skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Same! I just tried a few "likely to find in forum" searches and it hit!

Added to my playbook. Thanks again.
Difference Between Building Machine to Work on Business versus in the Business
It's an apt name :)

Really I just wasn't feeling super creative, and I felt that it got the point across.
It worked for me even in incognito mode.
Art is not the object, never has been, art is not the materials. Art is not a chord progression. A dictionary of all the words is not War and Peace. Art is not the raw data from a cmos sensor. NFTs are nothing like art.
Fleischmann and Pons had a lab sponsored by IMRA (the research division of Toyota) where they were supposed to repeat their experiment. They spent 12 million dollars without getting any believable results. The idea that their research was somehow suppressed is laughably wrong.
HN mods, please delete this spam :)
Let's be real: a full blown conflict (i.e. fight to opponent destruction assuming a Nash equilibrium of no early surrenders) between team A and C would probably mean complete destruction of both teams: look at what was achievable in terms of destruction in WW2, and imagine the result with 70 years of better technology, better bombs, etc.

The Earth is too small and our weapons too powerful for playing child games anymore.

So it doesn't really make sense to train an AI for full scale conflict, nuclear arsenals are already MAD-sufficient enough. Instead, you'd have to model complex geopolitical, even cultural and psychological details to model surrenders and which territories one could lose, for example. Essentially AGI-complete tasks.

I know our realities are such that we can't let go of defense spending and defense systems yet, but it's looking increasingly ridiculous and dangerous to rely on military strength[1].

[1]: Instead of seeking ethical-economic-cultural multinational equilibrium, that is, a mutually acceptable plan toward individuals and development of our entire society/civilization.

In the sense of each "nation" (non-trivial political subdivisions in general) tolerating the collective vision for development of our society. I don't think bombs are a very effective form of communication or cultural-philosophical exchange.
I would recommend you to read this article by a former Canonical engineer - https://boxofcables.dev/no-microsoft-is-not-rebasing-windows...
Do you ever publish your list?

After reading through this discussion, I am inclined to explore search.

This crap sneaks up on a person one little adaptation at a time.

Searching on Yandex was a wake up call.
You don't have to use assumptions just from stellar fusion. You can use the evidence from all the nuclear testing, from fusors or from cosmic ray analysis.

The science behind fusion and what byproducts would come from it are also explained by the standard model.
You wrote "to bail out California" and yet the headline says "robust budget." Do you have evidence that California was bailed out?

How much money does California give the federal government compared to that $26 billion that it got back? How much does California give vs. other states?
In the United States, very few people are on short-term mortgages, which means that you have the option, but not the requirement to reneg on it.

You should generally only reneg if interest rates are dropping - and interest rates dropping causes an upward pressure on home prices.
I am not a lawyer but personnly I think the fact that you are hardlinking the download links of the premiums videos is a really unethical behavior.

Lets say you were doing the same thing to any big company that host premium video content like Netflix (if they didn't had security mechanisms), you would be likely to get sued.

Why would anyone pay for their service if they can access it for free with your website?
It doesn't matter where the money goes in the grand scheme. What matters is that we have enough vaccines to end the pandemic. Whatever we needed to do to achieve this is what we should have done instead of worrying about hypothetical corruption and penny pinching.
> I think the media and entertainment have a hand in this and the establishment does not care

I agree, but I think the establishment does care quite a lot. That's what I was getting at when describing my personal view of the "establishment" as a kind of conscious entity, not exactly what I would call human, but conscious all the same. Like a corporation where harmful decisions end up being no particular individual's "fault" because every individual contributed but a sliver of the final thoughtform, individuals doing their best but who exist in a space where the scope of possibility is already narrowed for them in a way they might not even notice.

That's also why the US media industry and cultural exports are so important here. My personal view of a country is descriptive rather than prescriptive, that borders are implicit based on the speed that ideas can travel, and the US media-exported culture was the dominant one when global instant communication became possible. Makes me think about the esoteric outcomes of the copyright wars too. The big bad RIAA/MPAA get to be the boogeyman and absorb all of my nerd-hate-energy, but the outcome ensures that only current-generation media with establishment-approved themes makes it to our eyes and our ears.
My favorite Adams construct was the SEP Field

Somebody Else's Problem (SEP) Field - the ultimate cloaking device :)
On a complete tangent: scattered-thoughts.net is one of my favourite technical blogs. Author has a lot of great insight in many areas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot_Jox
Yep, now I get it. Some addon does this override
You hit a note with me about your American upbringing because I've had the same thoughts about mine but hadn't seen it hit it on the head like you have. American youth culture doesn't really value hard work and intellect. I know media like movies has a hand in this portrayal but I'm not sure it's really intentional like you allude to. I still wonder what it really is that some of us make it out into well paying careers while most of my HS cohort also mostly coasts on lackluster degrees and jobs. Race hasn't been any common thread in outcomes I've seen intra-high school, whereas the biggest differences seem to occur between high schools.
There is no way, other than to actually watch the artist make the art piece in front of you and with no trickery to make sure something is in fact the original. When you realize that you'll understand why NFTs make no sense.

Authentication is just the process of other people putting their reputation on the line to claim something is in fact what it claims to be; it is not absolute proof of anything. Authentication is not the word of god.
simply put because AI is way too stupid for that kind of stuff. When we talk about AI today most of what we talk about is actually just processing sensory input at a low level.

Wargames and strategy require cognition and level of contextual awareness and understanding of human motivation and intent that falls well into the realm of sci-fi AGI. No military confrontation is generic enough to run on some ML pattern-matching or travelling salesman type algorithm.

I mean just to talk about how low-level and limited AI is, when you take any modern learning system, you teach it Atari Breakout, if you adjust the panel by a bunch of pixels or rotate the screen you need to relearn or transfer-learn the game because the algorithm doesn't even understand the ontology of the game and really just manipulates pixels.

Even Deepmind's starcaft bot was stupid in this sense. It didn't understand starcraft strategy at all (which was visible in it's nonsensical unit combinations it was building) but simply out-microed its opponent, it just had better mechanics.
I should have worded it better - not Goddard himself but the early pioneers of rocketry in general in the US, Britain, Germany and Russia, if they could have developed the technology without military influence.

Still you might be right that it might have never got the funding it needed like that and stayed a pure niche for ever.
Yeah its really bad, as though the ui is a weird disjoint web of features instead of a heirarchical flow
Because you're buying it for the object, not the peice of paper.
i'd consider using this if the app didn't require the multitude of permissions that it currently requires. Will this be changed soon? If not, why?
I figure the easy (though actually hard) answer is to try to collect commonly used add-ons in one central place and update those there, the same way that TypeScript can always keep moving as a language while centrally publishing new versions of types with backwards compatibility to older language APIs.

Alternatively, and not so good, the other answer is to maintain shims or back-ported APIs for some duration as downloadable add-ons that extensions could use. You could add existing extensions to a giant test-suite that ensures common extensions don't break.

You could combine all these approaches, of course. Personally, I'd push to have common community add-ons maintained centrally though, such that if they change an API and it's a relatively easy fix, project maintainers could automate a "code-mod" or fix to rename and use the new API, or shim support for the old API? It's not easy, exactly, it requires taking ownership of a community to such an extent that you can ship API changes as useful codemods to help automate community porting efforts.

That said, I've often found that even if plugin APIs don't change, requirements to list compatible API versions in plugin manifests can make it hard to use new plugins until app authors can get around to updating the manifest to a new version and ensure compatibility for their extension. It might be interesting if app or extension stores could run tests to confirm if a plugin is compatible or not and if not, maybe suggestions could be made to point projects to new APIs and porting guides, if not outright automated PRs for fixes?
Making corporate videos like this is much harder than it seems. If the tallant behind the video is in any way related to the tallant behind the products, I'm sold.
> Original works of art are valued because they evoke a connection to the artist.

Sentimentally valued, yes. In the world of multimillion-dollar artworks, art is valued because it enables tax avoidance and money laundering. NFTs do that just as well.
I am not sure why I got down votes here. If you are buying a NFT for an artwork that is not confirmed to have been created by the author of that artwork then surely you are just stupid?

Only Banksy can mint an NFT for his artwork for it to be of ANY value. The same way that only Banksy can create Banksy art.

Public-private key encryption is how you verify that something was signed by the original author.
Now if only everyone was capable of having a conversation about Zero Trust without asking "Ok, but where does my VPN go?"
I don't seem to be getting a video?
I'm not sure how to respond to this. Yes? Like, trivially yes. When you buy a piece of traditional art you get a physical piece of art.

Likewise artists having been selling digital art for ages too either in the form of prints or high res files.

NFTs don't achieve anything as far as I can tell, they're effectively a receipt with extra steps. And when the thing you're buying is publically available to everyone else anyway, what use is a receipt?
How would you feel if you were to ask someone "Hey how do I run Office on Linux (for whatever reason, probably work-enforced)?" and they replied "JuSt iNsTaLl WiNdOws!"
> "In a grim sense war is just another game."

Strange game, the only winning move is not to play.
NFTs are an interesting idea, and will find its place as soon as proponents stop pretending tokens are digital crypto art.
Only after one of his talks on software, not in a personal capacity. I didn't observe anything peculiar about his behaviour - except for the deep commitment to free software. But this was nearly a decade ago...
A lot of us Quorans were putting real insight there. Seriously. First few years was amazing.

As they wound down the top writer program, which is really where the "hits good" seeds are, they decided to pay people to ask questions.

Signal to noise ratio began to trend toward unfavorable. But traffic shot right up!

There have been other decisions contributing to the Quora we see today, but the paid questions really had the most impact in my view.

That said, yeah. There is still a lot of high value contributions to Quora. They are just a little harder to find now.

One thing I feel they missed the boat on was the credits system. Early on one could accumulate those and use them as a sort of currency. I "spent" some of my pile asking specific people for insight and it worked out well. I had others do the same with me.

Basically, one could get to a domain or subject expert and the site was still "family", so it would lead to a high value exchange.

For a little while, their text question UI hinted at what a Quora could be. Well connected Quorans could toss a question in via SMS and get solid responses back, sometimes quickly.

(Came down to follower counts, writer status, and a few other things)

These options were not abused much that I could tell and they hinted at a means to query people without draining said people, and or everyone participating having some give and take.

Was a fleeting moment, but one I ponder from time to time.

I would subscribe to a "group" that has the UX and overall dynamics of something like what I just described right.
You can group languages in different ways.

VM vs native is one way, but you can also go by the level of abstraction they provide, which very much puts them in the same category.

Also, this debate comes up every time, but ARC is widely classified as a form of garbage collection, just not a tracing one. It is transparent and automatic to the user. (Well, apart from cycles)
> a certificate of authenticity authenticated by nobody

What do you mean? It's authenticated by the artist saying it's theirs
Pretty much everyone? Return is always measured as a function of risk (i.e. volatility). For example, it's trivially easy to get twice as much return if you're willing to take twice as much volatility - just use leverage to juice your returns (and your losses). However, to get twice as much return with the SAME level of volatility is exceeding difficult (you would essentially be a Warren Buffet at that point).

Similarly, to get the same about of return with much less volatility is just as difficult. It's why people were so willing to put money into Bernie Madoff's ponzi scheme, and why his years of steady returns with very little volatility turned out to be too good to be true.
2/20 seems to be the standard because that's what's charged by some prominent funds, so that's what gets quoted in articles, but I don't think it was ever the fee at even 50% of funds, and it's been declining back towards 1/10.
It noticed just a few days ago that is wasn’t working on my iPhone because mobileSafari decided to stop reporting itself as safari and only as “mobile safari”.

That points to your code doing browser agent sniffing. There are much better approaches to feature detection these days, precisely because of the issue you've encountered. I can recommend https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Tools_and_tes... as a good place to start.
Did you offer to help this person improve their site first?
> Dell won't sell me a battery and their batteries have DRM so you can't use a 3rd party unit.

Are you sure you can't use a third party battery? Plenty of hits on Amazon for Chinese branded ones.

I replaced a XPS 9570 battery with a Chinese one a few months ago, seems fine to me.
It’s exactly like ICOs. There’s something about technology that makes people just want to adopt it without realising it is just a mechanism to an end.

A NFT has no significance if it was not issued by its creator or if there are no contractual rights tied to it.
If you needed privledged access to get the url's and are then using them in your own solution you've most likely violated some TOS, and they can argue you're sharing privledged information. It doesn't matter if the links are accessible without an account if you need an account to get the links in the first place.

Understand that their website, terrible as it may be, is apart of their product. Browsing on their platform is apart of their business and they can argue you're taking that away by aggregating privledged links on your own website.

Also understand it doesn't matter if you're legally right or not. They probably have more money than you, and defense of a case is a minimum 80k. You would have years of back and forth and a judge that doesn't understand tech doing summary judgement. U.S. civil system is entirely broken.
> Interoperability in communication software is impossible

emails have been interoperable since the beginning of time!

It's only impossible because the business models formed after the explosion of the internet required that they own the platform for profit. And doing so requires that other platforms not intrude. Hence, the failure of interoperability.
Things you're much more likely to get in a new house:

* Central A/C

* Fire safety (can't put a price on your family's safety)

* Attached garages

* High ceilings

* High capacity electrical circuits (Victorian homes weren't built for modern gadgets)

* Swimming pools

* More bathrooms

* Larger windows

* Better insulation

* Tighter seals to stop bugs and pests creeping in

* Better lighting
EU Tussle with UK
Things nobody cares about such as privacy and freedom? I don't think this one is a very hard sell. It's just an education problem.
A $40B manager once told if I could deliver 6% annual return with 1% volatility, he would give me all his money. Yeah, they want as little volatility as possible.
If it got the job done and we won the conflict - great work, AI!
Change it to a tinyurl and send the lawyers after them. ;)
Would you elaborate a bit? Are they scanning for other devices / other details about your network?
I have a continued interest in the gopher on steroid that is the gemini protocol.
It makes it hard or impossible to have non-static content, and css do not exists. navigation is a bliss, only or obedient bots are talking.

try it here : ssh kiosk@gemini.circumlunar.space
None of what you said is true. I have multiple friends that became brokers on the last year or two, and none of them trained under a broker. They simply took classes and passed a test.
Not a lawyer.

Yes, you're using the same or similar name and that may confuse users (trust me, more often than not users are [very] easily mislead [- ever heard of dark patterns?]). You can do what you're doing but you need a new and different name and the same about its content applies - the videos, images, aesthetics or whatever from the original one. That way you'll be competing against them, until then you're just outright stealing everything or impersonating from them.

Next time you want to do something like this approach the site owner and ask them if they are interested in a new visual or whatever and show them your prototype (make sure it's either private or password protected). If so you might even earn some money.
I did something similar last year after getting rejected by FAANGs and few more other tech companies.

- Google rejected 3 times.

- Facebook 2 times.

- Amazon(AWS) 1 times.

- Adobe 1 Times.

- Twitter, Github, stripe and others won't even consider me good enough for an interview.

- Dozens others companies, who do FAANG style interviewing.

I fear rejections, no matter how much I "try" to act normal. I was looking forward to working on some new projects and with talented team members, I never got that opportunity and its heart breaking. I been working on solving leetcode problems. But sometimes can't even solve Easy problems and its just so demotivating. Specially, when I get an automated rejection response without any additional feedback.

I have realized that maybe I'm not a rockstar coder that can come up with high performance code. I'm ok, I can figure shit out! and I think that's fine.

BTW actual feedback from an technical interview,

"I would encourage XXX to use some coding challenge practice websites to become comfortable with producing quick working code segments which would help him feel comfortable and produce code quickly in future interviews."

Unbelievable!
Even if he is entitled to, doesn't mean he should - and certainly not continue to do so after being asked not to.
I wouldn’t be worried about the copyright implications nearly so much as I’d be worried about the CFAA, state equivalents, and similar statutes, assuming you’re in the U.S.:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
That is great service, thank you. Please keep deeplinking.

Quote:

Deep Linking: The most straightforward case is so-called "deep linking," which refers to placing a link on your site that leads to a particular page within another site (i.e., other than its homepage). No court has ever found that deep linking to another website constitutes copyright or trademark infringement. Therefore, you can link to other websites without serious concerns about legal liability for the link itself, with the exception of activities that might be contributory copyright infringement or trafficking in circumvention technology (discussed below).

From:
https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/linking-copyrighted-materia...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_aspects_of_hyperlink...
Aging is as big problem or probably even bigger, than having a job. I'm sure your grandmother wouldn't just watch TV if she looked and felt like a 20 year old girl. She would probably go party, hang out, get drunk, travel and socialize all the time.

Chronic illnesses at any age suck as much as having aging as a chronic illness.
Since their domain name is probably also their trademark, using it as part of another domain name could be trademark infringement:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_infringement
The links are 100% publicly accessible. You could derive them yourself by downloading this JSON blob[1] that they embed in their HTML source.

[1] https://lol-content-dumps.s3.amazonaws.com/courses_v2/lol/co...
I like this general idea and indeed do similar things, but I’d personally much rather use regular keyboard shortcuts powered by something like Alfred than rely on the Touch Bar
It is all about vaccine politics.
Speaking of Zero Trust and the NSA, isn't the NSA the agency that published the weak Elliptic Curve Cryptography constant that allowed a backdoor into SSL encryption?
Occasional reposts are acceptable, but wait at least a few days between them, not hours.
> The substack writers are media stars [...] They are rich and powerful

The vanishingly small minority of Substack writers who are media stars, and who are rich and powerful, yes. That's not true of the overwhelming majority of Substack writers. Also, even the handful of media stars has traditionally been utterly powerless in comparison to our corporate media.

What power, eg, Greenwald may have pales utterly in comparison to the power of a media conglomerate.

> On the other hand, the employees engaged in PC warfare on corporate slack channels [...] In another framing you would call them populists.

Culturally, they would probably be the first to view themselves as part of the elite. And as for being populists, that would seem to require them to be pursuing policies which are popular.

The "elite" framing may bother you, but I don't think it can be easily refuted either.