skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think I worked out it's an array.map function that takes the same three arguments: (value, index, array)
Master nodes are not billed by GKE, only worker one. But micro node is not going to work - all memory will be eaten by k8s services.
Burden of proof generally isn't on the skeptic.
A properly fed cat, with an established routine, should only start going crazy around it's normal feeding time.

Most cats and dogs crave a routine. Unfortunately, sometimes a routine is difficult to establish if your work hours don't permit, or other activities get in the way. That was the original intention behind the free-feeders, however as you noted that can lead to obesity in your pet (not all pets, some regulate their intake well on their own).

So, if you're one that is establishing a feeding time, make sure you stick to exactly the same time every day (like clockwork, seriously). You may even consider providing "breakfast" and "dinner" to your cat (again on a fixed schedule), dividing the daily intake into two meals.

Your cat wants into the Kitchen because they are curious creatures, and you've made the Kitchen some fun forbidden zone. Ideally you're in the Kitchen when the stove is on, so you can prevent burns. You could also try training them into a negative association with the stove by squirting them with a squirt gun (low pressure) every time they walk on it... same with nibbling the plants.
//And yes, you have to work to earn it,

Like how all the existing owners earned it?
This used to work for me, but there is a limit to how much rage can help. As an adult, the anger only seems to lead to an endless cycle of pain and burnout. It's too easy for me to fall into the cycle of:

"Oh, you're in pain, you should try harder, you're weak, pathetic, and useless." -> Try even harder. -> Debilitating injury -> Tiny bit of progress towards recovery. -> "Come on, you're a total weakling, you shouldn't have taken a break, work harder." -> Injure self again.

I haven't figured out how to fix this cycle. It was much easier before lockdown when I had external feedback (gym buddies, etc.) on what was just cowardice and what was actually pushing myself too hard.
What kind of innovations do you plan to differentiate yourself from other search options: Google, Bing, Duck ... there are a lot of options. Why you?
The issue is that the AI will do the exact same thing each time it is presented with the same data (crash) whereas a human could go to remedial driver's education. And taking away the license of one inattentive driver gets them (theoretically) off the road... whereas if you have an AI crash into a fire truck and you said "stop it" - you still have all the other identical deployments out there with the same flaw.

And "add some partial blockage by a vehicle in the lane, retrain the AI, and then redeploy it" isn't a proper answer... wouldn't that be a different model AI that would need to be validated again?
Let's be realistic, the law isn't going to catch up. Uber killed a person with a safety driver not paying attention and all safety systems turned off. Did the law change? It did not.

How many deaths in total have occurred related to Autopilot use? 6 [1]. About 100 people per day die in auto-related incidents. If you want to take it to the extreme, Tesla has killed far fewer people than Boeing's 737MAX autopilot (which has killed 346 people in a six month span).

[1] https://www.tesladeaths.com/
Downsides (see: tremendous complexity) being generally understood, I'll list some of the upsides I personally feel compared to your described setup:

- If you wanted to scale up or down the number of container processes running on your VM, you'd need to write some code that looks at system utilization. Autoscaling k8s clusters do that for you. They can even provision additional VMs ("nodes") for you during times of heavy traffic, or scale down to save money.

- Updating your app requires either logging into each VM, or writing an Ansible playbook to do that for you. By the time you've written a zero-downtime, health-check-honoring, contextually-aware Ansible playbook, you've made your own container orchestration solution.

- If you run multiple containers that need to talk to each other, you'd need to handle their networking. K8s gives you tools for handling networking between containers in the same namespace that allows them to communicate without exposing them to the wider internet.

- The ecosystem of utilities is as good (and sometimes better) than you'd experience in your VMs setup. cert-manager makes certificate management almost as easy as LetsEncrypt does on a single machine. Prometheus and Grafana are excellent logging and monitoring solutions (and, IMO, much easier to setup on K8s than ELK is within a distributed VM setup). Cillium provides extremely powerful and useful networking and security policies that leverage eBPF

- Changes you make to the configuration of your server won't carry over if you ever need to switch hosting providers, or (more often the case for me) just want to start fresh.

It's absolutely a huge learning curve, but eventually the complexity (mostly) goes away, and you're left with a reproducible method for deploying apps. So in the same way a rails/django developer might use an overpowered solution for their blog API, or a React developer may build a custom frontend when wordpress would also do... someone who's taken the time to familiarize themselves with K8s might find the familiarity and consistency of the interface enjoyable, even if it is clearly killing a fly with a sledgehammer.
Given that Tesla has no PR department, you might be waiting a while for that
Your statistics are for human drivers hitting cars and people. Not objects with blue lights (intentionally designed to be highly visible) that can be seen for miles at night being hit by vehicles that are augmented with computers that don't get distracted. Stop being intentionally misleading. An always-on computer hitting a police cruiser (the rear end of which conforms to known standards regarding number, position and size of reflective surfaces) is nowhere near equivalent to someone hitting something because they were looking at their phone.

Is it too much to expect technology to at least avoid the kind of accidents only incapacitated humans have?
Huh, I always thought chartreuse was a red-ish color.
1) Different results. Google may have a near monopoly on search but their algorithm is not the only, nor perfect, lens.

2) Contextual Ads

Search is best done with more than search tool. Google+Duck+Mojeek if you like.

https://blog.mojeek.com/2020/12/popping-filter-bubbles-in-fi...
The article states the police said it was on autopilot -

> The Tesla's Autopilot driver-assist system was engaged when it struck the police car, a blue Dodge Charger with its emergency lights activated, police officials tweeted.

Or did I misunderstand and are you saying you don't believe the police report here?
Or how Boeing thinks it should operate.
If you call your product "Autopilot", or "Full Self Driving", it is 100% reasonable for a consumer to assume that it will handle not driving in to things in the road appropriately.

It's dishonest to dismiss this with "regardless of your opinion on the naming".
Lua is orders of magnitude easier to learn than TeX. No macros, no expansion trickery and no obscure tricks to do things as complex calculations (either for typesetting or drawing).
Elon says a lot of things he shouldn't, but the user accepts a very clear disclaimer before enabling Autopilot:

https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/images/autosteer-e...
Well duh! Elon Musk thinks you, and I, are idiots, apparently.

What a clown!
> Is there a service for autoconfiguring the DNS

There is! I use external-dns. [1]

I haven't actually set up a Let's Encrypt wildcard cert, but I'm pretty certain cert-manager [2] supports it. I don't think you need a proxy if you use the DNS01 challenges.

[1] https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/

[2] https://cert-manager.io/docs/
How to find a tech job in politics
based?
As someone who services client SANs, I could not disagree harder. I cannot count how many times I have seen some site suffer a poweroff and then half the spinners don't power back up even though the health checks were previously green checkmarks across the board. Most folks plan their RAID for 1 or 2 failures, not 6!

If you want to archive at rest, bluray/dvd or tape in good climate controlled storage is the only way to do it. Your HDD will spontaneously die simply because it is a moving part well before a comparative SSD reaches the write-limit.
AGPLv3 doesn't solve the problem of projects being used as components SaaS services, as far as I understand? So companies can still use the projects just fine without the need to contribute anything back.
Well, CI doesn't necessarily mean CD. In more than a few cases, I've found it advantageous to use CI to do automatic container builds, but manually attend to the deployment upgrades, particularly when things like db migrations are happening.

> Jobs do not actually automatically remove themselves from the cluster.

set `ttlSecondsAfterFinished` and they will

> And as far as I know, you can't even reuse the already created Job, so if I want to migrate the database again, I need to make it from scratch.

If you need to run a job on demand, you can always 'kubectl apply -f' the metadata, or you can create a cronjob and `kubectl create job --from` your cronjob. Or, if it needs to run at a particular part of your installation/upgrade workflow, use helm hooks. Jobs are intended to be a one-time thing, so the lack of functionality to repeatedly run them is intentional.
Isn't it a little hard to accept that it isn't a value judgement when we generally have a lower value of things that have rusted?

I think the original comparison to 'spinning rust' was tongue-in-cheek and not meant to be taken so-very-seriously, but it's kind of taken on a life of its own and, personally, I feel that it's gone a bit far and undeservedly undervalues hard drives.
The only bag of air I want inflating into my driver’s seat is the airbag, and then only if it’s reasonably likely to save me from death or dismemberment
And, for the 'art investor', as long as other collectors don't sell for a lower price, it doesn't even matter. Many galleries will blacklist collectors who sell for lower prices. As long as there's someone to buy, you're fine.
Neither of which they've actually shown happen. Those are things that don't exist, and autopilot is distinct from FSD
Cloudflare not using any firewalls seems like a strange concept, considering they literally sell firewall-as-a-service.

https://www.cloudflare.com/waf/
I think the stubborn refusal to make use of LIDAR and other advanced sensors along with the idiotic claim that "humans can do fine with two eyes so so can we" will go down as one of the most genuinely foolish and bullheaded moves by Elon Musk. Having unavoidable surprises and accidents in the development of something like self-driving is understandable, and ultimately a few such things are frankly acceptable losses if the rate of tens of thousands of annual deaths by humans is cut. But they should be unavoidable and surprises, and there should be failsafes to try to avoid the worst. Driving into an object at full speed is obviously the most fundamental Bad Thing, Don't Do That in driving. Having a system that can cut into the more complex autopilot and at least slam the breaks every single time, even at worst within a short range where it's too late to avoid but can at least greatly minimize impact energy, should have been a day 01 foundational safety measure before embarking upon the rest. Huge point of self-driving should be being better than humans are. They should have FLIRs to deal with both moose and dark pedestrians at night, LIDAR/terahertz/ultrasonics, 360° cameras, whatever is needed to not just meet but actively avoid all kinds of crashes humans have. I hope Tesla really does get a bit slammed for cheaping out and then refusing to do a mea culpa on it, it's just so dumb.
> Autopilot in a car should mean the same as it does in "Airplane!"

Shirley, you should keep your jokes PG! Wait, Airplane is PG? Oh man, the 80s were a different time...

An "Airplane! autopilot" requires... services... to operate. That was apparently PG in the 80s but not PG in today's society!
'Big Short' investor Michael Burry says he'll stop tweeting after SEC visit
In the EMA statement from today they said:

> there is no evidence of a problem related to specific batches of the vaccine or to particular manufacturing sites;

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/covid-19-vaccine-astrazene...
That correct. The code can't considered open but rather source available.
But you can forget consciousness and ask the same question.

The chances that the matter you're made of ended up making you is astronomically small compared to it just being random space dust or something. And yet it happened.

I think it's just selection bias.
I used to (late 2000s) work for a tiny, tiny company that was courting a customer in the mobile banking space. They wanted us to tick boxes. So we bought a box (some sort of Fortinet) that said it was a firewall and IDS. Plugged it in, used it as our new router. "Cost of doing business."

Could we have argued with them during the sales process? Only if we wanted to lose the sale. The Fortinet was cheap compared to the value of the contract.
This website can't display content with javascript disabled. Screw them.
> lie about the Tesla crashing itself

Isn't one still fully responsible even when the car is in autopilot mode? I feel like blaming a Tesla for "crashing itself in autopilot" is a bit like saying a Mercedes "crashed itself" because you put it on cruise control / lane assist / collision detection mode so you could text from the driver seat or some such.
There isn't any consensus. Right now there's a whole variety of licenses like BSL, SSPL, etc.
Yeah, surprised more people haven't mentioned this, this is very plan9-esque. Although as a side note for the viewers at home, because plan9 exposed all interfaces as files, the remote cpu server could use all resources on the client machine. Also, because of plan9's exclusive use of static linking and supporting file servers with many arch binaries "superimposed", the "server needs to be same architecture" req could be relaxed.
Short answer: no other creature has developed complex languages, written books or made art.

Long answer: there is a plausible argument that consciousness might be a gradient. Certain creatures might express some level of meta consciousness, yet still far from what humans can do. For instance, elephants, primates or even just a dog might express some sort of empathy or more subtle mental states that do not equate with the experience itself, which would be mere phenomenal consciousness, but they do not appear to articulate to themselves those mental states and do anything more than simple reactions with those states.

Ultimately the claim comes from empirical observations: there's an immense evolutionary gap between humans and everything else, so that we can plausibly claim that we are the only fully meta-conscious creatures.
Of course I read the article. It was would be impossible to hold my opinions without reading and thinking critically about the information in the article.
Microsoft documents that code-access security should not be used as a security boundary:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/misc/code-...

As others in this thread have mentioned, CAS does not even exist in .NET Core and .NET 5.
Don't "call bullshit" because you can't personally see how to falsify a theory by reading some popularized science articles. There are real papers with math behind these claims, and when you've read them and at least tried to understand the math, then you can call bullshit if you still think so.
The current lights are great, they have their charm. Unfortunately councils just wait to have an excuse to spend our money (ideally on affiliated companies) on any vanity project they can get their hands on and then hike the tax.
AGPLv3 stipulates that network communication counts as linking, so that putting AGPv3 software behind a SaaS requires that the software's source must be made available to the users of the SaaS.

edit: thanks to pydry for pointing out that this interpretation isn't correct. It is more correct to say that if a user interacts with AGPL software over the network, they have a right to its source.
No definitely not. This version has scaled and works well on nearly 4 billion pages. It works efficiently, is fast for users and was a breakthrough from the previous iteration. Hereon it will be incremental improvements.
> crashing on a rare edge case (i.e. not well represented in the training data)

This isn't a case where it makes any sense to try to extrapolate from training data and call it a day. You don't need any training to avoid hitting stationary objects.

Compare this comment from 2018: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17015528

> The first job of automated driving is to drive only on flat surfaces. Doesn't matter why it's not flat. Then you worry about where to go. That's how the off-road DARPA Grand Challenge vehicles had to work. "Flat road" is a pure geometry thing. Not much AI needed.

Why use "AI" to solve a problem you don't have in the first place? This is the wrong tool for the wrong job.

(Compare also GPT-2 chess, in which a model trained on transcripts of chess games isn't able to stop itself from making illegal moves. The solution is straightforward - give your chess model a model of the rules of chess! And don't attempt to drive into spaces you cannot physically occupy.)
"White" and "space" are two words, and "Whitespace" is one word.
Wouldn't population growth rate need be massive in order to overcome the large difference in volume that a small increase to the diameter of the sphere causes?

Given a quick scan, I don't see anywhere that takes into account population increases in the paper. The only way I think this works is if you count meeting the society's Von Neumann probes as meeting them.
Most of "context tex" search results are relevant/useful.
It's baffling that this feature wasn't already available to content creators.
> project is clearly useless in HPC setting

Which is why I'm curious about the applications they had in mind. I know that my workflow isn't typical for most people, so hopefully others have better uses in mind.

For me, I just submit adhoc jobs to SLURM and call it a day. Not everyone has access to an HPC cluster or is comfortable setting such a system up for a small, home cluster.

Anything (like this project) that makes HPC-like processing more accessible, I'm interested in.
Congrats mh_ and team.
What you're telling sounds wonderful. That definitely wasn't the case a few years ago and documentation still does not reflect this conceptual merge between -release and stable.

And also, as far as I can tell the newest Firefox version available on -stable OpenBSD right now is 82.0.3 which was released in November.
Capitalist firms be starting countries these days.

https://apnews.com/article/legislature-legislation-local-gov...
I believe a similar hypothesis is being tested as relates to Google Chrome's "Incognito Mode" and whether users should have expectation that the browser takes active steps to mask who you are to servers you access (as opposed to modifying its policies for storing cookies and locally-cached files).

In that case, the law has not yet decided.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/judge-rules-5-billio...
If Tesla Autopilot is going to keep putting lives at risk then they really shouldn’t be allowed to keep selling it. I’m a bit baffled as to suggestions otherwise. If some lettuce gets contaminated with E. coli, we don’t say “oh well, caveat emptor, maybe start cooking your lettuce instead of eating it in salads,” we recall the lettuce.
I think you are completely correct that what autopilot means in the public consciousness is much more than what it can actually do.

The funny thing is that what an autopilot does in a real airplane is actually pretty close to what the Tesla autopilot does, if you set it to fly you into a mountain it will happily do so (abet with a lot of alarms going off in a modern airliner).
"If YouTube’s copyright identification system finds a violation after a video is scanned, the rights holder’s policy will be automatically applied to the video, according to the company."

During the height of the quarantine last year I managed the live-streaming of the traditional form of the Catholic Mass (1962 Missal, substantially the same ruberics and ceremonials from the fifth century until the 1960s) at a local parish and on EVERY Sung High Mass there were multiple copyright flags applied because the liturgical hymns sung by the choir, the "newest" of which averaged 250 years in age and some of which were over a thousand years old, were part of a commercial recording by some professional choral ensemble. Had someone played a CD of that professional recording in the chapel then this would have been a copyright violation, but it's OBVIOUS to any human who listens to the sound on those videos that this was a live performance -- by volunteer, part-time singers who make lots of mistakes -- of works that have been in the public domain for centuries.

This system is clearly a CYA for Google: they would rather flag videos and PERMANENTLY demonetize content creators based on repeated false positives (but still show advertisements on the videos anyway!) than to risk even the remotest chance that a content creator might sue YouTube for enabling copyright infringement.
Was it a PR move to do spans the PR department? “Tesla, where every dollar goes towards making your car better!”. Or did they seriously disband their PR department!?
A 100% casualty rate is by any definition a 100% failure.
I am working on firedating.me - a community of FIRE (Financial Independence/ Early Retirement) enthusiasts looking for friendships and love. All stats are public: https://firedating.me/open.
> Dumb switches will blast packets to all interfaces that are connected

Multicast and broadcast sure, but dumb switches will still keep mac-address>port mapping. If the router sends to 52:54:00:ad:ra:a7, the dumb switch will remember that's on port 7 (having seen traffic from it recently - if only an arp reply) and only send the packet to port 7.

Hubs (remember them!) will blast every packet to every port.