skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is that information comes with risk.

And I don't understand your comment about knee-jerk biopsy--if you're not going to do the biopsy why did you even bother with the mammogram??? My wife has been through that: Routine mammogram--it got read while she was still there. The radiologist didn't like a spot. Ultrasound. They still didn't like the spot. An hour of sitting around while they get authorization, then they do a biopsy there in the radiology facility.

That came back abnormal but not cancer. At that point the urgency was over, she was referred to a surgeon who removed what pathology said was a precancerous lump.
I was commenting on solely the "typing in code from a magazine" experience.
Because he doesn't care ? I mean yes SSL is easy these days but he knows he doesn't have to do it and people would still read this blog.
I found Matrix/Element:

- E2EE

- cloud sync

- arbitrary many devices and web client

- you can choose your vendor and even alternative apps without having to argue with contacts

- floss
The US only accepts doctors who went to Canadian or American medical schools.

That's absolutely not true. Foreign medical graduates do have to take the US board exams, complete a US-based residency, and possibly take additional courses to fill educational gaps, but they absolutely can practice in the US with a foreign medical degree.
I'm skeptical, because a key element of the US payment system is that everyone is highly motivated to shift costs to someone else, to be paid more money and to pay out less money, so doctors hire armies of accountants to do battle with similar armies deployed by insurance companies, hospitals, and drug companies. How will they fix that?
> there are practical reasons too, namely hygiene.

That's not a valid reason to have it done.

It's easy to keep yourself clean and I've never once heard of anyone getting sores because they failed to wash for an extended period of time.
There's a softly quantitative argument that humans are far better value for money than robots at doing science in space:

http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfbiac/Human_efficiency_pap...
A fast neutron is more likely to cause fission, but much, much less likely to interact with a fissile nucleus in the first place.
For what it's worth there's still r/CombatFootage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_Actors_Guild#Becoming_a...
It's the name of the book collecting the stories https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0915M7T61
There's difference between engineering for lowest possible cost and engineering to win a war.
Posting something trollish, then replacing it with reasonable text and saying it was "too critical for dang and HN readers" is an abusive trick. You even smeared someone as being responsible for someone else's death. That's just vicious.

I'm not sure what to do. This is easily a bannable offence. You can't post things to HN like your original comment, which was horrible. Editing in so misleading and nasty a way is also egregious. Even the posts you left up, like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27066185 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27066560 are egregious, and the latter is a shameful personal attack to boot.

On the other hand, I can give you the benefit of the doubt in a couple of ways: everyone goes on tilt sometimes, and most of us post things that we have reason to feel ashamed of later. Since we try to err on the side of giving people second chances, I'm not going to ban you for all of this. But please clean up your act if you want to keep posting to HN. We're trying against the odds to have an internet forum that hovers at least an inch or two above the bottom of the barrel, and behavior like you've contributed here just pushes it all the way down.

HN commenters need to at least try to follow the rules: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. Regardless of what you feel you owe pg or YC or HN mods or me personally, you owe this community much, much better if you're participating in it.
The disabled doctors not believed by their colleagues
NASA itself investigated similar spherules [0] they called "blueberries" and determined they were hematite-rich "mineral concretions" [1]. Evidence of water in the environment long ago, but not of life. This ResearchGate paper has only one reference to "spherules" and none of "blueberries".

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_spherules

[1] https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/6944/martian-blueberries/
FB does enforce the fair housing act and other laws. The platform is actually quite strict nowadays and catches lots of innocent ads in their filters for protected categories. Ad platforms should follow the law, that's working as planned.
HN markup for comments isn't great. It's table cells and spacer gifs. Visually, threads are clear, semantically, they aren't.
However, a significant portion of rocket science is thermal management.
It’s a preprint.
Usually, a comment tree is made as list of lists. HN does not bother with semantic tags though and the information does not reach the SR.
Arguably they didn't in the most visible sense only because of the inherent level of noise made, and you still got some gems like the throttling of Firefighters in California. It's also a rhetorical technique to promise not to do an impractical thing to cover up the intention to partially implement an unpopular measure.

>No, we're not setting out to throttle Netflix. (We won't need to, because use will go up, and it's already in the contract we reserve the right to traffic shape anyway, and given we won't improve infrastructure, it's a given it will happen).

The stuff in parentheses is the unsaid part that would upset the normal people. The Network Engineers in the crowd heard it loud and clear though .

If Net Neutrality (and the incentive it creates through forbidding QoS to dynamically prioritize traffic), should have lead to investment in the infrastructure to increase network throughput to meet actual demand. Instead, POTS got torn down, broadband stagnated as ADSL lines were milked for every possible cent, Unlimited data plans disappeared and were replaced with caps...

We have more IP addresses than we should ever need, yet the biggest hurdle to robust connectivity is no one wants to spend money to actually get the wires strung/buried/overhauled. Why? because screw y'all. We're near if not de facto monopolies now, wires cost money, and they'd subtract from the exec bonus that gets cut.

https://www.cnet.com/news/verizon-throttled-california-firef...

When you start resorting to rationing (data caps), you have an infrastructure problem. Fix it. Don't embrace it.
The quest for faster Python: Pyston, Cinder, or should devs just use PyPy?
> Worthless paper, administrative costs is only a piece of the many issues with US "Healthcare". Medicare For All is the better and cheaper way forward.

As frustrating and arcane as the current system may be, the government fully in charge for the provisioning (rationing) and financing will only increase 'worthless paper, administrative costs'.
The problem with healthcare is that inefficiency and lack of transparency is profitable.

The government has deep pockets, and everyone is trying to get as much money as they can from it. Pharmaceutical industries, insurance providers, healthcare facilities, etc.

Pharmaceutical research is important and expensive, but there must be a way for that research to happen without doing stupid shit like making insulin expensive.

Labor costs in healthcare are high, but there must be a way to not make a bag of water with salt not cost $500.

People pay for costs that are completely unrelated for the products and services they are receiving.
Even fairly mundane steps like assigning people uniform medical record numbers, so that every single organization doesn't need its own system, is a heated political issue in the US: https://ehrintelligence.com/news/house-votes-to-overturn-nat...
To be fair, supposing it were a recently introduced earth fungus, it would still be pretty incredible to learn that an earth fungus can evidently flourish on Mars.
> I've been using Google Search for over 20 years for free which is pretty amazing. Would I rather replay history and pay ~$120 every year (~$2400 ?) to search for web articles? No.

And that is the point, where I would say: "No, you have not been using Google for free. You have paid with something. That something is your personal data and privacy of others."

Why privacy of others? Well, because by using Google, you are actually supporting their business model, which is online stalking and selling info about you basically.

If no one was using their search (and other services), then what would be the point for businesses to throw money at them for placing ads there? Every user counts in the end. Many people keep thinking, that they alone will not make any difference, but that is, where people go wrong in many scenarios. The typical: "But if only I do x then it wont be so bad." or "If only I stop doing x, it wont change the big picture." If everyone thinks that way, then nothing ever will change of course. It is a feedback loop, or vicious cycle, or whatever it is called. The right idea is to start doing, what one can do oneself. And that is to stop using services such as Google search.

Personally, if I had the choice between paying money every year to have a non-stalker Internet search for the whole world, ensuring everyone's privacy when searching, I would rather choose that Internet. I would prefer it over an Internet, which we have today, where I need to arm up my browser to the teeth, to avoid being tracked everywhere, being unable to access a lot of content, because knowingly or unknowingly people put it behind stalker-walls and paywalls. I also think that your suggested numbers of 120 or even 2400$ are wildly exaggerated. It would probably be much more like an Internet tax, that everyone had to pay and that is lowered or increased based on your personal economical situation.
Teen charged with CFAA for rigging prom election
> I can only assume you haven’t done a lot of functional programming because Python is just not expressive as a functional language. Lambdas are extremely cumbersome. JavaScript by contrast has a huge FP culture and does not even have comprehensions. But it does have syntactically lightweight, multi-expression lambdas.

You assume wrong, but more importantly you missed the point of the snippet of mine to which you are replying—namely the expressiveness isn’t the reason the Python community rejected those features, but rather the complexity and cognitive burden.

> Except I’m not arguing that,

I wasn’t arguing that you were arguing that, I was using it as an analogous argument. We’re not going to get anywhere if you aren’t going to respond to what I’m actually saying.
As a Rust total newbie, I see the list of stabilized APIs I never encountered. I just have to click on them to get a comprehensive and well written documentation, with links to all the concepts it speaks about.

That is really the sort of documentation I love, the one that are not just boring references but also learning you things. It’s really a great work.

It remembers me that, while I never had the chance to work with Django, more than ten years ago, its documentation literally taught me about how web applications, the concepts, the paradigms, and this probably is the root of my today career.

The people behind this documentation effort really deserve kudos.
I'm with you. To me, it was pretty clear why they were making recommendations in the way that they did. There was no secret about why they wanted to limit the supply of masks going to the public at the start of the pandemic. They didn't know for sure how it spread, but they did know that the most important places to have masks were the hospitals. You need to be extraordinarily cautious there because every hospital worker that gets sick reduces the number of people available to deal with patients (and adds another patient). There was also concern about face touching if people not used to masks started wearing them, but I only recall seeing that being a concern when it came to sending children to school with masks.

Once the mask supply was able to meet demand and after they were reasonably certain it would protect against the spread of the virus, they adjusted their recommendations accordingly.

None of that is deceptive.
Another 6: ఢ૫ໃυޛඞਖࡨௐงເƍ౫൶ลٽ௨౾ІJ௮ටСݺԊق໐ɞ௨൜షݸ౻ටܬݹԪࡄถࡨ௭ඞФॡஸػʒஆಒ෩ಸݹࢳටଜݶౚ൜ਈމ௧෬ІھƐೲໄߢসࡆІݚɷ൜ປ൴ƋٯຯРமҔПܢமɈܢܭԤڌฅٽߤఏە

Agree it is like chess.
You need a psychiatric evaluation for diagnosis, which is exceptionally hard to get. So there's a nice shiny website and then there's the reality. Getting the diagnosis and then medication can literally take years, and it looks like this is on purpose.
With some more fiddling I got 5:
హقຽࡐԚقଖݹ३ΤໃςԎРಊݶɺටງђञසໃל௨ೱІJলظІŧԥගƖݹƔقWђવටܢݹԪmЄࡧԥฃໄڝরߩງוభ൜ϾঊஶϺळॾԫԉІݶݬΟไࢲذ൜షaஜشНܥಒකСݤЬඝܘƎࢶ૫Ɣڍகnബॠ
These photos are from like sol 965; it’s currently well into the 3,000s. The rover would have to backtrack significantly.
Lots of image pairs showing "growth" (7&8 esp which is the image pair they did their hypothesis testing on) can be perfectly explained by the sand just blowing off and revealing more of the round pebbles. The "smaller" ones are nearly all covered more in "before" than "after" and the "appearance" might just be "reveal of". See 41, 42, 44 for the close-up of changes. I don't buy that whole section.

Fig 29-30 is interesting ...
Fig 31-32 can be explained by the treads collecting blue sand.

All the images of dark streaks and clumps are in line with these:

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/PIA...

which show that there's a bunch of dark stuff under the surface that shows when you disturb the surface. Interpreting fresh impact imagery with a fungii story would be "Rocks impacting the surface cause fungii growth" which makes very little sense. Even dust devils strip off the surface enough to show the dark stuff.

https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2021/02/Mars_dust_...

I'm doubtful but hey what do I know, I just make robots. I hope it's all fungi and I hope it's edible.
You are either deliberately misleading people or are ignorant of the UK education system.

Highschool in the uk ends at 16, you graduate with GCSEs. After this there are 2 extra years of education (compulsory in England), you start university at 18 (at the youngest).

Medical schools are competitive and require strong a-level results, typically 3 As (the second highest grade, after A*) [0]. It's a 4 year degree, you then go onto train for another 5 years as a junior doctor.

There is a _lot_ of training for UK doctors.

[0] https://www.manchester.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/courses/202...

[1] https://www.healthcareers.nhs.uk/explore-roles/doctors/train...
> I would like you to start from the beginning of the person's medical training and not include the gatekeeping bit of having to get a bachelors in a random subject unrelated to medicine.

Why? An apples-to-apples comparison would be to see how long it takes to become a general physician after completing secondary school. In the UK or India it's something like 5.5-6 years.[1]

In the US it's 3-4 years of "pre-med", then 4 years of med school. That's from the article you referred.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_school_in_the_United_K...
What about a Lissp-Hebigo pair? https://github.com/gilch/hissp#hebigo

Hissp takes a different approach than Hy. Where Hy has to use shims to pretend statements are expressions, Hissp just targets the expression subset in the first place. (Actually a somewhat smaller subset than that if you're not injecting any raw Python: literals, lambdas, identifiers, and calls.)
Might be? It already is: Apple has gone on record to oppose political statements in videogames.

The clickbait pullquote for this is, "If you want to criticize a religion, write a book".
People had claimed their own email address had been used to post a message. The messages themselves were repetitive and clearly had generated names. Someone ran the entire thing through and reduced the bulk messages down to a handful. I believe there were some attempts to add filler words, but for the most part someone just put together spam bots.
Engineers are not somehow separate from society. When you say "let's get the law to handle it", that "us" includes engineers. Politics is just people, including engineers, figuring out how to organize society.

If you think something is wrong, the first step is to not do it. If you think it's so wrong it should be illegal, you can take the optional second step of trying to change the law.

There are some circumstances where you think something is wrong, but not doing it would be impossible or require really drastic life changes. For example, maybe you think driving a gas-powered car is wrong because it contributes to climate change, but you can't afford to buy an electric car or move somewhere that doesn't require a car. This is not one of those cases. The author has 10 years of experience at Google and could easily find a very well paying job either at another department inside Google, or at another company.
What fraction of the users come to stack overflow because of the font?
For context, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rhawn-Joseph holds the profile of the first author.
I mean, I'd be happy to have educated discussions about net neutrality, if I'd ever seen an argument against it that didn't boil down to "I think ISPs should be allowed to make things worse for everyone else—customers, streaming providers, game companies, everyone—just to increase their own already-obscene profits."

And yes, that includes "they should be allowed to do the above Because Freedom".
Is "life on mars", really an extraordinary claim? I guess I have a hard time seeing a solar system where Earth is so unique that biological life only happened here. I agree more proof is needed of Martian life, but what we're imagining here is bacteria/fungus like life, not green spacemen.
Peloton recalls 2 treadmills:1 for injuring children,1 for falling touch screens
> It kept giving me S pieces and threw a Z in there and then an l

"Line piece. Line piece. Line piece. LINE PIECE!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alw5hs0chj0
In Germany, I've heard if you stay on the same job for more than a couple of years, people think you're not good enough to chase for next/better opportunities :)
I don't really agree.

It's obviously purposefully non-committal, which makes sense, as Google leadership clearly is not inclined to want to be remote-first.

Lots of stuff is really group-specific at many firms. Google aims to be more top-down than most companies its size about these sorts of things, but it's a valid model to say some-teams-this-is-acceptable-some-it-is-not.
What does it mean the SSD is soldered to the motherboard? If I was to loose 2 months of work I would rip the disks off with my teeth. What is the real issue here?
this is the difference between 'strong' copyleft licenses like the GPL and 'weak' permissive licenses like the MIT, pythons, or BSD
How many people are capable of that though? Tech literacy (in terms of using a general-purpose computer and not a walled-garden) seems to be decreasing and the industry trend is to isolate users from it even more.

If nothing gets done it's probably a matter of time before general-purpose browsers end up only allowing "signed" web pages by default (this is already happening with extension API being deprecated, making things like powerful ad-blocking impossible on certain browsers).
Fixed width fonts don't always fix it depending on context. Consider

Your Passcode is: 6234024

Is that an O (oh) or a 0 (zero). It's an Oh. Of course often in a fixed width font the zero has a slash through it but if there's no zero nearby to compare it to most people won't notice.
I don't know how residencies could not be profitable for hospitals.

If it helps, think about it this way,

how does the malpractice work?

There are a lot of indirect costs around residents. For example, staffing mandates. Think what implications there are to regulations that say, for instance, no more than 4 patients for each RN on duty. That said, there are a lot of indirect funding sources too. The problem is, of course, sometimes the funding doesn't equal the costs depending on where you are.

And now we come to the rub. Which of the MDs are willing to do their residences in places where everything matches up nicely to support a lot of residents? Keeping in mind that those places may not be Sarasota, or Tampa, or Charlotte, but rather places in Alaska, a small desert city in New Mexico, or some small place on the tundra of North Dakota.

If you're asking, does the US government give enough funding? You can get an answer that's "Yes" if you consider nothing else.

Does that funding cover every regulatory cost of having a provider on staff? Not likely, depending on the rules in the state you're in.

Does that funding get to where MDs want to practice? Rarely at all does that happen.
Only accepting doctors who went to medical school in the u.s or Canada is not the same as having higher standards (necessarily).
It was just that the thread went completely off topic.
The Fermi paradox is going to get even weirder if we find life on the nearest planet.
ICLR Workshop on Enormous Language Models – May 7th, 2021 (Livestream)
Most probably they would be fundamentally different in classification from any Bacteria/Fungi on earth.
It might not be what you meant, but it's seems to be an underlying principle upon which your argument was based (if accidentally). Otherwise there is no reason to presume that an individual with a disability cannot be the best for the job (which you did).

Also, saying that an action is taken "in the principle of diversity and inclusiveness" does not imply that the decision was solely based on that, so that quote is meaningless to your argument.
Because you're saying up-front that you didn't even bother to click the link to see whether it was different, and you're suggesting that corporate malfeasance is only worthy of scrutiny if it's fresh.
There even a mal in Hy! https://github.com/kanaka/mal/tree/master/impls/hy
Validating should be pretty trivial. Explicitly handling all cases would look something like this:

#[inline]
const fn is_valid_scalar(c: u32) -> bool {
match c {
0..=0xD7FF => true,
0xD800..=0xDFFF => false, // surrogate pairs
0xE000..=0x10FFFF => true,
0x110000..=u32::MAX => false, // outside of Unicode range
}
}

But this could be reduced down to a simple if statement that tests for the invalid ranges.
As I said, because it implies that people with disabilities cannot be the best fit for a job and their achievements are not as good as anybody else's but a wasteful charity that is yet another box in a compliance checklist.
I'm certainly no expert, but as they pointed out this is basically a trompe, which...

>Compressed air from a trompe is at the temperature of the water, and its partial pressure of water vapor is that of the dewpoint of the water's temperature. If the water is cool, the compressed air can be made very dry by passing it through pipes that are warmer than the water. Often, ordinary outside air can warm the pipes enough to produce dry, cool compressed air.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trompe]

So use a better heat exchanger to cool the water, and then heat up the air until it's dry enough, I guess?
At first I thought this article was talking about returning just one value from a function, as opposed to say, an object or a tuple (e.g. things that feel and look great with ES6 destructuring).

Alas, the question actually describes a practice I've never seen nor heard of. Maybe I'm just too young.
> 2FA sucks for so many reasons.

> Privacy is destroyed

How?

> and losing your phone is multiplied into an even bigger disaster

Not if you are using a U2F key instead of your phone as your second factor.