skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
FWIW, America also has lots of winding shit roads. I want to see a video of this Tesla navigating Lombard street in SFO.
Texas Power Companies Remotely Raise Temps Amid Energy Shortage
Given 0-day vulnerabilities and supply chain risks, I'm going to take a little bit of poetic license and say it's impossible to stop ransomware attacks, certainly with commercially viable levels of investment in infosec. You can mitigate some of the exposure, but the level of validation required to continuously guarantee that those mitigations are intact and effective.

So attacks will continue, the level of impact will hopefully be reduced along with the commensurate justifiable ransom payment.
Its really not a big deal. Just preallocate as much as you can behind a load screen, and use pooling on your tight loops. You'd be doing this in any language, anyhow. If you really want to go overboard, C# has Span<T> now, if you want to do your own arena allocation.

At least in Unity, the profiling is fairly well established so its easy to hunt down allocations.
The BAT that was moving around at that time was from Brave. We allocated hundreds of millions of tokens back in 2017 to a User Growth Pool. We distributed tokens to users of the Brave Browser, and allowed them to send those tokens off to their favorite content creators. This is similar to how PayPal lets you email money to anybody, even if they aren't signed up on PayPal. Our thought here was that users could effectively earmark the BAT they received from us, and that creators could sign up and claim those tokens.

We identified verified creators as such, but didn't make the non-verified state as explicit. We largely followed a similar pattern to that of Twitter (checkmark for those who are verified, and nothing for those who aren't).

When you visited a YouTube channel, website, etc., we would show you the name and favicon for that resource in the tipping UI. In the case of some YouTube channels, the page name was just the YouTuber's name, and their favicon was a picture of their face.

The changes that Tom Scott and others suggested back in 2018 were ground-breaking. They helped us realize some naïve decisions in the UI/UX of the tipping process and more. We moved quickly to implement those changes (https://brave.com/rewards-update), and the entire system is now substantially better as a result. But there was never any ill-motive involved. We had BAT, and we wanted users to give it to their favorite creators. Tom Scott approved of the changes at the time, which was a nice way to wrap things up
I'm trying to understand, by passing the trade request you are like a hosted wallet that you control? Instead of the user broadcasting a transaction, the hosted wallet does that?
I don't understand how that isn't money transmission, unless the hosted wallets are actually multisg, because as I undertand it multisig isn't considered custodial.
CO2 is least of the problems with varansi. From disease vectors to river pollution there is ton of issues with it.
Why is not reliable? The same has been said about Wikipedia for long time, but for some reason Wiktionary still does not get the same level of trust as Wikipedia. A lot of the etymologies on Wiktionary come from reputable sources such as the mentioned OED. In some cases there might be multiple conflicting sources and theories, and such complex cases are likely misrepresented by the automatic extraction tools.
“Thermal Shutdown” – Heat Wave Knocks Beta Starlink Users Offline
The context of the article is the Gnu coreutils. The coreutils version of echo accepts options which is not allowed according to the link you referenced. Therefore within the context of the article stating echo is non-portable is correct.
When it comes to that sort of fine tuning, there's no substitute for JOSM, which is the all-powerful java-based desktop editor with a hundred plugins and a somewhat inscrutable UI. But it's great because it can load several sources of aerial imagery at the same time, and quickly cycle between them or set transparency levels. This gives good perspective when it comes to precise alignment of map features to imagery, and to each other.
Gross person, gross company, and gross twitter has taken down the tweet. One of these days, Lot is going to leave the premises, and the fires will come down.
> In my experience wiktionary is a pretty great+reliable source for word etymology. I've corrected a few things, but generally it gets it right faar more often than wrong ...

Serious question: How do you know if it's right or wrong?

How do I know the Oxford English Dictionary is accurate? I trust it because experts trust it, because experts write it, and because it's had over a century to mature and it has retained its reputation for that long. Also, they show and cite actual quotes.

> good about citing sources

Ever check cites on Wikipedia? Many of them do not at all support what is written in the article.
This isn't the Tesla suv
It depends on the content you are being linked to. It is hard for the platform to fix that. However, what I mean is that it is easy to get hooked consuming similar short videos and before you know it, you have spent almost half an hour on this thing you are trying to avoid. I believe it is the UI that makes it so easy to jump to the next video even on the browser.
Why are they an excellent idea?
Where would it justify the cost of construction and operation?
So, suppose I'm Huge Video Streaming Corp X, and I get a DNS request asking me for the address of my servers. Well I have over a thousand servers around the globe, which one do you need? Any of them would work, but you likely want the fast nearby one, right? So I can try to guess based on the IP address the query came from...

I know the best answer for a Comcast DNS server in New York is the server I physically installed in a New York Comcast rack, but when a public DNS server asks me from Paris, maybe I suggest a London server, 'cos that's pretty close to Paris, shame that New York isn't.

EDNS Client Subnet is a feature that lets a DNS server say OK, I'm asking on behalf of somebody from 10.20.30/24 and so my system can do the same trick with ECS. But doing this unwinds most of the privacy benefit of using a public service, so several famous public DNS servers explicitly do not use ECS.

Obviously the cheap bulk host used for some Single Serving site like "Is pizza rat mayor of New York yet?" isn't affected, that is only one server and it is wherever it is, but somebody like Netflix absolutely is affected by this because they have their machines close to the customers to deliver better performance and if they don't know where the customer is that inteferes.

QUIC has an optional feature called Connection Migration to help improve this, the remote server is like "Um, now that you're connected to www.example.com here in Glasgow, Scotland, I notice your IP address is from Tokyo, Japan, and this is just a suggestion, but maybe talk to my identical twin also named www.example.com in Tokyo, Japan for better performance? Here is the IP address to try"
This description seems unpleasant, especially the hook part. I expect they need some better description that doesn’t involve people picturing themself or their loved ones being torn up by a hook.
Academic Family Tree
How does Virtual DOM work? (Build your own)
Probably because the first users were naturally more selected and targeted. Opening up to more people, regardless of their phone, inevitably leads to a noiser experience indeed.
When it comes to what it is tailored: there are two VM models: CoreCLR optimized for speed and throughout and MonoVM optimized for aot and small size workloads (aka apps and webassembly).

Nodejs is beat by CoreCLR dramatically on its own domain.

GraalVM i have to little insights but CoreCLR beats/equals performance of it java equivalent. I guess you can tweak GraalVM a lot more than CoreCLR because that is an actual weak point of the CoreCLR.
According to https://www.etec.energy.gov/Operations/Major_Operations/Majo... it's even worse than that; 1.83%.

That said, it seems like, all by itself, conversion efficiency is a tricky measure of the usefulness of a design for spaceflight purposes. Wouldn't it be more useful to consider the total cost to deliver a given energy production capacity to space? In that case, rocket fuel itself, and the tyranny of the rocket equation, becomes a major consideration. If an efficiency gain comes at the cost of increasing the weight of the energy generation system in some way, then perhaps it doesn't end up being a net win over the less efficient design.
Once it became obvious through Firefox blog posts that they support censorship and oppose free speech, I made the switch to Brave.
Show HN: Raytracer with both C++ and CUDA back ends
If someone is escaping Spring for it's verbosity and complexity JAX-RS and the Java EE standards aren't that much better IMO.
Doesnt this just mean that 80% of orgs that were hit with ransomware attacks just didn't bother to fix their infosec, and got hit again because they left the same holes open to be exploited?

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
I programmed professionally in .NET around 2003 with the initial versions. I liked it a lot and over the next years I tried to keep up to date about it on my spare time (I remember reading about LINQ development, the amazing CLR improvements, etc), all while I developed in Java, ruby and nowadays TypeScript.

The problem I see with .NET now (I did some tinkering on it via Unity) is that even though some of it is "open source", Micorsoft's grip is still pretty tight on it. Or at least it feels like that.

Given Microsoft's history I find it very difficult to "commit" to using the .NET framework for something real, because I feel I will be bitten back with the 'proprietary' aspects of it as soon as I go to production. It's a sunk cost that I cannot afford.

And it is not personal 'hatred' or anything given that I use VSCode as an editor and TypeScript itself comes from Microsoft.

I wish Microsoft would donate .NET to some 3rd party open source foundation (like what happens with all Apache projects, or LibreOffice, the MariaDB foundation, etc).
I'm sure the US has hundreds of spies and personnel in Russia at any point in time.

But sending a spy to a software developers house and assassinating them probably isn't going to stop the problem - more people will spring up doing the same.
Or, The Wooden Spaceships? Literally.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_and_Overland#The_Wooden_S...
> The same has been said about Wikipedia for long time, but for some reason Wiktionary still does not get the same level of trust as Wikipedia.

I don't think Wikipedia is reliable at all. I can't speak for others.

> A lot of the etymologies on Wiktionary come from reputable sources such as the mentioned OED.

Wiktionary reuses OED content? I'm surprised the OED allows that.
"Brave runs on the exact same ad model as Chrome…"

You couldn't be more mistaken here. I covered the history of digital advertising and the introduction of Brave's model here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsrrT502luI.

In short, Brave's model is largely the inversion of Google's model. With Brave, users must opt-in. Google doesn't ask you to opt-in. With Brave, user data remains on device. Google requires the remote collection of your data, as well as the broadcasting of it to third-parties. With Brave, users decide when and how many ads they will be shown. Google shows you as many as they can get away with. With Brave, user's collect 70% of the revenue for their participation. Google gives you nothing, but takes quite a bit. With Brave, Brave Software learns nothing about you, your interests, or your browsing history. Google learns quite a bit about you, harvesting as much data as they can get away with, and using it across contexts and domains.
"After an organization experienced a ransomware attack, the top 5 solutions implemented included security awareness training (48%), security operations (SOC) (48%), endpoint protection (44%), data backup and recovery (43%), and email scanning (41%)."

Only 43% of organizations invested in data backup and recovery after a randsomware attack? I would expect that number to be closer to 100%!
Andy Warhol and a million graphic designers might disagree :)

I maintain that art affects society. Scorsese makes Taxi Driver, some crazy guy watches it, decides to shoot Ronald Reagan to impress Jody Foster. Would crazy guy have done the same thing regardless of the movie? Maybe. Would he have done it on the same day, at the same time, in the exact same way? Probably not.

The world where Scorsese chose to make Taxi Driver is different than the one where the movie never existed; maybe the difference is trivial, but -some- effect is there. The remaining question is the extent of that effect.

The fact that when I imagine a cop, I imagine "Bad Boys" and "Law and Order", even when I haven't watched these shows for over a decade, is a testament to art's effects. Maybe this image was born out of the crime waves of the 70s-80s, but the image persists, affecting how people feel on topics of policing.
> I am almost entirely convinced that there is actually no such thing as a natural key.

Yes! Or if it is now, there's a future scenario where that will have proven to have been a poor decision.
lol I did this too eons ago. I don't think those speakers ever worked the same again after that.
what was true centuries ago is no longer true. "he" is not gender neutral in English, in any sense of the term. it's only used as such in historical writing - languages evolve over time. "she" connotes as much knowledge as "he".
Out of curiosity, what is missing in .NET that isn’t being prioritized by Microsoft and that other languages provide?

C# has been pretty groundbreaking, adding features like async await and generators before other mainstream languages.

They are also pushing forward ASP.NET pretty aggressively, even having first class support for gRPC and other popular technologies.
Cremation will destroy prions. Composting will not. I guess the issue would be with prions from a composting brain getting into food supply.

I’m not sure how real of a concern this is as deer with CWD die and decompose and I’m not aware of any transmission in this way.
Great! Legacy underground mazes full of decomposing human heads are such a pain.
The audio mixer is dependent on the speakers, not the other way around. The speakers should be able to handle anything the mixer is able to throw at it. If they aren't, that's fault on the speakers' part.
Well, on some level they are related, as you noted, by the ideological background that drives the belief system of the people managing SF. But, if we range their decisions by the amount of harm they are doing to the city, I don't think not jailing addicts would come on top. There were other places, where this strategy worked successfully - when combined with suitable addiction management programs and proper law enforcement in other areas. SF management, obviously, is unwilling to do that, but I would blame the whole complex of delusionary beliefs they hold rather than specific decriminalization decision.
Patent Ambush
Sorry but I think this author is being more pedantic rather than helpful, and actually seems to miss the point entirely. The crux here is two things the author claims:

> Since SQL does not allow creating or using nested tables, most relational databases will be in first normal form by necessity.

> Many explanations (including Wikipedia) uses the example of a comma-separated string with phone numbers as an example of a 1NF violation... Make no mistake, encoding multiple values in a single string is generally a bad design. But it has nothing to do with first normal form. First normal form mean a column should not allow relations as values. A comma-separated string is still just a single string from the perspective of the database type system.

I think it's rather obvious that the example here is nothing to do with literal commas. But that storing multiple comma-delimited phone numbers in a single field is precisely creating a nested table in spirit.

It has nothing to do with SQL support for nested tables or the database type system -- it's not about formal definitions. It's about whether you're conceptually putting multiple pieces of data into a single field. Which has everything to do with first normal form.

Because if you put comma-delimited phone numbers into a field, you lose the ability to relate and join those phone numbers individually to another table. Which is bad, and the whole concept of "1NF" exists to give a name to this badness.

And this isn't a minor point. It's actually extremely important, because the common practice of throwing JSON data into a string field destroys the ability to operate relationally on the data within it.

Now of course, plenty of databases these days actually do provide ways to index and join on data using a new "JSON" type column -- which is yet another form of the "nested table" the author claims doesn't exist. Which is great for combining ease of use with performance, but certainly isn't 1NF, and basically explodes (or at least dramatically complicates) the fundamental concept of relational databases as tables of rows and columns.
The claim that Brave was collecting money on behalf of others is quite misleading. See my response here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27553383.
Eh, UI consistency is overrated. I'm old enough to remember the 90s and early 00s when people said the webapps would never really be widely used outside of toy applications because of UI/UX inconsistencies.
Catacombs as a Service is really going to take off.
There are solutions for that problem which involve a tiny source of alpha radiation and the atmosphere. Basically a modified lightning rod.
They're becoming a file encryption service. No one can steal your files either because they will just get encrypted trash.

Though I suppose those thieves could also pay for the encryption key, or just go directly to the "service provider" for a paid copy.
Because that’s where the money is, someone once said.
"Low key" is an easy enough homophone that I don't think that that will fly. I think they even used it on Supernatural at some point. Not as a name, but as a pun on the name.

Copyright is kind of loose. Gaiman and Marvel can both base a character off of the character of Norse mythology because that character is public domain. That doesn't mean either is a reference to each other. There are certain character traits that are contained within that mythology. Certain things are added by Gaiman or Marvel that are specific to their interpretations and those could be protected under copyright.

But could is not is. It really depends on how much of a deviation those details are. Or how much can be extrapolated from public characterization.

Loki and Thor being adopted brothers is probably off-limits to Gaiman as that is something Marvel invented out of whole cloth.

Loki being a secret identity of an archangel to hide from his brothers is probably off limits to both Marvel and Gaiman as that's specific to Loki's portrayal in Supernatural.

Loki being a manifestation of chaos whose power is waning and running a con out of jail is specific to Gaiman. Although deities being manifestations of belief isn't exactly a stretch itself. But him leading a new pantheon of "New Gods" is novel. That specific characterization is off limits to Marvel.

But noticing that Loki and "Low Key" sound similar, that falls squarely in the realm of possible independent discovery.
At a quick googling, the basic VS Pro subscription costs $45/mo. That doesn't seem unreasonable to ask, even from a small company with $1M annual revenue.
The freenas hardware requirements themselves say
"8 GB RAM (ECC recommended but not required)"

https://www.freenas.org/hardware-requirements/

I myself use freenas with 16GB of non-ECC ram.

Of course it is possible to have a bit flip in memory that is then dutifully stored incorrectly by ZFS to disk, but this was a possibility without ZFS as well.

I've actually been waiting for this feature for since I first setup my pool. It seemed theoretically possible we were just waiting for an implementation.
The statement clearly that I linked to clearly exists. It's right there in front of your eyes.
Neither quantity nor ECC is essential.

ZFS defaults to assuming it is the primary reason for your box to exist, but it only takes two lines to define more reasonable RAM usage: zfs_arc_min and zfs_arc_max. On a NAS type server, I would think setting the max to half of your RAM is reasonable. Maybe 3/4 if you never do anything except storage.

ECC is not recommended because ZFS has some kind of special vulnerability without it; ECC is recommended because ZFS has taken care of all the more likely chances of undetectable corruption, so that's the next step.
No more than opportunities to do good reveal. We all have good and bad in us. Today you have an opportunity - do some good!
New Indian Covid variant is going crazy around the world
How will you prepare?
Although my favorite is Win32, Modern/Fluent is the only one that really strikes me as "bad."
AB testing shows 80% of the customers like it
I'm looking forward to one of them going public in a country where ransomware is legal lol, seems like they've got really solid ARR.
Idk, I've never opened tiktok. I'm reacting to people's comments.
The criminals already do often recommend firms to manage the payment and recovery process.
Which vulnerability did the attackers use to gain initial access? Do the attackers disclose this along with decrypting the data? And are you sure they didn't leave a sleeper Trojan behind for later?
One way to motivate yourself to make self driving cars is to make your steering wheel less usable, I guess.
I do the same when they call up and say “have you been in a car accident that wasn’t your fault?”

I’ve tried every posible reply I can think of in every intonation from fear to confusion to anger to genuinely glad they’ve called. They always just hang up.
Fully support this for myself, though I don't think I need my composed remains to be returned to the family. Not sure why, but that feels more grim than ashes on the mantle (though I don't feel a need for that either).
You want know current, or potential?
Yeah, I'm currently facing exactly that dilemma. I have to model a database of machine parts.

There is a natural PK in the form of the supplier's parts number, but the legacy system (which uses that as PK) notes that it is specifically the parts number as used in the supplier's ERP system, but suppliers often use differently formatted parts numers in publications such as catalogs (adding or removing spaces, slashes or dashes). So the legacy system also has the "published part number" as one or more separate fields.

This inconsistency makes me lean very strongly towards using a synthetic PK instead.
Fastest production car in the world...and seats 5 adults comfortably!
So your problem is with the use of unbounded quantifiers that range over all natural numbers?

So for example you would consider "∀x. ∀y. x + y = y + x" a nonsense statement because we are quantifying over all natural numbers, and there are an infinite number of natural numbers, so we cannot quantify over them?

(For the record the ' in 0' or x1' is a post-fix notation for the successor operation. See http://tachyos.org/godel/proof.html for details).
Absolutely. We're trying to sketch out the solution to that right now. It's kinda complicated, but from a high-level it seems to require either tracking on-chain address contracts or case-by-case api integrations. DeFi connections are one of the our most requested features, and honestly we want to keep track of our own holdings there as well
AMD vs. Intel CPU Market Share
We should switch the title to Porfessors, because academics shouldn't take themselves so seriously
Yes, but getting your opponent to believe you will take an absolute position is often the most useful tactic.