skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That code is 100% pure, it is a value of type IO (), it can be passed to pure functions, kept in lists. It is a pure description of some impure actions. This is run by the runtime. But within haskell is 100% pure
The idea that Android phones are getting these feature updates and iOS security updates is an absolute joke. Seriously. HTC Wildfire E3 just came out, running android 10. Released 2019. And chances of it getting updated to Android 11 (released 2020) or Android 12 and 13 (coming out in 2021 and 2022) are pretty much zilch. HTC U Play was on Android 6 maybe forever? Did they EVER release an update? It might STILL be stuck on Android 6. Do folks not understand the benefits of updating phones?
To start with, remove network related code. There is no reason for a autocomplete language to need to fetch a file or send telemetry. A telemetry setting is insufficient
If it was leaked from a lab, what would you propose be done about it? Why do you feel this is a pressing concern? I could totally believe that it was a lab leak, but I suspect that could happen in many labs.
This is actually worse than I thought compared to N2 used on Server. N2 was suppose to have 40% IPC increase, comparatively speaking.

> In terms of the performance and power curve, the new X2 core extends itself ahead of the X1 curve in both metrics. The +16% performance figure in terms of the peak performance points, though it does come at a cost of higher power consumption.

The 16% figure was done with an 8MB Cache compared to a 4MB Cache on X1. i.e In the absolute ( also unrealistic ) best case scenario, with an extra 10% Clock-speed increase, you are looking at single core performance of X2, released with flagship phone in 2022, to be roughly equivalent to A13 used on iPhone 11, released in 2019.

The most interesting part is actually the LITTLE Core A510. I am wondering what it would bring to low cost computing. Unfortunately no Die Size estimate were given.
Some of my candidates I've supported have won. Some I've liked once in office, some I haven't. Some I've voted for again, some I've voted out. Can't win them all. Just have to keep trying.

Sorry my efforts aren't good enough, I guess?
His issues (from 3.5 years ago):

"- The string handling is braindead"

How so? Not a lot of specificity here.

"- The compiler and stdlib is immature. This seems like the first programming language the guy has written. You should have a few failures to learn from before you make a Serious Programming Language imo."

The Hare compiler isn't immature? As noted, this was 3.5 years ago.

"- Code run at compile time is a neat idea but has a weird syntax and really really complicates the internals of the compiler and related tooling."

And yet this has become one of Zig's strongest points.
Yes, and most of our coal dates back to a time period before cellulose could be digested. An organism then evolved the capability to digest cellulose, and destroyed that type of environmental possibility for all time, into earthly perpetuity. I'd say that's a bigger ecological devastation than we'll ever accomplish.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-fanta...
The major problem with enabling sideloading from Apple's perspective is that if they allowed sideloading, all of the big tech companies that compete with Apple would happily, immediately, force users to sideload their app.

Case study: Facebook. Hates Apple for the App Tracking Transparency prompt. Hates that they get substantially less revenue from iPhone users, according to leaked slides, due to restrictions on what APIs they can use to fingerprint and track users. Hates having a Privacy Label in the App Store. Solution? Force users to sideload. They'll most likely do it because they want Facebook, Facebook doesn't need to follow Apple's rules anymore, problem solved.

In that case, it is less that Apple is afraid of giving users the choice, as much as that large apps that people use will force users to make the choice for them.

And for that reason, while some users would legitimately want their iPhones to be able to install apps from anywhere, most users hitting the "Allow Sideloading" button would have essentially been forced into doing so, without actually wanting it.
I would choose #1 if I believed in the company (FAANG tends to be a sure bet in terms of growth). By the time RSUs vest they could be worth substantially more. This is assuming that you're awarded a set # of RSUs rather than a dollar amount pegged to the price of the stock at the time they vest. The details of vesting matter here.

If you're unsure or feel uncomfortable with the risk, then the all-cash option (#2) would be better.

As for option #3, it would really depend on the specific company - difficult to evaluate without knowing. It's hard to know if taking a bet on a non-FAANG company's stock is a good idea without an understanding of what space they're in, what stage they're at, etc.
It seems that this saga goes far beyond Apple. The bigger question this will probably lead to is to what extent operating systems/platforms/intellectual property fully belong to a person or entity. How much of it should be "shared" if at all? This will affect game consoles, ATMs, automobiles, and anything with an electronic circuit. It's a property rights conundrum fit for the 21st century.
I doubt Russian, Ukrainian airlines will stope overflying Belrus.
Only millions? What are we taking about then! Who cares, there is more time between the T-Rex and the Stegosaurus than there is between us and T-Rex (about 100 million more). And we have about 4000-5000 million years before the sun gives out.
You sold me within 30 seconds of downloading. Yes, I know there are options out there for enabling autocomplete in my terminal, but I have no time to futz around with that stuff, and it still doesn't work when I ssh into a new server, while this is really, really easy to setup and "just works" everywhere. Spent 60 seconds installing, and I can easily see the immediate ROI shaving off several brain cycles every day as I spend a few hours in the terminal.
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written directly or indirectly against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism as I understand it." -- George Orwell
> FTL info transmission or not?

No.

It's about group velocity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_velocity

In some experiments it's easier to make the calculations using fake waves that move at a velocity that may be faster than light, but they are just a mathematical recombination of waves that move at another velocity (that is less or equal than light velocity).
Those people are also gone and no longer have any beliefs or ideas that can be violated.

Nothing we do today affects those people or their beliefs in any way. Those people no longer exist and cannot be harmed or protected. Ideas about respect and proper behavior around their landmarks only affects people who are alive. It is only important to the extent that it is important to us. It is clearly important to you but not others. So why should it matter to others if it doesn’t?
Julia 1.6 addresses latency issues
.gov did moon landind, but right they are incompetent...

maybe they are because conservatives design it that way? irs dont go after big corps because of luck of funds
People who can configure their shells are not their target audience.
For once, if you walk into any research center or academic environment and look over the shoulders of people who have to code or use a terminal because they have no other option, you would see that the vast majority know little beyond cd and ls. I wouldn't be surprised some would pay for directory completion alone.

Can those who know what zsh mean do a better job with existing tools or custom made scripts? 100%, but that doesn't matter.

Beyond that, you can level up even further by firing up Emacs and never again needing a terminal for things that require completion.
>I understand that this came across as rude, but I'm not trying to say that Germany is a Kafkaesque hellhole. I love Germany. Simply this - there is no 'good faith' defense when breaking rules in Germany.

It's thought that Franklin Roosevelt's view of Germany and Germans' nature was affected by his being, as a young visitor, arrested four times in one day in the Black Forest (https://archive.org/details/rooseveltinretro00gunt/page/170/...).
> Oftentimes, a role changes to something that an employee didn't sign up for.

...which is also generally bad if the role is materially different and goes on top of what was signed up for, with little to no extra compensation.

> Perhaps there is something unique about sex and how it interacts with power dynamics?

Suppose that your boss asked you, in addition to your current duties, instead of giving sexual favors, you follow him home and do all his laundry - with the same implication that your career hinges on it. Would that change the power dynamic? I don't think so. The only thing that "sex" changes is that it arouses attention.
In 500 years? It has to be 50 or there won’t be any societies to power in 500 years
Extremely disappointing. Siemens has no business owning or purchasing these sites. Shame on Supplyframe.
No problem. Thanks for the praise!
Specifically the first kind, much less of the second.
That's awesome to hear! Glad that everything is working!
My understanding is AArch64 is more or less fresh vs AArch32, whereas the ia16/ia32/amd64 transitions are all relatively simple extensions. Almost all the instructions work in all three modes, just the default registers are a bit different and the registers available are different and addressing modes might be a smidge different. You would make some gains in decoder logic by dropping the older stuff, but not a whole lot; amd64 still has the same variable width instructions and strong memory consistency model that make it hard.
No, you’re pansies that expect others to keep them safe.
Large parts of the Italian civil and penal code date back to the Statuto Albertino and to Roman civil law, just like there are principles in common between UK and US common law.
https://marshallbrain.com/manna1
https://marshallbrain.com/manna2
https://marshallbrain.com/manna3
It would seem so, as that would be a situation which threatens the safety of the aircraft, which is a pretty good definition of an emergency.

I've not gone through the detail yet, but depending on altitude of the aircraft at the time of the alert, and its speed, continuing onward to Lithuania may have made more sense for the crew - if they were at or near cruising altitude, you're talking about (say) 100 nm of lateral distance to execute the descent (for a normal descent profile).

Under normal circumstances, you would be unlikely to want to divert to a new airport for this emergency landing, unless there was an issue like poor visibility or very limited emergency services at your destination - since diverting would likely require new descent and approach calculation and routing and briefing.
The Inflation Economy
So true. I've experienced more than my share of addiction, and the dopamine hits, while intense, only bring momentary pleasure. Instead of happiness, feelings of shame are often the result.

Fortunately there are many things out there that both bring happiness and pleasure. But the pleasure happens at the appropriate time and place. For instance.

1. The high one experiences during or after strenuous exercise.

2. The satisfaction of a job well done (whether physical labor or not).

3. The feeling of relief after going through a difficult time.

4. Even sex, when it results from genuine emotional/spiritual connection with a spouse.

These things all involve a moderate-to-severe degree of pain. Yes, even the fourth one. It is hard to trust another person with our own personal darkness.

Those things (drugs, eating, shopping, porn, etc.) that attempt to isolate and repeat just the reward/pleasure sensations experienced in life not only cheapen the experience, but limit our capacity to enjoy real life fully.
As bad as climate change is, it’s not going to wipe out human civilization in 50 years.
No, it is sold to China, and then the trace naturally vanishes.

Then a Chinese broker comes to an EV battery materials co., and says we have a conflict cobalt for you from Congo, and a conflict free one from "somewhere else."
> "your code should read like well-written prose."

This is a good assertion but ironically it's not Bob Martin's line. He was quoting Grady Booch.
Seriously, a million square feet to build stationary bikes with a screen attached? Does anyone have any predictions when this market will be saturated? It's not like exercise equipment is a recurring purchase.
> they are saying "I told you so"

To whom? No-one on this site was instrumental in deciding to hinder Morales's flight, and I doubt many supported the action at the time. It's obnoxious and comes off like trolling for an argument. Dispassionately making the link is one thing, but most of the comments of this form I've seen are borderline tu quoque nationalist trolling.
Yeah, buying a dataset of a couple of million email addresses and then using them to email people who didn't sign up or request your email isn't really something I care to optimize. It wouldn't shock me at all if the services that charge to validate emails are just doing a half-ass regex and leeching off spammers anyway.
Yes, definitely pedantic.
Yeah. I registered, logged in a couple times to see who followed me and abandoned it.

Main problem is I dont even know what Clubhouse really is. Is it supposed to be some kind of talk radio or what?
You're underestimating the effects of breaking points and phase shifts. The planetary system could at any point snap and transition to a completely different mode of functioning with irreversible changes cascading one after another.
We may take as given that advertising agents cannot simply buy the history of your usage, outright.

Does that mean much? Google would not be so foolish as to hand over everything at once, when they could do something else that allows them to sell it, or the use of it, again and again. They doubtless have a hundred ways, each more clever than the last, to sell it again and again. Since they control the whole apparatus, they can make full use of all your history at all times without revealing to advertisers anything that would allow Google to be bypassed next time.

So, Google's pledge is simply that every use of your data will necessarily involve paying Google again. And, anything at all that can help Google uniquely identify you with activity anywhere online certainly is collected into your file, the use of to be dold for what the traffic will bear.

Your ISP has a different set of incentives.
It wasn't similar because Snowden wasn't actually on that plane.

If he was, you think he wouldn't be arrested and would just fly with Morales to Bolivia? The agents that searched the plane was just there to say hi?
For CRUD things I stick with Django because I know it, but if I were starting fresh today I’d look into Go, based on what I’ve heard about it. Mainly, speed and ease of deployment.

For things more like web apps, look at Svelte.
Yes, see also my other comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27278939
What about <embed src="button.swf">? Should I use that?
Google Stadia

Siri/Alexa/Google Assistant

Everything "smart home"

5G LTE

USB-C
I’m not opposed to sharing an author’s unpublished works after death because their is value in allowing certain readers access.

But after reading Douglas Adam’s, I’m personally hesitant to read unpublished item from any other authors. After finishing The Salmon of Doubt I felt vaguely embarrassed, like I’d barged into his house and found him relaxing on the couch in his boxers. I’m a fan, not a scholar, and there were reasons he wasn’t ready to share the material yet.
Shut Up, Thoughts
Something created but not published before 1978 gets basically the "modern" copyright duration: life of the author plus 70 years, with a caveat that none of these would fall into the public domain until 2003. To encourage publication, if you did publish a previously-unpublished pre-78 work before 2003, you got a bonus extension of that term until 2048.

This was written before 1978, was not published before then, and not published before 2003 either, so it is protected by copyright for 70 years after Steinbeck's death: he died in 1968, so through 2038.

As to the hypothetical unpublished work that the publisher takes and publishes as their own: with newly-created work nowadays its easy: the work was copyrighted at "fixation," no need to publish or intend to publish. Before 1978, the author had state-level common-law copyright in unpublished works that would have applied.
The level of cynicism is concerning.

But also (as an Ohio resident) there isn't really all that much in the way of incentives for a business to move here. The state has to do something. But this won't go the way of Foxconn - mark my words, because it's not nearly as complicated to set up.

Like it or not, the future state for not just the world but individual states will be competition for jobs and revenue, so they're going to have to give companies a good reason to locate to their sovereignty. Tax advantages are a tool they can use (among other things), and unlike the federal government the state governments (at least Ohio) have to actually balance their budgets and spend somewhat responsibly - so they can't just do whatever they want and have to be strategic. Not collecting taxes is fine because if Peloton wouldn't locate here without that nothing is really being lost. At least there are jobs.
rawgit.com is sunsetted[1], so this URL may die any day now. It's simply a proxy server for content hosted on GitHub. In this case, the real source is https://gist.github.com/darcyparker/1886716, and it's displayable (officially) at [2].

[1]: https://rawgit.com/
[2]: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/darcyparker/1886716/raw/c...
The infringement is limited to a very specific class of people who are a small subset of the general population. Consider that convicted felons may not own firearms, is that an infringement? I would argue that it is not, as you lose certain rights when you are convicted, just as you lose certain rights when you are deemed to be mentally ill or of unsound mind.
What do you mean? The UI is fine. The better part of it happens to be the fact that they haven't messed with it.
> Worth pointing out the “minority” in the case represent far more Americans than the court’s “majority” appointed by people who lost the popular vote.

That's neither relevant nor true.

The case, D.C. v. Heller[1], was decided 5-4 with Scalia, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, representing the majority.

Scalia (1986) and Kennedy (1987) were nominated by President Reagan who had won the 1984 election with 58.8% of the vote (v.s. 40.6% for Mondale).

Thomas (1991) was nominated by President Bush who had won the 1988 election with 53.4% of the vote (vs. 45.6% for Dukakis).

Roberts (2005) and Alito (2005) were nominated by President Bush who had won the 2004 election with 50.7% of the vote (v.s. 48.3% for Kerry).

Not some, __all__, of the justices that decided that case were appointed by Presidents who had won both the popular vote and the electoral college.

Not that it matters though. A justice appointed by a President who only wins the electoral college is just as much as a justice.
The thing is that there have been many incidents like this, not just the Snowden incident. Israel has done this kind of thing before, dating back to decades ago (and kidnapped people [NAZI war criminals, so frankly probably justified] from other countries territory, too).

I doubt Belarus needed the Morales thing as a cover.

> Wars have been fought over both, attacks on state ships, and attacks on civilian ships.

Yes, this was the casus belli for the war of 1812, supposedly. But the reality in statecraft is that this is rarely the actual reason and there's much more in depth and structural reasons for the start of war.
The phrase "Congo's Cobalt Rush" seems to presage mostly dark side to me.
Not sure if that would be a panacea for Facebook in this case. Aren't the privacy controls built into the OS?
To be free in the positive sense requires that every individual is able to do as they wish even if you don't like it.

"Positive liberty is the possibility of acting — or the fact of acting — in such a way as to take control of one's life and realize one's fundamental purposes."

In the journey of life you cannot rush someone to realize their fundamental purpose. You can only cultivate an environment that allows them to do so. You might see choosing to be a prostitute as avoiding their fundamental purpose. I see it as a stepping stone in their journey. They are earning enough money to move to a higher level of the hierarchy of needs. This is necessary for self-actualization.
A company getting a tax break is not in the same league as what happened with Foxconn in Wisconsin. That was a truly special example of wild incompetence and corruption.

https://gimletmedia.com/shows/reply-all/wbhjwd

https://www.theverge.com/2018/12/6/18128133/foxconn-deal-wis...

This is just a company that actually wants to build what they're saying they'll build (at least I believe Peloton wants to build treadmills and exercise bikes because that's what they do, I have no idea why anyone would build a "state of the art" facility for a technology that's already been largely obsoleted as was the case with Foxconn and LCD screens) and hoping for a tax break.
Oracle Cloud free tier – up to 4 ARM CPUs and 24 GB RAM free
Because it’s a simple matter of recognizing other human beings and respecting their cultural achievements and desires. Just because they don’t exist anymore doesn’t mean they weren’t humans worthy of our empathy.

I hate to use this example, but your argument would also basically say a genocided people is completely unimportant and unworthy of respect, as they no longer exist either.
I'd love to read a book that teaches concepts "in anger" — where you're given a big problem statement with lots of subproblems; and then, in each chapter, the author:

• introduces a subproblem, that would be solvable but for one tool you're currently missing;

• introduces the tool you'll need to solve the subproblem;

• explains the tool in the process of using the tool to solve the subproblem. Only explaining as much of the tool as is necessary to solve the subproblem — more can be explained in later subproblems.

Sadly, I find that most books like this first introduce all the tools you'll need; teach them all thoroughly (including teaching stuff you won't need at all, because it's part of the explanation as traditionally taught); and then go about solving all of the subproblems using all of the tools, in a pretty random order. So the first half ends up boring, and the second half ends up messy and hard-to-follow.
Let's say M2 has SVE. Do you:

* only use NEON to save developer time and lose performance and forward compatibility

* only use SVE to save developer time and lose backward compatibility

* Pay to support both and deal with the cost/headaches

Experience shows that AVX took years to adopt (and still isn't used for everything) because SSE2 was "good enough" and the extra costs and loss of backward compatibility weren't worth it.

If SVE were supported out of the gate, then the problem would simply never exist. Don't forget (as stated before) that there's been a huge wave of M1 buyers. People upgraded early either to get the nice features or not be left behind as Apple drops support.

Let's say you have 100M Mac users and an average of 20M are buying new machines any given year (a new machine every 5 years). The 1.5-2-year M1 wave gets 60-70M upgraders in the surge. Now sales are going to decline for a while as the remaining people stick to their update schedule (or hold on to their x86 machines until they die). Now the M2 with SVE only gets 5-10M upgraders. Does it make sense to target such a small group or wait a few years? I suspect there will be a lot of waiting.
I wounder why? $0.7B for a blog, and a wordpress shop?

Cheap money make "miracles" these days.