skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's at least one example of that I'm aware of:

https://www.fox35orlando.com/news/fox-35-investigates-questi...
So you can use contractors that don't have a Secret clearance. The government calls a lot of things Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), its unclassified but its controlled and there are strict requirements on transmission and storage of CUI. See CMMC.
I dont think its the community. Its just that the people who read/comment on apple related articles tend to be the kind of demographic that dont value those aspects as much. They are looking for a service, not a product.
This is better written and less condescending than your original write-up, except for your last childish insult here which you just couldn't resist making. Whatever, I'll take it. Cheers.
You mean the US? Have you seen what's going on in the middle east? And that just scratches the surface.

Not sure where you're getting your news of a "nationwide ethnic cleansing" from, other than western news sources that intentionally feed propaganda to rile people up for war.

There's only one country in the nation with literally hundreds of military bases all over the world, and it's not China.
It would be practically unenforceable if CA did it, or even the US. The market in both is large, but not large enough, and it's hard to force compliance on companies from other countries.

The result would be similar to the protectionist trade policies that hamper market entry for foreign produced goods in India and some Latin American countries like Argentina. There are enough customers elsewhere whose governments wouldn't give a thought to this that non-CA/US companies would safely ignore CA/US in this case. It would only work with coordinated effort.

There are also other second order effects not considered by a policy like this.

What's the timeline and what's the company scale that this levies?

Is the documentation expected on day 1? Great, Apple and Google and Sony and others will squash all small competitors. You will never see another small (< 20) person hardware startup (not that we see them often anyways) because the cost to produce this kind of documentation is non-zero, and the big players can easily absorb it into their processes. Additionally, small players would literally be handing the design to competitors. OK, maybe patents and things like that stop some companies from being bad actors and reproducing the product in short order, but it won't stop everyone especially in countries with laxer or no enforcement of patents.

Additionally, problems would be created if designs were produced in non-compliant countries. If I start up a hardware company and make a new device, but half my components are designed in Taiwan and they've decided to explicitly reject this, am I non-compliant for not releasing documentation I don't have the authority to release? And if I'm able to become exempted because of a 3rd party component, everyone else would start shifting their design departments to contractors (if necessary) in those countries or shift a portion of their company there.
Some of the things it does are extremely handy for simple privilege escalation attacks.
Rust on the Frontend and Backend
The word 'deagentization' is quite unsurprisingly my second favorite Czech word after 'defenestration'.
What has repairability do with OS security? They are two different topics. You have a valid gripe about the first one but it’s misplaced in this thread
So far these people have not made a dent with their carbon capture. It's awesome if these carbon credits are advancing research on carbon capture, but that's not helping with reducing carbon emissions now, these shouldn't cancel actual emissions.
Being able to add or update the rpath on apps and shared objects is pretty handy, particularly when the target would be annoying or problematic to rebuild.
A comment from a high school math teacher concerning that book (which yes, was commonplace to read even decades ago, even among high school AP students) has stuck with me: "It's definitely possible to lie with statistics, but wait until you see how much you can get away with without them!"
And that's the very beginning.

We also have plenty of time series data from effectively instituted lockdowns worldwide. Excess deaths rise prior to the lockdown, in line with but greater than reported COVID deaths. They continue rising until median COVID- time-to-death days after the start of lockdown. Then they fall, sharply, dipping below regular excess deaths (and tracking the fall in COVID deaths). That isn't a pattern that fits the "maybe some other factor like the lockdown itself caused the spike" hypothesis, and it is also the pattern that was predicted by the scientists advocating the lockdowns.

Sure, some deaths are caused by lockdown, but the evidence suggests a pattern of the deaths which have been[1] caused by lockdown being [more than] netted out by normal deaths prevented by lockdown.

Some days it's cold, and anthropogenic climate change models are just fancy math, but this doesn't make all climate hypotheses equally plausible

[1]there's a plausible argument lack of medical attention during lockdowns and/or long term economic consequences may have a significant death toll in future, but that doesn't affect the "excess deaths reported during COVID have matched COVID spikes evidence
I don't know how people compare two isolated islands that are multi hour flights to any other nation to the USA with a straight face. Think of the backlash at even proposing locking the Mexico border. Also, Australia and New Zealand just broke their travel bubble, I don't know if that still constitutes as a "short lockdown" if you haven't been allowed to leave your country the entire time.

> It wasn't obvious that applying enough pressure wouldn't have prevented the uncontrolled explosion that we now have to deal with.

I'm not sure exactly what you're saying here, but I think we agree. Nothing about this pandemic has been obvious.
I don't know anything about this, but...? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_greenhouse_gases...

Edit: maybe not https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063727659

> The Clean Air Act sets national air quality standards to lower pollutants that cause smog, acid rain and other health dangers. It's never been used for greenhouse gases, but environmental groups now hope EPA might finally use it after ignoring the option for 11 years.
If last time you tried using Wayland was Sway, maybe this is the issue you were running into: https://github.com/swaywm/wlroots/issues/2889

TL;DR: Drag and drop involving chromium or electron windows has been buggy. wlroots/sway has not implemented _NET_CLIENT_LIST_STACKING, and both the fallback code inside Chrome/Chromium and the way sway has been stacking Xwayland windows have been buggy. A patch has been submitted to Chromium to fix the faulty fallback, the sway bug will be fixed, and wlroots will also support _NET_CLIENT_LIST_STACKING, so by the time the next sway release comes out everything should be ironed out.
An example from someone normally on the "just try it out" side:

Got a new laptop, it has a "high performance" nvidia GPU as well as the integrated AMD one. I was getting notifications that regular apps were using the wrong GPU and wasting battery, and I should use an option from the manufacturer to disable it. Once I eventually figured out that you needed to kill all such apps before enabling it does anything, everything seems fine, until weeks later I realise sleep isn't working.

Took a detour investigating "modern standby", which is Microsoft's new sleep mode that doesn't turn off the CPU and so was suspicious. But after messing around trying to force classic S3 sleep, messing with the powercfg command (which reported sleep as normal, wake on keypress, no wake timers, etc.), and testing with all apps closed, no change.

On the verge of giving up and assuming this was just the nature of modern standby, I booted a Ubuntu live USB, hit sleep, and saw all the usual pulsing LEDs. That reminded me of seeing the same thing when I used the laptop for the very first time, so I had enough confidence to "refresh Windows" (a reinstall that keeps files).

After doing so, I hit sleep, it worked fine, then had to gradually reconfigure the laptop, hitting sleep every time until it broke, which of course was just after I started feeling brave enough to make multiple changes every time. Narrowed it down to the GPU setting and all working fine after changing it back, but I'm going to be very selective about what I change and install for a while now.

I think most people who enabled the setting (as prompted!) would just be living with the battery drain though.
Does this mean if I leave this disabled then I’ll stop getting ads for products I just bought?
If it was actually a real thing that might show up in a decade, sure, why not, sounds nice. It's not, though.
> that combines with other factors and very few devices make it past five years of use

The original version of the iPhone SE and the iPhone 6s are six years old now.

They run the current version of iOS and still work just fine.
Perhaps not better, but different and yet on the same "power level": Smalltalk metaprogramming. Other than that, I am not sure anything more powerful is possible inside a classical computer.
I almost agree with this, except for the part where you claim that "It's not a practical requirement": this is entirely a practical requirement. People who use Macbooks gripe constantly about the viscous repair and replacement process. Apple's refusal to recover data (or even help customers recover data) is a hostile experience, whether it logistically qualifies as one or not. Customers deal with these issues, and Apple holds all the cards in their hands with the capabilities to fix them. People wouldn't care if the latest iMacs were twice as thick but could upgrade the memory and maintenance the internals. People wouldn't give the Macbook shit if it was twice as thick but had HDMI and USB A. Nobody cares about a thinner product, our current devices are about as ergonomic as they can get without sacrificing durability (if not compromising it, in Apple's case).

This is just a case of Apple being careless. We have a right to criticize the largest company in the world, if not hold them to the highest standards possible. Instead, we've let Apple off the hook because nobody wants to stand up to them and call them out on it. We're all willing to bury those experiences, as long as our next laptop can export our Photoshop projects 500ms faster.
Riboflavin and the other nutraceuticals are in this paper. Co Q10, magnesium, etc all have promising prophylactic effects.

We still need research and treatments for those who get migraines despite the prophylactics.
Its definitely not investor driven at all.
We had a long long internal hashing out of RISC-V
vs. POWER internally - and POWER won by a long shot
when it came to sheer demand from potential customers
interested in something other than embedded hard drive
controller CPUs.

For example, POWER right now support off the shelf AMD and
NVIDIA GPUs. POWER also has full JSv8 web browser and
JDK engine support.

And I also don't build companies for investors.
EVER.

I've chosen investors that believe in the vision and
I am not afraid to be vocal.
Tsuname.io
> bout of cluster headaches (you don't want those!)

Oh, now you tell me...

"Cluster headache is among the most severe pains known to mankind." [1]

Cluster headaches to generally thought to be neurological compared to migraines which are generally considered vascular. I guess by this article, indirectly vascular.

Cluster headaches are significantly rarer than migraines. Only a very very few get both. You should have gotten a lottery ticket that month. Glad it faded.

[1] https://www.practicalpainmanagement.com/pain/headache/cluste...
You're good, you should work in advertising.
Cables are an interesting example because they are so inexpensive and easy to produce, I can't imagine any one being much better than the others. Especially when they're all within 10-20% in price.

I used to agonize over finding "the best" but then I started to realize how much time I was wasting. Just find the cheapest option with the length you want and call it a day. Same goes for most things on Amazon.
interestingly i take it more from an intergenerational contract that at some point it's the duty of the old to senesce and optimize for the good of subsequent generations.

As I understand it this intergenerational contract used to be quite strong as people would see that previous generations invested in them and as a pay it forward sort of mechanism, they would in turn pay it forward to generations that proceed them .

I suppose there was some "take care of me when I'm old" in the intergenerational contract too, but I understood that as secondary to the propagation aspect...
>There are a few people who frequently have this complaint, but I don't think it's a real problem. If you actually need to do Y in a situation where most people who think they need to do Y are wrong, it's not everyone else's responsibility to divine that you are the magical case.

Well, that's strange, because what they do is still divining. They try to divine "what you actually wanted", even though you asked another thing.

Even worse, a lot of the time the one doing the asking has explicitly said "I know this is unorthodox" or "just answer how to do Y please, don't give me your 'better' options".

It's especially annoying when what you what to do is hack something (and not do it the official way), bypass some restriction that absolutely prevents X, try an alternative style, push the envelope, or generally think Y is better even though the "conventional" sheep-like answer is "do X".

An example of the latter would be trying to use Java with simple POJOs and lite patterns in ~2005, and everybody suggesting you go through some monstrous J2EE setup with half the GoF book thrown in instead because that's "idiomatic".

Or e.g. trying to ask about trying to use a regex to quickly parse some known-quantity HTML where regex will work just fine (say, extract all href out of all a elements), and everybody insisting they lecture you on proper html parsing instead, not caring about your use case.
This is a good point. I have been guilty of using "we" when I carried out the experiment entirely alone. I suppose it's a lie intended to increase credibility, but I never really thought about it before.
I've used it to edit a binary's rpath as part of relocating binaries that really want to be installed at a certain path.

You can do this yourself with e.g. hexedit if your new path is shorter but if it's longer you need something smarter, like patchelf.
can anyone show what happens if you feed it regular video / photo?
I don't know, I haven't tested if that is fast, but I'm assuming it does hit the disk again (since they refused to add another "feature", if "Type Ahead" even deserves that name).

Even it was fast, which I assume it is not really, I would prefer to have usable defaults without having to hunt for an obscure setting on every computer I happen to walk to, which is usually not even my own.

And as many other commenters on that gitlab.gnome thread described, I would much prefer to not to have the list filtered.

And also, I would strongly prefer not to have to disable/toggle this setting again to actually do a recursive search.

I just don't understand how it can be so hard to communicate why the existing status was so much better. And why the current status is unusable. I guess only people who never actually used that earlier feature don't understand.

But I will try that setting out next time... I hope then, that they fixed their stupid settings manager, which, at least some years ago, was some daemon that wrote to a binary database, and that frequently crashed, and then forgot some of its settings.

> That could also be solved with an intentional search option to search by prefix, maybe bound to a certain key that makes it obvious and not confusing what's happening.

The current search does just that, it's extremely confusing. It doesn't have a real search box, it is triggered as soon as you type the first key (which might be accidental), at which point it switches to a different UI state - and it's "flickering", it takes ages for the process to complete, and what your following key presses do within that timespan is very much dependent on the timing of the updates from Nautilus...

I don't understand why you keep defending it. It's a huge disaster on all fronts. It would be soooo much better if they would just protect that messy imperfect search thing by a Ctrl+F combo, and otherwise do the simple Type-Ahead thing. It might be only like 20 lines of code to change it....
Setting up an authentication workflow with React Query [Part 1]
US population: 328.2 million. So that's 0.24%. Assuming the average victim would have died another 10 years, that means everyone lost, on average, 0.024 years = 8.8 days.
You’ve made it clear that there is no evidence that can be brought forward that would get you to accept that there exists diffuse but consistent behavior that creates structural hierarchies within society.

It would appear then, that we are at an impasse.
There are screening processes when selling export controlled goods.
You may find the Rossmann Group logo amusing - it's a black sheep.
Don't forget that if e-ink wasn't patented, there's a good chance that it would be cheap enough to integrate into everyday utilities.
A Tale of Three (Miami Tech) Weeks
To call the XY learning QA a problem is akin to calling learning to swim a problem. It can be a problem on a sinking ship but not at the community pool.
There's no point in the hivemind downvoting you, but it is an interesting question on product philosophy.

One way to look at it is as ('at it is as'? English is weird) general purpose computer vs. appliance. Apple probably feels no more obligated to give you schematics, chip internals, etc. than Garmin does for a GPS.

Another angle is that hardware companies are becoming more secretive over time. There weren't many secrets in a Marantz receiver or a shortwave radio. Perhaps there's been a change in approach due to low-cost Asian manufacture and the tendency to ignore IP.
see my comment here for a different angle than just pure utility: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27080048
How do you justify the £100/year?

Which's primary benefit seems to be for White goods, but how often do you buy a new fridge/oven/etc?
This book was so big (5-6 cm) I had to cut it into three parts to turn it into a manageable desk reference.
I guess default camera apps have built-in QR recognition nowadays? Else this won't have been useful. Asking as I've always used Open Camera, which doesn't, and Barcode Scanner, when I need this functionality.
Why not credit the new invoice, and mark the old one paid as the client asked?
What about a feature that is both useful and, by its nature, requires tracking to even work? (not a dark pattern but technically depends on something that falls under the purview of tracking)
The strategic lesson is, always move upstream until you own the hardware.

Google had the search and moved upstream to own the OS and protect his search. But still has to beg Apple for 25% of its users (and 40% of its revenue, if I understand).

Content (films, instagram personalities) are at the mercy of apps; Apps, even on Heroku or Atlassian platforms, are at the mercy of the platforms; Platforms are at the mercy of cloud platforms (AWS, etc) who own the hardware.

The only counter-example is telecoms, who owned the hardware but became dumb pipes, after 20 years of extremely bad behavior (including modifying HTTP pages on the go and injecting JS to insert ads, for Verizon).
Just want to thank you for the total HN-esque tangent this comment launched.
There's data on my machine that I'd like to be that well protected, but... certainly not all of it.
In traditional Java, you're probably using Jackson for your JSON. You can achieve those sorts of results by specifying the classes and type tags in annotations on an abstract Either class to use Jackson's polymorphic serialization feature.
Hey, I worked in a related research field a few years ago and published some of the results. Here are some ideas I find important:

- Generally I found that overlay DHT based routing is not very scalable for large graphs. It performs well for random looking graphs, but becomes very inefficient for large planar-like graphs. If pinecone is designed for small local networks, it might work well, but it will probably not scale well to large networks with the current design.

- With a small local hack to the Chord network, it is possible to achieve eventual connectivity, see here: https://www.freedomlayer.org/articles/chord_connected_routin...

Other pieces can be found here: https://www.freedomlayer.org/research/
Of special importance are the experiments performed to large networks, which can be found on this page: https://www.freedomlayer.org/research/landmarks-lookahead/

If anyone from the matrix team is reading this, I will be happy to help if any help if needed.
To satisfy the authoritarian impulse, one can ask "in what manner should the mountain to be moved? Would just transporting the dirt be enough?"

And if this is "just interview question", the literal answer is "I don't want the fricken mountain moved to France, I just want to this exercise in hypothetical done with and you're not making it easy on me"
My favorite search highlights a good pub's influence on academia: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22muddy+charles%22
I have also used this engine to create a panoramic picture visualizer: https://victorribeiro.com/3Dsphere/
If these people are willing to provide schematics and motherboard traces to < 10,000 users, why can't Apple provide schematics and traces for devices being used by tens of millions of people?
> GOODMAN: But we can expect to see additions?

> ATKINSON: Lots of improvements. This is not going to be abandoned like MacPaint was. Pretty much Apple put me on something else and gave the maintenance of MacPaint to someone else and then kept shuffling that from one person to another, and MacPaint never got maintained.

As far as I understand that’s almost exactly what would happen to HyperCard over the next few years as well.
This is great, disappointed that the site won't let me download it though.
> Distribution costs were about 20% of their expenses.

It depends where. Where I live they were negotiated individually but in the range of 25-40%.
The "well they had comorbidities" argument does rather miss that after middle age that's true of pretty much everyone.

Or to take me as an example: I have asthma. That probably counts as a comorbidity, so if I die of covid, should that count as a covid death or not? I'm 42, I can reasonably expect another 42 years of life. Most chronic illnesses don't kill you.
I used crossbar at multiple occasions in projects of various complexity. My main take away:

- Pleasant to use and does almost exactly what it advertises

- Interesting authentication & permission patterns, unfortunately we couldn't extend it to the frontend, and that left us with a strange gap

- Hard to scale for serious cases, clustering is impossible in the open source edition and the commercial version costs in the 5 figures per cluster node

Ultimately I am quite confused about the target demographic of Crossbar (factories moving to IoT?)

I don't know of many pubsub + rpc solutions targeting a similar tradeoff with a tight packaging and a similar learning curve. Here are some I found then:

https://deepstream.io is the closest and has a richer feature set (including a replicating document store), however it seems to have a small ecosystem / community / limited support options, and permissions do not seem as advanced.

https://nats.io is close but lower level. Has a large community and rich ecosystem however.

Then you can also mix and match lower level technologies to achieve the particular set of tradeoffs you need. MQTT, AMQP, WS as the protocol, mosquitto / rabbitmq / zeromq, then json-rpc on top, grpc ...