skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's right there in the first paragraph:

"I’ve been less sure they understood the full scope needed to build a compelling AR ecosystem – a metaverse."
In the sense that you'd give these fraudsters a few bucks in order to ban them.
>I strongly disagree here. When I'm reviewing code, I look at the code. It could be written by ANYONE. I don't ever think "this woman" or "this <religion>" when reviewing code!

But that's not what you said. And it's not really the point either way, because we're talking about providing feedback on the code, which was written by a person with an age and a race and a gender. And when you sit down with that person to provide feedback, you see their race, age, and gender. Saying you don't is just silly.

>You don't see how it can be easy to accidentally state the latter?

I really don't.

>I think your main POV here is that if your heart is in the right place then everything will be fine. I just hard disagree with that.

I don't think and didn't state that at all and would never give anyone such absurd advice. I could go on with more examples for you:

I really like those shoes. - perfectly fine

Those shoes make your legs look great. - don't do this

That skirt is cute. - Yes

That skirt makes your butt look amazing - don't do this

I honestly can't tell if you created the throwaway for entertainment or having a real conversation but at this point I'm leaning towards the former because I genuinely don't believe you're confused about how to make an appropriate vs. inappropriate comment to a coworker. It doesn't really matter if they're male or female, if you tell someone that an outfit makes their body look X - you're probably going to get in trouble unless you happen to be good friends outside of work.

>No, I treat them both equally but I avoid expressing any opinion whatsoever becomes I'm worried about being perceived otherwise.

It doesn't really matter how you're perceived. If you document your reviews, and you do it fairly, the work will speak for itself. It has nothing to do with male vs. female. I've done this for decades, someone will inevitably accuse you of a bias, and you refer back to your documentation, notes, and the original work. They can mis-read all they want, the only thing HR cares about is a defensible position for your feedback.
Having a jury that knows something about software patents, or about the domain, is emphatically not a good idea. They will second-guess the evidence, ignore the attorneys' pleadings and the judges instructions, and pull a verdict out of their ass, because "they know better".
Easier to make the installation part of the business model recurrent, init?
You still need to pass 90%. Multiple choice questions were all 4 are possible, but where you need to pick the best one will test your skill.
This all seems to boil down to "we should work in the office because some people have personal and family issues". You mentioned privilege, I would consider those who are able to set company policy based on their own personal and family problems as the ones who are privileged.
>It's a discourteous and lazy way of dumping a romantic interest.

Language isn't fixed, the meaning of words, especially "new" words (and ghosting is a new verb) changes over time. That was the original meaning, but it's now applied to all relationships.

>Ghosting is by no means limited to long-term romantic relationships. Informal dating relationships, friendships, even work relationships may end with a form of ghosting.

https://www.psycom.net/what-is-ghosting

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Ghosting
Or you can just treat the unvaccinated like adults and let them behave as their own risk tolerance allows. That means no required masks, social distancing, or security theater like individually portioned food.

High freedom, high liberty, high choice
> these two statements are just dog whistles for what allegiance you hold and the actual meaning of the sentence doesn't matter much.

The horror?

I'll be honest, I don't see what the problem with short labels that express an ideological affiliation. People who aren't "pro-life" aren't pro-murder, and people who aren't "pro-choice" do not oppose choice in all instances. We all know what they mean though.
Robots may soon be able to reproduce
> OK, but Microsoft is in the best position to create great, integrated, first-class technologies that build on how great Windows is.

For a few years now there has been some noise that Apple’s Pro hardware lineup isn’t Pro, that macOS is becoming more locked down and more iOS-like, that the software is buggier than ever, and - until they dropped their App Store split to 15% for small developers - that 30% was too high a price.

With WSL, and VScode and GitHub Microsoft are making a (messy, so far) play for developers. But as you point out, they didn’t take it to the nth degree and nail the execution. I wonder if they’ve missed the opportunity now.

I develop for web on macOS, and have all Apple hardware, so maybe I’m missing some of the other things Microsoft have done.

Maybe it is the lack of verticality MS have, and the integration between devices, something they can never match Apple on that means there hasn’t been the transition they were aiming for. That’s why I’ve not switched.

I’ll be very interested to hear what people think about this.
At Amazon you still hire good people you just mark them poorly because you don't want to break up your team.
No, Manifest V2 support remains internally and for "Enterprise Chrome" customers. Therefore we at Brave have promised that we would support V2 on by default for extensions including uBO (not needed on Brave) and uMatrix. HTH
I don't know if Japanese construction projects are overstaffed or not, but if they are, do you think that would change? My guess is that they would continue the same staffing arrangement and get less construction work done.
Well it worked for Creed in the US Office, but it makes you smell like old people. Very scientific, I know.
The state is the last institution I trust to design a "life school" curriculum.

Remember, these are the people who require your drivers ed instructor to tell you to go 55 on I95 where the traffic goes 85. They're optimizing for covering their own butts while nominally educating people. They don't really care about truly education people so those people can go do to what will result in the best outcome for them.

They'll do something self serving and asinine like tell students you should make minimum payments on high interest debt rather than ask for a financial hardship extension/reduction for government services/fees/fines (which in many cases are legally required to take that into account).
Someone, somewhere, thinks something you did is reprehensible.
The Yang anecdote could be used as an example of bad or good power of memes depending on if you support Israel or not. The article is filled with the author's personal biases leaking into a purportedly principled argument.
It's true that nature is pretty red in tooth and claw, and very, very cruel.

But nature documentaries aren't really the best way to learn about it. They're designed to entertain rather than inform. They show an exceedingly skewed view of nature.

They're also not a great source of morality. You're not a bear. In particular, you don't live among bears. You have a sense of conscience that's different from a bear's, as a consequence (both nature and nurture) of living a very different life from a bear.
That AR will be visual first is the eventual obvious thing, but the soft start is audio based. Siri and transparency mode on airpods is the unacknowledged AR present that hasn’t been fully unveiled.
Of course it was. Every single public attack is a status game. No easier way to status and power in 2021 than in the name of "social justice" .
There aren’t any. Many of the students complaining about being forced to take pre calculus also tend to forget it. OP’s point was that teaching them is useless if they’ll just forget it.
There's probably a better way to frame this in a context where journalists are increasingly under attack just for doing their jobs.

https://cpj.org/2020/12/in-2020-u-s-journalists-faced-unprec...
In a lot of cases new software isn't delivering utility over old software, yet consumes more resources. Users justifiably feel miffed that they're expected to buy new hardware merely to keep up.
I don't see why dispassionate discourse is inherently better. I agree that empathy is important.
This is a self imposed limit. The debt ceiling is a tool for political brinksmanship and whatnot, but it's not imposed by the US's creditors.
The worst part (for me at least) of social media mobs is that they can only ever "cancel" someone who genuinely wants to engage in good faith. Someone who earnestly wants to talk to an audience suffers so much more than someone who just disconnects and continues writing their (supposedly) horrible opinions.

And it makes discourse online as a whole worse as more people start to realize this and we stop having conversations and instead just start talking over one another online.
I can't edit my comment anymore but did upvote yours. I agree with those warnings about imitating this practice. My "drinking as much water as I can" is perhaps 1 liter, much less than what seemed to be described in "The Old Way".

In the article you point to the main issue seems to come from inhibition of urination. I think native people knew their bodies extremely well and could avoid any problem here whereas in modern times we have been training ourselves since being a small child to ignore or hold back urination. Combining that with other suppressors mentioned in that article can end in tragedy.
There are different levels of "opsec" required against different types of adversaries and different types of costs of being compromised. Edward Snowden's opsec looks a lot different than someone just wanting to post Trump slogans on Twitter.
There was Lindsay Shepherd who was reprimanded by her supervisor for playing a clip of Peterson in class: as akin to “neutrally playing a speech by Hitler”. That's not the press though.

Usually, the word they use is alt-right. You might have more luck with that on Google.
> Cardinal Richelieu

Funny enough, I read today that one of Richelieu posthumous historian - which was an important European scholar connected with Newton and others - got banned of Paris by the roy in the 1700s for about six lines put in the wrong context They were quite true (1) but misleading in the context presented.

(1) https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:%C3%89tienne_Baluze
>> Low interest rate are not the problem here.

No, but they are definitely A problem.

Housing prices in a given market vary inversely with interest rates. Sure, scarcity has an effect which is why I said "in a given market". When someone goes to a bank looking for a home load, the first thing they are is what your income and expenses are. From there, they figure out how high your monthly payment can be, and from there using the current interest rates they calculate how much you can borrow. Everyone - sellers, agents, banks - pressure you to spend as much as possible, and one average they succeed. That means lower interest rates will enable you to pay more at the same monthly payment. In other words, the buyer will have roughly the same monthly payment regardless of interest rates. Those rates will determine how much money goes to the seller vs the bank over 15 or 30 years.

Low interest rates cause artificially high prices which don't benefit society, just the sellers. They also lead to banks not paying interest on savings, which discourages savings. They also encourage all sorts of high prices. The current cost of a college degree is due to government guarantees on student loans, which largely didn't exist when I got mine (at a much lower price even adjusted for inflation).

And finally, something I think is true but haven't worked out all the math. It's not lower interest rates that stimulate the economy, but the act of lowering them. If we were at a steady state, reducing rates by a fixed amount and keeping things steady should produce a short-term (perhaps a few years long) spike in GDP, after which things will return to an equilibrium possibly lower than before the rate decrease (or the same or slightly higher I don't know) but less than the short term bump. The opposite is also true, raising rates will cause problems so much be done very slowly. The Fed has the US economy backed into a corner of sorts. The only way out seems to be to ignite a lot of inflation and raise rates slowly so as not to cause another collapse like 2007 (which was triggered by an abrupt rate increase).
You should avoid connecting to video conferencing via wifi if at all possible
Sorry never played with Streamlit.
So... UWP is a tenbagger: It got 10x slower in 5 years.

I always like to remind folks that it takes longer to open calculator - or windows terminal - than to open excel.
> from the initial Vice article horrifically misquoting him, to the weirdly rabid hate towards anyone defending him on forums like this and Reddit

In fairness those are both very common features of cancellations. Another that comes to mind is Damore, who never wrote what most people attributed to him. I've had perfectly clear for a long time that even smart people will misunderstand the clearest statement if it's what it's socially expected from them.
> An real home economics class - with personal finance as a primary focus

Home economics has always included a variety of household skills, and was never limited to just personal finance.
I’m not seeing how 1 and 2 are directly enabled by ZKPs. In the credit score example, “this is my credit score certified by XYZ” is solved without ZKPs, no? And in the bug bounty example, how does one use a ZKP to prove knowledge of a software bug without leaking any information about it? That sounds fascinating.

3 seems cool but not particularly impactful in terms of the guarantees offered by CT.

4 can be achieved in many ways without ZKPs.
Really good questions and pushback. Thank you.

I've worked with people with 0-15 years of experience across completely different roles and industries.

I look for yes's to the following questions (as well as a few others):

1. Is this person competent in their target role?
2. Does this person lack a sales and marketing background (this costs you a few months more of job searching, lower offers, etc.)?
3. Does this person lack time and energy (e.g. if you're full-time at a company, you probably don't have the time to apply to jobs)?
4. Does this person value their time a lot? (Landing interviews can take several hours a month - some people would rather spend that time in other places).
Even "cycle-accurate" emulators aren't always perfect
The people who cut their ties with him only have his interactions from the time to go on, not what he's saying here. But I think we're going around in circles here. I'm just pushing back on the invocation of "puritanism".
No, Brave (the browser) doesn't send user data to Brave (the company) either. Matching happens on device. Categories are enumerated in the regional ad catalog. Local, on-device machine-learning decides whether a given ad is appropriate for the user. The data which comes back consists of cryptographic attestations; no user data. See https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Security-and-pri... for more information. We have also added a way to anonymously detect conversions, such as when a user purchases a product or service after having viewed an ad-notification. This too relies on cryptography, and not user data. Although, if you purchase a product from an advertiser, you are likely already giving them some form of user data (e.g. Name, Address, etc.), but Brave doesn't have/transmit any user-data to ourselves or advertisers.
I think what you mean is it's a good idea to borrow at the current low interest rates and put the money into an inflating asset. Aka leverage.

A good idea if money is losing value (inflation) faster than the cost of money (interest rates). AND if you can find an asset that will gain value faster than (interest rate) - (inflation). After discounting for risk and volatility.

But asset prices appear to running ahead of inflation right now, and thus risky.

Still, the Federal Govt and Federal Reserve appear to be interfering in the price-setting mechanisms of the market in new ways lately. Really since 2008. Signaling that (upper)middle-class property speculators will have some protection from rising interest rates. And too-big-to-fail banks and perhaps large employers will also be protected.

What's not clear is how much control the Feds really have. And how far they're willing to go.
There were are ton of things I learned in Psych 101, Phil 101, Econ 101 that all should have been taught in high school. Your list is a great start.

I'd add anger management (though perhaps mental health basics would cover this), practical logical fallacies, sunk costs, and basic law.
> the Leitz 1 is a rebranded Sharp Aquos R6

Reality is often disappointing.

Kind of getting tired of these brand name sales, Sharp for household electronics has been licensed to Beko and some Chinese company, for example. All for a quick buck.
Spreading child-supervision duties around the extended family and community so parents can do other things besides be with their children 24x7 has been a feature of many human cultures for many thousands of years.
Or simply add a strip of konbu. That works in an electric pressure-cooker, which makes beans even faster to prepare. It also works for cattle who are prone to bloat.
Companies have a book value, which is the value of their assets after their liabilities, to which their shareholders are ultimately entitled.

Many of the tech companies do share buybacks, which increases the ownership of the shareholders who hold the stock.

The value of a share is predicated on the belief that the company will start to pay dividends at some point. Apple, Cisco, Intel, Microsoft all pay dividends at this point.

If the executive team at Amazon or Facebook came out to say "we will never pay a dividend"; firstly, there would be a shareholder revolt and the board of directors would be removed and replaced; secondly, there would also probably be a massive shareholder lawsuit against the directors personally for violating their fiduciary obligations.
Patents have their uses. Trade secrets are worse.

We should not through out the baby with the bathwater....
Folks should do whatever they want to do. It is no secret that Iowa has a low unemployment rate and cheap land. But personally, I would rather be poorer and not have kids than do the type of work that is in demand in Iowa and/or deal with the quality of life there due to various reasons such as weather, geographic features, politics, etc. Not that it inherently bad, it all just depends on what one's preferences are and what tradeoffs they are willing to make.

I would even say that given some people's circumstances, and the odds they face, it might very well make sense for them to live it up in their healthy years if they feel like the probability of seeing a sufficient return on their grind is too low.

Maybe they saw their parents and families work two jobs and end up with nothing, or for whatever reason, do not have the chops to get the right credentials or learn the skills to vault them onto the next rung of the ladder. Or they were 18 to 21 and invested in an enormous amount of debt thanks to the US government's "generosity", that has very little payoff, and they figure they will never make it out of that debt.

At that point, you have already made mistakes you cannot recover from and it makes sense to just say screw it, and live for the present.
I saw that, and the definition still says nothing.

Ok, so a metaverse is somehow the realization of the "full scope" needed for a compelling AR ecosystem? And what exactly does that mean, and how does that define this particular usage of the (heavily overloaded) term 'metaverse'?

Meta meaning 'about', so a universe about a universe?

edit/ugh: googling the term says 'a virtual-reality space in which users can interact with a computer-generated environment and other users.'

Like wtf does that have to do with the meta root word here?

There is far too much abstraction in this vocabulary defining a thing that is very real.
>If $100,000/yr millennials can't balance their books[1]... then how can people of lesser means balance theirs?

Necessity is a hell of a motivator.

Don't mistake the standard practices of a 100k/yr single person for what everyone is doing. People who are living on easy mode won't develop the same skills people living on hard mode will.
>I am convinced that today's house prices are tearing apart the fabric of society, without exaggeration.

But how can it be tearing apart the fabric of society if inflation adjusted mortgage payments (ie. the number you actually care about) has been trending down since the 30s?

https://awealthofcommonsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/..., from https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2021/03/what-if-housing-pri...
Yeah man. With Python you have access to huge amount of libraries (and have better code quality TBH) while in Tableau you have to use whatever they give you.

That said, Tableau is still useful for the "ordinary" dashboards, e.g. it's a lot easier if you just need to do some simple calculations and get your KPI. Tableau is still way faster than any other programming language.
Possibly but I think a lot of what can be taught would be of interest to teenagers. Like the real cost of financing college and how credit card interest works. There really is a litany of small things that can be catalogued as "personal finance" that young people could find interesting. After all, every kid wants to "be rich" one day.

Detailing how compound interest works and how easy it is to begin investing in the free market with a small bit early that can turn into much more 25 years down the road, for example. FWIW I had a similar class in high school and loved it. Learning about markets as well as basic things like managing a checking account were fun and felt empowering. It was a very practical course and I'd agree with you that avoiding the abstract is probably important.

Kids, and many adults, really do not understand the relationship between money and time and what time is better to teach people about that than when they have a lot of time left?

I think it's important to champion capitalism and free, public, markets, as it is our proven way of life, and teach young people how they can choose to participate in it without much to start with. Much better than trends in teaching kids it is hopeless and we need to socialize everything.
Baltimore County Public Schools' Ransomware Recovery Tops $8M
Russia Forces Apple, Google and Big Tech Companies to Build in Their Country
Ok since you don't post links I'll assume you are referring to:

'Bradley’s statement came the morning after concept artist Betty Jiang posted accusations on Twitter about a “bald headed crusty assed ‘well known’ artist who went around groping female devs,” saying that she hoped “to never see you and your shitty v-neck shirts at any workshops or conventions.”'

He apologized for a lot of things, but I don't see him admitting to or apologizing for groping anyone.

https://www.hipstersofthecoast.com/2020/06/noah-bradley-admi...
Look at Andrew Cuomo. Dozens of women accused of him of lewd behavior and he said "whatever" and the media have moved on.
The person asked why such statements could cause controversy, I explained why, your post doesn't make sense in this thread.