skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While what you say makes sense superficially, I think you are not considering the possibility that the worlds interact with each other.

Notice that in the double-slit experiment, the wave function at different places interacts with itself so as to lower the probability of a photon or electron arriving at a place where it was likelier to arrive with just one slit open.

Informally speaking, that could be seen as an example of different "worlds" (i.e. different places where the photon could be observed to exist) interacting with each other locally so as to effectively lower the probability of observing the photon arriving at some place where it would be likelier to arrive had the different worlds not have interacted with each other. Taking the analogy a bit too far, this seems like if two different worlds interfere with each other so as to cancel each other out. Again, the photon/electron that was likely to arrive at some place, will not likely arrive anymore, and this is purely due to the the wave function interfering with itself.

Wouldn't that mean that there is the possibility that the observed correlations in Bell's theorem could be the result of this phenomenon and not necessarily mean that there is non-local behavior?

That is, couldn't the observed correlations be the result of the different worlds interfering with each other locally, e.g. when the light cones of the different measurements intersect each other, so that some worlds cancel each other out and we don't get to observe them, leading to the correlations that we do indeed observe?

Bell's theorem, as far as I understand, only takes into account what we can observe, but could be falsified if there are "worlds" that we cannot observe, i.e. that are temporally created but stop existing when they cancel each other out by local interactions.

Although, admittedly, I could be completely wrong because I don't understand enough of this to be sure of what I'm saying :)
Clubhouse was founded in March 15th, 2020 and has raised $110M according to crunchbase.

My take: If you think twitter is hot garbage, you'll be shocked at clubhouse. This is exactly why it got the funding.

More seriously: its a video forum where people like Elon Musk can invite Vladimir Putin to have conversations... Isn't that neat.
Many of these features add minimal benefit if you do some common-sense stuff such as, don't drive when you're really tired (or drunk, or on drugs, etc.); don't play with your phone while you're driving; don't read, do your makeup, shave, etc. while you're driving. IOW put your focus on the task at hand and you don't really need blind spot detectors. Of course the reality is that people are pretty bad at these things.
Portugal? Corticeira Amorim is the exception, not the rule.
I used to really appreciate fs. After a few years i, personally, think it’s clickbait and i am not the target audience anymore.
Can anyone recommend a good primer to learn OCaml? (ideally aimed at so someone familiar with traditions C-style languages)

The material I’ve found has been quite dense where I’m just looking to learn enough to be dangerous
Type III Errors
Any skydivers wish to confirm this? But the wind would push on the phone. So any lunar skydivers wish to confirm?
I have some friends who strongly assert only the "jif" pronunciation is correct and the "gif" pronunciation is incorrect due to the stated intention of the creator of the format. I can't wait to experience their transition from PNG to "ping" when they learn they've been "mispronouncing" it all along. I wonder if I can convince them to use aluminium?
Let me guess: You are from the US of America.

How do I know? Because the Russia is evil mentality. This comes from media in the US and lack of knowledge of History and geopolitics.

Let's take some History lessons:

Who sank the USS Maine? It was probably a false flag operation or the ship sank itself because of gas leak.We know it was not Spain, but it was used as an excuse to enter a war against Spain for taking Cuba and Philippines from them and committing genocide of at least a million people in the Philippines.

Who killed Rasputin? The British Government. Why? Because Rasputin was very influential in making sure Russia did not enter the WWI. Because they wanted Russia to enter they propagated all kinds of lies against him that even today remain and eventually killed him.

Who supported the Volsevisk revolution in Russia? The German Govertment so Russia would abandon WWI as they did after the Lenin coup.

Governments have always supported crimes when they benefited from those crimes, and that has not stopped in modern times.

I asked Reverte, an old war news reported who killed his friends and colleagues:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arturo_P%C3%A9rez-Reverte

He told me:"Half Russian secret services, half the US secret services"

In today's world, the US Government is behind way more crimes than Russia, because they are 10x or 20x more influential,specially after Berlin Wall's fall. Russia has the GDP of Spain.

The second biggest criminal is China, for the same reason. But US media loves China though.

Now when African activist that oppose a US multinational because gas or oil gets killed. Who do you believe is behind,Russia?

Who do you believe is behind when people is killed protecting the Amazon Jungle against the people that want to plant soy so Chinese pigs(and Chine that eat pigs) could be fed?

Who is behind all the chaos that is in north of Africa today. Who supported the war in Libia that made the Libyan army to infiltrate in all the Sahel.

Who supported the war in Syria? Afghanistan, Iraq.

How is that all those new weapons magically appear out of nothing?
> Given paying with crypto is as easy as a QR scan these days once someone is onboarded, the other claim that you use, convenience, is about to go out the window: see venmo, PayPal, CB integrations.

But why would you want to? In most cases, there's simply no benefit to using cryptocurrencies instead of real money.

Even if we could pay for our groceries, clothing, water, electricity, rent/mortgage, taxes, etc. with cryptocurrencies (which, for the most part, we can't) rather than real money, there's no compelling reason to do so.
Dollars and Euros, everyone knows. No one is buying it because it's worth anything. They are buying it because they think there's someone more ignorant behind them to believe the lies.
I pronounce it “ping”, but that’s because I’ve read the spec. I e never met anyone else that pronounces or that way.
> there are no conventions in the way you set up a project (you can put your files in any folder)

Dune enforces fairly strong conventions in project layout.

Agree with a lot of your comment though.
> There is no doubt that learning, for example, a Chopin Etude with the busiest hand alone is going to be a natural step before adding the second hand.

To me, the phrases “There is no doubt that” and “natural” come across as if a certain amount of debate might be warranted.

> would you expect someone who can play both hands together well to also be able to play them separately?

Some may be able to, some not so easily. Think of a Bach fugue whose middle voice sometimes alternates across both hands. I’d say it heavily depends on the player and the piece.

> Muscle memory does not disappear just because you add a second hand.

Good point. I think my choice of words was poor when I claimed muscle memory would reset. What I do claim is that some people, myself included, experience friction in their muscle memory when they move between practicing both hands and a single hand.
How can one learn more about which stimulants have the “right” impacts?
> with no real roots except egalitarianism taken too far

This is a strange way of saying that it has roots in ancient philosophy. Every major ideology I can think of has forms of anti-anthropocentrism spanning from classical animal rights to silicon valley's post-humanist techno-utopian ideology.
Plus sometimes an animal eats another animal with a higher degree of consciousness than himself. A tiger eating a monkey for example.
Oh, sorry, did not know this was their mobile workstation line. Makes sense, then.

To be honest, considering we're talking about Dell, I must say I'm nearly surprised they did not put a DRM in the BIOS/UEFI to forbid using more than the quantity the laptop shipped from without paying a license. I assume it's that then, all the customers that do buy the cheap lines and update the RAM themselves would go to other shops ?
What doesn't depend on the good will of other people?
Maybe they want to have a backup? People setup 2FA using authenticator, loose phone, no proper backups, backup codes lost.

Using access to specific phonenumber as second factor is not too good security wise, but there’s no perfect options. I’d say managing 2FA properly is hard even for IT pros, let alone regular people. Like how many store the backup codes offsite, regularly test backup Ubikeys etc.
For whom?

The real problem is that not all valuable paths can come to the same bottleneck.

Med student? Well, the SAT might be a good indicator of how successful you'll be at completing a medical program in the US. Same thing for law.

Are you the creative type? Then the SAT probably won't be as indicative of your future success.
They also seem to point the finger towards hoarding by electronics companies in china to prepare for possible future sanctions.
I can't read a text based on the Big Five seriously. My personality changed in many ways over the years.
It's kinda like your political position changes over the years.

Someone fresh from college might be introverted and on the left political spectrum because he has no money, but to be successful he might get extroverted and when he has much money, he might get more on the right political spectrum.

How can something which basically assumes that people don't change get so popular?! People change all the time, personality changes all the time.
Almost like those reasons for using Electron about developer productivity are really exaggerated. I wish they would invest in a few people to help optimize performance to improve UX, as it affects every one of their users.
Not doing things for fear of political shitstorms is a large part of why everything is so broken these days.

Terrible leadership!
Show HN: ASCII Dinosaur Made with Terminal
It’s very helpful to learn to recognize lumper versus splitter arguments. Pointing out that lumping things together or splitting things apart is arbitrary just isn’t very interesting. What is interesting is why some things are lumped and some are split. For example why are polar bears and grizzly bears considered different species? They can breed just fine after all.
Vs code is the opposite of ms teams in performance. Scrolling up in teams takes ages. It's nearly impossible to look at chat history.
Perhaps the SAT is more like an IQ test (where a "quick wit" is advantageous), and college grades are based more on sustained performance, planning, meeting deadlines etc. These are very different things.
I believe him but I also believe he needs to keep working on himself.. I don't see it as a free pass to do some of the stupid shit he has done. He's incredibly talented, no doubt about it but with that there comes social responsibility which he needs to work on.
Or a third, more boring option: the world just continues as it does right now.
This is just the general chip shortage problem, right?
As usual, Sandi is right on the money.
When did screenshots become a social problem?
Shameless plug, I actually built a little Chrome extension (works in latest Brave too last I checked) that aims to help you manage your tab growth.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/prune/gblddboefgbl...

It keeps track of the last time you looked at a tab, and depending how you set it up can either group tabs into a collapsed group, or close them automatically once they reach a set threshold. It also stops you from opening duplicates, focusing originals instead (based on exact URI match).
You lose all of that and more on depreciation in the first two years.

I buy older than most people; currently my newest car is a 2009. I do maintenance and routine repairs myself, and I lose almost nothing on depreciation. But you can still come out ahead by buying 4-6 years old and letting the original buyers take the bulk of the depreciation losses.
And maybe we could call it: 2 pi ?

Just saying
What are some well known companies that came from founders living in hacker houses?
Taking away that money also has such costs.
I always liked the quip: Wikipedia works well in practice, just not in theory.
My guy, gnuplot came like 3 years after the GNU project. It's like saying Charlie Chaplin chose a poor moustache because Hitler made it look bad
Nice. SF also has Double Union, an all-female hacker space.

Although it's late in the cycle to be starting a hacker house.
What? Never heard this before. Do you have a source?
New iPad has up to 16GB and I wouldn’t be terribly shocked to see an M1 or similar in the next iPhone pro maxx.
> Great read, although I don't think I have enough knowledge to fully appreciate the details of the article.

Same here, but luckily I started reading the article expecting that. Primarily because:

> The article requires some prerequisite knowledge about Linux kernel memory management subsystem.

Oh how I wish all articles had this sort of disclaimer.
Why anyone would want to use this is beyond my imagination. Can't see other reasons than because people hope to meet celebs. Otherwise there's nothing special or new about the concept.
Extremely well said. my gut reaction to the comment you were replying to was similar to yours which was this person clearly has no clue about smaller batch manufacturing.

It kind of ties into Steve Jobs comments on consultants versus people who have to live with the consequences of their decisions.
Money is another scalar value which matters a lot.
Tcpdump – 50 Ways to Isolate Traffic
The question behind all of these theories of personality is "Does the measured quantity have any underlying form?" That is, are you measuring something "real" or just coming up with arbitrary classifications.

"How you answer this survey correlates this well to outcomes" is perhaps useful, but binning answers into personality types with common names is questionable.

It all seems to be a little bit too far down the road of searching for things to name and classify.
> provided you live in the U.S.

Launched the Android app two months late. When everyone has already uninstalled the iOS app and their competitors have already released clones and features faster and copied them to death, after all of this Android is now only available in the US.

Had they released both at the same time last year, perhaps they would have had a chance. But even then, the invite system is still there 1 year on.

> “Our plan over the next few weeks is to collect feedback from the community, fix any issues we see and work to add a few final features like payments and club creation before rolling it out more broadly,”

And all the final features are still not feature complete with iOS. Android users are really always last supported unfortunately.

> "As we head into the summer and continue to scale out the backend, we plan to begin opening up even further, welcoming millions more people in from the iOS waitlist, expanding language support, and adding more accessibility features, so that people worldwide can experience Clubhouse in a way that feels native to them"

On the looks of the AppMagic data, invite system, competitors and the pandemic nearing to being over, by the summer they would have even less users and probably one more major competitor will be the one to send the final nail in Clubhouse's coffin.
With all due respect, what do autism and texture have to do with each other?
Most of what information I can find about damage to blood vessels is related to damage from chronic, progressive conditions. Can blood vessels damaged acutely by something like Covid-19 repair themselves over time?
Huh, that's very interesting. I certainly didn't know that protein folding could be influenced by other proteins around them; I guess I sort of thought that proteins and their structure were fully defined by DNA. But it makes sense.. if a particular folding has an unstable point (ie., could go one way or another), it would naturally be influenced by the forces around it in addition to its "code". Thanks for the insight!
Why wouldn't I say that? I might.

Are you comparing taxes to murdering children with poison and roads you drive on and schooling that you get to ice-cream? That is a bit of an oversimplification, don't you think?
This conversation would be a lot clearer with a distinction between "regexes" and "regular languages". The former is what Perl/Python/etc. have, and the latter is a mathematical concept (and automata-based non-backtracking engines like RE2, re2c, and rust/regex are closer to this set-based definition).

https://www.oilshell.org/blog/2020/07/eggex-theory.html

With those definitions, this part of the snarky answer is wrong:

HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions

That is, regular expressions as found in the wild can parse more than regular languages. (And that does happen to be useful in the HTML case!)

This answer is also irrelevant, since the poster is asking for a solution with regexes, NOT regular languages:

I think the flaw here is that HTML is a Chomsky Type 2 grammar (context free grammar) and a regular expression is a Chomsky Type 3 grammar (regular grammar).

In this post, the example given IS a regex, but it IS NOT a regular language:

<!-- .*? --> # comment

The nongreedy match of .*? isn't a mathematical construct; it implies a backtracking engine.

I gave my analysis here and listed 3 or 4 caveats: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26359556

I prefer to use regular languages and an explicit stack, but this is not really what the original question was asking.
it is absolutely riddled with falsehoods and most articles are written by people who know nothing about the topics. It is a garbage site
Consolidated production has benefits like economies of scale and world peace, but at the cost of redundancy and national security. Chip production isn't actually that bad; Micron is in the US, Intel is in the US, China, Israel, Ireland, TSMC is in China and Taiwan.

What we're seeing here has nothing to do with consolidation of manufacturing; it's entirely JIT logistics. Decentralization doesn't solve that; surplus capacity and/or inventory solve that.
>Russia did better then literally every other empire. Yes it lagged behind Britain, France, Germany and the US but it industrial output growth was outpacing Austria-Hungary.

Better in what sense exactly? It certainly wasn't doing well in terms of quality of life for general population, and neither were any of the major capitalist powers. It's also a fact that Soviets built most of the infrastructure with 10 year plans.

>And saying 'its an agrarian society' is hardly a negative, in fact, by many measures Germany was too. What you are simply ignoring is my point about the largest land reform program in history.

I'm not ignoring your point, I just think it's nonsensical.

>Nonsense, the revolution was possible because of WW1 and the demilitarization of the autocracy The last large famine had been decades ago and Russia was the most success agricultural country in the world

WW1 played a role, but claiming that living conditions did not is the hieght of absurdity.

>Multiple million people starved to death in the early 20s and multiple million people starved to death in the late 30s. Millions of people were put into labor camps.

Millions of people starve under capitalism today. Around 20 million people die each year under capitalism from starvation, lack of healthcare, and so forth. US currently has the highest prison population in the world, higher than USSR had under Stalin. Prisoners in US are routinely used as slave labor.

>Again, you are repeating all the typical communist myths.

"myths"

>The idea that Imperial Russia was some backwards country from the middle ages while within 10 years after the revolution Soviet Union was some paradise.

Have you actually lived in the Soviet union, because I have and I know what life there was actually like. It's also quite telling that the quality of life has dropped significantly after transition to capitalism in the 90s.

It's quite telling that you're fixating on the turbulent period right after the revolution as opposed to years after WW2 where quality of life continued to improve rapidly with every decade.

Go take a look at what happened under capitalist regimes during 19th century and start of the 20th century. The atrocities like the Irish Famine, British adventures in India, and slave trade are just some of the highlights of the horrors, and many of those horrors continue happening today.
I was skeptical too but my laptop doesn't thermally throttle when running cinebench r23. I changed the thermal paste to Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme (I don't have the courage to use liquid metal yet). It's quicker than my admittedly old 4790k desktop to build our code
Wikipedia is absolute garbage, that people take it seriously shows how doomed humanity is.
People will wail and cry and scream about their freedom being taken from them...
> Basecamp ... a company that offers 100% remote jobs, their employees are scattered across 32 cities in different time zones.

I'm guessing this is no longer accurate.
No, billionaires didn't earn their wealth. And paying your taxes is the bare minimum, it doesn't make you a hero.
Highest these days is like 0.5%. If you are really lucky you can find 0.8%
>I don't know what a good solution is, or how to stop something like dogecoin without being too paternalistic

"dumb money" IRA? By default you can only invest in index ETFs, but you you can contribute up to 5% of your income per year to a "dumb money" account that allows you to do whatever you want with it.
"Architect" seems a bit strong but the article on him says he contributed to famine in the USSR and China. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trofim_Lysenko#Consequences_of...
I recall being exposed to OCaml in an intro to programming language class in college. Learning recursion was pretty mind blowing but ironically, it puts everyone in the class on the same footing: many who have programmed in OOP were just as baffled as those who have never programmed. Looking back, it was a good gateway into discrete math in general.
> especially for people with less interest in tech

Hum... I can program in something around a dozen languages, can find my way around the Linux kernel code as well as enterprise software, can administer OSes...

Yet, I am completely unable to set my fridge's clock (why does it have one?) since I lost its manual. I have spent some time trying.

IoT and smart things are a great equalizer. Nobody can handle them. Some times it's even not possible.
Your position seems bizarre to me.

I want to live in a society where I can do what I like (which in my case involves founding institutions that help propagate things important to me like free software, and als making plenty of money).

My descendants? Some upbringing and a good education and then they are on their own. What would be the point of giving them some money or a company? Some sentimental knickknacks: fine.

I consider inheritance anti-democratic and not part of the kind of society I would like.
I had a similar experience recently because I called out that the name brand webcam was not in retail packaging. That was the last electronics purchase I’ll likely ever make from Amazon. I ended up returning it and actually found one at Best Buy a few days later.