skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For sure shipping equities with exposure to freight rates like Maersk, and maybe other logistics equities, like railroads.
I am, and still I prefer a system where some guilty people will avoid a punishment versus an overreaching system which will also punish some innocent people for some kind of a greater good.

What the linked article is talking about, though, does not seem to be „rape” as defined by a criminal code, so all this rape discussion hardly applies.

Nevertheless, one can be a creepy disgusting asshole and still not do things which are illegal, technically speaking.
Okay I can understand you not liking the idea but the sentence "I don't want it to succeed because it is dangerous" is a crazy statement. I'm sure there were tons of people who thought the same way you did when the Wright brothers were trying to achieve human flight, "I don't want it to succeed because it is dangerous". (Obviously not the same scale of idea, but point applies
I use AlReader on android... But I don't think there is a Linux equivalent.
I can't imagine a situation where I would spread an accusation against someone I don't know based on the word of other people I don't know. I'm frankly a bit confused why this is controversial - it seems like common sense to me, and nobody I know in real life has ever done this. (Of course, this is symmetric, so I wouldn't disbelieve the accusation either.)
Pretty cool.

I was hoping to see a swim lane diagram? Could you add that as a feature? Then I can share it with some business analysts who love that kind of thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swim_lane
Enterprise Config for Git might help: https://github.com/Autodesk/enterprise-config-for-git
The Test-Plan
I think it's because integrated tools parts are often worse than the non-integrated versions and when people are forced to use them, it means removing choice.

A half-dozen well integrated mediocre tools is better than the sum of its parts, but that doesn't mean it's better than a half-dozen not-at-all integrated excellent tools.

A half-dozen pretty good tools that are well integrated is going to be excellent, but you'll still have some greybeards saying "I have to click through 12 menus to frobnicate the widget in this thing, while my old tool I could do it with a single command"

99% of "Integrated tools" fall more into the first category than the second, which makes sense; N non-integrated tools can have N parallel teams working on them, while an integrated tool cannot. This means each tool will get only a fraction of the effort in the integrated tool; it's a special case of Conway's Law.
> Why does it take months and therapy for her to decode those clear signals?

Because brains aren't just bundles of logical interpreters that fully understand what they are experiencing all the time. There are many, many reasons why we may rationalize some behavior in the moment. Why do victims of cons sometimes defend the con artists for significant periods of time after they leave? Why do humans hold out hope for lost loved ones, when the evidence is clear they've passed away?

Emotionally charged topics take a long time for our minds to process sometimes. Sometimes we need help from others to put our thoughts in order or to gain perspective. Maybe she never asked herself, "Why was I crying?" until a therapist said, "Why were you crying?" We're all wired different, and we have to allow for some flexibility in how were perceive and react to events -- especially traumatic events.

> To me, that implies you are suggesting it should be illegal to have sex with this woman - after all, she apparently can't tell if she consented or not.

Come on, that's a clear strawman. I'm happy to disagree with you about this and discuss it, but that whole paragraph feels needlessly out of line.
There has been a common theme in this thread that the justice system should just sort it all out. Leaving aside all the issues of jurisdiction and citizenship that make a prosecution vanishingly unlikely here, the criminal justice system is just not cut out for dealing with cases of rape.

To prove it beyond reasonable doubt would require a level of evidence that is simply not present here. And in the UK, a suspect is only charged with a crime in 1.4% of reported cases[0]. This is why its so sickening when people gloat that some defendant in a sexual abuse case was found not guilty; it really doesn't mean they didn't commit the crime.

But even though the criminal justice system is not cut out for this kind of thing, that doesn't mean we have no other recourse. The reason the standard for evidence is so high is because the system would otherwise be vulnerable to abuse, and the consequences of wrongful conviction (loss of liberty or even execution) are so grave. Whether or not you agree that this very high standard is justified (I don't), it is clear that the consequences of publicly calling out this behaviour are less serious. Social ostracisation within a very specific community isn't such a big deal, but the direct benefits (protecting women through awareness) may be almost as good.

Whether or not you agree with the above, it's definitely an issue we need to think about. All it takes is someone close to you going through this to realise that the pre-MeToo system is inadequate. This new one isn't ideal, but it's a million times better. If you can think of a way to make things better then I want to hear it.

[0]: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48095118
Interview with Mitchell Hashimoto: Founder and CTO, HashiCorp
You're making so many assumptions in your posts.

Yes, to do a proper RCT you need to confine and monitor subjects in a controlled environment. YOU used the word "years" and nobody ever suggested a study that long. If you're implying that you need a study that long to gather meaningful results then that's just simply not true.

Let me put this plainly, you can design RCTs that are:

A) Safe for participants.

B) Aren't too long.

C) Don't rely on subject reported data.

D) Still give meaningful results.

These are not mutually exclusive and they are done all the time. These are gold-standard experiments in the nutrition field.

Like you said, they are expensive to do and usually only have a small number of subjects. That's why I'm suggesting that wealthy governments should collaborate to fund massive-scale trials at maximum quality.
Relevant Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downgrade_attack
It's a bit strange that you claim that the proper venue for this sort of thing is the justice system, but then relate a story where your brother for some reason did not avail himself of the justice system to right a wrong against him.

And that just rams the point home: often the justice system doesn't help, and actively hurts. If he'd brought suit against his former employer for terminating him, even if he won, he would have gained a reputation in his field for being litigious toward employers, and that would have greatly hurt his future employment prospects.

So maybe, just maybe, there are reasons the justice system isn't going to work so well in this situation either.
If they stopped spending on product and infrastructure build out, they could maybe be profitable at an instantaneous point in time. The issue is that Azure and AWS will continue developing and that will drive the market. Google share will erode and they will not be profitable again.
I mean the medium-term response from someone who wants to make it their full-time work project to solve this problem for everyone. For someone who doesn’t have the political clout to change Chrome directly, a plugin or fork could probably also be made to solve the problem.

Personally what I’d like to see in a browser is a more explicit and configurable policy about how many resources to devote to background tabs.

The remote-execution solution is incredibly bandwidth-heavy, costs money, hands all browsing data over to a third party, creates an unnecessary dependency on a startup company that might fail or get bought at any time, and takes a ton of control out of end-users’ hands.
Seriously? How often does this happen? Unless you are a terrible person, I doubt anyone would try to ruin someone's life like this.

This lady seems to have her head screwed on. Her post doesn't seem to me like she's trying to cause a witch hunt and it seems like she's sharing her story in a logical and sensible manner.

I'll gladly read the post from another woman defending John Pretty, but I doubt that's going to be forthcoming.
This doesn’t seem very scientific. You can’t determine if someone is lying based on them “seeming like an attention seeker or not” deductive reasoning in a legal system demands “beyond a shadow of a doubt” certainty before convictions are made.

Also no it’s pretty cut and dry: if you punish someone who is innocent under ANY circumstance without reviewing the case under a very critical eye you might as well throw out the justice system entirely, break out the torches and pitchforks and start gathering wood for the witch burning.
The article links to https://text.bargains/scratchpad/ which matches my own hashes, so I'm not sure why it's not working for you.
Why don't airlines provide a good free API for flights and reservations? I would think they would want developers to help make accessing their offerings and buying them easier.
I love this idea, I would use this every day if it was native to my Android and Desktop Chrome, does the extension read/send any of my data anywhere? (Incl. Usage)
Yeah, the point taken from the study is really designed to stoke tension when it is not really reflective of anything meaningful when it comes to job applicant filtering.

It reminds me of a learning from one of Thomas Sowell's books. There were communities that thought that background checks for employees in certain industries were racially discriminating by their very nature. They moved to ban them. Race disparities in those industries consequently went up, not down. The reason? Without an impartial and indifferent scan of a person's background, employer's were left to use the signals they could pick up on in person, filtered through their own biases. The solution was to allow background checks again.

It sounds like this study is basically saying that without the background check (in this case, actual interviews assessing qualifications), that people are more likely to filter through whatever biases they have at their disposal. Sounds like no surprise... That's the whole point of the interview, to be the impartial and indifferent filter that anyone would be judged by. The solution is to just apply the interview and not judge based on a few seconds of dialogue. Which nobody does anyway. So it's not testing for anything real.

(Cue many knee-jerk anecdotal counterpoints to "nobody does that anyway." Please. You're not getting that software engineering job by being an artist with no prior experience who flashes high-class speech for 10 seconds.)
> they wont forever. They never do.

retina imacs and macbook pros beg to differ

8,9 years later still no good alternative
Bummed I had to scroll this far into the thread to see some reason.

This is horrifying if it did happen but I don't know Yifan and I don't know Jon Pretty nor the trustworthiness of either.

It's disturbing to see HN readers jump to conclusions so quickly without proper evidence. If we continue to reduce our capacity for assessment of a situation to individual anecdotal accounts what kind of world will we live in 5 years from now?
This is probably good advice but if people are spending more and more of their time at work and work starts becoming half of their life, with outings with coworkers, bosses being your friend and not just your boss, then where can you meet people exactly?

You can't honestly demand both that people be disconnected from their coworkers and that they make work be 90% of their life. One part has to give (preferably the latter part).
"Almost certainly guilty," huh? Citations please? Are you talking about a DIFFERENT "Central Park Five" than the ones who were exonerated? Or are you just ironically quoting Trump? Do you agree with him that hate is what we need if we're gonna get something done?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case

>From the outset the case was a topic of national interest, with the commentary on social issues evolving as the details emerged. Initially, the case led to public discourse about New York City's perceived lawlessness, criminal behavior by youths, and violence toward women. After the exonerations, it became a high-profile example of racial profiling, discrimination, and inequality in the media and legal system. All five defendants subsequently sued the City of New York for malicious prosecution, racial discrimination and emotional distress; the City settled the suit in 2014 for $41 million.

https://www.pbs.org/kenburns/the-central-park-five/convictio...

>On December 19, 2002, Justice Charles J. Tejada of the Supreme Court of the State of New York granted a motion to vacate the thirteen-year-old convections in the infamous case. He did so based on new evidence: a shocking confession from a serial rapist, Matias Reyes, and a positive DNA match to back it up. A year later, the men filed civil lawsuits against the City of New York, and the police officers and prosecutors who had worked toward their conviction. In 2014, they settled that civil case for $41 million dollars. Despite their exoneration, the police and prosecutors involved in the case maintain that they were guilty of the crime.

https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-48609693

>Five black and Hispanic boys, aged between 14 and 16, would be found guilty and jailed for the crime.

>They became known as the Central Park Five.

>But they never committed the crime.

[...]

>The role of Donald Trump

>New York in the 80s and 90s was much more dangerous than it is today.

>Race relations were strained - especially when it came to the police.

>Meanwhile, Donald Trump - then a New York property mogul - seemed convinced the teens were guilty.

>He spent a reported $85,000 (around £138,000 today) on four full-page adverts in New York newspapers titled: "Bring Back The Death Penalty, Bring Back Our Police!".

>He wrote: "I want to hate these murderers and I always will. I am not looking to psychoanalyse or understand them, I am looking to punish them."

>In an interview with CNN at the time, he said: "Maybe hate is what we need if we're gonna get something done."
> slave labor

This is quite ridiculous.

I don't know about all the types of contractors they hire but they've sure been great to the ones that work in their cafes by paying them for the past year despite the campuses being closed.
When do they happen, and why did they happen?

Edit: since I wasn't clear, I am looking for examples of when this has happened to you, or your friend, or anyone that you have heard of...

Edit 2: also by "pretty much" does not happen, I don't mean never happens. But I think the rate at which it happens is probably a rounding error, and I think a lot of people would rather just say "oh well they could be lying" before even bothering to read what they have to say.
I've walked down the street before and not stolen things from people's houses. I assume you leave your front door unlocked at night?
The "from raw earth" part is what makes the parent a first. The house in your link is "India's first".

Both houses look very cool to me!
Sure, but do you believe that's what's described here? I don't see anything that suggests that consent was ever given.
well trust me, what you originally wrote would be a funny story.

"broken computer got more usable, by installing broken software".

and it would probably be funny to debug that! Ü
Microsoft runs their own ad network.
Donald Trump: Twitter is boring, it’s a failed concept
It’s clear that emotion clouds judgement on this issue more so than even murder.

Did you just cite Washington Post as an authoritative source?
Since they don’t have a UK banking license and no FSCS protection this was a pretty risky move, if you add the customer problems to the picture, I considered way to risky to trust them with my business account.
There doesn’t need to be a grand conspiracy to want to smear someone. Additionally, what happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty? Allegations are not proof.
which is interesting as there is currently a beer can supply problem. breweries are now ordering more cans than ever, from as many places as possible in order to get their product in the hands of covid-plagued consumers.

it's interesting to see cans from a brewery change depending on the week they were canned.
I mean they could post on social media about their account and see if the community acts.
I have a soft spot for ANSI art and secretly hope it has a reason to come back in a fresh way like pixel art has. The 1x2 blocks are just so iconic.

I fooled around making some tools to do stuff like parse a GIF of an ANSI back to ANSI and devolve a photo to (crummy) ANSI art the way some scripts do with ASCII, but it is pretty remedial compared to the code that exists for futzing with pixel art.
I mostly agree with the point you're making, but I think it's a bit of a stretch to assume that the jury actually really presumed Gacy innocent at the start of his trial.

Like everyone, they were certainly biased toward assuming his guilt in the run-up to the trial.

No system is perfect, and humans are fallible. But that's kinda the underlying issue with this entire discussion: if she had gone to the authorities (especially if only years after the incident in question, and also consider that the incident happened in a different country), would there be any legal remedy here? I think it's pretty likely that nothing material would have come of that.
Many consumers will buy from a more efficient supply chain because the price to them (for goods in stock) is a few percent lower. They don’t have nearly as powerful incentive to overpay for years in hopes of having more stable supply after a pandemic-induced global disruption event (especially since there’s no guarantee that those excess costs would actually deliver the stability; they might just be paid as wages, profits, additional advertising, and/or business expansion).
Plus for iOS, even the idevice simulator just builds for whatever platform you're testing on.
I used to have a professor who would say all the time “there is no such place as away”. Reading this article reminded me of that. The US has made a whole bunch of policy decisions to try to push things “away”. I think we are going to see more and more outputs like this in the future.
* Limited IO
* Max 16GB Memory ( at unjustified cost )
* Limited Multi monitor support
* No eGPU support ( as of now )

* Only about 50 a 55% of all the software is M1 ready ( looking at some tracking sites ). Technically this is not a M1 flaw but you need something to push the market/iron out the bugs. While when the M2 gets introduced, you may be at 60 or 70%. As in less likely to run into issues as the M1 users are the real beta testers. Even Parallels only recently got good M1 support ( with massive speed increases ).

As of this moment, buying a M1 laptop is a less beta tester feature then it was several months ago. If you ended up buying in Nov/Dec, you spend a lot of time under Rosetta 2 or dealing with issues.

> I haven’t read many negative reviews.

The above was kind of always overglanced by a lot of the reviews, as the youtubers mostly looked at their own us for video editing etc and there most software was on point very early in the release cycle.

You see a lot of reviews in Jan/Feb from people going back to Windows laptops after a month, not because of the CPU being bad but because they ran into software issues.

In the mean time the software situation has evolved a lot more but the progresses with software being made M1 ready has also slowed down a lot.

As a PC user i want a M1 like laptop, that has long battery life, is silent and still powerful ( unlike a lot of Windows laptops where its always the old saying: Pick 2, you can never have all 3 ).

But i prefer one with 8 performance cores, double the iGPU cores ( with preferably DDR5 ) for light gaming and standard 16GB. So some macBook 16 Pro or whatever, if the price is not insane. We shall see what Apple introduces...

So far the new offerings from AMD and Intel are fast but still power hungry and heat generating ( aka fan noise! ). AMD is only going little.big in 3nm.

Intel's alder lake may be a M1 competitor ( for battery life under light loads ) but its again first generation product so expect to be a beta tester until Windows gets fine tuned for a long time to properly use the little cores! For heavy loads, ... well, 10nm is 10nm, no matter how many +++ you add.
? It's core customers - businesses who are looking to advertise - are very well served by Google.
And 'Google' here is shorthand for any entity from which you have no reasonable expectation of customer support which is both human and humane — so don't make your business dependent on Google, Facebook, PayPal, or any similar entity.
You make your peace with the fact that you'll have a certain rate of false positives, where you'll intentionally lose also some legitimate business in order to keep most of the "ecosystem" cleaner. Perhaps an unsatifying answer, but that's it.

It's not a situation like putting someone in prison where "beyond all reasonable doubt" is the appropriate mark; you can refuse to do business based on mere suspicion that may be mistaken. There's a limit where extra investigation or appeals is too costly compared to just accepting the lost revenue, and for small-scale customers, that limit is quite low. With fraud detection, you have to balance the tradeoff between false positives and false negatives, but you'll certainly have both.
Except gold exists as a material/commodity. Cryptocurrency was invented.
For git on mac, i've found https://www.git-tower.com/ to be ridiculously good. Now that i primarily work on linux, i've settled for Sublime Merge, which has customizable actions, but isn't as intuitive a match for how i want scm to work, like Tower was.
> she's the "perpetrator" and he gives consent

If "he gives consent", then she isn't a perpetrator. By definition.

If one of the parties gets drunk, they can't give consent. Again, by definition.
German here as well. In general, I share your pessimism.

One thing to point out about VW is that their CEO, Herbert Diess, seems to get it. To name two anecdotal pieces of evidence, Elon had asked him to become CEO of Tesla back in 2015 [1] and he had conversations with Chinese battery supplier CATL about car batteries as far back as ten years ago [2].

[1] https://electrek.co/2021/04/13/ceo-elon-musk-reportedly-hire...

[2] https://www.teslarati.com/volkswagen-herbert-diess-ev-cell-p...
Unfortunely I'm unable to come with some kind of recipe/equation for that.
Howdy, that's some black magic! Thanks a lot, that's a really neat idea.
I'm pretty sure I wrote that I don't know what the facts are here and that I'm inclined to side with her.

I'm asking about this situation in general, not about her specific case.
> It's also strange to me that it takes months and consultation with a therapist to determine if you did or did not consent.

It would have been strange to me.

But I was recently victim of emotional abuse by someone I admired and trusted. And it is not strange to me anymore.

Abusers are sophisticated. Trust is a complex thing.
> If you’re really using too much, the system will either get horribly slow or you’ll get a dialog asking you to force quit apps.

Yes, she was getting both. To the point that I asked her to keep activity monitor running in the background so we could see who the problem applications were.

I'm not sure why this is in question.
> If you care about breakage, don't rely on a package manager that will constantly change the package version.

I do care about breakage of my C, C++ and Fortran programs, and I would be very surprised if updating gcc broke their build (unless using -Werror). Why can't static site generators, which are arguably much simpler than compilers, have the basic property of not breaking sites?