skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A Berlin startup wanted to conduct cyber war more ethically and failed
It might not be that hard to create an artificial field for it. 1 Tesla might be enough, similar to what's in MRI machines. Park that in the L1 Lagrange point.
Thanks for the reminder. I used to do that a lot and forgot that that was the joy in what I was doing. Definitely works. Gonna pick it up again.
You can run to visit a friend, sometimes.
Setting Up Your Business in the Middle East – Dubai
Looking for how to set a 0% tax business in the Middle East, set it up in Dubai.
And yet, focusing on one facet of life for most of your personal fulfillment isn't entirely healthy, be it work, a significant other, a social clique that gives you your identity or anything else.

Although i am also pretty introverted and it has definitely affected my social life so far, i also try to make an effort to explore a variety of the things life can offer me and i'd urge most people to do the same, even if it means exiting your comfort zone for a bit. None of those necessarily need to be persistent hobbies, but i'd argue that it can also be a good way to find one that you like.

In the past month, i've:

- learnt Ruby on Rails for my personal homepage, outside of work; while this is still a technical pursuit, learning new technologies is pretty useful, to expand one's knowledge
- been listening to some episodes of the Complete Developer Podcast, just to hear others' experiences both in the industry and outside of it: https://completedeveloperpodcast.com/
- have practiced doing some 3D modelling and animation, since i'd like to either make video games at some point, or at least continue making interactive visualizations outside of work
- been blogging about some tech related topics, as well as writing fiction in private, to improve my skills in that regard
- decided to drop a bit of weight, so i've been tracking how many calories i eat and have kept exercising daily; while i can't say i've enjoyed the actual process, the health benefits are not to be underestimated
- have done a bit of DIY stuff outside, as well as just chores around the farm (like mowing the grass with a tractor and then promptly fixing it, once the belts came off)
- have smoked some meat outside, which also meant a healthy bit of chopping wood for it, seeing as we have a wood burning smokehouse
- have practiced some 3D printing stuff; i guess this could be a hobby, but in my case i made a VESA mount for my monitors out of PVC and some PLA, as well as monitor support stands
- have been reading some books, like the Red Rising series by Pierce Brown and will read the Neuromancer books by William Gibson next
- have also played the occasional video game (most recently Elite: Dangerous) for a bit of nice escapism
- have set up a Wi-Fi repeater in the home out of an old router with WDS

That said, i haven't been awfully successful at most of those things, and that's okay. For example, will i ever be as good at applying maths to something like generating planets (for the aforementioned games/visualizations) like Sebastian Lague ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lctXaT9pxA0 )? Probably not! but that doesn't mean that i shouldn't try exploring what i can and cannot do!

Not even trying to do that makes me feel like perhaps you're somewhat depressed, which i've gone through in my life as well. That would probably be the first thing to address, if you can. Of course, my apologies if i'm assuming too much, since i'm really not sure about your particular circumstances. Regardless, best of luck!
Published ~1981
> It’s like if I said “i want to be able to attend the most prestigious school but I don’t want to pay for it”.

I think it's interesting to note that in many European countries the top schools are free to attend.
Almost all papers are legally available from the researchers’ websites anyway. I’m not sure it’s the big deal everyone makes it out to be in the first place. I very very rarely find a paper I want is paywalled in the first place.
Well that sure as hell cheered me up.
Common Lisp doesn't handle this at all in the way you describe. It does not have global lexical variables which you can opt-in to dynamic scope. It has only dynamically scoped globals. (Implementations may provide global lexicals as an extension.)
Though I'm pretty sure this is one of the oldest tricks in the book, I only get to watch my favorite TV show while on treadmill (I've put the treadmill right in front of it).

It has helped me mantain a pretty long streak and I also don't mind watching tv first thing in the morning as it's exercise now!
> You may absolutely run longer if you wish, but the minimum quota is 10 minutes.

I've found it helps to actually not overdo it.

When I started running again and was fairly out of shape, I did this 10 minute thing. The second or third day I felt great, figured I'd run longer. Next day I was so beat that I didn't go out at all. And 10 minutes every day is better than 20 minutes and then nothing at all.

I think that in the beginning regularity is paramount. This helps build the habit, which is the kind of "discipline" that actually helps you get out there, as opposed to "will power to force yourself to move", which may fail for random reasons (feeling under the weather, being randomly tired, wanting to finish just this one thing, etc).
You're only thinking of honest miners.

The cheapest energy is the one you steal.
So these new /r/wallstreetbets and related manaics are obviously going to burn piles of money going to war with the IPO.

Do you think the size of those piles of money is priced in? The size of the fear of the size of those piles of money?

The PR related stuff seems easier to figure out.

It's either a great idea or a terrible idea, and I can't tell.
As someone who got injury and sickness and could not recover from them for long, dont do "no excuses" nor "every day" things.

It is very easy to increasy workload and overdo it and crack something if you create systems that dont take recovery seriously. And sometimes you really really should stay in bed whole day.

Cause otherwise you may end up with months (well over year in my case with no or only interminnent activity).
Exactly, which is why running clubs never worked for me. It could be you're simply less fit than the other person, or you're carrying more fluid, I never understood the idea of running as a group.
> Being able to notify users

Using + emails don't prevent that from happening.

> limit erroneously input emails

BS excuse. That's what email confirmation, confirmation link, smtp inbox validation, etc, are for.

> cross reference to existing databases

Not being able to be cross referenced is a feature for the user, not a bug.

> Even if I have no interest in selling emails, it's still a net benefit if leaked data (e.g. after a breach) isn't full of bob.smith+mycompany@... rather than bob.smith@

It's benefit for the company, not for the user. I'd prefer to know which company leaked my email.
I simply stopped trying to like it. Trying to „like“ exercising proofed to be more of a burdon than exercising itself. So now im doing it despite of hating it - and that feels a lot better: Now I‘m honest to myself and every time i finish a workout i get „double points“: Doing something for my body and overcoming my reluctance!
The problem with your logic is two-fold, (1) speech doesn't have to advocate for violence or harm for it to create violence and harm, and (2) you're conflating government with culture.

As a group of people, a company is entitled to free speech just like an individual. By restricting their ability to terminate someone for their poor representation of the company, you're effectively forcing them to accept speech that could jeopardize their ability to conduct future business.

A free democracy means speech is free from restriction by the government, but doesn't mean the person speaking is free of consequences from their peers.
China prepares to move into Afghanistan with $62B 'Belt and Road' program
better to say ~30cm indoor localisation solutions. I did not see any UWB solutions yet that can provide centimeter accuracy in a real-life scenarios.
JavaScript: `export default thing` is different to `export { thing as default }`
I have a lot of respect for your perseverance, it was the right thing to do. Make your own mistakes, making someone else's is just so... Painful. And it makes you feel weak.

Similarly someone once advised me not to do a Masters in Molecular Biology because the market was screaming for Bachelors (back then in the Netherlands a Bachelor meant working in a production lab or something). I didn't listen and this also turned around in about 3-4 years and I love how my career went (and is going).

I had a similar (but much less intense) situation with my Father in law by the way. He has some experience in "home improvement". I like to read and watch YouTube before starting any activity. So we had a big discussion/argument on how we would re-do our ceilings. In the end I said: I prefer to do it my way and mess it up than to do it yours and regret that. He agreed, we had a fun time working together after that. He learned a thing or two and now he consults me on many things he does around the house.
That was a really oddball product that most people never heard about let alone considered owning.

My parents bought a higher-end '89 Sony model back then. What it meant was a tuner up to 40 channels, a whopping 25" Trinitron tube curved only in one degree (i.e. cylindrical) and OSD for most functions. The pinnacle of TV technology was Picture-in-Picture, and that's about it.
It did not helped me, it lead to actually overdoing exercising in my case.
But those pros will usually make some sort of subtle (because they don't want to openly, straight up accuse unless chess.com has actually banned the opponent after) comment that is clear they think they are playing against a cheater, but the odds are definitely not 1 out of 7. I have been addicted to YouTube chess videos for quite a while now...
How do they handle things like payroll taxes, benefits and such?
Then you have to trust that not only the original code works, but also the preprocessed upgrade. What could go wrong...
I much prefer just having a form and a normal website.

At least then if I screw up it's on me.
Could Copilot integrate linters? I.e. it doesn't suggest code that doesn't pass lint? That'd get rid of this, at least. I love linters so much...
GET is idempotent because it doesn’t modify data, not because multiple GET requests will return the same response. I could make an HTTP endpoint that returns random data on every request and issuing a GET to that endpoint is still considered idempotent. It’s the effect on the server that defines this property, not the effect on the client.

And no, the “multiple requests” do not happen at the same time, this draft even explicitly says that MUST produce a conflict error. The assumption is the multiple requests occur in a small window of time, but the size of that window is entirely up to the server. And even a window of time measured in seconds could still cause the data to have been changed before the request is retried.

For example, let’s consider a Twitter-like service. When you want to Like a post, that’s going to be a POST request. And it’s reasonable for the response to tell you the new Like count for the post. If you go to Like a popular post, and the request is retried 10 seconds later due to network timeout, that post could have gotten dozens of Likes in that time span. Surely the server should not be required to tell the client what the Like count was 10 seconds ago instead of the current count?
> Usually you don’t get anything in exchange for working hard.

A nice paycheck at the end of the month?
What worked for me was not to run at all and do actually fun sports. (Actually fun for me).
Don't you have any trouble with that ? Do you think it is fine ?
"Compliance with these rules is not optional and cannot be sacrificed for the sake of innovation or a willingness to ‘break things’ and fix them later,”

Good, finally some of these crooks are getting busted, and in this particular instance busted for having hacked-up things. Can't do that in a professional business, or else one gets busted, as one should.
I think the part about "caring about only your part of the work" is partially wrong, in that every team member, not just management, should care about every component they are aware of, not just what they build. Everyone should choose to depend on better quality components, and discuss with teammates what those are. If a tool has a defect, tell your teammates about avoidance tactics or workarounds if you can't fix it outright. Management needs to be informed, and if management can't delegate completely (e.g., if money past a threshold must be spent) then a person on the team should develop the cost/benefit alternatives.
I sincerely wish I could run. I do like running, but my knee does this "snapping" thing and is overly loose. Very quickly it turns into pain. I've tried stretching, strengthening and visiting doctors and physios but no one really seems to have a good idea what to do.
I have a very decent soundbar (Bose), I like it because I don't need to put speakers or a subwoofer anywhere, the main unit has girthy enough sound. Main downside is probably resonance with the cabinet I have it standing on, I could put a rubber mat or some felt pads under it I guess.
That’s when the smart people exited the field. Because they felt that computers will soon stop being fun (that’s what happened in the early nineties indeed). And now we are stuck in this bells-and-whistles industry (software and web). While real engineers and scientists are focused on the fields that matter, like transportation, space exploration, robotics, construction, food production, medicine…
If your peers thing that you need to cite the paper X because is relevant for the theme, you need to obtain it and pay for it. To decide to ignore parts of knowledge because you don't like its distribution mode is not an option.

The result will be less science, slower science and independent scientists being pushed out of the road. They would try to recruit them later under the ridiculous 'citizen scientists' category ('missionary scientists' would be an even better term), but this is what we have. Every single people trying to break monopolies or introduce changes for the benefit of the entire humanity in the past two decades has been laminated as a public warning for newcomers.
https://youtu.be/qYTwznRuCr8
> She's just 32 years old.

Weird thing to say - like you think 32 is a child or something? That’s someone well into their second decade of adulthood.
Also: Those of you in academia, please have a think about whether you, personally, could kick off one of these, or one of the suggestions in replies.
The Finder doesn’t create or mount APFS snapshots. And while I haven’t tested it, I fully expect Time Machine to still enforce Unix file permissions. You really need to be using the command line to do what you’re describing.
At what rating do you play? Around 1200 on chess.com? I don't see cheating as a big problem online for two reasons but I only play on lichess, not on chess.com.

First of all it's not that bad to play against a cheater once in a while. If you compare it with other games, playing against an engine is a huge disadvantage but will not fundamentally change the structure of the game. You are still playing chess, but against a superhuman opponent. You don't want to play against the computer but it's not as bad as the other player abusing a glitch in the game.

Secondly, I'm guessing that cheaters will mainly play at the entry level strength (1200 on chess.com) and a bit above that. If you are seriously cheating you will be caught very quickly. So maybe if you change your rating you might encounter less cheaters.

Edit: I just looked at your comment history to find out what your rating is and apparently you are playing (for an online game) with extremely long time controls? That's probably the reason why you are encountering many cheaters. The player pool for long online games is much much smaller, so you will automatically have more cheaters who just recently signed up for the game.
"Designed" is taking it too far.
What is "l_\infty"?
The problem with espresso machine startup is that there is 1.5kg piece of metal (grouphead) through which flows around 60ml of water from the boiler.

What do you think is the relation between boiler water temperature and the water that actually reaches coffee?

When the machine starts, the grouphead is cold. If you want to get good brewing temperature you need to, either

a) Wait for 40 minutes until grouphead heats up slowly and everything stabilizes

b) Heat up water for 10 minutes and then pump a lot of water through the grouphead to get it hot from the water and pray everything works well

c) Build a model that will predict correct setting of water in the boiler given predicted temperature of the grouphead so that when you push water through the grouphead it cools just the right amount. Unfortunately, the correct brew temperature is 92C so you only have couple of degrees to work with. But, still, heating the water to higher temperature causes grouphead to heat up faster and you don't need to heat it as much because it will receive hotter water.

Commercial machines do not have this problem because they are started in the morning and only turned off for the night and they have huge tanks of brewing water in them so inflowing water does not affect the temperature so much.
I think framing issues with learning and understanding a skill and what it requires from you as a 'trick' is very detrimental.
There were no pre-mined bitcoin distributed. Satoshi mined his coins in the early days but crucially anyone could participate and mine at the same time.
I'd say that's "Code you (should) understand doing things you can't understand (and possibly can't audit)."

The art and practice of programming didn't change much over the last 50 years. 50 years from now, though, it will be utterly unrecognizable.
Chainalysis | x6 Openings | Full-time | Partially Remote | New York City, New York | London, England | Copenhagen, Denmark

8 months, 3 rounds of investments (series C, D & E) totalling to $300m, a quadrupled valuation hitting $4.2bn (yes, BILLION) and still we're only getting started.

Chainalysis are the cryptocurrency ghostbusters. We identify high and low risk activity on the blockchain, segregating the lawful actors from the bad ones and subsequently play a central role in assuring cryptocurrencies are used for a clean purpose. There's no better time to onboard one of the most disruptive moving trains in the history of technology: https://bit.ly/3hhXQe1

Open High Priority roles:

◉ Staff Software Engineer, KYT (NY) - https://bit.ly/3hhXQe1

◉ Software Engineer, KYT (NY) - https://bit.ly/3hhXQe1

◉ Software Engineer (London, Copenhagen, Aarhus) - https://bit.ly/3hhXQe1

◉ Lead/Senior Cloud Engineer (London, Copenhagen, Aarhus) - https://bit.ly/3hhXQe1

◉ Senior Data Engineer, Data Platform (NY, Washington, DC) - https://bit.ly/3hhXQe1

◉ Engineering Manager (London, Copenhagen, Aarhus) - https://bit.ly/3hhXQe1
Until a court decides what it does and doesn't do I'm staying clear

Here's it outputting Quake code, including handy comments it came up with for each line and even an entire line of commented out code. Maybe it decided it was a good choice to comment it out but still include it I guess

Being word for word from the original is just a weird coincidence too

I truly wanted it to be as good as it was sold to us too, but it isn't

https://twitter.com/mitsuhiko/status/1410886329924194309

HN discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27710287

Additionally here's it somehow requesting and using API keys for use in your code https://twitter.com/passcod/status/1410822834272694275
Check out TheReadyState.com. All kinds of approaches to self-treat pain and movement dysfunction. One of the best bang-for-the-buck services I pay for.
I would add the AtariST to your list. It could use workstation compilers and had a flat address space, you could port software to it a lot easier than to a pre-386 PC.
Maybe degree programs should start with a bootcamp, then a "real" project using those skills, then start with in-depth CS fundamentals so that students can start to unwrap the things they've learned, why things are done a certain why, explore problems they had with their post-bootcamp project, etc.
This is called the oracle problem.

The proposed solutions are in the same vein as security in base layer consensus mechanism: create an economic incentive to be accurate over time. Make sensors/sensor data compete to be designated as roots and gain some sort of revenue. Reputation is hard to build, but easy to destroy.
>He eventually kicked me out for not listening, forcing me to to borrow money from a friend to pay tuition in my final semester.

A real sweet guy...
This resonates greatly with me, never thought about it this way, thanks!
The closure of what.cd should be up there with the burning of the library of Alexandria.
Is the nigh near for the US economy?
There are two types of products: the ones that people complain about and the ones that nobody uses or cares about; based on a famous Bjarne Stroustrup quote.

The fact that people post about it, point out flaws, leave GH out of spite, etc. only goes to show how impactful a system like this can be. It's a big deal, which is why people talk about it.
PID doesn't care how long it takes to achieve stability but sometimes you do.

In a lot of cases the time to settle is so short that it doesn't matter but sometimes it does. When you operate datacenter you might not want to wait for hours for PID to spin up the right amount of servers.
> And 10 minutes every day is better than 20 minutes and then nothing at all.

Why? I run every other day for longer distances (10k or so) and imagine that the benefits of running for 10k are greater than 5k twice. I notice that my heart rate tends to be higher toward the end of a longer run - presumably because my muscles are more fatigued. Pushing to fatigue (but not so much as to lose running form) seems to be the best way to get muscles to adapt.
> I find it highly suspicious that 32 licensed a lacing technology from those Salomon folks

Why? Seems perfectly reasonable to me.
It would be like a outdoor jacket manufacturer licensing the use of Goretex technology in their branded jackets.