skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Tesla design and build quality can sometimes be pretty good after several years of questionable revisions.
“A bit” as in the smallest possible unit of classical information capacity…yes, I can see an argument for that. The event did occur, that bit did flip.

Others may argue that is still overly generous.
For the same reason Wikipedia has a ton of disambiguation pages for dealing with multiple concepts that have the same name: so you know which particular thing you're talking about, instead of just going "oh I heard that word once" and going off on a lengthy tear about what turns out to be a totally different thing with the same name.
We run astrobiology experiments aboard the ISS for students around the world. In addition to making life better here on Earth, regenerative Ag is critical for off-world sustainability.
Great news! tbh I just assumed from past exprience with Intel NICs that it will negotiate to lower speed without FEC.

Personnaly I'll probably go with some cheap mellanox card on ebay :)
I actually come here more for these kind of stories than the tech news. From the hacker news guidlines:

What to Submit

On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
They are typically the main group of people who enforce laws in NYC, and operating a business without a license sounds like something they’d come in quick to shutdown. They were also the ones who originally came to his place to handle a separate ‘incident’ that he was fined for that he discussed for several minutes in his video. So instead of waiting for them to come by and find an excuse to shut him down or fine him again, it’s better to have written communication with the precinct captain to fall back on that explains his case.
Maybe I'm in the minority but I loved your design. I'm just a developer but I don't think I've seen a nicer looking design in a long time.

I'm not sure it's a high converting site because I couldn't understand what you were offering but I'll remember the design.
There is a right to repair on cars, it's a law. But there's not a right to repair on cars someone else owns, ie. a lease, like the customer in the article got his car via.
Primarily, because ECC is more efficient than RSA (which you can use to make it faster or more secure). That's particularly important for wireless devices/IoT.

A shakier reason is speculation that prime factorization could be more solvable problem than elliptic curves.
If you're tailing logs, can I suggest that you try out the Logfile Navigator (https://lnav.org). It really is possible to do better than tail/less/whatever when you just want to look at a local log file:

https://lnav.org/2013/09/10/competing-with-tail.html
The body temperature decreases?

This study was being discussed quite a bit when it came out, although there was prior work on it:

https://elifesciences.org/articles/49555

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-human-body-te...

One hypothesis is that there's been a decline in baseline immune activity with decreased exposure to pathogens, better sanitation, better treatment of infections, etc. But people don't know for sure.

I'm not sure that it applies to the obesity crisis as temps have been declining over a longer time period than what seems to be involved in that. But it got me wondering if there's something like that that might have came into play later. My guess is no, that it's something else, but I could see how antibiotic use might somehow be involved.
I agree; my argument is that that means we should consider if there's a monopoly issue. We shouldn't write new universal rules to address behaviors that only work if you're a monopoly; we should determine if there's abuse of a monopoly going on, and if so, treat the monopoly as the problem to fix. Doing otherwise risks saying "well, the monopoly is OK, as long as you fix this specific thing", and even entrenching those monopolies further. (For instance, even if you believe that it's acceptable to mandate explaining every refusal to do business with someone, taking the time to explain policies to everyone is something that may in some cases be easier for a large company but prohibitively hard for a smaller one.)

If you're abusing a monopoly in a way that prevents other people from coming in and doing better than you, that's the issue, not the specific manifestation of how you're abusing it.
I think some of the outrage is Tesla owning the car, but essentially demanding the renter keep it in like-new condition.

Legally subject to the terms of the lease, of course. But it feels unfair not to accept normal wear and tear and reasonable repair.
Would an Apple Watch be a better place to host a website than a Casio?
Yes sorry I should have specified, PD-1s. Was 4am in australia on mobile and wasn’t in the mood to reference. Sorry
Species close enough it could interbreed with humans, and with a larger brain.

Dunno why Neanderthal art is "fake until proven intentional". Think I'd start with the opposite prior.
When I was learning Spanish I first tried a variety of apps and cds and at least for me none really worked.

What did help, was basically creating my own handwritten handbook on how the language works, drills, usage examples, etc. Not just writing it down, but visualizing it. E.g. making little drawings where on the timeline all the different grammatical tenses lie. Still to this day, many years later and without any clue where the physical handbook is, I still often mentally pull it up when I'm not sure on how to say something.
Mega corporations capable of funding FDA trials buy patents and use them to create/produce drugs. Patent trolls don't create anything.
I'm with you on the second point strongly.

But IMHO it's not full self driving if it requests the driver to take over even once.

If there's an insane storm or something then it's ok for FSD to know it should disable and then you have to drive 100% control. The middle ground is more like assisted driving which doesn't seem safe according to most HN comments.
Not having the ability sort bookmarks by date in the bookmark manager is objectively bad UX for users.
> "we wanted to avoid nuisance braking so we put in a delay when the system was confused." As someone who used to work in safety-critical software, it blows my mind that you would deliberately hobble one of your main risk mitigations because your system gets confused

Maybe it was put in place to avoid erratic braking in absence of obstacle, in order to avoid getting hit in the rear by other vehicles (whose driver wouldn't see any obstacle and be unprepared for the Tesla car braking).
> This would predict that being tactless and accepting tactlessness from others are strongly correlated.

This is because most of us will try to understand other people from their own perspectives. This is the case even when one tries to put themselves in other's shoes -- it often fall short because one simply doesn't have other's shoes.
1) That's true! Maybe after Covid is over, going to a coworking space for to work will be better for remote workers

2) Did you find anything to solve this? I have this as well

3) This seems like a tough issue to solve
its not like a brake light or a suspension part this was a inlet port for cooling fluid to the battery . If not done correctly it will spring a leak in a onroad driving situation , Tesla probably does have safety systems to stop the car to prevent the battery from overheating and exploding. besides they charged 700$ for 5$ worth of parts and 1~2 hours of labour :) that isnt the best advocacy for RTR IMO.
OP here. Not going to disagree about folks underestimating where the real danger is. But the fear of photography is not unfounded. There are many examples of people suffering from being captured in public settings. Sometimes it is because of their behavior (every "Karen" video), sometimes it is an abuser getting a lead on their ex's location from a tagged Facebook pic. For this project I tried to make sure that I didn't "feature" anyone, so attention was diluted across thousands of photos. When I eventually exhibited the work, I worked with a watercolor artist to create paintings from the photos to further disconnect the work from the customer's identity.
Proximity is everything in trade goods. Things from China are cheaper than US made due to labor costs not shipping.
A lot of chemotherapy agents works by causing DNA damage and are therefore carcinogenic themselves.
WHO Issues Human Genome Editing Oversight Findings
A bit of splitting hairs, the notable exception I can think of is that if it comes with run-flats, you are expected to return it with run-flats since it's a specification. Higher end cars also usually have a "similar quality" clause in addition, but I don't know how frequently that is enforced, if at all.
WFH is hard without kids, can't even imagine how tough it is with children.

A woman I spoke to mentioned that pandemic remote work is nothing compared to actual remote work, where you have your kids in childcare
Fantastic post.

You say "haven't quite figured out" - does that imply there are things you wanted to convert but didn't see the path for, or that the question hasn't truly come up?
This looks like a suitable ESP32 version of the Teensy microcontroller dev boards. And even better, they're open hardware. Excellent!
If you'd like to go over all the issues involved in the failure of my marriage, I have a book length amount of journal entries we could go over in private messages. Maybe you would get more out of that.
The new ones have rechargeable batteries, color screens, USB, and Python. So, only a decade out of date.
mkdir foo bar
sshfs foo.server:foo.dir/ foo/
sshfs bar.server:bar.dir/ bar/
tail -F foo/foo.log bar/bar.log

A method that doesn't involve sshfs:

servers=(foo bar)
pipes=("${servers[@]/%/.pipe}")
mkfifo "${pipes[@]}"
tail -F "${pipes[@]}" &
for p in "${pipes[@]}"; do
true > "$p"
done
for s in "${servers[@]}"; do
ssh "$s" tail -F file.log > "${s/%/.pipe}" &
done
%tail

There's timing issues on this alternative. I just ran each statement separately in a prompt, and luckily it worked. The first `true` statement needs to run after `tail` has started trying to read the first argument, and once that dies, the second run of `true` needs to run after `tail` starts reading the second argument. Last time I did something like this, I just typed the statements without the loops and ran by hand.
You might have a point if this wasn't just the most recent of a giant pile of censorship from Google.

Medical doctors can't discuss possible treatments for COVID.

Medical doctors can't discuss side effects from vaccines.

Senate testimony where an alleged Ukrainian whistleblower is named is banned. If you even say the name, not even in any relevant context, you will get banned.

The list goes on and on. There is nothing "open" about the Google web. But again, I don't believe there's anything I or anyone else could say that would change your mind.
Knowing Tesla, they may consider the unapproved fix an excuse to brick the vehicle and disable it in software, which they've done before.
Having seen the sausage made in a few different government bureaucracies, I'm fairly confident this is not the case. It all comes down to whether there is any incentive to improve customer experience.
It's an ideal oracle as you don't need cards, sticks, coins or dice. Just a stick and sand. On the other hand, i like the 2 dice for casting the tibetan mo.

The geomancy figutes remind me of bagchen and domino configurations, i wonder if there is a relationship
Did you learn this in any way? Or just naturally?
This is technically true but kind of irrelevant? If it comes down to that level of radical transformation, of abolishing the judiciary, the state is on its way to disintegrating. Rather like the Royal power that exists only as long as it's not used.
As they say in the original video, it's just plumbing for a low pressure system. This is only a hack by the loosest definition.
Competitors Don't Matter
I searched for graphing calculator apps on iOS the other day and found a ton that simply attempt to recreate the TI-84, e.g. [1].

So anyone with high school kids: are they still buying $100 physical calculators? Or are they just using free/cheap apps?

[1] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/graphing-calculator-x84/id1247...
"This website is hosted on a Casio..."

Not anymore it isn't.
This is the second time in as many days I've heard about this happening. Someone gets a new car, replaces the old one on their insurance, while accidentally retaining the prior car's coverages (or lack thereof).

The other one I heard of was similar -- someone went from an old beater car to a new Tesla. The old car only had liability coverage and no collision/comprehensive and they didn't change this when replacing the vehicle. They learned this the hard way when making a claim after a crash and having it denied.

I have to imagine this is the result of using a self-service portal from the insurance company. I gotta think that if you spoke to a live human at the insurance firm to make the change, they would not miss an opportunity to sell you additional coverage.
This was also known as Planetoid on the old 8 bit BBC B micro and was sold by Acornsoft. It wa a fantastic frenetic game back then!
I guess 100% remote plus a few social gatherings in a year seems good
Heh, its just a paper reporting results that they found. There is nothing really to disagree, as it is not an opinion. I think science reporting should provide this context rather than produce some kind of headline that is treated as The Truth :)

Anyway, when I was trying to learn French, I found that for myself no single method worked. I learnt by reading, listening, writing, conversing, singing some random french song, etc. My belief is that learning is multimodal, and there is support for this view in literature. I think these types of studies are still valuable as they control for one variable and provide some insight on that. I'm sure we will slowly converge on the learning model most likely to promote long term retention.
I'd say the majority of new coins/tokens are launched with something like an ICO over the past 5 years.

Most/all of them are crypto-financial. I generally think non-crypto businesses using ICOs are extra scammy, because redemption of services is usually a squishy meatspace process - fungibility is rare. I am not a fan of 'blockchain' companies that fundraise with ICOs for IRL redemption of products or services - really gambling on the integrity of company leadership to not alter the terms before redemption.

(Personally I think 'access rights' is the only subset that is feasible for crypto<>IRL commerce - digital content DRM, event tickets, stuff like that)

Which ones are successful is certainly the subject of debate (I'd probably say "we don't know yet"), but I think over half of the top 40 coins on https://coinmarketcap.com/ were created via ICO.
The $800 fee is a minimum tax for the year, not an arbitrary fee, it is credited against other taxes you owe. To that end, most businesses with employees or substantial sales won't owe anything extra. It is waived the first year in most cases, so it isn't a short term problem for new businesses. There are other business structures for a company besides an LLC if costs like the registered agent, the tax complexity, the minimum franchise tax are an obstacle.
It is not meaningless. The split structure is actually better (if it is genuinely spun off, rather than created as a tax evasion mechanism) because it can licence the technology to multiple entities, which spurs competition among them.
Thanks!

Most of our competitors say they have "strong encryption", but when you read the page it actually means they have SSL. Or that they use SHA256 for hashing the passwords.
That is… disappointing.
What part of the driving test covers taking over control from an automated vehicle with a split second notice?
I'm not sure I understand how you envision this working, given the underlying technology. You'd have to have a pretty large cache of such analyses to train on, right?
Happened here too. With the first mention of lockdown it felt like a handbrake. I frankly don't see what people could've done more. Old people had trouble getting groceries.
Curation vs. Gatekeeping
> If your eyes tells you the floor is safe, and your nose smells something bad

well, if I'm smelling gas, I know the situation isn't safe… (and thus my nose is giving me an information my eyes might not have detected)
Yeah, this is a huge issue. People haven't realized that working remotely is different - I think this is an adaption thing and soon it'll change. Do you?
Weighing of components. Keep digital kitchen scales on the table and use them all the time. E.g. if you eat breakfast cereal, put the bowl on scales, press button, put in cereal, remember the weight, press button, pour milk, remember the weight. The same for everything you put on a pan. Don't forget to include the cooking oil, it makes a surprisingly large contribution to the total calories of the meal. If you're sharing meals, then you know the "total calories" you put in it, weigh the final product (it generally will be significantly different than what you put in) and weigh what's on your plate - so you know that you ate e.g. 40% of the total. It doesn't take much time (unless your scales suck), but it does take much attention and looks weird. It's a pain in the ass when starting out, but becomes easier when I can just reuse the numbers from when I made the same thing last week.

Some types of meals are easier than others, though - e.g. if you make a large pot of "non-uniform" soup for the whole family for multiple meals, then it's going to be an estimate. It's socially inappropriate to do it at some situations (e.g. if you're visiting your grandma who's providing a meal), but on most days you should be able to track how much calories you got on that single day.

Some restaurants will provide numbers for their dishes, some won't. For takeaway/home orders weighing gives a good estimate - if you don't have the numbers for some kebab or sushi or pizza, then you can assume that it's going to be the same per unit of weight as someone else's similar product, what matters is how much of double cheese pepperoni pizza you eat, not the particular pizza maker.
> Where is the complexity in Go to have a pool of workers looking for jobs on a channel exactly?

This is just one kind of pipeline. If this is all you have done, you may have the impression that concurrency (in Go) is easy.

BTW, this is worth reading:

Understanding Real-World Concurrency Bugs in Go
https://songlh.github.io/paper/go-study.pdf
> The fact that cars depreciate seems like the best reason to "rent" them.

Like any other depreciating asset, the renter charges the rentee(sp?) the depreciation anyway, plus a small profit.

You appear to be under the impression that renting is better; this cannot be correct. The rent for any asset is ($COST_OF_PRODUCT + $COST_OF_ADMIN + $PROFIT). How do you figure that it's cheaper to pay those additional costs than to buy?

You only rent if you want something temporarily and don't want to deal with the hassle of resale. For this convenience, you pay extra.
Former lawyer here, though this isn't legal advice etc. This is really more of a commercial question. Launching first puts you at risk of taking on personal liability, but most very early-stage founders are comfortable with this because they have 0 or negligible users.

On the other hand, there's a lot of value to launching quickly, and IMO usually this benefit outweighs the risk of personal liability. I'd just try to make sure that your terms of service includes a limitation of liability / indemnity clause.

One underrated aspect of not incorporating is that it keeps your company feeling more like a "project" than a company. And I think it's worthwhile staying in this stage for as long as possible, because it gives you more permission to experiment with wild ideas and iterate in weird directions, even if, as in your case, you have a pretty solid idea of where you want to start already.

FWIW, I didn't bother incorporating my own startup until I'd secured terms for my first fundraising round.
Your peddling FUD. Just because you touched something in a way that wasn't specifically authorized by the original manufacturer of that something doesn't make you liable for anything that something does in perpetuity unless there is evidence that it's actually your fault.

Homeowners insurance covers the fire. They probably don't go after anyone unless they have specific reason to believe the loss was probably caused by a pattern of action that could result in a winnable lawsuit (good luck figuring that out when you have a melted lump of car to to work with). If someone does somehow go after the shop their insurance goes to bat for them and digs up all the reasons they're not liable and this was a reasonable repair that their customer performed.
> Even going to the big burn, many never reach that "escape velocity."

Very true.

And you bring up an interesting point in terms of creating your own art. There are festivals where people arrive and proclaim, "Entertain me!" Whereas there are others (like Burning Man) where people often come to express themselves and share their creations. Even those not bringing a lot often go just to experience the joy of the creations of others.
Hacker space seems like an awesome idea. I've wanted to have something like that, maybe coworking spaces is the closest thing we currently have?
> Nonbinary code quality

At a tool level, yeah that should be configurable.

GOLANG, I COMMENTED OUT ONE LINE. YOU KNOW HOW TO COMPILE WITH AN EXTRA IMPORT JUST F---ING DO IT.

But at the commit/merge request level, either the changes are merged or they aren't. They are either mergable or not mergable.

You can decide what things are errors and what are not, but printing tons of warnings is a great way to get ignored.
As a privacy enthusiast, I am very mildly (because I was not directly affected) annoyed that you undertook this project. I see your post discussing it as tacitly attempting to move the overton window in a direction you want it to go.

> Whether it was ethical or not is a much more complicated question, and something that we each have to decide for ourselves.

(from the article:)

> What was probably 10 minutes felt like 30.

I don't know if it "felt like 30" because the task felt boring or because you were concerned about being caught, but if it's the latter then I think you know that it was at _least_ on the far side of "ethical".

> I understood (and still believe) what I did was legal.

(from the article:)

> After the one-minute-exhibition ended, we made a staggered exit from the store

Also doesn't seem like you really thought it was totally legal if you left the store that way.

Most people in this thread are addressing the legality/morality of installing an app on all those computers in the Apple Stores, but what about the unauthorized use of all those people's likenesses? I'm not familiar with New York state law, but in a lot of states, you can't use photos of people commercially without their consent.

You make a living from art projects. Maybe you didn't make any money from this art project, so you didn't directly profit from the use of these photos, but I would think a reasonable person would see your online portfolio as an advertisement or promotion of your services.

In the original article you talk about how it should have been alright to take the photos:

> I tried to think of a busy public space full of computers, and the Apple Store seemed so obvious.

Apple Stores are quite clearly not "public space", they are private spaces that they allow most members of the public access to. If the photos were taken with a telephoto lens through the glass walls, they'd be totally in the clear (though IANAL). Still creepy, but legally in the clear.
Blake Masters, COO of Thiel Capital, Enters GOP Senate Race in AZ