skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's quite a few retro shooters like that nowadays.

Prodeus, Ion Fury, Amid Evil, Project Warlock, Project Downfall, Hedon, Viscerafest... and those are just the ones I know about. If you include retro 3D (think mid-90s style) there's even more!

There's also a lot of mods and TCs for some classic games, like Doom or DN3D.

You should follow some gaming channels on YouTube that focus on retro shooters, they're a good source of new ones to play. I'd recommend ICARUSLIV3S and GmanLives if you'd like to find more.
There are people who still claim in public to believe that the US election was stolen.

Acceptance of evidence is socially constructed. If it's politically convenient to go along with the beliefs of your faction, and you're rewarded for saying increasingly ludicrous things in public, then people are going to do it.
So these traders didn't fully "parse" the meaning of the token, and are just assuming it's some kind of "standard"/"patterned" trade that they are used to?

Somehow the real details of the transaction must be machine readable and parseable if they bother.
This is wrong and a total mischaracterization. It *was* an opinion piece that they blocked:

From Greenwald's resignation blog post [1]:

> The latest and perhaps most egregious example is an *opinion column* I wrote this week which, five days before the presidential election, is critical of Joe Biden, the candidate who happens to be vigorously supported by all of the Intercept editors in New York who are imposing the censorship and refusing to publish the article unless I agree to remove all of the sections critical of the candidate they want to win.

Additionally, the emails he published between himself and the editors indicates specifically the claims they wanted him to remove, which did not include any factually inaccurate claims [2]:

> But your memo *doesn't identify a single factual inaccuracy*, let alone multiple ones. And that's why you don't and can't identify any such false claims. And that, in turn, is why your email repeatedly says that what makes the draft false is that it omits facts which -- as I just demonstrated -- the draft explicitly includes.

[1] https://greenwald.substack.com/p/my-resignation-from-the-int...

[2] https://greenwald.substack.com/p/emails-with-intercept-edito...
But again, how do you prove wombats + peanut butter won't ever make logic gates? Maybe they will if the temperature and humidity are at certain levels? Or maybe different levels of lights or sound? It's really, really hard to account for all variables with a negative result.
Like “wears”, it’s literally a corruption of “wares”.
Are you with a straight face equating consequences of breaking the law (fines and jailtime) with paying rent?
That was quick. Sounds good. I'm currently trying to discern the difference between the barman and the barmaid...
This is the counter argument. By protecting an inefficient sector you make it harder for every other sector to operate. If Ghana moves to protect their Chocolate manufacturing that will likely come at the expense of their Cocoa growers.

The best way seems to start with low level work and move up the chain.
Wares. I swear they say it in the BBS Documentary: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7nj3G6Jpv2G6Gp6NvN1kUtQu...
> that specific detail, like all details in fiction, is intended to communicate something to the reader/viewer

Except the details of being white or male - those are not intended to communicate anything?
World leaders should not have a forum on Twitter. We have official government channels for that, where other stakeholders in the system provide their input before the message becomes public.

If an individual moves into the position of a world leader or equivalent, their account should be frozen until such time that the position ends. This is the only sane policy. Anything else is too dangerous for humanity. Twitter and similar forums have the potential to destabilize global peace in the long run.

Ex: A world leader should not be allowed to say "We are going to war" on Twitter, only to have the military turn around and say "We're doing what?!". Most governments have an official process for declaring war for this very reason, otherwise we are regressing back to medieval times.
A Gay Girl in Damascus
This reminds me of an old scam on Runescape, which was to have two users, one purporting to buy an item for a very high price, and one purporting to sell an item for a moderately high price.

Wannabe entrepreneurs would see an arbitrage opportunity and bite the moderately high price expecting a profit. After that transaction the supposed buyer would no longer be interested.
They banned a sitting president of the United States and yet have allowed for years known despots, genocidal regimes, and terrorists groups to operate with impunity. Bad faith is Twitter's modus operandi until they show otherwise.
I'm no expert, but there are articles from many different sources saying that the transition will result in a crisis, and will take a long time to resolve.
Nope! Me too!
That's the point, as far as I can tell. An elaborate flowchart is constructed and all paths lead to DON'T, but stated in different ways, so that you cannot see the trap.

Write characters that are not exactly like you: you cannot possibly do this right and have no business attempting it. Write characters that are just like you: where's my representation?

It just needs a speech synthesizer uttering the words "The only winning move is not to play" at the end. Thus, effectively silenced by your own conclusion, other people can take your place. If you point this out, well, hasn't your kind said enough already?
Well, it's a matter of leverage, isn't it?
> It's just that in my perception Apple (or most any big business) is short sighted.

Ok, so let me restate what your position seems to be: you acknowledge that the move is in their long term best interests, but you assume that they must be doing this for other reasons, because you’ve already decided that.
Microsoft aren't going to care.

Then the obvious solution is to make them care. We penalise corporations for financial negligence and failing to take proper precautions and report correctly. We increasingly penalise them for violations of privacy and data protection rules, where similarly they are expected and required to provide adequate infrastructure to comply with the regulatory obligations. If failing to implement reasonable security practices and provide appropriate security updates to users with no strings attached started costing the hardware manufacturers and software developers and resellers the same kinds of penalty per violation as some of the financial or privacy regulations, we'd soon see those security updates universally available without forcing all the unwanted user-hostile changes at the same time.
What makes you think WSL2 isn’t able to run LXC?
Okay, but which coding errors/vulnerabilities get on the agenda to fix via rollback and which don’t?

That couldn’t be the first or last contract bug like this.

If I come across a bug, will it only be fixed if I only exploit it to a large degree? What’s the limit to “sorry for your loss”?
Racket.
It can't be that simple. This is a private company.

Isn't this where the entire problem is coming from? If this were a state run service, we know the answer and can apply it easily.

The confusion is coming entirely from it being something other than the state.
Why isn't this message a tweet?
They're still available on eBay in the larger anthologies like Six By Seuss. It's only the standalone that were removed and as I understand it that was because of the crazy bids they were getting.

I assume they wouldn't have bothered if the reaction hadn't been so extreme.
Please don't. We're trying to avoid the online shaming/callout culture, which takes the importance of an issue as justification for going straight to personal attack. That way doesn't build community, and more importantly (for HN), it leads to much less interesting discussion, the way that scorched earth is less interesting than a thriving ecosystem.

Obviously there is room for different points of view about a topic as deep as this one.
I could see us adding support for grouping via the "metadata" that would inform the nav bar on how to group and accordion / collapse things. There already is a pattern for grouping in the library that is exemplified in the Query and Mutation carats
68: Hazard:Cold
This is incredibly reductionist. The US alone has about 330 million people. There are many poorly worded or enforced laws, and not every single person is in a unified agreement about them. And the legal/justice system itself isn't perfect.

There are the legal courts, and then there are is the court of public opinion. Is it always -fair-? No. But you can't force a private publisher to publish someone's material either.

We have a strong solution available to each of us: a wallet. Don't support publishers that cave to the court of public opinion.. or do! I'm not your parent.
You’d need some rule voiding publication contracts and reverting rights to the author - otherwise unethical publishers might try to game the system to get works into the public domain to avoid royalties if something seems likely to be rediscovered due to a tie-in or another work by that author becoming popular.
I consider the demoscene style, tracker produced music a distinct genre from "chiptune". To me chiptune is mostly about recreating the sound and feel of vintage console games from the 80's and early 90's. Producers put a lot of work into either emulating the sound chips of those systems or outright using them through various hardware mods. There also seems to be an emphasis on the style of music found in Japanese games of the era.

The keygen/demoscene style songs are produced using MIDI tracker software and leverage the sound capabilities of PC sound cards of the era which have a distinct sound to consoles like the NES. They are tend to have a very different structure, often closer to whatever particular sub genre of electronic dance music happened to be popular that year. Ersatz final fantasy themes played with an emulated SNES sound different than a House track powered by Soundblaster.
The US built those industries only in the same sense that they built Germany's.

Japan's industrial base was built before the 40s, with an extensive domestic supply of machine tools and industrial equipment, rail infrastructure, and finished manufactured goods. Or else who do you think was building the planes, ships, and submarines that the allies were fighting on the Pacific front? Their industries were temporarily damaged by the war but it's no surprise that they'd be back to building cars within a couple decades.

They, rather than the US, were the ones who built up much of the initial industrial base of Taiwan and Korea, as part of their own colonization efforts. Not out of so much benevolence, of course.
I completely agree about changesets. I wish they would extract that into it's own project that ecto uses. Seems like a lot of work to make it general enough but using it for form validation has worked out really well and I think using them for that case should be a more first class citizen in phoenix.
On the other hand, if you can sell the "5,000 to 10,000 copies in a week" that is the supposed threshold for getting notice from the NY Times, do you really need help selling your book? Selling books gets you on the list, getting on the list sells books. Which is the bigger effect?

Given the NY Times growing irrelivance in the market, the high-profile cases of having their list gamed more than once, their ongoing war against their own users with the 3rd party tracking and bullshit they pull over cancellations, I somehow doubt their list is having much of an impact on anyone.
Naval! Not sure if HN has really gone down the drain, or if this would always have been downvoted.

Hypothesis: nerds are bad at politics because they lack intuition for game theory.
Because when I hit the logout button, the local session ID is deleted from my browser session storage (because that action would be performed by the browser and not by the website’s code under this system), so I would look like a brand new user to the site (setting aside other identifying stuff like IP address, etc.). All the session store should hold is an opaque ID for the session and it’s expiration info and it would be sent to the web server as a header (Session: djsisnxidnskxjf). The server would store all the info about you but if you don’t send that header, the server has no idea who you are.
Just what's needed! Another code Nazi telling everybody the "right" way to program because they have seen it all, done it all, and now, finally, know it all!

At least he put in a library unlike the Go designers who welded their concurrency primitives in stone!
> It’s human nature to follow only young influencers?

Marketers have known this for years before the appearance of "influencers" - youth sells, and a young women have better cross-gender appeal than young men. Go ahead an open any pre-WWW paper magazine, count the number of women vs. men who appear in the adverts for non-gendered products
I’ve Spent $60k to Pay Back Student Loans and Owe More Than Before I Began
Seconding this. The fracture at the heart of our society is not rooted in unintelligence, or lack of education or access to facts. It's rooted in a lack of trust. The most rigorous science is only as good as the trust people place in those performing it (and the entire chain of reporting from there to its reception). Those links are being/have been broken. No amount of added rigor will fix that. I don't know what will.
TL;DR - it was written in Nim[0].

[0] https://nim-lang.org/
> shed the tears of joy with how many symbols are used

It... doesn't, though? Rust's syntax is pretty aggressively conventional, from my perspective.

Looking at the punctuation symbol tokens, almost all of this is common to many languages: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/tokens.html#punctuation

The symbols that come to mind when I think about my experiences writing Rust are:
- <> for generics
- ? for early-return errors
- Macro invocations require a !
- Match statements use =>
- ' for lifetimes
- #[attrname] for attributes
- |x,y| for closures
- -> for return types

All the other common symbols I use feel too conventional to seem worth mentioning, like {} for lexical scopes, = for assignment, +-/ for math, foo() for function calls, foo.bar() for method calls, (a,b,c) for tuples, [1,2,3,4] for arrays, <>!== for comparison, "quoted" 'strings', / comments */ and //comments, etc.

I agree that might_fail()? and 'lifetime are different, but everything else I listed seems lightweight, and very common for languages to use symbols for. <> is common for generics from C++, but alternatives I've seen are [] and (), also symbols. Matches use =>, and C's switch cases use :, also a symbol.

Using macro_rules to define macros is pretty symbol-heavy, I guess?

Usually when I see complaints like this, they come down to complaints about the lifetime syntax, and not liking the use of ' for anything besides quoted strings.

If you disagree, could you explain how I've missed or misunderstood your point? Can you show some examples of normal Rust code that uses way more symbols than normal Perl?
> By that reasoning, then gun ownership should be completely banned anywhere, to prevent self defense justifications in what are now legal scenarios. Surely, you'd support such a law change as well?

You're not starting from the belief that nobody supports banning gun ownership are you? Because many people do. I'm not sure where this is going.
I’m sorry but this is so wrong...
Surprisingly, tiktok is better at this: it surfaces new content to people based on factors other than existing popularity.

> far rather pay an honest few cents for a page view or a video roll

I don't think this holds true for most people. PPV TV has always been kind of a minor thing, and eclipsed now by all-you-can-stream services. The feeling of continually inserting coins, or the taxi meter running, is uncomfortable to many people.
Sounds like we're in agreement.
Perfectly normal for this sort of product to not have fixed tiers, they've just pivoted off trying to sell to self-serve customers, to switching to a different pricing structure.

You can't make money like that if you have to negotiate contracts with government agencies.

Not sure how that's scary.

Imagine sending in a salesperson, and occasionally an developer, to 5 meetings, each lasting 2 hours, over the space of 6 months. Now calculate how long it would take to pay for that back at $55 p/m.

And you'll note that the page already had an "enterprise" tier, for which you had to enquire.
Don't worry. I've just started to explore Rust (coming from 20 years of embedded C). I was just sad I didn't see bare-metal represented in the examples and status-quo stories.
A great freedom :). Reminds me of harroway's cyborg manifesto. It's not an exact match, but interesting to read along this phenomenon:

> Cyborg imagery can suggest a way out of the maze of dualisms in which we have explained our bodies
and our tools to ourselves. This is a dream not of a common language, but of a powerful infidel
heteroglossia. It is an imagination of a feminist speaking in tongues to strike fear into the circuits
of the supersavers of the new right. It means both building and destroying machines, identities,
categories, relationships, space stories. Though both are bound in the spiral dance, I would rather
be a cyborg than a goddess.

He of course chose the goddess, but still breaks the gender dualism and got rid of his age.
I also found it at my local library in physical and download form. It was a little harder to find but, you know, more ethical I guess.
> That's one of the things I loved most about games in the 90s. Everything is a pile of hacks and tricks.

Command and Conquer: Red Alert had a rules.ini file you could tweak pretty much anything on. You could give an infantry unit rapid-firing cruiser artillery cannons that'd lay waste to anything within a couple screens in seconds. Much fun was had.
holy shit that is an Invocation right there

IA! IA! BULLUG GEGBUG IBGABIUG GIXCURE DAGABCIEA FUIC!
PBS, NPR, the BBC, and Al Jazeera all have seats in the White House press room.
My response to this is: why should anyone care? Write a book about whatever you want. If people want a “more authentic rendition” then read the story by the Mexican American immigrant author. If the white author has a flair to the story you enjoy, then read that. There can be annoyance and criticism as well of course. The author shouldn’t be “punished” by institutions though. Simply don’t buy the book.
You can turn off the speaker simulation + route your own setup in the "live" mode. I gave it a quick try and seems to work quite well, although the latency is quite annoying. But it's a demo, not performance tool after all.
> Harvesting peoples behavioral or other data is depriving them of privacy. There is lots of precedent for why privacy is important. So to be specific, the data collection is "stealing" privacy.

It's not always black and white as the OP demonstrates. Store owners memorize their customer's preferences or habits in hoping of their return; waiters do so to please their customers for tips. The customers weren't consented but that still isn't stealing. Scaling it up, small mom and pop stores compete with big box chain by providing better customer services. They can't do that without knowing their customers. That isn't stealing either.

So where is the line? I'd argue collecting customer's information en mass for the purpose of reselling being the line and that isn't perfect either.
I've had the trolls pegged as evil since the first viewing for one specific reason: "Only an act of true love can thaw a frozen heart".

That was what sent Anna off to find Hans, but also the key for Elsa.

Love is at the heart of her control of her powers, not fear. The trolls knew, but instead of teaching her this and helping her learn how to control her powers, they taught her to fear them.
The only Instagram influencers I follow are people I know in real life. So I know that the people are real. But even then, the content they post is often framed in an unrealistic way and sometimes outright fake or edited. I know this because I've traveled with them, and seen the real side of all of the same things that they post about.

I can understand why people find Instagram influencers entertaining, especially the ones that appear to be attractive women. It's obviously entertaining enough that it's a realistic career option for many attractive women. But to me, believing that what you see on Instagram is real life is like someone in the 90s believing that tabloid newspapers at grocery store checkout aisles were real life. We should all know better.
Not a weird claim at all, you have to be very self conscious not to click and watch young people doing whatever. It is a natural tendency humans have. It has worked in any entertainment industry (from Hollywood to Youtube) because it exploits how our brains are wired.
Steve Jobs and Justin Trudeau were part of the culture
CyberDuck is amazing! (MountainDuck also)
Thanks for recommending mate
Yes, long form Twitter is THE WORST. However foone is awesome, so maybe they cancel each other out?
Perhaps he's been using Christopher Walken's technique of pulling on your own hair for five minutes every morning to encourage blood circulation in your scalp? :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czK6ReYbaTk (Conan, 1m43s)
If you're on IG and TikTok regularly, it might be harder to tell. Pretty much everybody is using filters. Even heavy filters that basically change how you look aren't a breach of etiquette, since it's all 'just for fun'.
... except it's actually relevant to the thread's point about exercising greater control over cocoa
If you're really curious about this matter, film analysis YouTuber Lindsay Ellis has an excellent video on the history of depictions of trans people (primarily in film) and puts Rowling's work into that context, tracing it back to Psycho and beyond.

https://youtu.be/cHTMidTLO60

Basically, there's a long and sordid history of the Cross Dressing Predator as a literary and film trope and this has been used against trans people heavily.
So? He wanted to make a point, or he wanted attention, what did anyone lose by him pretending to be a young woman and get attention?

Instagram biker chicks might be annoyed because he's a competitor, but anyone else?
>For actual enjoyment, if a video starts begging for "like subscribe share" I just turn it off.

I used to as well but realized platforms like YouTube effectively force the creators to do it.
Also the twitter account [0]

https://twitter.com/obliquebot?lang=en