skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
To easily do everything with one hand, swipe down from the bottom (as if unlocking but down), then you pull the upper part of the screen down. Works everywhere. (I also have the 12 mini btw, really like it)
That would be the exception, not the rule with radio (that it would need to be, to justify using it as an example of a driving nuissance as the grandparent did).

And this exception points to the current trend for manufactured control + everything as a platform, so it can be seen as a further argument towards the point we're making here against this trend.
Furthermore, there's a payola scheme behind the scenes, to make sure automakers implement it in their infotainment systems and stuff, which they hope will force others to license it.

It's a great idea, a mediocre implementation, and a set of business practices that make the antichrist jealous.

On top of that, their bloodthirsty pursuit of any criticism means that legitimate discussions of the system's flaws can't happen in the open. The lack of that criticism may have encouraged some services to adopt W3W without realizing its flaws, and there's already some hinting that such a flaw may have already interfered with actual rescue operations:

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56901363

Thankfully the rescue was able to proceed once they switched to another coordinate system, and that case didn't result in a fatality. How many other such cases are there? We might never know. The company may have literal blood on its hands at this point, but fixing the flaws would require discussing them first, which we can't do as long as they're empowered to shut down discourse.
Would someone please dumb this down for me?
> I'm always highly skeptical of any account that essentially paints many/most others in the org as the source of the dysfunction, and if only they implemented my brilliant idea would things get fixed.

I didn't get that take from the article at all; I've been a part of one of the orgs she's describing and had the same experience. Over a couple years we went from a raucous, rough-and-tumble culture of open debate on the technical merits to a "polite" "respectful" org where nobody dared pop their head over the trench and bad decisions were allowed to continue unchallenged until they were nigh-irreversible. Much of it was due to a single executive's behavior. He was a big bully, always had to be right, and you knew that if you ever expressed an opinion about anything in his domain, he'd come after you like a fucking pitbull and worry your flesh until you submitted, using the power of his office and his connection to the founder to ensure you bent the knee.
Does Pipedrive work ?
I'm very confused by this thought process. It wasn't the CEO who initially said this was wrong. It was employees who did, and the CEO initially pushed back and said it was fine.

The employees were the ones to change that negative aspect of the culture after the CEO had failed to do so for years. What about that gives you confidence that the CEO values privacy?
Grustaf thinks the idea that companies exist for the benefit of shareholders is a bigger problem.
Build img from source is an option for mac osx.

https://github.com/genuinetools/img

A few rootless feature may not work. But as root i haven't seen problems so far.
Problem is (as it seems the case in the author's case) when this group (I really loathe the term "adults in the room", by exclusion the rest of people are children or to be treated as such) has people with power that are "well actually" people just there to pontificate from their inflated egos without letting others do their jobs.
I would further argue that executives are exactly who determine company culture. Anyone with experience in management knows this: culture starts at the top. The thing is, they determine it by what they do not what they say they do. If you have backstabbing mercenary executives - that's your culture. If you have a bootstrapped company where the founders own >50%, they get to determine the culture. Might not be what they want it to be or say it will be, but they certainly determine it with every decision they make.

They have decided to reset their culture - it might work out, it might not. But by doing it with a massive voluntary payout with no obligations, they have said huge amounts about their own personal integrity, which will trickle down. I have no doubt they are inundated with high quality applicants right now. No such thing as bad publicity and all that...
Where? The US? OP is right about the cold water, here in Sweden dishwashers are only connected to cold water and often say in the manual that they take nothing but cold water.
The innovation here is getting sql.js to use http and range requests for file access rather than all being in memory.

I wonder when people using next.js will start using this for faster builds for larger static sites?
It's actually not a thing in "all" endurance sports. Once you push into the realm of ultra endurance, athlete become so efficient at fat metabolism that they never "hit the wall" so to speak.
“Lack of all day battery” depends on how you use it. I have 2 day battery (about 2-3 hr screen time/day). Since I got a second sim it decreased somewhat though, negated again to a agree by setting WLAN call.
Nazi obsessed Travis Brown and his contamination of sexual harassment claims
I guess we could dig deeper and ask "what is the purpose of gaining wealth?" and "what is the purpose of money?".

One answer to the first is that wealth can be used to change the world. Small scale wealth can change things for you alone, like buying a nicer house. Large scale wealth can change things for everyone around you, like supporting a political platform of your liking.

In the same vein, money as a means of transaction is supposed to capture the social good that is gained within every transaction and make it abstract so we don't have to specifically barter for what we want in the present.

If we accept for the sake of argument the above, then we can examine if corporations are really doing social good, because if they are not then the ought to be restructured. This line of thought is what lead to the anti-trust acts of previous eras, safety regulations, food and drug regulations, and general business regulation in the present day. We have previously acknowledged that businesses can gain wealth, and power, without adding social good and as corporations are an abstraction created by society, it's well within our rights to change them for societies betterment.
Why don't you just get applecare plus? Getting a case has never even crossed my mind, I can just go replace my phone for free whenever I want.
I’ve never been able to get my head around the “anti-optimization” mindset. Like... what else should we be doing? If you’re going to be writing code anyway, you might as well take optimal advantage of the hardware while you’re at it. Now, some people point out that attempts to optimize sometimes backfire, but that’s a different problem - that’s something you should work on improving though practice (and measurement).
In my experience, executives are usually so separate from the rest of the company (insulated by multiple layers of management) that to hear them talk about the company culture feels a lot like hearing Queen Elizabeth talk about the culture of Britain: how would she know? Executives are so zoomed out, and culture is so ground-level, that I don't think people in those high level roles really even know what the culture of their companies are most of the time.

I agree with this blog article insofar as you cannot define what a culture will be, the way you define OKRs or go to market strategies. A couple anecdotes:

At a former company, roughly the size of Basecamp, a VP of business development said this to me, essentially word for word: "The culture of ${companyName} is getting to $30 million ARR within the next 6 months." This was in the context of me telling him that developers were not happy with the direction of the company culture. His framing told me that he was talking about something definitionally different than I was when I talked about culture. Incidentally, that company imploded, though it does continue to limp on.

At another company, the CEO repeated at every all-hands meeting that our company had a "culture of performance". I always wondered how the hell he would know that, since the only time he interacted with anyone at the company outside the VP level was when lecturing at the all-hands meetings. He was no doubt qualified to discuss the culture of vice presidents and the c-suite, but how could he possibly describe what the other 99% of the company was like?

My point is that executives think they can define what a culture is, but they can't. Nobody can. You can only describe what a culture turns out to be. You can try to change it, but it's not ever going to be entirely in your control, ex officio, like it's a dress code or something.
Then we are in agreement!
You should explain what's wrong with the argument instead of being a passive agressive asshole. It was a continuation of why it happens nowadays that people swing to static linking and then posts like this get shamelessly upvoted.
In this case the company being referred to IS Facebook though.
Then why not buy the cheap one I have and glue a piece of plastic over the other buttons?

I'll even make a nice looking piece of plastic for you.
This is simply incorrect. I have seen many creators and businesses try this and simply not find movement, for example RoosterTeeth which owns many different channels and brands and has a very comprehensive video streaming site, yet their videos get 1/1000th the viewership on their own platform vs youtube. The platform is captive.
My point is the potential is there for driving and delivering to rise in status and pay again.
> OO is a tree

Inheritance heirarchies in single-inheritance languages are trees. In MI they are DAGs. But neither of those constrains data representations, OO can support arbitrary data graphs.

> OO is suddenly terrible because the data is the wrong shape, you should hold your data as a graph then derive trees out of it to satisfy views

How does this make OO terrible? What you describe is exactly standard OO GUI practice (specifically, in MV<whatever> architecture, the model layer is an arbitrary graph representing the data, from which the view is derived.)
But you can influence company culture by removing people that are disrupting your vision for culture
Society didn't accept, it was enacted by the government.

The thing that disheartens me is that most people today fail to realize that people have been organizing into large work entities since time immemorial to build products and offer services in the hope of making money as owners, workers, and investors. Many people in every culture have accumulated great wealth by enterprising means. Yet people act like working for someone else is some new construct that exists to oppress everyone and most of the common mans ills are because of capitalists. This to me is quite silly.

The only easy things in life are complaining, procrastinating, failing and dying. Most everything else that is worth having in life takes discipline, work, and self growth. Yes some people will get more of those good things, some for less effort, so what though? As long as they are not breaking laws to do so I am fine with it. If someone breaks the law then punish them.
>Cryptocurrency is a logical response to central banks around the world trying to print their way out of their bad decisions instead of putting the ultra wealthy in their place.

I don't understand what you're trying to say. To me this sounds like political rhetoric not an argument.

Are you saying that cryptocurrency can replace central banks?
Are you saying that cryptocurrency is some kind of revenge or punishment against central banks and wealthy?
Are you saying something else??
The Marxists saw this coming 150 years ago, and not coincidentally they also have a few good ideas for how to fix it. They are worth hearing out.
This is about SNMP, and says nothing about SMTP.
There are so many groups in Linux. Ubuntu was oriented towards Windows users. Check out Arch Linux pkgstats [1]:

* gnome-shell is GNOME

* plasma-workspace is KDE

* i3-wm and sway — tiling WM and its Wayland successor

* xmonad — WM building framework

Note: these are installed packages among those who opted in, does not strictly reflects usage. Some fun statistics [2].

[1] https://pkgstats.archlinux.de/compare/packages#packages=gnom...

[2] https://pkgstats.archlinux.de/fun
You could just use std::vector<int> there
Facebook is the previous company she quit to this one.

I found myself in yet another tech gig in an attempt to provide reliability to a company that (as it turned out) was about to have its IPO.

There's a big hint as to the name of the company in the post. If you look at companies that are expected to IPO in the very near term, I'm sure you'll figure it out.
Does this use the tabCapture API? Last I tried that it limited the audio quality quite a bit.
I don't know how to make a shopping list and put the parts together.
One thing I have been doing since watching this video was to add a small scoop of Oxyclean to the dishwasher (in addition to the tab). The difference in cleanliness has been noticeable.
Right. We accept corporations because their entitlements (such as liability limitation) and some regulations enable investment in great ventures that make society more prosperous as a whole. That's the theory. Whether it happens or not is of course a worthy matter of ongoing debate.

In my view, the end of a business is whatever serves the self interests of the participants. A customer may want something different than an employee or an owner. A supplier is not obligated to offer a price that benefits the owner. Instead they are free to negotiate a price on behalf of their own interest. Likewise an employee, which is a kind of supplier. To the extent that the public are affected by the behavior of a corporation, they can demand regulations based on the public interest.

The people who are actually legally or contractually obligated to serve as fiduciaries for the owners can usually be counted on the fingers of one hand.

"It is not to the benevolence of the butcher, brewer, or baker, that we appeal for our supper, but to their regard for their own self interest." -- Adam Smith
See Ratatouille's interpretaron of "Everyone can cook".
You can bake a digital signature into an NFT, but that's not going to help you verify a physical painting.
The NFT itself can't be forged, but surely the artwork itself can be forged? How would the NFT identify the forgery from the original if the current owner is saying the forgery is the real one?
Linux could easily have never existed.

At the time Linus got started in 1991, *BSD was tied up in a legal dispute (which was not resolved until 1994), and Minix was only available under a restrictive license (Minix was relicensed BSD in 2000)

If either of those legal issues had not existed in 1991, Linus probably would never have started Linux [0], and Linux's place in history would have been assumed by something else – most likely some BSD derivative or a descendant of Minix.

(Minix's microkernel architecture, while elegant, has a performance cost. However, Minix could have easily been hacked into a monolithic kernel, which is basically what Apple did to Mach, and Microsoft did with win32k.sys. Or maybe it could have evolved towards a higher performance microkernel architecture, such as is found in L4)

In terms of the "technology tree", Linux occupies the place of "leading openly developed FLOSS operating system". If Linux hadn't occupied that place, some other system would have instead. And there is a chance even that one day Linux might be dethroned. (Unlikely to happen any time soon, but maybe some decades or centuries from now.)

[0] So says the man himself: "If 386BSD had been available when I started on Linux, Linux would probably never had happened." https://gondwanaland.com/meta/history/interview.html
Are you talking about digital files or actual physical art?
You're talking about a very specific tile product. It's also not got a user replaceable battery and has other concessions to meet that size constraint
Carbontech Startup Sequestering Carbon for Thousands of Years
Here's a meme blog post that's been going around that unironically helps with understanding how NFTs work: https://i.imgur.com/NJirDQp.png

> imagine if you went up to the mona lisa and you were like "i'd like to own this" and someone nearby went "give me 65 million dollars and i'll burn down an unspecified amount of the amazon rainforest in order to give you this receipt of purchase" so you paid them and they went "here's your receipt, thank you for your purchase" and went to an unmarked supply closet in the back of the museum and posted a handmade label inside it behind the brooms that said "mona lisa currently owned by jacobgalapagos" so if anyone wants to know who owns it they'd have to find this specific closet in this specific hallway and look behind the correct brooms. and you went "can i take the mona lisa home now" and they went "oh god no are you stupid? you only bought the receipt that says you own it, you didn't actually buy the mona lisa itself, you can't take the real mona lisa you idiot. you CAN take this though." and gave you the replica print in a cardboard tube that's sold in the gift shop. also the person selling you the receipt of purchase has at no point in time ever owned the mona lisa.

> unfortunately, if this doesnt really make sense or seem like any logical person would be happy about this exchange, then you've understood it perfectly
Did author really get the tagline wrong?
Microsoft Access Cloud Edition, basically?
The employees were also the ones to create that negative aspect of culture, and maintain it through out the last decades.

It is unclear currently if the employees leaving are the same ones who supported the old culture or those who lobbied for the new, or if both groups are the same. I've seen one report that a person called Basecamp culture akin to 'genocide' when that person had been an active supporter in the 'genocidal' culture themselves. It may have been a genuine change of heart, but their hyperbolic language couldn't have lead to good discussion making nor made it clear what kind of punishment that person should get for their past admitted misdeeds.
Adam Smith tells you the exact opposite. Their self-interest is not the end, it’s the means. The end is to provide society with reasonably priced bread, beer and meat.
Salesforce is amazing, in the sense that it truly lives up to its name. Everytime I've been hired into an executive role I've cancelled our Salesforce subscription and productivity has gone up.

Its clunky, slow and overly complex if you ask me. But their success cannot be denied, thus they must have an amazing salesforce.
When Paid Applauders Ruled the Paris Opera House
That's already happening, and it's causing further fragmentation, so now companies are investing in "IPaaS" tools to merge their data. Which creates even more non-transferable knowledge. It seems customer and marketing data is a mess because marketers will invest in every shiny new tool that promises "actionable insights" from a mountain of data. As terrible as Salesforce may be, it's not as bad as Salesforce + Segment + Informatica + Looker + Lotame + etc.... But that's the world digital advertising has created. Anything for an extra click.
Makes you wonder what it would take to get such a process (that produces a new medicine for every individual) approved...
Can you share the reasoning? How was the "cost" of migration justified vs. <insert problems with Salesforce>?
Scope of Marketers in the Tech Space?
For 10 years I have been following tech but only as a marketer and hobbyist, and never took tech as my career. How relevant is the tech domain for marketers and is there any similar career path of any community member as I have been wondering if the choice I had made is a right one or not.
That's what Excel is for.

I'm only half joking.
Note above, the “delete” operator is safe to call on nullptr values, and it is also not necessary to set pointers to nullptr in destructors (since the object is going away anyway). The example above therefore could just say “delete [] mem;” in the destructor with nothing else.

Yet this is also a good example of why you wouldn’t need “delete” or a destructor at all, if “mem” changes to std::unique_ptr<int[]> type.

And even then, you should probably seriously consider std::vector or std::array before trying a unique_ptr array.
You would want any good soap to be a degreaser. That's the whole point.
The brain fog is caused by rapid fluctuations of blood sugar. Low intensity aerobic exercise has a number of positive effects that all play off each other: You metabolize fat more readily as an energy source, which makes your body less reliant on carbs. This alleviates the exhaustion you might normally feel as your blood sugar crashes. And carbs (and especially refined sugars) are routed directly to muscles, blunting the insulin response and increasing insulin sensitivity.
> The MCL65+ is a 6502 accelerator card which uses a 600Mhz Arduino Teensy4.1 microcontroller to emulate a 6502 microprocessor as well as its bus interface signals. It was designed to be a drop-in replacement for the original 6502 processor

Oh man, that is really cool. The possibility for retro computers to be actually usable tools by giving them a little more horsepower and RAM is really neat!
On the other hand, ERPs and associated systems tend to involve a huge amount of work too.
> Mine report as “With you” so perhaps they don’t advertise themselves in this state.

So you know for certain that AirTags have multiple broadcast states (e.g., "with me" vs. not)? Apple's description makes it sound like they only have one state:

"Your AirTag sends out a secure Bluetooth signal that can be detected by nearby devices in the Find My network." [1]

[1] https://www.apple.com/airtag/
The authorization is eua not because of safety concerns but unknown long term efficacy > 1 year. Does this change your assessment?
My company had a lot of data in SAP and also a lot of data in Salesforce (don't ask me how they decided what to put where). Sometimes we need data from one or the other for projects and so far it was always that getting SAP data was extremely tedious to impossible while getting Salesforce data is usually pretty straightforward. I am not sure if that's caused by the teams that manage the systems but it's definitely very notiecable.
I worked at a company that started this yearly employee survey to measure things like engagement. We knew how to game the survey right away, making sure the first survey had low scores so there would be an MBO to improve the scores, and budget for things like go-karts, etc. Sure enough, the MBO came and the next year we improved the scores. We knocked that MBO out of the park 4 out of 5 years. The outlier was the year where we had two extra rounds of layoffs, so we got a pass for that one.
You are flooding this post with with multiple threads of innuendo and conspiracy theory - this syndrome is documented in dozens of officials in multiple governments at multiple levels. It has been studied by independent researchers, medical professionals, contractors etc. This has none of the hallmarks of a false flag operation, which in this case would require conspiracy on a massive scale. The US/Canada do not need conspiracy to accomplish any of their strategic goals with respect to Cuba.
Customers don’t have insight into the company culture which is why there are whistleblowers. Customers cannot give accurate assessments about corporate culture.
Of course you could. That wasn't my question -- my question was about the wording of the recommendation; "...should belong to a resource handle (that can call delete)"
Swipe left and right on an SMS to reveal the timestamp and other stuff.

Blew my mind after tearing my hair out that this information was just gone. It's not gone, just hidden in a place you'd never think to look for it.