> People still get scammed, though.

Which is why nonreversibility is a bug.

> A sketchy exchange hacked 7 years ago and many of the BTC was recovered.

4 years before that article.

> Good luck hacking Coinbase.

That's a matter of when, not if. Like I just said even actual real banks get hacked.

But it doesn't even have to be that clean. It's enough that one Coinbase employee has the opportunity for even one minute. I don't know how much they manage, but someone left alone (or conspiring, for a two-key system), and you can have all the money disappear.

And the thing is, they'll likely get caught in that case. But so what?

The average sentence for robbery is apparently 111 months. Now, I didn't do more research on that than a simple googling, but 10 years prison, and when you get out you're a billionaire?

And keeping in mind that during that whole prison time, your family is stinking rich.

> Proof-of-Stake is about to reduce Ethereum's energy use by 99.9%

Again, I'm not holding my breath. Especially since bitcoin HODLers will never give up, and bitcoin factories have financial incentive to continue the scam.

> So if we stop all crypto brainstorming and innovation

No. You should show some results after a decade of crime and waste.

> What if I told you crypto innovation is making these things better, not worse

I read this as "reducing the problems they created", not "making the preexisting problems less of a problem".

Great. Let me know when coiners consume less power than Denmark for 7tx/sec.

> DeFi lending is designed so that you can't go into debt.

How does that work? Let's say I have a DeFi loan, and then I get drunk and smash a priceless vase, now owing $100M to some art gallery?

So my assets and liabilites are now that loan, and my debt to the art gallery. I go bankrupt, and my assets and liabilities are renegotiated / forgiven.

And the solution can't be "the law of the land, and courts, do not have jurisdiction over DeFi debt". Because obviously they do.

> In meatspace, avoiding debt collectors and child support is still illegal, whether you're hoarding BTC or just putting cash under your mattress.

Yes, but like I said: judgement proof.

Today it sucks to be judgement proof (i.e. you pretty much have to be a bum). In a coin future it doesn't really affect you at all.

> Even so, can we agree that if I'm paying for a newsletter subscription online, that the multi-trillion dollar meatspace infrastructure of banks, credit cards, bankruptcy laws, FDIC, and court settlements is basically wasted?

Not sure what you mean, here. The multi-trillion dollar industry does more than allow you to pay for things online. It's the engine of the whole economy. A better comparison is to compare it to only paypal.

And paypal does have overhead, to be sure. And yes for any happy transaction between you and the newsletter that overhead is waste. But you're paying for when it's not a happy transaction. E.g. when the company goes bust, just plain doesn't give you the product or service, or when your card gets stolen (c.f. someone hacked your computer), and other mishaps.

And also for when actually the newslesser is a front, and "you" are actually just laundering money for them. Compare this to how in the 90s some people set up companios selling ringtones, and then went and bought SIM cards with cash, and used it all on their own ringtones.

You don't have to make it impossible, just too risky or expensive to be worth it. At least with real money. With coins making it risky doesn't help, because the money can't be clawed back, so you can just wait out your prison sentence.

You saying the whole industry is wasted is like me saying police, fire departments, and ambulance are a complete waste, because I have never neither either of them. Hell, I've never even needed my home or car insurance, or my life insurance.