skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nobody in their right mind actually thinks placement towards the top of a map actually denotes some kind of hierarchy.
Great idea. Would a local load balancing proxy do the trick?
Isn't that sortof the justification behind bittorrent and trackers?
Noteworth | Remote Sr. Backend Engineer role | Digital Healthcare startup| Full-time | US
The Role
Noteworth’s Engineering Team works tirelessly to raise the bar of healthcare software with technology-agnostic, user-centric development. We work every day to help solve the biggest problems in healthcare with elegant and innovative tech-enabled solutions. We’re seeking a software engineer to join our team, and help us continue to impact the daily lives of both the patients and the healthcare teams we empower.

As a senior backend engineer at Noteworth, you will make complex data accessible and, most importantly, useful for patients and healthcare organizations. Your responsibilities will include developing back-end components of Noteworth’s web and mobile applications, and working with our Engineering and Product team to implement robust features.
You can view the job description at https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/search/?geoId=103644278&keywor... or email me directly at nicole@noteworth.com
By this description they weren’t actually good UX Designers. A true professional will take all constraints into account, particularly in what seems to be a custom display for an appliance/kiosk/dashboard.

It’s like that guy that said: “it’s easy to be a good investor in god times, it’s when recession hits that the pros really shine”
This is answered in the FAQ at https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/dns-over-https-doh-faqs...
Yeah, this I totally agree with. Actionable alerts are important. The idea that novices should be opted out of ecosystem security concerns generally, less so (not least because they'll create their own security problems in the process).
But it did get passed under the radar. No one knows about this except for techies, and even then it was quite easy to miss.
Youtube Alternatives :

Centralized : Dailymotion, Bitchute, Rumble, DTube, Vimeo, Vidlii

Decentralized : Odysee(LBRY), Peertube
The syringe does two important things that your shower doesn't: it directs the stream of water into your ear to the right depth so that it actually pushes the wax out instead of further in, and it has a bend in it so you can't insert it deep enough to damage your eardrum.
You understand that other people aside from Eng. work in tech companies, yeah? Lots of folks in Ops. roles and other non-Eng. roles get really fucked over by these cliffs and don't take a year to ramp and be impactful in their roles.
It's not a massive news by any means. I know plenty of low income folks who use 1 member corporations to minimize their taxes. I mean, it's a pretty common knowledge.
Not necessarily. Look at the site we're on. They don't monetize, but I bet if they did it would make millions per year.
Wow, thanks for the example. I've been wanting to do this myself soon.
> so pure soul might be a bit of a stretch.

This is exactly where you imply it.
And somewhere is determined for your particular case in court. And tomorrow, a similar case may be determined differently.
The right to repair has nothing to do with open source and it is probably best to avoid conflating it with open source. It is going to be difficult enough to pass legislation to enable the access to components and schematics, as well as to prevent the implementation of technical barriers intended to make independent repair (and modifications) illegal. The reason why we reached this abysmal state of affairs has more to do with consumer apathy, a set of property rights for producers that were naively reasonable, and a twisting of laws that were intended for other purposes.

Put in other terms, the Apple II was not open source. The schematics were freely available, at least some of the ROM's source code was available, there were no barriers to repair (if I recall correctly, there were no custom chips/components), and people were free to modify the hardware. Yet you could not make copies, straight-up or modified, without being sued by Apple. A cleanroom approach would have to be taken to make something compatible. The world seemed to be okay with that. Things like schematics and code served supported repairability, which was an expectation of consumers back then, so the vendor voluntarily provided it.

That being said, a true open source approach to hardware would have still been frowned upon back then.
You can funnel money through an LLC and write it off in addition to your own personal standard deduction.
Excellent! Thanks for the reference, I'll be sure to check it out.
I wonder, if not for transportation could they have other uses? Amazon had patented a flying warehouse to be accessed with drones.

Or is there a case use for loitering flying objects? Possibly radio repeaters of some sort?
Who makes guacamole with an exact recipe? You don’t need precise measurements for a recipe like that, and if you do you’re doing it wrong.
I have a similar story but with just non-juul vaping. I actually started smoking again to stop vaping because I was so heavily addicted to the high nicotine availability. At least with cigarettes you get a sick feeling if you smoke too much, but with vape I would sometimes just puff away until I would start jittering from too much nicotine.

Ended up just quitting cigarettes instead which ended up being easier after getting over the mental block that makes you think it's so much harder than it really is. Everyone's mileage varies though of course.
Open source developers need a new kind of license with a ML model training clause, so there is no more ambiguity if they don't want their code to be used in this way.
I wonder about this often.

I've certainly imagined a central micropayment system that I could just see what is being used, how much, manage it all... but otherwise just use services seamlessly (the traditional cart experience seems a bit jarring in many cases) and still pay the creators for their work .
Was his expectation that YouTube would cover his hosting, encoding and bandwidth costs for free forever? I wonder what his backup plan is and where will he host the videos now.

(It's still kind of wierd that YouTube doesn't support simply paying for their hosting.)
I was more asking for examples of what AI solutions have achieved that is unambiguously good.
There is no top of the map since there is no objective frame of reference in space. The axis on which the Earth spins relative to its orbit is a point of orientation but which side is the "top" is arbitrary.
It's wrong, since "non-ferrous natural resources" includes a lot of things lighter than iron, notably aluminum, but it's not really misleading, it's got the right general idea. Before the Earth formed a solid crust, heavier elements settled out of the outermost layer of liquid and fell inward toward the core. Only where convection plumes have brought magma to the surface from deeper in the mantle do we find high concentrations of heavier elements in the Earth's crust.
> Those people are talking about society as still having slavery - in effect - because they realize, after their freedom, what it actually was the entire time.

Comparing a mortgage to slavery is wildly out of touch with the horrors of actual slavery. Let’s pick a different word to discuss the relative inconvenience of having to have a job in modern society.
This looks useful for someone with a lot of meetings to keep track of.

The one thing I noticed watching the demo was the odd way keyboard shortcuts were displayed. There is no "+" between the modifier key(s) and the letters/digits... it's just ⌘1 or ⌘D (not ⌘+1 or ⌘+D).
Climate change produces heat waves by definition. If we're going to take a heat wave as hard proof for climate change, then climate change is a valid theory by definition, and that's not exactly scientific.

> If that weren't the case, you'd be correct, but alas.

Why so snarky?
Uber took advantage of a grey area in the rules. They knew passenger transport was regulated, but didn’t physically transport any passengers. They didn’t break the rules as much as they had a (then) untested interpretation.
> PfSense offers a range of hardware they support, which disproves your assertion by itself without even mentioning companies like Apple and System76.

That disproves nothing. If you want to build your own system you need to research hardware if you want to have a pain free deployment.

> I'm totally willing to pay a premium to be lazy. Where did I imply otherwise? If OPNsense offers hardware these days then why didn't anyone just say so?

This forum is generally filled with people who want to build their own. As for why nobody mentioned they sell hardware: probably because they sold hardware from the beginning and it’s advertised all over their site?
So are we supposed to unlearn CSS because we want to make sure that unskilled people can take over the project?

I believe that quick deliverable you mention, will become a big burden for that client in some future.

I saw already multiple projects where both Tailwind and regular CSS are used. This seems like unavoidable, since Tailwind looks like easy-peasy, but it actually can't be understood and without understanding CSS in the first place. Maintaining this kind of mix must be fun...

It's kind of sad that not-learning is hyped over mastering.
Andrew Kelley of Zig also moved away from YouTube because of forced ads (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjz6xNO63mI)

YouTube is an amazing collection of knowledge, but it's unfortunate that it's in the hands of an entity whose primary goal and motivation is avarice. A degradation of the experience over time seems inevitable.

How to organize human endeavors in a way that captures the innovation and superbly focused effort of early-stage companies without devolving into the raw exploitation, rent-seeking, and monopolistic behavior of late-stage companies seems an open problem.
This attack apparently departed from previous tactics:

They deployed the payload via a trusted channel (Kaseya) which allowed deployment of any executable via system privs.

They looked for certain AV products and only executed if it was on their list.

They didn't delete shadow copies. (to avoid behavioral detection)

They didn't try to exfiltrate data. (to avoid behavioral detection)

They did a combo of automation and typical hollywood hacker on keyboard command and control.

No dwell time.
I suspect the machine you were using was swapping itself to death, because I've never experienced anything resembling that in Rust.

I also presume you were compiling in release mode, which is good for producing extremely fast programs but not something I bother with in regular development (in contrast to Go, which has no distinction between debug and release optimization levels).

> How do you get anything done.

The vast majority of my workflow just involves seeing if my code typechecks, for which I don't even need to build the program (so no codegen, no linking). This I do very frequently, as a sanity check on my work. The command for this is `cargo check`. This takes less than a second for small projects, one to five seconds for medium projects, and one to twenty seconds for large projects.
>copilot is not a human so it can't commit crimes

I can setup my drone to detect me and attempt to crash into me. AI would be quite poor, probably would attempt to crash at any human. Would it be my fault it didn't crash into me and someone lost eyes?

Can I setup torrent box that automatically downloads and seeds all detected links from public trackers? Would I be responsible for it?
Abandoned: The seafarers stuck at sea for two years
Everybody is thinking about how tech will save us again from this conundrum. About how we will science the shit out of this. But of course nobody wants to talk about how we have added 1 billion people in a decade. People that will want living standards similar or better than ours and who will fight to get them. Will you science the shit out of them as well? Maybe with some drone based genocide?
"The IT rules, which became effective end-May, are aimed at regulating content on social media and making firms act more swiftly on legal requests to remove posts and sharing details on the originators of messages. They also require the appointment of certain new executives."

The article makes this sound like a massive detriment to free speech.
Companies removing content on their own platforms makes sense. However, governments being able to force the removal of content (such as a "controversial hash tag related to farmer protests against new agricultural reforms") can't be good.
That plus forcing the company to hire government-approved executives seems like a slippery slope.

Are there any benefits to this regulation I'm overlooking?
I'd argue the risk aspect is what prevents more people from self-hosting than the actual cost. At least it is for me: The idea of waking up to a bill of a few thousand dollars is chilling. And then there is also this conflict of objectives: With an ad-supported platform more popularity means more money, with self-hosting more popularity is less money. Can't have your cake and eat it too.
And from here, it is a very small step (practically speaking) to The sixty of A Pebble in the Sky

https://archive.org/details/pebbleinsky00asim/
https://archive.org/details/podcast_dimension-x_dimension-x-...

For those who haven't heard or read it, the 60 is a law on the Earth of the future that requires that on your sixtieth birthday you report to a medical center for euthanization. Those who refuse are tracked down and forcibly euthanized.
Technically, if I understand correctly, one of the thing going for peertube is that it allows you to survive [insert any popular forum]'s hug of death. Some website don't even handle a surge of connections when it's just text. With peertube, most of the time, you're serving directly from your website, but in case of virality, the video will be distributed across most of the simultaneous viewers.
Hit the Ground Running – How to Ramp Up at Your New Job in 3 Weeks
Considering that they themselves made the telescope, do you consider all forms of self expression propoganda?
Seems to be too much effort (is it even possible to link the source to the end result ?), and might not be admissible, so just include a database with all of the relevant licenses and authors ?
If you are considering a native version, then you are not prioritizing multiplatform which is Electron's strong point. Why choosing it insted of something like Catalyst?

Mind you, I am not against Electron apps on my mac (Evernote user here heh)
It's because this time it uses AI!
i dont really care, if the code is public, it's public. If you can copy it, why cant a bot do it? But it would be a useful feature. Or does it also look at private repos? That would be scary.
There once was such a system —Google Contributor. It was supposed to be expanded into a full micropayment system once there was a baseline market activity to set the prices by, using the price of ads to bootstrap.

It didn’t work, obviously, but mostly because people just don’t want to pay. Not even if a typical cost is single digit dollars per month, or less.
Cool product! I find that the headline is a bit hard to read. I think "Get back control over your meetings" reads easier.
This is almost entirely about helium. There exist hot-air and hybrid airships that eliminate or lessen the need for helium. They haven't succeeded much yet for other reasons, I guess. But cargo blimps sound very interesting.

Maybe self-driving blimps will be more cost-effective.
But there are more than a billion chinese citizens...

In fact the gender ratio among 15-24 year old chinese (the peak of the one child gender curve) is 1.17. That's not low, but it's hardly a strong effect either. In particular those 17% of citizens having trouble finding a mate seems like a rather smaller effect than the significantly larger increase in workforce participation among their more numerous female coworkers.

So China loses a few men who check out because they can't get a date, and gains women by the truckload (no, I don't have demographics) who are entering the workforce. I still don't see why this is a social problem.

So I look to other people trying to claim this is a social problem, and I'm sorry, I see a lot of "der der redpill" and not much else. If this is a serious economic argument, then please make it.
What’s the most substantial thing you read in it?
good luck enforcing this. you are nobody and no court will hear your case.
For me, it's easier to understand these ideas by adopting a "lumper" mentality to human history. IE, Neanderthals, Denisovans, late Erectus & other archaics were just populations of humans. Sections on a large map of human diversity. On another section were, for example, that small subpopulation accounting for most modern human genetics. Near that little section were other subpopulations that even a "splitter" would call Sapiens. Just because they're Sapiens and we're Sapiens doesn't mean that they left more genetic legacy than Neanderthal subpopulations.

I do have some questions though...

"If you don’t have Sub-Saharan African ancestry, all of your ancestry (aside from your differential rates of Neanderthal/Denisovan ancestry) goes back to the same 1,000-10,000 humans that split off from other Africans."

No introgression with other Sapien populations? We know that Sapiens existed outside of Sub-Saharan Africa long before that bottleneck. Are all additions to that genetic stock from other species?

Also, what's the relationship between genetically isolated and genetically diverse? Most of our ancestors went through single a bottleneck 60kya-120kya, with non africans going through at least one more. Theirs did not go through that bottleneck or a seperate one. Coincidence, or is it part of the story somehow?
It fallbacks to local DNS
>it's in the hands of an entity whose primary goal and motivation is avarice

And we gave it all to them, for the price of the convince of using their service.
A good cut of meat and fresh veggies all cooked appropriately and hit with kosher/sea salt, fresh cracked pepper, quality olive oil, and quality white wine vinegar/lemon juice can still be a wildly delicious meal. At a certain point, it’s less about lack of ingredients than lack of technique.
Self-host at places like OVH or Hetzner that bill by pipe bandwidth rather than gigabytes transferred. Your site may get slow if it gets a hug of death but you won't get a stupid high bill. You can also get 2-4X the compute and RAM for pennies (comparatively).

If you are using AWS, Google, Oracle, or Azure and are just using VMs, you are getting horribly ripped off. There is absolutely zero advantage to using these for just compute. None. They only make sense in a business setting if you are leveraging their managed services to save on labor costs, or if you need to elastically scale to really enormous sizes and have confidence that you won't run out of resources.

VPS providers like Digital Ocean, Vultr, or Linode charge for bandwidth overages but their costs are generally at least an order of magnitude less than the big cloud vendors.
> it's shocking and eye-opening how many schemes (aka "legal structures") you can employ to preserve your wealth and reduce taxation which are available to everyone regardless of their social status. It's just that... most of us mere mortals don't know anything about them. In fact, some of this stuff seems borderline illegal

Be careful. There are a lot of creative interpretations of the tax code out there that genuinely are illegal. People who employ them often assume they’re fine because they haven’t been audited or caught yet, but that doesn’t make them legal.

Always, always refer to a qualified accountant to review any tax strategies that seem too good to be true. YouTube is a fun place to learn about things, but the goal of YouTube producers is to get more clicks, not necessarily give the most accurate legal advice.
Reminds me of neopaganism in the West, where some people in the movement will claim there's an unbroken tradition.

Do you think this is fed by a preoccupation/pride in the culture with their practices and beliefs being incredibly ancient? I think it's pretty well-known that that's a thing in India, but I don't know to what extent it also exists in Sri Lanka.
Yes, everybody knows that, and if someone asks me where Greenland is on a map, I will say "at the top" like a normal person.
I'm pretty sure the 6s was the first iPhone to support RAW.
Don't take this the wrong way but your comment represents many things that are wrong with the industry.

Meta about your comment: Major condescending-vibe overall.

> Would you want to hear about that algorithm? Because it's called communication.

First of all, drop the patronizing tone. Second: what are you saying? Developers don't communicate? Don't communicate efficiently or correctly? Specify the thing that is wrong and your proposed solution and then it can be assessed. As it stands your first paragraph is meaningless. For what it's worth I've worked with marketing teams that have communication skills that match a random rock on the street, so this is not a developer issue. That "developers are all geeks and nerds and can't talk to people, and i'm here to fix it" is an old tired routine that needs to be dropped.

> A UX Designer is there not to create the UI but to teach the Developer how to go about creating the UI

You're assuming a random developer is: A) interested in learning UI design, B) needs to learn to design UI, and C) that whoever this random UI person wants or even can teach them. You're building too many assumptions on top of each other.

This kind of comments resembles the thinking process of a person with "product manager" position in a small/medium size company. Deep down (consciously or subconsciously) they don't really respect or see the value of the individual developer, but they see the team more like a bunch of horses going around the mill. They optimize for "the product" and throw around sophists-like pseudo-philosophical thoughts that appeal to like-minded individuals or to their bosses.
> Should the committing of genocide be the bar? No, of course not

My friend, you read that "this is exactly how the rest of the world feels about US-based companies harvesting dna data for years" and came up with something that looked like a justification of why exactly it would be different for the US. You pointed out China's genocide. But if that isn't the bar (at least because both countries fail it) then why bring it up at all? For China to be compared to the US it's a step up. Not so much the other way.

If you analyze the world through a narrow slit you miss that whatever chasm you see when you look at China, most Europeans see when they look at the US. So collecting all that DNA data is unacceptable for any country, certainly not any of the superpowers.
Has ProPublica actually shown anyone to have broken the law in these articles? If not, then they are just trying to stoke the fires of class warfare.
Wasn't pfsense originally a fork of m0n0wall?
Fans banned at Olympics; Tokyo under state of emergency
Thanks for the comment, it would indeed probably clarify the shortcuts!
I think their point was your joke doesn't make much sense when only a small subsection of the entire telescope was ever replaced.
Covid-19 lab leak: Did the media fall victim to a misinformation campaign?