skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Interesting, I’m certainly older than that but i feel i can still handle trafic pretty well but i drive slower because i stopped giving a crap if i get late somewhere or i get out earlier and i’m less aggressive because I realize it’s pointless. If that’s getting old i’m happy with it.
Here's what tabs in Safari look like now:

https://media.welsh.cc/2jGRw1

And what the Monterey design was to start with:

https://media.welsh.cc/ghhD24

Worth noting that the tab bar in Monterey will adapt based on the site's `theme-color` meta tag.
I don't know, I appreciated the correction and additional information. There was also an acknowledgment that it doesn't change ops point. Seemed like a useful comment to me.
They don't want them smaller they want their autonomy not their sized reduced. Specifically they cling to the idea that social media ought to be a common carrier as obliged to carry their views as that of their detractors. If you look at the actual speech that is being disincentivized this looks objectively terrible in our present context.
OK that's fair. Assuming the COVID disease impact does not get substantially worse than it has been, the camp 2) will be seen as the correct one.

I can't imagine why it would get worse. Immunity of people gets better with time, and so do treatments.
How Reddit Made GameStop Worth $17B Dollars
Multiple implementations of loop being able coexist in the same language is an example of clean design that speaks in favor of macros.

If there is an issue in the implementation of for in your C++ compiler, or JavaScript machine, can you cleanly bring in another for implementation and switch the code over to it?

While code that is not affected by the problem sticks with the same one?
Had a friend who told the story of her aunt: Her aunt's mother married a man and had several children, including the aunt. Her aunt's mother left her husband as he became an abusive alcoholic and returned to her family. Who proceeded to treat the aunt's mother like a pariah for deserting her husband. The aunt grew up living in a converted chicken coop and being completely ignored by her extended family.
Google doesn't just demonitize videos, they make videos impossible to find by unlisting them from search results[1] and shadowbanning creators:

> One of the videos that had been restricted was a trailer for one of his short films; another was an It Gets Better video aimed at LGBTQ youth. Sam had been shadow-banned, meaning that users couldn’t search for it on YouTube. None of the videos were sexually explicit or profane.

> ... five YouTube channels alleged that the platform had unfairly targeted LGBTQ content creators with practices similar to those described by Bardo: demonetizing videos, placing them in restricted mode without warning, and hiding them from search results.

[1] https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/lgbtq-...
The Guide to Onboarding New Developers: How to Plan the First 90 Days
> The same way a store can't kick someone out who's running around saying racial slurs to everyone?

They can't kick out whoever they want, governments regulate that. And here Germany decided that Youtube can't kick out people for a particular reason. It is the same concept.
>It is right from the liberal playbook

Yep the liberal playbook that was kicked off by an investigation by the progressive news outlet... The Times[1]... which is owned by Hyperliberal Billionaire... Rupert Murdoch.

Do you even bother to do a small amount of research into your biases? It blows my mind that people think the world is controlled by a couple of megalomaniacs on Liberal Twitter.

[1] https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/youtube-hate-preachers-sh...
This is the opposite however, where Germany is standing up for the rights of people opposed to the the government. I can't imagine Modi government doing anything like that.

It would have been similar had India fined YouTube for removing videos of farmer protests.
Image 6 just looks like he is holding 2 pencils. Is he actually sharpening them?

However he does it, I don't think he is using a razor based sharpener, just look at the rough points in image 15.
I am pretty sure that the only way to halt deforestation and overfishing is to use technology to produce such vast abundance with current resources that those using damaging practices are driven out of the market.

There just isn't political will for anything else.

People will mock the "yet another startup" attitude in this, but is anything successfully moving the needle except products that outcompete worse products (Tesla vs internal combustion)?
I wonder if there are technical issues here? It wouldn't be too surprising if "tweets are immutable" (and therefore safe to aggressively cache) is an assumption baked into a lot of their code.
Cannot say too much about that since I only tried alacritty once, and from what I see it is mainly speed. And yes, that's actually noticable, at least on my machine.
The law is written by people, so it frankly doesn't matter what it says currently because it can (and probably will) change.
Engineer Makes an AI Camera Sprinkler to Keep People Off His Lawn
Full paper is free direct from the author/KPMG:

https://advisory.kpmg.us/articles/2021/limits-to-growth.html

Vice article with bad title but decent content:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3xw3x/new-research-vindicat...
don't say never. Until forty years ago you could have visited the country without problem. Maybe in a few years you will be able to, again. International politics is cruel, unpredictable and complex, but also fast paced. You can also acquire a different nationality and travel under your new passport.
> Most Fleets include media – people enjoy quickly sharing photos and videos to add to the discussion on Twitter. Soon, we’ll test updates to the Tweet composer and camera to incorporate features from the Fleets composer – like the full-screen camera, text formatting options, and GIF stickers.

So more like TikTok and less thoughtful. Twitter became big because people (sometimes) expressed coherent thoughts and used it for serious issues like the Arab Spring and #timesup.

It's much harder to foster conversation but this feels like an 'Innovators Dilemma' moment for Twitter: either go low and be a poor TikTok or go high and be something different.
Add slight 3D bezels and throw up that flat crap to the trash.
India’s been on a tear lately, first sci-hub, then Twitter now this… seems they’re growing up.
They are only ultra right because Gizmodo is either:
1)ultra left
2)generating rage clicks.
You could ultimately be right that they took the better of the two options and that this path would have killed them. I personally disagree.

I think there is also more Grey here. They could have de prioritized things in the algorithm to encourage the direction of the community without explicitly depltforming anyone or blocking\removing content. I think its possible that they could have achieved a lot of what they wanted with this method while avoiding poisoning the well.
Your numbers are way off, as is your moral compass. I hope I never meet you, or anyone like you. To use your driving analogy, the way I respond to your message is if someone told me they drove around drunk and high, without headlights, and without really doing any car maintenance, and didn't accept any moral responsibility if they hit someone because car accidents happen, and sorry, that's life.

As a baseline number, about a half-million Americans died of COVID already. For comparison, there were about 40k car deaths in the US. For someone like yourself, taking no precautions, the odds of catching COVID19 are way more than 10x of a fatal car accident.

The more critical problem is a systemic one. If no one takes precautions, nearly 10 million people in the US will die. If everyone does, virtually no ones needs to die. It's like polluting or littering.

And COVID19 isn't flu. The flu doesn't leave a quarter of people with brain fog 9 months later.
Hey! Lee from the Next.js team here. We're working on improving the Next.js <> Storybook experience. If you have a specific bug or issue you're hitting, please let me know.
I have never once watched Tucker Carlson's show in my life. Nor do I watch Fox News. Why must you assume everyone who does not agree with you is right wing?
When there are enough people, you'll see a plurality of every opinion.
Wikipedia says,
"Whilst terrestrial iron is naturally abundant, its high melting point of 1,538 °C (2,800 °F) placed it out of reach of common use until the end of the second millennium BC"

2000 BCE seems firmly in the age of antiquity.
You seem to be simultaneously arguing that it's ok to ignore the religious trappings and just treat the church as a social club, but also that the church is better than just any social club because of the religious trappings.
Same here, I love full-screen and Safari is especially lovely. I wish chromium browsers had the ability to show the UI only when I move the mouse up top or hit CMD+L. Unfortunately this isn’t the case we have to pick between all the UI or nothing at all.
Both of you have me tearing up while reading this. Probably the most humbling feelings I've had in a while.
> To reiterate, what I'm saying is: Shady ideas fester in the dark. Banning won't help society. Exposure and discussion does

Are you sure? That hasn't helped flat earthers or anti-vaxxers ( of the vaccines cause autism camp), why do you think it's true?
I find that the worst heat tends to be in the business districts, where there is often literally zero foliage or other sun cover.
> There's no such thing as neutrality. Leaving up a popular anti-vax video is just as political a decision as taking it down.

A lot of the replies to your comment fixate on this, since they take issue with “everything is political”. But I think it’s very true, and agree with you.

Why should YouTube host anything and everything that random anonymous users decide to upload? Why is this /holy/ act of uploading deemed undoable and unrevocable?

It’s a very weird way of thinking that it’s political only if the video is removed, but not if it is kept online.
For getting up to speed with modern C++, I highly suggest the courses and talks by Kate Gregory.
Right to repair for hardware seems to be getting momentum in US legislation. Here's to hoping right to repair for software follows.
Close | Multiple Positions | 100% Remote | Americas & Europe

At Close, we're building the sales communication platform of the future. With our roots as the very first sales CRM to include built-in calling, we're leading the industry toward eliminating manual processes and helping companies to close more deals (faster). Since our founding in 2013, we've grown to become a profitable, 100% globally distributed team of ~50 high-performing, happy people that are dedicated to building a product our customers love.

Product Manager (Americas): https://jobs.lever.co/close.io/21dca90f-06a3-4050-81a0-9659d...

Software Engineer - Backend/Python (Americas & Europe): https://jobs.lever.co/close.io/592193bf-8a9c-43cf-86a1-faeb7...

Senior Frontend Engineer - React (Americas & Europe): https://jobs.lever.co/close.io/10a1e32b-1a59-48dc-b8f4-e6f0d...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbyGnLhtj0o
This is an interesting example of subjective versus objective well being.

Asking someone to help clean is clearly not a misuse of power (e.g. abuse), but to an ill informed/molded individual, any request that they do something they don’t want to do (homework, chores, work, etc.) can ‘feel’ like abuse to them (subjectively), even though objectively it is not.

Most of our society is shifting to focusing on subjective well being over objective well being, so we get these confusing situations. (at least this framework helps me parse these issues).
Similar:

git://bitreich.org/gramscii
Surely this is a contradiction in terms? A strong boxer who is missing a leg is a weak boxer.

I don't think dictators are a good example, you only see the PR spin, it's not like you get a chance to meet Putin in person to realise he is actually clueless about whats happening in his own government.
>The discussion in the thread was cluttered with people attacking straw men instead of having any fruitful discourse.

Isn't this partly why the downvote button exists and pushes lower voted comments down and greys them out or the flag button for those really terrible off topic comments?
Having a time where it's not actually posted would work fine but probably not be super effective: after all, you already have an unlimited amount of time to look at the message sitting on your screen before you actually send it. It's just often very hard to read your own writing for typos. Still it would be a step forward. You could even make it opt-in.
Most articles have facts that don’t require (very much) interpretation.

Provide the name of a city mentioned in this article.
Perhaps I'm too close to the issue as I have worked with these businesses, but I disagree. This is intentional on their part, because banks first and foremost are about identifying and managing risk. If they can find a way to mitigate that risk or externalize it, then they no longer need to deal with it head-on. Most of the risks related to IT should be dealt with head-on because they grow over time as you stay still and technology moves further away from you, and it's impossible for anyone to accurately predict the future and therefore future risks.

Many banks and other financial institutions are finding this out now in their desperate bid to find competent COBOL programmers to continuing maintaining legacy critical applications running on mainframes when most COBOL programmers are retired or dead, and more are headed that way every day. It wouldn't shock me to find out that the effects of COVID being weighted towards worse outcomes for older people had a material effect on the human resource risk of using COBOL-based critical systems.

Banks will absolutely hold on to anything to avoid an unknown risk as long as they think they can hedge or mitigate known risks, and utterly fail to acknowledge the truth of unknown unknowns. This will ultimately be their downfall if governments ever let them follow standard business outcomes, otherwise they'll eventually absorb some upstart to keep hedging forever.
They will never tell you how many bots are on a platform because advertisers don't want to show ads to bots
_Some 23% of Republicans... say they agree with the baseless QAnon allegation that “the government, media and financial worlds in the U.S. are controlled by a group of Satan-worshipping pedophiles who run a global child sex-trafficking operation.”_

Source: https://www.prri.org/research/qanon-conspiracy-american-poli...

By chance, do you have a comparably researched statement about how "Trump Derangement Syndrome" is "very, very real" that didn't come from a Twitter thread or YouTube video?
Since “harmful” isn’t generally used to describe people, it’s not generally an issue. “Toxic”, on the other hand, I see applied to people all the time.
I understand, I was searching around myself for the answer, but I'm not at all versed in EU or German law. Only thing I could think of is it doesn't matter where it was filmed or who uploaded it, if was removed from german audience of youtube? Or it was filmed in Switzerland and uploaded by a German? I can't find anything in the news and I'd love to know the answer to this :)
I wish they did the sane at Comcast. Abysmal!
You might be confusing the question. A child does not have to apologize to a parent that left before they were born.
Hardly. The opposition was from flag-wearing jingoists upset at Islamic terrorist videos on YouTube.
Big +1 to this. My parents weren't abusive at all, they love me and have always done their best. But my relationship with my dad is extremely strained- it was a strange and painful realization that I wouldn't associate with him, at all, if we weren't related. And it's entirely because of his radical right-wing beliefs, which have only escalated in the era of Trumpism.

I've read accounts of older children during the rise of European fascism, seeing their parents consumed by bitter hatred until it destroyed everything in their lives except their devotion to the totalitarian state. I was prepared to deal with that. I have no blueprint to deal with a walking embodiment of the Southern Strategy- just complete and utter denial of the core tenets of what they support.
practicing the 'marketplace of ideas' led to the single most important idea/practice/accomplishment in history - the constitution of knowledge. just read jonathan rauch's new book. sure there are threats to this way of learning and understanding, and it isn't perfect. but it's the best we have, and it has not been debunked
If you want to believe that "whether your goal is to visit Nepal or not" is an opinion, go ahead. Nobody cares.
> "...centralized systems and the arbiters they empower are the core problem and never work out, even if you like some of their decisions for some of the time."

centralization is merely a necessary but not sufficient ingredient for dystopianism. you also need a ratcheting consolidation of power, especially money (provided by advertisers in this case) and attention/influence (provided by viewers). centralization is simply one of those (key) ratchets that can be leveraged to further consolidate power for the benefit of directors and executives.

relatedly, the american constitution is an experiment in crafting a centralized system with checks and balances stable enough to withstand assaults of power consolidation. the jury is still out, but it's looking somewhat bleak at the moment, given a runaway executive branch fueled by an unhinged fed/central bank. we seem to be stomping on the gas pedal even as the brick wall looms ahead.

in any case, i've long been an advocate of right-sizing organizations of all sorts, especially governments and companies. we've concretely learned over the past many decades that the negatives of large (and small, but those tend to self-regulate away) entities eventually far outweigh the benefits, and are better substituted by a more diverse and specialized collection of medium-sized ones.
The 3d input is transformed into a series of 45 views. At any point you're looking at on the screen, you're seeing one of those views with your left eye, and a different view with your right eye. The optics to do this kind of thing have been around for a while in one dimension. They seem to have a much higher resolution display with all these tiles in it, multiplexed, and driven by a custom display processor.

I expect the price to stay high, and this not to become a consumer purchase.
Or maybe just read more about hedonism? By your definition, you’re a hedonist as well because intellectual pleasure is still pleasure.

Instead, I argue that that is a loaded term, we’re all individuals and we like what we like. It’s really nobody’s business and certainly nobody’s place to add a term (especially one with such negative pop connotations) to people who like what they like.
Have you read the HN guidelines? Most rules have nothing to do with legality, and @dang moderates HN on a best-effort basis to ensure quality discussion.

Presumably, you don’t notice you’re on a moderated platform, but HN is very much not an unmoderated free-for-all.
The ToS provide the binding right for the user to have the video hosted. It's in the name "terms of service": you follow the terms and in return you're provided with a service. In this case, the plaintiff complied with the terms but was denied service. The court didn't approve of that. I doubt it has anything to do with their political alignment.
"Sorry due to GDPR you cannot view this article."

"Hi - here's 50,000 ads and 1PB of JS loading in your browser and the content jumps around, have fun! Oh btw pls accept cookies from 1,000,000,000 ad networks, kthx".

Most websites consume ungodly amounts of JS, are janky as shit and deplete battery life and consume resources pointlessly and unethically.

If an article loaded as fast as HN does then sure, after all, it's just words on a page like this thread, not hard to render in 100kb of data transfer?

Sadly, because the cancer of ads has infected the internet and we treat it less severely than Covid we get a situation where reading an article becomes choresome.

Fix that then maybe you have a chance but that's why I rarely read the article unless it works on noscript and can load in dial-up style internet conditions. You've got around 3-4 seconds or I'm out.
It looks and sounds like imperialism, but perhaps there’s a more benign reason?
at nomemerror (I cannot reply directly)

I don't understand why your comment is flagged and dead! You are making a perfectly reasonable point. HN admins, what is unacceptable about what is being stated - I genuinely do not see it.
But they were comparing Amazon to STD oil, not Bezos (diluted in divorce) to Rockefeller. Rockefeller owned a full third, Bezos 11%, Gates 1% (but similar foundation setup to Rockefeller maybe, and at one point was 49% or something, but of a much smaller MS than today).
True, once you start deleting videos, then leaving any up is a political decision. That's why, as a platform, you should not be deleting any videos, other than those that violate the law.
Ask HN: Help Me find a blog posted here
The Blog starts with talking about how Funds use full-time brokers instead of discount brokers because the cost of brokerage is passed down to the consumer. In return, the Funds gets Kickback. The author calls this soft money.

In Next Phase, author talks about how every Fund creates hundreds of schemes and then name top performing ones as "growth fund" and move other funds there.

Thanks in Advance!!

Edit: It was posted approximately 3-6 months ago.
If tou6 want to get out of a deep pit, first thing to do is to stop digging.

Humanity should stop those unbased fear-mongering against nuclear energy and start increasing the number of nuclear plants, encouraging the development of cheap, safe and reliable power generation technologies.
> AWS has less market share than Microsoft. The Cloud is a pretty competitive space.

According to gartner[0] AWS has over double Azure’s market share by revenue.

What metric are you using for your stat?

[0] https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2021-06-2...
A friend of mine (who couldn't cook) learnt by buying the delivered raw food packages that have say four evenings dishes with recipes.

The recipes are designed and written so that they are hard to screw up.

It was a least effort path that worked for him: no videos or books (so a different option than the majority of answers so far!). Mostly I believe it is just the desire to cook - even if just making one _favourite_ dish. Good luck!
> only slightly more recently, the Dixie Chicks. They called up advertisers as well.

If you want recent examples, look at WAP, its Super Bowl and Grammy's performances, Lil Nas X, or the NFL and Colin Kaepernick. There's also the witch hunt and boycott on teachers, companies and anyone else they believe are part of a nationwide critical race theory conspiracy.
Most certainly not, Медвежонок, and I doubt it will become one in the near future (although some aspects of it are already here). Nevertheless, it's always good to highlight socialist propaganda.
Requiring people to update to the latest version as a condition of providing support is perfectly reasonable.

Giving something to me for free and then altering that free thing at a later time against my wishes is not reasonable IMHO.

Consider an e-book: would it be acceptable to give out free e-books, then change that e-book (remotely) at a later time? What if those changes remove value? Or, what if they introduce content that you find highly objectionable?

Now, imagine a future where every (digital) thing is like that.

Docker can do whatever it pleases in accordance with its licensing, but we don't have to like it.
Those outcomes are often referred to as Arab Winter that followed the Arab Spring.
Is Figma open source?