skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can't talk about gamelets as I explicitly signed an NDA preventing me from doing so. But it's not "very custom", it's just Linux.

If you make it work on Stadia it will work on Linux. The main thing holding back releases on Linux is that:

1) The userbase is percieved as very small.

2) SDK features (such as entitlement checking, authorization, authentication) are only working on Windows (and Stadia is a trusted platform, so bugs aren't as big of an issue, people are relentless at abusing software they have direct access to)

3) The distribution platform outside of Steam (which is a bugbear in the AAA games industry due to being very expensive and prone to moodswings about what content is agreed and so on) doesn't exist on Linux at all.
Most Muslims aren't Arabs.

As for the issue with Muslims, people actually do hate the religion more than the race. People have no issue with non-Muslim Arabs or northern Africans, they mostly dislike Muslims even white ones.
Yes. Also split out into sub categories. How much of an ec2 spend was on bandwidth and how much on compute for example.
> South American countries which were huge destinations for African slaves

This is a gross misrepresentation of events.

They were colonized by European countries, who imported African slaves, to work alongside the SAmerican slaves for their economic exploitation.
SeL4 on RISC-V Verified to Binary Code
Awingu – simple, secure, affordable Citrix alternative
> Unfortunately the reality of today is we don't build data centres and especially not for very highly available systems. Instead we pay that latency penalty to build geographically redundant systems using cheap rented virtual hardware from 3rd parties.

Reminds me of AWS' contrasting approach (reliable delivery, out-of-order messages) in dealing with the latency penalty using specialized hardware and a proprietary transport protocol viz. SRD (Scalable Reliable Datagram): https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=916...

> They aren't wrong but they are basically just digging up the Tandem architecture and adapting it to the current RoCE/FCoE enhanced ethernet we have today.

Pat Helland, who worked on Tandem, published a paper on a novel way to avoid distributed transactions, which I believe is similar to Google Megastore's design (on top of BigTable) and seems (to my untrained eye) spiritually closer to Cloudflare's Durable Objects: https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3025012
Can you elaborate on that a bit?
>If I had to choose a stage of my life to become part of public records, I'd definitely pick my childhood over my adulthood.

that doesn't sound sensible unless you are assuming at adulthood you would be out of public records, in which case sounds great! because your adulthood will hopefully be a lot longer than your childhood. On the other hand I don't think an advanced society would work with that model.

Secondly - why do children need a higher standard?

People at different changes of their life are not necessarily the same people, a man at 50 might not be very much like who he was at 20. Unfortunately our society does not do much to support such a concept. It does however support the very rudimentary concept that things you did as a child should not follow you as an adult - when you have different legal responsibilities and possibilities of action. So that is something that probably shouldn't be taken away.

Furthermore as a child is not fully developed in reasoning it is probably nice that things the child does is not part of their permanent record.
>If so, what does the NFT do?

My take - it's like a prize result. If you run some race there's a big incentive to be the #1 winner even if there's no prize money or trophy. It's just the general agreement that Joe Bloggs was the winner of the whatever race. Still people dedicate their lives towards achieving such things.

Likewise with PGs NFT someone will be able to say I was the winner of that auction and the world will agree and it is something that will be with you forever.
You're correct on this to some extent. Teams in our company are so fed up with webpack for local development that they are willing to skip some features it provides to use vitejs.dev for local dev. We fully couldnt avoid webpack 5 because Module federation is very very valuable.
Of course they also sell access to new customers. I'm not saying they don't.

But they also sell access to your existing customers, both to you and your competitors. That's what companies don't understand, and I'm sure marketers would be a bit more careful with the data they share with tech companies if they understood that.
React Native runs on all those platforms too.
I totally agree with the pain of their scripting language.

Here is mine, it's very basic but does the few things I wanted (i.e run a program with a combination of keys): https://gist.github.com/tbronchain/c52b610a76eac8c26faae9ad2...
Not sure. Singapore has a reputation as a tax haven, but also a reputation for being squeaky clean.

(But that's perhaps a different kind of tax haven than the British Virgin Islands are?)
But methane is a worse greenhouse gas than CO2, so it's not neutral at all.

It is worse, but it doesn’t matter: as long as cattle population stays at constant levels, so will the amount of methane in the atmosphere that resulted from cattle emissions. You only get climate change from growing amount of greenhouse gases.

> You're also assuming that cattle are fed naturally occurring grass rather than industrial livestock feed, which I don't have numbers for but I assume is not carbon-neutral

In fact, I’m not; I explicitly mention artificial fertilizer, for example, which is typically not used to produce hay. The point is that to assess the effect of cattle on warming, you should focus on fossil inputs into it, not on methane. I think is quite likely that methane production from gastric fermentation in North America these days is lower than, say, in 1500s, where 60 millions bisons alone roamed the plains, along with another tens of millions of deer and other ruminants.
Doesn't work for 7 bridges problem :(
My take on it has always been that you wouldn't want to date someone who picks on physical features like that anyway, it's a giant red flag for an overall shitty personality.
You can add your own shapes.
These systems are highly scalable and ad buyers commonly use programmatic ad buying to test many combinations
They've been doing some weird stuff recently. Like this stunt and the reverse-hack thing, and they also run a cryptocurrency now. That last point alone is a huge red flag for me.
I think they’re doing fine regardless.
When drawing circle slow always says it is 'rectangle' ?
> and due to complex historical factors, we have much more Roman writing than we have writing from other civilizations.

Most other civilizations, yes, but Mesopotamia is beating Rome hands down for availability of writing.
I definitely don't get people here protecting Bose's proprietary sources. It's a consumer-unfriendly with bad customer support that just keeps it products dying.

I'd wish I looked at their user forums before buying QC35.
> ...only one

React Native, NativeScript, Xamarin
Blockchain-Based Archival Generative Art
There is no difference between tilted track and tilted train from what you can perceive from the passenger compartment, provided the tilt is done correctly.

I suspect tilt angle was perhaps rounded/approximated/delayed, which would feel the same as if someone had laid the track rather haphazardly on a bog...
I'd rather like everyone to stop paying capital gains taxes.

Or at least give everyone the same treatment as investments in ETF have: you pay your capital gains at the end, when you sell the ETF. Not when the fund makes internal transactions.
I'm hoping it would be seasteading https://www.yesmagazine.org/environment/2016/04/04/the-seas-...
>Can you go to the Berkshire shareholder meeting and vote for your 0.0001 shares

You could form a contract with your co-share owners describing how you allocate that benefit, just like would be necessary with a house with co-owners.

I have no idea if that happens, but it's certainly just as possible.
This exact optimization has been implemented in C++ coroutines via the 'initial_suspend' coroutine traits hook.

...and those are stackless coroutines under AOT compiled conditions, so it only saves a malloc.
> Can you go to the Berkshire shareholder meeting and vote for your 0.0001 shares?

I voted for part of a politician in my electorate.
This breaks pretty easy unfortunately by simply drawing in reverse (e.g. draw circle counter-clockwise instead of clockwise etc.)
Singapore doesn't have any capital gains tax, and will only tax foreign dividends, if they haven't already been taxed at least 15% at source.
ha! no way - I just cited your paper in the comments without noticing you already had.
Well, this isn’t really that big of a problem. Just let the price overflow. That should make it easier for them to just split the stock next time they get there ;)
Actually it was a way to avoid paying US corporation taxes, not EU ones. It allowed US corporations to park their profits "offshore" indefinitely which is why only US corporations used this set-up. The US - uniquely in the world as far as I know - only collects corporation tax when the profits are repatriated. All others force companies to recognize and account for profits made in overseas subsidiaries regardless of where the profits are being held.
I wouldn't count on them not being endocrine disruptors or carcinogenic, but they are solid, macroscopic chucks, which limits surface area and thus the amount of diffusion of the nasty chemicals into the rest of the body.
This is precisely the reason I have avoided AWS as a student and to this day I prefer providers that have clear billing like DO.

I don’t understand why anyone would use AWS when there is a risk of being charged stupid amounts of money if you screw something up. Are there advantages to AWS that I’m not seeing?
Indeed. You frequently hear "Everyone is different", "Symptoms can vary" and "Everyone acts differently to XYZ treatment".

But perhaps these are all symptoms of diseases and combinations of diseases varying, rather than the people?
UEFI by itself is not useful; we're going to support UEFI+DeviceTree in our boot chain, but it's not going to run Windows.

What you want is ACPI support if you want the platform to be compatible with higher-level ARM boot standards. Unfortunately, ACPI support assumes stuff like GIC and other hardware details. You probably want EL3 for PSCI too. But that would be a massive change to their silicon design.

So, effectively, there is no reason for them to support UEFI or any other firmware-level stuff if their chips are not compatible with Windows, which they aren't, and re-engineering their silicon to be something that could run Windows (without one-off patches from Microsoft, like they did for the Raspberry Pi which is in the same boat) would've obviously been a huge cost to them and not something they decided made business sense at this point.

Obviously Microsoft could choose to add support for these chips to Windows like we're doing with Linux, but that's on them; it requires core kernel changes that are not something you can do in drivers (last I checked Windows doesn't even support IRQ controller drivers as modules).
How and where you were able to read this?
Though its not crime where I live. But if it was, muncipal officer will give us two-three warning and later come with a team of worker, cut the grass and fine user with penalty + cost of cutting + additional panalty. Repeated violation will may lead sealing og property until the court hearing or a former apology.

Still it will never exceed $1k.
Perhaps you could put a bow on the hand?
I'm pretty sure all of my transactions other than wages and living expenses are internal transactions to my fund!
We can compare the view of expensive luxury stores in Pretty Woman (Julia Roberts attempts to walk into a top-end store and is summarily ejected by snotty staff) with the one in Breakfast at Tiffany's (staff are excruciatingly polite and bend over backwards to accommodate ridiculous requests from a guy who has already made it clear he doesn't have any money).

People imagine the first mode, but the second one is much closer to reality.
For passing upwards I typically fire a custom event, with data in the detail field. For passing downwards, I have the parent delegate attribute changes on the children as much as possible. This limits you to only passing string values downwards, but it keeps the html mirrored to the state, which has a simplicity to it that I prefer.

An example of this would be a radio-group and radio-element. When an element is clicked it fires a "clicked" event to the parent radio-group. The radio-group then toggles on "selected" for the clicked element, and removes the previously selected element's "selected" attribute.
- 5G and computing in the edge might enable low latency on mobile devices. I can imagine that Apple will release their AR glasses in Gen 1 with computing performed on the iPhone or the watch and Gen 2+ might use the 5G edge
- Cloud computing crawl closer to the edge use cases like ultra low latency cloud gaming

Telcos work closely together with the well known cloud providers to utilize the edge. The model will likely be a revenue share model. Telcos might develop a neat new revenue stream. Once those "killer user cases" like the Apple Glasses hit the market I could imagine Telco stocks to rise.

I also expect optician stocks to benefit from the Apple glasses. Apple might use the optitian retail network to bring the Glasses to the customer.
I believe it is a reference to the US dollar
It's not the loss of the product but the process; you have to start it up again. Like accidentally killing your sourdough starter.
Creating an iPhone 12 Frame for Screenshots in Tailwind CSS
Also part of the domination of those characters is simply being around early enough to get famous. There are loads of people as gifted if not more so who will never see the limelight particularly these days where so many people are working on personal brand building or straight up grifting.

Depending on your own goals brute force or giftedness might not even be necessary let alone sufficient. Particularly when it comes to external validation.
They all need to be drawn in the same direction of the demo. If I draw them in the opposite direction ( example the circle instead of counter-clockwise, I draw it clockwise ), another shape is recognised:

Triangle -> Delete / Caret

X -> Delete

Rectangle -> Caret

Circle -> Caret

Check -> Right square bracket / Arrow

Caret -> V

Zig-zag -> Zig-zag

Arrow -> V

Left square bracket -> Right square bracket

Right square bracket -> Left square bracket

V -> Caret

Delete -> X

Left curly bracket -> Right curly bracket

Right curly bracket -> Left curly bracket

Star -> Left curly bracket / Delete

Pigtail -> Delete
Programmatic ad buying still requires each creative be approved on most ad networks. This technique would require billions of creatives, most of which would never even be used.

I can see how ad networks may not want to take on that...
The performance argument is not a real issue if it is only used as a replacement for sed/xxd combination. And yes, it was designed to make programming difficult, but one could argue that it is easier to verify manually than machine code, because machine code requires you to know the whole x86 instruction set, which I understand, is rather large, taking into account all the extensions. I suspect that these exentions are not used in the stage0 code, but we still have to verify that they are not used.
What public chains can offer is an undisputed reputation rating. If I’m an oracle promising to provide information to Ethereum contracts you can check my history for mistakes. Although using oracles requires trust the level of scrutiny can be higher than off chain.

You also seperate concerns (Chinese wall) of data provider and settlement entity, with the latter being trustless.

We just need much lower fees and environmental impact.
That's a different stroke! Of course it shouldn't match.
Almost no one in the US 'truly' owns any shares.

They are all held by 'Depository Trust Company' in the name of 'Cede and Company'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depository_Trust_Company

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cede_and_Company says

> Cede technically owns substantially all of the publicly issued stock in the United States.[2] Thus, investors do not themselves hold direct property rights in stock, but rather have contractual rights that are part of a chain of contractual rights involving Cede.[3]

Modifying the last link in that chain isn't such a big deal.
Gah, that's what happens when I try to re-derive half-remembered proofs late at night :( Thanks for the clarifications.

> That would be O(4^N) time, which is certainly not O(2^N)

Oops, I wanted it in twos and misplaced my parentheses. Should have been 4^N = (2×2)^N, but I mistakenly did 4^N = 2×(2^N), then simplified to 2^(N+1) ~= 2^N, which is nonsense.

> But in fact each iteration does NOT take 4x as long.

> Thanks to the prefix-free property, each iteration only takes twice as long.

Yes, I knew being prefix-free meant the time fractions sum to one; but I wasn't sure what the total slowdown was (or rather, I was sure it was O(2^N), but got myself in a muddle trying to get there!).

I like to think of the programs as being leaves of a tree, and their prefix-free encoding is the path from the root. We allocate 100% of the time to the root (whose path is the empty string), and nodes divide their allocated time uniformly between their sub-trees. The time allocated to a leaf tells us how long to run its corresponding program.

That way, each iteration of the algorithm just doubles the number of steps allocated to the root, which "trickle down" the tree. We run all of the programs which get allocated at least one step (i.e. we don't follow subtrees which get 1/2 a step).

It's probably worth pointing out that this scheme is a general search algorithm, which isn't specific to programs (it's like a fancier alternative to grid search). For example, if we have a long-running algorithm like a theorem prover, but we're unsure what inputs to give it, we can explore all the different input combinations by arranging them in a tree and using Levin Search, running the prover for longer and longer on more and more complicated inputs until it finds our desired output (e.g. a proof/disproof of a specified conjecture).

Of course, as soon as we start to look at theorem proving, we soon stumble upon Hutter search, AKA "the fastest and shortest algorithm for all well-defined problems" ;)

Lots of great links at http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Universal_search
I'm not sure I'd be comfortable with this. It seems like you would have to 'perform' for an even wider range of people in order to get paid what you deserve.
Bikes from Sketches
You need to shorten the feedback loop to become productive.
Maybe you could optimize your environment to operate on smaller data sets during the development? Introduce sampling, local caching etc. Then once you feel confident about the code you run it over the final data-set.

I often find myself stuck staring at screen when some lengthy process occurs. What helps is adding progress indicator, ETA clock, some audible OS notification on finish. Or better take a walk and get a SMS once the process finishes :)
As an adult, any service provider can claim that you agreed, when you signed up to a service, to give away your personal data.

It’s presented as a contract mutually agreed between you and the service provider - you get the service; the provider gets the data. A legal contract.

But, in all systems of law that I’m aware of, you can’t make enforceable contracts with children.

This exists as a way of protecting children from making disadvantageous agreements that they don’t yet have competence to understand.

So, the service provider can’t use any contract as justification for handling personal data of children.

This leaves the service provider without legal justification and then calls their ethics into question.
While I see your point of misusing children to evoke an emotional response, I think this is an exception:

1) School is a mandatory part of life for every child, therefore increased scrutiny and high standards are warranted. As an adult, you are free to go if you ever disagreed with your employer on ethical grounds. But if children were forced to participate in a dubious (in terms of privacy) online service, they really have no choice other than to accept it (going to another school in the same area is hardly a realistic option).

2) In general, it is understood that children might not be able to grasp all consequences of their decisions. Even if children had a choice whether to accept their school's mandatory online services, I don't think they can really give consent considering they might not understand the ramifications of their personal data ending up in the wrong hands.

Reading your question again, I don't think children need a higher standard of privacy than adults - rather, I think the point is that regardless of the standard of privacy, children can only give limited consent.
Reaction before actually reading the paper - no, it doesn't, at least not its fundamental laws. If the universe is not static, then its state must evolve from S[n] to S[n + 1] = evolve(S[n]). evolve() may not be deterministic, it may be discrete or continuous, but it must be fixed. If it was not fixed, then there would be a more fundamental level that governs how evolve() itself evolves. Non-fundamental laws on the other hand could very well appear to undergo a learning or adaptive process.

EDIT: After skimming through the paper, the paper more or less agrees. They focus on a specific layer in a hierarchy of laws and are not concerned with the bottom of the hierarchy.

More generally, we adopt the useful idea that the world can be analyzed in terms of a hierarchy of levels; the degrees of freedom and the regularities described at each level appear to observers there to be stable and unchanging or slowly changing. At the same time, when expressed in terms of the degrees of freedom and laws of a lower level, they may seem emergent and variable. We can then be agnostics as to whether there are fundamental, timeless laws down at the smallest scale.
Any starting points for some of us who still don't "get it"? Having done an introductory course on Bitcoin (coursera) I found it interesting especially for somebody with a bit of crypto/security background, however it didn't really deliver that long lasting wow effect.
When I was a teenager playing Dr Kawashima's Brain Training on DS, I had to completely change how I drew my 9s in order to get it to recognise them (it turned out I started in the wrong place for it to recognise the number).

I only played that game for a month or two, but it stuck with me and now more than a decade later I still draw my 9s differently.
How Parasocial Relationships Have Defined the Tech Industry
> The executive in charge of that said, impressively, "we didn't exactly know why we might need it in the future, but we thought we should save that data."

Nowadays, that could be a GDPR violation.
How will Rome be faster than the other tools when its also written in Typescript? I see that unification will be an advantage but I dont think it will be faster than others. Especially when native code/wasm based tools are already available. (esbuild/swc/rslint)

The positives I see are:
- No fighting with different versions of different tools when upgrading
- Simpler configurations

But I dont see any other reasons to convince people to use Rome.
Regarding the Static Python subset, Microsoft also has one flavour of it.

https://makecode.com/python