skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They could have. Apple is a publicly traded company.
It sounds like you are describing monopolies or regulatory capture. And sure enough, the US and Germany have some of the least competitive infrastructure construction markets.
I'm not a particularly experienced or good Lisp programmer, I can customize Emacs, but that's pretty much it.

However, I think this article is a bit skewed and not highlighting things Python has.

For instance, the standard library means that Python is more usable out of the box.

Also when you've got things like iPython or Jupyter it means you can get off the ground easily.

So, in the end, they're two different languages, and I do not think either is better of the two. Right tool for the job and all that.
By this model vaccines are sadly "too effective" on two counts:

- They are preventative. Americans are scared that regular people walk into hospitals and debt peons walk out. We are too sickly and scared for preventative medicine, and like our infrastructure which is never maintained to the point of being in "good working order".

- They are O(1) dose. The unity economics of once-and-done is bad. Better to sell something which makes a customer for life.

It's really depressing.
"I actually think that replication is not actually the gold standard of science."

I'm not often left speechless.
The sweet spot is usually about a third of the way through, when he’s done blocking out the composition and has begun to lay in some good light and shadows. I’d buy a 1/3 Bob Ross non-ironically.
Yes this not that hard if you are statically linking as much as possible. The magic of stable syscalls. Variance between glibc is the biggest headache but musl libc solves a lot of the problems.

Have you ever actually tried that last step that you're suggesting? It's actually really time consuming and expensive to maintain that infrastructure due to oddities between distros, like glibc or unsupported compiler versions. Statically linking is easier than redoing all the work of setting up and tearing down developer environments just because one platform has a different #define in libc. It's also cheaper when your images are not small and you're paying for your bandwidth/storage.
All analysis we run is over 100s of millions of objects (objects can be a few megabytes large) every time it runs. The slightest increase or decrease for 1 object obviously makes a huge difference overall; either in cost, time or both.
> If we keep this up, in a few centuries we might get to a point similar as USA where your identity doesn’t depend on which country your grandma comes from.

As a fellow European I don't think it's going to happen. Not in a hundred years. We speak different languages that alone prevents it from happening. We might get to the point where people will define themselves with dual nationalities, like Polish-German, but this we see even today.
Is someone having reading comprehension issues?
Gorgeous graphics. Masterful teaching. I'd like to see a treatment of 2-cycle engines.
>sound extremely convoluted to me. A switch's express purpose is to break and complete circuits to direct current. It is part of the object's usage, part of the creator's intent on the object's utility. It has modes of operation where the circuit is broken and complete by design.

This is an excellent point and is a big reason why a lot of rabbis would not give "building" as an answer. Another answer commonly given is that electricity is like fire (made a lot more sense when "electricity" was 99.9% stuff like starting your car with a spark and incandescent lightbulbs) and lighting a fire is prohibited; this doesn't really hold much water anymore. Another reason given is that there's a rabbinic prohibition on "creating", but that doesn't really work because, like you said, all electric appliances are made to be turned off too. Basically electricity on the sabbath is pretty weak as far as prohibitions go and any explanation you hear for why it's banned will always be post-hoc, and the real reason why it's banned is because rabbis are afraid that letting people use electricity will "destroy the spirit of shabbat" (but they can't actually say that's the only reason because it's not strong enough to prohibit it). In fact, on holidays (like passover and the like) the prohibition becomes much, much weaker (to the point where some poskim say that turning on and off LED lights is permitted, among other things.)
> but it's still open source

Tell that to Termux: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25644964.

> reinventing a whole mobile OS

There is no reason to reinvent an OS. You can use desktop GNU/Linux on modern phones. You only need to tweak the UI (see Phosh). You will also have full computer in your pocket and ability to connect it to a screen and use all Linux apps.
Do they mention that pay will be rising to attract more able-bodied people?

Let us know if it's still an issue after the pay increases and work condition perks increased?

What they are not raising wages? Was the article looking at justifying some political point of view?
IP67, size, and design. Your comment is more of a facepalm moment.
https://mridgers.github.io/clink/ gives you readline editing in cmd.exe
At intensities that would injure, you light up the whole neighbourhood with scattered radiation. There's no hiding this attack from a sensor in the vicinity.
What about hiv?
The x-ray image looks like Apple's spaceship campus
The phones are the same price, you know. The carriers don’t literally ‘subsidise’ or give you a ‘free’ phone - it’s built into the contract price. It’s nothing to do with how wealthy you are because it’s the same price!
Real engineers are like doctors, lawyers, LMFTs... even licensed electricians have some similarity here:

The point is, the “field” , has taken in a number of disasters, established a professional association, set standards for what you need to know to not be putting people at risk of dying, and created tests that new entrants have to pass in order to be certified with a title.

Now, you can say that is pointless bullshit—fine. That’s an opinion. But then you are just saying you think the title of “Engineer” is bullshit, we could still at least try to use the word properly.

The point is, people used to be able to use the word “Engineer” to mean something like, your house isn’t going to slide off the cliff, and your bridge you bought isn’t going to fall down, and due to “software engineers” who never bothered to set any professional standards for themselves, that word is less and less meaningful.

Words come and go, it’s not the first time. But it’s still a little bit of a bummer when it happens.
The laws aren't the literal word of God though, because a lot of them come from the rabbis. The problem is that we don't have the rabbinic authority to overturn laws that don't apply anymore, so we're stuck with what we have a little bit.
Parent said network not just a single machine.

That includes the cost of mining without which your computer would not be able to verify the transaction.
In addition to the comments below, I think a way to implement your idea is to have certain technologies automatically shared between trading partners and/or alliances - and also wars.

This exists in other 4X games but not really any of the Civ series IIRC. You can trade generic science points but certain technologies and civics could be shared directly by trade and military engagements with foreign powers (wheel, military tactics, currency, printing press, etc).
I think it has as many non-loophole uses as loophole uses, so I can see why they chose to cut down on bulk there. I put one in my wallet and one in a small internal pocket in my bag, neither are actually attached.

I can't remember the last time I actually lost my bag or my wallet, but these are definitely pretty fun.
I think people do not realize that:

a) NASA did not receive sufficient budget to found even one proposal. SpaceX had to agree to delayed payments.

b) SpaceX was rated the highest by NASA in technical and management rating.

c) SpaceX was basically half the price of Blue Origin and probably 1/4th of Dynamics.

d) Starship is and will be developed with private money whether NASA awards SpaceX the contract or not.

e) Because Starship is and will be privately founded, it would be somewhat accurate to say that it is SpaceX subsidizing a government program not the other way around.

f) Starship is the most advanced project with early proof of concept prototypes flying (and crashing) all the time. Hopefully less crashing and more flying from next week.

g) Also a fun fact. The movie Avatar about a fake moon made in box office 2.9B dollars. SpaceX got exactly the same money i.e. 2.9B dollars for an actual moon landing. Let that sink in.

> This decision was
based on NASA’s longstanding Option A acquisition strategy of making two Option A
contract awards. While it remains the Agency’s desire to preserve a competitive
environment at this stage of the HLS Program, at the initial prices and milestone
payment phasing proposed by each of the Option A offerors, NASA’s current fiscal year
budget did not support even a single Option A award. Working in close coordination
with the CO, it was therefore my determination that NASA should, as a first step, open
price negotiations with the Option A offeror that is both very highly rated from a
technical and management perspective and that also had, by a wide margin, the lowest
initially-proposed price—SpaceX.

[0] https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/option-...

Also if you do not like Elon the tweeter idiot Musk. Then let me introduce you to Gwynne Shotwell [1] SpaceX COO who runs the company day to day. She is absolutely badass business woman and engineer and deserves as much, if not more, recognition for SpaceX outstanding day to day execution.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwynne_Shotwell
I believe the correct packaging mechanism was only conceived in 2018.
Was the use of c^2 intentional?
Is it also more ornerous to control for oscillations in pedestrian bridges? Does that require extra structure, or just tuning?
> Recycling plastic waste is indeed a good thing

Is it? It seems increasingly like it isn't, it's just that we've now got entire generations of people for whom this idea is an article of faith. We were raised on a steady diet of greenwashing. We've been hearing it on a regular basis, from authoritative sounding sources, for so long - perhaps since before we can remember - that it's hard to imagine it not being true.
I think what he means is that there isn't explicit consent given for the analytics, as in opt-in rather than opt-out. You can disable it but that's not the same.
If you're suggesting that this is done out of selfishness or intellectual fervor then I don't think that's true. I wouldn't say they "prefer" it but it's certainly easier and more economical for a skilled person to contribute to those tools because the developers and the users are the same group of people.

Once you decide you need to do user testing and hardware testing, the cost shoots up. You need to start procuring hardware and finding a place for it to live so automated tests can run on it all the time. That costs money. You need to bring in a lot more testers which requires project management and/or volunteer coordinators. Usually that costs money too. Everything you do needs to go through more stages of design review which also requires extra coordination and project management. These are real things you can have but someone's got to foot the bill.
I've honestly thought about keeping one of these in my apartment, I worry a bit about people doing stupid things with microwave ovens.
It sends spy data even when it doesn't crash, too.
Yup, they had one magic trick and stopped innovating since. A lot of their stuff feels very archaic now and they're refusing to change it.
Apple’s unique ethos is technology as a means for creative expression. That’s why they’ve excelled in font rendering, colour accuracy, sound fidelity, and input-lag.

I think this value came from Steve Jobs, and I hope they never lose it because it imbues Apple with real human spirit. They’re more than just another profit-seeking company.
I was a fan of musk but not much these days. His rude and off-putting behavior towards his own workers and the pandemic sullied me on him as a leader.

So I'm no apologetic, but Spacex seems the sure bet for Nasa to accomplish their goals. The competitors just don't have the experience, launches, and technology.

Spacex is at a unique spot, they basically have advanced tech nobody else in the world has(yet), at least that I'm aware of, until the other contractors have as solid a program I'm pretty sure he'll get the bulk.

I think competitors should be allowed to compete so they can afford to perfect their tech but start on satellite launches not the moon shot or bigger stuff until they have as many launches as Spacex
We do fund basic research decently well, but not development. That's mostly in agreement of the above, but leads to a few differences.

In particular, if we start funding the both research & development, the public sector starts taking on all risk, so there is 0 reason to reward the private sector with IP ownership. Do a drug bounty, and then public domain the IP. I would say have the state hold the IP and license it out with cost controls, but I think having medicare actually negotiate will do that well enough.
You're touching on something interesting, which is the difference between political narrative and politics-as-action.

In politics, narratives are not true or false in the scientific sense. They're created purely for persuasive purposes, as expedient air cover used to justify social actions.

Factually the narratives may be completely true but selectively chosen, partially true and distorted, or even completely untrue.

The social actions - which can be horrific and impossible to justify on their own terms - are sold via narratives to disguise them and make them palatable, with the aim of increasing the power of the ruling group.

Signal is a superb example of creating a selective narrative by copying the style and tone of a successful publication to make it more credible and persuasive to its middle-European middlebrow target audience. Of course all the harsh racism was removed because that was the entire point.

Western academic Marxist theory, on the other hand, is a superb example of failing to understand narrative - which is ironic, because Critical Theory is supposed to be the best tool ever created for narrative analysis.

It isn't, because it doesn't understand its own politics, never mind the practically-oriented opinion management machinery of Capitalism, or the condescending cynical dishonesty of Far-Right Nationalism.

In reality it's intensely tribal and exclusive, and this makes it an incredibly soft and easy target for its enemies.
You're right. The software uploading the zip is what plainly indicates uploading.
Which might even be the guy they quoted himself.
> I make individual commits for addressing review comments.

Those changes are visible when you make a force push in github since it generates a link that shows those changes.

> Association should be there through tickets.

I've seen companies change ticketing systems several times in career. Once it changes, all the old links and associations are as good as gone. But if that association is maintained via git, then that's not an issue.
Have you considered fat native binaries with C#/Go? Or is the app too complex with many external resources?
I just finished "The Spy in Moscow Station" which talks about these signals. Although this isn't a direct response to your point about mortality, an interesting feature of the Moscow (Microwave) Signal is that it -- considered as a surveillance threat, rather than a health threat -- also received a lot of the same skepticism I'm seeing in this thread.

The TL;DR is that various agencies strongly resisted attempts to dig into why the USSR was directing microwaves at the embassy, despite the fact that the USSR had already been caught placing microwave-powered listening devices inside the building. The book describes an argument between State, CIA and NSA in which the former two mostly wanted to ignore the signals. The belief was (1) that no technology had been demonstrated that these signals could exploit, and (2) even after the NSA cooked up some examples, people refused to believe that the USSR was sophisticated enough to exploit them. (I won't spoil the book by giving away the resolution.)

I'm not offering this as any kind of proof that the current batch of Havana syndrome cases is real: just pointing out that while "we've never seen it before so it probably doesn't exist" can be a reasonable heuristic in day-to-day life, it's not necessarily a great one in the world of spying.
Seems confusing to me to describe a location using the names of unrelated other places. It would be even more confusing to limit the word set in the way you describe. "Where do you live?" "London-Oxford-Leeds." "Where is that?" "Outside Brighton."
Slavic languages are as broad or more broad as Germanic ones. Ethnicity and the mother tongue does not always go together, see for example Wallonia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallonia
Look at AutoIt. It's a more traditional basic language, and iirc AHK was a fork of a very early version a few decades ago.
What makes a great NFT are much.
1. The artist: Lets take Beeple as a case study, Assuming you bought a beeple NFT before he absolutely blew up, The NFT you bought for about 1 ETH would have increased in value to like 4 to 10 ETH.

2. The story and Potential of the significance: An NFT With a great story and Meaning. For example two NFT's were featured on NFT Hunt spacex and starlink and a couple others talking about the future and painting a picture of the future. NFT's like that are almost bound to increase in value at some point.

3. A moment in history: Another NFT was featured , Evolution, It was about the Neuralink monkey Presentation. That's a Moment in history. It holds important significance. Once Neuralink makes Huge Breakthrough there is a huge chance the NFT will follow suite

Hope you Understand
Wouldn’t it be ironic if this was some secret comm equipment that the US is installing in its own embassies
"Stunning" is tendentious. These are public funds. Protests of contracts are routine.
Which printer is that?
A good chunk of that is that people had finally gotten a delivery mechanism to work in the past few years. The "for a decade" is misleading, because a decade ago it was an interesting idea nobody had gotten to work in a way that was useful. 2020 it was something with good promise and product development under way that could be sped up massively with more money and acceptance of it being a gamble.
To add to the other replies, remember that containers do not provide isolation for security, they are simply namespaces.

Rootless mode helps provide some isolation and individual machines also provide some isolation.

Anyone who can launch a container with the `--privileged` flag has the ability to read the host VM's disks, or on a physical machine even update the bios etc... Launch a container with that flag and play with mknod and dd for the hosts root drive if you don't understand that attack vector.

The question you should ask is why you aren't using user namespaces or isolated machines if you are attempting to follow the least privileges and zero trust models.
I work in a pharma company, and I have been working with the animal model they use for this paper regularly for the past 4 or 5 years. I am not an mRNA therapy expert by any means, so I'll only comment on the results from the MOG35-55 and PLP EAE models.

They have good disease induction in their control groups, their targeted mRNA therapy shows pretty remarkable efficacy, and they show they can diversify a little bit with respect to the target.

These models are a little too "furry test tube" for me for this application. They work by injecting an antigen, either a short version of the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptide or the myelin proteolipid protein (PLP). The mouse makes antibodies against that antigen, and those antibodies also attack those antigens in their natural environments, leading to demyelination in the CNS. Well their mRNA for the MOG model makes more MOG peptide, giving the antibodies another target so they don't cause demyelination. In the human condition, there are multiple antibodies against multiple targets, so I'm not sure this is as relevant as they're suggesting, unless I'm missing something. I do want to add that this paper has a ton of work in it, and it looks pretty high quality as far as I can tell.

None of this is to say there's no value here, I'm just not sure what target they would make an mRNA for to treat human MS based on this paper or how they'd identify and test that target to get FDA approval to move into trials.
>Personally, I just want it for completeness.

You know, that's an interesting point. There's a lot to be said for using one as a desktop. I've got a Motorola Droid laptop thingie around here somewhere that turned a phone into a pc-like device and it was actually pretty cool. A few generations of speed improvements and it would be fine for most uses. It's nice to have a single non-cloud state for your stuff.

My main need is for a phone to do the following: be as private as possible, make calls, send messages, occasional browser use, hotspot. I'm tired of being dragged along with everyone else in terms of complexity.
The source code may have had UB, but the compiled program could nevertheless have been bug-free.

> Any code that invokes UB is not a valid C program, regardless of implemention.

I disagree. UB is defined (3.4.3) merely as behavior the standard imposes no requirements upon. The definition does not preclude an implementation from having reasonable behavior for situations the standard considers undefined.

This nuance is very important for the topic at had because many programs are written for specific implementations, not specs, and doing this is completely reasonable.
sneak, the commenter didn't ask how to reproduce it, they asked what it sends. What is in the zip file and what exactly does it upload when it crashes? Are you certain that it uploads the whole zip file upon a crash?
> So, we only began hearing reports when Trump was in office, allowing for a significant planning period.

You are alleging a massive intergovernmental conspiracy, created up by Trump just so he can have some cover to strengthen restrictions on Cuba? No, the US doesn’t need a conspiracy to do that, they can just do it unilaterally.

There are dozens of families that have been affected by these attacks, with varying levels of government experience, from multiple countries, investigated by multiple governments, independent panels, contractors and health professionals. It would take conspiracy on a massive scale to get everyone on the same page… all to do something that can be done without conspiracy and at the snap of a finger. That is hilariously ridiculous, not a single chance that is the case.
The new bridge looks significantly wider than the Charles Kuonen bridge, so I guess it'll be heavier per meter.
prettty sure the entire point was so they can make money off accessories
No they don't do that. Only happened once when moving to git:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...
"tombé du camion" was a regular idiom around French housing projects.

Any shady sale was basically assumed to be so.
You can’t eat Bitcoin or use it to power machines.
You're basically describing WebOS and FirefoxOS.

WebOS lives on as LuneOS (and runs on the pinephone), but FirefoxOS effectively went closed source and became KaiOS.
The future of PHP parallel concurrency