skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah I don’t think there is, and doesn’t need to be either. If you believe it’s the Word of God then it’s got just what it was suppose to have in it, nothing more and nothing less. Most of the debated things are just not that important on the scale with things that are cut and dry, by design.

It’s like the science thing, there is science in the Bible, but the Bible is not a science book. Science is more of a way to describe the function of the lego blocks that make up the world around us, the Bible is more concerned with how the lego blocks came about and what the cosmic purpose of them is. Which is why science and Bible are never at odds, just like how metaphysics is never at odds with physics. Or how things like gravity and light are well beyond the scope of biological evolution.
Agreed. I wasn't saying that I think that the law is right. The original article phrases it as Reagan "called the strike illegal", which makes it sound like that was just his opinion. The law as written is pretty unambiguous.

If you want to effect change in the law, you first have to acknowledge that Reagan acted in line with the law as written, rather than according to his own whims. What made the civil Rights demonstrations work was that MLK and others showed just how bad the law was by breaking it and accepting the consequences. They were deliberately drawing attention to the law, rather than focusing on the enforcers of it.
I really hope that companies continue asking these questions and rejecting great candidates who choose to keep real world knowledge in their figurative L1 cache. After all, it makes it much easier for my company to find people that code real world solutions instead of grinding on leetcode.
The issue with blaming contractors in this case is that they can't afford to lose the job. It probably pays well enough but their options are 1. get fired because they couldn't meet target deadlines, 2. pee in a bottle and risk getting caught.

Given those two options, it's no surprise they pick option 2. Amazon knows this yet they continue to set unrealistic targets.
> The story I'd like to understand is: Does the EPA actually publish results with one car underrated by 60% (Taycan 4S) and another overrated by 2% (2021 Model 3 LR)?

My understanding is that in the USA: the manufacturers do the test and then report them to the EPA.

So the Taycan numbers were tested and reported by Porche. In contrast, the Tesla numbers were tested and reported by Tesla.

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/how_tested.shtml

> Fuel economy is measured under controlled conditions in a laboratory using a series of tests specified by federal law. Manufacturers test their own vehicles—usually pre-production prototypes—and report the results to EPA. EPA reviews the results and confirms about 15%–20% of them through their own tests at the National Vehicles and Fuel Emissions Laboratory.

Note: EPA only reviews the tests, not conduct them. The manufacturers self-test.
what did she say in response? I only saw her tweet and amazon's petty (and misleading) response. Who said she cannot be criticized? I think mostly people are saying that they are cringey liars...
I have had USB 3.0 devices cause noise which gets picked up by silicon strip detectors in particle physics experiments. These days its common to have a computer in the target room next to the digitizers to avoid long analog cable runs. Now you have to be careful which USB port you plug into with what device.
USB3 seems like such a sh*t storm.

Too many features, no standardized labeling for what cables support, not truly reversible connectors, dongles and hubs that barely work unless you drop hundreds, etc.

I'm hoping to god we learn for USB4.
On the other side of the spectrum, I myself am a relative musical neanderthal, having gone into the book not even knowing what the word "fugue" meant. I was fascinated by the way he related this sort of musical "recursion" back to general mathematical problem solving. When I read OP's dismissal of it, I figured I was just underthinking whether it was a good analogy or not, being the unsophisticate that I am - nice to see that somebody who does have some expertise on the subject weighing in.
Many trees/plants have dimethyltryptamine in them, the human experience of taking that chemical is often described as being close to dream-like, I'm not sure if it's relevant though.
It gives you a working MVP and a lower bound on what's possible. Tnen you can iterate either on model or data or both - data can also be further cleaned, changed and expanded. How can you gauge ROI of your data cleaning/collection efforts without it? Maybe an extra day you've put into it made a difference, maybe it didn't and you'd have better spent it on modelling or other tasks.
A Gallop poll serves as your evidence for religion's impact on stability and peace? This is pie-in-the-sky cherry picked data, stylized as a scientific inquiry.
Uncle Bob works for a consultancy. And I guess it’s easier for them to get funding to reimplement something (then it’s greenfield) than to maintain some existing piece of software.
You didn't get an answer so I'll provide one.

The ostensible reason is that it's social conformity, that does not tolerate dissent, and uses invalid means of enforcing that conformity. They see it as a form of identity politics and grievance nurturing.

The real reason is that it's precisely because it breaks social conformity. "Woke" is used to describe anything that objects to marginalization, by people who aren't in those marginalized groups, and fear becoming one.

Being against "wokeism" is precisely identity politics and grievance nurturing, primarily by those who identify politically with white men and nurturing their grievances. Pretty much any time you read it, you can assume that what they're complaining about is something they're doing. If they complain about being shut down, it's because they're trying to shut down somebody else. If they complain about somebody being easily insulted, it's because they're being easily insulted.

There are plenty of difficulties associated with the pursuit of justice and equality. People have legitimate disagreements about it. And they'll seek to exploit those by presenting themselves as the most aggrieved group, magnified by their sheer numbers -- that being the entire point.
Actually church is a long way down the list in terms of meeting a new partner:

https://www.eharmony.com/blog/how-you-meet-your-spouse-matte...
Did they? The tweet I saw was specifically talking about Amazon employees, and last I checked, none of the people driving delivery trucks are in any way employed by Amazon.

My understanding was that someone had made the accusation that this was happening in fulfillment centers, which are employees, and Amazon was officially denying it.

Amazon DSP drivers are hired and managed completely by third party companies.

https://logistics.amazon.com/marketing/faq
In my day job as a data scientist I always feel the tension between the "interesting" parts: reading new papers and developing new architectures relative to the features engineering and data improvement which I consider less interesting but usually take most of the time.
The US's First Amendment deals with that, in great part to get away from the (at the time) Church of England and prevent that (mixing church and state) from happening here. It doesn't logically surprise me that the country who left that scenario to worship freely has higher numbers of religious people 300 years later than in the country that still lived under much of the corruption for a longer period of time.
Asynchronous and “direct” IO support for PostgreSQL
* Had the chance to make mistakes and learn from them
- * Had a sense of privacy (pre-facebook)
Hitchens' knowledge of religion and philosophy borders on 0%. I would not reference him in any way if you intend to make serious arguments.
As a religious person, I don't see how the issues you describe are any lesser in non-religious populations. You're misplacing your blame; society would still have these problems without religion, and it'd arguably be worse, too.
I just came here to say that I really appreciate most of the civil discussion going on here on all sides. Doesn't seem entirely one-sided or extremely negative. Thanks everyone for keeping it that way!
>pathologically see the world through an individualistic lens and ignore their identity.

Pathologically? That's the healthy and correct way to see the world. Seeing through a lens filtered by 'identity' (you obviously mean race and gender) is flawed.

Victims of racism and gender bias... which include both whites and blacks, men and women... need to avoid becoming sexist and racist in response. It'll drag us all down.
The article making the rounds a few weeks ago about rethinking general thinking feels relevant. By showing that many large neural networks are ultimately really good at memorizing the training set, in curious how much the two views you are showing are in conflict.

It is the age old "rote memorization" versus "learning". In large, I suspect those do not have a clear line between them. Such that emergent behaviors are expected and can be taught.
How does it compare to I Am A Strange Loop? All 3 are on my list but I found GEB very difficult to get started.
The big difference is that with electric car ranges it's even more important for the buyer. People care about that extra range so much, that it's in the name of the car type (long range).
> The problem is CS degrees. What do you learn in a CS degree? First you learn data structures, then you learn algorithms, then maybe if there's time they burst your bubble and tell you about caches and how CPUs actually work.

There's 4 years in a standard CS degree program, there's time unless your curriculum or choice of focus is more strictly on the theoretical side, which is not typical outside of a few universities (as the only or primary option). Every second tier university graduate I've mentored has understood these topics. Except for the past 5 years where they are, more consistently, only capable of programming in Python or similar high level language and their program of study has divorced itself of talking about the real-world behavior on real hardware (from the same schools that, previously, seemed to understand or at least be aware of these topics).
This refers to the planned flight test of SN11, a prototype of the second stage of SpaceX's Starship [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship
People don't report it for free, they are hoping for a fix in return.
I exceed the EPA highway MPG when using cruise control for 100s of miles w/ little traffic. When driving manually or being a bit more aggressive with passing, MPG falls below the MPG estimates.
- map/reduce/filter/for-comps in the standard library. Go doesn't support this style of programming, and because of the lack of generics, you can't write generic data structures with these types of methods either. It's all loops and mutation in Go

- first class functions. Go does have these

- concise lambda syntax, that makes them nice/easy to use. Go has first class functions, but a very verbose/awkward lambda syntax

- can easily create your own generic data structures with functional interfaces (can't do this in Go b/c no generics)

- Python is pretty strongly typed, and if you meant statically typed, there's now optional static type checking in Python, similar to TypeScript (not as robust/well implemented though)

- Python has decent immutability support. For example, dataclasses (https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html) with frozen=True are a lot like immutable classes in more purely functional languages (i.e. case classes in Scala). Tuples and named tuples. There are libs out there for frozen (a.k.a. immutable) dicts, lists, etc.

- Python is about to get pattern matching in 3.10

- functools (https://docs.python.org/3/library/functools.html)

- etc.

You can absolutely use Python in a very mutable-OO style, but it also has pretty good functional programming support. If you look at most Python data science code, it's written pretty functionally.

I'd say most important for data science applications is the ability to create generic data structures with functional interfaces - you can't do this in Go, makes it really awkward to write a lot of the foundational vector, data frame, etc. libraries, that basically all higher level data science libs depend on.
So, did they let it into the Canal, or did it go to the back of the line?
Does that include war?

Throughout history, religious leaders have very rarely opposed killing "the enemy". Likewise it's a rare soldier in a time of war who is insists on obeying, "Thou shalt not kill".

Yet if this is true, then how do you define religiosity if it overlooks willingly acting in contradiction to the most essential laws that a faith and its faithful claim to believe?
I love this idea for a lot of things, and I think it beats the "smart mirror" trend in aesthetics and energy, but the price is a definite roadblock.
You're probably looking for Gemini
This is sad to see. I wonder if there are smaller browser codebases out there that might be possible to port.
Worldwide salvage capacity isn't up much. Mammoet Salvage and Titan Salvage exited the business a few years ago. Smit is one of the few salvors with worldwide reach and their own heavy equipment. The business requires huge equipment on standby, and trained people waiting for the next crisis.

Smit is now part of Boskalis, which is a big marine engineering firm. They have dredgers, heavy lift ships, tugs, and barges, which are useful both for marine construction and for salvage. So the fleet can do other things between crises.
It went public in 1994, when GenX was in college and entering the workforce. I wouldn't call what the internet was in 1994 as "built," it came well after.

Facebook was create by a Millennial though, just sayin'.
Best M3U Playlists – Free IPTV Links – 30 March 2021
Perhaps we're working with two different definitions of misogyny?

"hatred of, aversion to, or prejudice against women" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny

Where does power come into it exactly?
Agree. I am not a musician, but have absorbed a lot by having lived with them.

Weaving Bach in makes perfect sense.
As someone in that Twitter thread pointed out, 75% of that effect is accounted for by differences in cohort size vs total population.
My personal view is that syntactic debate over imports (including whether it's in an import/require/url/package.json/whatever) are basically meaningless except for surface level debate. How "nice" it is to write imports is pretty worthless to me.

The structural and semantic differences between imports are a much more important discussion. Import syntax is the front end to the languages meta programming semantics. It's meta programming in the sense that your code and other code is the data, but what you're really programming is a task runner with specific instructions about how to find and satisfy the requirements to build and/or run the software.

Integrating package resolution into the language itself is a really important distinction for contemporary designs - passing that buck to external tools but simultaneously coupling them to the runtime is a mistake that I think we should learn from. Deno is a good step in that direction.
Or, just maybe, it's someone who truly cares about the ramifications of a cryptocurrency that requires the cumulative power of a medium size nation to run?
Brings to mind the (quite funny) movie 'Bedazzled'.

However Brendan Fraser's character tries to phrase his wishes, the devil finds a way to mess him up.
While perhaps less portable (and a bit more proprietary) it's worth checking out the new project of Avery Pennarun, better known as apenwarr -- the creator of sshuttle -- which has made the rounds here, Tailscale [0].

I've switched all my devices to it and frankly, it's wonderful. Private VPN, tunnel, VLAN, auth, sharing, all-in-one.

0: https://tailscale.com
Bongcloud Attack
That feels like the kind of non-obvious claim that should come with a source (even just a blog post by an analyst that lays out the relevant vocab terms and the general theory).
Currently, not, but it's planned to support more Git providers, and other kind of apps, like PHP (I like it, roast me). :)
Why is a Free-Market thinktank upset that a private entity disallowed something on their private property?
I don't know you, but I love that you commented on this because your history and perspective is a perfect example of the phenomenon I'm talking about.

TO your question, I don't claim to have all the answers (let alone all the "Answers in Genesis") but I've come to understand there's a lot more nuance to a "literal" understanding of the Bible than Ken Ham may have led you to believe.

A couple of resources I've found helpful when navigating the intersection of historic Christianity and modern science are biologist Joel Duff [0] and physicist Aron Wall [1]. (Fun side note on the latter: he's the son of Perl creator Larry Wall.)

[0] https://thenaturalhistorian.com/
[1] http://www.wall.org/~aron/blog/
> Is it just me, but hasn't the mainstream financial news over the years taken on the feel of reality television?

I like to look at the bright side: The world has caught up with Egyptian geography. :)
It's weird how many Americans are completely unaware of the second largest branch of Christianity (or better call it "the trunk" and everything else - "a branch") - the Eastern Orthodox Church, which is the original Christianity without a pope, indulgences, inquisition, and other things, which have nothing to do with the early Christianity.
Bookmarking this. I fear this will not age well!
What Information Do You Need in Order to Change?
Not paying for proper facilities for maintenance and breaks is just what we in the biz call "disrupting". You might be able to undercut an entrenched business a bit by using fancy tech stuff - but using fancy tech stuff and ignoring the laws everyone else has to follow? That's where the money is.

Also, that isn't to say that cab companies are a great example here - that industry was ripe for a good shaking up and had a lot of really weird entrenched components, but, at the end of the day, neither side is good - we only get labour rights with laws and enforcement that actually has teeth.
Tangram Vision Is Helping Build Robots with Better Software
"Testing" implies the Edmunds report is in some way scientific while it is anything but. They drove the Tesla cars in temperatures as much as 20 degrees colder than the other cars. The EPA ranges are derived by testing in a controlled environment to ensure cars are treated in the same manner. There is variability in range when driving an EV, but this report is deeply skewed and unscientific.
That and going ridiculously fast during a sandstorm.

Juan Brown/Blancolirio channel has a good overview and he touches on hydronic interactions you reference too: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5iyn2q6s1Sk
The point of an interview is to evaluate a candidate's fit for a particular role. This reads to me like the evaluation criteria is whether the candidate prepared for interviews or not. I don't understand this worldview at all, and I've been a hiring manager at both startups and FAANG. What's also well documented is that studying Leetcode is about keeping a warm cache of solutions to common problems at interview time, and much less to do with reasoning through problems.
Just curious, what kind of work are you usually doing when you use the technique? What makes you decide to use it versus not?
I've seen this happen with mobile providers and ISPs in APAC, especially Australia and New Zealand. In the worst case, a migration we expected to take place within an hour actually long-tailed to a full 24 hours - where within an hour, practically all of the US and Europe had migrated, and practically none of ANZ had.
The actual range numbers (like, the real value of how far the car can go between charges) are almost universally in Tesla's favor here, though. The article is about the delta between the advertisement and the result, not the literal value being delivered to the customer.
Ask HN: How much of the Chinese internet is visible to outsiders?
Recently I stumbled on several hyperlinks in academic literature to a chinese domains which chrome concluded are unreachable with error code ERR_ADDRESS_UNREACHABLE. Is the great firewall two-sided by design?
Had to get to the very end to see that 'ridiculously low' was anything shorter than "between 40 minutes (2400 seconds) and 1 hour."

No thank you, if there's an outage that needs a DNS update to resolve it, 5 to 15 minutes is much more reasonable.
> Looks like someone from the security or PR departments took a picture of the ticket with their cellphone and sent them to the reporter.

Out of those two groups, Occam's razor implicates the one with a vested interest in currying favor with reporters.
My 2019 Model 3 is pretty good at estimating the range remaining, but it drops significantly overnight to the tune of 40-50 MPH in the dead of winter. That's not as big of a problem for me since I have a home charger, but it's definitely led to a few close calls getting home from work.
So, in Agile development it is important to do things in priority order. A typo should practically NEVER be fixed if it is not in the comments. So, this is not a GIT issue. This is doing the wrong thing at the wrong time!

And, I really, really dislike the term Boy Scouting. It is anti agile. The only result is usually that the none senior developers are changing things that simple is not important and causing new bugs. Formatting code etc, I'm fine with.
Tesla Daily did an interview with one of the Edmunds people:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rb1toreNTrU

Rob Mauer's early objections came from Edmunds knowingly introducing variations in conditions which would disadvantage the Teslas (like lower temperatures) but not being very clear about that.

Also, Edmunds originally did this thing, where they didn't account for the "zero remaining" buffer. Teslas put more of their capacity under the reading "zero remaining," to encourage low battery level drivers to seek charging sooner. Edmunds also had to be called out for that.
https://soulver.app
The HN FAQ[1] has this to say about paywalls:

> Are paywalls ok?

> It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.

> In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic. More here.[2]

In fact, someone posted a link to an unpaywalled copy of the article before you posted your complaint: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26623921

For that matter, you can read NY Times articles just by disabling cookies/JavaScript on the site with various browser extensions (I use uMatrix in Firefox).

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

[2] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=paywalls%20by:dang&dateRange=a...
I'm a layman, but it seems like there are probably other preventative measures that are way cheaper.

A Bloomberg article (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-27/how-a-des...) says the speed limit was 7.6 to 8.6 knots but the Ever Given was traveling at 13.5 knots. So maybe they need to start enforcing that limit.

Reportedly this was during high winds, so they could also reduce the speed limit even further in those conditions.

Or they could have Suez specialists be the ones piloting large ships through the canal rather than the ship's normal crew. (As I understand it, that's pretty standard for harbors. Not sure if the Suez already does that.)

Or maybe there's a technology solution, something like stability control for cars, except it's for ships in narrow canals.