skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's not quite the right example though.

CRT definitions of 'White Supremacy' are not about 'people acting deliberately' to support it.

CRT laments that 'regular people' doing 'regular things' act unconsciously to support oppressive systems, hence 'White Supremacy'.

Making a film about 'something' and hiring those people you know to make it, who by virtue of your social network might be 'mostly white' - would be an example of 'White Supremacy'.

Ergo - in their view, unless you are actively fighting to dismantle the concept of whiteness - you're supporting 'White Supremacy'.

I believe there is a kernel of truth in systematic, even unconsciously biased systems, however, I don't remotely agree with many of the assertions. Unfortunately, to disagree with their assertions makes you a 'bad person' in their view.

Have a read [1]. A thesis of 'self examination' i.e. a fairly progressive individual addressing their own 'white supremacy' due to their lack of active assertion of issues of equity etc..

http://www.anthropology-news.org/index.php/2019/06/25/disman...
Culture also instills in girls and young women that it must be their perfect day. Family obligations and expectations can add more pressure.
Thanks for the kinds words! Performance has been a huge priority from day 1.
Direct links to the studies cited:

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/august24/multitask-resear...

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-09/uos-bsr092314...
Interesting, I hadn't heard that. I always just assumed it was a descendant of PCI and ISA.

Here's a history video on busses from ISA to PCIe:

https://youtu.be/51YEyPqvkTk
Isn't equality of outcome used to measure equality of opportunity?
Yes. At complete chaos you can't see the world, because of information overload. And with complete order, you're no longer acting in response to the world. You're only acting in response to the order you've created. (In practice, models, metrics and beliefs). And at some point that can become self reinforcing if you don't ground your choices out by talking to real humans in the real world.

This happens all the time with ideology. If you get too steeped in any particular ideology, you no longer react to the world. You're only reacting to the ideology. (Or the world framed through the ideology). You see this all the time in the blockchain world. So much effort is going into making software and tools that nobody outside of the blockchain world wants or cares about; because it only makes sense from the perspective of other blockchain stuff. And of course, it happens all the time with twitter style politics.

"We have a problem! How do I solve it?" "Make the metrics go up! Use a blockchain! Acknowledge your privilege!" "Wait! I haven't told you what my problem is yet!"

There's a great quote from Bill Clinton: "The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
Wait? you could have Brew and MacPorts in the same user? I read that they are impossible to co-exists due to how brew and macports handles the user folder? BTW I never tried this, I just got this Macbook Air M1 few months ago. Fearful that I will brick it.
Uniswap is a pretty amazing story about how much operational efficiency can be gained with this technology. I'd say they're doing WAY better than "not bad" :).
Ask HN: Why is Microsoft never included in FAANG?
I read something along that lines that Microsoft is one of the most valuable public company in the world. Bigger than Google, Bigger than FB .
Why do they never include it in FAANG?
Please fix the AWS free tier before somebody gets hurt
Y2K was a thing too, but its not like we didn't see the clocks rolling over coming. People tend to procrastinate on this sort of thing.
Daily reminder that his name is spelled Buffett. Two t's.
Big discussion of original source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27040470
I don't know whether this is the case for everyone, but I've noticed that my wife's dissatisfaction tends to correlate very very strongly with periods where I'm completely exhausted.

I genuinely believe most men _want_ to satisfy their partners securely, in the same way that many working mothers _want_ to cook wholesome, healthy meals from scratch for their children, but after yet another stressful day we just don't have focus and energy required to show the love in that way.
Different cultures uses different displays to convey status. In cultures which do not place similar importance on a diamond ring, they may place equal importance on other displays, such as a large wedding banquet or purchase of a residence. Regardless of the specific expression of status in various cultures, I would think that they exist as a constant across all cultures.
I think you get tickets with BRK.B too. A friend of mine sells the tickets he gets on ebay and says that's a bigger dividend than the stock will ever pay :)
What the hell is the point of shares without voting rights? At that point all it is sans regular dividends is a speculation vehicle, which Buffett has long been against...

What am I missing?
BRK is an unusual case where they offer both A and B, wherein B is retail-accessible. BRK.A mostly exists for bragging rights at the shareholder meetings / getting closer to a celebrity a lot of people deify.

For other businesses, stock splits can increase investment/price since it makes that stock more accessible to retail investors and more importantly their huge pile of retirement savings. For example automatic investment plans that can buy whole shares of a company each month (via salary redirected savings) are much more popular than sitting on cash for up to months to buy a single share (and that is harder to automate/brokers don't support it).

Fractional Shares should solve this issue, but many 401Ks simply don't support them, different brokers have a patchwork of what can/cannot be done with fractional shares (e.g. market orders only), and there's also questions about voting power/stock splits/broker transfers/legal rights/etc.

If fractional shares were offered not at the broker level but at the exchange level with identical [proportional] power/legal rights/access/etc to regular shares none of this would matter, but they don't at all. So we've got a system where share price is both meaningless mathematically but also somehow an impediment to an entire investment class.
Want to feel old? We're closer to 2038 than Y2K now.
Joke's on him now that Robinhood lets those "unsophisticated short-term investors" buy fractional shares.
They even have a fan account on twitter https://twitter.com/worldbollard
((2^32)-1)/10000 assuming they don't care about negative equity price.
> and scaling solutions are just starting to launch that are enabling entirely new features, which I imagine will unlock another wave of demand.

That seems to me to be the opposite of what I wrote about the evolution of the Internet.
"making it to adulthood" is different than "living longer"
> On the other hand, when did racial equality become an inherently political topic? Especially racial equality inside the workplace.

When in the history of the US has racial inequality not been an inherently political topic? At its founding, the statement "all men are created equal" was highly contentious.
This is entirely accurate, except for two notes that I have: I never could braid to work, and flux works wonders. Other than that, spot on.
So... use a VPN or seedbox like any other isp?
FCA could hedge their bets and create a Fiat currency as well.
The steam games that I'm thinking of (chiefly MS Flight Sim) aren't on Stadia
Most of those arguments were made by people who don't understand what they are talking about, but that doesn't mean fuckery wasn't afoot. Segwit was falsely positioned as an alternative to increasing the block size, and after it went into effect, the pro-segwit people refused to raise the block size like the promised to, claiming some technicality. The result was that fees went astronomical, Steam stop accepting Bitcoin along with many other merchants and bitcoin went from being useful as a currency (a threat to fiat) to being a pure ponzi scheme like wall street had always smeared it as. And who was paying the anti-big block, pro-segwit devs? Oh that's right, private equity backed startups like blockstream.

>the bigger block people had thing and were basically in full on sabotage-bitcoin mode.

Failing to raise the block size and the resulting loss of real economic activity on the chain were what sabotaged BTC, exactly as the "bitcoin should be like gold" people wanted. Twisting that around and blaming the bigger block people for "sabotaging bitcoin" by warning that this would happen is beyond insane.

Segwit was a good change. But it was used by wall street to kill bitcoin and it worked.
You can't solder those because you can't get unset the part, you need a stencil and a reflow oven.
It is hard to argue that showing the pyramid of hate doesn't imply that laughing at names leads to genocide. That's very much the overt message - it's not even an implication.
Just goes to show you how a mix of boldness and simplicity goes a long way. Nike and Spotify had the most easily-reproducible logos. I don't think I could draw the starbucks logo from memory with a gun to my head, and I couldn't even remember Amazon's logo at all.
Right, my point was poorly articulated. I know why most companies split, I'm just not sure what incentives BRK to do this now. Do you think their cap is negatively effected by lack of retail access? They are a weird case.
Depending on how you want to influence your kids interests, a friendly cat'n'mouse game might give them a very real education.

"No wifi access until you figure out how to spoof your MAC to this."
Or we could follow Shakespeare's lead and not worry about spelling too much. Plenty of named also get anglicized into slightly different or multiple spellings. Are those Chinese people called Wang or Wong?
Shit you’re giving me the fear…

Edit: I mean… any tips?
From a status signaling point of view, it's the difference between a real van Gogh and a reproduction from Dafen Village.
One factor for Twitter was that Ruby was simply orders of magnitude worse for Twitter usage than I think Php or Python was for Facebook or instagram. Or at least one never heard of these providing horror stories where Twitter definitely had horror stories. In one of the few times I've been "close to the source", I heard Twitter's head of operations complaining the electricity had become their primary expense from starting X many Ruby instances per second. It was one instance per connection or something close, because Ruby was unstable and because Ruby never gave memory back to the system.
This guy has clearly never looked at an actual animal, like a dog dozing in the sun or a dolphin surfing along a wave for fun.
> Fallout in case they fall out of love. Divorces are such a complicated and often-times life ruining experience.

The fallout is going to happen no matter what. Marriage and Divorce law exist to bring a bare minimum of equity in the outcome and assure the care of any minor children who are affected.
> If you look at the queries in GPT-3 that are used to extract structured data, or to synthesize answers, the technical difference is huge, but it just has a high failure rate.

Yup. Though there are other systems that arguably had more technical success.

> There's also the general switch from searching for information, to doing things. We've gone from 10 blue links, to answers, to assistive functionality. The current state of assistive functionality is pretty shitty and has a long way to go IMHO.

Yes, I agree there's a great deal of opportunity for technical innovation. I expect to see a lot of it from Google themselves. Just don't kid yourself about the impact of those innovations on market share.
Saying E comes after B doesn't mean inevitably B leads to E. And it seems likely the employee wanted to make a point about the level the company was at or the next level up. Not the top of the pyramid.
So it seems like the worst outcome has been achieved then - overbearing bureaucracy for locals engaged in their legitimate business, and a relatively free hand for smugglers moving things across the border illegitimately?
If they were storing it in a signed 32-but integer, it would have already overflowed.
You can go to the meeting with BRK.B. Buffett prefers long-term holders, and the feeling was a higher share price makes things a little less liquid. With fractional share ownership it's kind of a wash now.

Even BRK.B would be 50x more its current price but it had to be split when they bought Burlington Northern with stock to accomodate BNSF shareholders.

The major difference is voting power. Economic interest is pro rata, but voting is much different (not that it matters in the current environment). That, and BRK issues direct tender offers to BRK.A holders.
You can ride the coattails of people smarter than you?
The readme does say that the goal here is to either get this work upstreamed to CPython or to inspire/inform improvements to it, not to replace/supplement it.
I've worked at a lot of places where politics was discussed casually. In my experience, political discussions at work tend not to be such a bad thing, provided that assholes can keep their mouths shut and not sow acrimony. When I read about the blowup a few days ago, I thought Basecamp had a cryptofascist in there somewhere and when he opened his mouth, shit hit the fan. Sure enough, it was Singer.

I'm beginning to understand why Andy Wingo emphasized filtering out fash when doing your hiring: https://www.wingolog.org/archives/2017/09/04/the-hardest-thi...
Buffett sees the stock price as a feature, not a bug (IIRC he's also said that you should only buy BRK.A if it's at a significant discount compared to BRK.B)
Oh, so for an incognito search with clear cookies in my locale (bay area), all you get for 1-5 pages or so with the search term you provided is the book and reviews and articles discussing it (with and without quotes): https://google.com/search?q=%22why+i+am+not+a+feminist%22

Perhaps when you search with your normal Google account it's skewing to different results. This particular book and the articles discussing it are critiquing modern feminist movements as too conservative, from what you perhaps would call a "radical left" perspective. I find it interesting that this is the exact opposite of "the general criticism at the moment seems to centre on the radical lefts takeover"!

I personally feel my incognito Google search captures the current zeitgeist better than your search, that people are fed up with conservatives and want a "radical, fearless call for revolution" as Google's auto-summary of my search put it. That said, ultimately it's all "bubbles" all the way down, as there's no such thing as a so-called "algorithm" (ranking formula, etc) free from ideology, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sir, I will assume you downvoted me as opposed to answering my query. Philosophical dialogue may not be intended for you, but for those who aim for eternity, it is important to arrive at necessary truths before we proceed to explain what an algorithm is in practice.
* Replace all `_` with `::` => sed 's/_/::/g'

* Append line number: `cat -n FILE`
> There is a fair amount already written on it but the insinuation that laughing a names leads to genocide ended up in the picture.

I think that's a misinterpretation of what that graphic is trying to convey. The point isn't that people and groups that exhibit behavior at the bottom of the pyramid are on the march to genocide. It's that there's a spectrum of bigotry and discrimination, and each level of it that is tolerated enables worse behavior. It doesn't mean every situation is going to get to the level of mass-killings.

Normalizing bigoted behavior encourages more bigoted behavior. The same way that normalizing managers who scream and yell at people often leads to others becoming more openly belligerent or otherwise creates a toxic workplace.
Either way, sometimes it’s going to be Wong.
Portability Is Reliability
It can also be lots of small careless allocations all over the place.
"People" say a lot of things that may or may not be outdated, outright stupid, or otherwise missing nuance. If that's your original point, I'm not interested in it, to be frank.

I'm mostly responding to the original idea of "Putting it on that pyramid has somehow fallen out of favor". your initial response of "It's not a basic physical need. It's a psychological need. " made it sound like it didn't deserve to be on bottom part of the pyramid, or that you perhaps didn't know that those two categories are often the same part of the pyramid. So I responded in turn to inform.
It looks awesome, but from the forums it doesn't appear that there is a built-in way to output direct to a pdf. I would value that feature, as options to convert html to pdf often have page boundary and formatting difficulties.

Am I missing anything, and is there a chance this feature might be added in the near term?
Nice! How accurate is it?
How can it not be possible? Surely if you have 1500 B shares, you can sell them and buy an A share?
God sounds like they needed to clean house if this was the kind of shit going on at work. Hopefully they can actually focus on the company goals after all this blows over.
While I agree SSD's should either slow down or fail read-only, the rest seems like wishful thinking and/or extreme exaggeration.

Do you have any examples or references that drives that implement your suggested algorithms?

I wouldn't expect drives to have sector-splicing and super-sectors (though multi-level cells regularly store less bits/cell), infinitely degrade their size via write-failures or rewrite data every hour. Especially frequent rewriting would self-destruct the drive if it weren't already preceded by catastrophic data loss.
one central piece of management: having very hard conversations with people while still treating them with respect and dignity.

I'd like to highlight this. I'd like to frame it and tape it to the head of every founder and entrepeneur so they have to look at it constantly. Hell, everyone who ever has to oversee other people.
This is absolutely the heart and soul of good management and being a good person, and everyone who thinks they're created a great workplace, but doesn't know this, needs to chant this 1,000,000 times.
Well if we're going to get into that, it should be pronounced Barkshire.
Doesn’t really say much but tone seems reasonable at least
Part of it is the difference in the receiver hardware. Survey-grade GPS uses the phase of the signals as well as their timestamps to measure sub-wavelength resolution. This requires larger antennas and much heavier-duty processing hardware, and generally only works when stationary as well, so it's not really feasible for a mobile device.
Except the new hires wouldn't have that first hand experience to help them understand the importance of sizing your integers appropriately. Institutional knowledge is a valuable thing.
It loaded 2MB (443kB gzip) of JS for that single button.
A lot of medium-to-large organizations used to have dedicated administrative staff, not just for senior management, but for everyone. It was good because the people in the admin pools were experts at navigating the organizational structures. They did it every day, all the time, for everyone, so they knew the tricks.

In the interest of cutting labor costs, those jobs were cut, and self-service systems like the ones you describe became the standard.

I've been around long enough to remember a time when, if I needed to travel for work, someone made all the arrangements, and just handed me tickets and an itinerary. I was really junior at the time, it was just how travel was done.

Now I'm pretty senior, but not senior enough to have my own assistant. I get paid a lot more, too. But employers seem to think it's more efficient for me to spend a day figuring out the corporate travel portal to plan and book my trip than to pay an expert to get it done in an hour or so.
That would indeed be fantastic. V8 has had so much optimization whereas CPython has had very little of it, though Pypy deserves a mention here. They've been doing fantastic work, but I guess there's always the curse of the reference implementation being the popular one.
Fair enough! Thanks. I’ll edit! (or apparently I can't, but I'll note it for the future - feel free to take out my last sentence there if you have editing privileges!)
100% this. Basecamp leadership just discovered that "stakeholder capitalism" isn't a choice made by management, it's something that happens to management because stakeholders are getting more empowered and organized.
I see it differently.

I watch my kid at the park now. When he is older, he will get to go further with less intervention/overwatch on my part. Eventually of course go without me.

Same for online. At first I will be beside him. I will educate what to watch for, what the motives of the actors are and how to work with them. Baby steps.

Later, he will get to go online without me watching every move. But I will review DNS logs. And I will let him know I am doing so, preferably in front of him.

Eventually, he will go without me. Although I will likely have a traffic shaping thing so I can have some bandwidth too!
Interesting. Not clear how "against your follow list" works though. Any tip is appreciated!
https://twitter.com/search-advanced?lang=en
Oh no! I just remembered I have a time-limited trial feature in my own software that won't work past 2022 because when I implemented it, I assumed I'd either rewrite it or be out of business by then. Now I have some more empathy.
I'm surprised to see the comments (at least at time of reading) are actually pretty positive, given the general distaste for cryptocurrency on hacker news. This reaffirms my view that the average HN commenter doesn't actually understand the innovations that are happening in the world of crypto, and merely parrots simple negative memes to get upvotes and reaffirm their belief in how it's a ponzi, or killing the environment, or enabling drug dealing and terrorism, or whatever flavor of the week thing it is. Thus when a post about a cool crypto use case (DAOs) pops up, people don't go for the immediate crypto = bad memes.

It kinda reminds me of that time period where the media was perpetuating the meme that Bitcoin = bad, blockchain = good. Which missed the entire point, because there is simply no way to separate the two. I think a lot of it comes from the moral dilemmas in the world of finance and it making people uncomfortable and prone to virtue signaling via negative comments. Like it or not, the financial system is what allows the efficient allocation of capital for all the innovations people around here love so much. It may be a slimy immoral world, but it's currently the best engine we have to power the world. The dream with crypto is to build a better financial engine to power global trade and innovation.

It's a lot harder to understand a fundamental global revolution than it is to bash it. I'd encourage everyone here to get more familiar with the world of crypto, because it's not going away and you're going to look back and feel very silly if you keep calling it tulip mania.
I've have had the opposite observation, probably has a lot to do with whoever is in the particular thread
> This seems a much nicer approach than Flutter's default ("we render everything in a canvas")

IMO Flutter should have used the DOM for web. Right now it's reimplementing (and shipping) tons of stuff that the browser already solves: layouts, styles, text editing, spellchecking, etc.