skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There was hn chat about setting up a sat network there too about a month back so no don't think far side of the moon will be far enough
Statutory damages are per work infringed, not per infringement.

They are normally from $750-30000 per work infringed.

The lower limit can be lowered to $200 if the defendant can prove that they were an innocent infringer (they were not aware and had no reason to believe they were infringing). The defendant has the burden of proof for this.

The upper limit can be raised to $150000 if the infringement is "willful". The statute does not define "willful". Courts have taken it to mean reckless disregard. The defendant knew they were infringing and did it anyway.

The jury decides where in the range you end up, and they certainly might take into account the magnitude of your infringement so 10000 downloads might cost you more than 1000 by convincing the jury to choose somewhere high from the range, but the cap on the total will be $30k (or $150k if it was willful).

Note that this means that willfully distributing 10000000 copies of one movies is going to be a lot better for the defendant than distributing a single copy each of 300 different movies, if the plaintiff elects to ask for statutory damages.

The 10000000 copies of one movie is just one work infringed, so you are looking at $150000 worst case.

The single copy each of 300 movies is 300 works infringed, so best case (assuming you are not an innocent infringer) is the minimal amount of statutory damages per work, $750, times 300 works = $225000.

(But remember that the plaintiff gets to choose between statutory damages and actual damages. If you've distribute 10000000 copies of their movie, they'll probably go for actual damages which could be considerably more than $150000!)
I mostly use the terminal, but I usually follow the same pattern of first creating a blank file then opening the file in an editing program.

$ touch myfile.txt

$ vim myfile.txt
> Do RISCV-style free GPU projects exist or would they be unviable because of some specific properties of the GPU nature?

Not that I know of, I don't think they are specifically unviable, but even RiscV is relatively new and in it's infancy, and CPU's in a sense are a subset of GPUs (modern GPUs have pretty comprehensive computation ISAs) and additionally, there exists a much more viable market for low-end CPUs that doesn't exist for GPUs in microcontrollers.

> Why even bother implementing actual rendering in hardware when you can just implement fast general-purpose calculations and use them to accelerate software rendering?

The answer is sort of a mixture of A. That's what we have and B. because custom hardware is very hard to beat. Do read up on Larrabee[1]

So, GPU's have been converging on being more and more programmable, there are a few parts that are still much faster done in silicon, and very widely used, specifically rasterization (Though, software can be a win with e.g. micropolygons, See UE4's Nanite), Texture Sampling, and we're starting to see BVH traversal in the case of ray-tracing. And rasterization specifically is the one that pretty much dictates the structure of the render pipeline, with vertex/fragment shaders, etc and is broadly what makes it's hard to fit it into a "general-purpose" pipeline with specialized instructions.

And just keep in mind, Cuda is basically just a compute shader, and a compute shader itself is basically just a fragment shader without rasterization stuck on the front and without render target blending stuck on the end, and that's also specifically the history of how we got to general-purpose GPU computation ala Cuda.

[1]https://brightsideofnews.com/an-inconvenient-truth-intel-lar...
In your case you need to give more power to users to block people categorically and add reasons, and share their blocklists with their friends.

Anyone on a blocklist can be ignored or they can have a big warning placed next to them about what's wrong with them according to your friend.

That is what local communities already do. If Facebook will never include that functionality, then fine, but it is possible.

Also, if you are a liar (unwittingly or not), you should be directed to other liars just like yourself.
> Healthcare, retirement, everything required for living should be socialized.

Indeed. Many small businesses can't even afford sponsoring a sick leave directly AFAIK. At my location (in Europe) you pay a part of your monthly wage to the social security fund and once you get sick it covers your salary in the amount like if you kept working (and also pays you basic pension once you get too old).
> mushrooms and amphetamines marketed by the same socially-minded people pushing Marlboros for decades is going to make the world a better place,

They'd be better regulated than the fucking cartels. The problems with dose would come up quickly, and you could make it available in X mg shots in liquid form. Add some ugly taste, like alcohol has.

> to take on the big jobs

Yeah, absolutely! Also would you be interested in acquiring a really cheap and famous bridge? Or perhaps the Eiffel tower? /s

So currently it seems we pay taxes to keep the darkness at bay. Maybe. Maaaybe after half the world stops sucking fascism's dick we might finally get to spend resources to properly address those big ticket items.
Yet more than 1/5 of Americans carry cell phones that are tracking them.

This logic really baffles me. There is no need to implant trackers when we blissfully surround ourselves with them.
>a rejection rate that low implies rubber-stamping, prima facie. You would need positive evidence to support your assertion

I've deftly avoided ever taking a class in statistics, but I have gathered there are two schools - Bayesians, who are honest about having priors, and everyone else.
One possible technical improvement is high quality honeypots. If Apple tried hard, they could arrange for certain iPhones to have instrumentation intended to detect and characterize these sorts of attacks. If every targeted user has a 0.1% chance of leaking the exploit vector to Apple, then mass exploitation becomes much more complex and expensive.

Doing this well would be hard, but even an imperfect implementation would have some value.
But it's not necessary right? If you omit the first step, vim will still open, and the file will get created when you first save it.
You mean like https://www.halfbakery.com/ ?
Venmo is crucial to college life.
I don't use vim, but can't you just skip the first command? I would guess that the second command would work just fine. Presumably the only difference would be that the file wouldn't be created until you first save the file within vim.
I can't speak to the general case, but I have to give the show that the grain elevator did get turned into condos [1].

[1] http://www.silopoint.com/
there are many ways to explain the result and all are extremely strange. particles communicating at FTL speeds? particles actually touching in an unknown dimension?
Let alone the cost changes for a bounce, a decline is very different from a bounce.

But also that bounced check was in a big stack and probably got 3 minutes of employee time spent on it across all those institutions combined. I bet that banker was describing some exceptionally double-dipped charges if they thought it wasn't high enough.
"Create a thing here" is a really powerful interaction. You often start the process of creation by navigating near the relevant bit (path in the file system, module in the codebase, etc), and then realize that you need a new file/class/method/whatever in the specific place you're looking. A consistently-available "New" menu seems like a good primitive in the computing experience.
Thanks for saying this. I feel that a lot of the time people forget about post scarcity. People can focus on the dystopia but I feel that it's important to remember there are other options. A lot of us are already living post scarcity and helping others. We are so close to limitless energy generation it is a matter of when not if it happens. Thanks
It feels like a cultural problem across your recruiting pool, with people 'traditionally' picking either a technical or managerial career track. What if you accept that you maybe can't find good ready-made candidates; can you grow good engineers and teach them people skills?

Maybe begin the interview by saying 'our company is very different, and working here will challenge a lot of your assumptions. Frankly, many people find it difficult or uncomfortable. But if you can adapt, you'll get to enjoy many opportunities that are usually reserved for business school types. How do you feel about that?'

I bet at least a few of your candidates would relish such a challenge, but are trying to conform to 'expected' roles.
I think that for a lot of businesses, it's a question of what will happen when extended unemployment ends in September.

If employees are going to flood the market and you can keep paying the wages you were paying pre-pandemic, then it makes sense to hold out, since if you raise wages now, you can't really reduce them later. You lose out on sales now because you're short staffed, but you keep your costs low in perpetuity.

On the other hand, if that's not going to happen, then clearly you should raise wages and prices now, so you don't miss out on those sales.

At this point, though, I think the folks who raise wages/prices because they think the latter case is true are going to cause a significant enough rise in the effective minimum wage (not the legal one, but the least you can practically pay and actually get employees) that everyone's going to have to raise wages anyway.

It's an interesting game theory problem - if everyone's going to hold out on pay raises, then you should too. If a critical mass of people are going to raise wages in the next few months, though, then you should raise wages ASAP to get the best employees and not miss out on a summer of sales. Luckily this appears to be one of the rare game theory problems that'll actually work out well for the little guy.
It is easier today, Netlify like apps offer the best of both parts ,integrate SSG to graphical UI. You can add CI pipelines for things like say W3C html validation, translation or WCAG compliance or image/asset optimization (designers sometimes forget), AMP generation, S3/CDN like hosting etc.

I was tempted to building something like like you did, but came to the same conclusion many do : it is not our core business and marketing will still have issues as the offering won't be as good as a professional one.

Even a solution to bridge the two setups needs dev time to maintain. End of the day managed solutions like Hubspot comes in cheaper in total cost of ownership even though all of this kind of architecture is technically superior.
Gentrification is too broad of a word to mean anything. Baltimore has a glut of housing due to the massive population drop caused by white flight in the 70s.
I don’t see why they’d need to.
> reflected in strawman project sketches

Do you have a link to some of them?
I love these commments. Now the distric attorney needs to tell the police to do their jobs. (Really tired of resources being wasted on marginal tickets/dui's, instead of zeroing in on real crime.)
It might be hard to convince the privacy engineers to allow us access to a random sample of message attachments. What if we asked for a temporary 'root' access credential, that is only valid for 3 minutes per day?
I use it all the time to add contextual note.txt files inside file archives.
Quick ps: gets stuck on "Entering world"
The commenter did not say the results of one year were under consideration. They described a state of recommendation without information. Besides, March to July isn’t even half a year for phase 3 trials.

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04811664
Jeff Bezos actual statement:
"[I] want to thank every Amazon employee and every Amazon customer because you guys <MY SLAVES>, paid for all this. So seriously, for every Amazon customer out there, and every Amazon employee, thank you from the bottom of my heart, very much. It’s very appreciated,"
Not only Macron, but also Charles Michel of the EU. By the same Morrocan government.

> Charles Michel, the president of the European Council, who appears to have been chosen as a person of interest by Morocco in 2019, when he was prime minister of Belgium.
I do `new > text document` enough so in 20 years that I still do it for all types of reasons. Often I do it when I signing up for an unknown-if-useful service and copy paste stuff into this newly created file.

I am sure in my early days, I used `new > Bitmap image` and it wasn't valid so I never used it again. Infact `new > folder` and `new > text document` is all I use, and I just noticed I have many options here.
Can we really say "targeted surveillance as a service" isn't already a booming business though? Camera feeds and device breadcrumbs from wireless devices incl. iphone & android, watches, headphones, vehicle toll tags, etc. are aggregated from every big name store, street camera, doorbell camera, etc. and processed by handful of companies that aggregate facial and location data for marketing and trend analysis. Police subscribe to these same services to track people, or get access through warrants if subscription isn't an option.

News articles talking about the massive aggregation of data come up every now and then, but I don't think the general public understands it well enough to be angry let alone scared. They may not have a name to a face, but guaranteed if you've been in a public place in the past few years, there's a record somewhere that you were there.

What may be more frightening is that it's untargeted
I think that is only if you do not meet all the requirements?
> I don't use vim, but can't you just skip the first command? I would guess that the second command would work just fine.

You are correct.
If you don't "get" the new menu, you are "program centric", but in a Fortran 66 way, not in an 1990 OOP way.

Constructing a new object is a constructor call from OOP.

Without arguments, you get some default, representative instance.

Look at Python:

New integer: representative default instance is zero:

>>> int()
0

New string: empty by default:

>>> str()
''

New bool: false by default.

>>> bool()
False
Probably should have said soyuz rocket engine, my bad...though I guess it would have been more proper to say "one of the Vostok-K booster engines" of which there were four.

Or maybe GE is really stretching things and referring something other than the first stage engines.

https://www.ge.com/news/reports/its-official-guinness-world-...
Costs are compensatory in nature, not punitive. This is a risky gambit, pardon the pun.

Also, in Australia, you'll only recover a portion in accordance with scale limits (party-party costs). Indemnity costs (100% recovery) is rarely awarded. What's the case in the US?
100%, the argument is perfect in it's circularity: we should it make it uneconomical for there to be iMessage exploits via fixing iMessage exploits
Why wouldn't psychedelics follow the same pattern as weed? An initial uptick as it gets legalized, then it just becomes one of those things people try and decide for themselves. (And if someone is ruining their lives with addiction, we might as well spend the war on drugs money to help them, or we can just ignore them like we do with the addicts of legal substances.)
This brought back memories, maybe Win98, where you would right click then accidentally mouse over the "New" menu and have the computer swap for 15-20 seconds in order to bring up the large list of new things you could possibly create.
Portland, Oregon here. For a few years now if I'm out in the suburbs or conservative exurbs and tell people I live in the city, I hear, "sorry for you. Portland's a shithole." That view went national over the summer of 2020, with a lot of help from Fox news. (The president declaring our city an anarchy zone and sending in unmarked humvees with DC plates to black bag protesters didn't help). And yet it's an incredibly livable, fun, interesting town. Outside perception rarely matches the reality.
“Cyber” is pretty “well” regulated, NSO exports under essentially an arm export license.
This and other dysfunction like it are just ordinary run-of-the-mill, well-documented societal effects of the rise of the kind of socio-political order proliferating lately.

It hides - and so persists - deep beneath people's therefore ever-increasing unwillingness to face the reality of the consequences of what they've consented to.

Such self-absorbed puffery is the hallmark of any similar regime, and those "toeing the line", which at the moment - is a large number - are of course puffed-up along with the "upper brass" they've aligned themselves with and dutifully follow, and so reap the benefits reserved for and bestowed upon only those who conform, do what they're told, and further dispense those orders to others they themselves see as subordinate.

It's pathetic to watch, will come crashing down eventually, and as the dust settles, those who were ostracised and persecuted for questioning it, will lead us back. As always.
I think that is the Dutch implementation of the Blue Card.
I was under the impression that peer meant in olden times a nobleman couldnt judge a commoner. Doesn't seem as relavant today.
The French have a pretty dirty history of spying on "friendly allies", too, including European competitors to Airbus/Dassault.
> until you look at

What exactly does it mean? This sentence always feel like as if these particals are sentient beings and can react to when someone sees them.

If observing means performing an experiment and finding out is this information, that an experiment to observe the actual state has been performed, sent to the other half? To know the state of other half another experiment had to be carried out on it.

How is it any different from picking randomly from a set of pairs? We won't know what other half is until one of them is observed.
And Steve Jobs didn't even have groundbreaking ideas, but he did execute them really well.

The iPod? Not the first MP3 player. The iPhone? Not the first smartphone, not even the first with a capacitive touchscreen.
He was the kind of guy who makes round corners, not the one who invents the GUI. And in the end, he won because round corners among thousands of other details are what make a device nice and usable.
Already done with gliders via ground-based winches, which once "bootstrapped" with enough height and forward momentum are usually self-sustaining, but you have to be in weather conditions suitable for it - thermals and such.

It's wildly impractical at scale. It's not just takeoff, either. It's climb. There is no way to assist a flight up to 30,000+ feet.
New Reddit is clearly a reference to desktop reddit, though yes, mobile reddit is intentionally even worse to push you to the app (it can be trivially defeated by requesting desktop mode though, or there's always i.reddit.com ).
"The public" usually refers to the whole community and implies payment through a government or similar scheme. You cannot call your benefit from a private transaction a public good or yourself the public in that scenario. Otherwise literally all commerce is for public benefit. The comment was making a point about externalities.
> And what is this about American conservatism?

An expressly marked tangent addressing an interesting (to me) feature of the document you introduced, after I addressed the silliness of your complaint.

> I'm talking about whether Asians should go completely unmentioned in a policy document on racial equity for Californian math pedagogy.

Its not a catalog of races (nor is it about “race” in the narrow sense.) Its about solutions to concretely observed group disadvantages produced by status quo approaches.

If you think it overlooks equally severe disadvantages faced by Asian students (or Irish, or mixed-religious-background) students as it addresses for Black, Latinx, and multilingual students, then, please, present your argument.
But what would prevent Amazon/Walmart to raise wages even more? That is what they are doing now, right?
Because they don't have unlimited money to pay the employees with
Save As is particularly worthless in Windows since Windows goes out of its way to obfuscate the file system. It's far simpler to create a new file in a folder and start from there.
Its 100% this.

“lets you create the file directly where you want it, saving you the trouble of having to navigate through the Save As dialog just to get back to where you started.”
> And who among us can say they never created a new class or project by copying an existing one, and then deleting everything inside?

Why would I do that? Sure, I've copied classes and whole repositories around, then deleted most of the meat but the reason for copying instead of starting fresh is because a lot of the boilerplate and directory structure can be reused.

Deleting everything is a pointless exercise.
Kubernetes Deprecating Docker: Explaining Containers in K8s
Surprisingly, I find myself slightly skeptical of Stockfish's claims, which is... a disquieting feeling. Could someone help me out by finding the flaw in my logic?

1. ChessBase was in violation of the GPL, but then cured the violation by releasing code (https://stockfishchess.org/blog/2021/statement-on-fat-fritz-...). But the post claims they refused to release the weights.

2. But the weights are already being released with the program they're selling. Otherwise, how would the program run? Why would they refuse, when they already distribute the weights with every copy of the program? I thought maybe Fat Fritz 2 was a cloud-hosted solution (weights aren't provided locally), but https://en.chessbase.com/post/running-leela-and-fat-fritz-on... seems to indicate it can run on a laptop with a GPU.

I suspect Stockfish may be trying to argue that whatever code was used to generate the weights is also covered under GPL, and that ChessBase is in violation because they refuse to release this code. I hope they don't try that argument, because it's certainly not true; you're free to train a chess engine however you want, insert the weights into a GPL'd program, and then are under no obligation to release the code to train the weights.

3. Setting aside the question of copyright entirely, it's unclear that Fat Fritz 2 is actually worse. Stockfish references https://www.sp-cc.de/ as an independent rating system, but if you look at the detail view (https://www.sp-cc.de/files/programs.dat) Fat Fritz 2 only seems to be compared to Stockfish 13 (210218) and not the latest versions of Stockfish.

I'm on Stockfish's side here, because I suspect ChessBase simply duplicated StockFish's training methodology and tried to pass it off as their own. (The engine's performance seems almost identical.) But I hope Stockfish has an airtight case for court. It'd be a bad idea to hinge the GPL violation on "they refused to release the neural net weight training code."
Israel does regulate them, you may think not well enough but likely there isn’t a single sale that wasn’t approved at a pretty high level based on their export license every sale requires an authorization.

I doubt they made a deal that didn’t directly served either Israeli or US foreign policy and security interest.

I don’t know about the NSO but another player in mobile tracking (Verint) tho very much more LEO oriented (SS7 tracking) had about a million failsafes that ensure that their software cannot be used to track or intercept US or Israeli numbers.
But look how long it took and how much harm was done. The union should have headed this off long ago.