skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is great. But how do you use them? I've not ever been able to successfully figure out how to bring new fonts a latex doc (I use miktek).
By focusing only on work experience you may discriminate against candidates who have previously been underemployed due to reasons outside their control. I don’t think only taking account of employment history somehow makes hiring totally fair.
I might just be living under a rock down under, but I don't really get what's satirical about that news segment. Is it the lockdown whilst having low case numbers? Only one death in Sydney on that day?

Just keep in mind Australia has, unfortunately, low vaccination (< 15%) due to low supply. The low case numbers are due to the sharp lockdowns. The sharp regional lockdowns are to contain the virus so the rest of the country stays relatively free of the virus. Things have been relatively "normal" outside of the lockdowns.
It's not too oversimplified. I have a library chart that's optimized for running a web app. Then each web app uses that library chart. Each chart has reasonable default values that likely won't have to change so you're left only having to change the options that change per app.

That's values like number of replicas, which Docker image to pull, resource limits and a couple of timeout related values (probes, database migration, etc.). Before you know it, you're at 15ish lines of really straight forward configuration like `replicaCount: 3`.
> ut look at France and UK just this week. Life ending fines, 6 month jail time if you enter one of these places without it. No exemptions for those that aquired natural immunity either

You are wrong, you need a valid digital certificate which can come from 1) two doses and 14 days; 2) negative PCR less than 73hrs; 3) certificate you had covid (in some cases a vaccine dose is required on top). Considering people have had Covid multiple times, a generic exemption for them might be too broad.
Supposedly the advantages of free market capitalism are that it increases efficiency and makes for better products, primarily through competitive pressure. Yet here is a case where a company is actively stifling its own product in order to ensure its more profitable product isn't threatened.
>am I the asshole" and idiotsincars are pretty normal places where people can politely disagree

These places are echo chambners too you just don't realize it because you agree with the echo.

Go on I am the asshole and give even the slightest hint of approval for a parent that's parenting in a traditional manner (e.g. approving of a "my house my rules" attitude toward an older teenager) and you'll get all sorts of hate.

Go on idiots in cars and talk about how people can't be expect widespread compliance for asinine road signage (like a 55mph speed limit on an interstate highway designed and marked for a much higher speed) and you'll be inundated with "hurr durr the law is the law" types.
Or see the case of the installer on Myth 2, that you could also say the cost was infinite, since the but on the installer made the company litearlly go bankrupt and get purchased by Microsoft.
I mean, if workers are withdrawing money this month, which I presume is then taken off their wages next month, they are now in the hole, and even without interest, the problem just gets worse and worse, because then the next month they are more likely to withdraw early because they have less money.

I do not know if this is financially responsible. How exactly will this prevent a horrific snowballing effect?
Reddit is broken up into sub-communities, and I think this is what is helping a lot here. Many subreddits are quite awful and toxic. Even ones which are not terribly evil are still awful and insipid. But there are also some really amazing and beautiful subreddits out there. This is all because of the existence of subreddits. Any subreddit past a certain size or popularity will begin to become terrible.
A leather hole punch is a handy tool. It's great for making holes of assorted sizes in almost any thin material. I use it for adding clean holes to my belts when they stretch out.
Yeah, it is odd how those discussions always seem to frame it as disproportionate.

The alternative has been exemplified in Europe, you can wait longer to have more cases and deaths, and a longer lock-down to get out of the mess.
I think it would be wrong to focus on the number. The important piece of wisdom here is that bugs get more expensive, even exponentially more expensive, to fix the later they are found.

If you find a bug during unit testing while developing a feature you just fix it.

If the bug is found in integration tests it may pull more resources and people to process. Even more so if found during integration tests.

If found after release to customer it might get very, very expensive.

The takeaway is to find and fix bugs as early as possible.

If you want to put an actual number on how much more expensive, you indeed need to carry a study but that will probably vary with the field or type of products and may in the end not provide additional actionable insights. Especially, I think this is risk mitigation so one would want to consider the worst case and its likelihood and not only an average number. That's probably difficult to capture in a generic study and product teams will know best what applies to their specific product.
> determine a class of things that should be publicly funded.

No. That is a misunderstanding. The concept allows the possibility that the standard competitive market price discovery mechanism is not going to lead to the optimal level of production of some goods and services. The word "optimal" here is in the usual sense of maximization _subject to constraints_.

Even if we all agree that something is a "public good" in the economics sense (therefore, the market mechanism will not be able to provide the optimal level), it is not a foregone conclusion that a government bureaucracy will be able to provide anywhere close to the optimum. For that, they would have to discover the "true social benefits" and "true social costs" created by each additional unit produced. That process is subject to usual political processes and the outcome is determined by who owns the politicians.
Why do you call it a hypervisor when it's more like a VMM?

Even the name "VMM" is a quirk of KVM; before KVM, "virtual machine monitor" was another name for a hypervisor: that is, the thing that ran on the bare hardware and provided the virtual hardware interface to the VM. KVM has fairly unique architecture, where a VM is basically a process.

I'm willing to tolerate that "drift" of meaning, because we need a word for the piece of software which converts a process into a VM, and "VMM" is a good fit. But I'd have to really object to the idea of calling such a piece of software a "hypervisor".

If your plan is to make wiser into an actual hypervisor at some point, I'd appreciate it if you made that clear in your README.
ah mario64 DS is there
PG&E doesn’t really make that much money from serving those more rural communities and houses where those fires are likely to occur. They subsidize those higher cost to serve areas with all the money they make in the big urban areas that aren’t at risk at all. Burying lines will just cause urban areas to subsidize urban areas even more, when there really should be some consequence for deciding to build your house in or abutting a dry forest with the need to have power brought in through that forest.
I fear anti-virus and firewall software may in the near future be used to guarantee DRM features.

I fear the day when I try to play media I legally own from another region and can't play it because of region blocking and can't circumvent it because my "defense" software prevents me.

Another thing that scares me: services requiring said kinds of software. The mobile world is somewhat like this already and it is basically what bars users from using their mobile phones as full blown computers even though said phone are powerful enough for that.
Perhaps the Internet Archive could do more to help people who find their personal/sensitive/embarrassing content made available in perpetuity (I’m not sure exactly what they could do), but it’s incredibly valuable to have archiving on by default. The voice of un-notable people is underrepresented in every field of study, and the voice of notable people tends to get preserved in other ways anyway.
In the US, people keep new cars for an average of 8.4 years [1], and the average working age adult (age 20-54) drives about 15,200 miles per year [2]. That is over 127,000 miles, and that is average. Obviously if you are someone that trades in their car every 2 years, long term costs aren’t important to you. But lots of people keep their cars over 100k miles, and plenty keep their cars out to 200k. I included 50k and 100k on the maintenance prices, and fuel costs just have to be divided in half for 100k. At basically any distance, EVs and plug-ins are significantly cheaper to maintain and fuel than ICE vehicles.

So maintenance and fuel cost over 100k miles would be roughly:

-EVs $5,125

-Plug-in Hybrids $7,405

-ICE $13,435

[1]https://www.iseecars.com/how-long-people-keep-cars-study

[2] https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/bar8.htm
microk8s also makes it super easy to have a multi-node cluster, even with HA.
The Starlink satellites weight about 200+ kg and have big solar arrays to power their electric thrusters. I'm sure they could squeeze in some space rated (or massively redundant) SSDs to provide some CDN capacity in some of the later revisions.
While "malevolent"/"malicious" definitely has a "wicked" connotation, you also see it in words like "maladapted" or "malodorous" which are just "bad" without the "wickedness".
What service do you have where your grid connection is that unreliable? Is it PG&E? Is it due to their "cautiousness"?
At the risk of derailing the discussion even further, I'd say: yes, we do. There's quite a difference between 1.25x and 100x more expensive, especially if you're building the next AWS.

However, such a number would need to be conditioned. I can imagine that fixing an error in the i9 microcode will be a lot costlier to fix in "production" than your average NaN JS bug.
Ooh, that's an interesting correlation. The number of smokers dropped a lot since the 80s, essentially right when the obesity epidemic started:

https://ourworldindata.org/smoking#the-rise-and-fall-of-smok...

Nicotine is known to suppress hunger
Most likely because people are desperate for money because they need to eat, and your app will create a snowballing effect where the next month, they are even more desperate because a chunk has been taken off their pay.
> Heavy moderation (/r/askhistorians) and niche (this forum?)

I'd consider these two to be both niche and heavily moderated: history is a niche topic too, and HN is heavily moderated.

> they are not the solution for the most "public" and mainstream places like comments under posts on BBC's Facebook page

I think heavy moderation is a solution, probably the only solution. But these places would have to implement it first. Moderation doesn't scale, and companies like Facebook only want to do the things that scale. Their toxicity problem is self-inflicted - they don't want to pay for what's needed to solve it. See my tangent in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27917473.
Low vaccination was because we backed the wrong horse (AstraZeneca) for the right reasons (more mature tech).

When we had to about face, the alternates were not readily available. :-(
DIFY
“this might be because easy bugs get fixed first, and they are naturally low cost. Nothing to do with being in production or not.”

I think you’re using the wrong definition of cost. A bug might take an engineer 3 seconds to fix, but still could cost millions if pushed to production.

Certainly historically, that could mean producing thousands of CDs or floppy disks, or burning things to PROM. With products such as interplanetary probes, a bug could harm quite a few people in their career (some people do their PhD on an experiment for a Mars rover. If that crashes on landing, those designing it still have their design to show, but questions will linger whether it would have worked. Those doing a PhD on the results of that experiment truly are hosed)
Unless you go to /r/libertarian?

It's hard for me to accept such a final "No" when there seems to be a sub for literally every viewpoint. However, I am willing to accept that those subs get brigaded and maybe that's what you're referring to?
I remember a few students using windows that took a very very long time to compile anything; even smallish single-file examples. Is is possible that this slowness is caused by windows checking the binaries that were just compiled?
Looks like you are being rewarded quite handsomely.

Not only is "there is no info provided by which button was clicked" a really odd take when we humans explicitly assign semantic to up/down vote, this contradicts your other point, which is that "having your post read is the real reward," since there is no guarantee the post was read before voting.
> Who said anybody was using the niche academic economist definition of „public good“?

Except that if something is not a "public good" in the economics sense, then the burden of proof is on the claimant that there is an under-provision problem to be solved. Is this crypto scheme geared towards solving an actual problem or is a money-making scheme for its proponents?

> Compare „string“ in computer science vs astrophysics.

That comparison is disingenuous because the scheme about "Funding Public Goods" using economic incentives and mechanisms. We are in the realm of economics here.

See also[1]:

> Co-author here. I definitely use the phrase "public goods" in the economic sense: goods that are non-rival and non-excludable.

Therefore, it seems like they are trying to build a binding scheme to help beneficiaries express the value they put on the provision of the public good. There is a rich literature in economics about mechanism design that should reveal the difficulties involved.

Separately, it is important to keep in mind that things that are nonrival and nonexcludable can also be "public bad"s. :-)

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27902669
Isn’t this problem more easily solved by more access to credit cards? It seems like the examples where an advance is needed would be more easily, and even cheaply, solved by using a credit card and repaying on payday.

There are instant approval credit cards and low credit limit cards.

And credit cards even allow cash advances at 20-30% annually.

So, for the example with the gas station customer, using a credit card and carrying the balance for a few weeks would cost them $0 in fees if paid back in the same timeframe as this pay advance. Or they could take a cash advance from an atm and pay 30%/365*num days until repaid.
That's the headline, but you'd need about $10k of kit if you're handy at digging through trash to put one together.
Linking Strategy to Everyday Work by John Cutler
That's fair, I guess. He can only work with the data he has been given. All the sources need to change.
The "Y2K bug" cost an estimated US$300 billion in remedial work, having been in production for ~40 years.

Corollary: The most expensive bugs to fix are the oldest bugs.
Care to elaborate? I'm using Windows as a primary dev machine for years and I've encountered no problems aside from the infuriating update-related restarts.

What am I missing? This is an actual, emotionless, genuine question? Always looking to find new ways to procrastinate by trying out new tools ;)
The infection of Youtube with Google's fetish for replacing people with machines may be the worst thing about the entire acquisition. Google's obsession with forever increasing the ratio of users to employees is a curse upon us all.
Just wonderful, would never have thought to do this
> MWI derives it from the Schrodinger equation. Observation is experience of the observer and can be calculated. Unless you assume that the observer is supernatural and is thus unknowable.

This posits the notion of an observer that only observes one outcome, whereas the SE predicts that an observer will observe several different outcomes with different amplitudes. The MWI is postulating that we should only look at each outcome separately.

Furthermore, it is not possible to derive the actual probability value from the wave function amplitude without some additional postulate equivalent to the Born rule, for example that the number of observers that observe one outcome is proportional to the wave function amplitude of that outcome.
It seems like a matter of taste. When does a miserable life stop being worth the moments of happiness? What is a reasonably functional body? Where is that line and why are you the one who gets to draw it?

Your current position sounds like no matter how miserable or how fleeting the moments of happiness are a person should just grin and bear it. They don't want to, but you want them to.

I agree there are clearly situations where a person only temporarily wants to die. These situations could be characterized as irrational.

For me personally, it's arthritis. I'm slowly losing functionality and interest in things I used to enjoy because the pain changes the calculus. It's not unbearable now but it's degenerative so it's only going to get worse.
> In my book DevOps is a set of practices that aims at improving the collaboration between Devs and Ops.

I think that's what sold me on DevOps.

> You built it, you run it!

This adds too much responsibilities for devs but also makes it hard to find good enough developers who can also manage deployments and infrastructure. I have never seen happy and competent Dev+DevOps person. There is just too much cognitive load for a same person to do these two things right at the same time. The Hello World of Kubernetes deployment is easy on Cloud but anytime you need to do something a bit more complex, learning curve increases tremendously.

What seems to work is that each team having one or more dedicated DevOps person. Or I have seen a dedicated DevOps team in large orgs managing infrastructure for many other teams.
The problem is that many libraries need access to configuration files or other stuff that comes with the library.

So if you start with a system that has some form of persistent objects, then very quickly a root namespace object is created to solve those library issues.

And then you are mostly back to a Unix root directory.
> if you are sitting inside your bubble and laughing at the outsiders, who don't even come to your bubble, is there any toxicity going on?

Yes.
I've had good experiences with Rook on k3s in production. Not on raspis though.
Not a lot of meat on this, but it looks nice from glancing at all the bits. I would recommend that you read the CPUID bits from the real CPU and copy most of them over so that the kernel can enable features like SSE4.x, AVX/AVX2 and various others. Use KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID and then KVM_SET_CPUID2.

I would also set the CPU name to KVMKVMKVM and enable a few of the paravirtual devices like KVMCLOCK.

Good luck with your project!
Can GameStop actually beat Amazon (customer experience analysis)
> I think it would be wrong to focus on the number. The important piece of wisdom here is that bugs get more expensive, even exponentially more expensive, to fix the later they are found.

This is always how I interpreted it.

It thought this was the obvious interpretation, since it's all but certain that no universally applicable number exists.
Seems to me the point is DDG does get to read your email, but all the tracker-using senders don't get to read you, since the tracker links would be scrubbed.

Considering that all email traffic, contents and metadata, must be assumed to be monitored by a long line of more or less unsavory organizations, the tradeoff seems highly appealing to me. Under the circumstances, I'm happy to have one more organization, with excellent privacy stance, touching the contents of my list email, to deny those who actively try to spy on the what, when and where of what I do with the contents some of the opportunities.

I guess I would be even happier scrubbing the trackers locally, but it seems like a high-variability cat-and-mouse game which could be pretty time-consuming to keep up with. Anyone aware of good DIY approaches to this?
Intel Accelerated Webcast on July 26th: Update on Process Technolog, Roadmaps
How can IA just go out there and copy+republish the content of others and get away with it?

Aren't they breaching copyright on a massive massive scale?
We are on the opposite ends of the political spectrum and I do not believe I am going to convince you with facts.

Your past comments makes me believe that you are part of the crowd that is on a witch hunt of Modi. Even though he has been through the trials since 2002, when the congress was still very much in power and has been cleared of any wrong doing.

At the same time you claim to want hard evidence on violence both political and communal in West Bengal. The NHRC has submitted a damning report on the situation in WB. Let Kishor go through the same trial that Modi went through to clear his name.

Until then I would hold him responsible for spreading hate and causing disharmony, if not actually mobilizing and orchestrating the violence.
I can’t really agree with you that Libertarians are a faction of the Republican Party. Feel like that would be untrue by definition and many libertarians are atheists, want weed legalized, disagree with war mongering, etc., and so while there is some policy overlap (just like there is with Democrats) it’s more of happenstance than being a faction. Both Republicans and Democrats tend to want to increase the size and scope of government and redistribute wealth based on their own priorities, which is something that generally is opposed to libertarian ideals. If you take more serious libertarians they’re probably saying defund welfare and the military.

> Where they most obviously break their own rules is environmentalism and climate change, where people are reducing the value of other people's property via pollution without getting a contract to allow that.

Ok so there’s a lot to unpack here and libertarians come in different flavors but it’s actually consistent. Most libertarians who actually know what they’re talking about would argue a couple of things:

First, someone else polluting the environment is a breach of contract even if it’s not formally signed. Your actions would be causing loss for another person. There’s difficulty in assessing blame, but in clear cases like pollution of an upstream river libertarian philosophy would indicate loss on the economic side. The hard part here is what to do about it, and that’s where you start to see more flavors of libertarianism emerge and get interesting.

Second, libertarians would likely say not that climate change isn’t a problem but the market can solve the problem better than the government can. This isn’t “breaking their own rules” but is instead completely consistent with libertarian philosophy and is rationally defensible. This is especially true given any study of economics shows evidence of this being the case in some or many industries. I personally disagree, but you can’t outright attribute this thought to malice. Here’s a trivial example! Why is the government subsidizing fossil fuels and oil and gas companies? Libertarians would argue that this market intervention by the government is leading the government itself to hold at least some responsibility for climate change.

I think your assessment of libertarianism is at most casual and your critiques are not wholly consistent. Comments like “this leads to flat out hypocrisy and denial” are baseless and easy to throw around. Same with “protect the power of the wealthy and the elite” - like what do you think Republicans and Democrats do??

I think you have this straw man of what you think libertarianism is and you just want to attack and blame everything on that. It’s like blaming everything on Hillary Clinton or something.