skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You could even just use computer to do near perfect theory openings and you can not charge any one for cheating here, and you can still gain more ELO there. There's so much variance you could do. One does not have to alt tab to input and mirror chess engine moves with Stockfish.
You can use neural network only, which is trained on human players, and have a programmatic way for AI to have suggestions on where to move show up on your screen. Time delay being pretty much non-existant, and maybe even good script can pre-move very obvious things for you. Maybe the AI will give you 3 non blunder moves, and you can yourself choose which makes the most sense or just block you from obviously blundering, but maybe like only 90% of the time.

I don't like giving out ideas here, but I feel like these are obvious ways one could cheat and go undetected.
A blunder is when someone makes a wrong move then and there that costs them the game. At AI levels, there are very few, if any, blunders. I think parent commenter means a strategic mistake, where they made a mistake about 5 moves in advance.
> Trades have regulated themselves since before governments existed.

Not even remotely. Guilds followed states, and were usually under the purview of and regulated by cities.
The model need not be very complex. Think of it as first approximation. It is just, the better model you have, the faster you are going to achieve the result.
>It's odd that it would be 1 out of 6 or 7, because when high elo streamers like Hikaru or Chessbrah are doing speed runs, they very often go on a 100 win streak, which sounds exceedingly unlikely if the odds of facing an engine user would be 1 out of 6/7.

I would guess that even with the engine you would take some games to rank up to that high so if chess.com is good at banning cheaters most of them would probably get caught sooner.
Yes. Unlike l_\infty, sums of exponentials are smooth everywhere, and smooth functions are easier to optimize. But geometrically, the two can be brought arbitrarily close together by adjusting the exponents with a multiplicative constant.
Apparently not Berra: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/10/20/no-predict/
It's definitely a thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quango
A lot of people point out that Bitcoin doesn't have any inherent value, and is effectively worthless. Well, I recently realised that Bitcoin DOES have value; it is the enabler or criminal activity, and as such, has lots of value to criminals around the world.

Those users are enough to ensure that Bitcoin's value does not plummet to zero, because it has this tremendous utility to them for use in illicit activity. Drug dealing, ransomware, terrorist funding, money laundering; it's 100x easier to funnel money for these activities through bitcoin than using the traditional methods.
There is a third method which, funnily enough, was implemented by the very first PoS coin. A hybrid blockchain in which PoW is used for distribution.
I find it helps to run somewhere interesting. Such as parks, or beaches. And it actually makes it cool to run when on a trip somewhere. Of course, without driving there.
Yes, I should have elaborated. The two best engineers in our team are in their mid 40a and our QA lead is in his late 50s. So, I'm well aware that even great candidates who are really good at what they do are passed over just because of age.

But I did want to explain the typical issue I have seen when interviewing older software engineers that had a long career but shot themselves in the foot by being too tied to a specific technology. At no point did I want to say that it was the case of every engineer I interviewed. And I fully agree that it's often tough dealing with the ageism in this industry.
Yes, but those streamers often start from 500-600. And often when they do actually face those cheaters, they have gone undetected for 100+ games, maybe at 2000 elo, and they seemingly only get banned because of the publicity they face against the streamer. Meaning chess.com cheating detection by itself hasn't managed to detect them for so long, and who knows how many are there wild in the open managing to do more than 100s of games, without facing any publicity and doing it a lot more intelligently than the obvious ones against the streamer.
I guess the problem is that most users that play with an engine don't play bullet/blitz.

I do meet a lot of engine players on 3 minute blitz but then I just do very fast bullet moves and all of a sudden I'm losing with a 90 second advantage that cannot be recovered if the user persists on playing with an engine.
I think this is an issue in most countries.

Government Development jobs just don't pay enough to be competitive for talent. So instead talent goes to outsourcers. Here in the Netherlands that has meant most big government development projects are done by outsourcers. Which leads to bad incentive alignment. Yielding cost overruns, projects that are DOA, and projects with way to large scope. And at the bottom line, the consultancies are better of keeping it this way than to improve things.

But government is not agile enough to pay fair wage for development work. Besides, it would be unfair to all other government employees if these developers made so much more money with less time on the job and the same level of education. (sarcasm)
I was hoping he was stepping down from his indulgent trip to space.
What about nano and banano?
How to add Algolia InstantSearch to your Next.js application
No pay wall version:
How I tricked myself into actually liking running against all odds
cnalifestyle.channelnewsasia.com/wellness/how-i-tricked-myself-into-liking-running-14678064
No. You could use copilot to generate code you do understand and double check it before committing. It’s similar to just copying and pasting from stack overflow.
> "The company might prefer the occasional breach and "we are sorry" PR over spending a lot of money on network security, for example."

Sure, but what about when the choice presented is more along the lines of "Hey, let's spend a little money on network security now so that we don't have to spend millions later cleaning up a huge mess", and is met with the mentality of "You're worrying about nothing." Ummm, no? I'm sharing the expertise for which I was hired?
You're only given a little spark of madness. you mustn't lose it
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism

http://wwwdata.unibg.it/dati/corsi/8906/37702-Akerlof%20-%20...
What is the difference to the other extensions like this? Like https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/mark-tab-manager/f...
Copilot is not a search engine. It synthesises code so it is unlicensed.
That is basically what Bitcoin is... because the cheapest energy is the one you can produce yourself from renewables.
There is one more dimension to this problem. It is how engineers are going to be interacting with the model which includes ability to understand, predict and configure it.

For a mechanism to scale server farm, it cannot be too surprising to engineers that work on it. They need to be able to understand what it does more or less to be able to figure out what is going and deal with problems.

This is even more important in corner cases. What is going to be startup behavior? What happens when a large number of servers goes down? Etc. These behaviors can be very rarely encountered but engineers must be able to predict and reason about them.
This is a fine example of why the current patent system is insane. Unless something drastic happens, this patent will probably be assigned to Google. The US patent office is understaffed and lacks the expertise to evaluate claims like this.

When some inventor patents something really novel, that is copied by Google, they will be harassed by patents like these.
I made something useful: http://root.rupy.se

It has 100% read uptime without complexity.
Maybe, but there are also few rapid "speed" runs, like from Daniel Naroditsky, while he has also faced cheaters, it doesn't seem 1 out of 7.

And Daniel Naroditsky definitely would have good internal cheating detection even when the user does it sparingly, as he can basically understand most lower rated opponent moves, and if it seems too good for this rating, he can know this from just few moves.

Check Daniel's rapid speed run account:
https://www.chess.com/member/ohmylands

145 wins and 3 losses. The 3 losses had, were lost purposely, if you look here in 3 or 4 moves with 5 accuracy, for whatever reason (to drop ELO?).
https://www.chess.com/games/archive/ohmylands?gameOwner=othe...

If there were 1 out of 7 opponents using an engine, he would never have 145 wins against 0 losses.

And again for bullet and blitz there are also quite many examples with 100W to 0L.

If you'd look at all the speed run videos Daniel has done, it definitely doesn't seem 1 out of 7.

Daniel also posts all the times he's facing a cheater to youtube, same with Chessbrah and others as it makes for a good content, good views as people are always interested in seeing a GM playing against a cheater.
A simple terminal GUI for Docker
I think preprocessing, upgrade the input data before training.
In Linux I convert to pdf in the command line and then use PDFgrep. Is awesome simple. Same as grew super fast.

On Mac it should be possible to get it trough homebrew...
Hey, I would echo @alexpetralia here - seeking some support might be really positive. It definitely takes some time and maybe a few tries to find the right person you can talk to, but I'd recommend persevering. I have had some very positive moments in therapy which have changed my outlook completely; and then meditation / mindfulness down the line. This sounds trite, and it isn't supposed to - but don't give up on this stuff, you have it in you, you just need to find it.
Do you mean like Commander Data played Kolrami in Strategema?
1987? How could the poor students have
known?

Gee, 1987, I was at IBM's Watson lab as a
researcher in their effort at the time in
artificial intelligence.

So, at the lab we had an ambitious
computer services group, and they had for
our general use six mainframes, I believe
all single processor machines, running the
operating system software Virtual
Machine/Conversational Monitor System
(VM/CMS).

For access from home, I had a PC/XT with
some special software to use a standard
dial-up land line telephone line to access
the mainframes. As I recall, the data
rate was about 30 characters per second.

So, the mainframes were likely water
cooled. As I recall, the last of the
water cooled mainframes had a clock speed
of 153 MHz.

In contrast, the last desktop I plugged
together has an AMD (American Micro
Devices) processor, FX-8350. It has 64
bit addressing and 8 cores. The standard
clock speed is 4.0 GHz. To buy the
processor, at Amazon I paid their usual
price, quantity 1, ~$100. Tiny little
thing; came in a tiny little box. The
processor has been fine: It is the basis
of my startup.

So, let's compare, counting clock ticks:

The 6 mainframes had best I can guess at
most in total

6 * 153 = 918

million ticks per second. The AMD has

8 * 4.0 * 1,000 = 32,000

million ticks per second.

Then we can take the ratio

(8 * 4.0 * 1,000) / (6 * 153) = 34.858,387,799,6

Call it 35. Soooo, counting clock ticks
my desktop with the $100 processor from
the tiny box is 35 times faster than all
six of those mainframes combined.

With speculative execution, out of order
execution, pipelining, etc., there is on
average some number of instructions per
clock tick. So, first cut here, and maybe
a gift to the IBM mainframes, for the two
processors count the average number of
instructions per clock tick as the same.

So, this fantastic, we're talking not just
world class but unique in civilization
class, improvement in price/performance,
is much of what enabled Google, Facebook,
Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, AMD, TSMC
(Taiwan Semi-Conductor Manufacturing
Corporation), smart phones, solid state
disks, and essentially all of the
Internet.

E.g., for communications data rates for
connect from home, now with 1 Gbps
Internet versus then, 1987, 300 bps, ...,
to the 56 Kbps of V.90 of 1995.

So, how the heck in 1987 was a computer
science student or early career person to
anticipate and actually believe in this
fantastic, all-time unique step up in
price/performance of computing and
communications along with associated
infrastructure?

This progress blows away wood, wheels,
stone, copper, iron, steel, steam,
electricity, and broadcast radio and TV.

Now, what are we going to do with this
suddenly cheap, powerful computing,
communications, and infrastructure?
What if I use a different key for each card?

I found the answer in the youtube comments:

> Dan McNeill: What if I use a different key for each card?

> MrBawn: In the physical version, you could absolutely identify each card by which of your keys unlocked your lock without unlocking your opponent's lock. In the crypto version, you can't tell which of your keys works on an encrypted card because your opponent's lock has turned it into gibberish. So an incorrect key would be indistinguishable from a correct key.
I just found the LinkedIn of Yi Yin, he got a job from Google just in time after being kicked out of Facebook for speaking up: https://www.linkedin.com/in/yi-yin/
Even against engines, a pro player will often win due to the other player running out of time due to the time loss in every move from copying the engine. You often see the game being slightly equal with the pro player slowly falling behind but then as the time starts to run out for the cheater they completely fall apart.
1. dogecoin was a joke, a copy of a copy, his creator sold years ago, has no team, no dev, no innovation and even so, it is in the top10.

2. Mtgox was the most popular exchange and one day went offline with all the funds.

3. Leverage until there is a flash crash and all your positions are liquidated.
Is this a Peloton ad?

Here's a more straightforward hack that worked wonders for me:

you simply run every single day - no excuses* - but only for 10 minutes. You may absolutely run longer if you wish, but the minimum quota is 10 minutes. It's simple: everyone can do 10 minutes, regardless of your current shape. Everyone _has_ 10 minutes, even Jeff Bezos. No excuses: 10 min every day.

After 2 years of doing this, I am the healthiest and happiest I have ever been. :)

No real source on this, but I assume that this is some sort of 80/20 thing, where a 10-15 min run will yield about 80% of the health benefits of a 1h run.

*except when you suffer from any type of viral infection - don't run with a viral infection.
Overall maybe, but certainly not for CS/any engineering. Even if you only count engineering employers.
Best Diet and Nutrition Apps
Being able to notify users, limit erroneously input emails, or cross reference to existing databases (which invariably have the same kind of validation) are legitimate use cases.

Even if I have no interest in selling emails, it's still a net benefit if leaked data (e.g. after a breach) isn't full of bob.smith+mycompany@... rather than bob.smith@
> Robinhood neither admitted nor denied the charges

this standard phrase is used so often it should be a meme. almost like having a defense attorney make a public statement to the news media, which is 100% of the time "my client is innocent, charges are frivolous, lawsuit is a witch hunt"
There's two problems:

1. generating code in the problem area (email address validation) which is pretty much a classic 'things programmers believe about' domain - https://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/21/i-knew-how-to-validat...

2. generating code in a programming idiom with which you are unfamiliar - which regex as a DSL is also a pretty classic example. I don't think most programmers are good at regex, I know I'm definitely in the 'now you have two problems' in the regex camp.

So to summarize it generated code written in a way the programmer could not understand what it even claimed to be doing, using a technology that many programmers are not especially good at; and it generated code that did not handle the problem domain correctly, and the problem domain is one that most programmers don't actually know that well either.

the more I think of this thing the more disastrous it seems.
Yeah, those are very big fines but there has been so much attention on this that we all know that 70 million is a small dent in the profits from the play that caused all this.
ROX - Digital Agency

Junior/Medior Backend Developer + Visual Designer + Frontend Developer + DevOps Engineer | Rotterdam, the Netherlands (HQ) and/or remote (EU) | Full-time or Part-time |

ROX creates digital products that are built to last and ready to scale.

We are ROX. A digital agency that's been developing custom software since 2009. We work with organizations to take their web applications, service platforms and CMS websites to the next level. We are a motivated team where you are given both responsibility and freedom to achieve the best end result. We are growing in size (currently 12+ people), which also offers opportunities for internal growth.

Our vacancies are currently written in Dutch but you're welcome to send me a message at mark@rox.nl if you require more information regarding a position.

Open positions:

* Junior Backend Developer: https://vacatures.rox.nl/junior-backend-developer

* Medior Backend Developer: https://vacatures.rox.nl/medior-backend-developer

* Digital/Visual Designer: https://vacatures.rox.nl/digital-designer

* Frontend Developer: https://vacatures.rox.nl/frontend-developer

* DevOps Engineer: https://vacatures.rox.nl/devops-engineer

Read more about us on our website (rox.nl) or send me a message directly: mark@rox.nl
Great article. The table composed by psychologist May Seagoe fits the description of some of my friends and colleagues who I perceive as gifted perfectly.
I'm not talking about copying but learning by reading code, you then synthesize the code you read surely you don't expect any copyright law to apply in such cases.
So many words for mere conjecture that is ultimately going to be used as a pat on one's own back for feeling bummed.

I especially love the author's self-designation as gifted and not once expanding on this very narrow dimensionality reduction. What happened to the personality traits? What happened to character, adverse childhood experiences, education etc independent of so-called giftedness?

Anyone could have come up with this; a human mind is a terrible thing to waste. Greater the mind, greater the waste. Just like an undertrained, under-exercised german shepherd is going to be much more destructive than a shitzu.
So a smaller pool of people than those people + people on robinhood. So nice convenient price pressure is applied.

Which I think is the OPs point.
It seems they are relying on the partitions to act as sync frames for this implementation.
Good post, this is exactly where i'm starting. After many years of being lazy, plus having to move because of divorce, i'm simply unfit so last week I decided to just go for a walk at 6am.

When I was a teenager I used to walk/run marathon distances every other day with the same proviso, and the rule that i'd always go further tomorrow (round the next corner, wherever) but didn't need to run or beat a time - I could simply walk it if I wasn't feeling too good.

It was wonderful - I remember going past a shop that sold old jukeboxes (this is in the UK) and stopping to look at them for a bit. No stress, just always go a bit further, even if only a metre.

Thank you.
> reasonable to me to pay a small one-time publication fee for an open access journal, to cover clerical and typesetting work

In my experience, the author typesets themselves anyway - the journal doesn’t do this. And the clerical work is done by community volunteers - the journal doesn’t do that either.
My parents to this day ask me when I will be getting a *real* job. I make three times what my dad makes in a year.
I built this for Rancilio Silvia (see explanation of the model in another answer in this thread).

I chose Silvia mainly because it doesn't have its own electronics, it is all 230V AC wiring, thermostats, switches, etc.

I made myself a precise thermometer with PT 1000 probe inside coffee puck and I learned the temperature can vary as much as 10-15 degrees.

I first used PID but was not satisfied with long settling time, because when water is right temperature at the boiler it still needs to pass through huge hunk of metal that will determine to large extend the end temperature of brew water.

So I built a bit more complex algorithm with the aim of first getting the water a little hotter in the boiler (while grouphead is still cold) and then slowly adjusting setting for the boiler as the grouphead heats up.

But there were still problems, for example pumping cold water into the boiler threw everything into chaos. Then the problem that you get temperature readouts with delays and offsets.

That's when I decided to just build a more complete model of the system that does not only take current but also past states of the system into account.
Yeah, that sounds like the reason people seem to agree on. Why give the customers 100/100 if you can give them 100/10 and sell 100/100 for a premium?

Also for Germany, I still think you're really lucky if you get fiber at all. Sometimes small villages get it and in big cities only in certain neighborhoods.
Zing! But well, depends on the algorithm. Some aren't that complicated to understand, like linear regression. Others, like DNN are basically impossible. But with ML you're at least always testing the code you don't understand in the process of training the parameters. That's better than the minimum effort when using copilot code. And many will just make that minimum effort and release untested code they don't understand.
How to accelerate your microservices journey with Choreo
Choreo is an iPaaS offered by WSO2
It is not at all clear to me that this is a scam or a rug pull. The uniswap pool[1] seems to show there is more than a million USDC left (unless I'm misreading this) and that is all that TechLead guaranteed - that you could sell the token back for 1 dollar minimum. You still can, right? In fact, the price is still up.

I think cryptocurrencies generally are scams, but this one doesn't seem like any more of a scam than any other token. Maybe TechLead is selling some - but why wouldn't he? It's a gimmick token.

1 - https://info.uniswap.org/#/pools/0x84383fb05f610222430f69727...
Found this for GPLv2.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.en.htm...

> In what cases is the output of a GPL program covered by the GPL too?

> Only when the program copies part of itself into the output.

As I understand, you need an explicit clause when you copy part of GPL code.
Not sure for GPLv3. Anyway, I also recommend consulting a lawyer.
Well, if I gave my kid five bucks and sent them to the store to buy a gallon milk, there wouldn't be any 'credit' or 'exposure' or 'risk' or 'volatility' involved.

Are we to believe these cutting edge financial institutions with their sub-millisecond high frequency trading, specialists in order execution, eight-figure salaries and dedicated high-speed microwave links are somehow unable trade cash for goods like every store does hundreds of times a day?
Sleep and anxiety: Link, symptoms, and treatment
Summary: "break things and fix them later" does not work in finance.

- No attention to the quality of core infrastructure.

- misleading information about customer ability to trade on margin ,cash in customers accounts, risk, and margin calls.

- failed to exercise due diligence before approving customers to place options trades.

- policy to not report certain failures and complaints to to FINRA.

- several other issues like bad customer identification.

Robinhood is designed to be cheap, easy and addictive. It's all that. The cost is quality.
What works for me is to not have any performance pressure: it's just a detriment.

Just go out and run. Don't time or track your run. You don't even need to know how far. Maybe I'll look at the time when I come back and think, oh I was outside for 60 mins, that's good, that's enough.