skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I find this very wrong in a couple of ways. Firstly, yes you can lose weight through upping your BMR through introducing more muscle onto the body, essentially giving yourself a bigger engine.

However, as you say you cannot outrun your fork, well you also cannot outlift your fork either.

Your body burns its carbohydrate and fat stores when exercising through cardio, now if you're going to the gym and running on a treadmill for 20 minutes you're unlikely to burn much. But if you do this consistently outside multiple times a week, you will absolutely see changes provided you aren't overeating.

This idea that cardio doesn't burn calories or help you lose weight is ludacris. If this was the case, every triathlete, cyclist or runner would be overweight.
> Expect this stuff to change drastically in the next 5 years.

Bwahaha... is this your first encounter with backwards compatibility?

Changing this would be very hard, but this has nothing to do with somebody embracing some grand philosophy, but with tons of existing software relying on Unix like systems to, well ... be Unix-like, because that's what the software was written for.
Mind sharing those places where they do post?
Your remarks kind of sound pretty dismissive of and attacking towards Anglo-Saxon culture and I think some people get tired of hearing about supposed "Dutch superiority." The Dutch don't have everything beautifully and perfectly sorted, though they do appear to have a better track record in certain respects than average.

The Dutch cultural tendency to be very blunt is probably not helping your case.

I'm leaving this comment in hopes of being personally helpful to you as an individual and it's probably foolish for me to do so. It would probably be better for me to say nothing, but it's just kind of a pet peeve of mine so to speak, so I am doing it anyway.
Yes that has been my experience dealing with _almost_ every black person, frankly. I am just saying it how it is.
> Also, are really downplaying what happened and ignoring the fact that it could have ended up much worse for KP.

I'm curious to hear what I'm downplaying here. We're talking about a very rare case where the individual making the accusation had the wherewithal both to file a lawsuit against the company and to write a mass market book that got tons of publicity. And the company won the lawsuit and is doing just fine. Doesn't that mean the risk of real, actual consequences is vanishingly small?
I’m not sure why you’re getting downvoted but somebody else has posted an excellent LWN article about the Libreoffice enterprise licensing issue and one of the biggest problems faced by LibreOffice commercial proponents is that MS has historically provided such lousy (non existent) support that people have started believing that it’s absolutely all right for your office suite to have little to no support. Even in enterprise environments. But you would not expect such poor support from any other software, especially if you were paying $100/yr for it, or a few hundreds for a perpetual license.
The WHO has issued guidance in 2015 to avoid naming issues such as you described from continuing to occur.

https://www.who.int/news/item/08-05-2015-who-issues-best-pra...
> Yes, this is extremely common and extremely frustrating.

Particularly when you can raise billions by being confidently wrong.
Recent, 1999:

https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/18376/ADMesc.html
I believe it's most/all varieties. See e.g. https://usapears.org/pear-ripening-and-handling

However, I think many people are used to the taste of unripe pear - it's sweet enough, and quite crisp, and some people prefer them that way. As it sits on the counter, though, it becomes softer and sweeter over time.
Volunteering yourself, or others?
> Your comment only works if it’s possible to construct your words so precisely that there is no way to misinterpret them.

Not really. We have a responsibility for the effects of our actions. There is a practical limit to how far we can take worrying about those effects, but that doesn't mean the responsibility goes away.

The same is true for considering how different audiences will interpret your words. You have a responsibility do take those interpretations into consideration but there is a practical limit to how far it can be taken.

However, I believe the listener shares some of the responsibility to consider other (possibly more generous) interpretations beyond their initial reaction.

If both parties do this, is is remarkable how quickly disputes get resolved. If neither party does this, a conversation accomplishes nothing.
What happens if you put your head in a particle accelerator?
No, since investors have nothing to fear when they give criticism to males, since they can predict the outcome to about 99%.

With female its the potential unknown predictability that causes the fear.
There would need to be a billion people in the US for us to run out of SSNs. I find it highly unlikely that our population will triple in 70 years. The Census Bureau finds it unlikely, too, considering they expect us to add only 76m by 2060. They could also decide to re-use the SSNs of those who have been dead for decades.
It is not known how long Japanese Encephalitis immunity lasts, according to Wikipedia.
You may have also noticed that one of the most active stories on HN right now is 'How U.S. media lost the trust of the public'.
I see that AndroidStudio was released in 2013. Intellij was pretty well established by that point. No doubt this deal helped them grow far faster than they would have otherwise.
Population density and politics probably plays a bigger deal than capita as a metric though.
How many gs of acceleration would that take? Sure, you could accelerate your mass to a gamma of 6000 or so, and then back down, in half a day, and do it all again for the return trip, but would you still be alive at the end?
This is how I make pbcopy/pbpaste work on both Linux and WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux).

if [[ "$(uname)" == "Linux" ]]; then
if ! grep -q Microsoft /proc/version; then
alias pbcopy='xsel --clipboard --input'
alias pbpaste='xsel --clipboard --output'
else
alias pbcopy='clip.exe'
alias pbpaste='powershell.exe -command "Get-Clipboard"'
fi
fi
> The important parts are in the US Constitution and comprise the important core principles, particularly the Bill of Rights. Australia is pretty decent, because Australia is pretty comparable in that regard

Australia's constitution doesn't have a Bill of Rights.

And why focus on the Constitution over the Declaration? The Constitution wasn't even adopted until 7 years after the Revolutionary War was over.

> Not if it's a veiled attack on the principles.

Which principles?

In many cases, those who criticise America's founding fathers do so, not because they reject worthy principles, but because they see the contribution that those men made to those principles as being overstated.
This is a fair question - not sure why you are getting down votes.

Background - I'm actually on the left a fair bit. So one issue - you are not supposed to really ask minorities / women to explain / teach you / help you deal with these issues because it in fairness burdens them. I'm not looking for that either.

In terms of my colleague who I'd mentored in past (before things had gotten more extreme). I think others have made good suggestions - do you want some suggestions that may have already been made (it's never truth really - just another persons guess) or comfort.
I've added a special exclusion to a robot.txt file for a specific article. It was some years ago while in college. The article in question was about the presentation of an assisting professor who had some kind of misunderstanding with the campus newspaper and therefore the article wasn't especially positive in tone. Couple of years later I was the sys admin of the newspaper website and a letter arrived in my university email. The professor had found that I'm responsible for the website and had sent me a tearful story about how this article is ruining her life, because it is the top Google result for her name, and how she had spent thousands of dollars on scammers who had promised to change that, and she was asking me to remove the piece. Long story short, I forwarded the case to the newspaper editor at the time and she agreed to let me add a line to the robot.txt.

Edit: newspaper -> newspaper editor
Giant Ship Is Moved To and Fro to Break Suction: Suez Update
>Tell me why you don't believe that specific source and give me something more than just cynicism and doubt, show me something that has the same rigor from whatever you're trying to justify.

This is completely upside down. Necessary skepticism (not cynicism) should always be your default mindset, not blind trust. If a specific source makes a claim then the burden of proof is on that source to provide evidence for their assertion. It is in many ways analogous to science or mathematics. You should never simply believe an assertion that comes without the underlying data or proof that supports that assertion.

Unfortunately legacy media (most newspapers, all corporate owned networks) have devolved into a toxic soup made up of opinions and evidence-free assertions from unnamed sources (assertions which often turn out later to be false). Well-sourced, well-written, fact-based journalism is practically non-existent. The critical role of the 4th estate is to be a watchdog over the government and other loci of power. Instead the 4th estate has been subsumed by the powerful, and effectively acts as another propaganda arm of the political parties and various powerful corporate interests.
On software, i.e. the things with UIs, dude, not in physical shops.
They can be turned off for release mode, and the SPARK subset of Ada can use them in formal verification, proving that the conditions hold true for all inputs statically, eliminating the need for any checks.

I think the performance impacts are usually not as big as you think (the Ada compiler is smart enough to eliminate redundant checks where it can), and I believe that they can be turned off per package, too, so for performance critical modules they can be deactivated in release mode.

I do not think contracts were intended to raise recoverable errors in a normal application's behavior; if they are triggered, then the program is incorrect, not just encountering an error. I think most developers would leave them on in release mode (if possible) just to get stack traces and exception messages to see what failed.
Maybe not PhD, but as a research topic, I think doing this well is an interesting task. I learned that ceilings are not featureless. (I know, it's a kind of ridiculous to say I "learned" this, since I could have learned this from, oh well, looking at my ceiling just now, but it really was a surprise when I encountered this in machine learning data context.)

Ceilings often have lightings! Lightings (either on and off) vary between geography and culture! (They do! Extreme variations!) Lightings, if on, will cause flares! We just sampled from actual distribution (privacy policy included we can monitor connection for anti-abuse and we can use data for research and development of anti-abuse), but dataset collected with care will be valuable. I am sure actually doing this will reveal other considerations, and even just with points I mentioned, it should be good enough for a paper, if not for PhD.
No wonder Galactus is so hungry.
This is great. It reminds me of the old web when people would do silly things like this purely for fun and not as a way to promote something.
I think personal biases (especially confirmation bias) usually end up interfering /strongly/ in these kinds of topics.
The society must work for each individual, if it doesn't, it causes issues like this.

That's why the Soviets failed, their incentive system totally doesn't work for majority of the individuals. Individuals are not to fault here as in there.
So is the "if it's possible, they certainly would have done it to visit us" leap of (non)logic.
"Given the prevailing yuppie sociopathy of the typical BMW driver, I think the majority of them would laugh at paying money to consider people besides themselves unless it benefited them somehow." - What would George Carlin say?
That sounds like the problem in a nutshell. "X is simple, so just gin me up a data set of it." (Four months later) "X is not simple, in all these ways..." Which is another way of saying that discovery and communication with SMEs is an important side skill in project success.
Building the 555 Timer out of Vacuum Tubes [video]
I'm not so bothered by this personally because it's not someone asking / giving advice and getting blasted by it. That's the real crux that I see.

The scenario you paint is uncomfortable - only because there have been a fair number of situations (music and elsewhere) where the white person really has raked in the cash off a minorities good idea.

Luckily my friend was the competitor trying to compete in a market much more crowded than she perhaps realized.
The Federalist Society is more nakedly pro corporate than trying to protect "institutionally connected organizations." They don't try to hide this bias either.
Then I might try Zork....

Honestly, I probably wouldn't, I don't want my mental vagaries of what a Grue looks like to be set by some random image.
At first I was like this must be Tokyo!

Zoomed out and found out I was in Boston.
But how about making lovecraftian horrors come into being!
I think this is a good framing. Note I always frame as a suggestion rather than a critique - ie, places to increase focus.
Respectfully, and with kindness not provocation: This "you know what I meant" sensibility, when many people don't know what you mean or simply have very different bedrock views that must first be engaged with and laboured on (if not you, then by someone) -- I feel this is part of the chilling effect of the view you're espousing here, and which others are downvoting you for <3

To clarify, i am not talking about pedophilia here, but other "obvious" things
Not necessarily. The crime scene was a diplomats residence, but the ddg results for the name are for some kind of New York businessman who might have been a guest. The dismissal of the case might have been an out-of-court agreement with lots of money involved.
I know someone who works in the arts and for them the patriarchy or racism (or some kind of oppression) is the cause of every problem because that’s the current culture of the arts. But if it’s the answer to every question, it isn’t the answer to any question. We would be better off just assuming that, discarding it, and looking for some other cause
All of news is opinion. That's how you get news! People decide what's noteworthy, or notable about it. You would literally not have news if people did this. You'd just be reading every single blade of grass or bug or bird or sneeze or sleepless night.
The US media was never trustworthy, i.e. worthy of trust. Pulitzer named prizes after himself but he was a propagandist for the democratic party and pioneered yellow journalism.

It was just easier for them to get away with lies before mass adoption of the Internet allowed anyone to point out their lies.
We have a couple of black sapote trees in our yard; sounds similar.
This happens every single time someone argues rhetorical hyperbole. I use it as a filter to know who not to take seriously on any legal analysis.
Not going to lie, this is sort of bad ass!
So we design cult missiles and send that at other star systems, sounds like a pretty hostile weapon.
I was implying LitHTML in my question, but yes, it's pluggable in LitElement. So I'll rephrase, how does it compare to LitHTML?
Yes I think people are commenting and downvoting without any context on what has led to this - people are not in fact happy to pay for support and think they’re fine without it.
In a culture where there are huge negative consequences for being labeled a $BAD_PERSON on twitter, people are obviously going to be more careful with everything they say. To expect them to behave differently is nonsense. You can't expect everyone to want to risk their careers and face painful, public, humiliating backlash for your own benefit. It's normal and healthy for people to want to protect themselves, in the same way that it's normal not to immediately trust strangers.

The real problem is the cancel culture. That's what needs to be fixed. A twitter mob shouldn't be able to cause as much damage as they do. There should be laws preventing people from being fired because of social media. Maybe everyone who's ever been fired or had negative career consequences due to a twitter mob should get together and bring on a massive class-action lawsuit. Force twitter to fix their toxic lynch mob problem, and let that be an example for any other social media company that wants to capitalize on harmful gossip and mob behavior.
>Great tool for getting an idea how big this thing is.

For me, it puts it into perspective how narrow the Suez canal is. Yes, Evergiven is a large boat, almost as large as my local mall, but when rotated at an angle is only 2-3 of my small neighborhood blocks wide.
>There is NO POSSIBLE WAY anyone can be this incompetent.

All this stuff is designed and built by hardware companies. I haven't used a single piece of software written by a hardware company that didn't suck (not counting Apple as a hardware company). If hardware companies can't (or don't care about) writing decent software even when a bad user experience can affect their bottom line, I can't imagine they're particularly likely to write secure software.

This probably won't change unless hardware companies stop paying so poorly, as anyone who can code well can get a huge salary increase just by moving from a hardware company to a software company.
Yes, I usually answer the “there are too many people” allegation with “you first”.
AWD and RWD: Why you should use RWD?
Works for non vegetarians
A good point.

It was basically as part of scoring of ideas. I think in the weaknesses box the panelist had noted lack of experience / plans with respect to X and Y. So while I would make a suggestion, this was probably more in critique space.

The issue was more - unless you'd been in the space, you wouldn't realize that THIS issue was actually perhaps very important in the products success. Since I'd been a part of a business that had gotten TROMPED on for a similar set of non-product issues - it hit home.
I think the amount of people doing silly things like this has certainly gone down in relative terms, but probably gone up in absolute terms (think of the statistics about how many people gain access to the internet for the first time every day-- they can't all deny their human impulse to make silly things!).
Exactly, in fact it’s the opposite of anything. I’ve seen plenty of life sciences companies where the bioinformatics team was added on long after founding the company, almost as an afterthought.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/supreme-revenge/

Frontline on the disastrous effects of the Federalist society and Mitch McConnell.
That outlet is a US psyop.
Except, could you imagine a software ecosystem where 95% of the software is vulnerable to injection, and nothing is ever done about it, and there is no clear easy solution for developers either, and you have a legion of users who turn technology into a religion and think there's nothing wrong at all with Unix terminals.

It also probably doesn't help that the problem is unfixable in general without rewriting so much software... and that things mostly work okay, most of the time.
Ships waiting for the Suez Canal to open
Nomura Crashes Reporting Record $2BN Loss from “Transactions with a US Client”
I just spent 20 minutes trying to find an article by Bryne Hobart vaguely in this area [0], but for personal messaging. The idea being if you control the storage (or deletion) you can avoid casual or speculative regulatory interest in your chat logs.

(apologies it's on medium, I couldn't find it anywhere else)

[0] https://byrnehobart.medium.com/the-stealth-regulatory-arbitr...
Ask HN: Best DIY home security system?
I am sick of relying on my isp’s home security package with poor hardware and questionable service.

How can you do your own security system and still have the ability to notify a security service during alerts?
Viewing a 2D space from a higher dimension can make it obvious that the 2D space is not a flat plane, but is curved and warped. Some pairs of points in the 2D space may be closer together in 3D space than they appear while confined to the 2D space.

There is a 3D/4D equivalent, but it can't be visualized, and it's unknown whether it has any possible physical meaning.
The thing is, the virus already had a name. He just refused to call it by its official name, because that wasn't offensive enough for him.
If you use a tiling window manager (and why wouldn't you?!) you don't need a background.

I guess a lot of people here use a Mac. Amethyst for MacOS provides the same basic features as i3.
I think your reaction is a normal response given what happened to you.
I’m sorry for your loss.

Yes, we want to have control over destiny, and depending on the negative event may reserve anger at creation or things and beings within it.

However, what the GP and GGP are referring to are intellectually avoidable. It’s mainly there because of social indoctrination and its effect on reason and judgement. Especially the young who are impressionable and believe these things uncritically. It’s sad to say, but they’re being taken advantage of by these charlatans.

It’s really not serving them. Long term it’s untenable, medium turn, people, thinkers, influencers, interested parties make some money on this.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyonic_antitelephone
If the greys figured out how to achieve FTL, then they probably also have the means to be covert as well - assuming passive observation is their goal in the first place.
Society's perception of what qualifies as sexist has changed drastically in a few years. Who knows, maybe well meaning criticism will be considered truly sexist by society in another 10 years. Why take the risk?
As someone that quit caffeine over quarantine, I cannot even imagine slurping half a gram of pure caffeine. I probably wouldn't sleep for a few days and I'm certain my teeth would chatter my filings out. I know it's an experiment and the people were consented, but man, that seems a bit ... mean. There's no way I can see having that much caffeine nowadays and not be a total wreck.
Here's the problem: Event A at location X at time T1 causes event B at location Y at time T2 > T1. If I can travel FTL, I can find a frame of reference where T2 < T1 - that is, where the effect comes before the cause. This leaves a few possibilities, and they're all bad:

- There is no real cause and effect.

- Cause and effect are real, but effects can come before causes.

- The laws of physics are not the same in all frames of reference.

Our current understanding/belief is that some things really do cause other things, that causes always precede effects, and that the laws of physics are the same in all frames of reference.
Any there any other world bottlenecks similar to Evergiven?
Cobalt production could be an example. Did you know that more than 70 percent of the world's cobalt is produced in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)? Cobalt is used for batteries in electric cars, computers, and cell phones.
That's easy, just pick the last chord in the piece.
I know when the NYT lost me: it was the insane boosterism for invading Iraq. I keep track of who was and wasn't rabid for it. Tom Friedman and Ted Koppel stand out. The former still writes, and apparently is still actually read.

To have been so thoroughly wrong would make anyone with any shred of remaining self respect give up writing.

Most people at the time thought that voting to authorize W to invade Iraq was what cost Hillary the nomination, because Barrack voted against.