skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I miss the old 4:3 laptops. The last one I had was an old Dell Vostro and it was great for software development, since I prefer vertical space for code than side-by-side windows/applications. Nowadays, I rarely use the full width except for watching full screen videos.

Now, I run Linux on a Dell XPS 15 (3840x2400 with a 1.5 fractional HiDPI scale) and it’s acceptable, but still feels a little vertically cramped.
Looks like the web desktops that used (are?) to be popular about a decade ago. Otherwise no information is provided or can be found. How does one run this on Linux or Fuchsia? Is this open source or proprietary? Maybe another link should be used instead.

Edit: Submitter shared the repo link in another comment: https://github.com/dahliaOS/pangolin_desktop
If you repeat it often enough, it automatically becomes true. It is a smear campaign.

Weapons of mass destruction capable of reaching the capitols of Europe.
Doesn't seem to work on Firefox. I get an empty white page.
Bonds are not currency. That comparison is even invalid as a strawman. I don't understand why I need to point this out.

Even if you feel the need to equate crypto-things to bonds, first you need to argue why buying, say, bitcoins can be argued as lending money to someone, which makes no sense whatsoever.

Cryptos are nothing more than speculation vehicle, and it's pretty obvious that they are massively used as a pump-and-dump scheme. The only point in time where cryptos played a relevant role as a currency was way back in the silk road times where cryptos were used with the expectation of laundring transactions. That usecases quickly went out the door ages ago.
There are people promoting it on youtube - I was watching some last night (What Bitcoin Did https://youtu.be/Pw6tfNh8DAk) but most seem to be recommending it sincerely rather than trying to sucker some fools in so they can cash out.

It's an interesting time in the history of bitcoin as we are starting to see a move from small speculators (number go up) to institutions buying in (it's sensible to diversify 5% of your portfolio into crypoassets as they have historically high returns and low correlations).
Not intentional, but I expect there to be some bugs -- didn't want to spend too much time on it.
The inner voice, also referred to as the internal monologue, is a form of thought. It's the same as how daydreaming isn't hallucinating images, it's seen with the mind's eyes rather than the physical ones.
While you can be tempted to define Bitcoin in that way, the Ponzi scheme definition doesn't apply [1]. As the parent comment: in Bitcoin no investor has the precise information of when to exit to defraud others.

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/ponzischeme.asp
Back in 2010…

There has been a consistent increase in Scala jobs in the last 12 months according to Indeed.com
too bad elon musk or someone else who is famous didn't make a big donation or bid for the NFT.
How many crypto investors have you been around? I’ve had many, many coworkers trying to convince me to buy Bitcoin over the last decade. This is across different companies, teams etc. And I have definitely witnessed the same thing online.

I mean I wish I had listened because BTC was $50 a coin the first time someone tried to convince me to buy in.
isindex – Obsolete HTML Element
I would love to get started with Smoking BBQ at home and I’ve been interested for some time. What type of BBQ would be good equipment to get me up and running from a beginner level? I’m in the UK if that helps.
I was curious how this compared with USDC, the smaller but also more reputable tokenized US Dollar service affiliated with Coinbase. It looks like 65% of that was created in 2021.
No one has denied that Bitcoin is an innovator when it comes to new ways to scam and defraud people.
I think this is using the HTML renderer. On any other platform it would be using Skia and should be faster. The author could compile the app using Skia on WebGL potentially giving a speed boost.
Customers don’t infer the purpose of a product from it’s company mission. The audience of a company mission are employees themselves. Dropbox has expanded to more than file syncing over the past decade. It makes sense to have a broad vision of their future, e.g purposeful mission.

Imagine Amazon telling employees to stick it to books because thats the business they started off with. Like why should AWS even exist, it’s not what they do! That narrow mindedness wouldn’t have gotten them to where they are today.
And this is what makes SPY mispriced? Why do you think other investors don't share your view?
Show HN: I built a tool that tracks rising mentions of stocks across Reddit
This line, which far too long for its own good and sort-of meanders through space, is quite the example of “political geography”.

The typography this article focuses on is a microcosm of how the place reminds you of its history, including both the beauty and whimsical, as well as the crimes against kerning and/or humanity.

May Berlin forever resist uniforms and uniformity.
Same on macOS Safari.
In an ideal world, the governments of the world (or other trusted parties) would provide identity providers based on zero-knowledge proofs.

These would have the property that when a person joins a platform, the platform can check what other users on it is controlled by the same person, without revealing the meatspace identity of the person in question; and without revealing the usernames to the trusted entity. (Well, ideally the platform would only get to know the number of users, not who they are; but I don't think that can be done.)

Then a platform could just put a hard limit on how many users any given person can have, while still retaining the users' pseudonymity. Or it could place a soft limit, for that matter: every subsequent user receives an automatic penalty (e.g. 10 downvotes on every new message).

It wouldn't stop state actors, and it'd be horrible in places where the government isn't held accountable, but otherwise seems to solve most of the problems of anonymity.

Perhaps you could replace the trusted entity with something peer-to-peer, but it would have to be very carefully designed.
All of the cryptocurrencies I've seen so far seem to based on a simplistic and fundamentally flawed view of economics. A long term trend (whether inflationary or deflationary) in the overall supply is insufficient to target price stability.

A currency's supply needs to increase/decrease in response to what's circulating at this moment in time. If the overall supply is increasing but everybody is squirrelling it away or deleveraging debt positions, then you're still going to have deflationary effects. Case in point, roughly 20% of USD was minted in the last year or so, with pretty much no inflation. Similarly with something like Bitcoin, if some event were to trigger a spending/selling spree (or a debt bubble were to form) then you would have inflationary effects.

What's needed is coordination to increase/decrease the supply as needed. That could be done with some kind of decentralised voting system. But I'm not sure it could react fast enough in a crisis, or be able to direct the action to the right parts of an economy to avoid the kind of damage that takes decades to undo.
My experience with Flutter has been a lot better than what this website demonstrates. I'm not sure how much of the stutter is to be blamed on Flutter and how much is to be blamed on the code architecture of this website.

This website is definitely running at 20-30fps max on my phone, whereas 60fps seems perfectly maintainable on my own Flutter experiments with web apps.

Having said all that, I'm still miffed about the extreme reliance on Javascript modern web applications have. With the ease of use Flutter promises for making web apps, I can only fear the slow, janky mess that websites will become if the platform ever gets taken up as quick as Flutter seems to hope it will.
The entire planet and it's ongoing cost per year.

The difference between CO2 emissions and geoengineering is that CO2 just randomly happens to change Earth climate. If we start changing climate directly and intentionally we can optimize all variables for maximal effect.

I agree that it's very underdeveloped and underresearched field. That's why I put my estimate at bellow 1000 billion dollars or 1 trillion.

Compared to potential costs of the climate change it would be worthwhile to invest 1 to 10 billion $ into geoengineering research to make sure that it will work, what side effects could it have and to figure out the costs precisely. We may have already triggered tipping points in the ecosystem that will lead to substantial global warming even if we stop all emissions tomorrow.

But my original point was that geoengineering appears to be feasible. If we can do it on Earth we can do it on Venus and to some extend on Mars too.
> But fundamentally it is being sold at cost to mine + a margin, same as everything else.

I don't think this says anything about why the gold price is what it is. If gold suddenly gained lots of value then it would still be cost + margin, because new mines would open up in places where gold mining had previously been unprofitable.
Try opening a big complex html file and scroll immediately in VS Code and in Sublime text. Sublime Text blows VS Code out of water. This lag made me switch back to Sublime Text from VS Code.
The original streamer is telling about the first documented instance of videogame streaming.
Woman who lost partner in crossbow attack wants ‘medieval’ weapon regulated
> They considered themselves modern...

Last week I was surfing google books. Was skimming The History of Modern Europe. Noticed it was from 1871.

At least for me, there's something about human artifacts, that can change what feels old. View a museum exhibit, a clay tablet, prescribing interval training for horses, from 3 kya. Something that was held in hands, and could be held in yours. Then, medieval objects, feel like they're from just yesterday, not old at all. I wonder if you could structure an stepped experience, where users repeatedly experience an "oh my, that's old", a baseline shift, and then get hit again with something older, and again. And then walk back through, feeling it all compressed into a stretched now.

I don't get the same effect from critters, or geology. Perhaps I'm not familiar enough with them, or thinking in genealogy. Lunch-time's inquisitive squirrel feels peer, but not "just yesterday" cousin. Enjoying the sea breeze, glad Boston is recently coastal, and that there's an ocean there to be coastal with. Despite flowering trees and chirping birds for context. On Gondwanan crust. I wonder if you could cultivate that feeling, and use it when teaching deep time? [fwiw, those are vaguely: 80 Mya, 12 kya, ~150 Mya, ~200 Mya, ~300 Mya, and ~~1 Gya]

I've lately been thinking about transformatively improved science education content. For AR, in part. Current content, classrooms, practices, apps, even education research... they've been starting to feel to me... distant? Clustered with inkwells in wooden desks, student arithmetic on Roman wax diptych and drawn on Sumerian sand. The modern of the present, become the patinaed old, the before. The "oh my, people lived like that? How curiously odd."
I would’ve thought 1 year for years ago myself so I’m exaggerating for comedic effect.
Feel free to speak for yourself, but don't make it seem like everyone is the same.

There are shareholders buying parts of companies purely for personal gain. They may not care if the business is shady, as long as the stock technically performs well they will join in and try to get out in time so that a less lucky investor is left holding the bag.

There are also shareholders who approach investment with other goals in mind. They buy parts of companies that they believe in, maybe because they find the idea valuable and the implementation viable, and/or find the people running the company trustworthy.

Under ideal conditions, those objectives align and a well-intentioned and well-managed initiative should succeed. In practice, of course, things don't always work like that. Some companies successfully abuse the system and inflate valuations riding on hype and speculative investments without a fundamentally good business model to back it, while others may fail despite being honest due to factors outside of their control.

Investors of the latter kind don't need to be rosy-eyed and buy into companies with noble intentions that they believe will never succeed, but they would be wary of investing into something they know is profitable but ethically questionable.
What are we looking at? All I see is a reproduction of an OS with abysmal performance, where everything is fake: the text editor is fake, the terminal is fake, the web browser is fake. The only thing working is the clock...
Not sure how useful it is given Apple’s restrictions, but it does exist: https://www.mobiussync.com/
You are seriously misinformed. ULA is just a launch company. They don't have a human spaceflight program.

First of all, ULA doesn't have that many more launches then SpaceX and by the end of this year, SpaceX will overtake them.

ULA has a perfect record of launches, but they started out with legacy mature vehicles that had failures before ULA was formed (by the military).

They don't get as much credit because they often launched for 300M+ while also getting almost a 1 billion in subsides every year for most of their history.

> pretty strangely nobody ever seems to give them credit for the massive list of successful launches they have under their belt.

Not sure what you are talking about. Everybody seriously interest in space knows about ULA. The CEO Tory Bruno is well known personality on twitter and regularly post on reddit.

And if you want to argue ULA is its parent companies, these were in the HLS competition. Boeing had its own proposal. However, despite them having a human space flight contract, their proposal was judged to be of very low quality. They were remove in the first round.

Lockheed Martin the other ULA parent was part of 'National Team'. However NASA identified a number of problems with their Accent Stage and that was part of the reason the 'National Team' was not selected.

> Maybe because they're not run by Musk or Bezos? How strange to put so much faith in a few eccentric billionaires - one of which is clearly building rockets as a pet project.

ULA practically speaking was part of both Dynetics and Blue Origins National Team.

Why you insist on talking about ULA even while they were not part of this competition at all is a mystery to me. That is why nobody brings them up, because they literally were not in the competition.
So it is getting loaded as file and can be swapped out due to this?
If you were a competitor at the time, the Halloween documents were NOT NEWS to you, they were just a frightening admission of what everyone knew MS was already doing.

Yes, they absolutely should have been broken up into fragments, if not crushed and handed out to the rest of America for free.
The article seems poorly translated (into English), so I’m going to avoid reading too much into it.

But one thing I want to highlight is the fact that this story appears to be based off a report written by a consulting firm, Capgemini. For that reason alone I would bet that this report identifies hypothetical risks, not actual instances of unauthorized access.
Onboarding with an M1
It is a matter of preference to readers of novels. Someone may have trouble enjoying novels written in present tense because they're accustomed to past tense - or vice versa.

A writer probably wouldn't write something they wouldn't enjoy reading themselves.
Like football. It is used for state propaganda, to make populations dream and look forward to the same direction.

Sports are a branch of the entertainment industry. You don’t get paid to run fast, you get paid to gather crowds. Same for Mars, and it only impacts ideas and hope, not actual well-being. But it’s still required, otherwise people err in Brownian directions.

I hope very much that the new Mars funding will be taken off the football spendings.
KDE has had "Wobbly Windows" in their desktop effects settings for some time, with pretty much the same animation. It gets old quick.
I would add to that control over top scientific journals. Before the war people used to publish scientific work in other languages, and in local journals. After the war the US took more control over published research. But it's also because of the money, and a good strategy ofc
The CWA is developed under extreme scrutiny wrt privacy. It's really good at what it does, so good that even the CCC gave it it's blessing (despite being made by companies that would traditionally be considered evil empire in CCC, which really puts CCC in a very favorable light for objectivity). But that strength makes it the absolute opposite of move fast and break things.
Sure it's your site?
Probably not helpful but i always thought could you theoretically find a way that Google might be violating EAR(export of crypto) , by exporting your data https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_th...
> This isn't even close to what will be the all time high.

The problem is nobody can tell where the top is, and there IS a top, these things don't grow forever (you can't have infinite growth and it becoming infinitely valuable).

Now there are multiple things that might happen when growth stops:

* 1) The price stabilises and bitcoin/crypto becomes a major standard currency, which people want to use and spend. This certainly isn't going to happen for btc due to transfer fees, but could feasibly happen to a different coin. I think this is unlikely because there are several factors that actually stop crypto being an ideal currency (e.g. non-reversibility in case of fraud or dispute resolution).

* 2) The price stabilises and everybody keeps their money in crypto because it is a store of value. Personally I find this unlikely as I think most bitcoin 'investors' actually want to see their money increase in value rather than the value stay static.

* 3) The price stabilises and crypto doesn’t manage to become a standard currency which is easy to use everywhere - and although initially people hold their money in bitcoin to see if there is another rise, when it doesn't come people start to withdraw funds to realise their gains (if bitcoin isn't growing what's the point holding it?). As people sell bitcoin the value drops and never goes back to it's high. As more people exit the bubble is burst.

I personally think number 3 is by far the most likely outcome, however it's impossible to tell where the top is. I think the most sensible approach is to acknowledge it’s likely a bubble, and if you invest funds to acknowledge you are effectively making a gamble that the bubble won’t pop yet (and you are confident that you will realise when to sell before the rest of the market does and not hodl all the way down like we saw with gme).
I think production ready on its own has value because it sets the stage of what to expect.

There's a very big difference between a project being production ready or not. Production ready (to me at least) means the project has been thoroughly tested on a live site and is in a position where you can take it as is and run it in production with confidence that it's going to work.

For example I have a Docker + Flask example starter kit project at https://github.com/nickjj/docker-flask-example and the GitHub description is "A production ready example Flask app that's using Docker and Docker Compose.". In this context to me that says it's using multi-stage builds, env variables, deals with static files in a way that's cacheable (md5 hashes, etc.), has tests and overall you can expect to see patterns that work well in both dev and prod. The README goes over those details too in case you didn't infer that from only "production ready" too.

Plot twist: It took me longer to write the README than create the whole project.
Most operators take a support and maintenance contract. It's also worth remembering that many operators don't have the staff needed to even install radios and other distributed equipment - often the radio vendor can offer that service to you as well.

You can run a mobile network with minimal external access, but the economics are such that few want to - in an era of outsourcing and managed services, it's less about what can be done, and more about what is done in reality.

Managed service providers have significant levels of access into mobile networks, beyond what many are aware.
The ship became stuck in the middle of the English Channel on Sunday afternoon. The ship was re-stuck for hours, drawing millions of viewers to the site to watch a live stream of the event. That's it.
I analyzed my six years of food deliveries
> > The Starliner is a Boeing product.

> ULA is Lockheed Martin + Boeing.

You still seem to misunderstand. Yes ULA is LM+Boeing.

However the Starliner has nothing to do with ULA. Its simply a Boeing project.

Just as the Orion is LM product.

ULA does not do anything with the Starliner except launch it.

LM in space domain had massive cost overruns with Orion and just recently had another major fuckup that requires them to do another 6 month work on it. Only because Boeing with SLS is performing even worse do they not get as much criticism for their terrible execution.

> At a minimum, there should be two competing designs

Tell that to congress.
If you need to pick and choose wisely what advice to follow, then the advice is useless. Might as well pick and choose wisely what to do, directly.
I've been thinking about the same albeit more limited:

it would still be useful in very many cases even if it wasn't so watertight.

As long as it is audited, I get a warning and it has to pass a judge to not be punished I'd be fine in most contexts even if it was technically possible to look me up.

Of course I am keenly aware that this is a privilege that not everyone has.
Bitcoin's value in terms of pizzas you can buy with one has balooned ever since it was created, with massive fluctuations. It's awful as a currency because of that - why would I buy a pizza today when tomorrow I could buy two?
More electrical problems found on some Boeing 737 Max, sources say
I think the Tether people know quite well when to exit, because their implosion will bring Bitcoin down.
NASA chooses SpaceX to build Moon lander
People should take the time to read this article.
But the method wouldn't actually _do_ anything in your app by itself. If you would want to pipe a SEARCH request's query somewhere directly, that would be up to you in your app to listen for that request method at some url endpoint and send the request body to some data store.

Some people do this sort of thing with sending GraphQL queries to GET routes which may do some validation and then send the query back through. Is there a downside to using GET here?
Those USDTs weren't "created" per se, they were just converted from regular USD which were created out of thin air
This is slightly incorrect, because inflammation is not only triggered by "diseases". Inflammation indeed hurts the body. Some of the weapons it deploys, for example Neutrophil extracellular traps (basically, playing Spider Man with webs of DNA) make subsequent cadiovascular disease more likely. Others are just generally bad for the body or uncomfortable (fever, ratches, ulcers).

Chronic systemic inflammation is known to play a role in the development and progression of coronary heart disease and diabetes, and accelerate the transformation of the immune system into an aged state, which makes it more likely to develop immune system disregulations such as autoimmune diseases, and to cause cytokine storms when exposed to agents such a N1H1, Epstein-Barr or Covid.

The immune system consists of many moving parts coordinating each other via the exchange of signalling molecules, which results in a large distributed system with lots of unintuitive emergent behaviors. We are only just starting to understand what effects our everyday behavior has on the immune system, and what happens to it when we age.