skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Now you have overpaid “““designers””” that need to show “““impact””” every year, so they have to reinvent the wheel over and over.

This is such an ignorant and oversimplified argument. The only reason one could assume that it’s the designers at Apple who “need to show impact” instead of PR project management shenanigans is if you’ve never worked with design at a large scale. I’m pretty sure some random designer at Apple has already redesigned something like Mission Control (which has been pretty much unchanged in the last few OS iterations) but it just isn’t the right time to launch said upgrade so it just sits on the back burner for years.
Apple is still killing it in the hardware space, but I think the writing was on the wall for Apple software when Forstall was forced out.
has overcapacity ever been a significant problem? I know drivers want more money but that doesn't mean customers would be willing to pay for it.
Nomad also doesn't have a lot of feature that are built into kubernetes, features that otherwise require other hashicorp tools. So now you have a vault cluster, a consul cluster, a nomad cluster, then hcl to manage it all, probably a terraform enterprise cluster. So what have you gained? Besides the same amount of complexities with fewer features.
I appreciate the context here.
Despite Tuesday’s flight, Jeff Bezos is running out of time to save Blue Origin
Liveminting NFTs with the Wolfram Language on the Cardano Blockchain
Your first two paragraphs are two separate issues. If their info is not up to date, maybe they need some additional training. The reason they have a hard time with complex issues isn't their fault. Medical practice and science in general can't deal with complexity very well, and there is very real danger of iatrogenics if they over test and over treat.
Pegasus is considered a munition; Israel has to approve its sale and export. Israel's attitude is a bit stronger than "doesn't care".
Many of the old neighborhoods and a few remaining urban farms are flood irrigated in Phoenix. The small city park in my old neighborhood was also flooded once a week to keep the grass green all summer.
Hahaha, OK, I figured you didn't mean what I hoped you meant, or I'd have heard a lot more about that already. That still reads like it's pretty handy, but way less "holy crap my entire world just changed".
Catholicism: the one religion you're allowed to openly call bullshit without being considered a bigot, apparently
Usually but not always and it depends on the variant. If you still get it then you are less likely to spread it - https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0607-mrna-reduce-ri...
If billionaires entrust their money to more or less random people for philanthropic objectives I rather have them be taxed higher and let a (somewhat inefficient) government decide how to invest the money.

At least I had a role in electing the government and can change my vote based on their performance.
>Genuinely curious, is "25 seconds" a typo?

I am not surprised. Dark Reader have to wait for the whole page downloaded before doing all the calculation on a page with lots of animations and other graphics image over features and CSS layout. ( And it is worst if the image has a white background and not transparent ) There are some page that are just problematic. So generally speaking it is not a very good browsing experience.
Just a minor correction here- SpaceX has been around for 20 years as well.
Ah my goodness, education does not immunize people from adapting very daft racism patterns.
To simply throw all Muslims in one box is beyond crazy, there are Muslims of various different races.
As a non Muslim, I have experienced Muslims as some of the nicest people out there, while the loudest Christians were often the most bigoted people imaginable and the only thing Christian about them was the label.

Freedom of speech should remain firm and never infringed with, but there should always be consequences for such freedom of speech escalations.

She has no business being an educator, poisoning the minds of people with her racism.

The sack was justified, the doxxing was well deserved, if she wants to be a racist loudmouth, have the guts and show your "face".
Compensation, hell no if it was for me to decide.
The defamation suit is claiming that his attempt to de-anonymize her false-positive-associated some reprehensible things said on another site with her, which she did not say. She isn't disputing that she said the things on the Disqus forum (or several other things on other sites).

She's either telling the truth or she's gambling that he overplayed his hand, doesn't have hard evidence to link her to those comments, and (in the context of a civil suit, which is what defamation is) lacks the resources to prove his case with preponderance of evidence. In which case, he'll be liable for damages and have to pay to "make her whole" (which could be quite a bit if she can convince the court she lost her job because of the things she's alleged to have said in that one set of comments she's suing over).
This is more complicated than you make it out to be.

The person who literally sends the money according to the law is not the same as the one who pays in the economic sense.

For instance, you could transfer the legal obligation to the other party, but that would change the negotiating position between the employer and the employee.

Similarly, you can add a sales tax to some product, and make the company that sells the product collect it and forward it to the government, but that doesn't mean that the company is worse off the that amount. The pie is split according to some negotiating position.
Exercising free speech can have social consequences. You're free to advocate for the legalization of necrophilia; others are free to criticize you and disagree with you (exercising their own free speech) or shun you (exercising their freedom of association).

Legal consequences imply non-free speech; employment consequences are more complicated.

edit: Responding to dead response; not gonna vouch for you again with that attitude...

Every freedom has consequences. You've got the right to bear arms, but you can shoot yourself in the foot. You've got the freedom to move about the country, but you can miss your sister's wedding if you're in another state. You've got the freedom to vote, but your elected politician won't always vote in the way you'd like. You've got the right to drink and smoke, but you might get cancer or other diseases. You've got the right to piss off your friends by spouting off hot takes, and you might lose those friends if they don't like what you have to say.
I think part of it is that some items/patterns/etc might actually mean absolutely nothing. It might be a dead end even with perfect knowledge.

Some Neanderthal was fucking around with some rocks one day and we look for some meaning in the remains. Was it a tool? Religious artifact? Nope, just Bobby Neander being bored and hitting rocks together into a shape with no meaning.

To be clear, that doesn't mean it's not worth trying to find the meaning if there is one.
Yes and no, for a private pilot license you are taught through intuition and diagrams. No Navier Stokes, no Lattice Boltzmann, no CFD. The FAA does not require you to be able to solve boundary condition physics problems to fly an aircraft.
I think the important point here is that even pilots dont know the full mechanics of a modern jet engine (AFAIK at least, I don't have an ATPL so not 100% on the syllabus). They may know basics like the Euler turbine equation and be able to run some basic calculations across individual rows of blades, but they most likely will not fully understand the fluid mechanics and thermodynamics involved (and especially not the trade secrets of how the entire blades are grown from single crystals).

This is absolutely fine, and one can draw parallels in software, as a mid level software engineer working in an AWS based environment wont generally need to know how to parse TCP packet headers, despite the software/infrastructure they work on requiring them.
No it's not attacking gays. These policies were implemented back in the mid 2010s and sexual orientation is irrelevant. It's a huge deal where priest basically are held to an even higher standard publicly. So while in the 70s this priest could've been shifted elsewhere, now because he's publicly a sexually active person, the Church wants little to do with them.

I've been through like 3 of these types of meetings our church made us do (when I was still Catholic). They were more like "if you see something, say something" and "how to catch a priest predator" inadvertently. It's more like the Catholic church only wants virgins and people who can't be proven otherwise as priests right now.
https://news.mit.edu/2021/ride-sharing-intensifies-urban-roa...

https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/6/20756945/uber-lyft-tnc-vmt...

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/5/eaau2670

https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/uber-lyft-traffic-congest...
Paralelni Polis released last year an interesting video of a drone based last mile transport system for their hydroponic lettuce, paid in cryptos

https://youtu.be/_vEJwD5lDTk
Grindr isn’t a gay bar directory. It’s a hookup app.
Bit odd to see the author of this article seems to be so vested in all things Apple and he still spells macOS incorrectly.

Anyway:

> First, we’re going to have a single OS strategy at Apple. We’re not going to have a dual or a triple or a quadruple OS strategy like some others. We’re going to have one OS, and that’s very important to us.

And twenty years later, Apple still doesn't have a single OS.
There's no reason to believe we can sustain human life on Mars. Immense technical and biological hurdles stand in the way of that being possible, much less worth focusing on while the planet that does sustain life can still be saved. Believing the human race needs to go to another planet in our solar system to survive is philosophical suicide for sci-fi fans, akin to believing that saving Earth is futile because the rapture is imminent. To the degree that it distracts from the very real problems on Earth that must be solved and are in fact less daunting than living in Mars, it may even contribute to our literal suicide as a species.
Although slightly higher in cost, you can get Theanine in pill form.
Everyone's brain is different and substances may don't affect everyone in the same way. Like how some people get addicted to coffee or cigarettes and some don't, some people get the benefits of Modafinil without the side effects and some don't. Cognitive disorders are one way to categorize this but it can be more complex than that. People with OCD or GAD are an extreme example, there's a lot of different personality types and brain structures out there, that's the "neural fauna" I'm talking about.
Microsoft acquires CloudKnox Security for unified privileged access
because a company is a legal entity and a DAO is a cryptographic slot machine. A DAO is no more a company than my 10 year old nephew’s gang is a company, although there exist similarly arcane rules, a complex voting system, and a great deal of wishful thinking in both.

Could you turn a DAO into a company? Sure, if you incorporated it, but that requires a country to incorporate it in.
Whatever Kubernetes flaws, the analogy is clearly wrong. Multics was never a success and never had wide deployment so Unix never had to compete with it. Once an OS is widely deployed, efforts to get rid of it have a different dynamic (see the history of desktop computing, etc). Especially, getting rid of any deployed, working system (os, application, language, chip-instruction-set, etc) in the name of simplicity is inherently difficult. Everyone agrees things should be stripped down to a bare minimum but no one agrees on what that bare minimum is.
Don't forget that money is exempt from federal taxes for the 2020 tax year and isn't taxed at all by many states.
Person dies, wealth gets inherited at new cost basis, heirs pay off loans with new (higher) cost basis, tax revenue isn’t collected.

At least that’s the model as I understand it.
Muslims can marry four wives, but it is generally not recommended. Most muslim-majority countries place restrictions on polygny, and at least one (Turkey) has outlawed it entirely.
I understand a youthful obsession and I understand not being able to afford a computer. I can understand if there is a slight access to a computer (either in a shop selling those not minding the kids playing ard, or a distant acquaintance of an uncle allowing for 30 min screen time every month or needing to bribe the grounds keeper for access to the schools it room), but I have a hard time understanding zero access and doing pen and paper programming. I mean why chose basic and not assemble when choosing without a computer.

How did you learn what computers were? Did you see it on a TV show about computers?
It's not in US jurisdiction?
Vetoing sends a message and as others have said would at least force the media to talk about it.
There's some truth to this but for the most part you're drawing the wrong conclusion here; Things like aviation and rocketry have become well-understood and "cheap" enough that they're now within reach of the private sector (same goes for the development/construction of satellites which facilitates commercial demand for access to orbit). Just because I can use my smartphone to perform tasks which could only be rivaled by global superpowers 300 years ago doesn't mean I wield the power of a state.
Those questions will make up the bulk of the defense's case, I imagine.
"extraneous identity burden"

Is this a phrase you have seen used before? That's pretty beautiful phrase/idea just to come up with for a random comment.
sorry about that. i will make sure not to repeat this mistake again
> Lumping them all together feels like we're giving out participation trophies.

In defense of Branson his other space company Virgin Orbit now does orbital launches also, and has cool capabilities that genuinely differentiate it from other providers. We'll see if Bezos catches up, he's personally focusing on it more now and may make faster progress on New Glenn etc.
OK. So relying on unsaved buffers long-term might still be less safe than in BBEdit, assuming Microsoft hasn’t made improvements that prevent this sort of scenario from happening again.

However, it definitely wasn’t out of sheer negligence, as they do have tests that try to ensure unsaved data will make it from the last stable version to the current version at all times. Without doing any serious research, all I can say is that it is unfortunate, but if you don’t keep unsaved buffers and changes for long periods of time it is at least fairly safe...

https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/blob/main/test/smoke/src...
Cool service.

FYI: after signing up with the MailChimp form, clicking the “Continue to website” link on the signup confirmation page results in a 404.
> I was blown by that feature

Is the feature Premium? Or only available in free mode? Just wondering...
That's a product of the leadership elected by the people of Florida.
> I put my hopes in online notebooks, but these are used mainly for data analysis, and "true developers" seem determined to ignore them.

This is merely my own personal preference, not an assertion that my stance is correct or common.

For development, it's important to me that I can put the toolchain into version control along with the code. This ensures that I can check out a build that is years old and be able to build it without issue.

SaaS solutions break this for me, so I avoid them to the greatest extent that I can. If it's cloudy, then it can change without warning or recourse. That's a problem.

For that reason, I would never seriously entertain using something like a netbook for development.
I'm not sure I see why you would expect anything different? The entire point of this framework is to provide a bunch of tools for squeezing the most you can out of SSE, which is specific to x86.

I don't know if there's an ARM-specific equivalent, but, if you want to use TensorFlow or PyTorch or whatever on ARM, they'll work quite happily with the Free Software implementations of BLAS & friends. If you code at an appropriately high level, the nice thing about these libraries is that you get to have vendor-specific optimizations without having to code against vendor-specific APIs. Which is great. I sincerely wish I had that for the vector-optimized code I was writing 20 years ago. In any case, if ARM Holdings or a licensee wants to code up their own optimized libraries that speak the same standard APIs (and assuming they haven't already), that would be awesome, too. The more the merrier. How about we all get in on the vendor-optimized libraries for standard APIs bandwagon. Who doesn't want all the vendor-specific optimizations without all the vendor lock-in?

Alternatively, if you would rather get really good and locked in to a specific vendor, you could opt instead to spam the CUDA button. That's a popular (and, as far as I'm concerned, valid, if not necessarily suited to my personal taste) option, too.
Get users to opt in, both to participate and to analyze any given payload?
Good callout, thank you. Yeah I'm aware in general that there are unprovable true things. I've somehow convinced myself that this can't be one of them, though the other thread of this I believe I'm being shown how it might be.
As I read your post, you're attributing a lot of properties to a monorepo.

That's fine, but I think you should be careful whether you're pointing to the properties of using a single repsoitory in general; or the properties of tooling certain monorepo-using companies have built with no requirements other than supporting their own source control; or how uniform it can feel to jump into multiple projects when every project has been forced to a lot of the same base tooling beyond just source control; and/or a work culture that happened to have grown up around a certain monorepo - but for which a monorepo is neither necessary nor sufficient to reproduce.

I've worked jobs where the entire company is in a unified repository, and companies where a repository represents everything related to a product family, and places where each product was multiple gitlab groups with tons of projects.

The most I can say is that monorepos solve package management by avoiding package management. The rest comes down to tooling, workflow and culture.

I would be interested in hearing why it would be hypothetically worse if google had gone the other direction. Where they still spent the same amount of money and time from highly talented people on the problem of unifying their tooling and improving workflow, but done it to support a polyrepo environment instead. How would it have been fundamentally worse than what they got when they happened to do the same with a monorepo?
Awesome can't wait to give one of the richest companies on the planet an interest free loan.
> The core fallacy is to assume whatever made Earth less than ideal will not follow us to the new destination.

there are plenty of existential risks which can't "follow" anything, or happen to more than one planet simultaneously.

does living on two planets eliminate all existential risks? no, and nobody has claimed that.
Only the k8s admins need to know that though, not the users of it.
> Repeat that until the problem gets a singularly misleading wording, or some key person is away, and the project gets a 6 weeks estimation.

At that point we're definitely at a point of "severe company process problems" and the method outlined in the original article probably isn't feasible - I can't really imagine that manager accepting the time required to create a GOOD estimate - but I've definitely seen it work properly at some of my jobs.
Your Work Email Address Is Your Work's Email Address
The best would be to learn the nation’s name. And then use that. In English I guess; in their own tongue would be cool.

It’s like if I want to talk about Germany, or Luxembourg, but only and always use the term European. But because most (?) know there are actual specific nations in Europe, we use those names. Sadly, that knowledge is still lacking in North America amongst the non-First Nations peoples.
Such a confusing title without "Python" in there, especially when it's specifically about some Python feature.
Pu Erh is great but you have to be careful with it if you have low blood pressure. I learn't the hard way after I once brewed some after having a beer and straight down passed out in the kitchen, like fell to the floor passed out. I do have low blood pressure and usually took Pu Erh while sitting down but after that I just stopped taking it allover.
The company is not under US jurisdiction. The lawsuit against it (Facebook/WhatsApp v. NSO) is ongoing.
This is the same with a union. Unions' only sanction against people ignoring the strike is social pressure. Ultimately strikes will only work when enough people have decided to work together and take the action together, whether there is a union or not.
Future alien civilizations are going to think the cool S means something.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cool_S
When Kids Flop, Parents Become NBA Refs
Don't take my word for it, take theirs. Here is one of their documents. http://www.noisyroom.net/blog/STORMSummation.pdf
Lyft doesn't create fake rides.

Source: work there.
This is not a personal gift to Van Jones and Jose Andres... they are being given this money to donate to charities. I think the way it will work is that they will designate the charities and Bezos will donate it, or Bezos will transfer the money and they will donate it within the calendar year.
Modern jet pilots certainly know much less about airplane functions than they did in the 1940s, and modern jet travel is much safer than it was even a decade ago.
This is the guy that Krebs doxxed shortly after the attack. I assume he has been working for the FBI or whoever since then, now he has served his purpose, or his undercover status has been burned so we get the official charges. Which I expect will result in a plea deal with time off for helping the FBI or whoever.
> your assumption will age poorly

As a Sketchfab user for few years now, I'm just hope that I would be wrong.
Focusing on the data privacy angle here, I can see how location data from the telcos would allow the publication to identify the priest’s device ID from the location data, knowing where he lives, works, etc. But how did they correlate that with his use of the Grindr app? Do the telcos provide data on app usage by location and time, or did they somehow get data from Grindr directly?
There's a lot of things I would rather other people do for my benefit and their detriment as well. Thank you for your contribution.
> For instance, "parser generators" like yacc, bison and all the rest are absolutely awful. One feature they miss is that you should be able to make a small revision to a grammar with a small code patch. (Say you want to add an "unless(x)" statement to Java that is equivalent to if(!x)" - ought to be 50 lines of code not counting the POM file.)

You could do that. Add "unless" to the Flex file and hack the Bison file to interprete 'unless->expression' as an 'if->negation->expression)' when pushing to the abstract syntax tree. You can probably copy paste from the other rules for the hypotetical Flex/Bison Java compiler.
Not a farmer, but alfalfa can be grown many places. I watched a gabe brown video where he mentioned growing it for cattle grazing in North Dakota, which is basically a cold desert. Presumably US farmers in wetter climates like the upper midwest and southeast are capable of growing more profitable crops than cattle feed.

Just one example: If we switched to electric cars and eliminated the need for the midwest to grow corn for ethanol, then a tremendous amount of farmland would open up. So you're right to ask the macro question, it's just that the answer is complicated.
When you die, your heirs get the stock with "step up basis", meaning the cost basis used to calculate capital gains resets to the market price at time of death. So if they sell right after you die, they pay no capital gains tax.