skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
To further with some views on feeding:

1. breast pumping provided us appreciated flexibility. After a crappy one, we got a good breast pump that did both at once. Wife appreciated being untethered from child for her relief. I appreciated being able to feed child.

2. We weren't too worried when we switched to formula exclusively after a while. Sooo many people get hung up on "breast is best" dialogue. Best comment I heard was a Maternal Child Health nurse pointing at a school yard of kids saying "Can you tell me which was breast fed and which was formula?"

Ultimately though, you do you.
It depends on the standard of reliability required. A good defence legal team might use this to argue that the phone data wouldn't be sufficient evidence in the actual criminal proceedings, you do need to prove things beyond all reasonable doubt there; however, even with all these caveats it would be sufficient to use that phone data for investigative purposes and as probable cause for getting a warrant for something else, and then use that for the actual conviction.

For example, let's say they extract the Signal message data from your phone. You successfully convince everyone that this data might have been the result of some tampering. However, that doesn't prevent investigators from using that message history to find the other person, and get them to testify against you.
Such a clever movement. That is beautiful of blockchain.
>>You could have multiple cryptocurrencies which support the exact same public API and clients could figure out their relative values automatically by crawling DEX markets (looking at current prices and daily trade volumes).

Transmitting between ledgers is associated with a cost, due to the capital requirements that make inter-chain bridges possible.

Look at the current attempts at such bridges, like Connext: they require individuals to run 'routing' nodes that faciliate inter-chain transfers by locking collateral in multiple chains to act as liquidity. There is a cost to this, that doesn't exist when two parties are transacting on the same ledger.
Try owning in SF, where it's impossible to get a plumber to come out for a small job, but a big enough landlord will have a guy that can come reasonably quickly.
If you want to go down a rabbit hole you should read about the recent Italian trial of ~300 mobsters. IIRC they have something like 800 witnesses scheduled to appear and they had to build a special courtroom to hold everyone. One of the accused was in hiding and police only located him after finding his cooking channel on YouTube.

Unfortunately English-language reporting is pretty light on the details presented in court but here are two articles to get you started.

About the trial: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55633091

About the prosecutor: https://www.independent.co.uk/independentpremium/mafia-trial...
Yes, but the copy shipped is signed by Apple.
i.e. they did not compile their own copy.
> I feel you're overvaluing the ability to contribute to the linux kernel - this is definitely a bad thing and the university should work to correct the situation. But when I was looking at colleges and universties (for undergrad - I didn't pursue a grad degree) I didn't ever ask if the university was blacklisted by any open source organizations.

You are not looking at it the right way. This is an issue for the President and the Provost because of alumni donations.

When the choice is between firing an adjunct/assistant and not getting a 100k from alumni the adjunct/assistant has no chance.
Depends on the history of UMN CS submissions for ethics review, how they were advised to complete the exemption request, whether they made false statements or omitted something, whether they intended to deceive, etc.

The requirements arising from US Govt grant funding may well be more strict than UMN.
How so? It seems common-sense that people in a less secure position would be more careful of others' feelings, and so issues would likely come from those in a more secure position.
Hmm, so I have no child and no experience huh? What happened to baby proofing houses? Keeping items they shouldn’t eat out of reach? As a parent it is your job to keep that child safe until they can do the same, and leaving dangerous items around is failing that one task. You don’t leave things around that hurts your child, be it guns or batteries.
It's well known that Google uses clicks on search result as a preference signal to modify its ranking. This way, decisions by users turn into decisions by the algorithm.
Further, if you want single-byte opcodes, then you took that space from 256 opcodes down to 64. It cost you 192 single-byte opcodes to use a 2b marker. This wouldn't be possible with the current x86 encodings [1].

[1]: https://www.sandpile.org/x86/opc_1.htm
Thanks for the link, and the only thing i've been doing is debian in WSL2 on arm (Surface Pro X), which works great, as does fedora....the strangeness is that the subsystem seems to freeze perhaps after a sleep / wake cycle, but not at a predictable time delay.

Anyway, since that's a showstopper, it's unusable, and i'm going to check out that link. thanks again.
Can someone explain how it was done?
The rest of the components are also broken down. The components are lipids (fats) meant to protect the mRNA while it's being introduced, some salts for stabilization, and sucrose.

Your body knows how to handle all of those perfectly well, and yes, most of them will be excreted.
Got it, that's helpful! In a lot of the ones I got wrong, however, it looked pretty clearly that the arm was the thing the VAR used to declare a player offsides.
I actually prefer the "I just kept showing up, and they kept paying me, but I didn't do any actual work" threads, if nothing else for the sheer absurdity of it.
Mark them as spam, tell all your friends to do the same. Eventually gmail will auto-delete them not just for you but for everyone.
...so use a different search platform?

Your rationale seems to boil down to "I hate when other people impose their values on me, I'd much prefer to impose my values on them"
You can but no one does it because resistive heat of water is simpler and more effcient and therefore cheaper.

We use microwaves on food because its faster and more directed at heating the food with electricity than with a resistive element in a normal oven. However is you immerse a resistive element in water the heat transfer is very quick and microwaves have no advantage only added complexity and more potential for losses not making into the water.
A flamewar detector is absurd and illogical?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mmt_economics/comments/mi2jl0/thoug...
Luck and that anecdote doesn't make for information. I'm glad that person has a bed, but it doesn't tell me how people there are, possibly many, possibly none, in Hyderabad in need of a bed that can't get one.
We actually had some remote crunch time last year, and it's clear that some of the colleagues who were working 12 hours/day last year are working 0 hours/day now, because it takes them days just to fix a typo.

I don't think most people try to abuse it. A lot of people are reciprocal. If you trust them, they try not to abuse that trust. But most business relationships are simply take as much as you can from each other. These are also the same ones that don't trust their employees to work remote. You hear a lot of anonymous stories from HN about employees who slack off, and it always starts with hating their work environment.
> Why is that the requirement? The extra layers of plastic to enable removable batteries cost close to zero dollars and don't have to cost more than a millimeter.

That very last phrase you said a millimeter. None of this will fit in one millimeter, which was my counter.
Is it in good faith when they were already told explicitly to not continue? That's the point where it becomes intentionally malicious IMO
It really is like dropping a file on your private file server DONT_RUN_THIS_BLOWS_UP_YOUR_COMPUTER.exe - but contrary to your expectations, it's not "oh well", if you placed it there with the intent to trap someone who you expect to be looking at your computer, you may well be liable if their computer blows up, there's no significant difference from active retaliation - the consequences are there, the intent is there, the act is there, it's pretty much the same.

Of course, if some criminal exploits your file server, they are not likely to press charges, but if it triggers on law enforcement who have a warrant to scan your fileserver, that's a different issue.

You'd be just as liable as for physical boobytraps on your property, with pretty much the same reasoning.
It's even worse when these emails come from ISPs you've never had an account with. I'm looking at you Charter, Optimum, and Verizon.
Seconding this! Went from npm/vue2/ts to npx/vite/vue3/ts and it's so much better.
Oh, I use WSL2 every day and that's not true. I uses dynamic memory and shares with the host. No blocked off 8GB or RAM or anything like that.
I know this is old, but got a link? That LMKL thread is long
By keeping the paper, UMN is benefiting (in citations and research result count). Universities are supposed to have processes for punishing unethical research. Unless the University retracts the paper and fires the researcher involved, they have not made amends.
>If you conclude otherwise I conclude its because its the answer you wish were true.

Confession through projection.
I think yes, it probably helps to know the limits or difficulties of implementing something when designing it as well, so you can design something nice and easy to implement, but otherwise why wouldn't someone be able to design a mock?
This isn't the same amount of wealth for everyone, which is interesting. Some of my friends get more psychological security from having no debt and a few grand in their savings account than others who are worth six or seven figures.
“Loins share” might be inadvertently profound
Yep this. SQL Server using RAM is by design. If it's using too much because you're using it for dev work then you can simply limit the amount it can access. RAM is there to be used!
One of my favourite instances of this was in podcasts where Cards Against Humanity sponsored and just sent one of the podcasters toasters to review: https://cardsagainsthumanity.com/toasters/

Nothing else was said about the sponsor's product. There should be more sponsors like that.
And if they aren't and it doesn't, will the maintainers be happier? No, just older and poorer.
This is inscrutable to anyone not familiar with whatever that site is and the underlying systems and terminology.

Someone should write a blog post or something to explain it, then link that here so we can all be in awe, or outrage, together.
Yes. I’m in the school that believes UX people should know how to code, but know plenty at big tech companies who can’t.
2021 Guide to Speech Synthesis Through Machine Learning
At my last job my boss, who is a notorious micro manager, hired a guy against strong ojections from my side. The guy was only one week for every two months onsite which nobody told me. After some while my boss asked me how it's going with him. This was the first time someone indicated to me that he already started working for us.

I thought first it was kind of funny, but this guy turned out to be a complete disaster. E.g. when I asked him about his progress he was talking about abstract concepts while trying to evade my question. Multiple times I tried to make him commit his code to our repository so I could at least provide feedback about his work, but his answer was every time that the code isn't in a shareable state. At some point I agreed with my boss that my patience is ending, and one of my direct reports was tasked by my boss to supervise his work.

Six months later, about one week before the deadline, a demo was scheduled and every action or click in the software resulted in errors. Since the result was planned to be presented in a broader context in the following week I promised to invest the weekend and fix the code. After looking into it for about 2h to determine where to start, I decided to completely rewrite the whole thing from scratch which I did in 12h. Only thing I reused were the webservice definitions since those were already communicated to others and their clients were waiting for our application.

In the end my boss was angry at me that I saved our face, because he was kind of forced to fire the guys ass. My boss even accused me to have done this deliberately because he hired him against my objections.
Mussolini cracked down on organized crime pretty hard. But he didn’t completely wipe them out, and so when WW2 rolls along and the Allies are invading Italy, they actually get in contact with the surviving mafiosi and cut a deal with them to gather intelligence and organize resistance against the fascist state. This sort of thing continued after the war because the Mafia are also reliably anti-communist.

So yeah—a radical approach was taken to fix it, and then organized crime was reinstalled by the OSS and the CIA.
Google has over 90% market share* in the search engine space worldwide. They most certainly do have a monopoly on web search.

* https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share#monthl...
Page still exists at https://web.archive.org/web/20091108193928/http://journal.da....
There does appear to be a static analysis tool.

https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~kjlu/papers/eecatch.pdf?fbclid...

Still, given that he is 4+ years into a PhD (after a Masters), and has published on this topic before, his first deflection is "We are not experts in the linux kernel" seems disingenuous - kinda like "Hey guys, I'm not malicious, just not good at my job."
MobileDevice.framework isn't open source.
Reminds me of "It's just a prank bro" video from Filthy Frank https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wldE_4xjVQ
then stop coveting digital beanie babies.
Several past threads but precious few comments:

Man-Computer Symbiosis by J. C. R. LICKLIDER (1960) [pdf] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20642783 - Aug 2019 (1 comment)

Man-Computer Symbiosis (1960) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18950590 - Jan 2019 (2 comments)

Man-Computer Symbiosis (1960) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14302515 - May 2017 (2 comments)

Man-Computer Symbiosis (1960) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11673917 - May 2016 (1 comment)

Man-Computer Symbiosis [J.C.R. Licklider] (1960) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11534637 - April 2016 (1 comment)

Man-Computer Symbiosis (1960) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8418654 - Oct 2014 (6 comments)

Internet Antichrist [J.C.R. Licklider's Man-Computer Symbiosis] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=920121 - Nov 2009 (1 comment) - article by David Byrne of all people
How do we stop more malicious actors doing things like this is really the question I’m asking. People who aren’t security researchers but say state actors who want Linux backdoors?
One note: VAERS is a voluntary reporting system, and not anything close to a census of vaccine side effects - it's notoriously unreliable. People are watching the COVID-19 vaccines like hawks (for excellent reasons), while there's no reason to believe the standard schedule vaccines are receiving anywhere near the same level of scrutiny.
This is EXACTLY my story (right to the Ryzen processor). Always been a Mac developer, got windows PC for gaming, then tried to do all my development on it, with WSL making that that actually enjoyable.

The VS Code team has done a phenomenal job with VSCode remotes - it's like magic. Such an incredible architecture that allows them to do that.
I think the original BTC and now it’s heir Ethereum had the right idea of a distributed VM where the reward for doing work for the VM is debt from the VM to do future work for you. A sort of generalization of the dollar as debt for current work exchangeable for future work.

Unfortunately, the “digital gold” mindset won out and those opcodes were removed from BTC and the compute-exchange it might have been was shattered before it formed.

BTC now is purposeless and ETH a much poorer second system.
Dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26871286
> The more accurate anology would be academic researchers sending graduate students to get hired by Microsoft under false pretenses, and then demonstrates that they can introduce security vulnerabilities that don't get caught by Microsoft's code review practices --- and the submits a paper to the IEEE saying that obviously Microsoft's hiring and software engineering practices could be improved.

sounds good to me! (j/k, sorta)

except here's the key point, and here's where i think the issue is: "...obviously Microsoft's hiring and software engineering practices could be improved"

...this isn't about the people involved being bad at what they do, or them being bad people, or the project being silly in some way. it's about the people, the process they use and the project itself meshing together in an unfortunate way to create a real vulnerability for society. linux is no longer a hobby project. every effort can and should be made to ensure that it is secure as possible as linux is now so pervasive that defects can literally have life and death consequences.

this isn't about some maintainer failing to catch security bugs, this is about the growing influence and criticality of the project and the vulnerability of the project to security bugs, both technically and culturally.

the only real human failure is seeing egos get in the way of improvement.

who am i to be making these arguments? i'm just a nobody. a nobody who has to live in a society that is increasingly being built on this stuff...
Does everyone on the team need more than a basic understanding, or can you rely on one or two on your team to handle the 5% cases?

I think that's the distinction here.
Now do crows!
Cellebrite doesn't even have a bug bounty programme or contact to report their bugs.

Last year I've managed to gain partial access to one of their systems and it took me weeks emailing their internal email addresses to finally fix the bug. They were total ass about it.

Now I've got complete access to their entire database and I don't know what do. Can HN advise?
or bugx.

any programmer will tell you bugs exist and both the telemetry and the police could technically be reporting the truth,
Either way I think I have seen more than my fair share of 'this person got absurdly rich absurdly quickly doing absurdly little work' content recently.
"Nothing of value was lost."

What a boss.

This is what often happens when you have community management report into marketing instead of engineering. A good MVP program is about having a tight feedback loop with engineering, and the ROI is about identifying and fixing customer issues.

There is room for community programs that roll up to marketing when they are explicitly at the outset about spreading the word about something that the community members love. But turning MVPs into shills was doomed.
I’m confused. At what point did they convert it from crypto to USD?
This research implies that the linux team should not be operating on good faith.

A software as critical as linux should not be this easily compromised by a bunch of grads..

It's one of the core technologies of our computing.

Having a discussion around the ethics of this is great but it does not detract from the importance of bigger issue.
YouTube is a different case. They had a policy of "don't mention covid" and executed it. The context here is straight up misinformation.
Any notion of "psychological safety" is an absurd impossibility in most tech companies since:

- your boss can fire you at any time without cause or notice

- your project can be canceled on a whim

Since these properties are generally foundational and immutable (and usually codified in corporate governance as well as employment law, at least in the US) "psychological safety" cannot exist in any such organization for any rank and file employee (executives may be protected somewhat by contracts and golden parachutes). The only thing that can exist is a hierarchy of fear and power, and that is exactly what we see.
Ah yes, the SAFEMOON literal Ponzi scheme. Beautiful.

Number go up, number go down. But damn, look at that chart https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/safemoon/. It’s one of the cleanest looking pump-and-dumps I’ve ever seen.

This is not something to celebrate or condone. A lot of people who don’t know better are losing their savings trying to play along with the hype.

See https://stockhead.com.au/cryptocurrency/this-is-a-scam-crypt... or https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/04/207213... for more.
Jonathan Smith walks free after 21 years of wrongful imprisonment
Fltk-Rs 1.0.0 Released
It isn't small users who are priced out so much as almost every use case other than speculation.

Anything that does not allow more transaction throughput doesn't help.
Free IPV Adult Netflix Sports All World Fast Servers of the Day 22-4-2021
Feigning surprise isn't helpful.

It's good to call out bad incentive structures, but by feigning surprise you're implying that we shouldn't imagine a world where people behave morally when faced with an incentive/temptation.
FWIW the icons do have text labels and even descriptions when you hover over them.
PMOVMSKB is a great instruction, and 3c understates how cheap it is - if you have a throughput problem (rather than a latency problem) it's even more efficient relative to the ARM equivalent.

I have a blog post about coping strategies for working around the absence of PMOVMSKB on NEON:

https://branchfree.org/2019/04/01/fitting-my-head-through-th...

We used these techniques in simdjson (which I presume still uses them; the code has changed considerably since I built this): https://github.com/simdjson/simdjson

The best techniques for mitigating the absence of PMOVMSKB require that you use LD4, which results in interleaved inputs. This can sometimes make things easier, sometimes harder for your underlying lexing algorithm - sadly, it's not a 1:1 transformation of the original x86 code.
Who is saying anything went wrong at WSB?
Past related threads:

How Many X86-64 Instructions Are There Anyway? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14233296 - April 2017 (133 comments)

How many x86 instructions are there? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12358050 - Aug 2016 (39 comments)

Does a compiler use all x86 instructions? (2010) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12352959 - Aug 2016 (189 comments)

How Many X86-64 Instructions Are There Anyway? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11535178 - April 2016 (1 comment)
Its not considered illegal if you're actively doing business with them. I believe there is a period after you've done business with a company where they can send you follow-up spam.
At issue there is the "foregone conclusion" exception to the 5th amendment. As far as I understand things you've lost the case by that point anyway.

Even then, I believe there would still be the additional issue of demonstrating that the defendant actually knows the password. Which is why I previously mentioned that if you openly admit to knowing the password then you likely have a problem. (This came up in a case where the defendant admitted to the FBI that he was capable of decrypting an external hard drive but refused to do so because "we both know what's on there".)
True. They would be better off competing in the Underhanded C Contest (http://www.underhanded-c.org/).
Looks like they bought and sold the safemoon defi token (bought really low, sold [comparatively] high)