skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s already the most recognized web development framework in the world outside of maybe the .NET ecosystem and maybe whatever rules Java these days.
He explicitly stated he could drink a quart of it and it wouldn’t harm you.
> Can you imagine how difficult it would be if other legislation was maintained in that fashion?

Pretty much all of it is.

But much (but not all) other adopted legislation in the US consists largely (but also often not entirely) in its raw form of English-language patch instructions for codified law like the US Code. So the legislation itself is added to the cumulative register, but then the main effect most people are aware of is a change to codified law. (Actually, that's true of Constitutional amendments to, but the diff is invariably in practice “the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified ...”; there's nothing stopping the diff from being more in edit form if desired.

But even though most of the text of most legislation is that way, there is lots of uncodified law, too.

(My understanding is that the UK still mostly does uncodified lawn though it does sometimes include specific amendments to earlier named acts in later ones.)

Honestly, though, on a document the size of the US Constitution, there's little impact (and given the original open-ended model, though newer amendments tend to be proposed with expiration dates for ratification that limit the potential problem, the diffing instruction approach would be problematic since the target of the alteration might be reorganized between proposal and ratification.

> I think the decision in the US constitution to replace the Westminster parliamentary system with a presidential system was a step backward.

The US Constitution didn't replace a Westminster-style parliamentary system with a presidential system; the system the US had under the Articles of Confederation wasn't a Westminster-style parliamentary system.
> Something being rational doesn't make it not racism.

That's the really tricky part with racism, not the mindless extremism. What is the acceptable limit between rationalism and racism? Is there one? If we take the example of the GP with Russian secret services, if 99% of the Russian speaking people you encounter are from the secret services, does it make it acceptable to discriminate against the 1% to save your life? If yes, then what is the limit? 50%, 10%, just one person, ...?
Um, can you post a list of the titles, please? To me, the old books are the only ones worth reading. "Everything old is new again." It's all been done before and generally much better, but finding old books in decent shape? You have a potential gold mine on your hands...
By being grateful for SSDs that finally give them the responsiveness that head-per-track disks did in the ‘70s…?
If you take a step back, you could actually look at this as a sign of progress in society. Things are moving enough for sexism to be a concern to a company - even if it's for cynical reasons and it has been weaponised by a dishonest person. Progress is bumpy and people can end up suffering during a transition.
Detecting financial fraud using GANs with Nvidia
I agree we need to start from an mvp and so with a data model, but does this model really need to be AI or ML? My counter point to your counter point is yes, we need a model, but probably the initial one can be done with simple BI/SQL type aggregation methods. Most of AI/ML I see is optimizing an already existing model, not create something completely new.
I know about strikes. They are different than everyone quitting.

> Yes, the workers will eventually come back to work, but only after they gain some concessions from management, and it can be a long time before they come back.

Workers don't get paid while on strike (they get some money back from the union that they saved there themselves). There's no guarantee that management will make concessions.

Yes, it can be a long time before workers come back.
I see this move towards redefining sexism and racism to be the prevalent form of negative sex or race based discrimination, instead of all forms of discrimination.

That's why I stated it is a semantic discussion.

On the one hand, I think this redefining is good. Because when we talk about the problems of racism and sexism, the prevalent form of negative discrimination (so in the west, racism by white people, and sexism by males) are what we tend to mean.

On the other hand, other forms of discrimination also happen, and we need words to describe them. Racism and sexism used to describe that, but by now such describing tends to feel bad. It tends to feel like drawing an equivalence between e.g. a white person not being able to use the N-word being 'just as bad' as the oppression faced by black people in America.

I feel we need separate words for both the systemic (non intentional) oppression of people by sex and gender. And discrimination based on sex and gender in general. Originally racism and sexism used to describe the latter. Slowly we are moving towards having it mean the former, without having new words for the latter. Ideally wish we had just come up with new words for the latter. But that would have lost some of the power that comes from calling someone a racist or a sexist.

In conclusion, semantics matter, and are hard.
As long as you create zero externalities for others, you are right. BTC is the exact opposite, though.
The problem solving can be very stimulating.
They don't have to do that. They can just make it illegal to operate any off- and on-ramps into crypto (from fiat).

And, if I'm not mistaken, the US can sanction all foreign businesses that continue to provide these services.
> It has nothing to do with Americans vs Europeans. Plenty of Americans spent excessive time navel gazing on optimal TCP/IP replacements (tons of research on Internet protocols comes out of American universities).

Yes, that was what my last point was about.

> First to market wins if it works and solves the problem. That’s all there is too it. Nobody is going to wait around for something that might work that is theoretically better if you have an option that works and solves your problem.

This way of framing the problem is weird to me. Markets are not handed to us by the Gods, we put them in place because some of us think they are a good way to solve problems. And in any case, consensus on green fields like networking at the time have very little to do with markets, at least in the economical sense (you could argue for a market of ideas but I don't think that's what you had in mind). But to give a famous counter example, most of the world have changed their perfectly fine system of units when a clearly better one emerged.

> IPv6 is a pragmatic replacement and it hasn’t even meaningfully killed IPv4 despite being widely available for nearly 20 years.

Not nearly as pragmatic as NAT.

Te be clear, I'm not saying that the pragmatic way is bad, in fact it's probably the best in most situations. I'm just pointing out that there might be psycho-social reasons for the non adoption of the OSI model by the network community. I could be wrong of course and I'm happy to read opposing thoughts on the matter.

EDIT: I re-read my first comment and I can see that I have been to dry in my writting and how it can be understood as "those damn Yankees are idiots!". I apologize for that, I'm trying to improve my nuances but still have a long way to go.
Except that the application that is able to display and understand what those magical HTTP contents mean isn't part of POSIX.
You're not seeing all the searches that didn't pan out.
> the samples will arrive in the early 2030s.

Ouch.
> A song could reasonably have a chord progression such as {Am, G, D, Am, G, Dm}, and the inclusion of both {D} and {Dm} would cause conflicts. Given that music theorists cannot agree on this stuff, there doesn't seem to be anything a computer can do that is better.

Whilst I'm no expert, I'm pretty sure we have hundreds of years of examples of borrowed chords [1] for music theorists to agree upon, so yes plenty of things a computer could do better (as per other comments).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borrowed_chord
Full-scale Commodore 64 remake has retro fun for young and old
"Yesterday (2021-03-28) two malicious commits were pushed to the php-src
repo 1 from the names of Rasmus Lerdorf and myself. We don't yet know how
exactly this happened, but everything points towards a compromise of the
git.php.net server (rather than a compromise of an individual git account).

While investigation is still underway, we have decided that maintaining our
own git infrastructure is an unnecessary security risk, and that we will
discontinue the git.php.net server." - https://externals.io/message/113838
Agreed. Only concern is that irrationality can last longer than rationality and the longer that happens the bigger the attack vector becomes.
In my case it brings me back to when Ubuntu was shipped on a free CD-Rom from Canonical.
Newspapers aren't making it easier for people. I'm considering subscribing to The Economist for several years now and I can afford it. But the horror stories about being unable to unsubscribe or a need to call someone by phone to do it (yeah, half across the globe, with several dollars per minute roaming rate) is always putting me off it.
in my experience while Europe and the U.S have similar problems things play out quite differently in each, and it is often useless to make a comparison for this reason.

I've also seen a free Leonard Peltier protest march in Copenhagen, but I'm not sure that the state of Native American rights in Denmark and the U.S is somehow comparable.
There's falsifiability, testability, verifiability, lots of ways to determine if something is real.

Zero trust systems for reality discovery is essentially what the scientific revolution is based on.

We know how to do it
It's a bit more complicated than that. For example, if you do

git log --format=%ae | sort -u

the cursor movement sequences will be preserved.

I haven't delved too deeply into what git actually does here in terms of processing for "pager" output vs not.
I run NoScript so I default to JS off for every site and will allow only what I need to allow to get a specific site to work.
As someone who did cross platform development for iPhone, Android and Windows Phone way back when, Windows Phone did actually have the superior dev experience by far (talking about WinPhone 7+ here). It wasn't free, but neither was iPhone development.

They didn't have any market share though, so there wasn't much money to be made making apps for them. I suspect they failed because they launched 2-3 years after Android and iPhone, so the other platforms had accumulated the network effects of an existing user base and app ecosystem that they couldn't catch up to. And they tried hard, IIRC, Microsoft offered to build a Snapchat client for Snap Inc, and to pay them to be allowed to do so, but were denied.
Cutting cloud costs with machine learning
I have been in the data science and machine learning space for the majority of my career, but have more recently spent time in meddling around with infrastructure. Could be the naivety, though the complexity (and inefficiency) of bundled cloud tools bothered me, so I built a tool to help manage costs.

It still requires some policy finagling, so it's not self service yet, however, I'd love y'alls candid feedback.
It was still stuffed in the author email field.
>Can't pass by some articles without hearing the phrase "radical left media" or "liberal media" or whatever.

Do you have some examples? I don't remember reading that in the WSJ.
I can’t even tell anymore.

I’m constantly thinking and coming up with all sorts of ideas and projects based on things I read, see etc. Around the time, I get really excited about the idea of bulging these things and often come up with graded designs plans.

But I can never actually bring myself to build them. As soon as I’m staring at a text editor or need to start writing code I kinda just just quit, if I even get that far. In a week or too all my idea seems dumb, not worth it, etc. I don’t think I’ve actually written very much code in a long time.

Maybe because I’m not very good at it. Maybe I dislike the drudgery that comes with building the boilerplate. I don’t know.
I dunno; there's a lot of SaaS that are in daily use by developers; build tooling, version control, code reviews, chat / collaboration tools, etc. Editors not so much anymore, but I've got an intellij license which I use intensely.

I mean I get where you're coming from; for solo developers and small clubs, free tools get you very far. But at larger enterprises you'll want to pay for the extra services and less management.
> 5G can be many things, but it isn't gigabit wireless speeds, or low latency, or smart microwaves. It can enable those technologies, but what it really is is a telecommunications standard, telling companies how to build out networks.

True enough. In some sense, 5G is just the next version of the protocol that mobile operators run. Its more than just a technical protocol, it comes with organizational practices as well.

However, the current standard was made with much intentionality. It was very much designed to enable gigabit wireless speeds, low latency and smart microwaves.
Panama is limited by its locks while Suez is at sea level. Ever given is almost twice the tonnage of New Panamax.
> What are the technical benefits of the "stick-the-amendments-on-the-end" model used by the US constitution, as opposed to the "change-the-original-text" model used by most other contemporary constitutions (including even many US state constitutions)?

The technical benefit is that the the multistage amendment process, with long ratification windows (originally typically unlimited, though 7 years is typical now; normal legislation, including most state Consitutional amendments, have much shorter windows because even if they are multistage it's usually a second vote of the same legislature or a single ratification vote of the people), creates a greater risk for crossing amendments with unintended consequences. Simply stating the final effect has less possibility of unintended consequences.
SKIP is cool but you have to learn it, whereas this just uses knowledge you already have.
For animation, the real issue is frame timing. It looks like there's an animation API in kitty that allows this sort of control, so it'd work there, and iTerm2 supports inline animated gifs which I've already demo'd.
...yet. It persisted as an awkward anecdote in the industry.

But more importantly, the story of Hans and Nina Reiser is of the kind that the various forms of fashionable fascism over the past two decades did not find interesting. It's not the act that makes people make other people remove references from software projects - it's how the act ties into current hot topics.
This could easily be made into hilarious copypasta
Yes, but there's a 32 byte limit which is a bit of a buzzkill.
"Racist because it uses the word black negatively"
Ah, right you are - I didn't realize. I'll have to add that.

I had heard of 電子辞書 having this feature, but I've never actually used one. Glad to see that 部品 was the right word, I had been kind of uncertain about that and gotten feedback about it.

https://jp.sharp/sc/eihon/pa660/text/kangi.html
In the original Vice article it's even 90%! https://www.vice.com/en/article/5dp4gx/professor-catfished-b...

So, we've slowly grown from 80%->90%->95%.
Thanks, I'll stick those in!
Cash enables tax evasion, sponsoring terrorism, all kinds of …

Should we ban cash?
There where full x.400 based systems that did use all the layers - I worked as third line support on the UK ADMD back in the day.
I used to use the activation.jar from JavaMail for Mime in my app. server, then I realized Mime is pretty simple and replaced it with this file: https://github.com/tinspin/rupy/blob/master/mime.txt
In terms of equipment capabilities we most certainly have switches that have sets of layer 3 capabilities, even a ten year old cisco 3750x can do basic OSPF, BGP, EIGRP etc. Often referred to as an enhanced or layer 3 switch.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/c...

But you for sure wouldn't call it a router because it has nowhere near the routing table RAM, routing ability, or full set of routing configuration parameters as you would want to use on a dedicated purpose router.

For your mikrotik, if you open it up or if you look at someone's teardown of one, what you'll see is a set of gigabit ethernet switch chips (perhaps 1 ASIC per every 4 ports) under heatsinks, that have purely layer 2 feature sets only. And then one CPU that runs the mikrotik routerOS which does layer 3 things. The mikrotik will have different levels of performance in packets per second capability for traffic flows that stay at purely layer 2, and another level of capability in Mbps and pps at layer 3. The OS on the mikrotik knows how to tell the switch chips how to do things at layer 2 (define this vlan, define this trunk, group certain ports into the same fabric, do 802.1x stuff, etc).

for instance here's a block diagram of a mikrotik rb4011: https://i.mt.lv/cdn/product_files/RB4011iGSplusRM_180903.png
Spatiotemporal Deep Learning with PyTorch Geometric Temporal
I can't imagine that even a 20% shift in productivity would be noticed.
Paging goes back to the original GSM (so even before 2G). In fact, the technology of paging predates mobile voice. The technology was used in pagers!

It is a staple of any always-available battery powered device.
So does government money. And these uses are only a small percentage. I'd be like banning internet because it allows false news/cons/<your vice of choice>
Yeah but that's not a controversy - because nobody is defending him. So ironically it's "safer." If someone is a controversial figure, you can score points and grab attention and praise by removing their code from your project. If someone is uncontroversial - even uncontroversially bad - what are you indicating that way? That you, too, frown on murder?

My impression is that ReiserFS was just sort of gently dropped due to disuse, disinterest and lack of maintenance. That's about what I'd expect - nobody wants to touch it, but nobody expects anyone to signal their disgust either, because it's not in doubt.
The only thing the US government can ban/regulate are the on and off ramps, going from fiat to crypto and from crypto to fiat. Because at the end of the year you most likely need to pay your tax in fiat currencies.

But given that the ledger data is public I could see it become regulate so that to buy and sell crypto you need to go through a Know your customer(KyC) process. So they know who's behind which wallet address.

This way states can create white lists and black lists of wallet addresses. Only allow white listed miners to add new bitcoins/crypto to exchanges. This will make sure sanctioned nations can't trade with US companies. The can pretty much track in real time when illegal transactions are taking please by cross referencing if transactions from black listed to white listed addresses are taking place and fine instantly. Chain analyses have already been used to find criminal activity.
Your interpretation doesn't change the facts around it. WHO lost significant portion of its funding for a while because exactly of China's self-interest influence. But because others, like you, see that as "nationalistic" and "destructive", that effort was in vain and to this day the status quo remains the same and the end result is at hand - "nobody can find out what triggered the pandemic."

My comment didn't disintegrate and destroyed more commons than said status quo. Inaction and censorship did.
> It's closed source, but it's astonishing

Really? Their name says OpenAI.

Anyway, how do we know their examples were not cherry-picked? Do they have an online demo?
Nothing extraordinary, it’s been in the news constantly for the last months: Morgan Stanley, BNY Mellon, JPM, GS, Blackrock
No discussion of artificial suns is complete without someone mentioning WWII era carbon arc search lights.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWLmKcZtb-4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho9doOP2RO0
Seriously? What about OAN and SBC?
Ask HN: Best Video Generating Library
Is there a python library for generating videos with text, images , CSS, sound and animation support?
But should there be other reason to ban it? Not just bitcoin, but proof of work coins in general:

* power usage

* environmental issues

* worsening chip shortage

Do we have technical reason for proof of work? Isn't proof of stake as safe anyway?

I would be in favor of banning PoW. Projects can switch anyway
Free 300 vectorized doodles for your design project
Donwload and get free 300 vectorized doodles of many shapes to use with your design project or on your websites or landing pages.
I'm glad you enjoyed it!

Mostly I wanted to give a bit more historic context. Japan is arguably a more productive economy and a better place to live than India, and Pseudoerasmus suggests that this is at least partly because labour was not able to mount as effective a defense as in India.

To belabour that point: Fred says at https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LABSHPINA156NRUG that the labour share of GDP in India is something above 50%.

Japan is also something above 50%: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LABSHPJPA156NRUG

India's GDP per capita is about 1.9k USD. The number for Japan is about 40k USD.

So even in the hypothetical world where Indian labour would somehow be so strong it would capture 100% of GDP, that would still be only about 10% of what Japanese workers get.

Now, of course, any nuanced argument will take into account that labour suppression wasn't the only difference between Japan and India.

But the important thing is that this shifts the context of the argument: instead of a knee-jerk attitude of 'unions are obviously good for workers in the long run', we have some more explaining to do.

(With sufficient mental gymnastics, you might stil be able to argue that unions and strong labour in general is good for standard of living. But at least now you have to engage in that gymnastics.)
This is a poor analogy. There is no particular reason to assign someone priveleges over the public facts of their life for example convictions trials misdeeds. In fact by definition no evil doer would ever give such permission.

Would you ask a rapist or their victim for permission to discuss the crime?

RTBF isn't ownership of information about self it is a privelege for villains to censor their victims and the general public.
Also handy when playing GeoGuessr since, obviously, the little map you're putting a pin in has no search box.
News orgs should be able to register similar to 501c and reporters similar to any perennial certification system and get subsidization for dedicating some amount of coverage to the public interest, which you leave intentionally nebulous and allow for the public to challenge it through the courts if they feel there's a bad faith actor.

The freedom of the press is sanctified to ensure functioning democracy but there needs to exist reasonably accessible tools to exercise that freedom otherwise it's just flowery language.

It's not meant to cover all the costs but exist as an incentive so that the service is provided.
Obama’s Kenyan grandmother dies aged 99
Well put, but I’ve always felt a middle ground existed where a knowledgeable scientist can make a very educated guess with much lesser statistical significance as long as the experiment is thought through, you are aware of the noise models and alternative explanations have been explored and mostly ruled out. Of course for publication you better whip your ass to whatever sigma they demand, but more often than not there either cause for optimism or pessimism ways before that point.
Land value taxes are still very much important.

Henry George wrote his analysis not under feudalism, but in the US.

See eg https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2015/07/22/piketty-... or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax