skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes they do. Not personally, but they do. The amount of child exploitation that falls through the filters is not zero, and sometimes the government of the US intervenes and asks for the content to be removed.
>Recently been thinking we should reform old style political parties. Instead we get to directly vote for ideological topics which we can vote on, and politicians/parties who adhere to them.

I'm not sure whether it's that. Addressing climate change might be a popular policy, but spending money to address climate change doesn't seem to be.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27686289
Global warming causes changes in weather. Experiencing record high temperates most years is down to it.

It snowing every year is down to seasons.
Interesting. And technology is what brought on the cataclysm of climate change.
Visa's crypto partnerships grow by 43% in four months
All pandemics end. That doesn’t mean the disease is eliminated. It means it no longer is spreading uncontrolled around the world.
Your honor, can the prosecution please be compelled to demonstrate where the bitcoin physically exists? Oh on this computer? Well, the key is memorized and there are several copies saved all over the world in cloud computers. Can the prosecution show the court, physically, where in the computer the asset exists?
I agree, co-ops are far superior to private corporations. However, they still exist in a market and the market will force them to make many similar decisions to private corporations. This is why we need a consciously planned economy. We cannot be free without the ability to make meaningful decisions.
Unless you're a sheep farmer or something (in which case, you still rely on the state for security) you need an enormous number of state services to run even a very simple business, but on a more basic level, property rights are defined and guaranteed by the state, currency is produced and given value by the state, employment relations and legal structures also, and so on.
Both the Copy machine and VCR were found to be legal because they had substantial non infringing uses. As is I don't see how Copilot does. It could, if trained on public domain or attribution free code only, unfortunately there probably isn't enough code out there to train the model adequately under such rules.
Can you add advertiser-unfriendly content to your video to avoid YouTube forcing ads?
Of course he couldn't dump all his stock at it's current share price, the sudden arrival of that many shares would drive the price down -- but these things aren't really about facts and more about driving an agenda
Say what you want about China’s record on human rights, if the Sacklers lived in China they would all have been passed through a firing squad by now, like those scum who adulterated baby formula with melamine.
> Google did not scan those books and use it to build new books with different titles. The comparison doesn't hold up at all.

Not sure if you meant to reply to me but I agree with you: you can't compare what Google did to what Copilot does.
This is really interesting because I was working recently on a way to have complete spreadsheets using only CSV files. The project is in my Github (https://github.com/yassirnajmaoui/runcsv and https://github.com/yassirnajmaoui/runcsv-gui)
The only (major) thing is that the cells are run in top-bottom left-right instead of running a graph like this repo suggests.
The people who are willing to pay for such subscription are the most valuable to advertisers.

They will offer way more money than you can offer for the service.
Hedge fund Citadel hiring from rival funds as some exit
> And by the way, this exact rule is the reason many South African startup founders incorporate in Delaware instead of locally, because it is extremely difficult to attract foreign investment if the investors know they will not be able to get the return on their investment (or share of the IP) out of the country again.

Except that in the USA you also need to declare transfers over $10,000 to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). And this is done to find people trying to avoid paying taxes. It is the same for the European Union. And it is the same for any other country.

Quite often the answer to all this articles is "the world does not work as you think it works", crypto-currencies are not special, it is just that the bureaucracy of countries need to catch up.
Good point. My current firewall is an older Celeron cpu and with 20+ devices hammering the 1Gbps fibre,I can hardly make it sweat.
DoH means handing your data to one more party since your ISP can already see your SNI headers and the IP addresses. The only thing DoH does is stopping DNS spoofing at the cost of handing your data to a third party.
this is medieval England thinking, where only landlord had a vote and could decide the future of the country/community
They force DoH in the name of freedom. What will be the DoH resolver ? Cloudfare ? Google ? One must use GP to disable this on Win or a DNS server on linux Everyday the reasons to keep firefox are converging to 0.
Terrible decision IMO. To default to application level DNS that then defaults to a large centralized DNS provider is the opposite of supporting an open and decentralized internet.

This should be an optional feature that is Opt in. Instead a quick banner appears when you start Firefox and if you don't quickly hit disable … it enables this by default.

disappointing behavior by Mozilla
I just zoom in. On my device it's easy; double-tap while dragging your finger down on the second tap.
The problem is you are trying to base a tax code on "should," which is why it's broken in the first place. The problem with taxing corporations is that it isn't clear cut what their income is. Individual income is much more easily defined, (even if it comes from distributions from corporations) so taxes that target individuals tend to be more successful.
Fearmongering and gaslighting.

https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1410961875899146249

Edit. Please read this and factor it into your understanding: https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Christy%20Testimony_...

Edit 2. For the people downvoting me (certainly without considering what I've presented) and others, consider the phrasing here... "killer" heat, "scares" me. It's intentionally emotionally manipulative.
The federal minimum wage hasn't changed in 12 years. Tipped labour can be legally paid $2.13 an hour.

What need is there for wasteful propaganda when struggle is baked right into economic policy?
What is the cost compared to mass migration of the entire world population to north of the 50th (or so) parallel? Would civilization even survive?

If we don't make serious changes the planet will get so hot that the clouds will vanish and there will be no more rain. We would be in a permanent drought.
We are already geo-engineering. That's why the climate is changing.
> However, that 'somehow' didn't seem to be an issue for 15 years.

It has absolutely been an issue. If you listen in on the earnings call, shareholders have been asking for YouTube revenue for years. Google has to show it can be a profitable business.
from what I remember, CM4 provides more functions and I/Os than you can get from Pi4. Just put it in the specialized motherboard (some boards have specific features to supplement CM4).

I strongly recommend you to watch Jeff Geerling YouTube channel, you will see the why it is beneficial to use CM4 over Pi4.
Your ISP is selling all of your internet activity to data brokers. This gets added into the detail profile they have on your spending, preferences, political attitudes, and much more. DoH takes that away.
Name the causes of death due to the vaccine.

* J&J has that blood clot issue, measured to be less than 15 in 8-million. Though serious, we now know how to deal with these blood clots thanks to the temporary pause. So with treatment, that vaccine won't kill many people anymore (if you count 15-in-8-million as "many").

* There's the heart-palpatation issue, which is measured to be less than 10-in-a-million and hasn't caused many deaths IIRC.

That's it. After 100-million Americans have received the vaccine for several months, that's all we've seen. And that's taking the worst of the two vaccines that have come out.

---------

mRNA self-disintegrates at room temperature. That's why they have to keep the darn thing at -80C or -30C. After a few days in the body (or ~37C), its __ literally __ gone and can no longer affect the body.

I'm willing to give a few weeks or even months to see if there's lingering effects of the mRNA spike proteins generated from the vaccine. But at this point, I'm willing to call it. The mechanics of how the darn thing works means that long-term effects are negligible.

That's why our bodies use DNA to begin with! Because mRNA (although effective as an "execution engine" so to speak) is extremely volatile and barely lasts. Our bodies transcribe DNA into mRNA instructions constantly, renewing the "code" that our body executes.

--------

Its put-up or shut-up time. The vaccine is in over 100-million Americans. If you think its unsafe, prove it. Find the deaths and report back.

EDIT: That's the thing. COVID19 is "put up or shut up" time. We have the evidence staring at us in the face. Climate Change, as annoying as it is, isn't anywhere near as "provable" as COVID19. We actually have placebo studies on different population sets and a proper experiment set up to create evidence for our COVID19 policies.

Climate change? We don't have a 2nd Earth to run as our "control study" in our experiment. We literally cannot experiment upon Climate change to get the same level of evidence that's available in the COVID19 debate.

And still: look at all these downvoters. Look at this debate. Its ridiculous. If we can't even get COVID19 figured out in our arguments, why the hell should we assume people will agree with us on climate change?
What is the primary cost issue preventing greater competition and hosted videos? Is it band with, storage space, or just infrastructure? It seems this arena is very crowded with producers yet everyone is beholden to YouTube. Why?
> won't be uninhabitable

I think you have a typo.
If you point out recent coldness records, you will be lectured about the difference between weather and climate. I think the real issue may be the human delusion that things staying the same is normal (perhaps because of the short life span of humans), and more recently in scientific terms, that averages are normal.

About this article I find it odd that it cites Thatcher, of all people. Surely the information she used in the 80ies is outdated by now, and she presumably never was a climate researcher.
To paraphrase Shakespeare on treason, Crime does not prosper, for if it prosperity, none dare call it crime.
Good question. "Sugar addiction" has some serious scientific attention [1].

If "gambling addiction" is a real thing (just search the web for it), then "social media addiction" can be, too. Casinos don't let kids under 18 gamble.

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28835408/
You're right, on further inspection, we may not be disagreeing.

To clarify: I'm arguing against the idea of people not liking the mental transaction costs being the primary reason why microtransactions haven't been adopted (which is the point that I thought that you were making). I agree that the monetary costs themselves are the primary reason.
Wow, this speaks so many truths. And to add to this, if you want us to care more about the product, the simple truth is just to pay us more. Hit that sweet financial spot for us and we're yours. This is universally true for any job, in fact.

Instead we get what is essentially a Mcdonald motivation video in white collar form... telling us that we should care cause of impact, customer care, improve motor skills, blah blah.
Opel to be 100% electric in Europe by 2028: CEO
A more energetic atmosphere results in more energetic weather - some will be cold, some will be hot, as weather always is, but more so, because more energy. Hurricanes and thunderstorms start with warm air but they can create hailstones. The weather is complex. I can't believe we still need to explain this stuff.

More heat energy trapped in the atmosphere results in more chaotic weather. But 'global chaosing' didn't have the same ring to it when we needed to coin a term.
In my opinion that's part of what makes it funny, and is also a core issue in the Ship of Theseus problem -- who's to say how much it can be changed and is still "the same thing"? Maybe the thing that was replaced was very small but was very important to the identity.
It's not possible to get copilot to output a transformed version of the input?
They remind me why Climate Change is always my #1 priority when voting in elections
> The problem I always face is that I want to vote for a party that want to do something against climate change but the party that claims to be ecologist wants to get away from nuclear without any real plans like they did in Germany. I believe that right now, we should rely on nuclear power and that it's the only way in the short to medium term to get out of the crisis.
Haskell's System-F is definitely completely is decidable. You need to opt in to undecidable features like RankNTypes (n>=3) explicitly. (which are GHC; and not Haskell specific).

Even then; Undecidability is a bit spectrumy. e.g. RankNTypes become sort of decideable again in the presence of explicit type annotations
> Think back to when we were listening to AI generated pop music, for instance. I don’t recall any concern in HN comments about the copyright holders’ music being used for learning.

Were those products sold to help people write commercial pop music faster? If not, I don't think your point is valid.
Koonin's book is highly misleading. You'd be better off spending your time reading IPCC reports, or, frankly, staring at a wall and picking your nose, than reading that contrarian drivel.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/that-obama-scient...
| Climate Change is always my #1 priority when voting in elections

If every climate change candidate you favored for won in the US and Canada the impact on climate would be near zero. Why? Because China, Vietnam, India and Indonesia are now the majority contributors to emissions and they don't care about your agenda.

Such are the unintended consequences of progressive agendas. We regulated 'dirty' businesses out of existence (mostly) in North America and in so doing gave up our influence over how those industries operate.

And, no, we cannot coerce compliance via tariffs or sanctions. You cannot manufacture drugs, chemicals, electronics and other critical societal goods today without inputs from polluting countries.

The lack of dimensionality in progressive political agendas is disheartening and dangerous.
It reminds me, that exact issue is why I switched from `npm` to `yarn` a few years ago. Sad to see that it has not been solved after all this time..
What about the marginal cost to host a channel that gets < 1000 views per year?
thats why you have holes in the southern border, to keep bringing fresh meat willing to work for peanuts and without entitlements to the social safety net
They already have filtered water refill stations in some grocery stores, they could theoretically do the same for milk (and other products) without bringing back delivery people.
> For all the recycling I’ve done, a single factory can undo in just a day

That's why it has to be solved by going political. Capitalism wont make companies care unless they are forced to pay for their pollution with emission taxes or whatever.

And in the same vein, a few persons driving a bit less wont matter. Instead ICE vehicles could have been basically forbidden. Of course, all this comes at a cost of somewhat limiting people's "freedom", which makes it so hard to get support for.

So a better way is policies that makes it the "rational choice" to do the right thing. Like building less roads and making stuff more walkable or reachable by public transit. That will have a far greater effect than someone voluntarily giving up their car with the status quo.
Some of this software is pretty terrible. I don't remember what for but the new CRM software at my apartment required that I fill some form that I couldn't find so I went down stairs to the office and the person working for the land lord didn't know either.

We ended up figuring it out together.
Agreed, compared to a novel chemical approach isolation and counterflow heat exchange seem almost embarrassingly lowtech to the mostly hypothetical "how to to electrolysis when it's cold outside" problem.

Perhaps there might be some actual merit when the end product of your process is compressed/liquefied H2? Still reads more like the usual make up some hypothetical use case for the highly impractical niche you chose to push the boundaries of scientific knowledge. But who am I to judge, I did semantic web in multi-agent systems back when ai was symbolic.
Also the US, Germany etc could all cut their carbon emissions drastically and it wouldn't even matter because China and India dwarf any small change by the West. Not only are you powerless, so are most countries, even the most powerful ones. What is tiresome is that the US, etc is supposed to do something drastic which would barely have any effect while China builds new coal plants constantly. They run over 50% of all plants globally. https://e360.yale.edu/features/despite-pledges-to-cut-emissi...
What finally worked well for me was an "ear loop" tool, a small, cheap plastic tool with a safety guard, that makes extracting the wax quite easy. They cost less than $10 USD, do not rely on uncomfortable squeezing of water or liquid, nor do they just push the wax farther in (unlike a cotton swab).

It was a big deal for me to discover these existed, and when I did, I was surprised I hadn't heard of them.
Yep. The entire point is to make it impossible to block ads at the network level. And since ad companies control the application level too, they then have a complete end-to-end ad delivery stack that you can't tamper with.
This is a point that's understated. Problems in the stock market hurt the real economy, problems in the crypto market hit an insular community of people who are trying to scam each other, much less of a societal issue.
People are very good at making small changes that make them feel good, but don't actually impact their lifestyle or require any sacrifice.

Paper straws? Not a bad thing, but if you really care about the environment, using a paper straw while at a bar in country on the other side of the world that you flew to is not helpful.

Additionally, people like to see the problem as "out there". i.e. my recycling is pointless because a factory undoes it. Well, the factory is building something... that you are buying. If the factory building (let's say cars) doesn't have anyone to sell the cars to, they aren't going to continue building them.
It feels like there should be enough information from the (4K) footage to significantly narrow the location of the laser down to a group of seats. Particularly if one can get images of the laser hitting the netting of the goal before hitting Schmeichel. (One can see the shadow of the netting hexagonal mesh on his face). He's standing reasonably still on the centre of the goalline which helps.
> the continued talk about climate change is necessary

That’s been going on for fifty years at least. Personally I think we should try to come up with solutions that are more attractive to people instead of pushing the same tired asceticism stuff.

Billions of people aspire to drive a Tesla. Let’s do more of that.
But is that reproduced code "substantial"?

I'm sure there's a "for i in range(0, n):" somewhere in a GPL repo, and yet having that in my code doesn't make it GPL.
Aaand they did.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27771538
I understand the concept of fair use (I think) but I can't see how it applies to Copilot.

Google didn't create new books from the contents of existing ones (whether you agree that they should have been allowed to store the books or not) but Copilot is creating new code/apps from existing ones.

Edit: I guess my understanding of fair use was wrong. I stand corrected.
There are lots of ways to make money with content that do not involve charging for copies. One of the most popular and promising is the pay to release model where a preview may be free but the product is only released in full once enough money has been spent on it. This a more flexible approach that does not lock producers into a particular price structure or production schedule. Now that copies no longer have significant cost or barriers it is necessary to move away from making exchange of copies the primary point of revenue generation.
They only claimed that training the model was fair use. What about its output? I argue that its output is still affected by the copyright of its inputs, the same way the output of a compiler is affected by the copyright of its inputs.
Oh, as an addition, the one that really protects you from fake DNS records is DNSSEC (given you have trust on ICANN or so).
We custom wrote our own Babel plugin + some runtime functions that handle this. It changes the way we import our components and we have to choose async vs. server rendered component at import time, so that is the main trade-off.

We will be sharing more about this approach along with an open source library soon. We have been working on it for the better part of a year.
Does the GPL forbid fair use? Why don't book publishers use a license that forbids fair use?
The government didn't have the ability to print an indefinite amount of money at that time.
I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean.
1. GP said "trying to get rid of cigarettes," implying it was not a completed effort.

2. It was (and is) a fairly successful effort:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/1717/tobacco-smoking.aspx

https://www.statista.com/chart/20385/cigarette-sales-in-the-...
Unfortunately, the only time CLI wins out in networking is when there's a cert to dangle in front of people.

I'm not sure what world you live in, but in the Cisco world I don't know anyone who does anything beyond the trivial in the various 'GUIs'.

part of that equation is handing projects off to other people to maintain

Yes, and I don't know anyone who would hire a Cisco engineer that wasn't fully conversant with the CLI. The idea that something we've been doing, successfully, for decades (handing a text Cisco config to the next engineer) is "basically impossible" is...interesting...and unsupportable in my experience. As is the implied "GUIs are always easier to understand and reason about".
The hashtags insinuated the government was planning a farmer genocide.

Source: https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/govt-se...
It seems like it’s too late for technology, given that there are no large scale solutions.

Technology also has a tendency to cause its own, new, set of problems, which can be worse than problems they’re trying to solve.

It’s not a panacea, and I would not recommend counting on technology to solve it either.
I see the difference as BitTorrent being an ignorant tool that just processes the data it receives. If you point BitTorrent to copyright data, it emits copyright data. The fault is on the users. Copilot was built with and "contains" copyright data, which it can produce with non-copyright input.
Is there any evidence of Copilot producing substantial (100s of lines) verbatim copies of copyrighted works?

Absent this, I don't think there's a case. The courts have given extraordinarily wide latitude to fair use and ML algorithms are routinely trained on copyrighted works, photos, etc. without a license.

I understand that this feels more personal because it involves our field, but artists and authors have expressed the same sentiment when neural nets began making pictures and sentences.

The question here is no different than "Is GPT-3 an unlicensed, unlawfully created derivative work of millions, if not billions of people?"

No, I'm quite confident it is not.
Agreed. We should all take being a billionaire more seriously.