skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s fine if he thinks it’s stupid, but then he shouldn’t complain that he doesn’t pay enough either as if only he could pay more then he would do so. BS!

I don’t have a problem with the guy or with his wealth, but the whole “oh but if they’d only tax me” thing is infuriating.

Hell, he could just endow any number of non-Ivy League schools and pay for kids to go to college.
Resource planning, timesheet, time tracking in Jira
Well, you’ve done some good work yourself, based on your profile:

> Investor, husband, father, ex-Microsoft. Creator of vuepressbook.com.

Being a good husband and a father while common, still involves effort, and is an accomplishment in itself. Also, being an investor is way to have a big positive impact on the world! So is writing that little book on Vuepress! And you can still more creative stuff (even if you’re close to retirement) in your life—especially if you have saved up a FIRE level of money.
Not without leaving US and maybe renouncing citizenship. But it is pretty simple to do. I live in EU and pay about 10% from $100k+ salary.
l know one of the founders, Benjamin, who has been a many-time CodeDay participant. He spends a lot of time helping the newer coders understand how to turn their ideas into code on our Discord, and is always friendly and obviously passionate about helping others learn to code. I'm super happy something like this exists to help him work on the next generation of coding education software.
Fuck the Bread. The Bread Is Over (2020)
Each pod in a Kubernetes cluster should register itself as a separate LLC and declare bankruptcy on shutdown. Free cloud deployments!
This is correct. My gums unfortunately receded and
* my teeth are extremely sensitive
* the area is sore constantly
* I will need a graft from elsewhere in my mouth to correct it.
It's nuts to me that our government lets this happen, yet strives to vilify the upper middle class as the "billionaire class" and tax the shit out of them.
Yes but the down button is stuck so you can only go left or right and only a little bit.
What risk is there in something the US government does itself, which relates?

* a treatment they give high ranking high risk individuals who have to go overseas

* a technology the US government uses, but cannot discuss, which they are exposed to. RF, or RF leakage.

It's not that I am incapable of accepting this is an externality, an attack, the bad-guys, but I do seriously wonder if this is a shoot-self-in-foot thing, analogous to the consequences of the gulf war CBW treatment effect on troops, or some RF communications gear and lack of shielding, or something.

130 officials is a high count. How many locations. What's the epidemiology.

Here's an entirely fictive example:

"use these headphones, they're guaranteed to prevent overhearing secret conversations using your Mac"

<headphones have been badly designed, the RF shielding actually focusses something inside the head, apart from doing whatever the NSA directed to limit overhearing>

The standard Malaria treatment "lariam" is now suspected of causing huge increases in suicide in Australian troops, in some cases years after.

Here's another entirely fictive example:

"all staff who are seconded to the following list of 130 economies worldwide must have <anti CBW shot> now"

<anti CBW shot> turns out to be a bad batch, badly manufactured, highly experimental drug...

In both these cases, there are reasons the government could legitemately decide not to declare whats going on: if they reveal they know certain monitoring takes place, and how they mitigate, they reveal the limits of what can be detected, and what can be mitigated.

If they reveal they are treating people for CBW risk, and it can be detected in the bloodstream, they provide a guaranteed mechanism to identify staff engaged in security-related contexts from a simple assay. They also invite design of CBW offensive weapons which are not prevented by this CBW shot.
The point is that there is not reduced mass.

You have the same weight, but less traction. That is not the same as reducing weight, in which case the two cancel out as you said.
I worry about the same thing, but in Google's defense, docs is a wysiwyg document editor, not a webpage for displaying info. It's meant to help users create and edit documents. It has different needs than HTML.
Watch out, once someone starts successfully selling prepackaged cauliflower steaks then they'll come to take "steak" away too.
A better use-case is having a third-party upstream service that you want your own service's users to be able to talk to directly — i.e. without using your service as an intermediary gateway. If you configure your third-party SaaS with your own JWT public key, you will be able to have your users

1. Log in with your service, receiving a JWT token

2. Send that token back to your service, as the auth key for authenticating as themselves with your service.

3. Also send that same token to the third party service, to authenticate requests against your service's account.

(One place where I just set this up the other day: allowing users of a crypto app to make authenticated requests to Infura via the MetaMask browser extension, where we're paying for the Infura credits to enable that. We send the user a JWT token; the client JS uses that token to build an Infura URL, and configures the MetaMask SDK with it. Infura accepts the requests as coming from "us" because it recognizes the JWT signing key we configured.)
> various conspiracy theories on HN thought it was a deliberate attempt to hamper FF

I remember those being fairly rampant.

I wonder if a technical blog post about the issue would have silenced some of the conspiracy theories.

Regardless, there's a lesson in there somewhere. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by degenerate performance of a browser pushed to its limits?
You forgot about the latency of going through the atmosphere, and the Manhattan distance between the satellites.
China tech crackdown turns to food delivery giant Meituan; $39B wiped off value
>...but agencies aren’t provided with the necessary appropriations to have the work performed, hence the mandate is left unfulfilled...

This is ultimately, IMO, why many 'cybersecurity' risks manifest. The work to secure things isn't valued and is always undervalued or even unfunded. It takes more time, effort and skill to make more secure software. In addition, adding security layers makes many processes less efficient and more time consuming. Working in secure environments means productivity has to take a hit.

These costs can't continually be passed to software development without appropriate resource allocations. Software already runs 'lean' in most ecosystems. If you want to add more requirements, you need to pay for it because it costs more and tends to add ongoing costs to develop and use more secure software systems.
> As of now, the laptop without any OS pre-installed is priced at ¥8,181 ($1,276), and the one with Unity OS costs ¥8,944 ($1,395) as reported by GizmoChina

That seems pretty steep for an old cellphone processor and 8GB of ram.
https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/css-paint-polyfill

Seems there is for parts of it already
I do see a day when every database that promises immutability periodically checkpoints the root of a hash tree of every piece of data they have into the bitcoin blockchain.

Whether it's the Internet Archive, the Library of Congress, or your personal git repo, if there's some piece of data that you may want to be able to prove hasn't been altered, you check it into the blockchain.
<sniggers in Australian>
The rates of IT Security consultants with Fed Gov't experience just increased by 100% overnight - for at least the next 60 days of the date of this order.
He was hired to work in the Bay Area alongside those women he despises though.
Go to the store. You are not in any way getting the typical experience. This thing is by far the fastest computer I have ever touched in terms of UX responsiveness.
I think https://www.perceptilabs.com/ is a little better.

But I hope the future is more like DreamCoder: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08381
Is this reason enough for Latinx racism?
It is a tool, you are right. But not the solution so it should not be so heavily encourage.

What should be encourage: a better distribution of the profits in the value production chain. At amazon, Wallmart, all the employees should be obscenely well paid (relatively to their job), the enormous profits should not be concentrated at the top.
FWIW I think the latest homepage explains what Glitch is / does much more than the previous one.
Some people like to make a defer macro like this:

#define itervar(i) i##__LINE__
#define FOR_DEFER(pre, post) for (int itervar(i) = ((pre), 0);
!itervar(i)++; (post))

Foo *foos;
FOR_DEFER(foos = alloc(Foo, 1024), free(foos))
{
// This "loop" only runs once.
}

Those can be easily stacked

FOR_DEFER(foos = alloc(Foo, 1024), free(foos))
FOR_DEFER(bars = alloc(Bar, 1024), free(bars))
{
///
}

Here is a memory arena macro.

#define FOR_MEMORY_ARENA(name) for DEFER(Arena name = make_arena(), free_arena(&arena))

FOR_MEMORY_ARENA(arena)
{
Foo *foos = arena_alloc(&arena, Foo, 1024);
Bar *bars = arena_alloc(&arena, Bar, 1024);
// all allocations automatically freed at the end
}
Definitely looks inspired by scratch. I think its going to fill the same niche as scratch as well!
It's impossible to make people understand a truth they've already heavily invested in rejecting, no matter how obvious and unquestionable that truth is. More than any other thing in the world the BTC saga taught me that. Stupidity alone although a big part of it is simply inadequate to explain it wholly given just how stupid the BTC position actually is.

Kids can grasp it and yet heavily invested fanatical professionals in the field cannot.

It's sad.
IMO the state should give incentives and ways for billionaires and mega corps to invest into new technologies as well as new programs that will invigorate the economy, technology and other perspectives of the society. Sadly it seems it is doing the opposite.
I was a semi-truck driver for a while. A lot of "fuel savings" gimmicks amount to sticking a card on your bicycle frame so the spokes hit it a lot and make it sound like you're going fast. It's bullshit. Why do some companies do it? Tax breaks and grants. Do they work. No. Why don't all the companies do it? There's actually a limited amount of companies who can apply for the breaks because the laws are incredibly fucking stupid when it comes to commercial trucks (and to drivers). Similar how there are limited amount of carbon tax credits you can apply for. Some companies just don't waste their time. I have nothing against protecting the environment. But bullshit gimmicks won't do a thing.
> Apple shouldn't be in charge of commerce on iPhone.

So just opt in when the phone gives you the choice.
Or just look into the older "dumb" versions of them. My Sonicare HX690 is by now over a decade old and still working perfectly fine.
Don't confuse "I don't see Argentina constantly being lambasted on /r/politics and /r/worldnews" with "Argentinean politics are better than that of the US". As the person you replied to would be the first to say, things are much, much, much better off in the US than in Argentina.
1. I think it's important to compare the security issues that JWT has had to the alternative. There, 'vanilla' cookie auth (which I assume to be session IDs) is by far the biggest offender.

2. It's not true that JWT is not stateless and therefore irrevocable. RFC7519 defines 'jti' for exactly this reason:

> The "jti" (JWT ID) claim provides a unique identifier for the JWT.

> The identifier value MUST be assigned in a manner that ensures that

> there is a negligible probability that the same value will be

> accidentally assigned to a different data object; if the application

> uses multiple issuers, collisions MUST be prevented among values

> produced by different issuers as well. The "jti" claim can be used

> to prevent the JWT from being replayed. The "jti" value is a case-

> sensitive string. Use of this claim is OPTIONAL.

I think the rise of JWT stems from the fact that unlike traditional auth tokens (see the bundle of entropy legacy OAuth tokens were) they are human readable. When I set up an OAuth API that a user hits, I can exchange a short lived OIDC id token for a long lived capability based bearer for greater security -- and when developers use my API it's easy for them to tell why their capability token doesn't work without having to fire off a bunch of requests and guess.

Edit: it occurs to me that the question of the JWT being 'stateless' might be about how session based storage often changes, but a JWT is largely immutable. Just for what it's worth, a session should not be revoked simply by removing it from the user cookie, or an attacker can persist simply by refusing to allow the cookie to be removed.
Because a lot of people see security in terms of black and white instead of a lot of shades of gray. Not everything requiring authentication is your bank account. HN, for example, could have even a 10 minute window and be okay.

Not having to block all your request waiting for the auth backend can improve your latency by a non-trivial amount. It also can make your auth server much less complex.

JWT is awesome. People just think it is "all or nothing" and implement it wrong.
How would it disincentivize long term investment?

In the US dividends are taxed at capital gains. I believe if a company makes $X and gives it out as a dividend it makes no difference to the investor whether the split between capital gains and corporate tax is 25/25 versus 43.75/0?
The term is a misnomer. You might know the history already - the context is pseudoscientific theories concerning race in German intellectual circles in the late 1800s. Rather than Judenhass (Jew-hatred), Antisemitism is a scientific-sounding word, with an air of rationality and sophistication.

Generally from the start the word meant hating Jews (not Semitic peoples as in those that speak Semitic languages - Jews specifically). If it didn't originally, it certainly came to mean that over time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism#Etymology

Maybe people that speak Semitic languages are Semitic (I don't know - feels like pseudoscience, though there could be a lot of commonality in different ways). That being said, "Antisemitism" means hating Jews. It's not a special prize or anything. More than anything, the terminology is an unhelpful distraction from the more important things around when it comes up. I wish they stuck with "Judenhass".
What @shkkmo said is right : the problem is the total absence of consumer choice.

It's strange that he got downvoted for telling something so obvious.
Saying people just have to use the tools you do means you don't really get people's minds work differently.

It ignores people have different needs too. You work with reasonably named Google docs. Other people work with reports with only different query strings. Or PDF data sheets with no titles and inscrutable names. Or they just have to juggle more tasks.

The person you replied to doesn't seem to worry about losing pages. And the paper implied people who keep tabs open don't use nested bookmark folders.

Your system is specific. But the methods aren't special. Consider others tried them and found them lacking before imagining they have psychological trouble.
Name the so called big tech company, you're already posting under a new throwaway. If you don't we can assume you just made that up.
Moderation is not a highly paid position anywhere.
Please read again. You do not understand the risks where one does not pro-actively protect one self.

Please note 'attractive nuisance' and 'calculus of negligence'. For a claimant's lawyer to be successful in California; that is, a settlement without going to trial, all they have to do is file a tort based on one or both of these two.

Based on on my insurance agent and my legal counsel, I had no choice to pursue the criminal prosecutorial path or my lawyer and insurance carrier would be legally allowed to walk away from me. So I chose my family's livelihood over the kid.

Your analysis was shallow and has no bearing on the legal reality of my world. If that is not how your world works, than good for you.
I don't think it's so much the paying of programmers for maintenance, as the desire for forced-obsolescence, so they can sell new stuff.
It's laggy and unpleasant. While it's almost certainly due to my own ignorance, I've never gotten a VM of Windows 95/98 to be anything near as responsive and smooth as it was on 25-year-old hardware, not to mention the goalposts seem to keep moving and every few years I find my VM setup is no longer compatible with my current version of Windows. At the moment running Windows 98SE on Ryzen is totally broken, with a dozen different potential fixes none of which work for everyone. VMs are just one big pile of bullshit after another if all you want to do is run a handful of classic software titles. If Archive.org took care of that whole aspect for me it'd be nice.
I want to work with good people too. As long as their personal peccadilloes don't spill into work, why should I care if I don't agree with you on a multitude of issues, political, moral and otherwise?

We're employed to provide value to the company, not to feel comfortable with whom we work with. Presumably this person can function and execute their duties despite any personal beliefs that don't align with those of others.

Working with fragile people can be more of an issue than working with an asshole. At least with an asshole you know the boundaries.

Do these people watch sports (and know how players behave) do they listen to everyday music and listen to the lyrics?

They are trying to build a Stepford Wives society. Every imperfect human jettisoned and replaced by a perfect model. It's delusion.
Interesting, but what about where you have groups like 'illegal content aficionados' (a fictional example, obviously) whose members revel in exchanging toxic or contraband material?
LiFi: Revolutionary Wireless Optical Communication
>How likely are large manufacturers likely to react to this?

Ruckus has updates out already: https://support.ruckuswireless.com/fragattacks-ruckus-techni...
How date-fns came about
I don't think this is correct usage of the term "unfunded mandate". "Unfunded mandate" means when the federal government requires a separate entity (e.g. state, municipality, company) to perform a function without reimbursement or appropriation of funds. Executive orders (that don't rely on special powers granted to the executive by legislation like emergency powers) only apply to the federal agencies. "Unfunded mandate" cannot describe mandates the federal government places on itself.

edit:
You're right, what's required is a funded mandate. Gas is too foundational to the function of the country to leave to a private enterprise that isn't (and shouldn't be) responsible for a guarantee to provide their service. There should be federal intervention by buying a stake in the industry (though maybe in the case of the petroleum industry the federal government already pays enough but I say that from meme knowledge not actual knowledge).
OK, so you read that section and see it as "repeatedly said programs that are aimed at a helping women and people of color should be ended"?

There is another section with programs Damore claimed would be more effective. I am confused why replacing programs equates to ending them. Unless the goal is only to have good intentions, shouldn't the effectiveness of programs matter?
Wouldn't Israeli posts have been deleted too, then?
> 3)

This is the craziest part to me. Writing the swaps meant the the bank had to replicate the position they sold by purchasing shares and options to hedge. The volume of hedging activity is what pushed the price of the stocks up, then VIAC decided to take advantage of the high share price by doing a share offering, VIAC gapped down 7-8%, and Bill Hwang lost $20B.

I wonder if the recent pullback in growth stocks is due to other family offices also gaining massive exposure via swaps, swaps that are being quietly unwound. Though, another round of panic selling by prime brokers would likely be obvious like Archegos blowing up was.

Family offices should definitely be reined in, make them equivalent to hedge funds and call it a day.
I guess it depends on how you use it yeah, like the token can be used to refer to a specific resource, which is then granted to whoever has the token. But obviously you can just treat them as a way of doing traditional identity based access control if you want, which isn't the most effective way of using them. JWTs don't let you easily revoke them, or narrow access to specific resources. That's something you have to do yourself, or rely on a library to do, but that would be built into an ocap based system.
FWIW, rsync.net is currently deploying LFS support such that operations like:

ssh user@rsync.net git clone blah

... will properly handle LFS assets, etc.

This is in response to several requests we have had for this feature...
As an side, the author mentions that people who use JWT instead of sessions can be likened to those who learn React/SPAs instead of conventional approaches:

> This is similar to many newer developers learning how to build SPAs with React before server-rendered HTML. Experienced devs would likely feel that server-rendered HTML should probably be your default choice, and building an SPA when needed, but this is not what new developers are typically taught.

I do agree with that point. It's important to learn the fundamentals before jumping into large frameworks and potentially over-engineering things in the future.
If you're curious what categories they fit into here's Wikipedia's list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WHO_Model_List_of_Essential_Me...
I am open to more appropriate terminology to indicate an executive order is set forth with no funding provided alongside.

For these orders, the President’s Budget should include requests for Congress to provide appropriations for the work that will need to be performed (the delta between current state and expected state).
https://www.electricmonk.nl/log/2015/06/22/keep-your-home-di... has been working nicely for me on multiple computers.
My interpretation:

He uses that to suggest the programs increase racial tensions, not to suggest that we shouldn't be trying to get more people of color involved in tech. He cites this article [0] as his reasoning.

Is there something I'm missing?

[0]: http://archive.is/00yb5
Title says 2 minutes, but it's actually 2:37, which is 30% more. Or actually 3 minutes if you don't disable optimizations, which is 50% more. Those 2x80 cores machines are also quite expensive. For reference, my Threadripper 3970X (32 cores, 64 threads, so much less cores) can build clang with the same command line (without optimization) in less than 2 minutes (1 minute and 42 seconds), or with -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86" in 2 minutes and 23 seconds, and that's much cheaper.