skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Many/most Christians take the Bible as a partial historical record of God's action in past times, and I'd hope that big chunks come across as eyewitness accounts of what real people saw and experienced ... see e.g. Gospel of Mark or Book of Acts. There are more esoteric parts, but many portions are relatable.

With regard to miracles, the New Testament purports to record many that Jesus and his followers performed, with explicit intent to exhibit Christ's authority over all that plagues humanity. With His ascension they've ceased or become much more rare (I grew up in Pentecostalism, whose adherents believe they're frequent and routine, but I don't think this myself).

So ... right now in 2021 there are tons of disaffected American Evangelical Nationalists, Trump-mongering liars willing to take every QAnon and political conspiracy, meld it with their beliefs and their need to hold on to "The Big Lie" that Trump won the 2020 November election. Their "apostles and prophets" are in a huge echo chamber across the airwaves, YouTube, Facebook, their mega-churches, convincing themselves that Trump is still president, that he will return as President in 2021 July, or August, or by the end-of-the-year. And they have a huge following, and they have inroads to Trump himself and to the Republican political jello (which has no structure, no policy). They could make things uncomfortable in the next two to twenty years or longer. And they've convinced themselves they have the "spiritual technology" and can control God (though they won't put it quite that way) and can decree their political, economic, social will to control the mechanics of American government and society. They are dangerous. ... and per the New Testament apocalyptic literature, at some point will rise a population so given to their delusions they'll be allowed to operate as they want, i.e., to perform those miracles and perform those wonders. So, don't take miracles at face value if ever they happen in your lifetime.

For the worst of the worst right now w.r.t. the Trumpian clamor, check out the "Elijah Streams" YouTube channel where Steve Shulz and his menagerie of false prophets bray for all. For someone who dissects their messages and compares it with Christian scripture, check out Chris Rosebrough (quite conservative) and his "Fighting for the Faith" YouTube channel.

EDIT(s): spelling
People are expected to learn not to be racists and sexists growing up. Those who don't learn then are rarely reformable but at least they can learn to be silent.
Cancel culture can go to far. But tolerance of intolerance is also a problem.

The US has a dark & dirty history and it seems the reason this has become a subject of debate again is because a certain element of people seem to want to pretend none of that ever happened, or worse, that it did but has no effect on our society today.
I Will Not Make a Discord for Good Graphics
BBC is biased in what it chooses to cover/not cover. You can have reasonably objective coverage but still carry water for the propaganda machine.
This site should be called Hipster News. I feel like the more obscure a project is, the higher the chance you'll see it on HN. Meanwhile, the bread and butter of regular programmers (c#/php/java) gets barely any mention here (and when it does, it's for major lang releases and it's typically poopooed hard) and you basically see ZERO threads about the news from within these huge ecosystems.
So your argument is that men are inherently superior to women in all physical aspects? Yea, no bias there...
It was MN not MO:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Farmer%E2%80%93Labor...
there is soo much incorrect and inaccurate in your statement I am not sure where to even begin, as not only to you incorrect state the position of the "left" you have also completely mischaracterized my comments.

First and for most the left absolutely believes cancelling in effective, infact they believe it is very effective and have used it to great effect, their problem is that for a few perculiarly popular indivuals, the one you kinda of highlight in your comment about "reaching millions" are insulated from the lefts ability to cancel them simply because they have more social power than the groups on the left

However that has not stopped the left from canceling in the 100's, 1000's or more from de-platforming on the popular social platforms of people with little to no following, small youtube channels, to getting people fired from their mundane jobs due to a twitter they did not like.

To deny the real world impact cancel culture has had to more or less irreverent people, people that do not have millions of followers, it is to deny reality itself

Sure for those creators, pundits, personalities that have a fan base in the millions "cancelling" may be ineffective, but I am not talking about those select few people.

I am talking about the school teacher that happened to support Trump in 2016, or 2020. I am talking about the marketing person they may have a controversial political view on immigration or abortion has dares to say so on twitter. I am talking about sub 100,000 subscriber you tube channel that may have said "hey that lab leak theory may have some merit" before the "authoritative sources" approved saying that, I am talking about a facebook user that happened to quote Ben Shapiro...

The examples are endless, real, and provable.
We don't care what it does with the previous ad data, what's disturbing is that there is even a setting to opt-in to more ads in the first place. Many people (myself included) will be completely turned away because of that option. That's just the cost of doing business.
PRC, Russia Professionalize Militaries – Without Cloning US NCOs
Trying to not read too much into the politics cough, but;

Navin Shenoy is out.

Sandra Rivera - It was always strange she moved ( or sidelined ) to Chief People Officer in 2019. ( One of those Intel politics we may someday figure out ).

Nick McKeown - ex Barefoot Networks. But never got much to do at Intel since he joined 2019. When you have talent and you dont use them. At least he is in charge of Network now.

Greg Lavender coming in from VMWare. I am guessing Pat Gelsinger needs someone close to help shake things up faster, or as he put it "but we must move faster to fulfill our ambitions,”. Intel is too big and moving too slow for changes.

Raja Koduri - ....... personally I am very skeptical. But Jim Keller seems to like him, so I guess he gets some benefits of doubt and we shall wait and see.

These changes come on the heels of a larger as-yet unconfirmed effort to restructure the company's Manufacturing and Operations and separate Global Supply Chain groups into one Manufacturing, Supply Chain and Operations group. - So even more shaking up coming soon.
Does this compete with LLVM? Sounds similar.
So how do I get the three-handled cup and "YOU'RE WINNER" message?
I see, the article has a contradiction:

'Now I don't think Chrome has implemented this feature in any other way from Firefox, except that for some unbeknownst reason it is a lot slower, but I do think that the two browsers decode images in a different way.'

It's a result of conflating the decoding itself, which is identical, with how images are swapped in or out.
English FTW.
Getting an automatic feeder has helped a lot. The cats used to wake us up at 3AM for food. Now it's much better. One of them still comes in at around 5:30AM to play, but that's not so bad.
Where has this been all my life lmao
Perhaps classes on ability necessary to the sport should be the only way to go?
I would generally suggest going for correctness over performance and the solution I provided is correct in the general case. Using an offset is only correct in the special case where objects will not be inserted or removed at an index less than the offset, otherwise you will end up with bugs as the offset becomes invalid upon such operations.

Furthermore, depending on the size of T, the performance penalty of the extra heap allocations is amortized over the cost of resizing the vector. That is vector reallocation is significantly faster for a unique_ptr<T> than it is for T when T is large and almost all memory allocators are tuned to allocate objects close together in space when they are allocated close together in time, so you don't lose the cache locality or need to worry about memory fragmentation.
I'm responding to users. You happen to have numerous comments here which aren't entirely accurate or fair, so I have responded to you a few times. Don't take it personal; if you publish something I feel is inaccurate, I'll post a response.

Regarding user experience, I'm not just a developer of Brave, but I'm a user also ;-) Not only that, but I spend a lot of time speaking with users all across the Web, so as to understand how they're using Brave, what works, and what doesn't. I do feel uniquely qualified to talk about matter of UX when it comes to Brave.
I just really doubt there's that many people out there who rolled the dice like that. First of all, landlords can report late to reporting agencies, which will make it difficult to get another apartment later and can impact the person's credit score. Secondly, there was never any guarantee that this would be the outcome -- it could have been something like having to pay back rent on a schedule. If you have the means to pay rent, why bother with the risk? It doesn't add up.
This seems way off. The number of engineers working at FAANG is in the hundreds of thousands, an athlete that is 100000th best in the world is basically a hobbyist rando.
Rust takes the approach of flat-out not letting you mutate any collection while you have any references to its contents. It eliminates all dangling pointer bugs... I don't know if it rules out any useful use cases of collections with iterator stability.

It does. Some collections have a "collection.retain" method.

collection.retain(|v| true_if_we_want_to_keep(v))

which goes through the collection in linear time and deletes any items for which the test is false. This is O(N).

Some collections ("multi_map", which isn't used much, comes to mind) don't have that. You have to make a read pass over the collection, construct a list of things to delete, then go through the delete list and delete those items. Can't read and change with the same iterator. That's slower. But sound.

I'm OK with that. It avoids subtle bugs.
I came here to provide similar, if not this exact feedback. I hadn't heard of the author before today and I only made it to the second labelled section of the essay before thinking, "Wow this reeks of arrogance and lack of self-awareness."
+1. I completely feel that and I definitely slacked more when employed by someone else doing something boring.

I was similarly surprised by hearing great things about me and how fast things get done (man, I did 10x the work for my own startup in the same time), but I think it boils down more to interpersonal skills, chatting on slack and showing my knowledge, solving problems quickly in the presence of others.
People's feedback is not a good metric to estimate how much work gets done.

At the same time I can work hours straight with no distraction if I enjoy the problem or if I'm working on my business.
It helps the poor be less poor but it doesn't help the poor become rich. Plenty of countries does those things and the poor still mostly remains poor, albeit with a better standard of living. A reason could be that when poverty hurts like it does in USA it motivates people to work hard to get a better job, while in countries where poverty isn't a big deal people can just choose to live the simple and easy life without much consequences.

I know I do it, I live in such a country and choose to live on much less than the least paid workers gets. I don't need more, and the low spending lets me work almost nothing and still get by. I don't feel I lack anything, and neither do any of the poor people I see here. College was free, healthcare is free, entertainment is super cheap with free public parks with sports areas and cheap internet, transportation is cheap with public transit and most stuff you need is within walking distance anyway.

If instead I was an American citizen I'd work a lot harder to avoid all the shit that can happen to you when you lack money there. I'd be richer on paper, but in practice I think I'd be worse off.
My point is: keep trying. Love thy enemy.

Imagine your mom is racist. Will you go to each and every house on her street telling everyone not to talk to this racist bitch who is not willing to admit she's wrong? Or you will spend time after time after time leaving no avenue unexplored trying to see what is she coming from and why is she wrong?
Can you conceive of any views one can express that deserve social backlash?
Rig Nacon Pro Compact Review – Decent Affordable Alternative
Yet more evidence that people should stick with dogs as pets, as co-evolution intended /s
There’s is nothing about how browsers decode images here. This is an article about an event called “decode” which you can await. It would be more interesting it was titled this way.
Perhaps it's doable with humans, but not scalable.

And AI makes it scalable.
this is canine propaganda
But doesn't RIFF specify the file size (the root chunk size) before the rest of the header, though?
Here it is Gizmodo; I didn't find it at the NYT in a quick search:

https://gizmodo.com/ground-temperatures-hit-118-degrees-in-t...
That’s why we ought to give people a sense of the odds. The chance that you’ll be a $400k income earner is somewhere around 1 in 100, so not too likely.

You can increase your odds by getting certain kinds of degrees and by living in certain areas, but odds are still going to be against you. I’m not sure how much since I don’t have the conditional probabilities at hand.

Try to get your hands on the stats to set your expectations accordingly. Good luck out there!
Its very likely that he could have obtained the Professional Engineer license either while working at these industrial companies or afterwards.

He likely did not as it would be an involved process and may require insurance.
C'mon, you have to see the flaw in this. There's a difference between making a monthly payment and having a large amount saved up.
Slightly OT, but today the UK 50.00 GBP note, featuring Turing, comes into circulation:

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2021/jun/23/new-50-note-al...
Thank you for objdump. It is a superb tool that I rely on.
I applaud your ability to recognize topics you don't like but it's worthwhile to ask yourself if you are avoiding those topics because they are not worth your time or because they make you uncomfortable. Without exploring that discomfort -- even just on your own -- those topics will always haunt you.
Incorrect. I voted in today's NYC mayoral primary. There are 13 candidates on the Democratic primary ballot. Perhaps 3 are considered "front-runners" but everyone's aware it's entirely possible at least a couple of the others could wind up winning. The race is entirely up in the air.

Because NYC is overwhelmingly Democratic, this election almost certainly determines who will be mayor.

And not only do you need to do your research on these many candidates, but there are similar lists of more than 2 candidates for Borough President, Comptroller, etc.

Welcome to actual democracy where you suddenly do get to express meaningful choices that aren't just between a single candidate preselected by two parties! And know that if your first-choice candidate doesn't win, your vote isn't effectively thrown out. :)
People are reluctant to move house or change jobs & cities during the pandemic. This reduces the liquidity in the market. Could the reduced liquidity trigger most of the price rise?
> This whole thing is thoroughly medieval

Actually, Medieval Scholastics had a vibrant discourse from a wide array of sources that would look practically libertarian by comparison to contemporary woke discourse. It sounded way more fun too.
Americans may not know that most countries don't have public primaries the way that the US does - here in NZ it varies from party to party - at one extreme the Greens hold a very public transparent democratic process, at the other the National party use closed 'smoke filled' rooms
If you didn't want downvotes you could have left out the particulars especially untimely is the inclusion of vaccines cause autism. The whole debacle was fueled originally by a lying sack of garbage who was drummed out of the medical profession for faking his results and just took off from there.
I find that really hard to believe. What would be the motivation behind that policy, and how would it be enforced?
Engineers are drawn to novel and exciting things; there's nothing wrong with that

But it's also not been my experience that the typical atmosphere around C#/Java posts that show up here has been "poopoo"
> I disagree that cardinal voting is understandable. It’s how we rate restaurants and review products on Amazon, and I don’t think it translates to an election with multiple options.

I disagree but also don't see this as a problem. If you rank candidates you still get the majority of the desirable properties. Rank with non-equal distances, even better. Hell, it isn't even bad if you bullet vote (that's just approval voting). Investigating non-optimal ways of voting under any voting system is an extremely important analysis. So for the voter there is no problem. I'm also kinda put off that you give real world examples of humans using cardinal methods and then claiming that we can't understand it (HN is using cardinal voting...)

But we also have to consider the counting of votes side of "understandable." Plurality is pretty damn easy, and this is clearly why we use it. Approval is almost as easy (just just sum multiple columns). Range/Score isn't much harder. Then STAR introduces 2 rounds of counting. Then we look at IRV and we see that we have tons of rounds. This isn't typically so bad in a presidential election where there are realistically about 4 candidates, but that complexity increases real fast elsewhere. Just watch NYC. There's going to be at least 5 rounds (probably more). This is far more complex. We only have to look at Arizona to understand why this part of the "understandable" question is important.
Boop him on the snoot. It’s what mama cats do to kittens.
not a bad one! I guess we would find out, when we find the heartbeat of other planets in our solar system. If all have same fingerprint, that would be a good indicator of a system-wide effect.
From that wikipedia article:

> A common argument in the debate about whether cat ownership is ethical involves the question of toxoplasma gondii transmission to humans.[58] Even though "living in a household with a cat that used a litter box was strongly associated with infection,"[32] and that living with several kittens or any cat under one year of age has some significance,[59] several other studies claim to have shown that living in a household with a cat is not a significant risk factor for T. gondii infection. [49][60]
Anyone who finds this paper interesting should read: "self attention between datapoints" Which shows non-parametric transformers often beat GBDTs on tabular data.

:https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/...
They say healthy expression of anger is an important tool even in human communication, to set boundaries/etc.

Angry cats chase each other. It doesn’t necessarily imply dominance.

I wouldn’t think this is cruel - it’s just a decent way to express your feelings on the matter to your feline, and he understood/learned.
its either that or wealth inequality
There's still a huge problem with the Australian system - seat-based voting. I live in one of the safest seats in Australia, and thus my vote has literally zero effect on any election result - votes only have impact in swing seats.

This is also very unfair on third parties - under proportional representation, winning 10% of the vote nationwide means 10% of seats. Under Australia's system, unless those votes are very concentrated in specific seats, it means zero seats.
>you need to obtain consent from a judge to do that.

It's not that the judge needs to step in to decide whether failing to pay rent should result in eviction. It's that you can't forcibly evict someone as an individual (because forcible eviction can go nasty, from either party, very quickly, and historically abused).

You need the judge to determine that it's now time to invoke the police to enact a forcible eviction, because the renter won't leave quietly/on his own.

The judge does not determine whether the renter is qualified to live there despite not owning up to his side of the renter's agreement -- the judge determines whether the use of force is now justified.

>To my mind, if the government suddenly refuses to evict anyone for public health reasons, the taking of intangible property rights is minimal, non-discriminatory and justified.

But that's not the problem at hand. Any reasonable person over the last 1.5 years should have not paid rent, regardless of capability to do so, because the law guaranteed you couldn't be evicted for it (inability to pay was a qualification for the law, but it's hardly trivial to prove it wasn't covid-related). The worst case scenario is you have to pony-up when the moratorium expired (and did you really expect the majority of the population who couldn't pay rent, to suddenly have enough money to cover 1.5 years of rent? The government bailing them out was inevitable -- the alternative is a massive wave of backed-up evictions).

Furthermore, you could barely even evict misbehaving tenants, let alone sufficiently-wealthy-but-not-paying, because the courts assumed it would fall under a covid eviction.

The entire thing was a naively well-intended shitshow.
Even beyond which country, when you were born is huge.

Most of us are lucky to be around now instead of 100 (or 1000) years ago.

For some reason people like to ignore temporal luck and temporal inequality, but for actual human outcomes they are massive influences.
In the meantime, can we just click on 'flag' or is that not appropriate?
> The mass evictions have already been prevented,

No, they have not, because the eviction moratoriums were expiring, which allows landlords to start evicting now. You don't think the rent was just forgiven, do you? The law only stopped evictions, it didn't go and change all the rental contracts and force anything to be forgiven. It's still owed, and landlords can pursue tenants for the balance, they can add liens and garnish income whether an eviction happens or not. So there is a big overhang of unpaid rent that is going to be burning through people's credit histories, their future income, and their future ability to not be evicted or find housing elsewhere. The existence of that debt has nothing to do with whether the tenant is evicted -- it is owed even after eviction -- it can't just be ignored because there was a temporary moratorium on evictions.
The median American has a pretty easy life growing up, they don't have any reasons why they can't succeed yet they almost never do anyway. And there is no reason to believe that the poor Americans would do better than the median Americans if they were given the resources of median Americans.
>However since this pandemic is ending surely there is some kind of student loans

I'm currently working on a degree but literally in the first semester, so that's going to be a while yet.
They’re different things. We generate the DID when the user creates an account. We use wallets to create that DID.

The issue of ENS is a side one. We do happen to have domains (and issue subdomains) on ENS, but that’s to have a pretty URL to resolve the DID. They’re not interdependent.
> I'm responding to users.

I'm gonna have to agree with GP that you're responding too much. I don't even use Brave nor do I care but I still browse HN. Obviously different people will see things differently, but you seem very defensive and it makes you come across as difficult.

Like I said, I have no skin in this game. You are welcome to ignore what I say if you don't find it helpful.