skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can! CSS Grid works just fine with <table> and its related elements. In fact Grid is overkill here, you can span multiple rows or columns using flexbox alone. You don't need to "rebuild" anything, use the same markup.

You couldn't control colspan/rowspan with CSS before, only HTML, which isn't responsive. (Ignoring the `column-span` property which isn't very flexible.)
Perspective on the rarity of the CGG pair:

https://twitter.com/K_G_Andersen/status/1391507272887455746

Basically, it's somewhat rare but not wildly so. FCoV has an RR pair, the first is coded as CGG, and the second as CGA, a difference of one base pair.
"Why this HN comment is correct on design", "Why said revered HN comment is incorrect on design", "HN comment creates cult"

Jokes aside, I tend to agree with you. No matter is so black or white, if something failed, it was a host of things that went wrong. If something succeeded, it was as well numerous things. The most common successful factors are the ones people role their eyes over cause everyone already knows 'dedication' and 'hard work' are factors, but they don't always get you results, they're just the most common factors.
> The Commission says it needs a new identification system because it wants EU residents to retain control of their data, rather than share it with tech giants like Google and Facebook.

> "Every time an app or website asks us to create a new digital identity or to easily log on via a big platform, we have no idea what happens to our data in reality," said Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in a speech last September. Instead of using your Facebook profile to log in to other apps, say, the Commission is proposing "a secure European e-identity ... A technology where we can control ourselves what data and how data is used."

Why do I have a feeling that these politicos don't know that data transmission means... the copying of data? So what if the source of the data is some EU server or me typing them in, if Google (or some other data broker) has received them, they can technically do anything with the data.
Buy CJC 1295 for the Best Results
Yep, but in the dual, they have the same goal: produce interesting inputs to the program which might exhibit trouble.

This is why you can use one of the approaches to help the other side of the approach.

The 3rd solution is concolic testing: use an SMT/SAT solver to flip branches. The path down to the branch imposes a formula. By inverting the formula, we can pick a certain branch path. Now you ask the SMT solver to check there there's no way to go down that branch. If it finds satisfiability, you have a counterexample and can explore that path.
I really wish Overcast was available on Android (and via F-Droid so I could use it on Graphene OS). I say this having no idea how hard that would be... I would GLADLYpay Marco if I could use Overcast on Graphene.
That’s probably for the best; platforms are better when they have as uniform as rules as is practically possible. Creating a special cutout for special people opens the door up for abuse.

Next FB needs to invest heavily in enforcement, so that breaches of the rules result in consistent rather than uneven treatment.
Using Vector Search to Detect Security Threats
Vanity Fair.. publishes a ton of articles that pander to various audiences. I'm not sure how else to put it but their stuff pops up all the time on r/politics (somewhere I spend too much time TBH). That community is easily pandered to.. I like to just keep that in mind when reading articles like these from sources like these.
I've seen this so many times, yet 9 times out of ten, even in this thread, when people are claiming it originated in a lab, they also include claims that it was created in a lab.
This is surely a problem with AdBlock Plus not Edge? AdBlock Plus has been well known to let some ads through: https://adblockplus.org/acceptable-ads
That's one attitude. I'm on the other side where having low expectation to the browser technology. People claim a lot on Web and Browser but it takes extremely wrong to get the fruit. I'm happy to be wrong eventually and will take it if it does come true. But until then, I'd stick on the pragmatic side.

That's said, someone has to chase the ambition to make it happen. Maybe I was being too negative and discouraging here.
The computer will see you now: is your therapy session about to be automated?
What rights does a developer have in these cases? Can you get some compensation/damages for the license/copyright violation even if you were giving away the software originally?

Can you get more money if they violate the OSS license if you offer the software under a commercial license as well?
Show HN: FP Without Category Theory
No evidence mystery UFOs are alien spacecraft, report finds
That would be the The Economist Group, and by extension it's owners. Had it been a stock company with thousands or millions stockholders it would be safer to assume that they most likely doesn't hold that much influence over the editorial content, but I believe The Economist Groups only have a handful stockholders.

Ideally I'd say that "they" are the editors, but we don't know what level of influence the owners have, so "they" could be the Cadbury family.
I just want to say, passport is a horrible name. Not because it doesn't convey the meaning, but because it is going to be hard to search for.

There are already quite a few technologies using the name (passportjs, passport Micosoft's former SSO service) and it won't be very distinguishable/searchable.

My employer had an identity service call passport and when we renamed it, it was much much easier to brand and find via search.

That said, I love the idea of aggregating all the non-walled garden communication tools into one easy to use interface and package.
On the Diverse and Fantastical Shapes of Testing
Fuzz testing is expensive.

And you gotta start somewhere. String inputs is a good start, and you can use those to test other inputs by factoring through conversion functions.
> I think you might be missing context for the thread? Or maybe I'm inferring context that isn't there.

I don't think I was, and I think you were.

> I thought we were discussing the "no copyright assignment" scenario.

Yup, exactly. Not that it makes much of a difference: To release something under any license, even without assigning any copyright, you need to have the copyright. (Or similar rights granted by a license, but in the end those too have to stem from someone actually having the right to license the thing they're licensing -- i.e. copyright.)

> > But if you do so and release it without notifying them

> That's them not doing due diligence as far as I can tell.

Not if you wrote and released it after you were already employed, now is it?

> The employee would also be in breach of contract, possibly even committing a crime.

Yes, exactly. Are you saying that can never happen, or what? That's exactly what I was pointing out.

> Employees can do all sort of illegal acts while in the employ of someone else... and when that happens you prosecute them (if it's egregious enough).

Sure. But if you're a FOSS project that they've contributed code to, with or without copyright assignment, that doesn't help you. You've still got to rip it out.

Sigh... I must have been unclear in my GP comment. So I'll go back to your GGP and try another tack:

> > > When writing GPL'ed code for your employer your employer must obviously be (made) aware that that code is going to be licensed under the GPL. Therefore, as the copyright holder -- they have already given permission for that license to be used or they must do so.

But if you write code and release it under the GPL there's nothing to say that you necessarily are doing it "for your employer". People could well assume that since they wrote something on their own machine and their own time, it has nothing to do with their job -- and then be in for a nasty surprise when their employer has a different opinion on that. The employer may well have had no idea at the time that someone was writing and releasing code, so they have neither already given permission for it to be licensed thus, nor do they have to.
This, it's a third-party extension. Nothing to do with Microsoft, and a sensationalised submission title here on HN.

Flagged.
Well, if you want to sleep on the mattress, I'd rather have something non-radioactive.
They are not looking for the ability to cause sonic booms, they are looking allow supersonic planes that don’t produce the concussive booms.

> In the airline industry’s current tube-and-wings model, shock waves largely roll off and then meld into a sonic boom. The aerodynamic X-plane, however, is designed to scatter multiple shock waves and minimize their cumulative effect, producing only a rumble or soft thump. [1]

> Acoustic engineers have developed a system for measuring sonic booms, called perceived levels of decibels, or PLdB. A decibel (dB) is a measure of pressure; PLdB is what people actually hear. When the Concorde airliner went supersonic, its window-rattling booms scored a PLdB rating of 102, equivalent, for a split second, to the high whine of a fighter engine just feet away. Those are the booms that inspired the original FAA ban. The X-59 has been designed to achieve a PLdB of 75, similar to what might be heard when standing next to a heavily trafficked road. (The numeric drop is larger than it might seem; the decibel scale is logarithmic.) In more conventional units, the Concorde’s supersonic sound waves carried a powerful maximum atmospheric overpressure of two pounds per square foot. By contrast, the X-59’s would exert 0.3 pounds per square foot on the eardrum. [2]

[1] https://www.nasa.gov/aero/nasa-prepares-to-go-public-with-qu...
[2] https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/lower-the-boom-1809...
Still, it must be quite rewarding to know that everyone, no matter how big is using your tools. Before i knew anything about open source, i was somewhat surprised to see that even the giant that is Apple had open source licenses on their iPod. I assumed that apple had enough resources to develop all their own software, but no, they go just like everyone else and pick off-the-shelf software.
So this method seems to create an inner core "skeleton" that is then used with various shells.

How is this method compared to a commercial product such as Poser ?
The other problem is that other people already wrote extensively on better refinements of the concept, coming up with theories of positional goods, conspicuous consumption, signalling, information asymmetry within bureaucratic organizations, economic rent extraction etc. As well as explaining why a lot of jobs which in an ideal world filled with ideally-behaving people wouldn't exist could actually be necessary and useful in the real world, and why professions often seen (especially by their participants) as extremely meaningful and impactful like the arts are often funded by those that aren't, like advertising.

Graeber's definition of a "bullshit" job as one the worker didn't feel was meaningful - the canonical example being his lawyer friend who would rather people paid him for his hobby of making music - and his claim that the private sector was creating them as some sort of workfare program feels comparatively naive.
Good that we don't have to rely on only hydroelectric storage eh? Just like we don't have to rely on solar or wind only.

Nuclear power whitewashing won't make it "green". This Astro-Turf crap is fuelled by ignorance of the dirt this technology leaves behind for future generations and greed of a few remaining participants in this dying industry.

The fact that there is yet more nuclear energy out there than renewable and true green energy is no argument for nuclear energy. At some point we had more horses than cars but that didn't make cars worse. This weird twisting is sickening.

I've shown with those studies above that investment into nuclear doesn't only waste money, it actually harms the fight against global warming. Even giving you an actual local scenario. This is investment into the future instead of the past.
The argument is that China is covering up the origins of COVID-19 to protect Fauci and ensure he gets rich?
I had previously ignored all this VR stuff but I had a go on an Oculus Quest 2 recently and it compeletely blew my mind, just the demo/tutorial when it takes you through the basics.

And I know we all hate Zuck or whatever but the Quest 2 is half the price of an iPad (more or less). Its the most amazing experience I've had with a bit of consumer technology since my first smartphone.

And so now I'm seeing how they've really finessed the VR experience in the last 5 years:

- fast framerate

- track hands for natural hand manipulations

- room scale movements (moving around in a small area)

- avoid nausea by keeping to the wearers natural movements as much as possible (no 'walking around' using a joystick, its better to teleport)

- this means a lot of the best games/experience involve standing still or fairly still - e.g. Beat Saber (which is awesome btw)

So this redirected walking is trying to use subtle tricks to make the players room scale movements take them further.
For those who are unfamiliar with this use of tau (a constant equal to 2*pi), see also https://tauday.com/tau-manifesto
I quite like elvish (https://elv.sh) for a non-POSIX compatible shell. It's by no means perfect, and it's not 1.0 so breaking changes are pretty frequent, but I find the language structure and syntax make it worth it. The docs on the site are a little haphazard too, but once you get a feel for it, you probably won't need to refer to them too often.
Insiders can then defraud it without harming their own company much. Find bug, tell your "friend", friend reports it, money comes from communal pool.
"Though this does not ensure that Haskell programmers know anything about security it does hint that they might be fast on the uptake when it becomes necessary."

Now HERE's some lazy evaluation... :P
The “smoking gun” was the “human” (arginine as CGG) way the AA seq was coded for at the furin cleavage site: Only 5 percent of SARS2’s arginine codons are CGG, and the double codon CGG-CGG has not been found in any other beta-coronavirus.
Yes, overrides. I've heard talks on this at conferences with a couple big publishers. A lot of effort is put into it but obviously if we were distributing OS security updates like Apple it would be a whole different ballgame.
Only if the copyright was registered before the infraction can you file for punitive damages. Otherwise you’re only eligible for actual damages.
> I promise the next bridge will be stronger

Wait, the faceless multinational corporations promise to improve their AIs? Isnt it mostly a shrug, if they react at all?
Vox downplayed Covid in a tweet in the typical smug liberal style: https://www.thewrap.com/vox-deletes-january-tweet-coronaviru.... I remember many left-leaning friends citing this ridiculous article about how the flu is worse than Covid: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/01/29/8008132....

I can't scroll to find the original tweets but many Trump loyalists were very early on the Covid concerns– while the left was ridiculing any concern with articles like what I linked above. See https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/03/coronavirus-mik... and https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/03/why-some-early-maga-.... Tucker Carlson talked constantly about the Covid from very early on as well.
This is happened today.. (I later found out that it also was an issue in 2019)
Stay alert, then. Software patents went close to become real in 2002, and come back regularly since then, pushed by a variety of lobbies and particularly large US software houses (Microsoft, Adobe, Oracle, IBM and friends).

So far they've been shot down every time by the Parliament. But the EU Patent Office, the EU administration in general and the Commission are all strongly in favor of software patents.
The best PMs I've worked with were engineers 10 years ago. While some with this background may be insufferable on the "how", the best PMs I've worked with don't do that. Paradoxically these PMs just never think about implementation and do think seriously about the product on the whole and about P&L.

The worst PMs I've seen were from business/ops side, they never looked for a whole picture they just focused on individual features and as a result constructed a completely incoherent product.

Of course a good PM can probably come from any background just wanted to share my different experience from yours.
This is the same Google that keeps "accidentally" breaking various apps for Firefox, and fixing them several months later? [1] At best I can believe that fixing it was intentionally deprioritized.

1: https://www.zdnet.com/article/former-mozilla-exec-google-has...
How to Create Custom ATS?
"I have an unfair advantage by living in MA, where the state subsidizes 75% of 3D printing costs for businesses registered in the state"

Ah, wow, yeah, that would be hard to beat.
6.5M search results across 4 search engines reveal how they’re alike
The correct title is "Bitcoin falls after Elon Musk tweets breakup meme"

Please do not editorialize
>You are right it has some warts, but if a file is really that absolutely critical I make a .bak copy of it before I start my work

This seems to miss the point completely, unless you back up your entire hard disk before running every command. The whole problem is it's easy to nuke things you weren't intending to touch, accidentally.

The user-hostility of the shell is not a required feature to achieve its power. All of the advantages you cite could be had without being a terrible footgun with human factors mired in 1970s computing culture.
Obligatory mentioning of the Better Explained article[1].

[1] https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding...
I thought this was going in the direction that I experienced. I had a recruiter try to recruit me for the position that I was already in (we were expanding the team, not replacing me).
From Section 2.2 "The Bad"

>> B1: Too arbitrary. The shell’s virtue of limitless composition (G1) is also its vice: the shell can compose arbitrary commands written in arbitrary languages.

This is what I fundamentally love about the shell, and you can try to pry it from my cold, dead fingers

>> B3: Too obscure. The semantics of the shell and common commands are documented in 300pp of standardese [7].

With respect to Bash, I couldn't agree more about the 'standardese' gripe. Man pages would be so, so much more useful if they prioritized showing examples of common/useful ways to use the command. I would love a 'man --examples $COMMAND' feature. Does something like that exist?
What Is the Best for Scraping Social Media Sites?
i was hesitating to answer because i did not know what was the product - now i know.

it looks like a niche product for developer community.
what i would try:

* write content around how to create web form in different language + add to each article reason why they should use your saas instead

* create a youtube video that would show how to use the product, focus on researched keywords, e.g. how to make a secured web form

* join slack and facebook group communities

* try to promote your tool on producthunt, not because of the sales - but to gather the feedback

* there are many great products out there and some of them have better product market fit + marketing = what i want to say it is more like a marathon than a sprint

good luck!
This strikes me as a narrative that's much easier to state and nod along to, than to demonstrate. Companies are ruthless about cutting fat. They have departments dedicated to isolating unnecessary employees and firing them. Beurocracy is inefficient, but it's rarely completely wrong. It's very easy to tell when an employee is contributing nothing, even for a monolith.

What I think actually happens is that companies hire more people for a particular role than they need, because load balancing is difficult, or they have a structure that extracts productivity from the workforce in a way that's inefficient. But that's not the same as outright non-productivity. Those people are not useless - they're still productive, they just provide suboptimal (and maybe negative) return on investment.

> For example, jobs may be created as a placeholder for otherwise unused staffing budget.

I don't think it works like that. They may invest the excess staffing budget in a productive worker they otherwise wouldn't have hired, but that's not the same as hiring someone who provides no benefit. The return that employee brings may even be negative but it's very, very unlikely to be -100%.
Amazing to see these statistics when, to a foreigner, South African businesses already seem to intentionally overemploy (I would assume as a way of maintaining social stability). It is not unusual for there to be twice or even three times as many people working in a shop than in Europe.
"Stantard deviation"? Typo?
This (to my read) handles the self-auditing aspect, but how would you handle the need for the central database to be hosted "somewhere?"

Not challenging your conclusion, just asking.
Agreed, the full formula is much more intersting and deep: it shows there is a mapping between the reals and the circle group that preserves the structure (turns addition into multiplication). This concept leads to the very general exponential map of a Lie algebra to a Lie group and Pontryagin duality, which is the essence of Fourier transform.
The immediate response will be: "bawolff, through their silence, is promoting not-my-agenda (obviously!) therefore I feel unsafe and want bawolff fired!"

It really is as simple as that.
A favorite of mine is the Gauss-Bonnet theorem which relates the Euler characteristic of a surface (i.e. its topology) to its Gaussian curvature (its differential geometry).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss–Bonnet_theorem
It's just corporatization of the typical New Age butchering of Eastern philosophy.

In other words, it is deeply unsettling cult behavior.
This feels a little silly, but, is the scan based on the literal strings "matomo.php" and "matomo.js"?

If so, why not (ask the vendor to) rename the files?
Does Poser work with photos and videos as inputs?

If not, there's your answer.
In my experience there is only a need for Project Managers when multiple groups that span multiple functions (development, marketing, customer support, etc) are needed to deliver something and they need to work on different cadences. The Project Manager can act as a transmission of sorts to make sure deliverables happen at roughly the right times to not block each other.

Outside of those circumstances I have never seen any value in it. For software only initiatives the entire project management function is little more than ignoring Jira boards and calling meetings with lots of people to “check on status”.

If you have anyone doing this then your organization is in a bad place and needs to be set right, it will not get healthier.
What is "pay.reddit.com"?
Alone time.
Java's thread support is as correct as can be and provides sufficient primitives that if you can't use a multi-core machine efficiently it is your fault, not the fault of your language and runtime. Same for C#.

This holds for "high-level" resources.Wwith the multi-threaded model you can share a single large immutable configuration object between all threads, or pass a database connection from one thread to another with close-to-zero cost.

Java and C# languages are a bit more CPU efficient. In the cloud computing world a website publisher pays real money for server CPU and RAM but can use the CPU and RAM on your computer or phone for free.
> It unifies algebra, trigonometry, complex numbers, and calculus.

I vividly remember my maths teacher impressing us upon what you stated above. By far the best math teacher I had. He didn't work out the proof on the board but made us work it out, took us on a journey, him as a guide, so to speak.