skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We probably use the tools differently. I squash minor commits in my local branch, so I never want the review system squashing branches. If I put a branch for review, it is a series of patches which should be applied as-is. See the kernel mailing list and associated patch sets for the sort of thing I mean.

I frequently use git rebase in interactive mode to rearrange and curate my commits to form whatever narrative I'm aiming for. Commits are semi-independent stories which can be merged, in order, at any rate and still make sense. Each commit makes sense with respect to history, but doesn't care about the future.

I squash and rearrange and fixup commits until they look they way I want, and would want to see if I was looking at a history, and then send them for review.

Whether you merge my branches, or fast-forward and rebase the individual patches, makes little difference to me. But please don't squash my hard work.
Of course it does. The working class doesn’t get stock options, vesting cliffs, inheritance, or capital gains!

Or much of a savings account or 401k, for that matter.

The option to stop working for more than a few weeks or months takes you squarely out of the working class.

Basically, what I’m trying to say is that the parent comment to ours is attempting to advocate for taxing just the billionaires and not to tax the moderately wealthy so much. I think that’s a flawed argument, because the moderately wealthy don’t need help, and are perhaps even more wealthy than they realize.
Event 1 as story 2 happens. This always drives me nuts about financial reporting.
【DTM】Use DTM to Report Events to Firebase-Huawei Developers
We needed long battery life - 3 years for a small 8051-based board with a data radio (kind of like wifi in 1989) that turned on every second or so. We created a power control ASIC that kept the 8051 off most of the time - it would wake up when data was available for processing. This was a proof of concept project for the military not a consumer item.
> At what point does the distinction between wealth and income become arbitrary?

I think risk is the difference. Someone invested (esp. heavily in one name) who borrows against that holding to finance consumption is basically adding leverage to their position, increasing their risk in order to continue growing their investment. Since growth is a social good, that's incentivized. It becomes income when you take your chips off the table i.e. making that capital entirely private instead of investing alongside others.

The risk is less apparently in TFA since it, you know, focuses on 25 of the absolute wealthiest people in the world, any one of whom can finance any sort of consumption short of becoming a nation-state without impacting their position, borrowing or selling.

Whether _wealth_ inequality is so undesirable that it should be ameliorated even at the expense of growth is a policy conversation worth having, but equating change in wealth to income and arguing _income_ inequality doesn't really hold water, esp. for wealth primarily invested in public names
I'm also lacking psychedelic experience, but one of the ways I made it through the pandemic was going for 4+ hour bike rides on Sundays. Total reset for my brain.
I find it amusing how all the news reports gloss over the fact that the FBI somehow got access to the wallet’s private key.

I’m also wondering why the hackers didn’t request payment in a currency that’s more difficult to trace.
So many people use parks even without paths that a common technique for park designers is to simply build parks with no pathways then go pave where people go over time -- so called "Desire Paths."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desire_path

People have been walking through things like Temple Gardens for most if not all of recorded history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_gardening

While psychedelics have a long history - and surely some wild animals unintentionally microdose including homo sapiens in the early days just by trying a mushroom they see - it seems certain that it's many orders of magnitude more hours of the human experience spent on walks in nature than on psychedelics.
It's more than a debugging tool as it allows you talk confidently about entire classes of vulnerabilities rather than the wack-a-mole of fixing bugs traditionally.

And it's a big enough deal that the rumor is that Amazon and Microsoft's type 1 hypervisors have been formally verified. I wouldn't be surprised if Google's is too.
Maybe. But how?

I think that, if you could somehow collect all the wealth and redistribute it equally, within a few years we would see disparity reappear. Some folks are better at accumulating wealth than others.

It seems to me that you would have to keep reallocating wealth. And many would then ask, what's the motive for generating wealth if it's just going to be taken away from you?
I never heard of any criminal that's fast as light so they do not need to be faster than light in order to catch him.
Your argument doesn't seem to agree with the evidence.

Feudal economies were actually powered by wealth taxes. So putting in a wealth tax won't do anything to avoid it becoming a feudal society. Further, confiscatory taxes[0] (of which wealth taxes are but one type) are favored by dictatorial regimes throughout history. I don't think we want to go down that road.

Wikipedia has a great summary on feudal taxes[1], and they are based on wealth (usually land and hides). It's actually a pretty good summary of a long period of time, and a complex topic to begin with.

[0] - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/confiscate
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_medieval_England
I think, in this case, the rich encroach on my privacy enough that it seems proportionate.

It's not okay to shoot your neighbor. It is okay to shoot your neighbor if they're shooting at you.

When the rich stop trading my data, I'll fight for their privacy too.
They're geared for enterprise so they're not exactly something you'd look to for "interesting projects."

If you look at the smart contract platforms built on top of various cryptocurrencies, however, you will find plenty of active projects. Whether or not they're interesting to you, I can't promise anything. But there's plenty of use cases being explored from simple games to tokenised art to decentralised DNS replacements.
> Why shouldn't someone be allowed to take it if they want to?

It's not entirely an issue of freedom. It's also about whether or not taxpayers have to pay Medicare to provide it.

By some estimates, 1 in 9 people over the age of 65 have some degree of Alzheimer's. The cost of the drug is estimated at $56K per year.

If we, the taxpayers, are now on the hook to pay $56K/year for up to 1 in 9 elderly people in the country for a drug that may not actually work and has some serious side effects, that's not good at all. Given the data we have, there's a significant probability that we'd be paying $56K/year to make these patients worse on average given the risk of serious side effects of the drug with negligible appreciable upside. That's a major problem.

It might be possible for Medicare to deny this drug due to lack of efficacy, but that sounds like a political nightmare.
If you have just enough assets to be "rich" but don't have enough to purchase tax assistance, you've become unprotected prey. Everyone that can afford this tax assistance has a lower cost of business than you, everyone poorer has a lower tax burden.
> You litigate and appeal and go to your legislators

How do you think most of the rich stay on the good side of the law? They have much more direct access to legislators via mechanisms that should be illegal, but are not because they pay to protect them.
> pretty certain this is not how Netflix's culture is.

> pReTtY CeRtAiN

This, the wording in of itself shows you have absolutely no clue whatsoever at all of Netflix's culture.
Yes that limitation was removed and you should be able to use the node graph in dashboards with any datasource providing you can query the data in the right format. In Explore though such query will still show the data in a table if the meta property isn't present. We hope to improve that later on.
Technically we could duct tape an iPad to the back of a Macbook Air?.. Sure, the CPUs are needlessly duplicated and so is the price but the UX and the form factor seem close? Obviously tongue in cheek, but also a fun thought experiment.
If you expand the system-under-definition to all the git repositories for a particular project, the proof of work function is the social dynamics (via PR/review/email) of getting changes accepted by other repositories.
Better advice might be to talk to an accountant and/or tax attorney. It's not exactly reasonable to expect someone to know enough about the tax code just from reading it.
I mean, it's possible he paid tax on stock he got when he started Amazon. It just wasn't that much back then.

Also, forcing people to selling stock seems like something that can be abused - imagine stock spike like we had with GME this year, during change of address year followed by significant drop. You would probably have to pay more tax than stock is actually valued at.
> It does not mention that E2EE is only available between PM users.

To the extent that PGP is E2E, it's available between anyone.
I had mostly the opposite experience.

I learned to program in zero period at Wilson High School in Portland, Oregon.

It was a self-taught course but I didn’t have to hide the work—-no one really cared. Not that my parents didn’t care, they were glad I was doing something I enjoyed.

But that no one had any idea how deep I was going into writing code.

The assignments were given once a quarter or so by Veryl Smith. We had far ranging latitude to figure it out on our own and gold plate projects as much as we wanted.

By the time the game of life assignment was due I had added a mouse interface and vga, color display of the cells and grid, all in Pascal.

I often lost points due to things like shadowed naming or other bad patterns.

But that didn’t really matter too much. I made up for it getting “A” grades working as a teacher’s assistant for the attendance office, writing hall passes and absence slips for myself and others as necessary. That was a great hack.

Anyhow, this essay resonates deeply with me. It has good ideas in it.
True, but chanting that at every correlation you see is a great way to never learn from anything.

To be honest it's a bit hard to believe this reporting has nothing to do with the price dropping ~10%, given that one of BitCoin's big parts of its value prop is precisely supposed to be that governments can't do this.
The "horrible crimes" of following the applicable tax laws. Got it.

I'm not focusing on the messenger. I'm questioning the ethics to violate the privacy of private individuals to try to score political points.
Ahh this is my bad. For some reason I assumed the blocks were part of the storage scheme, but I see they only are used to compute hash, and that the whole file is added to zip. Sorry for the misunderstanding!
No wonder it’s facing a credibility crisis. Almost every single Machine Learning for Neuroimaging paper I see is reporting 0.9+ AUC whilst using <50 subjects.

With the rampant lack of statistical rigour it blows my mind they get published. This great paper shows that reported accuracy plummets as dataset size increases: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01545002/document
I don’t think this phrasing is the worst progressive “improvement” in language (that award goes to “Latinx”, seriously please stop using this), but it is kind of awkward and the standard is not applied evenly. We don’t say someone is “experiencing hunger”, we say they’re hungry, despite hunger typically being a temporary condition.

Edit: your point about the need to understand the background level of housing instability in less well off population is completely valid. I don’t think people understand the extent to which large portions of the working poor continually cycle through housing crises.

Edit 2: My broader point is that if you do consider educating people about the true facts/nature of homelessness in US cities, you should seriously question how much using the preferred progressive phrasing actually accomplishes that goal vs just making you sound elitist. Even under the most generous interpretation, there is nothing in the plain language of the phrase “experiencing X” as compared to the adjective form of X that even attempts confer any information as to whether X is a temporary or permanent condition. This is an an attempt to use language as a form of persuasion that does not even try to engage with the basic reality of how people are going to respond to that language. There are already predefined ways in English to denote temporary vs permanent, “chronic “ and “acute” would be appropriate in a scholarly context, “short-term”/“temporary” and “long-term”/“permanent” work perfectly fine in casual conversation.
>... and it's not discouraged...

There are a lot of people who have been speaking out against "cancel culture", would that not be a form of trying to discourage social media mobs?
Idk - I think manufacturing consent may be easier rather than harder these days. The fact that it's now realistic to accuse people of being a bot (GPT-3) means that elites could just deploy large numbers of language models fine tuned and prompted correctly to AstroTurf and manufactur consent "from the ground up".
Agonia – War Based RPG Text Game
This looks great for medium-large size teams, but I've often found these sorts of tools to not have the same impact in smaller teams where communication and processes are a bit leaner and requirements simpler. Is this a market you're aiming for, and how do you think Runway suits small teams?

Related, I often find pricing doesn't scale down well for smaller teams (for understandable reasons!). What sort of ballpark are you thinking about?

Lastly, are you tackling the case of agency model development with external clients who may be involved in QA or other steps in the process? I see this as a common model in iOS.
Hey all, Agonia is a text based RPG Sandbox game and curently has a boost for new players which join! It's been posted in here before but it's been a while and had a good response last time so thought i'd post again and see if it gets any uptake!

Www.agonialands.com/index.php?r=5269
Is my referral link if you'd like to use it (If not remove the index.php?r=5269) but i'd prefer it if you could use it!

New players currently get a 60 or 75% bonus depending on which faction they join!
VCs don't want you to feel like they're bosses.
Doesn't Safari has the biggest marketshare on mobile (at least in the US)? So I don't think any major site could simply ignore that.
Empathize with you, and from the writing I am sensing the stress you are in.

One thought that may help:

As an engineer, your job is to communicate risks. You can’t control whether this becomes impossible, but you can control how you work on it and how you communicate.

One way to do this is to keep an up to date design document with progress and risks. Looks like there are some issues that are worrying you. If mot already would write it out and get thoughts from stakeholders.

Rooting for you!
Who squashes like this? I rebase all of my PR's not because I want to trash history, but because I want history to be meaningful. If I include all of my "whoops typo fix" and "pay respect to the linter gods" commits, I have made my default branch history much less readable.

I would say what you're describing is a break down in CI/CD and code review. How is code that is that broken getting into your default branch in the first place?
>>but they are based on weighing personal freedom above all else

and this is largely the primary difference between American Culture /Politics and the rest of the world, specifically European nations

European nations have always been more collectivist in nature, where the US was founded on Individualism, and Individual Freedom.

There are signs that the US is losing this desire, and it saddens me because unlike you I do value personal freedom above all else, and I think the world needs a nation that continues to put personal freedom above everything else.
Labeling something a "True Tax Rate" (paid taxes / wealth increase) isn't journalism, it's advocacy.
I hear you - it's just super weird (and rather suspicious) that FB is doing UI/UX so badly on something. This is not a mistake that they'd usually make, so to my mind, it isn't a mistake.
True but the cryptocurrency world doesn't seem to understand that. They're always tying events to price rises, and making proclamations about what will happen to the price in the future as a result.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Video_game_demakes

"A demake is a video game remake on an older platform, or one which converts the game to an older graphical or gameplay style."
We also have Segway tours in Chicago, where you get to ride one while seeing the sights.
I have been a teacher, tutor, and head of school clubs, as well as director of education for makerspaces.

The tools to focus on are THE FUNDAMENTALS. The fundamentals start with the framing - that means talking about Software Freedoms and our relationship with technology and society.

Then once the foundations are in place, the Free Tech starts to matter. Linux, Firefox, Devtools + html/js, Scratch etc.

Be sure you're clear on what your own goals are. Are you an entertainer, or an educator?
I think at this point everybody's aware of what it takes to be healthy.
People live their lives pumped up by stimulants and numbed down by alcohol and terrible food because their life is already terrible, it's a symptom and an escape from deeper problems caused by the inhuman environment a lot of us are stuck in.
You can manipulate the payment of taxes and only pay off the loans when you have other offsets to avoid paying taxes. 9 years no taxes, year 10 I pay off my loans and donate a chair to a University.
It could've been*
Many People Have a Vivid ‘Mind’s Eye,’ While Others Have None at All
Yes, it's a dark pattern in journalism. They hint at causation while having plausible deniability. Used to bother me too when I checked Yahoo Finance, every other day the market would be up/down "as" whatever happened that day that might have anything to do with the economy.
Indeed. $2.3 million dollars of BTC isn't too much.
Ahh yes, all drugs do the same thing and are all bad right? Caffeine should be banned.
Yes but the spec is often unknown (C language, GCC compiler, Linux) or flawed (speculative execution processors, which we know since Spectre).

The fact there is a formally verified piece of design and software is not bullshit. I said the marketing here is bullshit. This shiny piece of great software won't solve our security problems in multiuser environments, because the proof works only under a very limited set of assumptions. You can't just run your VMs in the cloud on this FV hypervisor and think your software security problems are solved.
You are not. Of course, the problem is that PGP doesn't get its informal resilience to single-bit errors through error-correcting codes on the ciphertext.
Empathy is hard to find around here, maybe someone needs to study it. Is it a feature of people in tech? Don't remember much being on slashdot either.
Sure, don't translate, but the input also has to be comprehensible. So there is always a challenge of not seeing the translation but still understanding. If you never look something up, there are some words you will never know. There is a balance, and that balance is hard to find.
US asks Taiwan to fill void as Confucius Institutes close
Interesting point. Yeah, my house went up last year, and so did my 401k, and I didn't pay any tax on either one. So do people have a problem with that? If not, then it's kind of hypocrisy to have a problem with it when it happens to a billionaire, but not have a problem with it when it happens to you and me...
The originating browser is responsible for encoding all the desired quality levels and sending them to the SFU to decide what to forward to the other participants - that is the difference between a SFU and a MCU, and why SFUs can scale. SVC-capable codecs are coming to WebRTC too, which makes this a lot more efficient for the browser to do.

Encryption keys are distributed out of band of the media, so it's the same as whatever the tradeoffs are for multi-party E2E-encrypted text chat there (I don't know what those are though!)
People should take care to distinguish pseudo-anonymous chains like btc from anonymous ones like zerocoin.

As soon as the ransom payment was transacted, the whole world could watch the chain and see the next step in its travel.
Reading a couple of sources on capital gains tax in India, it appears to work in the same way as the US (taxed only when you transfer/sell the asset):

https://cleartax.in/s/capital-gains-income

https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2011/12/india-income-t...
Facebook’s EntFramework did this _very_ well. I haven’t come across any essays that go deeply on it, but maybe from this comment someone will suggest an essay / if they are ex-fb write it up.
But that raises the question: is not working in Firefox considered to be a bug in prod?
I'm not sure how you can believe what is written here. Do you honestly think people adverse to taking LSD are being convinced because 'its just a little bit'? LSD isn't known to be addictive at all, are there any LSD addicts who started out small but are now taking whole sheets a day?

This post seems like the example of inventing something to get angry at?
If this was simply a matter of making the drug available for informed consumers willing and able to pay for it out of pocket, I wouldn't be as concerned.

If we're going to have Medicare and private insurance companies pay $56K/year per patient for a drug that may not have positive effects that outweigh the risk of side effects, that's a major problem.

Limiting access to experimental drugs is a difficult question. I know someone who has a different poorly-understood disease (not Alzheimer's, I'm being deliberately vague to avoid debates) who managed to get enrolled in a clinical trial for an experimental treatment. She responded fantastically well to the drug, as did a small number of other patients in the study. On average, however, the response to the drug was poor.

She and several other responders have now found each other online and are trying multiple avenues to get back on the drug. They're getting desperate enough that they're pooling funds to order a custom synthesis from another country and have it analyzed for purity by a 3rd party lab. I'm terrified to think of the risks they're incurring, but they're so desperate to return to remission that they'd rather take the risks than continue to suffer. It must feel unthinkably unfair to be given a glimpse of remission, only to be forbidden to continue to buy the drug because it didn't work on a majority of patients.

In their case, it's likely that the disease has multiple causative factors and the drug in question only treats one specific cause. Without stratifying trials by these yet to be determined different causes, it's difficult for trials to show efficacy on large populations. I wonder if Alzheimer's disease could be similar, in that certain subsets of patients respond to the drug but the average patient will not.
I learned to program C from the PGP source code. Thank you Phil!
Yours and Buffet's when to buy theory works retroactively, but how do you know in advance what is going to grow and what is going to sink even more?
Just wait till they figure out how to make money off it.