skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not one to typically paraphrase billionaires, or think they're too connected to reality... but something I heard Mark Cuban say the other day was kind of "oh, shit that's true" moment for me. It was something to the affect of (I can't find the clip at the moment), "Back in 2010 we never thought we'd see a company hit $1 trillion. We never thought Apple or Amazon (et. al) would be able to continue their growth year after year to even be those $2 trillion dollar companies..." All I could think was "oh shit, yeah, I never thought I'd see it either."

Ten years ago, Apple was worth $297 billion dollars, today it's worth $2.1 trillion dollars. I think Tesla stands a good a chance to be worth these seemingly absurd valuations. The market price isn't solely defined by the current value. With tech companies especially, it reflects expected value, and Tesla still has a lot of room to grow. I'd be more skeptical but EVs are eventually going to cost way less to make than typical ICE (internal combustion engine) cars, and per unit that savings translates into a lot of fucking profit. Not to mention the additional profit they're raking in thanks to the public's image of Tesla's and the experience generally being "magical" (even if gimmicky). Also, a "green crypto" if a Tesla branded play (I feel musk is bringing this soon) will cause a pretty gigantic boost to the company's bottom line.

For at least the next 2-5 years Tesla is gonna be pretty safe, and I'd guess that 2-5 will buy it like 3-5 more years just being the incumbent... I don't think Burry is going to be to happy on this one. Mark Spiegel has already fallen to the beast, and I suspect Burry is likely going to as well.

shrug just my two cents.
I would be concerned about wind shear in takeoffs, but I know very little about planes.
I concure. I like RMQ because I know how to configure and administer it but I would never trust anyone with it. My first exposure to it was on a project where the lead architect failed to read the documentation let alone understand any of it. Several years later I was able to fix it and then left it in the hands of some other incompetents.
LoRa isn’t capable of having the kind of bandwidth to support video so no, they can’t
Is Tesla the only car company collecting usage data? Off the top of my head, I don't think so.

Your comment kind of reminds me of how much shit "Big Tech" gets for data collection, just because they're highly visible, while the really scary shit (e.g. cell carriers offering granular per-user location data APIs to anybody with money) flies under the radar because it doesn't have that sexy down-with-big-tech angle that (ironically?) seems to drive the most clicks.

That's not to say the usual "Big Tech" suspects are choirboys, but the public discourse's focus on their data collection activities is absurdly myopic.
Also: https://usefathom.com/
Smoke is telling the truth that blurred on gg maps can be fixed by an update.
But isn't bias just an instance of lack of capacity? Lack of capacity encompasses an LM's general incompetence, which includes bias, nonsense predictions, racist language etc etc. No?
Good Citizen
How can you call your self a good citizen without doing the things that give development to your coutry.stop discriminat
The article says "The tri-wing design, with a double tail fin and two engines mounted to the rear".

Two-engine airliners are overwhelmingly the most common configuration today, including for ocean crossings. (I can't tell if you're arguing that 2 is 50% less than 4 and implying that 4 is the standard for water-crossing, or if you think it's a single-engine jet.)
Show HN: Alternative to Google Document AI made in Germany
Over the past 6 years we have built an AI to process documents. We now share our current status-quo and are looking for your feedback :)

Elevator Pitch: Konfuzio automates complex back office processes in large enterprises and supports them to use more data to generate insights. OCR, extract, validate & process documents.

Konfuzio enables business users to first OCR, then categorize documents and finally extract information. Optionally, data scientists can use Konfuzio as an automated text and image labeling tool with a user-friendly web interface to maintain high-quality data sets to build world-class AI, integrate their AI as containerized workloads and improve them with humans in the loop.

Konfuzio enables IT experts to use AI(s) in a non-invasive way in existing processes, especially for unstructured input data like documents or emails. Helm & Nagel GmbH hosts Konfuzio in Germany. The data processing agreement is GDPR-compliant under the Technical Organizational Measures (TOMs) specified in the Terms and Conditions, which provide redistribution rights. On-prem customers deploy Konfuzio either on a single machine or their Kubernetes Cluster via Helm.

Register for free: https://app.konfuzio.com

Test our free public Python SDK: https://pypi.org/project/konfuzio-sdk/

View the changelog of our server (proprietary software): https://deep-tech.com/changelog_app/

View the on-prem documentation of our server: https://deep-tech.com/pdf/konfuzio_on_prem.pdf

Get to know our team: https://konfuzio.com/en/team/
I'd say: before being aware of how typography should look, the main difference is that reading a badly-set book will feel tiring for some reason that's hard to pin, but it's definitely not content. After being made aware, it's just annoying - if you can name the thing that's wrong, you recognize it's wrong.
[Edit: Personal Usage] I use space within text, and TAB/Shift-TAB to move between data entry fields. You never know when a TAB key is going to do something weird outside of your home IDE.
[/EDIT]

They missed an axis.... sure you can compare Space vs Horizontal Tabs, but what about Line feed vs Vertical tabs? Form feeds are similarly overlooked.

Also missing is the lf / cr-lf debate 8)

PS: Does anyone use Group, Record, or Unit Separators?

Reference: https://theasciicode.com.ar/ascii-control-characters/vertica...
In Go the time is spent trying to see the forest and not the trees.

There's so much plumbing that you wouldn't have to write AT ALL in a high-level language.
Ah, this is reminiscent of best-worst translation of the Tao Te Ching from Suzuki & Carus.

The valley spirit not expires,
Mysterious woman ’tis called by the sires.
The mysterious woman's door, to boot,
Is called of heaven and earth the root.
Forever and aye it seems to endure
And its use is without effort sure
Insert "to do things more interesting than making in-app purchases?" after "our brains".
I presume you meant that they are never declared solved [unless...]? It seems pretty farfetched to say that murder cases are considered solved by default even when a reasonable person would consider them to be unsolved.
F150 Lightning being unveiled in a couple days is a good example of this. The F150 is the most popular vehicle in America & this has a good chance at being a pretty big success.
"For a hashmap, the operation of inserting N items is O(N) and yes that N is the number of items you are inserting."

This is not a proper application of big O notation. Big O notation is asymptotic. It's a shorthand for considering the performance of the algorithm as the number of elements tends to infinity. If you insert a single item into a linked list we don't say that is O(1) because it's a single item; you still need to iterate over N items already in the list before you can insert it. The more items in the list, the more items you have to iterate over before the insertion occurs.

But if you don't believe me about the hash map, here's an algorithm for inserting in C++ using linked lists for collision resolution:

template <class T>
bool HashSet<T>::insert(T item) {
// Hash the item
unsigned long ix = this->hash(item);
// Find the item in the appropriate bucket. If it's already there, return false.
if (this->array[ix]->findItem(item) != -1) {
return false;
}
// If the item is not in this bucket, insert it.
this->array[ix]->insertAtHead(item);
return true;
}

The only linear-time operation in this algorithm is findItem() on the linked list, but for a properly sized hash table, the linked list in question here should have very few items in it compared to the rest of the table (n_linked_list << N_hash_table). insertAtHead() is O(1) always. hash is O(1) always. The one thing missing in this example is resizing the table if it gets too full, which is O(N) and generally requires re-hashing all the items. Ideally you could make the table large enough when you initialize it to avoid this altogether, and then you can maintain that O(1) insertion time. This is why O(1) is the best case, while O(N) is the worst case. But O(1) should also be the common case.

Therefore if I have 1 item in my hash table or 1 million, it's still going to take the same amount of time to insert the next item. That's what we mean when we say inserting in a hash map O(1); it will take the same amount of time to insert the first item as the millionth item. Even though, yes, you have to call insert a million times. That's obvious. But that's not what asymptotic complexity analysis and big O notation is for.

With something like a linked list, if you try to insert a million items, it will be fast for the first one and slow for the millionth one (if you are inserting without a tail pointer). The rate at which it gets slower is linearly proportional to the number of items in the list. That's what we mean when we say inserting into a linked list is O(N).

If you still think inserting into a hash table is O(N), then answer me this: what's even the point of a hash table?
Playstore app used to mass report and spread propaganda on behalf of Isreal
DHS Announces Continuation of International Entrepreneur Parole Program
The judge issue is understated. Local judges who can throw out this evidence get elected without challenge and often by relatively small numbers of voters. Judges are often voted in during an off season so voter turnout is tiny. But i used to joke that if about 50 percent of a local university turned up to vote for a judge they could easily de facto make marijuana legal in their area.
I gives you $1K today. In exchange, we agree now, that in two month, I can buy your car for $10K if I want to.

I just bought a 2-month expiry put option at a strike of $10k on your car.

Two month later, I check the resell value for your car.

If it's more than $10k, let's say 13, I buy yours at 10 and resell it at 13K. I won 3-1=$2k

If it's less that $10k, I just pass, I lost $1k.
I have made some extremely realistic sound recording by using binaural microphones that are positioned inside my ear canals. Using my own head retains a lot of that sensory information.
Just take the aggregate of papers published on those four sites? That's certainly a rather crude methodology :p.
We've been flying twin engine planes over oceans for quite a while now. That's been a think since Boeing and Airbus introduced the 787 and the E350 using something called an ETOPS certification. If anything, we'll probably be seeing a lot more twin engine flights over oceans in the future.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a11987/for-transocea...
It is not about paradoxes like this, but missing proofs. Paradoxes are features of inconsistent systems, and we do not care about inconsistent systems. The types of paradoxes discovered in the early 20th century led people to refine set theory so that the paradoxes were removed and the systems were believed to be paradox free and thus useful for proving theorems. Once you've gotten rid of the paradoxes, you have a consistent system. This is the system of interest. Here, Godel is saying that consistent systems are incomplete.

E.g. any consistent system will have some theorems that cannot be proved within that system. Note that I am not saying there are theorems for which we don't know the proof. E.g. the proof is too difficult or unknown, waiting for a more brilliant mind to discover it. I mean that the theorem cannot possibly have a proof of its truth or falsehood.

The most famous example is the Continuum Hypothesis, which cannot be proved or disproved using standard set theory. The question of whether the continuum hypothesis is true is unanswerable. Thus the formal system is incomplete.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_hypothesis

The reductio ad absurdum, i.e. assume the system is complete and prove that it is inconsistent is not used to seriously consider inconsistent systems but rather to demonstrate that the systems we care about -- e.g. the consistent systems -- are incomplete.
Not really feasible at a usable resolution. The number of satellites required to do this as well as the data bandwidth needed far exceeds our current capacity.
The article states “engines” but it is hard to see where the second one might be. There are twin intakes on the body below the tail wings, but I don’t see a second exhaust….
ClickHouse: Data Warehousing with Robert Hodges
Hey, there, I'm over on this other hill now, not dying on that one. :)
He his long puts on $500m worth of stock. So the premium he paid (what he’s betting) is considerably less... stupid headlines.
Stable geniuses are unfortunately even more rare than unstable ones.
I am more disappointed about the TSLA situation. Leaving this company out of the SP500 until they were in the top 10 company in market cap. It was a very active decision when most people would assume the sp500 is a passive index.

[edit] For clarification, TSLA already had 4 quarters of profit in September 2020 matching sp500 profit requirements but was still left out on a very active decision. [1]

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-04/tesla-fal...
No one is being rude to you. If you don't want someone to mention that you made up something they didn't say, then don't do that. If you say the same things over and over that have been explained to you to be false, don't be surprised if that gets brought up. If you can confront what I'm saying with something true, feel free.
They bet the company on the OG roadster, S, and 3.

They don't need to now. The 3 and Y are quite successful and quite profitable.

The Truck, Semi, Roadster, Leaf Blower, and such are all distractions that aren't worth building until they've managed to establish much larger battery volumes and aren't selling every Y and 3 they make months before they make them.

What's their run rate? They've got a ton of cash and viable products (3 and Y) where there are people lined up to buy them before they're even made. And they've got the supercharger network which is an enormous differentiator against any other EV.

Their biggest threat is if there's some enormous unseen flaw in their battery design where they get swamped with battery warranty claims.

The share price is absurdly high, but it is similarly absurd to project the company going out of business.
Maybe compared to C++. Lisp outperforms Python.
> All modern popular relational database support (almost) unlimited sized strings with a text or blob-type column, so why not use that? The reason is indexes.

Indexes are not the only reason. Typical databases (mysql, mssql etc.) are row oriented so they store rows of data in blocks on disk. If you have a text or blob field it is potentially unbounded in size and if the field does get too big it will typically be moved 'off the row' and replaced with a pointer to the full object. If instead you have a varchar field then it's size is bounded and the db can keep all the data in contiguous blocks on the disk. Having all your data in contiguous blocks can improve read performance (though it's less of an issue with SSDs).
... and they got bought and it's not getting much work (if any at all) put into it. Shame.
Small nitpick, if you use WASD for control, it may be better to use the keycodes and not the characters. People with non-QWERTY layouts probably want to use whatever keys they have on this location (ex: ZQSD for AZERTY layout).
I don’t have much sympathy for people that commit actual crimes. There are too many innocent people being arrested to worry about the guilty ones.

They chose to spend their money to keep their son out of jail. Thats was their choice. That’s the consequence of the son committing what appears to be a major crime. Hopefully the son learns from that and he should be working to help repay that debt.
The entire head is being heated, slightly, but it can only cool by dissipating that heat to the environment. This happens slowly enough I do not see it as possible to achieve audible frequencies with such a heating/cooling cycle.

The auditory effects have to be generated by RF, possibly frequency phased modulation, interacting with the inner ear.
Israel kills 34 Palestinian minors, including 5-month-old infant
The PA has no control over Gaza - in fact they were kicked out of gaza by hamas.
You can tell he's short from him talking his book on Twitter.
When you buy a “put” you are entering into a contract that gives you the right, but not the obligation, to sell X number of shares of Acme Class A common stock for $Y/share on (or sometimes within) a specific date.

So let’s say Acme Class A is currently trading at $50/share. If you think, for whatever reason, Acme Class A common stock will be trading at $1 next week you might want to buy a put that lets you sell 100,000 shares for $10/share. If the price of Acme Class A stays the same, you would never exercise the option to sell because you’d lose money - why would you sell Acme Class A for $10/share when you could sell it on the open market for $50/share? But if you’re right, and Acme Class A is trading at $1/share, you would then of course want to sell as many shares as possible at the $10/share rate. So you’d go on the open market, buy yourself 100,000 shares for $100,000, then turn right around and exercise your option to sell those shares for $1,000,000.

So the only money at risk is the cost of the contract itself because you don’t have to actually buy the shares until you decide whether you want to exercise the option to sell them.

If you want a put contract that allows you the option to sell 100,000 shares of TSLA for $0.01/share tomorrow it wouldn’t cost much because it’s highly unlikely you’d exercise the option and so, for the person on the other side of the agreement, it would basically be free money. When there’s more uncertainty then the cost of buying the contract is higher because the person on the other side is taking a risk that they’ll be stuck buying a bunch of securities at a price much higher than what they’re actually worth.

TLDR: when you buy a put contract you’re essentially paying money to someone to lock in a price.
First, thank you. You sound like a very conscientious person.
Second yeah that is generally what I've run into it's often one or a few people writing documentation that really benefits the organization but other people don't carry the weight and so when that person leaves it starts to harm the company as docs drift out of being current and no new docs are created, it is a slow burn though.

I wonder how we could reduce friction so more devs start to write code, that they clearly know they benefit from.
According to a recent Btselem study 25% of Israelis themselves think it's an appropriate term to use.

https://www.btselem.org/press_releases/2021413_new_all_popul...
> is there even a way to ensure that a business that pays you something with one hand, doesn't try to take it back with the other one?

Hold tighter when they try to take it back.

No there is no way to ensure that businesses don't try to maximize profits. Its the same reason you want the thing of value for lowest cost.
Used 1080Tis are going for 600€+, so new ones for 400 would probably sell like hot cakes.
Elon Musk isn't a genius. He's a dumb guy who got lucky. Go and read literally anything he writes. Obvious dumb guy.
I've actually tried switching to Bing, just because Bing's search results include the actual URL of the page when you right-click (instead of some Google-riffic monstrosity...)
I'm not sure that's necessarily meaningful. Sure, you pay for optionality in a put as opposed to a short, but it may be easier and cheaper to buy a put than finance a short if you believe the stock will go down. The downside isn't unlimited if you short, since I don't think you'd be on the hook if you hit a margin call, your collateral would simply be seized and your position would be exited.

I'm sure there's other intricacies in short vs buy a put, but I don't think you can infer too much from the choice without knowing a lot more. I think all you could say is that he's bearish on the stock in the short term.

I could be wrong though so I would love to hear other interpretations or whether there's some liability apart from your margin in a naked short.
Tether Is Setting a New Standard for Transparency
There is at least one of those available who recently left his previous position...

Joking, joking :D
I'd rather have a todo (that marks the line with a nice bright color in my IDE) than the immediate alternatives of #1: Not implementing a feature because it has room for improvement, or #2: Leave out the deficiency marking because it makes the code look more complete.
What crypto can I use at checkout?
Edge of Emulation: Pokemon Mini
You actually described a call option.
Much more likely in NYC than Paris (among other things because in Paris there's a turnstile _and_ a door, typically, and NYC has swing open emergency exit doors people use routinely)
It is, that's the wager.
There needs to be accountability. If a dog is poor at sniffing drugs, it needs to be taken out of service. I don’t know what anyone hasn’t thought about that except because everyone who decides on these processes don’t care.
This got some quick downvotes, but it's a reasonable concern. Anytime you reduce the takeoff and landing speed [in pursuit of being able to use shorter runways], you reduce the relative margin against unpredicted wind shear. A 20 knot loss of airspeed [windshear] is more "easily" ignored by an airplane with a rotation speed of 145 knots than one that rotates at 100 knots.
ed/ex works perfectly fine with only line input and output. Afaik TECO stared out like that too.

Gvim works for visual editing
How to make your marriage awesome: 6 secrets from a top divorce lawyer
Gig economy couriers should be eligible for a pension, says UK regulator
I'm not an expert on it really. They rotate the giant cylinder and the wind is blowing by. The rotation forms a low pressure zone one side of the cylinder which acts as a lift force perpendicular both to the rotational axis of the cylinder and the wind.

It's the same effect which "turns" a soccer ball if you kick it with a spin. There is a really nice demonstration of the effect in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OSrvzNW9FE

This wikipedia page has a way better summary than my attempt above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotor_ship
Hash indexing is sometimes used, but B-trees are more common so you can select with ORDER BY and also because you can insert additional records as many times as you want, by splitting nodes now and then, but never having to rehash the whole index.
How is the long term productivity of PHP these days? I used PHP last time more than 10 years ago and it did not shine there.
in the US perspective? Please, show a map that has ever had the country Palestine...

I love how a simple statement of fact is getting voted down: You can't make an agreement with a non-entity.

https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/139168

> In fact, historically, there was never an independent country named Palestine.

> So, the historical record says that Palestine was never a country, and was rarely ever an intact entity.

Recognition of... what? a "government" of a country that never existed? People can vote me down more but facts remain that the country never existed as a real entity.
The article sort of implies that Romania is on the list of countries being excluded, but note the chart which says “Romanian (Moldova)” - the Romanian language is indeed spoken there.