skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I got rejected from many behavioral interviews. In a similar vein, the main thing that helped me was the realization that I had to work on my personality as a whole and then the interviews automatically got better. Especially making projects that showed that I cared about contemporary issues was a big plus.

In general: you want to be very humble and appreciative but also enthusiastic about the role. Try to talk about a project/hobby that intersects with the work they do. Try to start off average but once they get to know you, you want to be more friendly/likable (don’t give it your all from the start, it might make you look desperate).
Also sometimes it’s not your behavior & there’s nothing you can do but to find another role. In my experience I always found a better job when I was looking for longer so it’s all good.
I think it’s still used a lot. The startup I worked with that used php (5 years ago) just got bought.

I think it’s pretty stable and so doesn’t get a lot of mindshare. It not what the cool startups are using but it’s still used. With a framework like Laravel or symfony I enjoy working with it.
While the detail provided is plentiful, the article reads less like a technical guide and more like a story of how windows devs learned the caveats and tradeoffs inherent to dynamic linking/loading. I'm glad it was written and I'm glad to read it, but I'm a little surprised they chose dynamic over static linking. Yes, by default on most major linux distributions, you're at the mercy of the runtime loader. You either live with the complications associated with shared objects, or you change your linker invocations to avoid them.
I'll grant you the loan repayment, but the other things aren't expenses. "Lost income" is a psychological artefact, not anything concrete. It's a result of comparing against some hypothetical ideal financial situation. The same for "catching up" on retirement savings.

The concrete part is that people with that level of income (large, but not so large as to make all problems disappear) know that to be comfortable in the future they need to save a big chunk of their income. The people living with much lower incomes just don't have that luxury at all. Which is kind of the point - it's totally different worlds.
Should be possible to run an Atari ST core on it, too.
I SOLD all my Bitcoins IT’S OVER
I don't think one should exclude a viable option for profit, just because of some poor actors.

I think rent can be a beautiful way to earn profit and to connect with people.

If you are earning with rent it doesn't necessarily mean that you're evil and that you're abusing your "customers" with unreasonable demands or unexpected surprises.
It's one of these situations where the correlation seems obvious, but the causation seems very hard to establish. How world changed so drastically over the past century that it always seems a bit strange to pin our current woes on one single factor, "empirical evidence" be damned.
I'm not sure what the distinction is. Mainstream languages like Java have taken a subset of OOP because that's the subset they needed when they were being defined initially.

But we're slowly evolving towards a concurrent async message passing models, and they're slowly being integrated into mainstream OOP languages.

In effect what we call by various names like SOA, microservices, EDA, actors, and so on, is basically OOP at scale.
This emperor-or-minion dichotomy is exactly what I'm objecting to. It's both morally repugnant and entirely false.

Having started a few companies, I can promise you that it is not yours "to do with as I please, to command forth to fulfill my vision". What you'll actually be doing is desperately seeking to satisfy customers and pacify investors while working hard to keep good staff. Once you get a good business going, you'll have more of a margin to indulge any tastes you have for being a tinpot dictator. But that's always a personal indulgence that in the long term detracts from building the business. Look at WeWork as an example: that guy was absolutely in the "do with as I please, to command forth to fulfill my vision" mold. And how many billions has he lost?
Best Baker's Companion App
The ability to save money relies on the ability to "reduce your lifestyle costs" by cutting certain expenses (raising income is oftentimes not realistic. Poor People in general are not lazy)

Below a certain limit there is no way to do that without loosing more money like getting rid of your car.

And it's not only the obvious things. An acquaintance of mine was a single mother (ex-husband in prison) and had to decide whether she could afford to allow her children to take a bath in the bathtub.

People underestimate how much such forced decisions can damage mental health and the ability to work.

Many wealthy-but-broke people still have assets (like significant equity in a house) that give them runway (sometimes years) to sort things out and make life impacting decisions (such as moving far away to reduce expenses or contacting a friend from before to find you job).
I meant expressive enough that you don't need DocBlocks as often. We're nowhere near being done, PHP still lacks proper Generics and Algebraic Data Types. Recently we got Union Types (8.0) and will soon have Enums (8.1).

If you really needed generics today, you can do it with DocBlocks and static analyzers like PHPStan: <https://phpstan.org/blog/generics-in-php-using-phpdocs>. I'm hopeful that in the future, you won't need a DocBlock for that.

As for ADTs, there's some on going discussions here: <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/adts> which would build upon the existing support for Enums (8.1). I'm really looking forward to being able to have something resembling Optional/Maybe.

I'm by no means saying what PHP has is enough today, just that it's less limited than it was a few years ago. It'll be even less limited in the future.
I'm not trying to make a moral point here. For the purposes of trying to predict the outcome of the interaction of governments and bitcoin, what governments consider legitimate is an appropriate thing to consider. That doesn't mean I agree or disagree with individual US laws.

[Edit: Actually matthewdgreen is right in a sibling comment, that the argument can be made without considering laws as such]
> The main point here is that career decisions are highly personal and one person’s hell is another person’s heaven.

This. From "depends on person" perspective I fully agree with you, from monetary perspective I agree with the author.

After years of working for startups, now success for me means, financially independent to work on whatever I enjoy doing, not some OKR, KPI set by person who already achieved their success story.

Haven't reached my success. I was hesitant to do leetcode and join FAANG companies 10-15 years ago, worked for bunch of startups as an employee and contractor, all failed, financially I still depend on big boss, and even can be laid off if layoff season starts again.

FAANG are not only more stable, but total compensation for 10 years can easily beat 1B$ exit startups, assuming you get 0.1% of equity there
Carl Jung’s Description of Types
I don't think you understood what I meant, I probably wasn't clear.

There is no threat of violence if you choose not to work. The violence is if you try to subsist to your means without engaging with the economic system. So you are forced to engage in the economic system as it is.

As for debt slavery, I'm simply saying that the arguments used to justified exploitative labour relations are exactly the same as were used to justify debt slavery.

If you grow cucumbers in your garden, your first need to buy the land for the garden, which was ultimately stolen from someone else. But growing a cucumber in your garden is not private property in absentia, it's private property in present use.
YES! No to neutralize the opposition from the petrochemical industries, plastic, companies like coke which literally say " as long as there is recycling, pepper disposal of plastic is on the customers". Companies like that are rich by offloading the production cost in the environment which people have to pay
> Obviously, you can't undestant what you do not experience yourself

Sure you can. That's what imagination and empathy are for.

I've never been truly poor myself (though I did grow up what I would term lower-middle-class), but I can understand it, because I've read about it, I know the basic concepts of what the differences are between my situation and that situation, and I'm good at putting myself in someone else's shoes and seeing things from their perspective.
How does that address the problem that it is not possible to perform the experiments necessary to make the strong claims?

This is not an issue specific to this idea in popular psychology, but in general to almost any field with difficult to define parameters.
that. The main task of the reviewers should be to re-run all the experiments on their own computer and check the results.
What's so great about Debt: The first 5000 Years? I've tried to read it but had to abandon it after first two chapters as it seemed way too emotionally pushy for my tastes. It gives many examples of poor indebted countries and demonizes money lenders, but nowhere in these lines does author elaborate how would those countries fare if they weren't offered credit in first place. OK, I get it that lenders impose harsh conditions, but why is it in any way OK to not repay the debt, and in turn not receive any credit offer in future as it becomes clear that you won't repay? People keeps recommending the book but I found its arguments overly populist and ignoring obvious counterarguments.
It depends what you value..

Early in my career, I wanted experience with as many parts of the business as possible, I wanted to work on really hard problems and build really cool stuff, and I could take risks.. I was young and perfectly comfortable with a bad work/life balance because I had no other commitments.

At this stage in my career, I value stability and work/life balance much more, and while I am still looking to solve hard problems, it's not at the urgent pace that startups demand, and how I define "hard problem" has changed too.
I think you might be mistaken. The study of Nature/Science papers was "Evaluating replicability of social science experiments published in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015"
1. they don't need to agree. you decide who you trust.

2. the msn example is about nyt loudly and visibly updating a report. I don't see how that is an example about the claim. other than msn thinks it's a good idea to misrepresent a visible and cleanly tagged article update as "quiet update"
Enter and return, while often interchangeable are not always and some keyboards have separate enter and return keys.

Also, some keyboards like sun's and some serial terminals had dedicated copy, paste, &c.
Bearing risk is not rent seeking, passive income does not imply rent seeking
> Rich people are just as likely to steal if they think they can get away with it.

This assumes, that the motivation for stealing is .... the expectation to get away with it.

What if one of the two parties (rich, poor) has another motivation like... hunger... :-)

Would that scew the statistics ?

How and why do people write these idealist but still obviously false claims, like here: "The rich and poor are just equally (likely to steal)" ?
I'd translate it to portuguese like "Não há homem que não torne o mundo melhor" -> "there is no man that doesn't make the world better".
There's a command that uses podman command to use docker.
But I can't find it right now.
It is neutral by definition. And it is also a very good approach as it automatically filters out wokes from the potential candidate pool (as we've seen in Basecamp's example it also works wonders on your current workforce).
What gold is good for is a neutral settlement asset between nations with imbalanced trade. But not at a fixed currency price by weight, rather floating in fiat price, which forces nations to re-balance to more consumption or more production depending on if they have large trade surpluses or large trade deficits. Thus the pitfalls of either extreme can be re-balanced by covering trade imbalances with gold reserves which also devalue currencies and force domestic production, or increase them and force consumption.

Keynes's Bancor[1] was essentially this idea, but Bretton Woods conference rejected this proposal. Oil exporting and general surplus nations, like Russia and China, have been moving in this direction by reserving more gold in recent years (look up various European nation increasing gold purchases since 2008) likely to move towards a more multilateral system of settling trade imbalances with a neutral settlement asset, rather than stockpiling fiat currency or fiat currency debt "assets" created in unrestricted supply by one nation, who forces world to then use this inflating currency to purchase energy... which equals future inflation for these nations that can't print it themselves.

It is also useful as a personal "store of value" to avoid "saving" in a depreciating fiat currency, along with other "hard" assets.

But gold or hard money cannot be the unit of account or medium of exchange for national commerce. Credit/fiat is better for this.

This is why some have argued that there's always been and probably always will be a need for "two monies". Bimetallism was an embodiment of this principle. Here is a very thorough discussion of this concept[0]. Ctrl+F "two monies" for specifics, but the whole article is insightful.

This dynamic also presents itself in debates about crypto currencies purpose to function as a high throughput transaction currency or a more inert store of value. Because of the inefficiencies of blockchain and Bitcoin's finite quantity, it cannot function as a unit of account or high volume transactions currency; fiat and fiat derivative platforms (Cash App, Paypal, credit cards, etc) are much better at serving this function. Trying to shoe-horn hard money into soft money use cases (or vice versa, saving in fiat) doesn't work. One form of "money" can't satisfy these two distinct functions.

[0] http://fofoa.blogspot.com/2011/05/return-to-honest-money.htm...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor
It's not from a single book, I've personally come to the conclusion after reading about various topics on both science and philosophy, as well as thinking about some current trends in science and engineering. I can't really give you a simple answer, I'm still studying and trying to figure this out.

But to give you a bunch of unorganized links if you want to follow a similar line of thought:

- Cybernetics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybernetics)

- Systems theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_theory)

- Seeing how theoretical physics has been left behind in progress for many decades in favor of fields like chemistry, biology, and earth sciences - which all seem to use those discovered laws of physics, and is increasingly trying to arrive at conclusions through computer simulation of those physical laws.

- Thinking about the relationship between computer graphics (which brings the virtual to the real) and computer vision (which brings the real to the virtual) - and its interplay between the two.

- Continental philosophy (I'm currently reading Batallie's The Accursed Share and it's giving lots of good insights about 'societal' systems and the general economy. Deleuze & Guattari also talks a lot about cybernetics, although their books are notoriously hard to decipher and I've only read second-hand explanations of it. And a few writings from Nick Land (preferably something before his breakdown) seems quite illuminating. Marx also seems to have some surprising proto-insights about the cybernetics of capitalism - it's an area of research I might delve into it later.)
Ask HN: What should I learn next; Rust or Elixir?
My situation is that I must build an API soon and I've got complete freedom of choice regarding how to do it (this is part of the deal). I've decided to take this opportunity to learn something new. Both Rust and Elixir look really interesting and fun to me. However I was wondering what opinions people have regarding which one may be more advantageous to me as a remote developer that doesn't like front end programming. Thanks!
Great way to shutdown an argument without contributing anything. Shame someone for not thinking like you do.

I feel like I am the victim if I'm the person considered to be "in the wrong" because I won't use this new language other people are creating and recreating all the time. I didn't have to worry about compelled speech like that 10 years ago.
uMatrix has been discontinued. The repository has been archived.

It was great but it was also a dread, even after training it. If you visit mostly the same sites I guess it's fine.
I think "Everyone can be rich", extremely depends on your definition of rich.

And that definition not only varies from person to person but also due to geography and other factors.
> The author likely comes from a structured, religious background

How on God's green Earth did you jump to that conclusion? Can't it just be a matter of personal preference, as you said it yourself?
Like the WMD in Iraq and the smoking gun?
Define rich? I've always loved the quote:

Some people are so poor, all they have is money ― Patrick Meagher

You can be rich and have poor taste, rich and alone, rich and never have the simple experiences of everyday 'poorer folk'.
As a parent, it seems teaching empathy without direct experience, is difficult, if not impossible.

One solution that can work if forcing a person into direct contact with someone experiencing the problem. I see this class politics, and I see this in my job as a Product Designer.
Enjoy working on your hobby on the government's $1,000/month because that's what any remotely plausible basic income is going to be like.
Quick Survival Guide to Tmux
There are different levels of rent seeking. For example I don't think there's anything wrong with loaning money for people who will use it to start a productive business.

There's a lot wrong with corruption, where laws and politicians are bought with money. There's a lot of wrong with regulatory capture, where market regulation is distorted in a way that makes competition against the status quo next to impossible.
What do you mean by collisions?

As described, arithmetic coding does a 1:1 mapping of input-output, while NN deterministically generates probability distribution for the arithmetic coding. Conceptually, it would work with any deterministic / reproducible function, even a PRF or a running hash, though the point of NN is to give good distribution estimates for interesting inputs, thus short output from the arithmetic encoder.

Presumably, there are some limited choices during coding, which then need to be encoded as well.
Personally, I use a combination of tesseract and MacOS' screen capture to achieve the same thing. Very handy to have if you use an app like BetterTouchTool to run it with a quick hotkey.

https://gist.github.com/jerieljan/f86843388c4ee9ecbc44d687a3...
The financial planning bit is meant to come before one has a list of expenses to "figure out" (like home+leased car+children).
It's in euros though, much less likely that someone on that salary in Europe would be truly struggling, compared to someone living in the USA.
What about decompression speed ?
I think the negative aspect of rent-seeking is not so much passivity, but the lack of value added.
I’d personally look at job trends, particularly remote jobs. Which one has more job listings, and does one have a better growth trajectory than the other? That’s how I’d inform the decision were I in your shoes.
The issue isn't that Iran is doing bad things directly, it's their proxies forces. You can Google and find a source you may trust more, but here's two[0][1]. Iran was taking much of the money the US was paying them to not build nukes, and funneling it into proxy forces to further their interests in the region. You can dig deeper to understand what those proxies have been doing in the region.

[0] https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/irans-islamist-proxies

[0] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-iraq-proxies-insight...
fuck being rich. I just want to be able to afford a small house to live with my family. If I saved 100% of my salary for a decade I still would't be able to afford half of it.
Is having roommates not common where you live?
Sadly most of the research on adapting teaching styles to students learning styles has been completely relegated to special needs education in most countries. The Potential in Neurodiversity is not really appreciated in mainstream Education where it is mainly seen as a disability or hindrance to following a standard curriculum.
But the more we learn about the brain and cognitive development the clearer it becomes, that Neurodiversity is not an aberration but a fundamental feature of human evolution. An educational System rooted in the 19th century based on a fordistic conception of Students and Teachers does not align with contemporary research and will have to be thoroughly disrupted.
I don't think btrfs is a shining example of Linux stability/reliability. NixOS gives me rollbacks using XFS for root.
Programming Style Guidelines
Aerion Supersonic shuts down, ends plan to build silent high speed business jets
This is how the rich people hide behind whatever reason they find to justify hurting and killing random innocent people including "the Poors" and the plebs.

Now they want to be judge, jury and executioner. This should be banned
If poverty were an easily solved problem then it wouldn't be a problem at all and we wouldn't be having this discussion. That is the gap between sympathy versus empathy and differences in economic opportunity versus disadvantages of social pressures/reinforcement.
Not sure why this should be a valid conclusion from my statement; but undoubtedly yet another speculative (and even wrong) opinion.
It seems small, but it's a big distinction between hero worship and role model!

'Hero Worship' is about elevating someone to a categorically higher level. This can lead to thinking you could never be as good, taking everything they say as gospel, defending even their poor opinions, etc.

If we -worship- 10x developers, you can maybe better see how with the emphasis on that word things can get pretty toxic pretty quick. For example, I think many would agree HR disputes should not take talent level as an input, but if one of those people isn't even a mortal...

---

None of this is necessary to have a role model, or precludes celebrating someone for doing excellent work as is this case.
This must be a riff on the article I read a couple of months ago that described Iceland's aluminum industry as a means of exporting its geothermal energy. It's the only plausible argument I have seen for Bitcoin's intrinsic value.