skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What's hard to believe is that only people with massive bottomless pits for stomachs can handle eating two pieces of toast.
It's anti-competitive, but maybe not illegal. It's certainly a bad UX though: https://youtu.be/djB2xgALGfI
They also didn't ban "chitchat". They banned harassing people about politics, which is entirely reasonable.
If the Second Amendment doesn't grant a legal right to keep and bear arms, why is it necessary?

If it does, and is, how is it any different than a gun license or permit in being a legal fiction whose legitimacy depends on a government whose motives can't be trusted?
> I feel like all these self-driving companies aren't actually in it to achieve the success.

To that extent, was this acquisition actually a liquidity event for the employees or just an effective "change of ownership"?
Either the car is trained on Mexico's streets and so behaves as aggressively as the rest of the traffic, or a significant enough number of vehicles are self driving so they can essentially regulate the streets themselves.
Most companies have places where employees interact outside meetings.
(1995). Previous discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8614159

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20535984
I don't understand why it's hypocritical to want police reform and want guns/carry to continue to require licenses, even if those licenses must come from the police. Also, it sounds like you're describing the consequences of regulations that people want, where those regulations fail for being too blunt, but are framing it as those people wanting those consequences, which would make these apparently-many people quite evil, and of course, the easiest thing is to cast those who disagree with you on policy as evil (and to cast yourself as vilified).
A) Tesla Inc's own purchase of bitcoin's were traded at a profit, this has nothing to do with bitcoin they earned from people buying cars with bitcoin. That's not a pivot from anything.

B) Voluntarily disclosing you are buying something, which Elon and Tesla Inc did, has nothing to do with selling it. There is no regulation in the securities or futures market that would have changed that. You are suggesting a fictional higher standard exclusively for cryptocurrencies. In the securities market, disclosure for all trades exists when the owner is more than 5% or 10% of the total supply. There is no regulation that would have applied here even if crypto was regulated like securities or futures, except possibly the disclosure that they bought bitcoin into the company balance sheet because in 2020 that would be considered a material change for any equity investor. They filed the 8-K and posted on twitter to avoid non-disclosure scrutiny, and they get a nice pump out of it from people that derive their confidence in cryptocurrencies from S&P 500 CEOs.

C) You, again. Creating negative conflated conclusions for benign crypto topics, again. Why do you do that? There is a mild chuckle to be had about Tesla goosing earnings by flipping their bitcoin within a quarter, but adding all that extra fluff onto it? Why?
> Perhaps I’m wrong, but experience tells me you’re perfectly happy if my existence is kept silenced for the greater good of allowing your political side to thrive and speak freely

But this isn’t what I’m saying: I’m saying that plainly anodyne workplace chitchat that anecdotally confirms that I am a gay man is coded as political speech by many people.

I don’t know if you misread me or not, but if you didn’t then it actually proves my point: you’re ascribing a political “side” to my speech when I’m just trying to say “gays are gonna get told to stop mentioning their husbands like we used to”. And that’s entirely my point: you’re coding my existence and participation in banal chitchat as political, and these policies make that much more dangerous for me.
Sounds just as dumb as when Hacker News banned "politics" for a period, and people were discouraged from posting EFF blog posts and the like, because "politics" is an impressively vague word.

Politics is life, it doesn't have to be toxic.
Working hard doesn't consume many calories, as far as I know.

There's some extremely cases like training for the Olympics or body building, but overall, peoples energy usage is pretty similar
Monopoly is not that bad.

If you play by the rules, with experienced players, a whole game takes about an hour to complete. And when players starts getting eliminated, the end is close. The most common house rules usually drag the game down and are probably the source of a lot of hatred for this game.

So if you play Monopoly, do yourself a favor and read the damn rules. In my booklet, there is even a quick variant that is suggested: the main difference is that you start with some property and the winner is the wealthiest player when one player is bankrupt.

And yes, there are better games, every board game geek knows that, but sometimes it is the only one available.

Also, Orange properties may be the best, but you usually don't have much of a choice. What you really want is a monopoly, any monopoly, as soon as possible, and build aggressively.
One of my favorite things about Tailwind is the documentation. You’re right that you need to understand CSS, but if you know what you need in vanilla CSS you can find it in an instant in the Tailwind docs. Then it gradually becomes second-nature.
It sounds like it was pretty disruptive to the cheer squad with the bullying and interference with the team dynamic. They didn't suspend her nor cut her from the softball team. The only "discipline" she recieved was being cut from the cheer squad that year due to the disruption she was causing there. She became an active participant in speech that is contrary to the purpose of the cheer squad. I don't know of any sport that will let you be on the team if you are sabotaging the goals of the team.

What other speech would be interfered with? It's not like she was suspended, given detention, etc like we see in other cases of off-campus speech issues. It seems this case is fundamentally different from those other cases since formal discipline was never taken and only involved an extracurricular activity. So I don't really see this impacting other areas of speech and I would hope the court acknowledges these differences and greatly restricts their powers. But I think this case would meet whatever guidelines they come up with.
> slander, libel, fraud, harassment and incitement to violence?

They're not saying that what speech qualifies as free speech has no exceptions whatsoever[0]. They're saying that you can't do a end run around the entire concept of free speech by laundering your enforcement under the vague heading of "consequences", when those consequences are a result of your enforcement.

0: It should have as few exceptions as possible, of course, but if nothing else you shouldn't be able to get away with murder by claiming that the nerve impulses to your trigger finger are free speech, and that shouldn't be a property of nerve impulses versus other ways of transmitting information.
Just as 'everybody wants to rule the world', every company wants to be FAANG so they'll attack FAANG until they're on top.
It’s because it makes no effort to prevent people doing insanely insecure things. Rails has a lot of safeguards for insecure things like using user input to update a record.

PHP won’t even fix bugs due to backwards compatibility. They worked out their sql string escape function didn’t escape properly but instead of fixing it and telling everyone to check their code, they duplicated the function and prefixed the name with “real_”.
Ammunition manufacturing tends to be very hard to scale: it takes large amounts of capital to invest in production and long periods of time to tune that production into a consistent product. The end result is that ammo production capacity is, for practical generalizations, completely fixed. Nobody produces more when prices are high, and only in rare scenarios would they stop production when prices are low.

The end result is usually strong swings of price for moderate changes in demand. And we're currently seeing demand levels that have never been seen before.
They shouldn't be forced to... But their is money to be made. YouTube TV is a paid service. If I owned a Roku and YouTube TV want available for it I may cancel my subscription.
Profit margin. The driver just isn't an expensive or limiting part of cargo transport.

To be clear, the conversation also isn't about autonomous driving for individually-owned cars. Tesla's disasters aside, its about autonomous taxi services.
These are partly strawman arguments too, especially since they've been careful to state it's not a zero tolerance policy. If you take this on good faith and assume the goal is to reduce dividiness rather than a hard-line ban on everything that anyone could ever construe as political (impossible in any case), it's pretty easy to come to a conclusion for each of your points and any future points you come up with.

> - Talking about unions, or pay equity (Might be illegal to ban either)

Would be illegal, strawman.

> - "Hey Jodie, my partner and I are marching in a Gay pride parade this weekend, wanna come?" (Is that political at Basecamp?)is- this is something they'd have to decide, however it should be framed as "we're going to <political event> this weekend, want to join?". On the other hand, if they're incorporated in a place where being gay and gay marriage is fully legal, I don't think gay pride can be considered political any more than independence day, in which case, of course it would be allowed. Someone responding by saying "ugh, gay people make me sick", OTOH, should be censored under this rule.

> - Some ex-military employees form an informal group to welcome and mentor new employees coming out of the military. (Is that political?)

- not political, however, if someone responds by saying "ugh, I hate the military, you guys are terrible", that would be political and they should be warned to simmer down (I say this as someone who does dislike the military - but I don't think that gives me the right to say nasty things to people who have escaped and are trying to move on).

> - One of our new clients is a controversial group/business/etc, what should we do?

This is a business decision and should be discussed in that context. It probably shouldn't get discussed in the casual slack channel regardless of this rule.

Try examining this post again but in good faith rather than trying to poke petty holes in it - by which I mean, assume that they are trying to reduce division in their company instead of assuming their end goal is censorship.

If course, maybe it will turn out to be a bad thing in the end. But I don't think we'll reach that conclusion by listing minor problems with it.
> Even simpler, though, because only one of the masses needs to have a location. The other one is effectively at a fixed direction and distance, far enough away that you can ignore relative motion.

This still sounds like precisely what I described. Euler's three-body problem is two fixed point masses, so there's no relative motion by construction, and the restricted three-body problem in a rotating/pulsating reference frame has mathematical transformations applied so the two bodies are "effectively fixed" relative to each other in that reference frame (while preserving effects due to rotations, such as centripetal/centrifugal forces).

The question in such a case becomes whether such a thing is substantially better than a regular n-body integrator. Euler's three-body problem may lose some useful n-body effects such as Lagrange points, which partially defeats the purpose of moving away from Keplerian orbits, and the restricted three-body problem arguably isn't simplified enough compared to full-blown n-body integration to be worth it.

> I'll rephrase. The gravitational vector on the craft won't be shifting very fast, so you can get away with a quite big timestep.

Ah, that makes more sense. IIRC Principia has an adaptive timestep, so it already does that, though that's with full n-body calculations. Swapping between the approximation and proper n-body depending on position relative to other bodies seems like a rather complex scheme, though, and I'm not sure whether that'd be the best approach.
If you are a single developer, sure, knock yourself out, and stick everything in a single file.

If you actually ever plan on ever having other developers contribute to and maintain your code, or god forbid multiple teams of developers, you better have things structured in a way that they can understand.
This post is amazing because it seems to have come from a completely different universe than the one I inhabit.

In my world people were having early concerns about COVID in January. We were getting sporadic reports from China and it was bad. Experts were saying that it was only a matter of time till it got to the US and the worst part was that we didn’t have enough stockpiles of face masks for everybody. There was advice to save masks for medics and first responders until the supply situation improved.

People were already in a panic and buying up all of the toilet paper for some reason. Then in March the cases spiked and the lockdowns came.

If you were getting a lot of misinformation then maybe you should consider your sources. If someone was lying to you in 2020 they are probably still lying to you.
What would a government invest in this? Money? Technical expertise? The private sector already has a lot more of both.
The banned talking about politics, and my entire point is that my participation in idle chit-chat, when it indirectly confirms my sexuality, is coded as political and thus off-limits. And that this tends to get weaponized against disadvantaged groups.
Oh boy... I believe I'm this kind of psycho, when I see my name in a git blame after tracing a bug that I didn't foresee... I feel awful, disgusted, then I fix it and think "You sure are dumbass, now try to be a lesser one".
A lot of people wonder this first part and the answer is definitively no because immune systems generally don’t work that way. It’s (mostly) not something general purpose like a bicep. Getting sick with one diseases mostly does very little for you with most other diseases.

You can lift weights at the gym and build your arm muscles, then use those muscles to lift or push other things more effectively, because muscles are general purpose tools.

Most of your immune system is more like a key. It’s specific to one thing. There are some exceptions but overall the fewer viruses you encounter the better.

As for the exercise: yes. There’s already preliminary evidence that exercise is highly coordinated with covid outcomes.
Common in the wider Jewish community in the UK. Universally understood now by most british people. In widespread use. Was in Monty Python, back in the 70s.
I don’t think the line is nearly as complicated as most people make it out to be.

Somebody discussing their plans and related challenges may have political notions attached, but the “right and wrong” are not the focal point.

If someone responds with “good, gay marriage is wrong”, you’ve clearly crossed into political debate, and opened the line for personal attacks.

If someone responds with “everyone who’s against this is a Nazi”, you have also done the same.

If, instead, the response is centered around the person’s own experience (“I’m sorry to hear that, I know some family with a similar struggle”) then it’s fine.

It’s not terribly different if you’re discussing being disappointed that your insurance rates went up.

“Sucks that we have to pay $75 more a month” is fine. Adding that “it’s all because of Obamacare” crosses the line.

I don’t see the line being that difficult, it’s just that most people on BOTH sides take these statements as their cue to start engaging in their political debate, usually abandoning all subtlety and nuance while gathering the pitchforks and drawing warlines.

People forget how much diversity of opinion there is, from gay couples against marriage, to Christian supporters of gay marriage, to libertarians who don’t support any state recognized marriage at all.

Same goes for taxes, HUD approved appliances, EPA regulations, etc.

Name a political debate, and I’ll give you people I’ve met or worked with who don’t fit into the media-prescribed boxes.

Most importantly, people have seemingly forgotten that whether you agree or disagree with the cause, it’s entirely possible to just be supportive of your fellow humans for the sake of wanting them to be happy.
And as far as I can tell, Basecamp still does, and people will still interact and make small talk. So, what's the problem?
As said in the sibling comment, Google has combined all of their TV apps besides YTTV into the YouTube app. Music/Movies/Regular videos are all via that app. OP is saying "if i'm in an app, I want voice search to focus that app's search bar".
Indeed, it's an incentive problem. Banks create shitty systems because when their systems fail someone else suffers.

Even the phrase "identity theft" is a misleading attempt to shift the blame, as humorously depicted in this Mitchell & Webb comedy sketch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9ptA3Ya9E
"Prices on things could go up or down." "PLEASE WHAT IS YOUR SOURCE ON THAT??"
You don't have to answer the questions legitimately. As long as you are able to remember the answers, that is all that matters.
Depends on the company environment. If your company does MVP's regularly to trial out stuff or features to get projects funded, they're more than likely will fund a short sprint to prove the concept or idea works and gauge if it's worth fully funding. These orgs move fast, have lots of tech talent and budget. They're usually ahead of other companies in terms of features or offerings.

Other companies take ideas, consider them long and hard - and usually follow other orgs doing something similar who have already proven something works. They do a lot of planning and tend to put much more funding in up-front.

Both approaches suit different businesses. The former being startups and SME's, the latter where market share is already won and now they just acquire other businesses that develop the former way.

If we're considering what people develop at home however.. 99.9% of the stuff I write is never publicly visible, and it's terrible because I'm not a great developer. But I'm not a regular open-source contributor. I issue the occasional patch for shit that's broken for me.
From the link:

> “Those who say there’s no corroborating evidence are thinking very narrowly,” Victor Vieth, the founder of the Gundersen center, told me. “They’re thinking of hair, DNA, the things you see on television dramas. I’ve never worked on a case of child abuse where, if you look hard enough, you won’t find corroborating evidence.” Vieth invited me to imagine a child who describes that his or her assault occurred in a room painted blue. Police should obtain a warrant and visit the room. Were its walls blue? If so, that was corroborating evidence.

This is of course not corroborating evidence that a sexual assault was committed. But sure, it corroborates that the room exists, and why would a child know what color the walls inside a room were unless they had been the victim of a sexual assault there?
Oh boy, welcome to parenthood. Having young children in daycare or school means a constant stream of virus infections for the whole family. I don't remember when it started to trail off, but probably when my youngest got to about 7 or 8.
I generally agree with your sentiment, but am disappointed by the ageist phrasing. Your statement would have been much more convincing without it.
How TSMC has mastered the geopolitics of chipmaking
I just think this is how the PR/Media flow goes with these things.
I'm still astonished by how much LG and Samsung are able to cripple their own devices in the performance department. It's like they bought the cheapest chip/mainboard that checked the box 'smooth 30fps 4k hdr'.
If we were talking about VW or Ford making stuff in Mexico people would be shitting all over made in Mexico. "Hurr durr side stepping muh UAW and muh OSHA" and stuff like that

But brands that start with T and end with A can do no wrong on the white collar parts of the internet so Toyota gets a pass.
Silly premise. There's plenty of open-source products out there that will attest to the fact that the quality of a codebase has no effect on its overall commercial viability.

The adage "Move Fast and Break Things" is a cancer on the software industry. I've personally had the displeasure of working in numerous teams, departments and companies that adopted such silly philosophies in the pursuit of being "innovative". I've never seen it work in the long-term in a single instance. The cost of such mistakes are easily quantifiable. I'm sure most people here can think of fitting personal anecdotes where they've seen entire codebases rewritten to make them into scalable, maintainable solutions. Even this article lists several examples which attest to this. I shudder to think of the amount of money that has been invested in migrating codebases away from NodeJS, or MongoDB, for instance.

> "...or grow in a steady, sustainable and healthy pace and be eaten up by competition..."

Implying that it takes an order of magnitude more time to make responsible technology choices, or to write tests? This is rubbish. A stitch in time saves nine. I've never seen an instance where better management, better planning, and more responsible development couldn't have prevented a project from needing to be rewritten in twelve months.
Companies sponsor things all the time — as marketing, to help with recruitment, etc. So my question is, do you think all corporate sponsorships are inappropriate? Or just “political” ones?
I loved my time working at Level 5, there were some really top notch folks there. But this isn't necessarily surprising news, a little sad, but not surprising.
It's obviously different. And this is an example of why politics is a dangerous subject in the workplace. I haven't challenged your belief, in fact, I don't even know your belief and you're already on the attack.

If you say "I am married", that's a fact. If someone says they disagree with your marriage then they are stating an opinion.
Thanks. Do you have any other recommendations for "systems-y software" books or resources you think would be helpful for a people pursuing similar roles?
Correct! Teslas have been reasonable for a lot of long distance travel with their superchargers for 5+ years. They built chargers between big cities, close enough to each other. Every other ev suffers in comparison for long distance travel. The writer did mention that it was different for teslas (still not perfect), but I don't think they really made it clear enough. With a tesla model s you can drive cross country and I can go almost anywhere, whether that is across Washington State to San Diego or BC to Banff.
If you have a blog, make a production version of your comment and post it because what you said is something every developer should at least consider.
Wait until you see the reality in ordinary schools...
Note that the policy is not about "in meetings", but for all spaces of the company, and go back to tshaddox's comment about mentioning marriages in small talk.
Kaspersky TDSSKiller Crack 3.1.0.28 Plus License Key Full Download
Autonomous trucks for urban trucking are a pipe dream, but maybe for long-haul routes.

That said, it's not at all clear to me that developing autonomous trucks for long interstate routes would be meaningfully cheaper than laying rail on literally every high-traffic route on the planet, which uses perfectly-understood technology and has entirely predictable returns.