skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Imagine, a release announcement containing a sentence that bothers to say what the thing being announced is.

They will surely lose points for reduced brevity.
You mean slonsoring an environmental achievements award which the oil company wins itself?
Not being able to choose a different avatar per server is a complete showstopper for many of my use cases (mixing gaming/work/personal personas in the same account): https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/3600293...
How to code on an iPad: step 1, remote into a Linux box. Jokes aside, there is a Python IDE but that's it as far as I know.
Grafana: The analytics platform for all your metrics. Allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture.

Loki: Web Analytics Dashboard for NGINX

Tempo: An open source, easy-to-use and high-scale distributed tracing backend. Tempo is cost-efficient, requiring only object storage to operate, and is deeply integrated with Grafana, Prometheus, and Loki. Tempo can be used with any of the open source tracing protocols, including Jaeger, Zipkin, and OpenTelemetry.
The only difference between GPL3 and AGPL3 is what constitutes distribution. With GPL3 you have to provide source to anyone you provide binaries. With AGPL3 you also have to provide source to anyone who uses the software remotely (eg a web app). Everything else, including the scope of what must be included in the source (modifications, linked software, but not software that talks over IPC, etc), is identical between GPL3 and AGPL3.

More specifically, the only difference between GPL and AGPL is section 13 (and the preamble summary). The rest of the license is word-for-word identical (save for the name).
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html#section13
I guess the market is tiny for a full OS on an iPad or Apple just waits until MS is close in other feature parity: the surface X has the battery life and the looks but is crap in all other departments (or so I heard: I have not tried one as people also say it is slow). So maybe gen 2 or 3.
The hostility comes from people who wanted to abuse the loophole that it closes, and/or from people who bought into their FUD.
Does anyone know what the reason for this might be? (doubling the RAM because the SSD is larger)

Also are there any performance implications to this? Should I get the 1TB version for the 16GB RAM because it'll be a snappier machine and more future-proofed?
There used to be a jailbreak tweak called Accelerate that would speed up animations.

https://www.idownloadblog.com/2012/11/12/accelerate/

I still use an iPhone 4S, and thanks to this tweak, I don't feel like my phone is any slower than newer models. Pity I can't browse half the web though (https died due to TLS).
"A different set of policies would have prevented the vicious cycle and made housing cheaper and more abundant."

I think that's highly speculative. Many people in that area want single family homes or large homes. There's only so much surface area. It's not just that they want to live there, but also expect specific attributes with their housing.

"In other words, you can learn from California's example or your can make the same mistakes. Your choice."

If the policies work in other places, how can we determine that it's the policies causing the issues? Do you have a real world example of the alternate policies that won't cause those issues?

"Sure, but it is making the distribution within the US as a whole more uniform."

Not in any meaningful way. Over 50% of the US population lives in just 58 counties. They aren't moving to many rural locations, just to suburbs or smaller cities, which helps a little, but sometimes causes the same issues in those places.

"That's my point. They are not bringing the problems. They are coming, and locals are creating the problems by following the same bad policies that failed for locals in California. Yes, that does mean some things will change. You can't stop the change, but you do get to choose its character."

They do bring some of the problems when they go against established culture and force their views on others. This is pretty common. A classic example is people buying a house near an existing highway, then complaining about road noise and advocating for million dollar sound barriers.

Again, you mention policy as the problem, yet there's no example of the alternatives. Even the high level stuff mentioned previously sounds like a zero sum game - either existing owners get screwed or the new people do. I would like to see property tax eliminated and go strictly income based.

Yes, change happens, but it doesn't mean that the existing people need to roll over and not fight for their own opinions.
I agree that the target market might be different. However, even though multimedia workflows work pretty well on the iPad, some of the same restrictions that apply to development apply there.

For example, there's no notion of rendering a video in the background, organizing project files independent of the application, a plugin ecosystem for creative software, and proper IPC between these apps. So even though the market is different, there's still a lot to be done to come close to desktop editing workflows.
I'm writing this on my 2014 MBP that has:

- 2x USB ports

- 2x Thunderbolt ports

- 1x HDMI

"Half a decade" is not that long considering that the external mic I purchased in 2020 for WFH requires USB-A.

Why on earth would I want to switch to newer models that require a dongle for everything?
That's not what was asked. The query was, 'Is React a language now', i.e. specifically React, not just a general query like 'In general, is programming a process of designing little custom languages to solve problems'.
Hi,

Really interesting project, I couldn't find your podcast using pocketcasts.com, so I added it through their form here: https://www.pocketcasts.com/submit/

They mention a few errors in your feed:

Problem 1: Your podcast doesn't seem to have an author

Solution: Get some credit for your work by adding the following tag to your feed: <itunes:author>Author’s Name Goes Here</itunes:author>

Problem 2: Your podcast doesn't seem to have a description

Solution: Add a podcast description using one of the following tags:

<description>Podcast description goes here.</description>
<itunes:subtitle>Podcast description goes here.</itunes:subtitle>

Problem 3: Some of your episodes are missing a file length

Include the file length in bytes with each episode enclosure item:

<enclosure url="http://www.yourhost.com/episode1.mp3" length="25209836" type="audio/mpeg" />
Its a fucking thermostat.

I don't need the company to be bankrolling a $2mm/yr AI team so that the thermostat can try to make better guess about when I want to turn on the heat.
Turing-complete is (kind of) irrelevant, the question is what (equivalent of) system calls is has access to. Eg, javascript should not be able to set cookies or cause network traffic after page load by default.

> all you need to be able to do is make an HTTP request

Precicely. Inability to do this is (part of) what > > heavily restricted javascript means.
تنزيل واتس اب الذهبي 2021 اخر تحديث لليوم مجانا من ميديا فاير
That's wild. I wonder if they just always toss that in, in case they accidentally hook someone for whom that's true.

A number of things they say indicate English isn't their first language: "We could wait you forever", "your revenue is more than 4 billions. So it is a possible amount for you."
Could this be related to the Dunning-Kruger Effect ?

Seems incredible naive and maybe oblivious to the actions that are being taken by YouTube (correctly or not)..
In the video, they show an exploded view. The "chin" is where all the SoC, cooling, and speakers are. The screen is just the screen
I think you are missing the point I was making: If you can not inspire others to action, it does not matter whether you are right, because you will not make the world a better place by simply being right.
Metro California problems follow metro California popularity/growth.

Policies you're calling "NIMBY" are rarely the underlying cause. They're reactions. Some of them exacerbate certain problems, some of them attenuate others, but not the underlying cause.
> The cost of fixing a bug isn't just the deployment effort. It's also the investigation, the impact analysis for any potential fix, and the mitigation of any unwanted side effects on other code that is related to wherever the bug is.

...and also the mitigation of the problems the bug has caused, e.g., to production data or business actions. This is a big driver of cost of bugs that get into production.

> I'm not sure what since-debunked bit of research you were referring to,

There was a popular 90s report that concluded a 10× cost for each step from requirements to design to testing to production; I suspect that’s the one.
The chart in this article is not based on any hard data (I know that offhand, it's a very popular chart), and the concepts it's trying to illustrate are baed on a study from the 80s and on languages like COBOL and FORTRAN, where compile times were very long and changes were difficult. I believe this specific study was debunked, though again I am having trouble finding anything specific on this. Apologies!

Very little in software engineering continues to reflect the environment when this idea was originally created.

The argument isn't really, "Do bugs cost more in production?", the argument is really, "Do they cost as much as this article's chart states directly?" and I believe the answer is a firm, "We don't know, but likely not, given how different from modern reality the assumptions are."

If you're operating your software team as if bugs in production cost 50x-200x more than bugs caught during development, you're probably not operating your software team with a firm anchoring in reality, considering how thin the actual evidence is to support this notion.
When I try it I end up summoning Beelzebub, Siri is screaming obscenities at me, we’ve skipped the episode we were watching, and my partner is crying with laughter
Burning wood is certainly polluting, but CO2 is not the concern. The CO2 released by burning the wood was already part of the global CO2 "budget". As wood is burned, releasing CO2, more wood is grown, capturing it again. Wood burning, from a CO2 perspective, is effectively neutral, and far from "the worst thing".
As a leftist: Good for them. If they actually self-moderate their calls to violence, then I welcome the rest of their debate in the world and on the political stage.

But let's be clear: What happened on Jan. 6th was inexcusable, and a direct result of their inaction. It was a case study on why we moderate public discussion in the first place.
The answer is "it depends". And mostly on the terms that AGPL shares with GPL.
What happens to CNCF if Google backs out of it tomorrow? Including all funding?
It's great for this, but by a base $329 model for that, there's no advantage with the Pro for piano. Or buy a refurb 12.9" if you want a bigger screen for the piano
> why does a few hours of downtime ultimately matter?

In our case ( Azure downtime), because none of our customer systems would work.

This includes people on the road, that need to do something every 5 minutes on their PDA ( sometimes 100 people simultaneous in a big city)

So yes, it matters.
Teamspeak supports plugins so an entire server of 100s of people only hear the players in-game that they are actively working with.

It turns this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dM3HqNFox8) into this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znv6Cf4IKgE).
“Parents believing the teachers are effective” is a measure of effectiveness, but I wouldn’t consider it a particularly rigorous one.
Just to be clear, had Elastic chosen to relicense Elasticsearch under AGPL, there would likely be no issue with Amazon's usage of it and I doubt Amazon would have forked it in that case.

The problem for Amazon was strictly due to SSPL, not copyleft licenses in general.
For those in the SF Bay Area, you can play this game:

https://www.thegamecrafter.com/games/bay-area-regional-plann...
That depends on the pickup pattern of the microphone, the gain on the mic and the distance between the mic and the keyboard.

The pickup pattern dictates which direction(s) the microphone is sensitive to: see https://ehomerecordingstudio.com/microphone-polar-patterns/ as one example. You'd want a cardiod mic turned so that the least sensitive part of the mic faces your keyboard.

Secondly you'll need to get the microphone close to you so you don't need a ton of gain to be heard well. You can put the mic 10 feet from you and with enough amplification people will hear you, but they'll hear every chair squeak and you shuffling your feet and the ac coming on as well. Get it close and you don't have to increase gain nearly as much.

Finally the greater the distance between the mic and keyboard the less likely your tapping will be heard. But again if gain has to be used to pick you up, you're more likely to hear the keyboard even with a cardiod mic because sound still reflects and echoes. Consider something like the Blue snowball as an intro microphone or call up a supplier and have a conversation with a real audio tech, which I am not.

The issue is once you get off into mics then you have to ask yourself which input type(s) do you want, what sort of pre-processing you may want, etc.

Good luck.
The PSF, which is the organization hiring for this job, is a non-profit. As with virtually all non-profits, the PSF is funded largely by donations.
> misread: I didn’t accuse you of being a pedant

and nor did I say you did, who now is misreading?

why do you avoid replying to the the main thrust of my rebuttal?

again, I made a cogent argument about the main topic, and whether I labelled a old connector the way many others did is irrelevant to the topic at hand, and if anything hobbles your pedantry hobby horse. Where are your critiques of the more egregious errors in TFA?
no, it's that it happens less and when it does it's not so much your engineers problems as you have already paid someone to fix it.

also, security practices are supposedly better and more robust there than at your average place.

i think those two things are the value adds.
Dont worry, they'll just get rid of those pesky little dislikes to form cognizant conformity as their sponsors want pretty soon.
I don't recommend you do it, but engineer in me is trying to find technical solutions to all problems. If you can hear them presumably they can hear you on the same frequency. So you could get in contact by broadcasting on the same frequency. You can already hear them on the radio, so if they hear you on a child monitor that would be a weird-but-functional walkie talkie setup.

Depending on where you are, it's possible that stress from knowing that their child monitor is unsecured is much higher than the risk of anyone within broadcast range abusing the vulnerability. Moreover, it's possible that whatever they replace the device with will have more significant problems to worry about. For example cloud vulnerable to the whole world instead of enthusiasts with radios in a small local area.
If you know "The Last Ninja" from the C=64 times, then this may be something for you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7U5pQZJYKM

(Sound of Games: "The Last Ninja - Pure Meditation" - HQ)
That would interfere with marketing.

"Where did you go today? We know." - Car Data slogan?
TIL HackerNews blissfully strips emoji from comments (whilst I was trying to make a low effort joke response to this)
This is pretty cool especially since Forth is gaining interest in some circles.
The iPad 3 was not being marketed as a computer like the new ones are
> Freedom includes freedom to have privacy.

You have that. The AGPL provides rights to _users_ of your software; that's it, no one else. If _you don't provide_ the modified software to someone, they can't demand your private patches. No one can "bring down the machinery of state copyright enforcement" against you, unless you interact with them first and provide them your modified software and they use it.

And even when you do that — when you provide your software to someone — they still can't demand that you "publish" your private patches. Only that you give to _them_ the modified software under the same rights that you received the original software. Only to _them_, not the public. No publishing required. _They_ are free to publish the software they received, of course, as were you when you first received the original software; but you aren't obligated to publish it.

----

The only difference between AGPL and GPL is that the definition of what constitutes "distribution" of software is extended. The AGPL changes only "distribution" and nothing else in the GPL.
Pulse Secure VPN device remotely exploitable due to vulnerability
Amazon is the biggest leecher in the industry. They haven't open-sourced any meaningful project back to the community and they even prevent its employees to work in any of them[1] on their free-time.

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/3axbeh/i...
Yes and no, some things are actually time sensitive.

For example, I'm building a note-taking / knowledge base platform, and we were having some reliability issues last year when our platform and devops process was still a bit nascent. We had a user that was (predictably) using our platform to take notes / study for an exam, which was open book. On the day of her exam our servers went down and she was justifiably anxious that things wouldn't be back before it was time for her exam to start. Luckily I was able to stabilize everything before then and her exam went great in the end, but it might not have happened that way.

Of course most on HN would probably point out that this is obviously why your personal notes should always be hosted / backed up locally, but I of course took this as a personal mission to improve our reliability so that our users never had to deal with this again. And since then I'm proud to say we've maintained 99.99% uptime[1]. So yes, there are definitely many situations where we can and should take a more laid back approach, but sometimes there are deadlines outside of your control and having a critical piece of software go offline exactly when you need it can be a terrible experience.

[1] https://status.supernotes.app/
Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems Awards
Prisma does something similar, provides a typed schema and a query engine written in Rust.
How to Audit Your Asp.net Core WebApi
it wont be porting MacOS to the iPad. It'll be discontinuing MacOS and having everyone on a derivative of iOS locked up with the App Store at a 30% tax.
> However this technique has extremely limited practical application.

How so? I always wondered, why I didn't here more of this kind of recordings, since I heard a (fantastic) demo in the early 1990's.
So no mention of any manufacturers involved, and a mailing address that matches the USB Implementers Forum.

Sign me up.
The only thing that differs between SSPL and the AGPL in terms of being open source or not is that one particular group of people has decided one is Open Source(TM) and one is not.
Is it worthwhile to do authentication via SaaS instead of a local library?

For password use case, it seems nice that you don't have to store client secrets (eg encrypted salted passwords) on your own infra. However now instead of authentication happening between your own servers and the users browser, there is an additional hop to the SaaS and now you need to learn about JWT etc. At my previous company, moving a Django monolith to do authentication via auth0 was a multi month project and a multi thousand line increase in code/complexity. And we weren't storing passwords to begin with because we were using onetime login emails links.

Maybe SaaS platforms are worth it for social login? I haven't tried that, but I am not convinced that auth0 or some one else can help me connect with facebook/twitter/google better than a library can.
Pinned objects persist.
Go is one of the few Google things that I will actually use and promote.

I completely understand your justified fear of putting so much stake into a company owned language. It is completely reasonable.

But, since Go is only indirectly benefitting Google (as most of their non-ads products do) then I do not feel that using it is contributing anymore to Google's bottom-line or control than visiting an arbitrary website that uses Google Analytics, or using an Android phone, etc. will do.

But, an important discussion for the Go community (and any company-owned language) to have would be one around the hypothetical of Google shutting off it's contributions to the language.
Not regarding this specific incident, but to reply to this:

> However from the top of my head we've had AWS outages, Gmail outages, Azure outages, DNS outages, GitHub outages, whatever else. All these hugely profitable companies are messing this stuff up constantly. Why are any of us going to do any better and why does a few hours of downtime ultimately matter?

I've been mulling this for a while too, and I think I might have some responses that address your thought somewhat:

- Amazon/Google/Microsoft/etc. services have huge blast radii. If you build your own system independently, then of course you probably wouldn't achieve as high of an SLA, but from the standpoint of users, they (usually) still have alternative/independent services they can still use simultaneously. That decoupling can drastically reduce the negative impact on users, even if the individual uptimes are far worse than the global one.

- Sometimes it turns out problems were preventable, and only occurred because someone deliberately decided to bypass some procedures. These are always irritating regardless of the fact that nobody can reach 100% uptime. And I think sometimes people get annoyed because they feel there's a non-negligible chance this was the cause, rather than (say) a volcano.

- People really hate it when the big guys go down, too.
If you look at it in the abstract, using a computer is equivalent to programming it (ad-hoc), whether the computation and memory live in your head, on a clipboard, or in some app. If the whole "low-code"/visual programming trend is any indication, we need to collectively raise the power of tools and narrow the gap between usage and programming.

Apple should be trying to empower users with safe abstractions, not lock them down even more.
Tesla: Elon Musk suggests Autopilot not to blame for fatal crash
You really can't complain about their update support when iPhone gets support twice as long as Android. And I'm using Android personally so don't think I'm just an Apple shill
This reminds me of "Window 93" [0]

[0] https://www.windows93.net/