skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Stack Overflow operates a question-and-answer website used by software developers

That's spot on in my opinion, though I guess a bit dry. I suppose they could've included the traffic numbers or Alexa ranking to highlight how much it's used? I don't really see how this is an example of uninformed reporting, that description seems right on the money.

EDIT: The article actually does include traffic numbers.
It's by Lockheed (like the F-22) and we spent crazy amounts of money on it, why the hell is the F-35 deficient here?
>Unless you're an expert in a field, you are not scientifically literate in that field.

Really? There's nothing in between expert level and being able to judge if data was shoehorned or was a natural fit? Only an expert in a specific field can determine if logical flaws exist? If there's possibly hidden variables impacting readings, or incomplete models?

Has the scientific world become that black and white? You're either an expert or your opinion is not worthy of discussion?

I'm glad that of the many things I want to rant about, one I chose was the PCR cycles. Because the creator of that technology, Kary Mulis, specifically warned about it's misuse in that manner. Now for anyone just wandering into this mess going to search him for the first time - be warned, he did hold a very controversial opinion about another disease. But I don't think anyone could appeal to a higher authority on PCR testing at its core.

>Even in your comment, the majority of your points are political, because I suspect you're not actually scientifically literate.

Thank you
The difference between Thrift store prices and new garments in many cases is less than it used to be. Look at uncool stores, JC Penny, Walmart, and a few others, and you can get clothing for very little.
One Signal | San Mateo, New York, Texas | Multiple Positions | onesignal.com/

OneSignal is the number 1 Push Notifications Service. We are growing rapidly and hiring for a number of positions!

Design

- Product Designer https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/64f40633-30f5-4b21-b3b7-b9ce...

- Visual Designer https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/678ae408-a1be-4f7f-8426-fd1d...

Engineering

- Product Engineer https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/bbfc8a67-2d2a-4305-b1ba-939f...

- Senior Front End https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/bbfc8a67-2d2a-4305-b1ba-939f...

- Senior Infra https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/7d814151-e5cc-44b0-8861-6aec...

- Senior SDK https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/09d0b0ed-822e-4f7c-86db-305f...

Product

- Product Manager https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/4fbe6e9a-520c-4df4-9270-328a...

- VP of Product https://jobs.lever.co/onesignal/a7419358-43bd-48a2-997f-21a3...
I’m still trying to train Google to stop giving me W3Schools results and... I don’t have high hopes.
Ports?

Take out a port, and screw an entire region.
That's a little disingenuous. For other platforms, the constraint is fuel. Afterburner guzzles fuel. Only F-35 requires expensive and protracted maintenance after supersonic flight.

Which is another area where F-35 is lacking: range. Without external fuel tanks it can't fight in the Pacific.
If you have evidence that people of colour were being overlooked for reasons of racism, then you'd be right. But if you're merely concerned about optics and giving special dispensation to hire for reasons other than qualifications, you're not expanding your talent pool, you're tarnishing all minorities in your company with the potential tag of being a diversity hire.

Here's another reductio: Imagine if the NFL (that's American Football right?) started doing the exact same thing—requiring teams to work towards reflecting the demographics of their communities. There would cause outrage for obvious and correct reasons. And yet it's a direct parallel.

To be clear, I agree with the principle of applying active introspection to how your hiring outcomes compare with demographics. This is a good thing. But I don't agree with the argument that private employers should be responsible for fixing (or more precisely, compensating for) problems which exist upstream of the hiring process. Because it doesn't fix the problem. In fact it can make it harder to fix the problem. It papers over the actual problems so that society has greater license to ignore them.
I don’t think you’re an outlier. I think online comment sections in general attract people whose preferred communication and socialization style is digital. That’s why at times HN comment sections feel like everyone unanimously agrees that in-person work universally bad.

It’s great that we have more remote work opportunity post COVID, but it was never realistic to expect every company or even most company to abandon in-office work and all of the benefits that come with it. Maintaining a remote team is significantly more management and communication overhead than simply having people in one place.
Don't forget that a site being able to be managed & stay in business is also good for users.
Considering the current makeup of the Supreme Court, I highly doubt they would fail to make the distinction between soldiers and civilians. Aren't half of them literal constitutionalists?
They're different planes with different optimizations being made. Airplanes are one giant set of tradeoffs.
I don't know why you're not convinced about animation = appearance, but I do agree about frameworks. I've never used one enough, partly because I immediately found they sucked for replacing anything I could much more easily do manually, such as grid.
"Survivability and lethality in a contested environment now have more to do with stealth, sensors, data fusion, and the ability to network, than just pure turn performance. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to quantify these capabilities in an unclassified environment."

This makes me think about naval development before WW2. Everyone had lots of ideas about battleships and how to pack more guns onto a faster ship and all these other things, but lots of people missed how aircraft carriers would change things. I'm sure the next war will be different. The obvious development is drones, but I also think about the plotline of the second Battlestar Galactica series where the protagonists only initially survive because their ship eschews network connections. It seems like we aren't quite sure what future battles will look like and the US is making a guess in the form of a $1.5tn plane project.
Mentoring junior folks is a really big one that really needs in-person attention. It disappoints me that everybody is ignoring this.

Sure, work-from-home is nice for senior folks like me who have lots of influence and have nurtured their career over several decades. We can allocate resources and people listen to us by virtue of position.

For junior folks, work from home is terrible for their career. Nothing substitutes for standing in front of a whiteboard and talking things out. You need social contacts to spread out in order to be safe when your company goes to shit. And, you probably share a house with multiple other folks and don't have much budget to buy things.
Better to aim for the 4, as I assume it'll take some time to get everything done, the price will come down later on anyway.
This got a lot of coverage last year.

This article questions the colonial view point it was mostly reported from.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/416819/concerns-over-a-tale...

Here's an interview with one of the survivors
https://www.rnz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=2018746636

And the reason the island was uninhabited. the Pacific slave trade
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/20182...
The scale is a complete strawman. They aren’t falsely accusing 300 people for a crime.

A great example is the Capitol Riots. They are narrowing the list down to manageable numbers. They aren’t suddenly arresting thousands of people for a crime committed by three.
There are a ton of models that are 100% steel and impossible to break, just search for "french press stainless steel plunger".

For example: https://www.amazon.com/French-Coffee-Press-Espresso-Stainles...
K-Hole’s seminal pamphlet on normcore says something along the lines of: in the old days we were born into communities and had to find our individuality, now we’re born individuals and must find our tribe.
PowerPoint Is Evil, Redux (2010)
I do I simply disagree strongly, just as strongly as you would had I tried to bulldoze you with a naive stereotyped view about something you personally are highly familiar with.

In any case, it's clear continuing this line of discussion is pointless.
Very valid points. I went full remote 3 years ago and I really like it so far. Before had 25 min commute no traffic. I actually sometimes miss the time to just think by yourself. I took the wfh job because of the money and experience not for WFH. I think the key thing has been the entire company is remote all over the world. I think the hybrid model is just not going to work well. Either go all out WFH or not.
Ask HN: What country has more resilient hosting providers?
Lets say you want to start a service where people can host blogs, But i don't want blogs to be taken down or my site unless it goes into court. i.e. one day aws/cloudflare/twitter decide you are not politically correct enough for them.
They wouldn't call it religion if they wanted a conversation.
Surely they could have announced the missions, or at least be cited as having announced the missions, via a better medium than 45's late favorite?
Peak HackerNews
That is false. Maybe you mean "only operational US fighter".

The difference between the F-18 and the F-35 is that while the F-18 might need extended maintenance after prolonged (read : more than a minute) supersonic flight, the F-35 may suffer catastrophic coating degradation that may be fatal in the same flight.

As for other operational fighters, the Dassault Rafale can supercruise indefinitely the Gripen indefinitely at Mach 1.3, the Eurofighter indefinitely at Mach 1.8, the Sukhoi-35 can if outfitted with the AL-41F-1S (meaning, some operational Su-35s can supercruise indefinitely, but not all). The F-22 is far from the only one.
The author mentions the comms and sensors being the new killer feature, putting beside stealth can better sensing and interconnect not be retrofitted to existing aircraft? Why do you need to design a new airframe around better optics?
Sydney over Melbourne - nah
Yeah, the f-35 is optimized to cost as much as possible

(Edit typo)
The author of this article, speaking about Davos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8ijiLqfXP0

This article is an excerpt from Chapter 2 one of his latest book. The book, Humankind, seems to be making the argument that humans are essentially trustworthy and industrious and are thus proper candidates for UBI. UBI is more or less the topic of his first book.

Here is a review of his first book, Utopia for Realists:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/mar/13/utopia-realist...

From an interview about the book:

"OK, so basic income is all about the freedom to say no. That's a privilege for the rich right now. With a basic income, you can say no to a job you don't want to do. You can say no to a city in which you no longer want to live. You can say no to an employer who harasses you at work . . . that's what real freedom looks like."

"This is not about AI," he insists. "You go back to the 1960s, and all the economists, all the philosophers, all the sociologists said we're going to be working less and less and less and less and boredom is going to be the great challenge of the future. Didn't happen . . . mostly because we have this ideological obsession with creating new jobs."

Some other articles he has written for The Guardian:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/30/wealth...

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/12/phone-...

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/feb/07/rutger-bregman...
I have no idea where you are getting the idea that six boarding school boys had "dealt with hard gruelling hunter gatherer labour" or "studied the school of hard knocks first hand".

That is an amazing amount of assumption to draw out of the simple fact that they were Tongan.
How does a physical switch prevent you from writing backups of infested machines? Most organizations don't realize they are infected until they can't open any of their files.
Reddit itself didn't exist in the early 2000s wtf is this

/r/darknetplan itself is from late 2010

You're just bullshitting wtf

These are verifiable facts (go to /r/darknetplan and cmd-f for "community for" and then select that text).
Etleap (YC W13) Is Hiring a Technical End User Documentation Writer
Technical Writer

We are looking for a technical writer to take our technical product documentation to the next level, and help us maintain it on an ongoing basis.

The project is 2-3 months half-time to start, and then a few hours a week following that.

What you are going to do:
- Build out large sections of our end user documentation, making the site comprehensive and intuitive.
- Work closely with our engineering team to become an expert user of our product and extract insights
- Interview our engineers and users in order to create tutorials for appropriate topics

What we want to see in you:
-Experience writing end user documentation sites that include UI how-tos, at least one, ideally two or more.
- Experience writing and understanding for highly technical software products.
- High degree of user empathy - our docs will take hard technical concepts and translate to language that is a pleasure to read.

To apply, send your resume to jobs@etleap.com.
This is pretty cool, but it seems you can only view things with the active turtle as the focal point. I couldn't find any way to shift the point of view, even on the web editor. It means you can only zoom in on the center, or anything between the static POV and the turtle.

With some work, since you can use multiple turtles, it might get to NetLogo3D level and support cellular automata etc. But that one is hard to beat because the code is also very much faster.
We're trying to understand what HarmonyOS is in the technical sense, not the philosophical sense
There are actually four other operational aircraft that can reach supersonic speeds without the use of afterburners.
The issue isn’t about the warrant but the over breadth of the method for getting the desired information as it can leave other users vulnerable. Whether they have a warrant or not, this seems like overkill, because they could obtain said info in a much more straightforward way, assuming they have probable cause.
How about versus the F-22? I wonder which he’d choose between the those two.
I did accept them, but I just sent them a request to have me reject them. I am sure they will respect my newest decision.
I think you may have jumped the gun on this statement. Dolthub is a bit like github for data. You can clone the entire database without so much as a login right now, see the clone drop down situated in a similar location as it appears on github. (It is 165GB)

(install dolt which is apache licensed)

dolt clone dolthub/hospital-price-transparency-v2

The data changes over time so it is possible they will stop publishing it. Also note that this data is open to begin with and they are just aggregating it, though from a quick glace doing a nice job of it. Under HHS/CMS rules hospitals have had to publish a price index since january of this year.
> "Without external fuel tanks it can't fight in the Pacific"

If only we had large floating aircraft bases and the plane also had versions that supported VTOL for even more expansive capabilities at sea.
There’s no mention of kubernetes persistent volume claims.. it does mention that you can swap out a DATABASE_URL env var here:

> Or perhaps you want to use a managed PostgreSQL database in production but run PostgreSQL locally in a container for development.

It’s mentioned in passing with no discussion of why you should not run your database in docker compose - a very common use case - so the reasons I mentioned were not explicitly discussed.
Yep, heaven forbid the writer actually writes instead of just spitting out a Buzzfeed listicle ("8 Famous Artists You Didn't Know Supported Terrorism")

de gustibus non est disputandum and all, but magazine writing has been ever thus, from Thoreau to Hemingway, Mailer to Wolfe.
By “in the Pacific” do you mean flying from US west? If things come to that, then the US is in deep trouble.
I worry the author suffers from confirmation bias.

Does the bad press miss the point?

So much that "point" is the cost per aircraft is nutso for what you get. Something that's stealth, dogfight, and close-in air support.

And perhaps the article is right, the stealth is fantastic. Lets you fire without being seen. But after you've fired it, then what? Now everyone knows where you are and a potential dog fight is coming.

It's well known its dog fighting is weak even compared to other older fighters, but maybe it's also fair to say dog fighting is a thing of the past[1].

Being a stealth mobile missile battery... Is a good long range offense a strong defense? These kinds of things can only be tested, so... jury's still out.

My personal criticism comes in the close in air support, what good is all that money that was dumped into stealth doing as it just hovers above in plain view/access? Also, it does a poor job at flying slowly. It's just not specialized in it.

Time will tell if the price tag is even close to being justified, but I'm still a strong skeptic.

[1] https://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/f-35-pilot-heres-wha...
Is Apple forbidding people from coming into the office more than 3 days? AFAIK at Google, you can go everyday if you want.
"Distasteful" and "dumb" are far from the same thing, and the second world war happened for the former and not the latter.
Should be F3, I think (works on my system and I don't think I changed the defaults).
Not really. The main limiter for supercruise in the F-35 is sub-par stealth coatings that unlike the F-22's cannot handle the heat. Otherwise it could supercruise, maybe with some engine tweaks.
Or you can use a system with paper ballots where you fill in the bubble next to the candidate to vote and that can be quickly counted by simple, cheap, already widely used optical scan machine and can be hand audited, but by doing some clever things when you print the ballots get an end to end verifiable system that among other things:

1. Allows you to publish all the ballots afterwards so that any third party can do their own recount,

2. Allows voters to verify that their vote was counted correctly, but does not allow them to prove to a third party how they voted,

3. Allows voters to check before voting that the ballots have been correctly printed.

4. Looks and feels like a plain old fill in the bubble optical scan system to voters who don't want to take advantage of the extra security provided by the above measures.

Here's a paper about this [1]. Wikipedia article [2]. Here's a paper on the coercion resistance of that system [3].

[1] https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/evt08/tech/full_papers/c...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scantegrity

[3] https://eprint.iacr.org/2010/502.pdf
> When I look back on hallway conversations, I can't think of many that really mattered. Actual important decisions are typically not made by IC engineers

Not that I’m itching to get back in an office (I’ve been remote most of my career), but this really depends on the environment. I’ve seen some really pivotal changes happen simply because someone happened to yak about it, or overheard such a yak and jumped in.

Usually these changes have been mostly technical in nature and under the purview of the engineers. But sometimes they’ve significantly changed product direction.
I really do hope there's some kind of exotic technology that some nation possesses/is working on that gets spilled through this release. It would make things interesting.
Not at Apple but my company's internal data shows productivity is better as a hybrid vs pure WFH/In Office for many departments
Elastic results and stock today say otherwise.
Only operational stealth fighter
Oh weird, I heard Netflix offers the best base salary around because they make annual workplace cuts of 10%. Sounds awesome if they don't do that!
Of course he does. He gets to fly it!

This passage caught my eye:

> The last major reason the F-35 has seen so much criticism is that it was the first jet developed in the social media age. The paradigm shift, cost, and early problems, coupled with concurrency, led to an explosion of negative social media that grew into mainstream media coverage.

Cost buried second in a list of factors contributing to…social media as major factor?

If it weren't for those pesky kids on the Internet!
When browsing Tik Tok, one gets the impression that not much has changed since Zappa released the song in ‘82.
> There is a strong undercurrent that education is bad - a counterculture of ignorance.

My experience has been with people who don't think that education is bad, but modern universities. I know many people who are smart, self-driven, industrious people who like learning things - who aren't interested in going to a public university. (they're more than happy to avail themselves of YouTube videos, Coursera courses, GitHub projects, work on things with friends, and so on)

Given the state of modern universities, with so many of them pushing the murderous ideology that is neo-Marxism, I can't blame them. A few more generations of this and we'll have our own Cultural Revolution, except with even more than the tens of millions of deaths that China did with theirs.
Sandbox Banking has been remote for years! https://sandboxbanking.com/careers/
The website you've linked is nothing more than the "suggestion box" of a leviathan. They don't read the comments. When they're absolutely legally required to do so, they figure out their arguments first, based on politics and the possibility that a Court will or will not overturn their regulations, then they'll look for comments that exemplify the arguments they're making -- in order to satisfy the bare minimum legal requirement for appearing to address comments that are submitted. They certainly don't form "regulatory strategy" based on comments. As a commenting strategy, I'd urge you not trust the FTC's UI, and instead, learn about the legal framework -- and more importantly, the realities of administration -- driving the fictions and optics of regulatory policymaking.
Good question! A few reasons. Weight and balance is super important so anything you add means something else needs to be added or balanced. Power requirements are also a problem. More electronics means more power maybe means new engines. Maybe that all means more weight, so you need to reinforce the structure. Which means you're heavier and need a better engine. Etc. Sensors can't just be installed, if you need to drill holes and break pressure bulkheads.
Considering that we spend most of our day doing this "work" thing, I find it much more tolerable to view my coworkers as close friends and my career as an opportunity.

This is especially easy in such a privileged sector as tech where pay is excellent, office life is compelling, and work is challenging and exciting.

I don't know how people survive day-to-day with a perspective like yours. I get that people can get fulfillment outside of work, but its actually possible to enjoy both.

"Work is just a pay cheque culture" is just as toxic as "hustle culture".
I agree absolutely.

The thing is, until very recently, Bot Framework was the only game in town for Teams.

Doing something as simple as sending an outbound message to a user from a bot, if the user didn't initiate the conversation, was stupidly convoluted.

There's some stuff added to Graph API for sending messages now, but on the whole, the development experience is very, very far from what I would expect from Microsoft.

There's still no good way to sign in on behalf of a user to Teams, which makes writing load-testing tools to test a Teams bot a PITA - you can use Direct-Line, but then it isn't really testing how the bot would act against Teams...