skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The same goes for Google Photos. Instead of providing folders and other organisational features known for human kind for thousands of years, Google removes them. But not only to use search for pleasure. It is also to train their neural networks maybe?

We have to become compulsive hoarders, to train a bot that will help us find things, we could put in the right place in the first place.
> Telling gyms they cannot run treadmills past 6 km/h and cannot play music faster than 120 bpm seems like a much bigger exercise of power than telling the gyms they can't be open.

This is an interesting perspective and helps to explain a little more your original comment.

It seems that your objection is not necessarily the government's authority being excessive but rather too micromanaging? This is a sentiment I think most people can relate too - in our work, we'd rather our boss give us a straight no than make us jump through a dozen hoops and red tape. But in the real world where many different liberties are at stake such as the ability for businesses to make money and citizens to stay healthy, then policing in minutiae could have real tangible benefits.

I'm not saying that I agree with this policy - just trying to highlight your sentiment about not wanting to be micromanaged might be orthogonal to your stated desire not to be oppressed by an overreaching government.
Robert Baruch reverse engineers a chip [video]
This has to be depended on the pipeline you want to have.
alternative alternative:

do *² for 1..5;
I, the author, submitted it an hour before :)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27812051

I'll never understand how HN works, honestly.
It’s sad how often people assume you’re just being an awkward or crappy person when you have less obvious issues.

I see it as character building haha
I dunno, as someone with a lot of antique furnishings in a 19th-century house, I'd say that there's quite a bit of ongoing maintenance to prevent the march of time and usual wear and tear from grinding everything to dust!
- Same predictable working environment every day

- Feeling disconnected from my company and team

- Lack of physical/ face to face human interaction

- Reduced motivation

- Lack of spontaneous opportunities to meet new people, learn from others and socialise

I try to work from (SE) a different environment at least 3-4 days a week (Coffee shop, shared workspace etc, I head there after I've had lunch) and it really makes a difference for me - The small price of a couple of filer coffee's is definitely worth it.
Technology extends but also amputates. See character amnesia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_amnesia
This is really inspiring as I have been eyeing my smart electric utility meter as the perfect candidate for running my portofolio website.
I’m honestly very okay with this “search-first” mentality the author claims Google promotes.

I’ve never organized my photos anymore thanks to Google Photos amazing search, no more time wasted organizing windows media player albums like in the old times thanks to Spotify, I never organize my notes on Notes app but can always find old stuff, my Google Drive is a bit more organized but still I basically go by recent items or search all the time

I think we are just so overwhelmed with information nowadays it’s impossible to keep organizing it, why not let machines just find what we want?

Now I do agree that browsers search on bookmarks sucks, and I like a lot to bookmark everything so I can find it later, building my own personal index, to solve that I built an extension that crawls my bookmarks and allows me to search better on them later (it’s called Cataloger if you are interested)
You don't own a rental so there would be no "right to repair".
John Prine never took himself too seriously. Lot of humour there. Carter USM might work, or maybe the references would be too British.
Awesome project !
Any portion of a work has a copyright the moment there is a tangible copy.

There is a uniqueness requirement, but it has nothing to do with length. A unique one liner would have a copyright.
> What do the people sign that share the roads with those people?

Some of the videos show drivers having to agree to take full responsibility for all driving.
Brass is downright professional.

<140°F @ <5 psi? JB Weld and call it a day.

https://www.jbweld.com/product/j-b-weld-professional-size
Have you spoken to any person who escaped Cuba?

I bet you haven't, because they'll all tell you they escaped because the oppressive regime, not because of poverty.

The sanctions are there for the same reasons we have sanctions against North Korea, trading with murderous regimes is condoning their actions.

Listen to the protests and the Cuban people, you may learn something.

Hint: they're chanting "freedom", not "relieve sanctions". They're protesting their government, not ours.

But please tell me more how the Cuban people are uninformed and you understand the conflict better.
I must admit, I'm very surprised by the success he's having with the TinyPICO. I would never have guessed there is such a large market of amateurs in this niche who are experienced enough to know what they want yet lack the skills to know how to do it themselves (in an age where any hobbyist can order a fully assembled custom PCB from China for pennies!).

With that disclaimer, I mean no disrespect when I say this is a very basic design that I'm sure myself and any other experienced hobbyist or professional could whip up in an afternoon. There's nothing new or innovative here. It's small, it doesn't make any glaring errors in terms of low power design and... Well, that's about it.

Slap on the cheapest components you can find on LCSC and you've got a roaring success. It's disappointing how low the bar is, electrically at least.

He does, however, hit the nail on the head with design, networking, presentation, etc. There's even a devoted community that has grown around this board, who would swear to you it's the best thing since sliced bread.

Maybe there's a lesson there.
There's a lot missing in the article.

In particular, self-expression (IMO) has advanced a little bit. Hurling insults doesn't really mean much anymore, you can do it on any forum. But creating your art... that means something. Something that can't be said with words.

It's really amazing how different peoples experiences can be though. Even going to the big burn, many never reach that "escape velocity."
Liberalization was blamed both before the Soviet Union was established, and again when it was dissolved. You should be thinking of the former usage of both "liberals" and "liberalization".
How can bones last 51,000 years?
I have to agree with this. The search in macos is really broken. There are so many problems with it.
It could be so much better but they havent improved it in years.
Even using Alfred i dont get what i want sometimes. Maybe its because alfred is using spotlight indexes? I’d have to look it up.
I'm a bit surprised the original video (from Youtube channel Rich Rebuilds) that this article bases on, is not more prominently mentioned in the discussion.

I've linked the part below [1] where Chad (ex Tesla repair technician) explains why Tesla do what they do, i.e. only replace the whole battery pack (which costs 16k) when some sub unit is broken.

The main reason is cost effectiveness (for Tesla): Instead of training staff how to disassemble, have parts in storage, maintain facilities, assemble again etc, it's cheaper to do 'assembly replacement' and replace the battery pack as a whole.

[1] https://youtu.be/vVSw3KSevEc?t=1415
In particular phthalates (plastic softeners) are suspected to reduce testosterone. Lower testosterone is linked to fat gain.
Wages of Fear, anyone? https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046268/
Did you bother to read the article for 5 seconds? Native CA tribes were burning 3-5x the amount that've been burned in the last "Bad" fire seasons we've had.

Burns were done to help manage water supplies in the first place.
> Because the service writer couldn't get that part separately so they chose to quote for the whole assembly rather than ask the tech who did the diagnosis if there's any other options.

This makes it sound like the part in question could have been easily replaced. The assembly in this case was the seal pack that isn't intended to be serviced. Even if they could have ordered the plastic coolant line, the removal and tear down of the pack to replace the line would have been a tremendous effort. It's debatable that it would have been easier to replace the pack AND then part out the old pack.

The plastic coolant tube should have ended at the pack housing with a threaded insert and the tap should have just threaded into it. If pack had been designed in this manner, the repair would have been trivial.

The pack is has a severe design flaw in my opinion.
Thanks, I appreciate it! Part of the project's fun was discovering new things, so I thought it'd be the best to share it.
Yeah I meant "consent" in the not-real-consent sense of a EULA.
It's really amazing that his family has so many things that have stood the test of time. I've been thinking about how many things in my life are expressly designed to be cheap and disposable. Notably, how bad that is for the environment, how it empowers oppressive regimes to whom we outsource our pollution and pseudo-slave labor, etc. I try to find more things that are simple, robust, and which fill me with joy such that I'll hang onto them for a long time.
I'm kind of amazed that a calculator needs a processor as powerful as a SH4. If you had video out you could run Sega games on that thing.
How do they handle compaction? The biggest thing I have seen is work toward finding a way to introduce large equipment to a no till or RA farm.
Busted Create an ML-Powered Speed Trap
Not that I disagree, but I'm sure these packs have a significant amount of overhead costs as well.
> Why isn't it possible to make a new ad if the first one was rejected ? I don't fully understand how it played out.

The whole account was banned, that's why. The ad actually passed the moderation and even had 200 impressions.

> Other marketing strategies should be used to bootstrap it and grow it's user base

It's pretty common for the new players to burn money on ads, because it's scalable and predictable. So it actually would be super difficult to run the app for a few years without any predictable traffic source.
It doesn't matter how many hours of video there is, all it takes is hitting one pole to dramatically impact your life or the lives of others.

As a pedestrian and someone who shares the road with drivers who use FSD, I don't get to opt out of this "closed beta", and I certainly wouldn't care about how many hours of quality content it has on YouTube if it caused a car to hit me or drove me off the road.
I'd say there are basically too ways in which "inconsiderate" statements appear. One way is in people who genuinely are not that good at anticipating how others will view a given statement. The other way is in people who by reflex assert dominance and so don't care what effect their statements are going to have. A given boss lashes out at subordinates both because they can and to continue to show them "who's boss". An emotionally incompetent employee may lash out at a boss and get fired because they don't aren't being emotionally aware.

Even more, you can get a person who's always asserting dominance and they either rise to the very top or fall to the very bottom. Which is to say, there's a certain porousness between emotionally incompetent and "just being dick".

"but being asked to work with a tactless fragile person is asking for quite a bit more. :)"

No one can work with a tactless, fragile person. But plenty of people for tactless, fragile people.
No. Google is just shit at design.
Unfortunately your example is inapt because the center of your vision and your peripheral vision may as well be entirely separate systems that don't overlap, and the way brains apply focus doesn't translate to how cameras work. Your scenario is closer to asking about the center of your focus saying the path in front of you is clear and your peripheral vision detecting inbound motion from the side. Peripheral motion detection overrides the clear forward view, but it's because they aren't trying to record the same information.

Here's why:

> If your eyes tells you the floor is safe, and your nose smells something bad, do you stop?

Absolutely, yes, if the bad smell smells like dog shit or vomit or something else that I definitely don't want to step in. If I'm walking, I'm very unlikely to be looking directly at my feet and much more likely to be looking ahead to do predictive path planning. I definitely do stop at least transiently in your scenario and then apply extra visual focus to the ground right in front of my feet so that I don't step on dog shit. The center of my vision is great at discerning details, but peripheral vision is terrible for that.

Anyway, the obvious answer to your inquiry based on my explanation here is to use confidence weighting and adaptive focus. If I think something might be happening somewhere, I focus my available resources directly at the problem.
I am afraid this it what I will have to do. Small rebranding, new domain, fresh IP, new card, etc.

Still it's hard to understand this decision.
- Family interruptions

- Family thinking that you actually don't work and instead thinking they can schedule tons of things to do while you're supposed to be working

- No boundaries in terms of when work ends and begins

- Not leaving the house enough; eg getting tired of being home all the time
I must admit, I'm very surprised by the success he's having with the TinyPICO. I would never have guessed there is such a large market of amateurs in this niche who are experienced enough to know what they want yet lack the skills to know how to do it themselves (in an age where any hobbyist can order a fully assembled custom PCB from China for pennies!).
With that disclaimer, I mean no disrespect when I say this is a very basic design that I'm sure myself and any other experienced hobbyist or professional could whip up in an afternoon. There's nothing new or innovative here. It's small, it doesn't make any glaring errors in terms of low power design and... Well, that's about it.

Slap on the cheapest components you can find on LCSC and you've got a roaring success. It's disappointing how low the bar is, electrically at least.

He does, however, hit the nail on the head with design, networking, presentation, etc. There's even a devoted community that has grown around this board, who would swear to you it's the best thing since sliced bread.

Maybe there's a lesson there.

(Why is this flagged...?)
I think calling this intentional art is a bit of a stretch.
> It also raises the ethical question of whether these creators are responsible for the misuse of their products. Is it enough for them to say "This is how this product should be used. You are on your own if you use it outside these settings."?

I don't think you have to answer the ethical question to address the level of readiness that Copilot or self-driving cars are at. It definitely raises the question, but you don't have to answer it to talk about suitability for use cases.

As you say, it might address the requirements of some specific people. My argument is that Copilot is not good enough yet for the bulk of imagined use cases, whether or not you call that MVP, and I think the post makes a good argument about why.
Where’s the Apple M2?
I'm sure the fix will work fine, it's just there are things like liability that car manufacturers and dealers have to deal with.
AI for the Clueless Developer
> I seem to recall that this was intentional, to improve acceptance of motor vehicles in the early days.

The link I shared previously (Fonseca, 2020) mentions this:

---

Why do we talk about crashes like this? It didn't happen by accident.

You may know the history of how early carmakers turned "jaywalking" — a term initially meant to shame pedestrians out of the street — into an actual crime. But the emerging auto industry also had a hand in influencing how the public perceived fatal collisions.

In the early days of the automobile, reckless drivers were killing pedestrians, mostly women and children, at alarming rates. Newspaper coverage in the 1910s and '20s painted drivers as "remorseless murderers" and angry mobs reportedly dragged drivers involved in fatal collisions from their cars.

So the industry went into damage control, with one national auto industry group even creating a free wire service for newspapers, which incentivized reporters to send in basic details of a traffic collision in return for a full, ready-to-publish article. What a thoughtful convenience! Except, unsurprisingly, the narrative in those articles largely shifted the blame to pedestrians and used the term "accident" to describe crashes, which helped embed the term in the minds of news readers across the nation.

In the face of the rising death toll, a 1926 editorial in The New Republic titled "The Murderous Motor" proclaimed: "...much of the present waste of life is inevitable and will continue no matter what preventive measures are taken."

Imagine if outlets today were publishing stories about data privacy from a free wire service run by Facebook, Google or Uber. That's essentially the ethical breach many newspapers allowed back in the '20s and '30s — and the echoes and effects can still be seen in news stories today.

The auto industry exploited the power of the press because its leaders understood that language and perspective (and growing ad revenue) can shift culture — and recent scientific research backs that up.
You're getting really into the weeds. All I'm saying is the OP will behave unexpectedly for people expecting "just a lisp" (a Scheme-like and/or CL-like lisp). It is not some kind of contract-preserving optimization over a naive linked-list (though those exist!).

The way those languages chose to handle this stuff has well-trod advantages and disadvantages. I don't love it personally, but I get it. Certainly it's worked well enough for a whole lot of software!

But I'm not commentating on it here. I'm just stating the divergence with the OP. Critiquing Lisp's 40+ year history and what parts of it should or shouldn't have been different is out of scope as far as I'm concerned. You're arguing against something that isn't being stated.
I have a soft spot in my heart for underpowered computers, but practically, I know this is kind of an unnatural fetish, and not really a healthy love. The little computer costs way more and consumes way more per watt than modern systems, and any minimal use case is better done via virtualization in a container on a more capable computer. Yet, the fetishism of all manner of obsolete, underpowered and wildly obsolete chip process technology remains!
; DROP TABLE "COMPANIES";-- LTD
This depends on what "unpredictable" means. Do I know precisely what this java program will compute? No. But I do know some things that it won't do. Its behavior is not completely unbounded.
https://ausum.io/s/WsRxwA48rWnjKs-HIKgU9ICxzbmEJkqkvFK_lZmfk...
Interesting. I still have a Jornada 680, which uses the Hitachi SH3 CPU (compared to this Casio's SH4). It came with Windows CE, but there was a Linux distro for it called Jlime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jlime
Remotely, and then in person. We had a mix of meetings and social gatherings.
Predictable yields at controllable times are how you get efficient consumption and distribution.
Elife & PloS both charge fairly high submission fees. They employ their own teams of editors. PloS for example has close to 500 employees. Fees for most of their research areas are > $2000 per article submission. Their latest addition of Computational Biology has 80 articles, or $160,000 in revenue. I believe PloS offers fee assistance in certain circumstances, so the total amount will probably be a little less. Either way, this is more than enough to cover the sorts of activities I mentioned.

As an example from Elife, in addition to the peer review feedback process, Elife describes their editorial output as providing: "detailed feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions and suggestions for improvement."
detailed feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions and suggestions for improvement"

In terms of the mechanics of publishing, it's all very little different than a traditional publisher, except for the funding model. In terms of public access, it is far superior: Publication costs are covered without exorbitant subscription fees and the public gets the benefits of the research for no cost of their own.

This is why I would like to see a move to grant models where the grant includes the cost of publication, and a requirement for the portion to be used to get knowledge into the public even if the results did not confirm the experimental hypothesis.
Until you have multiple cars trying to project multiple arrays of infrared dots onto objects 20 meters away in bright sunlight and then getting an accurate reading on which of the array kerfuffle is theirs.
The dealer/bank are running a profitable business. They are not on the hook for anything, you are paying for it all.
"Right to repair" doesn't mean you have to do it yourself. Paying someone else to do it would still be made possible by "right to repair" laws.

Similar to free software. Free software means you can change the code as needed, even if you don't know how to code and pay someone else... that is still free software working as intended.
> Humans can write very good software. The Space Shuttle engineering group wrote some damned fine software. They look literally nothing like the #YOLO coding that makes up most of Silicon Valley, and deal with a far, far more constrained environment as well than a typical public road.

Safety-critical software like that used in the space shuttle is incredible expensive for the level of complexity involved (which is not very high, compared to other projects). A self-driving car is probably one of the most complex software projects ever attempted. If you were to apply the same techniques as the shuttle to achieve self-driving you would literally never finish (not even the tech giants have enough money to do this). So to achieve this you not only need to solve the very difficult initial problems you also need to come up with a way of getting extreme reliability in a much more efficient way than anyone has achieved before.
If it makes sense for you, do it. The question isn't who pays the depreciation or maintenance (this is explicitly factored into leases) -- the question is, who can predict it more accurately?
FYI the hamburger menu doesn't work on Android chrome.
I also did G1G1 and used my X0-1 some (though it was pretty slow even by ~2007 standards, Sugar was an interesting idea for a WM / UI, but running all that through Python...). Negroponte may have come off as unrealistic, but they did have some successes with the OLPC in South America, and other pilot projects[1]. It seems like someone could make a rugged chassis like that for an RPi 4 compute module these days.

1: https://www.technologyreview.com/2012/10/29/84908/given-tabl...
Dave Lynam (the person) is totally correct. Stripping organisational features is against UX.
Many airlines fly to both Cuba and the USA.