skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It also benefits from capital appreciation.

As for breaking even, the security is highly liquid and can be sold at any time to recover one’s capital.
TIL martial and marshal are unrelated etymologically, though marshalling data is by analogy with marshalling troops, and related to the military office.

Marshal = mariscalcus = "horse servant", compare mare and seneschal. Martial = from Mars, god of war.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/marshal
The most money is to be made by selling assets to a greater fool (or sage?) in the biggest asset bubble of humanity. Anyone throwing rocks at Dogecoin for being a bubble is living in overpriced glass houses.

I’m not saying there will be a crash. It will be interesting to see how this money experiment turns out.
Sadly very common in Silicon Valley culture. And this is far from the most cult-like thing about Pivotal.
The macOS D compiler cross-compiles to iOS, x86_64, and arm64. It just ships with 3 standard libraries built for those arch.
And in a capitalist 3rd world society, they're still happening now. A lot of people I see here in brazil are at their doors selling stuff on their feet and doing whatever needs doing 6 days a week.

The saving grace is that there are more holidays here than in most of the first world.
Full Stack Developer - Insights
REMOTE (US, UK OR CANADA)

So, only those three countries right ?
> Do you expect everything to be written in English for your benefit?

I'm not even sure what you mean to say here. Is asking that the README contain a single two letter phrase reference to the subject matter, the same as expecting the entirety of the world to be written in english?

Quite literally all I've stated is that if you're making something that's clearly intended to be public-facing, it's worth taking the exact ½ of a second to allow people who can't read your mind to understand what context they should read something in?
NYT only cares about keeping their stupid costumers happy within their echo chamber. It’s not a non-profit. Garbage desires in, garbage consequences out. The free market can’t do magic.
I don't understand why people are trying to build smaller PCRs. Why PCR of all things?

You can do close to nothing with PCR alone.
You'll need primers, enzymes, buffers, centrifuge, electrophoresis instruments, etc

PCR is not an expensive device compared to all the other costs of experiments.
Does anyone in your family suffer from hypothyroidism? That, combined with depression (it's a spectrum) is what was getting to me. I've since changed some habits, I'm taking 1 small thyroid pill each morning and going to therapy once per week. I still feel tired and lacking in energy from time to time but I have improved.
I come up with an elegant solution to a problem, but the previous dev has architect things in such a way won't work.

Finding an elegant solution to a problem in isolation is usually quite easy because you can ignore all the edges that make it hard. Finding an elegant solution to something within the constraints of where the problem actually lies is what separates great developers from the rest of us.
As someone having painfully translated some of STB headers over the years to D, this is good news. It's very easy for the translation to go slightly wrong and then code you don't understand breaks, usually loosing the time investment. That said, that work is pretty early to judge.
Blind Patients Hope Landmark Gene-Editing Experiment Will Restore Their Vision
I hope you never make the mistake of clicking on a clip from The Office!
A 1995 Tacoma xtracab length was ~ 200 inches. Today's Double Cab is ~ 212 inches. The Tacoma really hasn't changed in length in over 25 years. They have gotten about 10 inches wider in 2004 and a few inches taller (every model is the Off Road height now).

Side note, no one would call a Tacoma "compact". It was a small pickup in 1995 when it was introduced and now people call a 'midsize' truck.
I agree. When it is the right solution to the problem at hand there is nothing better than a good streaming solution.

It goes for pretty much all technology, that you need to choose the right tool for the job. For some reason the marketing just gets most people all worked up and ready to fit problems into technology that was never designed for their problems.
> The state of each card. If you define a macrostate in such a way as it can have only one microstate, then yes, entropy is 0. It is also completely artificial.

Obviously, a deck of cards can be in a lot of different microstates, I'm not sure what do you mean ? Consider that "macrostate" is another name for "distribution" ?

> There is indeed some overlap (I have personally worked for a couple of years on applying information theory to calculate entropy in glass-forming materials), but not enough that you can just apply random concepts from one field to the other. Basically, your interpretation is that "we know a lot about the system, therefore entropy is low", whilst in a physical system it's the other way around: "entropy is low, therefore we know a lot about it". Knowing something does not change the state of the system you are observing.

This is why having two different terms "entropy" and "lack of information" that correspond to the same underlying physical concept is problematic : it causes this kind of confusion.

Knowing a lot about a system is equivalent to having low entropy about it.

> Entropy itself is whatever it is even before we bother calculating it, and we can estimate it different ways. [...] Entropy is a thermodynamical property of a bit of stuff, regardless of what we know about it. The conservation of Gibbs free energy does not suddenly break down because we stop (or start) looking.

"Looking" (aka "measurement" or "observation") is not a "free" operation. To go back to the example of the deck of cards, the deck would have needed to be prepared beforehand to be "ordered", and the action of "looking" at it and to check in what order each card is in is not "free" either. In the same way, neither constructing an aligned spin system nor checking its alignment are "free".

As another example, consider the Szilard engine, which allows us to "extract" energy "from" information :

https://www.pnas.org/content/111/38/13786

(Semi-)Classical entropy is defined in terms of probability, it's a functional that depends on a specific probability distribution (aka macrostate) : it's the expected value (aka weighted average) over the surprisals (aka information contents) of all the possible outcomes (aka microstates).

(There's also a generalization of it for the situations where we have entangled microstates and quantum mechanics really come into play.)

As far as we know, this model works for all the situations where the two nuclear forces and/or relativistic effects can be neglected.
By this logic, the union should have all workers slow down. Or at least do the bare minimum to not get fired (oh wait, they won’t get fired because the union won’t allow it). You’re actually helping your fellow workers by making your labor more expensive!

This is what folks who worked at GM in Detroit told me. Guys would punch in, then head to the bar. I remember seeing local new coverage with undercover video of these guys being at strip clubs while on the clock. Was going on for years.

Here is a more recent example...

https://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/chrysler-workers-fired-f...
I've seen the film. Interesting atmosphere, digital effects are somewhat dated (think 90ies video), practical effect are fine. I am not a manga reader, so it may have flown over my head.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uzumaki_(film)
It's not like a conversation. It's like doing a task together. You're focused on the work, and most of the time, you're giving each other small nudges, rather than having a conversation. Not all the time. It's hard to explain.

It is tiring. Some people don't like it. Evidently, it burns some people out (i paired for about eight years and didn't burn out). But some people get on okay with it. And when it's done well, it really is extremely effective.
Read a random page from the last book you read. Do you remember any of it?
For most people the answer is no. Conclusion: you're always safe to skim
since you'll only retain 10% anyway.
> But some percent stick around?

Yes, these are the ones that you start to invest time in.

Coming back to the organisation I volunteer for, the majority of the volunteers are already 'members' (e.g. they have purchased annual season tickets, etc). A few will drop out after a few weeks, typically when they realise that the work can be physically demanding and in all weathers. But once people demonstrate reliability and earn trust, then they usually get the chance to do more interesting things.
That's very pretty to look at and easy to read. But it's a huge pain in the ass to debug when getPrice starts failing. You get a 42000 line stack trace and the only information is that it failed somewhere in that long singular line.

The first thing you do is unravel all that crap to a normal loop so you can debug it properly.

And when you're done, you really don't want to go back to the stream way of doing just in case it breaks again and you need to start debugging once more.
If Mozart had to spend more, or most, of his time gathering food and tending to his basic needs would he have had time to make music? What about the musicians who played it?

Wealth is the ability to do more with less effort. Some of that free labor goes to arts, science, or philosophy and advances humanity. Maybe too much goes toward building even more wealth or a fancier house/things but you would not have the former without the ability to get later.
I would not call 15% underpayment by 60% customers to be " a modest amount" if a company routinely had to settled 60% of its account payable with a 15% shave those companies would go out of business very quickly

Also in the Hospital context there are other factors that drive up the costs. Keep in mind that about 70-80% of all US Hospitals are non-profit
Getting past the "fear of getting it wrong" is a powerful skill. Learning that it's actually easier to fix a mistake than to get something right first time is the first step to developing that skill.
> These are implementation details.

Which are what a plan is made of. If you live in a democracy and not a dictatorship, you have about a 0.0002% chance of keeping the parents of a kidnapped, murdered child in jail for more than a day for the crime of "attempted ransom paying" without you and your family becoming pariahs and being screamed at in public places, and your political party being annihilated from politics even after press releasing your expulsion.

It's not just the parents that would have to sacrifice.
What do you think of Asimov's long novels that create worlds, populate them across millennia and then show an interplay between characters?
Will there be enough extra tanker-hours and tired tanker-hours to see a statistically significant upturn in accidents and deaths?
We do, for physics. Very often c is treated as 1. The "meter" is really just a conveniently human-scaled unit, equivalent to the "degree" in trigonometry.
Pyqt5 for Mac Os 10.11
what are the things I need to download to be able to run pyqt5.11 on my el capitan? and have you used it to make a gui?
Humans are limited to track and maintain stable relationships with ~150 people
I wonder if you could transcribe really-real time into something like Etherpad? https://etherpad.org
But you could look at it like this: by not choosing you are losing what you could have gained. I think. Maybe you are choosing the most optimal option, and giving up the lesser ones.
Booster of Theseus. Love it!
Would you advice Marie Curie or Richard Feynman to work less and settle for the output of average physicists? I’m sure they could get away with it.

Is this “cult” about daring to spend less of your life watching TV? I’m missing some central perspective judging my the comment thread.
I'm late to respond, but automatic line wrapping completely butchers code formatting and creates a difficult to skim mess.

I also don't understand why fixed width would cause any issues in practice. The only time I find myself coming anywhere near 80 characters is for API calls with way too many arguments (I'm looking at you, OpenGL). Even then, the fault arguably lies with me for my tendency to use overly descriptive variable names. And anyway, it's trivial to split such calls across multiple lines such that it actually improves the overall readability.
So, almost all tasks.
It's not entirely so black and white, and it's definitely no XOR. You can work hard and fail due to being unlucky - as far as I understand it, that's most people who start their first business. You can be lucky and fail upwards, see Trump, who botched more projects than he didn't. And you can be lucky and apply yourself, see Elon Musk or Bill Gates.

It's important to realise that both play a role, because you don't want to self sabotage when your business fails due to extraneous circumstance. Perhaps you should try again, preparing better for things you can't control. Perhaps it really just was a bad time to get promoted and you should stick with the company longer.

It's also important to realise that someone who got a couple mill as an inheritance or "boost" for their business will always have a leg up - if you're measuring success in monetary terms. The same goes for challenging entrenched competition in your sector. Perhaps you should re-target to businesses that will be amenable to your agility and tailor-made solutions, because that kind of service might not be offered by well-established competitors.

Equally important is realising that there is a basic truth to the biblical parable of the talents: no matter what you get, you won't get anywhere without applying yourself, whatever that means to you.
Show HN: I made a website that helps you practice your HTML and CSS skills
Hi HN!

I'm a designer who's been learning to code for a while now (far longer than I'd love to admit) and one of my biggest issues was trying to find something to code.

I would usually design something and then code it, but that took too much time. So I made Codewell!

Let me know your thoughts on this project and why you think this could or couldn't be helpful for beginners!
Having separate terms for "entropy" and "(lack of) information" is IMHO way worse :

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27095212
We could issue letters of marque and reprisal. Basically, if Russia won't prosecute their cybercriminals the US will permit cyber crime against Russian targets.
>The US and other government wills outlaw all cryptocurrencies but the ones that they control (“Govcoin,” as The Economist refers to them). Game over.

Just like how outlawing drugs ended the drug trade.
> “StackOverflow people” - what are they, even?

StackOverflow has a real problem with attracting strict rule followers who love over-moderating. I expect Wikipedia suffers from a similar issue but it's not such an interactive site so most people aren't exposed to it.

> Where’s all that anger even coming from?

StackOverflow can be an extremely frustrating experience due to people who probably think they are helping casually closing questions.

> Finally, I have never closed a dupe in all my puff, and I’m thoroughly unimpressed by those that do.

Good! I wish there were more people like you! I'm still waiting for the day when somebody starts a friendly competitor to StackOverflow that doesn't support closing questions, gives authors actual control over what they write (can you imagine if other people could edit your comments here?) and does away with mods. One day...
> "Trusted by organizations of all sizes".

Apart from Itep Pictures, all others seem to be in Turkey. Are you based in Turkey?

If yes, allow me to place zero trust on everything-Turkey, under the current government/leadership. I strongly believe that Turkey lacks the basic/fundamental freedoms and rule of law is going whichever way this regime's leader wants it to go.

I would similarly hesitate to upload such data to Iran, North Korea, Syria.

If no, where are you based?
Kipling is a "Dane" pretending that how his country got that way is because of its moral superiority and toughness, which makes it's own demands for geld justified by the burden of maintaining its flawless character.
It is an error. Nobody says "an history".
1990 wasn't a Tacoma, it was a T100/Pickup. The Tacoma was introduced in 1995. It weighed 3155 lbs for a 2WD in 1995 not 2700 lbs. You're also comparing the Regular Cab to the Access Cab for length. Regular isn't made anymore (because it didn't sell), but Regular to Regular is 174 to 190 (2004-2015).
Traditional pairing uses one keyboard, and one screen (or one pair of screens, etc). When i went to Pivotal, that was the first time i had seen two keyboards and mirrored screens.

I think the Pivotal way is significantly worse - you have a physical machine to yourself, but not a logical machine, so there is a base level of confusion. Sharing a single keyboard means that it's always obvious who is driving. Sharing a single screen means you can gesture at things.

Rather than giving everyone a machine, you can have a few spares for doing email and other solo stuff (as long as you are using webmail!). If people are pairing most of the time, you don't need a dedicated machine each.
I'll just rot13 this and anyone who's interested will decode it in less time that it takes me to type it - why, most fellows here will just move each char thirteen to the left in their head...

I love HN
Itertools
I'm from the EU/NATO side of this. It does help to understand how the other side in a conflict thinks! It helps to establish context.

From Russia's perspective NATO has been progressively taking over countries that were previously part of Russia's safety buffer.

Ukraine entering talks to join the NATO sphere of influence was one step too far for them. Russia has a major naval base at Sevastopol that threatened to "fall into NATO hands." From their own strategic viewpoint they could never allow this to happen without a fight!

And of course, everyone is the good guy in their own story.
Yes, but there's still a lot of work after getting the transcript, even if it is accurate. Researchers/journalists need a good editing tools for reviewing, editing, summarizing and etc.
It's blindingly obvious that you would only ask this to someone who should know it.
This is so they can fix bugs. Did you read the bit about how they are adding telemetry so they can debug rare crashes?
Cyberattack on US pipeline is linked to criminal gang
Marvel created a new “visual language” for The Falcon and the Winter Soldier
I still can't actually parse the title. What is "college success working at scale"?

Edit: Ok, halfway through the article it became clear: The proper reading is

> "Why Aren’t SMS Interventions which are Designed to Boost College Success Working at Scale?"

and not the way I read it initially:

> "Why don't we design SMS interventions so that they boost college success working, at scale?"

Funny enough, this is a case where languages with different capitalization for noun vs verb (working, in this case) would immediately resolve ambiguities. Well, except for Title Case, I guess.
Well the fact that the UK bankrolled aka bribed a lot of the collation against France is well known.

Years ago I was at first Tuesday in London and thought that VC looks just like that Napoleonic bankers portrait that in all the history books - looked down and the name badge was "Rothschild" .
Depends on the chip manufacturer. Nordic obsoletes versions of their Bluetooth chips at the drop of a hat. I worked for 2 years on a smartwatch that used the nRF51822 and they went through about 8 revisions of the chip during that time, occasionally obsoleting the software API as well. It was a nightmare to work with. We open sourced our design but it is useless to anyone now because they changed the hardware and API's yet again. Any open source hardware likely encounters the same problem eventually.

I think this churn in parts is hurting innovation since it makes things very difficult for small companies just starting out. It also wastes enormous amounts of human effort redesigning boards and rewriting software. People who could be inventing new products are tied up rehashing the existing ones. The cost to the world must be enormous. I do not understand how anyone could think this is a good thing and a reasonable way to run things. It is completely insane.
This would be terrible in the long term because without ransomware companies regularly carrying out such attacks, vulnerabilities would remain unaddressed until a rival nation decides to use them. Much better to have one pipedown temporarily shut down now than for China or Russia to shut them all down at once sometime in future.
This article made me realise that I don't know how to perform step-through debugging on chained of operations on Streams in Java, so I looked it up. I found out that there's Stream Trace Dialog in IntelliJ IDEA [0]. I guess it proves your point that working with Stream API requires additional tooling in cases when the code doesn't 'just work'.

[0]: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/analyze-java-stream-oper...
Isosurfaces? False colours? Volumetric rendering? Cross-sections showing field strength through that plane? Field strength at solid surfaces?

Pick any one.

I find even questions like this revealing: Why are you asking me such incredibly basic questions instead of having a dozen renderings ready to hyperlink?

If you ask a NASA guy to link some airflow simulations, he won't retort with "what criteria would satisfy you?". He'll just straight up link a bunch of gorgeous renderings of physically accurate airflow simulations.

Not cartoons.
I also didn't feel any issues on last 8GB MBA (pre M1) until I started feeling a year down the line. Everything was running slowly after couple of updates including Firefox.
Having your life destroyed by an unfair process is just as much of an injustice when you are not intelligent.
I wonder how many people have been to the scary devil monastery, or still know what it is.
p.s. on [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Macnamara
Not sure why you think the way China does it has to be the only way it can be done. It's exactly like shouting "COMMUNISM!!!!" at every social policy idea. Get a grip.
Cannot see spirals without thinking about Uzumaki. And by considering all his work, saying Junji Ito is a master of horror isn't an overstatement.
Please don't read faster. One negative thing that technology and the faced-paced-life, in general, has brought us is a world full of skimmers. We read snippets and think we know something.
Reading for pleasure is another story, but you specifically asked about "building onto the knowledge of people". Makes me think that you want to learn, or add to your understanding of something. In that case, take the time to really, read and critically think about what you are reading.
side note: keep a notepad and pen with you and write down your thoughts on what you're reading for later reflection.
You wont truly "know" something until after you have read it, thought about the material, and placed into a context that you can relate to.
Good Luck
There's a good chance for a lot more than that to come their way. Congress has spent almost $50B on SLS+Orion for Artemis, which Moonship would make totally redundant.
Is there a comparison with the other approaches, like htod? The PR describes them but does not say why this is better.
Show HN: Acid Properties in a SQL Database Explained
Call it wailing if you want, but what you are really describing is a different philosophy in product design: stability vs. flexibility. Western brands aim for stability for customers to be able to buy the same products, with the same guarantees, for longer periods. I am not saying one philosophy is better than the other, but they are not whining out of laziness; it is a different set of design requirements and assumptions for customer products.
More details here https://medium.com/the-svt-tech-blog/encore-open-source-lice...