skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It looks like this account has been using HN primarily (actually exclusively) for political and ideological arguments. We ban accounts that do that (regardless of what they're arguing for or against) because it destroys what this site is for, and is explicitly against the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

I've therefore banned this account. Doing this on HN will eventually get your main account banned as well, so please don't do that.
So if you're charging at a rate of 2 miles per hour you can drive 48 miles a day on average, which is a fair bit more than most cars do. Even a 1 mile per hour charge rate would be enough for some people, although at that point you'll probably supplement with solar panels or something.

One advantage over solar charging is that this won't be affected by the weather and works all night long. The excess waste heat is a problem, but it is way down the list of problems with running a RTG.
The JWST will not orbit Earth. It will be located near the second Lagrange point (L2) over 1,500,000 km away (The Moon is just 405,000 km from the Earth).

Space Shuttle could not have reached it.
That's typical if you have a VPN, which many people do.
I think this doesn't detract from my main point.
I hope. I suspect many or probably most cannot afford to buy their time back though, based on who I mostly see using online food ordering and delivery.
Wokepedia is completely bogus on such subjects because it is far-left and even lists anti-communism as very first value of the Right, LOL.

Also, that moderate left National Sozialist Worker Party is indeed socialist and pro working class.

Communism is based on nice sounding theories; Nazism isn’t. It’s based on heinous sounding theories. Intellectuals in general – including, of course, the intellectuals who write history – are seduced by words – so much so, that they deem actions as less significant than words. For that reason, they haven’t focused nearly as much attention on the horrific actions of communists as they have on the horrific actions of the Nazis. They dismiss the evils of communists as perversions of “true communism.” But they regard Nazi atrocities (correctly) as the logical and inevitable results of Nazism.

... while nointellecuals are just silently downvoting ...
Most of the time that there is someone speaking on the House or Senate floor, there are only a handful of other representatives around, milling about, waiting for their turn to speak, or doing something else. The only times the chambers are ever full are during votes or public events. Not only are most of them not paying attention, they aren't even in the room most of the time Congress is in session.
It has a docking clamp, though that's for future-proofing. Apparently the initial type of mission envisioned was a crewed Orion vehicle, though I'm sure a wide variety of missions could attach.

My guess was that the clamp was mainly for possible future replenishment of consumables, though presumably some sort of robotic-arm-equipped repair mission could attach as well. A crewed mission seems possible, too, assuming one of the planned Lunar craft could be modified to go to the Lagrange point.

https://www.space.com/3833-nasa-adds-docking-capability-spac...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecraft_Bus_(JWST)#Docking_...
We are just 2 devs at the moment and we've setup Lowdefy with a monorepo and yarn 2 and I can add that even for small projects a monorepo is just bliss especially with yarn 2 and lerna!

We come from separate repos on past versions of the code and the monorepo setup has sped dev up dramatically, even for a team of 2. Having the docs next to our code and autogen some of it from the source code, all is the same repo is just one advantage.

It's a small project but you can view the setup here: https://github.com/lowdefy/lowdefy
Sort of. The promise of on-orbit refueling is three-fold;

First, you can have several tankers in orbit which would allow for an "any day of the week / time of day" launch schedule from Earth for a payload satellite, that then rendezvoused with the tanker in the orbit it found itself in, fueled up, and then did a transition burn to the orbital plane it wanted to be in.

That "wins" because the satellite can go up with empty tanks for its orbital maneuvering thrusters, (so more mass can be allocated to the satellite), and the insertion 'tug' can ride along like an unfueled third stage. That eliminates things like "instantaneous launch windows" which keep satellites grounded if everything doesn't come together at exactly the right time.

Second, station keeping lifetime can be extended (most common value) and that means you can amortize the satellite's costs over a longer lifetime. Many geosynchronous satellites are "retired" not because they don't work, but because they are about to run out of fuel for keeping their place. If you can refuel a $5M satellite and get another 10 years of life out of it, that is a pretty big deal.

And third is the ability to gain fuel post launch as part of a retro-propulsive return profile. The heat shielding of all spacecraft is there because they use "friction" return profiles where they use the atmosphere to slow them down. That is fine but limits the amount of mass you can return because the more mass you displace, the more heat you generate in the return.

If you could fill up on fuel on orbit and use that to cancel your orbital velocity, you could do a return to earth that would stay within the heat limits of ordinary steel which would be safer and easier on the spacecraft.

ULA was circulating design ideas for a cryogenic fuel depot on orbit that were pretty neat.

These are but a few of the limitations that are imposed by having to carry all of the fuel you will ever need on every flight. On orbit refueling would make it much easier to work in space.
It's going to be China's turn now, and I'd put money on them succeeding.
Looking at the other comments here, it sounds like the sticking point for many is that the migration of everything to cloud computing already happened, and the problem is webapps assuming you can easily devote tons of RAM to them.

The escape hatch in the rules, I figure, was more because you're not going to be able trivially to respec any cloud servers you already have for the week.
A shameless-because-related plug: https://www.reddit.com/r/patient_hackernews/

A Hacker News mirror biased in favor of thoughtful discussion, by enforcing that you cannot comment on something in less than 24 hours.

This might help you spend less of your attention on Hacker News, by:

1. Showing you a subset of hot posts
2. Enforcing high response delays (thus suppressing the impulse to frantically refresh for new comments).

This particular post can be discussed here: https://www.reddit.com/r/patient_hackernews/comments/ofqb6n/...

Please give feedback!
Douglas Englebart wrote 75 seminal papers answering your question and demonstrated them in "the mother of all demos".

Alan Kay has many talks and papers explaining the ideas.
There were many fascinating things here, but in the back of my mind, there was this

"The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men
Gang aft agley"

I'd go for friends, family, and a place where you'd be happy. Taxes and other factors vary across time, why not be somewhere nice instead of always worrying the optimum spot won't be next year?
So I'm a bit confused why my post is unpopular, is /pol/ unpopular, or is Trump unpopular at /pol/?
Isn’t 3d Secure a thing in the US?

I have a little app in my phone from my credit card company where I confirm when I am really buying something and it looks more secure than relying on fraud detection.
It's a fair comment, and I had to reflect on why it seemed bad to me, when I've done much worse commutes on a bus for a software job. I guess it's that you're supposed to be there for a passion, but you're in snow gear, on a wet bus, in the cold, for minimum wage, and 30 minutes is the best case - probably more like 45-50 - only to work for people who make much more money than you, go to places you see but can't afford, who don't understand the local culture, and generally act like they're better. I realize this happens all over, but most workers are seasonal and doing it for a short time as a so-called once-in-a-lifetime experience. I actually took some time off college to do this 10 years ago, and 3 friends and I were able to get a large-ish home in a big ski town within walking distance to the mountain. It was great. We did have friends that drove in from the next town over, but I always felt bad for them, that they were wasting time during this short year. It sucks that that's the default in Ketchum. But I know skiing has only gotten more popular, and maybe this is just the new reality in certain places.
We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site guidelines and ignoring our requests to stop.

Please don't create accounts to do that with.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Oh wow, Safari still doesn’t do regular SVG favicons? Huh. Somehow I thought that got sorted out a couple of years back in 12 or something.
So, an American newspaper writes about Haiti, including a few paragraphs about the historical context: the independence from France in 1803, the thirty years of the Duvalier dictatorship, etc. And they forgot to mention the 20 years of American occupation ! Would they write that Vietnam fought against the French occupation, then suffered under communist rule?

I don't expect a random American to know any of the various countries that the USA invaded and occupied, apart from Vietnam, but I sure expect a big newspaper to give this basic context.
It's close enough already. Let's just use it.

That's been said many times. There are people who, nonetheless, say it's incompatible with previous usage. Such people are, demonstrably, completely fucking stupid. That's what the Chaucer is there for. Not that it helps, because nothing helps against complete fucking stupidity.
I think a better analogy would be Flat Earth, moon landing hoax, aliens on the dark side of the moon vs. astrology and mysticism and religion.

I doubt astrology causes much financial distress for the vast majority of believers, even if it results in some people making poor financial decisions. Same for any other kind of distress.

The problem with lizard people, Deep State, and much of Alex Jones' stuff is that the claims are about specific people and groups of people and their intentions and actions. They cause many people to genuinely, truly believe that certain people are the most abominable evil imaginable. That's inevitably going to increase the risk of direct and indirect harm a lot more than woo-woo fortune-scrying.

One could say religion has done the same, and that's not necessarily wrong, but it's misleading. You'd have to compare specific things like religious extremist videos rather than merely religious/spiritual videos. Lizard people / Deep State YouTube content is very often extreme, while astrology and religion YouTube content is very rarely extreme. Pizzagate and QAnon adherents are earnestly trying to bring about the arrest and/or execution of people they believe to be child rapists and murderers.

Even stuff like 9/11 conspiracy theory videos, if believed, lead you to the unavoidable conclusion that some, much, most, or all of the US government and/or Israel and/or Jews are diabolical mass murderers. You're not going to come away with a conclusion like that after watching a crystal healing or reiki video.

>As a new YouTube user why am I recommended 100% of comedians and channels who have identical politics? What are the odds?

Probably because something in your Chrome or Google search history, or the history or video activity of other people sharing your IP address or device, led YouTube to believe that may be something you like. Or, as this article points out, maybe you clicked one or two things that were tangentially related in some way and their data set indicated a lot of people who watched those also watched those other things. So, the odds are probably very high.
We Can Do This™

- ed. For clarification, I imagine that I personally can't, so instead:

It Can Be Done™
IMHO one solution would be to categorize vulnerabilities separately for prod dependencies and dev dependencies, and bubble that categorization up.

For example, a RegEx DDoS vulnerability in Express would show up as high severity, while the same would not show in the bundler you use, or any package that your bundler has in its dependency tree.
Coal Shows Its Staying Power as Economies Bounce Back
Mini Exhibitions
This does not prevent geo-blocking, because the relay's IP is still in the same region as the user.
Dozens of Chinese phone games now require facial scans to play at night
Thanks for the clear answer. I think I like that system. Sometimes minority governments make more sense that slightly larger but more fractious coalitions. If I was trying to design a republican constitution for my own country I think I would include a similar provision.
Of course it is. Not a single study has been done, not a single shred of evidence has been presented, it's lumped in as a possible symptom of the "long covid" baloney, the article itself even says that people might just be depressed after a year of lockdown or otherwise making it up.

Then of course there's the disgustingly obvious propaganda part at the end: "“Having vaccinations leads to having more sex,” he quipped. “I would suggest for young people to get their vaccinations: If they want to have sex, better to get the vaccine.”"
If you really believe that applying common carrier laws to social media companies, with the same exception for spam that phone companies have, wouldn't make a difference, you have no reason to oppose that, right?
They should put that team to work on next-generation tech, the stuff that's not yet a commodity. They can start working on habitat construction materials and hardware, for instance.

Although it is interesting to consider that we've put a lot of expense into optimizing payloads that, in retrospect, would have been smarter to put into better launch vehicles. SpaceX probably isn't going to spend $2 billion developing Starship (even if Boeing would have.)
The reddit iphone app is a data/cpu pig.
It isn't surprising to see so many poor postures while using the phone. You want your spine in a neutral position, not with the head bent forward. Thus raise the phone in front of your face, allowing the spine to be in a neutral position. Or bend at the hips to lean forward while maintaining a neutral spine (which is hard to do at a desk).
The JWST orbits out beyond the Moon, so I don't know if the Orion capsule and European Service Module even has the Delta-V to make it to that Lagrange point and back. Plus, I'm also unsure about the life support and duration requirements for such a mission.

I imagine the only realistic repair mission would be with a Starship crew, seeing as Orion and all the other Commercial Crew vehicles would probably require some additional components to make it out that far and to sustain their crews. Starship seems big enough and far enough along in development to be viable.

Edit: The JWST has a docking ring to let Orion service it. But I don't know if the SLS in it's available configurations can get it up there. It seems like a contingency but I don't see any solid information about an Orion service mission.
Highly unlikely. That would require designing a new spacecraft from the ground up while also developing new robotics and operations technologies. I'd peg that mission at $300 - $500 million. NASA would almost certainty be better off documenting lessons learned and pursuing a new observatory.
Haskell and Erlang basically go for mathematical notation. Python and Julia more or less go for how you read those notations.

I personally prefer math-like notation because I find it much more readable and composable.

x, such as x is in xs, xs is in xss

x | x ∈ xs, xs ∈ xss # my math is rusty

[x | x <- xs, xs <- xss] # haskell, erlang is isimilar

[ x for xs in xss for x in xs ] # python, julia, order might be different

As soon as you add conditions/filters on data, math-like notation wins hands down

Edit:

Since I don't know Haskell, apparently in Haskell the order is wrong. So, only Erlang gets it right (variables are upper case in Erlang):

[ X || X <- Xs, Xs <- Xss]
Higher Education | Engineering (Multiple Positions) | Remote US | highereducation.com
Higher Education powers the largest marketplace of high-intent prospective students in the US, and does meaningful work that helps connect prospective students with cost-effective paths to higher education. Our team spans offices all over the country, and we’re looking for a wide range of talent to help us grow

* Senior Software Engineer (React, Node JS) - Job description: https://bit.ly/3dSGzGm

* Software Engineer (React, Node JS) - Job description: https://bit.ly/3dRdbjq

Let's talk. Shoot me an email with Hacker News in the subject. grkoscevic@redventures.com.
I feel like the more you learn about neuroscience, the more you learn how precise and complex neural information processing is. For instance, there's evidence that at least some neurons "record" information about their activity in the form of RNA. Also the placement of synapses in the dendritic arbour matters, and some synapses can act like logic gates with respect to the synapses farther down the same branches.

I think there almost certainly must be neural behavior which codes fairly simply based on rate, but it's very difficult to believe that there isn't neural computation based on precise timing relationships.
Agreed. It's also my impression that Britain didn't take the war seriously at first. Not until after maybe Trenton did they allocate real resources (as much as they had anyway).

The irony from the US perspective is we're taught the superior force was defeated by guerilla tactics and unconventional warfare. Then we completely forgot that when we went to Vietnam. Oops.
And when you say "at one point" you mean as recently as today.

https://twitter.com/taviso/status/1412809764363411457
Might be better to have a smaller barge (or a bunch of them) which would load up at the tanker and transit over to the satellite with just enough fuel that was ordered? No need to waste energy moving the whole tanker..
Undoubtedly. But saying conflicts with France significantly affected the outcome of the American Revolution is a far cry from saying the Revolution was essentially part of the conflicts between Britain and France, as if the Revolution was some kind of proxy war. That's just not true. France piled on, and the conflict with France helped set things up, but the colonies had legitimate beef with Britain and walked the path toward revolution without having to be nudged by the French.
Er, your summary does not at all describe what is going on there. Like, all of that code violates the memory model, so whatever it accomplishes is irrelevant.
> I also don't see many valid use cases for graph databases.

It's the most general purpose means I can see to model entities. I can't see many invalid uses.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't them being Monad comprehensions in Haskell automatically mean that Haskell's "list" comprehensions can be all of those things as well, and more? As well as the language's laziness by default that pretty much encompasses the generator aspect in general anyways.

(Although I'm not really trying to pit anything against each other here, they are different languages with different requirements.)
This specific case could be approximated with something like:

>>> [(y:=x+1, z:= 2*y, -z)[-1] for x in range(1, 6)]
[-4, -6, -8, -10, -12]
In air to air refueling, both parties are spending incredible amounts of fuel simply holding themselves aloft at cruising speed. Matching alignment is a literal drop in the bucket by comparison.

The amount of fuel required to align spacecraft in similar orbits is miniscule compared to the cost of getting fuel into orbit to begin with. You're talking 10s of m/s of delta-V.
No, I mean detection systems that trigger consent. Most systems look at IP address to determine if you are an EU user, then give you consent options.

Now there there is no reliable way to tell
The best thing that happened for Windows Server and Exchange is Microsoft started to run them at scale in house. Suddenly things that had been complained about for decades magically started getting fixed :)
Time-lapse video of it opening (~1:20):

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57078657
Tell that to the many SF tech workers optimizing for profit.
There were plans in 1954 for an atomic powered locomotive.[1]

[1] https://books.google.com/books?id=bVMEAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA78&ots=...
Chatting via the Command Line (SSH)
So as a note, this whole tangent is built on my -aside- "and, amusingly, they made more money from Bitcoin than car sales". An interesting aside, that is a point both in favor and against Tesla with respect to the original post, but ultimately not that relevant with the core proposition I was making that Tesla is not like Uber, and could reasonably be argued to not be the kind of company that is kept afloat solely by VCs, to the detriment of would-be competitors, unlike Uber.

And, as you mention, emission credits are something all competitors can take advantage of. Bitcoin kind of is too, though speculative investments outside of the business the company is in strikes me as just as problematic as debt/equity funding an unprofitable company. But not the point I was trying to make. I actually was putting them in the "reliable profit" category, unlike Uber. Though if being profitable requires governmental incentives and speculation on crypto, maybe not so much.
I noted some here:

https://wiki.nikitavoloboev.xyz/research/staying-on-top-of-t...
Wow, that was a novel interpretation of Brokeback Mountain.
Thank you, that looks totally awesome! Analysis, exploration. Will be spinning the docker example over weekend. Also nice website,documentation etc. Great work
Not sure if this will help you but…

https://web.archive.org/web/20210301042419/http://www.stockf...
Hey very cool! Glad you've had a chance to try that.

If you've never done it, find a TV and movie or show that has audio descriptions of visuals for visually impaired audiences. It's kind of an interesting experience to hear a voice over describing the scene.

One of my favorites was the description of the opening Paramount logo animation. Something like, "Stars flying from a dark sky skim across the surface of a calm lake towards a distant mountain, then circle the mountain as the name 'Paramount' appears"