skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And what makes you think Maslow was right? Just because someone wrote something down or a belief is held as true in the Zeitgeist does not make it objectively true. There are many things that we hold as "true" which we really can't say are objective fact.

I'm not trying to be combative, I just believe that it's important to question things we believe to be true when we don't fully understand the reasoning.

Admittedly, though I know OF Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, I have no idea HOW Maslow came to their conclusions. So, I just looked it up:

> The most significant limitation of Maslow's theory concerns his methodology. Maslow formulated the characteristics of self-actualized individuals from undertaking a qualitative method called biographical analysis.[1]

> He looked at the biographies and writings of 18 people he identified as being self-actualized. From these sources, he developed a list of qualities that seemed characteristic of this specific group of people, as opposed to humanity in general.[1]

> From a scientific perspective, there are numerous problems with this particular approach. First, it could be argued that biographical analysis as a method is extremely subjective as it is based entirely on the opinion of the researcher. Personal opinion is always prone to bias, which reduces the validity of any data obtained. Therefore Maslow's operational definition of self-actualization must not be blindly accepted as scientific fact.[1]

Doesn't seem like the experiment was very rigorous or even scientific.

The linked article goes on to explain more modern and scientific research on the subject that seems to disprove some of the original hierarchy's assumptions.

[1] https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html#evaluation
Can PG sell it later for more?
Yes. There would be a chrome process always running in the background, visible in your taskbar on the right.

Chrome had a lot of smart people put in a lot of thought into it. It was a sea of difference when it came out.

Not to mention their original Chrome OS pitch was also amazing.

I really wish we had THAT Google now.
I still do this reflexively but zsh doesn’t word-split variable expansions, so the first version would work as expected.

Little things like this have made me prefer using zsh whenever feasible: and, in the age of dockerized everything, there’s few good reasons left to use bash.
Well, assuming the brain is somewhat similar to a computer, then there would exist a separation between "brain hardware" and "brain software". Just like a bug in Windows is not a bug in the hardware, even though it is measurable in terms of electrical signals if you care to look, it could be that there exist separate psychiatric/psychological conditions (problems with the brain software) vs physical conditions (problems with the brain's hardware, such as a tumor or a glandular abnormality).

They would both be measurable in physical terms, but that doesn't mean that they have to both be exactly the same thing. IF this vague notion were correct, it could mean that there could be separate diseases like "physical depressions" (that is, various defects of the body's hardware that cause abnormal amounts of certain neurotransmitters to be present in the brain, influencing thought that way) and "psychological depressions" (various mistakes in the thought process/software that cause problems with motivation/emotions/etc, that themselves also result in certain neurotransmitters being present in abnormal amounts).
I don't know. If you removed all the worst parts of the supply chain of a cell phone - the slave labor, the conflict minerals - it would cost like what, four times more? Boohoo. But nearly everything else about it, like the IAP sold on it, or the music you listen to or the books you read, is already essentially sustainable. And people spend literally hours on their phone, globally, consuming and spending in totally sustainable entertainment, and not just in the West.

For the consumer, sustainability in the West really is about food, and specifically, it really is about meat. There's no amount of equivocation that will change that. And affecting it - by simply not buying meat - really is as easy and as effective as it appears.
It is not orthogonal, they are clearly positioning their own cryptocurrency-via-chat as preserving privacy and are signaling that they are better than Facebook in that respect.
I have a 7575a. It will do some light reordering by pen number, nothing more. My Roland DXY-1150 which does "RD-GL" or whatever (but is functionally HPGL) does none at all.
The CO₂ produced by cars is proportional to their use. You could have 100 cars sitting in your massive garage and they wouldn't emit CO₂ beyond what was used for their manufacturing.
Toxic gender norms hurt both men and women, but we're only willing to consider toxic gender norms that hurt women as a politicized issue.

"Patriarchy hurts men" is a feminist slogan. It gets hundreds of thousands of hits on Google. The front page is full of lefty think-pieces saying that we need to consider toxic gender norms hurt men.

https://www.google.com/search?q=patriarchy+harms+men

The fact that it needs to be said means that not everybody knows it yet. But it means that the ones who are listening to it are the feminists. Feminism is an ally in trying to fix the problems of toxicity towards men, and these threads always bring out lots of men who blame feminism for their problems. If I've accidentally confused you for one of them, I apologize.
I think the answer would go along the same lines as answering the question "whose fault is it that you can't get a job?" when aimed at an identity category such as women or minorities. Basically: society has failed them in some form or other.
Ha, I've seen that! Really cool project!

The default part will be XC7K160T-FFG676, AFAIK it has some pin compatible family members as well.
Comparably rapid growth of economy and political influence
The scale of 'my boyfriend has anger issues' shirts is really dark...
> grind leetcode and interview-prep for a year and roll the dice on the interview circuit.

Or go to a serious CS/Engineering school and just take the Algorithm class.
I remember seeing a t-shirt ad that said something along the lines of "March people are X"... and I'm born in March. It just made me that I contributed to Zuck's data hoard.
I'm not much of a fan of Webflow precisely because of its complexity. Seeing Aspect a few months ago was exactly what I wished for from Webflow. I love how Aspect gives you the same freedom as Figma, for example.

Great work, Tshepo!
> you do want the staff of 20

No, you don't. Resources are not infinite, and at some point the budget has to be taken from other services which are more useful than a once-in-a-lifetime event.

Or you do want the staff of 20, but then it must be a volunteer and/or on-call duty system. Otherwise it is not sustainable.

In my country, the shift/switch to professionalisation that started 30 years ago has gradually become a big problem. Despite the fact that they still represent only 20% of the firemen, they are killing the budgets, and they always want more (lots of strikes); apart from 'standard' raises, the most common thing they ask for, is that on-call hours should be paid full-rate, as active hours. Which, beside being extremely costly, is absurd when they are 'working' 24h shifts! It contains a few hours of training and, depending on location, a few hours of duty; the rest is on-call (at home or on premises depending on the type of station), the number of service calls is limited, and 1 in 4 shifts happen without a single call (even more for 12h shifts).

There are plenty of other problems which surround this professionalisation, but they are not directly related to this subject.
So you're saying Tom Cruise can probably target ads better than I can?

In all seriousness, I wouldn't doubt that either - spend more, target more. But based on the screenshots someone else posted up a bit, it's pretty granular (I presume) by default.
In that it is similar to how Facebook operates:

* Facebook refuses to federate.

* Facebook is hostile to independent clients.

* Facebook is run as a one-man show.

And everyone agrees Facebook is Bad(TM).
Show HN: A screen recorder made for support teams using Intercom
My wife and I used natural family planning (ovulation tracking) with great success when we were not having children. We had our first child four years into marriage (conceived quickly). We have never gone more than a few months without conceiving, when we have had sex freely. When tracking cycles, we've gone years.
An inability to be happy without a person is not the same as a person making you happy.

"I'm miserable when my partner isn't around", is not the same as "I'm happier when my partner is around". Does that make sense?
> See telecom, airlines, etc.

Don't forget media companies. Everybody forgets media companies because media companies that have no qualms writing articles condemning mergers by Bank of America have a different incentive when it comes time to look in the mirror.
People aren't at fault here. These systems are deliberately designed to put the user in a compromised position. Designed by behavioral experts using techniques the business world has been building up for decades.
>>My biggest concern with this as a general approach—though its also an approach already in use lots of places and one which played a positive factor in out school selection for our son—is that it seems to be a much harder approach calling for more teacher skill to implement in practice.

Not only calling for more teacher skill, but also potentially requiring for more teachers (or assistants) in the classroom to implement this approach effectively, with no corresponding increase in education budgets beyond ad-hoc/one-time stimulus budget injections.
Flyertalk wasn't keen on the next big thing either

"ever since i semi-retired a little over a year ago, i been traveling A LOT and i hated it when people tried to reach me when i am on the plane or out of the country. so i asked myself -- wouldn't it be cool if i just set a status for my iPhone, similar to how you can set a status on yahoo messenger or skype."

Only response was

" It appears that this requires the other party to also have the app installed, right? "

https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-technology/952359-tho...
Could you spell out how the link you shared says anything about "year on year decrease" or anything about the movement being viewed as "despicable". Especially in the context of your very reference saying that the results depend significantly on how the question is phrased?
> How noble are we, talking about refusing to buy blood diamonds when the very MEMS mic in a household device probably vibrated to the scream of people watching a friend jumping out a factory window.

The suicide rate in those factories is greater than zero but is not high at all. You picked the wrong analogy.
Exactly. People act like EC is impossible to make viable, and ignore the fact that transactional logic can impose 10-100x performance loss. Putting an EC system in front of a transactional system can be a massive performance win.

This isn't quite what the Helios paper talks about, but there's lots of things like async indexing in there that are kinda similar in nature
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5nu_INVli0
Yeah, I'm over here going, "oof, I hope they don't do too well by burning VC cash, or they might stifle esbuild and deno and similar efforts, and we'll remain stuck at this embarrassingly-low local maximum even longer"
I believe pornography leads to hell, yes. I also believe that, even if you didn't believe that, it would lead to unhappy marriages? You should feel free to argue to me the benefits of pornography, though.
Farmer moves border stone for tractor – and makes Belgium bigger
Rome sounds awesome but the branding confused me for a second...

I was trying to find out how this relates to https://roamresearch.com/

I guess phonetically my mind was flipping things around.
You're strawmaning here because we agree that Carlson isn't "sane".

Some of your links take things he's said way out of context ("dirty" was referencing the amount of garbage left by illegal immigration at the border, an objective fact), and he's not wrong about leftists wanting to remove borders and import as many people into the West as possible, including an actual Democratic presidential candidate [1].

>(hint: not immigrants from Norway)

They're not flooding in illegally by the tens of thousands every month.

You say: "No one sane opposes racial equality, conservative or liberal." You might be right, but only because there are no sane liberals not named Barak Obama or Joe Lieberman and I think they have better things to do than hang out on HN.

You're still strawmaning and partaking in whataboutism here.

[1] https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2019/07/are-democrats...
yes it is def. not tech only. telecom, banking, airlines are great examples as well. One recent example. My phone company Sprint got acquired by T-Mobile. Btw, Sprint used to be Spring PCS many years ago which I think was a merger b/w Sprint and PCS. Consolidation/mergers are endless.
Every phone I've ever had on every car system I've ever paired to via Bluetooth has requested permission for contact sync before it would happen. Windows Phone and Android. Perhaps iOS works differently.
Replace gender with race and some voting/political patterns become obvious.
By 2030 gasoline cars are going to be just as equipped to violate your privacy as electrical cars. Many of them already are.
After so much time wasted with all of this, SPAs, microservices, microfraneworks, etc, I've ended up pretty burned out of the amount of work it takes, and the incredible number of corner cases I've found. From development environment issues to how to have a staging or testing environment to how to do authentication. Do many things you get for free with more traditional approaches.

Last year we started at work a project with plain old Rails. This year we started using stimulus and turbo. You cannot believe how much our lives have improved. Things are so easy and feel so solid. Everything has documentation, things don't change every other day. Patterns are clear, libraries well tested, we focus 99.9% on actual business problems.

Two members of the team left because they wanted to react node monorepos all the things. It's. South they left, but overall we are so much happier and more productive now, even with two members less (team of 6).

I really wish the pendulum swings back, as they say, and we stop this madness. At least for the 95% use cases that don't need to be an SPA with a Go backend for google scale.
Yes their value has decreased.
> It's a shame that a whole generation of people who want to be IT literate think that this is "Linux". This is Unix.

Is it though?

Disclaimer: I am an old Unix hand (a literal graybeard). I started using Unix back in the mid 1980s, when a dual VAX 11/780 was hot stuff. I've used most of the major Unix distributions that ever existed.

In terms of server market share [1], Unix these days is, like, 95% Linux in various distros, with Windows, Free/Open/NetBSD, Illuminos, and a few others rounding out the top 10.

We can and should honor the past, and the innovators that made today's compute environment possible. But in a sense, "Unix" is a historical legacy, and denying that isn't useful.

[1] Because outside of some hobbyists, who is running traditional Unix on the desktop these days? Desktop "Unix" is really OSX and Linux these days.
> Does raising the average math competency of all students outweigh the possible benefits of catering to a select few?

This assumes that advanced courses harm students not enrolled in them. I don't see why that should be the case, and would like to see some evidence for this dichotomy you presented.

If you have 3 teachers, and they A) each teach classes that are composed of 20 regular and 10 gifted students, or B) 2 of them teach classes of 30 regular students, and one teaches 30 gifted students, is B) "catering to a select few"? If so, which select few? Both regular and gifted students receive education adjusted to their abilities, so are they not both being catered to?
Hawaii? yup, I'd expect that is a solid YES.

I'm curious how much and how long it takes for this to drive migrants inland away from the border... and then how long it will take for them to make an excuse to make it 200mi...
This person is basically saying "show sympathy to those with intentionally despicable viewpoints, because maybe you can convert them". Stating this ulterior motive undermines the whole point - if your motivation is to change them, it is not to understand them or sympathize with them.

It also begs the question: are these newly formed sympathizers susceptible to being converted themselves? Could the sympathy train lead to even more incels, not fewer?
Something I've contemplated lately is what I call the chaos monkey economy. Since it's hard to politically gather the will to fight any given monopoly, we should just roll dice to do it.

Every year we look at firms above some size, and if they fail the saving throw, we liquidate them. Everyone who works there gets 6 months severance, all supplier contracts are terminated, everything they supply likewise. Get a bankruptcy administrator to sell the chairs and real estate, give the shareholders whatever is left.

If it's truly valuable what they do someone will find a way to do it again. If it's just a power position they were exploiting, we'll be free from their tyranny.
Show HN: Discover JavaScript Talks
editorials - especially on the right

I know you don't intend to do so, but assuming that someone's conclusions about an issue must have come from talking points, and were not arrived at independently, dehumanizes them and makes it difficult to convince them of anything.

It discounts the lived experiences of people who have seen their friends and coworkers radicalized against them, of either gender. "This happened to me" cannot successfully be countered by "stop parroting X/Y/W-wing editorials." (general pattern I've seen even among family, not necessarily your phrasing)

The terminology used also doesn't help make the case for feminism among anyone not already convinced. Terms like "the patriarchy" can be seen as implying that it's okay to talk about men as a whole group who can be vilified, but it's not okay to talk about women in any negative way at all. Or "ally" could be seen as implying that the only identity someone not of group Z can have that matters is as an accessory to their cause.

The most disappointing and insulting thing a friend has ever said to me might be (paraphrasing) "I thought you wanted to be an ally." No, I wanted to be your friend, not a footsoldier who dutifully agrees with you 100% of the time no matter what my independent experiences have been.

I don't think it's helpful to think of "feminism" as a singular movement,

Sadly, even some of those who advocate for feminism (whichever branches might be considered "the good kind" for purposes of this discussion) seem to deliberately lump feminist movements together, so one can be forgiven for seeing terms like "the patriarchy" used by different groups and not knowing which group's beliefs to ascribe to the term. I don't think this can be blamed on a particular flavor of media, except maybe social media.
Facebook's "Why am I seeing this ad?" info is deliberately incomplete and does not reveal exactly how the advertiser targeted the ad.

https://qz.com/1245941/why-am-i-seeing-this-ad-explanations-...
> To make things more equal for Bezos and to strike a blow against equity, naturally.

This is exactly my point: a flat tax rate would be more equal, but less equitable. And I do support a tax code that is more equitable, rather than more equal in this regard.
long bpf_redirect(u32 ifindex, u64 flags)

Description
Redirect the packet to another net device of index ifindex. This helper is somewhat similar to bpf_clone_redirect(), except that the packet is not cloned, which provides increased performance.

Except for XDP, both ingress and egress interfaces
can be used for redirection. The BPF_F_INGRESS value in flags is used to make the distinction (ingress path is selected if the flag is present, egress path otherwise). Currently, XDP only supports redirection to the egress interface, and
accepts no flag at all.

The same effect can also be attained with the more generic bpf_redirect_map(), which uses a BPF map to store the redirect target instead of providing it directly to the helper.

Return For XDP, the helper returns XDP_REDIRECT on success or XDP_ABORTED on error. For other program types, the values are TC_ACT_REDIRECT on success or
TC_ACT_SHOT on error.

Ummm.

Okay. This is actually kinda scary if you aren't looking out for executables that make the bpf syscall. That's a lot of mischief one can get up to. Yeah, you'd have a bunch of reading to do, but that's some scary level access.

I've seen a few cases where BPF is used to outpace the TCP stack within the context of the same hunk of silicon (loopback or virtual network spaces) but I'd argue at that point you may be using the wrong tool for the wrong job if you're invoking network logic for what amounts to an inter-process communication issue.

This is one of my chief complaints with containers. There is nothing wrong with a bunch of trusted code running on the same machine. One doesn't need to invoke the networking stack for doing everything, even less so opening a gigantic hole in terms of allowing near arbitrary program composition in kernel space. This is the kind of needless complexity that just by existing presents a risk to everyone who doesn't know about it.
i might have remember it wrong.

does multiple buildings at single site count as multiple DC?
or it must be multiple physically separate locations?
So you are saying to marry is a way to earn yourself a free nurse in old age? I say better make enough money to pay for a nurse.
Do you think of a washing machine or a dryer as a robot too?
our company impletemented salesforce because SAP was too expensive. that is all.
I think it's disingenuous to say that Amazon acquired cloud computing companies as a new line of business. They built that unit in house and were well established before they started buying related companies. Those acquisitions should be on the "core business" side of the graph.
It’s stopped river being able to be lit on fire due to pollution.
How effective is this today? Don't modern phones refuse to do anything except charge over a USB connection until the user unlocks the phone and trusts the connected host?
I was having a hard time discovering the best talks for JavaScript on Youtube, so I built Awesome JavaScript Talks to sort and filter them as I would like. You can narrow the results to a specific time range and duration and sort them based on various criteria. Hope someone else finds this useful too!
Or it's simply eco-facism.

I think, we should move to sustainable solutions, but I don't believe in over population
Looks great. The use of a CNC seems a bit overkill, when it looks like a trim router + template would have done the same job with zero CAD modelling required. Unless I'm missing something.
Climate change clearly visible as NOAA prepares to release new 'normals'
"Relaxation" of regulations has been sliding downhill since about the 50s, but it reached a fever pitch during the Reagan presidency.

The "new conservatives" and religious fundamentalists found they had a president they could control who was slowly forgetting everything he knew, and they used that to the fullest advantage.

Much of where we are today is due to the processes that began then, from (lack of) fairness in news reporting to the permissive corporate laws that allowed private equity and corporate raiding to relaxation of banking and securities laws that allowed 2008 to happen.

There have been some ups and downs between the 80s and today, and a few Democratic years, but in general the slide has continued because once money gets into politics, it won't leave quietly... it has to be forced out.