skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Check your numbers. Number of tanks as of June 1941. And Germany oil consumption and sources as of 1940. You'll be surprised.
not the same person
I can’t mix and match my VMware clusters with Intel and AMD, you lose features like vMotion
Apple Shortcuts is great, but it needs a notification toggle
I was interviewed for a fairly trivial story in the WSJ based on something I wrote on Twitter a while back. Total nothingburger comment and, from a 30 minute conversation, total nothingburger quote. But the amount of back and forth, confirming quote and associated details, etc. was incredible. Most pubs would have just quoted the tweet.

(That said, I've also been interviewed for a breaking news story and that's simply run.)
Or another 10 or 15.

Three months ago, I took my car camping in the Mojave Desert. I go on mostly good roads, but I go places that there aren't many people. If my car had broken down, I could have been in some degree of trouble. But it's solid enough that I wasn't worried.

This month my car is old enough to qualify for its own driver's license.

16 years old, but it's been bulletproof reliable for all 16 years. The interior isn't thrashed. It still has as much power as ever, or at least as much power as I ever use. It's long since paid for. Why would I replace it?
The author of the featured article has also written a defense of the Myers-Briggs system that argues against several of your points: https://dynomight.net/in-defense-of-myers-briggs.html

(I'm not particularly invested in either model, but it is somewhat cute that the author of both pieces is the same.)
Later in that same answer:

The solution is to change gnuplot’s idea of "zero"

:D
I think it's more “a personality is a function over the continuous domain of situations”.
This thread is filled with ignorant city boys who have never done any useful farm work.

I cannot imagine how excrutiating it would be for my wife to have to pay a bunch of stupid taxes and follow a bunch of fascist new laws in order to grow her 100sq ft garden every year which, even so small, STILL requires truckloads of compost and mulch since we are just in the process of building our soil. And that's just for the gardens. I don't have any idea how many times we've hauled in cow, pig, and goat panels. I propose that the assholes proposing taxes and limits on trucks find a way to bring us these goods.
Really? You can put your opam package files and dune files wherever you want and it’ll automagically work. Submodules can be defined far away from the library and it’s fine. If your opam packages are empty it’s fine, dune doesn’t care about versions of packages anyway. If you want to vendor/patch a library, just drop it anywhere in your project. Yet dune seems to be unaware or executables and libraries when you want to run or build something (you need to pass paths).
I've usually dropped collision coverage on cars when they get under around $15K. (All but one of my cars was purchased for less than this, often much less.)

If I had a 0% loan on it for some reason at that point, that meant paying off the loan to let me do that. (If you assume an 8% nominal return on investments, that means when paying off the loan would cost me under $100/mo.)

I think you should insure against risks that would be a substantial impact to your life and (generally) not insure against risks that wouldn't.
PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities (2020) [pdf]
Random advice from the internet:

Don't spend time and energy making your product suck.

It is counter-productive.

Take it off the roadmap.

Good luck.
It's neither massive nor massless object that follow geodesics, it's objects with energy (including the mc^2 kind).
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27086701
Is it ethical to give the "right" answer to a regular interview question? An interview might be a stressful situation for some people, who often suffer from a bias of downgrading themselves compared to others. So a calibrated interpretation of the questions may be necessary to provide a faithful result in the first place.
I personally know people close to retirement (age > 55) who quit their jobs for good because their investments have gone through the roof and they don't need to work any longer in bullshit jobs.

Some spouses have also given up working to become single earning households. The govt is paying enough unemployment that one spouse can focus on raising kids without fear of falling into abject poverty.

I think our system of squeezing output until the old age of 65 is not desired by humans. A ubi-lite system is already making people focus on what matters to them.
Because

A) that in itself shows that the whole rigmarole of ostensibly assigning sole copyright to these "journals" is a ridiculously unnecessary charade, and

B) Where are you going to get their contact information from? There would need to be aome centralised registry to connect scientific subjects to author details, Idunno, like some kind of... "Journal" or something?

C) And if you're already going to such a place anyway, then the actual content of the articles could also be there for everyone to read directly, without having to bother the authors with correspondence.

What you're defending is a humongous stupid Rube Goldberg boondoggle.
lol this was precisely the context in which I was exposed to this test :D
Both of the structures I mentioned were deliberately created by mammals.

Are the algaes deliberately creating "water coloration" in a pattern?
Intelligence is overrated. Like money, it doesn't necessarily bring happiness.
Italian towns will pay you to work remotely
SpaceX accepts Dogecoin as payment to launch DOGE-1 mission to the Moon
> you are supposed to understand that a person that scored 49% introvert in the introvert-extrovert spectrum is going to be far similar to a person that scored extrovert with 51% than to a person that scored introvert 10% because its a spectrum not an absolute value.

This doesn't fit well with my mental model of how Myers Briggs works (regardless of the veracity of Myers Briggs).

As I understand it: Myers Briggs maps to the Jungian cognitive functions[0] and the side that you fall on the J/P dichotomy will invert these.

An INTJ would be: Introverted Intuition, Extraverted Thinking, Introverted Feeling, Extraverted Sensing

An INTP would be: Introverted Thinking, Extraverted Intuition, Introverted Sensing, Extraverted Feeling

Getting near the 50% mark on the J/P aspect appears to show low confidence in any part of the model

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungian_cognitive_functions
While my comment was sarcastic it was still mostly true. The history channel is completely dominated by world war 2 documentaries and they rarely discuss the involvement of other nations.

Some British people will obviously know more, but the vast majority will still believe, as the saying goes, "2 world wars and one world cup"
It's super fun living in Sweden for some time, and then living in nearby Russia for some time. You get to hear exactly the same reports of military aggression, but the perpetrators are always the other side.
TIL I'm almost a team by myself.
This is a specious argument. You can't measure expenditures that go solely to retaining the exclusive use of desirable land as productivity.

Large engineering firms have offices in various Midwestern states that are just as productive as SV, NY, what have you.
> and would still be music even if nobody ever heard it

I vehemently disagree. that's like writing when you don't know how to read. Possible, but meaningless.

I can't read sheet music. The condition to understanding Bach's music on your own is to first understand sheet music. So to make his music you must read and understand his language. Is that music? It's subject to whoever interprets it. If we go nearly extinct what would be a more useful piece of evidence of what music is, Bach's Sheets or Madonna's "LIKE A VIRGIN" MTV special?
My observation (and, I believe the authors of How to Design Programs have some data about this) is that FP is only “hard to learn” if you already know how to program: you have to unlearn things like “for loops” and various techniques that rely on mutation and learn to think in terms of the abstractions FP provides you.
Both companies are profitable. This is simply a lack of understanding of business and accounting. Both companies are re-investing all of their profit in massive capital expenditures to support business growth - that's not a money losing endeavour, that's the same strategy that made Amazon into the behemoth it is today. It's also the logical strategy if you have a long time horizon for investment - which is arguably much better than companies which have short-time horizons.
Fossilization is rare. It's as simple as that.
No sarcasm. No sarcasm marker.
Monstrous Moonshine
same... this article doesn't actually seem to cover its own topic. One has to wonder if the article itself was written slowly, or rushed to production to garner more clicks?

I would have loved to learn about how to synthesize and filter what you read, and at what point your amount of stuff to read reaches saturation. I always hear "I read all the books I could find!" but that's an impossible statement for almost any field — I just want to know if there's an agreed upon state where one can feel that one has read everything available to start thinking for oneself and forming original thoughts.
Yes, Am a Software Developer
Primarily the state of its Linux driver, and rock solid support in VyOS (derived from Debian stable). For a router, TLS offload isn't so much of a consideration when the system isn't doing anything at layers 4-7 in the OSI model.

If I had to make a perhaps overly broad generalization, I see more Chelsio and Mellanox NICs used in end point servers, and more Intel used in DIY whitebox network equipment.
The real issue is: do you want to travel somewhere to try it on, or do you want to try it on in the comfort of your own home?
Exactly. When you are adding items to backlog faster than the team can process them, it is not obvious to me why "add more people to the team" should be the right solution.

Maybe there was a wrong decision made at the beginning of the project that needs to be fixed. Maybe the version 1.0 has too many features. Maybe the project could be split in two independent parts (which will still require hiring more people, but with less complex of internal communication). Maybe the basic infrastructure was not set up correctly (logging, unit tests, continuous integration) and there is no time to make it right because the visible parts of the application always get the top priority. Maybe the team members are working with a technology they never used before, and giving them a one-week training could increase their speed dramatically. Maybe there is some interpersonal conflict in the team, where things could be improved by removing a team member?

More importantly, why are you adding new items to the backlog so fast? Is your company doing "agile rituals, but with predetermined scope and deadlines"?

Let me guess: the answer "hire more people" is so popular, because it is a universal answer that does not require the manager to actually understand anything; and as a nice side effect, having more underlings increases the manager's importance.
This sounds a lot like a victim blaming to justify the existence of a technology which intentionally seeks to make transactions like these easier.
I'm not sure the point you are making.

Casualties are a metric, but not the be all end of war. Indeed the USSR was victorious despite having more deaths then every other participant put together... Obviously there are other things that matter.
Thank you! I didn't know PIN were also used for the magnetic strips (we never use them in Europe, or at least in Belgium).

The legacy software could explain it. But the difference of processes between my main bank (random temporary PIN obtained with 2-factor authentication: postal letter with code to send back using smartphone) and my credit card company (bank card mailed to my address with current PIN) was weirding me out.
It will stay the same...
You can get pretty far with osquery, and it’s extendable for the things you might be missing.

It’s also usable in a way that doesn’t violate folks’ privacy. It doesn’t do stuff like actively track what you’re doing, logging keys etc.
I am curious how much of the process delay in Intel came from having chip design and manufacturing under one umbrella.

If AMD wanted the latest process they had to deal with the limits TSMC said they could achieve. Intel's chip team could simply push back on their manufacturing team to improve reliability via leadership.

If Intel had gone with chiplets would 10nm have been delayed?
No, they'll only become the new norm if the majority of people buy them. And they cost more, because internet-enabled components aren't free. And most people really don't see the value in an internet-connected light bulb. Does it emit more light? No? Then why would I pay more for it? So if they have to sell the higher-cost BOM for the same price (because people see no reason to pay more), then where are the gargantuan profits?

So I really don't see internet-connected X taking over the market, no matter how much money companies could make if customers cooperated.
I'm _pretty_ sure that this is referring to gauge symmetry, so that's the term to search for.

I dunno of a good article as an introduction. As a grad student, I found Terry Tao's explanation [1] rather helpful, but of course it has a strongly mathematical flavor.

[1] https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/what-is-a-gauge/
Great to hear! Looking forward to your feedback, we are currently finishing auth docs, and we'll focus on some additional examples and tutorials soon. You are welcome to join our discord channel - https://discord.gg/VR2k5QAZ
Or just ask a question in the github discussions if we can help.
I really have no business answering this, but in the spirit of Cunningham's law I'm going to try to give an answer how I think of it. Would like some feedback and some guidance. This is purely a intuitive answer and not at all an academic one.

As we know from relativity and time dilation, as our GPS satellites need to be resynchronized as they move fast and at a lesser mass level. The center of the Earth is very heavy and is therefore going through time slower than the rock or surface objects. Gravity doesn't really exist. Gravity is merely the side-effect of heavy-mass objects going through time slower than lighter objects. This is what is meant when it is said that spacetime is curved.

So back to your question, where does the extra energy come from to accelerate the rock towards the Earth? An easy way to think of it, expanding on E=mc^2, Et=mc^2, where t is time. As the ball is now falling further and further into the Earth's gravity well, it is now going through time slower and slower. With t going slower, E must increase to balance the equation, which speeds it up.
I don't think you can think of it as becoming heavier in the traditional sense, as the higher speed does not increase the force of gravity.

There are several (roughly equivalent) ways to describe what happens as you approach the speed of light.

One is that instead of gaining mass, you gain extra inertia, making changing the velocity require more force. This makes it appears to outside observers like your acceleration slows down. I don't particularly like this explanation as it doesn't explain why your rate of energy usage appears to go down (as that is more a function of your clock). I prefer the other explanations:

Another is that your clock slows down relative to the outside world so you have less time to apply your force so you need more force to apply the same externally visible acceleration.

Another is that the outside world looks shrunk in the direction of travel, so again you have less distance to a apply your force to drive the externally visible acceleration. This is effectively the same as previous since distance=time*speed.
> 2004: 385

> 2005: 770

> 2006: 1540

You are doubling every year, not every two years.
how to you determine whether you're practicing thinking "correctly"? As in, if I practice piano I know if it sounds good or not, and over time my playing will sound better. If I practice the wrong things, I'll know that my piano isn't getting any better.

How do I know that I'm practicing thinking correctly?
Perhaps unsurprisingly given its origin, but it's often the case in France.
Many small manufactures can’t afford to order much more than the MOQ on parts. PCBs generally have much higher MOQs than parts you can buy from digi key, I ran a manufacturing business fit years and a PCB MOQ could last me a whole year but I could say cash flow on buying the components more just in time. It’s not “poor planning” it’s working within the realities of your business and it’s limitations (and he’s saving a few hundred in a month at cash low could have been the difference between me just not taking a pay check that month or paying part of an employees wage from my own savings on top of not getting paid myself)
Oh. Lol. Yeah, you don’t ride your bike on it. You get off your bike and put the bike in the groove there. Then, you walk up the stairs using your bike’s breaks as needed while pushing/pulling the bike up/down the stairs. The bike’s wheels fit in the groove so the wheels spin easily while traversing the stairs. It’s a very common thing here.
Definitely, but they were geographically and philosophically isolated from several traditional European power centers, unlike their US capitalist counterparts. So if Europe is the theater and ultimately part of the prize, I think the US was able to flourish in influence from the start given its more advantageous positioning.
I prefer to look at it from the other angle, which is that all vertebrates are fish. I had a professor who was mainly an ichthyologist, but overall a really old school natural historian. He always said that we were all just highly derived fishes. If you spend any time at all looking at evolutionary biology, it really does hold true. Bones in our heads can be traced back to the gill arches in bony fish. The pelvic girdle and shoulder bones developed from the pelvic girdle and pectoral bones of early fish. We're really just fish adapted to land.
The US didn't win WW2. The Allied powers won WW2.
>I don't really think the various Civil Rights Acts support the bay area's rebranding of separate but equal.

that is an incredible bad faith characterization. In informal 'frat house' style settings that don't have many rules women often face incredible amounts of harassment because mostly men don't respect boundaries. It's why there is such a stereotypical bro-culture in SV, it's enabled by the laissez-faire attitude.

In settings with rules and where people expect professionalism it doesn't tend to be as much of an issue, but in some house where people even mix drinking and work it tends to go bad really quick.
This is great. Thank you. This is like flippantly suggesting we all just drive on the other side of the road. Genius. Ignoring all the complexities involved in getting such an endeavour to happen.
I agree. Most people don't know, which makes me sad. Perhaps it's an opportunity for you to discover the secret history of the music. It's a wonderful and interesting journey.
Pacstall – AUR for Ubuntu
In my circle of friends I have an ex-gargantuan ship captain who now enjoys a quiet life fishing. He said to me of the Ever Given: "That mega container vessel is too big and too high and the pilot should take more care passing Suez canal. The vessel is too heavy and it will take time to get it out. They must be very careful not to break the vessel". He's glad they got it out but I won't be surprised if there is another accident wait in that canal.
> This conversation would be a lot clearer with a distinction between "regexes" and "regular languages".

Very much so.

> In this post, the example given IS a regex, but it IS NOT a regular language: `<!-- .*? --> # comment` The nongreedy match of .*? isn't a mathematical construct; it implies a backtracking engine.

Actually, that's [edit: "it IS NOT a regular language"] wrong, at least in principle. If you're limiting it to only the shortest match (which is how HTML (and most other) comments actually work), then (just like `(abc)+` is shorthand for `(abc)(abc)*`) `<!-- .*? -->` is shorthand for (assuming I haven't made a mistake in the for-lack-of-a-better-word-arithmetic):

<!-- ([^ ]| [^-]| -[^-]| --[^>])* -->

That is, shortest-repetition-only can be implemented in a purely regular system.

On the other hand, if you want to allow longer matches when actually needed, then for purely-regular purposes (where it either matches or not) `<!-- .*? -->` is just a wierd way of writing `<!-- .* -->` (which is quite obviously a regular language).
We have 6 lines of code that we copy and paste around projects:

https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/d01ce082180c41...

Now if you're saying that the autotools/make/cmake/meson tooling is hard, I sort of agree, but many people are familiar with C build tools already. I don't see how it's easier or harder than learning language-specific tools.
I was shocked when I heard a ransomware expert at a security conference tell everybody to just pay the ransom. Shocked.
the "75%" was quoting the original question in full from Quora.

Yes they were very different fronts... modern estimates put the USSR loosing upwards of 25% of its entire population during WW2.
we can infer that we’re at an equilibrium point with no real advantage either way

We can do no such damn thing! This analysis completely conflates natural selection and sexual selection, and ignores the role of genetic drift.
Just because something hasn't been challenged doesn't mean it is legal and the ongoing existence of a counterpoint is not a strong argument regarding legal review.

And the more obvious difference to me is that your example is not providing housing and is not providing education.

There are really two questions here, the first being is it legal, and the second being is this what we want whether it is currently legal or currently illegal? If the answer to the second question is "yes" then carry on. To me it currently seems incompatible, and I am still trying to understand what the current consensus is. I don't have strong opinions on it, or much of anything, which is why I gravitate towards the legal field because - like lawyers - I can compartmentalize anything. So I am aiming to also understand the consensus on what people desire and if "safe spaces" are the most productive approach to getting there.
Sure. That's what's in it for some "them" out there somewhere. What's in it for me, the consumer who just wants to brush my teeth?

(Crickets.)

So don't hold your breath for this stuff to take off. Most people won't spend more money to buy something that will benefit someone else.
You seem to be conflating psychology the science vs psychotherapy the practice. The latter approximates engineering and producing real life results takes precedence over proving things from first principles. Just like with medicine, you don't categorically reject medications even though it can't always explain the mechanisms of action fully (yet). Big tech doesn't hold off on making billion dollar business decisions based on the same techniques either. Science has its place but it is not always above real life pragmatism.
What if people who has some heart condition/ predisposition is more susceptible to Covid?
Area of a circle is Pizza

Given a radius of z:

Pi•z•z=a
This gives me hope that aliens might not look that different after all...
The great VCR clock boss. Ah... Those were the days. Those were how I learned to finagle things that the manual was gone for.

Still not sure whether I should consider the result brain damage though. I can set a VCR clock, but I can't grok people.

Longer I live the more I wonder if I learned patience for the wrong thing.