skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I tried that until they reviewed it (they're a required reviewer for all PRs...) and forced me to split the refactor into a separate PR and let it sit there for 2 months before asking me to delete it. This occurred multiple times.
Riding one of these is definitely on my todo list, but afaik we don't have any in my country.
Google search led me to a fairly technical discussion.

I scanned the site, liked what I saw and eventually made an account to comment on a "What to name a markdown?" discussion and have participated ever since.
I did the same and learned a ton about their runtime! In my case, I did similar and also had a go (pun intended) at shipping a single-binary Docker image (using the scratch base image). Best of luck!
Can you remember the last time that you heard of shareholders losing their collective shirt?
Yes, this is currently a big ask, and understandbly so.

There are a few SaaS companies that exist today which provide similar service, and they all require this level of access, unless you opt for their enterprise self hosted version.

I am probably going to release a self hosted version at some point.
That's literally what's needed to stop thermal runaway.
Absolutely this. The US could accelerate Russia’s brain drain [1] using robust visa quotas and fast track immigration programs. This would be far more devastating for the future of Russia than any military action or sanctions.

Very similar to what Great Britain is doing with Hong Kong. [2]

[1] https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=202004021...

[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-hongkong-security-britain...
That is not conflicting. "did they" and "how often" are two different questions. Metadata can and often does indicate the fact that something was accessed but not how often. For example, the "last modified" user/timestamp on a file.
> ... the conclusion is that elixir is the real deal

This makes me even more excited to start an upcoming new position writing Elixir full-time!
You don't need to have a "list" of explanations. Any explanation would either assume there were more than two people in the car (why stop at three?) or it would assume there were no more than two people in the car. Any explanation that assumed there were more than two people in the car would "multiply entities" more than any explanation that assumed there were only two people in the car, so the Razor would always cut out the former in favour of the latter.
Most of the time it's just because something looks neat, is well documented and might be a useful skill. That's why I learned Ruby back in 2006 with little to no programming experience. I really wanted to make websites, but I hated the idea of learning Java.
> It is not "dishonest." Toyota, AFAIK, does not publish these numbers; comparing to the national average is just the best you can do.

When you know, unequivocally, that you are missing huge swathes of information, and drawing all manner of conclusions and inferences not supported by those statistics, it's not "just doing the best you can", it's "being disingenuous and misleading with numbers".
Tesla does not limit the speed over the speed to 5 mph over the speed limit.
What's up with the image quality over the years?

Looking at my home in the UK, it's a blur in 1985, then the next image in 2003 is fairly sharp. The image quality is consistent/slightly improves from 2003 until 2014, and then from 2014 - 2017 it's a blur again. 2018 is the sharpest of all the historical images, better even than 2020.
It doesn't need root access, the RBAC is applied on top of the credentials Aidmin given.

I hear you on the approach, it is something I have been thinking about for a while.
I agree that there is a lot of spin on these stories: efforts to paint bad and sloppy network security decisions as evidence of actual malice. I am sympathetic to the national security agencies who are likely driving this reporting, though. Giving untrusted foreign companies access to your communications infrastructure is generally a bad idea, and the evidence (from Western countries’ own actions) is that this kind of access will eventually be abused. But the problem is that there appears to be an effort to paint these security screwups as something more concretely malicious than they are, in order to sway public opinion.

From my perspective it does not make a lot of sense for Huawei or China to engage in overt spying at this stage of the game, even if (assuming the worst intentions) that is something they plan to do. Right now all of the incentives for that company are to gain the trust of customers during these early stages when everyone is looking for a reason to throw up protectionist barriers. A decade from now when Huawei systems are ubiquitous and the competition has largely been put out of business, then maybe the situation will be different. But why kill the golden goose by doing something stupid now?

That doesn’t mean there wasn’t bad behavior. Maybe people are behaving irrationally. But I tend to see sloppiness behind these stories rather than actual malice.
Google uses search data to improve search and show you ads that you're more likely to click on. You can also use incognito/private mode to opt out of this.

Russia uses search data for things like applying pressure to political dissidents, blackmailing family members, harassing and attacking journalists etc. You can't easily opt out of this if you or your family is in Russia.

I consider the Google level of privacy completely acceptable, the Russian one not acceptable.
Enso (formerly Luna) 2.0 public Alpha
Personal attacks will get you banned here. Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules.

You've also been posting many unsubstantive and/or flamewar comments elsewhere. We ban accounts that do that, so please stop.
Doesn't have the same allusion to "the freshmen 15" :P
I've looked at the grinder attachment are was sure if 1) it worked very well-- mainly in terms hassle/speed 2) If it was too much of a hassle to clean between uses
Formlabs printers can do a lot of this stuff but at a fraction of the cost (base model costs around 2k, also has an expansive list of materials with interesting properties: https://formlabs.com/material-selector/ ). Also, you don't own Carbon3d, you lease it, for like 50grand a year or something crazy like that.
I second this. SST is like magic.
Here’s an unpopular opinion:

A language like PostScript would have been a much better foundation for the web than HTML+CSS+JS.

Browser engines would be much simpler. The platform would have had rich design capabilities much earlier and easier. A simple Forth-style language would have been a much better compilation target for high-level app development languages than JS. And having programmability built in from the start would have forced browser developers to think about security models as an integral part of the platform.
This doesn't make any sense, if people like those neighborhoods, why would they pay for housing whose value is based around what its potential rent income would be if zoning was not restricted.

The fact that you can (eventually) build a 2 story apartment building on that plot of land is already priced in.

If you like it this way then enjoy the needless suffering and economic inefficiency, it can only get worse. Turning one city into an "ugly" 10 million metropolis could have spared a dozen other cities.
It doesn't need root credentials. The RBAC is applied on top of the credentials Aidmin is given.
It's just an (North?) American thing - in the UK/Europe Lego is the proper noun company name, and adjectivally describes the brick or bricks.

Nobody says 'a lego' or 'some legos'; but similarly in the US I imagine you'd get a funny look (you'd never heard it before, after all) for saying 'a Lego brick' or 'some Lego bricks'.

(Actually, for anyone actually using Lego(s?), surely the real answer is that you speak in terms of their dimensions: 'a 2x4'; 'some 1x1s'..?!)
Back when the "Law of Leaky Abstractions" was first coined such things were given as examples: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/11/11/the-law-of-leaky-a...

> Even though network libraries like NFS and SMB let you treat files on remote machines “as if” they were local, sometimes the connection becomes very slow or goes down, and the file stops acting like it was local, and as a programmer you have to write code to deal with this. The abstraction of “remote file is the same as local file” leaks.
> And the first step is the ability to ask a fair share of the value one is generating.

I feel like you missed my point. I am talking about getting into a employer-employee relationship that you can feel good about. Compensation is obviously a huge component of that and you should absolutely make sure it's what you need and deserve. The point I am making is that if your relationship with your employer is so weak that you're walking out because of what happened with a single bonus, then you weren't in a good relationship to begin with.

> I think one can be unfair in the way one is generous.

Yes and it doesn't matter. The example that Ray Dalio uses in his book is this - the company office is in Connecticut and a lot of employees commuted from NYC. So at some point Ray bought a bus to shuttle employees back and forth. Sounds like a purely good thing, right?

Well, some Connecticut-based employee complained - the NYC-based people got a "gift" in convenience and cost of their commute, so he thought that Connecticut people should get something to improve their commute too (ignoring the point that their commute was never as bad to begin with). Ray points out that this is a huge entitlement - just because you gave a gift to someone, doesn't mean others deserve.

The point is - you can't manage your company and your life to meet the whims of the most unreasonably entitles. And on the flip side, the less unreasonable expectations you have, the happier you will be.
Please don't post flamewar comments to HN. It makes discussion meaner and dumber. We're hoping for the opposite here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
My pet peeve: Go on Youtube to search for camera reviews. At the end of the review "The best camera is the one that you have". Well, no shit, I came here to get your opinion.
> Here's also a preemptive "intention doesn't matter" because the first post I share covers that in the section "The Semantics of Intention", where it argues that the decisions have already been made in both the designs of our streets and in the choices people make behind the wheel, and those have known and changeable outcomes.

The argument made here isn't very good. "Traffic violence" implies intention to do violence. Intention to speed is indeed intention to incur the risk of harm, but that risk is in general quite low, whereas 'traffic violence' strongly implies direct intention to cause harm. Intention to take risks that have harm as a potential consequence is not equivalent. It may be true that 'accident' cuts too strongly in the other direction, but the correct term is clearly closer to 'accident' than it is to 'violence'.
But they'll still release press releases saying "The vehicle had warned the driver of inattentiveness and to keep his hands on the wheel"... and oh-so-conveniently ignore "... once, fourteen minutes before the accident" (which, knowing their system now, means that was the last warning, and the attention system hadn't been tripped between then and the accident).
How can it do that when the server needs an IP address to send traffic to? Cookies just make it more convenient but there is fundamentally that "analog hole". You can Tor things up and obfuscate but if you can interact with them they can track you.
Personal attacks are not ok, regardless of how wrong someone is or you feel they are.

Please don't respond to a bad comment by breaking the site guidelines yourself. That only makes things worse.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I can't hear anything on Firefox, but it works on Chrome.
> Year 2000 called, it wants its webdev paradigm back.

"Come and take it!" ~ Serverless frameworks, Lambda, etc.
Capitalism's search for minima isn't linked to human welfare tho. Therefore the minima may or may not align with humanity's long term interests. Right now the system seems on track to optimize for our extinction.

Without regulation, most essential markets fail humans.

And finally an ancap "free market economy" was the default state of the world and the whole of human history has been the struggle to overcome/refine that stake based hell.
You can't do this here, as is obvious from https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. We've banned the account.

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future.
Feels like a stupid reenactment of this Simpsons scene from two decades ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29ToNp1MY3c
idk about notification but otherwise thats what it does, it slows down and stops :D
Ahh, for a second I was like, 'wait...Snowden has finally stopped selling pictures of his face?!", but then I saw it!
I wouldn't go that far. I think Hanlon's Razor applies to Snowden's case. He seemed absolutely convinced that PRISM was a big story, which anybody with a fifth grade reading ability could tell was a non-story. https://www.washingtonpost.com/magazine/2020/05/11/2013-edwa...

If he were really a Russian asset, he wouldn't have made a claim that he has since had to stop claiming (instead playing up phone metadata collection for reporters), or he would have admitted that he was wrong to gain credibility. Instead, he looked like a fool and just stopped talking about it out of embarrassment.
Yup, that's a WebRTC thing.
Spoiler: It's not at Buckingham Palace
Please don't take HN threads into ideological or political flamewar (or any flamewar). It's tedious, repetitive, and nasty. We're trying for just the opposite here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Edit: this account has been using HN primarily for ideological battle. We ban accounts that do that [1], so I've banned this account. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with.

[1] More explanation at https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme... if anyone wants it.
I work London finance. Bonuses are a big part of the pay package (in many cases over 100% of your base, sometimes even 10x base for guys who work on successful algo-trading projects).

Every place I've received a bonus from gave me a gigantic, in-very-clear-terms, no-nonsense page to sign that said I acknowledge the this bonus is discretionary, it is not to be expected, there is no expectation to ever receive another one, etc.

This is most likely done because everyone expects to get some kind of a bonus (if you don't receive a bonus, unless the company is basically going bankrupt, that's a really, REALLY strong sign that you should probably your bags up and GTFO). It is considered part of the basic pay package, but then again, one of these years, there might not be a bonus, and they want to make it absolutely clear that you can't expect one in that case.

The reason for this is that most hedge funds pay bonuses out of their performance fees, and if you have a shit year in the market, there isn't any money to pay bonuses.
Interesting but the vandal will go back and tag it everyday.

http://stylemagazine.com/news/2014/sep/03/taggers-vs-artists...

Serious vandals / taggers want to dominate others. They’re the same personalities that go to bars and look for fights. Very different than street artists.
> can a FLoC ID de-anon into a user?

Currently yes and seems like a though problem to solve (there are trade offs but it's likely that this will never be fully solved, like encryption, you can only make it so difficult that it isn't worth doing it but not impossible to do): https://github.com/WICG/floc/issues/100
We tried Formlabs, of course. We could print fingers like these, but none of the materials we tried (about 10 different options) survived more than 1000 cycles.

As I said, Carbon3d underappreciated, because everyone think "it's just a more expensive Formlabs", while in fact Carbon3d is all about production-grade materials.

If it was possible to take materials from Carbon3d and then print on Formlabs, that would be a very good combo.
There's more:

6. you have so much infrastructure that it's a large factor and you want more control so you create your in-house cloud (or compete with cloud providers and can't trust using it)

7. you have so much infrastructure that you offer it as a service

I worked at a company that had a mix of 4 and 5. The advantage of 5 was the dynamic scaling and integration with other offerings (e.g. AWS DynamoDB, SQS, Lambda, etc). The provisioning and monitoring of hosts was about the same with bringing up new hosts slightly easier on AWS. Provisioning large additional capacity needed more planning as it wasn't delivered same day, especially for the largest configurations. Raw performance was something else though with battery-backup caching (important so you can skip write-thru sync and still flush after power loss) hardware RAID NVMe's configured to spec.
I agree my concluding statement should not have been personal but directed at the action. I apologize for that.

I think my broader point stands. You can argue that a question is philosophically moot because of dimensionality, or you can steer the conversation in a productive direction.
We don't want to believe but here we are. [ha, ha] Our robotic overlords don't even need to be sure, sounds-like is good enough, apply some exotic filters and odds to sell things go though the roof.

My funniest was talking with someone at work (who works for a different company) then when I got home facebook suggested adding them. That I didn't have a phone at the time made it extra comical. Plenty of other people work there, it never suggested those and there are no common contacts. How the CONSPIRACY works exactly I have no idea, the candidate theories are all to hard to imagine. (Like, I'm easy to track because I have no phone?)
Cool idea! I think that would help to preserve the conversation.
I wonder how many more people have to die before Tesla actually fixes it. Is either self driving or not, there is not such a thing as "supervised driving"(that's called driving), I also wonder if those people saying -actually, this link over here says self driving is safer....- will say the same if a family member die because of the "self driving" mode not working properly.
All post 2018 construction in my area (including single family residential) is required to have automatic sprinklers).
I agree completely.

At the very least, embedded PostScript should have been supported for scalable graphics from the beginning. We now have this "sort of" available with the HTML <canvas> element, which uses essentially PostScript primitives for drawing with JavaScript. However, this format is not amenable to easy automated processing within the language, because in contrast to PostScript, JavaScript is not a homoiconic language.

A useful compromise between simplicity, security and flexibility could have been Encapsulated PostScript (EPS), a subset of PostScript with certain restrictions.
Spring-Boot Native Image
(Never mind... misunderstood something important.)
Hm, the way I interpreted what you described as a spin-chain seems different to me?

I thought when you said "a qubit for each integer" that you meant that if dealing with integers from 1-n to n, that you would have 2n qubits,

while what I thought they meant was, say you had n qubits, then the possible positions would be elements of Z/((2^n)Z),

so e.g. you could start with |0000> ,

and then via Hadamard go to (|0000> + |0001>)/\sqrt{2} ,

and then by incrementing, go to (|0001> + |0010>)/\sqrt{2}

and then by Hadamard, go to (|0000> - |0001> + |0010> + |0011>)/2 ,

and then by decrementing, go to (|1111> - |0000> + |0011> + |0010>)/2

and then repeat the above.

So, next step would be another Hadamard, and go to (|1110> - |1111> - |0000> + |0001> + |0010> - |0011> + |0010> + |0011>)/sqrt(8) = (|1110> - |1111> - |0000> + |0001> + 2|0010> )/sqrt(8)

Then increment, etc.

I think this seems to effectively be using the least significant digit as the coin.

I wouldn't say that this has a qubit for each integer, only a qubit for each digit.

Would this be a spin chain? Wikipedia turns up the Heisenberg model for that, which looks to be a continuous time thing?
That's where the original chip came from!
> Okay but why should we afford that consideration to any company at all?

Why not afford it to them?

If someone asks you nicely to do something because it's important to them and it costs you nothing why not do it?
Big monolithic Java apps migrating from IBM power boxes.

For when your bank/insurance company discovers that IBM didn’t rip them enough!
> it is in order to use either

So you object to my correction rather than consider the inverse solely correct?

Fair enough. I have hitherto considered 'the company have announced' incorrect; I'll check that, but I don't like it for my own use.
You can find a audio version here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0nR2U4msHQ
If it is a security concern why he mention there racism, sexism and LGBT stuff? Isn't it a concern for any person with no relation to those groups? or is is there some political underlying thing going on which I should be aware of? When I see those terms I get an immediate suspicious feeling that someone is trying to manipulate me.
Have been programming in C (and then C++), like, forever. Hardly any memory corruption issues. Yes, you have to be a little more disciplined and pay attention to things. Being distracted certainly does not help.
> Tesla has a disclaimer that the feature requires active driver supervision

Tesla has also had, since 2017, a prominent page on the website that says "The driver is only in the seat for legal purposes. The vehicle doesn't need it." (Ironic, given the circumstances of this accident).
Thank you! We are not leveraging LiveView at the moment, since we already have a full-blown Vue frontend. I have been watching it from the sidelines though, and I agree that it's both very solid and very promising. I'd be very interested to hear your experience with it, if you'd be willing to share (either here, or you can email me: ege@pricetable.io).
Tim Edwards of Open Circuit Design [1] created XCircuit, which allows drawing electrical circuits and the file format is PS. It’s still one of the best programs for publication quality circuit diagrams.

[1] http://opencircuitdesign.com/xcircuit/
> By database I mean the actual database servers.

Yes I understand :) golang is still a terrible language for them though. Rust, Java, and C# are strictly superior alternatives.
Hi,

If you ever want to talk about how you build and deploy your app along with your tech stack in detail let me know. I've love to have you on the https://runninginproduction.com podcast.

There's 14 Phoenix episodes at https://runninginproduction.com/tags/phoenix but the more the merrier since every story is unique.

If you wanted to come on the show click the "become a guest" button on the top right to get the ball rolling.
we are getting rickrolled
And don't bring a phone! Ofc the 2 of those combined makes pinpointing you even easier. Like taking candy from a baby.
He’s referring to startups. The words are practically interchangeable.
> So you object to my correction rather than consider the inverse solely correct?

Yes. People aren't mistaken when they use the version that is more unique to British English.