skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Had a very similar idea 10 years ago. Just proves that ideas are easy. Execution is where the value is created.
Wild West of MLOps
I bet if we took all the legal and illegal offshore shenanigans and the laws written by the wealthiest that create more loopholes, the amount of "inhibiting" of tax collection by cryptocurrency in comparison is a rounding error.
My guess would be conjecture that millimeter waves increase plasmid uptake/transformation above natural rates. I think this is unlikely given the feature sizes here and the energy typically required to ‘shock’ bacteria into plasmid uptake, but have not attempted to research.
Property rights are a social construct. They are recognised in a certain social context and enforced by state institutions by use of force. They are separate from the actual objects of ownership. Cash is like any other physical object. If stolen, the owner can demand that the courts act on their behalf and get the stolen cash back. Sure, it may be difficult, in some situations, to prove ownership of the stolen cash or to recover it, and maybe this explains why many people seem to prefer electronic payments over cash. It might indicate that indeed cash is perceived as being less safe.

Now, back to blockchains. Blockchains are very inefficient and expensive to run. This is so, because they have to do a whole lot of extra work in order to avoid relying on a central authority that ultimately has the final say on who owns what. If blockchain users have to go to court to have property rights enforced, that means that the courts do have the final say on who owns what, and so the entire purpose of the blockchain, which was to avoid a central authority, is defeated. Not only that. The other problem is there can be no enforcement without the ability to exert force, and by design a blockchain cannot be changed by use of force, only by "consensus". So the courts would be powerless to enforce anything on a blockchain, even if they wanted. In short, blockchains are designed in a manner that makes them antithetical to property rights. I think most people want property rights and therefore will steer clear of blockchains.
Hey HN!

One of the founders of LiveKit here. I've worked on two companies now, fifteen years apart, that needed realtime audio/video infrastructure. Turns out that even in 2021, there aren't many modern, flexible and inexpensive options. I was chatting with my fellow YCS07 batch-mate, @davidz about it, and we explored what it would take to build our own SFU on top of WebRTC. The result is LiveKit.

You can read the more detailed version here, if you're interested:
https://blog.livekit.io/and-were-live-kit-5dc7fe03e1bd

We'd love to hear your thoughts and feedback! I'm also curious how other folks' experiences have been with Agora, Twilio, etc.

We'll hang out and chat here in the comments, or if you want to talk live, we hacked up an audio room in our playground (we'll be in there for a few hours, too):
https://livekit.io/playground#room=livekit-launch&code=fe54b...

Cheers!
This is correct in almost all cases (outside of highly commoditized goods) and it's crazy how people don't understand it. It's why the price of McDonalds doesn't increase when minimum wage does. McDonalds is already charging as much as they can for a Big Mac (where stores averages a 40% margin). Increasing minimum wage means that margin goes down a bit, not that prices increase. If they could increase prices they already would have.
No offence intended, but that seems to me like defeatism, and precisely what no-one must do. While there's any chance to fix this problem, IMHO everyone should do the little they can. e:g, never get in an aeroplane again and tell people why. Buy local food / grow your own, refuse to purchase products shipped from far when there are local alternatives. And tell people why. Ensure any investments you have are not in fossil fuel companies. And tell people why. Drive far less, or not at all. Red meat far less, or not at all. And tell people why! History teaches us there were plenty of totally unacceptable things that have happened and eventually people against the odds stopped this . To pluck a random example, there was a time in the UK for example when women weren't allowed to vote. That got fixed. ;) There must have been some very strong vested interests at the time that didn't want women to vote but it got overturned by strength of public feeling. I really hope this year's weather in N America will be a wake-up call.
That and the entire rental background check industry. $30-$50 fees for each submission of the same report on what is effectively your own data.
ISPs do not inject malware and phishing scams, Google Ads does. The benefit of blocking ISP tampering is vastly outweighed by protecting the bad behavior of a far more malevolent party.
The won't block my specific list of websites (reddit.com for example.)
The Face ID/TrueDepth sensor is however made by Austrian 'ams AG', not Apple.
It is pretty impressive, they made a whole company marketing secure phones, except the devices were wiretapped.

Aside from that, it sounds like a pretty decent secure phone, too.

Did they hire one of those TV show genius detectives to plan all this?

It sure seems more advanced than the usual FBI operations (or maybe we don't hear much about the good ones).
It addresses the principle-agent problem[0]. Yes, renters that want a broker may simply raise the rent to pay for it, but doing so affects their own bottom line because either (1) it's harder to find a renter at that higher price or (2) they could have found a renter without a broker and pocketed the higher rent themselves.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal%E2%80%93agent_proble...
I think result-filtering (based on license of search results) is gnarly enough, and likely computationally intensive, so as to break the whole feature. But it would be interesting to see if that can be crafted to fix the shortcomings of the ML model.
I'm curious about the product you sell.

Do you make it clear to your customers that you are selling a product that uses a cheap knock-off board?

I would hope the answer to that is 'yes' so I'm curious about what their reaction/responses have been?

Do the "Arduinos" you use in your device have any markings that are different from a genuine Arduino?
Similar to http://neverssl.com/ I guess?
Power Up your Business with IoT applications
Don’t forget that a significant fraction of them voted to leave the EU as a way of sending a message, not expecting that it could result in actually needing to leave the EU.
> Is Copilot fair use? It's reading code, generating other code (some verbatim) and making money from it all while not having to release its source code to the world?

Again, fair use is an exception to copyright protection. If something is fair use, the license does not apply. The fact that Copilot does not release its source code is related only to a specific term of a specific license, which does not apply if Copilot is indeed fair use.
We might, if we weren't messing with the “proportion smokers” control variable.
Birds watch everything. That's a huge part of the advantage of flight; you can roost high up and get an overview of any situation. Crows are extremely intelligent and have developed a heightened ability to do "systems thinking"--working out the elements of any situation, how they interact, what causality there is, etc.

It's great that they keep finding these new behaviors, but this shouldn't be surprising when you work out the implications of having a good brain, a high perch, and a lot of time and curiosity (a crow's lifespan could be 30 years or more). Add social learning aspects and an as-yet-undeciphered language of calls, and there's a lot of intelligence there.
> When is MS Windows going to use DoH to force access for monitoring, currently I block a few domains.

Microsoft doesn’t need DoH to circumvent DNS-based blocking. They control the OS and can make it do anything.
You're not calculating cost correctly. Think of it from an information theoretic point of view. You exist in a network that has already converged to a dominant representation. It's
essentially a nigh universally understood application of those terms in a technical context. Even more than an API, it could be considered a part of socio-technical ABI or calling convention.

Imagine if you will a world in which every individual starts changing what they call things on a whim every day. You run into a Tower of Babel problem, and one that at best, stabilizes to a dynamic equilibrium
i.e., the problem never stops, it just changes from thing to thing. Symbol changes have cost. That cost quickly amplifies in terms of required reconciliation and update of protocol across the entire human network. That means across languages, cultures, education systems, etc.

What you'll find, is this seriously grates against a bunch of people way more interested in getting work done and being understood without being on receiving end of This Week's Polemic at the same time.

This may sound callous or cold, but there is a reason society does not wholesale rewrite foundational communication structures/cultures/techné/art/etc... on a whim, and when it does happen, it's not just because a small group gets a marginal bump, but the change warrants such a bump in overall benefit or actualizable horizons of possibility, that it becomes worth the chaos of adapting to the change and shepherding it along.

Every individual may think they only have to pay or exact a one time cost but that quickly compounds.Think of all the times you end up saying "You know what I mean?" and the recipient goes on to demonstrate they do. This is one of those cases where one can only really justify change having a trivial cost in the presence of ascribing a value modifier of 0 or less to tradition, instead of actually accounting for all the instances of questions that don't need to be asked, because there is an instinctual, endemic response. While one or another person looking at themselves in isolation may see the cost as trivial to enact in their local sphere of influence, it exacts a non trivial cost in the overall context of human to human communication over time.

Note, I'm not saying no one should try to change these types of things. To do so, or try to is the essence of politics; I'm merely pointing out that the only way you see no cost is if you did count a whole lot of other implicit dependencies elsewhere as not significant.

You do you, but reality has a way of making it hurt when people do that.
The name Stellantis is not well known in the US, even less so than the brands they own, several of which aren't even for sale here. But... researching electric cars out of my interest in the US market for them (and my interest in getting one as a former Prius owner) led me to look casually at what was for sale in other countries.

I was absolutely stunned. What's available in electric cars in Europe would blow your mind. It's de rigeur. Every brand has multiple platforms and options. Here, the companies' stance seems to be "Well, we make some cars and then we also make this electric stepchild." This is not true of Stellantis. They are well in the game.

I think its safe to say that, with the possible exception of VW, Stellantis is further ahead on mass commercialization of electric cars than anyone. Like VW, they are very much not kidding around with electric (especially skateboard platforms) being the future of all cars.

The optics from other companies are not so clear. GM is wishy washy. Toyota is still pretending hydrogen for passenger cars is a thing. Honda is having GM build its skateboard, or at least they were until they flip flopped last week and realized they better build their own. Ford debased their famous Mustang brand to get an electric car that Joe Sixpack could buy.

Of course, Tesla committed to skateboards early (and now, strangely, suggests moving away from that) and Lucid* with its Tesla DNA is 100% skateboard and will produce passenger cars and SUVs from the same base platform.

EDIT: Just found this relevant story[0] from earlier today on HN. Opel is Stellantis and Jaguar is VW.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27773548

*Full disclosure. I am long on a tiny amount of CCIV which is Lucid's SPAC.
It seems reasonable to silence your political opponents on a 3rd party media with a force of law?
Both events are caused by the jet stream changing its usual patterns due to climate change. Your strawman is a poor one.
same kind of website but easier to remember for me:
http://neverssl.com
I disagree. Whether the prior occupant or the property management company has extra sets of keys, you generally don't want some random prospective tenant out there to have the keys to a unit that you will eventually want to rent out to another individual. For Airbnb's/STR's, same problem; guests returning to a unit much later to carry out illegal activities is rather well documented at this point. Across the board, it's not worth the logistical pain and/or liability risk. In the case of a prior tenant, you generally know who the person is...etc. There are edge cases for sure (e.g. evictions) but it's generally less risky.
Is it? I don't know the particulars of India's constitution but suppressing speech like this is generally frowned upon by democracies.
Still possible. The control moves from your home network, corporate network or local ISP to the default DoH resolvers defined in the browser. This can be changed, but we know most people outside of a corporation will not change this. So in this case, CIRA will be logging DNS requests and sink-holing undesirable domains presumably by Canadian standards.

People can still use browser add-ons to block domains, URL's, objects on sites, etc... uBlock is my favorite for this.
I've set up my own mail server recently for all my domains. My email is at the bottom of this page https://declassed.art/en/about-me In past I implemented SMTP/POP3 for email over HF radio.
Thanks :D I'm glad you enjoy my work!

For this particular series, I have _no idea_ how many articles it will take to cover enough APL syntax for me to be satisfied with the state of the interpreter. This is mostly a hobby project to help me learn APL and to help me learn about interpreters and related materials, so I feel the need to write about every major step I take, which might actually look like a minor step from the point of view of number of features that get added.

Does my reply make sense?
ZRAM makes 512MB really bareable, as if you had 1GB.

I used a ZipitZ2 with 32MB and ZRAM, I could even watch MPEG/DIVX videos on it with mplayer and multitask over CLI with streaming music.
I rarely get any mail from legitimate companies that I'm not genuinely interested in, because if I ever end up on their list because I signed up or bought something, I just click the unsubscribe link in the email, and then I stop getting them.

If you get a bunch of mail you don't want, but don't click unaubscribe, you shouldn't be surprised when they keep aending you mail.

There are few exceptions where a legit business will continue to mail you after unsubscribing.

All that said, it did take a few months of diligently clicking unsubscribe on every promotional email I got to actually clean up my inbox, but since then it's been very smooth sailing.
This is nuts. Time to fix should be hours or days with modern engineering integration and test.
Probably for the same reason your employer does. Not saying it's fair to discriminate against people who have paid their debt to society but I wouldn't be crazy about having a rapist or murderer neighbor.
The fallacy to which you alluded is actually the fallacy of the false appeal to authority. It is not an argumentative fallacy to appeal to the knowledge of experts in their area of expertise. A large majority of everything you believe to be true has not been independently verified by yourself. You have and continue to rely on the knowledge of others.

The 97% I alluded to is not what you claim it to mean.

https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-clima...
The big majority of the chinese prefer to live under their current system. The fact you are a white, american male in tech does not make your opinion worthier, more intelligent or the moral compass. For many people the US is a barbaric state who humiliates and kill their non-white population and it is a imperialistic juggernaut who stops at nothing (they can kill hundreds of thousand of children with no remose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8YQ8gKIV8U ) to get what they want. So I would stop with the moralizing, nobody with 2 cells will buy it.
It’s already fairly commonplace for news agencies to generate articles using ML solutions such as https://ai-writer.com/

So by your logic ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC have all been plagiarizing and violating copyright for doing so? I’m not sure if there’s been a legal challenge/precedent set in that case yet, but that seems like a more apples to apples comparison than the Google Books metaphor being used.

Disclosure: I work at GitHub but am not involved in CoPilot
Trampoline Jump Instruction
If I understand the comment right, the solution is to first use pattern-inside to mark that you're interested in all try-except blocks, and then pattern-not-inside to remove the ones that correctly reraise the exception. Could you check this out? https://semgrep.dev/s/underyx:always-reraise

If this helped, I recommend joining https://r2c.dev/slack — we've got a #rules channel dedicated to solving problems like this :)
I don't really get where brokers fit in. Most landlords should have the time/employees to take care of such things themselves. An absentee landlord would need a whole property management service to take care of everything, not just one small part.

Brokers should be a niche service at best.
> 350+ million people get screwed when the government triples the money supply

Not necessairly if those people have a lot of debt, or the inflation fears turn out to be a mirage.
> we know very clearly from Classical written sources and iconography that there were many peoples of 'Sub-Saharan' appearance well north of the Sahara desert, in close contact with Mediterranean and Levantine (thus, clearly "Out of Africa") humans.

We also know they had negligible genetic impact.

> while these folks were clearly a tiny minority and their distinctive appearance was often remarked upon, this did not hurt their social standing in any sense; there was even a well-known Egyptian dynasty of "Black" pharaohs.

You say that like social standing determines who gets to be king. The Nubian pharaohs got their position in the standard way, by conquering Egypt. They weren't native, they took very little interest in their new territory, and they didn't last very long.

There was a well-known Chinese dynasty of Mongol emperors. What do you think the social standing of Mongols in China was before and after that happened?
Do you use split-horizon DNS, or do all of your internal domains fail to resolve externally? If the former, then add your organization's domains to network.trr.excluded-domains. If the latter, everything will still work without you needing to do anything.
Does premium fee go to content authors?
Generally speaking, criminals aren't smart people. Otherwise they could probably use their intelligence to earn money through legitimate means
In my eyes, the options are "no tc" and "not c". "Not c" is pronounced exactly the same as the german loanword.
You can't do that with a Chromecast. The goal here is to sell devices which can ensure they always talk to their own DoH endpoint with no ability to secure it.
I'd completely disagree. Software engineers tend to be very pragmatic. Perhaps it's really due to the involvement of the community but you look at open source software that has no "UX person" and it tends to be miles ahead of closed software that has them.
Law enforcement agencies created a site to sell the phones, and then had informants and other such people "pass the word" in the targeted communities - "hey, there's this cool site where you can buy a phone that the FBI can't track!". Viral word of mouth marketing.
Thank you. Scailer beta version is free forever and includes free updates until 2022. After we release the application, our annual subscription will take place. Scailer subscribers will receive quarterly software updates and other improvements. If you're one of the first 100 users to give us feedback, you'll get updates for free, forever!
>but there is no way to distinguish people escaping from an oppressive government and people laundering money from criminal sources

Is there a difference? Which governments aren't oppressive so their definitions of criminal sources don't count? I think they are exactly the same thing. A meaningful split might instead be funds derived from violent crime vs victimless crime.
It is hilarious to me that a "high yield" savings account is considered to be ~ 1% APY
The FBI/CIA has a long history of doing this. I met a guy once who ran a fake pro shop in New York to spy on visiting Russians (in a part of town they were known to frequent) during the Cold War.
Yeah, exactly. The viet cong and NVA we're utterly sadistic and depraved. Just reading about the ways they would torment and torture not just enemies - but poor civilians - scars one for life. Complete and utter callousness toward human life -- all while the leaders of the communist party's children were kept safe.

Should the US not have intervened to prop up RVN, disrupting millions of lives of young americans (and losing 50,000 of them), and killing hundreds of thousands (millions?) of others from carpet bombings, napalm, etc? No, and continuing escalation was criminal on the parts of Johnson, Nixon, and their henchmen.

But somehow people need to take that into somehow supporting and idolizing the exact horrific, militant, violent, racist traits they claim they are against. At the end of the day, they just don't like the US (or use opposition to the US as a virtual signal) - it has nothing to do with opposing unethical things.
No mention of Louis Rossmann to who Wozniak is replying to?

https://youtu.be/8hVjvKQ5CXY
"I suspect 1:1 between getting vaccinated and not, that getting vaccinated is safer, but who knows?"

See the problem with this type of rhetoric? There have been tons of studies done at this point with regards to vaping. Everything shows it as being safer. This is not equivalent to the tobacco companies lying to the public. Juul never makes any claim as to their product being 100% safe, just look at the packaging.

On top of that, you also repeated a known falsehood that vaping causes popcorn lung.

My point is that repeating these arguments and casting doubt on vaping being safer further promotes these bans on vaping, which in turn will kill more people.

> I'm arguing vaping is more dangerous than not vaping.

There is no need to argue an obvious fact that 100% of people will agree with.
Taking my data back from Eufy
:( Visibility is a clear indicator of air cleanliness.
> If there is a simple way to convert my pfSense config to a OPNsense config

There is. You just back up your pfSense config, and then restore it into OPNsense.
I read the government's requirement of certain executive roles + the requirement of it being an Indian citizen as the government having undue control over a private (foreign) company's executive positions. I'm still not familiar with the background on the mandating of these new executive roles, but wanting the person overseeing implementation of your country's laws to be from your country at least makes sense to me.

As far as the "controversial hash tag", that was a quote directly from the article. I feel like removing an entire hashtag related to a political position is generally a bad idea and can silence a lot of legitimate free speech, but I don't know enough on the specifics of this situation to apply that here.

Thanks for adding more context to clear up some misconceptions.
More than happy to take a look...
I am not a lawyer but I do believe GPT-3 as a commercial product trained using copyrighted data constitutes infringement. I also think GPT-2 does not because it is for research purposes, which made it fair use.