skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hello! My name is Julia

Location: Phoenix, AZ | remote | NO relocation

Technologies: JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, React, Mocha/Chai, Cypress, Node, and currently learning Redux and GraphQL

Résumé/CV: https://www.canva.com/design/DAEbsY1iDQE/kOBasJ73uZzbKe1CUy7TFA/view?utm_content=DAEbsY1iDQE&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=publishsharelink

Email: juliaiwinski@gmail.com

A LITTLE ABOUT JULIA:
As an action and goal oriented initiator, I often bring myself forward to direct teams and can be found excitedly implementing new ideas. With a diverse background in customer service, leadership, and project management, from my time spent at both large corporations and small start-ups, I have ample experience in optimizing processes and finding creative solutions to any challenge. I’m an empathetic communicator with seven years of experience synthesizing and integrating user feedback into tangible results. I am excited to bring a fresh perspective and strong interpersonal skills from my previous career and international travels into the software engineering world. I’ve accumulated over 1500 hours of programming experience in JavaScript, React, and test-driven development; I have learned how to best leverage my creative and process-oriented background to become a well-rounded Front-End Software Engineer. I am an honest, innovative, out-of-the-box thinker who brings positive energy to all situations and teams I join.

Hobbies: Hiking, embroidery, traveling, plant enthusiast, and building puzzles.
They aren't contradictory. One is an assessment of the currently perceived reality and one is a stated goal. The mindset is simply that we haven't reached the goal yet.
Providing resources to students who need it is definitely important, and it is equally important not to stand in the way of the next Newton, Euler, or Einstein
Server-sent events in Flask without extra dependencies
This has existed since 2014, in embryonic form.

The exploit was that FB put your name in the public response from the Graph API. I remember discovering that, saying that might be abusable, and moved on with my life.

About a year later, I started getting oddly specific t-shirts like all <last names> do <x good>.
> the average number of relationships for men and women should be identical!

When those studies say average they usually mean median.

Imagine a population with 10 men and 10 women.

3 of the men sleep with each woman once.

The average hookups for both men and women are three each, but the median for men is none while the median for women is three.

This is a contrived example, normally in each population you'd have outliers, but the point is the data presented here shows that "hookups" are more evenly distributed amongst women than men.
Embedding Rust code in Java Jar for distribution
> I'm not sure I buy this. I'm a man who has lots of close friendships (many of which are with women, but some of which are with men), and I still feel like it's not enough and that I want a romantic/sexual partner. A partner is not a replacement for a close circle of friends, but neither is close circle of friends a replacement for a partner.

I think the difference is between wants and needs. Aside from a very small number of people most of us need friends and family who care about us and meet our emotional needs. Children need this unconditionally but adults have to take responsibility of their emotional needs and fulfill them in a healthy way by making and keeping friends. I think sexual and romantic desires are not needs; they are very strong desires and their fulfillment is definitely wonderful but life can be happy and fulfilling without them.
So do I have to ride horses to get my privacy back now?

I would totally buy a brand new car without all the "visible" electronics (by visible I mean all the screens and doodads. I don't mind ABS and other "invisible" electronics as long as they are reliable which is not a given nowadays).

I don't get the point of turning the interior of a car into a smartphone experience.

I watched a YT video of a Mercedess class S review. So many screens, leds, buttons etc. The reviewer was so busy fiddling with the controls that he never saw a pedestrian woman wanting to cross the road. If she hadn't payed attention he would probably have hit her.
What does this mean? I'm pretty sure the main alternative- China - is both over regulated and is very bureaucratic.
What type of Kintex-7 part were you thinking? This is a little more svelte than my 16-core Z80 "ZedRipper": http://www.chrisfenton.com/the-zedripper-part-1/
I don't believe in quotas. I don't think people from every different group should do the exact same in every job. I don't think that quotas are an effective way of dealing with inequalities either.

I do believe that roughly speaking, for an equal amount of work, black and white people should have similar salaries, for example. Something that is not the case today.

This is a disparity that can't be explained away by choice, or innate supremacy, but is instead à result of inequality of opportunity. So you have to fix the opportunity gap.

I do have an issue with the imbalance in nursing. That's because there is a strong stigma against men in nursing and men in nursing often suffer strong discrimination. In a society where these stigmas don't exist but men in general decide not to become nurses, that's fine.

Same in tech. There are stigmas and discrimination against women in tech at every level. For example, different countries have massively different amounts of women in engineering. Women in countries where this amount is lower often report discrimination. So this is clearly not a question of choice, and is thus a gap in opportunities led by sexism.

It would be nice if you wouldn't assume the absolute worst possible interpretation of the argument of your interlocutor. This is against HN's guideline and generally increases the amount of noise. It's also quite rude.
Most of Chinese pirate fishing happens in the open, with AIS on, and wholly reliant on victim country being unwilling, or too intimidated to use force.

Chinese fishermen have a record of ramming foreign coast guard, and even military ships of smaller countries.
I was really into Maturity Models when I was younger. They're easy to understand/communicate.

But, as you say, they suck when it comes to actually achieving anything. The priorities and context are completely absent.

It's funny to see anyone pitch maturity models for DevOps after the folks from DORA crapped all over them in their various works. Their idea of "capability models" is a lot more helpful and maps much more appropriately to outcomes based roadmaps.
That rule no longer exists, so it isn't that.

It's far more likely to be the "no personal attributes" [0] rule.

[0] https://facebook.com/policies/ads/prohibited_content/persona...
A dishwasher is to a robot what a calculator is to a computer.
How is this different or better than normal donations? If anything, isn't it worse due to the NFT overhead?
So feminism's answer to the the problem is "cuddle parties"? Are you serious?

I remember people used to argue that feminism was good because sexual liberation of women meant everyone was gonna get to have lots of sex. Obviously, these incels were not invited to the party. Women are having lots of sex, just not with them. And you actually believe "deep emotional relationships between men" are the cure for this unrest?

This is about deeper issues than friendship. It's about people's essential worth as human beings. People don't just have sex with anyone, they select partners and this implies selection criteria which implies value judgement. By seeking intimacy, we all risk judgement and rejection. Can you imagine what constant rejection by everyone must do to a person's self-worth?

"Cuddle parties" won't solve anything because they fail to understand the problem. Even proposing something like this compounds the issue because it's like saying "you are not good enough to have sex, enjoy this platonic activity instead". The root cause of this issue is society and women especially have decided these men are unattractive and therefore worthless. There is no fixing incels without fixing this inequality.
It's easier that way. If they're demonized, it means we don't have to grapple with the deeper issues and try to find some sort of solution to these issues. They're incels, thus (according to mainstream thought) they aren't deserving of empathy or help. They're sexists, racists and alt-right scumbags. Who cares if they die alone? Sympathize with them and you're lumped in with them too.

It's not surprising, considering how difficult the topics are that are at the base of these issues, but it's still depressing. We're no closer to bridging the gap between the genders than we were 40 years ago, and it seems to be getting worse in different ways.
The story goes that one of the founders hated text in ads, and decreed that it should be banned.

They later converted text in ads into a penalty, so you pay more (as an advertiser) for it.
Some people can't seem to wrap their heads around the fact that children are at about the same risk with COVID-19 as with influenza. Maybe it's all the deniers going "it's just a flu!" all along? Builds up a reflexive instinct to reject that sort of claim -- even this article makes the comparison to influenza. Not sure it's helping, even if it's true.

The same debate was had here in Canada. If you actually go read the experts, they all have qualms about requiring masks for very young children. Uncomfortable, social development, etc. One example that registered personally for me, as someone with a hearing loss. For children who rely heavily on lipreading, inadequate in-person socialization without masks during the formative period may interfere with acquiring language, and that sort of stimulus poverty cannot be reversed later. This is unfortunately not a zero-cost policy.

The expert panel set to the question in Ontario with re-opening schools concluded parents and schools should not require young children to wear masks, particularly if they strongly dislike them. Even when things got a lot worse and much stricter criteria was recommended in January, the advice is still to encourage masks if tolerable to the child, but... yes. Otherwise you should let kindergarteners and those younger run around without social distancing.

Or in other words: isolate the cohort itself, not the members of the cohort from each other. We've done really badly with this in general, though. With overnight summer camp it is so easy, too, like the article says. If it's at least a week, and no one else is admitted after the start, you can just treat time at camp as an isolation period.
Backblaze has said in the past that they don't buy enterprise drives because they didn't notice any difference from consumer ones. I don't know if that's still their policy.
> But when it comes to monopolies I just don't see them ever going away now. Too much globalization combined with lobbying power and corporate veils.

We’ve been here before though, in the era of Standard Oil. They can be broken up, but it won’t just happen on its own. The government needs to take action.
I am currently interested in infusing reinforcement learners with symbolic knowledge, with safety constraints as a special case.

I hope this helps cases where learners could come up with better solutions if it were not for pathological failures that we know to avoid.

Also, I try to keep expectations around AI reasonable.
These issues are far more serious than is known and commenters saying “too bad, you don’t deserve to date someone” really don’t understand how ineffective this approach is. You can’t just shame tens of thousands of men into accepting a substandard life.

Disclaimer: I am not making any ethical judgments here, just observing.

This problem didn’t really exist before for three reasons.

One, widespread access to prostitution and its social acceptability. Reading books from earlier centuries, it’s noticeable how common this was and how little anyone seemed to be socially stigmatized by going to a brothel.

Two, enforced monogamy. Our current culture is centered on removing restrictions. And as with every market, removing the restrictions on sexual access means the top players get more “resources” while the bottom get none. Monogamy was historically the solution to this.

Three, the primary model of marriage being one of love or connection, and not of uniting families, having children, or passing on property. This, combined with our consumeristic society, leads people to always assume that a better option is available. Add easy divorce laws and Tinder, and the incentives for trying to work out any problems (or even get into a relationship in the first place) are nearly nonexistent.

It really doesn’t seem like the culture is going to accept enforcing monogamy (2) or restrictions on divorce (3), but it does seem like (1) might be legalized at some point. Personally, that seems something of a dystopian solution to the problem, but that’s just me.
It's not about the commonly-known phrase, it's about the fact that it was used in an official blog post.
JAMstack CMS (+29 Helpful Tools for Your Project)
Technical people know this, non-technical people will click Continue on huge red pages warning for phishing. Not sure who is the target audience for this website.
For those wondering how big “Big Tech” companies are, I compiled a spreadsheet of over 600 products and services that illustrates the scope of their offering.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27040162
Relevant facebook group: Shirts marketed to extremely specific demographics

https://www.facebook.com/groups/smtesdthemain
the non-literal form is showing humility. It's not sarcasm - even if you are a literal expert (as in SME) on the topic it's acknowledging that you are still aware of your own fallibility - as the parent said.

I don't think I've ever met anybody in real life that interacted the way HNers do. I always assumed it was a social affect where everybody pretends to be a robot because that's the culture of the site, in the same way people form pun chains on reddit. Is this an American thing, or maybe just a software engineer thing? I mean, I work in the software industry as a developer (granted, in the UK) so I figured I would've run into it by now if it were industry specific.
This rule reads as “don’t tell the target about our assumptions of them”. Isn’t that kind of the point of Signals post?
second vote for Svelte support here - i'd hate for a next-gen tool like Rome to only support React when there are other great frameworks that it could handle
A 2011 Versa is younger than the iPhone which launched in 2007.
That's from 2014: "Ford Exec: 'We Know Everyone Who Breaks The Law' Thanks To Our GPS In Your Car" https://www.businessinsider.com/ford-exec-gps-2014-1
Usage:

git branches

Code for your ~/.gitconfig

branches = branch -a --sort=-committerdate --format='\
%(HEAD) \
%(if)%(HEAD)%(then)\
%(color:"#329664")%(objectname:short)%(color:reset) \
%(color:"#222222")[%(committerdate:short)]%(color:reset) \
%(color:green)%(refname:short)%(color:reset) \
%(else)\
%(if)%(upstream)%(then)\
%(color:"#999999")%(objectname:short)%(color:reset) \
%(color:"#222222")[%(committerdate:short)]%(color:reset) \
%(refname:short) \
%(color:"#ffc662")%(upstream:track)%(color:reset) \
%(else)\
%(color:"#963232")%(objectname:short)%(color:reset) \
%(color:"#222222")[%(committerdate:short)]%(color:reset) \
%(color:red)%(refname:lstrip=1)%(color:reset)\
%(color:"#ffc662")%(upstream:track)%(color:reset) \
%(end)\
%(end)\
'

Meaning

HASH Commit_date Branch_Name

A white branch_name means it is local.
Red means it is remote.
Yellow branch_name is the current branch.
It will also tell you if your checked out branch is ahead or behind the remote branch.
I mostly agree, but I don't think a PG post about him donating to Noora would make the front page of HN. In this case the NFT is providing value by bringing eyeballs due to how much hype NFTs have. I know I wouldn't have clicked through his post if he was just donating a bunch of money to them.
You surely won't be surprised if I tell you that Marxism-Leninism embeds the ideas of Marx about stages of societal development.

Also, no; most prominently, we largely dedicated our resources to pointless heavy industry at the expense of light industry and services.
Those are a lot of absolute statements you're making, and I just don't understand. There is so much wrong with your argument. You're attributing motive and action to someone else, with zero proof, in my opinion.

>You believe in quotas, you believe in equality of outcome.

Who is 'you' here? Who said they believe in quotas?

>they like the power that comes from doing so.

Again, who is this mysterious strawman you're building? Where is this argument coming from? What is your proof? I am very progressive, and I very much have disdain for racism, sexism, and any other bigoted activities. It has nothing to do with power. Often, I am unable to do anything about this behavior because I lack any sort of structural power in my local area. So what does that mean for your argument?

>For example no progressive has any issues with an imbalance in genders in nursing

I literally work to bring men into underrepresented fields in higher education. There are programs across the nation specifically designed to recruit, assist, and help ensure the academic success of men in nursing, men in daycare/education fields, and men in other traditionally 'feminine' fields. Claiming this absolute of a statement is just absurd.
And it can only be used on insecure platforms, iOS and Android.
Ridiculously targeted t-shirt ads on Facebook are actually a thing, but probably not for privacy awareness purposes: https://thehustle.co/who-makes-those-insanely-specific-t-shi...
That might work with a standard SaaS, not on the gaming market. Gamers are not your usual customers.
The refrigerant industry asked for HFC phase-out, and the EPA delivered
During the second world war, Austria was called "Ostmark", not österreich.

And yes, "we do not talk about that" since the war ended, the Myth that we were the "First Victim of the Nazis" still perpetuates, at least in the Generation of my Grandmother (who is 94).

The only austrian resistance when the nazis entered in 1938 was a Group of International Brigades that had returned from the spanish Civil War and they all got slaughtered.
You likely will not find that in a lot of history books either, somehow the ~80.000 international Volunteers of the Civil War in Spain are rarely mentioned anywhere.

No Pasaran!
$10 a day? Thats so out of touch with reality.
Thats like daily income of their major user user base,
millions of people from developing countries like India and afaik without these users, FB would not be what it is today.
You aren't alone - I know of a company that bootstrapped themselves by abusing the graph API to sell t-shirts.
Advertisement is good because it lets me know who is supplying goods and services I may desire or need.

There are a lot of methods allowed in advertising that are basically fraud, and a lot of methods to deliver advertising that are basically stalking. That doesn't mean that people shouldn't be allowed to post what they have for sale.
I’d argue it was - maybe not obvious, but I knew it was a big deal.

The nomad and other players at the time sucked (I wanted to get one for my dad). Plastic, poor build quality, software would often freeze up and crash.

The nomad looked like a cd player, why? Just bad design and not thinking about it.

You’re right though that 2004 it started to really take off.
I don't take quite the same bearish view on this app.

I suspect the "reverse engineering" here was just looking at Bluetooth LE GATT attributes and values, which you can just look at using something like Bluetility [1]. There appears to be some exemptions to DMCA for compatibility so long as the author didn't copy Bose' code, but IANAL. [2]

The name I think is the more challenging part because it's very close - probably a C&D if it becomes popular to change the name.

[1] https://github.com/jnross/Bluetility

[2] https://www.eff.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq
> If anything, it makes me want to make a business account so I can see first hand what targeting criteria would be available to me.

Here are some examples: https://imgur.com/a/7YVH3ch

There are likely thousands more, that's just the browsing section.
“It's a fact...that in societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute pauperization . Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as 'the law of the market'...Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society.”
- Michel Houellebecq, Whatever
One of the cars I rented (A Ford using the Sync console) had bluetooth contacts synced from the previous renter. It was just sitting there: names, phone numbers, addresses, email addresses. Being privacy conscious I deleted the contacts and the 20+ bluetooth profiles stored in the console.
This made me curious about how it was that Clarence Birdseye came to discover the fast-freeze approach that preserves flavor. The answer is surprisingly straightforward - he was a fur trader in Labrador (northern Canada) and noticed when he pulled fish out they froze immediately and were still delicious months later. So if only you could make fish as cold as northern Canada, you could make frozen fish tasty! It was from there that he designed a -45F calcium chloride based belt technique and then a -25F ammonia evaporation driven technique.

https://www.loc.gov/everyday-mysteries/technology/item/who-i...
You might be surprised. Enforcement is certainly draconian, but there are not absurdly many regulations, and it is also surprisingly (to westerners) Feudal - personal relationships and high agency in a narrowly defined area are very important to the system functioning.
No question. It was video gaming from the period roughly spanning 1990-2010 that funded gpu innovation. But programmable compute shaders caught on very rapidly in science. And Nvidia was quick to not just recognize the new market, but bet the company that supercomputing would one day be gpu cluster based.

Here's Jensen Huang talking to Stanford students about the birth of the Cg language (27:40" mark). The entire talk is gold. A text book case study of Moore's Law and the SV model of risk capital:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn1EsFe7snQ

Ironically, IC Design itself is a strong candidate as an industrial process likely to be revolutionized by AI ;)

Chip Placement with Deep Reinforcement Learning

https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10746
Not when it's dark!
You do realize small ducted fans are an order of magnitude louder than a helicopter, right? All those slick marketing videos omit that part.