skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There is something fishy about the focus of these two variables: rich savings and poor debt. It assumes a causality when there might be none- especially when these were not controlled/isolated against other variables.

The article also implies that poor mortgage debt might be causing a rise in real state, but fails to consider the manipulated supply and demand of the product itself.
More perspective here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27448175
Is there any research on people's preferences in this regard?
It helps that that's where the money comes from.
I had headaches for like two weeks after my second Pfizer shot. I drank plenty of water and was getting electrolytes, so I'm guessing it was a side effect.
"Tile" in the US probably (though not definitively) means "spanish tile" - those terracotta curved tiles. It's not the same as what I remember tile meaning in the UK, which was typically slate.

Also, I spoke with some roofers in Pennsylvania who explained to me the difference between Welsh slate and the stuff from PA ... way less durable because the layers are not as tightly bonded, and then you add freeze/thaw and it just doesn't last as long.
Three Blows of the Sword Against National Cyberspace Defense
> We've merely changed them, quite significantly. But there's still selection processes ongoing.

Hence “mostly”. But evolution requires large time-scales to function; selection for arbitrarily-fluctuating criteria is practically no selection at all.
"more often than not" is a vast overstatement, it breaks a tiny handful of sites at best.
What is the point of having a webpage called "Pricing", which has practically no information about pricing? (Rhetorical question)
It sounds like you're saying a group of collaborating persons is only a "team" if they're physically colocated.
I actually used to work as a test driver for FCA, and we were specifically told to report on knobs/dials not working or wiggling too much. Our training had us touch literally everything in the car that moved. Albeit, I'm not sure how much of that feedback was actually acted upon, based on the quality of some of those cars.
You left out Julian Assange, the Puerto Rican people, the Hawaiian people, the people of Okinawa, all the prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, the Native Americans…
I drive a 1985 VW Vanagon. While there have been many, many times that I have wished for some comprehensive diagnostics, and am considering an engine swap at some point, when I drive and there is literally zero distraction from electronics or touch screens, it’s wonderful. I did add a CarPlay-enabled deck for directions and road trip music, but otherwise everything is manual.
Argumentum ad autoritam. Something said from Newton wont make it true.
The missing spare tire was really just a gimmick to game some EPA mileage metric. Many cars missing them still have the spot for them, and it can even be purchased from the dealership (marked up as usual).

Thankfully the oil sensor was one of the few things that didn't fail on my BMW, but ironically my Lexus is the car that actually burns oil so I'm standing out there once every 1000 miles with paper towel wiping my dipstick. Wish we could have both.

I also agree I'd never pay for this subscription (unless I'm drunk and it's legally allowed to drive itself), but I'm probably just going to avoid subscription based vehicles like I already do (like BMWs with their annual CarPlay subscription).
Clearly not every library uses it, and not everything in the standard library adheres to it either, just as you said where the Erlang tie ins are.

What would you call something then that clearly has optional adoption and isn't consistently used across the standard library?
Is there anyone on HN who believes Mozilla will not implement FLoC in Firefox. Mozilla has stated over and over that it is a firm believer in advertising as "essential" for the internet to survive. In practice, they never phrase it as an opinion or even an underlying assumption (that can be questioned), they try to state this as a "fact".[1] This is called advocacy. Mozilla is an advocate for online advertising. They derive their salaries from payments from a deal with an online advertising company and in return they send search queries on Firefox to that company. (This argument that ads are critical is total BS, IMO. The internet worked great without ads. It would work even better now. Anyone who tests these things can see the web without ads works much better than it does with ads.) What Mozilla really needs to state is that Mozilla believes online ads are critical to Mozilla's survival as an employer. If web browser authors and their bosses want to be paid, then they assume they must to sell out to advertisers. Why is there no privacy by default when using web browsers. This is why.

1. Note first sentence, underlying assumption, of Mozilla communications. This company is blinded by advertising payola and cannot see non-commercial use of the web as worth protecting.

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/the-future-of-ads-and-pr...

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/building-a-more-privacy-...
SeedFi | Senior Software Engineer | SF, NYC or REMOTE (USA) | seedfi.com

SeedFi builds financial products for the 100M Americans who live paycheck to paycheck. Our customers are the most vulnerable members of society and our products tangibly improve their financial health. We're backed by A16Z and our founders have decades of experience in the lending industry.

Many of the products we're building are completely new to the financial world, so we're looking for engineers with an entrepreneurial bent. Our team experiments frequently, iterates quickly, and we use both data and customer feedback to measure our success.

We've purposefully kept a low profile, so we'll tell you much more about our products during the interview process!

To apply, please email your resume to jobs at seedfi dot com.

https://www.seedfi.com/jobs

You can also ask me questions via the email on my profile.
I'm sure there are some forums where people who sell ads like them too. :)

But what can I say, I'm a realist. I spent a lot of years working on a website supported by advertising. I understand not everyone will or can pay for the websites they enjoy, and advertising is a good second option.

And if we're going to have to live in a world with ad supported websites, I'd rather those ads be good.
>second dose
There has been some discussion on that:

Delaying a Covid vaccine’s second dose boosts immune response
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27156859
> If they don't tear that bench down now, the first time a child gets caught between the back supports with the large space between them, they will.

If the large space is the issue, a better solution is probably just to hammer in a bit more wood.
> Some people would naturally respond to the content of the article. Others would naturally appeal to authority or ad hominem the author. Some food for thought.

This was a general comment on the quality of Forbes opinion pieces not an ad hominem attack. It's worth mentioning it because I think there's a strong tendency to trust the Forbes brand, but it doesn't extend to their blogging platform. That's why I actually separated it from my other reply.

Inflation is defined relative to basic goods and necessities, not to all goods - or to luxury goods, and there's a reason for that. Prices of goods change all the time for all sorts of reasons. Lobster used to be garbage food, now it's luxury. Same with sushi, monkfish, oyster and pig trotters. If the quantity of lobsters in the ocean start going down and the price of lobster increases, does that mean inflation is happening? Even if people switched from lobster to salmon? Certainly not in my opinion. Nobody's not entitled to a constant basket of necessities isolated from the world around them.

Basing the inflation definition on basic goods and needs at the time is a reasonable proxy due to their broad-based requirement by individuals. Nobody needs luxuries by definition. Luxuries are expensive by definition. Luxuries tend to be scarce and their price as a result fluctuates substantially. But further, they're a product of social tastes that change for any reason or no reason.

Weights are adjusted because the price of things changes for all sorts of reasons, and the goal is to index against a basket of common necessities - not specific necessities for that reason.

A good analog would be the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones. Those index components change regularly as some companies fall out of favor and others rise to prominence. They reflect the economy but not specific companies. That's not a bug, it's a feature IMO.

The weights being adjusted is reactionary to the cost and availability of goods and the preferences of consumers, and that's totally fine. A platonic, isolated increase in price is not inflation, it's just what it says on the tin - an increase in price.
I definitely had this: got the first shot and felt confident, cocksure that I would have no symptoms at all being healthy and young.
Woke up during the night ~8 hours after the first shot feeling a little out of breath, with strong and almost painful heartbeats. I chalked it up to being stressed, but found it strange as I had zero reasons to be stressed that particular week. I connected the dots the next day when I still had this feeling, and talked to a doctor in the family who said it was probably heart inflammation, and actually not that uncommon after the vaccine or covid infection.

I'm still glad I got vaccinated, but given that heart disease is the #1 cause of death worldwide, I'm surprised the ramifications of heart inflammation aren't taken more seriously (if the heart was permanently damaged in a small way, I'd expect it to manifest many years later).
If I saw what the picture purports to show, a hipster in the park typing on a typewriter, I might smirk or roll my eyes or something if I did anything at all. However, if you want attention commenting on a post on reddit, or anywhere, you can't just say "There's a chance I'd subtly roll my eyes at this" - you have to go more extreme. In the same way that BuzzFeed described the picture as one that would make you "Black out with rage" you've got to go from "10% chance of smirk" to "I will smash this hipster-doofus's typewriter."

A lot of stuff in internet comments is stuff that would absolutely never happen in real life. If you saw a hipster on a typewriter and a crowd of people bullying him in real life, it would be absolutely clear which behavior was worse. Plus, none of those people in real life would actually do any of the extreme things they write about in internet comments.

The whole thing makes me imagine a forum of the future. Maybe it's more like a physical forum or park in virtual reality. There's a story at the center and radiating out from it are avatars that have been left behind by commenters. The avatars would be run by an AI that has been briefed on what point the commenter wanted to make. Other users, using the forum live, could wander through the park and interact with the deposited avatars or one another. Bringing some elements of reality to the forum experience - i.e. making it look like you are in a public space and interacting with people, may also bring in some elements of civility that we enjoy in reality and not online.
Interesting. I just dislike ads altogether. Especially Instagram feels very manipulative. So far nothing we have bought based on Instagram or Facebook ads has been useful in the long run.

Personally I prefer to either have a need for something (I want to solve problem X) and do some research based off of that. Or I share an experience with a friend where they make a recommendation.

Funniest Facebook ad by the way: I work for <employer> and my partner gets ads for <products of employer> on Facebook.
Once we can make bread with nothing but sunlight and robots humanity will be so much closer to being free from work.
TL;DR: No

Needle in the haystack:

> But after conversations with newsletter writers and media executives today, I’m not sure that people doing email-based journalism have all that much to worry about from the shift.
Considering that mystifying presupposes that the function of the brain is to represent lossless or perfect memories in a static way, rather than say, maintain coherence or consensus across experiences. It's not clear at all that altering or evolving memory is bad for the system overall.

It might very well be a feature of this drift that old memories or information is gradually adapted. After all evolutionary speaking you wouldn't expect the brain to optimize for archiving but for making fitness optimizing decisions in the world.
I remember back in the early days of Linux how we'd say that using a proprietary OS is like owning a car with the hood welded shut. It seemed so obviously ridiculous. Yet, that's basically where we're headed now.

In some ways that's a good thing: EVs require much less physical maintenance. (At least, their drivetrains need less maintenance.
Whether the rest of the car does depends on the manufacturer.)
But on the other hand, depending on how heavily locked-down the car is, it'll be hard to do third-party modifications and older vehicles are going to be at high risk of having security vulnerabilities as soon as software maintenance for old vehicles stops being a priority for the manufacturer.
> We can thus conclude they are uniquely necessary for the game perhaps there is a Donkey Kong transistor or a Space Invaders transistor.

This is hilarious. Thanks for sharing this. It brightened my day.
Though there's nothing preventing electronically controlled buttons working with imperceptible delay except crap software.
I’m confused. When I open a mail in iOS, I get a banner saying “this message contains unloaded images”

I thought the only ones loaded were ones embedded as an attachment. Is that not the case?
The scenario is not invented per se, it’s something that really happens sometimes. Maybe the systems you interact with never return malformed data more than a few times, but the ones I work with do. Throwing an exception on a deserialization failure in order to crash your process just seems like punting on your retry logic to me.
CIA has a long history of funding terrorists and attempting regime change operations around the world, China included.

People that know the pattern can see the bullshit coming from a mile away.

Why the US all of a sudden loves the Uyghur terrorists that it was bombing with impunity not too long ago...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m7id66fk9hY
> Just before launch date, we stayed up the entire night fixing polish items. I remember going to sleep in a phone booth and waking up early in the morning to try to finish out some last edits while Michelle worked on the blog post

God damn, I'm old. That start up scene used to sound appealing to me but now makes me cringe.
"The price of doing business."
Dynamic Blending – Simple contract manufacturing
It’s not “think of the children,” it’s “think of the lawsuits.”
Inflation is good. We want the dollar value to decrease over time, because it encourages spending. If people keep their dollars (thinking $1 will be worth more tomorrow, than today), then it hurts jobs and growth.

Why is this bad?
As odd as this comparison is, it isn't even advice meant for you. It's meant for other Government agencies.
On the other hand, having seen the software industry I don't really want its values applied to cars.

Games used to be shipped on chips to customers with the assumption that they could never be updated, but now the expectation that that's possible results in multi GB release day patches.
Games used to be shipped to consoles without network access but if Blizzard goes out of business tomorrow, Starcraft II will just fail to boot because the software you get isn't enough to run the game.
Games used to make most of their money by selling you a fun game that you wanted to play, but now they make most of their money from DLC's or selling in-game currency.

I don't want my car to move fast and break things. I don't want my car to fail to drive me to the hospital because it has updates to install. I don't want my car to drop features it had when I paid for it because some PM's bonus depends on me using their monetised features instead. I don't want my car to be measured by "works on my machine"-level QA. I don't want my car reporting telemetry. I don't want my car's UI to become unuseable over time because the developers shipping constant updates to it are working on the newer hardware instead of the hardware I have. I don't want parts of my car to stop working because an app developer doesn't support my car anymore. (I've lost access to many an iOS game because of this without changing any hardware myself.) I don't want my car to stop working because it doesn't support TLS 4.0 or 6g and the licence server requires it. I don't want my car to stop working because it can't find the licence server because Volvo went out of business, or even just decided they didn't want to support me anymore. I don't want my car to fail to unlock because of a network blip. I don't want my car to suggest I go to McDonald's instead because of an advertising deal.

That's what embracing the software industry's norms will get you. Awful QA, shortsighted dependencies, terrible incentives, and the ability to monetise you.
This is a logical fallacy. Studies show that there are fewer distractions at home.

Also, anecdotally, my team lead and tech lead see no discernible difference in their ability to help teammates, and our interns are just as productive and participate in just as many help sessions.
Visual Studio Code Remote Repositories
Unique Pretzels are my favorite. We grew up on these - https://www.uniquepretzels.com/
DD-WRT has support for Rpi now though.
> Expecting library authors to get their design entirely correct the first time round isn't reasonable.

People shouldn't be publishing such libraries, nor should people be using them. With the exception of my first few FOSS projects, all of my open source libraries represent the 2nd, 3rd, or even 4th incarnation of a concept.

That's just being responsible--don't knowingly litter the ecosystem with junk.

I take a similar view at work. People are too quick to break out components into modules and libraries, long before they have a firm notion of what a proper interface should look like. If you can't commit to a stable API, then often times it's better to just copy whole functions and files between projects and let them evolve naturally. It takes time to see where that evolution goes, and which commonalities emerge in the implementation and surrounding application.

But what about sharing bug and security fixes, you ask? Well, without a stable API you'll invariably end up with different projects stuck using different versions, anyhow. That's why people invented Docker :( What you end up with isn't an actually shared library, just the pretense of sharing, plus a bunch of unnecessary build complexity.
Difficult to feel pity for business models built on abusing HTML capabilities to track email viewing.

I don’t load remote images by default, so this already doesn’t work for me. However, basically every mail platform creates tailored links to track click engagement. So you’re screwed anyway, just maybe a little later.
I agree. I think "illegally cloned" would be a more accurate headline while still having as much clickbait as the author intended.
I would recommend writing specs for your functions and using Dialyzer, too :)
Pretty sure i had this after my second dose of moderna. On the day of my second dose I had a very unique piercing heart pain i never experienced before, thought i was gonna die. Had some arrhythmia/palpitations as well, but didn't go to the doctor or report it, I'm sure many more people experienced this without reporting it, just hope it doesn't cause permanent damage. (31, male)
Well, and sometimes "deliberately crap". Like power buttons. I don't want to have to count to 10 while holding a button to "really turn it off".
I dont think there are any AGI researchers. At least, I dont think computer science has much to do with AGI.

The turing test is also not an AGI test, it's a "good enough" standard for fooling people.

Intelligence fundamentally requires a multitude of environmental capabilities. The turing test considers only a single i/o boundary.
Is there a version of Godwin's Law but for slavery comparisons?
With Volkswagen's "under consideration" plan for their - as yet unavailable - self-driving package, you don't have to pay them to use your own vehicle. You can drive it all you want. However, if you're feeling tired or you've had a drink with colleagues after work, you can pay 7 euro an hour to have your car take you home.

You already have the choice between buying a car outright or taking out a lease. If the unfortunate happens and you can't afford to keep up with the payments on your car, then at some point you're going to have your access to it removed. Maybe not as quickly or as sarcastically as in Ubik, but it will happen.
OfferMarket wants to help houses get sold, without the real estate agents
My read is that it just go too big and they didn't do a great job of keeping up with golang. Last I looked it was still not module compatible fully.
SEO Split-Testing Lessons: Increasing the number of related article links
Verifying their e-mail address would be useless as attacker would already know the e-mail.

Attacker knowing some existing user email will go to "forgot password" view and type in the e-mail for the user they plan to attack. Then after will start bruteforcing the token.

It is highly unlikely they had rate limiting because they had long tokens there for a reason and most frameworks like Laravel for example which provide similar forgot password feature won't by default rate limit those tokens or at least haven't in the past. I am not up to date with current version of Laravel and I think it may be using signed urls instead. Which would also be obviously terrible if shortened.

So the original team who built forgot pw didn't expect someone in the future to start shortening those urls, so it is unlikely they figured rate limiting to be necessary in this case.

It would require in most cases conscious decision making and effort to specifically rate limit token guesses, likely to be out of scope.

Catch all rate limiting by IP wouldn't work either because it would be arbitrary to use botnet to bruteforce.

But in the OP example the e-mail/user was already in the url so included with the shortened url. In this case hacker could just try random short urls until they hit something and due to redirection also immediately know the e-mail.
Every privacy-focused push by Apple – or anyone, really – forces publishers to find less invasive methods for engaging with their audience, without having to rely on skewed data and grotesque tracking. How could that be bad for journalism? We got rid of blinking text and popup ads for a reason, and this is just the next step.
False. Civilization and law.
>go mod list -m -u all

minor correction: just `go list` on these. the `-m` ensures it's in module-mode.
You really shouldn't be saying this on public forums without proof. You have no proof that the first infection wasn't the flu or a bad cold. The odds of reinfection are very small, and the odds of both of you getting reinfected is vanishingly so. Without proof this is potentially fear mongering.
Tesla cars have a distinct look and a "prestige" whereas something like Ford's new F-150 will look nearly identical to its gas guzzling brother. There's an ego carried behind Telsa's branding and marketing that other car manufacturers don't feed into even in their own EV offerings.
Ironically I think he'd have some great advice, as does this article.
Good point. Still, if FDB was high-profile proprietary software during this time it might have inspired an open source clone. Spanner inspired Cockroach and Yugabyte, after all.