skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks for the upvote, you do have a valid point, most of the opposition was shut down one way or another.
My main issue with the German population was them not seeing on what the economy was based back then and the many saying "we did not know". This simply does not pass the sniffing test.
I agree, as usual with conflict riddled nations, the state apparatus is never entirely changed, many got off without any consequences whatsoever, the ones who paid were soldiers and the whole of eastern Germany and all places which were invaded and plundered by the USSR.
I share the exact same view as you , just worded differently.
Apple is said to have turned over data on McGahn
Could you share your source?
1. You can only really go on metrics of crashes with your fault, currently.

2. You can't really be certain

3. It would be good to be able to collect data of driver faults without crashes. But how do we do it without giving insurance companies more reasons to hike prices?
Thats not true for math / science.

Math is based on fundamental global laws which exist and can be checked from everyone and they can come up all with the same math.

We could isolate a baby and it could create the same math while it couldn't create the same religion.
This was indeed a very insightful read. Thanks for sharing this! Looking forward to more such posts!
we do not have a labor shortage. We have a wage shortage
If your 7 year old gets anywhere near seriously ill you’ll be in the news, but I suggest you don’t take your 7 year old to a bar anyway.
But why? Isn't that a sunk cost fallacy? In fact, running those offices is going to cost more in operations and maintenance that having them under-utilized?

Presumably they bought empty commercial real estate. If it remains empty they'll get back most of that investment when they sell.
For Pytorch and Tensorflow, you can use conda to install them with the right CUDA and cudnn versions.
DAI is pegged to the US Dollar, stabilized by algorithms and has been for a few years now without fault. The upside is 20 - 30% APY by providing liquidity to decentralized exchanges. Bank accounts are providing no where near that return on currency.
The End of Freenode
> How practically beneficial are around the edge/minor issue contributors to projects?

I have received a few such "minor" PR and they are really welcome. Even re-wordings or clarifications of the project README file. Sometimes just adding a single sentence at the beginning of the README, by a random stranger, is helpful and makes it much more clear.

You can try that. If you find in the wild a project description that is a bit confusing, send a PR with a better choice of words. The developers will likely be thankful to you and accept your pull request.
I liked Fall actually, but I can imagine pure sci-fi readers being put off by the second part. It’s a 2-for-1 situation which brings together sci-fi and fantasy elements in interesting ways. But you’ll have to enjoy reading both genres or else it will be a slog.

As with all fiction books, my usual advice is to read it for pleasure, and put it aside if you don’t like it or it doesn’t live up to expectations. You don’t have to finish a book just because you started it.
> I don't see the supply chain ever springing back to what it was. We are in a whole new world of scarcity for at least a few years IMO.

The current issues are driven by the automotive industry having screwed up and shitcoin miners snatching up GPUs. Neither is going to be a long term issue.
Yup that is correct but that window is reduced to a minimum. Your adversary will need to crack your PK in 10 mins and submit a replacement transaction which may or may not be accepted.
Since you're allowed to drive in the snow when you have a driver's license it should be part of the training. You can get skid training courses where a slippery road is 'simulated' on a wet plate which should be possible in LA ;)

Also, aren't steep fines a good "training program" for distractions like holding your phone and messaging when driving?
This interestingly touches on another frustrating property of go. Most of the people using it seem to have a different usage pattern than me.

Because of that, the language is unlikely to fix the issues that are very real to me. The community claims they don't need them, the language designers, perhaps a bit more arrogantly, claim that I don't need them. Yet, I've used other languages where I've never had to consider this. I can clone whatever I want, whenever I want.

If I only ever cloned []bytes, I'd write a helper function, keep it in an utility package and go on with my life.

This ties back to the original theme of "it works well for certain things, but if you try to do something that the designers didn't predict, good luck to you".
Last time I looked (a long time ago) there were some issues with running Linux on Chromebooks, like having to press some combination of keys at each boot and/or risking to erase everything if the wrong combination of keys was pressed (if I remember correctly). Does this mrchomebook firmware fix this kind of problems?
AI driving at a human level is equivalent to AGI, so I wouldn't hold my breath for it.
Why color functions at all? I think Project Loom is/will be the best way forward where blocking calls will be automagically turned to non-blocking.
It was rather that Germany thought they can do whatever they want once they believed Moscow is about to fall. I agree the Soviets did not care much more for Jews than Nazi Germany, hell, they even have been kinda allied or not entirely hostile to eachother at some time, like the Poland split.
If you remember it then probably there was some important meaning in it for you! For example, maybe one of the first times you encountered an ambiguous situation like this; something something the answer was more complicated than your heuristic allowed. It did have basically unlimited refills, but not technically. So does it pass your rule, or not? Decisions, decisions...

Fun memory, thanks for sharing
I say no discount, or the miners will prefer to include ECDSA key transactions.
what is lacking in your view is empathy. It seems you don't understand what it is to be the victim, for no good damn fault of you. Moreover in your 'solution', once the videos have leaked on-line to fulfil the ex-lover revenge, it will never be taken out. Fast forward 10 years later, the ex-lover has served its sentence, the victim moved to another place, another job, every thing is forgotten. At their work, they got into a heated debate about any topic. The adversarial debater, seeing red, searched the web, find the video and broadcast to everybody. There might be regrets the second after sending, but it's too late, *once again*

It's not about people being dicks it's about information as weapons laying around forever.

Humans have built-in forgetness but modern days tech does not. Since we are evolving at nature rate, technology must be rein in from time to time.
Forget about the porn for a moment. Read it first as online habits programming the mind. When you visit certain websites, the content and algorithms tend to program the user's mind. You can see it with Facebook influencing politics and such. TikTok, etc.

Now bring in the porn websites and you will realise how it programs the user's mind in a similar way. Eg. After some time, some people will exhibit cuckold, submission/domination, incest behaviour in real life. Some will look at an older woman and not see a mother but a milf. Hope you get the point. I don't have any scientific proof but I used to be a porn user myself. You are welcome to research the subject further if you are interested.

Referring back to the parent comment, as the stimulation of vanilla porn becomes boring, the user will need to watch more and more hyper stimulating material. Not dissimilar from a drug user. Some lose the interest in regular real life sex altogether or need to incorporate their porn habits into it.

I don't mean to generalize so if you don't think it applies to you then move on, but if you are interested in self improvement then tread these waters carefully.
This is the wrong question, and a loaded one besides. Self-driving cars do not (and will not, if you ask me) exist, and can't work within current asphalt traffic practices. Create a non-human driver who can drive equally as safely as a human (and not your grandma), then we'll talk about comparing strengths.
Music provided a framework for assigning numbers to fingers that I didn't grow up with. So I find myself counting using my fingers naturally but sometimes start with my index finger, and other times start with my thumb. I think his system is more intuitive and could be more useful but I'm not sure if I can relearn it as an adult and make it stick without a lot of practice! As an aside, my mother is French and learned math in France, and in her school she learned rather different methods for working out addition and multiplication. I remember doing a double-take the first time I saw how she worked out a problem when I was in grade school.
Replace wall street with open source, fair, decentralized financial systems that everyone in the world can partake in.
It’s not about performance, but about not having/mandating a runtime.
I just got done buying a house. Waterfront (vulnerability to flooding) real estate is worth a lot. Everyone wants to live by by the water.

We had a once in a 1000 year flood two years ago. It changed nothing.
Vulkan Compute shaders (or GLSL compute shaders, if supported by the OpenGL version) should be quite a bit more robust than OpenCL kernels. The main issue w/ shaders compared to OpenCL kernels is some missing features in the former, that will have to be optionally supported via standard extensions.

The programming model is also quite different, so code will have to be rewritten.
Because those better yields are there for a reason. That reason isn't lack of intermediaries, it's high inherent risks.

Economy has a risk-free rate of return, that of 1-year treasuries, at 0.05% currently. Anything above that involves risk. A rate of return of 7%/year means there's 7%-0.05% chance of the instrument being worthless after one year, ~14% chance of it losing half its value, ~28% chance of it losing a quarter of it's value, etc. There's no free lunch, and there's no financial arbitrage
and it seems to me from a bit of lookings for statistics just now that if you've been driving for a few years and haven't crashed, you're better than average
I will absolutely quit if my job tries to force me back into the office.
> There are lots of things people like to do that use a lot of energy that I think are stupid. (...)

I don't understand what argument you tried to make. Other than a far fetched attempt at whattaboutism... Is bitcoin's astronomical power drain ok because some hypothetical person might drive a big car or goods are shipped with trucks? That does not follow. I mean, aren't there alternatives to bitcoin that have far lower energy needs? Why stick with absurd non-sequiturs to insist that bitcoin's astronomical power drain is somehow ok?
Haven't tried ripgrep before but finally installed. It is noticeably faster than older tools and more importantly the CLI ergonomics is much better! Thanks!
Does a plant-based diet help beat Covid-19?
Sycamore would probably struggle to factor a two-digit number. Useful quantum computation is still very far away, if at all possible.
As an FYI, if you are interested in the fundamental frequency of birdsong the GitHup repo below might be of interest. It is an STFT + interpolation to get an accurate (potentially quickly changing) frequency estimate:
https://github.com/JorenSix/stft_freq
I think realistically this is very far a way. South America does not have schools that compete with MIT and Stanford.
What's in it for the likes of A16Z?
I think your vitriol is misplaced; the whole point of a negative interest rate is to stimulate the economy, i.e. increase the value of your investments, which presumably would be good for someone who has built financial security. Suppose for example that a -4% rate spurs a 1% economic boost - that would only be bad for you if you keep more than 20% of your wealth sitting around in your checking account.

I'm not saying it would work, as in successfully grow the economy, necessarily. Not my area, and it'd depend on the country and the recession and so forth. Just saying, the "central bank fucks" who toyed with this idea were trying to make people money, not take it away.
I didn't say that everything is a common carrier.

Instead, I am pointing out the ridiculousness of saying that every single instance of the governement "enforcing" speech, in the context of powerful platforms, is somehow some huge infringement on free speech.

Because clearly, we are OK with the government requiring phone companies, which are platforms, into allow most people to make phone calls.

Therefore, you cannot come out, swinging very hard, with this free speech stuff, when, if I were to guess, you are totally OK with phone companies being covered under common carrier laws.

So you need to either chill with this whole "free speech" argument, or you need to instead come out and say that common carriers are some horrible, really evil thing. Pick one.
It’s possible to skip the mempool, by including it directly in a block, giving no time to a QC attacker. Not worth it right now, but if QC was known to exist it could be done.
I do connect rationality with math and chances.

Of course there is always an unkown right? We don't know it all.

But as i said somewhere else: math for example is universal, you can come up with the same rules independently were you are.

This doesn't happen with religion/believe.

There is no experiment in the world, which shows any universal truth to believing in one specific god or more specific gods or religion.

Nothing spiritual was proven ever in my lifetime. None.

So i dream. I like to come up with things, ideas, stories, places etc. but that doesn't motivate me to believe in it so hard that it affects my normal life.
Early precursor to surveillance capitalism. /s
The elephant in the room is public transportation motivating bad drivers to stay away from the car. "Oh but they won't," and maybe, but I'm pretty sure there are a lot of people who would like to have someone else drive, not to mention bypassing the tickets and accidents (and repairs) that bad drivers experience.
Same level it was 6 months ago
Here is one of the classic research papers on the subject:

Iain A. McCormick, Frank H. Walkey, Dianne E. Green, Comparative perceptions of driver ability— A confirmation and expansion,
Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 18, Issue 3, 1986, Pages 205-208, ISSN 0001-4575, https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(86)90004-7. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001457586...)
Although a driver is not at fault in every accident they are involved in. Therefore it is possible that the good driver would be safer with an increased self-driving environment even if that individual's odds of causing an accident increase as long as the odds of other people causing an accident decrease.

I have nothing but a hunch to back it up, but I have a feeling getting the worst drivers off the road would provide a greater benefit to public safety that would outweigh the damage caused by downgrading the skills of the best drivers.
The status-quo is 'the work'. It's what's measured to determine how effective employees are. New ideas are a threat to that.
If a car can be more efficiently produced, the energy spent producing cars will go up because either more cars will be produced or more features will be added to the car. This is a win for the car consumer. This is very different from Bitcoin where any improvements to the efficiency of mining it (such as transitioning to ASICs) does not lead to a tangible benefit for the Bitcoin user. All major non-ASIC miners will eventually be out-competed out, but the amount of energy wasted will always be correlated to the price of Bitcoin.
Scott is a great speaker and does an incredible job at talking about and explaining a ton of cool ideas in functional programming and makes his slides in F# easy to understand and apply those ideas.

Absolutely a great video and he has many others in addition to his site fsharpforfunandprofit.com
What I figure is the printed money is given to people to buy things. It’s given to him who saved/inherited his money and could’ve bought that thing anyways, and to him who didn’t save/inherit his money and couldn’t.
The seller of that thing now has two people competing for it so he can mark up the price further.
He makes profit because he owns the capital, the non-saver or non inheritor, gets a good he couldn’t otherwise afford, and the saver is stuck paying a higher price.
That saver/inheritor who doesn’t own assets but only has his labor to sell, or his inheritance to spend, is effectively having some of his money taken from him and given to the non-saver and the rich man with capital.
He actually explain things in details after bashing him, so yeah,..
also it's Linus we're talking about, people used to his direct-and-borderline-rude style already anyway.

I agree that the ideal approach is talking like grown-up, educated people and not just shouting in face, but it also depends on who're you talking to and how firm their belief in something are, too. Some require a good beating with virtual baseball bat a few times for them to start listen.. :p
the pregnancy test doom was fake! :O
The difference is that PoW is permissionless and PoS is permissioned system. Another difference is that in PoS you pay once and get benefits forever, in PoW you must actively choose to spend energy mining. One more difference is that once you become a staker, your power in the system only grows, in PoW anybody can start mining and dilute your power.

PoS is simply worse from every angle and it’s also not cheaper because MR=MC.
Is it possible that becoming religious has not equipped you with helpful models, but rather it has led you to project your approach to understanding the world onto others? That last paragraph really screams that. I’ve had
and witnessed many discussions between believers and non-believers where the believers just couldn’t fathom the possibility that a secular person could honestly say “I don’t know” instead of blindly believing something
I’m no security researcher but have read one who said that due to it being a setuid program, it can potentially turn a bug in firejail into an exploit with root access.
> (...) what if the argument is that it makes sense to invest 1% in every investment that has outperformed every other investment class over the past 12 years of its existence?

Pray tell, how do you explain thaf fantastic performance of Bitcoin to those who bought in while it was at 54k and right now they look at the market and see btc at around 30k?

How does losing half the value fare against any conservative investment strategy?
Thats not my point i was making.

The parent mentioned specifically religious believes as a tool for good child upbringing.

My counter argument shows, that religious upbringing doesn't necessarily mean a good moral & ethics.
> ultimate truths

OMG man, this is delusional. We are not all the same person. To be specific, you and I are not the same person by any reasonable non-trivial definition of a person. We may only be parts of some larger entity (duh) like humanity, which may or may not be considered a person (separate from us, its parts) depending on definition you choose.
The sycamore is really on the border of what current classical methods can simulate. You also need to consider that the funding used for building sycamore was probably orders of magnitudes larger than the funding used to build classical competitors.