skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Oh that's interesting, I'll have to take a look. So far most of what I want is available from TD Ameritrade's API, which while it isn't pretty, it does work pretty well.
But is it possible to deploy it in Heroku for free ?
From Cuphead to Super Meat Boy: 10 of the most fiendishly difficult games
Life advice addendum.

Become a Billionaire in a manner which is so quiet that only the IRS knows that you are one, even better not even them :)
We are building lots of coal plants globally.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/despite-pledges-to-cut-emissi...
That really depends on your setup. The cache whatever you tell them to cache. HTML and dynamic content is also cacheable with good results. For example you can vary the cache by the user ID cookie. Or for dynamic content you can in most cases do caching for 5min or so.
Can you provide tutorials on creating/training the model ? Please.
Common mistake: Negative reinforcement is when you take a negative stimulus away to reinforce the desired behavior.

What you're describing is positive punishment.

Also nicely explained in TBBT: https://youtu.be/gLp_aLMm5qQ
I believe they fire up an http server, based on how their local executor behaves, and then do "servlet-y" (or WSGi-y) dispatch into the entry point method
Probably a natural gas well, not an oil well. Few oil wells generate oil under pressure. (Those "gusher" were found and drained decades ago, most of them more than a century ago. See "Spindletop")
Nicely done. Are there other overlays like this?
Ah I think you're misunderstanding the question about the steel. Steel contains quite a bit of carbon (the element carbon) dissolved in the iron, on the order of 1% of the steel bulk is elemental carbon. You need to get that carbon from somewhere and coal is good source of carbon.

No research is going to replace the carbon in steel with something clean, your article is about the energy used in steel production and not the elemental carbon going into the steel itself.
One thing that interested US readers might like to do if they routinely take a prescription drug is to see how much the UK's NHS pays for that drug, by searching for it in the British National Formularly and using a proxy/Google cache to get around the geo IP blocking.

It's amazing how the same drug can vary in cost by a factor of ten or more. This article at least explains why (sort of).
I beat the USCIS one recently out of sheer luck.
He understood my poor attempts at saying « reschedule » as « you have a home bounds request » and I was connected with a agent the second after.

I have no idea what is a home bound request but I will now say that.
You need carbon to make steel, but it doesn't necessarily have to be from coal. So we definitely could replace coal, but that may be very expensive at today's scale. Even if we can use trees rather than coal, we are avoiding the release of carbon which was previously locked away underground.

Also, coal we dig up is much more suitable for one or the other purpose. If you mine thermal coal, the steel plant doesn't want it, they want metallurgical coal. If your country has a steel plant, and a thermal coal mine, you will export thermal coal from the mine and import metallurgical coal to run the steel plant. Well, if nobody buys your thermal coal, the coal mine shuts, even if you still have a steel plant.
I meant this in a positive way
Given that a single teaspoon of soil probably has about a billion bacterial organisms in it, I suspect you're a couple orders of magnitude short.
I see, thanks for the clarification. Yes, I was thinking of coal solely as a source of energy (heat, specifically) to melt steel.
People do care but there is a lack of choice. Then you have another issue with enterprise software is the people who are using the software are generally not the ones buying it. It comes down to does it check the right boxes.

Business do care it is just much more difficult than people realize to make software simple and easy to use. Then you have the fact most software projects fail and way over budget so they think there is no other way. Therefore they end up settling since at least they got something that sort of works which is better than nothing.
And you blocking their email could have them end up in spam lists.
Their loss.
the blame pointed on having multiple/layers of sub-contractors can be avoided by the client inserting this clause in their contracts, or am I vastly simplifying this?

In IT, it happens often that there is a clause that prevents contractors from sub-contracting a position. This forces them to hire for that skill.

What is special about the construction industry that this cant be done?
I'm a SQL newbie so maybe I lack context for this decision, but why did you decide to keep the "SELECT" keyword? Going through your tutorial, SELECT seems redundant and could just be dropped without any loss of information. In that way look a lot more like most non-SQL languages. Why do I need to SELECT "string" instead of just "string"?
would you be able to use EdgeQL to introspect an existing postgresql database and run queries on it?

Asking as I have a project ongoing where I don't really have the time to recreate everything in EdgeDB, but wouldn't mind spending a few hours to check how the query language works compared to SQL.
The bidding process and ownership obligations are probably just convoluted enough to dissuade the small players. You see this sort of thing all the time when all manner of goods, equipment or land goes to public auction.

A small player would jump at the chance to buy a mine for cheap if they were reasonably confident they could actually walk out of the deal owning a mine for cheap.
They don't seem to be collecting any replacement data from their users...
This is a statistically shoddy talking point. The average of all causes of death is right at the average life expectancy, by definition. Any cause of death weighted towards the elderly will have an average age above the average life expectancy.
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/health-topics/safe-bris...

There's been a case in and out of the news for the last decade or so(?) of one specific practicioner knowingly giving something like over 100 kids a pretty serious infection/STD. Shouldn't be hard to find on the googler.
I just used the Podswap service mentioned in the article. The swapped buds work great so far! I hope they figure out how to swap AirPod pro batteries soon.
My local health authority has this summer mandated disposable masks for clients for certain indoor settings and it’s bothered me greatly because I’m used to the same bandanna mask and I recall we were told climate change was an emergency and plastic straws were banned.
Lean: so good, we mentioned it twice.

I've heard that ACL2 is also a thing that exists.

To me, one of the most intimidating parts of getting into formal verification is deciding which system to use - as you mentioned, there are several. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each?
Are those not internal services that pre-date GCP that are exposed externally _through_ GCP?
If you do not live in an area covered by them (which is the majority), it is the same as you say. Situation is not perfect here, either.
I spent 30 years at hardware companies, writing software.

I'm fairly familiar with this conundrum.

The single biggest issue that hardware folks seem to have with software, is refusal to accept that software, in order to be valuable, has to run by different rules from hardware.

They. Just. Can't. Accept. That.

If it works for hardware, it must work for software. Attempts to explain that the agility inherent in software is a huge advantage, are met with stony glares, and accusations that "programmers are lazy slobs that hate quality."

So software developers are sidelined, treated like crap, not supported in efforts to achieve quality processes (it must be the same as hardware, or it's "lazy slob" stuff), insulted, tripped up, and basically ridiculed. It totally sucks.

Software is different from hardware; even firmware is different, these days. That simple assertion needs to be the baseline for any true reconciliation.

But I agree that modern software is of appallingly bad quality, and there's a dearth of lessons learned/mentoring in Quality practices.

Most practices (like TDD) are useful, but still fairly nascent, and tend to be "one-trick ponies." They will work nicely for some projects, but can be disasters for others.

Quality is a continuum; not a point. In hardware, we can get away with treating it as a point, but we hobble software, when we try to do it the hardware way.

Since leaving my last job, I have been working with ideas I developed during my career, that were never supported by the companies I worked for. These ideas are working fairly well, but they won't work for everyone.
Apple Maps does not yet offer cycling directions in Chicago, period. Despite it being on their "coming soon" list about 2 years ago. I would love to switch, cmon guys.
Unless I am missing it, they don't report the results by gender, but they do by age. Is this suggesting that the results were identical across gender?
131F = 55C

For those who are wondering.
Jennifer Government was satire and not a manual.
He should not have faked the machine learning, but I like the idea. (And I hope that copyright fail to exist, or at least gets adjusted to what it should be... aka, the effectiveness should be the same as patents (not forever and not easily extended))
You are more likely to obtain the correct result from a credentialed expert than doing your own research. This should be clear in the ever growing landscape of unthinking people using “research” as a proxy for confirmation bias.
How about "What is your rank?" "I'm the cook" "You're the cook?" "Yes sir" "They always survive..."
I think making the music box play is supposed to be rewarding in itself.
> "Private security has zero authority on a public space," he later laments.

An excellent argument against the privatization of public space, such as those privately-owned parks publicized during the Wall Street protests.
Yup but it will be immediately useful in applications like MRIs
software is getting more complex and i.e. it's unthinkable now for anything but a very large company to make their own browser.

isnt the answer then to reduce the incidental complexity?

provide alternatives that have "onramps" to greater capability instead of being stuck in "dumb ui land".

even a browser could be re-imagined as just a vm that runs "html" as a shared lib for one type of content, greatly simplifying the model for broswer makers

there are lots of potentialities i think
Full title is
“Possible Climate transitions from breakup of stratocumulus decks under greenhouse warming (2019)”. Condensed title because it was too long for the title field.
Looks an awful lot like some of the fonts that used to be quite common on early microcomputers from RadioShack, Commodore, Atari, even Apple. That said, there are some thoughtful additions: the lower case F and L are as elegant as the M is (necessarily) awkward.
There’s IP and then there’s IP. If Moderna published their complete protocols, cell lines, etc and allowed any qualified manufacturer to pay $5k/hr to consult with Moderna experts on how exactly to manufacture the vaccine, I wonder if there would be more supply.
So, pre-school children are more likely to investigate a conflict if the testimony is provided before the observation than if it is provided after.
Basically, if you want to avoid confirmation bias you'll need to form your own opinion ahead of the event.
This is precisely my point. Quite easy to miss the spread of a virus when:

1) Your population is by and large not susceptible to severe illness from the virus. Rates of asymptomatic & mild cases are much higher than in developed countries. Tragically, this is because most do not live long enough to be in the high risk group.

2) No widespread testing. Pneumonia deaths are just pneumonia.
Goatcounter works on netlify, it's pretty neat.
Big migrations take days to complete because -- like the author alluded to -- SQL merges very low level data layout concerns with very high level abstract data representations. So to make a change to one you have to make a change to the other.

Decoupling the materialisation of a schema from its theoretical representation would make all migrations "instant". Many column-oriented databases can do this, or nearly so, but most row-oriented databases can't or won't.

I.e.: ideally database engines should be able to keep track of multiple "versioned" physical schemas and transparently map in-flight queries to them. Big data migrations often implement this kind of thing manually with "writeable views" or similar techniques. This shouldn't be manual, the database engine should be able to do it behind the scenes with minimal human involvement.
Modular houses - where the fittings are made in the factory itself - is one kind of automation.

I met a guy a few years ago who had a plumber role in one of those modular factories... he said he was paid lesser but he likened it to a 9-5 job in a factory, and was ok with the pay.
> The single biggest issue that hardware folks seem to have with software, is refusal to accept that software, in order to be valuable, has to run by different rules from hardware.

Except for the moment where the hardware contains a mistake, then it's on the software to be flexible and contort to somehow workaround the hardware issue, because software is magic and can adapt to everything.

That said, I see plenty companies that are not as bad, actively work to change or at least accept that they don't "get" software entirely and that they get better results if they leave it to those who do.

And also agreed in the other direction: Lots of resources about building software today describe things that work for a SaaS product you can deploy 5x a day. You can't do that if you ship hardware, especially hardware that can't phone home daily for a software fix.
This is minor, but it's at least a bit older than that. Via Wikipedia I found a link to the code on a Chinese forum in 2000: https://web.archive.org/web/20150702180504/http://bbs.csdn.n...
Global house price boom becomes a dilemma for central banks
My guess: a function that you can evaluate but that you can not differentiate. Differentiate being "know the slope".

Differentiable functions are great because you can run gradient descent on them in a very optimized way. Example: if your objective is to have a very high value, search in the direction that has a mounting slope.

Though maybe I'm missing something 'cos it seems to me you can run gradient descend on non-differentiable functions. It just requires more evaluations.
Third one is true and verifiable and actually useful for cooks :)
What do you mean some other company would have eventually figured it out? Literally dozens of companies were working on the concept in parallel, not just Lyft, whose existence already undercuts your argument. My friend Christian who eventually got into YC with a different startup entirely had one called CloudCar in Boston, and he was far from the only one.

This same argument comes up literally every time obvious anti-competitive practices are mentioned and it’s bullshit. It’s completely and totally reasonable to demand innovation AND ethical business practices coexist and anyone telling you otherwise has an agenda.
My personal opinion: I respect the opinion of a medicinal chemist working in the field of drug discovery more than I do a journalist. The insider who works in the field understands the issues and problems of getting drugs to market more than an outsider.
I don’t understand why China is building so many coal plants - for several years it’s been reported that they run them way, way under capacity.
I'll have to find the video, but he said that sub wouldn't have made it through the first 50m.
I consciously leave a lot of the Google data collecting features on.

More than once, Google search suggestions have been freakishly good; this is coming out of my ass, but I feel like they might use your contacts for suggestions, which I usually notice studying last minute for a test or whatnot.

Then, of course, you have things like Google Photos, the aforementioned Google Maps features, etc.
And Musk repeatedly publicly gives this to her/says this himself.
Three Lions in Latin: soccer anthem
Saunas (at least the way we enjoy them here in Finland) can be pretty humid, because we throw water on the stones of the stove. But throwing too much water can make it intolerable, and lethal if you don't follow your instinct to leave if it gets too hot.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-10904691

Normally in a sauna it's not constantly so humid that sweating wouldn't be able to keep your body temperature normal (as long as you stay hydrated). Throwing water on the stove raises the humidity just momentarily and makes you sweat at full capacity, but normally you would wait for some minutes before throwing more water.

If air is humid enough, sweating can't cool the body anymore because sweat won't evaporate, so already 35C is lethal in 100% humidity.

https://phys.org/news/2020-05-potentially-fatal-combinations...
lol. I realised I made that typo right after the time to edit elapsed.
I honestly thought this was going to be about C++:

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/rule_of_three
You're right, I was mistaken in the original post. I should have said natural gas, not oil.
Satire: Open-source orgs reject cancel culture, embrace meritocracy
This doesn't excuse Elon slandering Vernon Unsworth, but didn't Vernon talk shit about Elon's good faith attempt at making a submarine to try to rescue the people?
You're setting up a strawman version of intro/extroversion discuss, and missing what everyone else is telling you.
What issues have you had with Arch Linux ARM? I tried it for a little while and things seemed to run fairly smoothly (though many AUR PKGBUILDs didn't indicate support for ARM).
Sneaked or Snuck: Which Is Correct? It’s a Modern English Mystery
Just like when he gave tens of thousands of kids in Flint Michigan safe drinking water the U.S. government has been denying them for decades.
WhatisthePlant – Plant identifier online with AI technology
Then you missed the video where he farts at France.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ydv9Ef-99I
With the Compute Module 4 and certain boards, you can use (and even boot from) NVMe SSDs natively. Makes a world of difference for so many things!
Well, the reason pigs are not kosher is because they carry parasites/diseases that are dangerous in humans because of how similar pigs and humans are biologically (hence swine flu, etc.)

(In my family, we accounted for that by cooking a few extra minutes on the infrequent occasion we cooked pork. I personally don't eat bacon.)

So it's odd that one would get a transplant (raw pig organ) from a pig.

Maybe somebody can expand on that.
That pretty much describes the last ten years of my day job.

Thank the Gods for my extracurricular OSS work.
Storing trees for instance, but you can always rewrite your recursive CTE to use a while loop and a stack.
This is only a problem if you care about predictable rate of blocks being mined right?

What reasons besides predictable inflation are there for desiring that property?
Now I want the BBC to publish the article “Why Americans celebrate Cinco de Mayo with Taco Bell chalupa combo boxes with a forty ounce no ice Mountain Dew”
> Is it a hard and fast rule? No.

Nowhere did I say to apply any of this as a rule. Literally all this is for is the potential for power imbalances. Plenty of relationships have a mix of these factors and can be healthy. I tried to make this clear but to say it plainly, none of this is proscriptive or prohibitive.
You're completely ignoring long covid.

You don't need to die from COVID-19 to experience health issues, even without previous issues.
> In practice, we can easily generate a reasonable lower bound for the probability. Just take the number of billionaires and divide by a count of the total human population. You end up with a small number, but one considerably larger than 0.

I just got 0.000000354. I guess it's a matter of opinion what counts as "considerably larger than 0," but that's a pretty small chance.

That's really not the lower bound, either. That's the average probability for all people, but some people's chances are much higher than that. For Jeff Bezos' kids, the chance is nearly 1. That means the chance for other people needs to be lower to come out with the number of billionaires we actually have.

I don't really want to put aside that advice like this necessarily can't scale because the number of people taking the advice changes how effective the strategy can be. In the limit, if every single person on the planet tried to found their own AI tech startup, 0 of them would succeed and humanity would quickly go extinct as we no longer had food because all the farmers quit to found AI startups.

We may or may not need some people trying to become billionaires, but we definitely do not want all people trying to become billionaires.
Please do. Having lost my dad somewhat unexpectedly I would have loved something like this. I have 2 kids now and think besides financial security, journals, letters etc might be one of the most valuable things I could give them. That way they know me whether I’m here to tell them or not
Accurate enough. Saint Petersburg has been registering daily temperature measurements and publishing them in newspapers since 1778 (in Delisle scale).
He's also the Technoking of Tesla. The titles don't mean much when he can make them up and give them to himself whenever he feels like it.
Interesting. But are those old graph databases similar to modern ones like Neo4j? Neo4j has pretty amazing performance compared to doing the same thing in SQL. Although it's certainly possible that SQL database was poorly designed. Even so, a handful of developers new to graph DBs managed to easily beat its performance.

I've also heard that some modern graph databases are not true native graph databases below the surface, and therefore perform worse at graph-specific queries.

Edit: is it possible you're talking about Network Model DBs[0]? Wikipedia mentions them being around since the late 1960s, and that they could model graphs, but suggests it's more of a predecessor to graph DBs, which saw a lot of improvements until the arrival of modern commercial graph DBs in the 2000s[1].

Again, I'm not an expert on this at all, but it sounds like there have been significant improvements in graph databases since the 1970s. Much more so than in relational databases.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_model

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_database
"Malnutrition Hits The Obese As Well As The Underfed"

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/12/23/7855667...
Jobs program, perhaps?
I know, but I am just questioning whether any license is needed for open source to prosper.

I am positing that if licenses didn't exist, and anyone could do anything they want with any bit of code they see, open source would still prosper.
Doesn't this ignore the real world realities of economies of scale though with the physical materials being used? I'd enjoy a bit deeper explanation for this if you don't mind. :)
Do you have any links to peer reviewed evidence of "long covid"?

I haven't seen anything remotely convincing. But I am open to changing my mind.
Yeah, why would anyone be bitter about a giant corporation creating a commercial code laundering machine that digests a massive amount of copyrighted code and spits out "clean" code free of all the burdens of its inputs?
(SQL Server) Query hints(OPTIMIZE FOR), fixed plans, compiled stored procedures - they all do things like this but they all have tradeoffs that you generally would rather just let the engine take care of and write more clearly expressive queries than take on, mostly "hey wait why did my performance suddenly get worse?" type of reasons.