skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Amazon is under no obligation to delete negative reviews that are "disputed," and I for one have written reviews of horrible products that I would never change nor delete, even for money.

There is a weird defeatist mentality in this thread of "why try anything because sellers are just going to game it," but that's the wrong way to think when you're designing a human system. It's like writing a Constitution, insofar as you have to predict and hedge against the gamesmanship beforehand. If the review mills are in China or other non-Anglophone places, then removing stars and forcing them to be substantive makes it much harder because they would literally have to actually review the product. A reader can't differentiate between five fake stars and five real stars, but would probably be able to differentiate between an empty positive review and a well-presented negative review.
USB is also 5V
If they want to sell thin and light appliances ok.

But give me the choice to buy a repairable long term platform and I’ll stay invested in the ecosystem and pay a premium for thicker repairable MBP
If I wanted to reply to you directly I would have. I did not precisely because I was hoping to avoid defensiveness from any particular poster.

That said the logical place to put your relay would be L1, which is still some 60,000 km from the moon. It's not at all clear that off the shelf Starlink sats would be capable of communicating that distance from their orbit over the moon. You'd also need the earth side of the relay, which also clearly cannot be the existing Starlink cluster.

They'd be foolish to not consider a Starlink derived design or SpaceX as a vender, but I don't think this can be done as inexpensively and quickly as your comment suggests.
The sad thing is Aukey makes pretty uniformly good products; I'd happily disclose that I'd received free products from them if they sent them to me and then write honest reviews (which would probably be 4 or 5 star, at lest for all the Aukey stuff I've bought to date -- cables and batteries and stuff).
Are you missing the utility of transacting on the blockchain in your analysis?
Right. The evidence for his guilt is BS, but the counter-evidence is kind attacking a weird part of the evidence.
Is this covered by Dr. Duehr's Section 2.1 [0] on chimeric work the lab was doing with viruses? That section explains how this looks very different genetically than a natural virus (one copy/paste versus hundreds of scattered little mutations).

His explanations seem to have much more detail than the one you provided.

[0] https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/gk6y95/covid19_did...
They wouldn't shoot it down. Paper handed pilot. The guy is probably going to get the death penalty so looks like Ryanair pretty much killed him.
That's an interesting take on the issue.

As someone who struggled in university in another language, I am glad that this is not acceptable behavior anymore.

For me, this is something deeply personal. It took me a long time to be comfortable speaking another language and I can only imagine how they felt in that moment.

This is a step in the right direction and you should be fighting to keep your job if you find this kind of behavior acceptable.
apple authorized stores and retailers can buy modules or send them to apple
You sound angry. No need to be mean. Also it breaks the guidelines.
Or it's so bad everyone agrees.
Yup, all of life has been reduced to a number. And that number is how much money you can put in some investor's pocket. Derek Sivers says he talked to a taxi driver who preferred the mob to the beancounters. The mob didn't care what you did as long as they got their cut. But the beancounters would relentlessly optimize the amount of money they could squeeze out of the businesses.
That’s because those things make the video more interesting to watch. It’s targeted at a more general audience, not at scientists.
You're right. It's even less than zero sum.
This is an incredibly dishonest argument imo. Ignoring the fact that Grindr saying #BLM while changing a policy doesn't mean "BLM supports it", it's an entirely different policy and situation. Grindr is a dating app that had a race filter. Not a video content website that lets users tag themselves by their race or sexuality if they want, a dating app that allowed people to actively exclude any and all members of a race they did not what to see.

Even if you disagree with what Twitch is doing here, you can't possibly suggest that it's the same thing as what happened with Grindr if you're actually engaging with this discussion in good faith.
Regardless of where the logging is, the can be bugs, and there will be bugs given sufficient amount of time and complexity. It's all about planning for recovery.
Valean's (EU comissioner for transport) take on the matter is bizarre to say the least, too:

"The @Ryanair flight took off just now from Minsk bound for Vilnius. Great news for everyone especially the families and friends of people onboard."

https://twitter.com/AdinaValean/status/1396513415007506432

"Everyone"??
Is this possible if I have only an integrated graphics card?
I believe there is a market opportunity for something similar, but where someone else can helicopter to watch your application attempts.

It's likely not relevant to the sorts of jobs HN readers do, but in many countries, unemployment benefits can be tied to the beneficiary making positive efforts to find a job. Proving your efforts currently involves a lot of ad-hoc copying of emails and screenshots.

Likewise parents compelling little Johnny to get his A into G and get out there applying for jobs.

The interesting thing (or cautionary thing depending on pov) is that services like this have potential mega clients like national governments. One deal like that can make or break you.
Yes, there is. 3 diodes and 3 capacitors. But the catch is that the output is going to be 930 Vcc instead of just 310 Vcc. It's called Vcc multiplier and you can easily reach thousands of volts this way - that's how the police teasers work, they have a small DC to AC converter and then use this kind of multiplier to shock people by driving 25K Vcc, but the intensity is around 10 nA (if it would be 1 mA the teaser would kill instantly).

https://www.electronicshub.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Vo...
Like Fran: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FTermh1w_0A
Clickbait is more about titles and thumbnails and less about the content itself. The content of this video is hardly what I would consider clickbait.
Imagine a peer goes offline and stuff happens on the network while its offline, when the peer goes back online what state does it follow, remember that it is a decentralized network what peer does it trust? This is where the chain of verifiable transactions come in. Also with this setup it is kind of easy to prevent double spending.

> BTW cash does not have a recorded Tx history

Sorta... The central banks know every coin that has been created and notes that have been printed. When you fill in your Tax forms you are creating this Tx history manually.
And it gave many more people the chance to make it from place A to place B in the process.
Sucrase – Super-Fast Babel Alternative
https://bellard.org/tinyemu/ (riscvemu)
Quick blood-typing device can help bleeding patients en route to the ER
Eh, we looked on the east side. To each their own, but it felt lacking to us. I spent a great decade in Northern New England before heading west for a career, and I'll probably end up back there one day, but I value the diversity and even a bit of the grit Seattle has. I don't live in Belltown, so I find the city to be pretty clean and safe.

This isn't a swipe at Bellevue, it's just not for us. That was probably a swipe at Belltown though :D
> And yet it’s apparently insecure for me to buy a Kindle book with the exact same mechanism in the exact same app? Get the fuck out of here.

Gonna play the devil's advocate here.

If I pay for a physical good, I have an expectation of continued use of that physical good absent of the use the technology medium I used to pay for it. If I buy a physical book and Amazon shut down, I can still read the book.

If I pay for a digital good that uses Apple's hardware in some shape or form (Kindle is a weird grey area because you could technically use an Amazon Kindle device, but that is an edge case) then giving Apple money provides an expectation that they continue to commercially support App Developers. A great example - App Store guidelines that enforce a yearly update (or whatever the cadence is) to the app store so that developers don't get lazy and their apps break with new releases of iOS. I think this is effectively what Cook is saying - we need an economic incentive to keep app developers honest and in a symbiotic relationship with them.
On one hand, the security checklists are laughably insufficient, you can tick all the boxes and still have systems with as many holes as Swiss cheese.

On the other hand, so many real breaches have happened because very basic things weren't done, and a basic checklist would have shown that they aren't done. But of course, that checklist would not cause the organization to provide the resources and motivation to actually fix the issues.

The big problem with checklists is that organizations inherently don't really want to invest to fix these problems, they have other priorities, and if someone else forces a checklist on them, then they often will explicitly prioritize ticking off the boxes (with any caveats they can negotiate or hide) at the expense of actual security.
Right to repair would actually ease this burden: Apple manufactures very few components on its devices. Apple prevents its suppliers from selling to third parties (which wouldn’t necessarily be a repair shop but someone like digikey or mouser) of some pretty basic components that do not contain any real secret sauce (we are talking about things like voltage regulators here)

The auto industry has widespread part available for decades with no ill effects.
That is not unique to brick and mortar. Amazon could stop commingling its inventory with third part inventory, and Amazon has the ability to curate the products it sells. But Amazon chooses not to do that. Similarly, when I buy a product from Walmart for delivery to my house, it's curated despite brick and mortar being zero percent of the equation.
Given how easy it is to trick users, i feel like that's a decent trade-off. Its untennable for amazon maybe, but every sketchy app in the world processing credit cards as a normal thing would lead to a lot of phising.
Maybe the German version of kurzgesagt or Technikfaultier for some tech reviews , other than that I don’t really sorry. The other German youtubers I occasionally watch all speak English in their videos (Sabine hossenfelder for example).
Well.. you could still limit certain APIs to official "app store" signatures, and in fact I guarantee that Apple will take this tactic and it will take further legal wrangling to deal with the overstepping they will no doubt do.

And on a more base level, Apple has overplayed their hand for far too long for me to be very sympathetic to their arguments. The app store is still loaded with scams, they still deny things for arbitrary and inconsistent reasons with little-to-no explanation, and they've had years to clean this up. It's not 2007 anymore.

Apple isn't acting in good faith. They do not deserve the benefit of the doubt.
How about a feature to collect and present keywords in saved job ads so as to highlight those skills or experience worth most to review, learn and (in preparation for an interview) verbally recite about? E.g., 5 out of 6 saved ads mention Java, 3 out of 6 mention HTML, and 1 mentions machine learning. Then your app would help the user discover what is worth most spending time on in preparation for a potential interview and help to organize the time and notes about that preparation (in the latter case, an example would be fetching common interview questions for Java, then coaching the user by having a mock interview with feedback).
does the FDA not get a fee to review and approve drugs? is it not the exclusive arbiter of approved drugs in the US?

ignoring the for-profit corp vs govt regulatory body statutory difference, there isn't much different in operation.
Don't assume blockchains are bitcoin or BTC like systems.

I talk about the "current and undisputed or better indisputable (final) state". Bitcoin does not have this. Hence it can not function without history. This is a property of BTC not one of blockchains in general.

Plenty other systems have a current state and a final state and there is no "better state" that can comer around and replace it. Final really means final. Its often called a closed ledger.
Other systems have checkpoints and what not to reach a similar goal.

BTCs "final" is just to wait some blocks its never final its just becomes incredibly unlikely to change the longer you wait. This is objectively worse than having a final state and on top of that it requires the history rather than just the last final state.

>Why should we trust a state created from thin air that has no proof of how it was created? That's just a distributed database, which has is uses, but it's not a distributed blockchain.

You have no choice. Either you agree with the current final state or you dont use the blockchain. Your choice is to use it or not. You choice is not to validate or not or validate and fix something if its wrong.

The act of validating doesn't do anything. No matter what your validating gives you in the end you can only accept the current final state of the running network or not use it at all.

Also its not created out of thin air. It was validated by the code. If there is a mistake it is there because of the code people used back when it happened. If you were there running your node it would have made the same mistake. whats the point to find it now? (beside the fact that it was already found and fixed) It doesn't change the state the state is final. Bugs happen.
If you assume cheating however then well you should assume someone would have screamed back when it happens so you would already know that someone cheated somehow. Whats the point of validating it? you already know you dont want to use that chain. Zero reason to detect the cheating yourself.

We know pretty well from all incidents where blockchains had to be "fixed" there is no way someone would find an unknown incident by the placebo validation act.
Well, in theory the people starving are not under proper capitalism. Usually they're under some corrupt government that doesn't let small businesses thrive. You can't open businesses in those poor countries like you can in the US. Think about all the immigrants that are fighting to come to the US, and many of them end up having their own small business (many of which unfortunately had to close during last year, but that's a different matter).

I don't disagree about the rampant inequality at the global scale, but the solution is not clear and definitely not simple, especially when factoring different nations, different peoples and cultures and styles of living. Ultimately capitalism is solving some problems, and I'm not sure that the problems it is not solving, are the ones it is creating. In other words, maybe these problems exist despite capitalism, and we need systems on top of it, not a replacement.
Experienced well-being rises with income, even above $75k per year [pdf]
Considering that most if not all Europe to Asia flights go over Russia, it will be awfully long escorts and Russia will 10x cost too. Besides that Russia has nothing to do with current incident.
Many of the sounds used in Minecraft came from Freesound[1].

[1]: https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/attribution/sound
Would it? Its not like iphone's are the only game in town.
Wouldn’t each shard itself be made up of thousands of nodes and thus not easily taken down? And there would be incentive to join the hampered shard to repair it given joining nodes would have a larger share of the hashing power than in non-hampered shards.
That's... not how things work. Generally electrolytic capacitor lifetime halves for every 10°C temperature increase.

Ref:

http://www.rubycon.co.jp/en/products/alumi/pdf/life.pdf

https://www.digikey.dk/Web%20Export/Supplier%20Content/CDE_3...

https://jianghai-europe.com/wp-content/uploads/Jianghai-Euro... (page 9)
No. runIO' does not define PutStrLn, it translates PutStrLn; there’s a difference. I can write and compile all the IO' code I want without runIO' ever existing, and it has the semantics it has as a data structure built from pure functions. I can write a pure function that computes which effects would happen for a given IO' action for a given sequence of inputs, and I can evaluate this function within the GHC REPL. None of this receives any special treatment from the optimizer.

-- action -> input -> (return, remainingInput, output)
simulateIO' :: IO' a -> [String] -> (a, [String], [String])
simulateIO' (Pure a) input = (a, input, [])
simulateIO' (Bind ma f) input = (b, input'', output ++ output')
where (a, input', output) = simulateIO' ma input
(b, input'', output') = simulateIO' (f a) input'
simulateIO' (PutStrLn s) input = ((), input, [s])
simulateIO' GetLine (line : input) = (line, input, [])

λ> simulateIO' someCode ["Anders"]
((),[],["What is your name?","Hello, Anders!"])

The fact that the real IO receives special treatment from the GHC optimizer is an implementation detail that’s necessary for the correctness of GHC’s optimizations, but assuming GHC was implemented correctly, this has no visible effect on how programs are evaluated. If you actually run them, the resulting effects should agree with the predictions of the pure function above.
Dystopian is the word for it. It's fucking insane that you can't talk about why it's priced that way.

Of course, if you include the fee explicitly then people will think to look elsewhere and realize they can avoid it. But that's fine, taking a cut is stupid anyway. Really just seems like the app should be paying more to Apple (like a physical store paying rent on real estate) up front and getting the full price of their purchases anyway.
> I am perfectly happy upgrading the memory on my MacBook Air with a reflow air station rather than swapping out some dims if it means my laptop is half as thick and twice as rugged

The right to repair laws Louis Rossmann advocates for do not require manufacturers to change their designs to make repairs easier. Apple would still be allowed to solder memory on their devices without any repercussions.

> I’m also just as happy dropping my phone off at a corner shop to replace the glass (while preserving the same electronics) using an industrial laminating machine.

Louis Rossmann owns and operates the kind of "corner shop" you're referring to. He certainly isn't demanding everyone repairs their own devices. He's just advocating for the ability for owners and third parties to repair devices without interference from manufacturers.

> When I go to a corner store in the US the “solution” to swap the whole sub-assembly (glass+electronics) not just glass in case of a screen repair for $100+

That's because US shops cannot legally acquire parts and schematics necessary to perform component-level repair. Technicians in Chinese street markets aren't worried about legal retaliation from US-based companies. Right to repair would ensure owners and third parties could legally acquire the parts and schematics for repairs. They don't even need the manufacturer to provide the parts and schematics; they just need to be protected from legal retaliation.
The Morales incident wasn't simply one country choosing to deny airspace. It was a hegemonic superpower using it's leverage to create a wall of un-passable countries, and then having the plane boarded and searched before it was allowed to take off again. Belarus's version is a weapon of the weak to the same or very similar end.
Wasn't that just the latest iteration of "EU pretends no other country in the world has similar national security laws to its own member states", under which multiple EU-US agreements on data sharing have already been struck down and technically any EU business probably can't use any US-based service ever if that involves sharing of personal data? Did this one get to the end of the process and result in a real fine or other penalty?
>Ever wondered why Calendar components in Microsoft's WinForms framework does not go further back then 1753?

I hope it is not indicative of a dull and incurious mind that I have never wondered this.
Intonation, body language, etc... Generally transcripts don't make good reads. Well written articles/stories are a different thing.

As for summaries, long form / short form is an endless debate. Some people say summaries are worthless because you don't get the context and nuances. Others say long form articles (and videos) are a waste of time. Most people are somewhere between these two extremes.
Ok, thank you for the response, very interesting. Good luck!
It’s not the best system for everyone, but it’s the best system we have. When other systems prove practical at smaller scales, there will be pressure to change. But of all the economic experiments we’ve run in history, capitalism is the only one that produces decent amounts of freedom and economic growth.
What stops the authority from blocking internet access they can't spy on..
you are most likely correct!
I read ´Training took 1.82 minutes with 256 fourth-gen TPUs’ to mean Using all 256 TPU it took 1.82 wall clock time to do the training not 466 minutes.

This mean each TPU contributed to (1/256) assuming it scale linearly.

Even if it doesn’t the 256 TPU ran in parallel not sequentially right ?
My favorite analogy is log structured merge trees.. Which seems to be a rather fitting for Dorodango.
Which itch was not solved by Echarts?
I think you've misunderstood what I meant; I mean incentives for businesses to pay their people more (or to offer something like apprenticeships).

As for status not being lowered by words, we'll have to agree to disagree. No one in practice (in the US) calls medical school "vocational school" precisely because it is a phrase associated with lower status work in the trades.
How does the saying go? "If you never upset anyone, it means that you haven't done anything noteworthy" or something like that?
In the summer I have been there and it is miserable. You are standing in dirt in the heat... in the open. And I never found anything.

But it is an interesting place. There is a moment when I looked up and stared at the dirt field and thought. There is a volcano underneath us... I am standing in a crater.

It is fun but work.
Oatly is now more overvalued than WeWork
I’m not a medical person but I am an electrician.

If you receive a shock, if can affect the rhythm of your heart and cause problems later. We’re taught to go and get an ECG after receiving a shock. Like jump in the car and go to the doctor or hospital and have someone else drive you.
If you’ve received a shock - go get checked out.
Guessing that those accumulated digital assets couldn’t be wiped away with a key press and instead transferred to someone else.

Still nothing stopping WOW from simply ignoring those assets as part of account deletion process, rendering them worthless.
> Its motivation is profit and shareholder value, not some semblance of fairness or a good society.

It derrives profit from iphones being relatively secure, which in practise means making it difficult for average users to install stupid things like malware.

Just because corporate overlords have a profit motive, doesn't mean it can't overlap with more alturustic motives. Being an evil villian typically pays well in the short term but not the long term (plenty of exceptions)
Because capital is private, so non-profit-motive-driven, cooperative enterprises cannot access the capital necessary to operate.
I grew up in Indiana, and went with a friend on a road trip back in the 1980s. I remember it as a hot dusty field where you dig with your friends, all get tired, and end up buying some quartz crystals at a rock shop on the way home.