skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> you're not the market

I think it's a bit too easy to use this to justify whatever decision you make. After all, you can always define your market to be whatever set of people like your product and are willing to put up with whatever set of restrictions is imposed.

That isn't to say that this is never a valid point to make, for example I think "if you don't see the point of this, you're not the market" is absolutely reasonable. I can also accept it when talking about the price.

However, I don't see how it applies to the Operating System restriction and to a lesser extent the complaints about Electron. My primary machines from work run Windows, but that doesn't say anything about the number of meetings I have, how much I prepare for them or what value this application has to me.

I see potential for this to be quite useful and would have no qualms paying the subscription fee if it turns out to save me time over my current workflow. I think that makes me part of the market for the tool. But I probably won't find out if it's useful or pay for it anytime soon because the application doesn't run on my machine. I can see many colleagues being in a similar boat.

If not fulfilling the system requirements automatically makes me "not the market" and you're happy doing your business constrained to "the market", then you're obviously allowed to do that. The authors, and hardly anyone else for that matter, owes me a Windows app or any other product. But I don't think saying "I'd use this, but I don't use macOS" is naysaying or implies "you can never build a successful business" if done respectfully. It enables the creators to gauge interest and decide whether to invest resources into opening up another segment of potential users.
The illustrations were solid too.
They can already arrest any employee, like this head of marketing.
I think there's a bit of a spectrum between "I don't give a rat's ass about you or your project" and "This is my new life's passion".

From my own experience I find that yeah, job interview answers are mostly self-marketing BS. But I do also care about the quality of the end product beyond just having fun with the tech.
Thanks, interesting; I have looked through the PhD report, but think that Active Oberon only addresses a fraction of the issues; e.g. the "loopholes" described in section 4.4.3 are still present even in more recent Oberon versions; and issues like low level bit manipulation were apparently not the topic of the PhD, but only addressed recently (in http://cas.inf.ethz.ch/projects/a2/repository/raw/trunk/Lang... or my version of the language).
I had this when doing some work for a company that worked in China. I had to use a Chinese android app, but because I can’t read it I infected my machine with all kinds of malware. The app even had 100k downloads so my guard wasn’t up. I think it was some chinese version of youtube I needed.

Apparently the malware kicked in because I didn’t have a chinese keyboard.

After that a chinese friend helped me install the right app and avoid some pitfalls.
Building a No-Code Chatbot and CRM for Notion Pages (Need Suggestions)
We all love Notion. We have our Hiring page, Help guides, Product Roadmaps all designed using Notion. Why not go a step further and add a chatbot to these pages?

For HR teams:

- Add chatbots to your hiring page and qualify applicants, collect their resumes. Save all the applicant information to the built-in CRM.

For CS teams:

- Add a CS chatbot to your help page and understand which queries are being checked more. Answer repetitive queries and save more than 80% of your time. Tickets are automatically created when a chat session starts.
- Inbuilt SLA's will help you make sure you are attending to all the queries and alert you upon escalation.

For Product teams:

- Create a chatbot to suggest a feature request, vote for a feature, and subscribe to your product updates.
- Features/bugs will be created as tickets automatically and can be assigned to the engineering team using team collaboration.

For Sales teams:

- Add chatbots to your sales pages and qualify prospects, collect their contact details. Save all the prospect information to the built-in CRM and understand who to reach out to today.

Would love to hear what you think
Starship has a sufficient delta-v to service it.
The answer is simple: Github needs to make a tool which can scan all your code to see if it contains code from public code. Its what universities around the world do for students work.

Of course, theres a huge irony in that Github is also making the tool that enables the widespread plagarism....
Assuming there actually is a survey and people are actually being asked. 87% of the time it's people pulling numbers out of their ass.
This is such a funny story. Yeah, those guys were getting into something immediately preceding a short term crash.

But they were right. If they kept at it and ignored the people telling them that the internet was a scam, there is a good chance that they’re very wealthy now.
Probably had to agree to an EULA that bones your privacy rights as much as every other company's
Making being a landlord easier and more disconnected from people and your tenants etc for the investor class. What a great product for society and wealth inequality. Love it!!! Put an algorithm on judging if someone deserves shelter, we have never seen any problems with this in past studies!! Maybe one of the most evil things I seen on here in awhile tbh.
There are YC adds on HN though in the feed, so I guess you can say HN moneyizes?

E.g. this job add was on my feed right now:
https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/moderntreasury/dc9bcfe8-64ef-4377-a...
But that's US statistics, this happened in asmall area in Northern Italy.

Even if we go with your numbers, we get an average of 4-5% and since we know there was a huge spike in the middle of the outbreak it is not unrealistic to assume they were above 10% at some point.
He made the Sibelius one before he'd ever used MuseScore, did the MuseScore one before Dorico/Finale because of popular demand even though he'd never used MuseScore before that, and then eventually got hired onto the MuseScore team because of the strength of his critique, and proceeded to lead the effort to fix all of the issues he brought up in that video. He made the Dorico video no more than a couple months after joining the MuseScore team, and a couple months before becoming Product Manager there. The Finale video seems unlikely to come out now, honestly.

So, only the Dorico video is even possible to be a shill. Also, oh my goodness if he made YouTube videos to raise his personal profile, as opposed to all the other YouTubers who make videos anonymously?!?
Speaking of logistical headaches, what happens with your system when the power goes out in a building?
Most law is wishy washy. There are very few cut and dry answers in the law (If there were, we wouldn't need lawyers and a court system based on deciphering the law).

All that said, the one thing I'd add about fair use is that it isn't permission to use anything you like, but rather a defense in a legal proceeding about copyright. It's pretty much all about being able to reference copyrighted material with the law later coming in and making final decisions on whether or not that reference went too far. (IE, copying all of a disney movie and saying "What's up with this!" vs copying 1 scene and saying "This is totally messed up and here's why".)

That was a big part of the google oracle lawsuit.
miles _ahead_? I'm not seeing that, at all. Software without UX persons... often has bad UX.
no, stoppage for many century until policy change. policy remain a stoppage, just it has removed.
Before I start I note that I'm old enough to do what I want and I have no other habits/vices, but don't vape, kids ;-)

So I, a total non-smoker, started experimenting with nicotine a few weeks ago. First I tried gum which did nothing but give me an itchy throat. Then I bought a vaping device and some juices. Why? I think I'm low in dopamine (I am not depressed, though) and had read nicotine provides a temporary boost (until you get hooked) and I was intrigued to feel the difference.

I can't really tell what's happening. I like the taste and mouth feel of the smoke but the nicotine itself is a bust. Perhaps a very mild caffeine-esque feeling at a push. It hasn't proven addictive as it's been sat out in my car untouched for the past four days! Perhaps the nicest sensation is that of taking a truly deep breath.. but that feels just as good without the vape!

I remain intrigued what this means and hope to speak to someone medical about it one day. There's nicotine because it stings the throat if you hold it there (versus a zero nicotine juice) but whatever this amazing sensation people get has clearly passed my receptors by.
It's a woman's changing room, not a whoever-you-like-seeing changing room. There is no reason (other than some sort of puritanism) to get freaked out about girls seeing penises. In this context, it's just a body part.
Archaeologists may finally know the true identity of the Cerne Abbas Giant
So would a way to do this be to train multiple models on each different code license (perhaps allowing compatible licenses to cohabit) and then have Copilot identify the license of the target project and use the appropriate model?

It might have an interesting feedback effect that some licenses which are more popular would presumably have better Copilot recommendations, which would produce better and thus more popular code for those licenses. Although maybe this happens already.
Pay me commission.

Most businesses that pay salary operate like this:

Worker picks 5000 apples, coworkers picks 300. Business pays them each 1 apple. Both start picking 1 apple, business puts them on improvement plan. (China wants apple pickers to struggle.) Also, please write a 13-page paper detailing how your soul is mine, I'm your daddy, and any food you might try to grow on your own property is actually mine (Google).
That would be thwarting law enforcement.
How do you reconcile how bespoke and ever changing the requirements are for software products vs how stable the requirements are for garages?

I'm asking because I see the construction analogy pop up a lot and I just can't reconcile the two things.

To me the development of a new blueprint for a new kind of garage for a new kind of vehicle operated by a never before seen alien species is a bit closer to creating a software product.

I mean, who would ask a contractor to do what people regularly ask software engineering teams to do?
It's not ironic that I am failing to communicate when my argument is that it is hard to communicate.

Perfection is in knowing everything and not having to communicate. Nobody is perfect and communication is inevitable. New domains pop-up every year. It is up to the developer to work out which domain they want to seek out next and a team of developers that have all sorts of skills will always be required. The core of my argument is that we need to empower developers to discover what will lead to efficiency. Hopefully those developers can cross-train, as the only way to lessen the load on the team is remove complexity of the application, and the only way to do that is to communicate between all of the domains. The best way to communicate is to have someone who knows all of the domains.
There have been leaks of copyrighted code that were hosted on Github before they were taken down. There is also a lot of public code on Github without any license at all, which is not public domain but actually unlicensed for all purposes.
Blocking ads at network level is very easy to circumvent. Just serve ads from your domain. It's impossible to block youtube video ads using DNS, for example, you must intercept their API queries and modify them on-the-fly which requires browser extensions or custom apps.
I am somewhat confused how a middling social network of ~200M (generously) active users with a message limit of 280 chars has a lot of power? Celebrating government strong arming is an interesting take and only nice when its going your way.

Always imagine whatever government excess you are ok with in this instance is now going against your position and see if you still like it.
"15. While network-level blocking can be implemented without accessing the content of Internet transmissions, the Commission nevertheless considers that any regulatory framework for blocking or filtering traffic must include safeguards to ensure user interests are protected. Any framework the Commission approves will need to include, at a minimum, provisions that (i) ensure Internet subscriber privacy, (ii) enable subscribers to opt into or out of blocking, (iii) provide a false-positive correction mechanism, (iv) ensure blocking decisions are unbiased and made in the best interest of Canadians, and (v) minimize subscriber information monitoring, collection, and usage."

In case of emergency, break glass and use VPN.
I agree that what Google does is considered fair use. They show your content as snippets and they gain knowledge about topics and improve their search engine based on your content. I don’t see a big issue with what Github is doing either, as long as it’s not a near duplicate of the original content.
It has a real effect on the advertised price, and landlords are generally in a better position to reduce the cost or eliminate it altogether.
The definition of "unrealized gains" needs to be tightened, IMO, especially when used as security against "loans", or any other instrument used by the stockholder to otherwise gain liquidity without technically realizing the gains. Which is to say, there are convoluted transactions that are in effect selling shares, but the IRS doesn't presently classify as such.
Coinbase is a centralised exchange, they can ban it right away, no?
No, in the case of NYT brokers, software would solve the problem of NYC brokers, by putting them out of a job.

If you're from Germany, you have nothing to compare these people to, they run a racket that would be illegal there to begin with. They're nothing like the kind of rental agencies in Germany, they are individuals who basically figured out how to scalp entire buildings worth of apartments.
UOregon's Network Startup Resource Center (NSRC) has a good series of video tutorials on BGP / routing:

> The Network Startup Resource Center (NSRC) is a non-profit group that helps develop Internet infrastructure and network engineering expertise throughout the Asia-Pacific region, Africa, Latin America/Caribbean, and the Middle East. NSRC collaborates with network operator groups, universities, and government agencies to provide engineering assistance, training, and equipment to improve Internet access and services.

* https://learn.nsrc.org/bgp

* https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjVwd8FlHBAQk5U2Scrjp...
>No matter your technical proficiency, you are a lousy hire.

Hard disagree. There is a place for the developer as product evangelist, and there's a place for the developer as a skilled tradesperson.

The idea that someone needs to be fully invested in your worldview to pipe together a backend is... strange.
Probably the same reason why planting a bug in someone's home is illegal, but selling an always a smart speaker (aka always on microphone) to them and getting them to install isn't.
‘Financially Hobbled for Life’: The Elite Master’s Degrees That Don’t Pay Off
We did, it doesn't help that's the exact same article at a different URL. Their canonical headers each point to themselves too.. which, you know, defeats the purpose (presumably search engines suitably penalize one as a spam farm?) (Edit) Another copy here: https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/news/moskowitz-cellphone-rad...
I would +1 the ability to store my notes locally, with an optional sync to Google Docs or even your own server
The big question here is: On what data was the model trained? Presumably the news stations trained theirs on public-domain works and their own backlog of news articles, so even with manual copying there would be no infringement. In contrast, Copilot was trained on other people's code with active copyright.
Chromecast was already bypassing local DNS for years before DoH was even conceived.

Blocking people from using DoH isn't going to solve the problem you are describing, it will just weaken users' privacy. Big vendors like Google will just create their own workarounds.
> ISPs do not inject malware

Not taking a side on this thread, but just want to point out that Comcast literally has a patent describing just such a mechanism. [0]

[0]: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120224572
Can you go into more detail about the scary parts of Google Play Services? Or include a link?
Right now we have a multi-protocol hub with cellular and battery back-up. So the short answer is... nothing?
This is just a really silly way to think of craftsmanship. Whoever you pay to redo your bathroom doesn't care at all, literally at all, about your motivations behind wanting to redo your bathroom and how you think it'll change your whole morning and evening routines. They don't care. It's their craft. They will redo your bathroom to the best of their abilities and will take pleasure in new or interesting units of work you've included in your bathroom design that they haven't been able to try.

What you're suggesting is just hustle culture nonsense. If you want someone to be invested in your company, give them _equity_. If you won't (and you won't), accept that you're paying for a transactional relationship, not "investment".
This is pretty interesting for AI in general. Should you be able to train with material you don't own? Can your training benefit from material that has specific usage licenses attached to it? What about stuff like GameGAN?
Tresorit’s majority of stakes acquired by Swiss Post
Because even if you pay they will eventually insert ads into your feed. See Amazon Prime lately. So what is the point?
Haha, I agree that the behavior of those people is a major turnoff.

Communities in the space should be wary of encouraging cult-like behavior. Those who that are cult-like will probably have a hard time attracting talented people who can make valuable contributions, since they're usually attracted by the prospect of making new things possible for the first time, rather than some weird cult with a manifest destiny ("to-the-moon") narrative.
Brit here.

I can't read the OP: paywall. Does The Economist literally say that? I don't know how they came up with that - I don't believe anybody here is in favour of "permanent curfew" (a curfew is a ban on travelling during the hours of darkness; I guess they were referring to lockdown).

I imagine there is significant opposition, however, to the government's plan to lift lockdown more-or-less completely, in a couple of weeks, against the advice of his own scientific advisers. Maybe that's what The Economist is trying to say.
You're comparing vaping to getting vaccinated. You've clearly got an axe to grind.

> There have been tons of studies done at this point with regards to vaping. Everything shows it as being safer.

I haven't seen them, but there were also lots of studies that cigarette companies touted to show how safe their product was until they could no longer deny it. And seeing as how those same companies just invested a shitload of money into Juul, it doesn't seem crazy to think they'd use the same playbook. We also have no reason to believe vaping isn't purposefully designed to get people hooked on nicotine only to later sell them another product like cigarettes or something else they later develop. In fact, there are studies suggesting exactly that (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6652100/). There are many ways vaping could prove to be more harmful than we can currently see because it's a relatively new product.

I get your point about vaping potentially being helpful by getting people off smoking if it's safer, but it's simply unproven. Like I said if people want to vape let them, but I'll wait for the data before concluding whether or not it's safer. I suspect it's more dangerous and I'm sticking to that until the data proves otherwise. Similar to how you suspect it's less dangerous and will stick to that until the data proves otherwise. The common thread is we're lacking data and neither of us can confirm our hypotheses.

In other words we disagree and it's impossible to know who's right until we have more data. From my perspective your stance is just as harmful as you perceive mine to be.
Don't send any marketing e-mail to anyone. Everyone is opted-out immediately and permanently. End the right that businesses think they have to endlessly distract people.
How would "forgiving" the loans of people with MFA degrees from Colombia in film be anything but a transfer of money from hard-working taxpayers to some of the most privileged people in the United States?

This quote from the article is a better answer:

> “We should not be giving federal-aid dollars to these programs that systematically saddle students with high debt,” he said.

But I don't see our President proposing it.
> What makes you think the US gives a shit either?

Because we cut our emissions by a lot while increasing energy output & manufacturing, and it's many people's #1 issue.

I don't remember hearing about climate change in the CCP's 100 year anniversary speech, just bloody head bashing rhetoric.

Other countries outsource to China as well, why haven't they been cutting their emissions, there's only 12 countries or so that have.

You can hand-wave China away ignoring the numbers, or how much we send over there, what they are creating, how they are creating it, but you aren't doing the Earth any favor.

All of that doesn't address their new coal factories or plastic dumping either. Let's get a handle on that. Then let's worry about the manufacturing emissions as we don't even have alternative solutions for concrete or steel yet. Fair?
The point is that India is a sovereign republic and has its own laws about what is illegal and is not. According to India's laws, spreading false rumours about the police shooting a farmer when there is clear evidence that the person actually died by running his tractor into a barricade is illegal. And when Twitter failed to comply with government's orders to remove these tweets, they didn't have any point of contact from the company they could turn to for accountability. That's why the need for the compliance officer.

Also, criticizing the government is not illegal according to Indian laws.
I am also under the impression that one of the purposes of brokers/agents is to serve as plausible deniability against accusations of discrimination.
If I recall correctly, the nine line question wasn't decided by the supreme court, but the API question was.

The Supreme Court did hold that the 11,500 lines of API code copied verbatim constituted fair use.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf
A big reason that the false positive rate needs to be around zero is actually how uncommon school shootings are. Just a few false positives erode trust in the system and make people turn it off.

The problem is black swan events[0] are really hard to predict

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_swan_theory
Video consumes quite a bit more than imagery.
You can't opt-out of patents. You cannot enter the market with a product that infringes on a patent.
Use MDM and configure the browser. Or block the special probe domain Mozilla has for this purpose.
> Perhaps it's really due to the involvement of the community but you look at open source software that has no "UX person" and it tends to be miles ahead of closed software that has them.

You're setting a really low bar there. If you compare open source UX to the UX of closed source applications pre-iphone, you'll find that their incomprehensibility was frequently criticized. Case in point: GIMP.

What's changed is that closed source UX has gotten worse faster than open source UX (unless you count GNOME, which has set world records for how fast it degraded).
I don’t disagree with your point but was it necessary to make it in such a snarky way?
Clean "Success" sssSsss