skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, there isn't yet. Sorry.

I'd have to create an app for Apple devices to connect to Windows and allow rssi readings. But I don't have the time to do it now.
Firefly Semantics CSV Data Integration Help Center
Once a mall can't be used as a mall, it is pretty much useless and generally gets torn down. They can't be used for housing since people don't want to live in windowless giant buildings surrounded by parking lots (and owners don't want to lower the rent until the desperate move it. Even the city doesn't want to house the homeless there). Malls might have a bit of office space already but the store-spaces aren't really suited for that either.

Edit: which is to say that traditional malls are just terrible because mixed use would be much better. City center buildings, even strip mall buildings, get a bunch of uses. But the scale of traditional suburbans just forces a single use on it.
Their margin on bandwidth is literally over 1000%. Quick google says that S3 costs 320% more than Backblaze (which, presumably, isn't running at a loss).

> At a guess

The comments in this discussion that try to provide actual numbers show a fairly lopsided argument against S3. The comments that are advocating for S3 aren't as detailed.

You can look at this at the macro level, as on comment did, and see that one 1.2PB RackmountPro 4U server is $11K. Yes, of course you still need space and power. But at least this gives us actual numbers to play with as a base (e.g. buying 10 of these is less than what you'll spend on S3 in a month)

At a miro-level. You can spend $650 on a 16TB hard drive, or $650 on 16TB for 2 months of S3. Now, S3 is battle-tested, has redundancy, has power, has a cpu, has a network card (but not bandwidth), and is managed - unquestionable HUGE wins. But the hard drive (and other equipment) come with a 3-5 year warranty. Now, the difference between $650 for the hard drive, and $12000 for S3 over 3 years, won't let you: get the power, rent the racks, hire the staff, and invest in learning ceph. But the difference between $400K and $5million will.
Malls (shopping centres here in Australia) are terrible experiences. I don't like shopping, but the general process for shopping at a such a place is:

1) Drive some distance to get there
2) Park in a cramped car park, where the size of the parks is generally as small as legally allowed
3) Walk through the same car park, which bizarrely doesn't have walking ways for people to safely go through
4) Go to the shop and search for the item(s) you are after
5) Wait in line for some arbitrary amount of time because the store has hired as few staff as they could possibly managed. Note that I'm being asked to wait, despite clearly indicating a willingness to buy
6) Get accused of shoplifting on the way out, have to show a receipt and have a staff member ask to see all through my bag
7) Get back into the car, hope you don't hit any pedestrians as you are backing your car out
8) Exit through a maze of one-way streets, trying not to hit or get hit by other cars, shopping trolleys or pedestrians.

Obviously it's not all bad - you get to see the item you are buying and see related items, try on clothes to see they fit, and take the item home immediately. However, overall as an experience it is painful.

Online shopping has its negatives, but I can stay home, order what I want, pay immediately and move on with my day.
"Farmer" is an interesting word these days. Think giant corp running 1 million acres across 200 sites. And think of "tractor" as a fleet of combines that cost $500K each and are shared across all 200 sites.

The picture of a hard-working solo farmer repairing his only tractor out in the barn is becoming a rare thing. When you say "farmer" today, it is unclear if you mean the multi-billion dollar multi-national, the "manager" for this 400-acre parcel, or the lady next to the field operating the drone or mostly-autonomous equipment. Or perhaps you meant the latest breed--that fellow who greases the conveyor belt in the metal building in the middle of town where they do the vertical farming with the fancy lights and watering systems. No tractors or even dirt involved.
Is that not the story of the Bible as well?

> And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

Now the question is if the Bible views this "inculcation" of God-like-ness to be a good or bad thing. In a Gnostic interpretation this transcendence from Man into God is the ultimate goal.
The right to repair has nothing to do with socketed components. You already have the right to own soldering equipment.
> Or we should stop thinking about processing packets with hardware. Does it still make differences these days?

Yes, yes it does. CPUs will never catch purpose built chips for networking.

Networking chips are getting more programmable, though. The most known effort is P4 (https://p4.org). Even for vendors that don't support P4, they are still internally making their hardware more fungible, which is good.

> The reason that we are so slow to adopt IPv6, same reason.

IPv6 has been slow to adopt because it solves a problem most people have not had, in an overly complicated way.
> bad actors compromised its upgrade mechanism and used it to install a malicious file on user computers

You mean online as in it's software downloaded over the internet?
What’s interesting is that Tesla succeeded in spite of its dorkiness. Yes, you may think it is a “normal” looking car now, but sedans were dying, hatchbacks were dying, and you would be made fun of mercilessly if you had a spoiler on your SUV. But Tesla made cars like that and then succeeded in spite of those design cues and now Tesla owners are trying to make those things cool again.

Tesla might as well come out with a minivan and a wagon, they could probably make people think they were cool.
AltStore allows you to run any app you want on your iPhone without a jailbreak. How does the App Store have a monopoly when there are literally alternatives too it. This ignores Cydia and the other app stores that require you to jailbreak your phone.

Apple has no more of a monopoly on iOS app sales then Google has on android apps, Microsoft has on the Xbox store, Sony has on the Sony store, or Nintendo has on the Nintendo store.
Broadcom Tomahawk III, as an example: https://www.broadcom.com/products/ethernet-connectivity/swit...
Exactly. This proves the point I'm making. No one - even Apple with the best supply chain management in the industry - wants the version scheme you suggest.

Vendors want version numbers to push upgrades to consumers. They don't want to deal with demand forcasting for something with a limited time of life though.
„Developed immunity“ is speculation, so this should rather read

„What prompted you to get a vaccine when you have already had COVID?“
You Are Hyper-Carnivore
Ive experienced the same. Facebook must be 'have a file' on non users
MOBI is, and always has been, the format used by Kindle eBooks. (Amazon bought the creator of the format, MobiPocket, in 2005, shortly before launching Kindle.)

The prevalence of MOBI files today is mostly down to people ripping purchased Kindle books off their devices and releasing them to piracy.

The current file format for Kindle purchases, AZW, is just MOBI + DRM. If you strip out the DRM / customer fingerprint, you’re left with a MOBI file. So a large percentage of ripped books on e.g. LibGen will be in MOBI, even though the source was AZW. You can’t remove the identifying fingerprint of the purchaser without also removing the DRM entirely; so pirates do both.

The significance here is essentially that Kindle apps/devices will no longer willingly import+load+display pirated books originally ripped from the Kindle store. Because, at this point, that’s what 99.9% of MOBI files are.
Good to see correlation finally proves causation.
we have like 10+ in 30miles and just built a new one, next to massive mall. So since the 80's no new mall was built in your area?
There are malls like this in the US. Such as places called "Galleria". But these seem like much more expensive projects that clearly can't be built everywhere, while the typical mall is really just an american version of an enclosed bazaar.

Also one US-specific issue is Christmas shopping, which probably drives a lot of the planing. Stores make the most money during a limited interval when they are packed to capacity and need to plan for that.
Thanks to this article I can learn more. Expand my knowledge and abilities. Actually the article is very real.

https://www.mysainsburys.me/
Not the pandemic, no. That's clearly incorrect attribution of causation, because it's not as if malls can't keep the stores staffed due to people dying. It's government policies that are killing businesses, not the virus. This is exactly the kind of take one would expect from the Washington Post, a propaganda outlet.
This is great news. Anything that advances science should be done. I don't necessarily understand those that are having a moral panic at this news.
That's the Raspberry Pi Camera v2, however. It's also a Pi Zero which has some limited ability to run simple models, but it takes a while.

The Vizy has a custom high resolution camera special built for this platform that runs at 120 frames a second, not that it can detect things that fast. It also has a USB C port to connect a Google Coral device.
That's exactly what PMTiles is for, and there's nothing in it specific to maps or geographic coordinates, just a Z/X/Y pyramid structure. I chose to support Leaflet for now because it is very popular; there's other viewers like OpenSeadragon for which a decoder plugin would be possible.
After living in various parts of Europe for a few years and coming back, the US way of doing it seems mind-boggingly wasteful. Huge swaths of our country are long roads that lead to massive parking lots.

And of course we're obese, many people couldn't walk to accomplish errands if they wanted to.
> Marx may have coined the term capitalism to have a term to contrast communism, but it definitely has a large body of theory attached see e.g. Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations."

Is anything about that theory specific to any time period? Does any part of it refer to a system of "capitalism"?

Marx, and those following Marx, wrote their works under the banner of "communism". Adam Smith did not write under any banner. He made observations.

> Marx gave capitalism a name to talk about it as a step in the thrust of history, contrasting it with earlier feudalism systems, and to argue that it would inevitably lead to its own destruction while advocating that communism is the logical next step. It wasn't just "anything before communism" even for him.

You're not getting what I'm saying. Marx gave capitalism a name, OK. Did he give it a definition? The whole problem I'm talking about here is that people use the word "capitalism" without having a meaning in mind for it to refer to.
Implicit opt in is the way to structure decisions you want the user to take. This is of course not only used for good things like this but also "bad" things like checkboxes that say "share my data" and are already filled in.
Oh, no, you're communicating perfectly well, and there's no lack of comprehension; I'm simply saying this is flat-out wrong:

"If you find yourself sitting across from someone who cannot technically do the job, your step one has failed (and should never fail)."

The suggestion that any screening test must be infallible is simply nonsense, since simultaneous perfect specificity and sensitivity is impossible, and contradicts numerous findings in decision-theoretic research, and I therefore simply and absolutely disagree. All processes fail, and in particular, because individual process steps fail; it merely remains to determine whether you're biased for showing interesting people the door, or inviting them in to take a closer look. This is also the essence of a screening test in, say, medicine, that are necessarily biased to be sensitive over specific, since a false rejection of a patient may be health threatening; more specific (and generally more expensive) testing follows. Or perhaps in sales, where a lead attracts ever more attention as it moves through the qualification funnel.

As I say, these are general consequences of decision theory, a branch of mathematics to which hiring has no magical exemption.

Ergo, anyone claiming their screening is infallible is either a fool or a liar. Sadly, many recruiters are both, which partially explains why so many HR departments are essentially a mediocrity police that create barriers to accessing the entire talent pool. These are not to be trusted (and must, therefore, be bypassed at the earliest opportunity) when in comes to building teams of heterogeneous and interesting people with complementary skills and diverse perspectives, which is to say, any high-performance team, or at least every high-performing team I've been privileged to encounter in the last forty years.

Incidentally, my experience at AWS was the opposite. The talent acquisition team there, at least that assisting my own business unit, was very much on the ball when it came to pulling in candidates from left-field.
Always fun stumbling across another Qumulon on here :)
The average age of death from the coronavirus appears to be in the 80s for many countries. In Norway it's 84, in the UK it's 82.4.

You also have to take into account the health of those involved. Saving a life only for that person to live a few low quality years in poor health is worth less than saving the life of a healthy young child.

The resulting measure is the QALY, the quality adjusted life year.

Unfortunately there has not been nearly enough research or discussion about QALYs and their applicability to the coronavirus. There are a few studies out there, though, here's one: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hec.4208

TLDR: the mean discounted QALYs lost by someone dying of the coronavirus in the US is 4.3.
I'd wager that Canada has/had many fewer malls than USA (per capita). Even many small nowhere cities would have a mall.
That was the impetus behind MBTiles as well. I was building out an iOS toolkit to render OSM-based maps on iPad, offline, and transferring 1000s of rasters (at the time) even over USB was way too slow and error-prone.
If you don't understand how something works you shouldn't be including it in your project. I regularly reject PRs because of this.
> DO NOT RUN THIS VERSION OF NGROK (1.X) IN PRODUCTION

I don't see that anywhere. Even if it is somewhere, it's not ironic. Ngrok is used for all sorts of stuff. Stream redirection to hosted services is a thing for ease of use to get going with play of a product.

The point is that making it easy makes it public sometimes, which is fine if the use cases aren't arbitrary made up to justify a worrisome argument. It it very unlikely an agent is going to penetrate and exploit one of these cameras through such a service. Squirrels don't need to be secured. Other things do, so reconfigure!

If you have a use case...a real one...then run this locally. The inventor and I are both privacy advocates. Your argument is cherry picked and overlooks the obvious on-premise use of a Raspberry Pi! :)

In all seriousness, I get what you are talking about, but being adamant dog poop use cases must be secured is pointless. Seriously, if you have a secure use case for this it does NOT have to be streamed to some service. The service is there for squirrels, not secure deployments.
Talk with Linus at LTT.
Point. Though technically it's ... Stonestown.

https://californiatravelmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12...

South-west side of SF, about as far from downtown as you can get.
Can't find AltStore on the appstore and can't even bundle my apps for usage outside of the app store any more (I honestly tried for three hours last year. maybe the stack overflow was outdated)
You can also overclock the Jetson Nano as well if you install a custom kernel.
I have a startup idea and want to make sure it scales, I was thinking S3 but don't like vendor lock-in. Not that far along yet, I was thinking maybe SeaweedFS or even going crazy enough to write my own storage system. Use a database like CockroachDB or MongoDB to store the meta data, and then replica pieces of the file to "chunk servers". However cleaning up deleted files, etc seem a bit of a pain. I was thinking instead of top down, let each node contain a copy of the metadata and scan on each node individually instead of the central database trying to manage each node. Then have a a process to handle under replicated files. However if you can adjust the number of replicas for say a popular file, you'd need to then coordinate which extra copies to remove when scaling down. Maybe a bit optimistic.

Kinda disappointed the file solutions seem more complicated and nothing more simple to setup like some of the new databases are like CockroachDB or MongoDB are to use. I feel like reinventing the wheel is kinda bad as rather let people who are more experts in this field handle this stuff, but I hate the idea of vendor lock-in and forced to use other peoples servers, self hosting be nice from a single node to test to a cluster spanning multiple datacenters. Maybe there's a solution out there, I done some searching and just seems to go in circles. I seen one system but if you wanted to add or remove nodes in the future, you couldn't just "drain" a chunk server by moving it data.
I've made a new addition: now the operating system of the other party is also sent as part of the exchange. This info helps decide what software to use for further encryption. e.g. DMG or BitLocker? And, I managed to do it without making the string longer. I stuffed it in the unused bits of the compressed coordinate.
This is a huge effect.

I will be scheduling a tdap, because why not? You are supposed to get a tetanus booster every 10 years anyway.
I don't feel morally panicked by this, unless the goal is to have "human-like" animals to experiment on.

However, saying anything that advances science should be done is a crazy take. I do not believe that people should be tortured, that people should be given drugs against their will, or even be forced to take part in experiments.
Look at you! What an intellectual you are. You sure got my number. That's me, afraid of freedom. Freedom is good, there are clearly no bounds to freedom. There are clearly no counter forces to freedom.

You know what the cost of freedom is? Education. When you are educated freedom is good, but when you are not, it is dangerous.

Being able to directly install a virus is a freedom, and for a security researcher or human rights abuser that might be great, but I don’t want my mom to have the freedom to install a virus. Should virus creators be able to load their software into a store and market it as they wish? No? But what about their freedom?! What about my freedom to download viruses?!

Not getting a vaccine is a form of freedom, but what does that do for herd immunity if too much of the population isn’t smart enough to handle the freedom not to vax?

Do you like nutrition labels? Seems like it limits the freedom that food companies have to market their products.

I think all fishermen should have the right to fish as many fish as they can. What right do we have to limit peoples livelihood?!

Why can't kids take heroin if they want? Why are we limiting their freedom to conduct their lives the way they wish?

You use the word freedom like you understand it, but then fail to understand the cost of freedom.

For you and me freedom is great, we're probably educated and well read. For mom and dad, they need a bit more of a curated experience because they don't have the knowledge or experience which would allow them to protect themselves or understand their own choices.
Amarok was awesome! I really liked the "moodbar" addon that converted each audio track into a colorful 1D strip, underneath the progress indicator.

Ah, looks like it's a project in its own right, but the Wikipedia page has an Amarok screenshot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moodbar
I know that

while (*s++ = *t++);

is the type of thing seemingly designed to reach through history to make a modern programmer spit out their tea — but I also can’t help but feel that it’s a very direct “C machine” representation of the semantics of a processor string instruction, ala x86’s REPNZ MOVSB.
The planners at the firm are paid to do what paying clients want. That’s what everyone there is supposed to do. What matters is that checks don’t bounce.
Good scientific papers explicitly state what you can and cannot conclude from the data. Even if it is a case of "this is the best we can do" because there's no data to address the omitted variable, that should be clear.

I have a PhD in an area where (a) it's difficult to conduct experiments, and (b) it's often hard or impossible to get data for some variables. No one likes the person who critiques a paper presentation by saying, "you're not controlling for variable x" without providing a reason why it's an omitted variable and how you can proxy for it (if it's not directly available). But you also won't get far if you aren't clear about the limitations of your paper.
If it can’t be measured or controlled then conclusions which forgo it are not valid!
> create a longer lived branch and make small PRs to that.

I follow this pattern a lot, we call it an epic branch and usually name it something like `epic/foobar`
Not be harsh. But if someone is going to just quit because of jargon (which everyone has to learn btw) then Sayōnara.
Even worse than error message is incorrect results. I worked on the OpenCL neural net evaluation backend used in Leela Zero and lc0 Go and chess bots. We had reports of several OpenCL drivers being so broken that they gave incorrect results while appearing to work correctly without giving any error messages. Intel integrated GPUs on Apple were the worst offender and it looks like the drivers are never going to get fixed. Some older AMD cards had similar issues. We had to add a check that GPU NN evaluation matches CPU reference to catch these broken drivers.