skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s a good writeup.

Unfortunately the cryptojacked website gets screwed either way.

Without a CSP policy, it will have its resources cryptojacked, which depletes its resources, and with the CSP policy it will have to process the violation report, which again depletes its resources.

The only solution is to never visit a cryptojack website, if you’ve come to rely on that site for something then that might prove very difficult, and not visiting it could again deplete resources finding a replacement site.
> Life forms spontaneously?

> Where’s your evidence?

It was a logical argument at a higher plane, at the scale of Universe. I do believe that all Life on Earth had a common/similar origin. Similar = there could have been multiple origins at different places on the planet Earth - I don't know if that has been proven wrong.

Perhaps I should have stated it as if life forms spontaneously....

The point is how far up do you want to go? Say for example:

Z was created by Y was created by X was created by W .... was created by A ... limit -> infinity

(where Z, Y, X ... are life on distinct planets)

At some point it will stop. So, how did the top most life form? It must have formed spontaneously.

If someone wants to call the topmost life God or Gods, who created them?
"Second" used to be the communist bloc, led by USSR. USSR was disbanded about 30 years ago, but the idea of numbered "worlds" persist.

(I'd assume that Russia and China are first-world countries now.)
Google doesn't implement taxes, so these aren't substitutes.
This reminds me somewhat of the old 'Youcann' movement (an alternative DNS system, though that was still centralized)

I'm definitively looking for something that's accessible to the general public, so I don't think it's an option in my case (I'd probably also use the domain for my own email, etc.)

Still, appreciate the suggestion - thanks.
How do you reconcile calling something "nonsensical and unworkable" when it's a reality (implicitly or explicitly) in most of the developed world?
The only employer that ever asked me about high school was the army. When I enlisted, they were adamant about it. Incidentally the army was the catalyst to get me from my lower class upbringing to 6 digit salary.

Aside from the army, I can't think anyone has ever asked me about it.
Both are possible. Google is a very big place.
> Hey, fastest growing, means RATE OF GROWTH.

Fastest relative to? Do you have a chart or some numbers? Or are you just saying that because the number seems big? You know a 40X increase in locked-up value doesn't translate to 40X returns for anyone right?

> No, it's not. It has 100% uptime and you can execute ANY transaction within 15 seconds on Ethereum layer 1.

I believe Visa settles in 15 milliseconds lol.

> Anyways, you're obviously close-minded and anti-crypto, and you're going to get left in the stone age. Your ignorance is my alpha. Stay curious!

That's a very Crypto position to take, i.e. a zero-sum position. My "ignorance" (in spite of the fact I understand the space very well, I just haven't drank nearly as much koolaid as you have) has nothing to do with your "alpha." Trust me, I spend a lot of time researching this space. There's just nothing there.
Technically, ETC carried on the existing chain leaving the DAO child hacker's coins intact, and ETH hard forked to restore them. It's an important distinction as it shows only bitcoin is (probably? hopefully?) immutable.

It was a tumultuous and amazingly interesting time, with the hacker claiming the child dao function was used legally and threatening legal action if ETH forked. Of course the thief never stepped into the light, the (explicative) coward, as he would've definitely been litigated back to the stone ages, and probably jailed. Worth reading up on...
Do they offer anything else beyond just the private whois listing? I couldn't find anything.
Seems unlikely when most minor illnesses dont have vaccines, and vaccines work by pretending to be the virus. If the immune system stopped working against normal viruses it would probably stop working against vaccines too.
The whole thing reads like PR BS to me. Touting AI as a cure-all to make up for getting bashed about it lately.
I don’t understand this whole threads obsession with updates. ST has always seemed like a finished product to me. Always does what I expect and is stable. I’m happy for paying the price I did for the features I got at that time.
Finnish I think
It's good that it won't hurt the current schedule, but we could have had 15 million doses sooner.
> We ARE reaching the point (long past it, actually) where the mathematics demonstrate it is highly improbable that life as we know it today could have emerged from nothing in the limited timeframe imposed by the geologists.

Well, do you have a source that does this mathematical calculation?
There's plenty of "working musicians" not in the industry: playing gigs in jazz clubs, at weddings. If you're a composer or a songwriter, you can find work in films and TV and commercials (lots of ad agency work to go around), or become an in-house composer at a stock music house, or another production staff, like a game studio!

If you try to find stardom, you won't succeed.
The same one.
Consider who paid for his campaign money and went to promote him by fact checking Trump statements during the election. Big Tech.
Many, actually. There are quite a few active alternatives now, such as Nebula for science YouTubers and Odyssey. Last I heard Linus Sebastian was working on an alternative as well.

It seems that most content creators are quite worried about the way YouTube handles (de-)monitization and copyright strikes. Many CCs are also streamers and use YT only as a side channel. Sure, YT still has a large footprint, but it's not as solid as it used to be.
Errors like this happen in every single GMP and clinical facility.

What makes them different is 1) there are ample checks in place to prevent mistakes from ever leaving the facility, and 2) there is process that reduces the chances of having it happen in the first place.

But all of these places will have incident logs of mistakes like this, along with corrective actions that change the procedures and make it less likely to happen a second time.
Though we might agree on the first premise below, there is an error in subsequent logical consequences:

"small changes alone are not enough" -> "only big changes can work" -> "small change X ought not to be undertaken"

To me parts of this looks like the fallacy of the excluded middle. To claim that X has some merit is not to claim that X on its own has sufficient merit. I apologise if you are not making such an argument, but throwawayboise and arsome certainly seem to have been. And such arguments are far from uncommon.

I do see your point about scale and multipliers but I believe efforts like these are important not only for their admittedly small yet not negligible impact, but also to help establish a foundation for the next steps that should be taken.

In the eighties, the cost-effectiveness of wind-power was way off the charts. However, you'd quantify it. Per turbine, per $, per power consumer. Turbines were just small and inefficient with few deployments. Now, many incremental improvements later, the same technology is in the right ballpark. It's a good thing those pioneers like Vestas didn't just give up when the absolute impact seemed far too small.
Huge difference between designing for their own data centers vs consumer chips.
The Earth is too massive - almost all of the earths mass is below the crust and inaccessible due to extreme temperatures and pressure, bad sci-fi movies not withstanding.

Most asteroids have so little gravity that mining them out would be quite feasible.
Klystrons also power LINACs and probably other types of particle accelerators, too.

You'll also see large vacuum tubes in industrial RF heaters, typically operating at 13.56MHz, which is a "garbage" frequency set aside for such uses.
Yes there can be gratuitous screenings. Something that, I understand, happens often in the US system due to risk of law suits and patients with good insurance demanding they take every precaution possible.

But I’m quite confident that we have enough data to establish guidelines on what circumstances to screen. And health insurance coverage shouldn’t be a factor whether to screen or not.
are they hosting this on a 5 Mbps uplink?

edit: (context: this wasn't loading for a bit... seems to be working now)
What about this is AI? This is all perfectly doable with "classical" algorithms.
I started paying for my tools during my first job out of college outside SV making less then 100k.

Also most places I’ve worked offer to expense it.
> why is the fine constant exactly what it is to support life

Doesn't the constant depend on the type of life. I don't think we know enough to conclude that life everywhere in the Universe is similar, i.e. has a similar/same constant, as the life on Earth.
Both great ideas. Code and plot examples added.
People vs. Process
Managers have two levers to pull: people or process, but far less well understood is that people can substitute for process, and in startups and other elite organizations be the superior alternative.
Imagine having this much anxiety about accessing the tools provided by a private organization.
Didn’t Hitachi get sued for making a clone of an IBM mainframe? That case set the stage for the PC clone market.
Discouraging people from using tools that restrict a persons freedom is not the same thing as removing an individual because of wrong think or personal grudges. The "canceled" tools are still there and available for anyone to use if they wish. If people don't want to have anything to do with RMS, they are more than free to do so.

I would argue that, for a time, the focus was to create tools that abide by an ideology AND are the best at what they do.
I'm not in Germany, but I also get very frustrated when the Pfizer name is applied to what BioNTech created. BioNTech is going to be doing amazing things later on too, with their great tech platform.

I have a feeling that news sources are very guarded about introducing new names to the public, especially ones as difficult to pronounce as BioNTech (I've heard some great butchering of the pronunciation too).
Your comment makes it seem like Tierney et al. only authored XLisp Stat, and you wrote a "reboot in Common Lisp" called Lisp Stat. That is not the case.

Tierney et al. authored both XLisp Stat and Lisp Stat. You took the code and modified it. There's nothing wrong with that, but you also present this modified code as Lisp Stat, a project "inspired" by XLisp Stat. You gave this code a new license, too.

I wonder what's the purpose of using "Lisp Stat" and "Symbolics" as project/company names, if not to mislead others. If that was not your intention, consider being more explicit about what is authored by you, and what is authored by others, and avoid using the same name for your project as that of the historical project.
Fitness is very popular in VR and one of its retaining values. I've even developed some WebVR games that thousands of people used daily for exercise (and preferred over big studio games like BeatSaber / BoxVR) and had people pay money for like squat mode and such.

Whether it's something that serves a small select audience, and whether it's a novelty remains to be seen. There are advantages to VR fitness but also disadvantages including the impracticality of putting on a headset and isolating nature of it as you said.

And also sweat, humidity fogging up the lens, shaking the headset around, having enough space to not smash a controller into a TV or ceiling fan. I recognize thousands of people get over that though.

Gamified fitness is a thing, but I question whether the ultimate form of that is a VR headset. There are alternatives to consider as well: Peloton, social running and exercise apps (Strava, Charge Running here recently), Ring Fit.

For me personally, that has gone from DK1 to DK2 to Vive to Rift to Rift S to Quest to now a Quest 2 owner that has barely used it, I'll take a basketball or tennis court any day.
>>I've also found that YouTube leads to a very poor, surface understanding of most issues - and this isn't the fault of YouTube specifically, it's just a limit of video.

Try watching TIK's BattleStorm Stalingrad series (link below). Exceptionally well-researched and the videos are information-dense. I own one of the books cited in his series, the 700-page "Armageddon in Stalingrad" by David Glantz. His video format communicates a fairly high understanding of the play of events, of the people involved, and other nuances, in less time than pouring over ALL of the source material would take. He mixes tactical/operational maps with dialogue bubbles of key commanders, tables of equipment readiness/casualties, quotes from people who fought there or from books, and lately he's been adding photos showing where on the battlefield they were taken. So a lot of it is book content (and many of the authors comment on his videos, praising his work), but he steps through the battle in almost real-time, and it provides a better view of scope, scale, and even decision-making by key leaders than digesting static maps in a book would. I would challenge the assertion that reading all of the books oneself would yield a significantly higher comprehension of the battle, and it certainly wouldn't be time-efficient to do so. Hence video as a communication medium is not inherently flawed. Like any other medium it is reliant upon exceptionally well-produced content. Most YT content isn't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfo5mse-ag&list=PLNSNgGzale...
From a Bayesian point of view, that amounts to a "prediction" that the probability of event x is so significant that you should build your life around it. But I guess if you knew enough for that sentence to make sense you wouldn't have posted your comment. So, suffice it to say that Bayesian decision theory cuts the knot you're talking about.
Muslim Kashimiris lost all moral ground to claim biggest democracy farce when they cleansed 400,000 Hindu Pandits from the kashmir valley with threats of "leave, convert or die" and leave the women behind, if you leave [1]. This is what ISIS did to the Yazidis except it happened in 1990 and no one, including the Indian state, did anything about it.

Today when you lose 4G access the Indian state can point to the Islamist driven genocide and claim they are preventing another Islamist genocide. The choice for other Indians is would you have an Islamist state which is 100% purely Sunni Muslim with 4G Internet or one with a restive population with lesser freedoms but gives some semblance human rights to the 10-20% minority that is not Sunni Muslim but rather Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist and Shia and would get driven out, raped or just killed the moment the Indian state pulls back.

As to Ambani/Adani clique, the very jibe is farcical. There are dozens of billionaries minted in the past decade since Modi came to power. 90% of Adani's $55B wealth was added in the last 12 months on the stock market through publicly listed entities.

As to Ambani, I do wish he owned the country. Imagine if he could do to every service what he did to Internet data and voice calling - the cheapest rates in the world and near universal coverage. Heck, every country wishes he could own their telecom infrastructure lock, stock and barrel.

[1] http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/kashmiri-pandits-off...
Where are the capital gains here?
If you ever set up a business around this, let me know! I am woefully ignorant of these suppliers you reference.
Sure, why stand for principle if someone else might use rhetoric? What even is the point? Just go ahead and become the monstrous caricature your enemies sketch of you, at that point.
Scenario:

An engineer who you pay $200,000.00/yr in salary pushes code to prod which brings your totally unique SaaS product down. Accounting says the incident cost $2,000,000.00.

Do you:

A) Fire the engineer on the spot.

B) Conduct a thorough investigation of your testing and deployment practices and implement changes to avoid such a mistake in the future.
The only thing that matters for your car's carbon footprint is how much gas you use. So regardless of time, if you have more gas in the tank at the end of your trip, your carbon footprint is lower.

The faster you go, the more your fuel efficiency decreases. For the most part this is due to wind resistance, because there is a velocity^2 argument there(ie if you double your velocity, you quadruple your wind resistance). Your engine is also designed to operate more efficiently at certain speeds but that is less directly quantifiable than wind resistance.

So you might be able to get 40MPG while doing a steady 40 mph, but only get 20MPG when doing 80mph.

So if you need to go 40 miles, if you can do it at 80mph it will take you 30 minutes, and will cost you 2 gallons of fuel. If you do it at 40mph it will take you 1 hour and cost you 1 gallon of fuel. So in this contrived example the longer trip has a lower carbon footprint.

In the real world, there are rarely two parallel roads going exactly the same place but just with a different speed limit. Usually you need to drive out of your way to get onto a highway to make your trip go faster. On the other hand driving directly at a slower speed usually entails more starts/stops at traffic lights which eats into your fuel efficiency. Google is probably in a good place to answer the question of how fuel efficient is a given route because they have so much data about average speeds, accelerations/decelerations required/ etc.
At this point, one should assume that "attack the supplier" is a known, standard strategy for any person or organization that supplies software or expertise to a larger or target organizations.
Yep, sort of like being in a bar full of drunk people and you're stone cold sober.
Perhaps because I’m in enterprise I know them. They don’t get much sleazier, so they prefer keeping out of the news.
CBC Jim Morrison interview (1970)
For me, on youtube premium, "not interested" has massive, immediate effects on what is shown in my feed. Try it and see.
If "acting positively" means "work it out in the legislature", then we agree. But the language of rights starts to push this responsibility into the courts (at least in the US).

I am not saying there will be no arguments. I'm just saying we shouldn't hammer out the details of a medical system in the courts.
Yeah, I once had an employer offer a dental plan from a company who sent us all wi-fi capable toothbrushes complete with a mobile app with the promise of discounts in our group rate in exchange for letting the things phone home.
> Money is a debt from society to its holder.

I disagree. Money is a store of value that is separate from society - gold is an international currency accepted organically because of its useful and intrinsic properties, with thousands of years of history in a wide variety of cultures that had no link before trade began.

There is no "debt" here. Society doesn't "owe" the holder of money anything, necessarily.
The battle for data science [pdf]
Hard to do without knowing anything about this facility, but maybe just not store the ingredients for two different vaccines in the same place. Basically restrict the set of ingredients available to the person making the batch.

Or have the employee log what he is doing in real time BEFORE he does it. I am adding sugar, I am adding eggs, I am adding wheat flour. Then an alert is triggered when the system (which knows what product is being made) recognises that the ingredient doesn't belong.

This is a multi-billion dollar company... they could have the process live-streamed to 30 independent chemists each one watching the "chef's" every move (this is not a serious proposal).

This stuff is all hashed out when one writes up a HACCP process.
I don't understand what I'm looking at here.
Building Custom Model Using Huawei ML Kit Custom Model-Huawei Developers
15M Covid doses ruined due ingredient error
> Murder a randomly chosen half of people who reach sexual maturity at less than the median height for people doing so at their age for a couple decades and people will “spontaneously evolve” to be taller; and microorganisms have much shorter generations.

But its pretty unlikely they would develop bullet proof heads in a couple decades, which i think would be the more apt comparison

Alcohol has been used to sanitize since the 1300s. Evolving resistence to alcohol seems like something that would be difficult to do (but not impossible as evidenced by some types of pathogens are resistant). Anyways i think this concern is overblown for alcohol based sanitizer due to the method of action of alcohol. (My opinion on triclosan based sanitizer otoh is totally different)
I have been able to completely replace tmux with wezterm on Linux and Mac and love it. It even works on Windows and have been able to port tmux bindings . https://github.com/prabirshrestha/dotfiles/blob/master/.conf...
AFAIK he's using RatScanner[1], or something like it. I'm pretty sure the admin of RatScanner is in the Discord quite a bit, but that could be a coincidence (but I think it's some form of image processing lib no matter what, they include a screen cap of the latest market info for an item on the page when you pay).

I'm not sure I would consider what they do effective in banning trade bots (the captcha seems ridiculously easily beaten), I think the Found In Raid object flag is probably the really effective thing keeping most bot usage down, since it attacks the actual incentives of using a bot (it's still useful to auto-buy when markets dip or someone under lists an item, but that's about it I think, but I may be missing a use).

That said, if all you're doing is scanning the market results and not buying anything, it's probably much easier to not trigger any problems with the devs. The market data is really useful for those that like that sort of thing, but it's not really that much of an advantage, just a way for those into the economic portion of the game to go deeper.

1: https://github.com/RatScanner
I still hold that opinion, though reduced to situations where there are other ways than full-blown TLS to get authenticity.

Due to a lack of options for putting signing pubkeys into DNS or something like that, this requires the loaded page itself to be delivered over TLS. Bulk content can rely on subresource integrity, but may need a fall back on TLS to successfully load the content in the presence of MITM. This fallback can likely be done via a small script, either inline or also served via TLS.
I’m a Child of a Hoarder – and I’m Trying to Do Better for My Own Family
Hubble is not supporting your case one iota.
No one cares. Cancel culture is an advanced form of trolling.
I worked all summer between my first and second years of university, and saved up enough to buy a 'Morgan Generic' 486-BL2-66.

IBM used to make their own 'Blue Lightning' version of the 486. IIRC RAM cost at the time was around 100GBP for each 4MB, and I opted for more RAM instead of a better brand of PC.

It ran X fine, but the bundled monitor was limited to 800x600 non-interlaced, or 1024x768 interlaced.
>The main obstacle is the bandwidth cost

...hence the ads? How would competitors be immune to the need to pay the bills?
SpaceX, StarLink, Relativity Space, and Planet Labs would be better examples I suppose. The odds of space technologies getting cheaper versus more expensive is pretty good imho, including remote sensing and observatories.
Great deck! :)
This seems to get fuzzy when you consider there are many graduate students doing research who aren't going to have the same funds and likely not be as rigorous.
Or more closely, give me the .o files for my architecture, I somewhat understand the calling convention used. I should be able to make use of it.