skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"At 11:00 on Sunday morning when we stand and sing and Christ has no east or west, we stand at the most segregated hour in this nation." It's difficult for me to justify buying into the idea of Christian social life as the source of American unity when 10 years ago participating would have seen me bombarded with the reasons why my homosexuality would see me burn in hell for all eternity, or when 200 years ago it would have seen me bombarded with all the point of scripture that justified my being treated as property. This is as someone whose grandfather was a deacon; I can't imagine what people whose families don't have a church tradition at all must think of this suggestion.

I do think that the segregation of social life is at the heart of much of this country's ills. However, perhaps that has more to do with things like, say, Bill and Sally's frankly hysterical fear of sharing a street with the Freemans. How to reduce social division in America in the long-term: ban private schools, fund public schools at the national level, and do it quickly, utterly, and irrevocably. I don't know if you would end up with a single, continental American nation, but the part left still known as "The United States of America" would be profoundly united.

Even if you disagree, you must understand that the notion that everyone must attend church for America to achieve some measure of unity is about as radical. The focus must be on the bringing together of disparate communities, secularly.
desine, learning J, which is in the APL family of languages, is good with "J for C Programmers" https://www.jsoftware.com/docs/help807/jforc/contents.htm - you don't need mental superpowers, Henry Rich gently adds a few new things when you're good with the previous ones.
One of the things that helped Southwest dominate in the short-haul space, particularly in the Texas Triangle, was optimizing "turn-time" with a target of less than 10 minutes to both deplane and board passengers (10 minutes!)[0]

I wonder how lengthy charge cycles will affect the viability of fast turn times, especially for the short-haul segments that they're targeting for these new airliners. It seems like they'll need to either have extremely fast charging or be prepared for significant downtime between flights; where will the planes be stored while they're charging?

It's important to both invest in and appear to be investing in the future, but even a soft commitment of 100 planes seems like quite a bit, especially in the very competitive and cost-focused short-haul space.

0. https://www.npr.org/2015/06/28/418147961/the-man-who-saved-s...
God (of your choice), I wish I was multi-lingual.
Again, it might be best not to conflate logic and physics. Having different universes with different laws of physics is very conceivable to the mind. Logic is pure philosophy. It's an exercise in reasoning. No physical observation is required. The various kinds of logic you cite are different subsets that coexist without ambiguity under the same big umbrella. That is, it's still the same logic. If one law were to create ambiguity with another (which is the mechanism used in proofs), then at least one would be declared void, or some more work would be needed to explain the conditions that lead to the paradox. Logical truths have no order of precedence. Our minds simply use the ones it's more comfortable to reason about as a scaffold to uncover new ones. But they all exist together and are all equally true without ambiguity, including those we have not uncovered yet. If we posit that another universe has logical truths that differ from our own, they will not only be foreign to us, but they will also be totally inaccessible to our imagination in a way that makes any kind of sense (unlike alternate laws of physics), as being able to reason about them in our own universe then gives them validity and creates the aforementioned ambiguity. 1 + 1 must be equal to 2 when adding those two quantities. If you say it doesn't, you're either mistaken, or you're talking about a different subset of the same logic (bases, set theory, etc) where the same symbols are used to mean something different. That doesn't qualify as conflicting logic.
Exponential growth on a finite planet. What could go wrong.
The Chinese great firewall, even though it is primarily to not allow info flow from outside, one benefit has been that, a lot of the internet companies that operate in china have been local and they were able to develop without any competition from western players. This has benefited china and its companies. But in the rest of the world its mostly the SV companies who rule the roost.

There are bith advantages and disadvantages to protectionism I feel.
While that is true for a lot of circumstances, in others the addition of CO2 helps the plants survive droughts and other conditions easier.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fer...

https://theconversation.com/yes-more-carbon-dioxide-in-the-a...

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcb.14950
It isn't. US copyright law says brief excerpts of copyright material may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim

----> for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research <----, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder.

Copilot is not criticizing, reporting, teaching, or researching anything. So claiming fair use is the result of total ignorance or disregard.
You really don't have to accept contributions if the repo is open. You could simply disable issues and close all PRs with a comment explaining that you're not ready for contributions yet. You could even automate that with a Github Action or similar.

Developing in the open would make it easier to trust that you're not doing something nefarious. When I think about the kind of data that goes through my terminal on a day-to-day basis, I have to _know_ for sure that my terminal can be trusted. That makes Warp a non-starter for me until it's open source, which is really a shame because it looks fantastic.
Most farming in the US is actively destructive to topsoil. We could turn it around, but it would hurt the bottom line of Monsanto, et al.

See Gabe Brown's videos about regenerating topsoil.
It will be available at Aug 2nd. No price info.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-365
Let’s not forget that greedy VCs can’t invest in your business without YOUR approval.
I guess you missed the HN posts about another buzzy terminal app that is in fact written with Electron and boasts about extensible web tech as a feature: https://hyper.is/
This is talking about global resources. As resources dwindle they will get exponentially more expensive and become available only to a few. This isn't about a temporary societal collapse, and you would be a fool to ignore it.
Limits to Growth-the balance of the pursuit of economic growth and its effects
And the two TSA agents only have an older X-Ray machine and no big backscatter machine to whisk the short line through!
Twitter removing Fleets on August 3
It's definitely a type of Platonism. The question isn't how hard it is, but if it's possible at all.
The fact that it needs to be stated means that it has cloud features.

Opt-in and "encrypted at rest" AKA actually encrypted are the correct defaults.

I'm also uninterested unless both the client and the server are made open-source, because terminals are a bread-and-butter program and there's just no way I'm getting locked into someone else's cloud for that.

But the specific sentence you've quoted is a strange thing from which to recoil, from where I'm sitting.
All the experts have been talking about a housing market collapse in Toronto for the past 15+ years. It’s been imminent and inevitable year after year … after year. Well, I guess these complex systems are hard to predict. But OK, let’s suppose this true. What are the best/recent books that discuss this?
Thank you! The UI framework is entirely built in house with the help of Nathan Sobo (co-founder of the Atom text editor). We definitely considered a few of the options on https://www.areweguiyet.com/ but ultimately found none of them supported the requirements we wanted.

You can find more details about why we decided to build our own UI framework in the "How Warp Works" blog post we wrote here: https://blog.warp.dev/how-warp-works/
Doing the gods work, or the devil's work. I'm a little confused here.
There was the debasement of the currency of the Roman Empire, which lead to its failure. This was done for reasons of waging war.

I am arguing that if you remove the ability for a state to create money (or at least debase it), it removes the ability for it to wage war.
Continuous war requires continuous capital to wage. If this continuity is ended, wars end.
I have dug into the bash source on two separate occasions. Once in response to the absolutely crushing CVE-2014-6271[1] and once to add what should have been a trivial logging feature.

What this experience (and others like it) have taught me is that far more people should care, and that we as an industry should be investing dramatically more effort into completely rewriting low-level C projects that were designed and developed thirty or more years ago. Little of the code I saw would pass modern code review for a variety of reasons.

Software engineering tools and practices have improved dramatically in those thirty years, but our foundations are built on frankly completely shoddy infrastructure that’s barely held together with duct tape and fishing line. Our industry profits almost exclusively off of building more and more on top of what’s already been built, but I’m convinced it’s becoming increasingly important to spend more of our collective effort on fixing, replacing, and repairing the stuff that lies below.

None of this is meant to malign the efforts of the developers of `bash` or any of the other venerable yet aging tools at the bottom of our stacks. There’s no blame to be had for building a tool with the knowledge and best practices of the time and for being hesitant to “fix what ain’t broke” in the thirty years since. But frankly, these things are a lot more broke and waiting to fail than most of us realize.

Further, none of this is to say that things are on the dire verge of collapse or that any one program is going to be the thing that dooms us all. Simply that our foundations are suspect and are increasing need of repair, particularly as we build ever-higher on them. Community efforts like those to improve OpenSSL in the wake of severe exploits have been invaluable and we need so much more of it. Preferably before exploits are discovered.

So I for one applaud efforts to rewrite and rethink these programs, and especially to develop them in modern languages with stronger protections, infinitely fewer footguns, and better testing infrastructure.

[1]: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-6271
I came to APL looking for a compact code representation for a problem in hand (had to add transformations to data which was passed around over slow links). Not only APL is compact, it's different in an interesting way, which deserves learning by itself.
It's also infinitely easier for Microsoft to improve and protect world security by controlling all network data going into and coming out of a device. A framebuffer delivered to your monitor means Microsoft can run all its advanced threat detection magic with no regard for what network a monitor is plugged into.

The millions of unprotected businesses of the world can skip zerotrust / firewall / antivirus / network redesigns and jump right to pc-aas with azure-ad.

For all the "I dont want big brother controlling my device" there should be an equal "I dont want teams with millions of dollars carelessly building infrastructure that can be weaponized against society."
No. You get a touch screen with a WPU. A Web Processing Unit, it will authenticate you as a valid subscriber and let you access the clouds CPU/GPU.

You own nothin, you're a user.

2030.
Just like most articles on HN are ads for someone’s project.
Just in the interest of transparency, You're posting this positive comment as someone that actively works on this project?
They're definitely planning to build a social product:

https://assets-global.website-files.com/60352b1db5736ada4741...
Per unit volume, sure: A cave full of nuclear waste is worse than a cave full of CO2.

Per energy generated, it's not clear at all to me that the nuclear waste from a country running off nuclear power is worse than the CO2 emissions of running that same country off fossil fuels.

That cave full of nuclear waste has something like "all the waste generated by the UK to date". Enough CO2 to fill a cave is one coal plant running for a few days.
Goodbye, Fleets
How many are there? Two? I only know of alacrity as the other written-in-Rust terminal app.
> Businesses are a vehicle for people, like a commune with unified set of goals.

It would, if it weren't for the core feature (and problem) of Capitalism: the disconnect between those who work and those who own.

As it stands there are people with power so disproportional that to talk of democracy or a "common interest" is simply disingenuous. In this case in particular: the interests of a few people to maximise their own profits trump the interests of the entire public to have clean air, not suffer from 100,000s of deaths per year due to pollution, not have to endure climate change and the catastrophically expensive cleanup processes we'll have to implement sooner or later (i.e. they save 1$ now so we'll have to spend 10$ in a few decades), etc.
> Nuclear waste is a lot worse than any other type of waste.

It's really not. It is compact, contained, and isolated. It takes a tiny amount of space compared to any other solution.

> It's dangerous for tens of thousands of years

Some of it is. Most of it isn't. By definition, long-lasting isotopes are the least dangerous.

> we don't know if we will be able to tell a civilization 10,000 years in the future that the stuff we buried deep in a cave is dangerous.

We won't have a civilisation in the next century if we keep fucking it up. It is patently absurd, considering the state of the world, to keep saying that nuclear is the absolute worst. Non-nuclear is what put us in this very situation in the first place.
Also in dating.
Service is a very subjective topic :)

I'm a model Y owner. I broke the charging port sensor with high-pressure washing. I opened an App, click service, the error was in the App already; I pressed on that error, App created a request. Service came at my home and fixed it. I paid 0 dollars for it. I spent 2 mites creating request and 5 minutes to open and close the gate to service person. Will Ford come to my home? Good luck spending hours on the phone with a dealer that has no clue about electric cars at all. People pay the same price for Mach-E as I paid for my model Y except temporary federal credits.

Cheap interior? I have the best infotainment system compares to any other brand, even if that car cost $100k+. I've got games, best-in class audio, video streaming and I'm using it a lot. I have not fragmented glass roof; every person sitting in my car is amazed by it. Even owners of far more expensive Mercedes etc.. The seat is one of the best I ever seat it; they don't outsource it as other brands and tesla invest a lot of time in ergonomics. The rest is just taste. I like minimalism. And it matches my preferences.

And yeah, I call vapor ware when Nissan bundles satellite radio and tons of nonsense to have access to the app. Or navigation system in the past for few thousands dollars from any brand. Or when dealers charging several hundred dollars premium for the lost keys when I use my phone in tesla. Seriously you compare the ugly dealership experience of traditional brands to an optional offer of autopilot that will be soon available as a subscription? Or electic car that don't invest in charging network, unlike tesla, that has charging points in every stupid tourist destination I can imagine?

I had false feedback from many people about car price also. If you look at the prices and compare head to head...
Ford... compare cybertuck and F-150, like range, battery, motors, etc... especially premium $90k Ford with $75k CT, and you'll not be so confident. Or compare $32k Nissan leaf with overheating batteries compares to $37k-$39k Model 3... they not even in the same league. Nissan leaf was on the market for 10 years, but Tesla sold more model 3 as total Nissan leaf sales combined. And there is a reason for that, it's not only branding. You got service, electric charging network etc...

Ford Mach-E is dollar to dollar matches Model Y. Current BMW offering among electric car is not even worth discussion. It's just junk. They announces something next year though.
Don't get me wrong, they will sell a lot of cars, as entire industry will turn in electric as fast as they can produce cheap batteries.

I hear a lot tesla is expensive, but there is nothing with comparable range and features on a market that is substantially cheaper. A year ago the statement was there is almost nothing on the market at all. Luckily now it's changing.

Nobody offers you to buy $10k Autopilot, you can subscribe soon to it, for a fraction of that price if you WANT.
Countries can still extradite in this scenario as a "favour" but there is typical a strong legal case against extradition if the charged crime is not a crime in the legal jurisdiction. (see current issue with Meng Wanzhou the Huawei CFO fighting extradition from Canada to USA)

>> That’s kinda the whole point—you can’t escape justice by picking a destination that doesn’t prosecute your crime.

You most certain can; combine poor relations with the country requesting extradition and you can avoid "justice" indefinitely.
My take from the article is that the deviation happens over time from your preexisting baseline. So it's not your current habits, its that tracking your habits over time will show a difference.
Data can also move by satellite.
I admit that I don't know what is causing sluggish growth, but I see all the countries that are growing out of the poor group have much higher growth that we have had in decades. Isn't it reasonable to assume that we have simply (in most segments, clearly not consumer technology) hit the top of the S curve and that this has nothing much to do with government policy?
Lateral Growth of Knowledge
Robert Pirsig defines the lateral growth of knowledge as one that doesn't move forward like an arrow in flight, but expands sideways, like an arrow enlarging in flight.

It is the growth of knowledge that doesn't only cover the arrow's target, but can be enmeshed in the things around it. It doesn't only move straight and center.

The growth that covers only the arrow's target is medial growth because knowledge is amassed toward a specific target.

Medial growth leaves little room for immersion in the surrounding body of knowledge. While it gives direction, lateral allows you to explore what's just around it.

Businesses use lateral growth to achieve economies of scope where the unit cost producing an item declines as the variety of products increase. The variety eventually yields a positive turnover.

The same is true of a person's body of knowledge. Economies of scope means that the ability to grow medially increases with variety. With more variety people can make connections that would have not been visible. The brain has more to make connections with.

We can begin to see things that are not right in front of us. Or are not covered by profession or niche. We begin to see things out of the corner of our eyes.

Lateral knowledge can come from unexpected directions. Sometimes they come from where we least expect them to. And they can lead down unexpected paths.

It also often is a precursor of medial development. A breadth of knowledge helps inform decisions on next steps, and viable solutions to problems.
Alacritty is a different approach: they're building a traditional terminal. Warp is hoping to push the boundaries and build something different.

Warp is a fork of Alacritty, their team was very gracious in collaborating and reviewing Warp's initial designs.
Absolutely this works. I've been doing it for decades.
What is up with what appears to be the growing audience of “doom porn” enthusiasts?
My class did almost this exact exercise in junior high back in the early 90's. Teacher gave us a menu of stock tickers of companies that have been around since 1960, complete with some rudimentary financial info as of 1960. Told us to research the companies and come up with a list of stocks to pretend we bought and held for 30 years. This was before the Internet so we couldn't just sneak a peek at the current prices. The goal of the exercise was to learn about research and ultimately diversification, but our team "won" by simply guessing the stock that was most well-known today, and YOLOing the entire fake money investment into it. Taught entirely the wrong lesson.
Discord got traction because it was substantially better than Teamspeak, and Skype leaks IPs letting jerks DDoS you. It turning into something of a social network was very unexpected.
...huh.

Writing a tty which has to support specific shells isn't confidence inducing.

How did you paint yourself into that specific corner exactly?
Everyone in the Toronto analysis ignores dual incomes. Yeah, the median income isn't that great. But for those who are in couples? Working backwords from after tax income, it is about 120K-140K a year median.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PersonalFinanceCanada/comments/mbf4...
I see comments about open source, safety guarantees, speed, etc, but let's be honest. The real reason why Rust was mentioned in the title is because Rust is popular now and mentioning it attracts attention.

It's the same deal with every popular language that was the new hotness at the time: "written in Python", "written in Ruby", "written in Go" from years ago, which I see less of now.

Nothing wrong with this, it's just a straightforward way of tailoring information to the target audience to maximize engagement with an ad, whether the authors did it consciously or unconsciously (maybe they like Rust a lot and mention it often).
Yeah, I think ortho has benefits over row stagger, but if you're going to go through the learning curve anyway, I think going straight to columnar stagger is more beneficial. That said, I don't find it that hard to switch between ortho and columnar stagger, so it may not be a huge deal if you learn ortho first, unless you're moving to a board with incredibly aggressive pinky stagger or something.

I think the one thing ortho has going for it over columnar stagger is aesthetics, which is a little silly in a discussion about ergonomics, but after a certain point, some smaller keyboards are kinda just there for fun. I have a small ortho 10 column board that is just adorable and I like using it, but it's definitely not as comfy or efficient as my reviung.
I think that it's an important lesson to internalize both about yourself and also your coworkers. My place has a saying that literally translates to something like "there's a full graveyard with irreplaceable people" - and that's how it is; no matter how hard is to replace someone, eventually they will (have to) be replaced anyway.
Never thought I'd see the day where someone on HN is suggesting Ken Thompson isn't worth reading.

If you've never read it I highly encourage you to do so.
RBI Bars MasterCard from Taking on New Customers in India