skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've got similar hardware here - and just pulled down all my updates on the Fedora33 KDE spin. So far, both GTK and QT windows/UI are behaving fine for me...

Some some relevant hardware/kernel info I yanked out of glxinfo.

I've not looked for any bugreports, but I'm happy to follow one if I might be useful.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (NAVI10, DRM 3.40.0, 5.11.16-200.fc33.x86_64, LLVM 11.0.0)
OpenGL version string: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 20.3.5

Monitors: 2
0: +*DisplayPort-0 1920/598x1080/336+0+420 DisplayPort-0
1: +DisplayPort-1 1080/598x1920/336+1920+0 DisplayPort-1
Similar story here. I have 1000 shares in my taxable account, average cost is just under $13. Another 400 shares in my IRA, average cost of $36.

AMD has done well in terms of absolute dollar gains. Percentage wise, I have others that have done better, like MU, FB, PYPL.
Dreamhost is also great for domain names.
You need a vast number of house plants to make even a small difference. Basically you'd have to live in a greenhouse.
So run the browser on bigger hardware/better connection, and stream it down to the low-end desktop.

That smells kinda like Opera Mini back in the days, and how it was so much better than the pack-in browser of a Blackberry 7000-series: you could actually render a web page that looked more or less like it did on a desktop.
It really does feel like there's a day of reckoning coming for services that can boot you with one fell swoop. And unfortunately it's unlikely to come from the source or from a general public appeal, but from government intervention.

My adsense account was banned years ago. No details, no receptiveness to appeals. It's the kind of thing that's kept me from some personal/professional pursuits because I know there's a big barrier to monetization should it gain traction.

Google (or Apple) purgatory really doesn't seem like a sustainable business model. Someday they'll tick off the wrong person and it will turn into a big deal involving the government
With all due respect, this will not be a problem anymore with Apple’s M1 and the upcoming chips from Intal, Nvidia, and Apple.

Plus you don't know if tomorrow Google comes with a solution that’s will make chrome faster

Remember what’s happened to TwitPic?
Well the problem there is you can't really have the traditional mix and match part selection and get that kind of performance, right?
Good to know, Good for Iceland residents. Note that I didn't say 'all democratic countries'.
Okay. That's a bummer. But also: PlantUML is a lot more, or a lot different than another online diagramming tool. Their strength is expressing the diagrams using plain text. Having used my share of tools, l have never not hated drawing sequence diagrams, but in plain text it is a dream. They have command line tools, IDE integrations, etc.
Baldemor represen'!
What is the economics of Forward Email? How are they able to afford such low pricing when other incumbents like improvMX and forwardMX are much more pricier?
If you disable Javascript, it seems to still load the full article, and doesn't break formatting.
If Max is in USA and Ava is a random contractor in india - Max is screwed.

If Max and Ava in the same country - Max has a chance to apply pressure.

Two possible reasons for Ava behavior:

1.

No code written, demos are faked. Ava will try to kick paid can down the road as much as she can before quitting.

2.

Code is actually written and working well, and Ava's friend Ashish suggested to steal it and build their own business based on Max ideas and code Ave wrote.
The endgame is a credibility company that keeps a permanent history on everyone. Then once you have bad credit, no companies will want to give you a loan. Landlords will not want to give you space.
I think it’s highly likely that in 20 years we will view diesel cars like we do leaded fuel. An insanely bad idea that we knew was bad at the time but continued to use.
Unfortunately I don't have a specific answer but I've was thinking of doing something similar - I've since changed my approach but this is what I was thinking.

There are a number of these kinds of things for Kubernetes (Keel.sh, et al) but nothing that I could find for plain docker. One idea I had was to use something like https://github.com/adnanh/webhook and ping a webhook from the Github action. Yes it'd be publicly accessible, but using an HMAC header signed by a github secret would probably mitigate much of the risk. The webhook would do the pull and restart (via a shell script).

I also spent some time playing with waypoint (from Hashicorp) and think it has potential, but of course is a bit different. They do have a docker image 'builder' and I think the webhook could be built into the server side to do the pull on new image. fwiw, I am looking at moving my app to fly.io
If you can't find a descent AMD graphics card or 5000 series processor, I scored an descent OEM 4600g PC for $400 at Costco.
In practice, how does one try to achieve a balance between CO2 and PM? Do you open the windows for a while when CO2 is up and PM is down, and then close them and run your purifiers when CO2 starts to go back down? Is it possible to keep both low with HEPA filters on the windows?
AMD was developing an ARM core "K12" in parallel with the Zen core. K12 was delayed in order to prioritize Zen, Zen turned out to be a massive hit, so K12 got delayed indefinitely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_K12

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_(first_generation_microarc...

Once Apple released M1, rumors of AMD ARM development started again https://www.techspot.com/news/87851-amd-rumored-working-arm-...
HEPA filters cannot remove nanoparticles and ionizing filters ionize the air, and well, ozone is not good for us. So plants are far superior in this regard to air purifiers, which are useless
> The company claimed that the patches had “been released to address a recently identified security vulnerability. The security patch strengthens the protections of the solutions.” However, Vice also reports that the company did not “specifically say whether the addressed vulnerability is one and the same as the one disclosed by Marlinspike.”

IIRC Marlinspike didn't disclose one vulnerability, but a massive class of them: Cellebrite must process media in every possible format and thus relies on components from outside sources, FFmpeg being just one example. Cellebrite inherits security vulnerabilities from all those components, and doesn't appear to be diligent in keeping them patched (not that a perfect record of patching would protect them - the attack surface is enormous and probably most component developers don't provide sufficient security).

Integrating insecure code is likely a necessary decision for Cellebrite: Writing, maintaining, and updating their own code to process all types of media, and keep up-to-date with all changes to all those types of the media, seems impossible and certainly uneconomical. What could they do? Maybe they could sandbox each component but then they'd need a lot of horsepower in their device.
Its all fine until you have to complain about something going wrong and it becomes very trying to comply with whatever they need despite it being their fault.

I got stuck in a bureaucratic loop because an OCR reader interpreted a 0 as an 8. The fact that the automated process changed status and started throwing more forms at me, even though none it makes sense in context. Just because it was programmed that way. I still get them. Filling in forms with 0's is easier than dealing with people who insist I should be getting them in the first place (one person worked out what had happened, but transferred me to another department to get it fixed where I inevitably had the internal phone system fail and hang up on me. The horrible hold music/talk experience where they tell you how wonderful everything is just makes me loathe to attempt it again.

These things should happen less when human judgement is involved rather than cause-effect programming.

You may be right though - I can't speak for many overseas systems.

I did also get stuck in the UK tax system. They were sending me threatening letters, ironically I had to fill in multiple years worth of forms to escape the system even though I was in another country, and then they eventually worked out they owed me money.

Then there were the server failures due to load, for a specific online petition. Noone cared, but it was basically due to using old MS technology called Webforms which creates gargantuan data blobs per user/session called ViewState, which ran the servers out of memory. I think the online census submissions process had a similar issue too.

I do agree its nice to deal with these things from home rather than queue in some official building somewhere though.

Maybe I just have a natural tendency to attract flies to bypewriters or something. Maybe I'm bitter because I've built entire sites for the government only for them to throw the lot away once it was done, because the site might make them look bad.

I'm just very aware of the downsides of over-automation. If you're a valid case, but the existing system doesn't cater to you, then you become the problem rather than the system being the problem.

Anyway, I still think its awesome that the ACCC noticed this entanglement and brought it to peoples attention, and are one of the few indepedent bodies left that have some teeth.
Love Namecheap. Used them for years, esp was proud when they joined the campaign to protect Net Neutrality.
porkbun is cheap/good too (but some may throw the China boogeyman at them)
Does the Senseair S8 actually measure co2, or is it inferred via VOC levels?
I'm surprised "having a bonfire" isn't on this list, but I'm afraid to see how detrimental it might be.

The nostalgia factor is sort of wearing off now that I'm 40 and don't want my clothes to smell bad or have a low-key asthma attack. The last time I went camping in a campground and everyone had a fire going, the whole park was completely choked with smoke that it made going for a walk really crappy. It's such a weird activity, driving cars out to the woods to pay to burn dead trees.
Because of scale, and because they own almost the entire ad space.

But yeah, IMO the reputational damage in the prosumer POV is already reaching a tipping point. It's too early for them to notice anything but it looks that it has enough momentum.

Google was cool, but we shouldn't cling to it too much because of nostalgia. For me, it was most of my internet life with it. But now Google represents values and has behaviors that don't really go with me.
I've found something:

«...i'm dancing in a nutshell»

https://opensea.io/assets/0x2a2127753653f6210d26f5b470738bf1... (EPIC)

We do not do it...

https://opensea.io/assets/0x2a2127753653f6210d26f5b470738bf1... (LEGENDARY)
This depends on mindset: what do you consider the primary building block for a changeset - the changes, as made by the developer in chronological order or changes that are related by logic, despite the time (and order) in which they were made. I favor the latter approach - developers in the future will have no use in knowing the different approaches I attempted before coming to the actual solution - that is noise. What they should care about (IMO) are logical commits with related changes.

Additionally, "preserving detailed history" makes cherry-picking fixes across multiple release branches a royal pain: not everyone has the luxury of having on single, ever-green release branch. So having a feature/fix in a single, self-contained commit that hides away the actual history is a good thing in this scenario (with the added bonus of not running into fluff/half-cooked commits when running git bisect)
How does one ensure that the contract is even being abided with when such company refuses to even provide any info?
Google, Amazon, VISA/Mastercard, Apple etc companies have basically become the railroads of 21st century and they need to be treated the same way the railroads got treated in the 19th century.

https://theconversation.com/for-tech-giants-a-cautionary-tal...
>> If a developer gets suspended by Google or other companies like VISA, PayPal etc ...

Then support multiple payment processors. Be present in more than 1 platform. Etc ...
I personally can no longer trust this company with my email archive on HEY after reading this. I hope it’s not true.
While I get what you are saying, this is sounding more and more like an abusive relationship. "Getting beaten by your husband? Try not being around him when he is drunk." At some point we have to face the reality that the tech ecosystem needs some serious fixing, for both consumers and developers.
Sometimes when one of your accounts get banned you (the account owner) are legally required to stop using any other accounts. Bottom line - it increases survivability, but at the cost of breaking ToS. Separating corporate and personal accounts is a good idea in any case though.
> I'd extend this even further: never use a single account for more than one purpose. Create a separate account at the same company for the other purpose.

This should really go without saying. I’m sometimes shocked at the extent to which it has become normalized to mix up one’s personal accounts with work. I can’t count the number of times a colleague accidentally sent me an email using their personal account, or texted me from their personal phone. Some people even use their personal phone directly for work, without even doing so much as creating a work profile. Why are you doing this to yourself? You’re just asking for trouble.

Don’t even get me started on how entrenched “Sign In With [Company]” schemes have gained traction. Why deliberately have such a single point of failure? To save what? An additional password?
This is pretty true. I think this whole thing has been an argument for a low across-the-board tariff, to internalize the risk of supply chain disruptions.
Facebook advertisers target children interested in smoking, alcohol, weight loss
Is there a reason Google doesn’t offer a premium support tier for stuff like this?

There are millions of dollars flowing through Android to some companies. Paying $100 a month to always get to deal with a human seems like something that would be in demand.

I get that moderation can’t scale on the cheap, but with the dollar values involved, it doesn’t need to for the high paying customers.
Ironically, following this advice makes the problem even worse as you now require a car to do anything.

IMO, cities should just ban almost all car traffic from the centres so people can live car free without being poisoned.
My point is that there is scant evidentiary basis for any denominator for that 1% figure. The entire argument is an exercise in circular reasoning: you develop some methodology that results in 100 times as many rapes happening as we have rape convictions, and instead of questioning that methodology, we just assume that 99% of rapes don’t result in convictions?

Surely, there is a much lower burden of proof for this statistical methodology deciding that a rape occurred than there is for a court of law to determine that a particular rapist is guilty of rape. By what standard do you jump to the conclusion that the criminal justice system should lower the necessary burden of proof to incarcerate someone, and not that this statistical methodology should perhaps raise the burden of proof it requires? To be blunt, do you seriously think the American criminal justice system doesn’t incarcerate enough people?
Sorry, it's iOS only, and likely will be that way forever (unless I'm suddenly blessed with a huge pile of free time again).

I second giving SimpleRockets a try, though.
"Enterprises" do indeed dump hardware after 3-5 years, but not because it stopped being TCO-positive. It's just because they aren't sophisticated enough to own a computer without a warranty. Organizations who buy their computers by the megaton know that these machines are TCO-positive for 10+ years. There's a reason you can still get a Sandy Bridge in GCP or a Haswell in EC2.
There is no data published to fully back up the claim that autopilot is safer than humans. The problem on the surface is:

Autopilot is used mainly on limited access roads but safety is compared to all roads.

A Tesla is an expensive, new car and is compared to all cars of all ages and maintenance.

The drivers of above cars are also skewed statistically versus all drivers.

It's disappointing that the same people quick to claim to "follow the data" or "follow the science" are so comfortable doing nothing of the sort and simply trusting Tesla -- who obviously can't be objective here.
Is there anything in place to prevent bad actors from deploying fraudulent ad-click tools to takedown accounts?

(What you said makes sense to me, I just don’t know if/how ad networks could differentiate between the account-owner committing fraud and a malicious 3rd party.)
The specific package used is a TSOP-I-40L, standard registration JEDEC MO-142, controlling document here [0].

These things are super common for RAM or Flash in older designs or designs trying to avoid BGA parts (because BGAs are awful for anything but high-automation, high-volume work). The 0.5mm pin pitch is on the tighter side for gull-wing parts, but it's also super common itself. Many QFP processors are even tighter at 0.4mm pin pitch, and 0.5mm is very common for discretes and DFNs/QFNs. So it's no trouble whatsoever for assemblers; they do these things all day, every day, and won't even blink if you ask for one. The legs also make it amenable to manual rework, as shown in the article.

If I were designing this part in, I wouldn't think twice about using this package (used board area aside). If there were multiple packages available for a part, this one would probably actually be high on my "ease of working with" list!

[0] (Registration required) https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/mo-142-d
Wish I could remember where I read it but the conclusion was that having indoor plants solely to increase air quality isn't a good idea. Obviously it's somewhat better than nothing but so minor as to be largely insignificant given how much air exchange there is with the outside world when you aren't on a shuttle
Mr. "Marlinspike" could probably earn a few (edit: more) quid as an expert witness thanks to that blog post.
The revenue-sharing laws were a scam, basically the Government forcing Google and Facebook to pay arbitrary bribes to a few big media companies.

If the laws weren't a scam, that money would have gone to pay for journalism, not prop up the bottom line of companies which are consistently cutting back the number of journalists under their employ.
> Maybe a price that would allow such speed in an American company exists, but likely it's sky-high.

The Chinese one was sky-high, too. It's just that the Chinese government ate the cost.
>Not prosecuted != not provable

Fair enough. Only 4% are known to be provable.

>Not provable != false

I neither claimed nor implied this. My point could be summed up as not provable != true.
Forgive me for piling on yet-another-unsolicited-registrar-recommendation, but I'm a big fan of NFSN due to their terms of service and feel safe that none of my domains will ever get pulled without very good reason. I've never had that trust tested, but it's at least spelled out:

https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/services/domains

https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/help/abuse
Abiy Ahmed’s Counterrevolution
For consumers, there is one for Google One subscribers: https://one.google.com/about/support
We should use some ridiculously comical terminology like Starfleet Captain and Redshirt.
> The main thing I don't want is to feel network-effect pressure from some huge non-Apple platform to install from sources with worse privacy and security guarantees.

What you mean is that you do want app developers to feel network-effect pressure from the huge Apple platform which has those privacy and security requirements. Which you still have as long as a large number of people feel the same and refuse to install apps outside of Apple's store.

It may even benefit you for Apple to have less, but still some, leverage. For example, a third party store might start offering a BitTorrent client for iOS, which Apple only prohibits for bad reasons that don't help you. Then the availability of the apps in another store might convince Apple to allow well-behaved BitTorrent clients in their store to prevent you from switching (since their reasons for prohibiting it are bad). Then you get a selection of vetted clients when you currently have none.

Likewise, if there were other stores then there would be no reason for them to continue their otherwise-useless prohibition on emulators or virtualization.

Meanwhile you could still install all of your apps from their store and they would plausibly still have enough leverage to keep them well-behaved, just not enough to prohibit well-behaved things that you actually want if it's easier to get them some other way.

> Let's say I did like Facebook, or at least tolerated it because all my family was on it, and chose to use it only on iOS specifically because it was relatively secure and limited their snooping somewhat. Your scenario is a strictly worse situation for me. I was using it and was OK with the situation, now I have to either risk more snooping or drop it. That's not better.

What we're after here is a situation where the combination (you, Apple) has enough leverage to cause Facebook to provide an app that isn't ruinously bad on privacy. It's not clear that we're there even now -- Facebook has a huge network effect and basically the only reason Facebook is an app and not a web page is so it can suck up more of your personal information -- but suppose we were. Apple's leverage relative to Facebook is doing you some good.

The answer is then to make sure your leverage against Facebook is sufficient to keep them honest. This could imply some antitrust action against Facebook, e.g. so that you can use an app not written by Facebook to contact your family who uses Facebook, and then choose one willing to meet Apple's standards even if Facebook itself won't. So it's still possible to solve problems like this, to the extent that they exist, through other means.
I'm surprised this doesn't mention gas stoves and ovens. Gas is the "high end" option, yet creates totally unnecessary PM2.5 pollution in your home. Children growing up with gas stoves have higher rates of asthma.
I went in to the article ready to disagree with the claim in the headline, that Singer is committed to [presently] controversial ideas, as the whole animal liberation movement is relatively milquetoast today: nobody is going to try to cancel/deplatform you for claiming that you like "Animal Liberation". But I ended up being very wrong: the journal he discusses in the article, the "Journal of Controversial Ideas" seems like it contains legitimately controversial things.

https://journalofcontroversialideas.org/volumes_issues/1/1
That's a more ideal solution, but it's probably faster to move than for a city to make changes like that. You can try to stock up on food and grow crops to minimize driving.
Is this a HN bug? You just pasted the exact same broken link again... Here's the correct link: https://www.mightyapp.com/security
Yeah - happy user of this one for years :)
>Broil fish with windows closed 45 min

>Smoke one cigarette 11 min

How is "boiling fish" 4x worse than smoking?
Feds Arrest an Alleged $336M Bitcoin-Laundering Kingpin
Legit question: is there any other service/company on earth that bans you for having multiple accounts? This seems like an insanely restrictive policy. One of the defining characteristics of internet communication is that you can have a “work persona” and a “home persona” and maybe another one for your hobbies, another one for your porn browsing and gambling, another one for your aunts and uncles. To deny this basic, universal concept is backwards and frankly shouldn’t be acceptable to anyone.