skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Good question thank you.

Yes anyone can create their own template, exactly the way they want. A git template is simply a plain text file with a tiny smattering of special syntax such as for the git trailers.

> The second point makes sense if you use multiple issue trackers, but doesn't make sense if you're standardized on Github Issues.

It turns out it still makes sense to use full URLs, for example if you care about automating workflows, because popular parsers are able to scan for URLs and link them.

For example, popular parsers are able to scan "https://github.com/foo/bar/issues/123" as a URL then automatically link to its destination. For contrast, popular parsers are not preconfigured to scan "#123" as a GitHub issue tracker id, nor automatically link to its destination.

If you try reading commit messages with URLs versus issue ids in a variety of editors, you'll likely see the effect as the URLs do automatic linking. We like this convenience.

Of course YMMV and do what's right for you and your project.
Making it into FAANG is like reaching Heaven, achieving Nirvana. The epitome that one have lived a useful life.
I wanted to express thanks to Dang for the moderation of this site, precisely because we can learn, discuss, and evaluate difficult topics like this, without flame wars, and rudeness. There are a lot of good comments here today, that satisfy and stimulate, our moral, cultural, ideological and biological curiosities.
Thanks Dang!
These days I use ytdl instead of watch later... A friend sent me a link to an amazing tech tutorial someone made and they wasn't sure whether that is their thing. Of course they received a lot of abuse from internet trolls and later deleted the video and disappeared. I was never able to find that video again and since then I always download.
Agreed. Bill Gates was smart, but:

1) He had access to a computer via his prep school in 1968. This is way ahead of the vast majority of people in the world. Money bought him 5-10 years of advance knowledge.

2) Gates' mother had direct access to the IBM CEO

3) Gates' father could cut a sudden check to the tune of $50,000 to back his son's business venture

Kildall was just as smart as Gates, but didn't have the advantages.
Could you explain what that is?
damn, I can't believe how quickly you wrote that after my comment! :D
Proctor and Bergman
Non-technical users are often burdened with the responsibility of project planning and timelining - in this case seeing how many tickets are closed and where your team falls relative to expectation can be invaluable.
When is he getting a black bar?
In the Github issue linked by z77dj3kl I found a link to this vector port by ESRI : http://esri.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=d6b18...
Closed source but very impressive
> You're describing a UX problem which has UX solutions. It's not even remotely a justification for selecting a democratic procedure to express the will of the people.

Agreed but that's far from my only gripe with FPTP and IRV.
Commodore 64 BASIC
That's $1.2 trillion per year.

The USA spends $1.03 trillion per year on benefits at the moment, [0]. Most of that will be replaced. That's only federal benefits - more is spent by states.

I don't think this covers the administration costs of policing the benefits system (but I'm not sure).

There's also the veteran's pay and benefits which isn't technically part of this, but would be less necessary with UBI.

It's roughly equal to what the whole benefits system costs now.

[0] https://www.budget.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CRS%20Report%20-...
Couldn't agree more. The airtime on this topic is insane. People's email signatures filled with their pronouns. The anger. The division. I get it's an emotive conversation but then so are gay rights, gender rights, race rights, democratic rights, inequality, and about a gazillion other topics. That's not belittling trans as an issue, but it's so incredibly noisy.

IMO the wider question here is nothing to do with trans but about what being "liberal" means. We're in this insanely weird moment in history when the hard left is eating itself by being so Woke it's nearly impossible to even have a conversation any more.

I'm as left wing as they come, but being left wing means being able to have open, honest and sometimes uncomfortable debates. Being left wing is not, and never has been, about shutting down conversation, de-platforming, dogma, chilling effects. These are the things of the hard right, and the sooner people on the left start realising it and start being empowered to be vocal in defence of the freedom of ideas, the better.
Google the URL. You'll often find it in the Google cache or linked from somewhere else with the full description. This can sometimes be enough information to find an alternate source.
Yes. Yes, they absolutely are, and they should be prosecuted for their tax avoidance. Same with Amazon and all other companies. I, as lone individual tax payer, paid more in taxes in the UK than Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Apple did, probably combined. That is not okay.

Edit: evasion > avoidance.
If you'd prefer working with the data we have presented, take a look at https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2019/tables/table-1.xls . Other than racially motivated hate crimes which comprise most FBI recognized hate crimes, the next most is religious hate crime, below which is sexual orientation motivated hate crimes. And sexual orientation motivated hate crimes rank very similarly to religiously motivated hate crimes. In other words, sexual orientation oriented hate crimes are the 3rd most frequent, and very close in # to religiously motivated hate crimes, the 2nd most frequent hate crime.

Specifically with anti-gender-identity based hate crime, we can see that anti-transgender hate crime has one of the highest incident numbers for any individual cohort, despite knowing that only 0.6% of the population identifies as trans according to data presented earlier in this thread.
> And there's a huge number of "trans" who later realise they were sold a lie and have to undergo further surgery to try and restore their original sex.

There is no way this is a huge number. I'd be shocked if you could find a credible source on this. This sounds like conservative agitprop.
> Apart from the insults

I was implicitly referring to this exchange:

> > This is provably untrue.
> Both of you are correct, you're just looking at probabilities conditioned in the opposite way.

Which you neglected to incorporate into your mental model of this topic.
Disagree. It's Dell's decision if they want to screw around with the key-arrangement, but there would have been zero issue for them to keep Home/End also mapped on the arrow keys to keep at least some consistency.
I actually use a Bluetooth keyboard right now which has nothing printed on the arrow keys and still works as Home/End with Fn+Left/Right. Even Apple has keyboards with dedicated Home/End keys and still keeps the mapping also on Fn+Left/Right.
So yeah, it's not a bug, but it's still a usability issue in their keyboard firmware they should fix
What an incredible life.

Annoying antivirus creator, Belizean designer drug producer (and possibly murderer), bitcoin enthusiast, international outlaw, possible creator of the LSJ island drone videos...

I never really interacted with him but I will miss him all the same
I really like how SO is helping to advance good quality answers for GO. This looks like a good direction for them
anybody notice ngrok when singing in? wonder what that’s about…
https://youtu.be/85cL1HisrNc
The Investment Opportunity to become A Millionaire or Billionares, ick here
>Do you have any more information on the abortion policy you're using as a comparison?

No, s/he doesn't because is talking nonsense: conscientious objectors rights/persons are protected in Argentina by its Constitution and plenty of case law.

Re: Abortion: Doctors can (and have) very much deny to perform or "facilitate" abortions on moral or religious grounds but by law ("Ley del Aborto") they also have the legal obligation to refer the woman/patient WITHOUT delay of any kind to another doctor or another hospital (mostly public ones) to have the procedure.
I don't think this conclusion is justified by the data, though. If this were just a matter of "they'll humor trans people, but everyone secretly knows trans women are men and treats them accordingly," you'd expect gay men to generally be attracted to trans women. But by all accounts I've heard, the people who are attracted to trans women tend to be straight men, just like any other woman. It's true that straight men are generally less likely to be attracted to trans women than cis women, but this just shows that being transgender is unattractive to them. Gay men are even less likely to be attracted to trans women, so it's clearly not as simple as "people actually perceive them as male and treat them accordingly."
The way I remember how to write it is that "weather" and "whether" have the same number of letters.
Yes. Republicans are trying to pass bills under the guise of protecting against trans women. Trans women are people who were assigned male at birth, and now present as women.
It's also important noting, semi-related to your post, that nobody is pushing for trans-surgeries for teenagers -- they are pushing for puberty blockers. What this means is that puberty is medically halted until the teenager is a legal age, when they will be able to decide which puberty they want.

This avoids a lot of dysphoria-provoking secondary sexual characteristics from progressing, and also avoids accidentally "transing" a cisgender teenager.

Nobody hesitates to give puberty blockers to cisgender teenagers, for other medical reasons. I knew a young girl who had to have puberty blockers because she had a precocious puberty and it was literally destroying her young body -- she was not old enough physically or mentally to be able to deal with it.

However, for whatever reason, there is a huge backlash against giving it to transgender teenagers, despite it representing the best and ultimate choice in self-determination -- "Take these for a few years and then when you are 18 you can decide which puberty you want to go through". It leaves room for the individual to decide. If the person decides against it before then, they can stop and puberty immediately resumes as normal.

When the suicide rates are as high as they are for transgender people, and there is the option of halting the things causing the suicidal feelings, the dysphoria, all of the physical and emotional and societal pain. Halting an onslaught of pain that is utterly soul destroying, and just giving them more time to make a choice and more of an informed decision, how can there be any empathically-cogent argument against that?
There is a massive difference between following poorly written laws correctly and breaking the law.
I don't think you deserve to be downvoted but I don't believe having a conversation about heterosexual relationships is somehow free of consequences. Even if I had a conversation about a partner who is straight, people are going to make snap judgements about the their appearance, what they do for work, what religion they belong to (Be prepared to be judged if it is the wrong one!) etc.

Many children have been disowned by their parents because they fell in love with someone from the wrong family. There is no shortage of thousand year old stories and plays describing this exact situation. So, the idea that "Like the fish, you can't even see the water because you have always been in it." doesn't really resonate with me. That doesn't mean our society is free from discrimination and unfair treatment, but painting people with a broad brush serves to alienate those who might be your allies, and is ironically the very thing you are advocating against.
My view on gender is the same as anything else. We should accept the cards we're dealt and focus on our strengths.

Nobody is making you focus on your problems, you can choose what to focus on. If you were born as the wrong gender, why would you focus on that? You will probably never win that battle. You can never be satisfied because you will never have what most other people have. You should try to focus on other things where you actually have a reasonable chance of success; of feeling satisfied.

Most people are deepy dissatisfied with certain aspects of themselves and if you ignore these things long enough and focus on other things intensely, eventually, after a decade or two you may stop caring about your complexes completely.
I completely agree, but plea bargains are also the basic mechanism by which the justice system functioned. They represent something like 95% of convictions. If everybody who currently took a plea switched to demanding a trial, we'd need at least twenty times as many judges and juries.

I'm not against that, mind you, I'm just saying that you are proposing a massive sea change in the legal system. Everything about the recommended sentencing to basic questions like "what incentives can we offer to flip on someone" would need to be completely rethought.
Because it is cruel and unusual to punish someone for hyperbole, severing a mans penis and making them eat it is not justice.
Steve Jobs’s iPhone SDK Letter (2007)
Yes and no. The order IO is performed is well-defined (that's the purpose of the IO monad), but the evaluation order is not (apart from ordering arising from data dependency), and this is the case with or without unsafePerformIO. You just won't get any different behaviour with safe Haskell code, and Haskell is very much on the safe side of things, so even though the order of evaluation may be indeterminate, you would never notice it (maybe a timing attack is possible?). But this is admittedly hair-splitting.
Yes, and:

Parties get candidates elected. It's a form of social validation, vetting. The alternative is more money (buy votes).

Everyone should run for office at least once. Folk theories don't jive with the reality.

Yes, and #2:

Polarization != partisanship. Factors outside of the parties begat our current polarization. Ezra Klein's Why We Are Polarized is a good primer.
> What if the uploader of videos died?

Google has process for handling accounts of the deceased (mostly for closing them and exporting some data, which can then be moved to a new account). Or individuals could assure that next of kin get credentials to their account for control.

But, yeah, a zombie account (without any active owner) won't be able to opt out.
I'm not envious of the way transgender people are treated, and if I came across sounding that way I do apologize. My tone was for the disproportion of attention, not of action. In truth, very little action will be taken for good for the transgender population or health disorders. That isn't how these things play out, unfortunately. As a society, we only know the stick and not the carrot. While I sympathize with the sentiment that there are several openly anti-trans members of Congress, nearly all of Congress is anti-Medical Reform in action, if not in voice. My point is a scale of difference, which was brought up at the start of this thread. I really do appreciate the struggle that the trans community has to go through, and I am not deaf to their cries (and, though somehow this makes me a worse person to some who would hear it, I do know people who are trans). But if we are going to look at things on a societal scale, how can we ignore the statistical numbers of the societal woes and population impacts?

As for insurance, you might be shocked at what insurance doesn't cover for diabetics. They don't just "cut a check" for everything. I can't tell you how many times my doctor and I have to get on the phone to argue with them for literal months to get things covered. For things to keep me alive. Not to feel right in my skin. Not to keep thoughts of suicide away. To keep bare minimal physical biological function going.

As for Kamala Harris, she has a whole lot to be displeased about. Prison labor, drug prosecution, questionable school bussing policies, anti trans right policies. Yeah, I'm not a fan.
FWIW, 0.08 basis points = 0.0008% = 0.000008 = 8 in a million = 8 cents in a million cents = 8 cents in 10,000$, as the article says. (0.08% would be 100x more.)
A welcome move for individuals who may have embarrassing content as Unlisted links. Future politicians will thank you. But... this will hit B2B product training and product marketing libraries hard. Many companies I've seen have help pages with embedded or linked videos for features not updated in years, and many of those embeds are Unlisted videos so that they're only seen in the context of their help article, not promoted randomly by the YouTube algorithm. Some may have legacy content on legacy "X Corp Training" YouTube channels where nobody knows how to opt out of this policy shift. And especially post-COVID, they may no longer have the same technology and training teams, if they have any at all. They may not even have the YouTube login.

I could see a policy where YouTube made Unlisted videos Private that only had referrers from social media; this would be a welcome compromise to ensure non-guessability of URLs. But I can also see how this could become complicated and political. And companies using YouTube in this way aren't really contributing to YouTube's revenue materially, so there's not much incentive relative to the reputational risk of people guessing Unlisted links.

I shudder to think that healthcare professionals or heavy-machinery operators might be relying on these links to be trained in systems they use, will start to see broken links, will never report them back to the right people at their system providers, will just not get the full training, will make mistakes, and might cause harm as a result.

Security is not the only component of safety, and impacts need to be evaluated holistically.
No one self-identifies as an asshole or a bigot, but there sure still are a lot of them out there. I'd hardly say that the only use of those labels is to "crush nuanced conversation" - people just aren't inclined to take ideas seriously when they emerge from people they fundamentally disagree with. Telling a democrat that something is a "republican" idea will produce the same result, and vice-versa.
Forests are going to burn and anything we do only delays that. However, as you point out, people and structures are worth protecting.
A few years back they started moving to a new UI that is visually a bit better but functionally I find slower to get to what i need. I also find the load times to be extremely frustrating, not sure if that’s related to new UI.

compare this experience to trello or github issues and you’ll see the other end of the spectrum. obviously jira does way more
enterprise related features than those two.
Super, thx
Far from excellent imo. Repetitive and disinteresting in tone and topics(drugs.) Ok if you're a teenager.
Establishing a pattern of shiftiness would not make the actions in question less questionnable.

If I hear a surprising claim from a pathological liar, I'm also less likely to believe it, not more!
>sounds like discrimination and should be illegal

IME the "unique backgrounds" are "doesn't have a CS degree or a couple years of experience at a big software shop".
Hold on… your claim is that students are not having their special needs met, and your solution is to put them in a school that’s even less equipped to handle their special needs? Schools absolutely should be segregated, as much as possible, by things like academic ability. That’s the only way schools can effectively meet students where they’re at. It takes a totally different strategy to help a low-performing student catch up vs helping a high-performing student excel. By forcing those kids into the same classroom, you’re not helping either of them.
I was going to respond saying "at least it's less work than mimicking modern Apple momentum scrolling..." but in fact I'd argue that's simpler than one might expect as well! https://medium.com/homullus/recreating-native-ios-scroll-and...
The slack has a compounding effect

Like, sure public perception isn't immediately bad when someone is perceived as wealthy

But the immediate and long term consequences are very different whether people went along with it or not

People can have louder and wilder public opinions when they aren't beholden to current/future employment or even advertising dollars

Even convicted people that do not need employment are able to just go back to whatever they were doing. They are not marginalized.

Even before conviction they can pay fines and settlements and make it orders of magnitude more expensive for prosecution to even mount a case
Rural land reform is less of a pressing issue when agriculture ceases to be the main economic activity - even in Europe, it was mostly either 1) very very early, or 2) in economically backwards regions.
It boggles my mind that people don’t become a tad skeptical upon seeing such claims.
Recommend going to the weather.gov site directly and clicking on the US map in the regions with “excessive heat watch” or “excessive heat warning”…basically the PNW. Worth knowing about the site anyway, and the NWS presents both raw data and relevant information in clear and actionable formats.

PS: wonder if your town got as hot or cold as you thought? The local weather page under weather.gov reports hourly temperatures for the last 36 hours.
I agree that it's obvious to both of us, but there are regularly comments that seem to indicate that it's not always the case for people from other regions. No one needs more generalizations about the continent. :)

(Or about any continent, obviously.)
Some of my videos would be affected and I got an email from them. Seems reasonable to me.

Of course, there is probably a large number of currently unlisted videos from accounts that are no longer active, which would effectively be lost after this change. Unfortunate.
I think it might be legal.

When Google bought Youtube Videos, I followed their directions on the new password, etc.

Something went wrong, and I couldn't delete, or edit my own videos.

They weren't that embarassening, but I used youtube originally as kind of a diary, or todo list.

I tried for awhile to get them off, but failed, and just gave up.

I did reach a human in advertising one day, and she told me, "Those issues are not what they hired he fooor. Try the help boards?". (She brought back memories of certian new college grads, and I realized how difficult it is to talk to a human at Google.)

Anyway--the vids are still up their years later, with people telling me how lousy they are. I just commented on my own videos. Telling people at one time, some uploaders just posted without thinking about clicks.
The 99% of white Americans for whom all ancestors were from Europe, are European.
Some/many people can't separate the accusation from it being shown to be true. During that period of time (years??), it's a distraction for those people from the other problems like handling vaccine distribution, relations with China independent of COVID19, etc...

Yes, if this were a narrow academic research project looking into the origin that was left de-politicized until there was an outcome that would be great. Unfortunately this whole thing was born political and China hasn't done itself any favors by always being so hush hush.
Thats not interesting when its 9 months in advance

Maybe a few weeks

People arent just able to make a perpetual conspiracy indefinitely in the future, or you dont have to entertain people trying to do that

I wont here

He has increasingly depressing messages in an increasingly dimmed outlook and an increasing time in prison
Yeah, going to need to see some evidence and source code references for allegations like this.
ah ya of course you can’t put an ipod on apples app store!

looks like you could maybe use the Vibrate API for some andriod browsers…