skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
'emphasising that knowledge...is contained in the surrounding culture'

This!
And some more that is not in the brain.
Not to say what is in the brain, but isn't considered as intelligence like emotions, that control large parts of the planetary biomass.
Fear for example is a simple automatism that for the most part you don't need to replace with more 'intelligent' approaches and still has much more influence on human behaviour than abstract intelligence, whatever that may be.
If it exists at all.

Personally, and I emphazise I am thrilled by what the AI crowd has done the last years, kudos to that, they look to me like someone quite bright, that pretends or even believes to understand the inner workings of a computer by simulation its GUI.
If I'm right, my critisism would be, that's great and you're making really fun toys and gadgets and tools, but don't sell it to me as intelligence.
That's just a marketing ploy.

That energy optimising theory of the brain you're mentioning sounds interesting, have to ponder that.

Many thanks!
echo adds a trailing newline by default. You'll need to add the -n flag or use printf instead.
For competing with google one would have to set up companies with proper humans in the loop, and in some neutral and stable jurisdiction. For non-US customers it would be also very helpful to tone down the heavy political patronizing that Silicon Valley/anglosphere has, which is ridiculous sometimes.
> * Hydro is crap at startup too (they need black start units, at least the big ones do) *

This is a misunderstanding. All generators require an excitation current to start up. Most generators get this excitation from the grid. For large, important generators they also have black start, so that they can provide excitation on-site. This means they don't need to bootstrap themselves from a grid.

Hydro tends to have black start not because 'they need it' but because it is critically important from a grid security perspective. During a blackout, you want your high inertia, flexible machines online first - these are hydros for systems that have them. If you don't have blackstart on these machines, you need them on some other machine online first to energize the grid.

You wouldn't put blackstart units on wind turbines, simply because they are worthless if there isn't already an energised grid to support into (they aren't grid forming). So you can always assume grid-based excitation current for wind generators.

I think OP was talking about the cut-in speed (at what wind speed can the turbine start producing power). For HAWTs this is at wind speeds of around 5 m/s. For VAWTs, I don't know, but I assume it is a little higher based on the OP's comment, and that they may even need some mechanical assistance to get them spinning in the first place.
Using multiple accounts like this can also assist with implementing separation of duties.
I think they have gotten better over time, and DuckDuckGo is noticeably worse for me. (I notice this because I have some scripts that use DuckDuckGo as a fallback when Google bans my scripts.)
If they think that blocking certain words is going to prevent that from happening then well, good luck with that.
That is not correct. See this article [1] for a discussion of the leading case, Walz v. Tax Comm’n, 397 U.S. 664 (1970), on this matter. See also some later cases that applied that one, such as Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1 (1989), and Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. California Bd. of Equalization, 493 U.S. 378 (1990), both of which are linked in that article.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/t...
I got banned from Google Ads at age 16 because Google was convinced I was doing this. I'm 35 now. Never figured out how that happened, but it doesn't matter because I wouldn't choose Google's ads anymore, anyway.
So, every page with ads (as determined by an opaque and ever-changing method in a closed source browser), will be included while computing the cohort. Got it. It seems safest to assume that "it happens on every page" since so much of the internet is monetized with ads.

Please forgive us for not trusting Google's "we pinky swear it will change". We have no real reason to trust that Google will keep their word.
Venture Firms Bask in a Surge of Blockbuster Profits
That's why I pulled out all of my projects from Google index. Interestingly despite I disallow robots from parsing anything, I can still see residual data in search results over a year after I disabled crawling in robots.txt.
Now my traffic is truly organic, because the only way of knowing about these is the good old word of mouth.
How to Spot SEO Fast Talkers
Isn't there a limit on how often you can run ads? I remember some Youtuber talking about how people are deliberately making their videos just over 10 minutes long because then they can also put an ad in the middle, not just at the beginning or end, or something like that.
30 Years of Linux – An Interview with Linus Torvalds: Linux and Git
> Wikipedia does not need to take any action to disable FLoC [...] If you call document.interestCohort() to get a FLoC id for a user

It is still a problem for Wikipedia, because the global Javascript for each language is editable by a subset of the editors for that language (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.js for instance), unlike the HTTP headers which can only be changed by the Wikimedia sysadmins.
Probably HN wonders if you think we're the IRS, declaring every capital gain like that :)

I would see more material if you had some insight into how to invest in AMD looking forward. Saying do DD on all companies in general and then make a bold early play isn't super relevant. What do you think about AMD's prospects going forward?
Adding more abstraction just for the sake of it is definitely somewhat trendy these days, although it's been like that in the industry for a long time; only the extremes the web stuff goes to is a relatively recent phenomenon.

The hardware manufacturers probably like this "artificial inflation of requirements"...
It is absolutely possible to make an app that doesn't support iOS or Android and runs on weird unpopular Linux smartphones, and thereby bow down to nobody.

Except your landlord when rent comes due.
Perhaps the new design somehow reduces the shadow effect by extracting wind energy from higher layers of air?
Minus the fact it nearly pays for everything that's free on the internet. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> I have a dedicated shell script for each thing I do in git, because it is impossible for me to memorize the original syntax and I'm terrified I'll gut the repo by getting a flag wrong. I have an "undo" script, that just gets rid of unstaged changes, a branch deletion script for removing local & remote branches, and so on. I just take my scripts with me everywhere I go. They're not ingenious, just a necessity. I advise doing this.

I don't blame you, and I'm actually an enthusiastic proponent of this approach. It's just more ergonomic. I personally have an extensive list of idiosyncratic aliases that perform (conceptually) high-level operations on top of my git repo to let me work faster and use up less mental power to reason about what I'm doing. I use them at home and have carried them from one job to another (and am planning to do so indefinitely), taking care to keep things bash-based and portable between OSes.

I barely ever drop down to using built-in Git operations directly, besides `git push`. I don't need to, and I don't want to, even though I know enough about git to untangle complicated rebase clusterf*cks by reasoning about and operating directly on the DAG if I have to.
Well sure, they could go flip burgers instead.
Nice problem to have
This. (Warning: light-weight argument incoming, but it’s intriguing) Is anyone seriously looking into this? How do we know that (for example) subway workers don’t have shorter lifespans that can’t be accounted for any other way? Just taking a superficial, devils-advocate stance makes me wonder what other broad correlations may exist that aren’t known just because they’re not being investigated rigorously? In some ways this also intersects with the bias against publishing negative results - what if a good study of this has been done but wasn’t published because it wasn’t headline-grabbing?
While MX is for inbound smtp, there are some programs that will factor in whether or not mail is coming from a listed MX. It is usually a tiny fraction of the spam score though. In my opinion, it is totally fine to set your MX to wherever you want your mail to route. Ensure your outbound mail servers have matching forward and reverse DNS and that you have set up dmarc/spf correctly. If feasible, DKIM sign your outbound emails.

A challenge of using your own MX can be if you then forward those emails to Google. The relays would need to be trusted for your domain and I don't know what options Google provides these days to whitelist the MX relays. Hopefully someone else here that relays to Google could chime in. If you want a more trusted/enterprise solution to relay emails, look into services like ProofPoint. That is their entire business. They will front the inbound and/or outbound email for a company and deal with scam links, spam, malware and other nonsense.
If you don't feel like your own health is worth much, maybe try seeing a therapist?
Same, I'd like a way to disable this on my GHPages site as well.
So you're ok with children being able to buy porn mags in the same store they can buy sweets, but you're not ok with Apple controlling what bad actors might sell in the app store?
Whether ads are being loaded is being determined by an opaque, ever-changing algorithm implemented in a closed source browser. We have no way to verify that this is how it's actually working, or when it will change. That doesn't even include how a good majority of the internet is monetized by ads, often Google's ads.

It's simply safest to assume that every page will be included.
It's not a straw man, because the rule itself isn't germane to the discussion. I just picked one in which it’s clear that the “default” state is unfair.

> It's not limited to any one side, which de fact makes it neutral. QED.

The gag policy in my analogy is not limited to any one side. According to your reasoning, that de facto makes it neutral.
It does seem very clearly a permissible use. Corellium beat Apple's copyright claims and they did far more than just embed a DLL.
Oh no, I do understand that. It's just the excluding custom domains part I don't get. Why not keep Google out of all their data: why give them a portion?
Who really thinks it's worth $70M?
At first I thought the same as you. But, after reading the OP, his response doesn't doesn't seem as bad as it was made out to be. IMHO.
> This is not UI jank

With slack though, it absolutely is UI jank. The interface is an absolute nightmare to use on phones (I'd say deliberately so, to force you to use their app).
If it is "hard" to let user download their data, then they shouldn't be in this business in the first place. It's like they want their cake and eat it too.

> very expensive EU fine when someone with power in the EU gets impacted by this...

Given how EU works, more likely scenario is money under the table after a period of sabre waving.
Yes I would say that is weird, although none of the above would be considered creative anymore. Maybe 10 months ago during the first two months of the first AMM releasing its updated version, Uniswap 2.0. It is very easy to have a node or python bot set up to look for liquidity pool deployment transactions and immediately create a transaction to buy the asset in the second argument field.

Uniswap 3.0 is coming out next week, so if it is as monumental as 2.0 last year, this summer should have just as much creativity as last summer, so you'll have plenty of things to criticize there. All the other AMMs came out after Uniswap 2.0 and have slight differences just using Uniswap 2.0 code. It is unlikely they will update exactly to Uniswap 3.0 but they'll follow the market.

This space moves extremely fast with lots of competitors if you know how to code and haven't been spending the last half a decade doing something meaningful like working for an ad-retargeting conglomerate while complaining about cryptocurrencies.
*inheritance
Yes, they are in the repo but we usually have one developer own those and manage the check-ins. That avoids minor differences in those files, which sometimes depend on details of the workstation setup. There's probably a better way to handle this
I actually have an idea for browser extension:

implement document.interestCohort() and return some useless junk or better fake data (e.g. this user cats pictures and nothing else). However I run into that there is no documentation of how cohort ID is specified. This lead to another question - how are ad companies supposed to actually target their audience with it if there is no translation between cohorts and target groups? (I assume Google already has some translation)
China, Mesoamerica, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and (maybe) the Indus Valley all developed writing systems independently of each other.

For what it's worth, pretty much every major invention involved in developing civilization seems to have been developed multiple times.
Nice way to put it
"50% rate... a premium can be added to shares if the deceased has a controlling interest in a company, potentially taking the top rate even higher"

I have to wonder, there's a huge incentive to instead have the person somehow give huge gifts to everyone before death, right?
The way it’s displayed and then also the commands. With Sourcetree you have a really nice display and it’s very efficient to stage/upstage/discard lines and hunks. I am sure I could get used to the command line with enough practice but source control tools are pretty low on my list of priorities of things I want to get better with. So I stick to what works for me.
> Then they sold to Murdoch, and so my subscription was no longer fuelling the research and exploration stuff, so I stopped in disgust.

Is there any proof of the funding part? I find it hard to believe they would partner with Fox for years before forming the joint venture, not get anything out of the partnership, and then form a joint venture and get even less.
Personally I love using `git gui` for picking and choosing what goes into my commits line by line. Git command line is plenty powerful, but a dash of GUI here and there does sometimes do wonders for precision and visualisation.
I would assume that part of the testing process (or part of the checklist after going live) would involve clicking user interface elements, including ads?

You want to know that it works.
While this link is getting traffic there are no written details in it (you have to watch the video). For those curious here are some more informative articles:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/28/samsung-inheritance-lee-fami...

https://www.reuters.com/business/samsungs-lee-family-pay-mor...
Same-ish but to be honest my ban was legit. My goofy ass clicked my own YouTube AD one too many times as a kid. I'm pretty sure that ban is permanent.
Not sure how optics would help. If your wire has some kind of side channel, optics can have it too. If you want to detect stray mysterious photons then you could do the same with electrons.

But in any case, this is not really the level of concern here. It's equipment that tampers with the device. The only way to be sure is to roll your own. Which holds for both sides. So the perfect systems needs to be created by two adverse parties, which means it's impossible to do. Qed.

(In the real world with physical proof this is different since tampering is much harder and it's a problem worked on for centuries. It's not bullet proof either but much more mature.)
Exactly this.

From a regular European 230V outlet you can get 100km of range every night easily. Even more if you don't work 16 hour days.

The average commute around here is a bit over 50km a day, both ways combined.
Hold up, doesn't something central still need to decide what cohort you are and store your individual data? How does it decide what cohort you are locally without pulling data about other users down locally or sending your individual data up? Is it comparing your behavior tensor with the cohorts or something like that?
About that deli, it's actually not $100 million any more...

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-04-20/hometo...
Can you give an example where this slippery slope occurred? For example, in Fable III and Skyrim you can't kill children, or in Morrowind there are no children at all, but you can still name your character Jesus. You say this pattern is inevitable, but if that were the case we'd see it everywhere that limitations are put in place in the name of protecting children.
I enjoyed the XKCD. Thanks for that. I'm currently interested in Cynefin and complexity theory in organizations, so it's kind of right up my alley.

Here's the Dilbert I was thinking of:

https://dilbert.com/strip/1992-09-08
Is there any proof it ever stopped?
The GPU Shortage Deepened My Existential Dread
I wrote a Discord bot for this: https://fletcher.fun/amulet, it filters all messages for amulets and tells you the sha and rarity if you find one.
Example one we found: https://diff.substack.com/p/an-airline-ipo-in-this-economy
Common amulet (75b8af8579d81ba3bac788bb118fa78888717eb55c5faf778ea756750c02837d)
Samsung family announces plans to pay off more than $10B of inheritance tax
The greatest of sins was killing off Orkut.
Thanks for all the responses, makes a lot of sense. It seems like the answer is “Yes, from Toyota’s perspective” in that Toyota gets to focus solely on the manufacturing process, and let the others figure out the chaotic bits to get the required parts in the right place at the right time, because that’s a different skill set that certain other corporations are far more adept or have specific resources like rolling stock.

To use an analogy: a surgeon operating on a patient, holds a hand out and says “scalpel” and a scalpel instantly placed in hand. Does it matter that their are trays and trays of parts and other people in the room if we are just evaluating the surgeon’s efficiency?
Pariah means outcast, which is an accurate description of Iran's current situation in global affairs.

edit: werd
Samsung’s Lee family to pay more than $10.8 bln inheritance tax
SparkPost Joins the MessageBird Family
They had to figure out how they could finesse this so that they didn't destroy the South Korean economy.

So the Seoul National Art Museums will be getting some lovely new additions to their collections.
Reading that, it leads me to believe that the best-selling authors are really funding other peoples' hobbies.

I wrote a draft of a book around the beginning of the pandemic. At the end, I lost interest and moved on to other things. (The whole idea of trying to get it published looked harder than writing the first draft.)
Even if everyone's prices were MSRP (which they aren't), why pay ~10% more for an item at a local store who has to pay sales tax when I can just order it and have it brought to my door for a lower price?

A lot of Amazon's growth (and really any internet retailer) was because of inefficiencies they worked out of the merchandising process, but a lot of it was stuff like not paying sales tax if they didn't have a physical presence in the state which gave them an unfair advantage IMO. That benefit is disappearing as state's are starting to realize the damage to their tax base (FL amazingly being one of those even though we've paid Amazon sales tax for a while since they have a large presence here), but the damage has been done already in a lot of areas.
One solution to that is to assert that consciousness itself is the "outside" universe and what we perceive as reality is more like a communication protocol conscious entities use to interact with each other. I think this is similar to what Donald Hoffman talks about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_D._Hoffman
From TFA:

> Bookstore sales fell nearly 30 percent in 2020, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
You can still submit paperwork manually.
But here Tesla isn't selling a $10,000 dollar brick; they're selling a $10,000 dollar system and reviewers are bringing their own Brick to circumvent safety systems built in.

When the driver has to willfully circumvent built-in safety features to do something clearly stupid; the line comes in on the side of "That person is an idiot" not "The system is inherently broken". Example: Ford could prevent people from doing stupid burnouts leaving car shows because mustangs fly into crowds multiple times a year.

I don't see a difference, stupid driver is stupid driver.
I have a "prototype" but it is still in the truly hacky stage. When I have a decent "first draft" I'll post a github link.

I want to try it on a range of microprocessors. Some of them, like the Arduino, have strange memory layouts. I just figured out how to write assembler code for the Arduino.
> if women bring up salary issues, then that is seen as very negative

I have a hard time believing that this is actually the case, at least more than for men.
You have read the opposite of what i meant in my post !

Your question was; Why do you suppose that European population density is sustainable all over the world? Presumably the sustainable population density is going to vary with climate and geography ?

"It is not" w.r.t. the first one and "Yes" w.r.t. the 2nd one. Diamond's books were pointed out because they were the most popular ones showing the influence of Geographical Latitudes on the spread/sustainability of Human Civilizations.

Coming to my point; our mastery of technology has enabled us to overcome "natural" limitations in a given geographical area, human potentialities and thus our relationship with the "planet"

What i meant was that ever since the start of the "Technological Age" i.e. the industrial revolution, we have gained power to drastically change our environments to sustain larger Human populations (eg. in the extreme northern latitudes, desert regions, megapolises in the already densely populated regions etc.) which Nature by herself would not have allowed. Now add the influence of Technology to extend Human lifespans and potentialities and you realize that our very "technological progress" is now our greatest danger to survival. Nature no longer has the upper hand (other than infrequent occurrences like natural disasters etc.) and our stewardship of Technology is not well thought out. Though https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_technology wikipedia page is not well written, it points to authors who have thought about the detrimental influence of Technology on Society.
This is not attempting to preserve privacy. This is attempting to give a pretense of preserving privacy, while completely deanonymizing the web.

This is browser fingerprinting on steroids. In addition to things like screen resolution and OS, you get a FLoC ID. Browser fingerprinting already works very well. FLoC supercharges it, and adds profiling information.

FLoC also gathers information from web sites which otherwise Google could not track. Since your browser is tracking you, they don't even need Google Analytics installed.
Being double taxed is never a nice problem.
There are still a lot of things that you can do in a 4-core 1.1GHz Cortex-A53 / 3GiB RAM context of a pinephone, where performance is more than good enough.

Perfectly useable for i3 wm, terminal/ssh usage, light browsing in firefox, playing 1080p@60fps video, viewing photos, and plenty of other things, in docked mode.