skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Dynamic linkers aren't really dynamic enough.

If I don't use any features that require libbz2 or whatever a piece of software shouldn't complain if libbz2 isn't there on the system. If I add it to the system I should be able to use those features without recompiling and relinking everything.

Half of the features of autoconf such as "is this library with this method signature available?" should be moved into the dynamic linker.

Software would need to be rewritten to be more lazy and modular, but it'd make dynamic shared libraries actually dynamic. Having to make all those decisions at compile time instead of run time isn't very dynamic.
MyKeys.live: Share or store your passwords encrypted into a URL
It's also a weakness in other systems IMO.

In Windows, "DLL hell" used to be a thing. It's mostly solved by (among other things) Microsoft forbidding installers from overwriting system DLLs. Also today most apps bundle the DLLs along with the apps and don't really share them.

In MacOS, brew the popular package manager recently took upon using shared libs for everything. While it mostly works it can cause some version incompatibilities, you tend to accumulate garbage in your disk after uninstalling stuff and now you have to routinely update 3x more packages...
Pha loves Pa.
Robots.txt can accomplish the same thing which means they periodically grab a single text file from you.
This is maybe his first time when such tactic will be successful (maybe...we don't know if he managed to convince people to divest/not invest)

The first time he did it, well it was not effective.

It's not like people were not informed enough about war crimes. The Abu Grahib dossier had come out 3-4 years earlier.

People perceive this sort of stuff as far away, don't want to look at it or just simply block out the information because they want to believe whatever they want to believe.

Whistleblowing is ineffective to change the way a system operates. It solely make the system cover up better, and achieves the goal of having some heads roll (more often than not the responsible people for security and info compartmentization)
If you did a five whys analysis on this though, wouldn't you just end back at a likely cause being socio-economic?
You're exactly right - if you're writing readme's all the time, you'd have templates ready to go.

I only write readme's maybe once every few months or perhaps once a year, and having a template (interactive like this one, or otherwise) that someone else has thought about is super useful to me.
There's nothing ad-hominem in my response, I just question your assessment that 80 euros a year is forcing you to "pay through the nose".

Describing these events the way you do makes it sound as if you're being blackmailed or something. You're not. The Somalian government have the right to handle the .so domains however they please. If they demand that people are either Somali or otherwise pay a fee of 80 euros, there is nothing inherently wrong with that. If you find that an unreasonable price, go elsewhere. Nobody is forcing you to buy the domain. Which, as far as I can tell, is what you did.

Basically, what I don't understand is why you describe the event in a way that makes it sound as if they denied you something that you were entitled to when that was not the case.
Krotov (Hopfield's co-author in these set of papers) has a tweetutorial for that paper in your first link

https://twitter.com/DimaKrotov/status/1387770672542269449
If testing companies don't lobby, then states can develop their own tests that meet the federal guidelines. I have a family member who is an educator and has contributed candidate questions to their state's standardized testing board.
We can't all be either Funk or Wagnalls. This is the first I've ever seen an origin explained.

This [0] explanation describes a couple of definitions of "pale," a fence or a sort of political boundary with the Pale of Dublin as an example. It says "to be 'beyond the pale' was to be outside the area accepted as 'home' (outside the paling fence around one's home) and the first printed use was clearly using this sense.

I don't question whether anyone ever used "beyond the pale" in a negative way towards people in parts of Ireland but it clearly wasn't, and isn't, the exclusive meaning of the phrase.

Let's not discard something just because someone, somewhere used it in a bad way (he wrote with '88' in his username). To verb a noun, let's not swastika the phrase "beyond the pale."

[0] https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html
Though, from what I remember, zcash does not have full anonymity across all transactions, meaning that if you do sent anon one, you are visibly standing out from the other transactions (though if it's untraceable, it might not be a problem?). Compared to monero where all txs are anonymous.

Something along these lines
Something odd : While "The Red Sox are John's favorite team." seems more natural then "The Red Sox is John's favorite team.", phrasing it in the opposite order, "John's favorite team is the Red Sox." seems more natural then "John's favorite team are the Red Sox." .

This seems like a strange discrepancy. Why is this the case? Maybe it is because "favorite team" is clearly singular, and is closer in the sentence to the "is"/"are" then the plural indicating sound in "Red Sox". Or maybe it is just whichever comes first which determines how the "to be" is conjugated?

Hm, but what if instead of connecting a noun phrase (determiner phrase?) like "The Red Sox" to another noun phrase (determiner phrase) "John's favorite team", we instead connect it to an adjective?

"The Red Sox are singular.", "The Red Sox is singular.", "Singular is The Red Sox." "Singular are The Red Sox." . Well, the "[Adjective] is [noun]" is kind of an unusual thing to say unless one is trying to sound like one is quoting poetry or yoda or something, but to the degree that either of them sound ok, I think "Singular are The Red Sox." sounds better than "Singular is The Red Sox." . Though, in this case, there doesn't seem to be anything grammatically suggested by the adjective that the thing be in the singular case (maybe I shouldn't have used "singular" as the adjective..) .

Hm, what if instead of "John's favorite team [is/are] the Red Sox." , we instead look at "John's favorite [is/are] the Red Sox." ? In this case, it seems, less clear which is more natural? They seem about the same to me (but that might just be me, idk.) .

Anyway : Weird!
>Do you think that kind of aggressive tone would be suitable in a work place?

No it wouldn't be, but this isn't work, it's an internet comment section. You're literally providing his point that "there's a time and a place" for shit like this, and work isn't one of them.
I don't think the poster necessarily said that nothing else in the world will make you a better person... I think it's impossible to deny that learning kindness, patience, humility, acceptance makes you a better person.

Is it the only way to get that experience? In theory no, in practice it's hard to recreate the sheer intensity of the experience of raising children in other parts of life.
Roughly 30-40 minutes before tests, and another 30 minutes of tests. I work in games, and compiling the game on one platform is ~5-10 minutes even for an incremental compile on "compute optimized" instances on azure and aws (compared to ~30s on my workstation). It takes 20 minutes (per platform) to generate the runtime texture/audio files, and ~10 minutes to upload them to a shared drive. We do 4 platforms right now, my last project was ~10 bigger and did 10 platforms to boot.
The efficiency metric would need to take into account the number of cars it can charge at a given time and things like that also.
Interesting watch.
TL;DW - Apes like Koko were raised by trainers who did not perform rigorous scientific measurements and were prone to bias. Research on Apes became immoral over time, hence less recent examples exist.

The most recent and rigorous study is on a bonobo, where communication is done using touchscreen with buttons saying words (lexigrams).
Even in this case interaction seems to be limited to “give me an item” or “put item in box”.
About 5-10 minutes from push to deploy. Python/Django monorepo. 1-2 devs for several years kinda project size.

Build and test steps take about equal time. We build from a common docker image which has most of the time consuming work already done.

It can take longer if the Python deps have changed and therefore the ‘poetry install’ step cannot be pulled from the cache.

Also, we deploy multiple individual Django projects, rather than one huge monolithic project. That probably gives some speed up. It means that changes to common code can trigger 5-15 pipelines, but they all take a similar amount of time.

30-45 minutes seems like a really long time to me. Maybe you have a lot of slow tests, but I’d also looking at the build process too. If you’re doing docker images you may find you can extract a lot of the time consuming work to a common base image. You can also get plugins that help docker pull already-built layers from a cache.

If it is the tests then you could always try running tests in parallel. One worker per CPU or some such.

FWIW - I find that these long feedback loops can really kill productivity and morale. 10 mins for a deploy is about my limit.
Pearson. Absolutely evil.
We've already had the capability to do this for many years. See Napster or BitTorrent.

The thorny issue is that legitimate copyright holders lose out when anyone can freely host and share their work. That leads to discussions about whether there should be copyright at all, whether digital creators have a right to charge for their work, etc. Those are the problems that need to be solved, not the technical issues.
We're talking about a device that is completely unsupported by its manufacturer. You already have no expectation of security or integrity when the last available OS and security update is over 5 years old by now.

Opening up access to install your own software would have great potential to increase the security of the device, not least because you can actually run current and patched versions of any software.

What you're arguing for is security by obscurity.
Not everyone want that, if I need my own private space I don't need to go to office.

The reason I may want to go to office is to see my coworkers.

Doors/private cubicle defeat the purpose.
> I am a member of APRA and very much doubt that someone got away with registering a Beethoven work as their own.

I've yet to hear of one of these nationwide registries vetting any of the work that gets submitted to them for novelty or whatever. That would be too much like doing due diligence.
Actually, I think many animals might communicate better than humans, but we don't know how they do it.

I wouldn't completely suprise me if their are certain animals using telepathic thought? Or, some way if communicitating we haven't a clue existed.

(And yes I know telepathic thought has been completely debunked in humans. Actually, there's a million sitting stomewhere if any person can successfully pass a institutes telepathic ability test. To date the money is still there, or a higher amount? My point is we know so little about other species.)
Which itself is a reference to the 1967 Beatles song All You Need is Love (which also includes the line "Love is all you need").
"They lost an entire leg in that accident..."

"Oh yeah? How much did it weigh?"
> Google is trying to get a handle on how employees will react to so-called hybrid work. In July, the company asked workers how many days a week they would need to come to the office to be effective. The answers were divided evenly in a range of zero to five days a week.

"My responses are limited; you must ask the right questions." What getting your whole team together for 1-2 weeks per quarter? I hear some teams travelled that way in the before time.

> The majority of Google employees are in no hurry to return.… 70% said they had a “favorable” view about working from home compared with 15% who had an “unfavorable” opinion [and 15% neutral].… The company appears to be realizing its employees may not be so willing to go back to the old life.

Will be interesting to see if people actually leave or if it's just bluster.

> “No company at our scale has ever created a fully hybrid work force model,” [Google's CEO] wrote in an email a few weeks later announcing the flexible workweek.

Like communism: maybe nobody's implemented it correctly before, or maybe it's a bad idea.
As others mentioned, most now sit alongside the executables.

To give some historical perspective of why, check out this Wikipedia article on "DLL hell", more specifically the "DLL stomping" section:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_Hell
Whether it is rented or purchased is irrelevant. Increasing the supply will drive the cost down. If you have more renters than rentals prices will go up and a minimum wage is just a handout to wealthy landlords because you have the same people competing for the same housing just with more money.
I think it would be possible, yes. Google has even developed a binary diffing system.

https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/softwar...

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538339

It would still not be pleasant for disk space. Ideally I want my OS as well as the VMs to be small and require as little ram as possible. I don't want to update my entire OS just because glibc had a critical bug.
overloading?
I corrected the URL in my post. I was on JoinPeertube.org and watched the, "What is PeerTube?" video that is embedded in that page. If I watched it again, it might not buffer at all. Maybe it was a bad moment. But I consume a lot of content on YouTube and I can't remember the last time a video buffered a single time--let alone several times in the first 30 seconds.

I'm honestly done with this ridiculous strawman about whether the video works. PeerTube is not a viable alternative to YouTube from a content creator's perspective for many reasons which I've already stated; but, I'll summarize:

1. It lacks even a tiny fraction of the distribution and discovery reach offered by YouTube.

2. It lacks the monetization features that allows YouTube to become part of a business.

3. It requires me to provide my own hosting and technical setup which is far more involved than dropping a video into your browser like you get with YouTube.

4. If I, as a consumer with no knowledge or interest in how PeerTube works, "choose the wrong server," I get a crappy experience with videos buffering for ages so I'm disinclined to continue to use the platform leading to reduced audiences on the platform and the feeling of, "doing extra work for nothing."

You can defend it all you want; but, your responses so far have been thinly veiled, "You're too stupid to get it right." I guess maybe I am; but, I'll stand behind that being the single biggest reason that PeerTube simply cannot be a platform to rival YouTube.
It's interesting, and rather ironic, that this use of monospace is an affectation that makes the site's HTML _more complicated_!

It's been done by wrapping everything in <tt> elements, adding an extra layer of indentation and more code. If that was simply left out, the browser would use its default stylesheets - and the preferences of the reader - to display the text.
Loose coupling? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_coupling
I'm curious why this article uses the term "color timing" instead of the industry-standard "color grading".

I had to look it up, and it appears "color timing" was the analog practice of adjusting the time film took to develop, in order to over- or under-develop it, which seems to be primarily about exposure (brightness/darkness).

Whereas color grading is essentially about 1) ensuring an accurate white balance and then 2) adjusting further for whatever artistic warm, cool, undersaturated, etc. look is desired.

But this article seems to use the term "color timing" as a synonym for "color grading". Is this standard practice somewhere?
I think of that as independently wealthy, since I personally have a hard time telling someone that if you’re an engineering exec making > $1mm/yr, that you’re middle class because you get paid for your time. That seems pretty upper class even if it isn’t the properly wealthy, no need to work, upper class.
As far as I know, yes.
Learn marketing from these guys who can sell mediocre product.

Also, some might sell because their App resembles something popular so some users buy by mistake. Then make sure, it does not parasitise on your app!
React Authentication, Simplified
The screen could/should also display a prominent recording indicator, with the name of the app, while recording.
Technical guides for building application authorization
It strikes me that packaging applications & dependencies as Docker containers is a huge empirical example of Torvalds' point.
True, but I have seen software where the DLL files are in the directory where the EXE lies. So copy+paste from another computer works just fine (in most cases).

This does not really work in Linux.
> Yes they are business decisions but they are also political.

No, they aren’t. You’re trying to make them political. This is entirely of your own doing.

Take housing. It’s too expensive! Many people would agree. We can talk about houses being expensive without someone detailing the conversation by injecting politics into it. It devolves into politics when you try to let other people know why YOU think housing is too expensive. You are the one injecting politics into conversation where it isn’t needed, and absolutely isn’t wanted.

If you want to talk about politics go get a Twitter account.
You realize capitalism is a system for allocating scare goods, right? An auction model means manufacturers benefit directly, and unless they're in a cartel, the high prices incentivize them to increase production. We see this happen all the time in the oil marker with marginal producers entering and exiting the market. Without an auction, anyone lucky enough to win the HDD lottery will have the same incentive, only they'll sell it on ebay.
There are quite a few (good) comments here focusing on the crypto aspect of this HDD supply shortage.

That aside, to those of you that are scanning the comments here without having actually read the OP's reddit link - I'd urge you to read the linked page.

It is an incredibly insightful summary of the HDD supply chain.

(Whether it was indeed written by an "industry insider" or not is irrelevant; their analysis of the HDD market is highly informative)
Same. I mean... vim, right there already for free, and the invocation is rather ridiculously simpler.

And vimdiff is even an editor not just a viewer.

Now if it was say, Meld in a terminal, that would be worth talking about and I installing some stack as a dependency.
> Not that much on an ongoing basis. It's also O(n) with respect to the amount of extra money you need in circulation.

I think this isn't quite correct, but is even more in favor of fiat currency. Minting money costs in proportion to the number of bills/coins. If more value is needed, the denomination being printed can be changed to represent more value with the same cost.

On the other hand, cryptocurrencies require wasting resources proportional to the total value represented by them. Any less and they are vulnerable to attacks. Therefore, (as I'm sure will come as a shock to nobody) this is another way that cryptocurrencies scale worse than fiat.
Politicians started questioning the policy and demanded more control.

Let's consider the criticism for the vaccine policy by the opposition:

- Vaccine makers were requesting government grants to expand facilities but were provided limited to no resource till last month.

- Exporting vaccines was made a priority over vaccinating indians.

- When indians realised there was a shortage of vaccine and started highlighting these issues, and the government realised that it wouldn't be able to meet the vaccine demands, they suddenly do a complete U-turn of their vaccine policy - the centre backs out completely out of price-fixing and procurement of vaccines without setting any framework in place.

- Thus, completely abdicating their responsibility, they now expect each state government to haggle and negotiate the price directly, draw up individual contracts and get the vaccines.

The opposition did their job in highlighting the deficiencies. Instead of listening and fixing the issues, the government deliberately passed the buck to the state government with a revised policy. It is clear they did it in such a manner (without any framework) so that they could transfer any associated political blame.

The SC is not answerable to the people ... it does not have executive experience either.

Agreed that courts should be quite careful. But, in general, good judges don't make decisions arbitrarily. They listen to the executive, they listen to the critics, they listen to the state governments, and they also listen to the experts.

That said, some stupid executive decisions can be over ruled with common sense and some have past precedents to follow. For example, it is very stupid to make people register for a vaccine - poor and uneducated people will not be able to do so and will be susceptible to corruption due to this unnecessary step. Common sense. We have one of the largest successful immunisation programs in the world and have successfully vaccinated a large number of people in the past. So we have past precedents on how to vaccinate our people. The vaccines should be free for everyone - common sense and past precedent. And so on.
Also, enabling the subtitles helped me understand the terrible audio.
So much agree. Their taking issue with that detail made me trust their viewpoint less.
From what I observe, most people use dynamic libraries simply because they cannot get stuff setup correctly for linking statically.

So they're usually not shared, but merely use the shared library file format. For a practical example, most software on Windows will bring its own folder with DLLs.

One step further, this is probably why we're now seeing docker everywhere: it's a Linux equivalent to Windows and Mac app store apps.
I replied to someone else, with evidence, that the origin of the phrase is not prejudiced. I recalled I had access to the OED online and it also supports this. Furthermore, it says about the phrase "The theory that the origin of the phrase relates to any of several specific regions, such as the area of Ireland formerly called the Pale or the Pale of Settlement in Russia, is not supported by the early historical evidence and is likely to be a later rationalization."
I've seen color timing in credits, but I don't think I've seen color grading.
Sounds like Basecamp just got rid of all the slackers/drones...

I can see a typical job interview for one of those employees:
‘And why did you leave your last job?’

‘They wouldn’t let me waste half the day arguing politics’
To move where?

This thread was in part, but not solely, about undocumented immigrants, and sure maybe they have a place they can legally be sent to. But the same argument has been used for racial separation ("No, we don't want to subjugate black people, we just want to have a white ethnostate where the black people will be forced to move". The part not said aloud of of course, being what happens if someone wishes to stay where they have lived their whole life).

So yes, I think the distinction between "will be kicked out by force" or "will simply be shot in the street" can be a lot more tenuous than you're suggesting.

But even still, if we're discussing any group that isn't undocumented immigrants (or even potentially citizens whom the president wanted to strip that right from) the question of "where do they go" becomes even more important, because there usually isn't a place they can go.
SQLite and Redis
Not everyone wants a loud, bustling bullpen where you can barely hear yourself think and your productivity is crippled as a consequence.

But yet that's what most everybody in our field gets.