skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
FWIW, I've repeatedly come across Newsblur, when searching for RSS readers; it's quite possibly the most common name I see, even from back when Google Reader died, to a few months ago (when I last searched).

It's possible that you were adding the "for android" context in your searches, and it might not do well in that case (because of people seeing it as primarily web-based or cross-platform, and not emphasising the Android part).
The risk of the ship sagging or "hogging" is real. Tugboats are putting asymmetrical load on the vessel. These things routinely take km to stop, and km to turn. Moving them against a suction force, is trying to break resistance to being moved. Thats.. putting unusual stress on the frame. These things are not done lightly, especially in a fully loaded ship with a high centre of gravity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmlTk_3NN_g shows flexion in a ship during a storm in the indian ocean.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89Mw6L69b6Y is less spectacular but also shows how un-rigid these boats are.

No amount of intermodal container stacking is going to offset this, and the containers and mounts are not designed to provide rigidity or load to the vessel in this way as I understand it.
This is just such an amusingly colossal mess, a fitting epilogue to 2020.
I've had the exact same idea but the canal bank is very shallow.. so you would have to build around the whole ship (as you said). This also seems like a major undertaking.

I am excited to see how they will solve the problem though!
The ultimate purpose is to fulfill the will of the shareholders. While this is usually dominated by profit concerns, other factors can come into play as well. Especially social good and community impact.
Just a small correction: 20.000 TEU is not the same as the amount of containers. TEU is the number of twenty foot equivalent. There will be enough 40 foot containers on there. If it was going to Europe there will hardly be any empty containers.

Amount of actual containers is probably the 20.000 divided by 1.6 or so, though it's not a given that any vessel is fully loaded to max capacity. Sometimes need to deal with restrictions.
It will be weeks before this ship is free.

Fuel and oil can be pumped out but that only makes up a fraction of the total weight of the vessel. Containers can be unloaded but again the lightest will be at the top so a significant number will need to be removed to make a big enough difference. And unloading them will be a slow process. You can maybe unload a few per hour with helicopters. There doesn't exist any infrastructure which could get to that location and lift off containers. You could build a custom crane barge but that would take at least a month to fabricate and get to the site. The easiest way to remove containers will be using cutting equipment, winches and possibly explosives. It won't be easy and will likely take several weeks to unload a significant number of containers, the ship and containers will be damaged in the process.

That leaves dredging the sand under the ship. Again the infrastructure to do this rapidly doesn't exist. You can dig out the sand around the ship but there is a huge amount that the ship is resting on. It will take specialist dredging equipment to start removing this sand.
From orbit.
I like how Miui (Xiaomi skin on Android) allows you to do this.
Was it done in pen and paper? I doubt it.. Imagine trying to decipher someone's handwritten rendition of hən̓q̓əmín̓əm̓ k̓ʷə́yecən. Good luck. I imagine there were restrictions on character set, name length, and other attributes in the days of pen and paper as well.
>Again, my point is your experiment has too few samples (literally 1 pair).

This experiment was to show that the gains the original post made wasn't solely due to the video being an unchanging desktop. There were enough samples done to show that claim seems to be false, though more data could change that.

Basically, you're misunderstanding the theory tested, and while your complaints would make sense testing a different theory, they don't discount the experimental evidence for the tested theory.
Detroit's mayor has embraced the idea of 20 minute neighborhoods. One of the advantages Detroit has is that so much must be built back why not do it intelligently? Since 2016 Detroit has created several twenty minute neighborhoods. Some of it has involved walkways that connected smaller neighborhoods into a single cohesive neighborhood.

One of the biggest problems is finding people to open supermarkets. There's a single Whole Foods for all of Detroit. So they provided financial incentives, the big chains swooped in and built markets on eight mile which is at the city's edge. Those supermarkets serve the suburbs more than residents of Detroit. That doesn't help people in the majority of the city.

https://detroit.curbed.com/2016/6/15/11946166/mayor-detroit-...
A time capsule for web pages
And there's tons of background processing hooks for making that happen. They are detached from the UI portion of the API though.

I can't think of work that needs to be performed that requires a GUI to constantly be loaded, but doesn't require that the GUI be in the foreground.
I wonder how expensive and complicated it would be to let it there and dig another lane to bypass it.
> "Worst case scenario is that she breaks in half because of [uneven] weight distributions."

I usually think of "worst case scenarios" as putting things into perspective in a somewhat reassuring way.

As in, "Worst case scenario, this takes another week and we have freed up the canal."

But wow, that worst case scenario....
Detonate a small but still relatively powerful bomb upstream (or maybe multiple small but staggered ones), to create a small tsunami-like wave, which in turn will move at least the ship's aft/stern (as the ship creates in the canal a "V"-like shape which will therefore concentrate most of the wave's force in that area) when it hits it. Almost guaranteed to work, theoretically.
Except the language can choose from suitable templates (eg instead of a generic matrix multiply template for floats, it can use a library like LAPACK) and does so in a systematic way.

It also has a feature (I can’t recall the name) which is a bit like fexprs (let’s say macros who’s inputs are the types of the arguments of a function) that can generate customised code (eg an FFT depending on the input size) on the fly.
In many situations, you are right. For instance, the five-over-ones being built in basically every city in the US exist because of a regulation loophole for building wooden structures (that constructing a fireproof barrier between two wooden structures allows you to build large, multi-story apartments with it). They are infamous for burning down during construction because they don't have sprinkler systems yet: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-02-13/why-ameri...

Cross-laminated timber has a "char layer" that keeps the other layers from burning through, and is even known for withstanding higher temperatures than steel: https://www.greenspec.co.uk/building-design/crosslam-timber-...
For that to work, the dam has to go all the way around the boat, all the way to the bottom of the canal, and create a water-tight (or close enough) seal. That's non-trivial. And then, once the boat is unstuck, then your dam is blocking the canal, and has to be removed, all the way to the bottom, or it becomes a hazard.
As factorio players have said, "the factory is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding factory", the answer is nowadays the software that is developed is also much more complex, need higher availability and involve more parties than in the past.

Nowadays systems are integrated between divisions / departments, unlike 20 years ago, so to communicate we need many channels and thus ms team / slack.

Nowadays system need to have 24/7 availability and downtime is bad, hence kubernetes.

Nowadays we use more service tools, such as redis, elastic, grafana, etc. There are many more version of php and sql than in the past. Hence the need to use docker.

Performing ajax call is a big thing in the past, now it's a basic requirement.
How the cancel culture was leveraged against RMS (2020)
For me it depends on what the API does, and how much testing costs.

If it's something like Stripe (payments), Plaid (collects bank credentials), or Lob (sends physical mail), you definitely need a sandbox beyond the MVP stage. At one point we had a pre-launch payments API at Square and we provided partners with prepaid debit cards to test with, but that approach obviously doesn't scale well.

Another huge benefit of sandbox APIs is that people can use them for CI when testing their own integrations.

Still, when the cost of creating and manipulating objects in the production API is negligible I would say a sandbox is unnecessary.

As for how much persistence is needed in the sandbox, start with what is easiest to implement and gather feedback from your developers.

Be aware that developers often throw out ideas of API features that would be nice to have without much though about priority of effort involved. Sometimes they ask for something and then don't get around to updating their integration to take advantage of it.
> Might need a small nuclear power plant or two to make it feasible.

Amazingly, that's a severe underestimation.

The force on a wire carrying current in a magnetic field is given by F = B*I*l, and to move it upwards that force needs to be at least equal to gravity, so equate to F = m*g.

- Let's be generous and assume B = 100 uT = 100 * 10^-6 T.

- Likewise, assume the ship is a rectangular box with sides of 400 m x 100 m, so a circumference of 1000 m, and that we can wrap a wire 100,000 times around it, to give total wire length l = 10^8 m.

- m = 200,000 metric tonne = 2 * 10^8 kg (we assume magic wire that is massless).

- g = 10 m/s^2.

Solving for I yields I = mg/Bl = 2 * 10^5 A. That's a lot of current.

If we assume the wire has a diameter of 10 cm (which is ridiculously high considering we just wrapped it 100,000 times around the ship, but whatever) and is made out of copper, it has a resistance of ~200 Ohms. Necessary power to generate such a current is P = I^2*R = 8*10^12 W (= 8000 TW). That's about half the total energy consumption of humanity.

The largest nuclear power plant puts out about 8000 MW, so you'd need a 1000 of them.
Supposing you have enough population - an older and more developed suburban area - you actually don't need to buy out entire neighborhoods, in many cases you could get pretty far by just buying out a few homes or strip malls and connecting small scale streets through the gaps - even ped/bike only streets if you want.

The main problem with that is that it's still not worth it in most cases. For most neighborhoods there's nothing to walk to because the population density is too low to support businesses or services. There's too much fragmented farmland separating out all the little pods of cookie cutter houses and strip malls, so the only configuration that works is to have a little pod of commercial at some highway intersection while all the residential to support that is sprinkled around a 10 mile radius of fragmented development.
Cranes on barges or ships, unloading the cargo into other ships is probably the most viable way to unload any significant amount of cargo.
The excavators make sense as the first stage of a dredging operation.
News portal makes media bias apparent, e.g. about Biden press conference
Some older bikes, like my '99 Ducati Monster, don't have a petcock. It has a low fuel light that first failed in around 2002, and for which that part that fails (the in-tank float switch) stopped being available in about 2015 or so. No petcock _or_ warning light. (And that trip where the speedo cable fails so I couldn't even use thew trip meter to estimate fuel requirements was a fun one...)
Then why not automate the removal of the 8 GB spacer file when the disk gets full? Or in other words, just sound your alarms when there is 8 GB of free disk space.
The canal is very wide, very long, and very deep. It would take an enormous amount of mass to accomplish what you propose, and an even bigger effort to clear the debris afterwards to ensure safe passage of other ships.
The drawings are not at all to scale making it hard to comprehend the issue.

The ship has a draft of 16m. the canal is 24m deep in the 121m wide fairway, quickly becoming shallower outside. This allows for the navigation of ships with up to 20m draft.

For the actual side gradients see this image:

https://www.suezcanal.gov.eg/English/About/SuezCanal/Publish...

For extra credit assume some block coefficient and calculate how much sand was moved pushing all the way up to both banks.

Both sides are firmly stuck in the banks. This means unloading containers until the front of the ships starts to float again will tip the vessel aft lodging that side even harder. Same with the reverse. So to do that you would need to unload from both sides to not risk cracking the hull or make one side more firmly stuck. Therefore likely unloading from the middle also.

Now you need barges and cranes. The vessel is 60m wide and the height is about 70m, say 60m to the highest container. A container may weigh up to 30 tons. It's an awful operation.

Really tough challenge.
Everything is a paraphrase of the original source - whatever and/or whenever that maybe from.
Was this an intentional act or an accident?
It works fine in another browser. So I don't think it is a hardware issue? Is there a situation where Chrome/Vivaldi would be able to use hardware the FF wouldn't? And 90% of my time is spent on power (top left usb-c port).
I'm not. My point is that this article was being unfairly interpreted by the parent as some black mark against x86. There's plenty to hold against it, but not really anything that's documented here. I probably should have made that clearer.
> Get them to bring over some MASSIVE water pumps and some damming equipment.

If you had this, then I would damn each side and pump water INTO that space. Raise water level, ship frees. Boom
What's String Hashing Anyways?
People have started 'fake commuting' because they crave the alone time
I watch Gold Rush and one of the prospectors use a massive Volvo excavator that makes those two tiny ones they use in Suez look like tinker toys.

I think they have no idea at this moment as the tugs can't get it done.
Seriously, my phone is just getting bombarded by insurance and stimulus spam calls and texts. I did try RoboKiller but didn't seem to catch the calls.
> At what point does a chip stop being ARM and become AMD?

I should have said arm64 chip. AMD is fabless and they do spend a lot of effort on core design.
The Ever Given being stuck is both easy to understand what's going on, and why it's important; However it's hard to understand why it wasn't easily fixed.

This seems to be a good recipe for a viral news story. The Suez Canal has enough name reputation to be at least heard of world wide. The pictures of both the boat simply blocking the canal, and map of all the ships waiting to go through clearly demonstrate the problem.

However, I'm finding the response to this laughable. Sure they tried tug boats, but after that didn't work, what are they doing? A single backhoe? Given the importance of this shipping lane, why hasn't every dredging boat in the Mediterranean already been put to work? Can't they at least found a second backhoe?
OpenBSD default partition allocation is really well thought out:

https://man.openbsd.org/disklabel#AUTOMATIC_DISK_ALLOCATION

At least put /tmp in its own partition as well.

Multiple partitions can also save a lot of recovery time when there is a multiple bad sector event that corrupts an entire partition beyond recovery.
I've had this problem for years, outside of the phone factor. For this very reason, as others have said, I keep my phone on so not disturb 24/7 except if my wife calls.

However, open offices drive me nuts because of the mere threat of a potential interrupt, even if in practice it may happen only once or twice a day.
Dig it with what? By the time you could get anything in place and start digging any sort of a detour, you'll get this ship removed.

This is not a small detour. These ships can't turn well so any detour would need to be very long and would take months to dig out (even if you had infrastructure in place to do it).

You could nuke it though. Throw a bunch of nukes in a line and you are good to go. :D
Yes, yes, but they will notify you after your service is down (because that's when they notice), in part thanks to a spacer file that eats up available disk space without being of any use. A monitoring service would notify you before your service is down, users grab pitchforks and start looking for torches.

I understand the benefit to be able to quickly delete some file to be able to run some command that would need space, though I find that highly theoretical. If it's your shell that requires space to start, you won't be able to run the command to remove the spacer, and once you're in the shell, I've never found it hard to clean up space; path autocompletion is the only noticeable victim usually. And at this point, the services are down anyhow, and you likely don't want to restart them before figuring out what the problem was, so I don't see the point of quickly being able to make some room.

It feels like "having two flat tires at the same it is highly unlikely, so I always drive with a flat tire just to make sure I don't get an unforeseen flat tire". It's cute, but I'd look for a new job if anyone in the company suggested that unironically.
Do people on Hacker News genuinely think they’re able to come up with tractable ideas that wouldn’t be considered by the actual experts working on the problem?

This person wants to build a damn, someone else wants to use helicopters... waiting for other patronising armchair engineers to weigh in with other reasons why the experts have it wrong.
I wonder how much Julia could be helped with some uneval/image-saving magic. So when you run the repl you instead get a pre-built binary with plot already loaded and several common specialisations already compiled.
You have the discipline to use the 24 hour nomenclature all the time. I applaud you! I had to read this twice, and loved it so much I had to comment
Motorboat fuel tanks have a reserve as well. It's just a raised area that splits the bottom of the tank into 2 separate concave areas. One of the concave areas contains the end of the fuel line, and the other doesn't. When you run out of gas, you tip the tank up to dump the remaining gas from the other basin into the main one, and then you restart the engine (or keep it from stopping at all if you're quick enough on the draw) and head for the docks.
Did you see the video?

Going to the bottom of the canal is "only 24" m. The video I gave before shows some ideas on how to do it.

Quick thought: A skeleton where the bottom layer is filled with wooden poles ( to stick them firmly in the ground). The rest is a construction that is quicker to create.

The ground of the "canal" could be 3D mapped for precise measurements ( a company i know does this).

And you'd need some additional meters on top of this to raise the water level.
If you're defining CO2 as pollution... then you are in fact polluting everywhere you go, because you're breathing.
I would argue that all of those were failures, so there was no reason to keep using them. So I guess the better argument is that at this time Google wasn’t known for cancelling successful products
Previously discussed (and flagkilled) here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26585378
Terminal. Check

Web browser. Check

They're the same
What would be the total loss cost of this ship?
So...a car dependent city then. They tend to have their office buildings distributed fairly evenly throughout the metro area and have a supermarket in pretty much every neighborhood. Every daily need and lots of non-daily needs are less than 20 minutes away.

Just admit that you want public transit and high density and stop trying to weasel around saying so. All of the benefits professed about dense living already exist in most car dependent cities, with the only difference being the mode of transportation used. In a car dependent area, industrial areas are also part of the 20-minute neighborhood without the downsides of having to live a 20 minutes walk from them.

Outside of a handful of cities (mostly on the West Coast) that failed to expand their infrastructure when their populations grew, people in car dependent areas already live in 20 minute neighborhoods. You just disagree with their lifestyle and transportation choices. If someone comes along and builds lots of 100 story skyscrapers when the transit system can only support 10 story buildings, the same issue will befall your beloved dense public transit dependent city.
"Don't rise to the top"

"Doesn't get a lot of youtube views"

"Has three michelin stars"

I think we can stop reading now.
> CDN behind a Load Balancer

This sounds crazy to me. Besides the obvious superfluous network/layer hops, complexity and points of failure it would also partition the cache, right? So working against the very thing CDN's optimize for.
My favorite part of this whole thing is “if I were a canal this is how I’d solve this”. My favorite suggestion so far has been that boats shouldn't need their bow so they can detach it.
We have 4 open reqs for Clojure devs.
It's still an attractive platform to be honest.
Our frontends and backends are Clojure/ClojureScript and we wouldn't want it any other way
Could they just push a really big wave at it to temporarily raise the water level?
Extra protein (not to mention a few deviations from the OP)?
I know "physically based" means practically just "derived from Disney BRDF", but it still bothers me as a term. As a model it has still plenty of shortcomings in terms on how well it matches actual physics, and while true that it is more physically based than some previous shaders it feels weird place to draw the line.
I actually suggested exactly that in another comment, thoigtnto do it in stages: 4gb with an alarm, the more alarms and the other 4gb if not resolved.
I'd read in 'Apollo: Race To The Moon', Murray and Cox, that the booster engineers had done something similar with their weight budget, something the spacecraft engineers wound up needing. Contingency funds of all sorts are a great thing.
Completely uninformed guess is that what they're doing is faster and cheaper, and the "get it unstuck enough" point will be reached sooner.

> Concrete is dry in 24-48 hours.

Sure, but building a dam around the entire ship? How much concrete are you going to need, and how long would it take to build? They're pumping sand and dredging right now, today.
An image showing an excavator near the pointy end.

I'm sure the overwhelming scale is reduced at this proximity.

https://i.imgur.com/aAyrXub.jpeg
It actually is hard. When I looked in to it the only way to fix the issue was using xposed modules which did not work on my version of android/phone and is a security risk because I now have to load some untrusted module as root so I can get the phone to stop blocking me from what I'm trying to do.
Could this be why there are so many femboys on my TikTok fyp?
> More than 150 other vessels have been waiting to pass through the canal

I wonder at what point the operating cost of those waiting leads them to just unload and destroy the ship?
No, I enjoy having lunch with my coworkers. Good way to catch up without as much wasted time as a meeting.

If you prefer to eat lunch alone, adjust accordingly. I was providing loose guidance, not a strict prescription.
Those passing through the area afterwards might not like that idea.
Could they put inflatable bags under the ship and then pump in air to lift it out?
Making the existing syntax - `&<expr> as *const _` like you said - just work would be far and away the best solution. Otherwise we have a 5-year transition period before all code out there that touch this get the memo.