skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Every time I change developer tools it's because the one I've been using has become bloated with add-ons as part of the install. When the installer has options for choosing packages, they aren't granular enough to be worthwhile. So the IDE becomes a hinderance, using memory, CPU, and screen real estate intrusively. JetBrains is there now, but it still has better language support for my needs than anything else more lightweight. I use VS Code for everything unless I absolutely need to fire up JetBrains.
Benefits Packages for Small and Micro Businesses
Maybe, but right now I can't think of another way of showing how illegitimate it is to have a discussion over how best to treat a discriminated group of people, especially when when that group is so underrepresented on this forum. There is just no right way to have this discussion at all. If discussions on a tech forum look like they're minutes from a men's rights group meeting, then that's a huge problem.
Unless I am mistaken M1 chips have hardware dedicated to making translations faster.
How will I get insurance or coverage against fraud in a permissionless system -- who will be my intermediary?
> This is the take of people who have little on the line, and don't face issues everyday

This kind of narrative is an easy way to dismiss the opinions of people who disagree with you, but it bears little resemblance to the real world, where people of all kinds face issues that you may or may not know about, and people of all demographics actually do care about things like beloved Dr Seuss books going out of print: https://johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/and-then-they-came-for-...
This is what I was thinking. I find myself just staying way quieter around everyone these days. Men and women.

It's too easy to say the wrong thing and take some serious heat.
> There is a great moderation tool for such a discussion: not to have it

Do you honestly think the situation improves if the discussion is censored here? Whether you like it or not these industry discussions, and much worse, are happening elsewhere and censoring relatively timid discussions like this only makes matters worse. There are 490 comments at the time of this post and I'd bet the vast majority of them are relatively benign.
Obviously historical reasons due to how typewriters in those countries were once organized.

Keyboard layouts seldom seem to be particularly thought out, and the strange position of keys today is due to the historical reason of how the mechanical implementation of typewriters worked.

The world is filled with rather unbecoming design choices, simply in service of inertia.
Yes. SPARK/Ada will attempt to verify many of the properties statically. Not everything can be, and not everything can be done without significant effort (that is, more than it may be worth). But it's more than asserts in most other languages which are only verifiable dynamically. For those areas where SPARK can't prove something statically, the checks are used at runtime (like a traditional assert). It's a best of both worlds situation, in that regard.
Partly agree, but also keep in mind that the CCP is by nature secretive and authoritarian. IMO the cover-up still shifts the probability, but less than it might in another country where cover-ups are less "business as usual".
You need to find new online circles. I know if no young kids who are against free speech and innocent until proven guilty. But they also feel like they don’t “personally” need to give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
thank you, corrected
I think you are close.

The reality is they can sale sensationalism at dime store prices. There is no need to be a real news outlet when they can mimic “The Sun.”

There is no cost and all profit to just printing garbage. In the short term.

This is trading your credentials for cash. Eventually, people will wisen and realize this is not journalism. It will cost them dearly then, but that is the future.

Who worries about the future?
Glitch: Code, Collaborate, & Ship in Seconds
Recovering a full PEM private key when half of it is redacted
There is certainly enough lava. The eruption that occurred in 2018 in my home town produced 1 billion cubic yards or 914402.757839 cubic kilometers.

https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vsc/file_mngr/file-224/OVERVIEW_K...

I imaging the outgassing of the plastic would be pretty terrible but the volcanic gas is pretty damaging too. But yes, I imagine there are a hundred different reasons this wouldn't really work out.
The other day, I was in a Zoom meeting with another man and a woman. The call had too much latency, and the conversation was a tad heated, so we were all interrupting each other to some extent—but I noticed halfway through that I was interrupting the woman more, and she was speaking the least. Just like in all the research. While I certainly didn't go silent for the rest of the meeting, I made a concerted effort to let the woman talk more, and I'm glad I did, because she had good things to say.

I'm aware that I have the same biases as the rest of society. I do my best to recognize them, and, where applicable, to add a small mental counterweight before making decisions. I don't think this always leads to better outcomes, but I do think it's a net positive. And if investors act on similar frameworks, they've probably doomed some companies and saved others. The future is unknowable, and we'll never know what would have happened.

I wish this investor had acted out of a desire to be a better person, or a more successful VC, rather than from fear of a mob. I'm not a fan of mobs. But none of us are immune to cultural biases, and we should second-guess ourselves accordingly.
Indeed. My point was more that due to things like LI. It might influence an attitude towards security of "it doesn't really matter" when it comes to properly implementing secure controls
Hum... When normal people say "identification" the almost always mean what we understand by "authentication"¹. They main intended use of a social security number is as a key, that's the intended use 99.(some more 9s)% of the times a government gives a number to somebody.

1 - And when they say "authentication", they almost always mean what we understand by "non-repudiation".
I've been maintaining a git repo at my current and previous employer - both started out with submodules, and got axed due to added complexity and cognitive load. After removal, they were not missed. Case closed.
A perfect job, a perfect mate and a perfect climate all depend massively on external factors. Fertility requires the same two people trying more or less the same thing repeatedly, and, in that relatively closed system, stress can have a very significant impact.
Adservers Domain Names
I am trying to build an extensive list for my pihole in effort to block ads and trackers, how do people who create this adlists get the domain names? how do you know the domains loaded in a website are ad servers? is there a public list of publicly known servers.
thanks
So I dug this up a bit, because I'm accustomed to the form "Méjico" in Spain.

You are right that México is written with an X but pronounced with a jota. However it has a special status of topónimo (place name), which sometimes don't have a translation (thank god).

E.g. "Washington" is not pronounced with a sharp S, it's just pronounced as in the original language. Or Wyoming is pronounced as "uaióming", not "bioming". Which is exactly what happens with México, in old spanish the X was pronounced as jota.

https://www.rae.es/dpd/M%C3%A9xico
As a little tip I learned the hard way, for the harder or more unique topics in Rust it can pay off to look a little longer for just the right explanation rather than getting frustrated with the compiler's error messages.

Things like lifetime parameters and their placements were pretty cryptic to me until I watched a single video that made everything click into place. Once you got it most things make sense, it's just hard to find the right angle to look from. Plus having the search engine constantly bring up a town or video game named Rust when looking for problems doesn't help.
How is performance compared to something like LitElement, which does bare minimum DOM updates in place? Also, does this have any functionality to support data binding? Passing values down a hierarchy of components and injecting them into the DOM is half the battle with web components.
Calling Bitcoin owners leeches seems a bit of a stretch.

In my opinion there is little to absolutely no reason to ever change Bitcoin back to cash. Maybe take a loan against or rent it out to others for cash interest, if you really want cash.
…Minds very much have minds of their own (no pun intended) in the book (can't remember the title)…

Possibly Excession, which featured Minds at their most…well, I’d argue human. Their desire for [space McGuffin] does not end up being a good look for the Interesting Times gang.
Because their workplace might be normal but the wider web is not so a comment like this could hurt future job opportunities. Especially on HN where you are not able to delete your account or comments.
They certainly do it, haven't heard of any accidents yet:
https://www.bigislandhelicoptertours.com/
You can use formal verification tools to verify the code. Having preconditions ("assume" instead of "assert") reduces the search space.
> You can export the chaindata at any time

Prove it

> I'm still glad to take your $1,000 if you'd like a full tutorial

Post your tutorial on twitter on how to run a full node from scratch, using your own hardware, and I'll give you $1000 to buy some NFT's
That point 1 is interesting. Got any articles/papers?
Crossfire (1982) actually substantially predates FOX News (1996)... and I also don't think it materially changed in how it framed debates after the FD erosion in the mid-80s.

I do agree that the FD revocation leads directly to FOX News and AM talk radio, I just don't think CNN or Crossfire are examples of the phenomenon being discussed. I think people mention Crossfire largely in the context of Jon Stewart criticizing the Tucker Carlson era iteration, which fair cop was bad, and also coincided with an era where CNN phased out real news journalists like Aaron Brown in favour of more idiot talking heads. But I'm just not sure you can draw the causal graph from fairness doctrine to those events ~18-ish years later the same way you can to the rise of talk radio a few years after FD was sunset and FOX News 5 or 6 years after that.
I'm going to go in totally the opposite direction of things suggested here.

Personally, my backgrounds are things important to me, I easily forget about, and can't easily action.

For example, one background is of my family, including my grandma who doesn't have any kind of social media or digital communication device at all. I'm in another country, so actions available to contact her are small. Reminders of her are infrequent - chats with my family are usually not about her. But I don't want to forget her, so into my slideshow rotation it goes.

Another background is a theme park in Denmark featuring a 65m free fall tower into a huge safety net. International travel is hard now, and I know no one wants to do this theme park attraction with me. Odds are stacked against me to remember this thing, so into the slideshow.

All the above pictures are low res and crap. But they're important to me. I do love beautiful high res backgrounds, but I've now decided they bring me less joy than the above.
No experience with Ficus but others. I'd been trying to avoid that ceremony tooling/build step too. But, modern JS I've realized that's wasted effort. Embrace the suck.
i) False. Richard Stallman's primary concern is with the philosophy and ethics of free software. He has never shown any notable concern with money.

ii) True, but has no bearing on Richard Stallman's character or motives. It invites guilt by association.

iii) False. I take issue with the expression 'more designed' That imputes a motive to Mr. Stallman to the effect that he was deliberately and specifically covering for Epstein rather than reacting spontaneously to learning of the accusations against Marvin Minsky.

iv) Mr. Stallman may or may not have been aware of Mr. Epstein's largess, but given Mr. Stallman's known lack of concern with money, it cannot be inferred that he had any interest in soliciting donations.

v) Mr. Stallman is surely aware that he is a public figure, but that does not change the fact that he is no politician or diplomat, but a nerd who is more comfortable with computers.

>and that any statements which he makes in support of Mr. Epstein personally, or in defense of his alleged illegal behavior

Richard Stallman has made no statements in defense of Mr. Epstein personally. A case could be made that his ill-chosen words could provide cover indirectly for the activities of Mr. Epstein, but that is not the same thing.

The rest of this argument is sensationalist and irrelevant.
The United Daughters of the Confederacy had embedded themselves in the vetting and accreditation system specifically to get this outcome.

https://www.facingsouth.org/2019/04/twisted-sources-how-conf...
While completely unplugging from social or mainstream media for a while is one strategy to keep outrage levels at bay, you can also choose a strategy of quality over quantity for consuming information about the world.

This is also a strategy that involves depth over breadth of information sources. Choose longer and more thoughtful articles in respected journals instead of headline news bursts. Read books that provide deeper analysis and context of topics given insufficient context in headline news.

Watch shows like Last Week Tonight with John Oliver or The Daily Show that make you laugh while often giving you more thoughtful reporting and analyses of current events than traditional news sources. I might have included Real Time with Bill Maher, but lately I've found that show dials up my outrage against the host. In any event, you should tailor this strategy to your own outrage triggers.

Finally, while excess outrage can be harmful to your mental health, it also provides input about what is important to you. Or at least, what you think is important to you. For this reason, it's probably also useful to take the opportunity to be mindful of what it is that is triggering the outrage and determine if there is a deeper issue provoking the outrage. Doing this might actually help you regulate your own emotions while processing difficult information.
I’d argue we have more interaction with different people and ideas now than we have in the entire history of the world.

And i’d argue people were far more siloed with people before than they are now.

Joining up with people or clubs or groups who share your interests or passions is hardly new phenomena.
Most people read ineptitude to mean lack of capacity/skill rather than cynicism. If you knowingly do something that leads to a (generally) unwanted result, that's quite different from wanting to do something else but clumsily failing.
Whyline would not help you understand why a multiplication of two million by million matrices gave a 0.7374920 in row 6478 column 474995.
You spend all this time figuring out how to make git do what you want using this general format:

git <git-command> [args]

You would expect to do the same thing with a submodule, it would be:

git submodule <git-command> [args]

But no, submodules have their own set of commands. It's like it's purposefully obtuse for no good reason.
Comments do not fall on a spectrum between "absolutely sexist" and "absolutely not sexist".
Comments exist as fixed points in space, and the observers fall on a spectrum of "absolutely going to call the comment sexist" and "absolutely going to call the comment not sexist".
The men who are "clamming up" are judging the audience of their comments and deciding that the potential costs of honesty are just too high compared to the benefits.
They know that they will no longer get the benefit of the doubt and that they will be convicted without trial. If the punishment for traffic infringements was death and you were immediately judged, convicted and executed by the police officer on the scene, there will be a large number of people who would simply stop driving.
When the king of Mali would go on sabbatical their country was so much more wealthy than everywhere else that they would spread so much wealth they would topple whole monetary systems.
I think they're both overvalued, but as BTC reaches 100k, it will drag Coinbase along with it past AirBnB and possibly Stripe
Agree with? No.

But I don't have a better alternative for many applications, so I'm onboard just based on that fact.
If you walk away from the next Google/Facebook/Microsoft because of worries about US culture, that's on you. There are a lot of hot opportunities in China and around the world, but the US is still pumping out IPO unicorns. I'd be more worried about missing out on the next Tesla or AirBnb as the greater risk
Absolutely. Respectable media platforms and discussion forums have always "censored" some topics (if by that you mean that they've chosen to exercise their freedom of speech to choose what they deem worthy of publication); that's precisely the one thing that separates them from unrespectable ones. Right now there are a lot of discussions going on about blacks or Jews, but that doesn't mean a respectable forum should lend the subject legitimacy by hosting it.
This made Amazon look quite childish honestly.

I hope that union thing works out so there will be more checks and balances in place going forward. Those bottle peeing stories and all that surveillance is quite horrible...

I also heard lower levels don't have access to the company directory anymore. So they basically got cut off from career and socializing opportunities also inside the company.
You can make unlimited copies of software would be my first guess
Initial impressions:

Looks like a relatively new project -- only 59 commits, all by one person, starting from last September. And based on a GitHub search for "ficusjs," it seems that no other projects mention it.

It's only a bit over a thousand lines of code, and based on a cursory glance, the code is in pretty good shape. It should be able to fit entirely in your head, and for a lightweight framework, that's a good thing.

The API itself reminds me of the good old React.createClass({ ... }) days and I wouldn't be opposed to using it. Overall it looks promising for building an MVP, and shouldn't be horribly difficult to transition to a more complicated framework when needed :)
I'm curious to see how this plays out. The security ticket seems to have the most reasonable opinion - I can't see a scenario where this plays well for amazon but they're a trillion dollar company and I'm not

Any former warehouse workers here want to comment? (I'm guessing this will be astroturfed but might as well give it a shot)
Thisis a baseless claim. Personal experience doesn't count.

The overwhelming majority of history education leaves out inconvenient truth of vile and anti democratic acts committed in the name of American Capital interests.
That’s definitely not what a debugger is. You can’t add prints to a coredump and the run->add prints->compile->loop sucks a lot, especially if the bug is hard or slow to trigger.

I think the main promise of an IDE is being integrated. But maybe it could just be done with libraries.
For fans of Banks, who are looking for a analysis of the Culture books through the utopian lens, I highly recommend "The Culture Series of Iain M. Banks: A Critical Introduction" by Simone Caroti. To quote Fal N'geestra from Consider Phlebas:

"Everything about us, everything around us, everything we know and can know of is composed ultimately of patterns of nothing; that’s the bottom line, the final truth. So where we find we have any control over those patterns, why not make the most elegant ones, the most enjoyable and good ones, in our own terms?"
Those are two registered reporters who provided much of the coverage Jan 6.

Edit: registered White House press core

Edit: they had their cameras, that’s most of what you see on CNN if you saw police scenes of fighting
Looks great until you see the price of the display. €2,300 buys you a daily newspaper every day for 5 years...
Odd, you'd think that if they are students (and therefore, study), they would be familiar with the concept of creating an informed opinion. Pretty much everyone I've talked to locally has enough knowledge on the UNHCR, Geneva Convention and Fundamental Principles (comparable to a 'constitution' - the base of all other law) and even simpler things like the Trias Politica.

Perhaps there is a difference in that is classified as a genre of 'student' or it's a difference in age group (be it older or younger). It's hard to make comparisons across the world :-)

On the other hand, any case where the people that are forming the 'next' generation don't know how the basic principles of their society work is a sad/bad case.
> Well if that was the case where are all the horror stories?

Pre-empted by the abundance of caution described in the article? It's not a very deep game, so I assume the strategy in question is readily apparent to almost any man in such a position.
It's basically done by someone discovering a new adserver domains that wasn't blocked and ends up on a list.

It's a tedious job, which is why most people don't build their own lists but subscribe to them and grab the updated list periodically.
I feel this worry about having to type in /128s is overblown. The only times I've had to type a full /128 when setting up my IPv6-only homelab was for adding DHCP static leases for my pet machines.

If you're configuring LANs you're unlikely to be configuring anything deeper than a /64 per LAN, so the effort is approximately the same as IPv4 (four numbers, except that each number is four hex digits instead of three decimal digits).

Similarly, if you're setting up IP rules on a firewall, you're unlikely to care about anything smaller than a /64. If you want to ban a bad actor, blocking a specific /128 isn't going to achieve anything, since the bad actor likely has the ability to use any address within the /64 (SLAAC). You'd just ban the /64.

Lastly, if you're picking your /128s like the static DHCP leases case I mentioned above, nothing prevents you from zeroing all the segments you don't care about. Each of my static leases has all zeroes in the lower /64 except for the last hex digit. Net result is 2001:db8:1234:1::1, 2001:db8:1234:2::1, 2001:db8:1234:3::1, etc. The 2001:db8:1234::/48 is what I get from my ISP so it's already in my muscle memory, so it's negligible extra effort to remember individual machines' IPs.
There are many lists https://filterlists.com/ which are mostly manual maintained. Somebody notices a new ad banner or new ad company or pattern and submits a suggestion.

Manual reviewed lists of lists like https://firebog.net/

https://ublockorigin.com/ lists their default lists at the end of the page.
Part 6 is about a paper published in PLoS Pathogens. It says nothing about safety concerns.
I don't know, we have it everywhere in Eastern Europe. Maybe US did forget it.
You were probably paid more in salary to make that presentation than those licenses cost, lol.