted at the last possible notice.
That appears to have been true for only about a month: https://groups.google.com/g/clojure/c/WI3ddZRK4Bg/m/RtJVt3IZ...

https://github.com/clojure/tools.deps.alpha/commit/c22ad46c6...
I like data driven programming too. The code can become more declarative this way and the logic more malleable.
Now that tools.build is here, I think clj-new can be substantially simplified (copy-dir with text replacement is most of what clj-new does for built-in templates) and when add-libs gets to the main branch of t.d.a or Clojure itself, that takes care of a lot of the rest of what clj-new does.
Recommend to check the following handbook sections for a definition:

https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#gitlabs-...

https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#definiti...
>> Syria? South Sudan? Venezuela? Honduras? Belarus?

> these countries do not conduct terrorist activities or war crimes in a foreign soil

Are you sure you comment on a good faith here?
How we built EGo