skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The review experience can really vary between teams, and depending on whether you have readability or not and whether you're changing code you own or not. This can make the difference between a couple of hours to a week to submit the same change. Readability in general is a process that while valuable, but can be really streamlined. I was working in a fast moving team using Python where everyone had readability, and I just didn't have time to delay most non trivial CLs, so even after submitting hundreds of CLs I did not have readability, having sent only a handful for review. Another negative effect I saw was people opting not to use a less popular language that was the right choice for a project, just because not many people in their office have readability in that language.

A much easier process would go something like this: Suppose my teammate has readability in language X, They can tag review comments as being readability related or not. Once someone has N CLs under their belt with readability related comments under some low percentage in the past M CLs, they are granted readability automatically, or have to submit just 1-2 CLs for a speedy readability process.
> I guarantee you people said exactly the same about the first radios, for example

This doesn't prove anything and is 300% survivorship bias. There are thousands of tech innovations that were utter shit and we never hear about them. AR on the battlefield as describe above is a COD player wet dream and has no basis in reality.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a25644619...

> King estimates that the average soldier goes into action with a hefty 20 lbs of batteries.
What you may point out is hypocrisy. That hypocrisy still doesn't change anything about cryptocurrencies themselves.

Real or perceived hypocrisy doesn't absolve cryptocurrencies in any way. What they are and what they have to account for has to stand on itself, on its own.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

You also seem to be a bit disingenuous: cryptographic hashes don't boil the ocean. Amusement park tokens idem. They aren't used for ransomware.

So this attempt at some kind of slippery slope argument isn't really working, if you would ask me.

When money is at stake, logic and reason is the first to fly out of the window. Whatever necessary to make the grift going will be said.
I’m not doubting the story here, but I’m amazed that one can find themselves in possession of that much BTC without already having established some better way to look up the current price.
It's generally a good idea to avoid more than trace amounts of inorganic foods. Just Sayin'...
if any regulation should be enacted, it's to restrict sanitizer use to waste handling, food prep, and healthcare use, which is where it may actually do some good reducing infection transmission, not in everyday activities where it's merely a potentially dangerous evolution-inducing palliative.

instead of regulation, let's just promote soap over sanitizer, which is as effective against pathogens without the unintended side-effects.
Related - and maybe off-topic.

I have never participated in any change.org campaign for a similar reason: You cannot sign to oppose, so you end up with an extremely distorted view of a given matter.
The "mining fleet", if it uses computers, requires electricity. Who controls the supply and sale of electricity.

Nothing against desire to solve world problems but Bitcoin (edit: or any other example of a cryptocurrency) seems to be creating more problems than it purports to solve.

The author calls cryptocurrencies a "predatory investment scheme". In practice, is this not correct. Is it not the lack of "law and order" with respect to cryptocurrencies that allows for this to occur. Please explain. Show me how cryptocurrency is solving world problems. Evidence, not speculation.

When I was young people said that "money" itself was the root of all evil. Today, people online try to convince us that "fiat currency" is the problem. It does not feel like the same idealism.

The original Satoshi paper made his idea sound like it would be possible to implement as peer-to-peer^1 without third parties. All the implementations I have seen to date involve third parties. Doubtful a coincidence that the third parties are all profiting from that involvement.

1. The term now has multiple meanings. Here it is used in the original, Napster sense. Peer-to-peer networking, not, e.g., peer-to-peer financial. Edit: To clarify further what I mean by peer-to-peer, can person A and B, assuming each knows how to reach the other through the internet (address:port), conduct a transaction without involvement of a third party. For example, a requirement for person A or B to "sign up for an account" with anyone else in order to start using a cryptocurrency would be "involvement of a third party". If persons A or B needed to have a third party "mine" the currency before transactions between A and B could occur, this would also be "involvement of a third party".
PyMOSP, a Python library to access MOSP
Technically you're not printing in 'black n white', only black, hence monochromatic printer.

The white is, of course, the areas on the paper that you're not printing, assuming you're feeding in white paper.
They really don't seem very similar at all in "look" here, and their measurements are all over the place.

https://s.tonsky.me/imgs/font_size.png
> Asking a citation for how the one-child (now two child) policy has worked for the last 40 years is pretty telling.

Come now, you're being willfully obtuse. Clearly I was asking for a citation about your claim that it's not ethnically motivated beyond "ask any Chinese citizen".

> I sure am glad we have experts rather than security state propaganda.

Well, you don't trust the media, and you don't trust independent researchers, but you totally trust the Chinese government, so I don't know how we're going to make progress. Seems like we should just agree to disagree.

(More “propaganda” from my HN feed: a journalist fleeing China for covering State treatment of Uighurs: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-56586655)
we keep on improving the experience (priority #1 :) ). Would love to get your feedback there!

Here are some articles:
https://docs.airbyte.io/tutorials/building-a-python-source
https://docs.airbyte.io/tutorials/toy-connector
https://docs.airbyte.io/integrations/custom-connectors
> This may not be _practical_ but it is obviously _possible_.

Not obvious
Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for Medicare: study
About a third of the batch is unable to complete their round every demo day season.
The problem might be less with the chemicals in the polish per se and more with the mechanical processes surrounding its manufacture and use. Many otherwise safe substances become explosive when aerosolized.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_explosion
In the real world, most AI is just a bunch of IF statements, anyway, just abstracted away enough that it's no longer obvious.
Jalopnik has it's fair share of memes and repetitive in-jokes (BMW blinkers, Mustangs hopping curbs). But there are are also some pretty insightful and knowledgeable threads. I've seen a couple of technical comments on certain vehicles that I'm absolutely convinced were written by an engineer that designed that vehicle.
I'm not sure if normal scanners detect UV light, but that would break a good chunk of their tracking purpose these days if they were not detectable in scans.
Happy World Backup Day
About what is MOSP:
https://objects.monarc.lu/about
Run noJS by default with something like uMatrix/uBlock Origin, and never worry about this or similar problems again.

All parts of a page for me, even 1st party, have JS disabled... you'd be surprised, most useful ones work completely fine like that and things load much faster. There's exceptions that do actually need it, and if I trust them, I'll enable 1st-party JS via uMatrix.
Nice, I was in the boat of trying almost anything too!! I had been to over 8 different physical therapists, massage therapists, chiropractors etc over the past 10 years spending well over 10-20K, hundreds of hours in travel and treatment (lost time) and nothing really stuck. The days of any _new_ pain are 100% over now, including turning my neck the wrong way and having a week long "can't turn my head" situation.

I feel like I have "found it" finally, and it has been at least 3 years since I read my first Sarno book.
It's actually a good question. They say 1/3 of the batch should raise easily, 1/3 less easily, 1/3 will struggle.

It's also with which fund you are raising. There are many funds for sure, but raising with the top tier VCs is definitely not 1/3 or even 1/10 of the batch.

Anyways, hopefully, this article was useful to you :).
Fortunately I had a few bottles from a few years ago. Was able to avoid the buying frenzy.

Good catch though!
So I buy the Haynes book for my car, wait for it to be shipped and delivered, then finally figure out how to do what I need to do. Then I put it away for 1-5 years until I need it again, and hope I don't forget where I put it.

Or you want me to build a friendship with a retired fridge repairman? I don't understand that one.

With youtube I get to watch a pro do it right in front of me for free instantly. There's nothing like it.

ifixit is good, though, I'll agree to that.
I performed a napkin calculation about percentage of criminal transactions using $100 bills [1].

[1] https://twitter.com/sergueyz/status/1365040381155491841

Quote: "$100 bill spans 22-23 years with about 20 operations per year, 450 operations in total, 220 for median. We need to calculate probability p that operation is not illicit. p=0.2^(1/220)=0.9927. Probability that operation is illicit is 1-p=0.0073 or 0.73%."

I was answering clearly biased twit about "only 1% of transactions using bitcoin are criminal and 70%-80% of $100 bills are used in criminal transactions". The calculation above is for worst case of 80%. For best case of 70% of transactions are illicit, the probability of single transaction being illicit drops to 0.55% (fifty five hundredths of percent).

Thus, bitcoin carries from one and a third (1.36=1/0.73) to almost twice (1.8=1/0.55) more percentage of illicit transactions than money.
Scram is actually an acronym:
- Start
- Cutting
- Right
- Away
- Man

Basically it was how they shut-down nuclear reactors by cutting a rope that would drop the controls rods into the reactor.

Side-note: I know this because I played an Atari 800 game called SCRAM growing up. It was pretty good!

Also reminds me of SNAFU - Situation Normal All Fucked Up.
I remember a YouTube video of a local news reporter about to interview a teacher for making a eyes-closed backwards basketball shot from half court. The news reporter tries this and with amazing luck, makes the half court blindfolded backwards shot.

In the top comment of the video jokingly said, “the 2 dislikes are from the teacher and her husband”.
The best I can offer is mediocre bro science. I stopped using a computer or any kind of device outside of working hours and (as my condition allowed) I lifted weights. Eventually my grip strength was solid and my pain was minimal. Then i took up brazilian jiu jitsu which requires significant grip strength in a bunch of angles. Fundamentally i believe that thoughtfully only using a keyboard during work and gaining significant grip strength over time gave me a much bigger buffer against RSI.
Core I9-11900K Overclocks to 7.3 GHz, a New World Record
That's what I was thinking. It is April 1st in certain parts of the world.
Isn't SWIFT such a standard? It's quite common to use it for bank transfers in Europe.
I've always been annoyed at the cross-platform story for Bluetooth. GATT is one of my favorite protocols because it is so simple, but writing simple code against this simple protocol is _not_ portable:

iOS and macOS have CoreBluetooth, Linux has BlueZ, Windows has Windows.Devices.Bluetooth and Android has android.bluetooth.

I've seen a few projects trying to fix this, like https://github.com/deviceplug/btleplug, and I hope one of them becomes production ready.
Why wouldn't you entertain this possibility? Both political parties have been very vocal about regulating or breaking up big tech. I think it's embarrassing to White House. Do you believe that Google would be above doing this for political reasons? Or do you Democrats would be above wanting to suppress this small dissent?
the US dollar is backed by the petrodollar arrangement: oil exporters accept dollars for oil in exchange for defense guarantees and other benefits. everyone needs oil, so everyone needs dollars. the dollar is inextricably tied to oil consumption and the US is strategically invested in it. add to this that the US military is the single largest institutional consumer of oil on the planet. there is no coherent argument that bitcoin is worse for the environment than this. bitcoin only wants cheap energy; it is agnostic about what generates it, and incentivizes renewables since they tend to be the cheapest.
You've gone off on several people now who got the exact same impression rather than accept maybe you're not a flawless communicator. You can't expect more charitable reads from others if you're not willing to be the first to give others the benefit of the doubt. This lashing out is definitely not going to convince people you thought about security in advance.
> The whole Unix "worse is better" thing seems to me like a specific instance of a more general principle.

That was the contention of the original article, if I recall it correctly.
> AR on the battlefield as describe above is a COD player wet dream and has no basis in reality.

I can only offer that I want to try it.
s/engagement/addiction/
A Eulogy for the Pit Trader
I think your only hope is to try and get the attention of someone higher up. They MAY have archives of this data recoverable, and MAYBE they can restore it without costing them an arm and a leg as a special one off if this gets some traction.

However I do know providers like this tend to run as lean as possible, so I could also imagine they wouldn't explicitly try not to hold any data longer then strictly necessary as not only does that storage cost, it would open up having to spend time and resources providing it to law enforcement when demanded.

I don't think personal credit limits is likely to occur. Companies wants to have the lowest amount of receivables possible, especially if they are looking for valuations. I think snapshotting and archiving this data for 90 or 180 days is more reasonable for long term customers of good standing (hell it probably would be worth it for retention).

If you get the data back, you might want to look at having a way to download the snapshots at least once a week, even if you just hold 2 on your development machine. Its not ideal, but it would at least limit the loss. Finally if you are charging a customer (assumed from the "service provider" usage), I would suggest looking at seeing if you can increase you price to cover storage on another provider.
Your first mistake was thinking that you are the user they care about serving :p
Little confused, you raised 1.8M in preseed, and then 5M in seed?
The deck is really not that important. Things that help you raise:

- good product
- good connections (accelerators do help)
- many many meetings
well, time for someone to build a third party dislike count and release browser extensions
Amazon expects employees back in their offices by autumn
It's nice to see some common sense on display. Removing him is the correct step. RMS is a known creep and very likely a pedophile, if his public opinions on child sex (and links to Minsky and Epstein) are anything to go by:

> I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.

I can't imagine what the reaction would be if any (perceived left leaning) other celebrity had said these words. The same trump supporting kids defending RMS would probably be trying to find where they live and threatening their families, no doubt about it.
I'm expecting that someday, my defense budget will be part of my Amazon Prime fees.
My experience with C++ is that every time I look at it every few years, C++ developers tell me that I'm stupid for wanting to do memory management the way it was done a few years ago and nobody has ever done that.
I would argue that it has waxed and waned. 50s most music was written by a composer. Have a songwriter behind a big name like Frank Sinatra. 60s has a surge of bands producing their own music in a smallish crew (Beatles, Beach Boys). But then arena rock was tightly controlled by the industry, but then Nirvana and grunge got big.
Cloudflare Pages[0] claims to have unlimited bandwidth, even for their free tier.

0. https://pages.cloudflare.com/#plans
what does that even mean
yes, not only cheaper but you get more cleaning power per ounce, since you're not paying for the added water.
Right. To be specific, the whole of the Local Group is available to humanity for exploration. That still has a trillion stars, with at least as many planets.

That's a lot of real estate!
C is an ~untyped language so this comparison isn't very helpful.
Ok... Let's put a end to this!

GOD CREATED LIFE!

There it is! I said it!

And I'm going to say even more: there is absolutely no scientific proof that shows otherwise.

In fact the complexity points keeps pointing this way. It's just a question of keeping the mind open. :)

Ok... You can now ban me for my comment!
> So they're aware that really most people don't really care any more.

Unless you are on the Apple Music team and have access to some study how would you know that?
Having been near the epicenter of it, this was more than just a "skeuomorphism was in" thing. It was a complete aesthetic and functional nightmare at the time. Apple employees, customers, developers, and press were horrified.

https://www.salon.com/1999/09/30/quicktime/

That being said, I understand that sometimes one needs to push boundaries of taste in order to make advances. I'm just sad that QuickTime Player had to be one of the sacrificial pikes upon which skeuomorphism died.
> but the network's value is a global distributed ledger of transactions (debt) that has proven to be fault tolerant over many years.

This strikes me as both true, and difficult to put any real value against. It's an existence proof more than practical use cases. Intuitively the value of that alone is both non-zero, and a lot less that BTC "valuation" - but where in between?
> If people's money starts losing value, the last thing they would do is to be concerned with interest rates. With less valuable money, people would simply be able to afford a smaller consumption basket and, thus, spending will stay flat & consumption will decrease.

If your money starts losing value, do you A) put it under the mattress or B) trade it for things that you can either use now or that retain/grow their value in the future?

Now, if you're talking about erosion of wages over, that's less of an issue of inflation, and more an issue of the power dynamic between owners of capital and owners of labour.

> Where did this come from? Just because the productivity would increase 10x / cost would decrease 10x, it does not mean that workers would receive 100% of the relevant benefits. Most likely, 90%, if not more, of those would be routed to business owners (and robots' owners, if the machines are leased instead of bought).

Sorry, I understand the confusion given I used the term 'salary'. I should have said something along the lines of 'value' or 'goods'. The split between workers and owners depends on the surrounding conditions.

The point is that dollars are tokens that represent goods produced, at the time they were produced. Not how much energy or effort went into those goods.
> A single track will have 50 names on it between writing, production, studio performance, etc.

This is something I've noticed more and more lately. The list of credits on everything is huge. I happened to see an episode of Family Guy the other day. I haven't regularly watched it for years, but noticed on this one there were literally minutes of credits at the beginning. It went on and on and on. I don't know why this is or what it means, but it's interesting.

> I'm consistently shocked when talking with my friend just how little music matters in the music industry. The people who make the most look good, sound good, and hell they're crazy talented. But they aren't the people who've written the lyrics or the melodies that define our culture. We probably can't name those people.

I don't think this is a new phenomenon by any means. I was reading the other day about The Beatles and how, when they became big in the USA, the professional songwriters of the time were worried because these guys wrote their own songs. Apparently it was almost unheard of at the time.
Indeed. We'll add it for the next round ;)
>the Chilton's or Haynes (I'm sure there's a difference but I sure couldn't tell) manuals will cover just about anything you'd want to do.

Chilton and Haynes both generally consist of vague instructions like "unscrew bolts and remove part x". They're good for identifying which components need to be removed for access, but they often offer very little in terms of where bolts are (sometimes there are pictures), or how to deal with problem areas (e.g. sometimes you need to wiggle or turn things a certain way).

Their limited instructions don't compare to watching someone actually do it and walk you through problem points simultaneously.
Hmm, that would only work if they knew exactly which documents were used to inform the press.
When you are reporting a video there is "Spam or misleading" option but then again you are left with YouTube algorithm deciding whether video is really "spam or misleading" or it is malicious report.

For the past couple of months I was regularly reporting group of spammers spamming links in comment sections but to this day I still see them running amok.
thanks! will read.
I lose my focus moving between two windows, and I'm always moving around, so I only ever have a laptop screen and not double monitors.

I use VSCode very happily after using Gedit for many years, and it's just the layout I'm attached to, I suppose.
The title is incorrect. This is not about removing dislikes but about now showing the dislike count.
Use better alternative platforms such as Odysee

Or if your fave content is only on Youtube, an alternative front-end such as Invidious
This is my biggest worry. I can't help but wonder (with a very uneducated and uninformed opinion here) if we are stoking or entering the next stage of an arms race.
Arizona app store antitrust bill is dead following Apple and Google lobbying
> not for IT division though

The only reason I know that company name is because I think they sold hard drives in the past, and/or showed up on my BIOS screen. So maybe IT people know it too.
God forbid anyone would imagine how this would this work. I wonder which scenario is more plausible, the one you responded to, or the one linked below?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26652386
YouTube transferred all the Trump's WH subs to Biden's WH - while Trump's WH had started with zero.

Very stupid idea and apparently requested by the Biden admin. Now you have millions of Trump subs just disliking every video.
There's multiple studies and multiple sets of data from Manaus. You'll have to be more specific. Which data, from which study, is untrustworthy?
That title doesn't seem to be correct, they're just not showing the exact number to anyone but the creator.
A lot of people think their particular political angle is of great importance to everyone else.
I had a terrible user experience trying to register with Digital Ocean and their customer support and decided to never use them.
New research cracks the mystery of how the first continents formed