skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, you're talking about a device behind NAT which initiates a connection to an external service.

However, we're talking about a service listening behind NAT (in this case Call of Duty on an Xbox at home) that needs to be listening for connections initiated by other Xboxes to establish a P2P connection. This is what port forwarding enables and this is what uPnP automates.
Not just Zuckerberg's, but Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes are there as well. Interesting to see who has low user IDs in the dump.

Also mildly entertaining to see some names that are probably test accounts now associated with Facebook people in Google as people try to see who they are.
There have always been bad developers. Unless he means that he expects that by now, someone would have developed a completely idiot-proof infrastructure for making UIs, we can always assume that there will be people making websites who do not have the time or inclination to learn the tools and technology and make the wrong decision at every turn.

... And even though some idiot-proof frameworks exist, they still require somebody to put enough effort in to discover and use them.

I mean, we can apply the same criticism to the giant pile of crapware in the mobile stores. Some software is good, some ain't.
> This applies from billion dollar lawsuits to buying a pack of cigarettes. Haggling is an art form there.
Or, honestly, simple anxiety. I went through a year of severe anxiety where I honestly thought I was suffering extreme cardiac and maybe neurological symptoms. It turned out to be all psychosomatic. There are so many markers of similarity between this article and my experience. "Fainting spells, chest pain, numbness" were all part of it, and more.
I'd probably rephrase "trust" to "maintain appropriate confidence intervals on your beliefs"

that being said, there's clearly something to trusting yourself beyond rational levels. How far would Kanye have gotten if not for boundless self belief?
I don’t think it is the vaccine technology rather what part of the virus the vaccine causes the immune system to react on.
Maybe.

But I suspect it would probably descend into goal-post moving or quibbling about definitions.

It's doesn't feel worth the amount of legalistic laying down of rules that it would require to be a fruitful debate.
What about a special string, i.e. "null" (literally) in the table?
`if` blocks don't make a scope. Comprehensions do.
Antidepressants and medical uncertainty
You try writing a UI that:

1. works visually at all screen widths and resolutions

2. returned from a server with zero knowledge of said screen widths and resolutions

3. without shipping redundant assets

4. responds immediately to user input

5. but all visual updates go through this slow and crappy DOM API

6. oh, and it's all single-threaded

7. and there's no standard library for stuff like virtualized lists, modals, etc. so have fun picking your own and shipping it down

8. and your options for navigation are either losing all local state at each navigation, or writing a SPA that some neckbeards on HN hate for esoteric purity reasons
I'm very curious why is this downvoted?
Personally I think most of the "failures" out there are caused by organisational issues not technology issues. Namely, marketing departments given all the power over what the website does and what's bundled with it (trackers, a bunch of heavy/intrusive marketing tools), and optimisation that values increasing revenue above increasing actual usability. (Sometimes these align; often they don't).

You can make a SPA that's a joy to use and loads and runs extremely fast. Hardware has never been faster; browsers and application frameworks have never been as good as this (I'm talking about the web stack). It's really nothing to do with the tools or technologies that marketing insists it needs mixpanel, GTM, optimizely, hotjar, FB pixel, smooch, and god knows whatever else in order to do its job effectively.
It's definitely possible, but I guess what I am saying is that research in this area hasn't really been explored in the context of humans.

In the lab, we use targeted genetic manipulations such as optogenetics [1] or chemogenetics (see DREADDS [2]) to achieve precise circuit manipulations that can (maybe/kinda) change emotional state (see [3] and [4] for manipulation of fear in mice, sorry may be pay-walled check sci-hub).
But these are impractical in humans at the moment because they require specific genetic backgrounds (a CRISPR modified mouse expressing a specific artificial DNA sequence in certain types of neurons from birth), viral injections to add other genetic constructs that interact with the from-birth one, and implanting lights or adding drugs directly to the brain where the cells are.
Precise electrical manipulation is not really done, even in animal labs because it is not precise or controllable for these types of things.

Again, I have no doubt that we will get there, maybe in a few decades too. But the techniques are much further from human use than the "reading" technology demonstrated here.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optogenetics
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Receptor_activated_solely_by_a...
[3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28288126/
[4] https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2015276/
Yup, except none of the recipients in the AZ study had severe cases.
I don't disagree with asking for a email in exchange for a trial product, but I do disagree with his overall mentality. This person never cared about his users. He cared how they made him feel, that's a huge difference. Nothing about this leads me to believe that he wanted them to succeed, or to help them in any way. He wanted his ego stroked and his bank account increased.
> From this article: no more keyboards / mice? No typing, you can "think" to write. What about recording your own thoughts and then playing them back to yourself later? How much further can that tech go? And there is so much more beyond BCI, we are just understanding the basic building blocks in many areas, but making amazing progress.

While this itself is certainly an interesting concept, I'm worried at its consequences when implemented in our hypercapitalist economy:
We'll almost certainly, along with this incredible interaction technology, have advertising beamed directly into our consciousness or something similarly intrusive. It's honestly terrifying how much worse intrusive tracking and advertising would get with this technology.
> what actually happens if you mix sulfuric acid with lye

This reaction produces sodium sulfate (a salt) plus water and heat [1]. No idea if this is practical, though. Maybe it’s difficult to source sufficient quantities of some base to neutralize the acid.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_sulfate#Chemical_indu...
This stuff is no doubt promising, not least for disabled people but this neuralink-type stuff seems terrifying. Anyone who is excited about having an Internet connection into their brain needs their head examined. Us humans don't exactly have a good track record of avoiding awful unintended consequences when we introduce new tech, no matter the benefits.

It all starts out with an innocent sales pitch, "we're just connecting people" etc etc, but whatever we build ends up reflecting human nature and our social and economic context in all its myriad ways, good and bad.

We don't control technology or even have the foggiest idea how anything we build will pan out. We just make it look like there was a masterplan after the fact when in reality it was a headless blunder.

I'm the sort of person that yearns for computing to be done sitting on a chair looking at a big screen. I don't even like mobile internet devices that much in terms of what they've done to us. Beaming this straight to our brain? I'm out thanks.
They already exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevmorput

The only question is if it is economically viable at current level of technology.
"Adobe Research" This will probably get added to Adobe PhotoShop.
> Now take it a step further. Death isn’t death. Like the paradox of rebuilding a ship one plank at a time, your mind stops existing in your body and occupies a collection of other bodies.

Douglas Hofstadter talks about this in "I am a Strange Loop" [1], but he argues that our 'soul fragments' as he calls them are a representation of ourselves in others. Depending on how large of a fragment they hold in our brain, we can perceive the world as they do, and think as the other person. They get to experience the world through us, in a sense, given that we 'allow them to'.

It is an interesting idea, and helps reconcile the death of our loved ones.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Am-Strange-Loop-Douglas-Hofstadter/dp...
At least regarding the US federal government, it was a known issue that (a) the government wasn't willing to spend enough to hire quality software developers and (b) the government bureaucracy lacked a process to determine whether web software was "good." Specifically, no effective methods of software validation based on modern best practices (the processes they used were descended from the validation processes for material acquisition, which look extremely different from software engineering).

I'm not sure if the problems have been fixed, but they were both recognized and a process was put in place to address them after the healthcare.gov debacle.
Do you know how these chargeable atomic batteries („CAB“) which are mentioned on the NASA webpage work? A web search does not return anything useful.
This indeed is also my main fear. All the nefarious, intrusive, methods of advertising will get a hundred times worse, but now be directly beamed into our brains. Our hypercapitalist economy will only accelerate and exacerbate this.
That's definitely where I learned that it was expected.

I look at it as one of many possible conventions for communicating precision. For what it is, it works well. But it's not universal, and people who do and don't use it should both keep in mind that the other group exists.
Sorry, I could have been clearer in explaining how to actually use the thing. So the keyboard at the bottom is in the regular 12-EDO tuning that we are all used to and cubase does as well. It's the red dots that are the just intonation tones.

To hear the difference, try playing a just intonation C major chord, by clicking the red dots labeled 1/1, 5/4, and 3/2 (hold Shift for sustain to have them ring at the same time), and then the same chord in 12-EDO by clicking the piano keys directly below the tones you just played, so C, E, and G. The difference isn't massive, but you can probably hear it. If you want to make it more obvious, click the gear icon on top right and choose the sawtooth waveform, and try the same thing again.

You can also try playing a 12-EDO E from the piano keys and a 5/4 from the just intonation dots. These are the same tone in the two different tuning systems, and you can hear the "beat" between them, the slow oscillation that comes from them not being quite at the same frequency.
Sounds like you're from a warm climate. Unfortunately, comfort level is dependent on local temperatures. Canadians who vacation in Florida love the winters, and traipse about in shorts and sandals while the locals are bundled up in toques and sweaters.

86F/30C is nearly miserable

32F/0C is shorts weather if you'll be moving around at all

And I live in balmy Vancouver. But to be fair, our 30 is never dry, and some locals bundle up when it's 15.
It’s because frontend devs are taught to use react, so suddenly every website unnecessarily becomes a react app. If every tutorial and class out there teaches people to use hammers (react) then people start using hammers to screw in a lightbulb or perform surgery.
They do, I'm thinking of certain Ultra Orthodox sects (not all, but Skver for example). Most of their literature is religious in nature (the plays of Sholem Aleichem would be anathema to them), and religious books are traditionally written in Hebrew (Tseno Ureno is a notable exception, but it seems the author intended it for those who aren't scholars).

But the point is that it is silly to talk about Yiddish being a dying language when it has so many native speakers with a very high birth rate (if I recall correctly approximately half the population are under the age of 18).
1) did you try gscan2pdf, pdf arranger, or libreoffice with the pdf?

2) tearing is typically video driver related. Solution for many is to use intels video drivers

3) if you are tied to the apple ecosystem its always going to be easier to stick with it.

4) Most linux users focus on vim shortcuts or terminal/bash shortcuts. Thus the ecosystem will be behind
Would you get enough salmon to offset the cost? What’s the net cost of this approach?
Also the gp has no proof or basis for this statement other than:
a) they read a story about 1 persons experience
b) the site has 1800 units

The gp has to prove a counter factual now: no one else had symptoms.

They can’t do that. Do you know the history of all the move outs of that complex? Do you doubt the owner is highly litigious?

In addition, some people are just more sensitive. They act like a form of early warning system. Does living there give you an increased 10% of lifetime cancer? It would be hard to prove.

And a final note: doesn’t everyone deserve a safe place to live that isn’t poisoning them? The sheer amount of naysaying in these comments is disappointing and reveals a profound lack of understanding of the science and a severely over constrained mindset: if it cannot be proven immediately by an individual without a budget and no resources, then it cannot be true.
You're mostly correct, but I was poking at the fact that a tremendous amount of software has errors akin to "Something happened (0xcafebabe)" with all the documentation hidden. Error messages common in the industry are the reason most don't bother reading them - they're useless, unactionable and vague.
We have a lot of spare space for mangroves. That will store most of the carbon in the soil for up to 1,000 years.
The implication is rough, but it is part of the truth (not all of the truth). However, I will add that the anointed ‘high-end’, your lifelong long backend devs, devops, data engineers, etc are adding to the problem. Backend people taking up the frontend hat under the fullstack guise create tons of awful end results, and this is even more common because they already exist at the company and are given a blanket ‘competent’ rating (in other words, they get a chance to mess with the curve before anyone else).

All of this is part of the pervasive problem that your post is slightly tainted by (my attitudes are tainted by it as well), which is a general disrespect for frontend. No matter, the truth of these attitudes will show up in all of our products. It’s always obvious to me which teams take frontend seriously and which don’t (the quality is always literally visible).
I cant agree more. I could cry. Ive been on a crusade for over a year to scale back diddly js frameworks because 'scale'. Ive heard many bullshit excuses before but sacrificing performance and reliability for being "scalabable" is beyond mind boggling. It gives me a panic attack when medium articles are the chief architect and purveyors of software development truths. I live and work in developing countries and could never understand why sites keep getting slower around 2017 before I stumbled into medium with their React and K8s articles ad nauseum. I realised the juniors and intermediate devs are reading these things as truth and applying it as gospel.

My head hurts just thinking about react.
> Two-tap CMOS pixels have been developed for time-of-flight range image sensors1)-3). Ando and Kimachi proposed a time correlation image sensor in Ref. 4. In their experimental demonstration a three-tap pixel is used to implement weighted integration using current-domain modulation. In this paper, applications of multi-tap CMOS pixels with four or more taps are mentioned in terms of time-division-multiplexed imaging (TDMI)and coded exposure (CE).
That’s a really negative, glass is half full viewpoint. How can anyone not see the incredible wealth of unbelievable awesome that is the modern web?

How can anyone use 200 popular websites and see shit instead of being astounded by how awesome it all is?

I look at the same thing and see unbelievably powerful web applications, the web browser as the most sophisticated fabulous software ever built (alongside Linux), a constant drive amongst front end developers/libraries/tools for new and better ways of doing things.

And I see so many websites that it’s impossible to make sweeping generalizations about front end development.

The world contains certain people who want to see the bad... this is what’s happening here.
I reckon the bar is so low for software developers that if you can't geta job in eight months you are doing something very wrong. So many applicants can't even code a simple console app.

Just be somewhat proficient and you'll be fine!

My last few jobs were all left with no other job in place and i think the longest it took to find a new position was three weeks.
I’ve heard and read stories from seasoned engineers, here on HN and elsewhere, that say that FE dev was as prone to tire fires back then as it is now, so I don’t think that point is as incontrovertible as you claim it to be.

Some of those seasoned old-school engineers have, believe it or not, embraced modern FE frameworks and architectures and wouldn’t go back to the old thing if you paid them to do so. I’ve seen testimonials here on HN and surely it must be a factor in the world moving in this direction - it was not the juniors who made these decisions after all.
More commentary on reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/COVID19/comments/milxvy/qualitative...
It basically echoes comments here, that there's a significant reduction in neutralization (and paper says several instances of no neutralization in some sera). Comments also says that the pre-fusion spike stabilization used on the mRNA vaccine and J&J (which otherwise similar to Sputnik as both use Adenovirus vector) seems to be the difference.
Computers are plentiful everywhere, yet more bits are mined in SV than anywhere else. Maybe the fact that bit mining expertise is concentrated there is useful to produce more zeroes and ones. I suppose the same might be true of olivine.
How can a government contractor reasonably justify a price tag that's on par with fancy bloated non-government sites, for an no nonsense form + js approach?
I feel my experience was representative, because Egypt clearly consists mainly of a somewhat freethinking elite around the capital and a conservative proletariat within the capital's poorer districts and everywhere else in the country. The elite might have the power to decide the public school curriculum, for example, and if you spent all your time within the elite it might seem like a whole world in itself. Nevertheless the religious masses still vastly outnumber them.

I was told by Cairo elites that a major change in Egypt since the 1990s or so was the increasing pressure the masses were putting on the elites. For example, if you ran a business and you did not have the prayer bump on your forehead, your customers might question your religiosity and take their business elsewhere. And the stricter veiling of urban Egyptian women compared to accounts from the mid-20th-century was obvious. Again, I don’t know what might have changed in that regard since the revolution.

That people are employed in tourism to the Ancient Egyptian past does not necessarily mean acceptance of the Ancient Egyptian past. There are a number of Muslim countries that derive income from tourism that is at odds with a strict understanding of Islam, but devout Muslims are willing to look the other way (and perhaps tell themselves that this is just a temporary thing until the great sharia future ushers in an equitable economy for everyone).
The blog is called "a collection of unlimited pedantry", so at least some pedantry is to be expected !
>The articles you're linking are proven to be misrepresenting.

Citation needed. The articles are actual proof and measurements, whereas Tantacrul's take is just an opinion.

>They for example look at a really small subset of music "Million song dataset" and only analysed basic metrics that could be automatically measured.

The "small subset of music" is the most popular music of any year. That is what reveals music tastes over time, and this is the kind of music that permeates culture.

As for the "basic metrics" there's not basic as in trite/insignificant but basic as fundamental.

It's just that some people want so much to cling to "each period is the same, there are no ups and downs in cultural production" to not be seen as backwards oldsters, whereas milenia of history teaches that that there are absolutely ups and downs in cultural production (periods of stagnation, etc).

>it's a major simplification to say that "all music is worse now"

It's also a strawman. Nobody said that here.
Going to get worse SCOTUS just ruled saying a very strict reading definition on robocall to be only random or sequential numbers. So if you already have a list say bought from a 3rd party company of all the phones in the US sounds like you can bulk send now no repercussions.

In my field - politics - campaigns use tools like Hustle which are basically mechanical turk clickers to get around these rules. I'm thinking personally this will change...
All of screen's functionality plus:

Multiple windows

Multiple panes

Extensibility, plugins and more

Search in terminal for text

And there is a lot more, which I have not yet learnt.

See the tmux awesomelist for a better insight
I am pretty sure the $0.10 per tree of the Eden reforest project would be far cheaper than $47.10 per ton, to say the least.

That would be 471 trees for $47.10.
What is the effect of taking multiple vaccines, with a few months of gap? Sputnik is available to me starting yesterday. If I take it now, will taking a different vaccine that is effective against the variants later on, give me immunity? Or will the new vaccines not do anything because the immune response has already happened?
Phoronix did a benchmark on Linux, and states that the performance impact was less than a half percent: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd-zen3...