skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We have the professionally political on Twitter in Australia and they're very active, but we don't seem to have the extreme polarisation in politics at workplaces. I suspect that's part of it. Our political differences here don't seem as dramatic.
> If you had any cultural awareness about international students from Asia, Chinese students who attend undergrad in America did not score well enough to get into an elite university in China.

You're offering your cultural awareness about international students, and implying that I might not have any. I suppose this prose issues from your conversational instincts.

I offer data to anchor discussion for effect sizes, and so far you're building your own pet theory from scratch, as if the discussion just began here! And you're building your own little causal story (with implied effect sizes) about why metrics collected in the US look the way they do.

I'm putting Asians into a bucket because that's how bureaucratic data collection works in the US! If available data sources do not offer reliable drill-downs into the demographics, then you are making up your own fantasy version of data.

Meanwhile you are making awful, awful accusations about whether I am supporting "model minority" arguments, and whether I'm being toxic by grouping Asians together.
And yet....they arent even in DMARC reject mode..

https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=dmarc%3aopsecsec...

But they are getting their own forensics feeds.

This seems to me that they are willifully staying in p=none so they can try and have plausible deniability should these things get public.
Isn't this the connection to linear programming?
This has always been one of my favorite features of Tumblr, the ability to hide your likes and who you follow. Not only that, but Tumblr doesn't show follower counts - something that is immensely useful (especially as someone who had over a million) and you can implement your own if you want. It gives you a concept of social privacy in at least the things that matter - your network.

I hope Twitter follows suit.
> When I want to play games, I want to click on heads till they're not heads anymore, or think with portals, or race around a city with friends.

I understand what you mean. Nevertheless, some gamers have the fame of being technically proficient power users who are willing to pay more and spend a lot of time just to get games to squeeze even the last drop of possible performance from their systems.

Today these gamers could be using a higher performant kernel if publishers were willing to fight the monopoly.
Human centipede baby
Where are you getting 25 GB/s of disk speed?
How would you feel if we swapped out "social media sites" and "algorithmic" for "newspapers" and "editorial" in that first paragraph? There are a limited number of slots in the newspaper. Should the government step in a guarantee that the New York Times needs to publish any crackpot theory I come up with?
All of the AGPL bits are inside that docker container. You don't need to worry about AGPL contamination unless you're modifying the contents of the container.

This type of software distributed this way is one of the ideal use cases for the AGPL, IMO.
The laws that grant them their extra-contractual benefits depend on wide public support for the left-wing political narrative.
>The addition of the word “breaking” is just a stylistic choice and conveys no additional meaning.

"breaking news" is supposed to refer to news that's currently ongoing or developing. Whether or not it means much now, when practically all news is live, is debatable.
We all know why: gamers don't use linux because some of their games don't run on linux or run with limitations. If more publishers were willing to, this could change.
I have never heard of transmittable cancer before. Are there transmittable cancers among humans?
I'm not familiar with those fields, but yes this varies a lot by the field. I'd assume cryptography at least is more math-based (at least theoretical stuff) and the math scene is quite different from empirical sciences or engineering.

The antagonistic view is not just towards my colleagues, I'm not particularly proud of my own papers either. I find it more a nuisance to "pay the bills" and a lot of my research goes unpublished (at least in journals) due to all the IMHO unnecessary hassle involved. Just a blog or something would be a lot nicer and probably would communicate the work better, and would ease the pretension of objectivity which I find mostly causes wrong impressions and makes writing really a chore.
It's in the nature of those who are politically inclined to try to view everything politically, and they often miss the mark.

I just ignore them.
I didn’t read it that way. It seems like a completely normal interview.
But who cares? The fact that the syntax of this language is JSON-based rather than S-Expression based is an odd point to have the majority of commenters nitpicking about. When somebody posts an interesting new service to Hacker News, we don't have similar comments saying "why does this api serve up JSON and not S Expressions / Protobuf / Avro / CSV / XML???"

What about regular every day programming languages? When a language is posted to Hacker News we don't laugh them out of the room with "hahah! Why didn't you use S expression syntax for this language??"
SARS-CoV-2 came to the world's attention because so many people in Wuhan got sick that clinicians noticed the unexpectedly high volume of patients. No special skill in virology is required to detect that, and there's no indication that the WIV was involved in doing so; if you believe it was, please post a reference. The genome of SARS-CoV-2 was first published not by the WIV but by Professor Zhang Yongzhen at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre:

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3052966/chin...

Of course it's possible that the WIV had discovered the outbreak earlier by more sophisticated means, and the CCP has chosen to conceal this fact. I don't think it's even that unlikely, considering all the other early warnings they tried and failed to conceal (e.g., the reports from Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist unaffiliated with the WIV); but the question would then become why.
was Flutter included in the comparison?
How do you know they are false? And completely false, at that? Just asking.
Incredible comment, is this is the level of discourse now in America?
This is a highly concentrated benefit, in that the group to which they belongs constitutes a very small percentage of the population, and benefits disproportionately from laws that empower unions at the expense of their employers' contract liberty.
So Gerrit, then?
> You're offering your cultural awareness about international students, and implying that I might not have any. I suppose this prose issues from your conversational instincts.

Yes. When you start out with "What about Asians?" alluding to the fact that Asians as a whole fare better on the SATs. I am aware of that, what I am questioning is whether given an native-English speaking American vs anyone with English as their second language, where if they work the same amount, would achieve the same results on the SAT.

> I'm putting Asians into a bucket because that's how bureaucratic data collection works in the US! If available data sources do not offer reliable drill-downs into the demographics, then you are making up your own fantasy version of data.

We are talking about the SAT's language and cultural biases here. That is independent of whether the SAT wants to group people as Asian or Not. Then there is college application process which is a separate conversion. My question is whether a minority has to work harder to attain the same results as an native-English speaking American. Whether certain buckets as defined by bureaucratic data collection processes score better and why that is the case is not my original point

> If available data sources do not offer reliable drill-downs into the demographics, then you are making up your own fantasy version of data.

Yes, official sources do not because there are political agendas and initiatives to bucket people into races. The fact that you think I am making up fantasy data about the "model minority" MYTH is exactly why I took a tangent from my original argument
"There’s a really great fix for this, which is to design JS frameworks to not take over the entire application."

But then your framework wouldn't replicate itself with the prolific genius of Genghis Khan or the coronavirus.
The Blogging Software Dilemma (2003)
It’s just content marketing. It’s just as “fellow kids” as companies paying bands to make a song for their product in the 80s to get youth interest.
I don't think it's the actual facts that are especially problematic, but the rabid antagonistic response to a theory.
Where does it say it’s a parody issue? An April 1 publication date isn’t nearly enough evidence to make that claim, and the interview itself isn’t written in a cheeky way. What seems to make you think this is the case?
The fundamental underpinnings of China's government and way of life are entirely different from what we Westerners are accustomed to. The simple fact that there are more individuals involved does not prove plurality of thought, because the organizational structure actively punishes dissent and silences critics.

Not every society of more than one person is pluralistic. Extrinsic forces and incentives make a major impact on human behavior.
What I mean is to really address climate change all 8 billion of us are going to have to come together and make huge changes to our lives and each make personal sacrifices for the greater good. There will be new government mandates and it will affect how we live and work. There will be a huge social pressure to conform and a huge backlash. But we will have no choice because our environment will have changed to be more dangerous to our survival. Sounds a bit like the last year, doesn't it?
That’s true.

Another thought: I’m pretty sure that many of the alternative facts that get passed around are not propagated despite being improbable, but because they are improbable. The bigger lie triggers the amygdala in a way that the little one doesn’t, so that one is paradoxically more likely to get passed on.

Doesn’t help that every once in a while some conspiracy turns out to be true (cointelpro, Snowden documents).
Yes there is a framework gravity. More directly it is Invented Here Syndrome: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invented_here

Due to missing leadership and absent mentorship many developers are hoping tools provide the guidance they need.
Yes, and there are even vaccines for them:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hpv-infection...
Calling Kernel Functions from BPF
well, there's some ironic sort of logic at least in my head which says that I can afford to get locked into a proprietary solution only when I know there is a good (preferably open source) fallback option if it all goes to hell. So in a rather bizarre kind of way, this is what might enable me to consider Airtable where I had previously not.
I once had another founder of a tech startup send me a FB message saying it was "unhealthy" to do this. That person is now a VC (:
By memory-intensive I mean applications that have to do frequent allocations and de-allocations. This is very common on the desktop.

In HPC I think the more common case is a big allocation at program start and then lots of processing to de-allocate only after the number-crunching part is finished.

On servers it boils down to how quickly you can respond to network events and fire new processes.
The IETF Evolution
>>I would argue having zero leverage against rich corporations is always worse than sacrificing a few freedoms.

It is not. If you are looking for a job, and a union has monopolized all of a corporation's positions and imposed restrictive employment rules constraining who the corporation can hire, it reduces your leverage in negotiating to gain a position, by making it harder for you to offer a compelling deal to the corporation.

You can't offer to work for below the minimum wage, or to forego some benefit, for example.

Unions only appear to help workers if you look at it superficially.
CDC keeps secret its mishaps with deadly germs (2017)
Cervical cancer is usually caused by HPV. So women can prevent it by getting vaccinated
can someone combine these all into an OPML please?
That's what you get with authoritarianism. Both the carrots (political advancement) and the sticks (punishment from above) encourage underlings to obey what they think their superiors would command, even when those superiors are not involved.

The pithiest example is the death of Li Wenliang. The doctor who was threatened and silenced for warning others of a SARS outbreak, himself died of the disease when it spread due to inaction.
Remote control of brain activity with heated nanoparticles (2015)
This is fantastic and (from my POV) out of the box. I've only ever seen control theory used with cloth animation from some Pixar research papers I've skimmed so this really neat to see another application of controls in animation.

Thanks for sharing and keep up the great work
What does that have to do with mayonnaise ?

Anyway, try out a Point Chaud. Same overflowing sandwiches.

I once bought one, I walked out the shop and 45 meters later the sandwich literally went through the paper bag and fell down on the ground.
Said the man who lied, cheated, and stole his way to fortune and historical fame.
That's a great idea, really fit for an open-source use case as there are so many integrations to build. Thanks for this!
https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-760/

Confirms the theories about covid being man made are false, chapter and verse - a good watch, done by the specialists asked about this.
You should be introduced to Italian single-sided-swingarm nuts. For example, my MV Agusta Brutale required 220 to 240Nm tightening. It would come loose with my battery-powered 300NM rattle gun, but only after a while. (Fantastic bike but I no longer own it. I'd rent another though.)

Ducati single-sided swingarm nuts can be similar, but I have not yet owned a Ducati.
Look at the rest of the issue:

https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/04/01/the-paris-rev...

Definitely a parody.
This is a great example of the blessing/curse of gnu/linux.

On the one hand, freedom and infinite flexibility.

On the other hand... There’s is no high level structure or plan as a whole.

Linux is only the kernel, and distributions set up the userspace in varying ways.

So development is inherently fractured into numerous similar projects.

These projects leap frog and replace each other over time. But there is a lot of effort spent in reinventing the wheel.

Sometimes I wish that, for example, we could all settle on one window manager. Everyone could put efforts in the same direction, and make it awesome.

Of course in reality that would never work, but in some ways it would be nice to see the same amount of refinement and consistency in the userspace as in the kernel.
BTW, I'm not a web developer and don't see why I should have known what "SPA" means.
How is your worst case scenario still not better than doing nothing?
How is that contrary? MSM got one wrong in the same time that alternative media has gotten hundreds wrong. MSM isn't just better at rejecting misinformation, it's a lot better.
We certainly can take proactive measures, I just think it will be taken more seriously if we can point to a specific cause. It's the difference between you not receiving a package you were expecting so deciding to be more aware of the expected delivery time in the future versus seeing your neighbor run off with your package.
Your study does not address all types of injury.

I have seen more than a childbirth. I have 12 kids.

The most miserable and painful birth was in a hospital. That birth featured pain medication, fetal heart rate monitoring, beeping machines, and a prison-like situation with doors that locked us in. My wife was in pain for months afterward. We learned our lesson and didn't do another hospital birth.

The other 11 births were definitely not "so much pain", but pain did guide my wife to be careful. She was always up and about right afterward, without pain. One time she walked around town doing errands the next day.
yeah i had the same knee-jerk question. I can see the use-cases here for non-audio. But for the most part it would seem that audio input get to a level of performance that it simply works 99% of the time with little training.

I just broke my screen a few days ago, and b/c of the lock-down here (im in a tiny city) everything was closed. So i was forced to use audio inputs as much as possible, and on the IOS i was horrified that i couldnt simply say "Siri, close this modal" or "Siri, send new whatsapp text to Jane"... shocked.
You can get most of the gains just by changing how your game is coded, in a way that will perform very badly if installed on a hard drive. The extra compression and better DMA are useful but not necessary. And I'm not sure what you mean about packaging. The change there is mostly just undoing optimization for slow drives.
With equal samples in the two formats, JSON wins on readability. I can draw up bad examples in both. Since you've seen back JSON already, I give you real-world XML (I actually saw this example, yes), describing whether a structure has a roof, or not.

<roof>
<true>
1
</true>
<false>
1
</false>
</roof>

(Normally, exactly one of either the <true> or <false> tags should have a "1", and the other a "0". Normally.)

(The really horrible thing was that there were … I don't want to call them "reasons" because that's a strong word, so let's say "cause and effect" that led to this format… and once you came to know them, you "understood", in a sort of horrible sense, the format. But give me a JSON bool any day over it.)
I'm more or less in agreement with you on all of those companies except Twitter. Twitter is a notable exception and absolutely does have a monopoly on the social media sector as a "public square" - one which features almost every major politician, journalist, analyst, and activist on the platform, including at times, the US President and many other heads of state. And because of the network effect, this monopoly is unlikely to be challenged in the coming years.

Twitter sought out exactly this kind of political influence, so I'm not sympathetic to any complaints they may have now that they have that influence and are in the spotlight.

In an ideal world, Twitter would have been created as a government site and thus subject to the 1st Amendment, but given that we're not in that world, legislation is needed. I'm willing to concede the other social media companies you cited have competition and/or don't play the central role Twitter plays in the US political process.

Finally, there would be Freedom of Association on Twitter even if it were subject to 1st Amendment rights - no one is forced to follow anyone, and everyone is free to block anyone at all. It should be almost exactly analogous to real-life: you should have the right to associate with whomever you like in our country, but you should not have the right to expel them from the country.
> I'd argue that for the current outbreak the origin all but certainly does not matter in terms of steps taken to contain and end the outbreak

It would have mattered a lot back in early 2020, when the (circumstantial) evidence for the lab leak theory was assembled. And I’m not sure what your point is—are you implying that the world is incapable of both handling the pandemic and investigating its origins simultaneously? Like, we are going to get collectively distracted or something? No—investigate the origins now. This is not something to delay on.
To be absolutely clear I'm talking about disassembly. I'd never use a rattle gun to tighten anything.
This is why I’m not sad to see Blizzard dying and slow, painful death.

Your betrayed your communities and began delivering only what investors wanted. Activision and conforming to today’s shitty standard for game releases ruined you.
You have to assume that they also a) levered up and b) were doing some kind of arbitrage, not just HODLing. Color me skeptical but wilder things have been known to happen.
If you try bookmarking the page, it currently says $5.1M, which was inserted by HN bookmarklet during submission, then manually edited to $5M to fit within the 80 character maximum. The sub-heading of the article says:

> In January 2020 I closed a $5.1M seed round, my first financing for my first company. I’ve closed another ~$6M since then. This is how I raised that first round.
Honestly given the way I've heard teachers feel about those, good.
Yeah, I love TW and always have: sometimes it's fun to play on the lower turns/day servers just so the botters don't jump out to such a huge lead.
> This is not relevant to my original argument, but I pointed this out because you bucketed all Asian people together. It's toxic and ignorant, that is why I am educating you.

> Yes, official sources do not because there is a political convenience to group all Asians together.

Really, the arrogance and rudeness is outstanding here, I have to wonder whether you are talking about your own toxicity and ignorance.

Your concept of illumination is to offer pet analysis and pet causal theories, and imaginary drill-downs into the data which don't exist! You are engaging in theory-crafting as if the conversation just began here, today.

American data collection culture, including academia and government, groups Asians together. You are making your own fantasy data, and making awful accusations based on your personal fantasies of what people are doing.

I'm talking about effect sizes, and not from the basis of my own self-proclaimed international awareness.

Observe for yourself how many replies this thread can go before you offer any semblance of something that isn't your own pet analysis.
Did you ever get this working?
I had a similar problem with nextdns and the amazon app but I was able to resolve via whitelisting a couple domains.

https://torguard.net/blog/only-one-out-of-five-top-us-banks-...

https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2238885-wells-fargo-w...
Yeah, incredible. He knows nothing about me except what I wrote above and he's convinced I'm from the "MAGA-verse".
The wage effect of the personal choice of what wage to work at it is not an externality. An externality is when one party's actions deprive you of something you are entitled to, like your person or property. The opportunity offered by another individual, is not yours to begin with, and that other indivual has a right to withdraw it by contracting with someone else at a lower wage.

By way of analogy, imagine if you training to become physically more attractive made other male suitors less attractive to women in general. You did not, by virtue of making yourself more attractive, impose a negative externality on other men, as they were never entitled the affection and engagement of women in the first place.

Moreover, the absence of labor regulations and social democratic policies is associated with more rapid economic growth and larger wage gains, so the premise of the notion that there are negative externalities emanating from contract liberty is wrong. The free market is far and away the most efficient way to organize an economy, because the market is the ultimate coordinating tool, and helps raise productivity, which has enormous positive externalities.

These sound like the fundamentalist tenets of an ideology, that just happen to further the interests of the rich, but the statistical/empirical evidence has constistently validated these assertions, as do rationalist deductions based on game theory and widely accepted economic axioms like supply and demand and the efficiency of equilibriums established by them.