skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For me, if I have long email threads (think 1 year worth of to and fros), it takes ages to load and keeps moving the position based on images loading etc. The conversation view completely becomes unusable beyond few tens of emails.
Seems like you have update your API in two locations when changes happen, once in the `JobManager` definition and another time in the parser. How do you avoid issues with inconsistency?
Taming Silicon to Interact with Light for Next-Generation Microelectronics
Right. I find it annoying too, but for the opposite reason.

Since GraalVM, Babashka, and before them Lumo and Planck, or just plain CLJS + NodeJS, Clojure (the language) has several answers to those use cases, and it’s unclear to me at least why this is a point of contention regarding Clojure (the JVM implementation). Should we also bash CLJS for being single threaded?
Infrastructure is sized for peak power usage, so for those early evening times when somebody might have their air conditioner, range and clothes dryer running simultaneously.

Electrification will significantly increase energy usage (kWh), but it has a much smaller impact on peak power (kW). Electric cars charge at night, electric heat pumps replace air conditioners, et cetera.

Also, infrastructure was designed for rising demand. For infrastructure was built in the 60s the planners would say "demand is doubling every decade, so if we want our infrastructure to last 100 years..."

Sure, there will be some places that don't have adequate infrastructure, but it will be a small fraction.
Yes I was signed in, there was just no way for me to tell that I was until I navigated to the homepage manually and saw the navbar changed.
A flat population does not necessarily mean economic growth must stop. Economic growth can still come from plenty of other places, like better infrastructure, technology improvements, various types of efficiency gains, etc. etc.
This is in no way a critique of this project (which looks nice!) but my dream fitness program would be something like, "do all the things in this book, in order, and by the end of the book you'll be mostly fit". I'm sure it works great for some people but I get bogged down by choice paralysis when I'm presented with a list of workouts.
What products that quickly build muscle mass?
This is also good. And also having more of a network effect for people to interact and cooperate helps as well.
Mass Extreme - The Best Supplement for Building Muscle Mass
Visit the website to learn more
Get one of those under-the-desk bike peddle exercise machines and play the video on a TV in the background.
This assumes that everyday conservatives believe in the republican representatives that end up in power.

I didn't even vote in the last election as I felt un-represented. For me there was no 'greater evil' candidate. Prior I voted libertarian, but what good does that do?

Does having voted a certain way for a candidate make your beliefs ultimately responsible for the way the representative governs? In America we essentially get `choose red or blue`.

How can the subjects as complicated as everyday topics are ever be reduced to two colors!?

The problem _is_ our tyrannical democratic system.
> I think you’re discounting that everything Chrome does these days is designed to become a web standard

Indeed. It's rarely designed to be a web standard. However, Chrome rams that through standards body, calls that a standard and enables it by default in Chrome.

Just look at WebHID. Firefox devs couldn't even understand the spec [1], it was so Chrome-specific. Guess what, it's enabled by default in Chrome [2] and Chrome says that it's a standard now [3]. Most of those non-standards are not even out of the "draft" stage of the standards process, with both Safari and Firefox objecting to many, many, many things in the specs.

Google. doesn't. care.

[1] https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/459#is...

[2] https://webapicontroversy.com

[3] https://web.dev/hid/
Ah yeah the cheap atom-intel way...
It's never too late. Read about solarpunk and low-power computers/devices. The old is becoming new again (as new Pubnix communities are rising again, among the gopherspace), plus non energy-wasting science:

http://phroxy.z3bra.org/bitreich.org:70/0/con/2020/rec/energ...
I 100% agree that it is a godsend, especially for developers who want to offer competent alternatives to shitty electron wrapper apps. What makes me really sad is how some of the very wise people conflate this to a security risk to an average internet surfer.
Is Ocaml actually this legit? Or is this article just biased fluff.
I mean if all the candidates are only from big companies or went to the same school or are all white men (this part I only figure out on videocalls), then I assume the recruiter isn’t fishing very many recruiting pools. I want recruiters who do more than search LinkedIn. They should be tapped in to local technology groups, alumni associations, professional groups, etc.
People won't deposit their life savings in Tik Tok.
Student loan borrowers refusing to pay their debt, hoping Biden will forgive it
(Stripe cofounder.)

> Considering that Stripe was originally known for letting websites accept credit card payments without seeing your credit card number, one might assume that Stripe Identity only allows websites to see the verification result, and not your selfies and scans of your identity documents.

A few points:

- Fundamentally, Identity makes it possible to choose how much of this data traverses / is stored on your servers, just as Stripe did with card numbers.

- There's a basic difference between card numbers and identity verification. With card numbers, you (generally) don't really care about the number -- you just want the payment. With ID verification, however, many businesses have good reason to want more than just the verification result. For example, they are often subject to compliance requirements that mandate that they themselves possess or have access to the raw information. They may need or wish to perform additional checks on their side. Etc.

- The relevant UI in Identity is deliberately very clear on this points in order to avoid the assumption you're stating. The flow explicitly says "Stripe and [Business] may each use your data." Even though an end user might consider it suboptimal for the business to have their data, we still view it as an improvement to the usual status quo, where this data is frequently stored in very ad hoc fashion and without rigorous security protections.

- While many of the businesses initially building on Identity wanted access to the raw information, it may well make sense for us to enable them to restrict themselves in the future. In this world, Stripe could tell their customers that the business doesn't have access to the raw details. (This might even make sense for Stripe payments in the future.) As a philosophical matter, we consider ourselves to serve the business, which means that limiting access to what we consider to be the business's own information feels a bit strange. That said, it might sometimes be in the interests of the business to allow them to limit themselves in this fashion (especially as Stripe's brand recognition among consumers grows).

- There's a separate concern about compromise of the business's credentials leading to inadvertent disclosure of this information (a situation analogous to an S3 bucket key getting leaked). This is of general concern to us in lots of situations, not just with Identity. We have some new functionality on the way here.
Abusing File Formats
Just their life
So you're saying that you're single-handedly pulling in between 2x and 5x the median household US income, yet can't set aside $20k a year for your 401k?

That means you're either not living on a budget at all, or you're doing something ridiculous like paying out of pocket for prescription medication without using the ACA.
“Sane adults” only do well when predicting in hindsight, where algorithms are unbeatable.
But like one of the Identity team folks said, the hotel would only have the OPTION to download and store those blobs. They aren't required to, and I'm assuming they would not. They'd be happy with the verification result and letting Stripe handle storing the PII.

Speaking from experience as we use Stripe Identity, and love not having to store the PII.
Now how closely do the "What Conservatives believe" responses align with FoxNews, Limbaugh, InfoWars, etc. and how closely do the "What Liberal believe" align with the NYTimes, WaPo, etc.

This study says something, it just doesn't necessarily say what you all think it says. It's also wildly outdated. Because we now live in this reality: Significant majority of Republicans don’t believe Biden’s win was fair[1]

[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/blog/meet-pr...
Oh I'm not saying Stripe has a magic way of solving this. I'm merely stating that this is a hard and annoying problem, that many businesses would gladly let someone else handle.
Maybe. Can you provide an example?
Given finite resources we can only pursue finite actions. Pretending decisions are made in a vacuum is naive.

Let me know when you learn about your next word of the week.
Microsoft will end Windows 10 support in October 2025
Headlines and the Art of Writing Them
For those also looking I found it in the FAQ[0]:

------------------------------------------

How can I donate to ripgrep or its maintainers?

As of now, you can't. While I believe the various efforts that are being undertaken to help fund FOSS are extremely important, they aren't a good fit for me. ripgrep is and I hope will remain a project of love that I develop in my free time. As such, involving money---even in the form of donations given without expectations---would severely change that dynamic for me personally.

Instead, I'd recommend donating to something else that is doing work that you find meaningful. If you would like suggestions, then my favorites are:

The Internet Archive
Rails Girls
Wikipedia

* [0] https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/blob/64ac2ebe0f2fe1c89...
If your using a american company for privacy related data should be fired you mean?
Dude yeah I like high quality techno music and I go to shows by myself sometimes since none of my friends really understand a good rave.

Sometimes I just rave solo but sometimes I make new friends and almost always enjoy it.
Why? Are they going to get substantially more benefits from SS than an average programmer?
I'm familiar with the problem. The question is, what is the solution?
Why would anyone buy a property to rent it out if buying was more expensive than renting?
If it makes you feel better: there was, and remains, a tech subculture more focused on the tech than the money, but it’s been drowned out over the past 25 years because a gold rush makes for better press. Unfortunately that press attracts people who like that sort of thing.

So if you like what you are doing and can live comfortably you are at the top of your game. The rest is merely froth.
It’s downright so simple to use, it’s a pleasure.

But the behavior of auto layout when someone is sharing a screen is completely weird to me. Also their new UI which rolled out to us recently is bit more complex than the simpler one before.
Thanks. :-)

That's right. IIRC, I wrote it as a simple harness because I wanted to check whether someone could feasibly write a grep tool using the regex crate and get similar performance. Once I got the harness up and running though, I realized it was not only competitive with GNU grep in a larger number of cases than I thought it would be (after some perf bug fixes, IIRC), but was substantially faster than ag. So that's when I decided to polish it up into a tool for others to use.
It's hard to say either way without getting into polling data but anecdotally, I would say the amount of people whos issue with American politics is that they trust both parties so much that they can't decide who they like so they settle for the middle is many orders of magnitude smaller than the number of people whose primary issue is that they feel a general sense of distrust with all of the parties.
I'm talking about implementing a "court" inside a smart contract. That is, the "court" is just one or more entities that control the private keys necessary to govern the funds locked in the contract.

I'm not sure I understand your last sentence, escrow is a common mechanism in traditional finance, which seems to work for financial operations including loans. But you may well be right on this point, I just don't really understand what you mean.
i think theres a discrepancy between junior engineers who get abused/overworked and don't know any better, and the seniors who know that they can say no to things without any repercussions
Ah ok, thanks. got a quick fix for that incoming!
Can you provide a counterexample, hypothesis, or anything concrete?
Situation of an individual is a very short term view. We are living on credit here and while it seems, that the conditions have become better, we are utterly unprepared for the backlash, which will happen, if we continue down this path.

I am more looking at the long term effects here, because I care about future generations too.

Another problem with your view is, that you are totally disregarding other species on planet Earth, which are going extinct or become endangered species in this very moment, in which we enjoy that our "condition is better than ever".
England is a very different kind of place to most places I think you’ll find!
I replied below to another comment, but that reply fits here as well.

> This assumes that everyday conservatives believe in the republican representatives that end up in power.
I didn't even vote in the last election as I felt un-represented. For me there was no 'greater evil' candidate. Prior I voted libertarian, but what good does that do?

> Does having voted a certain way for a candidate make your beliefs ultimately responsible for the way the representative governs? In America we essentially get `choose red or blue`.

> How can the subjects as complicated as everyday topics are ever be reduced to two colors!?

> The problem _is_ our tyrannical democratic system.
Fundamentally different approaches to product and target market. We have no intention of building a service company or just being another conference tool. There are more than 100 in the market.

We're trying to create a new format that could only exist in the digital world. Fast paced micro-events throughout the year that keep attendees on their toes and help foster community as people get to engage more.

Doing one big conference at the end of the year is the old way of thinking. It's blindly taking the real world conference and making it digital. A movie has a different language than a play. We're trying to figure out that language as opposed to just filming the play.
Curiously, they support validating identities from Costa Rica but so far they don't support processing payments there. I wonder if the payments service is in-the-works for this country.
There’s some evidence that humans have a Universal Grammar and learn through deletion. And humans can not learn any old language — only a restricted class — meanwhile there’s no reason to think that an ML model would have that problem.

I’d encourage you to read a little more about the topic with an open mind. You might learn something.
You're probably right about KYC, but KYC is just one of the four use cases presented by Stripe, and their customer logos include Clubhouse and Discord, which I highly doubt have KYC requirements or any need to access the underlying evidence.

Stripe could do this differently:

1. Allow the customer to choose whether or not they need access to the evidence.

2. If customer has chosen to receive access to the evidence, the Stripe Identity UI should clearly disclose this. (And they shouldn't try to deceive users by talking about deleting biometric identifiers.)

3. Require customers with access to evidence to adhere to certain security standards, similar to how they treat exports of credit card numbers: https://stripe.com/docs/security/data-migrations/exports#whe...

Stripe could have been a leader in setting high standards on how this type of information is handled. Instead they've opted to go the easy route and maximize profits while the rest of us pay the negative externalities from identity theft.
I think its definitely possible, though I don’t know if the algorithms exist now. You would probably need to capture the scene under different lighting conditions, and probably from different angles. But assuming there is some theoretical way to go from photos to a mathematical representation of material characteristics I’d think we’ll eventually have neural nets that can do the conversion.
I don't think I've ever heard someone argue that the rational position is the compromise in the middle. I have heard people argue that it's the only politically available option in one circumstance or another, which makes sense because the structure of American democracy creates a strong pressure for there to be two parties of approximately equal power.

When I talk to people I generally hear people taking specific positions on specific issues, which often but not always aligns with their preferred political party's position on that issue.
If you stayed active in relevant circles, perhaps doable given personal contacts.

But I agree in general. If someone retires at 40 and realizes 5-10 years later this isn't working out, that's a pretty big uphill climb for conventional professional employment.
> Cryptocurrencies aren't this magical thing that can't (or shouldn't) be touched by government.

Who's going to tell him?
How many years of resources does the earth have stored in it though?
> user's have no idea that Stripe and us are different companies.

Doesn't that imply that if there's a security breach at Stripe, that your users will blame you [too]
That's not necessarily the case. When you buy a house you can't suddenly just have a mortgage payment equivalent to someone who bought 10-20 years ago. And someone who just recently bought a house cannot charge higher rent than someone who bought 10-20 years ago.

In other words, rent is dictated by the market, not some "cost plus profit" calculation on a per-landlord basis as you're describing.

If you're renting from someone who just recently bought the house, they are very likely taking a short-term loss for long-term gain.
My counter argument is that humans are more wasteful when faced with abundance. Look at what we did when we discovered two continents worth of land. When perceived costs are low, waste is high.
The way an author expresses and codifies their "wishes" over redistribution is through a license. If the current license does not accurately reflect the author's "wishes", it should be amended. Otherwise it is bogus to declare that this software is under the MIT license.

Having the author's wishes expressed in law ensures that all users can receive equal, non-discriminatory and predictable treatment, rather than having to walk on eggshells around what an author may or may not like you doing.
Kenji's method for creamy scrambled eggs works great on induction:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXTnq7srJRs
As someone who has been a big fan of Wikileaks, something about this story has always felt off to me - like this is some sort of state disinfo op rather than a 'real' leak.

The revelations from Winner's leak didn't seem subversive - rather they seemed to bolster arguments for RussiaGate and the new digital cold war - both of which were growing DNC talking points.

Does anyone else feel the same way? Or do I just have too much tinfoil on my head?
> Remember that the forced laborers are creating products for purchase by American consumers.

This seems like dissembling. Why single out “American” here?

> Pang’s book lists some of the brands and companies that reportedly draw on Chinese forced labor: Apple, Nike, BMW, Volkswagen, Muji, and Uniqlo

Here they list 2 American companies, 2 German companies, and 2 Japanese companies. Which contradicts the notion that this is has something to do with “American Consumers” in particular.

This is a group of international companies supplying consumers in many countries.

As for Apple, I don’t expect them to be able to say anything serious about the Uighur situation until they have reduced their dependence on China for manufacturing, which will probably take a decade to accomplish.

As far as I can see, this situation was created by European and American policy makers who mistakenly expected China to become less oppressive as it was integrated into global trade.
That sounds like a great philosophy.

Who gets to decide what is truth and what is a lie?

Case in point. The Pulse Nightclub shooting 5 years ago. Proven the shooter chose it because of lax security compared to other places he considered. He didn't know it was LGBTQ+. It was about Syria, Afganistan, and other middle eastern wars to him.

Now it is hailed as persecution of the LGBTQ+ community - a target. Who is doing this? Politicians, activist, etc.

Who decides what the truth is? Why do they spin the lies as truths? This is societies problem today. Manipulation of fact and fiction by those who want to control you, and those who control the message.

Inaguration Day at the US Capitol. Police officer killed after being struck in the head with a fire extinguisher. No proof, not even a strand. Now thought to have had a stroke. Pols, pundits, and Trump haters still swear he was MURDERED. Female protester killed by capital police - still no identification which officer did it, or what she was doing when shot. Sound like open&shut case of self-defense? Wouldn't they sing that from the heavens?

How about Jeffery Epstein? How did he hang himself in a maximum security facility where two video cameras failed, and guards checked him frequently? Guilty - probably. I'm surprised if they aren't taking bets on when girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell committed suicide. Who else was involved in their island escapades? Who benefits from their silence?

Who controls the truth?
> Most Americans support an abortion ban

This is not true. They support restrictions that are way smaller then the "only rape" one.
Those links don't disprove anything I've said on this subject in this thread.
Is "pleaded guilty" correct, grammatically?

Would it not instead be written as "pled guilty" in that article?
I randomly encountered one of the works of Kelly Kosmo O'Neil, an astrophysicist: https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Kelly-... :)
>Yes, this legislation either seems to have been written by people who just want overly broad powers they'll use in a technically sound way, or by people who have no understanding of computer forensics.

Or both.
> Also make software self-destructing with a warning

This is not how forensic analysis works. Data is copied to read-only supports before any attempt of access is made.