skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I was surprised by how many of my girlfriends here had at least one instance of rape or sexual abuse, usually from partners.

Same here, absolutely appalling. Whenever I speak about it with guy friends they don't quite believe me and try to rationalise it (which is a common response for me on many topics as well), often by arguing semantics of what is considered rape or abuse etc, or the integrity of the person in question.

I'm not sure what prompts this skepticism exactly. The friends I've discussed this with who are skeptical, tend to otherwise be quite understanding and well thinking individuals. It's a bit akin to my own first reactions to allegations of Chinese genocide against Uyghurs, the concentration camps, etc. That can't be... There's probably some nuance I'm missing. I was only convinced after reading more and being exposed to more information and evidence.

It's very hard to have these conversations with some guy friends as none of my female friends have wanted me to share any part of their experiences with anyone else. That makes it really tricky to convince anyone else of the veracity of their claims. If I could, I could say 'well it's actually my partner, who I fully trust, or my mother who is completely honest, or our mutual best friend for the past 15 years', people whom my friends also hold in high regard and believe at face value, like I believe them.
The actual requirement is a series of rear visibility tests that are done on a vehicle through the full range of seat adjustability.

A rear view camera allows any vehicle to meet the regulation regardless of vehicle styling and design. They are cheap, too.

But they are not strictly required. Your average 1980s sedan probably would meet the requirement as long as it had mirrors on the driver and passenger side.

Here is the regulation:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/571.111
I dont particularly like doge or PoW but I don't think it wastes that much extra energy.

It had so little mining at one point that to save it they had to make its mining compatible with LTC so they can take advantage of the hashrate there.
> Its an easily portable high value item that also serves as signaling for the person wearing it. It makes more sense then livestock in the modern world.

Jewelry is not a great value store, unless you're fine with selling it at a significant loss. Diamonds specially, unless they're rare, seem to magically lose a lot of its value as soon as they print your receipt.

To be honest, I find the whole love-engagement-sex-wedding handling retrograde and inappropriate for the current times.
There's something in humans and I'm not sure if it's an anglo culture thing or a biological thing but men who haven't reached a certain stage in life are more or less considered sub-human. Many don't reach it and still more don't develop far past it.

I feel like I'm just there and there's a night and day difference in how people treat you but it's most extreme with your female peers. It's also nice to have some friends from before, I feel like they're the people I would go to if my life fell apart.
I don’t see how people believe the founders of Whatsapp didn’t know what was going to happen. They are getting a free pass and even more than that - praise. No one gives you $19 billion dollars for a product..only to barely monetize it and do it inconsistently with how the rest of the related company operates.
Cinder: Instagram's performance-oriented fork of CPython
I agree it wouldn't be a good signal for most women early on.

I remember, a few months in a relationship, lightly making fun of some of her "cheap" behaviours (which I really appreciated) and her getting very offended. At that point I realised I never communicated I was a massive cheapskate and I asked her if she thought she was more frugal than me. It turns out she thought so!

I think I definitely proved I won the frugality contest, but I learnt over time to mask this to appear more interesting and charming.

Money is not the only resource that count and that's worthy of optimising for; time and reputation are important as well.
For well understood you don't need complicated machine learning you just need a searchable dictionary of test outcomes and flow diagnosis flow charts, these things already exist.
It's an industry specialization with no formal training. You can get a degree in computer science. You can't get a degree in running large-scale computer systems. Plumbers have better training than we do. Garbage men have better training than we do.

If any organization is bold enough to write a book on it, that book becomes the de-facto standard. (it helps that it's 10000% easier than buying and reading a million disparate ISO standards on Information Technology)
If you're in the UK, take a look at the Ordnance Survey. Some data is open source, some very reasonably priced.
This is impressive, and really quite fun.
at the top, you'll see a link to the article this thread is about
ABS does not significantly shorten stopping distances. It does provide improved steering control during brake applications that would otherwise exceed available traction, but I think it's extremely rare that ABS would be the difference between a pedestrian collision vs not. (They could just as easily choose a car that didn't have ABS as originally equipped and no one would say anything about the omission.)
and most electricity going into mining crypto comes fron coal
wtf I love lunix now
You played on wifi, right?
I'm not suggesting that the person feeling attacked isn't right to feel that way (I didn't see the comment you're referring to, but this topic seems to be kind of heated in nature regardless).

Mostly just, attempting to reason with someone that's feeling attacked (much less, someone that's feeling attacked about something as emotional as loving their wife) is an unwinnable task. I wish this conversation started better, because I actually think it's very important (and I generally think/agree that lots of relationships are unhealthy and it contributes to a lot of more negative societal issues), but I think discussing those topics with those that think you're trying to invalidate their relationship serves no one.
I'd hope not as I'm good at it, but my wife is awful at it. She pauses the TV to read a text message.
~30m: tests, security checks, linter, build images, k8s deploy etc.
>Yes, and it's shared by nearly everyone.

Not really. If you're talking specifically about whether an unmarried man that fits some particular criteria is owed a wife, most people in the western world at this point in time would agree with you. But that's far from universal.

>The alternative is that you believe someone does owe you a relationship, which is anathema to anyone who values individual liberty and freedom at any level.

Not really. "Individual liberty and freedom" is not one concrete set of ideas that you have to either accept or reject wholesale.

>Everyone who is advocating for making changes to society to improve their chances is really fucking cagey about the specifics.

Some are, probably. I don't know which you've been talking to.

>what changes do you propose

Bring back severe social shaming for women that engage in sexual activity outside of a committed monogamous relationship (e.g. marriage or on the way to marriage). Bring back social pressure for a man to marry a woman that he has had sex with outside of marriage.

>and who owes you a relationship

I am married, so I think from society's perspective, my wife should owe me a relationship. If either of us denies the other a relationship without very good reason (meaning something more than just not being happy any more), the one abandoning the marriage should be looked down upon as having done something very wrong.
That video zoomed in to a place 200m from my house (near C-Base, Berlin). It felt totally natural (of course I'll zoom to my house!) and only when it deviated slightly from my actual home did it seem weird (wait, It's not me who zoomed to my house).

Really like the Braille Console hacks.
Does that work for dvds?
I think some imortant parameters are: age when you started and ended first marriage, age when you started second marriage, current age.

I suspect sexual compatibility lowers in importance as people age.
Multitasking in this context means doing multiple things concurrently, not consecutively. It may be hard to launch a job, switch over to configure another one, switch back when you get the results from the first, finish launching the second, reconfigure & relaunch the first, and then move on to the third while 1 & 2 are running etc etc etc... but it's not strictly multitasking, it's just ocntext switching.

Also hard, also expensive, just different.
It is very complicated. My experience in dating post divorce is that men feel like they are in a no win situation. A lot of women still want prince charming and chivalry but they also want independence. They want a man who will take care of them but still want to have the freedom to do what they want. They want to be wanted but give only when it suits them. They want a sensitive man with high EQ but also one that will get in a fight for them at a bar.

That being said, I don't blame them. Why not want it all? A lot of this is cultural. They grow up with Cinderella but very few will get to play that role. They grow up thinking that motherhood is a must but a lot don't really want that life. They work hard and rightly feel desire to have what they want. You mix all these things together and it is no wonder there is confusion.

Another take is one from Billy Crystal in City Slickers, "Women need a reason to have sex, men just need a place." This difference greatly captures a lot of people's approach to sex.
Does this use a custom algorithm to map pixels to characters? It really shines when zooming in and out.
I wonder how your post and posts like yours would be received if you said you have no idea about the purchase button or pricing of apps in app stores because you had ways to get around app and in app purchases.

Probably not well. At least usually not well. Depends on the day and the audience of course.
The trick is in how broadly you define "basic necessities." Go talk to a plains Indian in the 1700s and ask them if a permanent structure all to themselves with running water and a refrigerator is a basic necessity. Now think about access to doctors and drugs.

That's the real crux of what we talk about when we talk about equality of outcomes. What qualifies as a necessity? And that's when you start getting arguments that start with things like "well in a modern society..."

You'll probably be hard pressed to find someone that says that someone deserves to starve to death because they're unwilling to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. You'd probably also be equally hard pressed to find someone who thinks that waigu beef is a basic necessity. You say "strawman" and they say "moving the goalposts" and none of that is productive, this is a legitimate discussion that is going to be had, needs to be had and is not over or settled, shutting it down by calling the opposing viewpoint fallacious on false premises will not change that, it will only be counterproductive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_steaks
Lots of people seem to state that git already solves lots of the versioning issues for ML experiments. However I am yet to find a good guide or example.

Just tagging commits and experiment runs does not seem enough of a framework to manage large experiments.
>Popular hacker software includes "Comet Cursor", "Bonzi Buddy" and "Flash"

OK i have to admit. This made me laugh.
Developing for Android definitely made me a lot more understanding of quirks and brokenness in apps on my personal Android phones (developing for Android and iOS, and so being exposed to many examples of both kinds of devices, ended up converting me to being an iOS user anyway, though)
Seems Galileo has four different services that it offers. Open Service is the public service. If you understand the protocol and radio signals, you can build your own device to read it yourself.

High Accuracy Service used to be the commercial service, but is now just called HAS and is offered free of charge apparently.

Then there is Public Regulated Service for government bodies, and a Search and Rescue Service.
in Russia, computer programs delete you!
Many existing version control tools help with this, but there are some challenges that crop up when doing this with jupyter notebooks:

1. Versioning notebooks in a semantically-useful way is difficult: think of it more like versioning binary data than source code. I know we struggle with this a fair amount.

2. There are many debates, some here on HN, about "best practices" for collaborative versioning (do you squash? rebase? etc). These questions exist for notebook users too, and there's a lot of interest in developing tools that either make these decisions for you (are opinionated), integrate them more into the GUI nature of notebooks, or both.
Thanks! If double-clicking or pressing the enter key while the text element is selected doesn’t work, it’s likely a bug. Are you using Firefox by any chance? I just tested on chrome and safari.
Do you find it's easy for you to head back into work at 9 am the next day? I'll have boughts, but they leave me drained and needing to recharge. I can't do it consistently, especially if the work isn't exciting.
I think you’re completely right and one way to counteract it is to bake in “non work” or “idle work” time regularly. This doesn’t have to be a vacation, but it does mean staying out of flow and reflecting on the project as a whole. This can also be a good time to fix little boring things like individual UI elements.
> I can fire off emails requiring little thought one after the other with little cost.

So can everyone else, which results in the state of the average modern inbox.
I agree that it's primarily a UX problem driven by the context. Someone designing the UX might not fully appreciate this, or be told to optimize for the best experience in particular situations.

Someone has just rented a car and is likely in unfamiliar surroundings. I guess some renters will renting regularly, but let's assume not. The want to hit the road while getting their seat in the right place, fixing mirror positions, familiarizing themselves with the dash, etc.

They also want to listen to some podcasts and in the back of the head they think they need to let someone know of their arrival time when they are closer to the destination. The fumble through the BT connection menu while multi-tasking. They are always going to do what's most expedient unless they are security conscious and know about this issue. Their contacts get picked up.

This is the manufacturer optimizing for the car being a single person machine. They often don't support multiple family members sharing a car. It's interesting to see how some sales people handle this situation when giving a test drive. Many are aware of the issue because there was one customer who spent time clearing things up before the test drive.

Can this be fixed? Technically, yes. It won't be fixed because manufacturers don't seem to care. The only option is for Apple or Google to make it part of qualification of some kind for CarPlay or the Android equivalent.
This is the first book to introduce the concept of a metaverse.
But if that extra complexity and difficulty helps to improve the overall quality and safety of the code people write with it, then maybe it's worth it?

Or put another way, C and C++ make some things easy when perhaps they shouldn't.
By progress I mean actual money making products. If your widget is doing shape recognition based on training sets and your competitors are hard coding color recognition then you end up making more money.
I agree, but felt like confirming it anecdotally.

I asked my two sisters, in their 20s (not in tech): they both had this misconception from school. A friend (not in tech) did too, but only until he tried registering a domain of his own and saw he could get .org. My mother (also not tech savvy) trusts .gov more than .edu or .org, but didn't realize that anyone can purchase the latter ones.

I asked her why she trusted .gov over the others, she paused and laughed as she said "well the government wouldn't lie to you!" :)
I can understand why people think of these as "market problems," but I think this angle tends to loom larger than it actually is.

It's at its strongest in a 19 year old, "dorm room" context. These times mean a lot to people, but in practicality this is a short period of time at the end of adolescence. Overall in life, relationships are not generally like a market. There's no "50% of the girls shagged 50% of the guys" stuff to make it like one. Mostly people are in monogamous relationships. Discrepancies (in the article) are smaller and are from dating patterns between age brackets.

In any case, why analogize? Think of it as a culture. Dating culture. Marriage culture. Late 40s hookup culture. Whatever "failures" exist are cultural failures.

If it really was mostly a market situation, the market would clear.
Meh, Most game engines have Linux support, devs just don't bother testing on it so they don't release builds for it.
Someone used awk to make a generative synthesiser http://kmkeen.com/awk-music/
Psychohistory FTW ;)
The proof is that men aren't described as gatekeepers, even though just like women, they choose to have sex with certain people, and not with others.

The "gate" you're talking about uncontroversially belongs to each individual in the form of their bodily autonomy. Yet women are uniquely cast as "keeping out" certain people. That's not a matter of dimorphism: that's a matter of mens' bodily autonomy being assumed, and womens' being up for debate.

In other words: for the sake of argument, sure, there's a gate. But only women are viewed as gatekeepers, as though keeping others out undermines equality, rather than being part-and-parcel of having the equal autonomy to choose one's partners.
I think the future of JavaScript tooling is esbuild and SWC, written in fast compiled languages like Go and Rust. I don't see the value proposition in a brand new toolchain written in slow and memory hungry TypeScript/JavaScript.
That's from multiple images, and if you look closely it looks really bad. Just look at her hand in the "far focus" image. A digital method needs to fill out information that's just not present in the image.
I literally have less ping on Stadia than the latency of a wireless controller. I’ve had several friends play on it and nobody noticed any lag.
You would just dial the other person’s modem and that would give you a bidirectional steam of bytes from one machine to another. Anything you typed showed up in their terminal and vice versa. Then you could initiate a file transfer using a protocol such as Zmodem, which would stream the file in checksummed chunks so that parts could be retried if line noise corrupted them.
It's currently got PoS working alongside PoW - so it's already happening
NASA has selected its deep space hardware–now comes the fun part
and remember to stop the extension auto-updating (I assume Chrome lets you do so..?) and review any changes.
Go Channels?
Not necessarily, our frontend repo takes almost as long as the backend to compile. I'm hoping we switch to esbuild at some point.
I absolutely agree, one should not have to do this.
Physical sex is not intimacy.

Sex work leads to some very strange dynamics, because often the Johns are desperate for intimacy, but they are paying for women that provide zero actual intimacy (because it is usually entirely faked.) I am sure there is some ideal world where prostitution could satisfy emotional needs, but in my admittedly very limited knowledge it doesn't.

Prostitution has been legal in my country since 2003, however it is still stigmatised for both men and women (at least for my demographic, and I haven't noticed any difference for other demographics.)
Thank you for taking the time to write this, I got a job at FANG right out of college and the impostor syndrome is real so I have compensated with a lot of extra work. Unfortunately the truth is at this scale my contribution makes little difference and the extra hours even less so. I just end up burning myself out over nothing.
Voting, and dividend distribution today requires intermediaries (e.g. broker). Those can be direct.
I also like nitter for this. Of course, you have to use a non-ratelimited instance, but there are a few to pick from.
It didn't take the government to shut down the economy, it was going to be severely hit anyway, government intervention was aimed at shortening the impact as much as possible, but people really fucked that up. It was unfortunately obvious in retrospect since a large portion of society no longer lives in reality.

- Elderly COVID patients being sent back to nursing homes is a great example of an early misstep and misinterpretation of rules creating a bad situation. Hopefully we can learn something from it.

- A few people out there hypocritically not following the rules doesn't make the rules wrong.

- Intimidated people at religious worship sounds like spin for people being unsafe and trying to claim their religion gives them the right.

- Yes, the US was deliberately lied to about the severity of the virus by the US President downplaying the risks, and I'm sure others in government or media played it up. Either can be excused depending on the motives.
This would imply that the "bottom" 80% of men are not finding partners. When we look around at the world, either anecdotally or statistically, do we see 80% of men without partners? Not even close.
> There is never anything I want from the phone tree except a human operator. If you could automate my request then you should have done it over the far clearer interface of the web page.

This. It's particularly infuriating that now many phone trees don't even have a built-in "I want to talk to a human, now" option. Hitting "0" used to be a fairly common way to do that, but doesn't appear to be any more. Often I have to wade through three or four levels of phone menus just to get to something that will take me to a human.
Most beef aren't fed grass, they're fed corn or barley or other grains.
Well, without being pedantic about the use of "copy", we might as well use "NFT" and "cryptocurrency" interchangeably, but it's useful to make the distinction between as they are different.

If you pipe /dev/random to 100 different files and hash them, the content are "the same" in the sense that they are all filled with garbage. But if you hashed the content, you'll get different hashes. Use those as Global IDs, and you have something like a NFT. The same, but also not the same as they are unique.
>A man who is no longer attracted to his wife won't suddenly become attracted when he understands how she feels. Attraction is not a choice. It's not something you can talk yourself or someone else into.

You have a point. And the scary factor (at least, in my society) is that admitting this would be rife to criticism (be it insensitive and maybe misogynistic if a man, or shallow and a slut if a woman), because so much of our teachings say that we shouldn't judge others based on looks.

It's not exactly about looks in this situation, but it's a very similar situation. You may find that you need something else out of a relationship, but the not only lack of communication, but *active discouragement" to communicate such inconvenient truths probably causes much more tension than the short term tension of a breakup/divorce

(not to say breakups aren't painful in and of themselves, but it's the difference between keeping a thorn in, and removing it. The latter gives you a chance to heal).
'Cuddle parties'? This is brilliant. Is it free?

Are the wimmen at them good lookin'? I'm all for this concept.
Perfect :-) thanks!
Entirely fair set of decisions! Thanks for the reply.