skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This is the same city council that deliberately plans to have half the housing units they actually need

Should cities be compelled to keep growing as long as there is demand? Are they not allowed to say "this much is enough - there are plenty other places to go"?
NovaPDF Pro 10.9 Build 133 Crack and Latest 2021 Product Key Free Download
I have a basic understanding of statistics and a basic understanding of logical fallacies, and I deal with this kind of sounds-good-if-you-don't-think-too-hard "insights" all the time.
Former McDonald’s CFO, Harry J. Sonneborn, is even quoted as saying, “we are not technically in the food business. We are in the real estate business. The only reason we sell fifteen-cent hamburgers is because they are the greatest producer of revenue, from which our tenants can pay us our rent.”

https://blog.wallstreetsurvivor.com/2015/10/08/mcdonalds-bey...
Well they don't. If you look at polling from the last election, what is turning Texas blue is hispanics turning 18, what's keeping it red are people moving into Texas.
> Dictators have broad powers -- the tenure is orthogonal. You could have a dictator who's in for a year

Technically you're right, but typically the highest priority for a dictator is to extend their tenure, indefinitely if at all possible, by exercising those broad powers.

Making a foundational set of laws dictator-proof is actually a hard problem. It is kind of like designing a programming language that is deliberately Turing-incomplete. You're trying to make abusing the system impossible, without crippling the desired functionality.
I'm surprised that "micro-expressions" and the work of Dr. Paul Ekman weren't mentioned given how hyped it was several years ago (there was even a drama series called "Lie to Me" I believe). Has this all been debunked?
Nice, but wouldn't an "awesome list"-like page on GitHub be more manageable and update-friendly?
«Эти хуи, на хуй, это захуярили и потом вместе похуярили на хуй» – «this bunch of not very nice men have done a sloppy job (of something) and then have locomoted out of here in a unknown direction»
France bears ‘overwhelming responsibilities’ over Rwanda genocide
Same here. I think we could also coin and use on the fly the word "refenestrate" which would be to throw some back throw someone back into a window they have just been thrown out of and "emphenestrate" which would be to throw someone through a window into a building.
Norton Commander was around in the 90's. I personally think this OneCommander is very crowded. It could be a little leaner.
A curated list for Kubernetes Security resources
Top Ranked Angel Gil Penchina on Why He Hates Venture Capitalists (2016)
It's not "free" speech when the audience is being coerced into hearing it.

Before you say it, yes, the workers are being coerced. The implicit threat is that they will lose their jobs if they don't listen to the employer's anti-union rhetoric.

"Oh, but they can just quit and not be forced to listen to it," you say? Well, no, the average American worker can't afford to just walk away from a job. Thus, it's coercion.
Could depend on climates. There’s an anecdote of a chemist trying to replicate an experiment to no avail, until he realized the author is from Eastern Europe where “room temperature” roughly translates to freezing point...
As someone who loves Rotten Tomates to pick movies and shows to watch, I was surprised when I realized there wasn't anything similar for tech.

Knowing nothing about building web applications, I created this from scratch over many months of self-education.

https://RecoRank.com adds new products and reviews every day, so the content is always fresh.

I've personally found this info useful and I hope you do as well!

Also, it's been a fast leap since this project has come together. I've recently teamed up with the guys from https://BuyForLife.com to help other businesses achieve similar results. It's called https://reviewr.ai if anyone's curious.
But I thought they are expats, not immigrants, and certainly wouldn’t be illegal?

Seriously, EU ganging up on poor Britain.
Not sure where you are, but in Australia the hot dogs cost $1 ea.

The staff working at the stand would be paid something on the order of $25/hr, plus paid breaks, annual leave, sick leave, long service leave and superannuation.
There would have been at least a solid minute of marginal labour in the hot dog I ordered today - asking me for my order, accepting payment and putting the sausage/condiments in the bun. This doesn't even consider the amount of labour required to boil the sausages, cut the buns, clean the kitchen at the end of the day, manage the orders from head office etc. I'm also ignoring slack time, where the queue is empty and the staff are not serving any customers.

In terms of raw ingredient cost, the meat they use is a cut above your bog standard Frankfurt and I suspect would be something like $5/kg in bulk. Assuming each sausage contains 100g of meat, that's 50c per sausage plus another ~10c for the bun. Even assuming the condiment cost is negligible, there'd be another 10c of cost in the little cardboard tray they give you.

Already we're getting up around $1.20 per hot dog, and I'm ignoring rent, power bills (which would not be insinificant in a commercial kitchen) payment processing fees and probably more things I haven't even thought about.

Not a chance they turn a profit on these. Tune in next week where I give a detailed analysis of the economics of their 50c soft serve cones!
This ( EMIB ) is suppose to be the most interesting part of the announcement but most of the discussion seems to focused on CUDA / One-API.

>Or am I off in thinking this approach maximizes yields?

This is absolutely the case here especially for HPC or high performance market where they are all previously served by large die size solutions. You can also use the best node for each tiles / chipsets. Example I/O die may use other node for lower power consumption while Compute die uses High power node to push performance. High Density node for SRAM, low cost node for simple function accelerator etc. You can now customise each part of the tiles/chiplet best according to your target power/performance/cost equation.

Now of course their are trade offs, Intel Tiles packaging (EMIB, Embedded Multi-die Interconnect Bridge) is expensive. And it adds tiny latency for not being on die. Although you could argue you saved latency for certain parts with it not being off a PCIE bus.

But this is very exciting. The best part is with this announcement that you can use Tiles and Chiplet from other foundries on Intel packaging! You could theoretically use Global Foundry ( or Samsung ) FD-SOI node for certain applications and still be on the same packaging. You can now truly mix and match to the maximum.

Not so good part is we are still limited by TDP design. And I dont see anything being done in the consumer / prosumer space.
Really ? Working more has nothing to do with it ? Or brilliant universities ? Or immigration ?
The best 47 minutes of legal advice you'll ever get: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
I would not use any platform that doesn't delete viagra spam or work from home spam or any of the other things we recognize are awful (say, someone spamming pages of all-caps AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA or Ż̵̧̦͈͕̼̜̫̦̟͈͎̆̈͒̀͆̉a̶̩̺͊̔͑́͆̕ļ̴̨͇̲͈͓̥̝̠̜̘̠̹̫̀̋͛̄g̸̹͇̫̗̼̺̰͍̻̦̯̹͆̆̈́̂͜͜ǒ̶̧̪̹͖͖̮̻̹̻̮̦͐́̌̐̀͐̃̒̓̏͝ ̷̠̯̹̣͖͍̩̦̪́̀̾ͅt̵̼͈͉͖̯̫̪̟͔͛͌̐̿̎́͌̇ͅe̶̫͓̖̲͍̞̞͈̎̔̿͐x̴̛̠̺̮̼̏͒̀̒̎t̸̮̼͔͖̹͙̦͚͙̣̜̍͋̈́͌). I regard a platform that won't remove this stuff as bad, user-hostile, and not worth using. In fact, I would think pretty poorly of Hacker News if moderators didn't want to remove what I've already posted because frankly the above text is annoying and detracts from the site.

I think any law that requires that platforms allow the signal to noise ratio to go through shit via spam (and in your specific law, even sets a minimum price to be permitted to spam) would be a bad one.

If you allow platforms to remove posts based on content, as I think you should, then we're back to having a debate about which particular types of content should be protected by law, or else which particular types of content a platform ought remove (irrespective of whether they are compelled to or not). You might disagree with me about which types of content those would be, but supposing we are in this type of world, then it is possible that the process of adjudicating which types of content might be removed could ultimately arrive at an end-point where fraudulent health claims (not so far removed from viagra spam!) are one of those types of content.

Also, as relates Hacker News, it's hard to imagine a world where it is illegal for a site owner to remove content a user posted, but it is legal for peer users, using a voting algorithm, to do so (by virtue of downvoting posts until they are dead or hidden). Would this lead to, for instance, wanting to impose criminal sanction on sockpuppet accounts, since we feel using multiple accounts to downvote is tantamount to interference that would be illegal if done by a moderator? This strikes me as a bit much.
That alone wouldn’t be enough; why does this have to be XOR?
The horrors of unions to me are represented perfectly in teachers unions, which repeatedly protect sexual predators and incompetent teachers [1] [2]. They serve their members to the detriment of everyone else, including the children they claim to care about (while enabling predators).

In fact, teachers are significantly more likely to be predators than even priests. [3] Thanks to unions who go to bat for them.

[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443437504577547...

[2] https://www.nj.com/education/2017/12/teachers_accused_of_sex...

[3] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/has-media-ignored-sex-abuse-in-...
Google is evil on HN, but the SF Board is eviler.

I’m sure other major metros supes would have no problems with freebies and would feel no pain from their campaign sponsors in competing interwebs markets.
Whether something can technically be done and whether it is good/easy/simple/etc. are totally different conversations. I'm pretty sure you can't implement a min function that works on both strings and ints in Go by using the interface{} abstraction.
>Best landing page I've seen in a while

Disagree 110%. No pinch to zoom, screenshots too small to see anything, no copy text as to what features it offers, embedded twitter which means it's probably loaded with javascript trackers.
Not letting envy/rage override logic != emotionless.
Adults rarely change their essential character. Most criminals guilty of substantial predictable harm to others are unethical people. Those who integrate with society successfully learn not to do stupid destructive things. They are not likely to stop being terrible people.

Anyone who would try to drive people out of their homes by destroying them while they live in them is a terrible person without redemption.

His inability to turn away money to do work he had no intention or capability to complete just demonstrates this.

Perpetual punishment is pointless but everyone has a right to know the kind of person they are dealing with.
Easy vs hard is dominated not by grammar and vocabulary, but by access to the language and interest in it.

Nothing is more accessible than English, and there is absolutely mountains upon mountains of pop culture from the Anglosphere which no other language comes close to matching except for Japanese.

If you have access to people that speak the language, access to native media, and there is lots of stuff on that language that interests you, then it's easy.

If you want hard vs easy you could move to Antarctica and try learn Kimbundu.
You are a total imbecile, Sir.
In reality, most of the applications are using it for authentication: to identify who you are using your GitHub, FaceBook or Google account. Authorization is the process of determining whether the identity can perform the specified action on the specified data [0]; such social logins provide close to no real options to users to specify this aspect.

0: https://aspsecuritykit.net/guides/designing-activity-based-d...
They aren't accusations just match scores. The scores are pretty meaningless unless there's a really good match. Obviously one shouldn't use that alone to determine guilt. Charges are decided by professors and committees, not turnitin. Yes some students might be concerned about the partial matches to the point of anxiety, but the solution is to simply assuage those fears. Because unfortunately, too many others habitually cheat with a misguided confidence that they can get away with it. Not to mention a completely warped sense of the risk versus reward for what they are doing. Making them go through turnitin is a way to dissuade doing that. Letting them see the scores before they submit the assignment is also a nicer way to push back. As opposed to having to hand out F's to get the point across.
The FBI has the responsibility to handle counter-intelligence domestically. At a minimum, the FBI should be the lead agency, and make the decisions, when trying to track espionage operations inside the country.

The "Five Guys" committee that President Obama authorized, reported back with findings and recommendations. One of them, which that committee felt was the most important one, was to split NSA and US Cyber Command apart. They felt it was dangerous to have one person in charge of both communications security, and in command of their own Army, Navy, and Air Force.

Giving them more authority, especially authority that is already vested in a different agency, is a Yuge mistake.
Somehow, "leverage" bothers me a lot less than "utilize." I guess it's because "leverage" has connotations beyond what "utilize" carries, i.e. it doesn't mean literally the same thing as "use."
>I'm not sure what you mean by that. Are you saying you can use #ifdef, #include etc. in Haskell code?

Yep: https://guide.aelve.com/haskell/cpp-vww0qd72.

>Many of us don't have the luxury of choosing the quality of code we're employed to debug. It would be nice if languages had some rudimentary sanity-checks to, well, preserve our sanity.

I agree, I don't think C++ is especially bad in this regard. If people are going to write bad code, they can write it just as well in Java, C#, Python etc., they'll just use different language features to bring about the horrors. No language (apart from maybe Go, in its extreme simplicity) can save us from having to debug bad code.
What a loss to literature but McMurtry's legacy lives on.

If anyone is looking for novels of his try out the Thalia trilogy Larry wrote. It bleeds Texan vibes in a very human, realistic fashion. And if you're into film there's a movie based on the last book The Last Picture Show in which McMurtry was also involved with the screen play. They filmed it in Archer City, the town he grew up in and heavily inspired the novel.

R.I.P. Larry!
What is 'best' is highly subjective and emotive.

At almost any price point there is going to be some model or feature that is a bit more expensive that you may not strictly need but that may be better in one way or other.
Uncomplicate Security for developers using Reference Architectures
That's the kind of thing we need to design for and handle using contracts containing hedges or cutoffs and price reactive usage. Texas isn't a cold climate place so relying on grid electricity to cover the exceptional weather is probably not the best plan in the post fossil future. But insulation will help with this and hot weather AC electricity usage both.
Those are temporary growing pains as demand for Ethereum block space exceeds supply, and will be solved with the ImmutableX NFT-focused zkRollup, which will increase Ethereum's maximum throughput from 15 NFT transactions per second to 8,000:

https://www.immutable.com/
I've never found "first come first served" to be a satisfying answer to municipal determinations.
Show HN: Automation tracing coming to Home Assistant
Also been playing a lot of Among Us with my friends.

We started out realizing how difficult lying really is. The early games definitely were characterized by just people not able to hide their lies (maybe we were not trained at it ;)).

But after some training it becomes easier to lie, and of course more difficult to spot.

We also sometimes play it with my kids and those from my buddies, but they have a hard time lying, basically partly admitting when they are accused.
>The hypocrisy

That is part is the Tim Cook's Apple that irritate the heck out of me. Social Justice, Left inclined Apple is far from Steve Jobs mostly apolitical approach.

They need an explanation, and a good one. In the old days Steve at least gave us some convincing argument. Now Tim Cook doesn't seems to care.

If I am making a search Engine and the results contained COVID information am I now banned from App Store? If I made a mailing list or Email that continued COVID am I now banned?
“death of entire industries”

What industry?

Maybe we need to open a gigantic can of worms that “runs counter to globalization” if we’re talking about sending those jobs to countries with unethical working conditions.
1. The powerful never willingly give up that power.

2. $13.5k/year still keeps you below the poverty line.

In other words, if there is no job to be had and your $13.5k "AI grant" is your sole income, you're still fucked.

The previous comments about "scraps" seem to be pretty spot on.
>CUDA could’ve been dog shit but when AMD could barely launch a GPU that could compete with NVIDIA’s mid range for multiple generations it wouldn’t have mattered.

This is really the only point to be made. Intel could release open source GPU drivers and GPGPU frameworks for every language under the sun, personally hold workshops in every city and even give every developer a back massage and everyone would likely still use CUDA.

The performance gap is still so large.
Recently is found out about how sophisticated the bronze age was and most interesting how is how the collapse was so rapid and not accurately explainable.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Bronze_Age_collapse

Makes you wonder how fragile advanced civilisation might be.
Wealth is not zero sum. People having more than they need doesn't harm others, and redistributing their 'excess' wealth will undermine the private property rights that incentivize and sustain effective investment.

Generally interfering with social processes through top-down cookie cutter measures leads to negative unintended consequences, because the rationale behind said intervention is based on an overly simplistic understanding of a highly complex system.
They will sell you the car currently in their lot that most closely matches what you need. Not what you actually need. Just the closest they have.
Closed source it seems.
This is particular to British unions, e.g. the unions of Germany would never do something like this. Basically unions run a spectrum of activities as broad as any kind of organisation.
Don't worry, it won't. At some point a large nation will eventually start using nuclear at scale and the competitive advantage will be clear so then everyone will have to follow suit.

That is, of course, presuming civilization does no collapse because of climate change. Fingers crossed!
People are practiced at telling lies that their peers believe. Random strangers are better at being skeptical because they are not empathetic about the excuses that are necessary to smooth out an explanation.
> so there's no competition trying to hire you away

I agree with a lot of what you said but this part isn't true. I've been in conversations where people were bragging up that they were able to hire away Person X after >2 years of convincing. It definitely felt like know a guy who knows a guy though, not some open market.
How could we bring back dinosaurs without any DNA? I think that's the problem with bringing most extinct species back is we don't have that DNA.
I use Firefox on Android and there's a setting to always enable pinch to zoom, even if the site tries to prevent it.
I'm not going to create those contexts by focussing on metrics devoid of content though.
If they can dig kilometers deep, they'll be advanced enough to notice the radiation, and take precautions. If they're smarter than us, they'll mine the stuff and use it to power their sky cities.
My first reaction was "very busy design" which is not bad (think about Excel) but those overlapping folder names are puzzling. Maybe they are OK when one is familiar with a file system layout, which is the case for all of us on our own computer. Same thing for all the other panes. It could be one of those tools for power users that need a complex UI because they do complex things.
I would add:

0. 'McTeague' by Frank Norris.

1. All The Kings Men, Robert Penn Warren.

2. Most novels by Sinclair Lewis.

3. Novels of John O Hara

4. Sister Carrie, Theodore Dresier.

5. Little Big Man by Thomas Berger.

6. Last of the Mohicans by Fenimore Cooper.
Yep, ‘-O2 or above’ we used to compile our UTs without optimizations because otherwise it takes too long, but now we have an additional(less frequent) CI job for UT with optimizations to benefit from these improved error detection.
This doesn't invalidate my remark though. Nothing says these union board members are there to make the company more competitive. They are there to provide better working conditions.
I agree. I had the exact same situation and experience. Came to describe the solution but you were quicker.

I actually liked what I saw in the screenshots and will give it a try.
It's not easier to learn because of grammar or vocab, but simply due to network effects. If you want to learn it, whoever you are, and wherever you live and whatever your mother tongue is there is the highest possible chance on average that you can access people who speak English, find high quality reference materials, and find native media that interests you.

If you run those considerations through all possible language pairs it's easy to see that these are the main factors that influence difficulty. Grammar, vocab, and pronunciation are a distant second.
If it's a book by Malcolm Gladwell, I can't anti-recommend it enough.

All of the Malcolm Gladwell books I've read have been tripe. Unless he has radically improved his writing and grasp of nuance in the last decade (and published retractions of his earlier books), his books are dangerous anti-knowledge which will make you feel smarter but actually be dumber.

Gladwell takes an obvious, folksy thing, adds a bit of a twist to it, presents several anecdotes as dramatic stories illustrating his point, then slaps on some "science" to make it seem like its true. It's not. He's just making stuff up that sounds plausible but surprising.

Gladwell writes well, and seems believable. That doesn't make him right.
It’s called hyperbole. Taking a stance so extreme from the expected that’s it’s humorous.
> would anyone say that this person should continue to receive UBI?

I would.

There are two ways to look at this:

1. We are supporting this person through UBI. We don't want to support neo-Nazi people. Therefore they should not receive UBI.

2. Neo-nazism is an issue we want to solve. Neo-nazism only dies when no significant portion of society shares that view anymore. Notice that this is very different from "when a majority of society thinks it should be eradicated" (which is where we are now).

If you focus in the latter view, cutting UBI to publicly known supporters won't help because:

- It would foster the "us vs them" holy war between supporters and society at large. This will only strengthen that minority.

- It poses significant (i.e.: expensive to solve) logistical issues. How do you detect neo-nazi supporters? Who makes the decision? How can such decision be appealed?

I see neo-nazism as a virus and education as a vaccine. Cutting UBI to identified supporters is akin to cutting life support to people displaying advanced symptoms. Would that really help?