skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Spears can be thrown, so they are a ranged weapon (albeit, short ranged). It's also easier to surround a creature with a group of humans and box it in with spears. It's not the 'net animals harvested' that would be impacted, simply the time taken to hunt. Spears probably increased the percentage of successful hunts. You have to imagine to try to kill a deer or a gazelle with a hand axe...the only way to really do it (since you're far slower on foot than a gazelle) is to chase the animal down until it gets tired enough to quit (takes as much as 8 hours of chase). Then, you have to be able to successfully fend off any other creatures hungry enough to challenge you for it (lions, hyenas, wolves, panthers, etc...). The opportunities for the creature to escape or for another creature to intervene are numerous.

Imagine if spears improved hunting success rate by 50%. What do you do with that extra time? Maybe you take up painting, sporting, music making, etc. Maybe you venture further out into the wilds and succeed across a broader terrain (no longer reliant on savannas alone for success).

Maybe your spear technology and additional leisure time leads you to discover other uses for woodworking, etc. Maybe a few hundred thousand years of that (including sexual selection) leads to evolutionary improvements in brain power.
From what I can see, KeePass does use the clipboard. [0]

[0] https://github.com/dlech/KeePass2.x/blob/VS2019/KeePassLib/N...
Haha. It’s actually not a bad idea.

Making good health, community service and social skills a core requirement to get admission seems like a great idea. Can this also be gamed? Sure. It’s not like the existing criteria are not being gamed by families with a lot more money.

It is futile to complain about how the admission system cuts kids off from society and takes a toll on their health. Fierce competition for scarce resources is inevitable. Sure, the government can do a much better job of spending whatever resources are at hand, but even efficiency can only go so far.

This kind of out of the box thinking is more likely to yield results than pining for ideal situation that simply doesn’t exist.
It does not apply as hyperlink is public, referencing to someone's hyperlink published by someone is not a fraud neither abuse.
FCC Reaches Out to Collect Consumer Broadband Availability Experiences
If users cared about privacy no one would use Google/Android. If they cared about freedom they wouldn't use Apple/iphone. Frankly those issues, important as they may be to you, are low priorities for most users.
There are a number of approaches to Zero Trust from different vendors since Forrester coined the term. We at Saas Pass are of the opinion that you are always guilty till you prove your innocence to access any company application, regardless of the fact of being in or out of the corporate network. We require persistent multifactor authentication, and other signals, even in the network.

To us that is the core philosophy. Don’t trust and still verify everywhere.
so facinated , i cant breath
I checked given json and found no links to videos, just UIDs. So, yeah you helped me to get unauthorized access to videos i was not intended to get. Now, it all depends on your jurisdiction if its punishable or not.
Sharing with friends and public references that publishers provide online is nature of Internet. It is not "really unethical", to contrary, it is very ethical to share.

If somebody complains "I am losing money because you pointed to my website links" -- must have some serious internal legal and technical conflicts.

Keep sharing.
Any website that is not behind a pay wall or does not require me to login to read the content, I would consider it to be a public site.
Theres also the question of experience. Where are you going to get the data for such experience. Keep in mind that GPT-3 takes A LOT of data to train.
> American youth culture doesn't really value hard work and intellect.

They would be foolish to value those things when they can look around the world at large and see how success vs failure is pretty much some combination of luck and network/nepotism.
Maybe people in general don't know about any "good" reasons to keep viruses in labs (eg research for new vaccines), and would reinterpret anything they heard as "intentionally released" or "bioweapon".

So I wonder if, even if trying to be clear about any virus escape probably having been an accident, maybe somewhat many people still would have interpreted it differently (as if it was intentional), and that type of "news" gets more attention, spreads faster, right.
I cannot live without RAII. Zig is just a no-go for me without automatic resource cleanup. A lot of people forget cleanup and destroy safety without RAII.
https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/782

Zig is apparently a PL for folks with perfect memory who never make mistakes like those described in that ticket. "Lesser" programmers like me can choose another language.
You’ve done something nice with the site but in the process you affected the content owner’s income. Since you mentioned a few times that the content itself helped you and you obtained value from it, consider respecting the owner’s wish not to publish those deep links.
I applied online and got access at the initial stages.
On MacOS there’s some phantom window object that gets created so that you cannot CTLR-<TAB> back to the Teams app. I believe the MacOS window bar indicates it’s “Teams Notifications” or some such thing. Basically these Electron apps are just incredibly poorly integrated in the OS.

Then there’s the painful markup capabilities when messaging. Oh if I paste in an IP address or something and then I want to style it as code, the backticks are ineffective since and pasted text somehow carries its own styling which apparently cannot be overridden. So the backticks just show up as literals.

Pasting large console output generally sucks as well. Out teams tends to switch over to Slack to paste big text dumps.
https://youtu.be/wQOblgAvrHw The drone pilot's video in 2160p60.
Those links are public.

I can sell my public website to paying customers, but cannot prevent non-paying customers to see the links. There is no TOS or agreement with non-paying customers to agree to pay me money, they are free to click on links.

Their digital chains management is not affected.

Your best statement is your last paragraph, you are not a lawyer.
So I fired up Ubuntu first for my current WSL2... then I installed a Kali distribution.. are you saying that the Kali instance is really just a container inside the Ubuntu WSL2?
I guess the question would be: is this JSON blob available before you identify as a paying user or after ?

If it’s before, the website have a serious conception problem. But if it’s after then it’s not « public ».

In any case (but IANAL) it’s not because you can hack it that it’s ok to do it.
I think ad-hoc union types is one of TypeScript's best features.
Might find that October 2019 hard limit may change.

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-italy-tim...
Note that this does not actually make the complaints themselves public. It's honestly a pretty lame attempt at transparency. With these sorts of weak datasets being published, we shouldn't feel comfortable with this near-useless data until NYPD releases the actual complaints themselves (with proper pre-release review, of course). I'm not familiar enough with NY to know whether their public records law allows the release of complaint files, but they should be FOIA'd if possible, and if not, then things need to change.

Contrast this dataset to Chicago's COPA's release: https://data.cityofchicago.org/Public-Safety/COPA-Cases-Summ.... This dataset is also missing information, but at the very least it gives context to complaints. What it's not missing is the underlying information that led to the complaint, the depth of investigation, a written summary of findings, etc. Happy to show anyone who's interested how to FOIA for that info, though.

Are these sorts of datasets useful? Sure, but at the non-trivial cost of an off balanced trust model where many folk who are just beginning in this work will think is the end-all, be-all and won't push for more. In a lot of ways, these releases don't feel like progress to me anymore. Particularly considering that a lot of these sorts of datasets are filtered, while implicitly hiding a significant amount of information, often without detailing what's missing, leading to biased analysis from the beginning. Keep in mind that these cities treat those who want access to data largely as adversarials, with things like this happening: https://www.chicagoreporter.com/chicago-police-department-ar...

Relatedly, Chicago had a huge win on this front with the Green v Chicago lawsuit, which resulted in about four years' worth of complaint PDFs, video and audio between 2012 and 2016. The lawsuit itself is supposed to yield about 40 years worth of complaints, but it's a slow process that the City's fighting back on -- last year they attempted a $500k buyout last year, but it failed after public outcry and it's hard to say what's coming next, or if the remaining ~35 years will be provided. I have sincere doubts.

One of the only ways that we, as a public, can get access to deep information that leads to real understanding is to get access to the underlying records used to build these datasets. That means submitting FOIA requests and pushing back on bogus rejections through litigation where needed. Sadly, not many folks do this.
That seems like a lot of duplicated effort when Davmail exists. I'd much prefer to see them supporting a decent new protocol than throwing resources at chasing legacy use cases like EWS that's not going to be used by a significant portion of their target market anyways.

I don't mean this to be dismissive, I mean that EWS is a massive moving target that will require a significant allocation of resources that would, IMO, be better spent on other things.
Yes. I've never heard them called "DuPont connectors". Search Alibaba and the term will lead you to 2.54mm crimp terminals, though.

"Header connectors" are usually board-mount pins.[1]
Within that range there are lots of options. Molex is noted for kinds that have board-mounted pins with a base and locking ramp, and mates with a shrouded wire connector that takes push-in crimp pins. Those won't plug in backwards, always a good feature, and are hard to vibrate loose or bend by pulling on the wire. They still cost only about a quarter, even from DigiKey.

[1] https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/rectangular-conne...
Well, there was OTRAG:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTRAG

But they had to launch from elsewhere, mostly for political reasons.
I've worked with people that were rejected 3-4 times from the same place, before finally getting a job there.

Getting rejected doesn't necessarily mean "No, we will never want you around here. Do not apply" though it might feel that way.

Sometimes there are just too many (great) applicants to choose from. But who knows, that pick could be you.
Sounds a lot like the snafu the U.S. had around testing, precautions, etc: everything was left up to the member states. I'm not sure why the vaccine rollout has been different; maybe because the purchasing and at least part of the distribution was centralized?
fwiw, there is substantial randomness in the process (worked at two of FAANG myself). Try to do mock interviews with your friends if it helps. You may be showing patterns that you think is correct, but actually quite the opposite (this is what happened with me).
For example it could just read all the passwords from the password manager's UI.
To clarify it can be derived with the JSON blob and the public website source.
Just asking readers/customers to re-enter their payment details on a new platform could easily trigger 10% churn in subscribers no?
The JSON blob is accessible before logging in.
Add to that:

If you write something on your note, which Mr. Facebook doesn't like he takes the liberty to alter the note before handing it to your friend.
> The thing is that whether this came from a lab or not is of limited relevance.

It has plenty of relevance. If lab leaks are the source of the virus, any serious solution will need to include improvements to lab containment and practices. Knowing what happened in a hypothetical lab leak could also help identify the original animal to study. Understanding how viruses hop & adapt from animal hosts to humans begins by studying specific cases of it.

For example, past US lab virus leaks including SARS have led the Obama administration to temporarily suspend and investigate the risks of Gain of Function research in 2014. At least one of the Wuhan labs were conducting Gain of Function research at the time of the outbreak.
> A language that lets you write unsafe code is an unsafe language.

Rust lets you write unsafe code, and as a matter of fact people are using unsafe abundantly.
My point is that your post is clearer with per capita numbers and percentages.
Yes, because they don't trust anybody else to have strong cryptography. Perfectly consistent.
A legal threat seems unreasonable.

You have a first amendment right to type strings on your web site.

The target of the links has the right to respond to them as it wishes (e.g. looking at the referrer link and put up a 404 or whatever response they wish).

They could also list their pages in a robots.txt which you should be kind and respect.

BTW: good work! Sorry it came to this.
Same here! I’m on a 2019 MBP, and absolutely _love_ the butterfly keyboard. I have also had no issues with it. Then again, I find those that do love smashing their fingers down on the keys whereas I lightly tap which I really really like. I am really not looking forward to using a non-butterfly keyboard when I eventually have to upgrade :(
Further: I'm in the other half of developers, but if I'm going to use Crystal to develop desktop applications (which I'd like to do - particularly games, because that'd be a nice change of pace from business software), it'd be nice to be able to support the platform that - for better or worse - the vast majority of desktop users use.
Which artist / which restaurant? I’ve got a few hunches, I live in the Crossroads.
Counterpoint: you don’t need a war for the arms industry to make a profit. What you really need is the potential for a war. Whether the armaments are fired, or lay dormant in storage for several decades makes no difference to the contractor because they are sold either way. As for votes, The last US president to start a war became very unpopular because of it.
It appears that you may not have read anything but the title of the act.

“Whoever . . . intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains . . . information from any protected computer;”

Would you want to go to trial over whether circumventing security through obscurity qualifies as access without authorization or exceeding authorized access?
You can do some of the following:
- If there are no code reviews, ask developers you look up to to review your code. Review or be a silent participant in others' code reviews as well.

- Ask senior devs to give you a tour of the entire system. Ask for code walkthroughs of parts that you will not be working on also.

- Participate in design reviews, providing thoughtful comments.

- Ask plenty of questions, including on seemingly obvious things so that you catch up to the others on the team in terms of your understanding of why things are the way they are.

- Whenever you first open a source file, take a few moments to browse through its version control history.

- Familiarise yourself with the build, CI/testing etc. loop of your product.

- Read the Unit Tests for parts of the system that you do not understand at first. They are usually an excellent starting point to get an understanding of the system.

- If there is a separate QA staff, make time to talk to them and ask them to show you how they put the system through its paces.

- Ask your manager to give you concrete goals for your first three months, and also to give you a few stretch goals. Try your best to exceed your goals, including your stretch goals.
And this was one of the best decisions NASA ever did.
That'd just be a subset (or perhaps an emulation) of 3, no?
Advantages of Functional Programming
Is there a problem with this article? It's only two paragraphs long. Seems like most of it is missing.
Don't take legal advice from a website called Hacker News. Talk to a real lawyer or shut it down.
When talking about Facebook, keep in mind that this is the company whose founder literally called its own userbase "dumbfucks" for trusting him with their data [1]

That really sums everything up.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-im...
robots.txt is well... for robots. It is not a binding agreement, it is a preference by website owner not to index some pages in search engines.

Public pages are still public pages, and regardless if they are indexed in search engines, everyone is free to to hyperlink to such.
I tried YouTrack a while back and it was super buggy, e.g. I would make a bunch of changes then navigate to another page and come back and they would all be gone. I just couldn’t trust it to not lose my work.
I had the same problem with a 9550. Luckily I was able to remind them of Samsung enough that they were willing to fix it for free.
AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID
Ha, I wrote that comment many years ago.
> There are a number of approaches to Zero Trust from different vendors since Forrester coined the term. We at Saas Pass are of the opinion that you are always guilty till you prove your innocence to access any company application, regardless of the fact of being in or out of the corporate network. We require persistent multifactor authentication, and other signals, even in the network.

> To us that is the core philosophy. Don’t trust and still verify everywhere.

I recognize this is a pitch, but I don't understand what you're pitching.
The dispassionate developer
> For example, if there was a campaign that people thought was distasteful, they could pay $10 to take $5 from the campaign and allocate the previously funded $5 and $5 from the defund fee to the antithesis of the campaign (selected by a site administrator).

Sounds like it pays better to be the antithesis campaign. In other words, the site administrator would be the ideological point of weakness.

edit: Oh wait, I see, you pay $10 and get $10 donated. Different problem: the site profits from defunding, so they have an incentive to magnify distaste. And the defund target is still determined by the site administrator.
The problem with that is that upvotes can be faked too.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3444897

As far as I know Ed Thorp also made a lot of money after B-S was published. So it doesn't necessarily follow that B-S made the market more efficient. Also, doesn't his discovering B-S before it's publication and using it to make money support what I'm saying?
I misunderstood and thought his NFT was for the real Brooklyn Bridge. That was more entertaining.

I feel like someone famous could double down on this farce and "sell" an NFT they assert represents the real bridge and maybe make a quick $50k on the novelty. <headsmack>
No that sounds like ZFS version 3.
In my opinion, discord has been so successful because it’s private. A big tech company trying to take the reign on discord’s success sounds disastrous. Discord is hailed for its ingenuity, flexibility, and community driven user experience above all. Advertisements would plague the platform.

Discord also does not compete with clubhouse, or any other major social platforms. Nobody is choosing to spend more time on clubhouse over the likes of Twitter or discord. If anything, they all complement each other. I find out from clubhouse talks through Twitter and discord.
This is a popular thing to say, and it's something that people say a lot because they like to say it.

I don't know all the forms that companies file to issue stock in the US, but I think S-1 and S-8 are a couple of them. Lots of these are constantly filed with the SEC.

Yesterday, Monday, there were:

40 S-1s (or amendments) which are registrations for issuing securities.
23 S-8s (which I believe are registration of securities used to pay employees).
11 F-1s (which are for foreign issuers of securities)
12 S-6s (which are for unit trusts issuing securities)

At this rate, say there are 260 business days in a year, 86 x 260 = 22,360. I vaguely think that the total number of public companies in the US is like a quarter of that, so issuing stock appears to be a pretty common thing.
> You need a citation for government lying to people?

When someone mixes in a vague accusation about the government lying for the benefit of a protected group, without citations, it's a bit of a warning sign. I totally believe governments lie, but citations always help credibility.
Anyone can make an NFT of anything, and people have tried to sell NFTs of famous works they definitely didn't create themselves.
Because my company's response to asking for Teams/Slack is "why do you need it when we have google chat/meet?" Google has positioned gchat as an alternative to Slack/Team.
> While it is ideal for the rule of law to be fair and apply to everyone equally, it never actually achieves that idea. The only fair way to govern what content people are compelled to relay is to let people choose what content to relay.

There is an alternative that is equally fair: don't let people choose what content to relay.

This also has the benefit of weakening the impact of relayers on the conversation.
The header photo features someone sitting in front of a computer screen and the computer is running Ubuntu.
The reason why those poor countries are poor is because of those rich countries. What you're describing is tribalism.

I hate so see how US looks at the wars it is fighting: it doesn't matter that they kill 100000 people, but the 100 Americans that died are so much more important just because they were born in a rich country.

We are all on the same planet together, and tribalism is already stopping us from limiting ourselves from using more resources that the planet can provide.
The importance of standards for your business
I a simple algorithm to generate a password based on the name of the service you are using, interleaved with a constant master password you remember. You can do the same thing with a password-manager password + clipboard, interleaved with a constant master password you remember, which should be even better.
NFT “Art Heist” sees famous artworks sold online
That list looks tiny. Have failed 10 interviews this year alone.
IIRC the vast majority of these art buyers don't put their art on display anywhere, even in their own residences; the artwork ends up hidden away in private collections to preserve it for resale (or to enhance the owner's reputation).

The actual, physical piece of artwork is almost entirely redundant already; the NFT business just makes it more obvious.
Collaborative Filtering and Innovation: A Case Study from Steam Recommendations
Rights that incur reprisals and sanctions are not rights. By that standard, China has freedom of speech.
To the targets, these are Blackswan events.
Two reasons.

1. Planners are penny-wise, and pound foolish.

2. Everyone's just blindly hoping that we won't have to repeat the quarantine-wait-a-year-and-a-half-for-vaccines for the inevitable tide of COVID-19 variants, that will be evolving in the world's unvaccinated populations.
Geez. 6% is insanely expensive. The 6% commission fee for an $800,000 house is $48,000.

The 3% is now $24,000. At that rate, the agent only needs to sell 1 house a month, to earn a decent living making $288,000/year.

It’s no wonder the real estate profession’s goals are to make houses more expensive for everyone. This is a racket, and they just skim off the top.
no it's not. it's about AstraZeneca failing to deliver the amount of contracted vaccines. AZ delivered 70% less than agreed. so