skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly!

I hated my time with Spring. Compile-time bugs became runtime bugs (Cannot startup one bean because cannot find other beans). Startup was slow (looking for all the beans!). Solved problems like null-checking constructors and 'final'ing all variables became unsolved once you needed to leave them nullable/mutable for Spring to update them post-constructor. Testing a single class became slower and flakier when you needed to spin up the IOC to test - because it would start building config for all the other classes too.

Keep in mind, Spring is already touting itself as modern. But along comes Micronaut[1] with a new set of promises:

"...monumental leap in startup time"

"Keeps your startup time and memory footprint low by doing the heavy lifting up-front"

"Easily spin up servers and clients in your unit tests and run them instantaneously"

Which is EXACTLY what I want in a framework. Having built two greenfield Micronaut services at work, as well as maintaining a few others, I can say it's bullshit. All the stuff I listed about Spring above is still true of Micronaut.

> Also, there are very small libs for java, you don’t have to create a spring/JEE app.

I like https://sparkjava.com/ but I'm never going to be working with colleagues who choose it over Spring/Micronaut.

[1] https://micronaut.io/
You are missing the point, it seems.

Being poor (but not debilitatingly starving) is an advantage for innovation. You have a lot of incentive to get the heck out of your miserable position, and you cannot fix the problem with just paying more, you have to incessantly invent and try new things.

Of course this is not necessarily good for your well-being, longevity, mental and physical health, prospects of your children and even chances to have any, etc.

I see this not as an advice to become poor, but as a solace to those who are already poor but whose mind is still inventive.
That’s a bold statement. Here in Berlin I am seeing the model 3 a lot these days.
I don't know on a full EV, but i know my PHEV has a relay for the big battery. When the car is off, the big battery is disconnected, and the 12v will drain (and would tend to die). I had to jump it a couple times, it just needs enough power to get the relay closed, the big battery usually has enough to run the car and start the engine as needed from there. Would have been nice if they didn't bury the 12v in the trunk, underneath the big battery though.
I think it would be much better if admission into elite schools were based on objective test scores. It's easy to see how racism seeps into "Your extra-curriculars just aren't Harvard enough" or whatever subjective judgment call would be used to evaluate in-person interviews, extra-curriculars, essays, etc. It's a lot harder to see where the racism is coming from if the admissions criteria are "Higest X scores get admittance, random lottery to break ties." There is also transparent racism in the current system that says some races have to score higher than others to be admitted.
Displeased to see the best comment at the bottom. This is spot on. People will always get the most work done when synchronicity is able to be maximized!
Looks like Ivermectin has generated a lot of buzz that many are self medicating. The first link that google throws up when searching for Ivermectin is the FDA page "Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19" https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-shoul...
Wouldnt it have felt more offensive if the author would have written: next advice is not for poor people...
If it works, not very well. There were some very small underpowered studies that showed promise. Then large RCTs were done and it didn’t work. Brazil would certainly not be in the situation it’s in right now if ivermectin cured covid.

https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/ivermectin-why-potential-c...
Also worth noting that the baker in that case won because , in part, the gay couple were not denied service, they were denied a specific message. The baker was willing to sell them anything else.

Had that gone the other way, it would have had some icky implications for compelled speech/artwork.
Yes and it's a BS argument, because going through bankruptcy is not something to be taken lightly or something that you can "just do", because it's not only about "you owe X" but how well can you service your debt.

Of course this argument was an excuse to inflate education prices and make lenders more interest as well.
> I have also never once cared about credit card skimmers at gas stations or anything of the sort.

As a European I haven't as well. But that's because it's been the safe chip part of the card that's been used all my adult life and not the easily spoofed magnet stripe.
That sounds good. Needs to be very specific and easy to "check". I assume making such well defined bounty issues will require quite some work. If it's worth it only time will tell.
Rocky Linux – Community Update – April 2021
Oh you mean affirmative action for non-Asian minorities is unfair to Asian ones?

I don't really think that is unfair, but then I think the whole system of elite university admission is a total disaster for equity.
When you sold 1 car yesterday, and sell 2 today, you have doubled your sales. It's misleading to talk about growth in terms of percentage points (or doubling/tripling, etc), if it's somewhat low numbers.
“Treating people as anything other than individuals is a political act.” - this is such a great line and very easy to forget.
> You have successfully obscured the issue even further by introducing the irrelevant factor of race.

I substituted one protected class for another, where it's more commonly seen as a necessary protected class. This is a pretty common device to illustrate bias in language.

Are you arguing that it's fine to make your statement about a generation, but not about a race? If so, why?
but what do you if you don't want it to unlock? like if you were in work and someone send you a nsfw message that you don't want your coworkers to see, or maybe you are in a car with other people etc etc. ...there's no way to stop that right?

at least with a fingerprint reader you can choose to glance at the lockscreen messages first before unlocking
> What “authoritative sources debunked it nearly in realtime”?

Much of the corporate and public media.

> If these sources were authoritative, why did the corporate media & the US government (e.g. State Dept) beat the drums of regime change?

The “corporate media” largely didn’t, it reported both the government claims as claims and the information about how they were manipulated, invented, and falsified, and how both public information and the stream of leaks coming out of the US and UK government showed that the governments were lying as part of a deliberate strategy, all as, often, big-headline page-1 news (in print, and the equivalent in other media.)

The government of course drove to war because that was the preconceived policy of the government.

> These “contradictory reports” you mentioned were buried under enormous heaps of propaganda.

No, they weren’t. People whipped into a storm of Islamophobia in the wake of the 9/11 attacks saw through the eyes of a desire for a less amorphous, more tractable enemy to attack. They didn’t need the truth to be buried at all to ignore it. “The truth was buried under enormous heaps of propaganda” is just revisionism because its more comforting to believe that the truth was hidden than that the people of an advanced democracy would en masse ignore the truth when it was right in front of their faces and rush to war anyway.
You've asserted several things that are themselves unsubstantiated or at least controversial.

"Is it your job to bolster the hiring practices of the past?" is a particularly good example of what I referred to in my comment, actually. You're essentially shutting down any rational conversation by asserting that disagreement is necessarily in support of "hiring practices of the past."
The problem with that argument is that with how long lithium ion batteries can be reused, there aren't any big lithium ion batteries at end of life, so it's too early to expect to see them being recycled yet. The first cars with these batteries are less than a decade old, so we're still probably a decade or 2 away from the point that there are enough big batteries reaching end of life that it's worth recycling them.
You’re not overthinking it. Those of us who wait for catastrophe aren’t silent until it happens. We’re just ready and willing to reiterate what’s wrong when it shows up.

Everything about that situation is dangerous to our careers: saying something, saying nothing, saying a lot, stomping our feet, saying we told them so.

But don’t second guess yourself. You’re expressing exactly the right attitude toward addressing things before they’re an emergency. The people who are using those emergencies to get things done agree, we’re just accustomed to getting shut down unless there’s no other option.
This seems overly optimistic. I don't even run my ICE tank to 10% because I am concerned that I will run out of gas before finding the next place to fill up. With my EV I am even more concerned, because of all the reasons stated in this thread.
Explicitly denied in the text:

> Advice like these are not laws. They are like hats. If one doesn’t fit, try another.
> also proven very effective against preventing and treating sars-cov-2 virus in vivo

No. India and Brazil are giving Ivermectin liberally. See how good they're doing

> is estimated to be 1 in 85 trillion (p = 0.000000000000012).

Their estimation is BS. Or better, it's the famous "CICO" (crap in, crap out) statistics

"Oh but it won the Nobel prize". Yes and John Voigt won an Oscar, doesn't mean his performance in Anaconda was up to snuff
This is important point indeed. Here is what helps myself, when thinking about pixels.

- pixels are point samples in 2D space
- their position is exact
- position of of top-left point is (0,0)
- position of bottom right is (cols-1,rows-1)

This way all math work (subsampling, affine or perspective warps, lens distortion, or even warping between image and any layer neural network). Failure to do that, will cause subtle issues that will degrade your performance. These will become quite important when working
with pixel accurate methods (3d object tracking, object detection in tiny resolutions and 1-1 mapping between OpenGL and Neural Network). So I have to agree, pixels are not tiny squares, they are dots in 2d space.
> A market crash could take down Tesla and set back electric car adoption by 20 years.

Why? Even if TSLA dropped to 1 cent today, all factories, employees, supply chain, IP, sales channels etc would remain intact.
Would this be okay to do as a private individual?
I'm just thinking that if he doesn't mention any of his companies and just say something like: "I like this stock/crypto", if that would still be illegal and/or market manipulation.

Then some days later, make payment available with Bitcoin.
Interesting - I didn't knew that one. It seems very security related - I'm not sure if issues for not supporting a specific part in a spec or for improving documentation for a feature will fit in.

What do you think?
> So basically, California specifically forced them to create a special contract, different from the one they use everywhere else, that couldn’t be discharged

No, again, the specific lie that they are getting in trouble with is claiming that the California contract was a “qualified education loan” which could not (easily) be discharged in bankruptcy when, in fact, it was a regular unsecured loan which can easily be discharged in bankruptcy.
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/renault-zoe-ecli...

Less Tesla's are getting sold while other car makers have massive growth in their sales.
Yes. Dominic is a friend of mine, and I’m endlessly impressed by what he’s been able to accomplish across the entire stack.

But I’m a US citizen, so I don’t own any.
I think a problem is that people don't want to discuss these subjects. They want to tell other people about the problems. This creates an atmosphere where, if you have the correct opinions, you are free to lecture ad nauseam, and if you do not then you must keep your ideas a secret on penalty of ignominious and instant termination.
OT Cyber Security: What Are the Common Challenges?
We are in fact the same and this is a broad overview how I do this. I plan to go more in depth in future articles by either 1) customizing bootstrap properly or 2) how to use tailwind
A little bit off-topic: If you want an explanation in Germany what things are the way they are, it's often because "otherwise the insurance wouldn't pay in worst case".
100. In a long list of advice, use numbers instead of bullet points. Makes it easier to share to others. :D

Most of the advise are really good though.
No I know were the idea in Yannis Varoufakis' new books "Another Now" originated. Or were he proposed it as he is part of DiEM25.

Actually quite some interesting thoughts within this book.
making children learn "pre-computing" through iPad apps at an age where they're not ready to learn real computing

I just think there's a bit of a gap right now. I think apps like Tynker that provide sort of pre-computing problem-solving are pretty good. I also like environments like Replit that are easy to jump right into and get a Python environment without a bunch of random setup. And all of this is way better than I had when I was a kid! But I think there could be something in the middle, maybe something that started to engage with topics like list manipulation a bit more than the current batch of pre-computing apps do.
(Bottom line. I am a consumer that pays money for the best product. And I will buy the best product, not the hype. I dont understand why all the downvoting, you are doing it every day when you go to a market? Do you worship John Harvey Kellogg when eating the corn flakes? Probably not.)

Ok, now here is where I object. Musk hasnt done anything incredible/remarkable, YOU have done it, the STOCK INVESTORS have done it, the tesla car BUYERS have done it.

Without people trusting, investing and buying the hype, this would just be another failure. But due to the hype he got enough of resources to pull it off. He is a lair, cheater, snake oil seller that was so successful in his deceit that he was actually able to pull something off.

It was not him to be grateful for explosion of electric car market. YOU are.

And now that the market has woke up, it is time to buy electric car. But certainly not Tesla. I want a good car not the hype while on the other side I am grateful to everyone that bought the hype and I give you all the credits for doing it. I will get a good electric car out of it. You keep the hype.

aero-glide2: sure and at the end the second to the market won where the first one has created the market, shown mistakes in the product, cheated a "few" people, and allow second one to learn from them and create better product - there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Consumers get the better product. Worshiping Musk? Irrational. I worship those that gave him the money.

ryzvonusef: Nothing has changed here. I am just stating the facts. He has shown there is a market for eCars (tm) pushed others to actually start making electric cars. I am perfectly fine with that. And I will buy some car from well established company as I want quality, not words. "lair, cheater, snake oil seller" this is just a fact. Sorry, I am not into fanboyisms clouding my judgement (I also dont have anything against him - I just dont care) and I am just stating how I see the things and I think that I see them very realistic and sane.
The ECB is working on something like that actually.
It's never a right-left problem.

It's always a people-problem.
Whiteness was invented by leftists to create a new boogie man to keep minorities in fear and keep themselves in power.
When I drive long distance like that, I stop only for gas, which is almost always available immediately at the end of the highway exit ramp. I use the bathroom and if necessary get food at the same time. Pulling off the road every 2.5 hours and driving to the nearest mall or wherever the charging point is, and then back to the highway, is a complete deal breaker for those types of drives.
I'm on the side where the kids should be able to say anything they want if the schools weren't in the picture. Fuck censorship, fuck prior restraint, and fuck schools prying into the personal lives of kids off-campus.

You can't shout fire in a crowded theater.

If she's told she represents a school-sponsored club 24/7 it's one thing to make them look bad by mixing her brand and their brand, but it's another to have it be a surprise banishment or some random school official telling her what she can and can't say to her friends or publicly.
There absolutely was a gold rush at the beginning! I believe it started with Dev boot camp in SF. Many of the students in the first cohort split off after graduation and made their own schools. If I recall correctly the person who started App Academy was a DBC grad. Anyways, imagine that, some one who just learned to code, now running their own unaccredited program. Scam is too strong of a word for these programs. They were just amateurs really. Add in a little silicon valley hustle and now you have a nice little pressure cooker where they need to start hitting enrollment and graduation numbers. It also didnt help they were in one of the most expensive real estate locations in the world.
As far as I'm aware the only reason to use hand sanitizer is because soap (which is more effective - again AFAIK but this has been told since the start) is even more damaging do the skin when done often.
I understand the motives (at least the official ones) behind those changes, and I agree with most of the points there. I would say that to some extend, joining social/political discussions by companies becomes marketing.

My biggest issue is that companies do not live in a politics-free bubble. The bigger the company the more it cares and tries to influence the politics, either publicly or not, because politics influences the business.

But business influences politics too. And I think this is a reason that employees want the companies to take a stand. A company employing 10k people can make a bigger impact than those 10k people themselves, so people want to leverage this.

Theoretically, it should be a bad thing, in democracy, we want every vote to count equally. But in sad reality, individual people choose politicians, but after that, the politics is shaped by powerful. 10k people are not powerful, the company they work for - may be.
well you could make the same argument for $14.99 vs $15. Regardless, have not been able to replicate this.
GCC did something like this to one of my loops last month and it took me about half an hour to figure out what was going on.

Simplified, the loop was something like this:

for (int j = 0; j != 5000; j++) {
foo();

if (bar()) {
baz();
} else {
quux();
}

corge();
}

The straightforward way to compile this is as follows:

j = 0
1: if (j == 5000) goto 2
foo()
t = bar()
if (!t) goto 3
baz()
goto 4
3: quux()
4: corge()
j++
goto 1
2:

Imagine my surprise when I found that GCC had instead emitted the
equivalent of the following:

j = 0
goto 6
3: quux()
4: corge()
j++
if (j == 5000) goto 2
6: foo()
t = bar()
if (!t) goto 3
baz()
goto 4
2:

It took me a while to understand what was going on, though you can
work out that the two are equivalent. Note that the straightforward
version runs 9 “instructions” each iteration when bar() is true and 8
when bar() is false. But the optimized version runs 8 when bar() is
true and 7 when bar() is false.

By rotating the loop to put the two-branched if-else conditional at
the end, as you explain, you get the jump back to the top for free! (The extra jump is still there, but it's executed once, to enter the loop, instead of on every iteration.)
And in this case this might matter significantly because the whole
inner loop was only 12 instructions, so it might be speeding the whole
program up by a measurable percentage.

That said, it's probably better to start by teaching people the straightforward version.

(The program was http://canonical.org/~kragen/sw/dev3/kmregion.h, a simple arena
allocator about 10× faster for small allocations than malloc/free, if
you're curious.)
We drive to the in-laws, and just unplug their dryer and plug the Tesla adapter in and get back to full charge the next day.
Sounds really useful, but I couldn't grasp exactly what your product does by reading your website. Let me give you some constructive feedback.

The 'How it works' section describes how to connect the code to your platform. It finalizes at the step 'Start Searching' and mentions 'use our intelligence features to gain insight into your code'. But why? What is the advantage? What can I do with it that my IDE doesn't have already? Perhaps you describe it on the video, but I think many of your visitors won't play it.

I would suggest that you extend the step 3 showing the key benefits of your platform over the standard IDE features.
Yet another reason why we have to be very careful about eating seafood. It's at the place now where the sensible thing to do is to avoid it all together.
They're balancing their production capacity with price. I.e. price that keeps delivery window not too long or short. They could sell them cheaper, but then they would be limited by manufacturing capacity.
Agree, it's all great if you are driving around a major built up metro area. It doesn't work if you're driving to North Dakota.
>What is called as AI by all these self-aggrandizing people is nothing more than glorified "pattern matching"

You can describe humans in exactly the same way.
Isn't that just every Silicon Valley company? Create hype with impractical demo, raise funds, and then actually build the product.
I see nothing wrong with this approach unless you are Theranos.
Part of the fun is how Elon has to discuss everything from battery technology to ‘roof protuberances’.
Goals != Quotas.

This is frequently misunderstood by people outside these companies (and frequently by people inside them too without integrity).

You're supposed to meet goals without compromising on integrity or quality. e.g. you can't ship buggy messes.

And you can't hire substandard employees. There are mechanisms ("bar raisers") in place to do this, at least at Amazon.

I suppose I can't speak for Google, Facebook, or Microsoft. But I'm pretty sure that it's exactly the same and what you're getting is a game of broken telephone where an ambitious goal in a high stakes environment gets re-interpreted as a quota.

BTW, you're supposed to fail ~20-30% of your goals at Amazon, or you didn't set ambitious-enough ones.
Natural gas is already a big step as it only emits 2/3rds of the CO2 per kWh compared to coal (high hydrogen content). Also, gas power plants can be regulated faster than coal power plants, so they work much better together with wind/solar power and make the transition easier.
I assume you are referring to hacktoberfest. We did get a few good contributions from that but yeah it's dangerous if any contribution counts.

This got me thinking so I think those issues will need to be very well define - probably even with failing tests if possible.
Also it's probably good to keep the number of bounty issues low for maintainability.

Seems there is still much to learn.
> Whiteness was invented by leftists

No, Whiteness was invented by White racists. The same as, actually, all the other racial groupings that are typically used in the US (and much of the rest of the world), because colonialism.

> to create a new boogie man to keep minorities in fear and keep themselves in power.

Whites and whiteness were a boogeyman for racial minorities for a long time before leftists cared about either.
It's Turtles all the way down