skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
iOS has gotten less intuitive over the years. It can do everything you're having trouble with, though. There's a quick settings menu that's pretty similar to the one in Android. You can get to it by pulling down from the top right corner of the screen. It's customizable with whatever settings you want [0]. There are a few other gestures; you might find this page helpful [1].

The back buttons should always be in the top left when they're available. There is also a gesture; you can swipe in from the left side of the screen to go back. There's an accessibility setting to make the buttons underlined, too [2].

[0] https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/use-and-customize-con...

[1] https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208204

[2] https://9to5mac.com/2018/05/25/how-to-go-back-on-iphone/
Really looking forward to the boards & ability to split check boxes out into new tasks. Being able to decompose business issues into workable technical items has always been a challenge for us. The impedance of needing to create a new issue and copy stuff over from the big one would encourage us to not always do this.
they raked in hundreds of millions from trump resistance libs over the last couple years, yet their number of lawyers that specialize in free speech is the same as a decade ago: 4! four.
If you know exactly what settings you need to access, pull down from the top on your home screen and search for that setting. No need to remember a series of steps.

I'm guessing since it's a hearing device, it should be a simple pull down and search for "MFi hearing device" or "Hearing Devices" which will instantly take you to that settings.

That said, learning how to find the exact settings the first time around is going to require a learning curve.
Yes, much more palatable to quote a decision that used the phrase to argue protesting the draft is a violation of the Espionage Act.
> Do you have a citation on that last part? I can't find any info indicating they were work sponsored events with vendors and the like.

https://www.hipstersofthecoast.com/2020/06/noah-bradley-admi...

> He apologized because some people said he was being inappropriate. We have no evidence that there was actually sexual harassment by any legal definition of the term.

His apology is Screenshoted in the above link.

"I was terrible to women. I preyed on them, I ceaselessly hit on them, I pressured them into sex. Yes I was one of those creepy sexual predators you hear about".

You really think this doesn't meet definition of sexual harassment? It seems pretty clear he admits to "unwelcome sexual advances" and creating "a hostile or offensive work environment" https://www.eeoc.gov/sexual-harassment.
My bosses at work are all old folks who use iPhones and they always come to me for help with this and that.

Their problems always boil down to the fact that all app settings can only be accessed by going into the system settings, scrolling through all of them to find the app you want and taking it from there. To make it worse, sometimes an app setting will be hidden away under another nested system setting and there's no way to know this without googling.

So frustrating. I see the "user friendliness" of IOS touted all the time but IMO, functionality is so well hidden from the user that they end up accepting and settling for Apple defaults.

The only advise I can give you is to teach your father how to use google to find out how to do stuff on his phone when he gets stuck.
With European welfare state and everything else? Yes, in a heartbeat.
When I learned about normalization in university, I discovered that essentially all databases that I had designed were in normal form. So I never really memorized the specific rules.

Also in some cases you deliberately do not want a fully normalized database.
All extremely useful: the overview, the examples and the comments.

A few months ago while writing a bot/crawler I searched for hours for something like this, but I found only full specs or just bits and pieces scattered around that used different terminology and/or had different opinions.

In the end I didn't even clearly understand what should be the max total URL length (e.g. mixed opinions here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/417142/what-is-the-maxim... - come on, a xGiB long URL?) => most of the time 2000 bytes is mentioned but it's not 100% clear.

Writing a bot made me understand 1) why browsers are so complicated and 2) that the Internet is a mess (e.g. once I even found a page that used multiple character encodings...).

My personal opinion is that everything is too lax. Browsers try to be the best ones by implementing workarounds for stuff that does not have (yet) or does not comply to a spec => this way it can only end up in a mess. A simple example is the HTTP-header "Content-Encoding" ( https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Co... ) which I think should only indicate what kind of compression is being used, but I keep seeing in there stuff like "utf8"/"image/jpeg"/"base64"/"8bit"/"none"/"binary"/etc... and all those pages/files work perfectly in the browsers even if with those values they should actually be rejected... .
It's pretty meaningful if you're a low margin restaurant. This was never about bringing costs down for customers, it was about protecting local businesses.
Like many social problems, this is actually a coordination problem, and can be easily boiled down to a tragedy of the commons situation.

Everyone would prefer to not have an army, because most of the time you don't need them but they're still expensive to maintain and when you do need them they're even more expensive. But if nobody has an army then the bad actors can form an army and take over everybody else. So everybody needs to have an army unless and until you can get global coordination working to the point where everyone de-militarizes and the moment anyone starts militarizing everyone else does the same and joins together to absolutely crush that violator. You just gotta hope they weren't able to massively militarize in secret.

The seems unlikely to ever happen, so until then you have a couple countries that get to live in the sweet spot of not having their own army but still being covered by someone else's.
"Is this person defending free speech in favor of liberty? Or because his anti-liberty extremism won't be tolerated otherwise?".

It works both ways so this isn't a practical way of looking at implementation of free speech. You can't keep a system that doesn't protect itself free forever - propaganda travels faster and further than truth, and I doubt the founding fathers wrote the first amendment with mass media in mind.

You can start the argument of who gets to decide what should be allowed and what shouldn't, and in the current political climate (at least in the USA) the answer to that is obviously nobody. Ideally those decisions would be made during a time of cultural unity, where a whole nation can say "These are our values that we want to write in stone", like Germany did with the new constitution in the 20th century where it put well-defined limits on what kind of speech should be forbidden.

It's doubtful if that kind of unity is even possible in the USA anymore, so I'm worried that, on a long enough time-scale, unfettered free speech will inevitably lead to tyranny of a kind because there is no system in place to protect it.
>expensive automation you're talking about becomes comparatively affordable

Perfect! Isn't that the point? Automation to make our lives easier? More automation will lead to commoditization of robots, instead of the current commoditization and dehumanization of humans.

Again your mindset shows you want to use automation as a threat against humanity to keep human cattle in line, and not as a force for good.

>It doesn't work this way.

Why not? Right now society is failing to take care of a large number of humans in order to maintain status quos that greatly enrich the few.
Image Similarity ML Challenge and data set for detecting image manipulation
As a PM who recently moved our eng team from Jira to GitHub (it was a good move btw), this is amazing news! It solves so many of the little problems that GitHub issue caused us, really looking forward to using it!
I prefer price transparency because it helps me decide whether to order directly through the delivery app or via the restaurant. The extent to which I support the restaurant is a factor in my purchasing decisions in addition to the total cost. Having good restaurants that are profitable near where I live is helpful for maintaining the community (and good for property values).
I think the real reason is buried deeper: most Americans have instilled into them that governments are not to be trusted. It's why government salaries suck, it's why it's largely filled with people that couldn't find jobs in the private sector (sad but true). This sentiment bleeds over into education, with nonsense talk of "leftist indoctrination", teachers being stereotyped as money-hungry and lazy because of their unions, and so on.

This isn't that far-fetched; the country was basically founded by rich conspiracy theorist farmers that didn't want to pay taxes.
People don’t like their identity being debated. Bringing up trans women in sports as a talking point would be pretty upsetting to most trans women as it is likely to feel like you’re invalidating their personal experience of being trans.

There’s this thing with marginalized communities where people outside of the communities “just want to have a discussion” but the stakes of that conversation are way too high for marginalized people. Trans people’s existence is not for you to challenge or debate. The best thing to do in situations like this is to let the marginalized people figure out what they need and then quietly listen to their conclusions. It’s not really something that’s there for you to “discuss”.
It's interesting that people are taking the approach of attacking me personally, which violates HN's guidelines.

They made a claim of something happening in reality, not hypothetically.
I want to agree and disagree with a minor point. The argument that error codes should be digits[0] is misguided. Errors should be named. E.g.: {"invalid_username": "An invalid username was provided."} is better than {"40001": "An invalid username was provided."}.

Why? Because you'll often add coded errors far into the future or multiple at the same time on different branches. When you merge two errors will have the same code but totally different messages. This can lead to regressions in userspace or annoying merges where an error code has to be manually looked up and changed.

Its unlikely that you'll define the "invalid_username" error code more than once and if you do it will likely have a similar error message. Plus, in your test suite `assert error.code == "invalid_username"` is much more explanatory than `assert error.code == 40001`.

Just my two cents.

0. https://alexkrupp.typepad.com/sensemaking/2021/06/django-for...
You are mistaken. It was written by Oliver Wendel Holmes writing for a unanimous court in Schenck v. United States:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States

Granted that decision was later partially overturned, but the general principle that the first amendment protections are not absolute remains in force, and there are many extant examples: libel laws, laws barring false advertising, and laws against incitement of violence are all constitutional.
Kickstarter CEO: Let's try a 4-day work week
Twenty Percent Time at Supercede
IIUC the IPv6 weirdness here is simply due to very unfortunate timing: IPv6 was being finalized at a time (first half of the 90s) when the Web (and with it URLs) was already nearly frozen but still not obviously important.
> I'm mostly bothered by the focus on trans elite sports, because I find it to be a niche phenomena, and it suggests the curation of those who lead with such an argument.

The reason I mentioned combat sports is because it's literally the clearest example I can possibly think of where one can have objections to transgender women in women's spaces without having hate in their heart, and yet still one gets lambasted for bringing it up. So my overall point is about the lambasting, as the Economist article talks about.

> By tactical argument, I mean an argument you make which you don't think is your leading argument, but you make it anyway because you want to demonstrate an effect.

My leading argument is: "the gender ideology community lambast people way too much. Here's an obvious example of something which they shouldn't lambast about but they do anyway.". I honestly don't know how I can be any clearer here. There is no hate. No hidden agenda. Just what I've actually said at face value multiple times. Please stop trying to read between the lines.

> You keep wondering why I bring up Joe Rogan. It's because I don't think any discussion here will rise above the playground of arguments made by Joe Rogan, a major player on the conversation of trans elite sports.

I find this ironic since you're the one bringing down the quality of discussion with all the red herrings. What do you actually want to discuss? Where am I going wrong and what do you want to convince me of?
> Einstein was ostracized from academia. He is the quintessential lone genius.

This is all true but most of the "lone genius" narrative paint people in an almost supernatural light.

Einstein work was widely recognized later on. Also, he interacted with plenty of people and read a lot and he never denied that.
Short answer: solar produces ~10 watts per square meter, all factors considered. Wind, even less. USA consumes 3.8T kWh/yr electricity, needing 44,000 square kilometers (20% of Utah) of solar panels & buffer batteries to supply.

Conceivable, but a massive undertaking at a scale having inevitable significant problems ($66T price tag for starters).
This X 1000.

Even as a developer, I don't always know which repo to file something against. And most "issues" span multiple repositories. Sure, I need to add feature X to repository A and feature Y to repository B (in order to implement some bigger project) but that's not how we plan or assign work.

More importantly, at our daily standup, we need a single view across all of our tasks/work, not the work within a single repository.
Isn't the difference painfully obvious? All of those crimes have victims. Sex work is work, not crime.
Thank you for your question. No, we provide sourcing intelligence based on in-depth supplier and supply chain data. We are not a two-sided platform.
I've never used this (little need), but a search for "ios shortcut to settings" turns up a howtogeek article on how to use MacStories' list of preference URLs to create an ios shortcut directly to many areas of settings. May make for a simple quality of life improvement.

Edit: this does not appear to be as simple as I'd hope on ios 14.

Edit2: it is that simple if you follow the directions (set URL) Then second step (open URL) instead of winging it like a 1337 programmy dude.
Is the click wheel "feel" experience only on iOS? I don't get any haptic feedback on Android
Yeah, they might just be lenient for now with the MusicKit JS API. I know for commercial partners they seem to be pretty strict.
Who needs to update or clarify what? Even English dictionaries explain this.
This is so pretty. I love it! Thanks for making it!
A quick google search suggests that it is easier to list the states that do have a provision for free ID than to list the ones that do not.

It is also not that simple, it is not just about cost, there are other barriers to getting identification. Availability of DMV offices, limited hours, etc.

Perhaps we should make passport cards free, and then fund an organization to proactively identify and issue cards to every US citizen who does not already have one. Then we can require that card in order to vote.

Problem, of course, is that the US Constitution makes voting a state problem. So we are probably doomed to continue having some states adding as much friction as possible while others seek to eliminate that friction altogether.
> I was surprised that you didn't advocate for using traditional server-rendered HTML for views that don't require significant frontend interactivity/client-side state management?

I don't know that there's one best choice for how to render the front end. I generally like Angular because it's strongly opinionated, and in general, strong opinions in software leads to faster velocity and lower TCO. But I don't think that Angular is the universal best choice.
I do however think having the front end powered by a REST API is 100% the right move, because it draws a line in the sand where if private data or incorrect data are getting returned then there is clearly an issue. Having a specific place (the JSON response) where you can write tests against is a huge win, one big enough that imho it outweighs every possible disadvantage of REST.
If you're not already familiar, I think you'll be interested in the concept of alliteration.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliteration
Anyone listening to Joe Rogan is showing the quality of their brain.
That this is even an issue is an example of why I never order through doordash, ubereats, etc. I literally laughed when I tried once and saw they wanted to charge me 20% just for driving over food. Instead I either drive to places myself, cook for myself, or look for places where the delivery is directly through the company like a local chinese food place that I love.
Does the 1st amendment protection applies because it is a public school or would this also apply to a private employer?
I think there’s an assumption in there that one shouldn’t condone bombing a nation for invading and illegally occupying one of its neighbors. I’m for that 100%.
Thank you for your contributions to WarVOX, and to so many other projects that advanced the security community.

I never would have guessed that in 2021 we'd have headlines about IRC drama and wardialing! Maybe history does repeat itself :)
Spain court agrees to extradite McAfee founder to US
This happened in earlier in the year. The paper was subsequently published in The American Journal of Therapeutics. The full text is online if anyone is interested.

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/...
> As argued in the article - would you suggest that the life of that single mother would not get worse if she stopped working so hard?

No, I would not make the straw man argument you're proposing.

> If we define success as some arbitrary amount of money, we can make the correlation between hard work and success “tenuous” just by making the amount of money defining success to be high enough.

No one is defining success as some arbitrary amount of money.

We're both defining success relatively: you're defining it in relation to a hypothetical outcome for hypothetical courses of actions for a hypothetical single mother, whereas I'm defining success in relation to real outcomes for real people who start from different situations.
The Julia programming language would help speed up computation.

https://julialang.org/benchmarks/

You can use Julia with Apache Spark and Julia works with Python via PyCall. If you are working with tabular data the Julia SparkSQL.jl package lets you create Spark apps using just Julia and SQL:

https://github.com/propelledanalytics/SparkSQL.jl

Tutorials:

https://propelledanalytics.github.io/Tutorials/
Ooo! As an avid vim'er, I rate this highly - thanks for sharing!
Yes, but the solution to a race to the bottom isn't to not be the top.

We need unions and capital controls based on the counterparty's labor and environmental standards.
>Can someone elaborate the benefits/goals of using the feminine pronoun here?

Culture wars, but a much more gentle version than the current variety. There's definitely an agenda here as it wasn't done in any kind of unthinking organic fashion, especially given long-established norms (which weren't always male). Rather like replacing BC with BCE.

Some future historian will probably look at an AP style book over time and pass judgement on us all. Dunno how it will look. Maybe they'll think of the singular use of 'they' as implying that humans of this era had multiple personalities.
I did not claim it was not a mental disorder. I said it is linked with identity in a way which is dissimilar to the depression analogy.

Is it far-fetched to say that the severity of negative emotional and mental effects on a person depends on how accepting the culture is of those who do not fit into the majority?
> That person still had to earn the money for the lottery ticket, and do the work of buying the tickets.

Not necessarily, it could be a gift or even something they find on the street.

It's also not the point. All through this thread you are ignoring that people are talking about relative hard work effort versus success output.

Buying a lottery ticket is such little effort I'd barely even call it "work". So the the work effort is tiny. The success outcome if you win is absolutely enormous. The deciding factor is luck.

This is why I say hard work and success are barely related. It's possible, perhaps even likely, to work hard and see little success, while others work less hard, get lucky, and see huge success.

At best, hard work gives you more opportunities to get lucky. People who get lucky in this manner (or wish they could) often say that hard work is a way of making your own luck, but that's just a form of survivorship bias imo.
She deserved strong negative feedback on that issues. Given same she doubled down. If you believe trans rights are important then its perfectly logical for example to boycott her books/movies. Which is to say she deserved to be canceled. By which I mean people simply vote with their wallets not to give her any more money. This doesn't infringe on her rights to live her life as she chooses she will just have to do so with less of other people's money.

This is fundamentally a different question from should someone hate her or say hateful things to her. Anything that stirs up strong emotions and reaches millions will result in both reasonable dialogue and insane screeching. The people who reasonably disagree with her can't do anything about the nutjobs nor are they responsible for same.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27593360
that's interesting to hear, and I'll have to take your word on it for now, but I'm curious why(unless things have significantly changed in the past 6-7 years) inner-city schools are still horrendously bad. I've experienced schools in both the worst parts of Philadelphia as well as in middle-class suburbs of Philly, and the contrast is even more exaggerated than they make it seem on TV shows/movies that depict these types of schools.

Obviously the students who are raised in these high-crime areas and surrounded by a community that's significantly harsher are going to be harder for teachers to manage, and I do think this is a very big part of it, but there are some things that clearly aren't related to that(such as equipment and the quality/quantity of staff)
I always got the sense that Jira is only universally hated by people who use it but have absolutely no say in whether they have to use it.
I feel like I half-remember something I saw here on HN a couple of years ago, about some mapping related startup going out of business, and open sourcing some interesting tidbits. Do you (or anyone else) happen to remember that, or know what I'm talking about?

Sorry for being so vague, that's just all I remember of the whole deal. I probably bookmarked the link, but I'll probably never find it again now.

Edit: it may have been MapZen that I was thinking about.

https://www.mapzen.com/blog/shutdown/
There is no click or vibration on Android.
USB storage tends to disconnect aftera few days on Linux (tested with various USB-powered and mains-powered HDDs), and the only way tho resume is physically disconnecting and reconnecting the device.
Trying to use one tool as both a reporting-to-management system and a communication medium for the people actually doing the work, is a great way to make it fucking useless for both purposes. And yet, that's the norm with ticketing systems.