skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It is absolutely not and I hate that phrase. If I ask whether you know something, I am not trying to "just talk". If you know the answer, I am asking for it.

If you don't know answer, the normal response is no. I don't want you to highjack my computer and completely prevent me from working. That is ridiculous. And it is not solution either - it is literally preventing me to solve it.

> However, men are hearing "Can you solve this problem for me". Giving you back the keyboard means admitting that I failed to fix it.

Then men should fcking learn how to parse human language. Because based on this, betweem them not being able to interpret direct speech and then supposedly being unable to interpret hints, there is not much space. How exactly am I supposed to communicate? And none of this is believable, because above interaction rarely happens against other men.

The whole "he is trying to fix it while women just want to talk" is insulting in situation when he is preventing me to solve thing, when he is not solving anything and I was not chatty at all.
Posting like this will get you banned on HN also, regardless of how bad the comment you're responding to is, or how bad a person you feel someone else is. The reason should be obvious: breaking the site guidelines in your own right and taking the thread further into hell (religious hell, god help us) only causes more damage to the commons.

Would you please read and follow the site guidelines? https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. They include this for tried-and-true reasons: "Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead." In case it's not obvious, that's code for "please don't feed the trolls".
I wouldn't even say they are particularly comparable.

I have an OP-1 and the killer features for me are _extreme_ portability, like even more than my laptop, and the best battery life of any device I have ever owned. I have it with me at almost all times, and I can bust it out and start playing basically whenever. I use it at the beach, on hikes, in cafes, wherever. There's no way I'd be lugging an MV-1 around with me in those circumstances.

I also do like that the OP-1 forces a "keep moving" workflow with it's stripped down synth engines and 4 track recorder. People criticize that, but if I wanted a device with tons of tracks and unlimited sounds I would just use my laptop.
> Even if not, are we asking the government to step in and ban Friends? Because if not, I don’t see how this observation gives us anything approaching a solution.

Absolutely not. Government should not have to solve every problem in society. The solution is for us (consumers) to not watch shows that promote values we don't agree with. And if you do agree with them... you reap what you sow.
Yeah, the terminology is wrong. It's not a high orbit, it's a high ballistic trajectory, which then is terminated on the low side. But if that object improbably happens to collide with a high-orbit object then you could get a spreading of the consequences to higher orbit.
Axoloti Core comes to mind

http://www.axoloti.com

http://www.axoloti.com/examples/
> You realize that this new 'vaccine' bears no resemblance whatsoever to any prior vaccinations?

> This new Covid Vaccine is not a true vaccine. This is a drug that modifies the inner workings of cells.

Flagged as misinformation. Complete nonsense.
There are 2 popular programming languages of Latin American origin, Lua and Elixir, both from Brazil.
Show HN: Pixel Physics on the Browser
Continuing to raise awareness of the consequences of assuming risky behavior is a reasonable action that could be taken. With widespread messaging, the burdens of the consequences of risky behavior greater fall solely onto those who engage in the behavior, rather than being distributed evenly across society
Coinbase Direct Listing Discussion
Yes, I'm being a bit sloppy by saying "adding more people". (Although, to be fair, the most obvious way to influence the future population that is morally acceptable is choosing whether or not to add people to it by having children, or influencing others making that choice. Removing people by killing them is not acceptable, for reasons beyond the scope of utilitarianism.)

I diverge from the video's argument at 1:10 when she says "it's hard to see how it could be worse". To me, a world with lower average happiness is intuitively worse.

I do think there are some aspects where a higher population is better. For example, if there is a wide breadth of life experiences in the world, it makes for a more interesting society. Also, a higher population increases the chance of humanity surviving in the long term. But these effects tend to be logarithmic. A world with one billion people has some advantages over a world with only one million people (though it has some disadvantages too). But if the choice is between a world of 1 billion or 2 billion people, as posited in the video, the breadth of society, and humanity's chance of surviving, are about the same in both. That leaves the higher average happiness of World A as the most significant difference, making it preferable.
That's absurd, though. It's pretty easy to determine when someone passes the threshold from private/unknown citizen to public figure. If the alleged slander/libel happened before that point, it shouldn't matter that they've since gained notoriety.

Based on your example, I guess that's not how it always works, but there's no reason in principle why the laws and legal standard around it could not be fixed to be more fair.
Per the main project link, the pricing information required to be posted in JSON format with specific schema and file names.
Since there have been and will be exactly zero useful ai application anytime soon other than bias laundering (aka "systematic discrimination is ok when a computer does it"), I think it's ok.
https://troll.tv/videos/watch/54bc7bd0-8691-4359-aa7d-dc5148...
Pixel physics uses celular automata to simulate physics across all the pixels on the screen. This is a three hours code session implementing some ideas, more elements and complex interactions may arrive soon. Choose one element on the top right of the screen and click the empty canvas.
You seem to know a lot about this subject! Years ago, an acquaintance of mine told me of their idea to use railguns to remove space junk. Is this a remotely feasible solution?
Do you think I’m wrong to say that sex education courses, regardless of whether they’re abstinence-only or more modern, typically already include admonitions against promiscuous sex?
Thank you for taking the time to answer. I just wanted to make it clear that I don't always get negative feedback but when I do, it makes me very stressed and I can not think straight after that. Someone also mentioned in this thread that being a non-native speaker is hard, which is true in my case.

I have worked with mid sized companies so far, where I have managed to work with it but I will start a FAANG job soon and just don't want to be in this situation when I start, specially when I am going to meet 10x more experienced and sharp engineers.
Not a book, but the podcast series "Scaling Postgres" looks really good.
Remaining somewhat illegible probably helps the project survive for the benefit of the cognoscenti.
So in other words you don’t have any solution.
Did you get my email ?
Sorry, you’ve lied too many times and misconstrued too many things. I don’t trust you and don’t believe you’re operating in good faith.
> Valve is a dream job because of that philosophy

I recommend going through @richgel999's tweets (he's an ex-Valver) for an exactly opposite opinion, with a plethora of arguments for it.
yeah right, they likely have the account closed but the assets still held
“Raising awareness” sounds pretty much useless.
BTC wastes more power as it becomes more valuable.

This is the opposite of other major currencies.

BTC is an environmental travesty.
If anything, it seems to be going the other way to me. In Europe, programming jobs only requiring English (and not the local language) seem steadily on the rise, because it means companies can pull talent from other parts of Europe, or even further abroad.

If you're a German company that wants to also be able to hire coders from France and Italy and Romania, requiring German proficiency is going to drastically cut down the potential international labor pool you can draw on. And that's for one of the biggest European languages -- imagine what the calculus is if you're a company in Denmark or Slovenia.

Plus, let's say you start with the local language, but then your company gets big. At some point, you may want to open up offices in other countries...but what do you do then? Have German source code from your German devs, and French source code from your French devs?
That sounds more like cold reading than a prediction.
Couldn't disagree more. I've always had false positive issues with Apple's trackpads. The newer ones are slightly better in terms of accuracy, but they're so absurdly large that it still happens more often than it used to - and this is across 4+ macbooks and multiple generations, so it's not just a faulty model, and I'm not the only person I know with this issue.
> Until his "theory" makes a single experimentally verifyable prediction, all of this are just empty words of a deliusional pseudoscientist that thinks too much of himself.

Hey, we give string theorists tenure! But for real, while it doesn't seem like this is going anywhere, I'm not sure I wouldn't be convinced by something similar that was. If I walked out of my room with a set of equations that made few additional assumptions and allowed for derivation of both relativistic and quantum equations, it kind of seems like that would be good evidence. Like even if all the predictions are the same as those two systems, the fact that it's much simpler would give it Occam's approval.

Now would such a single simple system fail to make new predictions? Probably not. There are holes in our understanding, and a unified theory couldn't really be simple and still tiptoe around those holes. But in the hypothetical scenario that there really was a simpler model with the same predictions, I wouldn't be opposed to it.
I believe that it is known that his basic CA approach is not relativistically correct, but I’m not sure. But (even) more fundamentally, there are plenty of ways to reproduce something that sort of resembles some of the patterns of reality that we already know. It means very little. It’s when something deeper is captured that you can make predictions, and there is nothing like that so far in this approach. In any case, of course he should be left alone to fiddle around all he wants. I don’t think there is any chance, in his case, of criticism cowing him to a degree that he actually changes his mind about the usefulness of his ideas.
I think the issue here is they're imputing goodness of a population by total or average happiness or some other tricks to make their happiness calculus work.
Also, for that much cash, I'd expect something bigger (therefore better interaction unless you have tiny hands) and more robust physically.
Can you share any benchmarks indicating this?
I would love USB-C (not micro though!), but the mini USB port is still really common in music gear for whatever reason. My audio interface, DAC for my other PC, midi keyboard, etc all use mini USB. It's really weird.
Don't you think this will bring down your reputation ?
Yet the Producer of Waste here is coinbase no?
I would say it is a new paradigm!
5.54 MB, 1920 × 1080, .gif - :(

`ffmpeg -i 6069b7c2057597000422abc7_original.gif -c:v libx264 -crf 30 -pix_fmt yuv420p output.mp4`

791 KB - :)
The biggest argument is the other coin networks that have been running for years in production without proof of work.
Nano and EOS have interesting consensus models. Nano manages to remove all inflation and transaction fees and is just a base level currency. EOS has an account fee and you have to rent resources but can do code execution on transactions (smart contracts). They both rely on accounts voting for representatives and have had similar problems with spam.
Nano has been running for > 4 years and EOS for > 1 years.
Cyprus, Ghana and Kenya join countries who create company ownership registries
I consider myself middle class. And I make what you made in 5 months what took you 4 years without any penny pinching schemes.

Not to mention I invest what I make. So yeah when I say it doesn't compound fast enough for poor people, I'm being honest. You don't even stand a chance catching up to me with just investing. Not to mention I'm still considered middle class.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying you won't make this kind of money ever. You could approach and likely surpass this income in the future. What I'm saying is investing won't get you anywhere at your stage. Not when baseline living costs are too high and compounding interest is too low.

Also I NEVER said to not invest. I'm saying investing doesn't close the gap nor does it alleviate hardship. It doesn't address the problem head on. To poor people investment is worth much less than it is to rich people, much much much less. So much less that a wage increase effects lifestyle more than gains on investment. See this: https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0211/why-the-fir...

Wishing your kid will be worth 5 million is a pipe dream. First consider inflation. Second consider that every generation will have it harder than the last. Your kid will absolutely 100% have to rely on inheritance to get ahead. Both me and you didn't rely on inheritance but I doubt our kids will have any chance if they don't.
> as people still want to buy/sell cryptocurrencies when prices go down

Is this true?

If you look back at the price graphs, there's typically a huge run up every 1-3 years, followed by a crash, followed by another run up 1-3 years later. We're in the middle of a run up.

The run up is when people get excited and buy. After the crash, I would guess that enthusiasm about crypto will lessen, until the next run up.

I think this is somewhat supported by the fact that Coinbase's most recent quarter brought in an insanely higher amount of revenue compared with previous quarters before the latest run up.
> People are going to do what they want.

That’s obviously not true. Asian countries for example have far lower rates of drug use, sex outside of marriage, etc. than western countries. For example Bangladesh, the country where I’m from, has virtually no prevalence of HIV. (And it actually has quite a good system of health reporting so it’s not just failure to collect data.) Societies can in fact shame and coerce people into avoiding harmful behaviors.
Dive | SDET 2 | India | Remote | Full Time | https://www.letsdive.io/

Dive is a fun space for remote teams where team members can socialize. You can see who’s online, call a group, play games, watch movies together, or bond on common interest areas. You can talk, screen share, and do video chat with a click.

We are growing rapidly and are looking for a SDET to join our early stage engineering team. We are seeking someone who has experience building automation test frameworks and executing extensive test strategies across both Frontend and Backend components of web applications. You'll be responsible for placing guardrails for the dev team to build quality software products and to makesure the platform is reliable, scalable and of high-quality for thousands of people using dive during their everyday lives.

We're a relatively small team of about 4 people - meaning your work will have a lot of impact. We truly encourage being yourself at work and it shows in the creative code we write :)

Our Customers love us. Our users are from 32+ countries and teams from Facebook, Google, Gitlab, Uber, Airtable etc. who absolutely love using Dive.

We use: AWS, Kubernetes, Docker, gRPC, Django, Go, Node.js, Cassandra, MariaDB, Redis, React, Redux, Javascript

If you are interested in joining our small and passionate team drop me an e-mail to om[at]letsdive[dot]io - come chat about what we're doing, or if you have questions!

More Info: https://www.notion.so/letsdive/SDET-2-544a5597a41a489ba983f5...
I agree but I’m not so sure society has that much control. Maybe technology itself (or/and the economy) is in the driver’s seat now. Pun intended!
Agree and I can’t support companies that are putting their weight behind it (Tsla, sq). It incentivizes global warming, as a feature not a bug. Insane.
How does Debian GNU/Linux run on System76 devices? Can anyone comment on that?
I use my Android phone's stock alarm app for reminders, set to a very annoying ringtone. It works great about 50% of the time when I actually have the opportunity to stop what I'm doing and do what the alarm says...
Tailwind UI: Now with React and Vue Support
A busted clock is right twice a day
Good question. And going back to the original example, would liking a Facebook post with the information also count, as that would signal to FB's algorithms that it should be promoted more?
Can someone explain the point of federating PeerTube. Their site doesn't really explain it, and it seems like you still need to create an account on every instance you want to use (if you want to comment on/rate videos).

How is it different from lots of independent sites, with RSS feeds for each channel?
Headless UI v1.0
We probably should start an IANA registry... Meanwhile, I call dibs on "🃏" and the ".🃏" file extension, for obvious reasons.
‘Godzilla Singular Point’ Releases on Netflix in June 2021
I agree that there needs to be a balance. I'd argue that US defamation law is close to the "right" balance, by making a stronger case needed to prosecute defamation against public figures (like public officials or celebrities), and by focusing not exactly on intention but on whether the defendant within reason could have believed the statement was true.
Here is the draft
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZaBPsfor_aHKNeeyXxk9uJfTru7...
One way is Solomonoff's universal prior. It's uncomputable, but supports the parent's argument since it's explicitly based on combining the results of every possible program; and short programs end up dominating.
I personally think there's a lot of room for improvements that would work in nearly all English dialects. The "ough" mess, for example, could stand some clean up. But in general, yes, there is too much variation in English around the world to "fix" it now.
I built FeedHive, a real-life tech stack for SaaS products
This is hosted on Bari Weiss' blog, but Bari Weiss isn't the author of this piece.
In an arms race it's not the best strategy to take a step back and look at angles. In AI there's an arms race going on and one likely outcome of this might be increased brain drain and even less likelihood of great companies rising in the EU.
At the end of the day, I'd guess this is less about alternatives and more about youtube being the best platform for your investment. Hosting isn't the problem, its the audience and traffic (and ad monetization from your vids.)

Do the alternatives hold up in terms of things like market reach, $ performance, and not banning the same users?
> There is a syntax debate I respect. While I prefer austere syntax, deeper thinkers like Bill Joy note that programmer productivity increases with more information on screen at once. Syntax that improves both code density and clarity is a good thing. I love Haskell and Ruby in actual use, even if I want to prefer Lisp without parentheses (an easy preprocessor if one thinks it through).

I strongly prefer verbose type systems, in particular, some lightweight type inference is good as long as it's not full fledged HM type inference (like Haskell, Rust etc). The problem with HM type inference is although it's extremely powerful and makes the code look cleaner, it hides important data from programmer, which ultimately causes 2 bugs:

* variables being inferred to have types slightly different than ehat programmer expects. E.g. I expected foo to be A(B(C)) -> D(C) turns out it's actually A(B(X)) -> D(C) which also type checks.

* Errors can be harder to read.
While I don’t necessarily disagree, can you elaborate a bit more? AI is likely to make some significant impacts especially in computer vision applications among others.
> any adverse effects would have shown

As I understand, the required teratogenicity study in rats with Pfizer is ongoing as of two weeks ago [1]. It’s rather optimistic to claim we’ve seen everything when even animal studies haven’t completed. Vaccine science itself is rapidly developing. Now I don’t think there will be issues with this drug, but surprises may lurk still.

[1]: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approv...
> > if you don't think that's absolutely crazy, and I don't know what to tell you, man
> > to adjudicate such things instead of leaving things up to a hate-filled lynch mob

> See the duality of your own post.

That reads as though you scored some virtual point, but I can't figure out what you're saying. Can you clarify?
When these satellites burn up in the atmosphere, what happens to all the particles? Do we have lots of likely toxic material just constantly being burned and circulating around?
PoW is anchored in some real-world value, the cost of electricity. PoS is not. Most of PoW’s security and tamper-resistance advantages derive from that characteristic.
I think the reason most people are watching YouTube instead of traditional media is _because_ of this type of thing. Take this exact situation here as an example: this kind of content would never make it to traditional TV because it can't find an audience for such niche content, eg. people smart enough to warrant linking a PhD research paper in the description.

I think Odysee is a good alternative. PeerTube doesn't really seem to be a great option here as it seems to have been down during this time.

> Google doesn't care about [...]

Mostly true, but also kind of not relevant. Google isn't doing anything here besides making poorly trained AI models that try to solve this problem for them. It's more negligence than it is malice, IMO.
The size is arguably the OP-1's "killer feature." It's closest competitors in terms of capability (meaning music-specific devices, not like an iPad or something) are all _way_ bigger and less portable. It's also one of the most solidly built pieces of tech I've handled.
Interesting. How well does it work in practice?
Worse externalities than the fiat standard which brought us genocides, nuclear war, and mass murder? Bitcoin could eradicate democide.
I've never heard of Dan Deacon but I clicked the NPR set you linked above and man - what a treat! Thanks for sharing, friend!
sounds like they didn’t guide them very well, as is their job. Perhaps they could counter sue.
Hazard pay? Why this sounding like CEOs do deep sea diving, welding huge oil pipes while squid and sharks look at you in a tiny cage with a few thousand amps of arc.

Let's call it what it is, It's a golden parachute.

I'd postulate that taking responsibility and leading the effort to genuinely right the wrongs would earn the company way more godwill from the people and media than activating your trump card which in this case is a mountain of cash to land on after successfully escaping responsibility.
They do both. As well as provide a description of the regulation's goals, context and examples. This is how regulation works. It typically starts with a rather vague law, then the regulatory agencies make up general rules to implement said law. Then they create a bunch of more detailed rules. Then as times change, they amend those rules. You can even ask them about novel situations and get a (non-binding) "opinion" from government agency. In my experience, the federal gov regulatory apparatus is not as inept as most people seem to think.
No evidence provided.

Of course it is useful - if you don’t know of a thing, you don’t know the consequences of engaging in that thing. It’s as axiomatic as the trite and age old saying “knowledge is power”. Your comment is completely disingenuous.
How exactly do you expect to impose this value on everyone else who doesn’t share it with you?