skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s a bit more complicated than that if you want reliability. They have two IP ranges on the same physical link, and their patched DHCPD is not standards compliant. If the dish loses its connection, you will be stuck with a useless local IP unless you block DHCP leases in the 192.168 range.
In my mind there's a huge difference between the 2. The sony rootkit was installed in secret, full of security holes, hard to remove, and made by a vendor that appeared to give 0 shits about said security holes.

All of the anti-cheat solutions I've seen that run in kernel mode are none of those things. They make it well known that they're installing, are made by vendors that actively care about the security of their products, and are trivially easy to remove once they're no longer needed.
Referring to the EEZ as "its waters" is disingenuous. A nation's territorial waters are much, much smaller than its EEZ.
Does anyone know if there’s a similar API/technique for windows?
Anyone using Metabase? Is it worth having self hosted and managing it?
When a doctor prescribes medication, they have the option to include a certain number of refills with the original prescription. This may not apply to all medications, but I don’t know the technical details.
At first sight: It borrows a lot more from PS (including the complexity) compared to Pixlr, which seems like it wants to be a mix of Photoshop and Illustrator, but simplified like Figma. Thanks!
Maybe for minimalistic UI design. But even there i would rather not want to work with a web tool (graphics is compute hungry).

For graphics design and artwork i‘d rather go with Affinity Designer.
Cool! I’d love any feedback you have!
You answered yourself.

Maintenance is seen by business as a cost, innovation is seen as potentially bringing more money.
The incentives are all wrong and that translate to engineers (and teams, and companies) chasing features and not fixing bugs.

A rewrite is often the only way of getting enough resources to fix up things.
Nit, though I'm going a bit (pun status unspecified) beyond my paygrade here: bandwidth is ultimately limited by the frequency of the trandsmission channel, though multiple channels can be multiplexed. This is the heart of Claude Shannon's work.

For deep-space transmission, other factors apply, though if you're operating in the right frequencies, the background noise level is low (at least as compared to Earth where there are numerous competing signals of terrestrial origin). And whilst signal/noise ratio does impose limits, there's only so much that boosting volume dB will achieve before you hit the channel limits themselves.

To increase bandwith beyond channel limits, you'd have to multiplex channels, which would involve different frequencies, different transmission routes (say, to widely-separated relay systems), or both. For physical media (e.g., fibre) this is relatively easy. For broadcast, given mass and energy budgets of spacecraft, probes, and rovers, the problems are harder.

Encoding, redundancy, error-correction, and retransmit protocols can all increase the ultimate reliability of the signal, though these impose other costs, notably on bitrate or at least time until the transmission is confirmed.
Came to this video expecting a cheeky joke, left with a genuine understanding of how to implement a basic Bitcoin miner

This is awesome!
It's "lazy" in the sense that you look for the simplest most leveraged way of doing something well, not "lazy" as in negligent.

A lazy programmer takes time to search for the things that the OS will do "for free". Keeping up with and using, the latest developments in OS libraries. This can save you a lot of coding, and gives you capabilities that are likely to keep working on diverse future hardware.

A lazy programmer will check in the smallest possible fix when fixing other's code. The simplest change takes time to isolate, but it causes the least disturbance and reduces chance of side-effects and new bugs. It also makes the change comprehensible to others, which saves time having to explain it.

If you do something right the first time, you don't have to do it again, and in order to do that you have to do it simply and carefully or you will never get it right.
You may also want to consider ChromeCast with Google TV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sb9-NOxZlg . ~$50
Typical WISP last mile: Something like a ubiquiti rocket 5ac gen2 on an RF elements 60 degree horn antenna, in a 40 MHz TDD channel somewhere in the 5.x GHz band, aggregate capacity of the entire AP might be around 240 Mbps. Shared between 20 to 30 customers. I'm regularly seeing 250-330 Mbps down on Starlink right now with beta equipment, and very, very few WISPs except those who are doing 60 GHz based PtMP micro-POP setups can match that. It's a real challenge for a WISP to have a few dozen houses all trying to download the latest 180GB Call of Duty update connected to one AP.

I'm not nearly as optimistic about WISPs in the long run, compared to my views 8-10 years ago. Really difficult to reach locations will go to starlink or similar (as a replacement for consumer grade geostationary), other places where the customers per square km density is sufficient will eventually get overbuilt with GPON last mile that provides vastly more throughput and capacity.

The most clueful and forward thinking WISPs I know are all making every effort possible, within whatever capital resources are available to them, to develop in house capacity for doing rural aerial FTTH. Buying bucket trucks, getting training, learning how to splice fiber, design GPON architecture, working with state PUCs for pole access, etc.
I read something that made it sound like this was about FCC rules on roaming vs stationary ground stations.
Next Generation Shell was born exactly out of the pain of using bash and Python. I'm the author and I felt the same way.

> shelling out when needed is not pleasant,

Handled properly because the language was built ground up for Ops tasks. There is even a syntax for "run a command and parse the output". Rationale and examples - https://ngs-lang.org/doc/latest/man/ngswhy.1.html

Currently NGS supports Linux and MacOS.

> smallish binary

Unfortunately there is no static build yet so can't check this checkbox

Next Generation Shell - https://github.com/ngs-lang/ngs

Alternative Shells list by @chubot - https://github.com/oilshell/oil/wiki/Alternative-Shells
You obtain your initial prescription from your doctor. It used to be that the doctor gave you this on paper, and you took it to a pharmacy to fill. Nowadays most doctors ask you what pharmacy you use and are able to transmit the prescription electronically to the pharmacy.

If this is expected to be an ongoing prescription, typically the doctor will authorize N refills. The pharmacy can fill those refills with no further interaction with the doctor.

Many even automate this. The pharmacy I use for most prescriptions send me a text message when I should be near running out, and I just have to text back "yes" to refill it.

When you are out of refills, the doctor has to authorize continuing the prescription. Most pharmacies will handle that for you. You ask the pharmacy for a refill, they tell you that none are left, and that they will contact your doctor on the next business day.

In older times that was usually by fax or even by making a voice call to the doctor's office, but nowadays I think it is mostly via some sort of computerized system.

It's not actually your doctor that has to authorize additional refills or reissue a new prescription. It is often a "physician's assistant" at your doctor's office that handles this, especially when it is just renewing an ongoing prescription. There are also some kinds of nurses that can processes refills (there are something like 20 different kinds of specialized nurses--I forget which ones can processes prescription refills).

From the patient's point of view, then, it looks like this:

1. You get a prescription for some ongoing condition from your doctor,

2. When you need a refill, you ask your pharmacy.

3. Every so often there is a day or two delay in filling a refill because the pharmacy has to get your doctor's office to renew the prescription.
I won't argue with 2 (I don't think either of us can really say with certainty, and then there's the second layer of arguments about what is "necessary" in a profit situation)

But for 1, this has some significant downsides to consumers. As it stands assuming most of the support comes from the android platform (ads and fees), you get price discrimination. The people who just want a phone to use the internet or stay connected or whatever don't have to subsidize people who do more.

I generally think having power users subsidize non power users is an ethical form of price discrimination. Thoughts?
> What I do know is that in the EU you have to enforce your trademark so that it does not get a commodity.

When I say "myth" I mean, very specifically, that many people like you "know" this falsehood. What you're doing here is just underscoring how widespread the myth is.

"But I really believe it" doesn't stop it being a myth, neither does "But lots of people I know believe it". In fact if nobody believed it then it wouldn't be a myth - for example "Cheese is made exclusively by alligators from the tears of French Kings" isn't a myth because nobody believes that.

You can end up triggering Estoppel or Laches if you are sufficiently lax in enforcement, but your rights don't magically dissolve if you choose not to sue everybody who might be argued to use your mark. Nike could (and in the past have for similar works) just ignored this infringement.

Lego's big problem in Europe is that they would prefer if they were the only people who get to make building blocks, if other building blocks have to be needlessly incompatible then everybody will buy Lego, but if compatible blocks are allowed (which the EU says they must be) then you can just buy "real" Lego for Luke Skywalker and a Snowspeeder and then use cheap compatible Chinese blocks with your local store's brand for the white blocky Hoth landscape. That cuts into Lego profits. Too bad. But the cheap Chinese block makers don't pretend what they're making is "Lego" it doesn't have the Lego logo, it just fits together nicely.
You could imagine a handful of starlinks providing the backhaul for public wifi at an event.
And randomly locking accounts.
IANAL but I would be surprised if a marketing website really fell under the ADA. It would be like saying a billboard or newspaper ad also had to be distributed in braille.

If the website provides an actual service or business transaction capability to the public, I think that is where the ADA starts to apply.
I don't see why you think it would make diffs painful. If anything, in my experience it makes diffs easier because each chunk can be put on it's own, independent line so that if you change anything it is constrained to the relevant line.
Ask HN: Tech Equivalent of a Trade Job?
I have a friend who is an electrician's apprentice, and I am so envious about how much he is learning and so quickly. He's truly learning by doing, and I haven't felt like that since I transitioned from self-teaching myself web development to attending college.

Is there any role in tech that is equivalent to working as an apprentice? Or is it going to simply be up to me to create that for myself, and perhaps start contributing to Open Source, or build a product (which seems to be a popular though on HN).
Same here. It's easy to forget the difference between a master LEGO builder and the average person just piecing together bricks though. Knowing what to build and when/how is a lot of the job too. I try and remind myself that we're also often there to help other people build better things, perhaps analogous to automatically sorting LEGO bricks so other people building can move faster with fewer compromises.
To support socket and seccomp filters.
It could perform it, but as the other comment has outlined it would be very slow (and not very secure)!
This is an infuriating mix of great and horrible ideas, in a horrible attempt at either humor, or sarcasm, in quantum superstition.
Your countpoints are solid advice for a good programmer.

For a great programmer you are missing that they control the environment as well.

If you know who you are delegating to you know what will be returned, when and how that is going to affect the next step. As a great programmer you are 15 moves ahead. Why would you worry about chaos? There is a lack of trust in your plan if fear of chaos exists. You are Michael Jordan and can see the entire court.

As an average developer I don't trust anything will work even if it was just tested.
RoboForm Crack 9.1.2.2 and License Key Full Download 2021
Solves the mystery of whether transformers actually match the size of their vehicle state
Nuke seems to be a 2D-3D/video compositing application. That’s bringing in a huge amount of complexity if you’re trying to deal with 2D still images. It’s an Adobe After Effects competitor, surely?
You answered my question. Signal (a non-profit) definitely has "Donate to Signal" link in Settings.
What breaks the narrative is that the system is clearly not antagonistic. Giving the correct kind of autonomy to the workers increases every single item that management should care about, at least in a capitalist system. And both logic and evidence point that way.

> Have you observed, preferably both as a participant and independent, Deming idealism in a functional real-life system?

As a participant, never. As an independent, we are talking about the mentor of the movement that teached the Japanese management how to go from an industry that didn't produce anything good into the highly developed one that outcompeted everybody all ever the world.
The advantage of the fingertips is that they're sensitive and especially, they're extremely mobile. I imagine that if the sensors were mounted on the fingertips of a glove, on the back of the hand and pointed orthogonally to the plane of the hand, it would be fairly natural to develop a sort of "saccadic hand movement" to get a rapid perception of the surroundings.
AA saying: "don't judge your insides by other people's outsides"
Not that everything is political, but it appears that the two judges in the majority were appointed by Republicans and the dissenter was appointed by a Democrat. If they end up having an en banc hearing, the composition of the full Eleventh Circuit (excluding senior status judges) is seven Republican appointees and five Democrat appointees. There are also more Republican appointees among the senior status judges.

Of course, this decision shouldn't be over-politicized; I only mention this because it is a relevant consideration in predicting the likelihood of an en banc rehearing, and the possible outcome.

My sense (as a former lawyer) is that en banc rehearings are somewhat more likely when the majority of the judges would vote to reverse. Given the composition of the Eleventh Circuit, this theory would predict that there wouldn't be a rehearing, which would leave this to SCOTUS to resolve.
Hmm, yeah, I guess I could. I'll keep it in mind for the future. :)
I'm surprised that this is still getting litigated and having lengthy trials or opinions.

You might remember that way back in *2002* this very same question came up regarding Southwest Airlines's website, and it was ruled that it was not a physical place covered by the ADA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_Now,_Inc._v._Southwest_....

I think what it speaks to most is that Congress needs to address the question once and for all to not have this issue decided over and over by the courts.
Highly recommended. Goes deep into the antenna design and overall components (and why it costs so much to manufacture).
If black lives would actually be in danger then fine, but they aren't. Its all based on the lie that police somehow shoots people based on their skin color.
> It’s baffling how US can quote the international treaty it’s not a signatory

The US is a signatory of the UNCLOS. It has not acceded to the UNCLOS by way of ratification, but being a signatory without accession has legal significance in international law.

Further, the US views the UNCLOS largely as codification of rules already binding in customary international law, so it is neither surprising that it would cite these rules in the particular articulation another party has explicitly accepted.
Fiber is not and probably never will be economical for rural areas. Most of the rural fiber rollouts that exist today are pretty transparent subsidy milking schemes.

I was thinking about buying 40 acres in the middle of nowhere earlier this year. It had no electrical power within a mile, but there was a buried gigabit fiber line running down the dirt road. It probably cost at least hundreds of thousands of dollars to serve fewer than a hundred people. I called the ISP to ask about pricing. It was cheaper to buy a fiber/phone combo than just fiber. Why? “We get more subsidies that way.”

Starlink is clearly a superior option in cases like this.
Replying to your reply, I don’t buy it. Your experience now on Starlink is analogous to being the first WISP subscriber on a newly deployed AP. Time will tell anyway. (And I will still be a grateful Starlink customer at my off-grid cabin, even with the throttling and caps. Starlink is a game changer!)
Evil geniuses at work.

I have found that the more screen a coffee machine has, the most unreliable and unsatisfactory the coffee it makes.

Now, this just opens a whole new world of possibilities for anger at the coffee machine.
Most secessions are illegal, the US from Britain, Texas and California from Mexico. I personally don’t see anything wrong with Texas becoming independent from the US should it choose to. (Confederate secession was wrong because it was about perpetuating slavery.)

The referendum law was passed by a majority of members of the Catalan parliament. It just seems very odd that Spain would not work on a mutually acceptable structure for an independence vote. Especially if a majority of people would vote against it!
It isn't just that the U.S. hasn't ratified UNCLOS, the U.S. never signed it to begin with.

Nevertheless, the United States has said repeatedly that it views the FON provisions as customary international law. Indeed, they are largely copied from the 1958 Convention on the High Seas (which the United States ratified in 1962) and the 1958 Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone (which the United States ratified in 1961).
Why AWS t3 insance are super scary to use
We've been using t3 for a long time, but just recently got an outage.
These are not the same people, however. There are the developers which give in to the rules and process their payment via the app store. These are somewhat exploited by having 30% of their profits taken. Then there are those which circumvent the store payments by using external integrations and therefore exploit Google by denying them their fair share[0]. These groups are distinct.

[0] Whereas the "fair share" is not necessarily 30%, but >0%.
I'm going to rephrase my original comment, which got flagged: There's inherent hypocrisy in having the biggest monopoly of them all regulate smaller monopolies. Because they're 'monopolies'. Right.
I also tried the donation-route with an app and had to desist (Apple also blocks donations that circumvent their payment system)
Only speaking from experience. In the end I moved to small in-app purchases. You can still do donations, but you need to make them an in-app purchase. The donation will pay for your work, and for Google's app store presence. Consider the latter carefully. They do advertise your "product". Even though it's open-source, it's still a product because you hope to make money even if in the form of a donation. Their advertisement is actually really cheap if you compare it to what other real-life products pay in places like Google Ads

So, if you really want to show that "feel free to donate" screen you need to make the donation an in-app purchase. What is allowed is linking the app to a website, without mentioning anything about a donation, and then showing a donation form straight after clicking. You can do something like "Help->Website" and link it to your donation landing page
The channel is only about 15 miles wide. Wouldn't that be inside the territorial waters of France and England and therefore require permission to sail through?
>literature (or art) is not "something that makes people feel good".

The notion that art can't be "good" if it makes people feel good is really misguided, in my opinion. People turn to art for all kinds of reasons, but most of all because of the satisfaction involved in consuming it. Even if a story is tragic or explores sorrowful experiences, we derive aesthetic pleasure from the recounting if it is well done. Art is not cheerleading, but neither does it need to be just some predictable narrative about how life is terrible and hopeless.
Definitely not just you. Google is just about the last company I’d want my health records stored.
Offtopic but I really liked the explanation animations, which software do you use for that?
As someone who uses Photoshop since version 6, I use both Gimp and Krita at work (because I use Linux there). Both are really quite usable and worth a look.
I regret

No worries. Sounds like you read some intent on my part to mean accessibility was optional. I wasn't trying to say that.
> All major Web browsers on Android and iOS provide push notifications to websites

No browsers on iOS allow push notifications on websites. https://onesignal.com/blog/the-state-of-ios-web-push-in-2020...
The fancy RAID controller just shouldn't be there - there's no reason to use it unless you're stuck with it. Sometimes you can flash these LSI controllers with HBA/simple-RAID firmware ("IT" or "IR") to fix this.

But really, this had little to do with Ceph (other than the ops mistake of rebooting several machines at once without waiting for an all clear, which is just a bad idea all around when you're upgrading a cluster of any kind). It was an interaction between XFS (not used on modern ceph-volume systems), the kernel, and the RAID controller.

I find Ceph to actually be a lot more introspectable than "typical" multi disk storage management filesystems like btrfs and zfs. On those, if something goes wrong, you're often left with a corrupted or unmountable filesystem, or worse, kernel panics or errors. It's all a monolith in the kernel and hard to fix anything. On Ceph, you can dig through the layers, and things are split into separate daemons that can be debugged separately.

For example, want to see where the data of a CephFS file is stored? Easy: the inode number is the first part of the object name in the data pool. Append the block number after that and you have your object name. You can just fetch that using the rados tool, bypassing CephFS entirely. Want to go deeper? Ask it to hash the object name to a PG ID. Use `ceph pg dump` to figure out what OSDs that pg lives in. Now you know what disks have your data. OSDs broken? Use the objectstore tool to read the data directly without booting an OSD.

Obviously you need to learn all this stuff, but the tooling is there and this is way more introspectable than a bunch of magic structures in a filesystem.
The US media posts stories about China violating other sovereign waterways all the time. Why are we salty about China doing the same thing?
you’re basically just wanting to solve the suburban/exurban commute problem, but that only exacerbates sprawl. that saps away resources and spreads it much thinner than creating denser, mixed-use neighborhoods in urban cores and developing inter-city high-speed rail for commerce.

LA to SF is one of the most travelled corridors in the country and rail can legitimately compete with air here. the decision to put it through the central valley was politically motivated rather than utilitarian. the coastal route up through san jose and silicon valley would have been more utilitarian (which is not to say that serving the central valley is unworthy, just less utilitarian).