skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure, there’s nothing for one less space either, or anything close.

> or the DoD may have listed the parent (holding) company

Like which one? I think it’s the reporter’s job to find out. Posting a link implying something’s there when there’s actually nothing is garbage reporting at best and malicious at worst.

Here's a more likely explanation though. The "security researcher" quoted saw AS56041 China Mobile communications corporation in WHOIS, which is actually listed by DoD, rather than the aforementioned company. However, that's just the backbone provider; attributing based on that is kind of like attributing a U.S. C2 server to Hurricane Electric. The "security researcher" should probably stay away from the attribution game if they can't recognize backbone providers.
I don't understand exactly what the writer is complaining about. The thesis of the page is never explicitly stated.

I see a complaint, "Hmmm. It didn't have the share destination that I wanted" yet the author never states what option they were looking for.

I would agree that, via the screenshot, the default options are all over the place and not prioritized well. However, the "Copy link" option is clearly visible. Being a website, I'm fundamentally unclear about what share option the writer could want beyond the ability to copy the url.
The real-life plan to use novels to predict the next war
I've always seen apology as insincere, especially if it's not admission of guilt. If I did something by mistake, sorry, is fast and cheap. Otherwise, why would someone say sorry for malicious behaviour? Only bad people say they're sorry for ill intents, and it's insincere.

Someone naive caught up in such mess is going to have a hard time, but you need to stand up for your own in this world. Don't assume good intentions, but also look past bad facades.
I would love to. The most cumbersome thing about notebooks, even larger ones like A3, is 1) they dont lie flat, and 2) even if (eg. rings) when I want to write on the left page, my hand hits the "spine" between the pages and its not comfortable writing.

When I used paper I got used to have a stack of A4, put a title in one corner, I?d keep them on my left beside the keyboard. There are nice a4 in 4 light pastel colors, easier on the eyes than white, and simple memory cue when looking in the pile.

I’d have cheatsheets and tasks, the task/feature pages with lots of check boxes. I’d keep some cheatsheets for a long time, like css/typescript, and the task ones i would throw away when that feature is done.
no business is under any obligation to provide you access to their data and services for you to build a business on top of.

If you feel that the owner of data or services maintains an illegal monopoly over that data, work to lobby government to resolve that issue.

It's not your individual place to unilaterally decide that a business owes you anything other than what is described in their terms and conditions of use. Period.
Homes can be purchased in other parts of the country for less than $57K.
Thanks for checking it out! To be clear, there's nothing for sale here. It's MIT licensed, anybody can de-brand it and use it as they want- the main draw for me is that some day I want to be able to have these features available to me, however it happens, and by any name.

If the spec evolves into being a not-spec, I'm fine with that too, I'm just a diehard podcast person who wants the experience to be a little bit better, and the purpose of the spec was to illustrate one way that could take form.

Thanks again for checking it out and taking time to comment.
We Hide Behind Our Stories
This doesn't seem to be specifically for running video games.
In that scenario, at least there would be some US citizens to put into prison.
> Don't we take things a bit too serious these days?

I agree that this self righteous fake outrage targeted at those who point out bullying and abuse gets a bit too tiring, and adds nothing to the discussion.

This is a very good example. Calling out the lack of rational arguments or any reasoning regarding a technical subject, and resorting to abuse to fill the void with ad hominem and bullying, is expected to be addressed with explanations on the technical merits of the original proposals.

But no, here we are wasting time with chatter that boils down to "why aren't you ok with being subjected to abuse? Don't we need to roll over and shut up when someone throws ad hominems?"

I guess we don't? But it seems that some people whine when they can't take what they are dishing out.
what kind of language are u using, using a statically typed functional language most removal of code is self obvious and even automated. u remove a method, it tells u to remove this and this too.
really? how do you know? and which "chats" ?
I can't see a real alternative to this (well at least knowing that S.F. is a liberal city, for conservative one, alternative is obvious). If they are given apartments instead, they will trash them. These people are bums after all.
The main thread already does that. The thread stack does not. It probably made sense on 32b with relatively limited address space... But I'm curious why we're not applying that to all threads on 64b. Reserving a few 10MB of address space per thread shouldn't be a big issue, right? (Without actually mapping those pages)
> How practical such a type system would be... I don't know. Flow type checker for JavaScript makes a distinction between "exact" types, i.e. object must have exactly the properties listed and no more, and "inexact" types where such subtyping is allowed.

TypeScript doesn't have this check (https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/12936) and I've found it can be really error prone when you're wanting to return a copy of an object with some fields updated. Spot the bug in this example: https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/C4TwDgpgBAKlC8UDeU...
> And company doesn't pay for anything depreciating at my house except laptop

I can only see incremental wear and tear on, say, furniture mattering if you are jumping on the couch while you code. Maybe a 33% wear on your kitchen from eating lunch at home too. The house falls down from the weather at the same rate if you are there or not.

What is depreciating about your house from WFH at an marginal and alarming speed?
"Rather there will be patches of interest that you hook on, like a mountain climber and handholds."

Really great way of describing it
I'm not sure I've heard sanctions on enemy states described as "cancel culture" before, nor am I sure it applies
Why monads and not something else? Because monads appear to be a/the mathematical structure underlying the denotation of programs with effects.

Why that type signature? You only have two options: that, or m (m a) -> m a. The former is more popular for ergonomic reasons mostly. It doesn’t really matter.
With mass adoption of TPMs maybe there will be a serious effort to finally move away from text passwords?
> In general, it is my opinion that if your program is crashing on Alpine, it is because your program is dependent on behavior that is not guaranteed to actually exist, which means your program is not actually portable. When it comes to this kind of dependency, the typical issue has to deal with the thread stack size limit.

The wording sounds as if it is trying to assign blame for the problem. What, then, is the guaranteed thread stack size? A developer would obviously need to know this (and other things such as the amount of stack size required by variables, parameters and frames) to not fall into this trap of writing non-portable programs.
First of all, I am arguing for the base case: absent any studies, the null hypothesis is naturally that there are no major differences between programming paradigms.

On the issue of bug counts, there was one huge study, that was successfully reproduced [0], which finds that there is a real but small negative correlation between FP and bug counts in large GitHub projects.

For productivity I haven't been able to find any large-scale studies that compare functional vs imperative/OOP languages. I did find one small scale study [1] that found significantly better productivity for Haskell (and a Lisp dialect) vs Ada, C++ and a few others, but it was about a specific small prototype problem with just a handful of programmers participating (the Haskell program had 85 lines, the worse, C++, had 1105; and programs took between 10h and 54h to finish - hardly representative of large-scale coding). Most other studies on productivity that I could find [2], [3] didn't include any FP languages at all.

[0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.10220.pdf

[1] https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.36...

[2] https://www.e-informatyka.pl/attach/e-Informatica_-_Volume_1...

[3] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4261726_Do_Programm...
Lol. We are so fucked.
Context is important. Imagine someone randomly starts talking to the one black man sitting in an Omaha airport about violent crime
The actual share destination isn’t the point, it’s how it’s not obvious how to get to more destinations than are initially visible.
> Facts arrive at random times and then are entered on a schedule. Corrections await on someone to resolve analytical issues. Different accounting units have different timelines, and in a unit there is many threads of an unordered fact flow. It is all synced together only at specific points, usually when it’s time to report officially or internally. If you ask your accountant and the only thing they drop is “busy”, it’s one of these weeks of the year.

I fail to see how any of this implies the data is mutable.
These 'enemies' are fellow humans too right?
For more of these daily annoyances: https://grumpy.website

The growing user hostility of UIs makes me want to stop developing software and even stop using computers. I started using computers because they made more sense to me than a lot of things. Now, I'm encountering these little moments of illogic and unreason every hour of the day.

It's not just beginners who need little cues. I'm deeply familiar with the APIs behind many of these monstrosities and yet I still find myself annoyed or momentarily confused by UIs that minimize, obscure, and hide in the name of Design.
The only way I have ever heard of people doing this successfully is to kinda cheat. Get a co-founder who has strong marketing skills and just as much ownership as you.

It's not technically outsourcing, but it does remove the task from you directly, and gives it to someone far better suited for it, with properly-aligned incentives.

Plus, would you rather have 50% of something, or 0% of nothing?
Same - I don't see that post as being anti-Jewish in the slightest.
"Time series database" and "log-structured storage" might be two keywords for starting points.
The entire body of category theory is where all of this stuff comes from originally, not Haskell.

> tries to explain them in terms of english, math

There are a million English-language blog posts, and it’s a mathematical concept. Just look up “monads are monoids in the category of endofunctors” if you want more of that…
The questions give a frame to the meeting but usually the important part is what is finished, who waits on what and who stuck on something. I know a few senior dev whom if I would lead daily standups would be unnecessary but that is called a dream team. Reality is littered with juniors, subpar programmers and devs only interested in tech not in business.
I went to the “debate” about Program Verif and the Lipton-Demillo-Perlis paper
How do we know for certain that TPM chips do not have any lawful intercept code that permit an entity to bypass disk encryption and possibly even authentication should MS decide to tie authentication caching to TPM?
Linear types let you safely do effect sequencing/mutation without monads, but I don’t think it extends much beyond that.
Tesla recalls more than 285,000 vehicles in China
The monads video by "Fun Fun Function" finally explained functors and monads for me in an understandable way.
My mother is Israeli. I’m an atheist in New York pissed off at how many of “my people” live off the welfare while the rest of us bust asses to put a roof over our head.

The haredim live fat off of our taxes and put targets on our backs. They literally have jack booted thugs, “private security” walking around new york keeping non-haredim out of their enclaves.

Wherever you are, if an orthodox jew has a dollar or a scheckel to spend, 9/10 times it came from public assistance. These “kosher” phones designed to help haredim hide from the outside world are paid for by your tax dollars.
I'm still using the iPhone 6s that I bought in 2015, and it's practically as good as new. It's still using the original battery, which doesn't seem to hold charge for as long anymore, but even so, it's doing remarkably well.
It's always worth rereading business cases for old software to see if the picture in the business case holds up to reality.

It's difficult to convey the idea of "don't solve problems dissolve them" when features always seem like the right answer.
How many domesticated animals enjoy being intoxicated? Few, in my experience, and I think wild animals would appreciate most forms of it even less.

I had a dog whom you could not leave an open beer near; she was a nasty drunk tho so it was worth the effort to keep her dry. She also liked one tiny sniff of cannabis, if someone lit some near her, but not enough to make her less attentive; she'd stay upwind after that first sniff.
Hi. I'm actually the creator of Gloss3D. It is true it started as a way to learn how to build a 3D modelling tool, but the ultimate goal was also to provide a full software package (modelling/animation/rendering) with its own community of users.In short, an easy alternative to Blender. I'm working alone on this project, so that's a loooong process. Feel free to join the team however :).
Probably because reflection & compilation+activation of types existing outside the original compilation context is possible at runtime.

I much prefer to having a language/runtime that can handle extremely complex problem scenarios out of the box (with the need for occasional tuning), rather than the other way around. It is not very often that I find myself screwing around with performance-intensive code. Usually, a few very important things are addressed at the lowest levels and then you put all your nice abstractions back on top for daily driving.
How can you write a program that runs without at least some guaranteed stack size? Are you at fault if you program doesn't run in a 1kb stack? And how do you work out what stack size your program takes from looking at the source code?

I guess make sure your required stack size is not a function of input, and test against a minimum stack size.
Your argument seems entirely contradictory. If you agree on the slippery slope, blocking at the DNS level is a perfect example of it.
Better than marketing? Sales.

Much more at small things.

I have a partnership with a friend, it take care of sale stuff. The deal is simply: I get X and he can sell more than it as he please.

A good salesman will instantly see how much nice the deal is! (btw: I know all his deals and customers: I host them. We were before partners in our first and failed startup and split to make things leaner and flexible - not more cost for office and all that-, and have worked for us)

Other very simply, is get % off the sale. Most I know work like that, and prefer it to a salary.
I use a iPhone 5s. Works fine and I have no reason to upgrade at all. I think I have it for like five years now. I did get the battery replaced last year though
There are a range of programs that grant apartments, many of them linked to work obligations. Some of them do get trashed while others are appreciated. The homeless are a complex and diverse group including many with serious problems and others who simply slid into destitution. The current crop of homeless are remarkably old and sick relative to what has been seen in the past.
The second, not unlikely at all.

The first doesn't look like an insect to me even after being primed by your comment prior to watching it.
Is it a romantic brain or highly rational?

Secular society is battling many problems (tech addiction, isolation, burnout, collapse of community etc) which religious society is protected from because of these superficially backwards practices.

As we watch our society grapple with issues that the religious community doesn't suffer from, won't at some point it make sense to question whether we are the rational ones?

To make this point another way, the more people on HN learn about the issues of tech addiction, lack of privacy etc, the more their technological preference "converges" to what you are currently making fun of.
Both of these incidents were during last 3 years. Last one was less than 6 months ago.

I am currently back on ubuntu 20.04 and haven't had any issues
Literally no part of this comment is true. They’re not hidden and they’re not malicious.

They’re also very much required, because a user mode anti-cheat is trivially circumvented by a kernel mode cheat. The only way to defeat cheats is to wage continuous war with them, adapting to their tactics and stamping them out. It’s like collecting trash; trash will keep accumulating, your goal is to keep homes and streets clean in spite of that.
It is easy for a single threaded program, but since each thread has it's own part of the stack, it would be non-trivial for a multithreaded program.
luminati runs on holavpn which installs backdoor proxies on people's machines. that "user consent" is not actually known to the users but is buried in some terms & conditions when they're naively installing the "free VPN" software.
Not sure I agree with the Marketplace angle. Ads are fine but forcing everyone into the app is odd. Will ios14 change any of that?
If a transparently run Tether competitor has such clear value why do I never hear of competitors?
Is it actually common to have distro-specific issues like that? I'm skeptical. There are people playing CS:GO with Arch + i3wm just fine. I would think just having the right versions of things packaged is enough, and maybe that distros with fresher packages will be better off.

Alternatively, if more games were free (as in freedom) software, a large community could better sort out some of these issues.
They might buy a Mac, though. As far as evil software megacorps go, I kind of prefer people using Apple products to using MS products.
Artificial Intelligence Act (EU)
Why must every app monetize through ads? Why can't they provide features worth paying for?
Panda Wish launches an equity crowdfunding campaign on Miventure
Panda Wish, the Uber like app for massage and beauty services launches an equity crowdfunding campaign on Miventure after the completion of a successful pilot to take a shot on $100 billion market share.

For more information : https://www.panda-wish.com/invest
> And don't kid yourself, any given city where a marketer makes $50k, even before commissions, will not be seeing plumbers make $90k.

Well... about that... Case in point: Indianapolis, In. Average marketing job pay: $55k. Average Plumber $78K (as of 2020). Ok, it's not $90K, but that is the average. It's similar in other cities.
The structures in biological samples are often very delicate, their structures ruined by all of those treatments: think soap bubbles rather than bones.

It doesn't matter how small the structures you can observe are if you can't be sure they haven't been warped and distorted by dehydration, doping with heavy metals like osmium, exposure to vacuum, and being blasted with radiation until it's heated to 150 degrees celsius.

Don't get me wrong: electron microscopy is great for mineral samples, and can be used for biological samples subject to some constraints. But you can't examine specimens with it while they're alive.
Its not that they want but politics might drive them toward this way.

I'm pretty sure a lot of Chinese big tech are willing to invest in semi conductor designs to keep more of the profit internally then send it to the US and prevent risk in their supply chains. You also see more and more Chinese big tech companies branch out of China so its not certain that windows and android can easily keep their monopoly.
Deep learning methods university course, along with several online tutorials and examples for using ray tune with pytorch.
This. Why? Yeah HN isn't a gamedev community, but still Chris Avellone is certainly one of TOP100 well known people in game development and he deserve to get his position heard.
Age-old case of dick hooks up with friend, ends up hurting feelings, so socially oust dick to stand up for friend and bad original advice.

Lots of unprocessed emotions and clearly different intents going into relationship.

Seems companies deserve no loyalty and professionalism if they can't muster any themselves.

Just a guess though.
The presentation of this article is really nice. I’ve only seen it on mobile. It feels like a reading experience. There was one weird thing with a paragraph’s font that was suddenly bolded. It had a link in white without text decorations, but also bolded. The green text and white link started giving me the effect of flashing.

Anyways, I think this site shows that even text-heavy content can be presented online in a visually pleasing way.
In Israel these phones are referred to as "פלאפון כשר" [1] which most definitely means Kosher Phone, so the name is apt despite the lack of religious rigor. It's definitely aimed at the ultra-orthodox communities.

[1] Pashkevil from an ultra-orthodox community warning people off the internet and not to use non-kosher phones: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%A8...
You completely missed my purpose. The OP was claiming that Haskell is superior to some other programming languages because it "embraces computer science". I was pointing out that computer science is larger than PLL, and that much of computer science (algorithms research being a very productive field within CS) is not in fact using FP or PLL concepts to a large extent.

Basically, I am only trying to dismiss the idea that Haskell is somehow closer to CS or more scientifically correct than other programming languages; instead, it is as related to CS as other languages are, just choosing to focus on a different area than many others.

I also want to dismiss the idea that CS == FP, that imperative style reasoning is just some second-tier style not used in rigorous circles - much of the forefront of CS is indeed using imperative style constructs more than FP ones.
Anyone know if the performance is good enough to bring it into scope of arms control laws?

As I understand it if you make (very) high performance night vision you may not be able to sell it to civilians under current regulations.
This is part of the agreement for using Arch, it's not a system you can ignore, you must actually pay attention to these news items. The upgrade tool I use actually shows new news to you front and center when performing an upgrade so you're blatantly aware that you have to follow instructions. Those are not "problems", they are "following instructions to keep up with changes." If you wand a distro to just ignore and hope it all goes well, Arch is not for you. Never was.
I have wondered about this too. They say it is green, but for that to be true due to renewables being intermittent shouldn't there be at least sometimes when there just isn't enough green energy? And thus shouldn't they close or stop getting delivery of energy at these times?

Also, how green are their backup power generation? Outside batteries?