skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This is true from an explanatory perspective but it still doesn't make it valuable or interesting.

This is literally applicable to any subject which the listener doesn't find valuable or interesting. To someone outside our field, kubernetes is neither valuable nor interesting in and of itself either. Nothing is valuable or interesting for its own sole sake.
No new countries to be added to the UK’s green list for foreign travel
TBH I'm not sure what you think I was saying.
I'd be less skeptical if these werent introduced at the same time rampant speculation on valueless currencies or tokens became profitable. It's kind of obvious the real impetus is to capture the need of investors to get constantly increasing returns from speculation, and that new agreed upon stores of values of required to be created as old ones get too expensive to enter.
> Detecting an error when creating a record is much better than when using it later on, as during creation you have the context needed to debug the problem.

This is a great insight no matter what language or framework you're operating in. Laziness has its virtues, but invariants, validity checks, run-time type checks, etc. should all be performed as early (and often) as possible - it's much easier to debug issues when the are proximate to an object or structure being created or modified, then when that data type is being used much later.
I think Jenkins is a very powerful tool but I would strongly disagree that it's quite valuable in a startup environment. Jenkins has struck me as a philosophical sibling as C++ - it offers a plethora of foot guns to the user that can also be used to accomplish rather good things. I would advise Jenkins to companies with projects that don't require agile responses to user requirements where the functionality desired at the end is very clear from the beginning - since the times I see Jenkins fail the most are when the configuration of jobs on it are being updated and reconfigured rapidly.

Jenkins tends to suffer from extremely poor state management and experimenting with things can cause a permanent loss of value to companies if backups are not properly configured - compared with a system like ansible where recipes will grow and be regularly committed to a repository Jenkins doesn't have a nature version control system and as a result strikes me as extremely brittle.

I almost wish the UI for jenkins simply didn't exist and it actually was just a whole mess of config files and shell scripts so that it could be locked down to a much better degree.
Word. I did my time in the Sobolev spaces.
>The use of the image has produced controversy because Playboy is "seen (by some) as being degrading to women

That's pretty straightforward, from the link I posted, and not the same quote or person.
What would MLK say about billionaires using identity politics to distract the working class from any kind of solidarity? That's what I believe is happening here. A lot of identity politics started after Occupy Wall Street.

A racially divided nation is profitable, and it's much harder for workers to organize.
No, the issue is that Tesla doesn't use dealerships at all, they sell direct to consumers.

It's illegal in many states for a car manufacturer to sell direct, because they have a supposed unfair advantage over dealerships.

The dealerships bribe their legislators -- oh, did I say that out loud? I meant donate to campaigns -- and the legislatures pass laws like this.
Unikernel Vs Container Vs VMs: Here is what you should use
Why I'm moving away from an agency to be more product-focused
And I think your service looks very good, but the barrier that fancy keys provides vs unfancy keys is against the subset of pirates in an adamantly-offline-only community who don't want to modify their executables. It's not an entirely trivial difference, but it's also not really mentioned in the blog post.
If it matters, I was speaking as someone who led the authorization platform team for a Fortune 100 company. I do suppose this depends significantly on company culture.

In my experience: failure to abide by company policy is first-and-foremost a compliance issue; the company policy framework definitely goes above and beyond the scope of "what is criminal".

HR is primarily there to provide to manage records of employee conduct (e.g. in case of a pervasive pattern of misconduct across a number of different controls) and a sanctioning mechanism (hard conversation; formal reprimand; separation).
Please try to contextualize those quotes. The context I’ve seen has actually only made them seem worse.
I imagine it's more damaging to the environment to ground working old planes and replace them with new ones that are 20% more efficient.

Grounding old planes will also result in a greater cost of air travel. With increasing nationalism around the globe, that may not be a good thing.
Steps to run the controller:

1. Open the SpaceX simulator: https://iss-sim.spacex.com/.

2. Open the browser javascript console. Example for Google Chrome https://developer.chrome.com/docs/devtools/console/javascrip....

3. Past the code in the gist: https://gist.github.com/rzilleruelo/f44252e77036403af4c6a3e8...

4. Paste this code to start the controller:

let regimeController = startRegimeController(config);
let controller = startControl(config);

5. Optionally, you can change the target values to make the controller set the capsule in a different state. For example:

config.x.target = 0.0;
config.z.target = 10.0;
config.pitch.target = -45.0;
I've tried a bunch of solutions like this and think the answer is that Spot.xyz is the richest (but still simple) experience.

Here's my summary:

* The world is easy to move around in and manipulate, which is rare for a 3d space (as opposed to Mozilla Hubs for example)

* Video chat showing up on peoples heads is much nicer than in a separate section like Gather.town

* Hear people per-room, rather than just volume attenuation is a better solution for larger meetings

* The screen sharing on a wall is such a nice and intuitive way to glimpse content from afar but still be able to full screen it

That said, my team is on Gather and we will stick, largely because we have team members on slow laptops and the 3d world of Spot makes the fans spin.
people are misattributing the most important one, then:

planning and following through with the action incompatible with maintaining a consciousness on this plane of existence.
left hand side of the road, or right hand side of the road?
14 years is such a long time. I am not the same person I was a year ago. There is no excuse to what he did, but what if he is a different person altogether now.
Right (and that would be more efficient, I guess), but the Fourier transform of White Noise yields complex white noise with real and imaginary part such that their std deviation a and b obeys var_x = a^2 + b^2 (This follows from FFT being Unitary or Parveval's theorem), so each frequency component has sqrt(2)/2 times the (non-transformed) signal standard deviation. So simply generate two i.i.d. white noise fields with scaled variance (1/2).

It's important to keep in mind when speaking of noise that we are referring to average values (or statistical values), e.g. although the power spectrum of white noise is on average flat, as we discussed it's really random (the expected amplitude spectrum in fact has average 0 anywhere, since it's also white noise!).
I think that's also why Clojure use peaked right before Java 8 was released; once Java became a better Java, and libraries started to be designed around more ergonomic APIs than wiring up objects that needed miles of stateful configuration code, the pressure that drove you out of Java and into Clojure began to diminish.
In Southern California, it's common to see ancient cars rolling around without overhauls, probably due to the mild weather. A little less common in the Bay Area, but I still see 20+ year old beaters and 90s Camry's almost every day.
How often does this happen? do they not keep track of what they need to upstream? how do they merge that all back in when X+1 begins? yikes..
I think it's a combination of all the high earners in the peer group either not wanting children (100 percent of my high earning single female peers) or wanting children but being unable to afford to raise them in the HCOL areas where they live (maybe 10-20 percent of the couples and single male peers). I wouldn't frame anyone's financial situation as dire, it's more that having a kid would result in a dramatic reduction in QoL or it's just a straight up idealogical nonstarter.

The couple interested in having children have made major quality of life sacrifices (think moving to a cheaper city and still having 2 hour commutes) and also come from more conservative families. I can't help but think at least some of this is pressure from family and also friends/family back home having (multiple) children starting in their early 20s.
Modern Jenkins using JenkinsFiles and cloud provisioning can work pretty well.

All things being equal, it's my preference to not use Jenkins for new projects, but anti-pattern is IMO a significant overstatement.
Is there more info about the tool itself that claims 100X decrease in application development cost? Quite the claim.
So, why do you think that conversation with them would de-radicalize them?

We need to send clear message to the world that we don't stand with such people.
We moved to drone after many years of a love/hate, abusive relationship with Jenkins (junkins was the common name).

Drone has this awesome feature where you can have it hook out and receive a pipeline on the fly.
We now generate our pipelines in an api and this way we can write the logic in ”something other than groovy” - typescript in our case.

No pipelines required in repo and everything as code without ugly hacks.

Never looked back even once.
Apple cannot force developers to develop for the Apple ecosystem. If you don't like the terms, leave. And I say this as someone who did just that. I used to be all-Apple all the time, but even as far back as 20
I always wondered who does all this backporting and patching work for these ancient enterprise Linuxes. It seems like brutally monotonous work.

Maybe they're reading this comment right now, hi!
> If you don't like the terms, leave.

Apple captured 50% of the American economy. You have no choice. This is why the DOJ must act to bring an end to these anticompetitive behaviors.
Not really. Jenkins allows a very fine control over jobs and steps orchestration. I realize it might appear as a dated glorified cron, but it's really not. There's nothing you cannot do with it, which is more than I can say about any other CI system I used.
Why can't you do this in Go? I'm 99% sure we can allocate a massive array of bytes using safe Go and use unsafe to cast a chunk of bytes to an instance of a type. This isn't type safe, but neither would the equivalent C code.
Isn't this like the Autogrill concept you can find on any highway like Italy?
The number one contributor to increasing carbon emissions is population growth, but the same people who pretend to be outraged about carbon emissions are also the same people who were adamant that we needed a full lockdown for COVID so that not a single unnecessary person would die. You can't have it both ways. You can't say carbon emissions are destroying the earth and then do everything in your power to undermine earth's natural defenses against overpopulation.
> As usual, you don't need a blockchain to do either of the two things you're talking about. For the copyright case, what matters is that you have a legal authorization which will be recognized by a court. An NFT can do that but so can an email or anything else

An email or anything else creates legal gray area. What if the email is from 20 years ago and the company that sent you the email doesn't exist any more? Do we know the email was authentic? Emails don't have cryptographic signatures. And even if, maybe their PGP key leaked. With an NFT, even if someone hacks the wallet of a creator and releases fradulent tokens, they are still trackable. The second advantage is the ability to sell the token. In NFTs, this is a builtin first-party feature, similar to your ability to sell DVDs. But how do you sell an email? How do you ensure that people didn't clone give the email to multiple people? If this problem sounds familiar, it is, it's the double spend problem, which various blockchains have found solutions for.

As for the cloud storage, I think it should be separated. NFTs can be set up in multiple ways. I propose to set them up as follows: a) you can prove cryptographically to others that your wallet contains an NFT and b) the legal framework of the NFT gives everyone the permission to give copies of the work to anyone who has given them a proof after a).

This move would create an entirely separate market for obtaining the work you have gotten an ownership title for. The barrier of entry for these services would be low, and some services can specialize for niche content, others can specialize for speedy delivery, etc. As the cost per work is quite low, I'd imagine a quite low price for these services. The most important advantage: one service going bankrupt wouldn't mean the loss of some people's collections. Especially, anyone would be allowed to host the content.

The single key leak issue is non-existent, because each single download is end-to-end encrypted via say TLS, but the download is only offered to accounts which have proven they own an NFT. Similar requirements are on torrenters, they too have to verify cryptographically that someone owns some content before they send it to them with a end to end encrypted ephemeral key. Maybe, for abuse prevention, there needs to be a record of the verification/download in the ledger as well, so that one can find people who lend out their wallets or something.

Can these issues be solved by a government run centralized registry instead? Absolutely, they can. In many countries, the govenrment runs a land registry already. Land registries share in fact many of the advantages of NFTs. The main issue I have though is centralization.
> I don't understand the need for people to frame this as you are.

Then perhaps the bigger issue, to me, is that this level of analysis is not given to other people, where it should be as well.
My comment wasn't about fragility, it was about how compatibility was long tail.

And long tail, accreted one weird customer at a time things are definitely a moat.
Very much its own UI that didn't follow (the admittedly somewhat loose) established conventions. Right-clicking to select and other weird stuff. I got used to it but it really required a lot of playing around to begin to associate the user-model with my prior experience in 3D software-land.

I remember thinking at the time that, had I had no prior experience to build on, I probably would have given up on it.
Agreed, I'll have to check but I'm fairly confident my 2009 Kia Soul had 10 years and 100,000 miles
Boom production models will use COTS avionics just like every other business jet manufacturer. They'll have to write custom flight control software but that will be much easier than on a military aircraft. No weapons, no external stores, no defensive systems, no tactical data link, no complex navigation modes, etc.
My point was really that ads are allowed. I didn’t make that clear enough
I fortuitously got rid of a 20+ year old Honda with about 170K miles shortly before the pandemic hit. It was starting to show some age and needed some maintenance--which is why I decided to get rid of it (in addition to not driving it much)--but I'm pretty sure it never had significant engine work other than a pro-active timing belt replacement.

(I hadn't driven it in the winter for years.)
Oh my, I never knew there was a different word for it, thank you!
They’re also colocated at Meijer grocery stores, Target, and in Texas, an HEB or two. Waiting for the day they install 21 station chargers at Buc-ees.

https://buc-ees.com/about/
Porsche has a bifurcated product offering... their sports lineup is extremely reliable, but their SUVs and more mainstream products are certainly not (these also tend to have brand new equipment which doesn't filter to the 911 for years)
Oof. I don't like this decision, and surprised to see the breadth of agreement from the Court. When you grant a person access to a system (digital or physical), it's for a specific purpose. Violating that purpose should be a criminal act. If I give a plumber my house key to come in and fix my sink, and he goes and he opens up my computer and looks at my files, that should be a crime. If I grant a Geek Squadder access to my computer to get a virus off my computer, and he looks at my private photos except to the extent necessary to do the job I hired him to do, that should be a crime.

One could always say "Congress can remedy this with legislation" but that body has become fully dysfunctional so we all know that won't happen.
People Data Labs | Full-Time | REMOTE (US/Canada) | Senior Data Engineer/Engineering Manager/Senior Software Engineer, Platform

People Data Labs is focused on democratizing access to world class business information. We empower developers to create innovative, compliant data products at scale. We’re building clean, consumable datasets of resume, company, location, and school data, which our customers consume via a suite of APIs.

We have an amazing team of around 70 people. We’re profitable and we’re growing quickly. We’re backed by amazing investors including Founders Fund, 8VC, and Susa Ventures.

Visit our career page at https://apply.workable.com/peopledatalabs/ for full job descriptions

Sorry, no C2C or contract-to-hire accepted at this time
Yes, because I'm not a sociopath. :P I'm well aware some people like to work from home.

If you are one of those people you can keep working from home. All I'm asking is for the respect that I am not one of those people - and for my employer to please give me the option to go in. Thanks.
That’s what’s frightening about this. I feel not enough people internalize just how primitive the car’s understanding/perception of the world is. A two year old human brain would have no confusion in this scenario.

We discount how much the concept of “understanding” is required in visual perception. We don’t just see shapes we have a complete understanding of what we’re seeing.

I might see a big rectangle flopping in the lane in front of me. I can immediately ascertain whether it’s a piece of tumbling plywood, or foam based on movement characteristics, color, apparently size, etc. I can then use that understanding to decide what evasive actions are required.

A Tesla it seems has absolutely zero of this capability.
>and he was fully authorized to use them

This line is the crux, and the problem is that "authorized" means subtle, yet critically important, different things to different people.

The officer was surely "authorized" in the sense that he had technical authorization to log into the system and accomplish the task.

But in the sense that "authorization" is defined by more than just technical controls, and also has to do with many dynamic situations that technical controls can't often restrict (or just aren't in place), it doesn't sound like was "authorized".

Think of walking into a restaurant and they have a sign that says "Employees Only Behind Counter". Even if there was no technical/physical control preventing you from going behind the counter (eg there was no locked door or anything like that), I think it would still be understood that you as a customer do not have "authorization" to go back there.

In my experience as a security consultant, my technically-minded clients typically think of "authorization" as the first way, defined by technical controls and thinking that lack of technical controls in a system means they have carte blanche to do whatever they want with that system. But my experience with anyone outside of tech is that they don't think of it that way at all, and that just because you have the physical/technical ability to do something does not make it okay to do that.

"Authorization" is an overloaded term and the CFAA suffer for it, but personally I do not think an average person would think the officer was "authorized" to do what he did, even if he did have the technical access to do it.

The points about "average employees technically violating the CFAA by doing stuff like reading the news on their work laptop" are valid concerns and I think they need to be resolved, but I think that is a completely different concern than someone like this officer abusing their access for legitimately bad acts.
‘Blizzard 2.0’ Storms in to Make the Games Blizzard No Longer Wants To
Grondbreaking? Unless this extends to more components, Kia has had this since at least 2009.
I assert it is impossible to secure an internet connected device running Windows, MacOS, or Linux. It boggles my mind that anyone would insure such fragile systems.
I love this. There's a virtual treasure hunt / digital geocaching application in there.
Jesus, that after 200 years this same argument is still used is incredible. But I guess some things never die.
Maybe there is good reasons why this kind of changes result in comments that are less than praising...
What precisely where they using it for? Beware of the dog here?
Because the current system/platforms of ads in existence is in anthesis to apples stance on privacy.
In this case the regression also caused a 3% decrease in throughput.
At least the App Store ads are completely contextual.
First law of Hacker News: taking the “pro app store fee” argument in any thread comment results in “k” karma points, where “k” <= 0.
My doorbell camera isn't even a Ring, but the local teens still make a point to flip it off every time they see it come on. Makes me want to put up a sign that says "not a snitch!"
Sure thing.

Apple told developers that webapps were the solution. They didn’t give any public indication that this would change. Now, one could argue that this was just cover while they got the native SDK ready, but that Bertrand Serlet email from the other thread was the point at which they even officially decided to have a native SDK at all (months after telling devs to write webapps).

I think the real issue is with the phrase “Apple planned”, because Apple is not one person, and the people disagree on “the plan”. We mythologize them sometimes as an all-planning “the Vatican thinks in centuries” kind of organization. But as emails like that one and others show, there are often legitimate arguments within Apple. In this case, some folks[0]were arguing that native apps would be too much of a security nightmare to be worth it, and that anything that needed to be native could just be built by Apple themselves.

So in conclusion: “Apple” planned nothing, some people at Apple had clear plans to push through a native SDK from day zero, and some people at Apple spent months being deadset that that would never happen.

[0] I’m too lazy to look up these sources right now, check out Melton and Ganatra’s multi-part interview on the Debug podcast.
You're right about competitiveness etc. But nothing you said takes away the jaw dropping abilities of Simone and the other athletes your parent comment mentioned. It takes insane amount of practice, insane work ethic/dedication, genetic lottery, geographic lottery etc to get to that level.

We can admire and respect insane talent and aspire to solve problems like homelessness at the same time!