skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't like cryptos for multiple reasons, a lot of which could be fixed in the future.

But we're way over the phase where governments would ban it, on the contrary, I think bitcoin is a last resort fix for the immense global debt.

My wild theory is after elites load up on bitcoin(and also a lot of ordinary folks) governments would change bitcoin to bitcoin 2.0 and completely crash other forms of fiat currency, wiping the huge fiat currency debts in the process and also shutting up all the people who want anonimity in bitcoin(because they would lose a lot of money otherwise).
That's what I thought, the article seems to be nonsense...
No, it simply shouldn’t have been public. The DPL elections aren’t public either.
Neither party is a party of freedom, despite their members themselves wanting freedom. The function of the parties is to appeal to the basic desire for freedom present in most of their constituents (differentiating based on cultural pain points), and then sell a similarly-flavored agenda of non-freedom in its place. Whether it's "compromises" that totally undermine the goal of a movement, or simply that pro-freedom pushes stall legislatively while the anti-freedom pushes move along well funded (by those who stand to gain).

edit: I think I'm being heavily downvoted for "both sidesism" after the Trump trainwreck. But if you cannot accept the idea that what motivates the Trumpists is the desire for freedom as well, then we're doomed to repeat the same cycle.
This sort of thinking leads to codebases that are too abstract, where it’s hard to follow the flow of execution.

There’s nothing wrong with 5 levels of nesting. It’s much easier to follow than 5 separate functions.
> It is extremely rare for me to drive without AutoPilot; parking lots are pretty much my only AP-free zones.

Even if the average Tesla driver is like you and rarely turns it off, and even if the average Tesla driver is equivalent to the average driver and drives under equivalent conditions, the choice of when it is turned off can have a huge bias on the result.
When I was 12 I lost my front teeth before my first communion. My mum took me to the dentist that day and ask him if adult teeth can re-grow. Dentist seeing my mum desperation said that in very rare cases it could be possible. I got implants obviously as my adult teeth never re-grow. The implants look so real and nicer that the original ones. I wonder how this process would look like and how long the new teeth take to grow.
dang or other moderators, can someone add the official title to this post? It’s unclear from the submission’s title that no one was driving the car, which is the only thing that makes this post notable.
Interestingly, some crypto assets do have revenue streams. Ex: uniswap has an optional cut that their governance token can take of fees, and their fees aren't minuscule ($5M over the past 24 hours). Other assets like Ethereum can be staked in return for mining rewards - I suppose this is more difficult to reason out as a revenue stream since it is a mix of inflation and transaction fees.
Because fiat money isn't backed by a trillion-dollar, oil-guzzling military-industrial complex?
Couldn't your girlfriend (or any other third party who overheard your conversation) have searched for memory stick water damage before you sat down and opened Facebook? It doesn't seem too strange to me that advertisers send targeted ads for a certain product to an entire household if they think somebody there might need it.
This is your parents on a Podcast
The Blood-Clot Problem Is Multiplying
There are obviously some conservative elements to the Republican party, but it is fundamentally a liberal party.

Democratic party, obviously, is not remotely liberal, but that has been the case for some time. That doesn't mean good or bad, just not liberal.
The "Further discussion" option is meant to allow for that. Note that the options calling for a statement in support of RMS were even less preferred than "Further discussion", which is quite weird given the context so GP may well have a point.
Easy to copy the coin, hard to copy the network effect.
Reflecting on this thought, I think it's because deep thinking requires/benefits from 'stillness' which is a way of saying free of distractions of noise, motion, etc. Walking on a treadmill I can do the same kinds of work I can do in a not-particularly-quiet open office. I don't know if concurrently burning calories that could instead go into thinking factors in at all.
Sure, I reported an issue to the Gogs maintainer over two weeks ago and he hasn't acknowledged it at all. Here's the public reference that their SECURITY.md asks for: https://github.com/gogs/gogs/issues/6534

Here's another one posted about a week ago: https://github.com/gogs/gogs/issues/6536
Central banking requires a lot of storage too so I'm not sure storage is a good argument against most blockchains (the proof of storage ones aside).
Just to check, did you not realize that the comment you are replying to is satire?
Was it a smart TV? Is it possible that it's actually the TV that was snitching on you and not your iPhone (of course, it could be both of them!)
My thinking is that games are inherently all simulations, to varying depths of complexity, and the players goal in nearly all games is really to learn and understand, optimize and eventually break the simulation to achieve game-specified or player driven goals.

Thus, the primary thing you need to introduce in a sufficiently complex simulation is those points of interaction, to influence the simulation. Essentially god games and dwarf fortress are the points of inspiration — and then you need a reason to optimize the economy, which is either internal (need to eventually produce some expensive thing to win, like factorio’s rocket) or external (e.g. need to continuously improve the defensive infrastructure against ever-stronger foreign attacks).

Another way of looking at it is on levels of operational complexity — whether the player is acting at the level of tactics (a single fight; Starcraft), operation (a single campaign/theater; total war), or strategy (resource control and long-term politics; grand strategies).

From the sounds of it, if your AI manages the cities themselves on their own, then they key interaction point is on the resource dependencies - land acquisition, trade routes and manipulation, etc. The player’s goal is to learn to select resources the AI can best make use of, and acquire them efficiently, to ever-expand the city itself (or perhaps multiple).

Also note there must always be some negative feedback loop, e.g. pollution, to contend with.

Also note that IMO random events like Godzilla attacks and disasters are a bit of a cop-out — it’s just shit that happens, but you can’t do anything about. It’s more a nuisance than anything else. Jurassic Park tycoon was slightly more interesting — dinos always had some chance of escaping, becoming more common as you had a bigger park (negative feedback), and disasters like typhoons just exploded that risk. The typhoon damage wasn’t of note — it was the rampaging t-rex’s it unleashed because of your fragile placement of barriers.

That last part is important, I think, because you can still interact with the disasters such that they weren’t plainly random events. SimCity on the other hand is just a nuisance trigger every now and then that you can’t plan for, mitigate, or really do anything about.
You can say the same thing with most trading cards but there always seems to be some second hand market that no one understands.
That statement of AU PM is definitely worthy of retard. But why do you think it is caused by Chinese influence? From what I understand being able to have "master key" is a wet dream of every government without exception even if said government wants to have nothing to do with China.
I think these were futures contracts?
Alternatively it could be as simple as lots of people having a crap execution strategy. I’m sure there are thousands of people who just have orders in the book that got swept and others with simple python scripts that “buy the dip” with no concept of risk or stop loss. The question is whether those people need to get out of their positions in the next few days causing a further drop or whether they can hold in which case the price will stabilise and eventually continue to run up.
You could say that about any commodity, like a stock. How is it valuable info though, a predictor of future performance?
You're assuming that there actually was $8B in transactions. It's possible that there was $800M in transactions and $7.2B in tape painting.
s/can’t/shouldn’t
A big reason for this, in particularly with big companies, is that managing them is like steering a tanker. Do you want to stop ASAP you need to do full thrust the other way for a while.

Obviously not the perfect metaphor, but for sure a part of it
Is the implication that the real issue is calories or that alcohol and sugar have similar metabolic mechanisms? E.g., similar effects on insulin, blood glucose etc.?
If I was going to do a lot of DIY stuff, the last thing I would do would be my brakes. I’ve got no problem paying for the professional there.
I don't get why organizations feel they need to weigh in on this so much. The FSF has a code of conduct (https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct.en.html), so it's pretty clear what the conditions are for removing someone.

Either remove him according to the rules of the code of conduct, or leave him be. That's what COCs are for.

If you're not happy with the COC, push for changes.
On the increase in complexity in evolution (1976)
You need fiat money to purchase food and shelter
Porn & Sex-Workers are a neccessity to our society.
Without it forced sex / rape would be even more prevalent.
So if you are against either, you (scientifically) support rape!
This is absolutely beautiful, thank you so much for building this!
Coinbase CEO Sold $291.8M in Shares on Opening Day
I'm as Anti-Google as they come. I gave DDG a fair shake for a couple months, but the number of times I was adding !g grew to be absurd so I switched back. My experience was that Google is far better at answering programming queries. I've also noticed that it's only that good when I'm logged in. So there are some benefits to personalizing search.
When somebody says “please don't explain this to me again, because I know how to do it” and people explain it to them, that's clearly not following the Golden Rule.
Most people don’t see completely irrelevant Facebook ads.

Frankly, Facebook and their proxies always speak in meaningless nonsense about everything. If you asked Zuck if he ate kittens, you’d get some reply about facebooks mission and why cats are important.

For some mysterious reason, all explanations for the “Facebook is listening” phenomenon are uniquely cogent, clear and dismissive.

Personally, I have zero doubt that a downstream “partner”, data provider, or affiliate is processing audio data of questionable origin for ad insights. Call center companies with tight margins do it, why wouldn’t an ad company?
> You cannot get Internet anywhere without ID.

Most free public Wi-Fi in the US (libraries, universities, airports, malls, hospitals) don't require ID to use, and usually only require accepting a ToS.
It's unobtanium anyway. Not even fusion energy will give us that. Most technological salvation promises, ignore the reality of our massive overexploitation and fossil carbon dependency. We don't have the building material and energy left to bootstrap abundance.

However, the theoretical thought of a near infinite energy source inevitably pushing a PoRessource currencies system into finding (another) limitation again is outrageous. With all those free market edgelords in the cryptosphere, why don't they see the catastrophic flaw of dependency on scarcity? That's just insane. No matter the material/energetic efficiency technology will ever achieve, PoR will automatically counterbalance it.

It's full commitment into the long known failings of a free market economy. Giving up all control to the reward delay capacity of a toddler. A modern take on the easter island collapse on a holistic, global scale.
Jupyter is great but it's somewhat of a "lowest common denominator". So there is always the temptation to make a more task-specific version; see also the Pluto notebook project for Julia and R Markdown (although the latter evolved concurrently with IPython/Jupyter, not after it).

LSP is in a similar situation right now, where it's great for languages that lacked tooling to begin with (like Python), but it's not yet possible to migrate existing powerful language tooling (Lisp SLIME, OCaml Merlin) to use LSP.
is this the "we don't tolerate intolerance" logic?
"Delivery may not be used if payment is cancelled for any reason" — the (not) buyer is not allowed to use the code.
> Majority of these are 75-85% ratio...

How do you know that?
> having this as a rule that keys in dictionaries are sorted alphabetically can be a valid rule

Ordering keys to prevent randomness is very helpful to spot changes when using "git diff", doing code reviews, comparing files side by side.

Often it helped me spotting bugs due to a missing or unwanted element.

I wish code linters had enabled by default with the ability to disable it with some simple syntax.
Just bought it. Will post back here when I finish it.
The only intolerance here is on behalf of a viciously ableist movement which does not allow for purely rational opinions from someone clearly on the autistic spectrum. Making women "uncomfortable" without making or implying advances is purely intolerant of those who fall slightly outside of social norms; I haven't seen any evidence that he actually did or said anything predatory or sexual.

It's the same implicit social shaming that socially awkward "nerds" and "geeks" receive in highschool, except turned up to 11 because of a vicious social movement which explicitly targets outliers. The open source community was far more tolerant when it was merit based and race/gender blind, before it was infested with ideologues and the social contagion that is the social [in]justice movement. Frankly, normies are ruining programming communities by demanding that the culture change to be inclusive of their norms, to the detriment of the very people who founded the movement. It's painfully ironic, and the people leading this charge are simply grabbing at power justified by self righteousness.
> I wonder if I could grow the teeth back now or if the fused peg has ruined the chances.

This is WAY outside anything I really understand, but unfortunately I would guess not. There's an epithelial layer (the dental lamina) over the bone that generates teeth. I would guess that the peg is bonded to the bone itself (via hydroxyapatite) instead of any dental layers. Unless that layer can be regrown somehow, I don't think this would grow back your teeth.

I don't have any implants, but I do have several missing teeth. I had something like 14 teeth extracted, including all of my canines twice- I grew a third set. I think that probably wasn't as bad as getting implants, although I can still remember the feeling in my stomach every time they told me I needed more pulled. My mouth is just too small to fit more teeth so I don't think I'll ever have a full set either ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

What's probably more interesting is having the option of regrowing a tooth instead of, say, a root canal. Or just to replace teeth as they're worn down naturally.
डोनाल्ड ट्रम्प फेसबुक, इंस्टाग्राम को फिर से कब कर पाएंगे इस्तेमाल?
https://talknewswale.com
Only plausible explanation I can think of is that perhaps you or your girlfriend looked something up about drying a wet memory stick.
I trust my manager to not be a dick when I'm sick. I also believe he is an empathetic person who cares about me and wants to know what's up. I understand he has a list of tasks that need to be completed by his small team. So I'm happy to let him know whether I expect to be out for a day or a week.

If I didn't have such a relation with my manager I'd be looking for a job. If he doesn't look out for me when I'm sick he will probably not look out for me professionally either.
Yes, for someone whose prior has been: “The price will crater and most people will lose interest”, I think that the thousands of hours of developer time and institutional interest is probably starting to pay of in terms of more mature markets.

I still have problems with the idea that people are able to pick the correct winners. When the blockchain finally gets its killer mainstream app, why not do a new ICO on a restarted blockchain instead of a billion dollar wealth transfer to early adopters?
Well I mean Errol quite literally funded his first company.

But also, Errol had a very successful engineering business. There's no question that was a huge influence and advantage to Elon. He got an informal exposure to engineering at home that would be better than the universities available in some impoverished places.

The evidence for grit is nonexistent. What correlates most strongly with successful entrepreneurship is having upper middle class or better parents. This is because they provide a better education, literal seed funding, and if nothing else, allow someone to take more risk knowing they won't end up homeless.
Haven’t read the articles, but wow, this idea needs a new name
FSF and FSFE are different organizations.
Amazon's K-12 CSback Reward Program
Chdir to Cwd: Permission Denied
Without exactly contradicting you, I wonder at the implication of your post on the concept of free moral agency and accountability for actions.
Reuters' job is to sell "news", which can be anything anyone* pays them to distribute.

It's harmful to conflate clickbait and stories with journalism.

*Only trusted corporate or political partners. They have some standards.
Systemic risks in Bitcoin do exist but primarily around fungibility and privacy.

Risks strictly related to PoW, hashrate volatiliy, or "51% attacks" are not existential by any means. We do know how to mitigate them and multiple examples exist how altcoins managed to survive such attacks.
I see the network as a key problem here--the miners will go wherever the grass is greenest, the network isn't permanent. If a coin were to pay them more or suddenly crash, they'd shift their rigs pretty quickly. Same problem Uber and Lyft have.
Author here. I fully support prioritizing a project because it's fun! We need to own that rationale though.

In OP's situation, it sounds like their counterpart is trying to argue that this project is a "good thing to do" for the user/system. In reality, it's a bit of code hygiene that makes it more fun to do work (still important [1]).

That dissonance hides the true value of the work and makes it difficult to reason about.

[1] https://blog.harterrt.com/bad-tools
> For people who are naturally good at that, an agent might not be such a good deal.

Even for those of us who are good at it, we simply don’t have the domain knowledge an agent can bring.

Understanding the history of an area, regulations, costs of getting work done, lead times, liabilities, seller/buyer psychology etc, aren’t things you can acquire overnight.
Right. A fire extinguisher is a "first aid" response to a fire. The kind of advice that's relevant to fire extinguisher usage is predicated on a small fire; general advice is that any fire larger than a small trash can is too big to fight with an extinguisher.

The fire department plays from a different rule book.
The confidence intervals don't seem to imply that Psilocybin is "promising" given that for a subset of patients, there were worse effects.
Steinbeck never actually said this. The closest he came (“temporarily embarrassed capitalists”) is actually in a description of the socialist movement itself, not its opponents: https://hellyesjohnsteinbeck.tumblr.com/post/23486952183/com...
Maybe Tesla can help design some portable wall/dam system that could be setup around vehicles to capture water used in a pool rather than have it all immediately lost to drainage.
The humble shrub that’s predicting a terrible fire season
I’m sure the Tesla crowd will jump in to say this is driver error because Tesla has a disclaimer that the feature requires active driver supervision, but the problem has always been the marketing that causes users to over estimate the system’s capabilities. Musk says that autopilot is safer than human driven miles, but this is apples and oranges since the human driven miles include city driving and all models of car, which have much higher rates of accidents than luxury cars like Teslas.

Full Self Driving’s marketing has been criminal. Tesla is trying to solve self driving without lidar, which it’s competitors are using. Waymo is way ahead of Tesla, but they create the illusion of being ahead by releasing features that are clearly extremely dangerous.

This video is a little over the top but highlights the abuses of FSD marketing better than anything else I’ve seen:
https://twitter.com/FinanceLancelot/status/13752898727562731...
How visualizations help make sense of deep learning
Ask HN: What was it like during the early days at Pinterest?
I'm not contradicting you, and I don't think bitcoin will be banned, but the US total stock market capitalization is 49T and 1T capitalization of bitcoin world wide is not an issue.

I use those figures to decide on the future price of bitcoin, in case governments actually addopt bitcoin, so a future, very unlikely ~50X increase in bitcoin price is not enough for me to put money into it.

I've missed my chance and a very unlikely future 50X increase in price is not worth the risk, imho.
Seconded.
Visited the dentist recently.

On my way I looked up directions in google maps, then for a week had dental insurance adds.

This one is obvious though.

That was on iOS with it’s pretty strict location tracking rules etc.

I’d be interested to see if you can get it to show you adds just by visiting the dentist (and not searching) on a vanilla android phone (IE google’s location history on by default)
The G5 was a PowerPC chip - if you continue to want PowerPC architecture the Raptor Talos II makes sense.

Clearly this is hobbiest for him in at lease some ways.
I mean, object safety is one exact example. Every trait can be monomorphized, but not all traits can be made into an object. So "turn every generic into an object" just doesn't work. When you request a generic bound, you're saying that you want certain performance characteristics.

Haskell's polymorphism is similar, it's true, but I can't speak to their semantics well enough to intelligently comment. They are much less concerned with performance than Rust is, so they tend to do less of the sorts of optimizations that gets Rust into trouble here.
Was it an anonymous vote?
There were definitely some Crimeans who preferred to be part of Russia. But I don't think the referendum was free or fair. And even if we could say that 51% of them genuinely wanted to secede from Ukraine and join Russia, it doesn't change the fact that Russia annexed Crimea first, and then, lo and behold, the Crimean people wanted Russian rule all along. I don't think there's any way to square what happened with international law.

There's another devious tactic Russia uses which is IMHO even worse than the bogus referendum: They've started issuing Russian passports to Ukrainian citizens in the part of Eastern Ukraine that is controlled by the "independent republics" which are de facto controlled by Russia. So now, Russia can say, truthfully, that there are many Russian citizens in Donbass, and justify military escalation there as a purely defensive act responding to Ukrainian abuses of Russian citizens. Meanwhile, life in Donbass gets worse and worse, Russian passport or not.