skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Currently, yes. It works by the frontend javascript code asynchronously asking "tiles" and other info from Python backend (which in turn calls C++), and currently I'm using Jupyter's communication channel ("comm"), so it would require some work to support other frameworks.

That said, I'm curious: what other tool would you use to quickly dissect and visualize data? A plain HTTP server?
(Of course there's also good old matplotlib, but I think the interactive UI is rather limited...)
> I just can't conceive of how modularity, in general, causes duplicate code rather than reduces it.

Yeah, like my node_modules folder doesn't contain tons of duplicate code.

/s
> What people want instead is a photo album with tags

What you really want is hierarchal tags :)
It's using generative adversarial networks create these images from a model.

Well explained here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWoravHhsUU
I use VS Mac exclusively. Wondering how long it will be before they try to leverage VS Code. There must now be plenty of young devs who have never used anything else.
The problem with inheritance-heavy OO is that complexity creep rapidly makes the code completely unreadable and incredibly hard to work with (and basically impossible to refactor), rather than just making it more branchy and complex.
This might be silly, but I kind of wish Date-with-Timezone types existed. It would be nice to be able to take a date and ask "Is does timestamp X fall within date Y", where Y is a calendar day in a particular place.
In contract law, intent is the key part, so if the "hole" is truly unexpected (e.g. the most significant errors that come to mind would be an accidental omission of "not" which completely reverses the meaning of the contract; or perhaps a mistaken swap in the description of who pays whom) then it would be reasonable to demonstrate that is was not what either of the parties intended, and thus that single mistaken word simply does not matter and would be ignored.

What you do get in contract disputes where specific wording matters is in edge cases where you might reasonably assert that both parties wanted (and agreed) A or not-A for some specific situation as part of the negotiation, disputing where exactly some boundary lies - but not for the core parts or complete reversal. On the other hand, automatically enforced "smart contracts" don't make such a distinction and any typo can reverse the core meaning of the contract as well.
The width and height attributes are used by the browser to determine the aspect ratio https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2020/03/setting-height-widt...
I've seen this pattern often in the last decade. This era is reciting not living
The sauce originated from Si Racha thailand. The original sauces are runnier, more like water than the american sriracha

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si_Racha
Human beings write software that flies people around the world and shuttles people between the Earth and space. Managing money is not more important than many things we use software for.
You say "obvious", but in the real world, the lines of net positive or negative have more inputs than that.
Adding an algorithm to the mix that may or may not be operating correctly is not a human way to operate.

In civilization, we make affordances for people that go against the razors edge of pure efficiency.
Californians are fueling Austin's housing frenzy
Unusual prey: spiders eating snakes
Is this a bug in Polygon? Just this weekend I was listening to Software Engineering Daily "Polygon: Connecting Ethereum Compatible Blockchain Networks with Denis Ermolin" (from June 2 2021) [1]

There was a lot of talk about how secure Polygon is.

[1] https://softwareengineeringdaily.com/2021/06/02/polygon-conn...
Yes, Pro is different. Windows 10 Home will require an account at setup if there's any way it can get to the internet. (No wifi and nothing plugged into the ethernet port will give you the option.)
Not really. If owning a coin becomes illegal it can fall below zero where you are paying someone to take your coins. Something similar to oil happened a while ago when storage had become an issue so prices fell below 0$
Still no backers for my "Big Arse Slingshot to Orbit" idea, alas.

We might just be getting to the point where useful functions can be packaged small and tough enough to survive a cannon type launch. Artillery to orbit might be made to work today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_gun
You can solve every problem automatically with algorithms except for algorithms.
The question remains, because presumably the exfiltrator had the option of OCRing the paper docs, then encrypting those files.
Lmfao, it's 2021. Stop parroting this tired meme. Linux runs beautifully if you aren't doing anything crazy with it.

I say this as a sysadmin responsible for maintaining a small fleet, the majority of which are Linux boxes. I've wasted far more hours helping end users with OS-level problems on Windows and, to a lesser extent, macOS. This is in spite of the fact that, again, the majority of the machines I manage run Linux, and all of these users are similar in technical capability.

Give it a try yourself. I'm sure a lot has changed since you last used it. Oh, and make sure you pick something that holds your hand a bit like Manjaro, Pop!_OS, Mint, or EndeavourOS.
> Call your congresscritter.

Sorry, but regular people don't make "campaign contributions" of any noticable size, so all we get back is a form letter acknowledgement based on whatever box you checked for subject.

Big Pharma, Big X and Big Y, on the other hand, "donate" enough "campaign contributions" that the campaigner can all but ensure (re) election based on recent name recognition to get the nomination, then counting on "their" voters being unable to vote for the opposite party even with the discovery of a live boy or a dead girl.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=live+boy+or+dead+girl&t=fpas&ia=we...
Two of three you have control over. Some might even agrue epigenetics says three of three.

Diet. Exercise. Etc. All known to change T2D.
From Wikipedia:

>Transactional Synchronization Extensions (TSX), also called Transactional Synchronization Extensions New Instructions (TSX-NI), is an extension to the x86 instruction set architecture (ISA) that adds hardware transactional memory support, speeding up execution of multi-threaded software through lock elision.

How is that related to CCA, which seems to be a security feature?
> If you actually have concurrency, and you have the hardware able to handle it, why do you not have parallelism?

You can have concurrent tasks but with dependencies between them which means there is no parallelism available.

> Can you give me an example of a concurrent program that is not also parallel, due to non-hardware reasons, in Erlang?

For example....

> the classic Erlang 'ping pong' example shows processes waiting to receive a message and responding when they do. Not actually concurrent, despite multiple actors and multiple processor cores it's a sequential program, not a concurrent one.

No that is actually concurrent. These are two concurrent tasks. They just don't have any parallelism between them because there is a sequential dependency and only one is able to make progress at any given time.

Concurrent and parallel are not the same thing, if you didn't know. Concurrency is having work in progress on multiple tasks at the same time. You don't need to actually be advancing more than one task at the same time for it to be concurrent.
This is way too paranoid of an approach for 99% of users.
I believe the popular line whenever someone is censored from social media right now is "they are private company and can do what they want"
> I was talking about Chromosomal differences between humans, NOT gene-level differences.

Since the former includes the latter, your excuse makes zero sense. It sounds like a convoluted attempt to obfuscate the fact that you thought "chromosomes" was synonymous with "allosomes".

> It looks like you skipped out on Biology 101

How so? This is a weird projection. You're the one who clearly didn't know what chromosomes are.

Finally, you still haven't answered the question: Is a person black simply by virtue of claiming that they "identify as" black?
I'm not sure I agree, but it will be hard to convince you if you're coming from a place where you think crypto is scammy/deceptive to begin with. Let me assume you're willing to suspend your disbelief:

I do agree that some stablecoins are scammy in nature, but others serve an important purpose and that purpose is to allow individuals and enterprises to navigate doing business in crypto despite crypto's high volatility. Where is the deception in that?
This shows a distinct lack of understanding of how crappy it can be when you're poor.

It takes awhile for a new job to cut that first check. In America, usually around a month.

That month can be insanely scary with no money and mouths to feed.
Wikipedia says:

"According to different benchmarks, TSX/TSX-NI can provide around 40% faster applications execution in specific workloads, and 4–5 times more database transactions per second (TPS)"[1]

That sounds like a pretty big deal to turn off. Though it seems to be based on microbenchmarks. I wonder what the real world impact for a typical RDBMS is.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_Synchronization_...
Note that it doesn't issue strikes, it only either blocks the video or directs ad revenue to the (alleged) copyright owner. You could get 100 content ID detections and not lose your account (although YouTube might suspend you for abuse if you just continuously upload hundreds of hours of copyrighted material).
It's not like people didn't warn that this would happen.

You need to have principles on your side and back those principles even when "bad" people enjoy those principles.

You will not go far if instead of principles you back people because they agree with you on a particular topic.
Software that you can't update is borderline not-software.

It's hardware with no joysticks for humans to adjust. It just happens to be hardware that's implemented in code.
Not just WebKit. Mozilla is opposed, too. And they have a whole document on Web Packaging: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ha00dSGKmjoEh2mRiG8FIA5s...
Just to be clear, space vehicles are not "hypersonic". They travel these speeds outside of substantial atmosphere, where the speed of sound is undefined. Mach number is relative to local air conditions, ergo their Mach number isn't 25. It's undefined. Mach Number is a meaningless quantity. It's not accurate to say that a space vehicle travels Mach 25, only that it's speed is 25 times higher than the speed of sound at sea-level conditions. Saying this can be a useful reference to give context to the insane speed of orbital vehicles (as was done by the commenter above you).

I say all this to give context about the surge in hypersonic research in recent years as being something distinctly different than achievements made in space-vehicles. It's not really accurate to say it's been given the "buzzword" treatment simply because things in space already move so fast. There's a distinct advantage (particularly for military objectives) to flying above Mach 5 in the atmosphere.
The parties in a dispute like that are likely to settle out of court, in a somewhat reasonable manner, instead of blindly applying the law until a judge automaton reaches a decision following the letter of the law.

With a smart contract, there can be no negotiation and attempt at reconciliation. The price here will never recover from $0, so at a single point in time $248,000 was transferred from bag holders to beneficiaries.
PETA tried to enforce a literal monkey's copyright (2018)
I run SpacedRepetition.com - glad to chat if folks want to discuss further! (Gabe@spacedrepetition.com)
This is uninformed. What do you call USDC, which is directly redeemable for US Dollars by anyone with a Coinbase account? Every USDC is backed by one USD of deposits in a US-based bank.

USDC is a stablecoin, and there are plenty of others out there.
I deleted mine after their class action lawsuit.
https://polydex.medium.com/plx-locker-smart-contract-inciden...
I like to go through my work history and basically cover:

1. What did I actually work on there. I usually pick one thing I'm especially proud of that I can talk in great detail about and answer any and all questions about.

2. What did I wish I could have done and talk about why - at the time - it wasn't. Examples: time constraints, lack of knowledge then that I have now.

3. What did I learn at that company that I was able to immediately apply at the next company I went to?

The first is usually all people get asked about in an interview. But the second and third items are far more important. As a hiring manager, I want to know that someone is capable of noticing trade-offs, weak areas in design, and able to learn and grow.

Also, if you can, talking about the second and third items with respect to non-technical things can also be big bonuses. For example, did you have a problem co-worker that you had a hard time interfacing with, but learned better strategies? Or maybe you did a poor job with time estimates, but recognized why and were able to improve on them? These are all things everyone can relate to.
That is a nonsense talking point from the industry. They use passthrough revenue to distort their profit margin. Express scripts is closer to 15% and CVS is closer to 10%.

See https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/facing-criticism-pbms....
Oil is physical; it takes up space, and needs special protections to not pollute the container it's stored in.

Digital goods, meanwhile, can just be transferred permanently "into the void" (i.e. to an account without an associated key.)
When there is a claim that there exists an arbitrage opportunity worth billions of dollars, I would consider it common sense to consider why has no one claimed the arbitrage opportunity yet.

The world has many very smart people spending many hours working very hard to find these opportunities, so the likelihood of it just sitting there like a $20 bill on the street, and not being picked up, seems quite small.

I do not know the answer myself, so I am interested in finding out. reddicky posted this:

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/why_peop...

which sort of answers it:

>Biotech insulin is now the standard in the U.S., the authors say. Patents on the first synthetic insulin expired in 2014, but these newer forms are harder to copy, so the unpatented versions will go through a lengthy Food and Drug Administration approval process and cost more to make. When these insulins come on the market, they may cost just 20 to 40 percent less than the patented versions, Riggs and Greene write.

So it looks like there is some expensive expertise involved and investment into R&D that needs to be done.
Those systems have built in redundancies. They don't assume trustless 100% bug-free code.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but that software in most cases isn't constantly under attack from another team of engineers trying to blow up all the planes.
Ask HN: How do you manage dev db environment?
Hi db experts,

I'm curious how do you manage dev environments? Here is some background:

- We use Vertica for prod/dev. Data team members share the same dev database.

- We need to import data from prod to dev for testing frequently. At least a few times per Sprint per developer.

- We don't control the databases. DBAs from HQ control them and the response time is from a few days to infinity.

Here are the pain points:

- If two or more developers are developing two different features for the same table, we have to make sure that neither breaks the table.

- It's slow to import data from prod to dev. We tried vsql (the command line tool) and pandas and neither works great.
The statistics for the bandwidth taken by youtube/netflix are quite revealing...
1. Not always correctly, as seen with the 737 MAX.

2. We have a general AI exception handler called a pilot.

3. Many of those systems have hardware redundancies, so even if there is a bug, hardware can stop it. A fuse might blow instead.
WORD!
He wrote Automoderator, SubredditSimulator, and worked on Gold too.
The reason these guys are in deep trouble is SpaceX. Current pricing is 1 megabuck per 200 kg for small customers (5 kUSD/kg). That's today's price on a rocket with a substantial launch history of success.

Third-party observers estimate that SpaceX's own cost is more like 1 kUSD/kg. So, they've got some room to move their prices if the competition gets close.

But the competition isn't even remotely close, at 2-3x the price. Astra's aspirational goal is 5 kUSD/kg, and 12.5 kUSD/kg initially. Alpha: 15 kUSD/kg. Vega: 15 kUSD/kg. They are default-dead.
They had to create USDC to keep it pegged during the crash before that, though. So actually it's USDC that's stable, that makes Maker stable.
Windows 8 was a reaction to the iPhone wave in everything, from the UI to this.

> it's not on remotely the same level as Apple or Google

Oh, it absolutely is. "The healthier one is a leper", as they (used to) say where I'm from .
I hope RWW is able to continue on after this. They do important work.

This exposes what everyone already knows. YouTube (Google... err... Alphabet) doesn't really have a problem with the conspiracy theories and right wing propaganda. They just don't want the drama. Nutjobs watch for hours and apparently click on advertisements.
Fractional Investing in Rental Properties [video]
Well, if the principle is "don't lie", then "expose people who lie" doesn't violate the principle. It remains to be seen, however, whether Google actually has any principles other than making money.
When I think about it in those terms...
Why not fund bug bounties that way?
This is not true and just an industry talking point from the PBMs. They use revenue tricks to hide their profit margin.

See https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/facing-criticism-pbms...
Like I mentioned, Assange isn't an idiot and knew full well who he was dealing with at the time. It doesn't need to rise to the level of provable criminal conspiracy for anyone to know someone as sophisticated as him just didn't bumble into the situation, especially when it was speculated at the time that the Guccifer 2.0 alias was likely a front for a foreign intelligence group.
Just don't normalize shitty food as something you eat casually, teach your kids to enjoy it like alcohol. A little every so often is fine, too much too often is bad.
It was an issue with a specific contract, not the contract VM or the chain itself. It's absolutely a problem for other poorly written contracts, but not a systemic problem for all smart contracts.
Until lawyers become coders or coders become lawyers I don't even see who could review them.
And this thread is why types help :)
The landing was confirmed with US satellite footage of the landing site:
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57427797
yes they can, and as such should be shamed for their poor judgements
I thought it was $248 million. 248k is tiny for a stablecoin.
Interesting didn’t know this. I always assumed it had to go to someone else. So digital currency can’t go below zero (or where you are paying someone to take it off you).
I feel I'm naturally a problem solver, and I noticed that I wasted a good amount of brain power thinking about things like unconventional air conditioning and bug control because I couldn't use power or use my building. Unconventional bathing because I had no running water(look up strigil),etc.

It wasn't productive, because I can't sit around re-inventing things that work good enough in modern society.
It's possible, but approximately no one in the shitcoin industry knows or cares enough to write fully formally verified programs.
Using smart contracts, people are creating cryptocurrencies within an Ethereum network. Sort of a blockchain-within-a-blockchain. Right now, Polygon is a popular alternate Ethereum network for doing these.

The problem of course, is that once these contracts are published onto the network to create your new cryptocurrency token, it's very difficult (perhaps impossible?) to update them. And of course, if someone finds a vulnerability in one of the contracts and exploits it, it's game over. There's no reversing the transfer of tokens.

So to give a more explicit answer to your question, it's not a problem with Ethereum, but a problem with the contracts people are writing on the Ethereum network.
Time for LawyerCoin (TM). The smart-contract is written in English (or other human language) and the oracles are powered by a bunch of lawyers who pinky swear to enforce them.

I'm doing ICO next week, if anyone wants in.
Thanks for the essay :)

> It's not like 2017 came along and Harvey Weinstein was like, "omg, is rape wrong now? Things change so quickly and I didn't know!"

Within my lifetime (I'm in my 50's) it used to be acceptable to pat girls on the bottom in public, pressure them into sex, rape them if they were drunk enough to not be able to say no, and a whole slew of other nasty behaviours that we now rightfully consider completely unacceptable. The whole Jimmy Saville thing in the UK - the stories coming out of how his demands for young girls to molest as payment for gigs were met by "respectable" organisations - sounds crazy now. Yes, this has changed fast, and caught a lot of people by surprise. I'm not defending any of them; they deserve everything they got. It was always "wrong", and they knew it, but society tolerated it to a certain extent so they could get away with it. Until they couldn't, thankfully.

> Jewish texts certainly do - and they have a lot to say on how.

Thanks for the detail, it's really interesting. I'm don't have much knowledge of Jewish practices. I'm glad to hear that there's some adaptability there. In most of christianity there's a strong element of "god's word doesn't change" - morality is unchanging and immutable, laid down in the bible. There's a strong opinion that atheists cannot be moral because we don't have an objective moral code to follow. This is where I find the fascinating part of the religious aspect - what happens when society's morals change? To a certain extent we can see it with gay marriage - most of the vatican is gay but the catholic church still condemns homosexuality. But this is more about politics than morals - the majority of catholics live in countries where homosexuality is not culturally acceptable, and the church downplays the whole question in countries where it is acceptable. The anglican church faced this crisis a few years ago, kinda, the African bishops did not want to accept gay marriage, the European and American bishops politically had to.

But I think the eating animals question is different, as most people publicly eat meat at the moment. It's not something you can be "in the closet" about and pretend doesn't happen (though I guess that will eventually happen - small groups getting together to kill an animal and eat it secretly). Which is why I think it's going to be more interesting to watch. It's possible that in 30 years we'll have the whole "have you ever eaten an animal?" thing going on, but I doubt it because the vast majority of people have eaten animals at the moment.
"SafeDollar" -- what an an unintentionally but perfectly Orwellian name!

Nonetheless, I feel bad both for the people who worked hard to create this failed cryptocurrency and for the victims who suffered these sudden losses.

It's hard to write bug-free code. One way to help prevent bugs is to make languages less powerful. In hindsight, it seems that Satoshi Nakamoto's decision not to make Bitcoin's scripting language Turing complete, making all sorts of bugs impossible, will prove to be a smart choice over time. It forces applications of Bitcoin that require control flow to be executed off the main chain.