skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You've missed the key point I was making, which is that these people do not fantasize about children at all, if by children we mean real (3D) children, in the same way BDSM enthusiasts do not fantasize about really non-consensually caning someone, or raping someone. It's only made OK in their mind by the addition of fiction and play. According to Galbraith's findings, concordant with other research in fictional media, they literally don't think of a real life child when they see these characters. They think of them as tropes, assemblages of aesthetic features (hair colour, height, body type) that are themselves referents only to other symbols.

If you've heard of the idea of the 'lifeworld' from Habermas, it's a similar principle here. They are quite living in another world, a fantasy and fictional world, to the point where they develop what Japanese psychologists have identified as a "2D sexuality". Please compare this to the way in which a BDSM practitioner/fan looks at what others may see as abuse. The practitioner actually sees some nuance, or a possibility of nuance, that others don't.

You might look at the material and say "that's a child" - but these fans, at least the ones Galbraith argues are the primary consumers, do not visualize a real child in that context. This is emphasized by the fact that even the term 'lolicon' before being adopted outside Otaku discourse is an entirely fictionally-referent concept.

Again, pedophiles will enjoy it too - but that's because they see the material through your lens, not the lens of someone who has developed some component of a 2D sexuality, and never shall their 2D and 3D sexualities meet.
Hmm the only way I can see right now is to pay US$45 (plus local tax) for the 13-page PDF. Which sounds insane.
An Overview of Test Case Reduction
a single bite can kill now.
Are you me?

Just finished setting up my Ubiquiti-based home network that includes a dream machine, 6 access-points, and a wireless bridge to an outbuilding. All told about a $1,500 investment I made because I thought I was investing in "best-in-class" hardware and software.

Sigh.
It is quite interesting from a branding perspective how hard it may be for traditional car companies to convince you to buy their electric car. Is a company like VW really investing, in the long run, in electric cars in the way Tesla is? Should I _really_ trust their one-off electric car they build to dip their toe in?

You wonder what it WOULD take for VW, Chevy, Ford, Toyota etc to convince you their product and commitment was on par with Tesla
Mossad’s gonna do mossad things
There are already toxic people. And they don't even need genetic manipulation to achieve it.

The good news is, they weren't born that way and they can change.
Still uses GDPR though, so perhaps the label really refers to using EU data law save and they've not updated it to reflect this technicality.
> you expressed confusion about why France

No, I don't think that can be read into my comments.

> they probably do expect to take part

You stated they'd be on the front lines with some certainty, and I chortled. You asked why. I explained why.

Diving into why a country engages in posturing is beside the point.
Because lying is press releases two days before April 1 is such a good look. The most reasonable conclusion now is that no, this wasn't a joke, but it fell flat, and so they're pretending it was. That might have gone off better had they waited a day or two. Anyway, it seems to have worked about as well as their cars, which manage to cram the sky-high maintenance and repair costs of an Audi or BMW into a car that's supposed to be affordable...
Once you’re signed in you stay signed in and you can’t sign out without authenticating. Resetting the phone doesn’t bypass this.
This ignores the fact that temperature has a known strong effect on flowering time [1]. It’s the obvious and evidence-based reason for the phenomenon, so there isn’t any basis to invent some other reason to do with hybrid genetics. Especially since there is no evidence for your hybrid hypothesis whatsoever.

There is also no reason for corn getting bigger when climate change happens so a ‘similar plot’ would not make us conclude anything of the sort. This is therefore a terrible analogy. In fact the evidence is that climate change will reduce corn yield [2].

[1] https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-0...

[2] https://exhibits.stanford.edu/data/feature/corn-and-climate-...
I am told day-in and day-out about how awesome this exponential growth thing is. Month after month, year after year, they just keep stuffing this exponential growth right up my in face without me even asking for it. Exponential growth has got the entirety of the world's mindshare behind it. It's not enough to just constantly scramble everything and revolutionize everything, and eat everything up. Ya can't even utter a word against it; everyone must bend a knee to it. It's the only model that anyone seems to be able to think of. "Circle the wagons, someone criticized it!" The reality is that we get nothing but exponential growth, and promises of more exponential growth. It's the only future we see now. It's the only answer have to any kind of problem. What are we going to do about all this debt? Exponential growth. What are we going to do about retirement? Exponential growth. What are we going to do about the climate? Exponential growth. How are we going to feed our exponential growth? More exponential growth. We're addicted to exponential growth mindset and we are now incapable of imagining anything else. No, I don't need to constantly mouth platitudes about the upsides of it, not anymore. Not after the rivers and fields I frequented as a kid are choked with garbage and plowed under for subdivisions. But oh yeah, exponential growth. Everybody loves it. Can't say a word against it. Like a watermelon growing in a lightbulb. This exponential growth thing isn't gonna work out in the end, people. But hey, your computer is fast, you little ingrate.
In our case not web forms but WCF
"Google and Apple both collect a lot more telemetry from devices with Android/iOS respectively devices then they should be; with Google outdoing Apple."

There, fixed that title for you.
Creating a backup of data stored in a Linux virtual machine
Oh hell yeah! That's great news, tons of work went into this -- props to the contributors!

I will take the opportunity to say that Kafka is kind of painful, with or without ZK. Check out NATS! [0]. It doesn't solve all the same problems, but is so much easier to use (during development especially) and can do a lot of the same things.

[0]: https://docs.nats.io/whats_new_20
https://arcgisportal.baltimorepolice.org/publiccrimemap/

see for yourself. in the last three months there's been at least one street robbery in most of the neighborhoods you named. if you look at the last year, they're surprisingly evenly distributed everywhere below university/33rd. I would have agreed with you seven to ten years ago, but things have really gone downhill.

roland park is almost a suburb, very car oriented, and LP is a special case due to its geography (really its connectivity). aside from that you gotta assume anything can happen at any time in baltimore.
> The most common solution I see online is to swap layouts when the page drops below a certain aspect ratio or width, which can actually be kind of annoying on desktops. It's a hacky solution.

In many scenarios, there is no way to interpolate between the ideal layouts for large and small screens. This makes it necessary to arbitrarily select some point where the layout is rearranged as the viewport changes.

I agree that this behaviour can be annoying on desktops as the window is resized, but it’s better than the alternative - a layout that needs to work the same way for drastically different screen sizes.
NVIDIA was involved in the Switch since even before the Tegra X1 was even announced. Those rumours aren’t true.

(You can take a peek at LinkedIn for example, of former Nintendo engineers, which makes the timeline more clear)
Not by default, no. These two specific tricks should work on .NET Framework (some of the other tricks in C# after 7 or 8 require functionality that .NET Framework doesn't have, though). You can ask VS to use the more recent C# compiler with the LangVersion tag in the .csproj: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-refe...

Obviously, it's not suggested doing that nor is entirely well supported, but it is at least allowed.

Though if you are looking to use top-level programs you probably are working in greenfields anyway that should just be .NET 5+. It's not really a feature that makes a lot of sense for existing codebases as it is more a teaching tool/"quick and dirty command line app/script" tool.
Here in London we’re treated to many ISS flyovers, some almost directly overhead.

We had a nice flyover yesterday, with perfectly clear skies. See below link to a long exposure star-trail photo I captured with my iPhone.

https://twitter.com/jeffwass/status/1376619838899154948?s=21
One problem, I think, is that touchscreens (generally) have no "hover" state. So an important mode of feedback is being lost.

There are alternatives, like the Material design ripple or haptic feedback, which at least let you know you're touching it. But it's different than being able to get a visual cue about what's touchable.

It's a tough compromise. We want to take advantages of all the dimensions we have to communicate, but we don't want to lose devices that don't have them. And as much as possible we'd like consistency.
(2016)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12965311
GTK 4.2 Released
Top Subtitles APIs
That is exactly what the article is talking about.
I'll do some more reading, but I find the concept extremely implausible. If the fictional child did not represent a child in their mind, there would be no need to seek out media featuring children. The 2D/3D attraction hypothesis you've presented would exist aside their paedophilia.
I read an article where Russia's Internet Research Agency learned it was easier to just take existing propaganda and memes, amplify them past the long tail of engagement with their bots, and let the racist hateful online population snowball that message organically for them.

People aren't rational, we are inherently emotional. Reason and logic need to be taught, and controlling your emotions is one of the hardest things you can do as a human. These propaganda just play into our basic primal fears of safety and the unknown at its root. It's not hard to engage with these emotions, especially if what you are sharing already goes along with this established worldview that some have, cultivated by years of past propaganda.

I'm not sure how you reset this, given so many people live in lives where they aren't exposed to other perspectives nor seek them out.
Probably because it is the "official" twitter account; and thus people will assume the tweets to be official messages. An agency responsible for nuclear weapons tweeting some gibberish is certainly scary for some.
This is so trivial it's useless nonsense. This is like saying that that existing in reality is linked to bullying. Yes, sure, you have to exist in physical space to be non-cyberbullied. And you have to exist in a digital space to by cyberbullied.
It is pirating books.
I'm not commenting on the article. I'm commenting on you saying that you can't imagine a major conflict in Europe.
> You aren't required to use the Apple store to distribute your product. You can sell to Android users and desktop/laptop users.

You aren't making much sense. You won't have any semblance of adoption if you don't have presence on iOS. Except maybe in India where iOS market share is tiny.

> You can't sell software to run on Kindle Paperwhite even though it's a full computer inside.

It's an appliance. It's marketed as a device to serve one purpose — read books. Amazon isn't making apps for it either, as far as the user is concerned, there's no notion of application software on these things.

By the way, washing machines and microwaves also have a full computer in them — there's CPU, RAM, and ROM. Yes, tiny and underpowered. Probably not quite powerful enough to run Doom. Computers nonetheless, technically.

Yet no one raises any objections about not being able to run arbitrary code on them. Precisely because of the marketing and expectations.

> What's the specific difference between that and iOS

iPhones and iPads are marketed as general-purpose computing devices. They are not appliances by any stretch of imagination. Yet they are crippled because Apple has knowingly and deliberately put in a limitation so they only run code that was signed by Apple. This limits their general-purposefulness. This forces developers who don't want or need the hosting and listing still go through the app store.
Bitcoin is not only a work around for Sybil attacks. That'd be hashcash by Adam Back. Please do your homework.

Bitcoin is able to settle transactions in an anonymous and open network of participants without byzantine-faults. A naive implementation of a ledger cannot do that. Neither can data bases. That's why some find Bitcoin useful.
"Fair" and "free" are almost opposite values in regards to markets, what you want is not "free", you want regulation.
Fairness means you got to oppress a party in favor of another party.
Er this is the company that made a tweet saying "Our workers don't piss in bottles"
Would be nice if instead of break points debuggers had log points which stored the values of variables at that point in time. This data can be displayed as a table later.
The fact that the current M1 already ships with an undocumented Matrix Multiplication implementation leads me to believe that Apple was one of the development partners for this new version of the spec.

https://medium.com/swlh/apples-m1-secret-coprocessor-6599492...

>All licensees are not equal however, the first few are called lead licensees and companies pay an added fee for this honor. ARM picks 2-3 lead licensees for each market segment and works closely with them.

https://semiaccurate.com/2013/08/07/a-long-look-at-how-arm-l...
We’re increasing the risk exposure for every user for our own trivial convenience. It is inherently bad, just like other forms of widespread surveillance that is often motivated by some seemingly good cause, like catching terrorists.
And the market for grandpas is much larger than the market for tinkerers.

This kind of thing has become a meme. It's basically irrelevant. If the market of tinkerers was big enough 20 years ago, it's more than big enough now, and the GPU shortage kind of proves that. It's also an all-or-nothing fallacy -- nobody can protect all financial victims, and restricting the tech device market is probably one of the least effective ways to try. There are much better chokepoints for combatting both malware and fraud than the sanitized amusement park experience.
solar winds clients were hacked through solar winds back door and equifax was hacked though outdated version of struts framework
No, the previous comment was correct, in that an open lightning channel balance is inherently at risk, if you're wallet software isn't monitoring that the lightning nodes you're dealing with follow the protocol. If a node broadcasts an older HTLC transaction to bitcoin's main chain and your software isn't watching, you may loose some/all of your channel balance.
I really love a lot of the software under the Hadoop umbrella, but so much of it assumes a static deployment on bare metal hosts, it's a struggle to use it in "modern" setups (HBase, for example; I miss my old friend).
Exactly my first thought. I remember my first steps with C# and it felt very "MS version of Java" and I didn't expect how much a) I would like it and b) how successfully it would spread to other areas
Your example fails to point out why AMD and Apple are able to compete despite having smaller vector widths, and no it isn't because "SIMD just really doesn't matter".

It is because AMD and Apple have wider architectures with more vector ports, they can execute 3 or 4 of these instructions per cycle while Intel can only execute 2(or even 1 in some cases with avx512).

AMD has already said they will be adding AVX512 to the next zen, so they apparently think SIMD matters.

Apple will almost certainly implement SVE, they would be stupid to not do so, and they aren't stupid.
Sure there’s down time involved, but you can always stop and mount the volumes elsewhere and then update the SSH keys.
I'd say the interior looks like someone stuck the cheapest sale parts at a surplus store but I haven't seen the car live.

Having tested latest VW ICE cars when buying a new car a while ago I would be shocked if it's anything but cheap plastics all over the place inside.
The wifi thing is fine/good IMO. It allows everyone to get their location without gps. It’s what let’s devices with no gps like the MacBook and ipad to get their current location. Google does the exact same thing although they used street view cars for the initial dataset.
May I say "lol"?

They bought a jpg wrapped in a fancy package.

Literally taken from wikipedia:

> A non-fungible token (NFT) is a unit of data on a digital ledger called a blockchain, where each NFT can represent a unique digital item, and thus they are not interchangeable. NFTs can represent digital files such as art, audio, videos, items in video games and other forms of creative work.

Lol
> So again: Allocations of regions of memory representing values, not variables, are what does or does not get promoted.

Right, I understand the difference between a variable and a region of memory.

> If `values` is an array of strings, do you think the following makes a new string on the heap (that is, a new 16 byte heap allocation, internally pointing to the same variable-sized region of memory)?

No.

> Do you think it's smart enough to do the trivial transformation of the first into the second?

I guess I'm surprised that the semantics for the `v := v` in a loop thing are "this will get allocated somewhere else such that it's guaranteed not to be stomped on by another loop iteration". For example:

for _, v := range []int{2, 4, 6} {
v := v
mut := sync.Mutex{}
go func() {
mut.Lock()
fmt.Println(v)
mut.Unlock()
done <- true
}()
go func() {
mut.Lock()
v = 1
mut.Unlock()
done <- true
}()
}

If it allocates `v` on the goroutines' stacks, then it won't catch the mutation, so presumably it allocates on the heap at least in that case. In whatever case, the semantics are surprising to me.
You used the phrase "once upon a time", a common opening for fairy tales, which seems apropos for describing a magical land where products achieved a 100% bug detection rate before release. I suppose this might have been true 50 years ago, at the dawn of the electronic calculator, but that is now an age of legend...
Looking at a narrow metric like GPD/hour as support of unionzation is very selective.

Sweeden also has more homeless people per capita than US, and higher unemployment, and lower GDP/capita, and different labor laws.

Its also not really a good excersize to compare against other countries. With full analysis, you quickly get into weeds of things like cultural values, homogeneity, hysteresis in policy, all of which affect the economy.

Saying that an economic policy works in one country has no relation to whether it works in another. For example (albeit a dumb one, but it illustrates the point) - in most of EU, there aren't really 24 hour grocery stores or food places, unlike in US. Is it better to enact a policy stop economic trade in late hours, with the assumption that people are more productive if they have time with their families, or would you rather have a free market that allows the night owls to make money if they want to?

The answer is that it solely depends on the population. General labor class with more traditional values would probably prefer the former. Younger techies that aren't concerned with families and love what they do and willingly work into later hours would prefer the latter. E.t.c and so on.
1) That’s extremely revisionist thinking, the original iPhone didn’t allow any third party apps.

The iPhone was never sold as a computer it was very much just a better UI on a traditional cellphone.

2) Again no, most cellphones at the time where extremely locked down flip phones. Hell, selling ringtones used to be a thing because of how locked down phones where back in the day. Look up what kind of a cut musicians got of that fad.
Noob question:
How does performance of state of the art Binary formats compare versus state of the art Json serializers such as SIMDjson?
(both in throughput and file size)
Elizabeth Loftus Changed the Meaning of Memory
Color Contrast Inside Chrome’s DevTools
CloudLinux Launches AlmaLinux, CentOS Linux Clone
Yep, and a man should focus on discipline in his house instead of confront the injustice of the world — that’s why he beats his wife instead of confronting real problems.

LeBron happily accepts Chinese money for his work to be aired in the Chinese market: focusing his criticism on the less problematic customer is exactly what I’m calling out.

China pays money he wants, and will stop if he talks, so he doesn’t talk about it — because he’s a cheap hypocrite. More than that, your portrayal of him not speaking on those issues is plain false: he was happy to discuss Hong Kong. He just doesn’t speak about issues in China which would negatively finically impact him.

How do you think black people are treated in China?

My hunch is “not well” based on how they hid Finn on the Star Wars poster. Why doesn’t LeBron talk about the treatment of blacks in China, where the NBA also airs?

LeBron runs his mouth, but he sits down and shuts up for a check. He knows that China is racist against him and treats him like a trained dog, telling him to sit or speak on command — and he does it. So he lashes out at other people about the fact even though he’s an overpaid circus performer, he’ll always be a bitch like that.
Clearly one of us has more faith in automation.