skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is not with the goal, it's the quality of those circles. There are groups without much hypocrisy, mysticism and abuse.
This avenue of thinking are messing with language. And language is what we organize and coordinate with as human beings. So stop this!

Religion is a very precise definition. By which your comment is not only technically wrong but also practically harmful.

Definition of the religion according to dictionary is:
"the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods."

So no, they are not choosing new religions. And their "priests" do not claim to be shadow of the divine, and certainly do not threaten them with afterlife.
Too many trading/crypto scammers out there and youtube especially is full of them with their shitty ads. Amazing how gullible people are and they fall for these "get rich quick" schemes.

Hey folks, remember that there is no AI behind trading that a youtuber can master. If there is, they would definitely not share with you. Please stop losing your hard earned money to shit scams.
Why? What do we need that money for? If you don't like it then just don't go to church and the problem is solved. Obviously less people are attending so it sounds like it'll just solve itself in the future. No one is making anyone attend church and give offerings. It's just letting the government double dip on taxes at that point. Everything given to a church is essentially a donation to begin with and you want to have it taxed a second time after the church gets it?

It's a waste of time to tax them and it's not going to be used for anything helpful in this country. After seeing where the US government is blowing our tax money on these supposed "stimulus" bills I can't understand why anyone would support taxing more things in this country.
in comments on the first commit it was said that the access was revoked, but another one appeared, which points at the server
Literally everyone has seen this. There's no chuckle.
> Or if it just exists because JavaScript developers don’t want to learn something new.

It's probably a big reason. But if you think about it from the other angle... you don't want to learn Javascript, which would be new to you :-)
It is generally best practice to not make buttons move as users are about to click them. I like the idea though, and I think I would consider using it; but the buttons threw me off enough to make me not want to use it.
> Have you tested this on the chip Intel got running last week in their lab?

This is my favorite, not because I've heard this particular one, but because I've heard this vein of low-effort comment after nearly every talk I've ever seen. "Did you consider this specific aspect of niche-thing-only-I'm-working-on?" Some people seem to always look for the opportunity to show how much they know about a topic rather than actually discuss in good faith the topic at hand.
I find it ironic this post presents "fake news" as fact
No one gives a shit what programming language you use
Tangentially related:

Many companies have auditing requirements for external dependencies, with increasing strictness for more sensitive domains.

It would be immensely helpful to distribute this effort.

We could have a platform that pays top domain experts and security researchers for audits. Companies can get access to via a subscription model or by paying for specific dependencies.

Vulnerabilities would also be reported and fixed, helping everyone, and companies benefit by having a trustworthy source for audits and save internal work.

Ideally the platform would be successful enough to open up a good amount of audits publicly to benefit the whole community.

Also related: cargo-crev [1] explores a concept for shared auditing and trust for Rust crates.

[1] https://github.com/crev-dev/cargo-crev
I am talking specifically, and only, about the people who have been in the same room with RMS.
Even libc with everything it lacks has IP address parsers, this is a great example of how node.js is flawed.
Humans are only expected to be able to life 50lbs, you can go a little heavier, but it is no longer a weight that you can safely expect anyone to lift. You need to hire for strength to go above 50lbs. At 75lbs two humans are required to work as a team to lift for safety reasons (weight lifters can go beyond 600lbs alone, but not workers). I'm not sure where the next cutoff is, you soon need mechanical help to move anything.
Ars Technica’s non-fungible guide to NFTs
Yeah, likely part of it. I think there's also been a rise in non-denominational and "seeker-sensitive" churches that just don't have any concept of membership at all...
The makers of Eleuther hope it will be an open source alternative to GPT-3
Laravel Octane is using Swoole which implements a complete webserver, so there won‘t be any php-fpm more. As you would need to restart the server for every code change, there won‘t be a performance difference between docker on mac and non-docker.
Lemon Spaces
The hypocrisy is that they preach and ideal and fail to achieve it?

One thinks this is because ideals are meant to strived towards but not necessarily achieved.

A solution of throwing out ideals because they are hard to achieve and a little myopic in my opinion.

What i find an interesting thought is that you either believe these teachings are from a higher power or they are just from man.

The former had obvious implications, but the with the latter you will then need to answer the question is it written by lunatics or people that actually knew what they were doing?
No apology necessary. I sincerely appreciate any and all feedback on the project.
Hehe, but still, it is a very funny remark and it points to a large assumption in the gggp: that all boats will float. They do, right up until you smash them into icebergs and such.

On a technicality such an event changes their density considerably, assuming we take that to mean 'everything inside the volume circumscribed by the hull', after all, whether you insert all that water through a hole in the front or in the top doesn't really matter, as long as the air gets displaced that will do the job nicely.
I wonder why the previous link to track it is not working again. Would have been cool to see it navigating the canal:

https://www.vesselfinder.com/?imo=9811000
You're not wrong, at least about hispanics. Many hispanics in the US come from failed socialist states, so they tend to come to the US looking for capitalism. And they tend to be religious and socially conservative.

Luckily for the democratic party, the republican party has doubled down on anything racist they can get their hands on, so many hispanic voters that would probably like to vote republican actually vote democrat.

Now if the republican party actually decided to reverse course on immigration issues and create a legal economic immigration regime with a statutory path to citizenship, they would probably lose a handful of trump supporters but they would likely gain a supermajority of the hispanic vote. And that could be an unstoppable political force for decades. Hell, I could probably be convinced to vote republican again.
Because the society and its obligations require it, as harsh as it sounds. I know Americans are all about the individual rather than the group, but seriously, how else do you fix centuries of injustice, other than by giving a leg up to the groups that have been discriminated against for a very very long time and denied those opportunities? Because places are limited, giving those people priority access means someone else loses out. Yes, it's unfair.

Let me go back to my example of Germany - German youth are very passionate, work very hard, they put in more time and passion into things....and yet can't have nicer living conditions, can't have better social care, better roads, better healthcare, better education, because their country is paying their taxes into foreign coffers for something that their grandparents did.
Once again I ask you, how is that fair to those young people who like you said - are very passionate and very hard working, now have to be denied certain things they want and pay for? They are the ones losing out for something they haven't personally done.

It's the same here. Yes, I'm truly sympathetic that a kid can get rejected from college because they are from the "wrong" social group, at absolutely no fault of their own. I truly am. But if society wants to repay its debt for the damages caused then that's one of the ways of doing this.

The other solution, of course, is to create enough places in higher education that no one gets rejected for any reason. But that's a system Americans are unwilling to pay for, so that's not a solution within that context.
What's the best practice here, for avoiding deploy-time dependencies on RubyGems.org in general, and specific RubyGems.org-hosted gems in particular?

I've been doing Rails for a number of years on medium-sized teams. However, I have been lucky/unlucky enough to have generally been distanced from the devops side of things.

Bundler lets you vendor your gems directly, obviously, but that seems like a non-starter from a practical standpoint when we consider the size of Rails+dependencies.
I'm not sure the American market has figured this one out yet. I'm sure there is some version of this coming though.
> a standard library (thank goodness!)

What's a "standard" for you? Whatever definition, I think it implies there are > 1 implementations of it.

Node.js is based on CommonJS APIs, an initiative lead and implemented by earlier server-side JavaScript (SSJS) runtimes at the time such as v8cgi/TeaJs, Helma, etc. until Node.js dominated SSJS around 2011. Remember, SSJS is as old as the hills, starting 1996/7 with Netscape's LifeWire, and arguably has seen even longer use than Java as a mainstream server-side language.

Also not a "standard" in the above sense is TypeScript.

As to "standard library", the core packages on npmjs plus package.json are the standard library of Node.js on top of core Node.js APIs, and were developed in that spirit.
Octects can be octal, hah!
The Christian church has gone through an interesting time in 2020. Many churches have lost attendance as pastors closed their doors or tried to stay out of politics, while other stronger pastors who have kept their doors open despite lockdowns and are speaking up against the US government with respect to threats against religious freedom (eg see H.R. 5) -- those churches are stronger and more vibrant than ever.
I think raw (framework-less), modern (no J2EE, Spring) Java is most likely a much better language than raw, modern Javascript.

Plus, aren't Deno libs compatible with Node libs?
That makes sense...

So if you're up for it, you can still roll your own deployment infrastructure and tailor your builds as needed etc.. and support all of that internally.

Or you can pay Deno to handle it for you and you can focus on building your apps.
https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/EVER-GIVEN-IMO-9811000-...

https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ships/shipid:56...
I’m not religious in the slightest, but the hypocrisy has always been fairly obvious from the outside.

That said, I have serious doubts religion and hypocrisy are aligned anymore than the other sources of truth - especially when followed without applying critical thinking skills.
Honestly I'm surprised I don't see more instances of the technology being used for things like windows or sunglasses with controllable opacity/tinting. It's a much less price sensitive market at least. I've seen them in practice but it's rare and generally in contexts where I assume it is super duper expensive (like in hotels in Dubai sorts of places).
ping does not, glibc does.
> Would a "grey" crypto market refuse to trade (some) of the coins into another less traceable crypto?

No, but every wallet it touched would be flagged by AML software, making it ineligible for e.g. sale to an institution or deposit at Coinbase. That reduces its value, albeit not to zero.
Nigeria, other African nations to get 400 mln Covid-19 vaccines from J&J
Similar thing here. I wrote a blog post about an online "contest" that was actually a bit of a scam. For years afterward I'd periodically get email from the person asking to take the blog post down because its prominence in search results was souring job prospects. I eventually relented, not because I cared about him but because he mentioned that he had started a family and it was affecting them as well. I didn't want to hurt innocent people. I didn't want to censor my blog either, but I did add a robots.txt so it wouldn't show up in search results.

Since then it seems he really has gotten it together, and even had a project show up on the first page here. So now I suppose the robots.txt entry doesn't matter much, but it's still there anyway.
Maybe the person that reported the exploit to Zerodium already cashed out in mid 2017 and was angry that the exploit hasn't been fixed yet. Therefore, he decided to make it very obvious and force php to react.
This obscure little feature in Ecto/Elixir is something we've been using at Slab.com for about a year. While the blog post only covers the feature itself, I wanted to give a better overview of *WHY* we're using it.

Slab is a multi-tenant Phoenix app where all tables in our database, including pivot tables, have an `org_id` foreign key that references the team the data belongs to. Using association defaults enforces that the correct `org_id` value is automatically set for all resources.

We combine this with an `OrgRepo` module that wraps around our default `Repo`, which can only write or read other resources with the same `org_id`, ensuring that data for one team has no possibility of accidentally leaking to another team (using `Repo` is forbidden in our codebase).

An added bonus is; when we eventually have to scale our databases via something like sharding and have to vertically partition the data based on `org_id`, we would already have this system in place to support us.
That seems weird - you’d rather have RMS keep his controversial opinions in secret than have him state them and ultimately change his mind?
Speaking for myself, I have already learned JavaScript - I just don't want to have to use it.
They answered this at the end of the article: “The Deno company hopes to enable the millions of web programmers out there to maximally leverage their craft in other domains.”

It takes time to learn an ecosystem, and when people know one ecosystem and not another, most people would rather do high skill, high value work in the ecosystem they know than start over as a noob in a new one.

The only thing unique about the web / JavaScript land is its ubiquity and size due to its place as the language of the browser. So anyone who can make an abstraction that lets JavaScript developers do stuff outside the browser without learning much new has a virtually guaranteed large audience of developers who are likely to think “I would love to be able to build X, I just don’t have time to learn a new ecosystem.” Those folks are then thrilled to dive in and use the new abstraction. And there are a lot of those people. And that’s why we are all stuck using Electron apps for so much stuff. :)

But that doesn’t have to be a bad thing. Electron can evolve to be less of a resource hog, and better alternatives are being tested all the time. The same is true for other non-browser applications of JavaScript.

I don’t know if this vision is reality, but I think that it may be that we’re in the early days of a transition toward the browser stack being the new “GUI.” Which is to say, back in the 80s there was a lot of debate around GUIs and whether they were a good idea etc., and while most people liked them to some degree, they also lamented the idea of losing the command line. But in the end, GUIs didn’t shrink the number of CLI tools in the world, rather they increased the size of the domain that computers are used for my making it more accessible to more people. I think that so far the web vs native debate seems to be following a similar trajectory.
As far as I'm aware, distros are not doing security review of all the packages they include. I'd be pretty surprised to find out that they have the kind of resources needed to do code review of even a small percentage of their packages.
Xxh – Bring your favorite shell wherever you go through the SSH
`printf` for a literal, seriously?

OK... The compiler will do your job for you, drop the \n and use a puts instead, but, still, it'll be very disappointed with you.
Even if he does, it in no way whatsoever excuses his awful behaviour, abuse and harassment. And it is cowardly and incredibly insulting to those who do suffer from it to claim it is.
You've been able to do that with Nexe for Node.js apps since basically forever.
> You see people, day-in-day out being terrible, judgmental, hateful people, except on Sunday when they're in the front row being holier than thou.

But you see this nearly everywhere, with every type of organization/group. A prime example would be politicians and political groups who constantly talk about how they want to help people, but then throw those same people under the bus to get what they want. This is not something unique to any one type of organization.

From my experience, there are lots of good people in most religious organizations. I would venture to say, at least in the northeast US (which is where most of my experience is), it's the majority of the people. However, as with any organization, it's common for the bad apples to be the ones that rise in power, because they don't care who they hurt to get do so. This, too, is true everywhere.
My 1) is a reply to why I did it. I took it as a literal question and I gave a genuine answer.

EDIT: Ok, I think I see what you mean now. I believe your question is about what is the appeal in doing this stuff. It's pretty much the same reason why someone would build a chair or a table from scratch versus buying one at IKEA and building it. The former gets the enjoyment from all of the journey from a piece of wood to the finished chair and from building exactly the chair that they want and the latter is probably more focused on the chair itself. END_OF_EDIT

As for the rest, I believe that some answers are already in the post and in the comments that I and other people made.

I may have misunderstood what you meant and if that is the case let's restart from scratch:

Do you want to program a raspberry pi at the hardware register level, without any APIs ?
better thread here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26620892
Because that worked so well for Florence, Oregon's exploding whale...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6CLumsir34
Interesting... thanks for sharing some insight.. :)
Few of these instill purpose and influence behavior of a person in the same way that religion does.
You might disagree, but I would argue that the virtues extolled by the vast majority of religious organizations are good ideals to be striving for and wonder what is going to replace this?
Fanny Holmes (wife of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.) once said, when asked why she belonged to the Unitarian Church,

"In Boston one has to be something, and Unitarian is the least you can be."

Unitarianism by the 20th century didn't have any dogma, even atheists and agnostics could be members, and accepted that all religious traditions had spiritual wisdom to offer. But because it had evolved from Christianity it had institutional legitimacy, in a world where church membership was a social requirement.

People's beliefs might have changed less than we think over time, despite the common perception that nearly everyone in the US was hyper-religious until the last few decades.

There might be other factors around the decline in church membership -- perhaps related to the decline in participation in secular community groups as well.
Recent history has shown than it's easier to establish technical institutions rather than political ones. It seems backwards (surely first you agree how to set rules, then set rules!) but in practice the very first hurdle is acceptance that rules should be set at all. So first you agree a basic set of rules that look unthreatening and reasonable, then build a case for common processes to amend those rules at a later stage.

This is a somewhat dangerous path (what if those processes are never agreed?!?) but in practice it's much easier than persuading 27 tribes, from first principles, that they should follow a single chief.
You don't think that the children of religious parents are more likely to be religious than children of atheists?
The plan is to open source the old WAF code (that I wrote long ago) once the new WAF is fully rolled out.
I'd imagine it's wrapping ssh which will reuse connections if you tell it to in your ssh config. I use that heavily on my mobile computers.
>There's a long way from freedom of belief to the kind of identity politics practiced by religious groups. Ironically religious people are under the risk of getting cancelled by their own group if they dare wrongthink, so they are less free.

Are we discussing organized religions or political parties? Your comment could apply to either.
Well the opposite may be true too - the comment may be lying about it having anything to do with zerodium or that date.

Could be just a meme or a bad attempt of misdirection in case it went undetected for a while.
I know this sounds crazy on the surface level, but I really wish I could do data engineering and machine learning with TypeScript instead of Python. TypeScript's type system is so good, it makes refactoring large projects so easy. Python's typing module leaves a lot to be desired, and on top of that PyCharm doesn't properly support everything. Perhaps I should switch to VSCode--but I do like IntelliJ, and it works really well for TypeScript.
The sad thing is how many people think deepity nonsense like what you sarcastically posted here is worth consideration, as opposed to being not-even-wrong level laughably bad philosophy.
Think of the low dirty politics involved when you debate with your significant other over the best setting for the thermostat. Now bring in the United Nations and pretty much everyone else on earth.

The creation of any kind of central authority with the power to make truly existential decisions for humanity is an existential threat to humanity. There ought to be a clear and imminent more dangerous such threat before we resort to that. And if we do, an even higher priority will be to put our eggs in multiple baskets, so that the threat is no longer quite existential.
> Of the myriad ways to program computers, scripting languages are the most effortless and practical variety. Of these, the web browser scripting language (JavaScript) is the fastest, most popular, and the only one with an industrial standardization process.

I haven't fully investigated in a few years, but isn't it still true that LuaJIT is is faster than V8 JavaScript? The last I saw it was outperforming V8 by a lot. The practical use of LuaJIT is still very niche though. The lack of a comprehensive standard library, and being forever stuck on Lua 5.1 makes it even less generally appealing. I still love it for programming Nginx though..
It could be because contraception didn’t exist in the Middle Ages.
On the one hand, I feel very sorry for Mr Krebs and his family, yet on the other I'm grateful for his tenacity in sticking with it despite all the brick bats the bad guys throw at him.
Those activities don't help much when you encounter the really big challenges in life.

Spirituality offers frameworks for dealing with, and often embracing, many of the questions for which there may never be a satisfactory answer.

Whether you believe the postulates of a religion or not, there a ton of higher-level lessons to be learned from those who do.
Can you walk me a scenario where you and I are hosting our code on a malicious git server and Chuck can get their code in our our codebase? (assuming only signed commits)