skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> we need to encrypt the information to prevent casual snooping using tools such as Wireshark. We don't need to verify the identity of the server because that's typically not a problem on the intranet.

If somebody is on your network snooping on packets with wireshark, they can easily be poisoning ARP or DNS to redirect and man in the middle all your traffic too.

Your complaints come down to certificate management. Spend some time looking at group policy and cert management tools--there are tons of things in this space. Or... hire a IT person to do it, that's how business works. X509 certs are well established and trusted as a way of securing internal networks. They aren't perfect and they have some warts, but deployed properly they are secure.
> anticircumcision movement

This is one of those things that is specific to the Jewish religion, in which it serves as an irreversible symbol of membership and has done for about three thousand years ... and also a subset of Americans, who do it for reasons which they suddenly find difficult to explain to their adult children.

If it's important for adult life, but not actually urgent, leave it until the child is old enough to be asked for their meaningful consent.
IC Manager work – what managers do during their focus time
The simple solution is a local certificate authority which is added to the users’ browsers. It can deliver certificates automatically or manually.

This is one of the services provided by Microsoft Windows servers, or you can roll your own. It’s not hard and scales whatever way you want.

Expecting browser vendors to weaken security to avoid this tiny amount of work is backwards and will never happen.
I agree that the average person today lives like a king, but I disagree that capitalism is what brought it about.

IMO, the capitalism = progress relationship is coincidental, not causal. The march of science and technology would have continued, capitalism or no capitalism. Even the Soviets, for all the problems and violence caused by their unfree economic system, managed to make tech and scientific progress work, albeit slower.

And yes, capitalism brought me the smartphone that I'm typing on today: with all the harmful, attention-grabbing and addictive features. That's why I'm trying to quit smartphones altogether.
Clickable link - https://forms.gle/aNiw1Wp5gejjqGPy9
For real, my tweet rate is less than once per year, yet I still regularly use the app just to follow some interesting people.
New Dictionary Words Summer 2021
Encryption without signing is arguably more useful than not encrypting at all, although there's an argument that non-signed encryption gives a false sense of security that encourages bad practice.

However,

> we need to encrypt the information to prevent casual snooping using tools such as Wireshark.

Given this goal, signing is necessary. If you're not signing the encryption, you can use a tool like Wireshark combined with Bettercap to man-in-the-middle the encrypted session, and there's no point.
Career Needs a Vision
Huh. There simply aren't that many C++ compilers in the world that matter... who is working with a C++11 compiler, but doesn't have at least C++17? (The core problem with C++20 is that support is still spotty: like, I am waiting with baited breadth for clang to finally get around to P1091R3/P1381R1... they list it as "partial", but it feels like "not even started".)
I call strings like that "noun soup".

These nouns connect arbitrarily like molecules in a liquid, forming one completely opaque (and barely palatable) whole.
Cities have the worst urban heat, where temperatures can spike 15 degrees
Obviously: 'dropped by -100%' means 'increased by 100%'. Looks like you missed the minus sign.
Yeah with python you have pip, with rust there is cargo wih c++ there is a whole painful largely manual process unless you use a big tool like bazel to help reduce the build complexity.
If there's always at least one computer switched on (which be a rented VM, or even a phone if that's enough storage) then Syncthing could work. I haven't tried making many edits from different places with lots of time offline though — mostly, I use it to sync photos I take on my phone to my computers and vice-versa for DSLR pictures, and music etc from the computers to my phone. Files generally sync within a few seconds.

rclone is the cloud equivalent of rsync, it syncs to S3, GCS etc. But you'd have to set up the "latest version" part yourself (--update?) and something to make the synchronization happen after changes (inotify on Linux?).
You can get a Let's Encrypt certificate for an internal subdomain: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/103524/lets-enc...
I am saying 40 minutes a day is an absolute minimum sufficient for simple maintenance tasks (aka walking, cooking healthy meals, etc) and a far greater amount of time is required to actually accomplish anything meaningful, let alone novel or groundbreaking.
*In theory. However, in practice...
Some past threads:

Svgbob – convert ASCII diagrams to SVG, now with styling support - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22325720 - Feb 2020 (33 comments)

Svgbob: Convert your ASCII diagram scribbles into happy little SVG - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19857349 - May 2019 (35 comments)

Convert ASCII scribbles to SVG - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14422777 - May 2017 (13 comments)
If interested in this topic, you may want to check out the book "The Body Electric" by Robert Becker.
Historical success? The CCP is only 100 years old, China is 5000.
Just because you crush revolts doesn't make your ideals successful.

Taiwan is the real China. The CCP is the boogieman and they're destroying both their history and the world.

The CCP are evil people and they are committing genocide.

Be Confucius, not Mao.
Well…

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205223
Other than the already mentioned parts, wouldn’t the acceleration be too great for your average passenger?
Nobody doubts there will probably be some planning of climate doom mitigation, but the reason we're in this mess is because of misplaced human ingenuity.

We can grow almonds in deserts beside golf courses, yes. But should we have been doing it in the first place?

All of our terraforming for the present world we live in today is at the expense of future generations prosperity.
I think that's exactly what parent is getting at though: it's a pain to manage certs for your own internal stuff and even worse for third party stuff in your environment. Rather than say "well, just hire more IT people" we should really come up with a simpler and easier solution if we want to actually see adoption.
I'm not confused by it, though I'm a native English speaker and live in an English speaking country and spend most of my internet time on English speaking internet, so maybe that's why
What makes a fleet a fleet isn't a video, it's that it's transient. You can make a text fleet. Or could.

If you've never used a fleet and have read the post, you can use the text from it "Most Fleets include media" to conclude that there exist fleets that do not include media. Video is a form of media. You can then conclude through pure syllogism that fleets do not require video.
But this is talking about 2030, not 2100. I guess the question is, if sea level rise stopped completely today, would there be no problem in 2030?
> For the people who left the church because they found some of the teachings abhorrent, I would assume they were rejecting the church's authority, not rejecting God.

If every conservative that rejected the church's authority decided to stay at home from church, the church would be empty.

I get you don't like the church... like I really understand this viewpoint. But why reject the church goers? The pope, the bishops, the priests, sure I can see not liking them. But if you show up and talk to the church members, the ones who you grew up with, etc, what exactly is wrong with that?

Man I can't tell you how annoyed we've been with our priest, our bishops, and yes the pope. I've gone through periods of extreme doubt. I still show up for the community. Always have, and likely always will. Just stick around.
You've got the order reversed. Mac pretty much defined the modern WIMP UI and was the only real game in town for consumers & professionals from 1984 - 1990 when Windows 3 was released, and during this time an entire industry (DTP) was built atop Mac's strong UI foundations.

It's more accurate to say that in modern UIs the others decided to each go their own different paths and replicate part of what made the MacOS experience special, but they also tended to forget to include a lot of the little details that made it great, and have never had the same dedication to consistency.

Re: discoverability, there's an order to discovering advanced options in MacOS - hold Option and click on menus. You'll be surprised how far that gets you. The whole idea of MacOS and native apps is you learn how to use the system once, and you're rewarded from thereon out. Not all things are discoverable without these keys because not all things are relevant for everyday uses and can add clutter - its a design choice to make simple things easy and hard things possible. They're not always perfect but they're still the best game in town.

RE: moving windows with hotkeys, just get an app like Magnet, problem solved.
Transport Innovations could Slash CO2 emissions by 75%
Cashing out: Selling the business and why it was a bittersweet moment
I really wonder how much of this actually is a problem, how prevalent it is, how new it is, and how much of the problem is socially induced.

Just anecdotally, my sister and I have different relationships with our parents. They had different relationships with their own parents, and different from their respective siblings. My adult child is quite close with me. My ex had yet different relationships with each of her parents, which was different from her own siblings. And that's just a small selection. Some of these relationships would be considered strained, some very close, and all sorts of points in-between.

Historically cities were full of people who wanted to get away from where they were before, some for adventure, sure, but also many to get away from family and social relationships.

I don't doubt that there are adults (especially older parents) heartbroken about estrangement from other family members. So for those people sure, it's a problem. But it's quite possible the counterpart in the (non-) relationship is quite satisfied by where things stand. And given that a kid grew up with a parent: how many less tight relationships are satisfactory to all concerned?

And all that leads me to wonder: how much unhappiness about the structure of a given relationship stems simply from its deviation from society's stereotypical model of what an ideal relationship should be? This definitely differs from society to society; the south asian side of my family is full of very close relationships (to say the least) but is also very stifling and unhappy for some members. Certainly people feel heartbreak, and some suffer serious psychological disorders, due to a mismatch between their body and the (then) social ideal. We recognize that as an unfair pathology; why not the same for human relationships which are exponentially more varied than body shapes.

This all reminds me of common surveys of religious prevalence: most of them assume that it's the default state, and often don't even have a way to measure "don't care".

You can see this kind of assumption in the article itself, where the author quotes an academic: "but the idea that a relative could be faulted for failing to honor/acknowledge one’s ‘identity’ would have been incomprehensible." -- Just tell that to, for example, the gay folks, or folks who adopted a different religion, who left their families of wider communities because they needed to be recognized for who they are. The incomprehension by these commentators that these are indeed longstanding factors demonstrates their own biases.
> No, I never had that question asked about dancing nor swimming or any other sport.

Or it could be that your experience of disinterest is not universal.

I know plenty of people who express interest in what other people and their kids do, whether they are odd or not.
So many doomsday takes here. For me, this is the important tidbit:

> Although both the business-as-usual and comprehensive technology scenarios point to the coming end of economic growth in around 10 years, only the BAU2 scenario “shows a clear collapse pattern, whereas CT suggests the possibility of future declines being relatively soft landings, at least for humanity in general.”

> Both scenarios currently “seem to align quite closely not just with observed data,” Herrington concludes in her study, indicating that the future is open.

What this is saying is that while one model predicts a more catastrophic scenario, the other predicts a slow drag (and even the catastrophic one doesn't necessarily mean the end of the world so to speak). But I don't think we need to go as far trying to predict things: you can just look at how resource-constrained economies are doing today: various places around the world are already forced to do water rationing, for example.

If there's anything the whole global warming doom and gloom got wrong is the idea that it would affect the whole world more or less the same way everywhere. But now, studies and news articles both show that these events are going to deviate from averages (e.g. pockets of extreme forest fires in specific locations due to local weather conditions, predictions of ocean tides raising by nearly a foot in specific locations depending on specific astronomic conditions). It doesn't seem like a stretch to postulate that the effects of a collapse are already here for some places in the world, in one form or another, such as what we already see with water shortages or flood seasons due to pollution or forest fire seasons.

Rather than some scenario where the entire world breaks out in civil war, it seems more logical to think that society will continue to live in a business-as-usual sort of way for a long time, except with ever increasing rates of location-specific annoyances/inconveniences/inequalities (e.g. no water tuesday or $70/lb salmon or terrible air quality for two months per year or what have you).
If the funds have equal performance*
> MAX 3 is a device with the HDMI monitor function. The device has an HDMI input that allows to accept the output signal from any external video source (desktop PC, laptop, tablet).

https://onyxboox.com/boox_max3
Good. I'd rather live in chaos than a world controlled by these technocrats.

Let's do Twitter while we're at it.
Oh please. It's not like only whites were part of churches. Blacks are more likely to be part of a church anyway. As usual, this is white people's faults.
With terminal emulators having already existed for decades, what benefits do Rust and GPU acceleration bring at this point? What problem are they solving? Not trying to sound confrontational, if I do, I’m just curious.
The article calls this a "historically high fine". It's also really small compared to the scale of YouTube dollars, i.e. for YouTube to care (about this fine in isolation).
> How can I "get things done" if I'm being told "oh no, you're not allowed to do <standard-thing-X>, we've decided that only us on the Elm team can do that".

I think this is common in almost any language. For example, in JavaScript there isn’t a way to turn off the garbage collector. Why are browser authors limiting us? I’m sure they have good reasons - reasons that I may not fully understand but that’s fine! Maybe this isn’t the best example but I’m sure you or someone else could think of one for me.

Anecdotally, even when lower level/advanced features are exposed, I personally haven’t had the need to reach. For example, say python allowed for custom memory management features - I’ve never had the need for them! And I’m just fine working on a large django application with thousands of concurrent users. This isn’t to say I will never need some advanced lower level feature of python, however, I haven’t needed for >5 years.

The point is, if elms feature set works well for most of its applications - what’s the problem? The creators have a vision for the constraints of the language! Which is directly related to the intended goals and benefits of the language
I use a giant sheet of graph paper on my desk with days of the month marked off horizontally at the top and a column of daily habits on the left. I put a big fat X in the grid for each day I accomplish a given task. It's incredibly satisfying and very obvious when I've missed a few days. Also the paper acts as a nice desk protector.
The statistical apple can only fall so far from the statistical tree. Some apples may roll down hillsides or into rivers but it's unwise to bet on any one apple doing so.
I think at this point we're reading too much into specific units to compare very distinct things. The point of the analogy either way is the compounding effect of seemingly small things repeated.
Many folks say to just take that money you'd spend on tuition and make a short film. What's your opinion on that? I got an AS in film production, and that was cheaper than making a mid-budget short film, and also helped make contacts. I was in city w/o much film program so even PA gigs were hard to come by and paying for my contacts was a great shortcut. There's a very short chain of links between the guy who sat next to me in Stagecraft 101 and my present job 20 years later.

And get this: turns out I hated film production itself and the long hours as well as unreliable life of a freelancer. This meant taking a day job and missing out on a lot of freelance gigs due to weekday availability, but even with that handicap I managed to be gainfully employed (although the first 5 years out of college were pretty rough).
Show HN: Beast API – Speedy app development with 15 tools in a single API
But the birth rate isn't really the point. It's a proxy for consumption. As the nation gets wealthier, the per capita consumption goes up and generally creates a net increase in consumption.
Microsoft: “If this gets 20k likes, we’ll replace paperclip emoji with Clippy”
> It's not a technicality.

In the context of this discuss it is.

It doesn't matter because what people want is to not be censored. Thats the point of all of this.

And you are bringing something up that just isn't relevant at all, that nobody brought up, but yourself.

> But it's not violating the 19th amendment.

Its not violating the 3rd amendment either. But nobody brought that up. Nobody cares if the 3rd amendment was violated, in this context.

What people care about is the bad thing happening. And you are distracting from the conversation, by not focusing on the fact that it is bad, and instead focusing on something that nobody cares about, in the context of this discussion.

The original context of all of this, is that someone said "It seems to me that if you really want to be a despot, you should own the companies that control the flow of information".

They didn't bring up the 1st amendment. You did. And that distracts from the important conversation, which is, that if someone wants to censor a bunch of other people, then they can get around all these laws, by just having a private company do it instead.

Thats why you got downvotes. It is because your point about the 1st amendment comes off as a bad faith way, of ignoring what everyone was actually talking about, which is about how a despot can censor a bunch of people, and cause a lot of harm, and that they can do that without running into 1st amendment issues, by just getting a private company to do it.
I’m not so sure about blaming social media. I really wish the article had included any sort of concrete data on whether estrangement has actually become more common over time. In my family, my grandfather didn’t talk to his parents because they were alcoholic money-grubbers. My grandma didn’t talk to her dad because he’d left their family to start another family. My aunt didn’t talk to my grandma because my grandma discouraged her from having a career. Reading biographies and history books, it seems like there have always been shitty, “toxic,” or difficult parents, and there have always been disowning, abandonments, and silent treatments. Add to that the fact that our social support structures (babysitting help, end-of-life care) can be paid for in cash, rather than social favors, and you have some pretty normal and understandable dynamics. People barely have time for friends these days. What are the odds that both parents are fun, awesome people you really want to hang out with and spend extra time with? FWIW, I get along great with my parents. But I also recognize that they were better, healthier, more supportive, more present parents than what most of my friends had growing up.
Have to wonder if that identity is the final refuge of generations that feel helpless and worse-off than prior ones.
If you have to ask what it symbolizes - it doesn't
Im generally for nuclear power, but nuclear waste at fukushima seemed to be a big deal
Sorry for the confusion: For Americans Google does not have to follow GDPR. Garmin has to follow GDPR worldwide as it is incorporated in Switzerland.
The Underhanded Hackathon!
No, it says the US government is the number two for "information requests." It doesn't mention anything about the US and requests to remove content.
Came for this.

“Curious how these things happen. The [pencil] chooses the [writer], remember…”
The contrast on that text makes me feel like they don't want anyone to actually read it.
tweets can't ruin your life any more than talking out loud anywhere else.

the long searchable record is certainly convenient for digging dirt, but public speech is public speech.
Is rust feasible for writing audio applications that are dependent on tight timings, and low latency? E.g a DAW or vst
On a 1km runway you could get up to 700kph with 3g of acceleration over 10 seconds. I think some rollercoasters pull higher G's than that.
Charging is limited by two factors:

- the power you can get from the charger to the batteries
- the power the cells can accept

You can reasonably easily fix the first point with custom infrastructure, so the second point will be the limiting factor, and that one means that it always takes e.g. 20 minutes to charge your batteries, regardless how many you're charging (because with a bigger battery, you're simply charging more cells in parallel, at the same speed per cell).
What's the problem? Demand, awareness, consideration, or conversion?

Do people not want the solution you're selling, are they not aware you're selling it, are they not considering you as an option, or are they not choosing you to solve the problem?

Start from the end and work backwards and you might find your answer (although it might not be the answer you want).
Remember, when embedding ASCII art in HTML, hide it from screenreaders and provide alt text. Otherwise it's an incomprehensible mess of seemingly random characters.
That's interesting. I've never used nscd, but the rule seems to work against both dnsmasq and systemd-resolved which just listen on loopback port 53.

As for IPv6 you can obviously just apply a similar rule using ip6tables (or the newer nftables, which I don't know how to use.)
> Sounds pretty extreme and absolutist to me.

I am giving a social absolute. Your absolute regarded abuse, a crime, and a serious one at that. A statement being absolute is only concerning if it's also extreme. Labeling deference to parents as abusive is extreme.
You can see datasets purporting to be, for instance, details about students appearing for various Indian competitive exams for as little as $50-100[1]. Other datasets are costlier, of course.

If you're marketing to that demographic (e.g. potential ads for private colleges, or other courses), your budget won't be super high, but you might well spend a little for a bunch of emails of potential leads.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/india/comments/63s18q/student_data_...