skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not sure what demographic you're talking about that can afford a $2-5 premium on every meal but cannot otherwise access or afford means to safely access a grocery store or restaurant. It would be much more economical for me to take advantage of one of my local grocery stores' free scheduled pickup options and just pay for an Uber driver to take me there and back.

I'm also not sure how Doordash is supposed to help at all for people who were already eating significant amounts of fast food.

Either way, all you're really doing with Doordash is passing the risk of transmission off to someone else. Ideally the delivery person has a better immune system than you (and refrains from making contacting those with weaker immune systems), but that whittles down the demographic of those who seriously benefit from Doordash even further.

Also, the PinePhone project is poised to bring serious repairability, privacy, and security options to a device category many now consider to be essential. It's not so trivial as preventing Google from accessing up your search results.

Regardless, we're comparing potential mortality to potential rights violations. If anyone can figure out how to objectively compare the value of human lives to human rights, give me a call.
exactly. the elites couldn't be happier about the discourse being diverted away from the real issues. instead they have everyone caught up in a moral panic over melanin and identity.

https://i.imgur.com/wusW5Rn.jpg
This is very true. Although some think so, particularly when it comes to dogs. We have a friend who has what I call a "killer little dog". The dog needs some serious discipline. It has tried to bite multiple people, including me. The treatment the dog receives is the typical "poor little baby!" as I call it. It's the stuff Cesar Milan has made millions fixing. To the people engaged in that kind of destructive behavior what he does looks like magic.

As you said, same with kids. We have a friend going through this right now. The culmination of this story has been that they had to send their kid to a 90 day program to deal with behaviors they likely caused over years of lacking structure and rules. You can be your kid's friend so long as you don't forget you are a parent first.

It's incredible how much I learned about raising kids from what I learned about raising dogs. They both need exactly the same thing: Leadership, structure and rules. It's that simple...and that complex for some.

I always think of dogs are mirrors into the owner's very soul. Every behavior you see is intimately linked to every interaction the owners have with the dogs. Dogs are rarely the problem.
Raku is actually a specification driven language

That hasn't been true for a while. The test suite is supposed to be canonical, whereas the 'specification' hasn't been kept up to date with language evolution.
A Sea Change in Recent Theology
Can you imagine the backlash. They walked into a stupid situation. The backlash of terminating this person will be labeled as Anti Trans, Supportive of Trans Harrasment etc.. Even though none of that even matters.

Someone surrounded and involved with issues related to Pedophilia is something I feel would show up on a background check. So now you have to question both their bg checks and their motives for hiring.

If the goal was to find someone that is Trans, i'm sure there are plenty of people that are free of crazy controversies that would do the job well.

If they don't fire this person, then they're going to face a revolt, if they do, they face a revolt. Stupid on Reddit. Though that seems par the course these days.
In a marriage, picking your battles is probably good advice. But being too picky about battles, in general, seems like passivity that tends to lead to resentment and explosive drama.
>Software has an inherent bias towards people from prestigious schools and enforces that bias via heavy algorithm testing that is otherwise mostly not needed in software.

Can't any school teach the same algorithms material? It's not exactly secret. Algorithms interviews seem more like surreptitious IQ tests than anything else.
Gnome 40
Like I said, it's very little, but that's not none.
That is literally the opposite of what I wrote.
JavaScriptCore could use a daemon process with elevated privileges that does the JIT-ting and then shares back the executable memory pages with the sandboxed process. It's simply a matter of Apple wanting to curb React Native because it threatens their control over app development.
I'm grateful for the reply :) I respectfully disagree. You have me asking myself why though. I'm thinking about this quote by Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:

"For the simplicity that lies this side of complexity, I would not give a fig, but for the simplicity that lies on the other side of complexity, I would give my life."[1]

I'm also thinking about Copernicus and how people were actually modelling planetary motion in workable ways before him, though perhaps with a few more variables.

Lastly, I'm thinking of "Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything", by Graham Harman. I don't subscribe to it fully, but it raises a case for how a truly explanatory theory of our universe MUST encompass fiction and metaphor and language as "real". So if true, then physics must have explanatory power over what happens in language. So I really don't vibe with the downplay of "just a language spin for the same thing", because new terms/framings are crucial to the ecology of science/tech/progress. Discovering "a language thing" is sometimes no less a discovery than finding a new sub-species of toad. The toad is just an instantiation of information in a different substrate, if you get my drift :) a dense network of biochemical interactions vs a distributed network of neural interactions. The universe doesn't care that we find one substrate more intuitive and innate (language). The objective universe "sees" each as a manifestation of novel information that self-reinforces and persists its structure through time

Thanks for giving me the opportunity to work through this thought :)

Disclosure: My background is not just tech, but biochemistry: the nitty gritty chemical mechanics of life. I'm wondering if this gives me different context on how important Imari's discovery of these new framings and models.

[1]: http://www.jonkolko.com/writingSimplicityComplexity.php#brea...
How Event Horizon Telescope captures Black Holes images with interferometry
It was only founded in 2005 and hasn't been a bastion of free speech since at least 2016 or 2017, in my opinion. So while I wouldn't say reddit's culture has changed that quickly, American culture certainly has as it's gravitated towards mainstream media shutting down non-PC topics and content
There is at least one case[0] I can find. Probably it is exceedingly rare simply because companies are much more likely to settle, especially in the cheapest way possible i.e. stop distributing the tainted software.

[0]:https://wiki.fsfe.org/Migrated/GPL%20Enforcement%20Cases#Bus...
For The last 7 years of working and traveling 50% of the time my setup has been two iPhones and a Macbook Air. I have about 30 sim cards now. In Europe I mostly use tmobile. Hotel lobbies usually have free wifi, as do cafes, hostels and bars.

The main difference is I kind of hate talking to people about work so I avoid video chat and try to keep all work communications on Slack/Signal.

America was actually the worst place to work and travel. Data there is too expensive and coverage sucks everywhere.
Nope. It has been explained several times that 5-10 years wasn't needed because that's how long the actual testing took. It was partly due to funding issues, partly due to administrative issues, etc. E.g. the review process has been accelerated for COVID through two measures:
- phase 1 & 2 could be done at once. Which increased risks for only those who participated in phase 2, obviously
- phase 3 was evaluated with a rolling review. I.e. the manufacturers didn't wait until phase 3 was over and submit their data then, but did it so continuously. And also FDA & EMA started to process those right away.

Then there is also the fact that when you don't have a pandemic (or even an epidemic) then it's hard to do a phase 3, because it will take a lot of time for enough people to get infected. Part of the reason the SARS1 vaccine was never finished (have never earned an authorization) is that it was over by the time the phase 3 would (or did) start. The same thing slowed down the ebola vaccine. The candidate was ready but then the outbreak vanished, so there was nowhere to do a phase 3.
This article was not involved, it was not linked to from reddit. I'm not sure how it's relevant to the situation
You can dual-license if you own the full copyright ownership but if you include GPLed stuff (and don't have the full copyright ownership) you'll have to GPL the result.

As for "at least as permissive" - it requires no further restrictions, but it adds a bunch of restrictions itself. And there's no other license that doesn't add restrictions - MIT adds restrictions to reproduce the MIT license, which is an extra restriction. The restrictions are attempted excused by the FSF under the "attribution" clause of the GPL, but it is not clear to me that is valid and it has not tested by any court.
It's not just COBOL, it's the whole OS environment -- which, for a lot of these old systems, involves legacy mainframe tech (z/OS) with its own peculiar jargon. Basic concepts like "file", "directory", and "disk drive" have different names, and subtly different relationships, and the closest thing to shell scripting is the notorious JCL, with a syntax derived from assembly language (back when writing applications in assembly was a common thing), and described more than once by the person most responsible for it (Fred Brooks) as "the worst computer programming language ever devised by anybody, anywhere".

Here's a blow-by-blow from someone who was, at the time, dealing with some of these systems as part of the United States Digital Service, and thought she ought to get to know the beast up close. It's not pretty:

https://medium.com/the-technical-archaeologist/hello-world-o...
I suspect Reddit's backup plan if going public doesn't work out is to use the villianous admin team they've created to try and take over the world.

Jokes aside, reddit has terrible admins and the "anti-evil team" has taken the site fully 1984. I suspect the current hire is less the exception and more par for the course.
This sounds very promising! I used to create checklists in Confluence and that was pretty hard to manage.

One question - does this only work for public releases or will it also help me with internal distribution (e.g. ad hoc/testflight for iOS)?
If rails is now considered as GPL because this dependency, does this mean that GitHub Enterprise is now GPL?
In case people what not know what is going on https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/27/greens-risi...
It's likely more to support walking (and running) on two legs for extended periods of time.
> collections of data are copyrightable as well

Collections of data are sometimes copyrightable. Depending on the jurisdiction, it may depend on the details of the collection.
>The asshole blaring music and doing burnouts is very unlikely to respond positively to a suggestion they stop doing that. If they were reasonable people and considerate of others they wouldn't be doing that in the first place.

You'd be surprised just how oblivious people are. I lived in an apartment building where a fire escape connected my bedroom window to another window that faced min about 7 feet away. People in that apartment would have parties featuring folks hanging out on the fire escape a few feet from my head and keep me awake. I finally opened the window and said very nicely, "hey guys, any chance you could move inside? I have to catch a bus to work at 7am tomorrow morning?" They were completely shocked that they were even bothering someone else. I never had a problem after that and the party stayed indoors. Not everyone will respond so well, but a surprising number of people don't realize that they're bothering others.
Green Investing Is a Fraud
It's become a politically charged subject. Conservatives are barely touching it because it's not a polite topic, and Labour outright are pretending it's not an issue.

Also, this happened: https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/pri_50287010..... Kind of shows the mindset a little.
I drive a truck everywhere. When i was on tmobile i was often out of range.

I am out of range much less on verizon.

I wonder if it's worth it for the OP to have accounts with more than one company.
We could have released on the macOS App Store but there was no benefit at first. We want to control how many people use it at first to make sure that we fix the bugs as they come. We've been working on this for only a few months.

Let us check the problem regarding your 401 and come back to you. Sorry about that.
It's about politics and our never ending culture war. My university's grad students had an organizing campaign. Organizers used the standard SJW rhetoric - dismissing people who had questions with condescending answers like "clearly, if you read about the history of labor movements, you'd agree with us" and "look another person regurgitating anti-union propoganda." Unions also donate dues to political parties (really only one of them).

If american union organizers signalled they really cared about positive impact for workers rather than pushing one side of the culture war, they'd be more successful.
The first cold email ever sent generated $12m+ sales. Here's how it looked like
Who would not like to see white amp page with three old comments when he already configured dark theme on real page and real page has also 20 new comments on it.
For those that are new to this topic this is quite a good read:

- https://www.wetheweb.org/post/cancel-we-the-web
When I did it for a few years, I'd use coffeeshop or public wifi. LTE doesn't work well as a day to day. That is, for international stuff. Even if US centric, data caps are no good.

But quite frankly: I wouldn't do this lifestyle in a pandemic.
Thank you!

When I was single I had a lot of free time to tinker and go through coding tests, etc, etc, and cater to whatever hiring shenanigans were in place.

First marriage, then a kid, and I find myself grabbing my laptop after work maybe once a fortnight. I'm always "open for new challenges" and I regularly apply to positions in interesting (to me) projects, but more often than not, at some point in their process they gimme some "take home assignments" that are a literal week of unpaid work. I've heard of companies that pay for those assignments, but I've never stumbled upon one.

I always drop out of that, thinking, "good luck with that particular choice of candidate sampling". I might not have been the best candidate, but most seniors I talk to are turned off by these things as well.

Timed coding tests are fine, up to 2-3h, I can squeeze one of those in most weeks. But, and I'm not making it up, "implement this subset of the MQTT spec in your language of choice" as just a step in the hiring process? Hell nah.
Reminder that GPLv3 gives you 30 days to "cure the violation," while the GPLv2 Linus Torvalds prefers immediately creates a copyright violation.
Is this gonna cause the next recession or what
I'm sorry... maybe I'm missing something here. Hasn't this 'phone' been in the news for over 2 years?
How does yanking work for rubygems?

In Rust a yanked version can still be downloaded when compiling (you have a lock-file referencing it), but isn't chosen when adding it as a new (transitive) dependency to your application. So yanking shouldn't break any existing applications.

(Though since is about a copyright violation, a DMCA notice against the package registry could result in a hard removal, and not just a yanked package)
> You may pay hefty "fictitious" licensing fees and (punitive) damages,

Except in cases like this you likely won't.

As it's clearly a mistake you clearly fixed asap its unlikely you have to pay more than small punitive damages.

Wrt. license fees and (non punitive damages) it's a bit more tricky but it boils down to the damage done. But as this libraries are only distributed GPL licensed and non essential (can easily be replaced) you will have a hard time to show that any damage was done and that the software can be sold for any non negligent amount of money. And if no damage was done and there is no reasonable case for selling the software i.e. non negligible fictious license cost you can guess how the ruling will end.

If you would have intentionally/knowingly done the violation and/or it being essential non easily replaceable software which saved you a lot of money and/or gave you other benefits things are different.

But this isn't really the case in this case as far as I can tell.
How about the reported Perl6 / Raku speed issues? Saying "reported" because I have not done an in-depth study if they exist, just read about it briefly somewhere (and a while ago, may a year or so). If they did/do exist, was/is anything being done about them? Asking because I, for one, found both Perl 5 and 6 interesting, and the language features of both, somewhat unusual and powerful.
Yeah but it's $800!
When ICE asks Google for your user information
> Unions are also blamed (rightly or wrongly) for the downfall of Detroit and auto manufacturing in the US.

What killed off the textile mill manufacturing in North Carolina, a state with the lowest (tied with South Carolina) unionization in the country?

The difference is unionized factory workers in the 1930s in Michigan sent their children to college, like Larry Page's auto worker grandfather. Non-unionized North Carolina textile workers could not afford college, and their children worked at textile mills until they closed down, and their grandchildren are in worse shape than they were.
Those two things are the opposite of one another. If a city grows denser, the size of its footprint is smaller.

Suppose you create a lot of high density housing in the city. Housing costs decline. People who used to have to live with their parents get their own place. People have shorter commutes.

The population of the city hasn't changed. Maybe if you're the only city doing this then it's a competitive advantage and people move there from other cities to take advantage of the lower cost of living. But if all cities do this then there is no relative advantage and all that happens is that housing is more affordable and people waste less time sitting in traffic.
> We'd end up with megacities who'd continuously expand and grow denser, swallowing their surroundings in that case, wouldn't we?

I imagine you'd still have the same pattern, just perhaps in more consistent circle shapes. Yesterday's "outskirts" would turn into tomorrow's "upcoming new area" and the people who lived there initially because it was all they could afford would get pushed further out, etc. The three story buildings will slowly get replaced with ten story buildings with wealthier residents, etc.

Constant growth doesn't mean more that in-demand areas won't stay expensive as demand constantly grows too, or that once less-demanded areas will stay less-demanded.

It's not our densest cities that our our cheapest cities. The demand is the underlying factor, not the density. (The density follows the (lack of!) demand for the cheap places.)

I'm not sure how you'd lower cost of living without negative population growth. Try to reduce the footprint of the city but keep the population the same, and you still have just as much money competing for places, so the supply/demand dynamics will keep prices high for the places people want.
Librem 5 has much more powerful hardware regardless of software optimizations: https://forums.puri.sm/t/comparing-specs-of-upcoming-linux-p....

It just depends on what your "daily use tasks" are.
It is not bad to move from one city to another. And every citizen have such basic right. Traditions are also not something good by itself. The title tries to incite a negative emotional response, but if you think about it, there is nothing wrong per se with moving from one city to another and wanting to end a certain practice you don’t like. Of course it may or may not be reasonable, but the title presents as if this information is enough to blame someone.
Manor, in fact, is I think where many of the Black (and perhaps Latino) residents have gone.
When your team is elsewhere the networking opportunities are more with whoever else came in from other departments. Which can be informative but rarely does it directly relate.
Again, it's not a question of what the most likely reaction is, but how grave the worst reaction would be.

You hold at least one insurance policy? If so, you understand the rationale in at least one domain.
As mentioned elsewhere here, separate hardware keys are on the way out. Banks no longer wish to offer them because the vast, vast majority of customers have a phone that, if it passes Safety Net, already is a hardware key.
Not valid for everyone, but for me, in the office, I'm almost never at my desk anyway. I'm usually booked solid in meetings back to back all day, so I'm simply carrying a laptop from meeting room to meeting room until I sign off for the day. I don't care about having my own desk or even my own workstation.
> If the previous version contains GPL code, it’s GPL. It doesn’t matter if you slap an MIT license file on it, or used it in “good faith” presuming it was MIT license.

This depends.

Rails used a gem by a different developer, a gem that had its own MIT license. The Rails project and all others using Rails can not be expected that they ought to have known the license is invalid, so usually the GPL does not count for their usage back then.

You can in general never retroactively change a license, so their usage back then was certainly valid. You can [be forced to] stop using a license and re-license future versions of an artefact, and also possibly have to stop distributing the old versions. But that's on the gem's author, not Rails, and would likely not even impact future usage of the old, already obtained versions.

If the original author wanted to claim damages under GPL from Rails, he would have to do so via the gem's author. And even then: What damages? And would the projects have had to know? None and no is the likely answer, safe juridical incompetence/corruption like in the Oracle-API case.

It would be further be complicated by the file in question being a database file. You typically can not license databases in a meaningful way under GPL. Even if you could, reading a GPL'd database has no chance of carrying GPL code obligations over to the consuming program.

As always with those questions, this might depend on your specific jurisdiction. Also, it means in no way that it is not the ethically right thing to swap the dependency to one that does not have this issue.

PS: Also consider that in most uses of Rails, GPL or MIT does not change much, as accessing a server running GPL software does not trigger GPL's distribution clause (you want the AGPL for that). This already limits the impact here. The Github thread has comments in the direction of all Rails projects having to be open source now if the license changed to GPL. Not only can the license of old versions not change, this is also not the effect GPL would have.
China is a capitalist state in all but name.
D 2.096 and other news
I don’t want to install deno into every Dockerfile, CI box, etc. For scripting, a light universal binary is a must.
Why? Why does the free edition owe you anything?
I'm pretty sure they called the cops on their neighbor because they were getting assaulted ("having to block punches"), not because of the music.