skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Right but if you say the french equivalent of "you fucking n-word" to your teacher, nothing happens

No, that's exactly the opposite of what I said. In the US you have to circumlocute your way around saying the word in all circumstances, even when it's not used in a derogatory / insulting way (such as referentially, or even because it sounds that way, see "niggardly" and "nega nega" incidents.) Insulting someone is insulting someone. Saying "go get sexually penetrated you inferior race person" is offensive whether you use a taboo word or not.
Citations[1] Needed[2] Please[3].

1-https://users.nber.org/~denardim/research/Wealthsurvey.pdf
- 2https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68507/13/Karagiannaki_Effect%20of%...
3-https://ifs.org.uk/publications/14954
"People routinely attack this group, QED we should ban this group" is odd logic. Lumber workers have the highest fatality rate of any profession in the US, at 1-in-1,000, should we also ban them? When queer people get attacked by homophobes, should we ban them from being queer?

Why is prostitution a different situation than those?

And how much of the violence against them is because they've been ostracized and routinely lack legal protections?

Is it really better for society that people who do prostitution to avoid starving to death... instead starve to death?

If you really believe people only do sex work because they lack the tools for something else, why not give them those tools instead of removing what little they already have? If your theory is correct, no one will decline these better tools; and anyone who does decline is reasonable evidence that your theory was wrong and sex work isn't actually intrinsically harmful.

Certainly, there are nations that legalize prostitution without falling in to anarchy and violence, and I don't just mean the Swedish model.
Same here. mSBC coded that started working for me around Fedora 33/pipewire 3.2x is a night/day change for me. I can use my Jabra bluetooth headset with high quality audio instead of really crappy sound. I think neither Windows nor OSX can do that with regular bluetooth adapter built in laptops.
Should make one that looks like a Zune!!
> Maple confirmation message for Clevercrossing

I think this one actually says “Mobile confirmation message for Global Crossing”. It’s a slightly nasal Brit accent so I can see why it might have been a bit harder to decipher.
I guess the real problem is court cases can ruin people financially, even if they win. Ideas like this are nice, but the real solution would be to make it difficult for these trolls to go to court in the first place
>> makes you pay tax even if you are tax resident of different country

It's not that someone is tax resident of different country.

The disgusting part of this IRS racket is that US forces people to pay taxes to US even if they no longer live there. Eritrea is the only another one like US in this aspect.
I appreciate your perspective. I agree with a lot, including that trans people are legitimately marginalized in our society in some measure (certainly the extent to which authorities fail to investigate murders of trans victims is abhorrent).

> The answer is not for the marginalized people and the dominant group to debate directly.

To be clear, this isn't "trans people" vs "non-trans people". There are lots of trans people who don't think it's appropriate to change our bathroom policies and non-trans people who think we should change those policies. The parties to the debate are different ideologies, not different trans/non-trans identities.

With respect to your steps vs debate, I think your steps describe a national debate, except for the earlier caveat that the debate isn't "trans vs non-trans" but rather different ideological positions and also that at any given moment different individuals in the debate (on any side) are at different "steps" in the process, and also that individuals on all sides vary in their willingness to listen or participate in good faith.

So basically a debate is a mess because people aren't uniformly acting in good faith nor are they uniformly disciplined about listening before speaking nor are they acting in synchrony (everyone within a group meets to listen to an ambassador for the other group, and then carefully considers together, and so on). However, over the course of months or years, things do tend to converge in a direction that most people feel pretty good about. That's what progress looks like.

> At no point in that course of action do random members of the dominant group need to discuss these changes with members of the marginalized group. As a white person I simply do not challenge what people of color say. There is no need for me to challenge them and I recognize that as a member of the dominant group it could be emotionally distressful for them to have to discuss it with me.

With respect, I disagree in the strongest possible terms here. No doubt you mean well, but black people and white people are equal, and race doesn't confer anyone with either authority or fragility with respect to having their positions criticized. If any given black person or white person feels triggered (in the clinical, not pejorative, sense), they are certainly not obligated to engage with the criticism, but to assume that someone is fragile on the basis of their race is the height of racism (however well intended).
Pinker's mistake wasn't about 'the justice system' - it was disagreeing with BLM populist orthodoxy.

It's revolutionary 'Reign of Terror' stuff around ostracizing the impure (i.e. Trumpers destroying Romneys, Rubios), not academic disagreement.
I agree to a certain extent, but ... if the allegations are true, he murdered his neighbour, raped at least 1 woman, hired a small private army, and was possibly running drugs. For me, that dominates my picture of him, building an anti-virus company seems like a small detail in comparison.

We’ll never know for sure which of the allegations are true, but from what I’ve read/watched, my personal opinion is most seem pretty credible. If they are, I’d find it in poor taste to celebrate much about the man, given how much pain and suffering he’s likely caused.
OK, but Elixir is TOOP (True OOP), not FP
Descendants of Europeans. It's not ambiguous.
Ask HN: Does the name Transpiler exists in Computer Science literature
I always hear people saying some project is a transpiler. Although, does formal Computer Science books about compilers calls a source-to-source compiler a transpiler? Is it a formal thing or just a buzzword. Honest question, not vilifying the term.
It's certainly consistent. Worldview happens as a result of experiences - if ones biological sex and/or gender is used as a reason to allow or deny certain experiences to someone, then maybe it affects their worldview, no?

This is different than whether the gating on biological sex makes sense.

(Note I don't mean strictly mechanical stuff like peeing your name into the snow, I'm talking about things like teachers "not wasting time on helping girls understand math"[1] - because I suspect that teachers not helping girls with math is probably more causal to fewer women in math than their vaginas.

[1] I've personally heard math teachers say this, and heard stories of others saying it too.)
I think in terms of scrolling through the big lists, the wheel was a far superior scrolling device than touch scroll is.
Why? Just take the gold and run. Bank robbery was a thing, and it's much easier to rob your own bank.
What subjective probability is at play? None of us were there, or even in court. Maybe something very traumatic to Mr. McAfee happened that day. Would that inform some of his later recklessness?
Don't get it twisted. By all means DO stuff.

It's not going to wind up making you rich unless your family was rich, and if you're not rich, you're not going to be able to buy your way into mainstream attention, either.

Go ahead and DO stuff.

If you're the kind of person where it doesn't matter unless you can 'scale' and get real competitive with all the other heavy hitters, I guess don't bother?

I would humbly suggest that the best recipe for making it big is having the resources to support your attempt, AND doing something that you would still care about if you were just small time. Just saying.
They do make the case for walled gardens as a feature, but that doesn't mean they solely should have that responsibility. They are basically saying that the market can't be trusted.
This is in Argentina.

MY MISTAKE: apparently the law does allow a doctor to say no for his believes. I cannot edit the previous post.

Again, so this people today say that you have to say "les", what prevents me from saying I am not filling included, I want everybody to start saying "lus" or "chimichangas" for that matter? The problem for me is that they force you to behave however they want you to behave.
It isn't, by itself, conclusive at all, but the amount of smoke China generates around this whole thing, vs transparency, screams that there is fire in the middle of the smoke.
Wow, Ferrer was brilliant. He made friends with the devil, and kept the devil looking elsewhere. One suspects this was also thanks to the fact that Costa Rica had no oil or fruit plantations...

With respect to the coup mentioned upthread, it's notable that Ferrer instituted largely the same reforms proposed by Calderón and previously instituted in USA by FDR. That took courage.
Not that I’m a fan, but Malcolm Gladwell wrote a whole book (Outliers) about how this is not true.
Tax evasion (IRS) is much more serious than a securities crime (SEC). Also, he did go to jail for some time.
The US loves it jails and they love making examples out of people unless of course you're a corporation or a politician. Then you're allowed to evade taxes, insider trading, and anything else that is considered a death sentence for everyone else.
If you don't believe me, just come up with a few measures and see if there is actually any improvement by the time he leaves office. How about fire safety, water management, education, and healthcare?

I hypothesize that there will be a lot of money spent and distributed with little to no actual improvement.
| grounded in facts and Biblical truth

You're going to have to come up with a better source.
big F for my man john mcafee. epsteined in his prime. he will be missed.
Oil heating's days are essentially over.

Still lots of natural gas heating though.

There is a lot of room for greening at the point of service through geothermal and the like, lots of room for efficiency improvements too. The economic incentives are aligned as well, every ounce of savings in-province means export dollars in on green energy exports.
My understanding was the IRS will give you a chance to pay back your taxes with penalties, and they only criminally charge people as a last resort. Is that not the case? Or perhaps only for people who aren't being egregious with their evasion.
All failed IP suits should have to pay attorney's fees for the defendants and invalidate the IP that was claimed to be infringed.
Thank you so much for the kind words. We took huge technical risks and got really lucky.
Rhetorically, why kill the golden goose?
"typically" is bearing a lot of load there, and GRS is a broad term.

Double mastectomy is practiced, at least:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abst...
It’s 5 years. The 10 years are an amendment in cases of organized crime or public servants misusing their power. This exception exists to lock up criminals if no other charges can be proven. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ao_1977/__370.html
Games are kinda, but in terms of development it's definitely bound by creativity and art.
Slightly off topic, but where can I get some popcorn?
Submitting to F-Droid Quick Start Guide
Nah... That's not what happened. Please read Sebastián Ramírez's post on the issue:

https://dev.to/tiangolo/the-future-of-fastapi-and-pydantic-i...
The protection of female virtue is also an enormously successful political tactic, from the "yellow peril" in the late 1890s in Europe and the US to the "white slavery" panic (specifically referring to the cultural phenomenon in the US that gave rise to the 1910 Mann Act; check out the contrasting commentary of Emma Goldman and Rose Livingston) to the murder of Emmett Till and the burning down of Black Wall Street in Tulsa -- all of these are really responses to larger questions of opportunity and freedom of movement for folks that crystalize in the threat to a white woman's sexual virtue and the justification of violent response to crush the threat.

The bathroom bills, the panic over sports, the violence trans and gender-nonconforming people encounter (especially on racialized lines) -- it's all part of a larger political narrative. As you can see from the comments on this HN thread, you get a daddy all worked up about his daughter's virtue/place in life and you can move political mountains because it is an Existential Threat that Must Be Removed. That's weaponizable in a way that talking about military spending or tax law or gerrymandering is not.
Better source:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abst...
Thanks, I'll remember that.
Nice circular logic.
Classes of people are different from each other. That's not to say that one person is better than another. It's also not saying that any class of person is better than another. It is saying that all people are different, and there are classes of people, such as men, women, blacks, whites, trans, cis, and all sorts of classifications that differ in aggregate.

The reason we humans can get through life is by discriminating, in the sense of distinguishing, classes of people. This is NOT prejudice but is sensible. After all, there is a difference between discrimination and prejudice.

Please consider this: "Honey, stay here. Don't play with those 5 men at the end of the block." Are all strangers bad? Are all men bad? Are older people bad? Are all people at the end of the block bad? No, of course not. But, we need to remain sensible to circumstances and sensitive to people's situations.
I think you have an interesting take on Newsom's career, but an interesting take isn't persuasive enough to sell such big conclusions like (1) Newsom's attraction to political success disables him from serious Californian solutions, and (2) Newsom will ditch California as soon as national opportunity presents itself.
Home Remedies for Asthma: 5 Natural Ways to Control Asthma
Seeing as how the historical perspective is almost directly reversed from what you claim, I'm going to have to be skeptical about this. The European-historical aversion to largely one-way nonconforming to gender and sexual roles (men acting as women being a problem, ditto male homosexual behavior) is pretty explicitly due to a rejection of (heterosexual) masculinity translating as a threat to that (heterosexual) masculinity.

Those currents run deep, and run through to today. And that's not to say that "but a guy might go in the girls' bathroom!" is not what bigots say, because as a prima facie claim that's certainly common--but I very much doubt, were we to see some unvarnished honesty, that bathroom fears are actually a primary motivator rather than a convenient battleground.
I don't even trust myself, I like to set up PRs+integration test gates even when I am working solo.

That said, everyone pushing to trunk all the time is how we did stuff when we used subversion, so the sky won't fall. But I would miss being able to review changes and have async centralized tests, a lot.
You really don't understand the difference between a safety regulation and a moral regulation? Or do you think sex work is intrinsically dangerous and prostitutes might fall to their death due to a lack of safety gear?
I have this set up at twilio with a simple Studio workflow and so far it defeats 100% of automated dialers:

A lot of auto-dialers wait to hear a human, so to trigger anything listening for a response, the challenge goes "Can you hear me? This number is protected by Samaritan Call Protection" (shout-out to Person of Interest)

Then about a second later, it follows "Press 5 to be connected."

Things that dial 5 get a ring-through to my cell, things that don't get blackholed.
Many countries largely limit things to taking your assets rather than locking you up, especially in cases like McAffees where I don't think he committed fraud, just refused to do his tax returns.
Sounds like the way things are going, open systems are going to be effectively illegal soon. Tencent/Apple/Google (TAG) will arrange that if you're not on an approved 'secure' device you are 'suspect', and slowly find ways to integrate this in to governance "for social benefit". At that point, if you're not 100% on the system (read: surveilled 24x7x365 - voice assistant anyone? - with a credit card/bank account, state-ID and consumer profile associated) you'll be penalized: your views will be impossible to share (it's almost that way already), and you'll be incrementally excluded or dissuaded from travel and transport, financial services, educational opportunities, events, job markets, etc.

To resist this situation a device manufacturer could emerge with a privacy-first experience and solutions to proxy just the right amount of legitimacy to the outside systems (PSTN, payment, etc.) with an international legal structure optimised for privacy, akin to what wealthy people do already. A sort of anti walled-garden shared infrastructure. Technically I could see an offering providing mobile # to VOIP forwarding, data-only phone with mesh networking > wifi connectivity preference, MAC shuffling, darknet/VPN mixing, payment proxy, global snailmail proxy network, curated (well tested for pop sites) lightweight browser with reduced attack surface and a mobile network only as a last-resort connectivity paradigm (with dynamic software SIM and network operator proxying). Open source of course. Issue being, infrastructure would be expensive to offer and if it were ever popular there'd be political pushback. I guess privacy will increasingly be the exclusive domain of the rich.

We've already lost.
Taking nothing away from the maker of this, but cried must also go to Apple for the original UX too and how well designed that is that copying it works so well too.
Unnatural because they thought of inventing it, they started saying "tod@s" (todos is everyone), didn't catch, they then moved to "todxs", didn't catch, then they said "todes", and because people don't naturally use it. They even use it wrongly all the time. But more importantly, unnatural because if you have to impose it and call me names for not using it, you are doing it wrong.
I'm genuinely curious what echo chamber you think I'm in. The echo chamber where I'm unaware what people think of Brave?
Yea, but the article is more towards who has the power to implement these decisions and why is it concentrated towards a small population.
The original filename is optional in gzip. It is not included in the response sent by, for example, Apache.

(There is a mandatory MTIME which is included, and an OS byte, but those only waste 5 bytes total. Far less than gzip will typically save.)
Funny enough, Washington wasn't a fan of parties. The argument against them is that they encourage lazy voting. Sure, there are advantages in that a party will help summarize a list of policies, but the disadvantage is tribalism. I think in modern day we don't have the same need for policy hinting (what parties give) because every major politician lists all their policies and positions on their campaign websites. 50 years ago this would be a logistical nightmare.

That said, if we adopted something like score or STAR I don't think there would be any problem with parties, nor would they be destroyed. You still get the advantages of pooling resources. Have a strong preference for members of the hippo party? You can donate and campaign for them even while you hash out which candidate best represents the coalition of people at the time. Think the hippo party played dirty and kicked out your favorite candidate Salamander-Gibbon Yack but really don't like the opposing party Tree Trunks? You can still vote your favorite person and not have any determent (system is monotonic). This actually gives less power for the hippo party to determine for you which is your preferred candidate.

Better yet, you get a lot of information! So even if the hippo party's leading candidate wins but you find that Salamander-Gibbon Yack was an extremely close second then the hippo party will have to update their policies (hopefully). By rating, instead of ranking, candidates you have a substantially more expressive ballot and we can data mine and learn from it through this expressiveness. We live in the age of big data and yet in politics we compress data to a point that is almost meaningless.

Cardinal systems won't destroy political parties, but they prevent them from controlling and manipulating the elections.
I agree about the signifier, but still think education has a real value outside the pure signalling. You need experts and for that you need schools/colleges because in most jobs you will not learn wide enough nor deep enough (exceptions are possible).
It might be a little bit more convenient, but really, models are central to everything else. You're spamming your most central code with arbitrary crap that you are only interested in perhaps 0.1% of the time.

Once you get out of the OOP mentality, it's much easier to shuffle code around, and keeping things that logically belong together close to each other in separate files. Move the crap out of the way and enjoy the cleanliness. Less mental overhead helps you make better decisions faster.

And yes, sometimes you have to deal with a circular import, but it's not the end of the world, just decide which file is the most basic, and don't let that import other less basic files at the top level, but only inside functions. Or try to decouple the logic.
‘Secret’ in context here simply refers to a mystery, much like “secrets of the Universe” would.
> A large number of Americans desire massive federal power.

It's complicated.

A 2016 Gallup poll (https://news.gallup.com/poll/27286/government.aspx) revealed that 55 percent of respondents preferred power to be concentrated in state governments; 37 percent preferred the federal government.

Another group of surveys (https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa759_web...) shows that Americans strongly prefer state and local governments to lead on health insurance (62 percent, versus 38 percent preferring federal leadership), welfare (68/31 percent), unemployment (55/26 percent), education (75/25 percent), pre-kindergarten education (71/25 percent), transportation (78/22 percent), law enforcement (73/20 percent), job training (75/20 percent), housing (83/18 percent), and paving roads (77/9 percent).

The problem with the universal health care polls is that 1) "universal healthcare" is such a broad term that can mean anything from NHS style single provider to Switzerland style universal privatized systems, and 2) it's entirely possible to favor a "universal healthcare" system that's administered and funded at the State level as opposed to the Federal level.
Unless they have a loop indicator in the file it's not a GIF replacement.