skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The M1 doesn't make sense when its in every darn product. The only differentiator is screen size, RAM, and OS?

They've only replaced the lower tier of Macbooks and iMacs with the current M1 board, which suggests to me that they're working on a variant with more CPU and GPU cores that will go into the higher tiers of those machines.
It isn't and they haven't. Reading past the headline is a basic skill of news reading. It doesn't make it misinformation just because you don't like the headline.
Well... when you're posting things on social media you're publishing them to the world. That somebody is going to look at them... well I guess I don't have that much of a problem with it. If you don't want the minor details of your life recorded and put up to government scrutiny, stop making your existence a reality show.
For anyone interested in the links he provided, I'll add a third, a nice tutorial that introduces you to LÖVE[0]

[0]: https://github.com/a327ex/blog/issues/30
Your factor #1 above (about adverse selection through trading with a well-informed counterparty) reminded me of something I read in 'Trading and Exchanges'.

The section 'The Adverse Selection Spread Component' says that dealers will set their bid/ask spreads to account for the information they will get when someone hits their bid or whatever. So they need to estimate the probability that their next trade is with an informed counterparty.

If that probability is high, then they'll quote a higher spread.

Conversely, if they are quoting for retail order flow, they may assume they're never dealing with informed counterparties, and can offer a tighter spread.
The Fujitsu manuals are really good. Like you say, it's not often that you see that level of detail in the ARM world - or, frankly, the non-x86 world in general. From my prehistory as a Hyperscan developer back in the days before the Intel acquisition and the x86-only open source port, I have a lot of experience chasing around vendors for latency/throughput/opt-guide material. Most of it was non-public and/or hopelessly incomplete.

I salute your dedication to nerd-sniping. I need my creature comforts these days too much to spend days out there in the nerd-ghillie-suit waiting for that one perfect nerd-shot. That may be stretching the analogy hopelessly, but working with just architecture manuals and simulators is tough.

I am more aiming for nerd-artillery ("flatten the entire battlefield") these days: as my powers wane, I'm hoping that my superoptimizer picks up the slack. Despite my skepticism about SVE, I will retarget the superoptimizer to generate SVE/SVE2.
It gets worse, apparently the code just assumes that the data is encoded limited range YUV, so it does the expansion to full range even on files that are already full range (the default output for some encoders). https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1654461

I believe this may affect the images in the article, actually. It looks to me like the dark areas of the animal's hair are crushed pretty badly - not just the saturation issue I'm talking about.
I want to be careful not to be seen as speaking for that whole community; I'm just saying, if you were in a gathering of vulnerability researchers, and you said "OpenBSD's security reputation is really overrated", you'd get shrugs, not gasps.
Is the universe finite?

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200123104919A...

Sadly that thread will soon be gone due to the approaching Yahoo Answers apocalypse. Hopefully Internet Archive will save it!
I agree with you in general, but disagree on the time scale. Particularly:

>The creative class (us) will quickly have largely all ARM computers within 4 years.

I think good options might exist in 4 years, but still possess trade-offs, where legacy x86-64 platforms still have their place. This could be something as niche as maturity of IOMMU implementations in x86 workstations, but stack up a bunch of niches and I find it hard to see "largely all" in four years. Fifty-fifty in four years, "largely all" in ten for "the creative class". Then there is a long tail of industries may end up legacy-bound to x86 for decades to come.

Nothing is guaranteed. If starting in 2022 we were to see another 3-year performance plateau, ala 2016-2019, then anyone who bought into an mid- or high-end x86 platform today may not feel compelled to upgrade in just four years. Even if the ARM options exist, it might not be a compelling enough gap in four years' time. I'm not saying that a plateau is likely (competitive landscape suggests the opposite), but I don't have a crystal ball, so I won't discount it either.

Again I want to emphasize that I mostly agree, but I wouldn't bet any money on sweeping changes on such an aggressive timeline.
The truth is you can basically already do this in excel without involving any more complicated things like VBA etc, purely in spreadsheet. You just need a lot more cells and longer formulas to set it up. Lots of Vlookups. This will provide the people that are already doing this stuff some much appreciated shortcuts.
And where does the MIME type originate? With many web servers, its based on file extensions or magic numbers...
I had a feeling someone was eventually going to pull this one out. :)
I suspect it's more like an FPGA - massively parallel structures that don't fit traditional "programming" well.

Incidentally, FPGAs are also insanely expensive at the high end.
I found this in the article and I think this is something many of us would find objectionable and dangerous even if the car is hacked.

“The amendment would also allow self-driving companies to disable human driving controls in vehicles when in full self-driving mode.”

Charlie Miller demoed the car hack in 2015 and I have seen nothing to increase my faith in the security practices of most car manufacturers. They are still 10 years behind the regular IT sec crowd.

https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-hig...

Car manufacturers still use static credentials on the keys to unlock the door! We have had affordable mfa capabilities on IoT for over a decade with multiple proximity technologies including BLE and NFC etc.
Back in the old days we learned about computers without the internet.

You had mainly paper documentation. With 10 or so of the best tech manuals to read, and a bunch of old machines to network together, and a few CDs of useful software, the right person could easily become highly skilled.

And by definition hacking means working out things that aren't already known (by many at least) so the absence of say stackoverflow and the other joys of the internet wouldn't slow those guys down either.
The question was not about stop signs. I very strongly doubt you spotted a "stop side" out your window. Even if you have a cold.
Creative class is a lot more than programmers. Look at boutique system integrators like Puget Systems... do you see Apple/ARM Hardware? Heck no you don't! These guys sell hardware to a LOT of the companies that comprise the credits in movie production, game production, laboratories, university science departments, ML researchers, big energy, and soooooo much more.

These guys are not rewriting their software stack for thin chassis, thermal limited, and non-repairable hardware. Raytheon doesn't buy Apple/ARM hardware for their simulations, design and development. Does Boeing, Airbus, Ford or Caterpillar run on Apple/ARM hardware? Are these companies just chomping at the bit to ditch their legacy stacks? I don't think so.
That does seem to be the intent they announced.
Ask HN: What programming languages are startups using these days?
I know each programming language has their pros and cons and we should pick programming languages based on the problem that we're trying to solve but I was wondering if there was a preferable language among startups.
I'm using ctrl+b (xfce-terminal) but also don't use vim
I thought this video was pretty clarifying, including words from Aisha himself: https://youtu.be/1zD-KjuGuiM

It definitely sounds like he got at the very least a shitty deal. If you don't have time to watch, he mentions he feels he signed something he didn't fully understand, leaving him liable as guardian, passport seized and all.
Parent said nothing about the US. You have a valid point, but there are far better ways to make it than with this complete non-sequitur.
What’s the option if you don’t outsource? Every company who wants to ship something by sea needs to purchase and boat and man a crew?
I'd say smart is what you have naturally, education is what you acquire in school, intelligence is a snapshot of what you actively remember from education plus what you've learned via recent experience, and wisdom is a scratchpad where your brain makes a note whenever it comes across something that's relevant to all of the above.
It’s rated as centrist bias: https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

From what I’ve seen they make an effort to be balanced. Saagar Enjenti, who appears in this video and is a Republican, regularly presents alongside Krystal Ball, who is a progressive, in this joint show:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rising_(news_show)
just use the newest one... especially if you don't already know it ;) that's how SV rolls
1. How would Japan know if the bombs would be delivered in small or large groups of planes?

2. If they do not surrender after demo, then drop on Japan. Invasion would never happen as U.S. was ramping up nuclear production: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/history-magazine/...

3. Where would Japan move all those people and production? Why did they not move them given the existing firebombing? https://www.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/deadliest-air-raid-...

Japan was confined to a fossil fuel poor mountainous island at the end of the war. Japan could only prepare for a last ditch defense of the home.
If the issue is not having roots you can always buy some real estate :)
This is one of the reasons I dislike the "literalist" judges and their "interpretations". It goes against what the law _is_, in my opinion.

Note: I have a law degree, but am not a lawyer
I prefer to think of it as wisdom is what you know intrinsically, education is what you have learned, intelligence is your capacity for learning
I have doubts about this study. It could be that participants are thinking about the questions differently than the author anticipates.

For example, one could argue that a stop sign has ten sides and not eight because it is a physical object with a front and back. And if it has circular bolt holes for mounting to a post then you could also say it has many more sides than ten.
Where you are from is a relative question.

If you are in the US you might say Canada.
If you are in BC you might say Toronto or Ontario
If you at the University of Guelph you might say UofT
If you are in Toronto you might say India
If you are in India in a different region you might say goa
If you are in goa you might say your village name
If you are in your village you might point to an area or your street
If on your street you might give the number

Where you are from is closest place that is different to the other person.
Www.sohbetturkce.com
http://www.sohbetturkce.com/ Sohbet türkçe turk chat sohbet odaları Türk sohbet siteleri.
http://www.sohbetturkce.click/
https://18sohbetodalari.blogspot.com
https://whatsappsohbet18.blogspot.com
Smallest Frog
This example doesn’t seem to have anything to do with the law. If you’re a big and important customer, you get more leeway to make mistakes and get them reversed. If you are small potatoes you don’t get to reverse mistakes. Go rack up a $1000 phone bill by mistake and see how difficult it is to fight. Then, go be a Fortune 500 company and see how easy it is to get a mistaken corp phone bill fixed. It’s not fair but it’s reality.
The problem for me is that at the moment everyone I talk to is on Facebook messenger, many of them I don't even have their mobile numbers to message them through iMessage. Having added them on Facebook many years ago, rather than meeting them and asking for their mobile number. Many of my friends don't even use the Facebook app just the messenger function because it seems as though everyone is on it.

iMessage has great features, but I just can't stand using multiple messaging applications if I don't need to and I'm not going to switch to iMessage by asking all my friends for their mobile numbers. It means I don't be part of the groups that have been created for years among peers and friends.

I don't really see how iMessage can compete.
Running and hiding when insolvency hits is illegal in most places. But sure, it's certainly possible that this has happened to his employer while that company who employ him is still providing quotes about it being impossible to find anyone who would take his place but not paying him either.

So in insolvency that is deemed bankruptcy the assets of the company are traditionally used to deal with as much of the liabilities of the company as they can in rank order of those liabilities. You know secured debt ranks ahead of unsecured etc.

This guy's claim on the assets of the company to get him out of that hell, for me, rank number 1, and alone. Next comes the wages due all employees not deprived of their liberty. And that's the usual way it is done too.
Like the confuscious quote:

By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.
> It actually sounds like your answer is more bias-based, because your intuition is more wrong here. There is data from the 2020 Stack Overflow survey[0] indicating a significant lead for devs who use Rust and continue to want to develop in it, vs. Go. 86.1% Rust vs. 62.3% Go.

That's great to hear. Unfortunately, language popularity in enterprise/production environments isn't really based around how much a developer loves or hates something.

There are more Go programs/programmers now than Rust, was the basis of my post that you're objecting to, which can be verified if you scroll up on the link you posted.
That seems very apple honestly, they’d rather you emit pure metal primitives (is that the right term? Idk) and then let their backend schedule on their soc- because for all we know, they have some special asic ip that they added/or will add and can take advantage.
Thanks for the feedback. This is definitely the thing we have the most difficulty getting right (there's only four of us, bit of an echo chamber sometimes). Just to confirm are you talking about the info on the main project homepage or the linked dashboard?

For anyone else interested, the project is a 'shared-economy' style attempt to collect broad scale 'reconnaissance' data on remote / knowledge-lite areas of the Great Barrier Reef (currently only 5% of the reef is regularly surveyed). Ultimate goal is to improve models used for targeted management / research / conservation efforts.

If you were on the Great Barrier Reef between Oct-Dec last year you could contribute by submitting photos of the reef (we also ran a large number of expeditions to remote locations, manned by volunteers and researchers). Stats are on the site, but we ended up collecting over 13,000 from over 600 sites (the reef is over 2,300km long).

Today you can contribute by helping us to analyse these images. Jump on the site and we'll teach you how to do that (basically paint by numbers to categorise what you see) and then serve you up as many random images as you can handle.

At the moment the data is being used to measure coral cover and feed into research modelling. But there's a lot of room to move. E.g. we're also looking to develop vision models for reef-scape imagery on the GBR using polygon data from the analyses.

Also worth mentioning that all of the collected data, including imagery, metadata, analyses, and any vision models produced, will be open sourced (or otherwise released under permissive licenses) as soon as possible.

Cheers!
In the context of COVID we’re actually talking about unknowingly exposing someone to a virus. So I don’t think it’s directly comparable.

Anyway, I don’t believe in throwing someone in jail for such an act. Some people do.

But I don’t think that invalidates the point that such a right does not exist, because “spread disease” is a superset of “knowingly spread disease”.

Ironically here in California it is legal to knowingly spread AIDS to someone, because democrats, yet that same political faction thinks that you are responsible if you unknowingly spread COVID-19 to someoen. (As an aside the absurd “infecting Grandma in the grocery store” doesn’t happen anyway because that’s not really where COVID spreads but I digress)
Yes, I already run Emacs (Spacemacs, to be specific) under WSL2 with X410 as the X Server. Presumably, I'll be able to ditch X410 when this layer gets to my corporate-mandated Windows build.
so he had a free home at the beach for 4 years?

what is this circle, anyways: https://www.google.com/maps/place/%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%86%D...
> Selling oil on the free market disproportionately benefits those that own the means to process and resell it further.

What is the basis for this comparison? Compare the profit margins of a gas station (tiny) versus the profit margin of a company that needs to purchase fuel to operate a factory (could be anything). Or for that matter a company that needs products produced at one of those factories (the rest of us). The benefit is widespread and it's not at all obvious who benefits most, commodity or not.
The parent comment didn’t say “we’ll all be using Apple”

He said ARM.
Ah, the good ole' React license trick. Where is the mob outrage? Or are web developers so fickle to not care outside of JavaScript frameworks? Video encoding standards are much lower on the stack and the potential for damage is much greater compared to a website.
> imagine you showed up on time and: A) the plane was gone and they explained you bought a ticket with an error in the flight time; or b) they informed you they cancelled your ticket and your couldn’t fly because the price of your ticket had an error.

With respect: those two points _do_ happen? So I must be misunderstanding your overarching point with them
> Haskell's had a great story around IO for 29 years, or longer than Java's been around.

I like that a lot. I did not realize that problem was solved so early on.

The things I was thinking of were more like good application frameworks, database libraries, etc. all the stuff you need to build commercial products and that you might have trouble justifying developing on an investor’s/shareholders’ dime.
Ryzen 7401p still represents the pinnacle-for-it's-time value offering to me. 24 cores, single socket, on a 14nm process, launched July 2017 for $1075. Just an amazing breakthrough processor. At the time there were supposed to be X300 and A300 chipsets coming, basically just boot bios, to make ultra-low cost motherboards possible. There have been improvements since then to architecture & IPC, but overall it feels like we've been headed in reverse since then in terms of chips that get put into medium/large-ish sized chassis.

It has been remarkable what a mockery Mac has made of mobile chips, and now of desktop chips. At a way more reasonable price point.

> but the company’s decision to eschew clock speed disclosures suggests that these CPUs differ only modestly.

I forget exactly when but the first Google IO that happened where Google started offering simply "Intel Core i5" or i7, without saying the model number (2017?), without revealing speeds, & it was a huge huge jumping the shark moment for me. A post competitive market, where speeds were good enough, where reputation & market presence domineered over metrics & comparable factors. I don't think chasing specific GHz & cache size numbers &c is super rewarding or important, but it felt like the first time we were being sold an unspecific system, where obvious inquiry into what we were buying was blocked.

This is somewhat the opposite of this article: that Apple has found a good enough CPU to sell everywhere. But I still think the real truth is that the providers, those building systems, have begun to refuse to compete. They refuse to detail what they are offering. AMD has been without competition and the new 24c chip is considerably more expensive, albeit for yes more IPC, but it still hurts me a little. Looking at Google no longer allowing us to have any idea what kind of Core i5 or whatever chip though, they beat this article to the punch almost half a decade ago. Consumers haven't been given respect, haven't been allowed to know what wattage, what caches, what Hz their chips use for a long time now. Google started that, Google pushed the post-knowable computing upon us. Apple is merely following up on this, merely delivering what Google started, at a far better price point, with far better underlying technology.
It's costing in usefulness. iMessage loses value if no one uses it, and outside of the US pretty much no one uses it, so it's useless.
That doesn't really explain what would happen if the person didn't have an iPhone to receive such notifications? Perhaps they're an Android user.
The 10% is what is currently often done because it barely moves the interest rates.

The interest rates are just so low that waiting to get a loan and buy a house is mostly money lost by not getting that stupidly low interest loan.
There's a subset of 1 who are good at making wild guesses while leaving open the possibility they're wrong so 2 has an opportunity to share what they know.
Nobody at MSFT talks to their counterparts. I cringe every I have to copy and paste between Teams, Outlook and OneNote. There have to be internal customers there with the same problems.
As you demand, eager to serve, sir.

But what's it worth to you?

Preferably in real estate, gold, stocks, bonds or bitcoins.
If need be, I'll also take cash.

No NFT's though, sorry.
You are not an expert but you are also lacking common sense and you’re stuck up on one paper. You can actually find a paper backing up quite a few opposing arguments and there are plenty of papers, if that’s the only type of thing you ingest, to claim that legalizing prostitution would bring a lot of benefits.
I'm expecting apple to go the tiles or chiplet route for their workstation processors. TSMC have been working on some advanced packaging methods that are ideal for this usecase.

Apple could make one 16 core die and offer workstations with anywhere between one and four tiles for 16 to 64 cores.

As for the high end laptops and iMacs, I'm expecting Apple to launch a monolithic 8+4 chip.

That would be just 3 unique dies to cover Apples entire Mac lineup.
A History of 'Consonance' and 'Dissonance' by James Tenney [pdf]
I like to think that intelligence is the set of questions you can solve. Wisdom is the capability to pick the right questions.
I’ve already outlined in another comment why they could increase transmission.

They increase net volume of air exchanged, therefore all else equal they increase the release of aerosols. There’s furthermore a strong chance that they actively nebulize respiratory droplets into fine aerosols; ie they incresse the relative aerosolization and therefore the absolute aerosols.

They make convo partners stand closer together or speak louder.

They alter risk appraisal.

It is foolish to rule out any downsides. At best you’re advocating for a condom full of holes. At worse you’re advocating for a condom that magically worsens STI transmission.
Do they actually have people who are experienced with type theory working on the type system, or is it the same core team?
This looks really nice, especially collaborative editing. I've been playing around with draft.js and also looked at other libs.

How does this handle maintaining text selection while interacting with a drop down list (ex. font size drop down, link editor with pop over)? Google docs handle this really well. It would be nice to see this in the docs.
ARM, not Apple. They are not the same thing.