skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Like child-labor laws? Public education? Your comment has a point, but it is quite black and white.

Governments are a service that people buy, which we have collectively voted on, agreeing that there are things that a purely corporation driven society would not do.
They drive the first two Rivian's in the Long Way Up documentary with Ewan McGregor and Charlie Boorman who ride early Harley Davidson Livewire motorcycles.
The Aral Sea is a perfect example of this
This is the wrong perspective on EVs. The solution is to have chargers at home, even slow ones. Then you have zero range anxiety. Your car is always topped up. You never visit a supercharger or a gas station or anything similar. You go, unplug, drive out, drive back, plug in, and that's it. Weather, infrastructure, DC fast charging, are all irrelevant aside from when you want to take cross-country trips.

> 5. Car manufacturers and battery companies get solid state batteries ready for mass production. Now is the time for 300 miles+ full EV cars. With solid state, no cold weather problems, much faster charge rate, no fire risk, no liquid cooling system, much higher durability. This is the battery tech that can fully replace ICE.

EVs already have enough battery capacity for 90% of trips with a simple at home charger that you plug into your regular wall socket. We need to radically scale up production, not wait for some uncertain future. Maybe solid state batteries will match current batteries in cost in half a decade, maybe not. Until then we are ravaging the environment for no reason at all when we already have a perfectly good solution with no downsides.
This is not a guarantee, and is just a rule of thumb, but if a professional fact-check from a non-super-sketchy source conflicts with your prior beliefs, it's a sign you might want to pause and re-examine why you hold these prior beliefs.

It feels very wrong to reconsider what we believe is true, but that's just how it feels when we're wrong.
> Musk is nearly a clone of Jobs in affect and attitude and reality distortion effect.

Eh, Musk has more negative tendencies than Jobs, especially related to his public behavior and honesty. Whatever you might think of Jobs, whenever he issued a firm statement it came true. iPhones were always released on schedule.

Musk is years late and many miles short on almost every product he announces. Full Self Driving was supposed to be a thing two years ago. The Tesla Model 3 was supposed to be $35,000 and was also released years late. Tesla Semi? Nonexistent. The Tesla SolarRoof that was the reason for the acquisition of SolarCity never got out of Beta.

Jobs also never had the same "$420 funding secured"/"bet you a signed dollar he's a pedophile" behavior Musk has had either. Steve Jobs was definitely a immanently flawed person, but he didn't exhibit the same degree of complete disregard of the consequences of his actions as Musk does, at least not at comparable ages.
I can, but the vendor's negligence causes me to suffer higher insurance premiums without any ability to leverage them into better practices. If they were obligated to buy that insurance, the insurers could require that their insured observe the underwriter's mandatory security practices (or otherwise they would be uninsured, and in my ideal universe, out of business). As it stands, the vendors take unreasonable risks, and I'm on the hook trying to insure the bloody mess that results without any control over the vendor's security practices.
According to Wikipedia [1], it’s a matter of some debate, with the theories being the (standard) corruption of a name for the first Western Baltic people encountered, or a take on the “unintelligible war cry” people from the Latvian root for speaking.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_Germany
For the amount of space a Tesla has, is it not possible to sell a separate generator / converter set that drives the motor?

I guess cost is an issue, but there will be a good percentage of buyers who would surely opt for such an addon.
For what it's worth, you making a lot of sense.
1. Many of the containers were punctured just before disposal so they would sink

2. These containers oxidize and eventually fail, leaking their contents. Some of them are from the 1940s.

3. All sorts of wildlife and humans have been affected. It has most definitely worked its way into the food chain.

Source: https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-coast-ddt-dumping-ground...
It is crazy the lack of protections around firing people. People fear that it would be harder for businesses to fire someone so they would be less eager to hire. But then you connect any health services to being employed and you created a big hole in the overall plan.
Several of the containers are leaking.
>Image that will be rendered straight to a webpage? Yeah, it’s probably a fine

I don't know, I still think the concept would appear in the context of image scaling and aliasing.
I kindly disagree with your critique. BUT I am also very biased. This is because I am an owner of a Model Y, but I do not own any stock in Tesla whatsoever. I do not like nor trust Elon Musk, especially with my retirement.

I think people want EV's and when they see that they only need to spend a little bit extra for that extra range and access to a nationwide supercharger network. They are willing to pay for it. I don't think a drop in stock is going to change that mentality. Other automakers keep trying to build a quality EV, but they simply do not hold up to a Tesla.
I realize your heart is in the right place, but I just want to call out that what you're saying is actually propagating the stereotype of Asians scoring high / other PoCs not scoring as much in exams. This can create undue expectations which can lead to feustration, anxiety, and depression amongst people that are stereotyped to be high performers. Add to that the layer of being systemically discriminated against, and it gets rather bad.

Again, I'm not questioning your heart, but I do think that words are powerful and words are how the society group think evolves.
Since India was never what many would call a communist country (the communist party was outlawed less than 5 years after independence), I would question the veracity of everything else you say.
this entire piece is a shitpost written by someone that doesnt understand crypto
That's not accurate in any form. The Mustang was not a sedan, but a coupe, and Ford has not stopped making the Mustang in the current form. You can still order a GT500 with 12mpg city. They added an electric version, the Mach-E, which is more of a crossover format.
Since you wrote the "pink" analogy and this post too, I can respond here:

The issue of anti-asian quotas at major american universities is absolutely a legitimate one that needs addressing.

Here's why it's a little bit more complicated than just: "Let's just remove all criteria for university admission besides high scores. That won't discriminate against asians and be a true meritocracy".

Because then, the amount of poor people getting into university would absolutely plummet, and the socioeconomic divide between the classes in the US would only grow further. Being able to do well on tests is a privilige based on having time to study, the money for tutors, and other factors. There is obviously a pure raw talent aspect, and the geniuses of the world might get in regardless of their race or poverty level. But there is not enough geniuses in the world. Most University student bodies are average and slightly above average humans. There has to be some way to promote balance in the student body - racially, economically, culturally. And right now, Asians are disproportionately pay that burden. It should be worked on, and improved.

But you should in no way conflate this problem with university admissions with "pink quotas" for hiring diverse groups of talent. The companies that are the most promoting the idea of improving their diversity through initiatives are the largest and richest tech companies. They do so not just because it's beneficial to the bottom line, but also because they can AFFORD to be choosy.

Joe Blow Software Co and Fizz Buzz Sandwiches aren't putting in diversity goals in their hiring strategy. They wait for people to come in to apply for jobs, and hope that they can get someone to cover a shift before the end of the week that isn't a drug addict.

Google and Facebook and Amazon and Microsoft do it because they know that on any given day for any given position they're going to get 100 resumes, and they have what can only be described as a "loosely scientific" approach to weaning them out to 40 that can be phone screened, 5 that will come onsite, and 1 that will be hired. (Numbers are made up but are close to the real ratios).

Everything from the phone screen onward is data driven, meticulous, and kept to a strict quality bar. But the intake process has a lot of randomness, a lot of flexibility, and THAT is where the companies focus to say "Why don't we actually try to interview more women, and minorities for a change. What's the worst that can happen? We phone screen 50 people instead of 40, and so our "onsite efficiency ratio" drops from 12% to 10%.

There is no quota. There are goals to improve these numbers. But there is no quota in the professional world.
I’m personally a lot happier not living in HCOL, noisy, polluted and just downright unsafe major metropolitan areas these days. The tradeoff is this precludes practicable EV ownership IME, at least at the current time. Even still, I’ve loved driving every EV I’ve had the opportunity to, and would be quite ecstatic were modern ICE vehicles to be entirely replaced by full EVs. (Classic and 90s era Japanese sports cars are another story.)
Seemed like more of a pro-Bitcoin piece to me.
It was always a "what the hell does Apple do with all of it's capital" question. They figured that out though -- just buy back stock. Anyone accusing them of being uncreative there has to argue that the hundreds of billions that they returned to investor hands would be better allocated with some forced merger like buying Tesla. It's not a failure to return money to shareholders. It's a recognition of the limitation of your ability to allocate capital.
> In any case, the claim that it must not have been manufactured legally in the US after 1972 is false.

I'm glad we established that.
As sibling says, run mysql in a container.

Configure the container without any attached volumes, so that the data is stored in the container itself.

Run your setup scripts, and get the database the way you want it.

Now commit the changes to the container, to create a new container.

Now you can spin up the new container, and your setup data will be already loaded within it.
Needs a static assert instead of abort().
Does anyone know if the proposed Infrastructure bill gives money for home chargers, or just 'gas station' ones?

It's 174 billion for EV which is absolutely what we need. But there is no way we can do it without paying to upgrade people's houses. Unless rapid charging gets a lot quicker.

I'm looking at getting a car for the first time in over a decade. I would love an electric, but our building is 110 years old. To upgrade my units power box thing alone was quoted 12k.

I'm not sure how to get a quote for the outside building or if it's even feasible to do EV here. But it will be a lot more than that.
I keep trying to give Azure a chance, but you can just feel how much slower the IO and networking is compared to AWS.
I am an Indian. I am curious, as to the amount of times one has the requirement to fill a tank of gas and drive 500 miles further.

EVs should target the regular commuter market. I was really surprised that Tesla invested in the supercharger network. I get the idea, but in the US, do people really go on such long drives regularly?
My point is that the correlation is the only real data we have.
It's true in the US. If someone manages to steal your debit card data and your PIN, all the banks say "well your PIN was used, so it must have been you" and you're SOL.
I dunno. I just refinanced at 2.35%.... fixed 30 year.
>Some people use “credit” for these daily sorts of purchase, but at least among the people I know, this is extremely rare.

Really depends.

If you know mostly college students, and younger, lower income people, yeah, most are paying with debit.

If your circle is high income and older, then it's mostly credit. Especially people who do frequent business travel.
Sure, but Tesla Solar generally advertises to smaller customers. If they get one big deal, its addition might overwhelm the sustainable growth in their business. They've definitely had multiple situations like that before with their energy storage business.
The fact that the train takes 18hrs is a political decision. In Japan, the same train over the same distance, often with even more torturous landscape and crowed infrastructure, takes 3hrs.
You can simulate poor weather with sensors by either 1. simulating it or 2. driving at night.
They're recycling them. Saved you a click.
The job posting does say remote though? https://careers-whoi.icims.com/jobs/1448/senior-software-eng...
I'm surprised that the article didn't mention the intermediate use case of stationary storage, which can extend the life of batteries many more years before they need to be recycled for raw materials.
> New S, X, Roadster, Cybertruck, and Semi models on the way

There is also a lot of noise around the sub $30k mystery car Musk hinted about at the battery event. He said $25k, but given Tesla’s pricing history, $28-30k is more likely.
that's the rub of a robotaxi service. A hypothetical taxi launchable today would probably have

~30 billion R&D
1:10 remote safety operator ratio (1p employees, not contractors).
100K Bill of materials/vehicle for the lidar sensors etc.

Compare this with an externally owned 8 year old vehicle being driven by someone who doesn't confer liability to the company.

Even if the dream was realized there likely isn't a viable business for robotaxis until the cars are on the road for 10-20 years.
I do not understand how you cannot easily "spin" a prototype that the company wants to sell into a good thing.

When you write that awesome prototype, your management will be thinking about rewarding you, not blaming you. They will listen to your concerns.

So, you can say that it's not ready. You can mention that you alone are not enough to fix the bugs that come up in greenfield code right away. You can even ask for people to help on your project. Why would management say no if they want to sell it?

Then when a manageable amount of bugs come down the road and everybody is happy, you are now in a far better position to negotiate a higher salary. You have far more responsibility. You have a great track record. Nobody wants you to leave.

The cost of developing a prototype when you handle every error you see along the way, set up all of those dev tools (tests, logs, CI, formatting, etc.), and test every branch like a madman is too high. You'll probably end up taking weeks to develop something that you could "code in a weekend". Then, since you never verified, it may turn out that nobody wants to use the prototype for obvious reasons
It's called a materialized view.
Thanks to the pandemic, Ivermectin, a widely-used anti-parasite that won the Nobel prize for virtually eliminating river blindness (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2015/press-releas...), a medicine on the the WHO essential medicine list, which has shown broad-spectrum antiviral properties in the lab (zika, dengue, west nile virus, covid and more https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7564151/), has also proven very effective against preventing and treating sars-cov-2 virus in vivo: https://ivmmeta.com/

The probability that ivermectin generated results as positive as the 52 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 85 trillion (p = 0.000000000000012).

A doctor who thought they had covid, took ivermectin and turned out their covid results were negative, but it still aided their recovery for the flu.

Dr. Pierre Kory gave an excellent discussion on the latest scientific findings of ivermectin as as a treatment for covid and general antiviral treatment on John Campbell's youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19DPijOoVKE

Personally, I think a drug with 37 years safety data makes a more promising candidate than a novel therapeutic that is rushed to the market.
Hopefully the obnoxiously loud people will learn that no one wants to hear their crap at work (or anywhere else).

Your take on race? I don't care

Your take on gender? I also don't care

Your take on politics? Nope, don't care.

Insert cause here, still don't care

I go to work to do my job and get money. When some person starts carrying on about politics, I walk away.

If I wanted to engage with this stuff, I would on my own time. I shouldn't be dodging it at work.
Completely agree with this. Credit freezes don't work because credit reporting agencies have never been in the business of identity verification or protection. Whoever grants the line of credit should be doing the due diligence on whether the right person is in front of them or not, but they would rather pad their numbers and shift blame to someone else.
This will only push the problem by a few years. After that recycling is still necessary.
WHOIS information should be private by default, at no additional cost.
This article seems to be making a few pretty big mistakes. First of all is the 5% of batteries are recycled figure. The first problem with this is that it's unclear if that is accounting for capacity or not. Recycling a 100kWh battery in a car matters a lot more than a 2500mAh battery from a phone. Also, it doesn't account for the amount of batteries that are re-used. Batteries that have lost 25% of their maximum capacity is probably no longer useful in a car, but still fine for grid storage, where price matters a lot more than volume or weight. Recycling a battery is really stupid if it can be reused, so I'm really disappointed that this article didn't mention battery reuse at all.
Also the very vocal anti-environmentalist company CEO Samuel Rotrosen is barely mentioned. Montrose executives were basically exaggerated movie villains in their defense of dumping DDT. Unapologetic doesn’t begin to cover it.
My bank in Germany actually has a hybrid system: Any charges are on the card, not your account but you have to specifically apply for deferred payment. The default option is that they settle the credit balance with your checking account every month.

Seems like a good system to me. You give people the "buffer" between your account and merchants but make it very hard for people to go into debt.
Do you know that, or are you assuming? Asking because I don't know if it's an issue but some basic google searches suggests it is.

> Minors are attractive targets for identity theft. Because they’re young, they have clean credit reports, and most don't discover the theft until they reach adulthood.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/leticiamiranda/what-hap...
I've really had a difficult time trying to get other team members to rely on asynchronous coummunication as opposed to video chat. Frequently, there are issues with video chat where the video or audio freezes and what was said doesn't get transmitted. Then there are issues where people don't precisely remember what was said during the meeting and it having to be repeated in chat.
> Perhaps you’ve forgotten how many usability compromises you’ve made in using Face ID, but I guarantee it’s slower

Counterpoint: with Face ID, if my phone is facing me I can interact with it just by looking in its direction.

Got a message while I'm at my desk? I look at it, it unlocks and shows me the notification. Cooking and a timer goes off? I look at it, it lowers the volume of the alarm.

Everything has trade-offs and different people use stuff in different ways, but I personally prefer Face ID to Touch ID.
If you want to understand the USA or figure out why something here is the way it is, the answer is usually "because it lets corporations extract the most money out of regular people." Everything, from seemingly odd little cultural quirks to enormous institutions like how we do health care, systems that were deliberately designed and things that emerged organically: everything is the way it is because it optimizes wealth transfer from ordinary people to corporations. That's usually the most straightforward explanation.
This seems to be counting seat belts as an FSD technology since it's all under "safety".
I think the cat is out of the bag for EVs: enough people have tasted them and wouldn't go back, and enough manufacturers got into the game, that even if Tesla was to fail, enough people would be asking for it, and enough manufacturers would already be advanced enough in their plans to keep the ball rolling.

Basically, Tesla's mission is 99% accomplished.
I think this post is sarcastic, but not entirely sure.
This advice is generic and sanctimonious. Spending time on social media on your phone leads nowhere, but so does shallow socializing in person. Thanks to the free market, we now also have a wealth of resources to fritter away time "socially." I spent two years in a shared house saying yes to all the board game nights. There are board game groups on Meetup and board game groups at startups. Board game nights are a dead end. They offer a structured and safe way to spend time around others without needing to open up or be vulnerable. You can spend years playing board games with someone and have no idea where you stand with them. (Believe me, I've done it!)

You know how to really build a close-knit circle fast? Join a church. Yes, there's a cost. You have to accept Jesus and let him dominate your day-to-day thoughts, judgments, and sensibilities. Jesus will dictate who you feel good hanging out with and what you should and shouldn't do, how you should think and what you should say. And people will reach out to you, and open themselves up, and be intimate and vulnerable, and you will grow into a community of mutual support together in the church.

Or go to college, if you haven't yet. Live a student's meager life in a tiny room. Share a shitty house with five roommates. Breathe the same air. Depend on each other.

Get a job as a retail slave or fast food employee with other people your age. Share the constant anxiety of running out of money for the basics of life.

Join the armed forces. Live in an artists' commune. Get involved with polyamory. But for the love of god, don't believe that you can eat-pray-love your way to a rich social life by putting down your phone and smiling at people more in the supermarket checkout line.
ACLU says it shares user data with Facebook, a frequent target of criticism
My guess is they won't do anything with them, and just throw their hands up because it's too expensive.
Ah, oops, you're correct of course. The general point still stands though (at 5% instead of 3% and 1500 feet instead of 1000)

I'm getting the density numbers from here by the way if you want to check the rest of my math: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-altitude-pressure-d_4...
Maybe I’m confused, but aren’t these two different things? As the OP stated, any streaming provider can have an app on Apple TV (ESPN, Netflix, Hulu, HBO, Amazon, Peacock, etc…) while some providers may also negotiate deals to be more prominently integrated in to the Apple TV ecosystem and/or distributed/upsold through the Apple TV+ bundle. I think they are mutually occurring circumstances… or maybe I am totally misunderstanding the arrangements Apple has with streaming services.
What really upset me was when my wife immigrated, she did so just before Trump passed some new immigration laws. Those laws would have required her to submit her credit scores as part of the paperwork for immigration. The idea that in order to immigrate you have to tell the government information from three private companies is just insane in my opinion. This last week has solidified this opinion as a year and a half later she still can't get info from them, I can't imagine what they would say just after moving here.