skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think that's right, audio sources are encoded as points in 3D space and the receiver downmixes to your speaker setup.
I agree. If they're an imminent danger to others, lock them up strictly for segregation and not gratuitous vengeance (that is, be as nice to them as practical given that you're locking them up), if they're manageable, leave them be.
People also expect their postcards to arrive untampered.

ISPs, Comcast in particular, inject ad-loading javascript into HTTP pages.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/why-comcasts-jav...

https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/9b5ikd/
This is a great strategy!
By all means provide an alternate study that shows 20Khz is the limit for human hearing.

Because from all accounts it is a myth.
Kind of, but they don't know which one is more favourable and resources are limited. If there are lots of seemingly OK options, an engine will have to spread those resources and explore lots of moves.

Chess engines tend to find good moves that seem really passive to humans. They don't create a threat or force an exchange. The purpose of the move may not be that complex, the payoff will become obvious 2-3 moves later. A human just wouldn't have thought to even explore it. There are no hints (like threats and exchanges) that it is worth exploring.

That's what I meant by prejudice.

Conversely, even in very option-rich positions... humans will explore the more active lines, and calculate material exchanges more deeply than other moves. If a normal player is calculating 7 moves deep in the mid game, that probably means a lot of material is being exchanged.

Remember that an equally matched engine is exploring for more moves than you are. The human is better at deciding which move to explore.
Wikipedia (of course!) has a list of locations intentionally blurred on public satellite map services:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_satellite_map_images_w...
> we finally have a real toolkit for creating layouts.

Here is the story of flexes: https://terrainformatica.com/2018/12/11/10-years-of-flexboxi...

Here is my original proposal at W3C/styles: https://terrainformatica.com/w3/flex-layout/flex-layout.htm, dated 2009 - 12 years ago, at the time they were implemented in Sciter.

So we might have flexes and grids 10 years ago. Finally. Sigh.
I had a class in college where a 40% curved to a B.

But yeah, the drug dogs are an end-around of the 4th Amendment.
Hydrogen sulfide is dangerous in a contained area, the smoke from a smallish fire producing it would be something to be aware of, not a catastrophe.
I do wonder what peoples reactions are going to be if the government comes out in next months congress report and just admits that these UAP's are real, in black-and-white terms.

There's lots of conjecture around about these being sensor errors or tricks of the eye, but when you're spending millions to train people to become pretty much the best trained observers you can get - and they spot this kind of thing - how can you continue to dismiss it as a non-physical object.

"If" it's aliens there's not much you can do, though that's the less likely outcome I can see. More likely, "If" its a foreign power with exotic technology/ some new way to perform recon then that's a real concern, and dismissing it off-hand should be even more concerning.
My point is that if it's a low number, a 300% increase is still a low number.

Using percentages without context is a red flag for me for something possibly being wrong with the article.
In practice, separating the subjective/objective elements is harder than it seems at first glance (and often impossible). The ideal, "perfect" contract would reflect the parties' intent with complete accuracy and would be clearly and fully interpreted by a judge/jury the exact same way. In reality, Party A and Party B want to "get the deal done." In many of the larger tech contracts I handle, the actual persons negotiating (sometimes even dedicated "contracts managers") are many steps removed from the stakeholders. Sometimes, it's a whole separate onboarding company. But even if it's the CEOs in the room, and they know fairly clearly what they want to put in a Statement of Work, they usually don't often consider (or want to think about) all of the intracies of the thousand ways something might go wrong. And standardized MSAs often fall very short (and sometimes lead to absurd results or contradictions); they are far from one size fits all and can't really be standardized to a menu of options either. 99% of what I do is dealing with retained background IP, warranties, indemnification, and liability limits. What is ultimately agreed upon is not usually something that can be determined with algorithmic certainty, nor would it matter, because the both parties would have to agree to use the same algorithm. In reality, it depends upon the particular type, severity, and likelihood of the risk to each party, each party's risk aversion, relative bargaining power, and -- much more than one might expect -- the entrenched corporate culture. A lot of the "art" in negotiating is presenting something to the other side that they can "sell" to their own superiors to get the deal done. And, very, very frequently, there's something irrational about it. For example, someone might not budge on narrowing an indemnification clause, but might bend on a blanket liability limit that would weaken it to practically nothing. Also, sometimes you might let something slide, because given the current state of the law with regard to how such a clause might be interpreted, you'd feel confortable enough that it would be interpreted in your favor -- i.e., in your risk assesment, you're considering how human beings (judge/jury) would interpret it. I've heard arguments before about how humans built laws and also built bridges, therefore laws can be reduced to scientific/mathematical/computational constructs. But unlike bridges, laws are based on this concept of "jurisprudence" which involves a foundation not built on mathematics, but instead built on ethics, morality, and philosophy. They're the thread of society. To fully "computerize" law, you'd have to do the same to society and humanity itself.
Ask HN: Tips and Advice for Building Publicly
The likes of Ryan Hoover (Product Hunt), Pieter Levels (Nomad List), Buffer have all built publicly to various extents, and it's said to engage users and demonstrate progress and momentum.

If you built publicly (or thought about doing so), what practical advice would you share with the community or others considering it?

Advice for all stages appreciated!

- Early stage startups might be on a shoestring budget, so simple tips to get started would be helpful!

- Did you open source (part/all) of your code? What were your security considerations? Did you worry about making it easier for competitors to copy?

- Are there downsides to open salary data?

- If you thought about endeavours to build publicly and decided against it, what was your rationale?

- If you have not built publicly but instead benefited from another startup doing so, please share what you learned!

Anecdotes, practical advice, interesting or surprising findings appreciated!
Wait, there are only four promotions! Queen, rook, bishop, and knight – you're not allowed to keep a pawn on the back rank.
Woah! That’s really exciting, I’d definitely tolerate some write slow-down if it means not having to run ZK.
You could deploy the vcluster pod without the syncer. That would give you a k3s cluster without a scheduler. You can create deployments, pods, services etc. but no containers would actually be started. Of course, that means you still need one host cluster though for running the half-baked vclusters on.
Not as far as I know?

Egypt does control access in and out along their own border, as every country does, but afaik the nature of that control is at least somewhat dictated by agreements between Egypt and Israel.

As far as I know Egypt does not do any of the other things I listed, like controlling what can go in and out of Gaza through borders that aren't their own, nor do they make military incursions into it or bomb it.

Also, and I think this is actually pretty key to the idea that Israel believes the land of Gaza to be part of Israel, if Egypt were to invade Gaza do you really believe that Israel would allow that to stand? If Israel truly considered Gaza a state not under its jurisdiction, Egypt annexing Gaza would likely be a welcome outcome.
The Collectors Who Hunt Down Radioactive Glassware
telnet is not shipped in the box on Windows and macOS, ssh is.
Hack Club founder here. I'm so glad you know SSHTron too!

I built SSHTron a few years ago at a hackathon. It served as the inspiration for jobs.hackclub.com.

The code for both is open source, at https://github.com/zachlatta/sshtron and https://github.com/hackclub/jobs respectively.
I assumed the implication of the OC was that 4 engines was the undisputed standard for long flights over open water, which would be kind of true until like, the early 80s.
Why is it? It is dishonest to compare per tx anything, also. There is a certain amount of energy used per block, so that blocks are emitted every 10 mins in a way that cannot be faked (proof of work). This trustless time stamp system allows us to arrange transactions so that chronology is respected without a trusted third party. This is technological and economic break through. It is more valuable than you realize. The energy that goes in protects ALL blocks that came before it, and thus all transactions. The security of history of transactions is increasing over time with more energy! Proof of work is good, honest and very difficult to fake. It requires no trust when only trusted models worked before — priceless
We got nothing in Calvert County!
My current "VM" inspirations include...regular expressions, constraint logic, modular synthesizers, three-ring binders.

You can go really, really far away from a computing system being a Turing machine with arithmetic, if you work at it - like, that's the thing you already have in every PL. But I think getting away from that also entails getting down and dirty with your chosen benchmark of expressiveness, and accepting that the system does not do some things well, and if you want to have multiple things coordinated, then you need to be careful about expressing that, too, to avoid just making a Turing tarpit.
Is that supposed to be some kind of excuse for derailing the peace process? Are you actually denying that progress toward a two-state solution happened between the Oslo Accords in 1993 and Hamas taking power in 2006?

Like it or not the government of Israel and the PLO made a good-faith effort to establish a legitimate Palestinian state. It is not an easy task, the solution is not simple and there are a lot of legitimate grievances on both sides that need to be sorted out. Unfortunately groups like Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and various other terrorist organizations have derailed that process. There is no cabal hiding in the background and pulling the strings to sow chaos in Palestinian society (do people really need to be told that wild conspiracy theories are nonsense?).
What if China's vaccine was a biological weapon? Would you be OK with the slow reveal for that? Allowing governments to get away with things has consequences.

Speaking of governments... does the US funding of gain of function research change nothing in the discussion of vaccines?

The US RNA vaccines were funded by BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority) for 10+ years, the tech is not open-source, and only a few politically connected companies are allowed to manufacture them. Any criticism of these very new, never tried before vaccines are censored online. Censorship is so bad it's reaching great firewall of China levels on social media.

So we have a PsyOps campaign looking to move the US towards required vaccination, a government that funded the research that allowed a virus like this to exist, and we're still yelling "trust the science" at anyone who questions authority?
I find the word "debunk" has been frequently used by one political side to label any idea they disagree with.

This is a very strange word. When I read history of science books, this word was almost never used. Change of scientific consensus is not uncommon in the history of science. Scientists disagree with each other, debate with each other, but they don't claim they debunk each other.

I don't believe people use this word in good faith. It seems to be politically loaded power grab.
Computer Repair Perth- Res-Q IT Services
Businesses in Claremont often struggle to find the best of IT solutions. With Res-Q IT Services, the search concludes as we bring to you computer repair and Apple Mac repair services in proximity.
Update: just went outside to check (it’s dusk)... there are thousands more coming out right now. It’s gonna be nuts tomorrow morning.
As I recall this article by Nicholas Wade goes into why the Furin cleavage site is a strong signal of potential active engineering in the GoF vein.

https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-th...

As addition of a Furin cleavage site is an old hat acknowledged technique for increasing human infectivity of a virus. The issue with a zoonotic origin though, is that the odds of a mutation is incredibly small, and a recombination at that site would require the sequence to exist in another coronavirus, which has not
been discovered to date.

It is also known WIV researchers had recieved instruction from another virologist on "no-see-um" editing techniques that would not leave traces of the mechanism used to splice in an edit.

So not proof, but the network of coincidence is as hard to ignore as a spinal tap amp duct taped to your head, cranked to 11, playing the 1812 Overture.
I was a kid when the last brood X came out(Washington DC area) and it's epic, like something out of a movie. They literally darken the sky, and you sweep mounds of their carcasses off your driveway and sidewalk. We used to grab handfuls of them and throw them at each other in school, put them down our friends shirts as pranks, etc.
Yes, I guess Stockfish doesn't bother to consider a draw on the 50 move rule. It does, iirc, go for a draw if it has no better via threefold repetition.
Alcohol does a great deal of harm simply because it’s very common and often severely abused. Few drugs are harmless when heavily abuse for decades drives up tolerance levels.

Lifetime ultra heavy pot smokers for example face significant lung cancer risks, though very few people are heavy daily pot smokers for 50+ years at this point.

At the other end, 1 glass of wine every day for 60 years is as far as we can tell on net harmless. Where even light daily pot smoking still causes some lung issues on those timescales. So yes, alcohol in and of it’s self can be deadly but it’s not nearly as bad as these comparisons generally suggest.
I think if you had something of substance to say backing up what you originally said, you would have said it already instead of constantly calling yourself a victim as a diversion.
Yes. It’s possible some engines represent bishop-on-black as a different thing than bishop-on-white, which would make 5 with bishops and 3 without.
You can’t check for humanity bots can solve all capcha.
Detroit to Host Inaugural Augmented Reality Art Festival Starting in June
> You consume in a slower manner.

> To answer your question of how do I curate a library, legally, is just over time. I have a lot of musicians I like, and when I find them, I purchase their music, and I listen to it.

I guess I can just start buying their albums today, slowly, but I often found it difficult to even find a vendor of their stuff online.

Thanks for the response.
Since high school I've wondered what those registers in the 0x3c0-0x3cf range are for. I found them in a book somewhere and started writing to them to see what would happen. The only one I found interesting was the PEL mask register, which was useful for practical jokes at school (I wrote a TSR to write to the register periodically, causing the colors to change).

This is the first I've heard of someone using one of these registers for something useful. It's a shame I can't send this knowledge back in time to my former self.
I liked it! Quite fun, thanks :)!
How Israel Helped Create Hamas
Would Dhall [0] suffice?

[0]: https://dhall-lang.org/
Israel can get all the detailed imagery it needs by just launching a reconnaissance aircraft or drone.

So on that basis I would say it only stops the Palestinians from getting imagery of the area.

Now considering the fact Palestine only has rockets and not missiles, I doubt that imagery is of much value to them.

Call me cynical, but I suspect the more important reason to keep these images blurred might be to stop the rest of the world from seeing what is going on.
> that people in my social and dating life will think I am either unintelligent or lazy because my university had a reputation as a middling party school.

Thats's a sign you're dating and being friends with the wrong people.

I'm saying this as an undergraduate myself. There are better people out there who really don't give a damn about prestige and just see you and work with you as you are, career-wise, business-wise, and even in intimate relationships.
The answer is that people like to simplify needlessly complex things. (Example: this simple comment replacing the needlessly complex article.)
This, and the World’s app appetite in general. I’ve noticed them up their maker game in various ways with other apps like CapCut which makes video editing very easy and is owned by the same company as Tik Tok. People made a big stink about Tik Tok’s privacy, but there are so many apps still in there with sensitive info going through PRC servers.
Marginnote is another app that is so good for research on iOS. I was reading a very obscure book with it while also on the Marginnote beta. I quit testing and noticed months later, in promotional material, the book I was reading was displayed as an example in the iOS store. Could have been coincidence, but the odds are quite low. They are gaining in cool tech soft power quickly.
Unfair, no doubt.

But people who have lost everything in one go? That can only be the result of either grave incompetence/inexperience, or behavioural problems of the kind that don't go so well with trading.

Whatever it was that made them put all their eggs in one basket, these people should not have been making - or even have been able to make - these trades in the first place.
Project EVIDENCE has records-ish of some of those deletions.

https://project-evidence.github.io/
Scientist dated some of the oldest stars with unprecedented precision
Scuba appears to be an in-memory-only database, so it’s possibly faster (not seen benchmarks nor used it) but at the cost of persistence.

Is Procella even usable by anyone not-google?

Haven’t used dremel + capacitor, but have used Snowflake and found it lacking. Promises a lot, performance was just kind of alright, support was useless, sales team was aggressive to the point of harassment, and it was eye-wateringly expensive on top of all that. Some people love it, I will never go near it again, it’s advantages just aren’t sufficient to warrant choosing it over ClickHouse or even Redshift.
A Mysterious Tech Billionaire Created Two Fortunes and a Software Sweatshop
Yeah, but it's patchy. There's a couple big trees down the block from my house where each one has hundreds of those exoskeletons on them, there's literally a carpet of the exoskeletons around them. While my backyard has 6 trees and I've yet to notice even one out there. I've seen a few dozen live ones, but all seem to be freshly matured. Most of them didn't have their wings fully unfolded yet, and haven't seen a single one flying or heard a single one calling.
Depends what you mean by best. I live in Japan, and if you look at Mt Fuji it certainly is very pretty, and some people are very impacted by that, but there’s little depth beyond that to me, whereas there’s infinite depth diving into the actual people and culture that makes up Japan, reveling in the mundane. And you’ll never find that no matter how much you look at Mt. Fuji.

There’s a vast difference between being in a place for the entertainment value of seeing nice things, vs actually immersing in that place - and personally I prefer the latter over the former.
This is how the Postfix MTA does it. And that software is super good, like bullet-proof.
Tbh no lol. I just check caniuseit.com, and that's it.
I have been fascinated with Göbekli Tepe since I first heard of it. I really do think we need to rethink our idea of civilization and that it likely stretches back (as loose groups) tens of thousands of years. However, the common definition of civilization as it stands does not include sites like these. Göbekli Tepe Is thought by archaeologists to be a a pre-Neolithic or early Neolithic and that it is more of a site where tribes, who were otherwise hunter gatherers, would meet for religious purposes. Jericho is another where we have an actual city that is thought to be made up of non farmers who were otherwise sedentary. This doesn’t meant that the article is wrong about farming being crucial to Göbekli Tepe but it does mean that archaeologists aren’t seeing all of the signs of a true civilization which they tend to care more about writing than farming per say.

I do think writing as we know it stretches back just not as an alphabet but more as tally marks and cave painting. A lot of information can be exchanged that way and we do have records of cultures going back >20,000 years using these.

I think if you went back a few tens of thousand years you would see culture that are a lot closer to civilization than we like to think. But again, they wouldn’t fit the current definition of civilization.
> Does Egypt also claim their land?

Nope. It (or rather the United Arab Republic, of which modern Egypt is a successor but not the sole successor) temporarily occupied it (officially, pending resolution of the Israel/Palestine issue, but terminated early by force) from 1959-1967 without claiming it.

There was some ambiguity about Egypt’s stance between 1967-1978, but after 1978 they unambiguously had no claim, even administrative, over Gaza.
You can buy them in the form of Cybernox nonstick pans. Unfortunately the things are somewhat susceptible to chloride corrosion - not the best thing for cookware!
I wish Apple devices support Opus.
I read it in Nicholas Wade's article: https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-th... (long read).

Some more reading: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210217/The-origin-of-SAR...

All these lines of evidence and reasoning show that the acquisition of the polybasic furin cleavage site by SARS-CoV-2 is a “missing link” in our understanding of its evolutionary history, that can only be addressed through the discovery of new viruses.”
Len Deighton and the Mundanity of Spies
> One thing often overlooked about the Hindenburg and its reputation as being a dangerous bomb with people hanging below it is that there were a substantial number of survivors -- out of 97 passengers/crew, 62 survived.

Hindenburg wasn't the deadliest airship disaster, it was just the final straw. It's the best known of the crashes because it was highly publicized and the last. The USS Akron crash killing 73 of 76 crewmen. There were no survivors from the 52 people on the Dixmude. 44 of 49 died in the R38 crash. 34 of 43 died in the Roma crash. 48 of 54 died in the R101 crash.
Thanks for the link. The commentary notes that this was possible because Rybka is an algorithmic engine with hard constraints like "must try to win in 50 moves to avoid tie", and this is what Nakamura exploited to win. DeepMind and other deep learning/neural network approaches don't have hard rules like this.