skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes and no. Paying for Premium and being subscribed for specific content creators gives them money, and isn't impacted by them being demonetised for whatever reason.

Indeed you fuel the whole machine and enable their monopoly though. Content creators don't have much choice anyhow.

That's why personally i pay for Premium ( split between multiple people), have Nebula and force myself to use it for creators on it, and support some on Patreon directly. YouTube is a monopoly and are deeply entrenched - i highly doubt any competitor could dislodge them, but i try to help them nonetheless.
The funny thing is that Samsung is constantly throwing in free crap to try and get people to upgrade to their newer phones. If instead of yet another set of bluetooth headphones, they gave away free wireless doorbell enclosures or something, they could kill two birds with one stone.

Granted, I've never been accused of having much imagination so maybe I'm missing the plot.
he set about investigating the trials and confirmed that they hadn’t ever happened. They all had a lead author who purported to come from an institution that didn’t exist

To me, this doesn't mean that simple distrust is the answer. These are basic issues that should be revealed with even minimal due diligence during the editorial & peer review process.

Peer reviewers and Journal Editors should brink a skeptical mindset to article submissions from the outset before they're ever accepted for publication.

After that? Well, whenever research is on an emerging topic there is a certain amount of scientific skepticism you should use. Same if results go against an established consensus on a topic. However this is where the "replication problem" enters the picture because replicating research has a lower status.

When it comes to media reporting, things get even more complicated. New science is messy. You only have to look at COVID research for the past 1.5 years, and when it's an issue of such public urgency, EVERY development hits the public eye, pulling back the curtain on the sausage factor. Because new science is rarely "Hey look what I discovered!" followed by "Yay we all agree!" It's more of a conversation or dialectic, with ever more research revealing the picture a bit more until there's enough to be confidence in a given interpretation. And even there, work proceeds on alternatives.

The above is very much NOT how science is taught to the public in schools. You learn "Darwin Discovered Evolution!", not the significant years-long process of researchers arguing it out, sometimes even with heated vitriol. You learn "Newton Discovered Gravity!", not all of the complexities and disagreements that continue even to today.

Out education systems have failed society when it comes to truly understanding the scientific process. This is why distrust of science increased. Because in past decades awareness of scientific advances often only reached the public after at least part of the sausage was made, meaning now it looks like it's descended into total disarray.
Well that is a very complex answer as I am not a supporter of the current prison system either. I am not a big fan of "prison punishment", instead I believe prison should be use to separate dangerous people from society, and not involve abuse.

That said in broad strokes, Death is final, and while reintegration may be pretty hard, if a person spent 20 years in prison because society made a mistake, I think that person should get a very large settlement from the state to the point where they never have to work again thus making that transition much easier.
Sure I did. I stopped using the device that was displaying ads for services that I don’t subscribe to. Google will no longer receive ad revenue from me.

So far on my Apple TV I’ve only seen promos (“ads”) for movies/shows on services that I already subscribe to. That is within my personal comfort zone.

I wish that I could replace it with a little computer running Linux, but it’s difficult to find compatible hardware and I don’t have the time or patience to fuss around with it right now.
At 1pm, considering that tides usually go with 6 hours and 15 minutes increments?

(I hope my memory is right, took the RYA exam a while ago)
>Given that such logic was once used to attempt to deny service to and harass PoCs, religious, LGBTQ and other formerly "undesirable" classes, society clearly doesn't buy that logic and made them into protected classes and required businesses to serve them on an equal footing.

No, that was not the logic, businesses were not discriminating based purely on speech and choices of content. That's the point. I mentioned Protected Classes, but those are about entire classes of people and things that are innate to their personhood. Skin color and sex/gender being obvious ones, but disabilities either at birth or acquired later in life still are innate aspects. We've decided that public businesses as part of the privileges they have may not discriminate and rightly so.

But none of that has anything to do with actions and expression, and indeed a core part of the point is that all protected classes are in no way "inferior" or less capable of reason, argumentation, responsibility, social activities and so on! No one is born with some political alignment, as humans we all have to develop that ourselves.

>* It's not a valid argument unless you're arguing to roll back protected classes too*

No, because the worldview you've come to about given issues, morals and so on have nothing to do with protected classes.
Affirming the consequent, sometimes called converse error, fallacy of the converse, or confusion of necessity and sufficiency, is a formal fallacy of taking a true conditional statement (e.g., "If the lamp were broken, then the room would be dark,") and invalidly inferring its converse ("The room is dark, so the lamp is broken,") even though the converse may not be true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent
By the OS, not by the scheduler
see https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpressler/loom/loom/sol1_part2....
Biographies of developers or successful/failed projects are great to listen to I.e. Masters of Doom and the like.
The problem with that is that the very definition of "uncanny" is that it is subjective. You see it and feel that it is off, without being able to explain why.
Man, this article had me interested at the mention of "Progressive Networks" and RealNetworks.
Blast from the past. Not heard Progressive Networks in a good while haha
Peer review is shit. It's elitist, it's actively anti innovation and enforces the status quo.

Peer review should happen out in the open and not just be limited to academics.
Check out Mushroom Observer[1], and use the map or search feature to find observations in your state. You can also search by genus or species.

[1] https://mushroomobserver.org/
> getting unfortunately common

I would say fortunately common. The sooner the C preprocessor (and C itself for that matter) can die, the better for everybody.
XHTML was a neat idea, replaced by something much less elegant.
Replace trees with vines and place them mostly on the south side of the buildings and it may be viable. The trick would be engineering a renewable substrate for the vines to grow on.
Launch HN: Work at a Fintech – job board for fintech startups
I came to the same conclusion the same way but it felt wrong due to the phrase "They combined their money to buy one book to share". Perhaps the phrase lost something in translation.
Different folks have different motivations.

Capitalists want to legalize for profit.

SJWs want to legalize to reduce the prison population.

Libertarians want to legalize because one should be free to choose what they do with their bodies.

Users want to legalize because they don't want to deal with the risk, and prefer above-board retail.

Your characterization of smoking as a "vice" is your personal belief, and personally speaking, I see forcing that belief on others as a vice.
> Or maybe you use sqlite in dev/tests and something bigger in prod.

I had that for a while. SQLite for the test suite and Postgres for actual runs. It was a shitshow, having to support two separate SQL dialects with separate feature sets. Then I realized that you can actually bootstrap and start a Postgres in tmpfs in about one second, so that's what my tests do nowadays.
How is "model.fit(X,Y)" better than "fit!(model,X,Y)"?

Julia is object oriented in a broad sense, it just uses multiple dispatch which is strictly more expressive than single dispatch, so doesn't make sense to have dot notation for calling methods because types don't own methods.

For giving up some facility in function discover, you get speed, composability, generic code...and a net gain in usability because you can have one array abstraction for GPUs, CPUs etc etc, which is just an instance of having common verbs across the ecosystem (enabled by MD). Instead of everyone having their own table type or stats package, you have Tables.jl or Statsbase.jl that packages can plug into and extend without the issues inherent in subclassing, monkeypatching etc.

This is a much better, more powerful and pleasant experience

Closing the gap in Method discovery will simply require a language feature with tooling integration, where you write the types and then tab to get the functions. There's already an open issue/PR for this
>iOS is the least worst mobile option and it’s ridiculous to say Apple is lying about security if any exploits are found, ever.

Speaking of companies lying... You are holding your phone wrong, and your keyboard works fine.

Oh and your apps might have a backdoor, but it took getting sued by Epic for us to let anyone know that.

Apply lying is about as common as a politician lying.
I have an amusing letter from the lawyers working for powerinsole threatening legal action for asking questions and that I should remove all my comments from social media. It was also demanded that I pay approx 350 euro that the letter cost to write. My response was to invest in the cost of the device, tear it down on video and post the analysis to facebook. That was more than 6 months ago. I have not heard from the lawyer since. I'll happily go to court with a printed t-shirt with the text "where is the battery?" but it won't come to that I guess.
I was wondering the same thing but Kopecks are not currently subdivided.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopek
Does prime still have these inbetween episode ads for their other shows? I have been considering going back but I don't want to pay for a service that does that.
Forget Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey Is the Hero Bitcoin Deserves for the Coming Years
>Anyone who assures you otherwise is not to be trusted.

I had a college roomate who gambled with his student loans in the stock market.

He tried to convince me to invest a few weeks before COVID tanked the market. He even questioned me why I was waiting to pull the trigger.
Odds are that a single climate conference dwarfs all the billionaire funded space missions for the next 50 years.
"...Ian Roberts, professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, began to have doubts about the honest reporting of trials after a colleague asked if he knew that his systematic review showing the mannitol halved death from head injury was based on trials that had never happened. He didn’t, but he set about investigating the trials and confirmed that they hadn’t ever happened. They all had a lead author who purported to come from an institution that didn’t exist and who killed himself a few years later. The trials were all published in prestigious neurosurgery journals and had multiple co-authors. None of the co-authors had contributed patients to the trials, and some didn’t know that they were co-authors until after the trials were published. When Roberts contacted one of the journals the editor responded that “I wouldn’t trust the data.” Why, Roberts wondered, did he publish the trial? None of the trials have been retracted."

I realize that meta-analysis is regarded as a valid research method, if not one of the best, but honestly, I don't know why. If the original studies are garbage, no amount of statistical manipulation is going to make them not-garbage.
IIRC, MacOS is well known for leaving .DS_Store droppings absolutely everywhere. If you ever shared a pen drive with a MacOS user, it would come back full of .DS_Store junk all over it. It might be that one you're recalling.
They had me at the work "power insole". Though I guess not in a good way. I expect a fairly meticulous definition of terms. If a piece of research sets off my marketing-BS sensors this early, it's usually all downhill from there.
How do you know they didn't, in fact, act with racial bias?
Loading was super slow for me. Archived copy: https://archive.is/kx3o9
There is a difference in belief that the authority is good in general and accepting the existing authority; when I talk about deference to authority, I mean the former, but it doesn't always translate to or imply the latter.

I think it is a useful value (and so it evolved in humans), because it forms the basis of parent-child relationship and the transfer of culture. So as young, we reluctantly defer to authority of our parents and other elders, and as we grow older, we begin to believe in the existence of authority as necessary to prevent the cultural collapses due to social experimentation gone wrong (which might result as pursuit of other human values). The fear of such cultural collapse (and the need to prevent them, through authority) is the focal point of conservative values.

Of course, in modern society, this gets pretty muddled, because the rate of change in societies has accelerated and actual authorities (in power) are often younger and change too quickly to really facilitate the transfer of life experience between generations. From this grows various forms of resentment, which is further shaped by ideological propaganda. My point is, I believe that the demand for more authoritarianism comes from people who believe that culture (they grew in) is in peril and want to slow or stop the rate of its change.

It might also be a reason why people believe in God - as Dan Dennett pointed out, it's more like that people believe that belief in God is itself a good thing, rather than necessarily believing in God as an existing being. This is, again, a manifestation of the belief that some authority is required.
This is inaccurate or out of date or both. Some species of Psilocybe look just like Galerina and sometimes grow right next to them.
The congress party signing an MOU is public information, but the contents are secrets.
What’s New in Python 3.11
Good points, but as far as I can tell, there's nothing preventing you from spawning a bunch of Loom-thread backed `CompletableFuture`s and waiting on them.
For our team, the reason is standardization. We have our entire baremetal infrastructure running Kubernetes. There is no process for running anything in not-a-Docker-container. This does come with some caveats for stateful databases, but it's still easier to manage than a special-snowflake environment for database deployments.
Never heard of a car color being illegal. As long as it has the mandated lighting and reflectors, how could it not be visible at night?
I turned my monitor off and saw the most disgusting creature staring back at me. No idea why you'd want to paint that around your house.
What surprisingly bugged me more than the potential climate impact was not feeling the same kind of excitement after seeing passengers in space during Virgin Galactics flight.

Dunno, but I've always felt some deeper sense of wonder when seeing astronauts fly to space or onboard the ISS. The vision to start a company like that aside, space tourists just had to shell out enough cash to go up there. This alone might be an exciting thought for us as a species, but it imho isn't what space travel should be about. It's hard to find any purpose in just shooting rich people to space.
> :is(article, aside, nav, section) ...

> The :is selector is pretty damn cool. Given the combinatorial nature of these groupings, writing something like this in CSS before :is would’ve been insane:

> /* keep going _forever_ */

In this case, there would have been 4^5 = 1024 selectors. Large enough to be annoying to a human, but small enough to be parsed and stored in memory.
It's my biggest weakness, so it's definitely not like I have this fully under control.

The problem I have around tool paralysis is mostly related to permanence, especially when each choice is technically really good but has their own individual known flaws.

I'll fearlessly try a bunch of things out, implement the same project in each thing, compare my results and then pick one based on what feels best for me when the thing I'm implementing doesn't take a long time.

Editing a specific video is a great example of something with little permanence. You can try out a few audio / video editing tools in a few days while you actively do your editing and then pick the one the best meshes with your brain and stick with it until it becomes a problem. Each video might take a few hours to edit from beginning to end, and is a self contained unit for the most part. That's what makes it feel pretty temporary to me.

But for me, building a long living web app, or the idea of a SAAS app is one of the hardest things to pick a language or web framework for because you can easily talk yourself into thinking "well this is my potential life, it needs to be the right tech choice or I'm stuck with the wrong decision forever".

But this is an illusion. I know it's an illusion, I've proven to myself multiple times it's an illusion and there's countless examples online showing this is an illusion but damn it, this permanence magician is really good so I often find myself going back and forth, implementing bits and pieces in 1 thing but never feeling motivated to finish because I always think there's something better just around the corner.

With that said, the thing that pushes me over the edge to actually do it is usually the act of making a decision and running with it. Knowing full well this isn't a perfect solution but a perfect solution or tool or tech stack doesn't exist. It's just picking the thing that checks off the most boxes on what you like and prefer and then embracing it.

In the end, nothing beats your own personal experience. If 7 people say a tool sucks and 3 people say the same tool is amazing that doesn't mean the tool sucks. It means 3 people found a tool they really like and it's working for them. Don't let reviews or others fully control your decision. Absolutely take their feedback into account but never follow the crowd for the sake of following the crowd.
Try to contact the other two. You can reach Peter Kolba here https://www.verbraucherschutzverein.at/Kontakt/ or on Twitter even https://twitter.com/KolbaPeter. He won the case against Volkswagen so if anyone can help you then him.

The University of Salzburg also has a "Ethikkommission" https://www.plus.ac.at/service/uni-administration/gesamtuniv... and "Kommission zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis" https://www.plus.ac.at/service/uni-administration/gesamtuniv...
And on the other side, how does not being open-source stop people from patching the bits anyway (maybe not legally, but no one can stop you writing to a storage device you own)? If anything, I think OSS is just a distraction from the real issue, which is companies trying to lock out users from the hardware they own in the name of "security".
Indira Gandhi was 3 to 4 generations ago. All those who are critical of Modi's method now are just as critical of Indira Gandhi's methods, they are the same barring the difference that IG had made it official.

The point remains that IG is now an object of history, the people from her congress are mostly dead, if not all dead. On the other hand Modi and his methods are an objective reality now.

I don't see how it follows that IG's grandson would adopt the methods adopted by her. In fact it is offensive to suggest that.
> One thing I really missed in Julia is Object Oriented Programming as a first class paradigm.

Julia peeps would tell you that the multiple dispatch used by Julia is a generalization of OOP. And that they like multiple dispatch
The Bad Marriage Problem (In Startups)
Holy... ! That second video, the character on the right, one of her incisors ends up in the middle of her mouth. It's amazing how these things can get so many details right, just from analyzing existing images, but some details like the symmetry of teeth get lost.
Let’s Encrypt ACME is a service that many depend on for their services, like Netlify, Synology, or Digital Ocean. It is true that existing certificates on existing hosts shouldn’t be impacted, but new certificates will be, and in my opinion that does actually matter. There may even be legitimate use cases for lazily grabbing certs in the request path; it’s pretty easy to do given that the Go ACME integrations basically do this plus some caching and scheduled renewal logic.

This is of course aside from the OCSP point that others are noting, which does at least make PKI downtime a little more sketchy.
This is intriguing, can you describe in more detail how you map a series of numbers to a shape/sound?

like is 1234 a slope /

?
I have no idea if there's research directly linking the two areas together, but what you're describing sounds more like a form of synesthesia than this more general effect. When I think of "bouba" and "kiki" I don't have any mental visualization...it's just that if I see these shapes and have to name them, one pairing feels a little more "right" than the other. Having mental visualizations associated with particular words, letters, musical notes, etc. is synesthesia. It's also very, very cool. And I guess the article does note near the bottom that there may be some relationship. But the bouba/kiki effect is definitely more widespread than synesthesia.
> your bluetooth headphones are sending a play command to your device

Yep this is what's happening. I have a car bluetooth addon that I purchased that does the same thing -- it sends Play commands to the phone on-connect repeatedly until something starts playing.

By default the phone will open Apple Music but if I already had been playing music on the Spotify app, it'll just start playing that instead.
For the team that I am in, I can see a huge productivity boost if my teammates can write in direct style instead of wrapping their heads around monads.
I couldn’t agree more. I am so frustrated by the tone of many of these HN posts along the lines of “it doesn’t solve a big enough portion so don’t inconvenience me at all.” And then magically nothing changes and everything keeps getting worse. shocked face
I don't believe in decolonizing archives.

(It's amazing that the article says this with complete seriousness.)
> governments are at minimum accountable to voters

Voting on how government spends money is in no conceivable way like you deciding how to spend your money.

> Private money is in no way accountable

It's accountable to the people who are providing the funds out of their own pockets. People do not like wasting their own money.

I bet you look at your own budget. You have to, otherwise you'll be in jail for bouncing checks and tax evasion. I also bet you've never looked at your city, county, state or federal budget. It's other peoples' money, so who cares!