skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Then the core members don't need to have a dedicated channel somewhere else.

But isn't that "a replacement"?
Compared to sprawl and commuting, no it doesn't. So either build up or start euthanizing people because they use more concrete and still the more of us there are.
This should not be the case; if you'd like, Netlify's Support team will be happy to review your settings to help discover why it didn't help you out (start from https://netlify.com/support) and ensure that you are "futureproofed"!
Just move to the east coast and work for a company on the west coast. Problem solved.
What servers usually run as root? Some may start as root, but usually drop privileges for the actual server processes quickly, eg. apache, nginx, sshd.

Nothing that actually does the "serving" or accesses data should be running as root.
I remember SSI. I haven't seen much of that albatross in ages.

Good riddance.

I did write an entire CMS in PERL, once.

I still wake up screaming...
I do similar, I keep multiple files though - 4GB, 2GB, 1GB and 100M, which I also use for testing speed
My Intel atom netbook from 2009 has some PMCs, so worth a try
This is what I'd expect. Even after death many bodies contain plenty of ATP and a pool of enzymes sufficient to carry out subsets of metabolism and growth. Carrying that further, if you have all the apparatus to make a protein from DNA, you could get more protein expression. However, all of this would be completely local and uncoordinated, I think.
It looks like the configure option has been renamed to

--with-native-compilation

on the feature/native-comp branch (and it has to be specified otherwise it defaults to no)
Evercore dives into winners/losers of potential central bank digital currency
we can also have a SQLite database with branches, like in Git:

https://github.com/aergoio/litetree
I know what you’re talking about, but I don’t have links.

I took part in a “training session” at a med school. Basically undergrads were brought in to go through a “PBL” session so the facilitators could get training for the upcoming school year.

Looking for literature in the medical field might help to narrow your search. I think it’s a “flipped classroom”, “Socratic method”, “case studies” approach, or probably goes by a different name in different fields.

You do a bunch of pre-reading and preparation ahead of time. You come into the room and are given a problem statement. Then everyone tries to solve the problem and discussion ensues.
This seems like much more of a loophole than just modifying Article V -- You can modify any part of the constitution via amendment, it's like root access. But your scenario here wouldn't require the "actual" states to sign off or would at least override them. Nice post!
SQLite has a pretty good built-in fts engine: https://www.sqlite.org/fts5.html
Gravimeters are already a thing and they're sensitive enough to detect accumulating snowfall on the roof of the building they're in.
You can still keep a diary. Online isn't real anyway. It's electronic bits; ephemeral by its nature.
Yes, and how often are you having to switch it back? I've read several stories that Twitter will flip it back for you every couple of weeks.
Funny because I have always tune2fs -m1 or tune2fs -m0 because the reserved space was never supposed to scale linearly with hard drive capacities and is not useful to userspace in anyway. Have never had any issues and been doing it for decades in commercial applications. In some cases, where you probably shouldn't be using ext3/4 anyways, we are talking about reclaiming TBs of reserved space.

It's important to note that mkfs doesn't care if you are formatting the root partition or a data volume partition, it will still reserve space for the kernel.
You can take a screenshot or photo of almost anything.
You keep bringing up the China travel ban, over and over.

That makes sense; the Trump administration kept bringing it up over and over as well since it was the ONLY concrete thing they did in the first few months of the crisis that COULD have possibly helped.

Of course, it didn't help. COVID was already in the western US from China, the ban was only partial anyway, and the US's NY outbreak was seeded from Europe, not China.

What other Trump administration actions last year were the Dem establishment and media ignoring to the detriment of the country? Because Kushner and his little prep school buddies tried to privatize and profit off of the crisis supply chains and are absolutely responsible for tens of thousands of deaths from the first months of the crisis, and that's the only other one that comes to mind for me.

I similarly hear that we should thank Trump for the vaccine. (The ineffective China travel ban and the development of the vaccine are literally the only things that even the most die-hard Trump fans can think of to credit him with.)

No, pretty much every US president would have ordered full-steam-ahead vaccine development, just like Trump did. It's not like he was personally mixing reagents, or even publicly respecting and admiring the scientists and doctors.

What every other American president would NOT have done:

* put their inexperienced son-in-law in charge of the national logistical response

* sit back after enacting a partial travel ban against one country, assuming the problem was solved

* publicly denigrate the important "wear a mask to prevent transmission" for MONTHS, repeatedly, after the public health establishment united around that mantra.

* publicly mock and denigrate his own public health officials on TV, daily

* interrupted their own COVID treatment at Walter Reed to take a little joyride, possibly infecting countless Secret Service agents

* host a confirmed super-spreader event in the White House Rose Garden during a global pandemic

I'll ignore the bleach and light comments here because all of his ardent supporters like to pretend that was one of his famous "jokes."

Finally, I'd like to disagree with your idea that even the most terrible president should be unquestionably supported during a crisis. Most of the country believed he should have been removed and it's solely the vagaries of our gerrymandered Senate that he wasn't thrown out on his sociopathic tuchus.
The only one being patronising is you? How would this, hypothetical vapourware distribution system, steal your, or anyone, choice of doing whatever you want with your code? I think that if you read this and that's your conclusion it would seem that the only one assuming something would be you? You can just scroll up and read my post again.

It seems you're the one saying that others shouldn't have the choice of doing that? What would it matter to you if someone decided to do that for their own packages. How would that be different from using GPL on their own volition?
More details for folks who are curious about optimal config using Cloudflare's DNS hosting, can be found here: https://answers.netlify.com/t/support-guide-which-are-some-g...
Not just the font of choice, but the formatting (hanging indent?). It makes it harder to read when there is little volume of text.
As a technical team lead I’ve struggled more than once with the trade off between getting meaningful deep work done for myself and getting others on with their work.

Over the years I’ve come to realize it is not as clear cut of a trade off. Teams can be coached to be self-reliant and to distribute knowledge effectively, so that they have fewer urgent questions. I try to proactively take myself out of the critical path as much as possible. Documenting thoroughly is one way. Another is to use channels for question-asking and encouraging the use of the channel instead of dm. There’s a higher chance a person can answer who is not interrupted, and because everyone passively follows the channel the knowledge is shared more effectively.

Decision-making is always the tricky part. Junior devs need constant handholding and it is more about a lack of lived experience than a lack of knowledge. You need enough senior devs so that the load of constant micro-decisions for the juniors can be spread around.

The thing is that getting to the point where there is enough time for deep work is a process that takes time and that is easily undone by team churn. IMHO the only way to sidestep the matter entirely is to have a lieutenant who handles all the urgent matters, but I’ve only had that once and in retrospect it was hardly a fair situation.
We had all this with Gnome 2, although you had to apt-get install it.
NFT for Human Resurrection?
"Yocto Project" is a registered trademark.

https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/
Thank you for the work you've put into Snowdrift -- I'm still very excited for the project. Getting fairly close to my first charge now, actually :).
This is very contrary to my experience: it was thriving up until the day Google pulled the switch. I knew a number of people who were expecting them not to go through with it because Reader was so important to their daily routine. The catastrophic failure Google made was not recognizing how disproportionately the Reader community were influencers — in particular, tons of journalists used it so they were pushing out an un-QAed Google+ and telling everyone that it was great right after taking away the service they liked. Even if Google+ had been well-designed or implemented that would have been a tough sell. Since it took something like 6 months for them to think about problems like privacy, spam, or notification overload the coverage of Google+ was overwhelmingly negative.

All of the RSS readers I used at the time other than the Reader web app also had the option of fetching full text or loading the feed in a browser frame to avoid the fragment problem. Some of that was simply performance: a busy site publishing full text could generate some massive XML files which take time to transfer and parse.

Also, why is it a problem to show ads in feeds? Annoying ones, sure, but I'd be happy to have ads (or pay for a subscription) if that meant that places could pay journalists.
The Constitution fails to describe how States are to conduct their elections for federal officers.

A group of states, for instance, could do something silly like hold an ‘election’ via mail-in ballots with no verification of citizenship, residency, etc.

So, you could have a corrupt party in charge of a handful of states take over the Presidency, Senate, and House. And, from that point, it’s a trivial matter to pass legislation ensuring that party’s perpetual power, whether it be through grants of amnesty to millions of non-citizens, or federal laws requiring a method of voting that favors the party, etc, etc.

But, these things could never actually happen, of course.
To formally verify an implementation you need a... formal description of what is to be implemented and verified.

Constructing a formal specification from RFC8446 is possible.

Constructing a formal specification for PKIX... is not. PKIX is specified by a large number of RFCs and ITU-T/ISO specs, some of which are more formal than others. E.g., constructing a formal specification for ASN.1 should be possible (though a lot of work), while constructing a formal specification for certificate validation is really hard, especially if you must support complex PKIs like DoD's. Checking CRLs and OCSP, among other things, requires support for HTTP, and even LDAP, so now you have... a bunch more RFCs to construct formal descriptions of.

And there had better be no bugs in the formal descriptions you construct from all these specs! Recall, they're mostly not formal specs at all -- they're written in English, with smatterings of ASN.1 (which is formal, though the specs for it, though they're very very good, mostly aren't formal).

The CVE in question is in the PKIX part of OpenSSL, not the TLS implementation.

What you're asking for is not 5 man-years worth of work, but tens of man-decades. The number of people with deep knowledge of all this stuff is minute as it is -- maybe just a handful, tens at most. The number of people with deep knowledge of a lot of this stuff is larger, but still minute. So you're asking to spend decades' worth of a tiny band of people's time on this project, when there are other valuable things for them to do.

The number of people who can do dev work in this space is much larger, of course -- in the thousands. But very few of them have the right expertise to work on a formal, verified implementation of PKIX.

Plus, it's all a moving target.

Sure, we could... train a lot of people just for such a project, but it takes time to do that, and it still takes time from that tiny band of people who know this stuff really well.

I'm afraid you're asking for unobtanium.

EDIT: Plus, there's probably tens of millions of current dollars' (if not more) worth of development embodied in OpenSSL as it stands. It's probably at least that much to replace it with a verified implementation, and probably much more because the value of programmers expert enough to do it is much more than the $200K/year suggested above (even if you train new ones, it would take years of training, and then they would be just as valuable). I think a proper , formally verified replacement of OpenSSL would probably run into the hundreds of millions, especially if it's one huge project since those tend to fail.
Yeah, the illuminati agenda.
Archaeologists don't want everyone's data. They want samples.
What's the text editor? If anything could get me off Emacs, it'd come from the Hippoverse.
I'm currently trying to buy one, best quote I got was 3k U.S. for a 20ft but that did include $900 for shipping.
I run the Netlify Support team, and this statement from @michaelmior is correct: apex domains are served using redundant, global CDN if you use Netlify's DNS hosting, or Flattened CNAMEs from Cloudflare.
Georgia Republicans Pass Bill to Make It Easier to Overturn Elections
That launch cheatsheet link is going in my "Entrepreneurship Journal" Google Doc ;D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_that_Failed
The gravitational attraction between spheres of lead is strong enough to be measured in a high-school science lab (if you can remove the students and air currents); this is the famous Cavendish experiment of 1798.

I remember it blowing my mind to realize that although a lead sphere is tiny compared to the Earth, it's also right there: whereas the Earth acts like a point mass four thousand miles beneath your feet.
And it makes your point about how "it's the Dems' fault for not supporting Trump's travel ban" much, much weaker.

President Truman knew where the buck stopped. And it wasn't a state health commissioner in New York.
Anastasia (The Ringing Cedars Series) - probably would not have built our house without it. It is strangely different.
I'm still on Unity, and will probably delay update for a long time because I just cause use Gnome 3.

It's not for lack of trying, but it requires to many plugins to be just usable, and then they break, some features is missing in nautilus or other shit.

I don't want to fight with my desktop manager. I have work to do.
1: Actually this is a feature,
It's awesome and easy to map typing to your language types. In python see: https://docs.python.org/3/library/sqlite3.html#using-adapter... specifically the DECLTYPES option.

Other language bindings do things like this also, and makes it pretty idiot proof. you `create table test (mydict dict);` so your tables know their types, and then at bind time you say a sqlite column type of dict == a python dictionary.

Obviously python is sort of a terrible example, because python typing is somewhat non-existent in many ways, but you see the point here.

2: There are definitely cases where it won't work out well, high-concurrent write load is definitely it's big weak spot, but those are usually fairly rare use cases.
I don't think there's a strong argument for the second one in Rust. It's not an error handling bug as much as a simple logic bug; it's aggregating the results of multiple checks.
If the dataset is small, speed doesn't matter. Also, there's PyPy if you need speed.
I use Fossil for my own projects. However, I do not use the forum feature, chat feature, etc. They don't belong there in my opinion, nor do I like the implementation much; I use external software.

There are a few other things I dislike about the design of Fossil; it doesn't have very good low level access, for one thing (there are other concerns too, although rebase isn't one of them). I have started to make my own implementation, which I intend to support the Fossil protocol and deconstruction format. Someone else perhaps had a similar idea, so were writing libfossil; however, they seem to consider the protocol implementation a lower priority, while I consider it important (however, they consider it important to use the same database schema, while I don't, and can freely rewrite it). As it turns out, both of us had independently used the term "deck" or Fossil structural artifacts.
Scientists create a lifelike material that has metabolism and can self-reproduce
>(If you did want to argue against diversity libertarianism, you'd want to show that relevant systems are more fragile than anti-fragile; giving people more options will usually make them worse

No, the more fundamental problem with 'diversity libertarianism' is that diversity and libertarianism cannot exist together. Increasingly complex systems, such as human societies (but even non-human systems) require control and governance as they grow larger to institutionalize and manage knowledge that makes them function. Complex system produce hierarchies required to manage them.

The fact that our complex internet infrastructure is managed by large companies isn't some kind of random accident or failure of government or whatever, it's the natural result of trying to tame complexity. (the notion that making complicated things is 'hard' the article stumbles upon).

The only way to get, locally at least, the kind of system that libertarians like is by embedding it in a system of governance that actively displaces the natural state of affairs. This is why you can have, paradoxically, Shenzhen within communist China but not in Germany, or charter cities in the UAE but not in France. Western countries with their moderate and constrained ability to exercise power lack the authority to create radically ungoverned spaces.
Cloudflare CTO telling off the open source project guy, while ignoring all the other comments suggesting cloudflare?
It's also worth noting that many of the chan boards are also publicly archived, though the effect of that is mitigated by no/ephemeral identities.
yes! we will definitely do this in the future for cities worldwide.
In case anyone is unaware, libertarian socialism does exist and includes many schools of thought, my favourite being that of Bookchin and Ocalan.
My first hypothesis was like the others here - that it somehow screws with my brain chemistry to make me permanently dependent on it for my mood.

Another possibility is that coffee enforces some level of ritual and regularity into my mornings. Since I have a physical dependency on it, I'll go out of my way each morning to get caffeine and usually induce some tangential benefit, whether that be by brewing some coffee (benefit - I usually make breakfast while waiting on it to brew), by going to a coffee shop (benefit - I go for a walk), or by taking preworkout (benefit - I get a workout in).

So I guess if I was able to be super consistent about some alternative positive morning ritual (like a physical warm up) maybe it would fix the problem of feeling more depressed when not drinking it.
It's about identifying healthy boundaries, and apparently most people can't do that when it comes to smart phones.

We use ours like regular phone junkies to stay connected/dick around/navigate life throughout the work day. But we use gps/time triggers to shut off notifications during our time most likely to be used for deep focus, and/or enable airplane mode at night, when at home, on dates, or with family.

That way the silence is natural, and we don't have to rely on our own self-control to do the right thing.
Is that not the point here? Labeling something a "trope" isn't a self-contained argument. The reliability of Linux systems is terrible for certain contexts: modern gaming[1], universal hardware compatibility, taking advantage of bleeding-edge software updates (the analogue to which doesn't exist on Windows), etc.

IME, there's a lot of talking past each other when it comes to OSes. The vastly superior experience that Linux fans describe requires a couple of one-time boxes to be ticked, like constraining yourself to known compatible hardware platforms and stable software versions. There are plenty of people who don't realize this dynamic exists and trip over it, and it's not dodging the question to make them aware of these limitations and let them decide whether the cost/benefit fits their situation. Eg, in my case, I like Thinkpads, don't game, and need a stable, reliable, and performant system that I can be productive on. The pitfalls of Linux don't affect me personally, and I obviously can't meet the needs I describe with a Windows system (or to a lesser extent, OS X).

[1] I hear this is getting much better with things like Valve's Proton, but I assume that Linux is still far worse than Windows for a dedicated PC gamer that wants to play new games.
ncdu saves my bacon at least every few months. I do machine learning and am always running out of space!
I'm the same way. It's crazy when you see people out in public that are having some kind of text conversation and their phone makes a loud obnoxious beep with every message. I honestly couldn't tell you the last time my phone was off silent mode.
The author added this jab at the end, lol:

> Bezos’s Washington DC mansion has been reported to have 25 bathrooms for his own use.
The most requested features for online food delivery
> Allowing potentially arbitrary parties to revoke tokens right before, say, a critical security release feels like a potential issue to me

If the third-party has the token, they can make releases *adding* critical security issues.
I meant more that its a bit pointless to compare 2020 apple processor to 2014 intel processor without knowing what 2020 intel processor can do
Not exactly this, but here’s a website which calculates isochrones (regions included in a certain travel time) based on OSM data: https://commutetimemap.com/
I think just about anything "more interesting" reduces my ability to focus even when not distracting me. It just-so-happens my phone has convenient access to all those things
Personally, in some cases, getting rid of a single distractor helps but usually only when there's nothing else conveniently available
Brian Beckman has the best interviews on Channel 9 [1] and there's usually, maybe always, a whiteboard involved. They're a bit old but I'm sure they're not completely outdated.

[1] https://channel9.msdn.com/Tags/brian+beckman
Oh, I'm showing my ignorance here - I didn't know NSAPI was in-process. The Netscape server software was expensive and kinda hard to find in Europe back then. I guess FastCGI was an improvement in terms of stability - I'm assuming the NSAPI was .so/.dll-based? So if you messed up, the entire server went down.

Back in the mid 90s I worked on the Spinner/Roxen webserver that was built on an interpreted C-like language modelled after the LPC language being used for MUDs. Modules were were run in-process, but because of the interpretation a failure resulted in an exception/error, rather than a full crash. This software didn't get very popular - we sucked at marketing.