skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Only a small portion went to the early devs, and an equal amount to the nonprofit foundation. The rest of that 70% went to the presale, which was open to anyone and well-advertised. First-year bitcoiners had a way bigger advantage than ETH presale buyers.

https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/launching-the-ether-sal...
This is one of the many reasons that adding screens to cars has been such a failure. All these carmakers were deluded and couldn’t even build custom systems that were pleasant to use, much less secure.

The problem is only partially solved by CarPlay.
> You know they'll help you even you got nothing to give and without expecting anything in return from them.

I cannot decide if that is more abusive or more romanticized.

If you expect your friends to be there for you without you returning anything, you are abusing them. That isn't friendship, that is exploitation.

And if your friend is there for you even though you are incapable of returning anything, it is incredibly romantic. But also usually very limited, because that drain on your friend has consequences and needs to either be equalized by something (not you) or suck your friend dry until he himself is incapable. Which is a very un-romantic ending, because it leaves the world with 2 emotional cripples.

For me, friendship is also very much about knowing the limits of what i should make my friends suffer through.
I agree that these are extremely general categories that could be reproduced by scraping a person's public LinkedIn.

What's trickier is when the ads make assumptions about your taste based on the Facebook groups you participate in, and the websites you visit outside Facebook. Those are still connected to you via the Facebook beacons (share widgets) embedded in practically every website.
Depth information is lost once light hits the sensor. Software can attempt to account for this (portrait mode) but it's imperfect.
I really enjoyed DaoHaus who make it easy to spin up a moloch dao in a few clicks -> https://app.daohaus.club/summon

and cheap to run on xdai (until rollups arrive then we can move there and get eth security too!)

Also would recommend this article on dao relations too: https://medium.com/primedao/conceptual-models-for-dao2dao-re...
Cash value of a losing vote is nonzero before an election.
It's not an Android situation. Android makes you do the same thing.
> It's weird to try and explain this from a sterile alien-studying-humans perspective, but since that's the HN theme I'll do my best.

This made me laugh, in a good way :) I'll approach it from that angle:

Monogamous child-rearing looks to me a successful evolutionary strategy for the human race (and keep in mind the "monogamous" part might be relatively recent). It implies less about the happiness of the parental units, though.

The Terran octopus dies off soon after giving birth to its progeny, and this is successful for octopus-kind, but results in no long-lasting happiness for the octopus mother. Likewise with many species of insects, arguably very successful lifeforms on Earth. Many of them die or are cannibalized after mating or giving birth.

Successful species propagation strategies do not necessarily make the parents live happier lives. There is an evolved reason for said strategies, but is happiness the maximized factor?
>students will no longer be able to take calculus in high school

What leads you to this conclusion?

You can still take calculus without being designated a gifted student before you enter HS. In fact, isn't 12th grade calculus the standard without any acceleration?

It sounds like the report questions the rationale for targeting calculus, which seems like a healthy debate to me. Maybe some students would be better served by something else. However, I don't see anything to suggest that calculus is going anywhere.
I'm convinced having to eat fish sticks as a child has caused me to hate the taste of fish as an adult.
Mechanical design of original platform does NOT limit the OEMs ability to install telecommunications modules and other upgraded electronic.
Somewhere out there is a series of future events in which the prolonged gyrations of the Dogecoin exchange rate trigger a global financial crisis.
I would say if you can, replace it with a SFF PSU. The work is a bit "messy" (rewiring the ATX with the Sun connector) but no more cap leaking...
Wow. that puts him in the top 30 richest people on earth...according to https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/#233e45c53d78 which i randomly googled.
This is such a great idea. I struggle to see it being adopted at my current, OKR driven organization where literally any work is debated until death lol.
U.S. residents were not prohibited. Here's the official announcement saying so:

https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/launching-the-ether-sal...
I started bringing and charging off those little external battery backup on trips years ago. Not perfect but great in hostile environments.. which is more and more.
> I find removing obstacles and latency-inducing loops helpful, to start seeing what the work really should be.

Should MBA's be studying DevOps?
They made me laugh out loud for a few minutes. Did anybody actually buy those? There has to be someone with the right sense of humor.
It's downvoted because it's not true. There are tons of traditions that men follow too. Gender norms just lead to men and women following different traditions.
Epic CEO says he would have taken a special App Store deal if Apple had offered
Yeah, for the most part I agree, I just think that it's possible to frame the fact that a lot of guys simply being at a loss of how to go about this can be framed as a societal failure of some kind.

These kinds of skills are rarely talked about in any setting. Maybe that's how it's always been, but it seems to me that young men really aren't given much actionable advice when it comes to attracting a mate, and at one point the rules/expectations were a little more codified than they are today.

My own experience: I would be a millionaire if I had a nickel for every time I was told to "just be yourself". On the other hand, I was told a lot growing up what NOT to do when interacting with a woman. Don't try to kiss/etc her without asking permission. Norms around when it's ok to flirt (almost never appropriate). All of these kinds of negative rules made interactions with women feel like a minefield to me so I just stuck to online dating, but of course that has its own rules and expectations that take a lot of getting used to. Don't mention sex or anything remotely sexual. Don't mention how attractive she is. Don't use pick up lines. Don't just say hi. Don't expect a reply. And then of course, there's a whole new minefield to walk through when you start getting more serious -- a lot of which comes down to boundaries, another thing we don't do a very good job of talking about.

I made it through though, amazingly. I had a reasonably successful 8 year relationship, and even though it ended, I feel like we were right for each other in the sense that we had things to offer each other and I learned so many valuable life lessons from my partner during that time. Now I'm 4 years into my next relationship and it's going great as well, still learning so much!

I think a lot of this just comes down to things changing a lot re: gender roles, norms, etc. We're in this liminal space where things haven't quite shaken out yet into something more stable. My hope is once that happens (it feels inevitable -- things can't just keep on changing like this forever, right?) we will be able to talk about it more concretely.

It is worrisome though. My younger brothers (24) have not yet made any foray into the world of relationships. I try and fail to get them to open up about their feelings about this or anything else. They don't use the word incel but it could certainly apply.
> If having no advanced courses is best for everyone, as that study claims, then there's no need to think about those questions you raised, is there?

You are correct, and that’s probably why the intro to the framework, while it mentions equity concerns on this issue, breezes past them fairly quickly and spends a lot more focus on the evidence of more universal problems with the existing tracking approach.

The framework’s position is not “tracking is segregation that enables serving more able (or white and asian) students better” but “tracking is segregation that is a pedagogical disservice to students across tracks”.
Why not say why you think they are insane?

Also - how do you define ‘normal’? What does it mean to you?

What do you think a normal social interaction is?
Its crypto, but with carbon..
The bitcoin culture is very religious and getting even minor changes into the protocol are very difficult. Bitcoin is not trying to be like Ethereum, no one speaks for bitcoin, and everyone can have their own opinion on what it is. The fact it takes so long to make changes is a good thing from my perspective - the risk to the entire crypto space if BTC were to have a serious problem is catastrophic, so slow-and-steady is a smart tactic.

For me, bitcoin is a store of value, like digital gold. I don't purchase BTC for the same reasons I purchase ETH.

Taproot will enable better privacy on bitcoin and more efficient transactions. It will not enable an EVM-like smart contract system.
Which is IMHO a really fun example of how how unintuitive these things can be. It's a really really hard rock, shouldn't it be really stable? But it just doesn't work like that.
If marine biologists are to be believed, Seaspiracy is not a reliable source of information.
Because no digital solution can recognize depth correctly from a single image, which would be needed for this effect.
Good lord, you do all that with cashier? I load the stuff onto the belt (or don't even do that now thanks to COVID), and get a cart full of bagged groceries on the other side.
Yes I learned the same too yesterday from Hacker news. What a coincidence! There was also a bashquote function which you can put in your .bashrc file but this approach really beats everything!
Hyperbole does not elevate serious dialogue.
> Or got someone else to do it for you.

I assume you're talking about cheating? That's mostly possible for remote interviews, not that easy to pull off.

> I think you underestimate the skill of interviewers. You can learn a lot about a person from one directed conversation, if you want to.

You can definitely learn a lot, but the three qualities you mentioned were:

> interested in the work, willing to learn, and aren't a jerk

If someone wants the job because of $REASONS that differ from these, they can still practice to show these traits during the interview.

You could dig deeper in their portfolio if they have one, but my point is that the 1h interview is not going to bring you much more with respect to these three criteria you mentioned.
Marc Andreessen was publicly speaking of Bitcoin as an important technology in 2014 [1]. He sounded like a true believer then, not a moonshot speculator.

I remember Sam Altman (then YC president) tweeting about him and other YC partners trading Bitcoin in about 2014 too. And I heard of Peter Thiel having big Bitcoin investments several years ago.

It’s not so true that VC’s “invest in highly-speculative moonshot ideas”. YC does as their business model is to bet on a huge pool to catch the outliers. But traditional VCs have to defend their investments to LPs so have to be more prudent. Any VC investing in Bitcoin companies in 2013 was doing so because they personally believed Bitcoin had huge potential.

[1] https://www.econtalk.org/marc-andreessen-on-venture-capital-...
Ask HN: What Would IT Take to Get NASA to Blow Up at Least One Moon on Pluto?
Hey guys, we earth links live in relatively safe part of our galaxy with not much action going on and sometimes it turnt to be boring...How about we get NASA to blow up far away moons just for a show here on earth .
Where did you get the number 700? The article says they had 22 million shirts
Beautiful.

What is the blue dot for?
Sure but, please, let's show some context sensitivity.

An engagement ring is emphatically not costume jewelry, and if you don't understand that "real jewelry" is an important sense the antonym of "costume jewelry", well, now you do.
Oh I absolutely took too much with that edible. But I tell you, I did not have a single panic attack until I tried weed (I got minor panic attacks smoking weed but an edible was the first all out panic attack). Haven’t touched weed in years and unfortunately I still get panic attacks here and there. I’m doing cognitive behavioral therapy and it works very well.
Is it just me though, that for how targeted FB and Google try to be, they're usually still way off?

I mean sure they'll know things like relationship status that I directly input, but the inferences are often very incorrect.
I find tech like this so impressive, because back when I used to code for a living, web browsers were slow, clunky and woefully underpowered.

Is the core app just using a canvas/svg? Did you have to build your own UI toolkit on top of it? Any open source libraries / similar projects I can read to learn more?

Thanks
Getting started with Fitbit development – Part II
The charge was money laundering, according to the article - not tax evasion.
> You can't expect women to work on having more of a penis.

That's a bit simplistic, isn't it? Not to mention, maybe it's not just the penis. Maybe you can teach women how to copy the kinds of attitudes (eg: assertiveness) that help men succeed. Maybe you can get more women in engineering by giving them positive role models from an early age.

We can help prevent there being so many incels by supporting young men emotionally from an early age. Right now we have a very punitive approach IMO. The education given to young men is a lot of "don't do this", "that's toxic", "women hate it when men do that", but there isn't enough positive messaging and encouragement.
>Hard bit is knowing how to find that info out!

You'd have loved trying it pre-Web :-) I was a product manager in the late 80s/90s and I needed to do competitive analysis for pricing and feature prioritization.

One of our sources of information was an analyst firm that basically collected faxes of product briefs from ourselves and everyone else and then basically charged us large sums of money to send us copies of the product briefs for relevant products because we couldn't ask for them directly.

There was another firm that shipped us basically their own datasheets in a standard format of the products in a space (computer systems), which were often considerably outdated/inaccurate.

I sometimes say if I had to go back to those days, I'd quit in a week as I basically wouldn't have the information to do my job.
The article indicates she may have been “missing” by choice, a decision which may have been spurred by mental illness.
Times Pi.

Why?

It works!

Ok, Phi it is then!
How I miss the ol standby Aux port with a 1/8" cable.
One of the uncomfortable conversations we're going to have to have soon is about how 'Flow State' is efficient but ineffective.

One of the characteristics of Flow State is a diminished sense of considering the consequences of an action. Exactly the "so busy figuring out if they could do it that they didn't stop to think if they should do it".

In particular I've noticed that people get extremely defensive about code they wrote in Flow State. My working theory is that we think somewhere on a spectrum from, "how could anything that made me feel that good really be bad?" to "I got three days of work done in one day you are crapping all over it instead of congratulating me? Fuck you!"

I know that the efficacy of my code tends to be higher when I 'come up for air', reason out what to do next, and if I find that Flow Me is disagreeing with Planning Me, I stop and regroup. This is essentially the same skill I use to, among other things, keep from overspending at a store - setting ground rules and stopping when I'm tempted to violate them.

Pomodoro might be a little to structured for many of us, but as a starting point it might be a reasonable antidote.

I think in general that programmers have an easier time entering Flow State, but if you're going to willingly exit it, you had better have some confidence you can find it again, so you need to have better than 50:50 odds of being able to enter it at will instead of just going with it when it happens. This seems to be a rarer skill.
How is it arrogant? He's honestly asking. There might be good reason for using a digital solution, such as keeping valuable equipment intact..

We can have both. The world is not boolean.
Have you looked into that study? That seems kind of shady to me. They are using math attitudes to say there's a stereotype. It's not even asking stuff like 'do you think boys or girls are better at math' etc. It's just stuff like "Math is important for my career" etc. Well if they already have ideas about the careers they want to perform, then obviously the study is looking at the outcomes and not the drivers - why did they choose those careers? So it seems we're back at square one - that women as an aggregate choose fields that aren't as math centric. It seems like a leap to assume some implicit meaning behind those general questions on the survey.

"If I had that answer, I honestly think I would be a billionaire."

If we can't even define the problem and the underlying causes or measure the outcomes, then how can we fix it? Even if we try things, we would have no idea if they are actually beneficial because we don't even know what to measure.

"I just simply am not educated enough to know what, how to measure it, or how to attempt to fix it."

If we can't measure it and don't know how to fix it, then do we even know that a problem exists?

"Even the often touted Gender-equity paradox can be boiled down to gender stereotypes manifesting in individuals' decisions"

But if it's their own free choice, then why should we interfere with that? It's like saying my mom doesn't want me to play football because I might get hurt, so I'm going to base my decision on that. That is up to the person to decide if they want to use that as part of their decision making. Nobody is forcing them.

The study had a question about if being a house wife is fulfilling. If a person finds that fulfilling, should we prevent them from doing that? I ha e a STEM job and I don't feel fulfilled. Judging by the number of disillusioned posts on HN, it looks like an engineering job is not something that is fulfilling. I don't see forcing people into it as a fix for anything. You're talking about swapping social norms that value family (fulfillment as a house wife) for the social norm that making more money, even at the expense of fulfillment, is what society values.
> My biggest mistake was including her in the decision.
> When I showed her what I'd picked out, it quickly devolved into a lot of uncharacteristic tears and shouting.

I do not think you would have had a better experience if you did not include her.
> I say enjoy being single. If a relationship happens, good for you, but don't listen to people that say you're damaged / worse off / going down the drain because you're single. They're just jealous you can travel and play video games whenever you want. =)

This is infantilizing people's desires. Enjoying being single is something that many people just cannot do. To me, it's like telling someone who is paralyzed from the waist down to just walk it off - you can still enjoy all that life has to offer... Assuming those things don't involve the use of your legs!

For many people - this is debilitating. A lot of people are just wired up this way.
A soldier is closer to a morally-neutral endpoint of your money, than a decision-maker that chooses to use violence or the threat of violence to achieve their objectives.
I've been blown away by how little engineers will know about the use of their own company's products, even the one they are working on. It's an area that companies could stand to do more training in.
It has one, check out the section labelled "Output filtering"
I don't think the OP is arrogant. I think it's a genuine question. I didn't think of the question itself, but after it was posed, I didn't know the answer (because I have no background in photography or image processing). A few other folks have responded with a technical answer, which is that rendering this would require depth information which obviously isn't available in a 2D image.
Open Android Studio once a week and it will each time ask you to install something new. I am not against progress and small, iterative updates. That's what agile promises us and that's how we get quick feedback from customers, especially when building an MVP. But Android and Android Studio should become mature products at some point in time. Given they are constantly changing Android APIs and requiring multiple layers of compatibility classes, Android Studio will continue to remain a powerful teenager in its puberty still for a long while.
Why climb a mountain when you can just send a drone to the top? Some things are worth doing just because they are.
It's a win-win for the company gets the image of caring for the environment, and they can buy the Lab diamonds for a 15000% mark up. So if you buy a $1,000 Lab Diamond, they are literally getting it for almost $7. All it really is, is heating up carbon.
I think this is a good thought. My own religion gave me some direction for how to become to type of man women want, but it did leave something to be desired. And then upon searching for this sort of direction later in life while trying to improve my own relationships I stumbled upon the "red pill" communities. There's a lot of nuance to these communities as well. They tell men that you can become the type of man that women want, and they give you a roadmap to do so (work on your personality, lift weights, take care of yourself, take care of your life) but unfortunately these communities also come with some ideas that range from strange to downright misogynistic.

I think there's room for some down to earth, responsible men to try and fill this space. Right now the "teach young men how to be" space is mostly filled with misogyny and terrible pick up artists.
There's a reason why the Soviet Union collapsed and China liberalized their economy
I think the many qualifications in OP's question make it clear that the intention was not to be arrogant, but simply to ask a question and maybe learn something about photography. I had the same question, not because I'm looking down on people who do this but because I genuinely don't know very much about the photography world and think that it might be possible that there are some unknown advantages to one method over the other.
They've added a separate backup client that is supposed to be better than the web interface.
XOps.

It helps to ask around.
Have we also reached a point where no intervention will fix the problem?
https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/launching-the-ether-sal...
I think that varies highly between individuals. I consider myself high libido and it's something I have to deal with fairly often, otherwise it starts screwing with my faculties. And the desire has not changed much since my 20s, even if I've learned to be more comfortable in the things that intersect with it

The concept of a dead bedroom absolutely terrifies me. Like, why bother with a relationship if the one person you can have sex with doesn't ever want to have sex?
That's great. It doesn't work for everyone nor is it guaranteed. When your financial stability is tenuous, it seems far more prudent to use more reliable methods, or even to layer multiple methods.

I personally know people who used that method; it didn't work. Conversely my wife and I have used that method with the intention of getting pregnant, and it still took a while because accurately tracking it can be difficult for a variety of reasons.
Smog check will be a problem.
The difference is in China the corruption is more organized then it is in America.