skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Its funny you say that because the seated/not-seated climb was actually a debate in my cycling club long ago. The agreement was: road = seated, offroad = not seated. Heh, back then (1987?) I rode a cannondale with a 26" front and 24" rear wheel with a gear ratio so low that my cadence had to skyrocket or i'd fall over from lack of momentum, but I sure could climb!
I live in the US. I care not one iota about their cookie law and I'm not going to nag my visitors about cookies. Of course the site uses cookies. That's how you retain your settings from session to session.

At the same time, I'll happily give you any data I have about you. I don't really collect anything. Your IP address gets logged and you give me an email address if you want to get a newsletter (on most sites of mine). I'll even happily delete your data, such as it is.

I'm in the camp that says if I have your data I have to secure it. So, I'd rather not really collect more than I need. I don't even need to know your real name and you're more than welcome to use a fake email address for many things.

But, no... No, I'm not going to nag my viewers with a cookie notice. I don't care if they come from the EU. I don't like the nag and I'm not going to nag you.
It was so endearing to head about Shannon spending his time as an illustrious academic learning to juggle, then unicycle, then both at the same time.
"It would crash like every two hours."

You'd hope Adobe was better than this too.
I would argue working is a main functionality :P
Interesting! Anywhere that I could get some more information on that?
That's not another reason, it's the same reason more detailed. Bar-ends had their heyday on top of rigid forks.
I wouldn’t be surprised if people got paid to spam ads on the website. People who don’t have any money (or care what Google indexes on them) would gladly send spam on behalf of their drivers license.
192 khz/24 bit
I am going to swing to the latter but "funny" wouldn't be how I would characterize this as. It's downright sad. I still have a heart, especially for people who don't know what they are doing or are in a self-destructive mode that they end up getting trolled by national media. Is this what "news" has just become? I think greater minds than even myself need to weigh in on this from a societal standpoint. What is happening here...?
Bar-ends are mounted in the handlebar tube by friction alone. On any decently bumpy trail, they have a pretty good chance of twisting (forwards and down) and you could hit the handlebars with your face.

They are useful for one of the reasons curved bars are useful on a road bike, it's a change of position to give you a rest, and potentially a better climbing position but I doubt it.

I had bar ends on my bike in high school 'cause they were cool but I've ridden cross country and downhill MTB for a couple of decades now and bar-ends are not something I would consider adding to my bike.
Why is this "news"?

We already know the commies lied and denied other facts.
I have an above average number of hands: 2 (like most people)

Or in other words, it’s not contradicting if you’re in a 70% group of people who said some answer.
Why the scare "quotes"?
http://archive.is/twBlO
> There are already tons of sites you can move to if you get banned from a platform, so there is no functional difference.

But none of those platforms draw a direct line between the constitutional guarantee of free speech and implementation of that speech. That’s the idea behind the public option: it’s the constitution with teeth, freedom in its purest form, while leaving corporations open to experiment with restrictions as the market demands.
That's an interesting idea imo. You'd need to solve the earth side of the link too. The current NASA et all network is massively oversubscribed.
Don't all batteries weaken with age? What's the actual solution here if the battery is too weakened to continue charging at full speed safely yet still perfectly capable of running the car
You're effectively saying that we don't really need limits on state power until the state has used that power. That's a pretty bold stance considering all the abuses of power modern states engage in. Why don't we just have an absolute monarch? It would make things much easier!
Further clarification after looking into the repository's reflog [1]:

- Shells' logo goes up on February 25th.

- tomaw assumes his position as head of staff on March 21st.

- Lee's access is revoked anywhere April 5th-18th, not to be regained until May.

- Fuchs publishes the reorganization announcement on April 18th.

- Lee gets lawyers involved on April 19th.

- Libera Chat was created and its bylaws were written on April 23rd.

- tomaw takes down the testnet and swantzter reverts Fuchs site changes (by force-pushing them out of existence) on April 30th. Presumably under Lee's request.

- Lee appoints kevinp as head of infrastructure on May 11th.

So the narrative that Libera Chat was created because of Lee's active network control is fading the more information we gather. Staff planned, registered and wrote the bylaws for Libera Chat after Lee's request for his access back. That's the only evidence they provided. All other evidence of Lee's supposed hostile actions happened at least 7 days after Libera's inception and should only be seen as a post-rationalization.

[1]: Event #16150837732 at http://web.archive.org/web/20210525011039/https://api.github...
Was thinking the whole thing stinks of selection bias but this one is the epitome hahaha
Powers of 2 certainly come up more often, e.g. memory sizes before everything had GBs of RAM.
That's a way more honest response than I expected.

I respect that a lot.

In the absence of a legal after market or licensed / genuine / third party parts ecosystem, this is, or should be, the expected natural response: off license / bootleg / counterfeit parts ecosystem.

In my opinion, then, the fault lies with Apple, and / or the absence of a regulated market for those parts and the necessary documentation.

People will find a way to source what they want. How you approach or deal with those problems is probably a political / ideological thing.
Summers during college, I worked as staff at a summer camp, where part of the "camp experience" was that the kids got to (had to) help wash the dishes are meals. This was usually done by a rota, so a different subset (4 to 5) of the campers (mostly 6-12th grade, but there were adult camps too) helped after each meal, and the staff took turns supervising this.

As such, over the course of a few summers, I have watched 100s (18 meals/week, 10 weeks/ yr, 3 years) of discrete groups of people of varying ages "wash" dishes and can confirm that there is a wide range of dishwashing skills across the following criteria:

- cleanliness (what % of dishes had to be sent back for rewashing because they were too dirty for the sterilizer)

- speed (fast groups would be done in 20-25 minutes. Slow ones could take an hour+, mostly because they would spend time complaining or arguing rather than actually washing anything)

- how much of a mess was made (sink water splashed on the floor, mostly) during the cleaning progress

And our dishes were unbreakable, but if they hadn't been, I'm sure "breakage" would have been a metric too.
> Yes, it's new but it's safe. No one will be surprised or insulted by it.

Are you sure? I was just watching the first episode of Solos where the character says that Trump has defected/escaped to Russia. I won’t call that a safe line..

Similarly they have Borat 2, again not very safe.

Perhaps you’re referring to some other type of content..
The flaw in this survey is that they do not specify what type of average they are referring to.
Right, but comparing opinions in the first place is odd. Is this concept more common than I'm giving credit for? I would assume that everyone thinks they have the best taste in music - if they like something better that would be their taste in music.
SPA exists

Orange warriors: endgame
The average person has less than 2 hands :)
Scholarly works will pretty much never call the mean "the average" without clarifying what they mean either.

As for the implication, a statement along the lines of "the average person" will almost always be interpreted as median, not mean. For example, Jeff Bezos lives in Medina, WA, a remarkably anagrammatic suburb for this demonstration. You can probably understand why saying "the average person in Medina has a net worth of $65,000,000" is both somewhat misleading and remarkably unhelpful for pretty much any purpose you'd want that information.
PlotNeuralNet: Latex code for making neural networks diagrams
> when there is a perfectly good alternative

There is very little cost in simply preventing Apple from taking so many intentionally anti-competitive actions.

It is not about forcing Apple to write software. Instead it is about preventing them from spending so much effort and trying to remove other people's ability to install other app stores.

Allowing other app stores, really would not be a huge burden on Apple, and it would give people a lot of choice.

> should be able to put whatever OS you want on it

That is not really very possible when Apple spends so much effort engaging in illegal anti-competitive practices, to prevent other app stores from being installed.

Finally, even if it were possible/easy to provide jailbreaking software, I think that Apple would almost certainly make serious efforts to prevent people from doing that.

But sure, I agree that game companies, and major tech companies should absolutely take action to provide people with very easy ways of jailbreaking people's phone.

Perhaps if Fortnite was available through Epic provided jailbreaking software, then that would be enough to kickstart things, and cause a bunch of other companies to move off of Apple's app store, and move to the jailbreak only version.

EX: imagine if fortnite provide incentives, like "free vbucks" to a large number of people, in order to get a large amount of people to jailbreak their phone, and then imagine if other companies, like Facebook, worked together on that, until almost everyone had a jailbroken phone.

That could certainly work. But I doubt Apple would just let that happen.
And just under 1 testicle.
yEd will let you do diagrams, doesn't have the zoom feature you want.
One of the editors of that book wrote about Derek Jones’s book “I think (at least I hope) this will influence software engineering education [more] than anything I've ever done”

https://twitter.com/gvwilson/status/1326190553738977281?s=20
This. I closed out of the quiz when I saw that I couldn't answer "close to average, and without enough certainty or precision to guess above or below".
Tech might be like that.

The SV startup bubble is not.
Why Should I Pay to Read This?
Vaccine waitlist Dr. B collected data from millions. But how many did it help?
> No one was competing for fastest single thread because no one needs it.

A big part of the reasons why web applications are so darn fast on the M1 is it’s single-threaded performance. Remember that JavaScript itself is single-threaded
Seems like c# is gaining lots of traction on AOT stuff very soon.
Quest are stand alone devices, you can connect to a computer for high fidelity if desired.
It took me 15 tries to finally pass it with my touchpad. I almost broke out my mouse just to pass!
I really like this book on CQRS & ES: https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Microservices-Event-Driven-...

It’s a really practical treatment of CQRS & ES with JS examples. I had heard about CQRS & ES on HN for years but I had never seen any system that actually used it or any practical examples so this book is amazing cause it takes you through how to build a system using them.
> Number one for first two questions: hiring. Finding solid, dependable people with the right skills and attitude is really, really hard. I probably spend 30-40% of my time on the hiring side of things. We have so much work to do and not enough people to do it, and combining that with the slow rate of inbound high quality candidates means that I have to spend a ton of my time screening and talking to candidates.

Spending 30-40% on hiring is a lot. How is the current compensation and what does your hiring pipeline looks like? Internships? One of the smartest decision I've ever seen was to simply raise initial offers by quite a bit. Suddenly the quality of applicants just jumped.

> Number two problem relating to the above: diversity. It's nigh impossible to find women and other marginalized groups. They're in such high demand and the supply is so low that it's just so hard to hire people and have your team not look like a team of white dudes.

I'm curious why does it matters? Shouldn't folks be hired on their abilities rather than some arbitrary reasons?
Let's say I believe you. My remaining question is: so?
Are friction mounts ever a good idea for critical applications?
I'm not sure how good this advice is, but I think if I was in your situation, I'd find a Silicon Valley lawyer. They'd have the experience with this kind of issue, and would understand the various legal, tax, etc, implications.

I've used Wilson Sonsini (wsgr.com). I can't say if they're better or worse than others.

There are bound to be other suitable firms in NYC, and major entrepreneurial cities worldwide.

Of course, this wouldn't be a cheap solution, but perhaps that's ok given the importance of getting this kind of thing right?

Good luck!
I was thinking that the block of cheese was tracked down at the store by police by it's very unique shape, and fingerprints dusted off of it...
Maybe you aren't a native english speaker, but have you ever heard someone ask you to move over by saying a phrase even remotely like "on your left" ?

If something is "on your left" <side>, I'd hope it should be easy to realize that you should either move to the right, or be aware of someone passing "on your left".
I've seen way too many plates that have been "washed" yet have grime solidified to them, or worse, still damp on them.

Some people really can be worse at washing dishes. But I'm not sure how I'd define "good" or "average".
Does it feel weird writing about yourself in 3rd person?

But ok. We have conflict between people who run freenode for decades and someone who since 2017 owns the freenode name and its DNS.

What do you think will happen? There's already an exodus of Open Source projects (I learned about the drama from Nix). All you will ultimately end up with is the freenode name and database of people's registration emails. Was it worth it?
The url should be updated to the source article

https://windows-internals.com/i-o-rings-when-one-i-o-operati...
I'm an EU citizen and GDPR is one of the reasons why I'm hesitant to run a website. I don't see how you could look at the risk from GDPR and find it reasonable to run it as an individual. An individual is liable for any fines with everything they own. Companies usually cost something to run, even if they only exist to hold something.
A core part of the Mint Sauce aesthetic:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0e/f4/3a/0ef43a1d3656587beaef...

...a cult cartoon sheep and his friends from the most popular UK mountain bike magazine in the 1990s.
Top Lessons I learned while working with Go for two years
I'm sure they were exempted for non-partisan reasons. Disney doesn't own any social media networks, or openly promote anything in the partisan space, which is what I think the law is going after.
Sadly money is not the issue proximity to family is. I'll just hope one day they open an NZ or south east Asia branch.
Thanks!

I agree that the roles in marriage or other long term relationships are less clear than they have been in the past. Overall that's probably a good thing in terms of creating the potential for each person to self-actualize, but as you point out, exactly what role each person expects to have in a marriage is not known without a very, very thorough discussion about each aspect.

What do you think about Suzanne Venker?
This whole post could have been just two pictures. But no, it only includes one picture, of bar ends, not what they’ve been replaced with. I guess I’ll never know.
Paths Aren't Strings (2014)
You're lucky to have encountered such thoughtful people. Not everyone is like that. I'm not sure what your Japanese level is, but exact examples of what I wrote are a search of "町内会ルール トラブル" etc away.

Who accused Japanese of being cowards? People here are raised to avoid conflict and let things go. It's not cowardly, it's a useful way of keeping a community together. Unfortunately, it also a tool for めんどくさい人 to get their own way.
It hit too close to home. It described me and everyone I knew age 22 - 30 in tech to a T. We really aren’t as original as we’d like to believe
"Simple Made Easy" by Rich Hickey:
https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy/
"We should aim for simplicity because simplicity is a prerequisite for reliability. Simple is often erroneously mistaken for easy. "Easy" means "to be at hand", "to be approachable". "Simple" is the opposite of "complex" which means "being intertwined", "being tied together". Simple != easy. ..."
Good question! The code is broken up into two parts: a number, and some words. The number is like a mailbox: you put messages into it, the person you're intending to talk to puts messages into it, (maybe an attacker puts messages into it), everybody can read the messages there.

The words are secret. There's a special cryptographic protocol named PAKE ("Password Authenticated Key Exchange") that tells you what messages to put into the mailbox. The protocol has a lock-step part in the middle, where you don't generate your second message until you've seen the other person's first message (and vice versa).

When the protocol is done, if the two people used the same secret words, they'll wind up with the same secret encryption key, and nobody else will know the key. If they used different words, they'll wind up with random strings. The file transfer uses the shared key to encrypt the bulk data.

Your client will generate a random wormhole code (random words plus server-allocated mailbox number) and run the protocol exactly once. It will generate and send its first message, wait for the partner's first message, then generate and send the second message, wait for the partner's second message, compute the shared key, do a test to see if it matches the other side (send a hash of the key), negotiate a direct connection if possible, then encrypt and transmit the file data.

If an attacker is trying to guess your code, their only option is to pretend to be your intended recipient and follow the same protocol. They watch the server and learn the mailbox number: that part isn't secret. But then, to send their first message, they have to commit to some particular secret words. And they don't get to find out if they were right or not until they see your second message, by which point your client knows that this "one shot" has been used up, and it's either correct (the key-verification hash matches) or it's not (or the attacker disconnects and runs away, in the hopes of getting you to blame a flaky network instead of suspecting an attacker).

If it fails, the client tells you that fact and quits, and you have to re-run the program (getting a brand new random wormhole code) to try again. Which means the attacker is back to square one: they know their first guess was wrong, but now the code is different, so their second guess has exactly the same chances of being right as the first guess.
SK hynix wants to dominate direct time of flight sensor market
His name is Gene Ray.. His name is Gene Ray.. His name is Gene Ray..
My mgr experience is relatively light

But I needed

1. Better predictability about how much new features would cost

2. Ways to limit the soul-crushiness of scrum micromanagement and just management in general

3. Easier/better way to communicate upcoming features, and features once they were actually live. Doing weekly product update emails with screenshots was fine-ish but it was a chore that just took too much time, and was it worth the effort/ROI? Eh.
You’re probably thinking of the Dual Photography work from Stanford (and all the follow-on work): https://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/dual_photography/
>...in general, the sending machine generates and displays the code, which must then be typed into the receiving machine.

So you need to have a secure method of communication to transfer the code? Then why not just use whatever that is to transfer stuff?

How is this end to end encryption without any identity management? How do you know who you are exchanging stuff with? How is this different than just regular encryption?
Quickly running through it I know from memory all but a couple of cubes, all but maybe ten squares, all of the multiplication tables. It would take maybe 30 minutes to get everything down

I'm pretty handy with numbers but nothing special. It doesn't seem like that major a task
I really liked Fleabag. Maisel seemed too pretentious, watched only 2 or 3 episodes. Maybe should try again.
I agree 100% with avoiding compiled frameworks (React/Angular/Svelte, whatever).

But betting on jQuery being around and functional in 10 years is a gamble.

The modern DOM is very user friendly. I'd advocate for skipping any framework and writing plain JavaScript.
Quick Summary: Tube Mastery and Monetization is an excellent course for starting a YouTube channel and making money online I feel Tube Mastery And Monetization is an expensive course ($997), the good thing is that Matt gives 60 days to try it out and ask for a refund in case you’re not satisfied
The course was created by a young man named Matt Par who earns six figures from multiple YouTube channels According to the creator of Tube Mastery and Monetization, this step-by-step course is suitable for anyone interested in making money with YouTube
It should be clear that Tube Mastery and Monetization is for anyone interested in starting a YouTube channel and making money online
VISIT WEBSITE TO LEARN MORE
Yes ... would have been nice to have some sort of explanation for what they actually are (and what the differences between all the "ends" are).
What do you think about Suzanne Venker?

I've never heard of her before. So I don't have any opinions about her.
> Unfortunately 3/4 of those people were actually really bad at their jobs, they just wanted to phone it in. All 3 quit at the one year mark and went to another job. This is their entire resume - a string of one year stints with assumably increasing salaries. Not saying this is representative of minorities but theres a few who have figured out that they can phone it in because they are diversity-quota and milk it to the extreme.

Nobody will acknowledge it publicly but diversity-quota and affirmative action is actually hurting minority candidates. Some places are notorious for lowering the bar for "diverse" applicants. So when faced with a resume, I know that the non-diverse candidate got there on merit alone. But the "diverse" one? Maybe it was merit, maybe it was the quota... Why should I be the one to take the risk?
The movie Klunkerz is free on Amazon Prime right now and has a lot of interviews with the people who were there back then. It's worth a watch if you like bikes.

I think it's a bit more complicated too: they liked to go downhill, but they needed to get back up, and wanted to not have to maintain the bike after one trip down (repack), so bikes that could climb were desirable.
The world's gone mad!
> R: It makes hard things easy and easy things hard

Maybe you'd like this post: http://bioinfomofo.blogspot.com/2014/01/r-hard-things-are-ea...