skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think the paper justifies the statement as you put it, though perhaps you can point out what I'm missing. I don't think you can tell just from looking at the particle itself whether it has an entangled partner somewhere in the universe.

It is, however, possible to use the entangled partners to create systems with decidedly counter-intuitive properties that change the way the un-involved partner interacts. That's also the essence of Bell's Theorem.

It only works when you're controlling the experiment as a whole and thus not transmitting information faster than light... though you can set up the experiment in a way that makes the conventional transmission of information incredibly obscure. Bell's Theorem requires you to jump through a lot of hoops to exactly mimic that, which is why it took a long time to definitively rule out other interpretations of the experiments.
>What flags you have in mind?

-Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html

This is common knowledge for ages. Any cursory Google search returns countless answers.

Take this post made over a decade ago.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1730255/gcc-shouldnt-a-w...
We can start by writing software that doesn't have any features at all, and save ourselves the trouble of removing them later. /s
> Exploratory analysis is p-hacking.

It literally is not.
Why are you "quite sure"? What are the consequences of having naked photos of yourself out there in the world that would cause most people to regret it?
All analogies are flawed because the underlying reality is different. They can still be useful if they can communicate some more abstract idea.

An analogy I like for entanglement is to picture two atoms that will both decay at the same time. You could place them on other sides of the planet and until one is observed to decay nobody learns anything because the timing is unpredictable. After the observation people agree with that timing independent of distance but can’t communicate anything because the timing was random. Still, having two people both knowing some fact at the same time which can’t be observed by outsiders is a useful in it’s own way.

What I like about this is it’s clear what’s going on is different from what’s being described, it’s describing a property of something, and it separates information from communication. On the other hand it’s got plenty of it’s own problems.
sudden urge to do this in 3d.

currently spins a 1d circular emitter through space.

instead, spin a nested set of 1d circular emitters, to add volume.
It was news because it was the first manned flight of a private launch provider. That doesn't happen often and it is an important milestone.
7 years, wow. Is that the oldest example of Mozilla selling out?
I wonder if you could beam power to an airplane instead, or maybe even have a low-flying airplane touch electrical wires. An airplane with no battery -- solves a lot of the Maglev problems.
I think your question presumes among other things that the wife has better career options and/or no need for money, or we have a better idea than the wife what career is best for her.

I don't think any of us have any idea what the facts of the situation is. So it's not clear to me anyone is "enabling" anything.
The security staff isn't building the exhibit in a vacuum. They're working alongside professional curators.
As someone who travels frequently with both plane and trains, (Modern) trains are much more pleasant to ride than planes.

- More space (including the Chinese ones). While it might not be wider than a plane, it's order of magnitudes longer. So, each row has less seats, and rows are much farther from each other than on a plane.

- More room for bags and suitcases as well. There's usually no need to check your luggage, unless you have an excessive amount of them.

- No turbulence

- You can stand, walk, eat, drink, open the table, work with electronics, etc. at any time.

- No long-ass waiting time before and after. For a 8:00 train, all you need is to be able to walk onto it at 7:59. Whereas for a plane, they won't let you on unless you are present at the gate before 7:45 (the exact time depends on the airport). And not to mention the security checks.

- Quietness

- Air is better
It's YouTube ads free. If in the video itself the creator(s) advertise something, it doesn't magically skip it.
CC-BY-NC explicitly prohibits commercial usage.

It’s also common to see GPL license for non-commercial usage and paid licenses for commercial usage.
Mozilla is the last organization keeping us from the complete takeover of the web by Google/Webkit and they seem to be held to an impossibly high standard by users. There's no FTP support in Chrome, there's terrible support for Adblock, there's telemetry, etc, but somehow Mozilla has to be 100% perfect.

This is why we can't have nice things and why the internet is going to become Chrome-first.
How to achieve code quality with DevOps
The main issue with old code, is that it slows down refactoring.
Maybe!

> A number of later studies have concluded that a global sea level rise of 200 to 270 cm (6.6 to 8.9 ft) this century is "physically plausible".[8][2][9]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
Let's look at it from the Hollywood angle: SpaceX clearly wins in explosions per minute, but on the other hand BlueO has Vin Diesel (I might have squinted too hard)
"we would be doing mostly the same things, but in a more complicated way" is a pretty good summary considering their use cases seem to be well covered by autoscaling groups (which, incidentally, are a thing other clouds have)

It's OK to not use k8s. We should normalize that.
That is on me. The example here was more intended to show that IAPAC got what it wanted out of Trump presidency.

You are correct to point out that people of Appallachia did not get anything of value out of that exchange.

Since that is the case, would you accept Keystone Pipeline ( https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/trump-administration-app... ), which was approved and, arguably, allowed for a lowering of energy cost across US?

< It doesn't take much to to give people what they want.

I do disagree with that statement. This is the hardest thing in politics.
Why I have the felling that all the SpaceX fanboys would have the exact opposite opinions if this would be Chinese satellites,

- they could use fewer

- I am from US why Chinese internet shoudl affect me

China, Russia, India will also want their own constellations so I am waiting for when this happen and the hypocrisy starts.
I've been posting this explaination for more than 10 years now:

http://www.felderbooks.com/papers/bell.html

I think I prefer Felder's explaination more than Quanta's. It's omitting some details (eg. the angles) but is better at explaining the difficulties of Bell's Inequality--why it seems like spooky action at a distance and why it cannot be used for communication.
For example, I've just reported this: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537

You can find more cases in the bugtracker. To be fair, it seems many of them were fixed in recent releases.
«A derivative work is based on a work that has already been copyrighted. The new work arises—or derives—from the previous work.

If you own the copyright to a work, you need to be aware that you also have rights to derivative works. If you're considering incorporating someone else's work into your new work, you need to be aware that you may be violating the copyright to the original work.»

https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/what-are-derivative-works...
While we are at it, let's remove the domain name and replace it with something readable and maybe just default to Google without the ability to change your home or maybe Facebook. /s
I encourage you to read and listen to the stories of sex workers who are speaking their experience directly. Here's a former sex worker I really like on TikTok who is part of a wave of Gen Z'ers who are pushing back on the narrative that sex work is somehow liberating, good, or healthy. [1]

[1] https://www.tiktok.com/@profitfromtrauma/video/6926281617094...
FTP is Internet browsing, it's just not not "web".
Considering StackOverflow rewards speed, and that most common questions fall into category of "how do I make thing X work?" - a good proportion of highly voted answers already come pre-loaded with vulnerabilities.

And no, I'm not being snarky. I wish I was.
I mean it takes half the time to build in Xcode on the same machine.

I think you’re also confusing runtime code (dynamics) with reflection. Dynamics rely on reflection. AOT has issues where reflection would be used: generics, serialization, Activator, etc.
FTA: "To date, many malware distribution campaigns launch their attacks by compromising FTP servers and downloading malware on an end user’s device using the FTP protocol."

It removes a malware vector going through Firefox.

But seriously, who's serving FTP but doesn't serve HTTPS?
Personally I prefer the superdeterminism arguement: i.e. the state of every "future" entanglement was already set "before" the big bang. The anthropocentric corollary is that "free will" is an illusion.
This is exactly why I anticipate every grade school teaching kids Esperanto any day now

As someone who uses both but mostly metric, neither one is difficult to use. Metric relationships between volume and energy and heat are cool - but they are linked to the present day earth at sea level, which in the future might be just as archaic as Fahrenheit being linked to an erroneous human body temperature measurement
I thought we should be familiar with this kind of corp speak from Firefox team. This is what they say every time they break or remove useful features in the pursuit of chromification.
He got elected on a reactionary populist platform, and if he (or Bannon, rather) had any desire to shift American policy, he inevitably got discouraged from doing so by Washington's unelected bureaucracy. So he ended up using his largely ceremonial 4 years of power to enrich his family and friends.
You can do that in any language; just write software that no one uses. The rest of it needs to be maintained regardless of what language was used.
I used to agree with this, but with how easy it is to run MITM attacks these days I think there is a pretty compelling argument for removing plaintext FTP. I don't think FTPS should go, but tbh I don't think I have ever encountered an FTPS server in-the-wild.

It's one thing to have your password stolen, but another thing entirely to have your download and its shasum/md5sum/whatever sidecar file replaced in-flight
>It's much better not to do dumb things than to do dumb things and then try to fix it. Yes, it's good to fix one's mistakes, but that doesn't mean we should be celebrating those mistakes.

But nobody was celebrating the mistake. The comment was literally commending someone's resolution of that mistake.

The assertion you're making/supporting is incredibly arrogant because it implies that living a life without mistakes is possible. As cliche as it sounds, nobody is perfect. It is not possible to live life without error.

In other words "Just don't make mistakes" is not advice: it is ego-tripping.
Let's look at this from the other end of the horse.

FTP is a horrible kludge that needs to be depreciated. SFTP is better.
The number of ports needed, holes punched in firewalls, everything sent in plain-text, inability to traverse NAT without more kludge and hacky work-arounds. We only tolerate it because it was the only thing that worked.

There are better/newer methods that should be embraced.

We don't bemoan the death of Gopher, or Finger do we? Hell no. FTP does have it's uses, but I'd dare wager that every-single-instance could be upgraded to SFTP and the world would move on.

Legacy, ancient apps that haven't been touched in 40 years; will break. Let them.
At one job, the order came on down from on high that we had to do timesheets, but we had to log precisely 7.2 hours a day. So I made a little emacs lisp function to adjust my times proportionally. Hot key was C-M f (for Fraud) :)
They are using cloudformation which predates Kubernetes and it's meant to solve the same problem. CloudFormation still uses docker, originally it used AMIs. I've worked for a lot of Fortune 500 companies that don't use Kubernetes and use Docker.
The hard thing of kubernetes, is that it sounds easy to do something/anything. It does, and because it's "easy" people tend to skip to understand how it's working: That's where the problem occurs.

It _forces_ you to become a "yaml engineer" and to forget the other part of the systems. I was interviewed by a company and when I replied the next step I could do was to write some operators for the ops things, they simply rejected because I'm too experienced lolz
Nope, literally not. It's an internet service, sure, but not the web.
FTP might be dying in other sectors, but at least in biomed research, I would use FTP anyday when the alternative protocol needs a client app and a bunch of configurations. It's also handy when sharing data.

Browser support is important here because those files are often not explored from command line etc, but rather the FTP links are placed on individual pages as a quick download. At least for me, it's much more convinient to click and wget, than reading a page then switch window to query from API/client...
You could have said that, too, about universal TLS.
Here you go: https://github.com/kelseyhightower/nocode
Very cool, I really like your innovative approach!

How are you creating the courses - by yourself, or do you have instructors?
We already commodify human interactions. Dating for starters (and arranged marriages before that). You could run the gamut of dates on your own or pay a matchmaker to set you up with a guaranteed relationship (or your money back). There's rarely a point to doing something the hard way if a successful shortcut is available, so long as all involved understand what they're getting out of it.
> This is frustrating. FTP is really handy for distributing some files and there are lots of servers in place that now Firefox users can’t access.

Why are people still using ftp rather than http?
Russia’s Checkmate Light Tactical Fighter Is Officially Unveiled
No, it's a fictional TV show
Stop spiritual fornication and turn to the living God. Jeremiah 2:13 John 14:6
> I disagree that we should deride rich people for spending money the way they want.

Why?

Is it ok if I deride people who molest their own kids? I mean, it's how they choose to spend their time, who am I to judge right?

The way society works is by deciding collectively what's ok, and that's decided based on people's tastes.

My tastes are that no small group of people should have power over large groups of people without their ongoing consent. Any system that isn't like that is garbage and anyone interested in power over other people is human garbage.

Today's society is wage slavery in developed countries, colonialism and barbarism everywhere else - it is garbage and anyone with a modicum of power doing anything but attempting to change the status quo is clueless or human garbage.

Why would wage slaves not resent their masters, or people colonized, not resent colonialists? Anything but deep resentment and derision is surprising, frankly.
I did my PhD in agriculture at OSU and the amount and type of pesticides used in the US is criminal. The fact that so much damage has been done to farmers and consumers yet nothing is done is the best evidence I have that the US government is complicit in making money off the suffering of its citizens.
This story warms my heart. Thank you for doing the right thing.
Isn't all of theoretical physics pure mathematics? That's the point.

Well, maybe not "pure", but HUP isn't particularly "pure" either.
Scaling is a sexy problem to have. Most places crate problems to solve just for the appeal. They're spending angel investor money, not their own, so prolonging the time to production is in their favor.
Why not to ask them directly?
I made a relatively large list of reasons. Most are going to sound fickle but I consider some to be very problematic if you’re woken up at 3am and have to orient yourself- others I consider problematic because they cause an order of magnitude increase in complexity.

Mostly it’s an issue of perception too, a cloud saves me time. If it doesn’t save me time it is not worth the premiums and for our case- it would not save time. (Due to the complexity mentioned before).

But here’s part of list (with project specific items redacted):

3am topics:

* Project name (impossible to see which project you're in, usually it's based on "account" but that gets messed up with SSO)

* instance/object names (`i-987348ff`, `eip-7338971`, `sub-87326`) are hard to understand meaning of.

* Terminated instances fill UI.

* Resources in other regions may as well not exist, they're invisible- sometimes only found after checking the bill for that month.

Time cost topics (stumbling things that make things slower):

* Placements only supported on certain instances

* EBS optimised only supported on certain instances

Other:

* Launch configurations (user_data) only 16KiB, life-cycling is hard also, user-data is a terrible name.

* 58% more objects and relationships (239 -> 378 LoC after terraform graph)

* networking model does not make best practice easy (Zonal based network, not regional)

* Committed use (vs sustained use) discounts means you have to run cost projections _anyway_ (W.R.T. cost planning on-prem vs cloud)

* no such thing as an unmanaged instance group (you need an ASG which can be provisioned exclusively with a user-data (launch script in real terms)

* managed to create a VPC where nothing could talk to anything. Even cloud experts couldn't figure it out, not very transparent or easy to debug.

Sticky topics (things that make you buy more AWS services or lock-in):

* Use Managed ES! -> AWS ES Kibana requires usage of separately billed cognito service if you want SAML SSO.

* Number of services brought in for a simple pipeline: https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/implementations/game-analyt...

* Simple things like auto-scaler instances being incrementally named requires lambda: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53615049/method-to-provi...

* CDK/Cloudformation is the only "simple" way to automatically provision infra.
How many of those who are saying that this is for the greater good could be bothered to call up and fight for local fiber. Comcast and ATT spend billions in a town and stall that and that ad campaign gets you side tracked.

Your inabilities at distinguishing the fake from truth shouldn't take away the night sky from all of us.

Go fight the big companies instead of sitting here and talking. Start a local WISP.

Stop waiting for the billionaires to save you.

This is exactly how the rich stay rich. By dividing us and preying on the natural resources.

Nobody goes and fights BSNL in India or the local telecoms in Philippines to establish better wireless links.

This is basically moving the goalposts from one duopoly to another one soon.

For those that haven't seen the sky, go take a trip to natural park. This is akin to saying, I don't use sea water because it is salty. Let some company mine to for oil, because it is for the "greater good"

Nobody should be apologizing for a company. Companies as is cause as much harm as possible. We need better regulation to put checks in these comments and rich ass billionaires who think the world is their toy.
Is there anything existing that avoids having to stop the whole train at each stop? For drop-offs, just detach the back train car at a stop. Everyone who wants to get off just moves to the back train car at each stop. For pick-ups, some relatively high-ish speed coupling to add a car at the front of the train. In this way, the train loses one car and gains one car per stop. And as the train progresses, it also slowly turns around, ready for the return trip. Sidings at each stop can allow the boarding and un-boarding process to happen without tying up the track for through-traffic. Seems like something like this must have been tried at some point. Why is this not a thing?
Out of the replies I got so far, I liked this one best. Unfortunately the story is off the front page already, so I doubt there will be much more discussion.

In my view, artists work the same way. If you ask them to draw Mickey Mouse, they (maybe) will. It wouldn't be fair to say that they are infringing on Disney's copyright by storing images of Mickey Mouse in their brain. But their version of Mickey Mouse won't be copyrightable (unless they add parody/significant creativity etc.).

If we perform an _exact_ simulation of a human brain such that it believes it is a human, how will copyright law work? (Maybe it will own the copyright and turning the simulation off would be robocide. Okay, enough sci-fi.) If we remove consciousness and all that from the simulation, will the copyright go to its creator?

I saw in a couple other comments saying that machine learning is "just an algorithm"... But is machine learning sufficiently different from the way some parts of the human brain work to warrant being held to different standards?

My opinion is that it's reasonably similar and should have the same privileges that humans enjoy -- learning from whatever's in sight that is not explicitly marked as "for authorized personnel only".
The concern here is more that a lot of old websites embed ftp:// URLs into their links, which this will break.

Now they have to be handled by an external protocol handler, and I'd bet most of us don't have one set up, so things will be a little bumpy for a bit
I'm confused by this comment. Do you mean to say that Buddhists ought to engage in religious flame wars? FWIW, Buddhism is fairly centered on self-improvement, with idolatry being generally seen as respectful reverence, or at worst as lucky charms.

I don't see the problem in taking just the teachings of a belief system while ignoring the idolatry aspect. In fact, some western takes on religion could use less idolatry.
> Due to Chessbase’s repeated license violations, leading developers of Stockfish have terminated their GPL license with ChessBase permanently.

What do they mean by this?
CPC: Here's some money to move out, take it or leave it. You're still moving out though.
I think doing the engineering design of structures and machines (buildings, bridges, engines, etc.) is still a creative endeavor after many hundreds of years, and I think this is the closest analogue to what software engineers do. The difference is that once we have the blueprints drawn (ie. the code written), a computer can just execute them rather than requiring a lot more material and labor inputs. Program execution is the right analogue to manufacturing, not program creation.
Oh hey, I made that, but it was taken down by what was then called Zeit. Looks like that didn't persist through their Vercel rename.

Note that it just fetches the current URL from Wikidata.
Negative because the loan interest rate is below inflation?
Yes, but these constellations aren't designed to serve 'everyone without internet', they are designed to serve areas with low population density where physical connections are financially infeasible, hence my usage of 'boonies'.
I mean dead as in since they've only been frozen humans have not been in contact with it. If it somehow gets out, then it's able to spread again!