skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As the hint explains, it's a combination of PDP-11 and VAX machine code, set up so that either system will run its own code and ignore the foreign code.

You can extract a few ASCII strings from the data. As the hint says: "Can you guess what is printed? We knew you couldn't! :-)"

The ASCII strings I found were "vax", "pdp", "str", "write", and " :-)".
> Those continually burn natural gas

Not really - they're very well insulated, so they do a burn/coast/burn cycle where they are off far more than they are on.

That said - I'm a big fan of tankless, however in a big family with typical loads, the savings in gas alone aren't as much as you'd think.
The intuitive properties you expect from HTTP actually aren't delivered and can't be delivered, except over HTTPS.

A lot of people focus on the confidentiality element of TLS. "Clearly I don't need for it to be secret that I looked at the Wikipedia entry for Napoleon (the 1995 movie, not the famous guy)".

But TLS bundles together three things and if you need any of them you can't have them with plain HTTP. You get confidentiality, but you also get integrity and authentication.

That means when you curl https://foo.example/something we can promise you that the result is the resource https://foo.example/something - maybe that's not what you actually wanted, maybe it's full of lies or worse, but it is what you asked for and it is what you get. With plain HTTP all bets are off, anybody can interpose and present anything else to you.

If it's OK if you just get anything and not the article from Wikipedia, why even look at Wikipedia at all? You could make up whatever you want, it's a black-and-white movie about a dog who ruled France and then went into space, and it was the #1 grossing movie in every country for six years.
Vents should turn on automatically while the burner is ignited and for some amount of time after.
I’m ready to defer to your expertise (or any expertise, really), but aren’t we just disagreeing over terminology?

By a “federated system” I mean that there is a relatively small number of independently operated first-class entities (servers, nodes) that are more permanently connected and host a large number of second-class entities (users, points) that are more intermittently connected and generally correspond to individuals. Internet mail, IRC, Jabber and Matrix are federated; Slack (centralized) and BitTorrent with DHT (peer-to-peer) are not. The Internet itself is complex enough that it probably doesn’t usefully fit into this classification.

In this sense Usenet and FidoNet are both federated store-and-forward mail systems. Or am I wrong?
That is false; you might be thinking of figure skates on ice. Steel on road obeys coefficient of friction.

(I promise I will keep that in mind the next time I attach skates to a bicycle frame.)
OTOH when you sell you reap the benefits of $4800/year in the additional appraised value.
Not for UK users

Which sucks, because thats the only way to get Google Voice, which we still dont have here outside of Workspace.
Tour De France riders do use wider tires than they used to these days. At some point the width starts imparting aerodynamic drag penalties that are worse than the handling gains.
> why do Discord [..] need to verify my identity?

> the overall population of users on the web

You keep arguing about a non-issue. Normal users do not need to verify with Discord. It's only for bot owners of popular bots to prevent the widespread abuse Discord saw.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27505905
Well, that's frustrating.
Slicks themselves are under-appreciated.
People don’t even know they are supposed to use the vent.
> you were arguing with a moron

I'm inclined to agree, but increasingly these "morons" are more numerous and more likely to occupy positions of power and authority.

> I was under the impression in liberal democracy even up until maybe 2015 treating an individual as an example of all individuals from that group was considered reprehensible for obvious reasons, i.e. you will end up saying racist or sexist things.

Yeah, me too.

> The more general rule I would like back because everyone is being forced on left or right have it assumed that they occupy absurd positions.

I'm having a hard time parsing this sentence, could you rephrase/clarify?
Google Is Officially Launching Fuchsia Os with Nest with First-Gen Nest Hub
Do you feel in doing this that you're making the web worse? As a business, you certainly have no obligation to be ethical, but doesn't it feel a bit strange as a person who presumably grew up with the web to be playing such a big role in harming the people who use it?
Wow, all the confirmation one needs for the first two paragraphs of your post is to read the replies you got.

I'm reminded a bit of the Futurama where Zapp Brannigan attacks the neutral planet :)
> This is the absolute antithesis of the intent of open source.

I disagree with this assertion (...and with Frenck too). There was no need for NixOS packagers to involve HA here, they are outsourcing work upstream. Imagine some small-time driver author/maintainer asking Debian to remove their driver - and Debian's solution to honor this request is to ask Linus to drop the driver from his upstream tree!

The long-held tradition, when you disagree with upstream, is to maintain your own patch-set that you are responsible for and have to labor to keep current - that is not the antithesis of open source - it is very much in the spirit of exercising the right to change the source code as you see fit.
Appreciate your feedback. On the first point, limitations on what the secret key can access are coming very soon.

> A concrete suggestion: make it possible for businesses to choose whether they have access the raw data, and expose the choice to the end user in the Stripe Identity flow. Ideally, businesses that want the raw data would be subject to security compliance requirements. This is an opportunity for Stripe to be a leader in setting high standards on how this type of data should be handled.

Yes, per GP comment, I think this is a good idea. I suspect we'll do it.
Electric stove is also safer around kids and elderly..

I have gas stove, hot water, dryers and heating. The hot water and heating were upgraded to gas fairly recently, from oil (I live in New England, there are a lot of legacy heating systems- oil was actually an upgrade in the 1940s from the original coal heat). There is strong incentive to do this because oil was costing me $3800 / year back when oil hit $5 a gallon, whereas gas costs $700 / year. This upgrade costs $14000 (includeing installation of forced air vents, central A/C and gas water heat tank). The previous upgrade from coal to oil was about reducing waste and increasing convenience. With coal, you had to deal with ash waste and stoking.

A dual-stage electric heat pump would in theory work and have comparable operating cost, but the install cost was like $30000, had questionable reliability and few contractors even knew about it. Geothermal would also work, but my land is tiny and the cost would have been something like $60000. There was even a Honda generator home co-generation plant option available, but again, expensive and no contractors.

What would you do? BTW, my largest utility bill now is actually water, because we are paying for the Boston harbor clean-up in my sewage bill. I'm tempted to illegally use rain water for the toilets... A rooftop solar system is popular around here, but it's not worth it based on my tiny electric bill.

We have to get off of fossil fuels, but it's definitely going to take a government mandate backed with financial incentives to get people to switch.
You can pull up and push down. Also if you get a pro fitting then the position of your foot will be optimised to get the max power through the pedal.

Anecdotally they’re faster.
> No. When you rent, you usually are paying (1) the owner's mortgage, (2) taxes, (3) maintenance and (4) profit

In what world is this usual? Most of the time when renting you're paying for a single floor of a house or a single condo unit. It would be insane to expect people who are renting a portion of a building to pay for the whole damn thing.
I bought a Specialized Diverge over a year ago. It was mostly to commute to and from work, but also to have the ability to take gravel paths and trails on the weekends. It's been awesome but friends have suggested I take off the stock tires and add some new ones. Is it really worth it? The tires are already fairly fat already, at least compared to road bike tires.
Stated vs. Revealed preferences.
I disagree. The FDR era featured a lot more public corruption and cronyism then currently exists. Indeed, I suspect there's some trade-off between anti-corruption and the ability to get things built, as layers of checks, hearings, certifications, etc. end up making it much harder and more time consuming to build anything.
To break free of the sensationalized partisan news, I've switched to reading The New Paper's [0] Monday-Friday daily email + Wikipedia Current Events [1] (delivered daily via email [2]) + HN (I try to check just once a day).

I've found that when the news is less "exciting," I'm a lot less inclined to read it. I still know enough to participate in most conversations, and if something seems really important, I'll read more in other outlets. I still forget most of the news the next day (just like I did before).

Overall I feel equally informed and less stressed out and better able to focus on the things in my life that have an impact.

[0] https://thenewpaper.co/
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events
[2] https://dev.to/kiwicopple/daily-email-of-wikipedia-s-current...
>If a policy is effective and correct, I would not call it extreme.

>I guess it depends on the definition of extreme, but I would not think "good" policy would be extreme

The issue is that you've begged the question in your definition: Good policy isn't extreme, therefore all policy that is extreme isn't good, therefore no extreme policy. You've just redefined extreme to mean bad - so we can't really discuss much more.

I'll propose a different definition for use here, one that accords with common use: 'Extreme', in this case, is whether or not the position is unreasonable, unmoderate, or exceedingly unusual.

With this definition we can find examples of positive extreme policy positions: We take take the abolition of slavery as an example of extreme policy. Granting women suffrage is another. Desegregation is another.

This isn't to say that all extreme policy positions are right - many, maybe most, are wrong. But digging into the trade-offs between the two requires a far more nuanced discussion than the one we're having here, because there's a lot of legal history about the relative velocity of legislative change and that's gonna take up more room than we have.
Combating Spoofed Robocalls with Caller ID Authentication (Stir/Shaken in 2 Wks)
You can't really rely on the Tour de France peloton for guidance. They're pretty conservative and, to a degree, ruled by fashion and sponsors.
Wikileaks disinfo has almost always been in deeply misleading and sometimes explicitly false editorializing and framing of leaks rather than the content.

They also post a lot of misinformation to their Twitter account - falsely claiming Bob Beckel was a Clinton staffer, boosting the false Seth Rich story, boosting bogus Clinton health claims, and much more besides.

They also posted selectively edited leaks to hide information that made Russia look bad:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/09/09/wikileaks-hi...

Their selective choice of leaks which they did and did not choose to accept also suggests a lot of bias:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-l...

Their internal leaked chats from 2016 showed they were consciously and deliberately skewing their coverage to help the GOP and harm Dems:
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/14/julian-assange-wikileaks...

They're very biased, and their biases come out in what they choose to publish, what they refuse to publish, and how they choose to editorialize, and in one known case in selective editing of a leak, but in general the leaks themselves aren't "false information" but are documents which they're spreading to create a specific narrative, and in several cases like the Syria, Podesta, DCCC, and DNC leaks it's clear they're serving as a front for Russian intelligence agencies to spread a specific narrative to aid Russian goals rather than further the truth. Since they serve as a front for foreign intelligence agencies, it's totally possible they're getting drops from other intelligence agencies with similar agendas.
Since we're all sharing, the concept of tracking progress by the day as popularized (but not created) by Jerry Seinfeld[1] has helped me quite a bit.

What also helped is realizing there isn't a silver bullet or magic pill that will get me to do the work: the work has to be done, and I have to do it at some point.

I started a few spreadsheets for things I'd like to log: amount of piano practice per day (aim for 30m), amount of script pages written now that I've transitioned away from programming, the amount of laps I swam that day, etc.

It feels appropriately "bad" to keep filling in the cells with "0". And looking at the "streaks" I have keeps me going.

Here are example pics of some of my spreadsheets, maybe this could be useful to some:

Piano Log: https://i.imgur.com/H0TbSSC.png

Writing Log: https://i.imgur.com/6Qb7Dka.png (not doing as well there, clearly...)

Conditional formatting reminds me of various thresholds per day and per week. Red = below minimum, yellow = at or slightly above the minimum, green = above the minimum

1. https://lifehacker.com/how-seinfelds-productivity-secret-fix...
Many (most?) vents do not vent outdoors; they are attached to the microwave and simply move hot air from below the microwave to above it. It's still a major problem.
is this the intercept magazine, the one at least formerly edited by a apparently entirely uninformed self appointed security expert, who nevertheless successfully duped Snowden into sending files in the clear literally by wearing him down with obstinate indigence and ignorance of the most elementary encryption concepts in a simultaneously suspicious display of incapacity to comprehend the most clear and simple instructions and theory of operation provided to him repeatedly over the course of months?
HTTPS is definitely useful for preserving the integrity of data between the server and the end user.

To be clear, I'm very pro-SSL and have used LetsEncrypt for years on all my domains. I was just taking issue with the notion that someone's web server serving static content could be breached just because it didn't have an SSL cert.
This is how Americans who aren't from LA or NYC feel as well.
The policy basically changes on a daily basis, depending on which action he needs to quickly justify.

Generally speaking, mentioning anything about libera.chat in the topic is counted as "spam" or "advertising" or whatever, even if you were keeping a presence on both networks, or only considering the possibility of a move.
I can even see an option where they want me to unlock the phone but I was so stressed that I totally forgot my pin and I was trying to be helpful by trying as many times as possible...
There's a tendency to conflate identification with endorsement. Twitter muddied the two together instead of keeping it as anti-spoofing measure. Users are trained to see HTTPS as a sign a website is legitimate or secure and not just a way to confirm the public key. Democrats want to use the unconstitutional no fly list to ban individuals from buying guns. After the Boston Marathon bomb attack some senators wanted to require KYC on all cellphones and encourage the police to not read suspects their defendant rights. The reflexive opposition to COVID-19 vaccine verification is because people don't trust the government.
Cheers but no need -- I'm just repeating what other smarter people have told me. Take whatever you got from my comment and put it to good use: pass it along to someone else, or just go out into your community and lend a hand to those in need. Good luck
Fear-mongering sells. He's good at it. So is Rachael Maddow and just about everyone they put in front of the camera to "inform" you.
I'm a fan of Haidt and think his moral "tastebuds" (I think he makes that analogy somewhere) is an interesting model. I largely buy into it, but I found a really perceptive take in this short blog post that came out a few years back that's a bit more skeptical. https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2017/05/26/trump-as-...
I'm missing something: How do lower pressures lead to tubeless?
I do get your point, Chrome is launching new APIs faster than the other guys can catch up. My issue is that the others guys had a lot of time to create the APIs Chrome is creating now and has created. When Chrome was focused on making the web better, these guys were working on making it more restrictive.

On https://webapicontroversy.com, I see these APIs that Chrome supports that clash with Mozilla:

Web Bluetooth API
Web NFC API
Web USB API

These seem like useful APIs. Mozilla seems against these due to security risk, but then why not work on a protocol that is safe? Bringing NFC, USB, and Bluetooth to the web is important in my opinion. Apple still doesn't let you connect a bluetooth device via WebKit, but guess what? You can pay to install a browser on the App Store that does.

Nothing is going to be perfect at the beginning but if Mozilla is so against it, the best response is a better product.
> Doesn’t a greater surface area touching the floor means more frictional effects when pushing against the road?

Good question because at first I thought it might be negligible due to the tire normally being in a state of static friction relative to the road. But some quick searches showed me that rolling resistance is related to how large the contact point is, like you suggest, along with a variety of other factors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance

I don’t know how reliable this is, but googling brought me to this site which compares bicycle tire brands according to rolling resistance on their test machine. Apparently, some 25s have all the 23s beat. If true, the variability range for bicycle tires is a lot wider than I expected. https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.com/
The C standard requires main to be defined as a function, but failure to do so is not a constraint violation, so no diagnostic is required. If you define it as something else, the behavior is undefined.

A conforming C compiler could reject a program that defines main as an array, but is not required to do so.

gcc doesn't complain by default, but with warning enabled it says "warning: 'main' is usually a function".
Some context: Frenck is a core developer on the Home Assistant project, and was hired by Nabu Casa (the company the project's founder founded to try to create a sustainable funding source via adding some optional value-add services) to develop for Home Assistant full time.

If instead of packing these separately, the home assistant nixpkg for home assistant simply downloaded all the required dependencies from PyPi, and verified them against a maintained list of checksums as part of the nixpkg (for reproducibility), then frenck probably would not object to that, since the last I knew the some of the official home assistant docker images do preinstall the requirements for the majority of plugins like that.

I'm suspect frenck's real concern comes from any possibility of modifications in the packaged version, combined with any possibility of nix allowing home assistant to be used with a version that is not an exact match of what home assistant specifies.

Alternatively If this could be packages as some form of home-assistant sub-package that was guaranteed to always match the PyPi version specified for home assistant exactly, without any mixing and matching, it would likely allay his concerns. Unfortunately he has not spelled out his concerns fully, so I cannot know for sure. I also have no idea if this is at all feasible in the nix packaging system.
This sums up my (admittedly naive) view towards retirement. Why would I sacrifice so much of my youth for a future so far down the road that I will 1) most definitely be in worse shape for, and 2) may not even reach? I think the wringer of grad school is enough of an investment in my future.
The subtitle states the intention of the article pretty clearly and is located directly below the main title:

> Climate change is bringing tourism and tension to Longyearbyen on the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard

The article's first paragraph is how homeowners are noticing cracks in the foundation due to the terrain under their houses receding due to climate change warming the otherwise permafrosted ground.

The article's third paragraph pretty concretely discusses exactly what is happening to the temperatures there.

The entire article is about climate change. You've removed a very important part of the original title for (in my opinion) some philosophical nonsensical reason, ultimately changing the meaning the author intended.
You're welcome! If you have any feedback, please email me gab@strongpigeon.dev
What is a 'controlled opposition asset'?
You can use google checkout transfer to transfer everything from a workspace account to a gmail one

https://takeout.google.com/transfer
You mean like the Austin urologist named Dick Chopp, who specializes in vasectomies? He even offers a t-shirt to his patients that reads "I was 'chopped' at the Urology Team."

(all of this is true)
I had the same feeling as you recently, until I read a site posted here a few weeks ago. I can't find it now, but it was a personal page where someone described in increasing levels of severity what can be done over an unsecured HTTP connection even if there is no private data transmitted over it. Can someone help?

Because unencrypted HTTP allows attackers to MITM the traffic, they can do things like put ads on your site, inject malware or bitcoin miners, or just replace your site completely. None of those affect you, the site owner, directly, but ìt subverts the purpose of your site and lowers the value and trustworthiness of your site to your visitors.
You only depend on the compiler to interpret these floats correctly and generate their binary representation that decodes into valid instructions. As far as the CPU executing this code is concerned, it's machine code either way.

> Maybe in a different architecture or something?

Of course this isn't portable across CPU architectures, neither is it portable across operating systems due to at least ABI differences.
You just need a thicker pan.
I hear you, I've been working on peercalls.com, a video conferencing app, for the past few years and it works on all major browsers and platforms, including Firefox.

That said, I'm bummed out that E2EE using insertable streams / SFrame transform is only currently supported in Chrome.

I've also noticed that very few devs in the WebRTC community actually test stuff in Firefox.
You don't need to give equal credence, but you do need a source of facts that is not cherry-picked. Polarization leads to cherry-picking, so the only way to get facts that might falsify (or complicate) narratives is to seek out adversarial sources with their own (but different) biases.
> I'm not a discord bot maker

You don't say. Go to a random Discord server and you will see how bots are used. Your solution makes no sense and would kill most of the current use cases.