skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just take DF for example:

"The necromancer managed to raise both a skeleton and a hollow skin, which I'll keep because it makes as much sense as a walking skeleton"

"My adventurer fought through around sixty zombies in the tower, killed the necromancer, learned the secrets of life and death, and then raised various limbs (not my own). Then I talked to one of them, and it told me that it was peasant. It was flattered but had no need of my services. I imagine its little fingers were shaped into the form of a mouth and they flapped back and forth while it spoke with a high-pitched voice. I guess there's still work to do."

"Of course, you might prefer raining "blood", but we don't have generic blood anymore and I don't think it's proper to add it now that we've got real alternatives, though perhaps a slurry of some kind would be appropriate later. It didn't even work out right with the rodent man blood — the indexing was screwed up, and we ended up with "a dusting of rodent man skin"... dandruff snow."

Other bug fixes: https://www.pcgamer.com/the-most-ridiculous-patch-notes-from...
"Interpretation", in the way that Copenhagen and Many-worlds are called interpretation, is just a way to add human meaning to an existing formalism. Like adding the label "energy" whatever quantity in Newtonian mechanics.
It's lame to dream of space until utopia is achieved? Until life is perfect, NASA should be shut down? Do all 7.5b people on earth need to dream of solving the same problems? Is eliminating diversity of dreams constructive? If your teenage daughter told you she wanted to go to school to be an astronaut, would you tell her that was lame?
Just call it clock. If it's a stock app, give it a stock name.
You forget that on the ground-floor, where programming languages compete for mind-share, easy matters. In fact easy, in terms of getting something working, trumps difficult simplicity any day of the week. Easy is part of what makes an employer want to use your technology.
The point I was making is in regards to people who want bitcoin mining banned - it was attempted in NY and the elected politicians folded under pressure. That is the democratic process.
Maybe police should default to assume swatting and develop techniques to evaluate actual risk prior to storming in based on an anonymous phone call? It would be nice to know the stats on false alarms vs actual threats in SWAT deployments. Having a prior would help a Bayesian analysis.
Given that we are outside observers, is it possible that they know something we don't? What might be some charitable explanations for why they don't raise prices?
I am not a teacher. I have practiced irregular Soto sitting for many years. I do occasional and informal reading of Buddhist texts.

By inspection (eg. sitting, paying attention, etc!), I discovered that we both do and do not have an independent self, at the very same time. They form a non-dual—-each arises in the combination of both and are mixed together in a way that trying to fix the boundary between them is folly.

I believe it is a major error to practice with the objective or possibility of annihilating the self. The self is an observable phenomenon. To reject it is crazy, as crazy as rejecting non-self.

IMHO a major milestone in practice is to grasp deeply the reality of non-duals, and leave behind the attachment to a dualistic belief in the self. This is nothing like annihilation.

As I became less desperately invested in a simplistic sovereign concept of self, my “self” became more confident, natural and wild. It's not going anywhere!
It's right there in the fine article.
Apologies that I don't have time right now to clarify further, but I highly suggest you read the Wiki for entanglement and then reread the articles with that context.

These simply do not do what you think they do. Information cannot, under any currently theorized model of physics, be transmitted faster than light.
They answered it - it's @tennessee
Did you read it? It clearly noted it
This argument works only if the labor and jobs don't have fungible alternatives. But while in-store retail and dine-in restaurants have been suffering, online-order retail and food delivery have been taking off. Plenty of workers are turning to the gig economy. At least there the apps aren't constantly degrading you, even if they are depreciating your car.
Smuggles use cling wrap to hide Intel i7 chips on their bodies
Was this not in the first paragraph of the article?

> was organized on Discord in an attempt to intimidate Herring into handing over his valuable @tennessee Twitter handle.
End of 2nd paragraph: “@tennessee“
To be maximally fair they didn't kill the old guy a heart attack did which might have been unavoidable.
This is going to work as well as the ban on sharing copyrighted media.
It presupposes that position and momentum have definite states that are just uncertain to us, while in most interpretations of quantum mechanics (e.g. Copenhagen and many worlds) the particle exists as a wavefunction, lacking a specific position or momentum, but instead existing as a probability density function in this space.

The uncertainty principle here then relates to how much this probability density function 'peaks' in position space or momentum space. A higher peak in one space results in a wider spread in the other. This is because position and momentum are Fourier transforms of each other.
Hmmmm... believe a scientist, or a grand-standing blowhard politician? Choices, choices.
This is a really good point here. Most corporate development that I have experienced is centered around "features" and speed. "I'm working on a new feature", "there has been a feature request", "the feature has a bug." The only time the complexity of the project is considered is by the time it fails and the team is canned.
If you are mistreated in your country, why does it matter if you are a member of an underrepresented group or not?
NeXTSTEP, I believe.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXTSTEP
Russian vaccination IDs show Covid-19 numbers up to 5 times higher than official
Sorry I'm not sure I quite follow by what you mean by canonical, do you something like applying a standard style?
Because your example does not contain superpositions. With entanglement the pieces of paper are both 0 and 1 at the same time until they are observed - and only then is it that the superposition of both particles become resolved.
> I'd have to make the costs of hacking me so high that someone at NSO would say "wait a minute, even we can't afford that!

No really. You just have to do what just happened happen a couple more times and they are finished. If they can't protect their data they have no business, their reputation is destroyed and there's no point of hiring them if a week later the list of the people you are spying leaks. Turn the game around, info security is asymmetric by definition, it's a lot easier to attack than to defend. As a defender you need to plug all possible holes but If you become the attacker you just need to find one.
A) Until your comment, I didn't even know this existed. That's a massive marketing failure.

B) Most Chinese smartphones dump all over this with the exception of the keyboard--which comes in for all sorts of grief for being crap. You had one job Blackberry ...
You actually can pass -Wconversion to a compiler, but it's one of those things that's going to generate a lot of noise and not be a vulnerability 99% of the time. It's not an easy solved problem, because if you annoy developers with noise they stop caring.
I'm pretty sure I saw concerns from the astronomical community before launch. Maybe they just weren't aware of the process to complain, or didn't know about the threat until after the comment period had closed.
That’s a financing thing plus if you have an old building it’s probably better to evict everyone so you can build a new one
Not sure why this is downvoted. I am _radically_ against prison punishments for non-violent crimes since they don't achieve anything, but for crimes like these, I honestly don't want to live in a society where someone with this kind of judgement is allowed to roam freely and cause more harm.
While the kids knew what they were doing and certainly have some responsibility here... all of them are (well, were) kids: can we really blame them for doing fucked up shit without considering the consequences? The core problem with swatting really seems to be the process of reaction by adult police officers starting with a fully-militarized force as their first interaction, as SWATting someone has clearly gotten so easy that we could probably just automate it by connecting GPT-3 to Twilio via Wavenet using data from public background check websites.
Also pointing your (or anyone's finger) at the already overworked and exploited engineers in many countries is just abysmal in my opinion. It's not an engineers decision to make what the deadlines of finishing a software is. Countless number of companies are controlled by business people. So point your finger at them because they are who don't give a flying f*&% whether the software is secure or not. We engineers are very well aware with both the need and the implications of security. So this kind of name shaming must be stopped by the security community now and forever in my opinion.
Imagine a requirements document for Hacker News - such documents traditionally have a tremendous amount of change control around it, with tons of review for every change. Remember, people like you believe it is 100x easier to catch a bug in requirements and 100x gives you lots of budget to spend to make sure you catch bugs in requirements.

So, there's a bug in the requirements document. Specifically, the 'logout' link has a spelling error. It says 'lugout'. If someone were to catch this bug in the requirements doc, it would trigger a bunch of costly review, as we established earlier.

However, in the implementation phase, once the entire site is up and running, it would take maybe 5 minutes to fix.

Trivial example, but there it is.
The reason "magicians" succeed is because Occam's razor is a heuristic that we rely on intuitively. When the real explanation is super-complex, like "this magician spent 8 hours a day for months learning to hold a hidden card in an invisible way, followed by a year of engineering an under-the-stage lift hidden by mirrors, the reality isn't "disproved" by Occam's razor.

Sure. But if the entirety of reality is created by magicians, then one's concept of reality collapses. The "simulation" view point is indeed pretty much the idea that magicians control everything.

If you read the argument above, my point isn't that Occam's Razor is always correct but if you posit a world where it is generally/always incorrect, your ability to coherently understand reality collapses.
The police aren't the initiators of the death here. They get a call that someone is shot, and that soon others will be killed, they are going to call SWAT.
I'm not a Physicist. From what I understand, Bell's theorem only covers local hidden-variables and that this can still be explained using non-local theories like Bohm's. Can someone shed a bit of light on the non-local theories and if Bell's theorem addresses those as well?
It depends on the establishment.

Grilld is a popular mid-range burger chain and their burgers range from AUD $9 to $16.90 (USD $6.60 to $12.40). All advertised retail prices in Australia include 10% GST (good and services tax).

At a more formal restaurant you will likely find a AUD $25 burger but that's about the top end for burger prices.
I've seen Qt Creator segfault due to the CMake plugin doing some strange QStringList operations on an inconsistent "implicitly shared" collection, that I guess broke due to multithreading (though I'm not sure exactly what happened). In RSS Guard, performing two different "background sync" operations causes two different threads to touch the same list collections, producing a segfault. (These are due to multiple threads touching the same collection/pointers; racing on primitive values is probably less directly going to lead to memory unsafety.)

Apparently in Golang, you can achieve memory unsafety through data races: https://blog.stalkr.net/2015/04/golang-data-races-to-break-m... (though I'm not sure if a workaround has been added to prevent memory unsafety).
Yes, defining a boundary of what you're willing to put up with is vital when someone you love is being self-destructive.

That is knowing what you are going to do, and when, and communicating that to your partner.

It is not about controlling what they do, which is what the wording of "let your wife" implies (whether intentionally or not).
> No, consider the case of neutral pion decay, which emits one spin up electron and one spin down electron.

No, it does emit two electrons with total spin zero which is not the same thing.

> We can clearly say ahead of time one electron will be spin up, and the other will be spin down.

Let’s imagine that one was really up and the other was down. But you decide to measure instead the spins along a perpendicular axis. You would expect to find no correlation between them.

However, what you actually see is that if you measure both spins along any (common) axis they will point in opposite directions.

It doesn’t make any sense to say that before any measurement one was up and the other down. The red and blue balls analogy is very misleading and has nothing to do with entanglement.
Thanks so much for taking the time to outline your thoughts...I share the same goals and input from industry experience like this very valuable. This has spawned some discussion on the Julia slack about how best to target your usecase.

Can I trouble you to make a post either on discourse or on the slack? I'd really like this to get in front of the broader julia community and core devs, and you're the best person to do that. Maybe there's a solution of which I'm unaware....or there could be some design discussions to come out of this.

https://julialang.org/community/ (slack and discourse link)
i agree that it’s possible to have both, but you have to start with simple, and as he said in the talk which we just reread, easy is often relative to your local priors

also those custom hand rolled fns are … a library, which is way better than a build plugin
In general I completely agree that it's not reasonable to say the cops have no responsibility for what they do because of what they were told on the phone. But in this case it's not as though they opened fire on the guy, so it's not clear what they should have done differently.
> I think you do not understand how short 10 years is. There are tons of people still running computers on Sandy Bridge.

Ten years is about the time since C++ 11. I may be wrong, but I do not regret my estimate.
It was multitouch and visual voicemail that really sold me on the original iPhone
Consider the numbering with html

<ol><li><li><li></ol>

The purpose is to give the indication that it's a numbered list to the rendering engine in each case. If the spec was to use # # # for a numbered list and a * * * for a bulleted list, it would have have the same result.

That 1. 1. 1. and 1. 2. 3. are both rendered the same is a statement to the loosens of the spec, not the incorrectness of 1. 1. 1.
thanks, didn’t know that, will definitely be annoyed when i hit that someday
> can we really blame them for doing fucked up shit without considering the consequences?

Yes, we can. Maybe the actual punishment should be less severe because they were kids, but we can't say, if you're a kid and you do this, nothing bad will happen to you.
Unfortunately, I don't have the un-minified version. The original code was written in 2004 during a short wiki contest http://wiki.c2.com/?ShortestWikiContest
You should try, for sure.

But you can't make them stop choosing to take the next hit.

All you can do is try to persuade them to stop.

Sometimes defining boundaries of what you'll tolerate is part of that, as I've described elsewhere in the thread.

That's about knowing what you will do and when, then communicating it to the others in the situation. It's not about controlling what they choose to do.
Sounds about right.

I feel a bit wobbly about your question though. Would you ask someone who is hiking in a forest why they are not surfing on a beach instead? Interactive fiction is not a faulty game where the graphics is somehow missing. It is a different experience. Some days you entertain yourself with this, other days with that.

a thought provoking question: why would you read a novel where you can’t influence what is going to happen? What is the appeal in that? :)
The original proposed framework that intends to make math worse for unrealistic reasons
> I encourage you to read and listen to the stories of sex workers who are speaking their experience directly.

I could say the same thing to you.

Because I have. I've been doing it for 20+ years now.

But also because you literally admit to ignoring sex workers. You can't just pick and choose those that support your narrative.

I'm done with this conversation. It's clear you aren't interesting in having a real discussion, and just pushing an agenda while at the same time insulting your friends, your wife, and ignoring the people you pretend to support.
> It's just that the actual manufacturing does not exist (or rather is done by compiler)

Here’s the kicker though: The part that is done by compilers used to be the bulk of software engineering.

In his Art and Science book Hamming talks about how programmers rejected the idea of even just automated address assignment. They took great pride in manually managing absolute addressing. Only a sissy who doesn’t know real programming would ever use something so silly as symbolic addressing, to say nothing of compiling from assembly. Ugh!

Now we don’t even think about that. Too boring, too solved, too uncreative.

There is a lot of engineering that we currently do, which is completely mechanical, mindless, and can be automated away.
Although I prefer Lein at this point one of its disadvantages not mentioned here is that it requires its own JVM process which means you're running 2 JVMs during development.
I use a debit card, I pay zero interest because I hold a positive balance at all times.

Have you looked at fees on crypto "currencies" lately?
The latest 1.3 version runs on Mac, Linux and Windows.
Ugh, TIL "per work." I'm sure I've read past that 100 times.

Too late to delete, but thanks for the tuneup.
In high school, I worked at a fast food joint to make a little extra money. There were no expectations to pay rent or other essentials. But you'll say that it's not kids working these jobs, so we need to provide a livable wage. What about getting these people skills for better jobs? I'd rather attack that problem than make Wendy's sandwich maker a viable career.
Well that’s probably something that hasn’t crossed their mind. Shitting on the US is not on the "avoid" list of Israelis.
With the mass militarization of the police, malicious SWATing is basically attempted murder.
I've worked as a structural engineer (EIT) on bridges and buildings in Canada before getting bored and moving back into software.

There are major differences in designing bridges and in crafting code. So many, in fact it is difficult to even know where to start. But with that proviso, I think the concept of safety versus the concept of security is one that so many people conflate. We design bridges to be safe against the elements. Sure, there are 1000 year storms but we know what we're designing for and it is fundamentally an economic activity. We design these things to fail at some regularity because to do otherwise would require an over-investment of resources.

Security isn't like safety because the attack scales up with the value of compromising the target. For example, when someone starts a new social network and hashes passwords the strength of their algorithm may be just fine, but once they have millions of users it may become worthwhile for attackers to invest in rainbow tables or other means to thwart their salted hash.

Security is an arms race. That's why we're having so much trouble securing these systems. A flood doesn't care how strong your bridge is, or where it is most vulnerable.
Searched this thread for this video. Good to see it made it in.
agree. The issue that is confusing in explanations of entanglement is the use of a statistical measurement to a model of an individual event. Entanglement is a state made after the observations of many events. Before there is a red ball and a blue ball, there is a precursor, purple ball. That purple ball splits and two balls wrapped in paper are created. They can travel great distances over long times to separate locations, A and B. When some humans start to unwrap them, they are amazed at the correlation-one blue is always matched by one red. So until the balls are unwrapped, how are the humans to describe them? They use the word superposition-unfortunately, many interpret that as a SIMULTANEOUS existence of both states in each ball. Whereas in reality there are many events - the humans at location A see both colors as do the humans at location B. That does not mean that individual particles assume both states. A similar confounding statistic was taught in grade school. The average family has 2.5 children. Yet half a live child was never born.
Software engineering can only exist with an incredible amount of discipline.

We routinely start new implementations in excel and perform formal normalization checks over models before writing any code.

You can get away without having a strong type system as long as your tables and relations are clean. This stuff is so powerful.

Figuring out how to funnel your domain instances into a SQL db and writing all your complex logic in terms of basic queries is how you can build an ecosystem in which determinism and formal proofs of correctness are possible.

For me, software engineering is about correctness for the business end. There is certainly still a layer of craftsmanship below the engineering realm which enables all the magic. This is where things like performance and reliability live. Interacting with the outside world is an icky thing, and the specific implementation always depends on the use case.
What's the point of naming the person's nationality here? Would you specify if he was black, or, say, gay?
I agree, to a certain extent - sometimes "facing your demons" isn't the best course of action in all instances and being self-aware enough to recognise that you're not in a position to do so will probably reach a better outcome than trying to do it anyway.
Exactly, now you have people making an EKS cluster and then deploying a vendor supplied Helm chart to it. When something breaks they literally have no idea how to start fixing it. It’s deceptively “easy”
I feel so clueless on how people obtain these things. As someone in the bay area, it seems like everyone has the hookup but me.

My wife and I tried mushrooms (well, the non-fruiting-body things they had) in Amsterdam and I didn't notice much. She, on the other hand, stopped her OCD ticking for maybe 9 months afterward. It was so life-changing for her that I've been planning a trip to Amsterdam just so she can take another dose.
The Strangest Aircraft Ever Built: The Soviet Union's VVA-14
Julia's multiple dispatch explained with Pokemons
The reason they're not raising their wages is because restaurants make slim to nothing profits. Additionally the people quitting is from the government continuing to provide the stimulus checks that are in excess of the minimum wage. They need to stop providing those checks when the economy needs to be recovered.