skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What substances a bipolar person can consume will vary by the individual. Some can use alcohol moderately, others must completely abstain.

Bipolar is a progressive illness. I have taken psychedelics a handful of times and experienced the purported benefits that last a lifetime. Other times I have experienced extreme paranoia. I guess it depends on what state I’m in (mania, depression, mixed, stable).

I used amphetamines and THC for many years to self medicate before being diagnosed. Self medication is extremely common for bipolar folks, especially alcohol. It only makes things worse.

I’m still figuring out what I can and cannot consume, along with dosage. Since being on a mood stabilizer, I absolutely cannot consume any amount of THC, as it will induce mania. Alcohol will make me incredibly depressed the next day. Medication is new to me this year.
I was thinking about this the other day actually and I believe consciousness serves a higher purpose. If you think about it without any consciousness in the universe, nothing would ever be observed. Without consciousness the universe would just be an empty library, full of history and knowledge but with nobody there to read the books (assuming we are the only conscious life form in the universe). And that's fine I guess, the universe obviously could care less if we read its biography, but at the same time I think about how lucky it is that there is a biography to read at all. We could have been conscious beings in a universe that is truly chaotic and could never be made sense of but here we are in this nice one. That is able to be quantified and one that can be appreciated. One filled with unimaginable beauty and mystery to appreciate. Even if we have no tangible purpose, we still have the ability to observe and in a limited sense manipulate the universe around us and I think that is a highly overlooked facet of what makes being a human not completely unbearable. To me the meaning of life is to just simply to be. Butterfly affect applies here, just simply existing can have an unknowable cascade of effects that ultimately shape the story of the universe. My version is a little different: Entropy will always win. Until then, just exist and enjoy.
I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

I wanna rock and roll all night and party every day

(Actual lyrics)
> ...some commentators accuse GitHub of copyright infringement, because Copilot itself is not released under a copyleft licence...

This is not why. The issue at hand as I understand it is that people using copilot will potentially have code snippets in their work that are already licensed they do not know the license for and that they will not license properly as a result.

That's in the first paragraph. If you enter this discussion with an incorrect presumption from the outset I don't see how you can form a valid defense.

> However, by doing so, the copyleft scene is essentially demanding an extension of copyright to actions that have for good reason not been covered by copyright.

No. Nobody is asking for an extension of copyright protection, we are asking for the existing reach of copyright to be respected. We built our licenses based on a ruleset that we were told is fair. You don't get to violate rules you made and then claim that copyleft people only made their licenses because as a workaround to copyright and so are being hypocrites.

> Others focus on Copilot’s ability to generate outputs based on the training data. One may find both ethically reprehensible, but copyright is not violated in the process.

The arguments I've heard are not that Microsoft is using publicly available information to train it's AI. The argument is that people are potentially (and in some current cases demonstrably) getting copy pasted code snippets from licensed software. If you can't see the plainly obvious problem here it's because you're trying not to.

Also a point made in the article, that machine generated things cannot be copyright because copyright requires a creator, brings up an interesting question as to whether works by people who used copilot can be licensed at all.
> There is no color, and could never be.

This illustrates the scope of experience we apply to the world. I have never seen a color of running, but somoeone has. Synesthesia is very real and to those who possess it, there is a color of running. There are whole worlds of understanding that we cannot see because we lack the ability to see them.

Some we can learn to see, some we deny because of reason or they have faded in our memories, some we dismiss out of hand because, well, "that can't possibly be true".

All that to say: you might be missing the meaning of life, the universe, everything because you are not equipped to see it.
Thanks. I initially used a regular HTML parser as well, but I quickly ran into sites that wouldn't render without JavaScript. I'm therefore now using a regular browser controlled by Playwright to fetch the websites.
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Remote: 100%

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: ReactJS, React Native, Webflow.

Résumé/CV: https://alamedadev.com

Email: hola@alamedadev.com
How to keep your dependencies up-to-date
It's also a single point of failure. If the spike mutates, the vaccines will be less than useless.
If anything, I saw shortages as a failure of the capitalist system by which shortages are caused by greed, particularly by those with more money. From my understanding with a more socialist system in place, people would be limited to purchase only what they need to make sure that there could be enough for everybody (which there definitely was)
Have an upvote, you deserved better for this.
> Also, both of your examples are missing `key`, though React will warn you about it and Vue will not

Vue will warn when you're missing a key on the loop.

>That requires you to create 2 new components (which unlike React, will need to be in separate files if you're using SFCs)

Your components don't need to be in separate files even when using SFC's.
Given 'component' can be as simple as adding to any Vue Component or SFC (when adding it to parent component option):

<script>
const myComponent = {
props: ['myProps'],
template: `
<div></div>
`
}
</script>
SEEKING WORK | 100% REMOTE | $70 per hour

We are a Javascript development team specialized in ReactJS and React Native technologies.

Tech Stack: ReactJS, React Native.

Integrations we have worked with: GatsbyJS, Mapbox, Google Maps, QR codes, OCR, Firebase, Netlify, Netlify CMS, Stripe, WebFlow, etc.

- Email: hola@alamedadev.com

- Web: https://alamedadev.com
> Could you give an example for "meaning" which is not "human-created"?

Without providing a more objective definition of "meaning", this question seems circular.

Hypothetically, if someone gave you the example you seek, I see two possible responses:

1. You see the "meaning". You'll then say that it implies the meaning is "human-created" (since it was *you* who found it meaningful).
2. You do not see meaning in it, so you remain unswayed.

Neither outcome would cause you to change your position, which implies your position is actually just a definition.

If you argue that meaning is inherently subjective, then there is no point in asking for meaning which is not "human-created".

I will make a proposal for an objective definition of meaningful: something is meaningful if it is non-random, in the sense defined by Kolmogorov, i.e., it is compressible.

Using this definition, there is meaning all around us, very little of it human-created. Statistical reasoning, which drives the scientific endeavor, is among our most powerful tools for discovering this meaning.

The question really is: where does all this meaning point?

Unfortunately, even our best statistical methods fail badly in answering such questions. A concrete and convincing example is presented here:

Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor? (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5230747/)
But that fast inverse square root example is particularly interesting because it is also a derivative work. Carmack did not invent it, and several variations of it had been passed around over time.

Algorithms should not be subject to copyright, that way lies madness. It would prevent new generations from building on top of the work of their predecessors, because copyright lasts a very long time. The amounts of code that github copilot reproduces fall squarely into the “shouldn’t be subject to copyright” domain for me, even if they pass the bar for originality.
You need to stop using your credit card for free trials and subscriptions
Duplicate. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27735367
I have been using kubectl + zsh for quite a while.

But now my choice is Intellij (or other IDEs from JetBrains) + Lens, which I find more productive and straightforward (more GUI, fewer commands to memorize). Here's my setup and workflow:

1. For each repository, I put the Kubernetes deployment, service configurations, etc. in the same directory. I open and edit them with Intellij.

2. There's also a centralized repository for Ingress, Certificate, Helm charts, etc. I also open with Intellij. Spend some time to organize Kubernetes configs really worth it. I'm working with multiple projects and the configs gets overwhelming very quickly.

3. Set shortcuts for applying and deleting Kubernetes resources for current configs for Intellij. So I can create, edit, and delete resources in a blink.

4. There's a Kubernetes panel in Intellij for basic monitoring and operations.

5. For more information and operations, I would use Lens instead of Intellij. The operations are very straightforward, I can navigate back and forth, tweak configurations much faster than I could with the shell command only.
That is incorrect. The final position is what determines that knot. There can be many ways to get there, but they are all considered one knot.

Search for how to tie alpine butterfly for an example of a knot that are many ways to tie, but all are considered the same knot.
Don't assume bad faith. The banned subsidiary is also named Binance.
> especially if the dataset to recreate it is larger than the original

Many types of compression produce a compressed file larger than the original for input data that is not easily compressed. Just because a compressor is bad at compressing (some) inputs, doesn't exclude it from being a compression algorithm.
This is really cool. I hope this leads to more innovation in the open source phones, computers, and game hardware.
Here's the source:

https://www.fca.org.uk/news/news-stories/consumer-warning-bi...

The regulator made it clear that Binance itself, not just the subsidiary was not licensed to pursue any regulated activity in the UK. The confusion (some would say deliberate confusion) has arisen because the application rejected was from BML, but Binance Group itself holds no authorisations to carry out regulated activities with UK customers and has effectively been banned from transacting in the UK. Here is the statement:

Binance Markets Limited is not currently permitted to undertake any regulated activities without the prior written consent of the FCA. No other entity in the Binance Group holds any form of UK authorisation, registration or licence to conduct regulated activity in the UK. The Binance Group appear to be offering UK customers a range of products and services via a website, Binance.com.

This is why UK banks have banned Binance transactions, it's not a conspiracy, it's not a lie, and you should question which news sources led you to believe it was.
If this is a topic you (reader) care deeply about, I have been building an open source project to avoid having a centralized authority on messaging while also keeping out the endless spam you'd get on an unmoderated system:

https://www.stampchat.io/whitepaper.pdf
That does not really ring true to me. AGPL broadens the scope of violations as well, and you cannot use AGPL code in GPL-only code bases without turning the end product AGPL (but you can use GPL-only code in AGPL code bases).

If you're just adding something along the lines of "copying passages extensive enough to reach originality is a violation of this license" then that's indeed already covered by the GPL, and there is really no need to add such a passage other than to be more explicit - and confuse people at least at first about why your license is not actually the GPL. So there isn't much of a point to do it in the first place, in my humble opinion.

If you add text that says something along the lines of "you may not use this code as training data", then you created an incompatible license, and your code cannot be used in GPL code bases, and even worse, since it restricts what you can do with the code more than the GPL, it might even mean you stop being reverse-compatible and may not use GPL'ed code yourself in your own custom-license code base.

The AGPL does not further restrict code uses, just broadens the scope of when you have to make available the code, so it's fine there. However, the original BSD license with the advertising clause is considered incompatible with the GPL.

I am not a lawyer, and these are just my quick layman concerns. I fully recognize you're entitled to use whatever license you find suitable for your code and I am absolutely not entitled to your code and work whatsoever.

But that said, I wouldn't touch your code if I saw a "potentially problematic" custom license, and I wouldn't consider contributing to your projects either.
If you like Ministry, I'm guessing you probably also like Gravity Kills, Prong, KMFDM, and Pitchshifter (amongst others). Kind of similar. Used to listen to them a bunch back in the day. Should probably try giving them another go.
BTW, since there are links to mp3s here, you could probably dump them into a playlist like the radios.

Browsers do support media controls these days, but that likely excludes the prev/next buttons on most sites—like in this case.

My personal gripe with online music players is that they often don't have volume control and play at ludicrous loudness (ahem), whereas everything audio-playing on my system is adjusted to a certain average volume, and I only make small nudges now and then since we still haven't learned to normalize.
"Finding" the builds is easy, but first someone has to design all the builds to be found.

I wonder if the tech could be used to take some pictures of a completed model, recognise pieces on the outside, guess pieces on the inside that would work and produce instructions for the model.
the more the virus spreads, the higher the possibility of variants. Since vaccination reduces the spread of virus, it helps (tremendously) to reduce the chances of variants.
Man, I used to listen to that a bunch back in the day but forgot about it. Thanks for the reminder!
As other said, if/when it comes to this it is because the code in question has change in a significant way. So the point was to test a previous version.
You might want to watch Nvidia's presentation on the recent MLPerf competition. There's a tremendous amount of engineering going into making this stuff more efficient on current hardware.

https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/mlperf-v1-0-training-bench...
Once the feds opened coinbase all was lost.
I think the hardest problem is contributing changes back upstream. With hardware, people are a lot more paranoid about introducing new bugs and I feel like that sometimes makes collaboration a lot more difficult.
There might not be meaning to the universe, but there is meaning in the human enterprise.

We went from animals, to highly effective and conscious of ourselves and the universe. The human developpement keep pushing forward.

I think that the main cause of meaninglessness is our rejection of our own culture ( mostly Christian). There is good reason to reject them as the bearded magician in the sky seem stupid to a modern science minded person, however if you look at those stories at a second degree there is a lot of parts that make sense.

Theses stories were the bedrock of our civilisation and the spine of our consciousness. We need to update theses stories with what we now know instead of throwing them out because science make them look outdated.

Take a look at Jordan Peterson biblical series, it explain in evolutionary terms how we invented theses stories, what they mean, what we can learn from them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-wWBGo6a2w
"Email address validation cannot be solved adequately with a regex" is something we need to start teaching somewhere. The RFC spec for emails is just way to permissive to make validating email addresses a winning move.

I swear I wind up having a battle over email validation at every company I go to. There is inevitably a business person that says "Well what about this site, they do it" and then I have to dig into whatever that site is actually doing and likely find a valid email address that breaks their validation to prove it.

And probably some junior dev (or senior who swears they did email validation flawlessly somewhere else and same story. I have to break their regex a bunch with valid emails they don't permit.

And of course then it's an uphill battle convincing them that what I'm using are in fact valid email addresses. Or you get the "Well no one ever actually does weird things in their email addresses so it's fine" or "gmail doesn't let me register that address so you're wrong"

Email is annoying.
I do this too periodically. It works for me.
The funny thing about the Quake function is, id Software is almost certainly not the origin of the code. They copied it from somewhere else, possibly added profane comments, then slapped GPLv2 on it. Did they even have the right to do that? From an IP absolutist standpoint, probably not.

https://www.beyond3d.com/content/articles/8/
I have insider knowledge of the hotel and its tenants. The Chelsea tenants are firmly wealthier beyond the American middle class.
> I probably wouldn't do yet as you don't know which you need, and an angel can help you figure that out

This really depends on the industry and how much internal expertise overlaps with the market.

You may very well need some targeted advice early on, and angels are a bit hit-and-miss, both in terms of engagement (unpredictable) and how their expertise really lines up with your needs.

If you do need short term concrete advice in a very specialized area, a consultant engagement(i.e. purely transactional) might work best. For something longer term, an advisor that might grow to something more concrete later (e.g. advisory board, actual board, exec, whatever) is probably better.
You can get amazing deals on storage at different points in the year. I have a Seagate 16TB external hard disk that I bought during Black Friday sales of 2020 for about $270, half of your quoted price. Currently, it is $450 new.

At the reduced cost, we'd only need 7 of those for 112TB of storage, and that's $1890 + taxes, close to $2000. Not a lot of money for a backup of humanity's knowledge.
Yes, indeed I mean the Python Package Index (PyPI). Mypy, pypy, pypi, pyenv, pipenv, pip, pipx. Easily confusable names are a core tenet of the Python ecosystem!
If you work with pull requests, as many companies does, it is essential that things go into separated commits. What junior devs often does is refactor something and then also add functionality in the same commit making it hard to understand if a change is an error in the refactoring or part of the new functionality.
For context, this is usually known as a 'Sybil attack'.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack
Unless Vitalik proposes a rollback.
It's not rocket science. In an ideal world, people probably have a dedicated room, a good adjustable chair that fits them, good lighting for video, temperature control, ergonomic keyboard setup, etc. Sure you can write all that down on a page. Maybe make a video. But a lot of people just don't have that space and there's nothing they can easily do about it.
If my code isn't released under a permissive license, then I might have the expectation that those wishing to use my code for commercial purposes will contact me and pay for a commercial license.

This is sort of the whole point of non-commercial licensing (and often, of the GPL itself, since many potential licensors don't wish to deal with GPL restrictions).
Re 3), there is not anywhere near enough renewable energy to go around to phase out fossils is there? So make Bitcoin harmless you would have to postulate:

- The energy could not have been transferred to reduce use of fossils

- The energy could not have been stored to reduce use of fossils

- Production of other, more necessary goods (batteries, aluminum, datacenters serving humanity in better ways) could not have been moved to the source of clean energy
It depends on the charge curve for the car. For the fastest charging cars it's better to keep the battery in the bottom half (where it charges faster) and charge more often in very short stints.
YC is hiring our first data engineer
>Proof of work has nothing to do with that, any system that can encourage everyone to agree on the next block does the same prevention of double spend.

What foundational frame of reference are you using to write that sentence above?

Because for Bitcoin's specific implementation, the purpose of POW is to prevent double spend without centralized trust. Consider the following "if()" statement in bitcoin source code:

Excerpt from validation.cpp [1]:

bool CBlockIndexWorkComparator::operator()(const CBlockIndex *pa, const CBlockIndex *pb) const {
// First sort by most total work, ...
if (pa->nChainWork > pb->nChainWork) return false;
if (pa->nChainWork < pb->nChainWork) return true;

In older versions of source code, excerpt from main.cpp [2]:

if (pindexNew->bnChainWork > bnBestChainWork)
{ ...

The motivation for the C++ code above to compare the chain work is in the original 2009 Bitcoin whitepaper. Excerpt:

>12. Conclusion : We have proposed a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust. We started with the usual framework of coins made from digital signatures, which provides strong control of ownership, but is incomplete without a way to prevent double-spending. To solve this, we proposed a peer-to-peer network using proof-of-work to record a public history of transactions that quickly becomes computationally impractical for an attacker to change if honest nodes control a majority of CPU power.

[1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/271155984574a5bba961...

[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/40cd0369419323f8d738...