skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is a reason you need an escape hatch from SES.

In the past when I worked on a system that needed to notify via email we always had a way to change delivery process for certain emails, domains, etc for exactly this reason. This is one of those cases where we would “deliver directly” (i.e. send directly to their mail provider).
Thinking Is Work
Well, you have to have a basic set of evidence for any court to hear it. That was lacking.
So you think that because someone works on marketing or marketing related areas they’re technically illiterate?

As a former Gitlab employee I can tell you that Gitlab has a lot of technically accomplished people doing marketing.

People at Gitlab understand Gitlab because they eat their own dogfood. Everything at Gitlab is build using Gitlab including several marketing workflows.
I'm a paying customer and I agree.

Meanwhile many core features are still unpolished e.g.: running your own runners sucks and you can't test CI/CD locally.
Lisp machines were an interesting idea. Unfortunately they were very expensive and fairly slow compared to other machines at the time.
That was then. Some major events continue in B.C., of course, but this particularly bad heat dome phenomena is now being felt all the way from B.C. to Northern Ontario, the Yukon, and the NWT.
The wonderful quote that appears halfway through supports your conclusion

"There are many theories about the connection between sensory processing and intelligence but my personal belief having lived it is"
curious to know what you think about WSL2? I've been using emacs and ubuntu with pretty great sucess
Why doesn't the insurance company trust Dr. Nick?

If there's reason to not trust Dr. Nick, then surely the insurance company must disclose it. If there's reason to not trust Dr. Nick, then surely Dr. Nick would have trouble maintaining a medical license. If there's reason to not trust Dr. Nick then surely Dr. Nick's own malpractice insurance would become too onerous for him to keep.

No, this smells exactly like what @Someone1234 stated:

> Out-of-network was always just a sketchy way for insurance to avoid paying what they should have paid.
Canadians spend 220k (in 2013) per person per lifetime. It's very unlikely you can shrink 10 million dollar bill to anywhere close to that.

[1]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/heal...
Maybe you’re right about gorillas, but chimps are much more closely related to us, and they’re hyperviolent at times, engaging in (essentially) genocide, just like us humans.
I wonder what the actual single most impactful thing you can do to boost your intelligence is?

Besides going to school for 20 years, being well-fed and rested, presumably it's taking modafinil?
If anything, the contrast is stronger.

Slovenian: -a feminine, -o, -e neutrum, rest masculine. (Again, some exceptions.)

Italian and Spain is probably even simpler, since there’s no neutrum.
I find you're exaggerating what I don't recall has ever been an issue for me when doing C/C++. Having to compute sizes of dynamic objects in memory is just a normal thing to do. Here is a better practice btw:

utf16_output.size()* sizeof utf16_output[0];

This removes the redundant indication of the element type (which can introduce bugs when the type of the array is changed). It gets even better when removing the naming slightly (names indicating types rarely make sense):

out.size() * sizeof out[0];

With less magic: plain pointers instead of C++ vector like object, the following is total muscle memory for me:

out_count * sizeof *out;

I don't see how it is a problem having to do a simple multiplication when what's needed isn't the size that is normally used ("number of elements"), but the size in bytes of the slice.

Adding some kind of syntax of library feature to remove this trivial multiplication would add more non-orthogonality, as one would now use sth like

out.size_in_bytes()

but for custom slices would have to do the calculation manually:

n * sizeof out[0];

Note also that in the former case, the need to multiply is removed syntactically, but not at runtime. Personally I don't think there is a worthwhile improvement to have.
Anything posted to Stack Overflow has a specific (Creative Commons IIRC) license associated with it. The same is not true of GitHub Copilot, and in fact their FAQ doesn’t specify a license at all, probably because they are technically unable to since it is trained on a wide variety of code from differing licenses (and code not written by a human is currently a grey area for copyright). The FAQ simply says to use it at your own risk.
When I lived in Manhattan and worked with some really wealthy clients, they'd fly to France, Israel and elsewhere for care when they could have easily gotten the best care the US has to offer right down the street.
There are legitimate complaints to be made about Wikipedia.

It's a pity this author chooses his handful of pet political issues and spends most of time arguing about the summary sections of certain pages. And most of the complaints are "how come they aren't making a big deal about the things I want them to". Man, can you believe how unfair Wikipedia is to Stalin? They didn't talk about any of the nice things people said about him?

Ultimately, these complaints are incredibly self-defeating. The point about Wikipedia is that literally anyone can change it. If you don't like the information presented, you are more than free to actually fix it instead of bitching on the internet. But it turns out you will actually have to put in research, provide valuable information, work with other volunteers to establish consensus, and survive the scrutiny of every reader. And no on will pat you on the back or hand you internet points.

And it turns out that a lot of these random ideas, like Hunter Biden's totally real laptop or the deep state plants in the January 6th riots might very well be true, but in no way do we get to stop the train on every stop so that every fringe viewpoint can get on board. Or no one who believes in this stuff is actually willing to put in the work.

If your entire political identity is that you would rather pick up your ball and go home to complain rather than put in the work to establish your points, I say good riddance. I don't want your lazy tropes on Wikipedia.
Personally, I've long since stopped expecting breathless coverage of important events from a press that collectively prefers covering who Miley Cyrus most recently flashed her crotch to. You'll need to go beyond CNN, MSNBC, or FOX.

“For the first time in the history of our country, the government has brought criminal charges against a publisher for the publication of truthful information. This is an extraordinary escalation of the Trump administration's attacks on journalism, and a direct assault on the First Amendment. It establishes a dangerous precedent that can be used to target all news organizations that hold the government accountable by publishing its secrets. And it is equally dangerous for U.S. journalists who uncover the secrets of other nations. If the US can prosecute a foreign publisher for violating our secrecy laws, there’s nothing preventing China, or Russia, from doing the same.”

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-comment-julian-assa...

"Don’t let the misdirection around “blown informants” fool you—this case is nothing less than the first time in American history that the US government has sought to prosecute the act of publishing state secrets, something that national security reporters do with some regularity."

https://www.cjr.org/opinion/assange-extradition-espionage-ac...

"For the sake of press freedom, Julian Assange must be defended"

https://cpj.org/2019/12/press-freedom-julian-assange-wikilea...

"The most dangerous press freedom issue of 2020 is Trump’s prosecution of Julian Assange"

https://freedom.press/news/the-most-dangerous-press-freedom-...

"The US should never have brought the case against the WikiLeaks founder. This attack on press freedom must be rejected"

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/18/the-gu...

"The U.S. Government’s Indictment of Julian Assange Poses Grave Threats to Press Freedom. The Trump DOJ is exploiting animosity toward Assange to launch a thinly disguised effort to criminalize core functions of investigative journalism."

https://theintercept.com/2019/04/11/the-u-s-governments-indi...
>The team first reverse-engineered our backup script to delete all of our offsite backups.

I guess the permission should be one way. The production server can only push data to backup server, never to delete or overwrite anything even if it wanted to.
IBM should definitely have a place there. Netflix is the one that's not like the others.
ColdQuanta Inc. | Software Engineer, DevOps | remote (US only) or onsite (Boulder, CO) | https://coldquanta.com

ColdQuanta is building a quantum computing platform to accelerate AI, drug discovery and material science. Our neutral atom approach allows scaling beyond ion and superconducting architectures while still maintaining high fidelity and connectivity. Quantum computing knowledge is not required but a math background helps.

* Software Engineer: https://apply.workable.com/coldquanta/j/79FB2C08B9
* DevOps https://apply.workable.com/coldquanta/j/17C7409D06
Should probably have gone to an ER. Emergencies are easier to argue and appeal. "Urgent" (yet less costly) and they assume you still could have waited... it wasn't an emergency yet. I hate our insurance/medical payment/determination system. It's a joke.
This part almost feels like confirming Noah's Ark
It kind of depends on the network. For a real owned and operated HMO where every provider in the network buildings and offices is an employee of the network (or under contract as a network provider), in-network only (for non-emergency services) makes a lot of sense to control costs, make staffing predictable, ensure consistency of care, etc. As an insured, you go to one building and get everything taken covered. If you want to go out of network for something, you need a good reason or be willing to pay for the whole thing.

When it's a third party HMO network and you've got stuff like a medical office where only some doctors are in network and others aren't, so if your doctor is behind or out sick and you're offered to see another doctor in the interest of time and then you've seen an out of network doctor, that's a totally different deal. Then you've got things like in-office X-ray analyzed by an off-site radiologist whose identity and network status wasn't known before hand.

I'd like to see non-emergency medicine take up the same kind of quoting requirements as auto repair. You can't always stop a procedure to update the quote, so provide several quotes for the likely outcomes.
> Hm - I recall they did try to bring it to the supreme court and the court declined to hear the case.

They brought lots of election cases, but they didn't bring allegations of fraud in most of them (Giuliani got chastised by a judge in one case for going on a tirade about fraud even though the case he was arguing did not allege fraud), and in the cases where they initially made fraud or fraud-adjacent claims, those claimsnl were often withdrawn before the case was resolved.

Fraud has been something they’ve argued in the media, and in GOP controlled state legilaative show hearings, but not really (at least properly) in court.
> Facebook asks users to identify extremists

Just like East Berlin and North Korea, parents will soon have to be extremely careful what they say in front of their children, because our technolords are making our children into informers.
>I find it really hard to believe that US citizens are allowing this abuse and many even defend it.

Because US citizens know that increasing the amount of healthcare provided will increase taxes. This whole game is being played because we want to have our cake and eat it too, with many in the middle and upper deciles betting that they will be better off without a universal healthcare type system.

>I wish the Democrats had had any courage to go for Medicare for all.

We are lucky the Democrats are even trying, and that ACA even got passed, with the compromises that had to be made. They simply do not have the numbers in Congress (and will not based on population trends) to do any more.
There is a pretty large continuum of potential value between the 'cheap' care that people want, and the ruinous bills that get charged.
Dude, this is basic overlay filesystem stuff / just look at every live image ever.
> I find it really hard to believe that US citizens are allowing this abuse and many even defend it.

Your average US citizen has no choice in the matter.
There possibly is great stuff there, but after having dismissed the third popup in roughly as many seconds, I gave up and hit the back button.

I've no idea why websites do this. No one wants it.
sadly the site is unreadable in brave browser on Android (latest stable)
For filesystem navigation there's ranger/nnn

For text/file searching there's fzf + rg + fdfind

All these tools integrate with eachother but are already great on their own.

With nerdtree and other alike plugins you lock yourself into building IDE out of vim. With these specialized tools you can reap their benefits even without launching vim.
BitTorrent – a new P2P app (2001)
This is why I just let the NSA do my backup management for me.
Student gets Windows 11 running on a Windows Phone
Right, it's the only low-emissions power source that is available at-scale.
Acknowledge problem.

Accept problem.

Attempt to solve problem.

Accept outcome.

Rinse and repeat. Don’t waste cycles on the emotions of having problems.

(not saying that emotions don’t matter, often times they distract one from making progress)
I read this as learn to reign in your extremes so you don't stop yourself from learning. Extreme distractions, emotions, actions all will pull you away from what you'd like to accomplish or learn. Soothing the anxiety that prevents you from doing something, or calming the anger that blinds you to reason are effective ways of getting through challenging times to help you do what you originally set out to do.
For me it was the lua config file.

Now tweaking vim to the behavior I want is no longer learning an obscure language but figuring out what is the behavior I want and coding that using lua and the vim api. With the lua language server vim’s api is very discoverable!
I'm not confusing them, I'm making a distinction. My posts have been about market efficiency and I didn't say a thing about economic efficiency.

If 1000 new participants wanted to buy and sell rockets, yet, the price would become more "efficient". There would be more sellers and buyers, and more room to negotiate and trade. Your example is a stupid one.
Sometimes the trust issue is more about fraudulent claims than one's ability to practice medicine...
Twenty years ago I heard stories about people taking Piracetam, but afaik it's for Alzheimer patients and not healthy individuals looking to boost their intelligence.
I can relate to this. My parents lived in a 22 story building that had water leaks throughout the entire building from construction defects. Until my mom literally got herself elected to be the president of the condo board nobody seemed to care that the building was broken. Many years later and a lawsuit against the developer, the building association and the owners were finally able to get compensated AND have the construction defects fixed.

There is no way you can financially prepare for the magnitudes of repairs needed in their case.
Which they did because there was no actual evidence presented.
From a skim read of both blog posts it's still impossible to understand what's actually new in this version. Just introduce the features in the post, no?
> "Fascism" gets thrown around a lot and I know it feels a bit overplayed, and I'm not saying we're there yet, but when most people are apathetic and the remainder form their opinion based entirely on their political faction, it's hard for me to believe that fascism isn't inevitable. After all, what is fascism about if it's not 'party firmly over principle'?

I'd say that the focus on party loyalty is more a feature of authoritarian parties in general and not fascism specifically.

If there's any single tenet that can be called central to fascism (a debatable premise), it's probably the idea that "the nation" can reattain its former glory by forcefully purging various forms of "degeneracy" and thereby becoming "pure".
I'm going to go against the flow here and say that worrying about this is similar to worrying about the license we give to snippets of code we copy-paste from other licensed code.

The reality is that we never attribute the original source because we copy-paste it, change it up a bit, and make it our own. Literally everybody does this.

I still care about licensing and proper attribution but the reality is that a snippet of code is not something so easy to attribute. Should we attribute all kinds of ideas, even the very small ones? How quickly is an idea copied, altered & reused? Can we attributes all the thoughts humans have?
I like how unicorns can do such hiring challenges while normal companies are desperate for people to apply. I think my current company would hire anyone who can breath and write 3 lines of code per month, but no one fitting these criteria applies.
Not everyone is going to have a 10 million dollar hospital bill. That's the entire point of insurance, and also the point of having a national plan: you generally aren't going to know if you're going to have a lifetime expense of 10K or 10M. So you need to aggregate that across the entire population.
By rolling your eyes you accept my terms and conditions.
It seems to me a core cause of this problem is enabling a relatively small cabal of power users to determine what is and is not a reliable source. A neutral wikipedia should despense with the "reliable source" requirement. Let the reader make up
his own mind.

It is astounding that an english lanuage reader will find basic facts and details about the Biden scandals censored by wikipedia because no "reliable" sources reported on them.
It's not just condo boards, it's everything in America... physical infrastructure, corporate R&D, software security bugs. It's more attention grabbing and personally profitable to do something new than maintain something old, so people kick the can down the road and cash in, making the problem someone else's (and a bigger problem). Even worse, America's soft power / cultural influence is infecting other countries with this mindset, which once used to have family owned businesses managed on a centuries-long mindset.

"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in."
We have literally no idea what kind of a morality the vast majority of people who have ever lived subscribed to. I mean, even today there are still cultures around where literally kidnapping a teenage girl and keeping her hostage is the virtuous traditional way of getting married.

What I was trying to allude to is that it's easy to sit on our high horses and bash people from bygone times about how stupid they were for dividing people into 'we' and 'them' over minuscule differences, when they were mostly just faced with a simple choice - 'we' dead, or 'them' dead.
Is everyone an ‘eccentric genius’ with some magical disorder these days? Or just bloggers?

And where’s the source for the white matter structural deformity “delaying” signal processing by “a fraction of a second”, I’m very interested in how that works since it makes no sense that a signaling channel in the brain would suffer a large delay like that.
GoodRx | San Francisco/Los Angeles/Remote | Full-time
GoodRx helps Americans find access to convenient and affordable healthcare.

Hey all! GoodRx is hiring for many roles, including:

1) Senior (technical) SEO manager with in-house experience: https://jobs.lever.co/goodrx/85a82117-81ee-4ff8-aa17-1e48767...

2) Senior BI manager to join the SEO team: https://jobs.lever.co/goodrx/6753e321-d3a1-49e9-9996-0a37520...

We have other roles open in BI, data, engineering, editorial, finance, growth, HR, marketing, and more. There's never been a better time to join the team. Take a look and let me know if you have any questions! https://www.goodrx.com/jobs

- john@goodrx.com
The Nazis ran what would more accurately be termed extermination camps.

Though what they did certainly bore a strong resemblance to the Boer war concentration camps/manzanar,etc. whose purpose was to "concentrate" people into one place rather than industrially slaughter them.
Apples and oranges: Stack overflow snippets are explicitly granted under a permissive license, as long as you attribute.

https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing

It appears that the code that copilot is using is created under a huge variety of licenses, making it risky.

On the other hand, a small snippet in a function that is derived from many existing pieces of other code may fall under fair use, even if it is not under an open source license of some sort.
a lot of people have given very thorough explanations of why pfof is not an evil thing in this thread. i suppose you're free to believe your own narrative, if you want.
Agreed. The journalistic options here are 1 and 3.
2A and B are what propagandists do.
I have too much of an aversion to vendor lock-in and/or Microsoft. I don't think I could give it an honest appraisal. The only way I can see myself using it is if it becomes a mandate at work, and even then I'll make sure the project gets assigned to someone else.
I think I obtain a lot of the benefits of focus without quite being this extreme. I use a lot of virtual desktops. One virtual desktop per logical activity. For example as a student it would be one desktop per course I'm studying. As a software engineer, each git-repo that I touch gets its own virtual desktop (especially when one application involves many git repos). Each virtual desktop has its own editor process, terminal, and browser window for documentation and tabs related to that activity only. This means I can change my focus just by switching to another virtual desktop. And the tabs and editors and such on other desktops are not visible (they are not even in the panel) while I'm not working on them. So unlike you, I have lots of bystander applications, and each one is exactly where I left it. They just aren't visible until I switch to that activity. So I would argue that they don't distract me at all.

I also have things set up so that there is a keystroke that raises the editor on the current desktop to the top. Another for the browser and another for the terminal. When I switch to another desktop, the same keystroke raises a different editor process for that desktop, etc. So within a desktop, I switch between these apps using the same keystrokes regardless of which desktop I am on. And there is only one way to switch desktop. I can't switch to another desktop via choosing another application on another desktop, because the other applications that are not on the current desktop are completely invisible.

When I'm working on something with a Scala backend, an Elm frontend, and C/C++ embedded device, and when I need to go back and forth often between these sub-applications making related changes, I can't afford to close and reopen each one when I change the language/repo. I can change desktops very often this way. eg. Add a new field to the frontend. Immediately add it to the backend and the embedded also. But they are in different repos. etc. etc.

If I have one editor opening all three projects it is a nightmare to navigate between files. But one editor for each language and repo is the sweet spot for me. And it means my documentation for Elm is all in a separate browser window from my documentation for Scala (which is on another desktop) etc etc.

Sorry this was so long, but I think all the details add up to making it an efficient system.
That's possible, he is a politician after all.
However, here's a civil rights lawyer's take on it and seems to echo this:
https://youtu.be/1Ozbqjv0xw4?t=937