skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Employees deserve high-quality equity on par with investors

Why? As an employee I'm taking on nearly 0 risk. Maybe if they are paying me poorly I can see the argument where I'm "investing" more time/work into the company that I am being paid for and that difference should be made up with equity but otherwise this seems divorced from reality.
You can fit a lot more people in the asteroids, and it'll be easier to transport stuff between them.

Mars has a lot of the same disadvantages that earth does. Its got a lot of gravity, and you can't communicate through the planet from one side to the other
Datadog | Data Engineers | ONSITE eventually (Boston, NYC, Paris) and REMOTE (US & EU) | Full-time

Datadog is a monitoring, tracing, logs system, and more, for your infrastructure and services. As a Data Engineer within the Revenue & Growth group, you will work with Spark and big data tooling to build highly reliable, verifiably-accurate data processing pipelines for a large scale mission-critical process.

- Data engineer : Metering: https://www.datadoghq.com/careers/detail/?gh_jid=1825939

- More open roles: https://dtdg.co/hnwhoshiring
There are all kinds of cataclysms that would end humanity on Earth while leaving Mars untouched. Global nuclear war, asteroids, and solar flares are three relatively likely ones that come to mind.
>"distributed" bit that nobody really wants

Distributed adds complexity but is pretty much essential for illegal activities which is why it is needed for cryptocurrencies which would otherwise be shut down for not KYCing everything and bittorrent which would be shut for copyright infringement. Otherwise centralized is usually easier.
In space, any food produced would have to be grown inside, sealed away from the outside environment to protect it from the vacuum or near-vacuum of space or Mars. We will grow it in greenhouses or perhaps vats (staples like corn or wheat can be replaced by fermented foods like @solar_foods or @feedkind, using ultimately solar power, this is actually more efficient than photosynthesis and with a much smaller environmental footprint than agriculture) and certainly not have free grazing cattle (which is the biggest land use in the US). On Mars, we’re already beginning to master solar/battery-electric flight, so perhaps we may not need so many surface roads and we can place trains and such underground. Our footprint on the planet Earth could shrink by an order of magnitude even as our economy and quality of life improve (the density effect on economic productivity is well-established—and Mars will be really expensive to live on unless in large, dense cities... suburban sprawl being prohibitively expensive). These are all things that are fairly hard to prove on Earth as the whole system has an inertia due to developing with abundant fossil fuels, but on Mars we will be forced to rely entirely on renewable (mostly solar but perhaps wind and geothermal) or nuclear power, so a Martian society becomes a blueprint and a powerful proof of concept of how Earth life can be..
Angularjs (aka Angular 1.x) is supposedly being deprecated.

There are enough sites out there still using it in production that I'll be surprised if nobody steps in to pick up development.
Detailed Introduction to CSS [video]
Not to mention shutting down the gas pipeline for a crypto-based ransom. I'd imagine there is going to be a lot more regulatory look at it very soon.
And if the penalty for hacking systems for malicious purpose goes up.

Hopefully every member of DarkSide ends up in court if they're US or friendly nation citizens or in Gitmo otherwise
I stopped looking at this site (.dev) as it turned in to a big SJW mess and less about technical and career growth.
How much resources are going into multicore compared to other needs / improvements in ocaml (if any) ?
Your account has only been registered for 30 days...
Accurrate in how Microsoft acquisition literally pays a studio to not sell on Sony, yes.
In absence of any information, I could come up with a few plausible explanations:

The wife spoke with another buyer who tricked her.

The agent was busy or lazy around 3PM

The agent didn't like something about the wife other than race, e.g. attitude, attire, cheap car ect.
How unique are these ids really? I imagine certain apps will be very commonly installed as well as certain groups of apps? So it's not 32bits of information. Still more information to add to the finger printing pile..

I wish we could find a way to deal with this risk that's not simply disabling all kinds of functionality. Browser APIs seem to be suffering more and more by limitations to prevent finger printing.
Exactly. Actual $ count does.
"very accessible" relative to what?
That is very inaccurate. TLA+ is normally used for things that are much bigger than Coq could feasibly be used for at all. They're aimed for programs of completely different orders of magnitude. TLA+ is commonly used by engineers to specify and check systems or components with tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of lines over, say, a couple of weeks. Coq and other things that are more aimed at end-to-end verification, all the way to code, have only ever been used on programs or components less than 10KLOC, and even then required teams of world-experts working for years.
How does one train GPT-2 with their own content and produce nice results at arbitrary lengths? I found a few libraries but I could not use them well, I get lost very quickly. I just want to train our internal Confluence and have fun with it.
How to Buy ISACA CISA certificate online without exam?
Proven Work at Home Jobs for Passive Income
Interesting but only works on desktop
Fingerprinting and profiling in general just makes me not want to use the internet sometimes. I stopped using gmail at the very least. Maybe I should start using a VPN.
Do you realize it's the same reason used to start the Manhattan project?

Do you realize that only one country nuked civilian cities?
Because they wanted to take as much as they could without any pesky constitutional rights getting in the way.
Actually as to my observation it's the same fools again every time, plus some new fools, with ever-deeper pockets.

This streak will break not when the maximum number of fools has been reached, but when the fools with the biggest wallets have gotten involved.
> Where is all this white privilege?

On Twitter.
Show HN: Cygnus-X1 a Thrust Vectoring Model Rocket
It is not possible to clean up bitcoin.

Even if it moved entirely to renewable energy it would still be a massive opportunity cost. There are productive uses that energy could be put to. Bitcoin is not productive.

Using gigawatts to process a few transactions a second, when existing financial frameworks can process millions of transactions a seconds at a fraction of the energy input means that bitcoin is always a massive waste.
> “A biosphere full of life means horror and suffering every day for so many living things it potentially eclipses all humanity's past crimes combined.”

This is the most astounding perspective on the value of life that I can imagine. Like the argument of a genocidal supervillain.
All of this has happened before, and will happen again.
Mine is 7+. I'd love a phone for free but then I lose my unlimited calling and data as I would have to switch to a more expensive plan.

Buying a phone outright costs more than a computer. $1200 for the latest samsung. A two or three year old phone could cost $500.00.

I do need a new phone as the buttons barely are able turn on the screen but I see no viable upgrade path.
Ok but those are unreasonable things to do. Versioning large binary files is clearly not an unreasonable thing to want to do.
I think we've already started terraforming the Earth, perhaps not intentionally at first but now armed with data on climate change we continue our warming ways.
Building 'cylinders' gives us an environment that's a lot easier to control, manage and safeguard compared to a whole planet. Most planets will be entirely hostile to complex earth based life to begin with. They'll require either complex terraforming or some sort of isolated environment, and that's not even bringing up issues concerning gravity.

Furthermore, in future wars planets would also be far easier, bigger and immovable targets compared to asteroids and space-stations. Just look up what happens when you drop a 10ton tungsten rod from outer-space. Thanks to gravity, when it hits the ground it has the same impact of a small nuclear device.

When humanity starts to create colonies outside of earth, I expect most planets will only become fully automated mining colonies. Colonizing planets is a Star Trek fantasy that, most likely, will not be worth it.
Cus he's not that bright. Isn't this the elephant in the room that no one wants to consider? Why do we have to start with the assumption that Musk is a genius, then work back from that?

The dude thought covid would go away last May.

He thinks it's easier to make Mars habitable than it is to keep the Earth habitable.

He's thought that full self driving was 6 months away for literally 4 years now.

And he didn't really understand what Bitcoin was when he sank 1.5 billion into it.
Well, what I was using was called Burroughs COBOL. I was using it on minicomputers, but it was basically the same COBOL that ran on the big Burroughs mainframes. Mainframes needed to maintain backward compatibility, so I guess the COBOL I was using was 1st-generation.

I gave up COBOL before I ever encountered any Structured COBOL. Around that time I performed psychological repression of all memory I had of the language, or even that I'd used it.

It has taken years of programming-language therapy for me to start to recover these memories.
It's an observable notebook: https://observablehq.com/ Basically a notebook where you write JS code and see the results immediately rendered in the notebook. In this case it's being served locally instead of requiring you to use their service website. If you've ever used Jupyter or IPython this is very similar (code notebooks) but with some interesting changes in philosophy and more of a Javascript implementation instead of python.

What might be tripping you up is that in this demo the observable notebook isn't showing the code cells, only the outputs. The code is in the editor on the left and the output on the right is the result of running the code as an observable notebook. In some ways it is like a simple interactive web app.
Asking genuinely because I’m not sure, but were Britain or France forced to upgrade due to war-related damage?
The theory does not allow for 'your consciousness' to exist as a meaningful concept that experiences more than one moment.

Say you are going to flip a quantum coin. Before you flip it, given MWI, you know that there will be two copies of you, each experiencing one of the outcomes. After you flip it, one copy sees tails, the other heads. Each copy is perfectly identical except for the new observation. Each may ask itself 'what were the chances that I am seeing heads/tails?', and with MWI in mind, they should answer 1: the chance that the copy-that-sees-heads sees heads is 1, and same for copy-who-sees-tails seeing tails, since there is no other way to identify them as separate entities.

This also corresponds to the mathematics of QM: if you want to give proper predictions, you need to 'update' the wavefunciton to have value 1 for the observed outcome and value 0 for any other outcome. Doing that for 'your branch' is precisely how MWI works.
160 kts (around 140 indicated) does not seem like a remotely appropriate airspeed to join a pattern full of Cessnas in closed traffic.

SR22 Vs0 is 59 knots (call it 60 to make the math easier). 1.3 x Vs0 is a reasonable "over the fence" speed, so 78 knots (call it 80) indicated would be good on short final, maybe 90 on base-to-final. (Instead, they were descending and thus accelerating slightly and hit 169 knots on the base leg.)

Bombing into the pattern over 50 knots faster than appropriate (70 knots faster than the traffic you're following and 40 knots faster than the much larger and on-profile Metro on the parallel) might be contributing, but certainly suggests to me that the Cirrus crew was behind the airplane.

https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a4eabe,a2cee7,a90ffa&la...
Worked for me on FF 88.0/Kubuntu 21.04. Detected the 2 apps I have installed correctly. I was also unique.
Everyone's a genius in a bull market.
Don't piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining. Just say it: As an investor you want to keep more of the wealth employees create for you.
> in case of attacks on hospitals. People can literally die.

Setting aside the appeal to emotion, there are a couple of things to unpack. In real-world ransom kidnappings, life and death was always at stake and the government still errs on the side of not paying.

Second, you presume ransomware authors are prepared to commit murder. If a hospital cannot legally pay, the only thing to gain by shutting it down is murder.
Hey there! I've been working on this rocket for about 10 months or so now. It had it's first flight this week and I thought I'd make a little montage of the footage I've captured throughout those ten months. I designed the custom flight computer and all of the 3D printed components.

More info about the flight computer can be found here!

https://github.com/polishdude20/CygnusX1
I appear to be getting false positives with a different identifier each time I run it. It says I have 3-4 different applications installed, none of which actually are on my system. Each subsequent run comes back with a different set of applications, and a different unique identifier. Looks like I may have beaten this method of fingerprinting, although I'm not quite sure how.
I tried it on Opera and it detected no apps installed. (On Edge however, it detects all the ones I do indeed have installed).

This is interesting since I didn't really expect Opera to care about this kind of thing.
It also doesn't work at all under Chromium for Linux no idea why but the result is complete garbage.
> [Golden Handcuffs are] one part of a companies toolbox to increase retention.

Not in any way that's good for the company, though. That'd be a classic application of optimizing for the metric, not in what you really want optimized.

Usually if an employee is staying solely or mostly because of the handcuffs, they're not producing their best work, and aren't fully engaged or focused. Do you really want to keep an employee like that around? Wouldn't you rather they left, voluntarily?

On the flip side, as an employee, I like the idea of golden handcuffs. In a hypothetical situation where I didn't like where I worked, I could drop down to doing the minimal amount of work that wouldn't get me fired, and coast along while collecting the money. Sure, it's not a particularly fulfilling life, and probably wouldn't be sustainable for the long term, but maybe it's not that bad for a while.
Ceramic Mosaics Mend Cracked Sidewalks, Potholes, and Buildings
"Expenses". They get audited at the moment though, because the companies paying them owe tax...
We could learn how to "simply exploit" atomic fuels. That should be good for another magnitude or two, right?
I would be willing to bet money that there is more malware on the App Store than in the official Debian Repos.
>Can you point out which part of my statement and the one above has been misrepresenting the facts?

disingenuous: not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.

this post here is disingenuous in that no one was arguing with the technical correctness of the interpretation. and the above post is disingenuous with describing the situation.

There certainly is a difference between saying "Epic blocks game from being submitted on steam" and "Epic signs contract to sell game on EGS". Pretending these have the same connotations is in fact... disingenous.
He's the main character in the sequel though. So while he was Steve Guttenberg's comic sidekick in the first movie, I don't think we can deduce that the filmmakers thought Fisher Stevens's character was "crap".

We're just going to have to accept that we were a bit tone-deaf back then. No one blinked twice at Fisher Stevens dipped in bronzer and doing his best Ghandi impression.

Not as bad as Soul Man however.
Look at the post above yours. Yes, some want to make the case that laws on the whole are essentially oppressive. Whether of not foucault made that case precisely, or whatever, is totally irrelevant if it’s what most people actual mean, viz that laws are the tools by which the powerless are oppressed.
This is one of the things that you should just f-word do it.

There’s literally nothing to break down.

Either you admit, or you dont.

For instance you can admit that you probably asked now for some way to avoid the problem. By moving responsibility from your shoulders to some “expert” on youtebe etc.
I'd rather the money and fines flow to the US government, not random hacker groups.
> I do. Right now it feels like a carnival full of carnies.

With people making fortunes or losing everything based on one dude's mood and a single tweet.

The SEC and other's exist because of the Robber-Baron's of old... I'm no "Regulation Hawk", but it does seem silly to allow this nonsense to continue.
> Law is primarily about voluntary submission, not power.

Let me know how that works out for you, k? I can assure you that although state power ultimately comes from the people, the state most definitely will enforce its laws against you, should you break them. That is, unless you're rich and powerful enough to afford the best lawyers and a handful of legislators.
Pretty sure jai has operator overloading as it is intended for games and being able to add two vectors is something you want to do all the time.
This is the third comment in this thread where you've written the same quote, claiming this is what "changed his mind".

Do you have any evidence of this claim?

I want to keep an open mind and not jump to gaslighting accusations. But something about this thread doesn't sit right.
It's running on localhost here and I presume that's their intended use case for this feature. Localhost is critical for development--imagine if VS code wouldn't work unless you were connected to Github.com. This is fixing that issue with observable notebooks so now you can run and develop your notebook locally without depending directly on the internet or their cloud service.
In my comparison of HSR vs. cars for <300 mile travel, the rail being 'drastically less flexible' means that it's subject to the same last-mile problem as planes are, whereas cars do not have this problem. Therefore the advantages of cars for trips like this are difficult for HSR to overcome.

As for buses, the article's author diminishes the significance of intercity buses in Europe by making it sound like private intra-national intercity bus service isn't competitive with HSR on travel time, as if HSR were widespread. HSR is only present along a dozen or so corridors in Europe, and while within France such premium bus services are a relatively new phenomenon, that isn't true elsewhere on the continent; so across the whole of Europe intercity buses are both much more common than he initially suggests, and much more competitive vs. rail than he suggests. After this, he does say buses thrive in the gaps between the train network, complement it, and have historically been important for international travel because of rail fare structures, and on those points I agree.

My wording of 'buses are flexible' does refer to the ease of introducing new routes (i.e. not having to build lots of rail), as a sibling comment correctly identified.
Consider that people with higher IQs have greater proficiency at math and reading (such as SAT scores) despite everyone regardless of IQ having some ability.
Side Projects at Work
I started using the web in 1994, and no, I don't ever remember a time when people designed web pages to work on any browser.

In the mid-90s, the internet was filled with pages that had "best viewed with Netscape Navigator" or "best viewed with Internet Explorer" icons. Twenty-five years later that mentality hasn't changed, and I don't think it ever will. It costs too much to target more than one or two browsers.
Even in a VM you have to carefully ensure that memory deduplication is disabled, and/or some form of mitigation against Rowhammer is in place. Else you will be vulnerable to Flip Feng Shui cross-VM attacks.

https://fahrplan.events.ccc.de/congress/2016/Fahrplan/events...
"More fuel" is irrelevant its about pollution.
You can never make parts without using a fix amount of resources and energy and if they are used they will end up as waste which is pollution too. Fuel however is just energy in a specific form. If the fuel is created with electric energy and it all comes form coal then it pollution is high but there is a clear path to reduce it down the line. There is no such path with rockets parts that have to be fabricated again and again and again.

Cost is the reason why it is feasible. But it still reduces pollution. The additional fuel used to land the rocket causes way way less pollution than creating a new one for every launch. Embodied energy (gray energy) is often significantly underestimated. Just transporting the raw material from all around the world to make a final product uses immense amour of energy and very often its in the form of oil.
Also down the line the additional fuel to land can be created with low pollution energy so pollution is reduced even further.
I've never found any of these kinds of approaches to actually work; I always end up with a rasterized image that I could have gotten by just taking a screenshot.
Oh, I was thinking in terms of the cost benefit of terraforming. If you magically make the planet's atmosphere 1 bar of co2, how long would that last at a usable level - say at or above 0.5 bar - assuming no replacement?

If that's 10k years it's less appealing, but 1m years might be worth it.
These are obvious dimensions that need to be considered. Of course there can be discussion as to boundaries drawn in that (here 2-d) space as to 'acceptable' and 'unacceptable'. There may be other dimensions as well, such as 'decision making input sources', etc.

As to your specific example, while system x may have 'full agency (autonomous, willful)', if it is purely 'defensive' in nature, it may indeed fall within acceptable zone.
+1 for planates

Though yes like the other comment says be aware that not all anime kicks off well, a few bad episodes at the start are pretty much expected at this point.
Ask HN: Is disabling JavaScript necessary to circumvent browser fingerprinting?
I've used Tor browser both on Tails (on a pendrive) and on my main OS, trying out security levels Standard, Safer, Safest. But only the Safest level works (because it disables Javascript) to the degree that I pass the test at coveryoutracks.eff.org and amiunique.org. I get similar results by simply disabling Javascript through about:config in my main browser (Firefox).
Version control of large files is clearly a reasonable thing for a version control system to do.

I think if you introspect you'll see you are defending a flaw in something you like with spurious technical objections because you don't want to admit it isn't perfect. That's understandable. Happens a lot.
The problem is scale. The program is the specification, but it is far too big to affordably prove arbitrary interesting properties about it. A program like CompCert is among the biggest programs verified end-to-end, and it is less than 1/5 of jQuery in size. Even then, it took world experts years. Plus, saying "zero bugs" is misleading. What you can get is proofs of your assertions about the program -- or a bunch of theorems. You know that those assertions are true.
A single transaction costs more than the space to store the entire chain many times over.