skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A multicarrier DAS is $5-$10 per square foot up front and expensive to maintain - these costs typically do not fall on the carrier but deals can be struck depending on volume. 5G looks to minimize the number of locations that need a DAS in the first place so the places that couldn't get a deal don't need one and the ones that could can be covered cheaper by the carrier than the deal would have been for the carrier. Solutions like Wi-Fi Passpoint look to provide a far cheaper alternative (and avoid things like single carrier DAS which is cheaper but only fixes the problem for some) for cases density is sky high (like stadiums) or the location not otherwise coverable.

A DAS can certainly be an answer but it's never been a very attractive one, and that's from when there weren't other options on the horizon.
Yes, that's how they're issued.

But if they're still valued that years later, you've done something wrong. (You as in the team.)
What does it do to every other disease? Doesn't say much if it looks at a single factor outcome.
Is anyone using website blockers? I broke a Google News habit by modifying my Windows hosts file once, but there are more sophisticated solutions now. Quick search reveals tools like "Freedom" and "Cold Turkey".
I find it helpful to go back and read my old content on social media and simply ask myself if this is the type of person I want to be.
I have been extremely fortuante that women have always found me very attractive and there is not a single job I've had where female co-workers didn't make comments at work which would not have been seen as extremely inappropriate the other way around. Even when I was 19 and I got my first job some 30+/40+ year old female co-workers heavily flirted with me in the most inappropriate way. I'm not gonna lie, I enjoyed it for many years and definitely have had many fond memories because of it, but equally it has shaped me of how I think of some of the outrage which is happening nowadays the other way around.

I even had married women behave extremely inapproriate, with some groping me in various places, getting me drunk at work parties and trying to get me make a first move if they felt bad about doing it themselves.

It's not like all women at work acted unprofessionally with me, but there was enough inappropriate behaviour that everyone knew about it and guess what, not a single women told another women that this behaviour was not ok.

Interestingly, after I got into a serious relationship and stopped to accept such behaviour I have had many women above me to turn on me and treat me as if I offended them by not flirting back.

All I know is that all humans are the same. Let's pay women an equal wage but please let's not pretend that women in power are any better than men.
I think how you use a thing might make for some middle ground. Facebook has consumed many forums I use for my hobby, and so I now go to Facebook for that. I don't read my feed or whatever it's called, I only go for some very specific groups which focus on a single interest. No doom scrolling, no anger, just the occasional sense of awe at the creativity people in those groups are capable of.

The old way my family and friends used to use social media (keeping in touch and up to date on family stuff) has migrated to first Whatsapp and now Telegram.

I do however doomscroll on Pintrest, although for positive reasons -- primarily inspiration, and some learning.
Do you believe the protest is working well, achieving meaningful change? Have protestors so far been able to stem the slide toward 1984?
I don't say you should not fight back. Racism has to be fought!

I hope we can all agree that in 90% of the cases we can hear on the tone in the voice what the poster meant. If unclear ask and if racism occurs report the ** out of him :D
Bullshit. Heroin is addictive no matter your biology or background. So are certain psychological triggers and mechanisms. Even the well adjusted get angry when they see various forms of abuse, for example. So if news is framed as abuse, victimization, etc it will trigger your oh so well adjusted self.

To illustrate my point I’ve deliberately inserted “bullshit” as my preface and “oh so well adjusted” as sarcasm. Be honest with yourself about how this anger inducing copy compels you to reply. You may not. But the feeling exists because you have similar triggers to the rest of us, and it is these that are being exploited.

Ps: Sorry about the sarcasm. Hopefully it makes the point.
Ok let’s play which country you are referring too? I know for a fact that in the UK, Netherlands, Israel and Switzerland it’s not the case.

I can’t think of a single country in the EU either in which you can trade any asset for another without a capital gains assessment.
Women have for years had the same fear of men. Most men, good people. Or at least not criminally bad. But some are. But the social stigma of women going out alone at night, fear of first dates etc. has permeated the social fabric of how women have to treat men on their day to day. I've yet to encounter a woman who has gone from internalizing this aspect of society to dropping their priors and living care free without fear of men they don't know / met for the first time.

They have had decades, minimum, of this just being how things are. And things have not found a way to change to a more easy going society. If anything things have just hardened up as information and media have become more prevalent. In comparison, powerful people fearing being potentially (mis)interpreted not being worth the risk to their entire career is a relatively new phenomenon. I wager that the OP of this article doesn't have a solution to the problem of trust by investors, because women have yet to discover the solution to their own generalized mistrust of men outside their direct social circle despite how long that situation has gone on for.

Until the risk / reward dynamic changes (and I do not see how it could without making people less accountable), I fully anticipate that this self censorship in society will not only just continue, but will yet increase further in an information society where powerful people can be made accountable by the public as stories of people being held to account to their actions, regardless of whether those actions were deliberate, accidental or misunderstandings.
Why would you give a large company "some leeway" when entering into a contract with them? Expect them to exercise the language they put in the contract!
Worse yet, it's destroying the fabric of our society. I've know my neighbor since I was a kid, always having a friendly relationship. Just yesterday we were talking about my uncle and somehow he jumped how angry he was at "Coke for training their employees to 'be less white'". So I pull out my phone, and first hit is a fact-check showing it's a right-wing, culture war fabrication. I see the same on the other side with younger generation. We've lost a shared set of facts.

Social media and the filter bubble it creates is destroying our country by radicalizing people with addictive disinformation.
I'm confused as to where the comment you replied to claimed that the media claimed that "7 people died" as a result of being gunned down in the street. Was there an edit?
Do you mean understanding what the words are or what they're talking about? I can understand the words in Two Ways to Play, but I would have had a lot of gaps in Poke Chop Sandwich if I hadn't already looked at the lyrics. I have little, if any, idea of what either of them are actually talking about. I get the vague sense that Poke Chop Sandwich might be their version of Fat Bottomed Girls by Queen ("waiting in the sack" and "gonna get some" might support this). Two Ways to Play is probably about a relationship, but I can't tell for sure what the problem is or what the singer is saying he wants to do about it. In any case, it seems like he wants to try again, but I can't entirely grasp what he's expressing about his philosophy of relationships.
US Social Security cards used to say "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" but I guess it's just too hard to pass up a good primary key.
A person or group whom is wronged seems to instinctively react by desiring that particular wrong to be corrected.

It is sadly rare for any to take a full step back and view the wrong within the broader context and redress the true wrong(s) which lead to the individual persecution and often a myopically inverse racist or sexist or group-ist patch that still fails to address the root cause of the issue(s).
I'm really curious if the purported consequences of an accusation of sexism are so harmful for these wealthy investors. For example, Ellen Pao filed a lawsuit against Kleiner Perkins and wrote a whole book about sexist behavior she experienced while working there. That got a ton of publicity - what has the long-term impact been? Kleiner Perkins seems to be doing fine. I'm not saying investors don't perceive a risk here - many people are concerned about their reputation, but this idea that someone's career would be ruined doesn't appear to square with reality.
Well, from the article: "This result, which the researchers themselves describe as "unexpected", could be linked to the fact that the named CV allows the recruiter to be more sympathetic to shortcomings in the application letter ("gaps" in the curriculum, little experience)."

That shows two things: inequality is real, and some recruiters are actively trying to compensate for it, which has a positive effect overall.

The inequality problem is unfortunately a very tough nut to crack, that would require several decades of consistent policy, which is completely unattainable in the current political situation (with governments randomly changing policies every few years in a direction or another).
Tired ideological tropes are flamebait. Please don't do that here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
It is not the outrage, but the outrageous, that is responsible.
Yes, already in early stages of development.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec3vIdpoPIM
Outrage is a problem, but I don't think it's just (social) media that are responsible. The article says that things are better than they were 100 years ago, but politically speaking I'm pretty sure they're not better than they were 20 or 40 years ago, and they may well be worse. In the US and UK, at least, democracy seems pretty creaky.

So yes, your outrage is being gamed, but it is also real. The challenge is to channel it into something useful, and (social) media is little help with that.

Edit: on brief reflection, maybe (social) media is the problem after all, since perhaps politicians themselves are now optimising (social) media exposure via maximum outrage, and chance the consequences.
> Being self-employed does have a monthly quota but it only kicks in after I think 2 years (first 6 months gratis, second 6 months small fee, third 6 months bigger fee and so on), so you can get up and running relatively cheap.

Nope, there are some exemptions, but if you want to run a business (even self-employed) in Spain, you need to pay 300€/month, even if you have zero revenue.
Well I don't think it has to be taken so literally. 1% of the news is actual new info that you should know, the other 99% is repetition, opinion, speculation, propaganda, etc. You can check the news once a day from a reasonably neautal source and know all the relevant information.
So, to summarize-the-summary: there are four possible theories:

1. Direct-jump from bat population

2. Started in bats, came to humans through intermediate animal

3. Came from frozen food outside of China

4. Lab accident.

I used to think the lab accident theory was crazy, because it sounds like a science fiction movie. Not an impossible theory, just a crazy one.

But according to this article, despite a year of investigation, (1) is unlikely because we haven't found anyone that interacted with the nearest bat population hundred of miles away that didn't work in the virus lab in Wuhan and that caught the virus, (2) is unlikely because we would have found the intermediate animal by now, (3) is unlikely because the first case found was in China (and not somewhere else... if frozen food had the virus, the food would have had it before it was frozen, and someone else would have had it), and (4) is unlikely because a government famous for blocking information and is paranoid about how it is perceived domestically and internationally says "No, trust us on this one."

At some point, crazy theories become the most likely. Hopefully I'm wrong though, and they find an explanation that isn't "lab accident." It seems like we should be studying viruses and sharing that information with each other, and accidents like this will make it more likely that such research doesn't happen.
Outrage is one part of the problem but it's the lack of shame and guilt that allows it to flourish. People are too insulated from feeling shameful about their own behavior these days. Everyone's got a quick excuse to justify their animalistic behaviors now
I think that applies to all languages, not only English?
Things that work in some context may turn fairly dangerous outside of it.

An example. Being hungry and finding high-calorie food is, in our natural state, a very important mechanism for survival. Our tribal ancestors wouldn't have survived all the famines and periods of bad luck or bad weather if we weren't programmed to seek high-calorie food.

Unfortunately, in the developed world of 2021, we have so much cheap high-calorie food in our lives that blind obedience to the ancient "gorge yourself!" impulse is killing us.

The same applies to outrage. Twitter is an outrage mall, with outrage screaming at you from every shop window there. It is not in anyone's interest to buy it all.
The problem is that it's a username that is used as a password. In Europe you'd use some kind of tax identification number plus a physical copy of an ID card or driving license.

My identification number is algorithmically derived from place and date of birth, first and last name and gender. Anybody who knows my address and has heard someone greeting me happy birthday can guess mine with two-three trials corresponding to the closest hospitals. But that doesn't worry me, because I don't fear identity theft, it just doesn't exist in Italy.

Instead, as a result of America's allergy to ID, they are essentially the only country where identity theft is a thing.
The important question today is what we would have done if Joseph McCarthy had been right. If (in some bizarre parallel universe) he was somehow right about Communists doing...Communist things and we all definitely agreed on this, would we have applauded his tactics?

The cancel culture crowd today seem to think yes. They look to him as an idol and see his only flaw as his unjust cause.

I don’t think I agree. Extrajudiciality should be shunned in all its forms even if it leads to bad people meeting bad ends.
>>My question is, is this even sexism at all?

There is a danger of getting overly semantic, but also a danger of ignoring the importance of semantics to perspective here. Sexism as opposed to sexists. Sexism, using the term as the the GP does, is how they behave towards or speak to her. That's what sexism is regardless of why it is. It affects her or the workplace the same way whether it is because of "exclusionary assholes" or unintended chilling effects.

Gravity in a box is equivalent to acceleration.

That said, you have a point too. From your (me also) perspective, there's a snookered conclusion to this story. Inasmuch as Twitter mobs are scary, some people are opting out of joining the girls for a drink.. sometimes advisably.
While I am glad you have found inner peace or some thing ignoring the world won't make it any less shitty for those who have to deal with the consequences. While social media is fueling outrage people have reasons to be angry with the world and to ignore it is to be ignorant of the problems that real people have to deal with.
USA Today editor alleges 'white authority' after being fired for a tweet
The book "the design of everyday things" by Don Norman deals with this for design. I think he even coined the term?
>It does mimic an MLM-Pyramid and Ponzi scheme

It does so because it is.
Considering that the topic is "men clamming up" I don't think that's a fair criticism. The author has a right to choose what her topic is.
yeah because you can't talk about this stuff openly without getting cancelled, unless you aren't white or male.
Slightly edited title to fit char limit. Mods, feel free to change to fit.
Of course employing someone to help you target your product to as many people as possible makes sense. But employing someone just because they tick an (arbitrary) box makes no sense in a competitive field.

Just think about sports teams.
How come other professions like Law and Medicine were able to make huge progress overcoming similar problems while tech continues to lag behind?

This is not an intractable problem.
I remember when I started working I got hooked on this subreddit tumblrinaction. At first it was just funny "Oh PC culture you're so ridiculous,", but over a few months it got really dark and I started impulsively heading there to feed this weird anger. On reflection I realized it was the same thing that happened to a family member with Fox News, but here it happened much more quickly.
When you cancel man for saying stuff and then you later complain no man wants to hang out with you...
You can clearly see this in action: open reddit in an incognito tab and half of the posts on the front page are from outrage “porn” subreddits: PublicFreakouts, JusticeServed, instant_regret, IdiotsInCars. Go ahead and try it.

Outrage is highly engaging.
Flax Engine 1.1 released with Linux editor support
It's crazy how 75%+ of the content on reddit has the single unifying theme of "this should outrage you"
While I 100% agree with you, I think 2 things are somewhat implied in the article: that a ton of the outrage bait is in bad faith, overblown or in some instances completely fabricated, and that everyone will not do what you say everyone should do, so the outrage machine will continue. If these are both true, then yes, the solution 99% of the time is to tune out. And where it isn't, when something is really that bad and so important to you, just getting outraged about it makes you feel like you care even though you aren't doing anything. Discuss it clearly, without getting emotional, and if it is really important, try to do something about it if you can.
> giving privileged view to a random scale

The piano gives that privileged view as well.

There have been some attempts to remedy this (Janko) but nothing that really succeeded. The inertia to change is tremendous.
Yet no way for page good numbers if you print a website (e.g. not counting the cover page etc.).

First example also fails on my wider screen and on my phone XD
One of the forums that I post on has a thread specifically designed for requesting a suspension of your account to either take a break or cool down. It's recorded as a requested suspension, and moderators do not use it when factoring any future suspensions for breaking rules.

I generally take a three month break twice a year, several months apart, when I find myself too sucked into what is going on there. Sure, I miss some of the "drama", but those sabbaticals are what makes sure that my side projects are productive.

One of these days, I'm going to ask that they upgrade the suspension into a full on ban, but we're not quite there yet. There's too much nostalgia in that place for me to be ready to completely let go.
Yeah, but it involves a lot of development. I made this a few months back : https://github.com/ugomeda/esp32-epaper-display

I'm working on a more "user-friendly" version :)
This emphasizes the need to keep efficient military forces and resilient civil infrastructure even at times when everything is going well and you are as strong as ever.

Something bad may happen without much warning. It actually does, at small scale, as of recently, and shows how poorly the western civilization is prepared.
But in the modern environment, a lot of people can't take a few minutes, because they're exposed to too many things that anger them. A Twitter poweruser can easily see 100 maddening tweets in a day, and most are unlikely to have the 5 free hours it would take to investigate each.
How does the Mersenne's Twister work?
I’m a white cis male, and I work as a software engineer at a Silicon Valley unicorn. My employer is a perennial darling of the HN crowd, and is likely to continue its rocket ride in the years to come.

I’ll be completely candid here: I have some kind of problem with women. This isn’t to say that I don’t like women or don’t want women to succeed. I just don’t want to associate with or be seen around women. I’m sure there’s some kind of deep reason for this, but I haven’t exactly been looking for it.

On the other hand, I’m a huge believer in the “live and let live” principle. I found a good way of reconciling these two sides of my personality. Whenever I’m thrust into a situation in which I must interact with women, I gracefully extricate myself from it.

I’m very sneaky about this too. Sometimes my departure can be performed swiftly, but other times I must maneuver over a period of days or weeks to get myself away from an unpleasant situation. I’m never overt about it, I never hurt anyone in the process, and I’m pretty confident that no one has any idea that I’m like this.

In the past I’ve had to abandon projects I was working on, and even ditched maintainership of a popular open source project because a female coworker started contributing to it. Given that I’ve been doing this for a couple of decades, I’m willing to say that I’d do more or less anything to get away from women, as long as no one gets hurt. Yes, it might take a while, and I might need to make some sacrifices, but I’ll eventually get away.

Of course this started way before Twitter mobs and cancel culture became a thing, so I can’t claim prescience. But I do permit myself a little smugness at this point in time. I think I’m pretty much cancel-proof.
I would argue that people whose emotions are easily affected by an external influence is the definition of not-well-adjusted.
Nitpick: PVC sinks in water. That would make it over 1g/cm³.

Polypropylene and polyethylene do float, but don’t come near 0.05g/cm³. They’re closer to 0.9g/cm³ (https://www.plasticseurope.org/en/about-plastics/what-are-pl...). That’s close to icebergs.
Is it not possible to use refinement types to erase some (but maybe not all) runtime checks but still maintain a type safety guarantee?
Interesting pivot from identity politics to "opinions they don't like." One is discrimination, the other is business as usual. I wouldn't conflate the two.
Have you felt the need to fix rape and murder, which other men have given to society in a manner far over representative relative their demographics?

Maybe if this author was encouraging twitter lynch mobs with scant evidence it would be an apt point, but I don't think there is any sign of that. She doesn't owe the world anything because some other women did something.
The same happens if people stopped caring about the yellow rock.

People stop mining gold only because it’s valueless.

People stop mining bitcoin because it’s valueless.
I remember this guy flying a drone over a whole in a lake. Its been a long time, maybe someone else has seen it. Its like a whole in the middle of a lake, and water floats in.
So I guess it some ways its like the exact opposite of this video.
That is a symptom not the cause. News agencies have had to slash their budgets and can no longer afford to send journalist to cover stories
But the speed at which the earth is approaching the sun makes a biggers difference than your flight of stairs?
I don't blame the media for this. The media just magnifies a very real and sizable aspect of our culture that already exists.

Just like how these people are seeking someone to blame, you are seeking the same when you blame the media. It's not just the media, what's going on here is something we're all responsible for.