skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can still do this today though its a bit indirect.

> Your Library --> Artists --> Click artist --> Liked Songs.

The changes to library these services have made for simplification in my opinion are the wrong direction. I want more controls on how to filter/sift through my library, NOT less.

Edit: Also, we're slowly diluting the definition of album. The industry is going away from it because artist release frequency becomes more important in the streaming system. You have to stay relevant by releasing new music so album's are fewer songs with less duration. Lower duration also increases revenue because we pay per stream not by mean time listened to artist. :/
And half of the country thinks the Mueller report showed Trump was undeniably guilty. The truth is in between.
Fair comment. But when Jira is slow it’s getting stuff off the server that made it slow, the Monday slowness was more like a webpage with loads of ads - it slowed down my whole machine and everything was semi unresponsive.
> areas of the world where the map itself is political

That would be everywhere. Even the most boring border in the world is political: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_areas_disputed_by_Ca...
>Do you have any examples of shorts actually help uncover fraud

just from recent memory:

1. Muddy Waters Research reporting on Luckin Coffee

2. Hindenburg Research reporting on Nikola

3. Citron Research reporting on Valeant Pharmaceuticals
Do you really need an explanation on why China historically doesn't like to share data?
Oh you're completely missing the nuisance of what we just learned.

Sure, he's been talking short since September, but the size of his position has grown considerably since then - almost certainly timing the S&P inclusion (sorry index investors, you quite literally paid the top price for a stock that has lost almost 45% since you bought it).

He's almost certainly made a killing with his position and the beauty is we don't even know what it is today. He could have realized hundreds of millions in gains, or he could have them all still open.

If he has the position from the filings - just today, when Tesla is down $22 - he has made over $16 million dollars in unrealized gains.

It will be hilarious watching the Musk Zealots crying to have Elon tweet something to fraudulently try to pump the stock price and try to trigger a squeeze. Meanwhile they don't realize he's doing this with options, not shorting directly.
The P/E is probably still skewed. They're accounting for the robotaxi windfall which is leveraging their buyback program, kind of ridiculous considering the constant delays and skepticism surrounding their fully autonomous system and then you've got to consider the regulatory hurdles that are inevitably going to develop after deployment.
App Pays Users in Crypto to Name-Drop Brands
Or for in-ear users it will be AirPod Pro Max.
Note that all entries that have the format Vinyl on that site can be ignored, as the dynamic range calculations don't work well on audio recorded from vinyl records.
Might makes right, as always ...
I bet it's more to do with rate of growth than total volume.

I believe that one of the cognitive dissonances with people who think a lot of code is good news is that they become overwhelmed by how much they would actually write if they stuck to their convictions and so they start using TODOs to make themselves feel better about doing the wrong thing.

Projects that grow slower I suspect have fewer TODOs.
It might not help at all from a density perspective. The IO die has a lot of pads along the edges that can't be shrunk which puts a lower limit on die area. I wouldn't be surprised if the logic areas in the middle already have a lot of blank space at 14nm. You used to see the same thing with north bridge chips, and that's basically what the IO die is anyway.
Forbidding sniff tests from being used as evidence themselves or cause for further searches is likeliest to result in a just outcome. Sometimes the best answer to who watches the watcher is to simplify by eliminating the position.
A. You only notice it when it is done badly, not when it works.

B. Repetition is everything. How many people watch RT and its wild mix of true stories (copy&pasted) and blatant propaganda and soak it up? Or vaccine conspiracies in mommy Facebook groups? Badly done propaganda repeated 1000x still works.
OK, so add it to your list then.
It's a classical (and, in this case, fortunate) case of wrong incentive structure. People who direct these propaganda campaigns are not rewarded by polling Americans for their perception of China. Presumably, they are rewarded by their superiors looking at beautifully curated Powerpoint slides.

You don't want to be the guy accused of using an expression that can be interpreted as China conceding $(some utterly inconsequential point). Guess how they will behave.

* That said, I'm sure some brilliant minds inside CCP already know this and are working on improving their methodology ...
"by definition" of what? Carbon neutral or sailing ship? Neither term is defined in the article, and neither interpretation makes any sense.
he was not wrong though, just too early
USA is the only country on earth that recognises all of Israel’s territory claims.
Ah, I see, the limit was revised from 2m to 0.4m, but not dropped entirely (and Wikipedia needs an update). There's still an Israel-specific restriction, but it's significantly less draconian:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/21/2020-15...
Constexpr.js Hello World
Well then why isn't the tech executed in EU? If it was about being in Asia, then why are they bringing it to the US?
Because there's never been a country named "Palestine" and as such it's hard to make agreements with a country that doesn't exist.
https://zoom.earth/

not quite real time (I'm not sure if that's even possible) but this is quite up to date. I used to to check out the smoke from last year.

edit: you get pictures every 10 minutes of the whole globe, but the resolution is pretty bad, good enough to check the cloud coverage though
You can interface with input devices directly if you want that. The output can still be in an VT10x terminal, or it can be directly in a framebuffer if you want software rendered graphics. Or better yet! X11 or Wayland.
I'd think of Tesla as of an iPhone for affluent hipsters. Teslas remain connected to the manufacturer that collects extensive info on drivers (spying, some would say) and can use it for marketing or other purposes later. Teslas can be a powerful distribution channel if Musk figures a way to discreetly advertise to them right in their cars. Teslas are a golf club in a sense: a directory of important people, except that the club has managed to install mics, gps trackers and a internet connected screen right in the members' cars.
Whether or not it was leverage related, I remember thinking the same thing when I saw that Google routinely placed me in Israeli settlements (e.g. Kiryat Arba, pop 700) when I was in Palestinian territory (Hebron, pop 215,000).
> I think they will be very successful and become a big, dominant car maker.

"Big, dominant" in the same sense as maybe Ferrari: Prestigious cars for a niche audience that are willing to pay a premium for the brand.
This guy has been wrong a lot recently. Admittedly, he was right once and in a big way. However, remember that success is mostly luck, and this is orders of magnitude truer for success in public markets.

Outside of entertainment, it isn't worth the time to follow celebrity investors.
>If all housing does is signal income, then why is housing so much more attractive than an expensive car or an expensive watch?

I do not understand what you mean by this, but I do not claim that "all housing does is signal income".

Let me re-characterize my statement for the basis of this discussion, which is that the vast majority of people would have an ideal goal of earning an ever increasing amount of money, regardless of capitalism.

My contention is that due to the way people rank themselves versus each other, they will be interested improving (or at least maintaining) their position in the rankings. Why would they want to rank themselves? I posit that it helps for attracting mates. One can even go deeper and attribute it to the function of an ego, or some mechanism in the brain that incentivizes one to assert their priorities over others', allowing them the ability to not only survive, but compete.

Going back to your initial reply:

>What is attractive is social status - in capitalism this is linked mostly to wealth but that's not a given at all. Another thing that's attractive is stability, but that doesn't have anything to do with consumption, in today's world it means having stable access to housing, ideally owning it, mainly.

I agree that it is about social status, which is what I am referring to by people ranking themselves (and each other). But money or not, the root of the ranking is power. Who has more power than who. Money is a proxy for power, which can exist with or without capitalism, so as long as there is money, I would bet that people (in general) will want more and more of it.
Israeli here. I find the word apartheid pretty suitable to describe the situation of Palestinians living in the West Bank - no citizenship or voting right, many issues with land ownership, a majority controlled by a minority, etc etc.
It isn't priced in. Not even close. In markets with non-financial traders, by definition, everything can't be priced in (you see this in commods, forex...it is why these markets trend). Again, in most of these markets supply cannot respond quickly so you get trending price action.

Predicting the future is relatively straightforward. You just look at fundamentals, and for most commodities it is fairly easy to predict how demand/supply is going to change. Predicting the future and how people will react is not.
BeOS was heavily threaded.
Elon Musk’s Bitcoin Fun Continues
https://archive.md/Dqzum
Show HN: A meditation app built with just HTML, CSS and JavaScript
“That was great news, and while we didn't expect AirPods Max to be able to play the high-res lossless tracks also offered, we did hope the standard lossless would work. Apple says that isn't the case.”
Eat Your Frogs First Thing in the Morning
What are you talking about? Singapore is highly diverse.
How did golang gain and lose 12k todos in an instant?
Am security tester. Can confirm.

Sometimes the vulnerabilities are just handed to you on a dark-themed platter and I don't look them in the mouth.
There is, but it's like that for lots of places. There are plenty of conflicting border claims in the world. The azerbaijan-armenia was a recent hot button, for example. Crimea probably will be, going forward.

The Israel-Palestine conflict tends to be unique mostly in the passion it draws, inside google maps teams, FB's moderation teams and nearly anywhere else. Any specific issue likely has coroleries elsewhere.
> That directly supports me. Interesting how you seem to be ignoring that.

Let's analyze the phrase carefully.

> A trademark owner is not required to uncover all possible uses that might conflict.

> and it’s developed a demo game called Nreal Tower.

You, personally, might not confuse this with Unreal but do you think that an average person can differentiate between Epic's product and Nreal's product? (I'm pretty sure though that the answer to that is "I don't care, I don't really play computer/video games.")

> or immediately commence a lawsuit against every possible infringer.

Epic knows that Nreal exists back in 2018

> Epic and Nreal have been quietly fighting over the “Unreal” trademark for years. Epic filed to block Nreal’s trademark in 2018, and the companies discussed a settlement after that. But Epic’s suit claims the discussion was “fruitless.”

In other words, it was already known to them that Nreal exists as a company and they have attempted to settle this previously. In other words, this is a continuation of a 2018 lawsuit.
If there can be a tax on luxury cars that are transported by ship or planes powered by fossil fuels that is reduced by wind powered shipping, I’d gather there would be innovation in this industry.
Right, hence the team of lawyers and policy people that Google (and presumably Microsoft, Apple, and anyone else who runs a mapping product) pay to figure out how to craft a policy that at least APPEARS non-political.
all these limits could be changed at amazon’s discretion
would be great if you had parks in Washington state.
I have no idea why this was downvoted. Lots of people have made livings showing illegal arrests, illegal searches, police lying (which is legal but a crime the other way around), coerced false confessions, and police brutality on YouTube because there's just so much damn material. It's right out of 1984. Here's one of many channels on the subject:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMCSd9ZNL0nshOhXwtfIJBA

All this is emboldened by the drug war. If it wasn't for that, most of these police departments would be well overstaffed (if they aren't considered that already). The US justice system is a farce.
On Windows APE doesn't need to modify itself because it's an MZ executable. On UNIX the MZ is the prologue to a shell script, which calls printf 'ELF HEADER' >$0; exec $0 to make it conform to the local convention. For subsequent executions it won't need to self-modify so you can simply prime the ape binary once before copying it to /usr/bin if you're an admin. Think of it like a zero-step install wizard that takes a few microseconds.
Luumy – Customer feedback Made simple
Gossip, Parody, and Pastiche
This is the best that's currently available.
But if the semantics speak to project philosophy differences that result in a worse or better experience, then it is important that they don't have the same semantics.
Hummingbird, a lightning fast Linux init
Again, what makes it click bait? It's telling you the article contents honestly. The colloquial style doesn't make it click bait.
possibly because the israelis already have all the imagery they would want anyway, and the blurring is only a problem for people who don't?
From the article:

> As of March 31, Burry owned 8,001 put contracts, with unknown value, strike price, or expiry, according to the filing.

So what are you basing any of this on?
I heard that it got so bad that they had to start using UK/Aussie/Kiwi flags because they would be spotted as Americans sporting Canadian flags.
Maybe Starlink satellites should also feature a camera? They've already got the connectivity. You'd need a large constellation and this one seems like it will become huge.
The BBC has an easier job than NTSC based outfits because filmed material will have been captured at 25 frames per second and converted to 50 fields per second. They are less likely to have problems like 3:2 interlacing breaking in an edit which used to be quite common in NTSC.
Wow, and here I was feeling like I was the only one who thought this way! Such a similar experience to yours.
> We want to produce lasting versions of our tools and games, and by using simpler systems(Uxn has only 32 instructions) we can build more resilient software due to their lack of dependencies, and support older hardware when possible.

Lately I've been thinking a lot along similar lines, but have come to a wildly different conclusion about how to do it. Of course, they are explicitly limiting their use-cases so that's to be expected. I generally agree with the idea of a VM that is simple to implement, but I think the result shouldn't look like real hardware with memory addresses and registers and a stack and all that, it should be more abstract and leave more implementation details up to the interpreter/jit.

Regardless, it makes me slightly less gloomy about the future of computing whenever I see more people coming to similar conclusions.
There are lossless audio wireless gaming headsets. Astro A40 used Kleer, which is 16/44KHz stereo. And now there's also Audeze Penrose.

It should be noted though, that gaming headsets have different priorities. They usually sport bulky design enabling bigger batteries, and low audio latency is a must, so whatever codec is in use it must work fast.
Great, another non-discoverable key combination I need to memorise. You can guarantee I’d have forgotten that by the time I next need to use it.

GUIs are meant to be simple for discovering features. I really dislike how Apple hides away all the useful features. It doesn’t need to be this way and it makes working with macOS a real pain in the arse.
I was mentored by a few scrum masters who put their whole career on this. They wanted us to succeed and the success would put them out of the job, or send them to another team.

To my mind, a good scrum master is a good leader.
Just to clarify the ideaology behind the app.

We have plenty of apps for meditation, but none to build a meditation habit. That is where headclear.in comes in.

1. Starting your meditation habit with 5 minutes or 10 minutes makes it very difficult to sustain as an habit, it would be better to start small and incrementally go to higher times. That is why at headclear.in started at 1 minute and everyday increases by 5 seconds. This reduces the friction for someone who wants to meditate. And this habit sustained over 6 months you are meditating for 15 minutes and you have a solid habit.

2. No streaks - motivation for habits especially meditation are much better if it is intrinsic rather than external. Streaks at some point often become a burden rather than a gift.

3. Without streaks how do you remain motivated. That is where the community comes in. I am working towards creating a community of people who want to build this habit along with me. I have added a url to the community in the website, please check it out if you like a headclear.in.
that is sorta a myth. they often get solved but it may take a long time. Murder cases for example are never declared unsolved unless a suspect is charged or the presumed perpetrator is dead due to age or other reasons.
Or, apply Occam’s razor. People like watching cop and detective shows.
As far as Gaza goes, Hamas rules Gaza but they're not the recognized government.

I'm not sure who you would ask to make policy in such a situation.

Just Hamas because they rule that area by force? That sounds a lot like asking Israel for the same reason.

I don't think there's a good/ automatic answer for these situations.
> (sorry index investors, you quite literally paid the top price for a stock that has lost almost 45% since you bought it).

If there's a single index investor that feels saddened by this stat, in the slightest way, they should stop index investing right now. The great joy of index investing is that this single stock is down, while on average everything else is way up...
The issue is solved in any service manager as long as the service doesn't fork, when you are the parent process you can ensure that you don't reap the child before sending a signal.

Once the service forks then it becomes a problem. If you use cgroups it can be solved separately with the cgroup freezer, but there are still some open issues with this in systemd: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13101
Cookies de Pão Integral
"I'll do it later" is one of the more challenging personality faults to deal with in coworkers. There are very few people you can trust to make that statement, while most of the rest behave as if you should trust them as well, even though everybody knows they won't in fact do that later.

Not only will they not do that later, but at some point they will compare their productivity to someone who ended up having to 'do that later' for them, causing their other work to suffer.
I am not a fan of public figures (seemingly) using their power to attempt to influence price movement in equities.

The market action following someone like Elon Musk’s tweets about $GME, DOGE, and others, show high correlation with the sentiment in those tweets, at least from my armchair. Sure, Burry was correct in a similar scenario before. I don’t believe that means others should immediately believe/trust and follow individuals like this to the end of the earth, however.

Shorting a stock is a very different - and far more risky - investment “strategy” than the purchasing of a stock. I should know, I lost 2 months of gains on a single short over a 3 day period, despite all market intelligence, facts, and the logic which follows, pointing to the fact which the stock should have bottomed, not skyrocketed.

Despite most of its participants being relatively predictable, the market never ceases to surprise. Headlines like this should at least lead to an article with a highly visible notice or disclaimer about the risks of mimicking the mentioned behavior.

Edit: I see I am being downvoted without discussion. I’m open to learning what I may have missed.
> If you have an actual short position, your potential losses are unlimited.

Isn’t this a bit like saying that the potential upside of holding any stock is unlimited?
Dog searches should not be used as evidence unless Officer Dog can be called to the stand to testify eloquently, in english.
Some relatives of mine got to experience a fun little hostage situation with, "either you pay [absurd figure] per month for a couple years for drug rehab at a facility we chose, for your adult kid, plus smaller amounts of money for other stuff pretty much indefinitely, or or they rot in prison rather than getting out on probation".

On the one hand, the guy definitely did something bad. On the other hand, gee I wonder how generational cycles of poverty, driving future crime rates, happen. No mystery that the effects of criminality seems to afflict entire families when the justice system is actively contributing to that.

And no, it's not like they only got charged that much because they're flush with cash. I'm pretty sure the courts didn't give a damn whether they could afford it (technically, yes they could, but in anything resembling a financially-responsible sense, god no, not at all, they weren't starting from a great spot and it basically ruined them—the bread-winner will now work until he dies or gets so sick he can't anymore)
You're spot on. I've followed this topic area for some years out of curiosity. Saildrone style wingsails only require a very small electric actuator to move a control surface. The control surface sets the overall net angle of attack of the assembly. The wing tracks the wind, only needing the control surface changed as the bow crosses the wind.

A system like this can be entirely labor free.

Tall ships on the other hand... I don't care how many electric winches you have, they'll always require massive numbers of people for sail handling.
See here's this guy proving me right. These nitpickers are extremely easy to fool into doing the work of propaganda.
About the success of their mars mission? Yeah?
I also say the Sudan and the Congo.
It's not a bias, it's a lack of capacity.

It would do just as bad at any other kind of contract because interpreting contracts involves a close reading and understanding of the text.

The old AI of the 1970s was centered around the SAT problem, that is, finding value sets for logical variables under some constraints.

Contract law is like that too: it is reasoning over "has the contract been broken?", "would it be possible to satisfy this contract if X is true?", "is this contract satisfiable at all?"

Trouble is that it has to be done with a logic extended over the common sense domain (John believes that Mary believes that..., Birds fly except..., Babe Ruth was the world's home run hero in 1965, he was #2 in 1973...) and it's easy to say but hard to prove sound, consistent, and such.
I don't think that good work can be achieved if people in the same team do not trust each other, at least on software projects.

If you believe that an employee has to be micromanaged to be productive, then there is something wrong somewhere, and you should probably fire them.