skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What we've seen in the US is that the J&J was the choice of people who legitimately wanted a vaccine but were leery of the novelty of the mRNA vaccines. This is going to crush that group of candidates and some non-zero number of them will wind up in the camp of people who don't get vaccinated at all.
I'm sorry, what? You need to take _years_ to practice for algorithm interviews? You think that it's physically demanding to do BFS?

Nobody will tell you what to do? What about, say, the entire interviewing ecosystem that's sprouted up?
It says they use Arm Neoverse cores so it is another processor like Fujitsu A64FX and Amazon Graviton 2.
Be it Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq or Central America. Wherever British/US army goes to bring culture and democracy, drug epidemic follows along.
> We don't know the future

Too often when I see this claim it’s used to defend the opposite idea - that we should assume that the future will continue to look like today.

A good engineer should be thinking about robustness and flexibility from day one. Many choices we make early on close off options in the future or make them achievable only at great cost and at the expense of other business goals.

By this I do not mean “future proofing” or trying to account for all possibilities or to solve for specific scenarios that do not yet exist - those too are traits of an inexperienced engineer.
Having at least a tiny bit of DevOps knowledge can save you a ton of money. Actually setting up GitHub Actions with a special SSH key-pair just for the deploy in GitHub Secrets took me a few hours from 0 to full deploy of code. I haven't seen the code to build before as I was at that time just consulting, I was sick and haven't known GitHub Actions until then. The same setup runs for a year already, I joined the company in the meantime :-) We can push to production or staging (different machines) and it just works for what we need.

Heroku is great, if you just want to start with something and show a proof of concept. As soon as you are doing more than just that you will probably get the first steep bills (at least from my point of view). We actually migrated from Heroku just a bit more than a year ago.
That is one option. Which is why so many anti-vac people have jumped on the no vaccine passport bandwagon. If there is no way to prove you have been vaccinated, then they can lie about it and take part in non-masked public activity (I'm not sure why they are against the mask).

There are other options. Give everyone who has got the vaccine some money is one I've heard more than once. Maybe someone else has a different idea.
Innopolis seems to have official websites here https://innopolis.ru and here https://sezinnopolis.ru

It's in Russian, but Google Translate works nicely on the sites.
I inferred it but you said:

> but I know I can get a bit of normie cred by brushing up my algorithms at least...

So I guess the question would be “why do you want normie cred?”, and then the rest of my comment remains the same.
The assertion in that title is patently false click-bait.

Apple definitely cares about its customers being driven away from them.

That doesn't mean they've caught all scams, or more importantly in this case have managed to automate detection of them all, definitely not as fast as folks online identify them.

Also note that there are entire classes of scams that never get click baity titles because Apple DOES detect them and shut them down before they're widespread.

(I worked at Apple in engineering, left after many years for compelling genomics, and that's the basis for my assertion.)
You'd replace an entire team due to one decision you didn't like?
I mean, like half of the twelve steps are all 'stop thinking and give yourself over to God because you're broken and can't save yourself, only adherence to the program and god can'. At least in the south I've seen them push the cult aspect of it hard.

1) We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.

2) Came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.

3) Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.

4) Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.

5) Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.

6) Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.

7) Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.

8) Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.

9) Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.

10) Continued to take personal inventory, and when we were wrong, promptly admitted it.

11) Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.

12) Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

Like, there's a few good things in there, but you can say that about most cults.
The error output for your code is

error[E0382]: use of moved value: `suffix`
--> cli/src/test.rs:416:48
|
406 | let suffix = FIRST_HEADER_REGEX
| ------ move occurs because `suffix` has type `std::option::Option<std::string::String>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
...
414 | .map(|s| String::from(r"^===+") + &s + r"\r?\n([^=]*)\r?\n===+" + &s + r"\r?\n");
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- `suffix` moved due to this method call
415 |
416 | let suffixDividerPattern: Option<String> = suffix
| ^^^^^^ value used here after move
|
note: this function consumes the receiver `self` by taking ownership of it, which moves `suffix`
--> /Users/ekuber/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-apple-darwin/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/option.rs:451:38
|
451 | pub fn map<U, F: FnOnce(T) -> U>(self, f: F) -> Option<U> {
| ^^^^

error[E0716]: temporary value dropped while borrowed
--> cli/src/test.rs:419:23
|
419 | let headerRegex = suffixHeaderPattern
| _______________________^
420 | | .and_then(|s| ByteRegexBuilder::new(&s[..]).multi_line(true).build().ok())
| |__________________________________________________________________________________^ creates a temporary which is freed while still in use
421 | .as_ref()
422 | .unwrap_or(&HEADER_REGEX);
| - temporary value is freed at the end of this statement
...
425 | for (header_start, header_end) in headerRegex
| ----------- borrow later used here
|
= note: consider using a `let` binding to create a longer lived value

You need to change line 413 to turn `suffix` into an `Option<&str>` to avoid taking ownership of it:

let suffixHeaderPattern: Option<String> = suffix
.as_ref()
.map(...);

and you need to change the `headerRegex` extraction to turn it also into an `Option<&str>` from an `Option<String>` by using `.as_ref()` before the `.and_then` call, which lets you avoid the `&s[..]` reborrow, that only lives until the end of that closure:

let headerRegex = suffixHeaderPattern
.as_ref()
.and_then(|s| ByteRegexBuilder::new(s).multi_line(true).build().ok())
.unwrap_or(HEADER_REGEX.clone());

Edit: I would also consider this to be a diagnostics bug, for at least the first case rustc should have suggested .as_ref(). For the second part, the compiler would ideally have pointed at the `&s[..]` as part of the problem, and the sibling comment has the change you likely want.

Edit 2: to further drive the point home that this should be a bug, this is the current output for a similar case while I was trying to minimize this:

error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:10:22
|
10 | .map(|s| bar(s));
| --- ^ expected `&Struct`, found struct `Struct`
| |
| help: consider using `as_ref` instead: `as_ref().map`

https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&editio...
Already planning on running this in an internal cluster for training & documentation scenarios. Hexdocs are great, but having a live executable tutorial connected to a staging database sounds really valuable for getting new team members up to speed.
The most hilarious thing about "a few select and their families" being rich is that it's not even true. Having a roomish (1 room per person + a living ropm) flat, a car with the personal driver, a small villa, and access to "closed for others" food and clothing stores was pretty much the most one could achieve -- and non of those things could be bought by money. Heck, that car and the villa? State-owned and attached to the position, you lose your place -- your successor gets them. Money simply could not buy one a lot: there was either nothing to buy, or the thing you wanted wasn't being sold.

And yeah, the common populace did object to the higher-ranking party members and bureaucrats having those privileges. One of the slogans of perestroika was "away with privileges", I kid you not -- people would rather elites be as poor as them. Well, the irony is palpable: thirty years later, the common populace is not much richer than it used to be (teachers used to be able to easily travel by plane on their wage, not anymore), but the top-level government officials are way, way better off than they used to be.
That's a big deep hole for one small marble. looks like a hole for a concrete pier... dug 8 of those last year. that's some back breaking work ...
> do you think a Pulitzer prize winning NYT editor would get the salary and respect they expect if they take up a job at a tech company writing marketing copy for their website?

Probably not the level of respect and deference they are accustomed to, but potentially higher pay?
And I'm currently working with the INA229, its SPI cousin I guess :) Those chips are really nice, I'm trying to use the alert feature as a configurable overcurrent trip protection, as well as overvoltage device protection.

https://www.ti.com/product/INA229
I think what the OP takes issue with is not the opinionated nature of the article, it is the fact that the Paris Review (long famed for its rigorous editorial policy) gave space to blatant advertising.
> This drug was approved under an emergency order and this side effect was not listed.

Sadly, this is the case. The German regulator's FAQ explicitly called this out; they are not interested in determining the path that saves the most lives, they are simply following the process that checks all of the boxes that the regulations require. In the EU this regulatory pause of AZ has likely killed thousands of people.

> The valid argument would be, those that issue the emergence order for use to should amend the order to acknowledge the issue but not block use immediately.

Or, more generally, in the emergency-order regime, all decisions that can demonstrate a clear 10:1 improvement in expected deaths should be taken, regardless of regulatory red tape.

The FDA and other regulators have over-fitted their process for "minimize likelihood of another Thalidomide, for drugs which have a small chance of saving a life, and a very small chance of causing harm". This is defensible for testing a new statin, where we have existing safe drugs to choose from, and we're looking for incremental improvements. But it's shockingly harmful in an emergency.

One thing that has become very clear is that the FDA and other regulators are structurally incapable of making even rudimentary risk-based tradeoffs in emergency situations, and we need to fix this.
> a dampening effect on agility, individual contribution, risk taking, etc. which is opposite of what you want for a software shop.

These are company problems and not employee problems. The employees have no incentive to care about this so unions are a way to get more power over the things that matter.
Some time ago, here on HN, user api described social media as a "hate laser". I thought that was a brilliant term - stimulated emissions of hate. But maybe social media is a "stupid laser" as well.
> real tacos are "scalable" : Not really hungry? Get one or two. Really hungry? Get four or five.

I'm Mexican, and this is a new way of thinking about tacos for me. It's very true for street tacos, you pay by the taco, so you order exactly how many you want.

There are places where you ask for one, eat it, then ask for another, and so on until you're full. JIT tacos.
Thank you all for your great feedback. We will fix all the bugs and add some of the suggested features and release a next iteration of DeepHN within the next few days!
the things that matter are. Land, housing, access to others labor. Natural resources.
I never had any problem in switching forth-and-back especially because the layout are completely different and this prevents confusion.

Besides, why would you need to use qwerty other than occasionally?

Reminder: sharing keyboard with other people is really bad for hygiene, due to the shape of the keys preventing any deep cleaning.
Yep. This is why humans invented trust and consequences, though. Most people aren't dicks if you aren't dicks to them, and I'd rather discover the exceptions and fire them than treat everyone like one.
To be fair, a lot of these problems are caused by the pursuit of wealth in the first place.
As a younger developer I was part of a 3 person team that was interviewing people at a telecom. I mostly kept quiet and observed since it was the first time I'd done this but we had one member of the team who was bent on trying to show how smart he was.

My absolute favorite interview of the group, a guy who ended up getting hired elsewhere, was the most calm and professional developer I'd ever been around. Sitting in the room, I felt like he was interviewing us rather than the other way around. It was just in the way that he carried himself, answered questions.

And then the guy on our team started asking questions. The gentleman we were interviewing, rather than answer, kept calmly asking more questions of him instead.

- Can you describe the situation where this would be used?

No

- Have you ever run into an issue like this before that could be an example?

No

- How do I know that by solving this problem we would be addressing the business or customer problem?

We don't

- Then shouldn't I be solving questions related to the work?

...

I loved that guy. Wish we could have hired him because I really wanted to work with him.
Stalin sold out his country in debt negotiations with foreign banks. He did this because Kulaks destroyed massive amounts of grain in order to maintain profitable prices.

Ask a Russian and they will tell you that profit seeking caused the Holodomor.

This Animal Farm logic has been digested by most Americans. Russians actually wanted democracy, but this was suppressed by Bolshevism.

Most of human history encompasses hunter gatherer societies, a social hierarchy in which the most vital resources are collectively owned.
I had RSI issues crop up when I was writing my PhD thesis - a lot of hurried, last minute typing where typos be damned. I'm also mostly hunt and peck, so touch typing would have probably resolved most of my issues.
Yes, I know about it. BTW, as a result of this takeover "Эхо Москвы" which critisize Kremlin quite hard now belongs to the state owned company Gazprom. So, this is a way more tricky than you might think.
I mostly believe in self censorship - do not touch "dangerous" subjects etc. This is a main force behind censorship rather than directives from some dedicated goverment department.
The source you mention does not explicitly give a one in 30.000 figure, and it is not something that can be safely concluded from the data in the paper. The authors state that at the time 132,686 people had received their first AZ shot in Norway, of which five had developed thrombosis.

This is definitely not enough data to conclude a 1 in 30,000 figure. And neither does the cited paper conclude this.
I do not "blame" the rise of identity politics on anyone, I merely point out that it has been taken up by many people who consider themselves to be "progressive" and that it, in combination with the adoption of critical theory - specifically the practice of "deconstruction" - leads to a witches brew of regressive and destructive ideologies.
On the contrary, in your scenario, the profit goes to the retirees whose land is now super valuable. That they can’t afford to pay the wealth tax on that land without selling/mortgaging some of it doesn’t mean they’re not now very wealthy. A mortgage or a reverse mortgage would allow them to live the rest of their lives there if they really wanted to. But they’d have to pay their fair share of the tax on that wealth.
You said it yourself:

> an abuse of Microsoft's market position

Apple has no such market position to abuse.

It's perfectly legal to put restrictions on your product. It's perfectly legal to be a monopoly. It's only a problem when you abuse your monopoly position to restrict competitors.
If an article said 2+2 is 4, and people commented "no, it's 3", "no, it's 5", and "no, it's 6", they'd all get downvoted. Would you say that article is biased and astroturfed too?
What is the background rate of CVST / 2 weeks? I think it's significantky less that 1/million people
Multitouch on mobile has an interesting effect
My apologies for not replying to you earlier, I printed the paper out (as I like to make notes in the margins), but I managed to be sidetracked longer than expected. I downloaded the paper in a hurry and I initially thought you were its author and just wanted comment on it. It wasn't until I looked more closely at the download URL and saw 'ucdavis' that I realized that the file resides on that site and not the one where the author works.

There are several issues here: (a) this topic will time out in a few days and I'll not be able to contact you about the matter, that's likely a problem; (b) the paper address both general shielding issues and some very specific ones that relate to specialist research equipment; and (c), whilst I am happy to provide some general comment on the paper here at HN, there are some in-depth issues that I would prefer not to comment thereon given the paper's origin and the nature of my intended comment.

The reason for my point (c) is that I used to work at an establishment whose work concerned itself with hardware that is somewhat related to that mentioned in the paper and thus its instrumentation incorporated magnetic and EMR shielding of a similar standard to that [which would likely be] employed on equipment mentioned in the paper.

This raises two issues and it depends on your reason for asking in the first instance. If you want general information about shielding then I have no trouble giving that; alternatively, if you work with technology similar to that which is discussed on page 4 of the paper then it's a somewhat different matter. Thus, I would have to be much more specific as the shielding requirements are not only anything but trivial but also they are often much more demanding to implement. It's here that I have some issues with the paper and it would be unfair to air them in public without informing the author first (and as he's not sought feedback the matter is moot).

If you are involved in similar technologies that demand similar standards of shielding then I'd be glad to discuss the matter further in private but that seems difficult given there's no way on HN to exchange private messages/ensure privacy.

Anyway, please provide me with more specifics about your application/requirement and if I can contribute anything useful then I'll try to help.
> What's up with French disdain for peanut butter? Is it just something else to feel artificially-superior about?

You can find giant jars of it in the Western African neighborhoods. I'm not even french and I also don't like it but my nephews will eat platefuls. And they are also French, the brown kind.
> The hyper-specific bits and pieces that show up over and over again in interviews

One would think the same topic showing up "over and over again" would make it easier to study for interviews
CoinTracker (YC W18) is hiring to make cryptocurrency easy to use (Remote)
I mean he was right (in that there was a decline of the West, or Europe in particular - I am not familiar with the content of his book beyond that). The West went from conquering & dominating almost every place of the planet despite being but a small minority of its population to losing the vast majority of their conquests. The tech difference between say Paris, 1918 & Shenzhen, 1918 was much higher than today - in fact I would say Shenzhen is ahead.
Archaeologists no but grave robbers have been around a long time.
> so it's fair to say that the risk will likely grow beyond that.

not really. that's not how statistics work. it could grow, it could shrink.
I’ve been thinking about this, the communication has been so bad from public and private health officials for 15 months straight.

When not considering any externalities, anti-vaxxers and everyone that comes up with anti-industry and anti-establishment conclusions is rational, but inaccurate only because they dont consider what was not said.

Even with regard to COVID itself, most of the official communication is about avoiding death when the reality is that its not about only avoiding death its about all the additional debilitating effects in the vast “recovered” statistic, so it is rational to decide to ignore that once you do your own math and noticing who is actually dying. But it is not accurate because it doesn't factor in the unsaid aspect.
> but when it can be one of several apps, and the sole purpose of the app is retain a cryptographic key and run some hashes on it... I lose most of my sympathy.

I can't see how having a choice of apps changes anything.

An employer shouldn't be able to demand an employee to use personal property for work purposes against the employee's will. That's unreasonable, unacceptable and ethically wrong in my opinion.
Will Chad’s internet survive its upcoming election?
According to this BBC News article, it's 4 per 1M:

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55302595

Quote:

"The MHRA said about four people in a million would normally be expected to develop this particular kind of blood clot - though the fact they are so rare makes the usual rate hard to estimate."
No, I blame the anti-vaxxers for pushing the spec to be so strict that when 6 people out of 6.8 million people see a negative medical event, we pull the entire vaccine out of caution. We are pulling the vaccine because of a literally 1:1000000 chance that you might have a blood clot. Meanwhile, the risk of dying from covid is closer to 1:100 to 1:1000.
It suggests that Russia isn't planning to annex "every free person in the world" as the parent comment suggested. They're taking blatant, aggressive advantage of the Ukrainian Revolution to expand their power and influence, and that's undoubtedly a bad thing to do, but I don't think it indicates any substantial risk to other countries in the region.
I say "plain and simple" because IME people tend to overestimate the novelty of problems and underestimate the impact of "memorized" problems for solving new ones. 3 months of studying for an interview, while extremely annoying, is generally speaking a pretty small amount of time needed to cover a field as vast and complex as DS&A. And yet it is more than sufficient for most because there's extremely little novelty in the problems being asked. They want you to solve classic algorithms, but either dont' want to tell you so or (more commonly, IME) don't realize they are asking classic algorithm problems and only think they are asking some novel problem. Even "simple" techniques will be impossible for a person to solve in an interview setting, and yet if they've seen it before the interviewer will think they are a brilliant programmer. Its a memorization game even though it doesn't directly look like one. IMHO.
TLDR;
We want to get free users to move to paid plans sooner, by (a) relaxing sharing limits, and (b) reducing the amount of pages you can create to 3 unless you upgrade.

Existing work created prior to 21 April will be unaffected.
Democratizing Facial Authentication