skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It still works just as you'd expect in Dolphin (the current KDE file manager), you click in the breadcrumb address bar on top, type in fish:// and the address, and you get a login prompt.

All of the other KIO slaves work as well, certainly SMB/CIFS works great and I use it all the time.

KDE has all these nice convenient little features that just makes everyday tasks a bit easier.
Given the shape being drawn I don’t think this is real.
Anecdotally, I had a professor who would ask what that arrow without label meant and would not process any further data until all edges were labelled.
I don't see how more years make it more likely to have more interconnection. The power requirements will balloon, it might be still cheaper to have some local generators instead of investing in long range transmission
Most of them are not farmed in a sustainable cycle that prevents those animals from become endangered species? Or they think of the animals as pet animals.

As for fur, I'm guessing it's because a moral panic happened in the 80s and nobody really cared that much about fur, since it was a luxury item for a few, while meat, milk and leather somewhat is something that everyone pretty much still uses today worldwide.
Yep no arguments there. It's not perfect, but it's nowhere near as bad as the article makes it out to be. Also, you only set up a project once, but it's compiled and iterated on many many more times. Having some initial friction isn't ideal but it's better to solve for the real problems which are maintaining a project.
I didn't like the article. It cherry picks mild cases and appeals to sentiments to refute the "bleak statistics" ("the learning impairments and health problems, the strong possibility of heart surgery in the first few months of life, the reputedly high divorce rate of parents of a child with special needs"). It also makes it looks like a bad thing that we manage to detect and prevent 90% of the births.

Add to that the quote at the end about "every family should have a down syndrom kid" and all I can think is there"'s a strong case of misery loves company here.
Isn't the relationship between unions and corporations NECESSARILY confrontational?

A corporation would like to pay its employees as little as possible. The employees would like the opposite. What am I missing? - genuine question.
Manufacturing the chip-lets independently appears to be an interesting approach to maximizing yields. If anyone component has a defect, you just assemble using a different chip-let, as opposed to it affecting the final product.

Anyone know how this affects power, compute, or communications metrics compared to monolithic designs?

Or am I off in thinking this approach maximizes yields?
A rare clotting disorder may cloud the world's hopes for AstraZeneca's vaccine
AdoptOpenJDK Moves to the Eclipse Foundation as the Adoptium WG
(author here)

Initially my draft had the title "CMake and the Diamond". When the article was finished, I decided to make it more clickbaity because I'm not Paul Graham or Scott Alexander.
Rumors are that words like "How to" and "You" make it look more interesting.
I weakened it intentionally by adding the "can" because I don't claim that this approach is the one best solution.
You've convinced me. I no longer care that some countries kill dolphins or whales or cats or whatever for food and foxes for fur.
https://www.reddit.com/r/java/comments/md9nwf/adoptopenjdk_m...
this would be great for headache and sleep tracking, both of which I need.
How is it possible to know that animals have or do not have "the required neurological structures to process the concept of free will", without a definition of free will?
Oh or skip that abd just use pen ( http://siag.nu/pen/ ) to get the traffic from 53->whatever port (can’t remember if haproxy supports udp)
Crazy they were able to label natural gas as “sustainable” but nuclear just barely squeaked in.
The Pen is Mightier than the Keyboard (2014)[pdf]
> Ineffective, or using side-channels

Yeah, I worry more about the device running Signal.

Is it up to date?
|
Any other apps with flaws?

And then any time the browser is used there's risk, especially since mobile devices are worse about supporting ad blocking - that's one reason I like Algo - block malicious stuff at the DNS level rather than worry your combination of privacy extensions is giving you security but also making you more fingerprintable (reducing privacy).

BUT I like Signal as a way to reduce ambiguity. (Eg: If I text you on Signal, it's unlikely someone snarfed that out of the air, and over time I can see where information is leaking, same goes for a voice chat)

Then it's down to trust, which is sadly an unsolved problem. (At least for this poster)
I can see a bright future for this approach. Figma is very "constructional" design tool, encouraging the use:

- variablized colors and fonts, that can become CSS variables and classes

- Components and component hierarchies, that can turn into React components

- Auto-layout that is based on Flexbox

- Component propertes (Variants in Figma, but with enough effort it can turn into attributes for React components).

With a bit of annotation inside Figma, I can easily see pretty good results for this conversion.
> I can just imagine the monk explaining COVID to these cows, and just getting a "Moo" in return.

They need Ein from Cowboy Bebop. See specifically episode/session seventeen, "Mushroom Samba".
Tracking multiple things would be nice.
The same opposition that illegally declared itself the government after losing an election? The one that attempted to smuggle US weaponry into the country under the guise of humanitarian aid? The one that attacked and killed poor black people in the streets? The one that bribed military personnel to betray the country? The one that welcomed a (thankfully incompetent) US coup attempt? It’s not like Guaido was arrested on the spot. He was free to continue breaking the law as due process was being followed.

Also worth considering the constant sanctions and threat of invasion by the US that Venezuela is subjected to. Of course capitalist-owned media will smear a revolution of poor, black and indigenous workers against the former slave owning colonisers.
Germany's populistic policy decisions following Fukushima set us back so much.
In the United States a photograph of a public domain 2D image is still also public domain if the photograph is considered a faithful reproduction of the public domain 2D image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel....

However, I think the laws for this vary quite a bit across countries, and in many countries the photograph is considered a new copyright work. In general it's pretty frustrating how many legal barriers there are to accessing and reusing old works of art. Thankfully a growing number of museums have made things easy with clear copyright releases (Rijksmuseum, Paris Musées, the MET), but others seem more interested in preserving their ability to sell prints.
Thing is, any substantiative discussion will be way too complex for most people who could fall to these conspiracy theories, to understand, and they will arrive to a conclusion like "these Jews are trying to look too smart and bullshit us".

Sadly, this asymmetrical warfare from authoritarian nations hits the right point: it forces us to either let misinformation flow and people become manipulated by it, or to revert to authoritarian measures by gradually chipping away freedom of speech.
the word opsec is a foreign concept for the average Joe. A good 95% of the audience who throng such places.

Doesn't matter who gave out my ip or metadata. I'd be pissed anyway. Even if my data wasn't leaked, what ever happened to the f#ck the pōlice code within our society... Someone sitting down and thinking how they can make the FBI's work of hunting down civilians like them easier. Something seriously wrong with these new generation of netizens.
https://archive.is/Ossyj
i’ve been angel investing for 15 years in approx 250 companies.

check into angellist and nfx signal. also post your project to show HN and people might reach out (i do.)
It's worse than that.

It's like they succeeded and then many decades later flight MH17 happened and the world collectively lost its mind and declared air travel as inherently unsafe and condemned all research into it as dangerous.

The issue though, is that energy production is mostly quiet unless there's a problem, but people do see personal benefit in air travel.

Add to that: Coal is a silent killer, it's not obvious that it's killing us and in such numbers as it is. Nuclear is a dramatic killer, when we die from radiation it's clear and obvious and horrific.
Top-7 expensive UI/UX mistakes
> You can’t, that was his point.

Oh, ok. I'd prefer he say things directly. For example, if someone insinuates criminals are stupid I tend to discount what they say, not try to infer the speaker's true meaning.

(Many criminals are extremely intelligent, but feel stymied from legitimate employment despite having smarts and skills, this is a well documented phenomenon.)
Ask HN: Software engineer for 20 years what should I do next?
Ive been a web dev focused on all areas of the stack for 20 years. I'm currently leaving my role as VP of Engineering for a startup and I'm burned out. Look at my comment history. The job I'm leaving in 2 days did me in. They gave me a large sum of money to transition a new team on my way out.

I'm debt free, turning 40, and unsure what to do next. I want to avoid traditional work and concentrate on my own pursuits. I have put many years of effort into learning to build 2d and 3d games during my free time. I also enjoy drawing comics. I'm considering moving into content creation teamed up with my wife... maybe doing contract web dev work to avoid draining my savings.

I'd like to hear thoughts and suggestions for non traditional revenue streams / ways to live differently to make a more creation centric life for myself and my family. I really don't want to work for companies anymore if I can avoid it.
Red Hat and AWS’s Rosa Hits GA. Managed OpenShift in the Cloud, Anyone?
By far the most important reason dictating lifespan is evolvability - the ability to adapt genetically [0].

This has so great effect that it's easy to observe even in a simple computer simulations. If you don't adapt and the environment is changing, then you go extinct.

Think about this sharks and how much their environment has changed since they were born. As a spices they will have a very hard time adapting to the changes we induce in the environment. While small animals that have lifespan in weeks, months or few years will be adapting a lot faster. E.g. in one generation of this shark a mouse will go trough up to 900 generations with up to 12 offspring in each generation.

This shark probably will go extinct and mice will thrive.

Interesting consequence of this effect is that our lifespan is most likely not dictated by any fundamental limitations of biological machinery to maintain us healthy indefinitely.

A lot more likely is that we are evolutionary designed to get old and die.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolvability
With the exception of industrial farming, everything that humans normally do to animals is much nicer than the way wild animals live and end their lives. So as long as you make sure to get your milk and meat from traditional farming, you're supporting practices that are much kinder to the animals then nature would be.

Animals in nature inevitably die violent or painful deaths, often being eaten alive by other animals while they slowly starve. They often live lives of subsistence, with periodic times where they are near starvation or freezing and barely survive. They are often in ruthless competition for food and mates with their own species. They will sometimes eat their own young when conditions are especially bad, or eat the young of others to improve their own chance at reproduction.

If we're talking in pre-industrial times, if I had to choose between the life of a Buffalo or a domestic cow, I would take my chances as the cow.

Now, industrial practices like factory farming are truly horrifying and on that side I agree that they should be stopped, despite the increase in cost that will represent to animal products.
Yes? That's literally the case: if there is no land tax in Manhattan either, then yes: that land has no value until someone decides to do something with it.

But it also shows off how much the idea that "land = value" has been hammered into you. By default, land's just land. It doesn't have value until someone slaps some kind of "land management scheme" on top of it.
> Having to work consistently is the norm, not a treadmill.

Agreed. Work is what creates value for others. However, trading one's work for money that's designed to loose value over time via the inflation tax central banks impose on us all is why so many hard working people feel they're on a treadmill that they can't get off. If our money functioned correctly as a tool to store value over time, people could work, save, and with frugal living could actually get ahead if their work consistently created value for their clients or customers. There are systemic monetary reasons why work often resembles a treadmill.
Let’s just ignore the carbon released by cement production.
Straw Man

I've seen "not a business model" quipped a hundred times, as if that ends whatever debate is going on. I've yet to see anyone actually argue that open source actually is a business model, as opposed to having their argument bent that way. The author doesn't link to any examples. Who are they browbeating?

I don't see MongoDB arguing that the meaning of open source should address financial incentives for developers, either. I see them arguing that open source copyleft can be strong enough to demand openness from their competitors, as GPL would have in the packaged-software era. Mongo have a financial concern, but exactly to the author's point about means versus ends, they're not trying to write their business into any definition. They're reading the definition to cover a license that works for their business.

If open source didn't concern itself with business, it wouldn't exist. The whole pitch was to business. Cathedral and the Bazaar was a marketing manual for selling manager-types. O'Reilly bankrolled events and meetings. Early on in OSI history, they readily approved several stronger copyleft licenses for specific businesses. MPL. Sleepycat. QPL. IPL. RPL. Arguably AGPL. That's the history.

JMW does say there hasn't been a successful open core product, but he defines success as "ubiquity in the modern data center". In business, there's plenty of success between irrelevance and market domination. Ferraris and fast chargers aren't ubiquitous in modern garages.

What I see here is that open source is a business model to some interested parties. That model is add-on services---integration, customization, support, hosting---and no other. Never mind that dual licensing, open core, delayed release, and others existed well before RedHat and WordPress and IBM successes made headlines. Never mind that these models had their business standard bearers, too. Never mind that they sometimes offered support documentation or configurations for hosting that add-on service companies didn't.

The difference now is that the anti-commercial, permissive-focused, "open source means I never hear 'no'" faction view happens to correspond to the interests of the titans of industry, who are all cloud services companies. These companies want to commoditize their complements---"open source" means we can reap what you sow and sell it to our customers---but not the proprietary code they use to differentiate their clouds. They patronize the big open source foundations.

We shouldn't be asking what open source is or means, as if it's an end in itself. We should be asking what it's for. And accepting there was never any conflict-free consensus there. We brushed all that under a rug in the late 1990s and early 2000s, because there was fame and money and a sense of purpose to be had selling "open source" as a brand and a "revolution". Now that work is done, the victorious allies are squabbling again. So it goes.
Chiptune.fi
because if you scan the brain of a cow with an MRI and start talking about free will to it, nothing lights up.

they respond to food, loud noises, other physical stimuli, but not to philosophy.

Also, if you open the gates of a farm, cows don't run.

Quoting Dennet

Let us return to our vultures. Consider the hypothesis that for all I could ever know, rotting chicken carcass smells to a turkey vulture exactly the way roast turkey smells to me. Can science shed any light, pro or con, on this hypothesis? Yes, it can almost effortlessly refute it: since how roast turkey tastes to me is composed (and exhausted) by the huge set of reactive dispositions, memory effects, and so on, and so forth, that are detectable in principle in my brain and behavior, and since many of these are utterly beyond the machinery of any vulture's brain, it is flat impossible that anything could smell to a vulture the way roast turkey smells to me.

but let's suppose cows have some sort of free will concept.

if they can't explain it to us, how will we ever understand it? (because it's impossible they have the same free will concept we have)

and if we project our roast turkey smell (free will) concept to cows, how can we be sure that it's what they need or want, if they can't even communicate a yes/no to us?

All our philosophical concepts are based on millennia of history that's been transmitted to future generations that built new concepts on the old ones

They are not "natural"

if you take a child to a remote location and abandon him/her there they wouldn't even know about death or illness, let alone laws or rules or free will. Because nobody thaught them.

We are basically still stuck in a Solaris situation.

but the question still stands, so I propose another one: how do we know that dogs want to live in our homes?

modern neuroscience can explain a lot of things that philosophy still consider questions.
It's his foundation, and you are welcome to start your own foundation promoting your own ideals for software.
My experience over the past year mirrors this. I'm regularly surprised that there aren't more generally-accepted and boosted solutions to lots of the minutiae that comes with DevOps/cloud config. CloudFormation and Terraform are both pretty bare bones - they give you tools to describe any cloud resource and the way they relate to eachother. That's great! But I'd rather not be left in charge of defining how cloud resources can securely communicate - I'd rather include an AWS/HashiCorp-supported module that predefines configuration for adding a Redis cache to something, or letting only certain resources connect to a database.

Terraform modules were a nice start, but I've pretty much never seen a module I would trust using. It may just be my own bad luck, but the vast majority of the TF Modules I've looked at are A.) A single maintainer, B.) 10 stars or less, C.) Haven't been updated in 6 months. The combination of the above 3 do not leave me feeling confident in including a library. I wish that there was an easier way to tread the paths of those that have done the work.
You say US-controlled, but I can't think of a country that would be better than the US in this regard. European countries are not the biggest fans of free speech. And then you have China, Russia, etc. which are even worse.
Unleash the Power of Storytelling to Draw Investors In
If they work out the details of the shopify integration they've got their market laid out for them.
I think the article title is fine, I'm saying that the HN thing that removes numbers and "how to" and so on (to prevent clickbait titles) has done the opposite here. :)
Graphcore Shows GAN Gains for CERN
... which doesn't taste nearly as bad as you've heard and is produced in limited quantities only as result of the few bycatch sharks accidentally netted each year.
You think the NFT money goes to the artist? What are you basing that belief on?
> They would need to hire software engineers and, quite frankly, most municipal governments aren't capable of adequately compensating these positions.

Of course they are, because they already are compensating them plus contract management overhead on both sides of the contracting arrangements (which are usually made even greater because they have different contractors for different phases of an effort), plus contractor profits.

Aside from simple corrupt motives (both by responsible managers involved in deals directly and higher-level politicians who favor inefficiency of kicking things off to industry because it buys support from the beneficiaries), this is done because it spreads the blame in the event of failure, which is seen by many involved as more important than maximizing likelihood of success or cost efficiency.

But citizens (well, at least those not corruptly benefitting) shouldn't tolerate that.
Show HN: JavaScript Library to Call Mail, Calendar, Task APIs
Trump didn't refuse anything. Multiple parties failed to act, parties of all political positions. There's plenty of evidence in these threads showing that.
Socat is terrible.

When used to establish a persistent connection to a remote listening (TCP) port, it has NO WAY to detect that the remote end has dropped the connect, and automatically reconnect. It just does not work.

Yes, I know all about all the keep-alive and retry options in the manual. Try it yourself.

It's one of those horrible tools that you can get up and running quickly, but can never make work reliably.
I'd be interested in hearing a designer's view on this sort of tool? It seems really appealing for me as a developer (and I've thought about building something like this in the past) but I wonder where it fits in the designers workflow?
I don't think I've ever cared how many transistors were in something I purchased.
The people who study and report on Venezuela did.

If you find the topic interesting there is actually quite a lot of material

https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1387787/FULLTEXT...

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5mj6j3t8

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/authoritarian-su...
Ya, but the challenge, and I say that as a supporter of Nuclear in general, is that you don't sign up for the experiment. If you're in the radius of the plant if it were to fail, you might be wary of it.
What went wrong on the Suez Canal
It’s far more centralized and prone to overly bloated government contracts, big industry, corruption, accounting shenanigans, excessive taxation to pay for the mistakes, and loss of individual freedom and control over where your energy dollars go to. Especially as compared to solar but it’s even bad compared to fossil fuels in these respects.
Fair, then the new crop seems to have forgotten it
another one is 8base.com, which seems very similar.

Airtable needs to get their stuff together and expand their pretty terrible API
I used to dismiss Goodhart's law as trivializing measurement. After all in the oft mangled Deming Quote - what you cannot measure, you cannot manage or you cannot improve.

I was terribly wrong and this is my mea culpa.

Goodhart's can also be thought of as the notion of reflixivity or a negative feedback loop. Reliance on a measure leads everyone to optimize for it inducing fragility and in the limit breaking it.

This is often seen in realms where human behavior intersects with emergent phenomenon e.g. financial markets. A metric like the sharpe ratio comes into vogue. Everyone works on optimizing (gaming) it to the point that a high sharpe ratio actually becomes a signal of impending large drawdowns. (https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1002622066426773504).

The world is messy and we all labor under Godel Incompleteness.
People don't sign up for pollution from fossil fuels either.
you should really get rid of all the popups when you first get to the site... that is SO off-putting. Especially the "woop woop" sound