Unlikely.

For people who do want to "play the game" so to speak (aka: make a 1kspm factory or rocket-per-minute factory), the methodologies for achieving that are pretty well known at this point in the community.

The "blueprints" you need are mostly rail-blueprints (quickly building rail-lines and miners that connect into your greater design).

The "logic" of Factorio factories are... unfortunately too simple. All resources eventually turn into science (even the "Rocket launch" is just a space-science generator), and then those science packs enter the labs, and you're done.

As such: all resources form a mostly simple tree beginning (miners) to furnaces, to assembly machines, to science packs.

The exceptions:

* If you use barrels / unbarrelings, your barrels need to loop back to the source of fluids. You can remove this loop by simply using pumps and/or fluid trains instead.

* Heavy Oil / Light Oil / Petroleum gas looks like it forms a loop at first. But it turns out its just a tree, and entirely solvable by simply "drawing enough Petroleum gas". If you ever feel like you aren't making enough Heavy Oil / Light Oil, you can make more science (and infinite science means you have a literal infinite sink), which causes any Petrol-gas backup to self-resolve eventually.

-------------

The "difficulty" of Factorio quickly becomes one of traffic engineering. Train intersections are one of the hardest sources of bottlenecks and take an extreme amount of effort to resolve (usually using 3-8 trains or bigger, as well as advanced intersection designs possibly using combinators to form "Traffic lights" if you need to go there). Attempts at 4-line rails usually fail in my experience, because a 4-line intersection is harder to design than a 2-line intersection.

Furthermore, 2-line with 3-8 trains is sufficient for 1-rocket-per-minute bases. So a "proper" 4-line intersection doesn't seem necessary unless... you really want to go there and solve that problem unnecessarily. (Its a fun problem :-) So do it if you have fun).

------

From there, you have Train -> belt and Belt-> train designs, to ensure you optimally unload / load the trains. Those belts that feed these stations need to operate at near 100% efficiency if you hope to achieve rocket-per-minute status.

Well... maybe not "necessarily" operate at 100%. But a RPM base needs something like 50+ blue-belts of raw materials. So if you're only operating at 50% capacity, you suddenly need 100+ blue belts (at 50%). So staying at 90% to 100% of what a blue-belt can handle (45 items/second) really cuts down on the size of your factory designs.

------------

I argue that the core assembly machines are probably the easiest part of the design. You calculate the ideal ratio (though this ratio changes based off of the number of productivity / speed modules you use), and then build that many machines... careful to not run into bottlenecks (blue-belts are 45-items/second maximum. Stack inserters are 13-items/second belt->machine, or 27-items/second for machine->machine or machine->chest).

If you're hyperoptimizing designs, its difficult to beat what some people in the community have made. But if you're just aiming to make something "decent", its not very hard to slap together some 8x speed beacon + PM3 based designs, even without any blueprints.