skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd say whether a button does something without JavaScript is a separate topic.

The page repeatedly mentions accessibility characteristics, it just doesn't call them all out as such.

> Not keyboard focusable

> Correct button role

> correct key events by default

> No accessible name

"Shows wrong cursor on hover" is arguably also about an accessibility characteristic.
A single fast food place might have several million dollars of revenue.
It was a TikTok accident, if you want them to stop happening without bannking TikTok, you need to ban knives:

https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-news/story/tiktok-acciden...
You are arguing with the wrong person. I actually like Apartheid.
Shouldn't language predate money?

Language or cave paintings or whatever, use discrete symbols to describe physical reality
FYI I use waypipe with the feature/pgtk branch as part of my daily workflow, and it works great---better than X11 forwarding in fact.
I affirm that I misrepresented McCLIM's license despite looking directly at it. I appreciate that you corrected my error.

Depending on how modularly Second Climacs combines McCLIM into itself, it is possibly LGPL licensed or, at minimum, released under the Github terms of service: view and fork. I am not in a position to assess the level of integration Strandh has opted for.

The Gnu Public licenses are designed to proscribe the minimal license features required for works combined with those released under GP licenses.

No, my assessment is not a serious argument, it's an incorrect puzzle solution, during lunch.
> Because it's timestamped earlier

That depends on who thought of making the NFT first. Which isn't necessarily the artist.

> or its proven to have been generated by a person who exclusively had a certain private key

That has the same problem, it's generated by arbitrary pseudo-random numbers, rather than a real, living human hand. Look, I'm not disputing the underlying cryptographic principles. I'm happy they exist, because they are immensely useful for many purposes, like securing communication and financial transactions. I just struggle to see the artistic merit in someone having pulled some numbers out of /dev/random and having done some math on them.
I don’t think this is universally right about brick and mortar. I don’t remember MicroCenter having a RadioShack-like section before but it is there now with a bunch of Adafruit, Raspberry, Pimori, BBC Microbit, etc. In a large metro like Houston, there are also local stores like EPO and regional chains like Altex. I can see how smaller metro areas can’t support the same actual stores as before, but online serves the long tails of specialized demand and supply better anyway.

https://epohouston.com/

https://www.altex.com/Tech-Supplies/Electronic-Parts/Mechani...
Given that it's simple for anyone to setup a powerful radio to spoof ATC, and it probably would be too hard to sabotage the real ATC radio, I'm surprised planes haven't been hijacked like this before, but without the use of official ATC.
> I thought that you said that JSON was incidental and unimportant?

It is for this, but if we're already declaring a restriction to JSON then we're likewise declaring a restriction to unicode. All delimited data requires escaping if your delimiter can be part of a no-delimit sequence. At least a character explicitly intended for delimiting isn't part of any no-delimit sequences representable in unicode whereas \n is.
Here is my argument:

I disagree because

1) in this specific case, it seems to be part of India suppressing information, and IMO India's suppression is a much larger issue than Facebook/Twitter/Instagram propagating controlled information (their suppression is different because there are other sites, vs. India cracks down on those other sites).

2) in the more general case, banning Facebook/Twitter/Instagram is controversial and there are more moderate approaches which are at least more practical. For example, you can better educate the public, or convince them to join your own site. It would be hard, sure, but forcing the public to quit Facebook/Twitter/Instagram without full-out rioting would be harder. Heck, you can "teach" children in schools that those sites are bad and the information there is wrong - I'm not arguing you should actually do that, but it would seriously threaten them while technically preserving free speech.

If you aren't actually arguing for a full-scale ban (it was implied), then I 100% agree with what you said.

---

Anyways, the main point of the above comment is to show that I'm glad such a great opinion is not only posted but it was top comment (unfortunately not anymore). It took me a long time to actually find a good argument against it even though it intuitively seemed so "wrong". I really wish this was more common on forums.
It's not a "premium". That's the whole thing about the US. There's the ruling class, and then there's the rest of you. The ruling class throws scraps, as in this instance "500+ in airline credit", and they somehow get the people to insist that it's a better way of life.
That’s more inline from what I’ve read but is that true in general?
The GDPR does not give you any way to sue them directly. You can report the company to your country's DPA, which should look into the issue and might take it with the offending party in a court of law. That is assuming that the parent is actually an EU citizen or a foreign citizen living in the EU; if they aren't, the GDPR doesn't apply to them.

I see a lot of (mostly non-EU) commenters thinking that the GDPR is grounds for any individual to sue any company for practically anything because privacy is hard, (which is probably why everyone was so hyped to hate on the GDPR) but that's just not how it works.

As much as I value data portability, I'd much rather see a DPA sue the hell out of the companies that make those ridiculous, illegal cookie walls and popovers filled with dark patterns instead.
No, the question is whether Indians are free to choose to read things which are inconvenient to the Indian government [but not at all irksome to rich coastal Americans], or whether the Indian government gets to determine which information and ideas are allowed to be disseminated online in India. Facebook and Twitter seek only to control their own, separate platforms.

(Plus of course what will actually happen is that Facebook and Twitter will comply, and Indian users of those platforms will be subject to both the whims of California-based moderators and the Indian government's current penchant for objecting to pictures of funerals and suggestions they might not be doing a wonderful job. The potency of control of information and ideas in action; nobody in the upper echelons of the Indian government cares about Zuckerberg's policy on the lab-leak theory...)
This is great. I've just implemented it to replace the clunky mess I had in place while waiting for this type of product from Stripe. Thank you!
Yes, I did. My files are simple. Around 15 or so assets. One file per asset, no elaborate effects used.
> a lot of the features you need for a shared multi-user system are basically cruft

That's just not true. A "single-user" system running multiple "apps" where each app is actually endowed with its own user-like privileges is just a shared multi-user system by another name. There's no reason not to reuse the existing infrastructure, if perhaps with some tweaks.
>Flexible funding - This campaign will receive all funds raised even if it does not reach its funding goal.

is how you usually spot scams on indiegogo

Indiegogo campaign page: DASUNG | Galveston, United States

Indiegogo DASUNG page: Beijing, China

Real address: 3018, Block B, Building 3 , China Agricultural University International Pioneer Park , No. 10 Tianxiu Road, Haidian District, Beijing

..on the other hand they ran couple campaigns already and delivered working screens. They still sell ~$1k Dasung E-Ink Paper Like 13.3. Here is one test https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pw-oCItgx8
Unless there were ridiculously excessive tax breaks, I fail to see the issue. Where as they previously had a greater number of workers doing the same thing, they now have fewer workers who are more productive. More productive workers could receive higher wages as their work ultimately generates more value.
> 1. Cannot identify any killer features above what I already have with forever free tools with much larger support communities.

It does have the features I want, although not enough to convince me to switch right now. cli can be painful if you are working on commands you are not familiar with. IMHO, this is a better interface than the ones in Fish/Zsh, that provides richer information regarding command choices, hence can be a huge improvement for discoverability.

Imagine that you are not familiar with AWS EC2 and want to spin up an instance to play with. If you do that via awscli, first you need to run a bunch of `--help` commands to find the correct subcommands(`aws ec2`, and then `aws ec2 run-instances`), after that, there are 40+ flags for `run-instances`, some are mandatory, some are optional. If you do that from the web console, there's a very friendly wizard with several pages breaking down by networking, storage, OS...etc, intuitive and easy to understand.
Mac is very popular with devs.
Well, if they were one function before they probably share some state.

Clean code recommends turning that function into a class and promoting the shared state from local variables into fields. After such a "refactoring" you get a nice puzzle trying to understand what exactly happens.
I'm going to set this up for one of my products tomorrow. There doesn't seem to be a way to request delivery information though. Hope I'm wrong.
> It's not too long ago they would ask for information faxed using company letterhead, as a form of legitimization.

I had PayPal ask me for exactly this (emailed rather than faxed) recently for my PayPal business account!
No, that is not "all this is doing".

A JSON array is exactly 1 "record", in that it must be parsed entirely before it can be interpreted as anything other than a string of text.

Moreover, you can write a ND-JSON file where each record is an array. The following is valid ND-JSON:

["a", "b", "c"]
["u", "v"]
["x", "y", "z"]
Name any big company that values human rights over money.
It's gonna be a short list.
My Favourite Ted Talk
All the developers I know run macOS. The major San Francisco companies are predominantly macOS for developers.
There is more to this narrative than meets the eye. Before roundup ready crops we used far worse herbicides and pesticides that are much more prevalent in runoff and in the local ecology, like atrazine, metribuzin, and alachlor. So while they use more pounds per acre in some cases, it's usually stuff that is far less harmful to the environment.

BT corn is brilliant. Bt has been used in organic farming for 50 years and doesn't harm people or animals or pollinators. Having the corn produce it directly rather than having to spray excess amounts of it regularly over your crops is a boon. You use far less since it's concentrated at the site where it matters: in the tissue the insect bites into.

We have to take these measures. If we didn't treat with pesticides and herbicides, we go back to biblical plague levels of insect blight and are unable to feed our population. It happens even in backyard gardens. I've seen cabbage loopers turn my tomato plant into swiss cheese in a matter of days.
You are so educated, surely you can provide a short summary explaining your views.

>But I still saw people plowing fields with oxen. I've seen very poor people in developing countries, but I haven't seen that first hand. The level of poverty in Cuba is pretty bad still.

Do you think that has anything to do with the US embargo on Cuba? (Y'know, one of those external forces I was talking about originally).
very much this, I'm a very restless person and I _need_ to move every 2-3 hours. Cafe hopping is very very important to my general flow. I also need noise and general life happening around me. Offices are too artificial an environment and my apartment is too silent.
May the best software win.

Anyway, if they succeed in integrating it into Android then that will be a lot of users :P
Apparently they have unretired:
https://www.sportskeeda.com/mma/5-ufc-fighters-suffered-badl...

However, as you can see, young and fit is no protection.

It's a roll of the dice.
I think the problem with something like (specifically) Happy Hour is that it's really welcome by some employees, and really hated by others.

Imagine being one of the few Mormons, observant Muslims, or recovering alcoholics at a company that "rewards" your team with Happy Hours. Or being someone who's been sexually harassed or assaulted at previous events where coworkers drank too much.

I'm not suggesting that it's easy (or even possible) to plan a social event that's guaranteed to be welcomed by every member of a team. But I think events that focus or rely on alcohol as the means of team bonding can be a bad idea depending on the team.
What to buy to improve your video conferencing setup
> the types specified for columns are completely ignored

They aren’t constraints (except in the case of “INTEGER PRIMARY KEY”), but they also aren’t “completely ignored”, because of type affinity.
Numbers is the consequence of conservation law. If you relax the definition of the natural number as something that can be stable at time and space, you will see another system is possible. Gosh, even periodic table is a good example of what is possible if no strict proton-oriented association is in mind.
> I think recent cells tend to be in the 150 Wh/kg ballpark, which isn't bad.

Even better:

https://insideevs.com/news/481770/guoxuan-210-whkg-lfp-batte...

Those sub $100/kWh cells that made the news a while ago are were all LFP.
Humans wont care about the environment until humans live forever and their actions now will impact their own lives later.
> on record that he never wanted it published

One can control one's estate while alive. Once dead, the estate belongs to others, one's intent no longer incurs any obligation for others to adhere to.

If someone never wants their manuscripts published, they should destroy them while they are alive.

P.S. It took me a long time to get over the desire to please my father in what I did with his estate. You can't please dead people.
That explains a lot :)
More evidence that, no matter what horror finally consumes us, we will thoroughly deserve it.
It reminds me of calling 'slippery slope' on an argument. Slippery slope arguments are sometimes fallacious, and sometimes very pertinent. You actually have to use reason to distinguish the two scenarios, not just use pattern recognition to try to spot a match to a list of fallacies.

Lots of people using 'what about' are doing so to try to make reasonable comparisons between two cases. Lots of people do it to avoid blame or confuse the argument. You have to actually read to figure out which it is.
Linux has PID namespaces now, so it's not global. But yes, the race conditions you describe are real, and can only be addressed via new API's.
I didn't meant to imply that Category Theory addressed the obtuseness of Set Theory. Rather, I was alluding to work in Category Theory that helps to redefine our ideas of equality and equivalence. A discussion of that is available in Quanta Magazine [1].

1. https://www.quantamagazine.org/with-category-theory-mathemat...
No, but it is far better than doing nothing and allowing our cultivars to be wiped out from blight.
Striking it rich on doge or whatever is still meaningfully different than investing in rentals.
Can't use the hardware without the drivers. If the driver is low quality proprietary code that can't be fixed or updated, they don't have a high quality product.
Your employer's group policy controls, management agents, etc. that control access to their internal network can (and are) already telling them all of that information. They're basically rootkits that run anything they want on computers that access their network. Usually they just distribute certs, keys, etc. or remotely wipe a lost/stolen machine, but the capability is there to do anything.
Surely you can’t simultaneously support cultural relativism (misplaced as it may be for an American author being discussed by mostly Americans) and also speak for an entire group of people who existed thousands of years ago. The only thing we have empirical proof of is that the deceased don’t complain about the treatment of their remains or estates.
>Code doesn't tell stories, programmers do. Code can't explain why it exists;

Code can't tell every relevant story, but it can tell a story about how it does what it does. Code is primarily written for other programmers. Writing code in such a way that other people with some familiarity with the problem space can understand easily should be the goal. But this means telling a story to the next reader, the story of how the inputs to some functional unit are translated into its outputs or changes in state. The best way to explain this to another human is almost never the best way to explain it to a computer. But since we have to communicate with other humans and to the computer from the same code, it takes some effort to bridge the two paradigms. Having the code tell a story at the high level by way of the modules, objects and methods being called is how we bridge this gap. But there are better and worse ways to do this.

Software development is a process of translating the natural language-spec of the system into a code-spec. But you can have the natural language-spec embedded in the structure of the code to a large degree. The more, the better.
I said I don’t respect any charity to give them my keys, not that I don’t respect any charity full stop. No thank you to your offer.
Project Gemini FOSDEM 2021: Bloat-Proof Method of Sharing Content
Faster, More Private, Less Complex, More Energy-Efficient and Easier to Learn than the Web

https://video.fosdem.org/2021/D.retro/retro_gemini.mp4

Gemini incentivises self-sufficient software authors instead of drone-like web developers beholden to a handful of corporations that produce "web browsers".

Creatvity in making infinitely varied "UI's", if the user desires such variation, lies with the authors of clients, instead of with site operators and a single-digit number of clients controlled by corporations conducting surveillance of site users as a business.
Ruling with fear?
That's what dictators do.
I prefer the larger team outings, as there are usually more people that I enjoy hanging out with than the small 4-7 people team that I work with. Also, larger team outings usually means more things to do because of the larger budget, so it could be a trip to a tourist attraction or activity camp, as opposed to just a meal when it is the smaller team.
I'm still looking and almost homeless. Our corporate culture is rotten to the core.
So you're basically just arguing that technically humans will not go extinct, as long as there's at least two of them out there.

Okay fine, that very well be the case, but I think most of us would prefer not to live or have children or grandchildren that live to suffer (and probably be one of the casualties of) a 99% or higher percent population decline, which would still be 76 million people at the current population count.
Please elaborate. Which materials and methods?
Different targets. And there can be multiplayers.

Gumroad is essentially a one-person company. Maybe they are impacted. I doubt they will be dead.
An interesting read, albeit with information that is likely familiar to many. Given the issues surrounding concrete with greenhouse gases, recycling, and landfill contribution, it seems that timber (https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/05/wood-...) may actually be a more viable alternative. We have techniques to grow it sustainably, it can be a carbon sink within a city, and it is mostly natural wood so it can decompose.

As an economics exercise, it may also be interesting to price in the cost of dismantling/disposing of construction materials into the initial construction cost. I wonder if doing so will steer materials development away from composites that are difficult to recycle towards something new.
One of my favorites by Shel Silverstein: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvNhhEtUGJY
I really wish there was an electoral system of some sorts .
This is essentially a textbook example from

Chapter 5 of Probability Theory: The Logic of Science

http://www.med.mcgill.ca/epidemiology/hanley/bios601/Gaussia...

"...The new information D is: ‘Mr. N has gone on TV with a sensational claim that a commonly used drug is unsafe’, and three viewers, Mr. A, Mr. B, and Mr. C, see this. Their prior probabilities P(S|I) that the drug is safe are (0.9, 0.1, 0.9), respectively; i.e. initially, Mr. A and Mr. C were believers in the safety of the drug, Mr. B a disbeliever. But they interpret the information D very differently, because they have different views about the reliability of Mr. N. They all agree that, if the drug had really been proved unsafe, Mr. N would be right there shouting it: that is, their probabilities P(D|SI) are (1, 1, 1); but Mr. A trusts his honesty while Mr. C does not. Their probabilities P(D|SI) that, if the drug is safe, Mr. N would say that it is unsafe, are (0.01, 0.3, 0.99), respectively.

...

Put verbally, they have reasoned as follows:

A) - Mr. N is a fine fellow, doing a notable public service. I had thought the drug to be safe from other evidence, but he would not knowingly misrepresent the facts; therefore hearing his report leads me to change my mind and think that the drug is unsafe after all. My belief in safety is lowered by 20.0 db, so I will not buy any more.

B) - Mr. N is an erratic fellow, inclined to accept adverse evidence too quickly. I was already convinced that the drug is unsafe; but even if it is safe he might be carried away into saying otherwise. So,hearing his claim does strengthen my opinion, but only by 5.3 db. I would never under any circumstances use the drug.

C) - Mr. N is an unscrupulous rascal, who does everything in his power to stir up trouble by sensational publicity. The drug is probably safe, but he would almost certainly claim it is unsafe whatever the facts. So hearing his claim has practically no effect (only 0.005 db) on my confidence that the drug is safe. I will continue to buy it and use it."
Yes, and many of the target readers are emotionally connected in that they are customers who use the finished product.
I have never really heard the name "two language problem" to refer to what you are describing. Whenever I have heard these words it has referred to "I want a high-productivity newbie-friendly introspective language like python, but I do not want to write C modules when I need fast inner loops". Julia seems to solve this already, without providing compact binaries.

A sibling comment made a point about "compiling down to shared libraries" which seems similar to what you are describing, but that seems like it has little to do with "the two language problem".
I dislike a lot of Google's practices as much as the next guy, but this is literally just a case of "nobody paying serious attention" rather than outright malice. We all (should) know that moderation at Google is mostly black-box bots that may or may not work properly.
If that were the case, it would require more data collection than competitors and force ads. Instead, you can trivially get your location on Android devices (even those sold by Google) without telling Google. You cannot on iOS. You can install apps on your Android device without telling Google. You can develop apps for your own device without telling Google. To do any of these things on iOS requires exploiting a vulnerability.

Similarly, Google doesn't give itself a privileged separate settings for marketing data collection that ignore global settings. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202074

If the point of Android were data collection and marketing, Google would abuse configurability of data collection at least as much as Apple does, but it does not, not even on devices that Google itself sells.