skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The article seems to be saying that one particular "discovery" is not part of this pattern. That is, an actual cemetery in Cranbrook.

Among the pieces of context, the article says that graves are "unmarked" had wooden markers once.

They were "burned or deteriorated", but it doesn't say who burned them and how/why.

“What happened in these other places is these remains have been found not in graveyards, that’s the big difference,” Pierre said. “It’s horrible.”

“To just assume that every unmarked grave inside a graveyard is already tied to a residential school, we’ve got to be a little bit more respectful of our people who are buried in our graveyards,” Pierre said.

“We just buried one of our people there last month,” Pierre said. “Anyone who died in my community would be buried there.”

"she said the findings at the cemetery near Cranbrook isn’t the same as the other findings at other residential schools throughout the country"
And where does all that contaminated waste water go?
Major news organizations pre-write obituaries for famous people and update them occasionally if anything changes.

see https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/539363/do-media-outlets-...

Most likely Mr. Shanahan's obituary had been written years ago and updated for recent events that happened to him and his family (his arrest, his son's crime).

Another website mentions that his death was due to complications from surgery. see https://michaelmaslin.com/remembering-danny-shanahan1957-202...
You're ignoring the part of the transaction where Tesla gets a $16k battery pack for free with $700 worth of damage to it. Want to charge full price for the new pack? Fine, but I'm keeping the old one or you're paying me market value for it as is. This is where the profit margin is for Tesla, you think they just throw these slightly damaged packs in the trash?
The whole “right to repair” thing gets a lot of traction with this crowd. One of the worst offenders is John Deere, which won’t let you repair your own tractor. Vehicles are mostly software now so tinkering with them is basically criminalized under the CFAA.

This sucks and echoes the repairability problems with modern laptops and phones. Apple and the other major consumer tech companies make more money by selling stuff that can’t be fixed, or that only they can fix. That gets consumers slightly thinner, less expensive stuff, but it’s terrible for e waste and weakens the secondary market for tech, making tech more expensive overall while boosting corporate profits.

So, to answer your question, you could probably get traction by talking about people who are building tools that aren’t encumbered by repairablility and IP problems. Let’s see some open/source crop cycles. Let’s see bootleg tractor repair. Let’s see weird local regulations that force people to play fair.
There is the threshold where these theories rule in human plausible warp drives, and then there is the weaker threshold where these theories rule in that they should be taken as serious explanations for the alleged “advanced technology” demonstrated by UAPs. I wonder what we ought to expect to see from such a device as an observer if the geometric formulation here is correct, even if we can’t explain the energy management problems. It sure would be nice if this research adds tools to the scientific community to start forming decent falsifiable hypotheses within the scope of an assumption of a given incident being such a tech demo.
What's your background? How much and how recently have you done math? Do you do much computational work? Answering these questions will be useful for helping find target resources.
Tesla’s own factories use all sorts of shoddy fixes. This is a legitimate fix that you could expect at any licensed mechanic and that Tesla would likely use it they had a parts shortage. Not every repair needs to be done with perfect oem replacement parts. Good luck getting an insurance company to cover 100% replacement during an accident for example.
At least in your case, someone is fixing it. In MS case, the broken windows seem to stay that way and pile up eternally and I'm not even sure if the engineers who could fix them become aware of them. I did get escalated/sent around to a bunch of different people, seemingly all at different levels of indirection. I assume the issues are still exactly the same several years later.
I think on a scale of years, yes. But it requires churn. I work with a team that hasn't had any turnover since their office days and they behave the same. I'm talking 1-2 hours of Zoom calls with 8 engineers M-Th most weeks.

Only one person can talk on Zoom at once..the project is going slower and they don't know why.
In Singapore, rent in buildings known to have "bad feng shui" are measurably cheaper than in buildings with "good feng shui". So even though the belief itself may be irrational, if you're a property developer or a banker catering to clients who do believe, it's still rational to invest in a geomancer.
Eagleview | Senior Software Engineer | Remote

Eagleview is an industry leader in geospatial software using aerial imagery. We provide an accurate modeling of the built world.

Come join our small, 100% remote, US based, work/life balance focused team.

We are looking for somebody
- with experience or strong interest in 3D modeling development and/or mapping technologies
- with opinions on code & software technologies (using the right tool for the job)
- comfortable informing design & best practice decisions

I’ve thoroughly enjoyed my time with this team, and am happy to answer questions about the work.

Apply here: https://recruit.hirebridge.com/v3/CareerCenter/v2/details.as...
> Intriguingly, all Borgs carry large FtsZ-tubulin homologs that may be involved in membrane remodeling or division, and proteins that resemble Major Vault Proteins and the TEP1-like TROVE domain protein that also do not occur in Methanoperedens genomes (Table S5). These are known to form the highly conserved and enigmatic eukaryotic vault organelle, a ribonucleoprotein that has been suggested to be involved in multidrug resistance, nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, mRNA localization, and innate immunity.

I can't follow most of this, but the phrase "highly conserved and enigmatic eukaryotic vault organelle" jumped out at me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vault_(organelle)
In many parts of the country they spray it on public roadways as "de-icer" in the winter.
was thinking a toyota or a honda.

btw, I would take a ford over a tesla any day
The New Pornographers, maybe?
Dual core is nice for example when you need a little bit more processing power say for something like https://github.com/atomic14/esp32_audio
Flow batteries aren't a fantasy. RedFlow is shipping them now and has multiple large sites powered by them.

I worked in the same building as them some years back, and they installed backup for the solar system in around 2016 there.
Because Tesla owns the car (It is a leased car) and want it fixed according to the manufacturer's specifications (which happens to be them). It is not an unreasonable request.

However I completely understand the complaints people are making about repairability and insurance shennanigans etc.
For channels and other things in the local OS process, you should have a good idea. Give or take being in major swap problems, etc., but I think of that as an "already lost" situation; at that point the problem isn't the expense of moving things between threads or local processes anyhow.

When you get out into discussing network matters, it gets a lot fuzzier. You may "know" that you're only .025ms away from something in some specific system, but your TCP-based API doesn't necessarily "know" that and will happily use the exact same code to do something that takes 4 orders of magnitude larger. That's enough difference to be problematic.
Even for aerospace you can use equivalent or stronger parts for repair. You can even reverse engineer part capability and build a stronger part
I'm not nearly as worried about fracking when it comes to PFAS/PFOAs as I am about airports. It is well documented, that airports (especially military ones) have used PFAS/PFOAs as firefighting agents for years and years. If you live near an airport, you should not be drinking groundwater. If you absolutely must, then get it tested!
> A channel can be buffered or unbuffered

Yes, with predictable results.

> it can be closed

Yes, by the owner/sender, who then understands it as invalid. The effect of receiving on a closed channel is well-defined and predictable.

> and there's different behavior of [recv/send] whether it's in a select or not

I don't think that's true? What do you mean?

> And you often end up with multiple channels as well

Sure! That's part of their power.

> Reviewing code with channels is often more confusing than code that uses mutexes

I totally agree that goroutines and channels are often over-used by new Go programmers. If what you're trying to do is simply protect concurrent access to some shared state, a mutex is the far better choice.
I agree, the weather is very unpredictable. If the Olympics were next year in Utah it would be a disaster. Because of the drought, there is little water. That makes snow making very difficult.

Perhaps they would take water from others “for this higher purpose” but it doesn’t change the fact that there isn’t enough water.

I’d love the Olympics in SLC in 2030 or 2034 but would support finding a place where the winter will remain for a while.
skimming through the source code it is amazing to me that someone could write an entire game like this in assembly. I tried to figure out how things are drawn and how object collisions are detected - I can't
Ask HN: Is it still possible to get started as a solo freelancer?
I've been unemployed as a programmer for a year and a half. I have a degree and lots of experience but no one is interested in hiring me.

So I have the skill but no one wants to hire me. Whatever, I hate working for companies anyways. But is it possible to do freelance work anymore? I mean PROFITABLE freelance work.

I'm going to be honest I'm not going to be able to underbid and outcode on a freelance site. Is there some niche that I can just learn and find work? Similar to how knowing how to make websites used to be enough to do freelance work.
> I still run into deadlocks and panics (writing to a closed channel) when I try to use channels beyond the simplest use cases.

Wild!

The rule is that channels are owned by a single goroutine, who's uniquely responsible for sending on them, and closing them. That's basically it. Do that and everything works fine, in my experience.
Fantastically written summary, thank you!!
He's a drug discovery chemist so explosiveness notwithstanding it's right up his alley.
To be fair when you ask an attorney "how to", their default answer is "don't".
"Soyuz Rocket Struck by Lightning During Launch"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jQVsI7erv8
Does anyone have any experience with high reliability applications with these types of boards? I'm thinking closer to consumer or industrial products, but not person-rated vehicles or medical applications. It seems that these are quite capable boards and designed for accessible and more rapid development, which could be great for getting some projects/products off the ground with lower development risk (as long as we aren't just substituting in hardware risk).
I like how HN arguments involve someone deciding they like a particular technology (concentrated solar) and then imagining an entire non-existant R&D program and industrial infrastructure to support it, despite the physical, economic and technological arguments all being against it.
Mate, your talking about a brass nipple being threaded into a broken plastic part to replace a plastic reducer that was [probably] poorly ultrasonic welded in place. What I see in the article is a common sense repair. Anyone who turns a wrench is laughing at the Tesla fanboy pearl clutching over this. Not an attack on your post btw, just a general statement that every Tesla owner comes out of the cracks in these posts and talks about how magical their cars are and how they are so advanced that no one could possibly understand them. The SAE has programs and industry standards on EV's- every other car manufacturer works with aftermarket shops. Teslas are not made of magic pixie dust and rainbows. The Gen1 tesla roadster was all Toyota parts. Their advanced motor technology is based on reluctance motors invented in the late 1800's. Tossing tcp/ip in your car as a bus [vs much better industrial protocols] and a vfd and calling something groundbreaking does not make it so.

You should have access to the documentation and parts- I and many other gear heads will refuse to drive/own/buy any Tesla car until I can turn a wrench on it.

How would you feel if I told you only Dell/HP should make computers because people make dangerous repairs that will allow hackers to attack systems? It's just as ridiculous when people make claims that fixing a busted fitting is a 'hack'.

imho Tesla Autos are straight-up 'unauthorised bread'.
Do you know if things like sprinklers count as irrigation? I grew up spending a lot of time in Delaware which is tons of farmland, and I remember seeing lots of weird watering devices and sprinklers.
Because Tesla FSD accidents don’t kill people who were not party to the agreement. That seems intuitively fair to me.
> Apple Stores are quite clearly not "public space", they are private spaces that they allow most members of the public access to.

The definition of "public" vs "private" in the context of property is fairly distinct from the one used in the context of privacy law. Obviously an Apple store is a privately-owned property, but in terms of privacy law it's very overtly public - you are allowed to take photos there, and people inside an Apple store would not (or at least, should not) believe that they are "in private".

In short, private property (like retail stores) "generally open to the public" allows photography by default, and you're good to go unless there's a "No photos" sign put up by the proprieter.

> If the photos were taken with a telephoto lens through the glass walls, they'd be totally in the clear (though IANAL).

For the sake of discussion on this point, let's pretend that the Apple store is unambiguously private in all senses, like your residence would be.

I believe that in the relevant jurisdiction taking photos of it would be legal under the conditions that:

(a) the photo was taken from somewhere public

(b) the owners/occupants of the building made no attempt to prevent it

(c) the photo is not of a "sensitive" location (bedroom, bathroom, changing room, etcetera)

(d) the photo does not contain genitalia (this is illegal to do without consent, even in completely public scenarios)

(e) the photo was taken with ordinary photographic equipment (so no zooming in from 10km away)

So obviously the first four are no problem at all, but a telephoto lens specifically might get you in trouble on point (e). Not too relevant to the Apple store, but it's an interesting point of discussion.
Alexander Unzicker Talk: "How Herrmann Minkowski Led Physics Astray" (2019)
SR is 2 assertions, really: first, that the laws of physics are invariant in all reference frames, and second (and far stranger), that the speed of light is invariant in all reference frames. It's that second rule that must be violated for FTL to work - FTL implies a reference frame in which light can, at the very least, switch directions! That is, light from behind you looks like it's coming from the front (but still going c).
Would be interesting if paired with the harvesting of energy from a black hole. It is theorized that you can do this 'remotely' by slingshotting a laser around a black hole. This functions the same way a normal gravity assist does, except in this case it's photons, and not spacecraft. Shoot a laser around one side of a black hole, it returns to you around the other side, but at a higher energy wavelength. In this way, perhaps you would not need to store the energy needed 'in' your spacecraft, but instead in a black hole that is some safe distance away.
I dunno.. if the coolant leak damaged the batteries, it could put the entire car at risk. I guess the owner should have the right to take that risk though, but not sure Tesla should be held accountable for the full car warranty.
> The context here is not "they're half-assing it because the system demand are minimal so they can". It's "this repair technique works just fine on real automotive cooling systems that are much more demanding".

Firstly, using a tap to reverse thread into plastic housing, and then using brass threading into the housing and into a cut hose with a screw clamps.

Internal combustion or not, its hackish, the article even recognizes that, and their defense is that some people in Tesla's factory shipped some cars with fake bits of wood from home depot. You don't put metal threads into plastic in something that is exposed to vibration, in this fix they do it 4 times, it might work, for a while, but it isn't a good long term solution.

It's not a hypothetical, it happens literally every single day, I spend my youth working in a car shop, and people expect their cars to be fixed the way they where made, and even more so when someone else damaged it, and they (or their insurance company) are financially responsible.

It would be foolish for Tesla to allow this, they will likely want to sell that car after the fact, and I doubt they want to take on the liability of selling that car, that had this sort of hackish work done to it.

Also, I don't know where you reference for "Most people's answer is going to be..." but it wasn't my experience when working in a shop, so on that we can agree to disagree.

At the end of the day, he signed a lease, and agreed to the terms, those terms include how this maintenance and repair should be handled. Right to repair isn't going to change those terms, even more so when he isn't the owner of the vehicle.

If anything we should take away, is that leasing cars is stupid, on many levels, and this just high lights another one.
If you're pairing samples that you have decided share a sameness, then implicitly, you're labeling. I would not call that unsupervised.
Seems software side quite clear. Not sure the hardware side.

Is the usb power used to communicate with the host and run on that usb power. What is the other cable do? And how network work (other than the domain … wow)
$200 or $20000 or $200000? If you make up numbers, you can argue anything. Perhaps you didn't understand it because it's not true?
"I don't see how the absence of licensure would prevent courts from issuing restrictions on individuals found guilty of criminal misconduct."

That might cover fraud, but that doesn't cover incompetence or other harm.

"The government requiring a conviction in court before restricting someone's right to free association is how it should be."

That is one way to look at it, yet is is not how the legal system works today. The courts have determined that licensure is a lawful restriction on association.

"Yes, because people do far more research for personal consumer choices, where their level of knowledge has a substantial personal impact, than for political positions where their level of knowledge has a minimal impact, or minimal likelihood of impact, on their personal life."

It may have a more direct impact, but that does not mean they will have better outcomes. For one, you will be taken to the nearest hospital in an emergency - you have no choice. The important part is "their level of knowledge". Most people do not possess the level of knowledge to evaluate a medical professional and the information given to them by that medical professional. Most people accept it as truth and do not care to do any research on credible sites like PubMed.
Conectores textuales: Guía rápida para usarlos bien [pdf]
It’s a complicated formula sometimes it works for you but most of the time the manufacturer gets gets the better deal
Until it isn't. The attitude about this seems reminiscent of that cable snap in Italy recently.

https://youtu.be/uCB1xbkn1Ps

And I'm one that is for right to repair, I just don't think it holds up for the lease scenario, I expect my repairs to be done to manufacturers spec and would be concerned about any mechanic for any make making "half arsed" repairs.
The first album is dark enough to appeal you'd think.
> Those security cameras aren’t hidden and always have a sign somewhere in the store noting their presence.

My understanding is that this is not a legal requirement and is rather something stores do solely to scare away potential burglars.
Car insurance isn't really that bad. It's often moderately expensive, because cars are expensive and we drive a lot.

Michigan, in a big populist maneuver, got rid of requirements for unlimited personal injury protection (with lifetime medical payments). Drivers are happy, as the risk they take when they hit the road has been transferred to Medicaid. It's not quite the libertarian victory the Republicans that back it are claiming, shifting from a required user fee to a public payor of last resort.

(It's more consistent for Democrats, moving a cost that disproportionately impacts lower income people to a public funding model)
Tibetan woman holding Bitcoin mining PSUs
I disagree. Describing them as not borderline totalitarian is making them out to be milder than they are towards the set of people I've highlighted. They demand severe subservience by those people who face severe consequences otherwise, and that is the definition of totalitarian.

Requiring someone to prove their status for a private, low value transaction between individuals is a strongly authoritarian state. Requiring ordinary people to act as police for the state is also strongly authoritarian.

I don't believe that is a hyperbolic view.

And "requiring someone to prove status" means a lot of different things. If the issuing of status is itself done abusively, and without regard for the law (the Home Office routinely breaks the law and is routinely found to have behaved abusively), that phrase sounds much more reasonable than it is.

You would not think this unless you have witnessed the distressing multi-year effects on people of ambiguous status who are still trying to get a straight and justifiable answer out of the system designed with rejection quotas in mind, irrational decisions at times, and horrible consequences for some individuals. (Note I said "ambiguous", not "without". There are so many cases which ultimately end up resolved as "ok you're fine" after a few years fighting unlawful judgements).

The result is obvious: There are people sleeping rough because it is, essentially, the law that they must be kept homeless until their status is resolved. There are many more currently sleeping in dangerous accomodation, and in abusive relationships they cannot leave. And there are people living with life-threatening, curable diseases, where there is nothing they can do but slowly die.

I also think requiring people to earn significantly above the median wage before they can live with their own spouse is also, in my view, authoritarian. To be honest I was shocked when I discovered that. I always assumed any decent state would at least allow genuinely married couples to be together.

And in fact, EU law does allow that - it's considered a fundamental human right (the right to a family life). But it's not a human right in the UK.
People dying is auto-accidents is bad, but this figure will not be reduced by faulty software which repeatedly swerves towards concrete pylons.

If you care about reducing automotive deaths then you should agree that reckless "full self driving" functionality which is anything but is a concern: behavior like this will create public and regulatory pushback which ultimately delays the availability of safety improving technology.
How can you charge to fix something that doesn’t break
List of organizations supporting centralized digital IDs