skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"This share has been age-standardized assuming a constant age
structure to compare prevalence between countries and through time."

Not sure why the rate is so much higher in the US and Canada. Better detection might be part of the explanation.
Archive link if it goes down again (seems OK right now, but seemed to be swamped just before):

https://archive.md/iUFAL
A couple of other things my wife and I have picked up over the last few years for anyone starting out.

1. Mulch mulch mulch! It keeps weeds down and water in and will add organic matter to your soil as it breaks down. Your municipality probably makes tons of mulch from trimming trees and you can usually find somewhere to buy a truckload from them for a few dollars. We put down at least 3 pickup truck loads over the course of the first year in ~200 square feet of beds. Unless you are directly sowing seeds somewhere, you don't ever want bare soil showing.

2. If you have plants that seem diseased or have pests, rip them out or prune the affected parts off ASAP. We don't use pesticides or anything so the best way to keep pest populations down is to keep them from multiplying. Caterpillars become moths/butterflies that make many more caterpillars. If you eliminate the plant or leaves hosting them, they won't get that far.

3. The more you weed, the less you have to weed. This is the same idea as with pests. These things don't spontaneously generate, so every weed you pull up that doesn't go to seed first is one less seed in your soil waiting to pop up. If you keep on it, eventually the only weeds you have to worry about are ones that come over from your neighbor's overgrown beds!
chia is already up to an exabyte; not quite the same thing but i think it shows the limits of possibility
I don't want to put words in Greg's mouth, but if you check the code for udevd at this moment you can see a lot of use of utility headers that are not really appropriate for a libudev: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/c54cfef3968613f9e86e...

Expanding udev's library would probably end up a decent size library of other functionality, I don't think there is any good way around needing this. This is not code that could be deleted from systemd if it was separated. The way eudev has handled it is by doing what you describe and copying those shared functions out from systemd: https://github.com/gentoo/eudev/tree/34b2037d379e33f1cf79a34...

The result of that being there are two copies of the same shared code floating around, which is what they were trying to avoid.
Working more than 55h/week increase deaths from heart disease and stroke
> not everyone wants the cognitive load of having to pay constant attention to what they're doing and neither should they.

That's an answer so typical of our generation. A symptom of the uncertainty that pervades our lives - that we need to justify not paying attention to any single thing or doing it properly.

Where would we rather spend that "cognitive load"? Snapchat?

What possible reason can we find to justify not paying attention while having a 150¤C pan with boiling vegetable oil.

That statement is just borderline reckless if not silly.
I'm surprised that you're surprised. "Absolutely no human check" may as well be Google's tagline.
Arguably that's better than the alternative, where they get scammed or hacked. I usually edit their desktop shortcut to disable extensions, personally, but I like the parent's solution better.
You forgot mounting /proc and /sys :) Anyway, it's the quickest way to recover if all you need is to edit some config file or run passwd.
What were the charges for?
That's make me wonder: what's the "right" pronunciation for Haskell in English? Does it rhyme with Scala?
Most people can't charge at home (because most people live in multi-story houses in a bigger cities and don't have a garage to charge in), so refueling in 2min at a gas station still has appeal.
Compared to a tank full of gasoline?
I think its worth clarifying that there are multiple virology labs in Wuhan; the WIV BSL-4 lab is indeed ~12km away from the wet market, but the WHCDC BSL-2 lab in use since around 2018 is located a couple hundred meters away from the market. Ref the last page of https://img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02/16/11472...

There are some claims (debatable?) that bat coronavirus studies were conducted at the WHCDC lab. There is more information about the laboratory locations and biosafety concerns in this report: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350887648_3_WUHAN_L... (written by members of the drastic project; I'm not sure how much of this information is substantiated by other sources but at least the maps appear to be reasonably accurate).
Driving a car tank full of gasoline or thousands of lithium batteries is also dangerous, there are ways to reduce risk.
Even better way to discover which browsers don't handle pretty normal situations (read-only) in a normal way. If Google Chrome is forcing people to allow installation of extensions, it's much better to move to a different browser, than to either live with crashes or live with poor security (in this, parental case).
Here a good blog post on this exact topic

https://dashbit.co/blog/a-new-authentication-solution-for-ph...
I don't know how old you are, but the sad fact is that the tipping point was basically in the '80s and '90s, when most people reading this were not even teenagers. The world as a whole woke up to the problem when it was effectively already too late, because the scientific method wants proof and proof can only come after the process runs. There is absolutely no point in reasoning in terms of guilt and apologies.

Edit: some commenters seem to think I'm trying to blame scientists. I'm trying not to blame anyone, because things just take time and that's what it is. What I'm trying to say is that reasoning in terms of guilt is pointless and counterproductive, because it just antagonises people.
Please recalibrate your irony detector.
Sadly, the most efficient way is probably to report it to the abuse contact of the host. In this case - Scaleway / Online.net.
Fantastic video. I love the host and it seems like he tackles the topics I'm interested in—such as the egg peeler machine.

I'd love to be able to buy soft boiled eggs like I did at the vending machine in Japan. :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7HBxBCaUMI
A Year in Cyber Attacks: 5 of the Most Interesting Recent Breaches
Computers don't reason. Computation isn't a property of any physical system, it's a subjective property attributed by an observer.

For example, consider a circuit. Suppose we attribute TRUE to 3v, and FALSE to 0v. Then two simultaneous input of 3v, 3v giving 3v (and so on: 33->3, 03->0, 30->0, 00->0) can be said to compute AND.

But the same physical system is at the same time "computing" OR. Here we attribute TRUE to the 0 signal.

Any "computer" is actually simultaneously running many, quite radically different, programs. We only attribute one program to it in how we rig devices (screens, keyboards, etc.) to interpret signals to mean something device-relative. If you "plug a speaker in a gfx socket" the output isn't visual. It means something completely different, and the GPU is computing audio now.

So "computational" algorithms in being merely purely formal specifications do not describe any unique physical system, and only apply to physical systems in an observer-relative way. Computation is explanatorily bankrupt; it is only a game people play in rigging physical systems to behave as they wish.

Animals however have the intrinsic property of intelligence: it isn't observer-relative. We are, quite literally, the observer imparting meaning to our environment. Our brain states resolve to unique thoughts, not to "many radically different ones simultaneously". Gold isn't both gold AND something else, and neither is thinking.

The category of explanation for these abilities which are intrinsic to animals cannot be, and is not, computational. It's scientific. Involving characterising the properties of materials, and their causal effects.
If your home has the appropriate electric supply, then yes, but there's lots of places in the world with poor electricity distribution.

The future of transportation seems likely to be a mix of electric, hydrogen, and diesel, depending on the use case for a long time to come.
I believe there may be a patch for the IDE drive mod for NetBSD somewhere about the net.
There is also the serial to SD card adapter but I dont know if there is a patch for that in NetBSD.
Of course you can't boot from either without a custom bios(for the ide mod. No booting from SD adapter period)
> How about criticizing Hamas for shooting these rockets from civilian centers?

Looking at google maps it sure seems that the IDF does the same, keeping their headquarters in the middle of densely populated center of Tel Aviv. Between a large hospital and a shopping mall.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Israel+Defense+Forces/@32....

If you are gonna both-sides this, you should commit to it.
Another possibility could be what people consume and how much of it, if we start to accept that cancer may be a metabolic disease. [1]

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06e-PwhmSq8 [video]
> Java, Python

I was talking more about Java/Python. Also Scala has inheritance and OOP. Which don’t exist in elixir has only map.Map + additional field is struct in elixir.

Function capture, enumerations, pattern matching, implicit return and tuples returning status is what confuses new people.

Most try to implement some kind of inheritance in elixir.

Actor model is in OTP. Process, supervison, actor and messages are concepts of OTP. Elixir does not have actor in in its language constructs.

There is no replacement/alternative for OTP if you want distributed systems.

Many tried to reimplement Erlang in their languages and failed miserably.
What is the appeal of a hydrogen car vs an eletric car?

Fast 'charging' seems to be the big one. Also for larger engines (like trucks) you should get lower total weight compared to batteries.
FWIW, I wouldn't say that nobody is talking about it. In the county where I live, the new county prosecutor moved to eliminate cash bail on his first day in office: https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2021/01/washtenaw-count...
Ad block shouldn't break your checkout
$7 for labor on a single sandwich is a lot -- much more than just the proportion for a living wage, even in New York.

A short-order cook could crank out a dozen sandwiches like this per minute. They're being fancy and getting a lot of things perfect, which requires a lot more attention -- perfectly fried egg, perfectly grilled cheese, careful plating. The spinach required a bunch of setup.

Even so, it's hard to imagine that it costs $7 to put this together. Even that "living wage" is probably only $20 per hour; with benefits and such it's probably $30 per hour. That's a rate of only 4 sandwiches hour -- sure, it's a lot of care, but surely they can cook faster than that.

The labor cost presumably also includes the expediter, manager, cleaning staff, etc. Even so... man, that's just a ton of labor cost, and considerably more than other stores. Given that the ingredients breakdown included $.03 worth of butter, lumping all of the labor into $7 could really use more breakdown to explain why they're spending so much.
You're turning it into a moral issue instead of a measurable one...

Loggers, oil and gas workers, roofers, police, and more, all have SIGNIFICANTLY higher chances of dying then the average person.

They do their job everyday.

The idea of 'significant' is subjective. Statistically, anything that is not random is significant.

You need points of comparison.

Significant in comparison to what?

Do the night shift workers have higher chances than these groups and therefore should people be overly concerned?

Is it about equal?

I'm asking for accuracy instead of outrage from the news media so people can decide for themselves because statistics is easily massagable for the less knowledgable to create maximum outrage.

That's all.
The problem with the internet is that you can't markdown irony...
Here a few major issues hydrogen would need to solve.

* There isn't a fuel distribution system. The reason BEVs work is because everywhere has power, setting up power distribution is generally just plugging into the local grid.

* Hydrogen escapes any container it's placed in. That's a pretty hard thing to deal with. Most approaches have looked at chemically binding hydrogen to something in order to keep it from escaping, but that, as you can imagine, is expensive. The other option is onsite electrolysis, but that's rather expensive to pull off.

* Speaking of electrolysis, while we can get hydrogen from many sources, the one we are likely to actually use isn't electrolysis but rather natural gas and oil. Why is that? Because electrolysis is inefficient (about 20% efficiency IIRC edit I recalled incorrectly. Electrolysis has a ~70% effciency).

So you have a hard to store fuel, without a distribution network, that may be coming from fossil fuels anyways. -So why do major companies like Toyota love hydrogen? Because it doesn't require them to make any major changes to their fleet. You can get a lot more miles out of the basic combustion engine design and you don't need to retool all your product lines.- edit I was wrong, looks like most hydrogen vehicles are fuel cell based.

Now, that isn't to say that hydrogen has no place in the future. I think because of it's energy density hydrogen will likely play a role in the airline industry. It may even be possible that hydrogen ends up finding a place in long range shipping. However, hydrogen in a consumer car is, IMO, DOA. BEVs already exist as do their charge networks.
I remember them hyping blockchain in their tv ads a few years ago -- how they were going to revolutionize everything with it. Pure hype.

IBM is a great old brand, but all things pass, and it's way overdue for them. New things grow where old things die, and I'm ager to see what follows them.
Hide and Seek Code
I think it’s precisely that; with electric, there’s no special product to sell you. With hydrogen, or ethanol, the old oil and gas companies can more easily pivot into simply selling another chemical product. With electric cars, the oil and gas companies are like cable TV in the age of the internet; their days are numbered, and they fear it like nothing else.

(Also, governments have nothing to levy special taxes on if cars run on your wall plug.)

Of course, this is all conspiracy theories and speculation. I have nothing to back this up.
I do have to ask...why is it morally bankrupt?
Do you go out of your way to pay more tax than is legally required? If not, are you morally bankrupt? Of course not.
Tax laws are the rules of the game. If you don't like the rules, change them (democracy and all) and enjoy the positive and negative consequences as they unfold.
@gapps.microsoft.com would be at least better than a random unverifiable @gmail.com address. Google Workspace (is that what we're calling it this week?) lets you use subdomains right?
I went back and read the content again because of your comment. What a waste of time.

> Identify a Facebook user by *his* phone number despite privacy settings set

Stop being so obtuse about exculpatory mistakes; I am not suggesting HN comments should be humourless, but this is not Reddit.

No one can tell if you're genuinely offended (by grammar or societal gender-terms) by or just a smart arse, your sarcastic tone implies the latter.
My HRV changes when I drink. Isn’t some alcohol good for us?
Perhaps, though I’m not arguing that it was a good headline. My point was only that it is a valid headline, as long as you understand that shutdown is the noun.
> First API's don't support it, can't pin memory (which is what a PBO does). Then oh well they are not taking advantage of it. Move the goal post much?

No, they don't, so no, I didn't move the goal posts at all. PBOs are a transfer object. You cannot sample from them on the GPU. The only thing you can do with PBOs is copy them to something you can use on the GPU.

As such, PBOs do not let you take advantage of UMA. In fact, their primary benefit is for non-UMA in the first place. UMA systems have no issues blocking glTexImage2D until the copy to GPU memory is done, but non-UMA ones do. And non-UMA ones are what gave us PBOs.

> TBDR came to prominence in UMA mobile architectures, it's a big part of what allows it to perform so well with limited memory bandwidth.

Support that with a theory or evidence of literally any kind. There's nothing at all in TBDR's sequence of events that has any apparent benefit from UMA.

Here: https://developer.arm.com/solutions/graphics-and-gaming/deve...

Look at that the sequence of steps. ARM doesn't even bother including a CPU in there, so which step would UMA be helping with?

What UMA can do here is improve the power efficiency by reducing the cost of sending the command buffers to the GPU, but that's not going to get you a performance improvement as those command buffers are not very big. If sending data from the CPU to GPU was such a severe bottleneck then you'd see the impact of things like reducing the PCI-E bandwidth on discreet GPUs, but you don't.
In this use case, hydrogen forms a fairly inefficient way of transferring energy from renewable sources to your car. As well as that, you have severe problems with distribution and storage - the pressures required are frankly terrifying as an end-user, and hydrogen embrittlement of any steel in contact with the hydrogen is also a big problem.
Why Sharpsend Failed
No. You can still commit privacy violations even if it is easy.
I shouldn’t think it’s much more dangerous than other pressurized flammable gases. Those pressure vessels are designed for safety contrary to what you see in movies. I’d be about as concerned as I am driving around with a tank of highly flammable gasoline.
-akx

https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/ssh.1.html
Entrepreneur Raised $130M to Protect Your Family from Financial and Health Risks
Thank you. I have exactly the same opinion as you. The support that Jeremy provides for Sequel and Roda is irreplaceable. I built few apps with Roda & Sequel, and I'm not sure if I will be back to Rails in the near future.
Endel app creator on the power of endless ambient music
haha thanks again! we've got so many visitors!
>There were restrictions / rules on the game (only a pool of 18 heroes were allowed), but they they won both games in a best of 3. You can see the progression / evolution of the training of the AI here: https://openai.com/projects/five/

In league of legends there's almost 150 heroes

not only the whole draft phase makes giant amount of possibilities if you apply combinatorics, then also in game itself, the amount of possibilities that the draft phase itself results is difficult to imagine

I didn't play much Dota, I'm LoLer, so I don't understand those limitations:

Pool of 18 heroes (Axe, Crystal Maiden, Death Prophet, Earthshaker, Gyrocopter, Lich, Lion, Necrophos, Queen of Pain, Razor, Riki, Shadow Fiend, Slark, Sniper, Sven, Tidehunter, Viper, or Witch Doctor)

No Divine Rapier, Bottle

No summons/illusions

5 invulnerable couriers, no exploiting them by scouting or tanking

No Scan

________

But good to know that I'm relatively close to being 100% wrong here, thanks.
Sounds like you're talking about distribution infrastructure, which is true but in my mind the biggest issue is efficiency. Storing and using H2 isn't very efficient, and current production techniques for H2 emit as much or more carbon as Diesel.
hmm, the responses there make it look like lua has co-routines (which are explicit) and are async-transparent when calling C++ functions, but not generally implicit like hyperscript

so, a step in the right direction, but not a fully async-transparent runtime like hyperscript

thank you for the link
I agree - it is a big compiler that has backward compatibility for java apps. The problem is code logic where at one point we had to use stringIO to read every byte - now we have fileIO to read a record. Old code worked but was too slow, Marcos and calls gave us screenIO in bytes 40by60 today 1024by720 seems small - the old code is just too slow - COBOL/IMS is in service today but 45 magabytes a second, means batch runs all night and why there's COBOL/DB2 - In sum without c++, information engineering and the dropping of recycled ideas this goes nowhere .. better is to build new faster chips, bit processing tools(ML), Such that I can say build me a light saber(NL) and there is a call to 3D printers, metal fabrication, laser delimiters, and butane assembly!
TO HAVE ON DEMAND MANUFACTURING of goods Eg(star trek replication)
It depends on how you define convenient. Hydrogen can be refilled quickly, in minutes, like a conventional liquid fueled car. If there were a network of hydrogen filling stations then driving, especially long distances, would be similar to driving a liquid fueled car.
What's interesting to me on a meta level is that this appears to be a very hotly contested topic in the United States. Meanwhile it's not even making news over here in Germany, outside of "Americans are discussing odd things" kind of reporting. I believe it's generally accepted that it's most likely an animal origin.

That's just a data point, but it goes to show how political the debate is.
It can be very safe if using hydride tanks. I think there are some international arms controls related to hydrogen bombs that makes hydride tanks difficult to produce.
How Covid is changing the study of human behaviour
International relations benefit from a range of sanctions, including very minor ones, because it allows you to ramp up and down pressure to suit the relative degree to which you care about any of the thousands of disagreements between nations, rather than just having a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer for every occasion.
There's a lot of Hydrogen FUD for sure, but the core of the problem is storage and transport. Hydrogen is just extremely hard to store and move around pressurised. This makes it uneconomical in most use cases. There's nothing fundamentally wrong about it as a technology (if you treat it as a energy store instead of a fuel), just engineering challenges and cost.
I tried the report abuse button and got a 404 when submitting the form. Lol, classic Google.

EDIT: My guess is they delisted the extension right about as I was submitting, since the extension page loaded, but the report submission failed, and now the extension is also gone. Maybe a cache purge was in there somewhere.
Yep. I was tired of coming home and seeing a million malware search engines and fake VPNs extensions installed. I'm always puzzled as how they manage to get in there. I'd rather crash the browser than allow this garbage which usually takes a full reinstall to get rid of.
How I Self-Published a Technical Book
There is indeed only a 5% tax on gains that can directly be attributed to innovation, which is probably what you are referring to. It's intended to give innovative companies a leg up against ones that don't innovate, and aimed to support start-ups.

This is a good idea in itself, but, of course, it's quite tricky to establish what part of profit is really owing to innovation, and several tax lawyers have found ways to abuse the scheme. By now that loophole has been mostly closed, but there will always be new ideas by politicians that will subsequently be abused, it's not really because they wanted to become a tax haven.
aaaand its gone. Worked two minutes ago, now the link responds with 404.
LOL, article is hidden when uBlock is active. Way to go!
There’s a ridiculous amount of of FUD from the industry (at both/all ends). It’s a Catch 22. You need infrastructure before people will invest in infrastructure. You don’t want to invest the millions/billions in the wrong one, so people spread FUD to protect their investment. For example, Elon Musk had doubled down on battery tech, so H2 winning out isn’t in his best interest.