skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because the process is different. You and any computer agent are allowed to learn the functional, non-copyrightable elements of fast inverse sqrt. When you need that functionality, you can write code that implements your understanding of those non-copyrightable elements and gain copyright over the resulting creative expression.

What you can't do is copy all of the creative expression in the original (such as comments) without complying with the terms of the license. Moreover, reproducing the magic constants is a strong indication that your process didn't independently derive your code because the constants used in the original are unique and non-optimal.
Well, the "enough quantities to matter" part wasn't tested in courts yet, but I fail to see a way to rule for "No" here in a way that wouldn't gift us an universal way to turn any code into public domain, destroying source code licensing as a concept. Other than this part, the first two claims have already been demonstrated, and the rest follow from them.
I didn’t have student loans because state schools are cheap. I pay like $75 out of pocket for my health insurance per month and most of that is my HSA contribution.

For what it’s worth I can’t afford a Tesla either making $200k now and live in a 450sqft studio.
I would think objectively it really doesn't matter that much either way.

As someone who is fully vaccinated, I think we are at the point of many people just have a form of Stockholm syndrome and have formed a psychological bond with the captor that they do not want to let go of.

If these stories comfort you in some way then enjoy. To pretend this is some giant deal though is just not reality.
The Effect of Gerrymandering
Where on earth have you got that from? It certainly doesn't ring true for me.
Apple doesn’t lose any revenue from this migration of ad spend, because they weren’t earning any revenue from this ad spend in the first place.
Good on you (and the other guy).

In this case, though, I think you would have said about the review "Oh, yeah, that's the embarrassing bug where it crashes when you do something totally ordinary. Fixed (or fixing) that."
In case you work a lot with k8s, you can take a look as well at k9s, hightly reccomend it. It can save a lot of time with typings, especially to quickly check what pods/deployments are running, execute command in pod, describe to understand why did it fail, change cluster / namespace and so on
This makes sense if you only speak English, but a lot of people in this forum speak at least two languages.
The Rocky Mountains are hundreds of kilometres east of the Fraser Valley. The mountains between the coast and the Fraser Valley is the Coast range.
Maybe, but for better or worse it's also become the industry standard, much like Terraform.

If you don't know k8s and Terraform, you're shooting yourself in the foot for future jobs.
OSS licenses, so far as they a permissive and require nothing in return, are not contracts. This is often the case for simply using the OSS software. The user has no obligations whatsoever.

If, on the other hand, the licensor and licensee both have some obligations (in OSS, this is usually when you modify or redistribute the source or compiled product), then it's basically a contract, no matter what RMS claims.

I mean, with all due respect to the guy, he makes controversial claims even in the field of software engineering (and also free software evangelism), his supposed professional field. Why would you trust what he says about contract law, a field where he has no professional training whatsoever?

(That said, GPLv2 is still an ingenious work for many reasons, albeit lawyers probably won't draft it that way)
> It's really the US that is the exception on climate.

China’s pumping out more than twice as much CO2 as the USA is.

https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by...
All I see is a bunch of entitled people butting in and demanding accommodations.

They were rightly told to "fuck off".
> you pretend this glorified markov chain is something more

I hate this belittling attitude that HN has towards projects in certain fields. It's like if I dismissed any progress in graphics as "just glorified triangle-drawing".
Time-Travel with Svelte Store
As a hobbyist musician, music is often too distracting while I'm coding because I am actively enjoying the nuances of the song. Though, if it's a song I've heard several times already, that can work.
The point is not about future price evolution, but the marginal price of storing 1h more, if you just need another tank it will be cheaper than having the same energy in a battery, with the same system to store and destore the liquid air. Li-ion is not a good fit for long term storage.
You mean the coastal mountains, right? Beyond the Rockies is Alberta.

Generally the grass goes yellow here in the summer, even right on the coastline in Vancouver Island and up the sunshine coast.
mynoise.net is amazing
> Africa is also not reducing their numbers of births.

African birth rates have declined steadily since the 1950's:

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/AFR/africa/birth-rate

There have also been lots of state/local-level initiatives in the US. USA is still an innovative driving-force of the world even though some leaders have tried to sabotage it.
I'm lazy and I don't like having to remember "the right way" to run something, so my solution is directories and wrappers. I keep a directory for every environment (dev, stage, prod, etc) for every account I manage.

env/
account-a/
dev/
stage/
prod/
account-b/
dev/
stage/
prod/

I keep config files in each directory. I call a wrapper script, cicd.sh, to run certain commands for me. When I want to deploy to stage in account-b, I just do:

~ $ cd env/account-b/stage/
~/env/account-b/stage $ cicd.sh deploy
cicd.sh: Deploying to account-b/stage ...

The script runs ../../../modules/deploy/main.sh and passes in configs from the current directory ("stage") and the previous directory ("account-b"). Those configs are hard-coded with all the correct variables. It's impossible for me to deploy the wrong thing to the wrong place, as long as I'm in the right directory.

I use this model to manage everything (infrastructure, services, builds, etc). This has saved my bacon a couple times; I might have my AWS credentials set up for one account (export AWS_PROFILE=prod) but trying to deploy nonprod, and the deploy immediately fails because the configs had hard-coded values that didn't match my environment.
>>> Have I created a derivative work or, worse, plagiarized?

If you reproduced code that's copyrightable and under another license, then yes you are in violation.

It will take a decade for the case to proceed to court and determine exactly what claims can be made against your company and GitHub.

In practical terms, you should turn off Copilot this very minute.
Yes. Foreign language is great for this.

MC Solaar, Amadou and Mariam, some k-pop (last played was (G)I-DLE), Onda Vaga… that’s all I can think off off the top of my head.
At least for me, my fiber install is fully inside my house.

My ONT (buried inside a BGW-320 that I can't bypass -_-) is fully inside as well. I think a lot of AT&T's setup is going this route as well from what I've read.
That site looks like it’s just repurposing the us government’s occupation data. See https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/...

The BLS statistics have us based “programmer” jobs declining by 9% but “software developer” jobs expanding by 23% on a higher base. The job description is largely the same, although software developers have more design responsibility.
> 25% for cryogenic

Also from Wikipedia, the efficiency if 25% if you let the heat of liquefaction and the "cold" of vaporization go to waste, but it can be improved to 70% if you store that heat and re-inject it in the cycle.
> What's you angle ? Depressed people are spoiled brats ? Depression is not a real struggle ? Only bored people get depression ? Just say so and stop sugar-coating what you think.

I’m sensing a lot of defensiveness. I’m sorry if I’m triggering unpleasant feelings for you. I don’t believe any of those things and I don’t appreciate having words put in my mouth.

The people I’ve met with depression have a lot of that tendency to jump down people’s throats after perceiving insults that are of their own making.

Saying that society is structured in a way that prevents people from functioning well (I.e. is not tailored to the realities of the human limbic system) is the opposite of saying that it is in depressed people’s heads or that depressed people are spoiled brats.

> > Someone who has never known struggle or threat may not realize how happy they should be.
> This is another broad statement for which there is no support.

While “may” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here, I don’t think you can say there is no support given I gave a concrete example from my own life in which I came to that realization. FWIW I also practice gratitude journaling, so I know it’s helpful from my own life. I’ve also overcome binge eating disorder (bad enough to result in morbid obesity), anxiety (social and otherwise), and small bouts of what might look like depression (given that I pulled myself out of it, I think you’d define it away as not actually depression, and I can live with that).

> That's an overly broad statement ignoring a lot of what research has found about causes of depression.

Fun fact, we still don’t actually know what causes depression, and we’re not very good at treating it. It doesn’t seem unreasonable to speculate that the environment might be a contributing factor. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/diseases/depressio...

> You seem to think depression is only in the head and try to rationalize it.

No, I don’t. But one of the better treatments for depression, CBT, involves talking about and rationalizing ones thoughts, ultimately with the goal of getting into more productive habits of thought. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_behavioral_therapy
Love how the sophisticated mathematical test was “oh man, that lithium stock is roofing”

Sometimes it’s takes a human looking at a chart to see what a million tables of data can’t
Bingo bango, all of existence is one infinite orgasm.
Someone that works at Github already checked. I think asking for a more independant study is fair.
Yup; all they need is high IQ people, preferably with pedigree (something I don’t have and am still sad about)
That would be a great resource. Most of the information I have found ends up being outdated.
this project is inspired by a project that does literally exactly what you just posted https://brickit.app/
As I understand it someone who had the appearance of a naked man was walking around openly in a single sex area. This made someone uncomfortable, and now there are protests. I sympathize with the rights of transgender people but what about the rights of non-trans people? If a woman is in a single sex area should she be forced to see male genitalia?

Perhaps the solution is a third area for gender neutral. Otherwise someone’s rights will be violated and it’s ethically and morally wrong to say one person’s rights are more important than someone’s else's in such a private space.

Perhaps this was another Jessica Yaniv-style disingenuous provocation.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/jessica-yaniv-canadian-c...
The article has some historical paragraphs, then abruptly ends with fluff. Not worth the time to read.
You can name 10 people of the 100 billion who have lived? Even 20,000 notable people from today and history would be 0.00002% of the humans who have lived, or 1 in 50,000. Most of them are unknown to the vast majority of humans - hardly famous in any colloquial sense.
That article isn't written by RMS, and the author has some relevant credentials.

> Eben Moglen is professor of law and legal history at Columbia University Law School.
> The output of a machine simply does not qualify for copyright protection – it is in the public domain.

Does it mean that compiler output does not qualify for copyright protection and I may legally share copies of MS Word via torrent?
I can hear instruments, but after reading about the humming guy I could suddenly only hear myself hum. I had to force myself to switch back to instruments, like some sort of optical illusion. This makes me think it could be a learned ability.
The linde cycle is not used industrially, they are using a reverse brayton cycle. This cycle use air as the refrigerant, and is probably the most widely distributed industrial cycle in the world (because liquified gases do not transport easily).
If you are going to sell me a bang-bang controller for cruise control of a mini car or a trajectory tracking of welding robots, or automated gun/fire control to track a moving target while firing at the same time, blaming the lack of bang bang on institutional inertia, then I unfortunately have to call you out for speaking through a hat.

Bang-bangs are just not smooth enough and does not give enough control over tracking. With tuning, PID can at least perform within the desired smoothness envelop. PID have been surprisingly robust even if the gains are set far from optimal. There are satisfactory tools and best practices for tuning PIDs.

A stuttering car on bang bang cruise control will certainly not be a pleasant ride.

Bang-bangs cannot do the job where you have a low inertia, low damping system that cannot tolerate jerks. PID introduces exactly those properties, inertia and damping, but through the controller.
> not so deeply rich in composition or lyrical content

KISS and rich lyrical content would be like sunshine in the shade
I'm not really talking about things that violate energy conservation or statistical mechanics. I'm talking about how the uniformity of the state during the big bang lead to something clumpier. Structure formation. And I still find it suspect to apply the concept of thermodynamical entropy, something defined for isolated systems at thermal equilibrium, primarily, to even make sense at universe-scale.
If BTC was valued based on actual real-world usage (as opposed to wash trading on exchanges and speculation), the value would be near 0.
Nuclear isn't truly green. It still involved mining, and industry that as of today does burn lots of hydrocarbons. Nuclear is certainly better, but it isn't 100% green. It could become green if we can manage to electrify mining and/or get uranium from alternative sources such as water. While I am a fan of nuclear power I don't think it is perfect nor totally carbon free. True renewables, when they are working, are still better than nuclear. Nuclear's niche is that 24/7 reliability that we need to gap-fill wind and solar.
On the other hand, will there be dramatic improvements on the software side using improved algorithms? It seems like deep learning research is currently more focused on making things possible than making them efficient.
none, until you're years later or making a lot of $$$

but you do want advisors for now, and also to start testing some to be your own future board members when you vs VCs start adding them.

two types of advisors:

- angel investors. they will give you money, and on-demand, a bit of really smart advice. mostly tiny bits as part of your monthly internal updates and your less frequent syncs (if many). some might get more involved, but you won't know who!

- paid advisors (cash or equity). I probably wouldn't do yet as you don't know which you need, and an angel can help you figure that out (ceo coach, someone for tech vs sales vs marketing vs hr ...). cash or equity. if equity, look up advice columns. but basically, give less than you'd think and for 1yr (can renew next year, but make manual, not default) and for specific mutually agreed upon tasks and meeting schedule. especially early on as it seems here, you won't know who you need, so wouldn't go heavy here

- edit: third type is your senior staff. also get VPs who have done your current + next stages before :) but generally not until raised 1M

fwiw, it does sound like you would benefit from finding 1-3 senior startup-experienced angels (successful/serial ceo who have led seed stage + series a + m&a) to invest and help guide on basics. there are good answers here, but they're without context and thus prioritization & specialization. there are a lot of generic basics they can help save time on + avoid making timebombs + give leverage, and in turn , help you identify where you need specialists, and pragmatics like when & how, until you build your own intuition & recruiting process
Weird Conspiracy Website
AI Explorables: big ideas in machine learning, simply explained
If competition were the reason Barclay’s blocked the transaction (it’s not) then Barclay’s would also block brokerage accounts from purchasing mutual funds advised by competitors and block retail banking customers from paying competitor credit cards via ETF. Banks “fund the competition” all the time. The transaction was blocked because Binance is breaking the law in allowing unauthorized securities transactions within the UK.
StarCraft 2 Bot Gauntlet
Not a perfect solution but I add a prompt signaling both my current namespace and cluster, along with some safeguards for any changes on our production environment. In practice I haven't deployed something wrongfully in production ever.

I use a custom written script but I've used this one in the past - its pretty nice.

https://github.com/jonmosco/kube-ps1/blob/master/kube-ps1.sh
The Developer Certificate of Origin Is Not a Contributor License Agreement
What if an attacker’s goal is to see another validator get slashed?
K8s is an enormously complex piece of software and I haven't met a great many people who "know" it inside and out.

Basic concepts and how to write a job/service/ingress, sure. Knowing the internals and how to operate it? I'd say that's only for specialists. Most people don't need to know what a Finalizer is or does. Most people aren't going to write operators.

It is a multi-year investment of time to deeply understand this tool and it's not necessary for everyone.
Not necessarily. The object code produced by a compiler might best be regarded as a different form of the source code, even though it is not a copy or a new work, according to

http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise26.html
tl;dr: order by mastery desc, method desc
- when looking for advisors
1600 km in 15 hr is borderline irresponsible driving. Depending on speed limits as there simply isn't enough rest time to ensure you are focused on driving.

The EV cannonball record was set this winter in a Porsche Taycan at 44 hrs 26 minutes and that included some charger trouble and much less than ideal temperatures. Google's estimate for that route is 42 hours without any stops of any kind.

Here is a route plan for Lincoln, NB to Las Vegas NV. 1989 km with 17:43 driving and 2:29 charging for just over 20 hours total. That's an extra 400 km covered from your rough estimate and includes going up and over some pretty serious mountains.

https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=71dfd1e1-a134-46c...
We already have the first 8 seater that can go around 400 miles in testing. And that is using pretty conservative battery tech.

And there is a significant amount of potential optimization left.

Using the batteries as load structures is just one of them, that significantly changes the simplified calculation people do on density. There are many other ideas. The problem is a lot of investment and engineering is needed and to get a passenger plane threw the regulatory process, specially something as new as E-Plane is a gigantic project.

In the future battery tech will get significantly better in the next 10 years and rethinking the plane from the ground up with that technology in mind will do the trick and beat hydrogen.
Going to do that! Vikings is on my list now :)
Me to my boss: yes sir, right away sir.

Me in reality: in the pool with my daughter, will get to it soon.
That excerpt has its own Wikipedia page, of course it meets the threshold of originality. In any case, once you are discussing this, you have entered the area of fair use; that is an admission of copyright violation.
Bitcoin pretty much always works 100%. It is the fiat that often has problems. In this case the issue is that you can't deposit British Pounds to Binance. If you already converted all your useless fiat currency to various cryptocurrencies, you are safe and free to use your money however you like.
IMO these sorts of methods become interesting the day they are demonstrated working in a conventional AI framework on a commercially important graph like Resnet or BERT. Everything else follows from a killer demo like that.

The benefit is obvious if it works, but it also entails embracing non-deterministic results by design because it's analog. It's also a major shock to the tech stack. It took a half decade for GPUs to be noticed. This is a much more traumatic transition, no?
With an option to invert that pattern.

I’d be curious to see if more energetic music when I’m in a lull would speed things up. Musical motivation.
Articles with misleading or exaggerated information have been flowing from the British press on this topic and is clearly (sorry to use the funny jargon) a "co-ordinated FUD campaign". I'm no fan of binance but where are the articles on lack of action on money laundering in legacy banks in the UK? Or other topics like Standard Chartered links to oil investments?

This hints at anti-competitive sentiments from a group of "traditional" investors/blatant media outlets who can't keep up with the pace of change. Instead of trusting the FT to manipulate your opinion you can now deal with economic media directly and this is best done via MetaMask or many other similar platforms.
Heat is the output of the depressurization process so I would think that would not be a problem.
> To understand why, it’s important to realize the choice is not “vaccinate or do nothing.” It’s “vaccinate or eventually contract the coronavirus,” and the risks that come with it

Hmmmm. I'm not so sure about this. You can choose to continue self-isolating indefinitely. In this case the risk of exposure to covid is low. Sure, on an infinite timeline, you will catch it. But the longer you wait, the more data we will have. That includes data on "known unknowns," like long-term vaccine side effects, effects of long covid, and vaccine efficacy against new variants. But it also includes more data on "unknown unknowns," like potential long-term risks of the mRNA delivery mechanism, or new vaccines that have yet to be developed. Also, the longer you wait, the more other people get vaccinated and the more you benefit by leeching off herd immunity.

On an individual level, the choice is generally far more complicated than "get vaccine" or "get covid." Personally, as an under-30 with a low-exposure lifestyle, I'm waiting as long as possible to get the vaccine. I want to see more data on mRNA side effects – specifically, I'm worried that we're observing vascular inflammation, but doctors are unable to explain the mechanism causing it. To me, that means we don't understand the vaccines enough to eliminate sufficient "unknown unknowns." With that much uncertainty, combined with my very low exposure coefficient, I don't agree that the benefits of a vaccine outweigh the risks for me personally at this time. And an NYT columnist is not going to change my mind on that without a more rigorous analysis that allows adjusting for exposure risk and unknown unknowns.
Mỹ Lai Massacre