skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Um, no, that’s not what I said.

The APTs do not have magical powers, they buy from the same exploit market everyone has.

Let’s say my organization (which is not very well known) has an exploitable bug. What are the chances that someone will discover it? Pretty close to none, the hole can be there for many years waiting for APT to come and exploit it.

Now imagine Github runner or default Ubuntu image has an exploitable bug. What are the chances it will last long? Not very high. In a few months, someone will discover and either report or exploit it. Then it will be fixed and no longer helpful for APT threat actors.

Remember, the situation described in the post only occurred because they used binary images that only a few people could look at. Generating binary kernel on someone’s laptop is easy to subvert in undetectable way, but how do you subvert a Dockerfile stored in Git repo without it being obvious?
Ok, Economist. So where’s the Coup? Usually it follows the moment when certain establishments determine that a government is no longer desirable, or convenient. In this case it’ll never be too early
This is 100% true... and they often do the opposite too... Sometime if feels like they are censoring more then Twitter.
I don't think you understand how TCP works. A TCP connection can stay alive through an unplugged Ethernet cable if it hasn't sent any packets.
They are different skills, but people can have many skills. Having a team that considers adding features with operations in mind from day one results in much more reliable services. The only reason people look for specialists is so that they can scale their org by having separate teams. But whenever you split things like this, incentives for individual teams diverge from the end goal of "give users reliable software". Ops will reduce risk at the cost of features. The most reliable software is no software at all. Dev will want features at the cost of operational ease. The most featureful software is software that doesn't have to authenticate users and deal with pesky real-world concerns like running on servers that cost money. I don't think it can be made to work.

I think when you need to scale up, a better model is to treat shared infrastructure like it's own business. You have products that customers can buy, rather than saying "operations manages the servers" and "dev manages the code". I have worked at places that do that, and the results were very good. I have also done the "dev manages everything up to the end user", and that's also great (but requires a training investment for team members that haven't done operations before). Finally, I worked at a place that split dev and operations as hard as possible and ... I don't think in the years that I worked there we ever ran anything in production. The process for putting code into production seemed to take on the order of years, so people just ran it on their workstation. Sometimes implemented inside an Excel spreadsheet. Now that I think about it, most of my time was spent debugging that and not delivering features. I wouldn't recommend it.
You need to improve your Google game:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/292252/age-of-housing-dw...
In Germany, for instance, companies are required to have union members on the board. From what I understand about the structure of unions there, it allows unions to advocate on behalf of employees while being less confrontational. It's ostensibly a more effective way for the two parties to collaborate effectively to everyone's benefit.
Yet it is the South African variant which is much more dangerous and resistant to vaccines. The South African government is left-wing and has embraced reparations so you won’t hear about how they mismanaged Covid.
Editors have to do that already, so if she doesn't have an editor, it probably is her job.

In High School, I did a (very) short co-op copyrighting for a radio station. At the time I thought it was pretty ridiculous that I had to basically reword everything to mean the same thing, but differently. As a grown-up and seeing the same stories in different papers struck me as ultra-lazy, and then I realized why all that copyrighting had to be done.
So, I guess you don't know why OP specifically asked about Racket: https://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/dagstuhl19/ https://beautifulracket.com/stacker/why-make-languages.html
There's definitely an element of truth to that. For example, Italy's mismanagement of Covid-19 probably did immense damage to the world - early on the European outbreaks were basically a gradient radiating outwards from there, there's some evidence that even the US's outbreak came from Italy, and it seems they somehow managed to report zero cases right up until the point a significant proportion of their population was infected which would require really, spectacularly screwing up their testing program - but that narrative never made an appearance in the media because it'd make it harder to blame right-wing politicians in countries like the UK and US which the media dislikes. Instead, the narrative around Italy is that actually, it was the other countries like the UK and the US which screwed up worst because they should've learned from Italy, as though there was something meaningful that could be learned from a country that collected so little useful data. On the other hand, Bolsonaro was really pally with Trump and gets the full blame for everything. I wouldn't even be surprised if there was some mutation during the first Italian outbreak which made Covid-19 more of a danger; there's not really any way we could tell.

(This also basically completely doomed contact tracing in every other western country, because they had no reason to be looking for cases related to people who'd travelled from Italy until it was far too late to start. It's probably not a coincidence that all the countries which made it vaguely work were ones that were close to China rather than Europe.)
> It was at a university and the union is called in France CGT.

As a mostly labourer union, CGT is a minority in universities, especially among teachers and researchers (less so in administrative and maintenance departments).
You would only have an outpouring of discussion as to why the claim is wrong if you are 100% certain the claim is wrong.

Last spring the CDC and the WHO were consistently wrong on masks, on asymmetric spread, etc on just about everything.

Maybe the experts themselves don't even trust what is supposedly the truth anymore.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention

>A major turning point in Nazi policy toward Jews was the coordinated attacks by the Sturmabteilung (or SA, the original paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party) against Jews and Jewish institutions and businesses throughout Germany and Austria on November 9-10, 1938 – an event known as Kristallnacht or the Night of the Broken Glass, due to the large amount of shattered windows at Jewish properties in its aftermath. At least 91 Jews were killed in the violence, and 30,000 were arrested and interned in concentration camps (but not extermination camps). Over 900 synagogues and 7,000 Jewish businesses were severely damaged or destroyed.

https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/holocaust-remembrance-day/whe...
What will it take for you?
Mutations are a matter of chance
Jenetics: Genetic/Evolutionary Algorithm Library for Java
Jenetics is a Genetic Algorithm, Evolutionary Algorithm, Genetic Programming, and Multi-objective Optimization library, written in modern-day Java.
Considering the vast amount of money being lost in global trade, how hard could it be to build a couple of temporary dams to the north and south of the ship, pump water into the contained area, and just refloat it?
I think "because everything should be open source" is a fine answer to why something should be open source, even if it doesn't answer the different and more important question about how the company will make money.
Volkswagen will catch up to Tesla, then comes the hard part
Poverty, infant mortality, mutagens and endocrine disruptors in drinking water, police impunity, more incarcerated than entire rest of the world combined, institutional corruption, $140M fighter jet with 600+ designed-in class 1 faults that cannot be cancelled because its parts are contracted out to 48 different states.

So, yes, "third world in nature". But the billionaires find life here pretty convenient.
But then you get to enjoy it without paying anything to Lamborghini. Is that fair to them?

Not that I care whats fair to them, just interesting to compare it to the argument for/against free media sharing.
> It's not though, you can't just ignore the woes of industrial farming when that's the vast majority of the meat products that surround us. These animals are for the most part born into horrible living conditions.

Reducing animal product consumption is important. But there is no reason to reduce it to 0, that is my main point. And note that you don't have to be extremely loving and caring with farm animals to be better than how nature treats them - it's not a high bar.

And purely from an argument point of view, the arguments against the extreme cruelty of industrial farming are far different from the arguments you presented, which would apply just as much to traditional farming as well (which, to be fair, is not always without its own horrors, especially where delicacies like foie Gras are concerned).

> If a cat is born in the wild and ends up dying of a curable disease then it sucks for it but that's life. If you have a cat as a pet and when it gets sick you decide to abandon it to fend for itself and die in the wild then you're a bad person. Same outcome, very different ethical implications.

To some extent that is true, but just as we don't judge the bear for killing salmon, I don't think it's right to judge a human for killing a cow to eat its flesh. The fact that we are farming it and not hunting it doesn't affect the morality of the situation in any way from my point of view. The cat example is immoral from a purely human and internal point of view: the human in question had entered into a caring relationship with a pet, so abandoning it in its hour of need is immoral.
On-demand service is drastically less efficient than fixed-route service. That's the main reason Uber/Lyft is already several times more expensive than bus or train service for the same route, and it would be even more expensive if Uber/Lyft drivers made the same total comp per hour as bus drivers including benefits, fuel, vehicle depreciation/wear and tear, insurance, etc. Not to mention the additional congestion and pollution you'd get if you replaced every bus during rush hour with 25 cars or whatever.
in the AMA he gives notice of things to come regarding the name. Like - the operating system keeping /e/ intermittingly, but choosing an overall easier to communicate project name.
OK. How does one country not handling a pandemic threaten the world?

It's certainly bad for the people there, but how is it bad for the rest of us? It's a pandemic, it's not like failing to contain the initial outbreak.
So we should believe your ramblings over experienced epidemiologists who say differently?
Killing a predictable number of people each year is not danger, it's damage. The danger posed by hydro is real, but entirely negligible compared to nuclear.

But of course we should replace fossils by renewables and phase them out before nuclear. And if nuclear wouldn't take too long to build building new nuclear plants as a stopgap may actually make sense. Unfortunately, they do.
>For their own platform? Facebook

That is an American pow, that is not shared in Europe or China.
you nailed it, i bow before you.
Nobody in data science wants fragmentation. Therefore, any aspiring new platform would need to bring some serious benefits to the table. I'm not sure what they are here.
Twist: The article is written by the imposter who discredited and then disappeared the real Dr Lodder.
Breeding ground for variants. Much more likely to happen in such a high infection population. Then they spread to the world.
And the gas comes from biowaste, which is actually nice, because municipalities which have the most effective ways of collecting and processing biowaste can export the resulting biogas to e.g. surrounding municipalities and in this way generate income to run things for everyone.

This means waste must be sorted somehow, but this is a rational thing to do anyways.

And it pisses me off immensely to see some idiots throw plastic bags or non-food waste to the biowaste bins. There are signs in many languages and even with pictures, but some people still manage. Such biowaste cannot be used for gas generation, so it's kind of hurting all the inhabitants.
It was/is the same rule in English also. Cheers.
You can just download Filezilla to become an injured party.
So I've talked to a number of people at various companies about open security work for various areas of detection and response, which is something I don't see really represented in the existing working groups for OSSF. Is there somewhere I can discuss ideas about this?

I see tons of opportunity for guidance to OSS devs that, when implemented, would have massive positive impact for detection and response.

I don't have the experience with such foundations, or the time, to really form a working group, but I'd certainly be interested in discussing this with others.
People travel, and mutations can be created from the non inoculated interacting with the inoculated
Mental deficiency does not make a culture or society. It's not sufficient to say they are a "group". It has to be a national, racial, religious, or ethnic group.

Famously, those with other ailments such as deafness or blindness have gone on to form their own subcultures. This of course never happened with the likes of Downs because they are not a "group" broadly and autonomously forming a culture. They are dependent on care, usually, and at the very least for a good portion of their lives.

You seem to think the risks of carrying a child knowing they will have Downs are irrelevant and ought to be borne by the parent. That's irresponsible and naive.
Yep, it should have been GCC, not LLVM, that earned Apple more big bucks. Totally a bad decision.
My guess is they’re saying if you have a population of 20, you have 20 chances of mutation. If you have a population of 200M, you have 200M chances of mutation. Size matters.
Yes, and that chance is a diceroll on every infection, so the more infections, the more times you're rolling that die..
??? Those are input powers of terrifically inefficient and expensive electrolyzers. That 250MW plant put out 17MW of hydrogen -- (120 (megajoules / kilogram)) * ((0.000236 kilograms) / (cubic foot)) * (2 200 000 ((cubic feet) / hour)) = 17,306,667 Watts.
The more and the worse the infections, the more the infected serve as a bioreactor which not only generates viral mass but also serves as an evolutionary playing field for accelerated viral development. We are fast-forwarding the virus into the future.
So much racism here based on political opinions. Jeez, it really shows people here are living in a bubble in SF.
> "an Anglo-Monarchio-Aristocratic party has arisen"

He's talking about Federalists.
Sorry, but when you are the chief advisor in a national crisis you don't get to learn on the job.
That's not "fair to say". That's your opinion. You can argue that Texas is "right wing" and yet people keep flocking there - wanting less government ("aka California") in their is inherently harmful?
I think that ruling is only for the Fourth Circuit.
The chip shortage is completely normal supply and demand at work. Real markets are not magic faucets that supply an unlimited amount of things at a constant price.

We haven’t even hit government mandated rations for things and that was a matter of course several times throughout the 1900s.

The Suez Canal is a cost and time optimizer. There is an alternate path around South Africa that all of these mega ships are more than capable doing. Transport costs for some stuff and delays will go up, but that’s it. That won’t even impact people in the US in any meaningful way.
This is such a nonsense headline.

It is immensely clear that most (all?) countries in the world are soon going to require proof of covid vaccine before they'll even consider letting a person travel to their country.

If you find this hard to believe, this system already works today, very well. It's already the case for many, many countries in Africa - you can't get a visa, and the airlines won't let you on a plane unless you have proof of Yellow Fever vaccine. You also can't cross land borders. It even goes a step further - when entering a country like Australia they specifically ask if you've been to <given African countries> in the last 90 days, and they won't even let you into Australia if you have not had the Yellow Fever Vaccine.

If you're wondering why the airlines enforce this, it's the same reason they enforce visas. The governments cleverly decided to make airlines foot the bill for anyone that must be sent back, therefore airlines are strict about not allowing anyone to board who they know would be denied entry. It works very well, and has done for decades.

From my experience travelling the world, it's immensely clear this will soon be the requirement to fly essentially anywhere in the world - proof of Covid vaccine and possibly a recent negative test and possibly a short quarantine on arrival and even another test in a few days. (like Iceland now).

This will be an interesting way to "force" citizens to get a vaccine. Your own government probably won't be able to (human rights and all), but foreign governments will force you to, if you desire to ever leave your own country.
Brits head home to avoid being deported as illegals in Spain
Thirding.
How about we talk about the actual elephant in the room? China na and its denial of anything serious going on + not sharing information early on which could have prevented a majority of deaths.
This.

The best references I know of are listed in that comment.

I just wanted to emphasize David Beazley's videos. The video [0] about python concurrency I consider a masterpiece.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCs5OvhV9S4
It's not a megaphone. A megaphone forces people to hear whether they want to or not, and drowns out others trying to speak. A facebook page does neither.
Either you believe the only moral thing would be to treat cows like cats or dogs, you believe that eradicating the species would be preferable to the current situation, or you must accept that we should compare the condition of cows with similar wild animals in order to decide whether our practices are uniquely cruel. Cows are not so unique among mammals that comparisons with other wild animals to get a feel for what their life could be like if we somehow let the free make no sense.

And if we compare industrial practices, then I would agree with the GP, the life of a cow in a factory farm is unusually cruel if we compare it to the potential life of a hypothetical 'wild cow'. But if we look at the life of a cow in a traditional farm, I think the opposite becomes true.
China has been chosen as the manufacturer of the western world.

While it's a big thing they need, I'm not convinced that it is impossible to shift a lot of that influence to India. Who would probably make a better partner ( not sure).

Other than that, I don't see much options.
But then, my customer has an interest in making me go out of business.
Lenin, Stalin and Mao applaud from their graves, even as the leader of National Socialism looks down lovingly from the heavens at JacobSuperslav.
Oh, you don't understand the difference betweeen power and energy...

The context here is storing energy for the days when it's not windy or when it's cloudy.

> Batteries are still far from economical in many situations, but there are many situations where they now make sense.

This a not about your Tesla, or what you feel about Tesla and batteries in general.
I didn't say FB should be forced to do anything. I am just saying that what they are doing is bad.
Focalboard
I made a small utility that'll replay socat log files captured by the -lf -x -v flags with the timing it collects if used in this way. It is very simple and is basically only there if you can't be bothered to roll your own:
https://gitlab.com/inivekin/socatplayer/-/releases

So if you're commonly doing a socat process like:
socat -x OPEN:/dev/ttyS0,b115200,echo=0,icanon=0 PTY,link=/dev/ttyO0,rawer 2> socat_log.log

then it may be of interest to you.
ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/FR7HH
The lyrics of the song “Smoothie” by The Limba
Perhaps this also depends on the type of software being built. If you are solving complex problems with original solutions then math and problem solving might be very important, but if you are building more "mundane" software for lack of a better world, then readability and maintainability might be more important. And in my own biased opinion, those aspects might rely more on good language skills instead.
Yes. Some other well-known ones are Richard Feynman's Surely you're joking Mr. Feynman and What do you care what other people think?, which are "as told to Ralph Leighton".
Hai Romanii!!!! :D
>As a result, this behavior can lead to a serious vulnerability if the client application doesn't properly check that the access token matches the other data in the request.

Later they use this language the clarify the situation. I suppose the situation being described is when the token has no information that can track to a specific user id. I guess devs are just checking that a token decrypts and aren't verifying it matches the user id in the request?

Seems like basic security 101.
This part. People point to things like wealth inequality but not point to median incomes or employment rates, or marriage rates or birth rates. its extreme selection bias. If france was a country its median income with be comparable with alabama.
Sounds like a double standard and possibly moving the goalposts. There are strongly typed languages that don't have those features, and compiler codebases that don't use that kind of architecture. Do they get a pass or not?
Sounds like "guns don't kill people"
I don’t think the fact that people are choosing Texas over California for themselves disproves OPs point.
Because It's not the actual elephant in the room.

In any operational outage, you focus mitigation, then prevention.

We are still in the midst of a global pandemic, and things can still get worse before they get better. Nothing China did or didn't do or lied or didn't lie about a year ago helps deal with OTHER authoritarian governments TODAY contributing to hundreds of thousands of other deaths and potential resurgence with P1.
For Linux the default file managers all support SFTP/SCP.

Also there's Krusader (KDE/Qt - https://krusader.org/ ) if you want something with two panes.
This is why I avoid front end coding. This seems eerily close to automating front end development
Wow,

It's weird to have what seems (I repeat, seems) like pretty a big deal technically be first described in a meandering New Yorker article.

This is a more-or-less hand-tune system apparently effectively competing with deep learning systems (identifying cancer is far from easy and not solved by deep learning at this point). As the article says, by being person-created, the system has obvious advantage in both explainability and users being able to understand it's mistakes.

Of course, a broader look from experts is in order but I can't see this as a strong demonstration of an alternative paradigm. Now, the challenge is to automate the construction of systems of this sort.

And I can find little-to-no information about this, except in Japanese.
Nah, I know about Racket's DSL support and touting itself as friengly to language writing, but it's still not the same as a dedicated parsing toolkit, the same way I wouldn't consider a Lisp with reader macros equivalent either...