skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's becoming more and more popular for hobbyists to have at least double-digits of TB of storage sitting around for various purposes. I'd gladly make some profit out of the part of my array that's not filled up yet.
Your page may have expired. In the past there were complaints of links expiring if the user left the page for longer than 10-30 minutes.
You shouldn't try grabbing a cop's gun in Germany, or come at them with a knife, because you might get shot. I don't think it's that different in countries with armed police.
I would say exactly same is happening with health of human body or even how it's working. I simply stopped trying to correct others and talking at all about it. When people start conversing about it, I just shut up.
Making you uncomfortable is the point. An opressed person doesn't get to opt-out of politics about opresssion.
That is precisely what happened with navigation skills. Just punch it all into your GPS and listen for the instructions from a nicely speaking robot.
I stumbled upon an interview with the actual Chia 
miner
 farmer, he claims best SSDs will stay healthy for about a year, and having SSD is a must. Plotting should be done on an SSD (preferably as an NVMe), since this process involves creating 300Gb temp file on the same device that will be used to form a plot.
Actual interview [0] is in Russian, but I guess you could get a decent Google Translate-processed English translation .
[0] https://habr.com/ru/company/ruvds/blog/554046/
Interesting article. Thanks For Sharing
nice, I made it a link about ETH2.0 stake in this article https://andrewarrow.substack.com/p/in-order-to-bank-in-the-m...
> In a separate 2019 episode, a White House official reported a similar attack while walking her dog in a Virginia suburb just outside Washington, GQ reported last year.

I too carry around the equipment required to determine if something I'm feeling is biological or a secret energy weapon while I walk the dog. I wonder, was this White House official also affiliated with the intelligence apparatus as the other person who reported this was?

> Defense officials who briefed lawmakers said it was possible Russia was behind the attacks, but they did not have enough information to say for sure.

They really want Cold War 2 don't they? Hopefully this time we go to Mars.
>Both libel and inciting imminent lawless action are expressions of ideas, that term is so vague as to be all-encompassing.

And yet courts all over the world are able to separate them from "expression of ideas" (here in Europe e.g. where we have and use libel laws).

It's not that hard either, unless we specifically go for edge case.

"X is a thief" can be libel.

"The climate is in danger/is not in danger and we should or shouldn't do so and so" is an expression of an idea, and can't be libel.

As long as you don't speak about someone in particular (a person or set of named persons, as opposed to ideas and abstract groups), and don't accuse them of being something criminal or derogatory (especially something they're not) you should be able to express any idea you like, how about that?
Everything they do is massive. People are paid relative to the size of their potential success or screwup, and pay is not withdrawn based on which they did.

I get the point that golden parachutes are annoying, but yeah. It's all part of the compensation package, and the reason for it is in the above paragraph.
> If they want to pay 1000 people to fan them

Then the transaction will be taxed as income for those 1000 people. Gifts to children, particularly adult children, should be similarly taxed as income whether they are passed while the parents are alive or when they die.
I mean, I'd love this to be true, but the mobile market is currently larger than the entire consoles +PC market combined together. Clearly there must be people out there who really enjoy playing games on their phones.
This story has been going on in the background for about 2 years now. I get that the obvious suspects here are Russia and China, but I can't pin down what exactly either of them would gain that is worth the risk of a major international incident. It most certainly is either Russia or China as no one else is sophisticated and adversarial enough to pull it off, but there are still more questions than there are answers.
The Shape of PSIBER Space (1989)
Not only developers, but I think most people using computers.

It feels like people have a tunnel vision focusing only on the parts of the screen they're accostumed to. The other parts are ignored.

They try something, fail, try the same thing again, fail again, and repeat until they either give up or decide to slow down and explore the corners of the screen (which often leads to them finding the error).

I wonder if this is somehow related to the "magical halo" of technology. First because they try the same thing expecting different results, second because they don't explore the unknown parts of the system (maybe for fear they'll make things worse?).
How Startups Launch Products That Customers Want
And who's to say that that has to be the only one?

(Except that there's not even just one; there's a wide range of elections from the national level, to the local, or even maybe down to your city block in some places).
> RTS are quite good to play on phones

Probably one of the most ridiculous things I read ever. For starter there aren’t even any game worth called a RTS on mobile. Screen size and lack of keyboard means that any real RTS experience is impossible. How playable Wargames: Red Dragon or Age of Empire II would be on mobile? They won’t be at all, and that one of the reasons they aren’t available on smartphones.
MermaidJS is also a good tool, similar to PlantUML
No matter what the calm and rational part of my mind tries to suggest, the louder emotional part of my mind is shouting the following:

"""You’re entertained by torture and murder of characters who had done nothing deserving of such suffering."""

That part of me wants to continue with a long rant, but by this point my rational self can sit my emotional self down with a nice cup of tea and a biscuit.
We used to have a centralised bouncer that both fixed push notifications as well as transparent history and presence (i.e. automatic away). File sharing has been part of literally every client for so long I don't know what you want me to say about that. It works, it's p2p. What more is there?
It's based on the reports sharing symptoms and onset patterns. Nothing to do with someone carrying around "equipment required"
I find sarcasm and personal taste are at least somewhat negatively correlated... but then again I guess that's just my personal taste.
If you’re not American, it’s difficult to understand.

However, insurance is an absolute scam in the US. You pay hundreds of dollars per month for the privilege of having to pay thousands of dollars before your insurance will start paying. For many families the monthly premiums could run over a thousand dollars, and the deductible could be $15,000.

…or you could get some cheap catastrophic insurance, and pay cash for everything else. The cash price is generally less than half of the insurance price.

Many people have done the math and concluded that they don’t need insurance.
I’m curious, have they done any market fit testing? The crowd seems unanimously unhappy.
I would be hesitant to trust any cryptographic implementation coming from browser JavaScript. It’s not that I doubt or don’t trust the implementations from the browser vendors. I don’t trust the JavaScript developers executing them. This will provide a false sense of security implemented by persons lacking the education, training, and experience in security.

Most software developers generally are not formally trained in security as a separate domain of knowledge. If you think security is something that can be passively acquired by reading a few APIs you are wrong. This is why employers require certifications for security work that software development otherwise doesn’t require.

Cryptography was one of the most challenging domains/chapters in preparation for the CISSP. This is because real world cryptography implementations comprise various different cryptographic functions doing different things, such as: certificates, encryption, signatures, hashing, and so forth. The different crypto functions serve different purposes because they have different pros and cons. There isn’t some encryption blanket solution.
As ex-Accenture, I can totally believe you. I was once on a project where a guy took more than a month to deliver a codebase that was negative in value - we spent more dev time untangling and cleaning up the utter cr*p that he produced than it would have taken to scrap the whole thing and rewrite it from scratch.
"Not that philosophy was ever paramount in politics, but it was at least expected in the highest classes."

Well some of it has been influential, works by Aristotle and Plato for instance. In another post here I've mentioned Plato's Republic (now well over 200 years old). Its arguments about justice are still the cornerstone of our justice system these days—or at least they're supposed to be.

"Everything devolves into tribalism without philosophy."

Unfortunately, that's true. It's not gone unnoticed that in recent decades many universities have closed down their liberal arts and often this includes their schools of philosophy. It's pretty terrible really.
Interesting:

"We wear masks for three reasons: to protect ourselves from people who might be infected, to protect others from our infections, and to set social standards and norms appropriate for a pandemic."

I've thought for a while that this "imposition of social norms" was a driver for masking, but not really seen it stated explicitly before.
SQL is based on set theory and there is a reason for its existence. FORTRAN is based on legacy. Still remember the I j k and 80 columns things ...

To be honest reading https://github.com/fortran-lang/fpm/blob/master/src/fpm_back... the only thing look like the old fortran I know is integer I j and do loop. No go to I guess.
One of my neighbor works fir Amazon warehouse here in NJ, he is quite happy, never heard him complain about it.

Yeap, I agreed with you. The media is untrustworthy and is a propaganda machine. Good thing is they are digging their own grave now.
The idea of a decentralized ledger coupled with smart contracts is too powerful to be called a ponzi.

Ponzis can be built on top of it, just as the internet can be used to sell penis pills and get rich quick scams. But just as those don’t make the internet a sham, crappy coins and get rich quick schemes don’t make decentralized ledgers a scam.
The question is whether it can get better. Even small steps aggregate to great changes over time.

First CGA monitors were bulky, energy hungry and blurry at the same time. 40 years of continuous development, and I am staring at a nice 4K screen that does not strain my eyes and is substantially more energy efficient.
I don't think this changes anything about the point being made by the person you were replying to though, unless I'm missing something
Oh so an entirely subjective, impossible to verify set of facts are the reason our intelligence community decided to publicly provoke a nuclear power?
> Punching people in the face is illegal regardless of the reason

Sure, but see all the “punch nazis” memes. Examples:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210118210335/https://www.jwz.o...

https://punchingnazis.tumblr.com/
You forgot to quote the "best" bit a few paragraphs later :

>It's important to first explain the horrible template that ruined Trance music. Somehow a musical artform that devoted itself to hypnotic rhythms and spacey soundscapes became, inside of a decade, a mass produced assembly line McProduct for middle class Europeans (pejoratively known as Trancecrackers because they're white. Terribly, tragically, sunblindingly, basic-bitch-ordering-a-pumpkin-spice-latte white) who should have not spent their young adulthood clubbing but rather dying horribly in another continent-engulfing conflict (I mean, come on: Europe is due).

You know, one could answer this with an equally salty comeback, like how ironic it is for an American to think he's in a position to lecture white Europeans in any way about electronic music culture or taste : we built, grew and lived this music revolution for 20 years, while white America was still all about stale rehashes of guitar-based genres*, and black America all about hip-hop. To some extent, they still are.

Then around 2009**, when we had matured this into something commercial enough to be sold to the US public, we exported the cheesiest, bro-ready fringe of it as "EDM" and sure enough, it caught on like wildfire. Frat boys & sorority girls had "never heard anything like this OMG!" :)

But with remarks like the one he makes about war, it's probably sufficient to say that this guy, knowledgeable as he is, sounds like a bit of a bigot and a right d*ck.

*This was the era when Eminem had lines like "nobody listens to techno" (and by "techno" he meant Moby, lol), while in Europe the Berlin Love Parade had a million people in the streets each summer. I was dumbfounded in the late 90s at how many different names the id3 tag format had for country music and Christian genres. It was a complete WTF from a European perspective ! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID3#Genre_list_in_ID3v1[12]

** David Guetta-produced "I gotta feeling" for the Black Eyed Peas is widely credited to have launched EDM into the US mainstream. Soon after he & Tiesto had their Vegas residencies, EDC & UMF blew up and the rest is history.
https://www.irccloud.com/pricing see "Teams"
I don't mean to pick on you a bit here, but this feels like a good place to express something I've been having trouble with.

My parents raised me to do my best to neither take nor give offense. Most of my peers as a child were taught the same way. Obviously we're not Vulcans; We will sometimes inadvertently give offense, or respond emotionally to something that may have been meant innocuously. Yet so much of what I see in public discourse is reveling in both sides of that equation: deliberately trying to provoke emotional reactions from others, intentionally adhering to uncharitable interpretations of others' statements even after they have explained themselves, and celebrating the drama resulting from these things.

Civil discourse simply cannot function if this is a substantial part of pubic culture. There is no way to have a productive discussion if even one of the parties is deliberately provoking an emotional response. There is no way to have a productive discussion if even one of the parties is deliberately misinterpreting another in order to justify their own emotional response. Yet the dominant forms of public discourse these days include heavy doses of both of these things.
Dark Trade by Donald MacRae is a great book. Gave me a new appreciation of James Toney.

Boxing is frustrating as fuck these days though. I prefer boxing over MMA as a spectator, but UFC being the promoter and the sanctioning body at least ensures that the fights people want get made. As it stands we still don't know if Fury/Joshua is going to happen over doubts about the venue in Saudi Arabia.

Having said that, though, the top boxers make 10-20 times the money that the top MMA stars make (Conor MacGregor being the exception). It's no wonder the top MMA guys talk about fighting the top boxers.
My brother is an artist and the stories he tells about the art world are hilarious.
He's gay with brown skin and votes left so I consider him reasonably unbiased. Hardly a reactionary.
Radicalisation on the left spectrum of the horseshoe.
Microsoft has also said that they're envisioning a permanent work from home setup. Some people I know just gave up their apartment in Washington and moved to our small city in the midwest because even after MS adjusted his salary down he's coming out way ahead.
And an annual fee of $180 that kicks in a year after purchase. Facebook's hunger for personal data is more and more disturbing.
Well that says Intel has a non-fraternization policy and presumably Microsoft didn't when Bill and Melinda started dating.
Does that democracy include the right to not join the union?
> In a fair society

That's a central flaw in right-wing ideology. Society has never been fair, and probably never will be. People don't have the same opportunities in life, if nothing else due to the birth lottery. Adopting laissez-faire or "bootstrap" policies doesn't address this problem. As such, it very much is an irrational stance because it is incongruent with reality.

In other words, the right focuses on duty over rights, in extreme cases making welfare punitive. The left goes the other direction, focusing on rights over duty: government handout programs with few stipulations for the receiver.

The difference between the right and left here is that people on the right tend to presume fairness, and the left prescribes fairness - and conversely increasingly presumes oppression.

> the fruits of someone else's work

This is another, ignoring that we're social creatures and only thrived as a species because of co-operation. The left exaggerates in the other direction, pretending like we don't have a selfish gene and nowadays confusing outcome with opportunity. Individualism versus collectivism.

> efficiency

Yet the following are right-wing policies: teaching abstinence, the war on drugs, budget cuts to education... You might be right in some areas, but your definition of efficiency would need to be narrowed down specifically to budgetary efficiency.

In the context of your example, yes, it it more efficient to help someone financially while they're unemployed. It's also more efficient to decriminalise drugs and prostitution, to inform kids about sex and drugs, and to invest in education (as a proxy for success in life).

> common decency

Which has no objective definition by default.

I don't think there is such a thing as a political stance that is free from emotional axioms. At best, the political ideology can be internally consistent, with one point logically flowing from the basic principles, but there is always an external dependency on emotion. That said, there definitely is value in right-wing principles, just as there is in left-wing principles. The key is not becoming too entrenched or foaming at the mouth.
The refined point (and all preceding points) are not based in any sort of actionable public policy. I would argue that that point is as much based in emotion as the leftist points the parent is talking about. Yes, it sounds good that in a fair society people should not be entitled to the fruits of someone else's work, except if they cannot work themselves. It sounds good to people of both sides. I would not label this as a very conservative viewpoint.

However, that is not what politics is (supposed to be) about. It is supposed to be about actionable policies and their effects. When putting this into an actionable public policy you run into many problems. How are you going to police the "except if they cannot work themselves" part? What are the requirements for "not being able to work"? How lenient are you there? What happens to people that fall through the cracks because of mistakes made in policing that (i.e. people that cannot get a job, but do not qualify for the help)?

How much money does it cost to police that, and what are the costs of not policing it at all? If the cost of policing is higher than the cost of not policing and just accepting that some people will take advantage of the system, is it still a good idea to police?

You can also contribute to society in ways that are not defined as work. What happens to someone that is taking care of children, or taking care of their sick parents? Should they be assisted financially, or not? If so, how do you define that?

Then there is the issue of automation. Perhaps people are not entitled to the fruits of other people's labor. But what about the labor of machines? As more and more jobs get automated, who is entitled to that? Should the owners of the machines reap all of the benefits while the rest of society is left with less and less as more and more jobs get automated away, or should this be divided amongst the total population?

Different people will answer all of these trade-offs in different ways, even if they may agree on the core view. Left-wing and right-wing people generally share most of their core views. Nobody wants more crime, more poverty, etc. The implementation of these policies are where disagreement and discussion happens.
Fix the constant desire of everyone to re-invent/move away from & generally denounce email as a platform.

If you think email is perfect as it is, you're living in a bubble and are ignoring the pains of countless people. You may have an email setup that works perfectly for your needs, but if it was easy for everyone to have the same, no-one would be trying to re-invent it.
US police brutality would be unbecoming of a third world country let alone the first world, but that doesn't say anything about Italy.
People would if they had physical buttons The Gameboy and switch show that mobile gaming could be popular.
The linked article is not about the content moderation changes. Anyway,

Paraphilias are strengthened through repeated exposure and association with pleasure. So if you're in the camp of not wanting to strengthen a pedophile's desire to prey on children, you also want to restrict the availability of such stimuli. The whole "provide them an outlet" idea is nonsense - human sexual attraction does not work that way.
Enjoy your ridiculous reading, while I have fun playing my set of RTS games.

https://www.phonearena.com/news/10-best-real-time-strategy-r...

Don't like them? I don't care.
Yup, it's all wobbly and either scrolls too slowly or jumps and I lose my position.

I can't read it.
For those like me who had trouble finding the full report, here it is:

https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Digital%20platform%20se...
I think you misunderstood how a photo finish camera works. Please try re-watching the explanation video. The photo isn't a snapshot of the race at a specific time, the photo shows an entire interval where the top cyclers passed the finish line. It's like having long shutter time and a narrow slit and slowly moving the camera such that you get the view of the slit projected along the entire camera sensor.
I interpreted it as them picking an example that most people would agree is bad. Taking something to its logical extremes is a natural part of exploring its consequences.

Fewer people thinking that the Earth is flat would also be a reduction in viewpoint diversity.

OP has tried to make one point about the poor logic of the headline & you shut them down & refused to deal with the argument because you inferred the posit that racism is bad as them calling people who disagree with them racist. That's not you engaging with diverse viewpoints.
Apparently you haven't kept up with times.

https://www.manning.com/books/modern-fortran
In 1982, FORTRAN use was widespread. The limitations of the language were well known, and it was "obvious to all" that the languages of the future would be more sophisticated and overall "better" than FORTRAN.
It was not "cool", but very mainstream. Taught to all engineering majors in college. And it was the go to language when COBOL wasn't a match.
I interpret this statement as pointing at the tremendous inertia against change, and the fact that most of the tasks given to the computer do not require a abstraction and advanced concepts; just the "IF THEN", "DO", and assignment.
I think he was off by 10 years.
Even now "You can write FORTRAN in any language". I have seen javascript done this way. And it works. We can argue about how well, but it works.
Trust in Traditional Media Sinks Precipitously in April
In cycling you dont race the parcours you race your opponent, so the winner will do just as much work as is needed to beat his opponent.