skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have no idea how the spectrum of political views can be divided into two discrete categories. But a plausible reason one could be more subject to "misperceptions" (hopefully people see how scary it is to have that be the way that a political view is characterized) is that some people are more free thinking than others and don't just accept orthodoxy as fact.

I'm not trying to say that my alternative hypothesis would follow some kind of party line, just hint at how there could be many interpretations of this study, if you don't already reject its entire premise of trying to bucket people and then find intellectual differences between then.
Armchair lawyers again, not knowing how monopolies does not mean 100% of a market.
I think that what the officer did is likely illegal for other reasons. So this ruling doesn't mean the officer deserves no punishment, it just means they committed some other crime than unauthorized access to a computer system.
Title could be better. add "Dependency Graphs".

"Dependency Graphs for Open Source packages" or something
Out of curiosity, what's the 20%-80% time? As I understand it, that's the range you want it to be in most of the time.

It means you only actually use 60% of the max capacity, and max capacity is only for rare-ish extreme cases.

But if it's only, say, 15 minutes for 20%-80%, that's not really all that far out of keeping with a 5 minute gas fill-up.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210603175503/https://www.tangr...
There are a massive amount of mid—tier players, not to mention Oracle and Adobe who are also whales.
I don't know much about it, I'm afraid. But there is the very cool fact that the usual Riemann integral can be written as basically just a sum in nonstandard analysis; it's covered very neatly in André Pétry, "Analyse Infinit́esimale: une présentation non standard" which is very readable. There's a lot more advanced stuff, including Brownian motion and (I think) some integration, in Hurd and Loeb, "An Introduction to Nonstandard Real Analysis".

For the foundations of nonstandard analysis, and a wide-ranging overview, I strongly recommend Robert Goldblatt, "Lectures on the Hyperreals: an Introduction to Nonstandard Analysis", one of the Graduate Texts in Mathematics.
It does seem odd. Stealth product. Bold claims. 3 blog posts one of which is a funding announcement and the other two having nothing to do with the product. I am intrigued but also a bit skeptical.
If you are into books, I will recommend Clojure for the Brave and True which is free to read online [1], and Living Clojure [2], in that order.

If you're into interactive kata-style problems, there's 4Clojure [3].

Also join the Clojurians's Slack [4] for the community.

[1] https://www.braveclojure.com/clojure-for-the-brave-and-true/
[2] https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/living-clojure/97814919...
[3] https://www.4clojure.com/
[4] https://clojurians.slack.com/
GitHub Enterprise Server 3.1 is now generally available
50% of consumers for any way you want to reach them.

You can't get them anymore because Apple has them locked up.

It doesn't matter if you're a video game or a dating app or a movie marketplace. You have to pay the Piper.
Those are far from the only competitors.
This is an interesting article that's worth discussing.

From my understanding, there's no specific rule about anything like that. "Show HN is for something you've made that other people can play with. HN users can try it out, give you feedback, and ask questions in the thread." [0] Generally people on here care only if there is an issue about a conflict of interest in some way. I am sure there are rules about spamming but flagging usually takes care of that situation.

https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
I don't know if it can always be avoided, but I think it makes sense for a court to try to avoid the code-based approach.

It seems to be all downside (exploiting bugs will typically be OK because the code said this was OK, even if the people who wrote it never intended that) with no upside (the things rendered illegal already don't work, because code forbade them).

Courts ought to be familiar with the fact that they're present mostly to make decisions about fuzzy things like "Did the accused intend to cause harm to the victim?" and not simple mechanics like "Does being injected with cyanide kill people?".
You don't make it into the higher echelons unless you conform to the desired ideology.
CORS can fully stop an origin from accessing an http resource, this discussion is about allowing different origin to reuse the browser local state (like cookies, http cache, local storage).

CORS is a stronger security layer in the browse than cache segregation, some people want to keep the CORS security model but weaken cache segregation.
You don't need control of the app store to do that.
I guess now you can literally sell "seats" in your licenses.
In-office work needs to be compensated differently than WFH. They will try to decrease WFH compensation initially, like the loss of benefits threat in the article, but the number of potential employers is higher for WFH workers, giving them leverage.
+1 for drone.

Note that it's intended for dockerized deploys, so it won't fit if you're not deploying containers.
"One worker’s company “had everyone come into the office for an outdoor luncheon a week ago,” according to a post"

Some of the stuff companies do truly baffles me. It's only the beginning of June, you can't really assume your whole team is fully vaccinated. Why would you bring everyone in for lunch and then send them home? All downside and near-zero upside. It'd be another matter if it was a full day event where you did some meetings or seminars in addition to the meal, but are you really going to make people commute in, eat, and go home?
Looking back on Microsoft in the 90s they seem almost childish. If the Apple/Google duopoly had existed forty years ago the government would have smashed both companies into dozens of pieces.
The worst (best?) part is that apple already sells targeted ads - and they're getting away with it without major backlash.
Buffet-Style Architecture
Not the user you are reacting to, but the correlation of education with total fertility seems to be pretty strong across the world.

https://wol.iza.org/uploads/articles/228/pdfs/female-educati...

It seems that the gap in fertility between the "no education" and "8 years of basic education" cohorts is extra pronounced.
Hiring for Senior Frontend Developer (Remote)
This leader in the lease-to-own-marketplace is looking to add a Senior Front End Engineer onto their team. They are looking to add a talented and motivated individual as their team is the formula for their success. In this role, you will be developing the next-generation of products and systems that serve all of the company’s customers, merchants, employees, and partners alike.

Required Skills & Experience

Strong experience using JavaScript (Agular 2+) / Open to React
Experience in cloud platforms, preferably AWS
Strong knowledge of REST API’s
Understanding of accessibility and security compliance
Desired Skills & Experience

Experience with some ORM
Understanding of GIT
Strong understanding of messaging queues

If you think you'd be a good fit, or know someone who would be interested, please email your resume to
christina.forsyth@motionrecruitment.com

PLEASE NOTE: Applicants must be currently authorized to work in the United States on a full-time basis now and in the future.
Delivery time is a feature of the product you are selling.

Say I'm looking for a bike. Person A is selling one I like and promises to deliver after two weeks. Person B is selling one I like a bit less, but promises to deliver after one week. I might now choose to buy from person B, even if I like the bike a bit less.

If I buy from person B and they deliver after three weeks, there's a problem. Why did it take three times as long? Did they ever intend to deliver after one week? Should they have known they wouldn't be able deliver after one week? They got the order based on a feature they didn't deliver. If that was intentional, that's fraud.
Oh believe me, it's very definitely a feature. "Sorry kids, there's no McDonald's at the Supercharger".
I don't really like 'Component'. I seems very clunky and we had a lot of issues with it and a lot incidental complexity in our codebase (now converted to Java). It was the first real system that did these sort of things but if I start a project now, I much rather use Integrant or Clip.

https://github.com/weavejester/integrant

https://github.com/juxt/clip

I haven't used Clip a lot yet but my next project is defiantly going to be with Clip.

For validation I have started to use Malli (https://github.com/metosin/malli). I really liked the idea behind clojure.spec but some of the implementation was a bit clunky and a bit too 'Rich Hickey', not sure how to describe it otherwise. Schema was again the first serious attempt at a library like that for Clojure so it was really nice when it came out. Malli sort of combines what is great about both.
I mean, depends on who puts it there? If the contributors list their emails knowingly for that purpose, that's one thing. If a tool leaks your NPM account email, which you have no control over, that's not exactly transparency.

You can see the Collaborator's NPM profile, where _they_ can set handles to contact them at. You can also get to their GitHub profile where they also can set handles to contact them at. If the tool made it easier to see those, then great.

These emails don't appear to be directly listed on NPM's website. Or correlated with Github/NPM profile. My guess is they're surfacing the email associated with that user's NPM account? Which is not otherwise obviously listed. And the only way you could control it is by also affecting who is an owner of the NPM project itself.

If that is the case, then contributor's emails are being 'leaked' without their say-so or probably knowledge, and without any particular way of managing it. Meanwhile they've already listed perfectly good ways of being 'reachable'.
> Setting up the situation where you make more money if your cars charge slower and more often sounds like a dangerous game for an EV manufacturer to play.

You mean like that time that London Heathrow airport ran a trial in which they specified every flight's gate number when passengers checked in, instead of only revealing it shortly (40 mins?) before scheduled departure?

Retail revenues in the terminals dropped, passengers went straight to their gate instead of hanging around the shops.

The idea was quietly dropped.
You have control over corporations insofar as there is actually a competitive marketplace (which is enforced by anti-trust, which is the purview of the government).

If corporations capture the market/government and become monopolies/oligopolies and you have no choices (i.e. Comcast in some regions), you will have no more recourse.
Your effort here is admirable, but I think you have chosen a very hard market to make an impact in. Some hopefully constructive feedback:

Who is your target customer? A small business owner without a website? In which case listing features like "Cloudfare CDN" and "DDoS protection" won't resonate with them at all.

A couple of other things that jumped out from the pricing page:

* 10,000 for submissions a month is pretty meaningless: if 10,000 people a month are interested in my business I am motivated to spend a lot more than £7.99 to capture and process them. Either make the limits really small to feel like a limit, or just say unlimited.

* support responses in 5 days ... this would be a red flag regardless of price. As a small startup the one thing you can offer is exceptional support (since you don't have many customers to offer it too!). If it takes off lower the expectations, but I'd suggest 1 day even for the lowest plan should be doable (and if not raise the price...)

A business owner doesn't really want a website builder at all, they want a website: lead more with your 'custom websites' page. If £199 is too much of a hurdle for them then realistically they aren't going to be a great customer anyway. Maybe offer a couple of business a free website to have some real world referable examples.

If you are targeting website designers (which are probably an easier to identify market) then focus more on the builder itself, maybe stressing the mobile friendly side (though I don't really see how that helps me if I am a designer ... I won't try and work from my phone).

Good luck!
> how they can update their software
I agree on all your points except this one. The App Store update process has grown long in the tooth. It was fine for the first 5 years or so, then they added auto-update, great.

But now 10 years in it is still all or nothing. Either the OS allows all apps to auto-upgrade, or you do it yourself. There is no way to "remove" an app from the update list if you want to keep an old version. There is no way to ever go back to an old version if you accidentally upgrade. Backing up an old version of an app requires a Mac to extract the binary. Each app already has it's own settings screen, why not add an "auto-update" toggle to each (And by default it gets your system-wide setting.)

And from the developer side - no way to have paid upgrades, unless you release the "new" version as a separate app with a bundle discount alongside the old version.

So instead you get either more apps moving to subscriptions, or more abandoned apps because the developer can't support free updates.
What the Heck Is a Pneumonia Front?
We were told for years, there is no flex time, don't even think about it. While the higher ups obviously flexed whenever they wanted to. Suddenly covid hits and I'm scrambling to get everyone setup so they can work remote. We go a whole year working remote with almost no issues or lost productivity. And now we're back in the office and the mood has definitely changed.
> The major change here is to stop tracking in anonymous situations (like app installs that won't know which device clicked on an ad and then installed on app), not to stop all data collection.

Let's suppose you use Google or Facebook to discover an e-commerce site, and then you visit that site "anonymously", and then put something in your cart. Maybe you even convert.

If the site has a "log in with {Google,Facebook,etc}" pop-up, then Google/Facebook (even if you do NOT log in) can join your visit with whatever else data they have. (I think Faceboook says, or said, something in their TOS that they won't but I wouldn't trust that-- they're recording the hit to their pop-up after all).

Google / Facebook will already record your click that lead to the site. Now, you might not be logged in to Google or Facebook on the device visiting the third party site, but if anything else on the local network is logged in, then they derive data from your visit even if it's "anonymous." Even the regional impression gives them value.

So here's the deal though: that e-commerce site "owns" that session and impression. At the very least, they paid to serve it. What FLoC and this Android change do is make it harder for Google/Facebook competitor (e.g. Amazon ads, Microsoft, Verizon/Oath, AT&T, etc) from finding something that can join the user visit to whatever data they already have. That makes the impression to the e-commerce site less valuable because now only Google/Facebook can derive data from it.

Moreover, Google / Facebook are going to target ads based upon that visit. Maybe not ads delivered to that user, and maybe not delivered on that e-commerce site (or for them), but they're going to derive targeting value nevertheless. So if the e-commerce site ever wants to run ads, FLoC and this Android setting should in theory make competitors to Google weaker.

So there's a lot of discussion about privacy here, but in the macro I can't help but see FLoC and this Android change as a way to protect Google's monopoly, and Facebook's moat over their own space.

When it comes to mobile, though, I thought there was already so much fragmentation between browsers / quirks, display settings, other User Agent meta, and IP addresses that fingerprinting without cookies was a lot easier than on the Desktop. And by now, many users have transitioned from Desktop to Mobile, making any other previously joined fingerprints more valuable (something Google or Facebook could do, but maybe not ATT/Verizon). So the Android opt-out really only hurts new properties or ad providers who are starting fresh, right?
Yep, it's down. Y'all have just about tipped over my baby redis instance with a few thousand project simulations all at once. Should be back as soon as I scale 'er up.
Policies, by definition, are ways by which authorization rules are enforced. If the officer violated a policy, they also by definition violated their authorizations.

>The idea that you could be authorized, but suddenly not

They were never authorized to use this system in this way, so there was not a "authorized but then suddenly not". The officer's authorization was static: not authorized.

Authorization is more than just the technical controls in a system, and lack of a technical control to prevent an officer using a system in certain ways does not mean said officer is authorized to use the system in any way they please.
You're again mistaking security and software safety for anticompetitive business practices.

Apple loves to mix this too - after all, their marketing is spending a lot of money persuading it that those two are related. They're not. Even currently, AppStore is not without malware, so they have failed at that goal and us users have paid too great of a price by distortion of no.1 tenement that makes capitalism a functioning and decent system to live in: competition.

It's like an abused wife being afraid to run away from her husband because she thinks he's the only one that can protect her.
Then just ignore rust-related posts, you're not going to like everything on a news site. Other people like Rust because it's a cool language.
Vaccines have been readily available to anyone who wants them (in the US) since mid April, even in the highest demand parts of the country. If you are not vaccinated, at this point, there is no excuse.

(edit: obviously, I’m assuming the article is talking about a company in the US, since the article is about the US.)
He was conflating jews with Israeli government and zionists, so I can assume he was unread on the topic.
Over 200 bodies found at Indigenous school in Canada
Also with touch: Arthritis, Carpal Tunnel and other RSI, tremors, using touch screen in bed or other awkward situations

Vision: Color blindness

And the list goes on.
Thank you for sharing this detailed rundown. One of the challenges that I faced as a new Clojure developer was understanding how all the parts fit together (and in fact, what parts I should care about in the first place). Example: is learning Component worth it? (yes)

Extremely glad to see this resource published! Thank you to the Red Planet team for releasing this!
gotta love HN. no problem, thanks
That’s not true. It runs whatever you want, inside a container with your code. You can deploy from within that container however you like. You can run tests that just pass/fail, and throw away the container result. You can ssh or rsync things from within the container to other remote hosts, and throw away the CI container. It uses containers to ensure build consistency, but you don’t have to use them to deploy containers just because your jobs run in them.
After the bombs on Lebanon I was mainly angry at myself. I overheard the news during dinner - "Beirut has been bombed" - and kept eating. Somehow growing up I ended up in a mental state where bombs being dropped on Beirut was 'normal'. It bothered me to no end: it would have been a completely different reaction if I heard "Paris has been bombed".

I ended up taking up an international cooperation job in Beirut, worked there for about three years. I danced, drank, worked, ate, drove around and enjoyed time with people that to this date consider very close friends.

I guess I just suck at blogging.
> I want them to have restrictions on how much of my stuff they can access, how they can update their software and how much of a blast radius there would be from messing something up.

The OS already does this for you, no software distribution monopoly (App Store) needed.

This idea that an App Store is the only path to security is FUD. If allowing 3rd party app distribution on iOS actually did allow some sort of destruction of iOS user's privacy and security, then iOS is clearly garbage.
Ah yeah, the deluded (you) thinking everybody else are the insane ones.

If you look back at that time period, the "Fine!" surely came about because iPhone jailbreakers had extracted the API from the apps and were making their own Cocoa Touch apps and sideloading it onto the iPhone. "Let's enable" sounds like they decided to open it up to the public, if your theory about stop-gaps is correct I would've expected the wording to be "Fine, let's enable CT apps early.". The rest of the email also talks about the jail which is the app store, which seems to be a rough concept of "What we need to make this happen", rather than something that they've been preparing in the background.

It looks more like you're having a stockholm syndrome with your own "knowledge".
Well, if remote work isn't feasible (for the reasons stated), neither is offshoring. Or outsourcing. Or physical satellite offices.
This reminds me of the time Mozilla attempted to improve Firefox's error message for undefined property accesses, but it caused breaking changes because some websites relied on parsing the old error message format, so nothing could be done to improve it.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1488417

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19493433
If you are Atlassian shop, then yes. Otherwise, don't even bother
I was in the waiting room of a Toyota dealer and heard a service writer tell a woman that she would have to pay for a new oil pan because the drain plug was stripped out and service related damage was not covered under warranty.

She said the car was always serviced at that dealer and the service writer said there is no way to prove that.
> This is a policy violation, and maybe that should be illegal in some way or have consequences.

Sure, and usually policy violations that matter do involve civil consequences (e.g. litigation to recover damages) but not handing out felonies or putting someone in prison for a decade+.
This is an important decision, in that it means that violations of terms of service are not criminal offenses.
CFAA stands for "Computer Fraud and Abuse Act". The entire purpose of the law is that is addresses that type of fraud.
> Then open the console and paste the code in the gist.

1. Open the SpaceX Simulator webpage[0];

2. Open your browser console (e.g., in Pale Moon browser its in menu "Tools > Web Developer > Web Console" or just type [Ctrl]+[Shift]+[K] shortcut);

3. Copy code from the gist[1] to browser console and execute it;

4. Enjoy

[0] https://iss-sim.spacex.com/

[1] https://gist.github.com/rzilleruelo/f44252e77036403af4c6a3e8...
An abstraction doesn't mean you can close your eyes and everything will work by magic. They're extremely useful tools, but like I said: garbage in, garbage out.
We were talking about ownership, not authorship. In the real world titles of ownership are issued by a trusted third party. They're not issued by the same party who claims ownership. But in the NFT world they are, and this means these titles of ownership can't be trusted. There's no way of assessing whether they're valid or not.
No, these would probably not be considered or valued as originals when the deception was revealed. No method of verification is perfect. You could also physically coerce the artist to issue an NFT. But this is not a unique “flaw” of NFTs. Art forgeries can also fool experts. People can steal physical items.
Elon Musk’s Berlin Gigafactory Water Conflict