skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In this example you will always have more in assets than you will borrow, so any new borrowing will be well collateralized. So yes, you can do this.
I like the reinforcement learning tutorials but his channel is for machine learning in general

Machine Learning with Phil

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC58v9cLitc8VaCjrcKyAbrw
So is an xbox when I plug a keyboard into it.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/apps/windows
I vaguely remember that they went back and drove more piles, somehow, until the building was stable that the exterior glass facade no longer shattered on a regular basis. However they did the work, it wasn't visible from the outside.
...let them eat toast!
Capitalism is free riding by definition. Capital gets rewarded not work. It's even in the name.
Only for apps. They aren't really suited for libraries or even command line tools.
Not if they have something you gifted them. Then the dynamic is reversed.
That one seemed rather blatant. I was shocked to hear a mechanic disabled the emergency brakes!
Income here is not relevant. What matters are assets you can borrow against. You could make 35,000 or 350,000, but it wouldn't be material.

So the important question is how this could be applied with whatever your net worth in usually taxable assets is.
Except Unity on mobile will be able to take advantage of Vulkan, Metal and GL ES 3.2, while WebGL is stuck in ES 3.0 subset and who knows when WebGPU (with a MVP 1.0) will come out into stable.
I don’t have to know how STAR voting works to know that Gibbard’s 1978 theorem applies.

The only game-forms which are straightforward (meaning, one’s best strategy in what option to choose not depending on how one expects others to choose, or on others’ preferences) are the probability mixtures of “do whatever voter X said to”, “between option A and option B, determine how many voters expressed a preference for A over B and how many for B over A, and if the proportion preferring A is more than p%, pick A, otherwise B”, and “pick outcome C”, with the mixes being any mix of those over any combinations of A,B,C, and X.

(So for example, you could flip a coin, and if heads, select a random pair of candidates, and the winner is whichever of the two got more pair wise votes, if tails, select a random voter and go with who they said was their top pick, and if the coin lands on its edge pick Neil deGras Tyson. This would count as “straightforward” because in choosing how you want to vote, it doesn’t matter at all how anyone else is voting.)

(Another example is if there are just 2 candidates period. This is also “straightforward”)

Outside of such probability mixtures, there can always be situations where your estimate of how other people will vote would influence the most effective way for you to vote in order to best improve your expected outcomes according to your preferences.

Outside of such “straightforward” game-forms, there can’t be a function from (your preferences (like, vNM utility, not just a ranking) between the different outcomes) to (a dominant strategy for you).

Whatever STAR is, it doesn’t change this fact.
Paying back debt requires income, which is taxed.

In this example you continue to incur new debt, but at a rate not more than the growth rate of your assets.
Regarding the numerical separators: they're for readability, and readability only. They do not change the numbers in any way. 12300 is the same as 123_00 is the same as 1_2_3_0_0. Up to you entirely.
Yesterday I finished a complex library in C++20, which I wrote "Rust style" by following the ISO C++ guidelines. I used 0 `new`, no smart pointers, all by-value returns, move semantics and STL containers. It literally took a month to write, but it worked as expected at the second attempt (first failed due to forgetting a `}` in a format string). I did not see a single segmentation fault and it works fine on both Linux and Windows. Rust and modern C++ give you the expressivity to describe what you want to accomplish to the compiler.

You can use the type system to erase certain classes of error entirely, without ever having to worry about something pointing to bad memory or whatever. If you follow certain rules, C++ can be _almost_ as safe as Rust.

I love C personally, and I've been coding in it for more than a decade now. It is simple, easy to learn, but it gives you literally zero ways to create abstractions. That could be a good thing, until you realize that almost all complex C codebases reimplement (badly) half of the STL due to libc providing no containers of sort. Linked lists are terrible for performance, yet C programs are pestered with them due to how simple they are to implement. And I won't get started with C strings, which are just a historical BadIdea™.

Most C codebases tend naturally to evolve into a mishmash of reinventing the wheel and ugly macro magic. After all it's either that or to risk committing preventable mistakes all over.

That's not without saying that C++ is that better - every three years a new release comes out and fixes certain issues so vastly that it completely changes how you are supposed to write code (see string_view, or concepts). That's not without saying that the language is also full of old cruft no one should ever think about using.
> I would really, really love to have been in that sales pitch meeting.

Me too. I could do with getting a bit of extra cash handed to me in a brown envelope.
Compared with what Flash offered in tooling, pretty high.
Last time I looked at Disruptor it still required a WaitStrategy, one of which was a Spinlock
No worries, soon enough you will get to load Blazor app instead.
"marcan" (creator of Asahi Linux https://asahilinux.org/) live codes on YouTube https://youtube.com/c/marcan42 - they're pretty long videos but super interesting if you're into that kind of thing
Certainly. This is basically a line of credit secured by your asset portfolio. As long as you keep that line of credit under your asset value and pay the interest, you can do this.
Try to see things from the following perspective: If you want to end your life as it is today, that’s perfectly fine – but you don’t need to kill yourself to do so!

You are obviously willing to take extreme measures to bring an end to your situation; well, then, let’s have a look at the catalogue of extreme measures at your disposal. Suicide is an obvious option, but how about the following alternative:

- Sell everything you have, take the money, and put all of yourself and all your resources into supporting something like Partners In Health; like, literally move to Haiti and dedicate your life to the poorest of the poorest of this country.

That’s just one example from the top of my head, obviously. My point is this: the “spirit” for drastic steps is already there – use it to take the steps that 99,999% of us never muster the courage to take.

Salvation might await you.
Seems like self-identification answers these questions.

Nation-building is a fairly new concept.
Not for the single producer multi consumer case, which is approximately the most useful case. (For me, anyway.)

If you have multiple producers and consumers though, then yes. But it's very cool to me that you can do without the spinlock in any useful case.
I always thought it was to improve SEO in the face of headline rewrites?
Mathematically, the logic works for anyone obtaining their income from capital gains. So it’s not so much about how much you make annually, but about how much of that is capital gains on assets you own.

Realistically, it doesn’t make sense for smaller figures. Banks are unlikely to lend (at the required rates) for small figures, transaction cost and management fees will reduce the gains too much, fixed costs to setup the scheme will be too high, etc.
Hi,

I've never created an account on HN before, despite many years of lurking. But I felt compelled to comment here because I want to offer what encouragement I can.

Personally, I made it through tough times in my life by opening up to the people who I knew cared about me. Good friends and family.

I don't know what your personal situation is like, but if there is anyone that comes to your mind who you can rely on to be there for you, reach out to them. Spend time with them. Sometimes you don't even have to talk about anything; merely being with others who treasure you as a human being can help you weather the worst emotions.

If you don't feel there is anyone like this in your life, then I personally extend my friendship to you. I'm posting on a throwaway because I don't like having a public identity, but I've added an email address in my profile that you can contact. If you're open to the idea, write me whenever you'd like.

Good luck and take care of yourself. I'm not much older than you are, but I learned some time ago that life is long and far more surprising than you think. You might not be able to imagine a better future, but it both exists and becomes increasingly likely as things get worse. All it takes is a bit of faith and time.

Hope this helps!
Capital is one of the factors of production, along with labor. They both get rewarded according to supply and demand.
What about the interest accruing on the debt? I didn’t see that accounted for.
Brauer has clearly had a different experience with classical mechanics and engineering physics courses than I did…
Meanwhile, a data science project in python runs right up until it doesn’t, and the only help you have is heuristics for why your data maybe was bad.

I almost sort of envy compilation at times.
Very cool! I’ve spent the last few months implementing a production MVCC system that’s completely lock-free. It’s really quite simple, but there were initially bugs in all the concurrent algorithms I designed. I wish I had time to learn TLA+ and properly model-check the algorithms, but for now I have to gain confidence just from stress testing and thinking hard about interleavings. The main thing I’ve learned is not to over-optimize. Keeping the algorithms as simple as possible is the only way I can reason about them.
https://www.youtube.com/user/hjalfi/videos has gems like:

Hjalfi writes a vi for CP/M (9 hours)
Hjalfi writes an assembler (7 hours)
Hjalfi ports Fuzix to the ESP8266 (38 hours)
That's not even half of a life yet. And considering the first 18-25 years were basically groping in the dark, 39 is nearer the end of the beginning than the beginning of the end.
if people like this, there is an interesting podcast on lyfe and life. [0] Apparently, the people who do research to artificial life, where they create things in silico and try to make life evolve from them, constantly run into a similar problem. By the time one or two hierarchies of organization have formed, progress halts as it succumbs to parasitic behaviour. Afaik it is still a poorly understood phenomenon, and even the bee society doesn't look immune.

I wonder how we ever got here with all these parasites.

[0] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs1K46AUK3M
Online dating is broken, by design. If it wasn't, and everyone found "soulmates", the business model would make a lot less money than it possibly could.
Focusing on tech for a decade would've given you so much experience and expertise that others of your age couldn't ever compete with.. that's something to ben proud of imo.
I wish you all the best friend, take care
That's a bit disingenuous considering the scalability and concentration of capital compared to labour. Regardless your point doesn't refute mine. Supplying capital reqires zero personal effort.
My parents believe that Coliseum and Notre Dame weren't built by humans, so yeah pretty safe bet!
BTW nukes are femtotech.
There are multiple lock-free allocators now that are suitable for production, such as mimalloc.
Most of the richest did, but is this true of those in the 10 million to 1 billion range?
> Sorry, that's not doing much for me!

It's easy if you first learn about Haskell notation and type classes, which pretty much every online tutorial covers. What you quoted isn't arcane, you're just unfamiliar with it (just like my granma would find C-like syntax illegible: she just wouldn't know anything about it).
So you would rather have them waste that exact same amount of space on every computer, just so you don’t have to download it when you want to build a package?
> Capital gets rewarded not work.

you get paid for the work. Capital gets anything above the cost, but could be negative. Capital trade certainty of reward (wages paid for work) with uncertainty of reward, and correspondingly higher return.

So unless you're saying that workers are not paid (aka, slave labour), both gets their appropriate reward.
Russian threats in the 2000s turned Estonia into the expert on cyber defense
> My grandmother made those in her Sunbeam toaster before loading them with room-temperature butter and Laura Scudder's smooth peanut butter. (Yes, my grandmother kept butter at room temperature but refrigerated the eggs. Go figure... grandmothers.)

American commercial eggs (and this has been true for a long time) need refrigeration because thet are washed, which reduces surface pathogens but compromises the eggs natural resistance to environmental pathogens and spoilage. Meanwhile, in most climates, butter is safe out of refrigeration. So, your grandmother was doing it right.
Show HN: 12 Prebuilt Templates with 200+ Coded UI Blocks
really like your garage analogy.

the missing piece seems to be the type of car.

if i put down a years income for a new car, the 'authorized garage' has it's perks because the value of holesome repairs is probably greater than the cost.

if on the other hand one has a ten year old, used car, which main purpose is a means of transport, that greasy, dusty garage, were the mechanic will let you know that there was only one screw missing and charges you a few bucks is golden.
>im quite certain lots of information is not at all public.

What information are you referring to that's not public? Most scientists' research areas, publications are public knowledge. Science relies on this to make progress.

OP claimed people signing the letter had a conflict of interest and/or were somehow complicit. Rather than getting into an argument, why not put forth the data. I'd suggest OP to look up their names, papers, labs, funding sources, etc and put forth a real argument.
I think the key point with AR is: How do you interact with it? The smartphone works because of the touchscreen. The blackberry was cool, but the smartphone wasn't ubiquitous until the iPhone. Similarly, the PC works because of the mouse. Other computer systems existed, but normal people weren't really using them day to day until you had systems with a mouse.

AR has a peripheral problem. There's just no easy way to interact with it.
They are highly profitable because they have an oligopoly over consumers. Consumers are forced to use them and other companies are forced to do business with them. For no other reason than a lack of alternatives. The reason that there are no alternatives is simply because they cannot compete financially... But if they could play on a fair/even playing field, the alternatives would almost certainly win.

Their high visibility is why they are able to soak up fiat from the economy. When the Fed did the trillion dollar stimulus packages, it went straight into these highly visible stocks.

These companies seem to be running a kind of money laundering operation at this stage. I suspect they found a way to keep borrowing large amounts of money from banks in perpetuity and then circulate that money among themselves to pay off each other's debts to inflate revenue numbers (maybe they use shell companies or corporate partners). It seems that there's something not right going on financially speaking. They're not playing on an even playing field as other companies. They shouldn't be profitable but they are; simply because they have an unfair advantage due to having special access to the centralized money printers.
What's difficult about Haskell syntax? Or do you mean "it's an issue because it doesn't look like C, Java or Python?".
I did mentally facepalm after I wrote that.

They seem to be following the 'ooh shiny' philosophy of software development.
There's a limit on this. If you borrow against the capital appreciation, eventually your debt percentage will put you at risk of a margin call. If your assets drop in value such that the assets are less than the debt, you lose all your assets, and the portion of the debt not covered by your assets still sticks to you.

I know people this has happened to.

The trick relies on your assets always increasing in value, which is not what assets do in the real world.
I believe that in some countries the equivalent to a Roth is limited to exchange traded companies and relatively low risk funds and bonds. If the intention is for normal people to save for retirement this makes sense to me.
NASA uses the experiences of Victorian sailors to prepare for life on Mars
no.

i am under the impression that he avoids going to a restaurant if the reviews are bad.
It's funny, I saw a basic description of this mechanism on reddit a week ago and now it shows up here: https://old.reddit.com/r/fatFIRE/comments/o2w0wx/how_do_the_...
It’s entirely possible to close this loophole by taxing wealth/capital, and there are countries that do this, and they are still capitalist.
I am speaking from experience, I have written a lot of renderers.

> GPU resources in particular need to wait on fences and therefore can't have a neatly defined lifetime like what you're proposing unless you block your whole program waiting for these fences, while other GPU resources are (like I said) immutable and need to live for multiple frames.

I don't quite understand why fences are a problem here. As long as you know what frame a resource corresponds to, you just to have to guarantee that the entire frame is finished before reusing. You don't need to know what's happening at a granular detail within the frame.

As far as static resources, that's easy: another arena for static resources which grows as needed and is shared between frames. Most of that data is living on the GPU anyway, so you just need to keep a list of the resource handles somewhere, and you're going to want a budget for it anyway, so there's no reason not to make it of finite size.

> More generally, how do you track resources other than the framebuffer, which are usually managed very dynamically and often appear and disappear between frames?

See the whole issue is trying to solve the issue "more generally". In many cases, you can know exactly the resources you will need (or at least the upper limit) when you start rendering a given scene. If you need to do any memory management at all, you can do it at neatly defined boundaries when you load/unload a scene.

The only time when you need some kind of super dynamic renderer is when you are talking about an open world or something where you are streaming assets.

Most of the serious renderers are written in C++ using custom allocators, which are just some kind of arena allocator under the hood anyway.
It's not disingenuous, it's simply a description of the market reality of both capital and labor and why they both have prices.

Supplying capital is compensated by the market because it's a scarce factor of production. It is a scarce factor of production because (i) there are risks associated with its provision, (ii) there's an opportunity cost. Nobody would invest in a startup if there wasn't an expectation of an ROI. Because it's risky, that ROI is high. The ROI is high because the cost base is deflated by the market. This is a risk premium, and it's built into the cost base by supply and demand. This basic mechanism underpins all capital markets and is the reason capital markets function at all.

Your statement about the scalability of capital is of course true. Capital offers the owner intense amounts of leverage and scale. The same can in general not be said about labor except in domains where that labor is scaled by technology (e.g. dev), media (e.g. instagram influencer), or being in a managerial position (e.g. decisions impact 1000-person org), which probably covers about 2% of the workforce.
ACX Reader Research Survey: Call for Submissions
Is the library open source? If so, would you share a link?
Time Management Won’t Save You
I’ll provide a perspective not usually found on programming forums - over 6 months of usage, I had ~250 matches on Tinder when I was 23. I’m not unusually attractive by any stretch, but before I started I treated getting matches as a technical problem and A/B tested pictures as well as seriously studied what types of pictures tend to do well, and deliberately shot each type.

Of those 250 matches, I didn’t message half. These were people with almost nothing in their profile who I also didn’t find particularly attractive. Half the people I did message didn’t respond back or ghosted after a few messages

So about 60 short to medium conversations. In the majority of those, it was clear that they weren’t particularly interested in dating or were on the app for an ego boost(or perhaps I wasn’t attractive enough for them)

I was able to get about a dozen numbers, out of which a third ghosted me and a third got ghosted by me. I dated 2 people casually and met 1 woman that caused me to delete the app, and I have been with her for 1.5 years.

If I had to start over again, I reckon the odds of me finding a relationship is very very low. The LTR started after the girl messaged me first( which happened like 1% of the time) but it was obvious she was attracted and interested in meeting. But I count myself very lucky that happened. I would likely be single if I didn’t match with her.

TL;DR: Tinder is a huge crapshoot even if you’re getting matches
You'll find a lot of SIMD code using the multiple calls approach as for far too long C++ compilers did daft things like transfer the SIMD registers back to the stack or refuse to inline when the expression got slightly interesting.
AutoSub – Auto Subtitle Generator Online
The most simple and practical online automatic subtitles generator and subtitle text generator. Easily and automatically generate and edit subtitles in videos & YouTube URL. Accurate transcription effect, cost-effective, convenient operation.
Did I reply to the wrong comment? I thought I was replying to one about how the Netherlands doesn't cover cancer screening under its national healthcare.
> What I miss the most is a good NURBS modelling that is runs on Linux

Try FreeShip Plus (Lazarus port of FREE!Ship+).[0]

Also, check Paolo Furani's technique on SubD modeling in Blender and converting to NURBS via FreeShip.[1,2]

[0] https://github.com/markmal/freeship-plus-in-lazarus

[1] https://twitter.com/PaoloFurani/status/1407071700244701195

[2] https://blenderartists.org/t/from-blender-subdivision-to-n-u...
> it's probably not very useful in the context of programming

This puzzles me. It turns out it's very useful in the context of programming in practice (i.e. Haskell programmers use it and find it useful), so what do you mean? I don't know CT so I wouldn't know how well it maps (pun intended) with the Math concept, but regardless, whatever abstraction is there in Haskell that programmers call "functors" is tremendously useful.
If you're paying 8% interest on the debt (Etrade charges a bit less than 8%) that can get out of hand quickly.
I remember reading they are more likely on autistic spectrum. But that is not personalolity disorder either.
hopefully someone else can find this- but it was only recently that business people started dethroning the inherited wealthy off of the top Forbes spots. Recently as in 1980 or so. So second and third generation children of tycoons were still dominating.
With a PAL you don't have to pay back the debt, just the interest, as long as the assets don't drop in value too much
I have a friend who worked in the past five years for two tech companies that IPOd and has lots of vested stock.

She wants to buy a house in San Francisco but doesn’t want to sell her stock to make the downpayment. She plans to use a collateral-loan offered by ETrade (who manages her employee stock plans).
Thanks, I appreciate that! (and thank you to the other repliers too)