skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
“Real” and most people will know what you’re talking about.

The only people using the term “cis” are trans-activists.
That's unfortunate. I have a few videos which seems to have been forgotten even by their uploaders. Those videos would probably not be updated. I guess I need to back them up manually.
I love having our less-technical team members on GitHub. We post loads of screengrabs in issues and PRs, discuss changes and wording and it keeps everyone in the loop.

I really wouldn't want to go back to using a separate to like Jira or Trello.
Not all vaccines are created equal.
It's a fallacy to think there are not good schools possible in poorer areas; they used to be quite common, and still are in many places: https://www.city-journal.org/html/irreplaceable-9836.html

Rich elites, which almost everyone on this forum is, imagine that the poor people in the inner city who want vouchers want to send their kid to some swanky rich kid school where everyone wears a blazer.... they don't. They want to send their kids to the ordinary private schools that would exist in their communities if they were able to afford non-public education.
Your theory doesn't explain Quebec scoring so high¹ in math in the 2018 PISA² test.

https://www.schoolofpublicpolicy.sk.ca/research/publications...

https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-results_ENGLISH.png
Tons of money, check
Tons of blow, check

It was pretty simple at the time, blow up the nose, money to the hooker, repeat and rinse. It only got complicated when I ran out of money.
Given that reproduction in mammals is inescapably binary, and a really big fraction of social interaction in humans is shaped by courtship, both overt and covert, it's hardly surprising that our historical perspective on gender roles has been predominantly binary too.

I think another reason "things are different now" is that more of us think abstractly today than in years past. Many of the perspectives and possibilities we entertain today would have been alien to more of us 50 or 100 years ago, when the world was more conventional, more black and white.

Finally, with the multitudes of voices that no longer remain hidden behind mainstream media outlets, we're more aware of nontraditional, complex, and nuanced POVs today. That helps us realize that many psychological variations exist "between the lines", not as pathology but as a matter of natural variation.
Citroen’s very common in my county - far more than a Mazda

Your experience may be that used cars are cheap. My experinece over 20 years is that’s not always the case. I’ve had good used cars and awful used cars, the awful ones costing more than my current lease even before you get into the less concrete value of reliability and comfort.

I don’t deny that used cars can be cheaper. I simply state that’s not always the case.
At least that’s lower than in many European countries. In case of the income tax at least.
Reminds me of https://height.app/. I highly recommend giving it a go.
FWIW, if HST is to be believed, I think McAfee and Acosta would have gotten along:

Oscar was not into serious street-fighting, but he was hell on wheels in a bar brawl. Any combination of a 250 lb Mexican and LSD-25 is a potentially terminal menace for anything it can reach – but when the alleged Mexican is in fact a profoundly angry Chicano lawyer with no fear at all of anything that walks on less than three legs and a de facto suicidal conviction that he will die at the age of 33 – just like Jesus Christ – you have a serious piece of work on your hands. Especially if the bastard is already 33½ years old with a head full of Sandoz acid, a loaded .357 Magnum in his belt, a hatchet-wielding Chicano bodyguard on his elbow at all times, and a disconcerting habit of projectile vomiting geysers of pure blood off the front porch every 30 or 40 minutes, or whenever his malignant ulcer can't handle any more raw tequila.

— Hunter S. Thompson
Well sure.

But do it for poor people first. There are a million people without millions suffering from similar treatment in the US.
It’s not a good question to ask.

One person’s formal thing is another person’s buzzword.

I would point to the word ‘Soliton’ in physics which is used for two different things.
Do you think that "labeling" black women as women is similarly lossy? Or female cancer survivors to pick another example
Never speak ill of the dead, unless it's the truth.. seems like a final, fatalist drama move. Always with the drama for attention: guns, police, random projects, extreme this or that, vaporware never delivered, moving around a lot like a psychopath.. while light on the getting anything real accomplished other than staying in the media. Sigh.
Will Bit Replace NPM?
Really sorry about the stress of raising a teenager!
> You can say you’re not debating their existence till they’re blue in the face, but I’m telling you that’s how it will feel to 9/10 trans people when you try to discuss this topic with them.

Indeed. Though I'm honestly not sure if it's "9/10 trans people" or just the gender ideology crowd. Regardless, having strong feelings doesn't win the debate. I can give platitudes all day about how sympathetic I am to people with gender dysmorphia or any other difficulties in life, but when it comes to debating issues, we need to be more dispassionate as my original point and the point of the Economist article is that these topics are nuanced and shutting down the conversation as "hate speech" is not productive at all.

> You can ignore their feelings but that’s the problem. You don’t care that it’s upsetting.

No, in my view, this type of comment is the problem. You're assuming I don't care at all just because I disagree. Please just take my comments at face value. I said in my original comment I have sympathy for trans people.

> To you it’s just some abstract intellectual thing to discuss but to them it could be a source of trauma and pain

Take the women in mixed martial arts. To them, it's a source of actual, physical pain.
This is the same "Well linux doesn't run my program" argument windows users make about switching to linux. The appeal isn't that it's a platform that I can twist into Android it's that it's Linux and it does things the right way.

Blackberry didn't have an amazing OS to hold it up. That's why it failed
We should make a conscious effort to avoid this thinking. It's way too common for people to dismiss a brilliant man because of a few bad deeds or events that happened surrounding him. Genius is rarely accompanied by butterflies and rainbows. If we expect everyone to be perfect, there will be no one left worth respecting.
Yes, there are many accessibility features. Turning off slow, excessive animations is a big first step.
Yeah I'm unfortunately well aware. Also, Bolzano-Verona is quite lacking! But the Berlin–Palermo railway axis is one of the "core" projects of the EU, so I hope it will improve in time
> Why? What specifically makes transrace/race-identity any less valid of a concept than transgender/gender-identity?

Because there aren’t any (or infinitesimally few) people who believe from a very young age that their “race identity” doesn’t match their genetically defined race. Gender dysphoria is rare but not infinitesimally so (~1% of the population), and it usually first emerges in childhood.

> If there is nothing physiological to make that determination I think 'hardwired' isn't the right term

Sorry, I was a bit sloppy with my language. I should have written “there is nothing grossly physiological that distinguishes heterosexual people from homosexual people.” Colloquially, we don’t generally consider neurology to be physiological, since we don’t yet have the technology to identify subtle differences in neural topology. Doesn’t mean that neurological phenomena aren’t hardwired, and thus “physiological” on a microscopic level we aren’t yet able to detect. As an extreme example, mental retardation is certainly hardwired, even though there’s often nothing grossly physiological (i.e. detectable physical brain abnormalities) that causes it.

I suspect that as science and medicine advance, we will identify the neural wiring patterns that determine one’s sexuality and gender identity (assuming we are allowed to study such things), at which point we can actually point to a definitively physiological determinant of both.
https://archive.is/jWVa9
That's like 300% sane!
I think your posts in this thread are downright admirable, and for that reason, in case you're not aware (and if you are, readers probably aren't)--it is probably worth noting that "intact" is common TERF watchwording, pushed and intended to normalize the position that trans women are not women.
wouldnt it be 15 years, as thats the maximum?
> I don’t care if McAffee owed some taxes - leave the guy alone, he's obviously unstable

This is ridiculous. Okay so let's leave all the rich people alone who claim they are unstable. McAfee made millions, from what I understand, he paid little taxes on that. That's stupid. I don't care how unstable you are, or how good you are donating your "fair share". You're still not excused from paying your taxes.
Let’s be extra clear: what exactly is your argument?
> That would have been a very long con since he has been tweeting things like this since 2019.

He started doing that not long after (or maybe concurrently with) announcing he was on the run from the USG in relation to the specific charges that he was ordered to be extradited to immediately before actually committing suicide.
John McAfee dead of apparent suicide
Still that’s quite petty motivation for such a long con.
In a thread related to women thinking they're men and men thinking they're women
I strongly suspect that you'd discover that your data forms two major clusters.
> My bosses at work are all old folks

Ageism isn't cool, bud.
Proprietary platform, quite an easy pass.
Ferrari Is Racing into Fashion
Aside from the generic documentation on Flathub I am not aware of any. That said, on recent Manjaro Plasma Mobile Betas it was simply enabled by default.
Why person needs to go through the hassles and expenses to file tax return every year to the country where he/she doesn't not live in any longer?

What kind of state sponsored racket is this?
No, left people in my home country do it all the time.

In general they are "militants" of the Peronist party.

There are videos and books for kids that shows Peron, Evita, and more recently our current Vice President as heroes and such.

https://i.imgur.com/zgVUcjS.jpg
There it literally says: Peron is the leader, everybody loves Peron, everybody sings long live Peron!, long live the leader! hurrah!

https://i.imgur.com/gkqespa.jpg
This one is about Evita, Peron's wife: Evita loves the kids. The boys and girls love Eva. Long live Evita! Hurrah! Hurrah!

This two are pages of books for kids of elementary school from 60 something years ago.

However, you can still see in school:

https://i.imgur.com/MJuFrQx.jpg
This one shows Cristina Kirchner, our current VP, in a book that tries to "leftiside" the kids.

https://i.imgur.com/YIgEDja.jpg
that is the results, kids with the "La Campora" a militant group from peronism.

https://i.imgur.com/Ei2VWG0.jpg
And there again.

It is what has brought Argentina to is knees.
That's a pretty good example, because it illustrates a disconnect between how people expect IRV/RCV to work and how it actually works.

Biden would be eliminated first, because he had the fewest 1st choice votes in the first round.

The Dave Chappelle voters' 2nd choices for Biden don't matter: they're thrown out because Biden was eliminated.

So, it comes down to Chappelle with 40% and Trump with 45%. If none of the Biden voters listed Chappelle as their second choice, then Trump wins. If enough voters had Chappelle as their second choice, then Chappelle wins.

The lesson from this example is: it's quite possible that your second choices don't matter, because they're eliminated too early. We could come up with other examples that show that it isn't always safe to put your first choice first, either. IRV/RCV is non-monotonic, which means in some cases you can cause a candidate to lose by ranking them higher.
To be fair, you can't really do that because then that lowly waitress who owes, say, 3 grand because her manager reported her tips will say, "Why do rich people get off?"

And she'd be right.

If you go after anyone, you have to go after everyone in my view. If anything, you should go soft on the low income people rather than the wealthy. But on the federal level, going soft on a famous and wealthy person when you have the exact same evidence is just not something you can do in a rule of law society. Particularly in today's environment. You can do that on a state and local level, but on a federal level the IRS, FBI and the prosecutors would be crucified.
John McAfee dead in Spanish prison
Well, until these are actually adopted by a car company and out on the road, any claims about performance are meaningless. Your original comment implied Tesla chose to use inferior tech compare to the market which is not true in the slightest.
I paid little attention to what site that was on, just looked for the content.

But it links to http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0250-insurers/0300-insurers/0200... which is the actual decision posted on an official California government website. It confirms what I said.
You are not free to convert money you need to live into stocks.
I don't think that this alone can explain the difference we're seeing, but one thing that comes to my mind is the power consumption of the WiFi module. If you're in position to be able to use 2.4GHz networks instead of 5GHz ones, that should bring power consumption down a bit. One more thing to try may also be WiFi power saving - it's not enabled by default yet since our testing has shown that it can cause troubles and significantly limit the bandwidth with some access points, but you may want to try checking if you're lucky enough to be able to use it already: `sudo iw dev wlan0 set power_save on`
Resorts World Hotel ditches in-room dining for Grubhub
Seems reasonable tbh. even through it might "hit" some hidden and mostly forgotten gems.
Mastectomies are performed for non-gender-related reasons, such as prophylactic mastectomies, so it's arguable whether that falls under the definition of SRS/GRS. For any reason, it is exceedingly, vanishingly rare in children.

It seems like an oddly small number to obsess over, especially considering over 8,000 non-trans teenagers between 13 and 19 receive breast augmentations each year.

From your link:

| the mean (SD) age was 19 (2.5) years for postsurgical participants and 17 (2.5) years for nonsurgical participants

Surgical patients would be the ones who are in the most danger of suicide or self-harm or for whom nonsurgical (hormone) treatment is not an option.

Also,

| Self-reported regret was near 0.

Here is the document that the report refers to as the standard for care for transgender patients:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/amo_hub_content/Association140/file...

You'll want to look at Section VI: . Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria.
This is true. But he did also do a lot of drugs and he was also weird. See Fear And Loathing in Las Vegas for examples where he was portrayed as Dr. Gonzo.
Not to mention South Africa as well
The conclusion is that there might be a correlation between a country's culture, largely shaped by its majority religion, to its GDP over time. It is too complex to explain so the article is just an inquiry into an overlooked factor, often ignored by economists.
If the car can function without its screen, and can even be managed with a phone app, might it be possible to create a more-functional, more-traditional control panel as an aftermarket modification? Tesla's all-screen approach is exactly the opposite of the driving experience I want.
There was some prior discussion on this submission from yesterday, though it fell just short of the front page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27598222

The source paper (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.18.449051v1) or Twitter thread (https://twitter.com/jbloom_lab/status/1407445604029009923) are probably better sources than the New York Times article based on them.
You're absolutely right about this. Future-supervillain children framing others for their crimes must never be discounted when attempting to explain any phenomenon. That's just basic household safety. :-)
Teenager brains have a outstanding circuitry designed at discovering what infuriates their parents (and the generation of their parents) and just hammer on it, whatever that thing is.
"The average URL" and "what is allowed by the URL specifications" are two very different things. (And the same could be said about your command line example)
It seems quite unusual to be double taxed according to what I could understand from the relevant laws. The first X amount of earned income is exempt as you noted. The amount above that, if a tax treaty is in place with the other country of taxation (i.e. your country of residence), is generally subject to the rule of paying the difference, although the details on this may vary by individual country and tax treaty.
Google famously only hired people with elite education credentials in the beginning.

"We also didn't want to hire anyone from what were considered lesser universities" Eric Schmidt
https://youtu.be/hcRxFRgNpns?t=1756
My <2 year old can already convincingly fake an accident if he believes that doing so will lead to tasty food.

I can imagine thousands of reasons why teenagers would lie, and maybe they'll come up with new pronouns just to annoy you. Because that's what kids do, they constantly test the limits of acceptable behavior and the limits of your patience.

That said, I agree with you that people can choose what gender they feel like and others should accept it as an opinion. But trying to force others to change their behavior to accommodate your opinion very quickly becomes unreasonable.

So gender is fine, but pronouns are already a slippery slope.

Do you believe a horny teenage guy would be willing to lie and say he identifies as female, if that means he gets to see all of his female classmates naked?

It's a tradeoff between people living out their believes and the inconvenience that this causes for others.
The opt-out process only takes 30 seconds.
They probably mean whether you encountered one by accident.
Not all states have income taxes.

State income taxes are usually pretty low.

Texas and Florida don't have an income tax.

Georgia ranges from 1% to 5.5%.

California goes all the way up to 13%.
I live in a median income neighborhood that is next to a low income neighborhood. The school is funded just fine, and we passed a local bond measure to ensure the school could build and grow. The student population is pretty mixed. The only thing holding this school back is the people that run it. I moved my kids to private school so they could actually get an education instead of just a babysitter.
> Personally I think the Condorcet methods are not that difficult to explain.

To the voter, no. It is just a ranked choice/ordinal system (which is why people get mad at IRV being called RCV). Just rank your candidates in order of preference. People naturally understand this, yes. BUT that's not what people typically mean when they says the system is hard to understand. What matters is transparency and how easy it is to tabulate the votes. Actually this is where all ordinal systems fall in comparison to cardinal systems. In cardinal systems just just sum some columns (in STAR you have to do this twice). But in ordinal systems you have to do many rounds of counting and eliminations. Look at the current NYC mayoral race. We have only one round counted and they have like 10 more days before round 2 (which is funny because IRV results typically follow the first round results, we expect Adams to win). So look into tabulating Schulze or Ranked Pairs. Condorcet methods require you to run n^2 election because you have to run every pair. Now consider contested elections like what is going on in Arizona. The more complex of a counting system is the more either end can be abused (the original vote or the verification). If it is sufficiently complex a group will easily be able to justify foul play regardless of actual proof because the evidence against the claim is nuanced.

So yes, it isn't hard to explain to voters, but it is difficult to explain how you count the votes. But VSE is only one metric. Like you pointed out max(STAR) is only slightly less than max(condorcet) but min(STAR) has a decent gap over min(condorcet), which also matters. The smaller range on STAR suggests it is more resilient to strategic voting (or voter manipulation). But cardinal systems are not only easy to explain to voters but it is also easy to explain how votes are counted. I should also note that Approval/Score/STAR are monotonic and will not spoil elections (IRV increases spoilage where cardinals decrease). I'll also suggest that if you're a data person you should be in favor of Score and STAR because they are more expressive than any ordinal system because the distance between your preferences isn't constant and thus we can get more fine grained data on voter preference.

If we only look at the VSE metric, condorcet wins, but what makes voting complicated is that this isn't the only metric.
I don't think "trans women are women" is a literal statement - I think it means "we should give trans women the rights and protections afforded to women"; it's an expression of support.

Kinda like "Black Lives Matter" - obviously they do, but the fact that you have to say it out loud and directly highlights the disparity and systemic injustices faced by people of color.

At least, that's what I think those things mean, someone with a more sophisticated understanding will probably correct me if I'm wrong.
| The WPATH standards of care also state, however, that male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male
patients “could be carried out earlier” than the age of majority in certain cases, and ultimately should be considered on a case-by-case basis “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.”

What do you think that specific clinical situation was in those situations?
I would say it's the lack of SJ with a bean counter in-charge are leading to slacking .

Product coolness, usability, reliability, value, and customer service have all fallen off a cliff in the search for more money.
Hold on. I talk like this and I'm a free man with a good job, good friends, and a good life. Sure, it becomes even more apparent when you are in a cage. But it's true, everyone really is in a cage of their own making. Even worse, being in a cage of someone else's making.
In the United States continuous revolution is referred to as 'property tax'.

The historical pattern is that advocates for the rich will try to undermine assessments to fall more heavily on buildings in poor neighborhoods and replace property tax revenues with sales tax, and that advocates for the poor will try to reform assessments to fall more heavily on land in rich neighborhoods and decrease sales tax.

'Land reform' in the sense of trying to equally divide low value rural land by area without appointing assessors to appraise taxable value of urban property is viewed as a bizarre and impractical European idea.
I'd argue that making those millions turned his life upside down, made his life drown in hedonism, eventually taking his mind and any shred of dignity. Still, RIP John
Humans are extinct, we just don’t realize it yet.
> The mRNA vaccines have not had the same level of scrutiny and transparency despite comparable levels of adverse event reporting.

Could you give some sources for that?
I created an HN poll asking the community their thoughts.