skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What I am relaying to you is based on personal experience growing up in the lower middle class / poor American south. It's still that way when I go back to visit. As far as "the media version" of the American south goes, I have no idea what you're even talking about. Perhaps you're in a high socioeconomic status bubble and you need to drive 45 minutes in any given direction and re-test your conclusions.

At any rate, I live in the bay area now and I very rarely encounter issues with un-friendliness in the contexts mentioned in this thread. The lack of effusive friendliness that I do encounter for the most part is cultural. Which makes sense, as the bay area is extremely diverse culturally.
But could you obtain it legally though?
https://www.brown.edu/Facilities/John_Carter_Brown_Library/e...

“The revolution ended slavery in Saint-Domingue but not forced labor. Louverture and several of the early governments of independent Haiti used the army to impose forced work on the plantations”
In your basement? not hard

In a DoD facility? pretty hard
Only in the US would they brag about the economy based on anecdotal evidence of 1 person working two jobs but can’t afford housing.

The mayor proposing “allowing” tents should be forced to live in a tent with the people, I bet the mayor would come up with some new proposals real fast. In fact all politicians should be stripped of healthcare from their compensation packages as well.
The ICAO standard says a passport must have a field labelled "sex" containing F, M or X; in this context, X means "unknown" or "unspecified". About a dozen countries will issue passports with an X in the "sex" field, but I'm not sure which of them, if any, will do it for anyone who asks for it, which seems to be what's proposed for the US.

The really radical thing to do would be to only issue passports with an X in the "sex" field. That way non-binary people wouldn't be treated any differently.
That could work. Market forces will play it out, investors will get burned and be more hesitant to pour more gasoline on the fire. The business model as it stands appears to not work long term (maybe). What company has had long term success with this model (operate at massive losses until no competition left)? But short term the investors have been dumping their money directly into consumers' pockets via cheap uber rides or uber eats subsidized by VC so whats not to love?
The hubris to think something as controllable as what's served for dinner is in the same realm as shaping your kids' social circles! You'll learn eventually!
Yeah the overlapping circles make absolutely no sense because typically they are used to visualize operations on sets of the same kind resulting in a third set of also the same kind.

But when joining two tables the two base sets are of different type (containing tuples/rows of different length/element type) and the resulting set containes neither tuples from the one nor from the other original set but totally new concatinated tuples combined from the base sets.

It makes absolutely no sense and everytime I see an article explaining joins I just check if it contains those venn-diagrams and if so, just skip it.
Really? I don't understand that. The power isn't in dissolving the Dáil itself, it's in the choice to do if it's deemed appropriate, whether the Taoiseach wants it or not.

When the Queen dissolves parliament she's just going through the motions, it's a formality. If she had refused, say, Theresa May's request for a general election in 2017, saying that there was no need as the Government had a clear majority and Brexit needed to be the focus (and she did this by either hiding down the countryside, not answering her phone or by shooting down the idea preemptively) that would be a huge deal. That would be her exercising her power.
I get access to paid parental leave, an extra 8 weeks of parental leave, do not have to worry about women’s healthcare (abortion choice), higher minimum wages and a minimum salary, no tipped wages, assisted suicide, legal marijuana, etc. I can also get alcohol in the next aisle over instead of having to go to a different store (not that I drink outside of an occasion, but the principal of it annoyed me).

And even though a bunch do not affect me, my kids might benefit from them someday. Was a no brainer for me to look at how my neighbors would be voting when choosing where to live.
You only need that if you want to live beyond what Social Security and public assistance provide.
I guess the star is for outer join? Or maybe it's just vendor syntax. Interestingly the postgresql tutorial introduces joins without using the join keyword initially:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/tutorial-join.html

See also join_type:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/sql-select.html
I don’t really see the inequality of representation and taxation in capitalism as any less authoritarian.

If everything I do is being validated for value by management and bosses, and my buying power is managed by bankers who have inflationary powers to dilute my earnings, we’ve just made managed economy ephemeral. We’ve socially normalized grift and protection rackets.

Some estimates suggest up to 30% of inmates are innocent. And when plenty are in there for marijuana, that’s a bit more petty than a billionaire disrupting an entire society.

Rather than real prisons we let people die on the streets from preventable disease so we can say we didn’t force anyone into anything as if letting them rot is glass half full.

It’s a shame the “I am educated and worldly” community hasn’t put much though into the depth to which relativity applies to human existence.

If we’re going to intentionally avoid lifting people up at the cost of putting agency into propping up the already rich, well, the poor can never experience the alternative to form meta opinions.

This bantering in traditional political memes is patronizing and ignorant af given our scientific understanding of reality.
On this subject, almost every textbook is wrong. Well, I shouldn't say wrong, but their models fail to predict and explain easily observed real-world behaviour in futures markets.

I can strongly recommend Williams' The Economic Function of Futures Markets[1]. It gave me a lot of those "ooh, now that makes more sense" experiences after having heard the faulty model used in textbooks over and over.

[1]: https://www.amazon.com/Economic-Function-Futures-Markets-Wil...
My takeaway: If you don't actually care about the death toll, do nothing until your population is about to rebel, turn on max restrictions until the spike falls, repeat. Minimizes costs, and it is low risk for the ruling class. If only we had handled it that well. Pandemics are great when your problem is a labor surplus.

(hint: this is sarcasm)
We should be careful with definitions here.

Dumping, in the context of international trade, is very specifically a price discrimination rather than just an absolute price concept: it's where you export for cheaper than you sell domestically.
To use ip binding as means already fails today. I mean CG-NAT and the slow adoption of ipv6 also did help dig that grave and I would argue that with that you can't rely on the IP because it is volatile anyway.

From a threat model perspective it is absolutely true that when attacker gains control over the device they could extract the secrets from that said device (they can act as you as well). However token-binding would at least allow for some safeguards against attacks from the application layer (in this case web apps and extensions) in the browser but not against device attacks.
Comparison of Haskell and Julia List Comprehensions
To be equivalently (ok, maybe just a bit more) blunt back to you: if you (as another person who will be speaking after me) care so little about what I am saying when I am speaking that you aren't fact checking what I am claiming and taking notes while adjusting your own talking points, what the hell are you even doing? Hell: what am I even doing at that point? Isn't the goal of this entire exercise wherein we all came together to have a massive meeting that we are supposed to be talking--even "sparring"--with each other in an attempt to find the truth? Your quaint concept of what it means to "listen" to someone else is just extremely strange to me... (though maybe a bit less strange as your final sentence makes it sound like you don't even care what people say anyway).
I find the stack traces to be fine as long as there's some middleware in use to filter out the Java stack frames from non-Clojure code, like eg CIDER does (and probably other envs can too). Otherwise they have some noise which is a bit annoying but not showstopper.

println (or other logging/tracing, eg using tap) works for seeing where things go wrong, but stepping through code with a debugger works too if you're so inclined, or experimeting at the repl.

Sure, it's not always obvious what caused bad input that evnetually leads to an uncaught exception, just like in other languages.. it might have come through an event loop or other layer of indirection that doesn't show the real caller, for example.
Show HN: Open-source real-time transcription playground (React, Python, GCP)
>Why does it have to be imposed and enforced.

Because it won't happen otherwise. The evidence is easily seen in the current state of these markets. If a company wanted to do this voluntarily, they already would have.
Admit it, many Americans want something like this to happen to Musk and Zuck.
Protest can lead to change in America, but before it does the American intelligence system starts visiting and assassinating people. This is well documented.

The US government is a collection of a few, not that many, disparate power bases that nonetheless have extreme similarities. Which is why, for example, COINTELPRO was a bipartisan effort.

The Chinese government is absolutely susceptible to radical change because of organized protest. Not peaceful, because violence would get involved, but the disintegration can be put into gear as a result of peaceful protest. I don't see why this is absurd, it happened to the USSR that had a political system that is identical to China.

And yes, the Chinese tyranny is honest, they tell you upfront that they will suppress protest as long as it threatens a few key points, and they generally stick to it.

The American local and federal governments have never done radical reforms without violence or the threat of violence. I don't see prohibition as a radical reform, and neither is the relatively inconsequent expansions of minority rights except for the 60s and 70s, which definitely involved the threat of violence.

I'm not claiming that no change can be done from popular will - neither in the US nor in China, though more can be done in the US. I'm claiming that radical change that threaten the shared interests of the power base will, in both cases, be opposed by lethal force. And they will.

And no, this isn't limited to single protestors. The US National Guard has opened fire and bombed whole crowds in the beginning of the 20th century when organized labour was a threat, and figureheads of protests were and almost definitely still are subjected to intense surveillance and often threats or even actual violence - it's absolutely not a single protestor that is effected, it's everyone in the US.

But yes, if you state the assertions without the necessary nuance they sound absurd. This is a discussion that requires a lot of nuance and it would be nice if we could steelman each other.
"Radix-50 Rulz!!!"
haha! or they'll make it work by not being friends. If a social group is based around playing a specific online game, why would they be friends with your kid if they don't even play?
Were you working at an hourly rate at those companies? A salary at reduced hours/pay?
Also from the article:

>Philippe Girard writes "when the genocide was over, Haiti's white population was virtually non-existent."

That seems pretty in-line with what OP stated, I'm not familiar enough to know if Philippe Girard is a reliable source but the reference seems legitimate.[1]

[1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0031322050010619...
Geez, serves me right for using an "-ist" word and getting an anal retentive "They're a different sort of '-ist'" comment.

The Wikipedia definition "Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy" seems to tick all the boxes in the case of China, although I don't know if they fit the definition "far right" (too lazy to see if they tick those other boxes).

The problem with "-ist" and "-ism" words is everyone has their own definition what this means. Bernie Sanders can call himself a socialist that thinks the rich should be taxed more, and some dumbass will think he hates Jews because the Nazi party also has the word "Socialism" in it.

Also, if you want to say "They're communists because that word is in their party name", then the Democratic People's Republic of (North) Korea must be a great place to live, since they're democratic, and belong to the people!
Data Engineering Road Map – How to Learn Data Engineering Quickly
so about the same as most python "developers"
I think that is classic Standard Oil.

It seems start-ups are different. When they do this they are not dominant. They are up and coming and attempting to leverage scale before competitors come and take their lunch (Uber, AB&B). At some point they cross the threshold and do become the dominant player, however, often not yet profitably. So the question is how to gauge that so as not to kill innovation but also to ensure other competitors aren't drowned.
"It’s described in that quote and in the article as if the Americans defeated the British on their own. The American revolution was essentially part of a fight between the French and the British..."

How does that sound to you?
I'll happily grant you that they weren't prepared enough to build an actual gallows; they just had to make due with the perfectly functional suspended noose to do the thing they were chanting, rather than a purpose built wooden frame for it, as they violently stormed the nation's capital building, demanding the overthrow of a legitimate election because of the lies of the former president, causing the actual elected officials to have to flee, unable even to hit the panic buttons that had been removed from the wall.

Sure, calling it a 'gallows' is an overstatement.
From the article:

> The European Commission has already announced a follow-up regulation to make chat control mandatory for all email and messaging providers. Previously secure end-to-end encrypted messenger services such as Whatsapp or Signal would be forced to install a backdoor.
Do your children not have minds of their own about which store they want to go to?
Amazon, Uber, and Tesla have done pretty well by a similar model. They went a long time and spent a LOT of money before they turned reliable profits
I see your point. But I think this is why I don't think either giving a kid a savings account nor a debit card alone teaches them anything. That said, I think a savings account offers much more valuable lessons to be learned, or at least it did for me growing up.

I saved money all the time as a kid because I was taught that saving is good. One of the first accounts I got was a savings account. However, I soon learned that I needed to access that money so I got a checking account and started to divide my deposits between each. And on and on, you get the point.

To this day I keep a cash savings -- I need it. Yes its not earning as much as my other investments, but I don't need it to. I need liquidity and I value being able to pull large chunks of my hard earned money from the bank to do a miriad of things: spontaneous vacation, buy a car, medical emergencies, etc.

I think both devices offer something to youth. However, it seems like giving kids debit cards leans in the wrong directions as far as valuable life lessons. I don't want my kids learning to spend their money. Kids are already great a spending my money. They need to understand how money actually works (beyond spending).
Surveillance-based advertising is just the tip of the iceberg.

All unsolicited advertising should be banned.
It is easier for US to ask Apple to monitor the traffic for a specific user, if the exit node is in US soil. Although the sibling comments say that it is probably a bug, and I hope that it actually is.
Would the set analogy hold if the "parts" where first all "promoted" to the ssame type via cross join, then filtered down, and finally joined? (I'm not sure if this would make sense in general for sql, but it just occurred to me in terms of the type/category of sets involved in a join.. )
That’s a great practice as long as zero of your users are on phones — which will generally be the case if you deauthenticate them every time their IP changes and they stop using your site.
Thank you ;-)
> There simply wasn't any working mechanism to deal with the situation where the price rises above one dollar.

..inflation?
Ah yes, those wildly innovative do-gooder car companies of the 50s:

"The “smog conspiracy” was revealed in 1968 when the US Department of Justice filed an anti-trust case against the Big Three. They were accused of colluding to withhold the installation of catalytic converters and other technologies to reduce pollution. “Beginning at least as early as 1953, and continuing thereafter,” alleged the Department of Justice, “the defendants and co-conspirators have been engaged in a combination and conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of the aforesaid interstate trade and commerce in motor vehicle air pollution control equipment.”

https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/28/automakers-and-their...
What would you call it?

Q1 2021 - 6.4% growth [0]

Q2 2021 - 7.8% growth [1]

[0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/188185/percent-change-fr...

[1] https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow
It is trolling. And while I understand the motives of the artist who created it, I hate the conclusions that are being made, that somehow this is related to accountability.

Anyone who has ever visited a plenary session of parliament (as I have as part of school trips) knows that they are unbelievably boring. 99% of the time, they aren’t about cutting edge law making that will propel society into the next century, but about routine declarations or posturing where a politician wants to promote the local industry.

It is IMO completely acceptable for attendees to just be there and do something else, while waiting for a topic that interests them. This is no different than zoning out during some group meetings where you don’t really care and don’t need to know about most of the topics, but you still are present in case your input is required.
Do you visit https://news.ycombinator.com/newest ?

It has a lot of crap, but also a lot of small post that die with 5-10 points. (I don't like the threads in the front page, because they usually have too many unrelated comments.)

Also, there is the second chance pool: https://news.ycombinator.com/pool

It has a list of post curated by the mods. Those projects get a second chance, and go for a short time to the front page.
I do think he makes a valid point towards the end though. create-react-app, and projects like it, get a lot of bug reports about these vulnerabilities. It's a lot of energy dedicated to something that ultimately isn't that important if you understand the context. I can understand the frustration.
I agree about the false positive problem. Boy who cried wolf and all. I've also worked with security vendors who offer to run "free" vulnerability scans for you, and to absolutely nobody's surprise, they find vulnerabilities that just happen to be the ones that they can fix, if you buy what they are selling.

Still, your example is problematic. Beware the "internal-only network". Such a thing has mostly lost meaning today, and it was never much more than a picket fence anyway. "All devices must be capable of maintaining their security policy on an un-trusted network." https://collaboration.opengroup.org/jericho/commandments_v1....
The alternative is hiding most of the reports by default. It's a firehose, and almost all of it is guaranteed to be useless. For example, denial of service in a devDependency shouldn't be shown unless the user specifically requests it. Denial of service shouldn't be marked "high" importance, even though occasionally it might be quite important to some user.
This library is really targeted toward non Apple systems.
Add prototype pollution and you've covered 90% of all "vulnerabilities"
How nice for them.

If you can recommend a core banking ops solution and a loan origination software for banks under $1B in assets that doesn't require Windows I will gladly go around to all my clients and sell it. Something comparable to what Jack Henry, Fiserv, and Finastra are hawking.

Small businesses can get away with doing everything on websites and a gmail account. Large businesses can 'just' make their own stuff. Middle market businesses that aren't selling software are all trapped on Windows by the software they can buy.
Ask HN: Would you consider adblockers theft?
The US has combined the head of state and head of government in a single position (President), so it doesn't make sense to say either has more power. France is indeed one of the (many) exceptions with a semi-presidential system where the head of state has more power.
That is not how this works.

Instead : capacity gets curtailed, prices are raised, and what people can afford goes down.
The site has a pre-paid US plan at $103 / GiB. ($0.14 / (1.39 MiB / 1024 MiB/GiB)) This doesn't seem like "plans change" levels of error, this is more than twice what I pay for all service (SMS, voice, data) since I first got a plan that included (allegedly unlimited, but actually not) data a decade ago…

The site also says "Prices were collected from the operator with the largest marketshare in the country" but follows it with "Because these numbers are based on the least expensive plan, they are best case scenarios." which doesn't logically follow. But going with that, the largest carrier in the US is apparently AT&T, and just the first plan on their site offers a 4GB plan at $50, or ≈$12.50 / GiB, which is an order of magnitude lower than the figure on the site?