skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This might be contraversial:

So, if i read this correctly, there was an eviction moratorium (so they can't evict you if you don't pay).

So you have Billy, saying "fsck it, they can't evict me", spending the rent money on other stuff, and letting "future Billy" deal with the rent later... And you have Bobby, being responsible, saving, maybe even literally starving to pay the rent on time.

And the "future" comes, Billy gets his rent paid by the taxpayer, and Bobby gets nothing.

This may be because I live in a former socialist country, but what I've learned here is, spend (or hide) your money, screw the rules, and the state will "save" you.
There's a lot of people who say "teacher and police unions" or even "public sector unions" when they really mean "just, exactly, police unions."
It sounds like you're referring to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanson%27s_method

and the related Baldwin's method, which, while being Condorcet methods, both fail monotonicity.
I guess Toyota forgot to get those line-by-line coder reviews.

https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/pubs/koopman14_toyota_ua_...
Well, you're not picking people at either end of a normal size scale. You're picking people with gigantism and dwarfism. But let's take Andre as an example: what sports Andre would truly excel at? He made a name in wrestling, but his gigantism was as much a cause of health problems as an "edge" in sport. And if size was the deciding factor, then why wasn't the largest woman with gigantism (Tanya Angus, 7 feet 7 inches and weighed 400lbs) beating the shit out of wrestlers like The Undertaker (6 feet 10, 309lbs)? Because size isn't all.

Edit: now I'm taking weight!

Ross Tucker made a point about safety, but also about fairness, about which he said (paraphrasing) that females would disappear completely from mixed sex sports, even with weight categories. His point about "fairness" categories is more like "how would that even work?"
Thanks! I ended up here, which is about the place one needs to start https://medium.com/freely-sharing-the-sum-of-all-knowledge/w...

understanding which tags from the ontology to use and then building the query.
This year will be a big pivot moment for the sport. Next month, 100s of millions of people are going to watch Olympic climbing. The speed climbing will definitely be front page news all around the world, just because people have never seen anything like it. Everyone's going to want to get down their local climbing gym and give climbing a go. But, you're correct - very few will end up outdoors. I hope that those that do are safe!
There are 7 commercial vendors for Ada.

https://www.adacore.com/

https://www.ghs.com/products/ada_optimizing_compilers.html

https://www.ptc.com/en/products/developer-tools/apexada

https://www.ddci.com/products_score/

http://www.irvine.com/tech.html

http://www.ocsystems.com/w/index.php/OCS:PowerAda

http://www.rrsoftware.com/html/prodinf/janus95/j-ada95.htm
I suppose some experienced developer just found out that some interessting features have been added since 1996?

another, not that well known, tag which is IMHO quite useful when you have to serve static pages <base>[0].

[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/ba...

Edit: 1996 is just a random reference, not actually checked.
Edit2: Link to English MDN.
"Major US Supplier" is the shorthand. It's strictly inaccurate, but not a bad first gloss.

The deeper reality is that Saudi Arabia have provided (or occasionally withheld) stability to global oil markets since the early 1970s.

KSA are the world's reserve capacity supplier of oil. Given that world transacts globally and is a highly liquid commodity (in the economic sense), *even where KSA don't directly provide the US with much of its oil, the Kingdom's management of production and leadership in OPEC have a profound impact on global oil and through it, global economic and strategic stability.

There are countries with larger total oil reserves, more exports, and greater production (Venezuela, Russia, and the United States, respectively). Saudi Arabia's strengths are the quality of its oil ("light sweet crude", as contrasted with heavy sour crude from Venezuela, which requires light volatiles simply to extract it from the ground, hence periodic headlines about the US "selling oil to Venezuela", which is more misleading than informative), and the low cost of extraction. Additionally, Saudi Arabia have excess capacity --- their pumps are not running full out --- which means that by increasing or decreasing their supply, they can effectively set global oil prices. (Again: liquid assets, it's possible to move $100 of oil by tanker for about $1 in fuel, making arbitrage and cross-supply highly viable, unlike far less readily handled fuels including coal and natural gas, both of which require special handling.)
I’m using them quite extensively (except the Stream video feature). APIs are good, traffic can be restricted or rerouted based on Geo. Not sure what cookie based auth would do in a CDN but if it’s on the origin it passes through. For authenticating URLs there is a signing scheme you can use.
Is being philosophically critical of something automatically hostile? There are plenty of things that would argue against on a moral basis, that are important parts of the lives of some of the people I've worked with. I'd never harass them directly or indirectly for one of these things, but it would be hard to keep them a complete secret either.

On the other side of the coin, I recognise that the people I work with will surely have some deeply-held beliefs about the wrongness of some aspects of my life. That's inevitable when you have some minimum diversity of viewpoints, and of course "reasonable people may differ" on many of those topics. I don't think I have the right to insist they supress these beliefs, as long as they're not trying to harm me with them. (Assuming that just having a belief isn't harmful.)
As a few examples:

"Anyways, any woman dumb enough to participate in the farce that will be competing against HIM deserves to lose."

"Women are getting screwed because of trans ideology. Mr. Hubbard is clearly a cheating male."

"In the old days, abittoirs use to have a well trained cow that would calm the nervous cows on their way to be slaughtered. I often think of these women as those calming cows trying to placate the rest of us women."

Like, there are some good comments and people trying to have a discussion in good faith. But clearly there are others who don't and I don't see how the real name policy has improved the quality of the internet discussion at all.
I'm sure it'll be at least 10x the cost of flights.

Train travel is just too expensive.
Wiki data is awesome. I’ve been considering using it for some projects, but the main thing that’s keeping me away is the concern that some moderator will decide that my data doesn’t fit and remove it. Can anyone speak to this concern? On WP for example notability is a big thing, how does this work in Wikidata?
they are very a small team. Their CEO codes !
... but if, say, someone with a million BTC spent it on mining rigs and gathered enough power to control 50% of the network, they could institute changes overnight and their rigs' interpretation of the rules would dominate the network. There's nothing in the design of BTC to stop that scenario other than "It costs a lot of resources to pull off," but that means control of the currency is by a de facto oligarchy (of enough rig-owning power to call the shots technologically).
Most people have no idea just how massive the biological advantage is. Movies and popular culture have conditioned people to think that females can hold their own against men. Individuals can, in some contexts, where the statistical distribution overlaps. For example a mediocre middle aged man can be beaten in strength or speed sports by an athletic 20-something woman. But at the tails of the distribution, where the competitions occur, the advantages of the Y chromosome and male puberty are insurmountable.

Just look at these female world records compared to 13-15 year old high school boys: https://boysvswomen.com/#/world-record

Hubbard is also 43 years old. There is no precedent for any human female being competitive in this sport at this age, not even the most freakishly talented female weightlifters in history, not even the Soviet drug cheats.

Kuinini Manumua, the Tongan woman who would have been given this place if not for Hubbard, is 21 years old.

Feagaiga Stowers, who placed second behind Hubbard in the Pacific Games in her native Samoa in 2018, is 20 years old.

This problem cannot be solved or even properly discussed without properly acknowledging biological reality.

This disparity is why women fought so hard for sex-based separation in the first place. I cannot understand why we would roll back those protections by considering “gender” equivalent to sex. It can only hurt women.
I'm more just shocked that they're valued at 1B and are still doing their thing without a clear path to a sellable product. It's great and something I'd like to see more of, but we're long past the days when companies would spend a lot of money on long-term research projects.
Hacking the Hackathon
I wouldn't say it's 'harder', it's 'different' is many respects. It's true that women are way more frequently propositioned for sex than men (talking heterosexual relationships here) and it's basically up to women if sex is going to happen or not. However, after sex happens, it's up to a man if he is going to have sex again with this woman or not and if he's going to have exclusively this this woman or not. Obviously, women too make these choices as they may or may not want to have something more than a one-night stand and keep relationship open or exclusive. Most common complaint that women make about online dating experience is that men have sex once or several times, but refuse to commit and may entirely 'ghost' them. So in this respect it doesn't seem to be accurate to describe online dating as 'easy' for women and 'difficult' for men. Instead there are different issue for opposite genders, but you can still use online dating to achieve whatever goals you have, regardless of your gender. Just don't blame men, women or dating apps - relationships can be hard work for many of us, especially if you have disadvantages, like appearances, income level, personal issues, past history, criminal record, substance abuse, etc.
Why, Firefox of course!!!
It's the only real option if you do value privacy
I forget which, but one of the big dating sites has a toggle to be invisible to straight people. I think it's mostly so people in the closet can still use it without being outed to locals, but it could be expanded.
Unlike LyX, TeXmacs is truly WYSIWYG and does not use TeX/LaTeX.
So has Gender critical been defined as a group in such a way that no-one will admit to being in it? Is it similar to TERF?

I think you're correct in your second statement. This whole area seems very polarising. The edge case of women's sports is the obvious situation where a principle of 'Live and let live' doesn't work.
I used to do that test with a mobile pentium from back in the day... I think it was a T5600? The model name sounded like a terminator, that's for sure.

Problem is that then AVX became a common thing (at least in part of what I run) so that processor became unusable. I moved to an i3-3120m, which supports AVX, but then AVX2 became a thing.

I could've gone for a 4000-series i3 at that point, but I just grew tired. And Pentium/Celerons are a bigger mess to find because some of them are Atoms now. For example, I have a N4000 sub-notebook that I got for my mom to check her email and view online videos, and the things feels pretty snappy for those things. But then you try to run some numerical code and you find it's 50-100x slower than their bigger siblings... Turns out it has no AVX of any kind, and event though it says it supports SSE4, it feels possibly slower than the older Pentium I mentioned at the start, even with faster, dual-channel memory, and those old Intel didn't even have SSE4, just SSE3. But possibly at that point the 35W thermal headroom of theT5600 plays a big part as the N4000 is passively cooled and has a 6W TDP.

Moral of the story? Even if you try to, it's hard to pick a slow/old processor that will support all the operations that your software could use. Some of the give a huge speedup. You have to pick your battles. You'd probably have an easier time underclocking a lot out of your current processor (and disabling a few things?) and call it a day for performance testing.
I don’t buy this. I see myself as a top performer and I’m very well paid, but I know I’m not getting nearly the same amount as the investor class. I’m not greedy either—I make much more than I need, but I don’t think our society benefits when the lion’s share of compensation goes to the super wealthy. I do understand the nuance in that the investors are putting their capital on the line, and that is worth something, but a line must be drawn to avoid runaway inequality.
I think it means that the most notable aspect of life is suffering, so if we're aiming for something else to be the focus of life then we're not doing very well.
But that's the point. Rachel Dolezal is a grifter and a laughingstock, not a black person.
Ok, this article had me at "...which is a bit dense to summarise in a few sentences, so why don’t we start with some historical context?"
Check out gigabytes aero line. Got one a few years ago and it's still going strong. All that and it's got an RJ45
You've hit the nail on the head calling it the basic attention token. While you haven't literally replaced ads in the page you are still removing their ads then adding your own. You didn't replace the ad directly, but you've redirected the user's attention.
Don't try to go in that direction as to define yourself as the opposite of indignant bullshit. A lot of homosexuals don't like that either.

As long as you don't hurt or discriminate in a professional setting, you should be fine. Some of this behavior developed because people were shunned. That is no excuse for Twitter woke, that is more an addiction to outrage. Societies can function with homosexual people because they were always prevalent.
Seems like a serious breach of ethics to lie to those women.
Note that the letter is probably not authentic, and does not reflect how an actual Sultan would describe himself.
hey dejan, we have been using BunnyCDN for quite some time.
Thanks for the detailed writeup.

looks like storage zones are still not fully stable ? after experiencing several issues with storage zones earlier, we migrated to pull a zone. we didn't had any major issues after the migration.

what plans do you have to improve your storage zone ?
All data is notable on Wikidata as long as it can be directly sourced, and/or structurally linked to some other data that's itself notable. There's nothing like the concern for the "encyclopedic" that one might find on Wikipedia. The most obvious example of this is the zillions of entries for individual scholarly articles, which are included because these can be endowed with machine-readable info about authors, publishers and citations that is of general interest.
You can find the changelog here: https://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/about/changes.en.html
They claim to be a privacy focused browser that can pay users via cryptocurrency. Yet there is no point to pay via cryptocurrency when there is no privacy for receiving it.
> Because you can attach bots? or make calls, custom emoji?

Because you can access an indexed repository of every conversation your team has had, organized by grouping, channel, digression, and participants, even if you weren't present, online, or even a member at the time. What's the MSN Messenger approach to this? Everyone join one giant group conversation window and try to keep the conversation straight, everyone send every file to every person each time, everyone keep every file you've been sent, grep through your 5 years of logs to find stuff, and hope you never need to use a different device or lose your connection? Slack provides the ability to reply to specific messages in digressionary threads, which is a key part of keeping busy channels readable in the present, let alone in the future, and the only reason many conversations can span long periods without getting lost in noise. I shudder to imagine my job relying on staying up to date with an MSN Messenger window with 44 participants.

Then there's integration with the bugtracker and support ticketing system, and Keybase, putting live-updating views from spreadsheets and the database directly into chat, drop-in/out call channels (which aren't comparable to MSN/WLM's direct calls), compatibility channels to migrate from IRC and mailing lists without losing anybody... those don't count as extra functionality? There's a reason professional teams use Slack when they never used MSN/WLM.
Russian ship fired warning shots at Royal Navy destroyer, Moscow says
Alas infoboxes on Wikipedia often have more info. Particularly, in the case of cultural phenomena people are frequently eager to populate the infoboxes.

Perhaps some kind of synchronization would be feasible, where with standardized infoboxes relations between known items could be extracted when specified on Wikipedia, and plopped into Wikidata.

For myself, I looked around for a service that could present infobox-data from pages in a category as a table, with filters and sorting. But ended up just firing API requests and parsing the boxes.
I'm not killing any animals, I wouldn't even kill the rats, I was just indicating the arbitrary line between vermin and pets. We have frogs, hedgehogs and in parts of our town sometimes even a fox (and they kill chickens if you don't close the hen). I think it's beautiful. Not the same as the high concentration of cats we have in our urban area. One of our neighbors has 4 cats, and they all shit in the area directly around her yard. And they are the reason I can't leave the chickens alone outside during the day.

And believe me, nothing deters cats, me and my cat-less neighbors have tried everything under the sun. I splashed them with water multiple times already. Sure, it's all fun when the cat sits in a box and is cuddly. But it's a roaming predator that spreads excrement and disease. And if you don't cuddle with it regularly, that's all it is.

And how can you tell me to keep my soil moist, do you know what an amount of work that is? Cat owners should come and keep my soil moist. Or, just keep their cat inside.

If you love your animals, go live on a farm or in the woods. The city is no place for pets like cats.
Well the problem I had was that I apparently didn't forbid it from using the move constructor, after I changed that it correctly failed to compile.

So in my case the problem was very much that it took the liberty of doing something I wasn't expecting it to.
Or https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/ba... for english
In my opinion this is a partial explanation for the rise in suicide in first world countries.
DBPedia board has been faffing about regarding the new hyper-relational data model [0] and has come up with a bunch of hack-ish solutions (read: esoteric data models) to incorporate it. As far as I remember, there were dumps from 2018 with some hyper-relational facts but by and large the go-to dumps is from 2016-10 [1].

I think they acknowledge that info-box information is no longer good enough (both in coverage and completeness) and have handed over the moniker of the open-access KG to Wikidata. To their credit, I think its the right call.

src: I worked in a lab lead by DBPedia's founder (and one of the contributors to the original infobox to KB code).

[0] https://blog.liu.se/olafhartig/2019/01/10/position-statement...

^^This enables, amongst other things, fact's validity to be quantified. Instead of saying <barack obama> <president> <united states>, you can now say {<barack obama> <president> <united states>} <from> <DD-MM-YYYY>; <to> <DD-MM-YYYY>

[1] http://downloads.dbpedia.org/current/ (from 2018);
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/ (see the folder titled 2016-10)
That is great prototype. iPadOS 14 has the same feature called Scribble. I bet your work found a way to the people that made Scribble.
How Disney Mis-Managed the Star Wars Universe
Also, a discussion from 8 months ago:

"A gentle introduction to the Wikidata Query Service"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24823074
It depends. I've just been looking for (non-sleeper) tickets from Germany to Prague and back, found some for a group of five adults for 149€ one-way, three months into the future.

The last sleeper train I took was Berlin-Budapest and that was 39€ in a six-bed room, which I personally prefer to economy flights, where the cheapest option is usually somewhere between 10pm and 7am. I can't wait to take another NightJet train.

Of course, just going from any place in Germany _to Berlin_ for that sleeper train can cost you upwards of 100€ if you don't book in advance.
It’s a surprise because you cannot retroactively change the terms of a purchase. This is probably illegal, and while Peloton is probably relying on their voluntary recall to mitigate this risk (“look, you can just get your money back”) that probably does not solve it. Even with free returns they are attempting to unilaterally change the terms of the purchase to their own benefit, and for no benefit to the consumer.

Honestly I look forward to seeing the lawsuits that come out of it, to remind companies that contract law does apply to them.
“Being a Billionaire Is a Lot Harder Than It Looks”
help me out here, I don't understand how the spoiler effect returns if the third party candidate becomes competitive. Wouldn't that just mean they have a chance of winning? Suppose Dave Chappelle ran in 2020 and 40% of people voted for him and they all had Biden ranked at #2. 15% rank Biden #1, and 45% rank Trump #1 with no #2 marked. Biden wins, no?

edit: found your explainer elsewhere, currently reading.
edit edit: Huh, that is weird.
I guess we agree, it's not about cats v dogs, people that let their dog poop on the street without cleaning it up should also go straight to jail...
In Europe tech workers also make ~40% less than American tech workers after taxes, retirement/pension, and healthcare. I’m sure that’s not entirely attributable to unions, (and I would genuinely be interested in understanding the full cause of the disparity) but I imagine it plays a role.
You, like many youtubers, made completely exaggerated claims in your commentary. Your model fits a sequence of inputs to a video frame. But you say "wow look it even models the movement of the sun!". It's pretty absurd.
I think the question with drugs is slightly different. Nobody cares how much vitamin C you take, because although making sure you're not vitamin C deficient has an advantage, at some point taking more doesn't help you at all; and if you take the maximum amount that your body will absorb, there are no health detriments. Same thing with creatine: taking creatine isn't "natural" in the sense that you'll end up with 2-3x as much in your system as you would "naturally"; but after a point, your body just stops using more; and if you take that amount, you won't have any health issues.

With anabolic steroids however, if there is a "maximum amount that your body will absorb", it's far beyond what causes long-term health problems. This leads to a Prisoner's Dilemma type situation, where if most competitors are taking dose X, and one person takes dose X+1, that one person get an advantage; but if all competitors take does X+1, nobody has an advantage, but they all suffer health consequences.

I don't inherently see a problem with any particular sport openly advertising that competitors may use up to dose X of any particular drug or steroid, where X has been reasonably shown to be a safe amount. The problem is, is it possible to test that only X has been taken, rather than X+1? If it's only possible to test that 0 (or a negligible amount) has been taken, then the only enforceable limit is 0; and an unenforced limit is effectively no limit at all.