skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Google also has blocked Tor and VPNs since 2006 or so.

I just Googled when was Bush born while on Private Internet Access and the only thing google did differently was giving me results in German.

And no cookies either: I opened a temporary container tab so it shared no cookies with Google.
The case against using homebrew mounts daily. Their poor decisions (regarding all of engineering, community/social, and privacy) are numerous enough for a non-listicle blog post at this point.

I switched to using Nix on macOS to manage packages, and it's fantastic. The nix concept in general is wonderful, and there's a lot of work put in to making it work well on the mac. I haven't missed `brew` at all.
> "I was guided throughout by two principles:

- be true to the photographs

- be true to the Earth

[...]

The main changes I made were:

[...]

- adjusting the black point until the background of space appears truly black"

These shots are beautiful, but is making the background completely black really doing reality justice? In our unfortunately light polluted night sky we can barely see the stars, but shouldn't the astronauts see the earth within a shimmer of billion stars? Or is the source material not showing stars due to a lack of exposure?
I am very sorry to hear about your experience I hope all is better now. My comments are by no means an attack on you.

> Whether it is legal or not, isn’t the question.

I think it's perfectly normal to discuss whether things are legal or not. IANAL but what that person did seems illegal to me.

> Very few people have the balls to even try anything to help, even just giving money.

Would you not agree anyone who pays taxes is technically speaking helping?

> Why the government isn’t working with him rather than against him is the real question.

Many organisations follow very top-down approach and it might be extremely difficult for staff "on the ground" to make big decisions.
No, it does not feel strange that it is the default, as I would love it if more people abided by the same moral code as myself which is why I contribute in a free exchange of ideas and advocate for people to volunteer both in terms of organ and blood donations – the latter I am sadly not allowed to do in the UK due to my type 1 diabetes.

It is however strange to me that rather than to communicate clearly with its populace, improve/innovate in terms of recruitment methods, and generally “educate” the populace, a government reaches for an option that I would consider morally dubious and potentially harmful to the overall opinion on organ donation further down the line whenever that inevitable case comes up when a donation is carried out without properly seeking consent. I say inevitable here, because out of the three countries (Sweden, Japan, and the UK) I have lived in long enough to form an opinion, the UK government is by far the worst and its institutions the most poorly managed.

As for “elected”, the UK has a very large expat community and many of us are well over the 12-month limit and are being “volunteered” as donors without being close to having the right to vote for the political body that enacted this legislation. Make of that what you will.
There is growing nationalist sentiment in China which is resulting in increased status of domestic brands among Chinese consumers and reduced status of foreign brands

Does China have luxury fashion brands that are high status abroad? Not many
Again, real problem is socialism [thinking] - that system will resolve all problems. But any systems are unperfect - "never say never" do not apply here.

We have society/tax/government sponsored homeless shelters, food points, social workers etc etc. But it is obviously not enough because every "system" is generalization -> some or most cases are resolved but some cases are lost.

More, having "help system" sometimes PROHIBITS real help, example: article above ! It is epidemy and they prohibit more then sensible help ! Possible fire problem ? Or just someone didn't like this ? Other example: some baker was giving free food to poor peoples and government tax institution send him to court because someone (poor people) gained somerealynothing and no tax was paid... - beyound stupidity or evil .

Even more: when there is official help system some people take it as excuse for not doing personal help, eg: "GO TO FOOD POINT YOU $%%*(&^". Socialism mentality is like this. Plus corruption acceptance, IMO always.

Help systems are part of our better civilisation. But preventing personal help is effective destroying that civilisation.

My proposition: every city clerk take one mini-wooden-shelter with homeless person on his house front grass
lawn. And providing some food for your poor neighber is pretty obvious, right ?
yeah, but if you really need to store 3 states, why not make 1 first-class concept instead of awkwardly combining two?
SN 815: Homogeneity Attacks – Is FLoC All That Bad?
Is the quest to do all and be all costing us our health?
> Collins, who remained in orbit on the Command Module, is behind the lens. Every other human is in front of it.

This caption is so powerful.
Z-Tox Review, Legit or a Scam?
For that, simply use https://twemoji.twitter.com/ or a similar service that lets you download SVG emojis. Then you implement it as a regular favicon.
I don't think that's a fair definition. If such a CPU could be reasonably made, you could still call it assembly.
I quite like the shopping centre experience in Australia. I went down to the my local centre today. It was vibrant and absolutely teaming with people. We shopped around and the kids had a good time in the play area with other kids.

Despite it being really busy most stores had short to no queues and aside from JB Hifi had nobody anywhere near the doors checking receipts.
About WAM implementation mentioned in paper:
http://wambook.sourceforge.net/

Edit: added some info about link
I cried a little at the the shot of the lander and earth from the command module, the thought of every single other human in the same frame is just too much.
Automerge is one thing, it's the implementation that relied on some pure text hack. Matching text is a hard problem, and regex is not a solution, but a mere tool that translates one problem to another.

Actually, it only creates more problems:

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think
"I know, I'll use regular expressions."
Now they have two problems
This is a nice sort of post capital star trek thought, but the current reality is that this environment of yours us a mixed commercial, community and personal space. While you'd have to be fairly thick to not consider warhol's work fair use, there are an endless amount of creative and technical pursuits that without protection would leave the creators destitute. Just take one look at open source - an outright ocean of creative technical work used commercially and personally, and the avergae funding there is not just zero, but negative by way of dev time and material goods required to produce it. And that's probably the worlds most conscious space in terms of free use and shared contributions and so on.

Declaring all sharing discussion just doesn't cut it.

I would _like_ if we were in a place we could have this environment/discussion idea, but we're not even close.
> luxury clothing is for dumb people with money.

Follow HN guidelines please
It’s a good question, but if you care about the audit trail, then perhaps event sourcing is a better choice.

So yes, this only assumes you care about when the on state happened and you don’t care about the history.
https://twitter.com/saurik/status/1337094724813918208
Fork a fork of the iconic font and CSS toolkit
Well, since gender is mutable now, I suppose you can't store the date the gender changed "just in case". But yeah, unless you're dealing with people, this doesn't apply.
Does it? I think you’re twisting my words a bit there.

My aim was simply to answer the parent’s claim that I might have an issue with organ transplant and that’s not the case.

> because it’s the right thing

“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so”
Interesting, thanks for the link, I wasn't aware of that one.

I've been mulling how to apply fast search algorithms to regular expressions for a while. There isn't really one technique that works well for all expressions, so the more options right now the better. Eventually I'll settle on a few that offer the best overall coverage and performance.
I think it’s a case of picking the low hanging fruits once the technology is unlocked, then moving on.

We have the same not only with space but with everything.

Steampunk is essentially the feature we never had with advanced enough mechanical machines. Somehow we sprinted towards harnessing the energy of the steam stoping short from coal powered AI robots but was that the case? IMHO what happened is, we exploited the feasible part and moved on.

The same with space. With the science and tech we harnessed so far, it’s simply not feasible to do more than what we have done already. With the advancements made in recent decades, some more stuff might have moved within the range of feasible but nothing revolutionary. We are not going to the nearest star anytime soon and that’s not simply because we lost interest in it. The best we probably can do in human travel is Mars.
Since scale and locality is such an issue here, I wonder if there are any concepts for integrating such a system in new mid-rise buildings. Similar to an elevator shaft, but with a weight of depleted uranium instead of the passenger car.

You're digging for the foundation anyway, maybe maybe the marginal cost to dig a few meters deeper is worth it. You're building with a crane anyway, maybe the marginal cost to build a steel frame tower on the roof is worth it. It's certainly not a mine shaft, but perhaps better than nothing.
They are not real lakes, as far as I know. They might have been once but Skylake and Ice Lake are just made up.
Weird, Minnesota is known for corruption.
People can easily share the solutions to real exams, as well. (Though I agree the bar is much higher.)
A bright moon surface and fully lit Earth hanging in the sky is also a sort of "light pollution" for the human eye ;) (at least it will cause the pupil to close and let less light through, tuning out the dim stars, same effect why there are no stars in the moon photos). Of course I haven't been to the moon so far and can't really know what the sky actually looks like during "moon day" :)
Malls peaked decades ago in the US, but they haven't peaked at all yet in the developing world. In the Philippines, for instance, they can't build enough huge, 4-storey malls fast enough. They are significant meeting places for young people and people use them to get out of the tropical heat because many people here do not have A/C.
SLS/Orion are years behind schedule and billions over budget – but they are fully constructed and the testing before the first mission (Artemis I) has basically been completed. The last major pre-flight test milestone was the "green run" of the SLS Core Stage at Stennis Space Center in Mississippi, which was completed successfully last month–after an earlier unsuccessful attempt in January. Right now, the first SLS Core Stage is on a barge on way to Kennedy Space Center, where it will be stacked in the Vehicle Assembly Building with Orion, the ESM (European Service Module), the ICPS upper stage, and the solid rocket boosters (all of which are already at Kennedy). The first flight of SLS+Orion, Artemis I, is scheduled for November – that is an uncrewed test flight in which Orion will orbit the moon and then return to Earth. It is widely expected to slip a bit, but still, if they miss November, it will happen early next year. The next mission planned after that is Artemis II, which will be a crewed Apollo 8-style mission, with astronauts orbiting the moon but not landing on it. Artemis II is scheduled for August 2023. The gap between Artemis I and Artemis II is decent-sized and hopefully gives them time to address any issues that come up, but at the same time don't be surprised if Artemis II slips by a few months too. Finally, the first lunar landing mission, Artemis III, is tentatively targeted to October 2024–but many think 2025 or 2026 are more realistic. Even if SLS/Orion are ready for that, nobody knows whether HLS Starship will be. SpaceX moves a lot faster than the SLS/Orion contractors (Boeing, Aerojet Rocketdyne, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and Airbus), but Starship is at a much earlier stage of development, and Starship is novel and technically challenging, whereas SLS/Orion is a technologically much more conservative design.
GitHub is hostile to rebased PRs, going as far as erasing commits not present in the latest version of a PR. It does record a "... was force pushed from commit xxxxxx to xxxxx" in the PR's chronology though; but if you click on the first commit in that message it shows a 404.
So one person acquiesces to "no solution because it's a chicken and egg problem." Another says "let it rot into decaying blight."

Even if suboptimal, revitalizing the mall as a co-working space sounds like a less-bad solution to me. Still open to practical alternatives though. ;)
I think thats only the case when it the data can be used to (help) identify a specific person
But it hasn't been made. Isn't that the point? Assembly maps very closely to actual hardware instructions/opcodes
As for C like Assembly language, Texas Instruments has some DSP Assembly that is similar to C syntax as written in SSA form, I just can't recall the name any longer.
Ask HN: What’s the cheapest Android enabled computer?
There is another commenter who kind of thinks that this should hold, but I've got to disappoint either of you:
Most ISAs specify some pseudo ops, so might get something like

disassemble(assemble("nop")) == "add r0, 0"

I think that's how v850 or tricore do it. Than there is ARM, for which the v8.6 ISA manual casually contains the term "This instruction is an alias of" 115 times. (I checked the rev. F PDF, you can get the rev. G PDF at https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0487/ga/ by clicking "Download").
Sure you can force push it, but the reviewer has to review the whole branch all over again. No diff between versions of the branch.
At least they had it planned, and very well planned. And they still understand what JIT really meant. The actual idea and concept is now only known to Apple and Toyota. For various sort of reason ( Mostly Politics ). Others are only applying what they think they know to Supply Chains.

Most on HN would likely have little exposure to supply chain, take a look at another example coming from Toyota that anybody should have at least heard of it in Software development.

Remember Kanban board?

Holy mother of God that great idea quickly turn into a shit show.
Yes, but that is not what this thread (GitHub Actions is somehow more vulnerable than Jenkins because no one exposes Jenkins?) is about.
You aren't doing it right
Yeah, I don't get that either. This only seems to work in very specific cases, like where the boolean starts off false, becomes true and can never be false again. So like "user viewed homepage". That seems like a tiny subset of what Booleans are used for but it's presented as being the one, obvious use case.
-1 can be useful, too, especially if you've already assigned a certain meaning to 0.

Javascript developers are used to certain functions returning -1 if there's no match, so -1 shouldn't feel strange as long as it's well documented.
Is plain text the best way to send plain text?
Well, there is always the option to just pick a FPGA language and write an hardware implementation for them.

Most mainframes, like those from Xerox PARC, don't have any kind of Assembly, the first step of booting was to load the corresponding microcode execution engine.
"Also, we already have gravity-based systems, only nature does all the work of raising the payload for us in gaseous form, and we let it fall in liquid forms. But it takes so much dam place"

We actually also do have self created gravity-based systems, where we also do the work by ourself, to have a energy storage on demand:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricit...

They work reliable and with big capacity since the very beginning of electricity. The only problem is ... scale. You cannot just build them where you want them. You need rivers and height differences.

Unless you create such systems completely artificial and there are plans to do so, but that will be very expensive.

edit:
here is a paper (in german) discussing such possibilities, to create a artificial pumped-storage out of the remains of surface mining

https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/72...

edit 2:

and my opinion is, that I am not a fan of complicated solutions, like the originial solution from the article seems to be, which is also stated as "The technology is still “incredibly immature”

There are solutions to make batteries without rare elements.
They just don't reach the energy density of lithium based ones, but that is not really a problem, when you have them stationary.

So if you could scale up production of these and in the end, have a big battery in every home/factory connected to the grid - you would have a stable grid without any need for gas- or coal powered backup.
How the Embryo's Brain Is Formed
--onto seems to be the right way to me. I'm not sure why the article proposes a sequence of cherry-picks. That sounds more frustrating.
No, Flight from Washington Reagan AA2148 20MAR, check out Boston harbor at the time. Ship that looks exactly like the Evergiven was there, with Evergreen painted right on the side, "the volunteers" mentioned and pointed the vessel out to me. The following day, the issue in the suez happened.
And there's absolutely no way to talk to the company in question. Both Google and Facebook have become, we will do whatever we want, no you can't talk to a human, no you can't dispute our decisions, no you can't have any control over your life
Yeah, seems to have been a great guy.

Beside, if you like to read more about interesting recent deceased, just read the death notices on Wikipedia's Portal Current events.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_in_2021
My experience with the oral exams have been the opposite. The profs ask useless questions on details that do not matter at all and are never covered in a real exam. They are also very biased in how they assess you based on their preconceptions. And it doesn't give you the time and privacy needed to solve real technical questions. (Most of my written exams were only 4-5 questions in 3 hours, which is obviously not happening in an oral exam.)
I don’t like NULLs. Nullables always get back you in ways you would never expect.

That’s why I won’t use a tip like that.
Too late to edit to add: when I say "continue to develop" I don't mean to continue creating new viable embryos, I mean allowing the existing embryos to mature.

I think both cases are probably unethical (creating to begin with, and secondly, more unethically, to bring them to further maturity, or even to the point of being self-supporting, i.e. fully alive)

If we start going down this road, eventually someone will allow them to be brought to life.

We already know the horrors wrought on other humans by our very selves in the name of "science" in the past (think unit 731, not really science, but "science"), I can only imagine we'd do worse to something not fully human.
It is a great site, I've discovered many interesting algorithms on it. And benchmarked them with their tool, along with some of my own.

And yes, EPSM outperforms the others by a mile.

If you are comfortable with your search performance being bound to particular CPU architectures, and that may be entirely reasonable, then you can't beat that approach.
I would argue that there's very little of "natural world" when you are downtown of any decent sized city. And you don't see any of it on any week day.
You aren't actually entitled to three strikes. Just one blatant infringement is legally enough to terminate your account. YouTube neither has any guarantee that even I'd you get any notices that they're spanned out with says between. If you have more than 3 videos and they all get a strike at the same time, well then it's bye bye to the accounts.

And honestly, if you have 1 legit account and 20 operating on more sketchy waters, it's only reasonable that they ban all of your channels.
Back in the day, there used to exist hardware where Forth was the lowest that you could go, so yes it can be considered Assembly on some hardware.
I really like seeing efforts being made in this direction. For the last few years I've been using git-town.com, which works quite well but I often end up having to work around it (especially when I have diamond-shaped branch dependencies, e.g. to refactor two independent things before implementing a small feature on top). I'll have to try this instead and compare!
Not on x86 it doesn't.
Tri-state booleans are also very ugly. What happens if you suddenly need a 4th state?

Use enums (or any equivalent) for states that are non-boolean.
I did not say DNSCurve is DoH, DNSCurve is TLS nor that TLS is the same as Curve25519. I said that DoH relies on TLS and TLS 1.3 mandates cryptography designed by the same person who designed DNSCurve. I am not sure what point you are trying to make. Constructing a straw man, perhaps. We are each stating facts. The reader must draw their own observations/conclusions.

The observation I make from the facts is that while DoH may win a "popularity contest" over DNSCurve (VHS vs Betamax) in terms of what most people will use, TLS and therefore DoH nonetheless is or soon will be relying on the work of the author of DNSCurve. Whether anyone else besides me thinks this is notehworthy I have no idea. I mean, the author could have just intended the work to be used in DoT or whatever was the current trend (VHS), but the fact that he demonstrated how it could be used in a different way (Betamax), encrypting each packet, to me that is not a coincidence. It was not meant to be ignored, IMO.

As an end user, I am not interested in what is popular, I am interested in what is best. But that's only me. Readers can decide for themselves.
last_active_at also makes sense, especially if you'd like some flexibility in deciding what to do with users who have been inactive for a certain amount of time.
As my comment clearly said; add other renewables into the mix, but not wave/tidal. These technologies are a dead end and do not scale.