skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm always crap.

It think it depends on the perspective, and can even be both. The unabomber was a genius, but also killed and maimed a bunch of people.

You are who you are. Think of yourself as average and that average people can perform well. Even if you aren't average, the modesty will do you well.
Why are those fields not overridden in the backend?... If the back-end doesn't check those fields are what they should be for each option then the reverse could also be true (free membership)
> Since many cities currently lack the recently-aging housing that would normally be filtering down market right now

Huh.... in the UK house prices go up for older houses. You'd pay a premium to get an interwar house, or a 19th century house. Do people not like old houses in the US? They're usually better built, with more character, built on more land, in my experience.
Not every outlandish claim should garner the attention and respect from scientists. If you hide your "discovery," refuse to publish in scientific journals and be subject to peer review, if you claim "secrecy" is why no one can replicate your result, well, you'll be tossed on to the tall pile of folks claiming this or that physics breakthrough.

Physicists have to deal with this kind of crackpottery a LOT. They don't owe you their time unless you have some solid evidence and full transparency. Don't want full transparency? Be prepared to be called a fraud. That's how it goes.
Because you dont use an add blocker?
Also sponsorblock to skip in-video garbage intros/outros etc.
Shows where they are in the seek-bar as well
Correction: if you want to do that in two dimensions, you have to do that twice, and the second dimension is going to have worse locality of reference, especially if you don't tile your images. I still think that's efficient and practical.

GCC unrolled the loop twice, so it was 34 instructions that processed two samples per iteration. The instructions are mostly things like this:

addq (%rax), %rbp
subq %rdi, %rcx
addq %rbx, %rdi
subq %rcx, %rdx
movq %rcx, -2064(%rax)
movq -2056(%rax), %rcx

That should clarify a bit how one core of my mere 2.8GHz Core i7 is managing to run over ten billion instructions per second.

Godbolt link for those who want to play: https://godbolt.org/z/MfEqYn3Pd

Gaussian blur gets used for this a lot precisely because it's so easy to compute this way — it's the only convolution kernel that's anisotropic and separable. So people press it into service doing things like camera bokeh that it's not really very good at.
This is the essence of what Google implements. Links between sites are a form of user curation, user behavior (clicks, read throughs, bounce rate, etc.) are like inferred votes. The problem is, everything is gameable. Marketers abuse reddit as well, it just isn't quite as profitable as ranking #1 on Google. If a major search engine implemented a voting model, it too would spring an entire industry of "optimizing" for rankings via upvotes.
Code review of an Order object implemented as a state machine
A crash course in Reinforcement Learning using TensorFlow and Python
I don't see how you can read this passage and not see that his feelings of inadequacy compared to other FI bloggers isn't the same "keeping up" that he criticized in his ex and others:

> I looked at other FI bloggers who quit work and retired. They all appeared to be blissful. Stoic. Confident and without reservations. Since I ran into problems myself, I started to feel like I was defective. Like something was wrong with me and that’s why it didn’t work so well.

That is the EXACT same emotion people feel when seeing their peers who are posting their wealth on Facebook. It might not be material wealth he is trying to keep up with, but it is still the same emotional desire.

He is still keeping up with the Jones's... just a different group of Jones's

There is nothing wrong with that, except he expresses such disgust for other people having that need, while pretending his own doesn't exist.
What do you mean "forced"? Noone is snatching men off construction sites to chain them to the desk in a classroom of lesbian dance theory
I got so annoyed with Google that I set my default to duckduckgo and/or Bing, but now I've gotten in the habit of switching back to Google constantly, because once I am directly faced with the quality of the other options, they suck.
Kotlin mostly requires JVM, Crystal does not.
With Kotlin native, Kotlin js and most importantly Graal native this is plain wrong.
I find that both Bitwarden (personal use) and 1password (work use) do a very good job of filling in login forms.
they're measuring power output put weight, seemingly. some weight saving could help real system designs but there's not really clear wins on system efficiency stated here, beyond some reduced weight from integration

the design is kind of interesting. the switching circuits are integrated into the motor.

generally i'd consider this a bad & terrible idea, because it exposes the board to the motors thermals, it involves way more jerk (change in acceleration) & vibration. but it is kind of cool. it does reduce a variety of small losses.

but ah... are those water cooling attachments? nothing like supremely kick ass cooling to jack up your power density!!!

still have a hard time believing an integrated design in a win over discrete motor controller + motor, which stills seems like the core thing here. but maybe! and maybe it's just easier enough to use!
1. Start with the 3 earliest known cases.

2. Review CCTV of their movements for the 14 days prior.

3. Find the commonality.

If there's genuine interest in where it came from, I think the answer is certainly findable.
I use a prepaid card online, which would have been a good safety net against things like this

Also he was able to get a refund, and i think in most places online, you can cancel the order
Docsend Joins Dropbox
Not only that, a 5% return on that down payment is a $833/month opportunity cost.

Owning in SF is generally more expensive than renting. Why? Because house prices have appreciation assumptions already priced in. Plenty of people lose money every month versus rent but appreciation more than covers it.
I think it's both. 1Password shouldn't have filled in that amount and Substack should have had a clear confirmation - "Are you sure you want to pay *2,023 dollars* a year?"
Fusors are room temperature. It’s the electrical gradient which produces the reaction, not temperature.
Yeah, that's true. Teslas have a front-facing long range radar and multiple ultrasonic sensors around the car for close range detection. Like most modern cars. But they are there just to avoid hitting anything, but can't be used alone for driving autonomously.
Scientist bridges the gap between quantum simulators and quantum computers
I don't see this going in the direction of a heavily enforced response, although some places may talk big. While a collective ban is rationally sensible, nations are made of individuals and every person will do a calculation of personal benefit relative to national interest. Crypto is valuable as a refuge, so a recurring story is currently playing out in destabilized nations all over the world where crypto is used to escape the inflated local currency: the government gets wishy-washy about what it's going to do with the stuff, with different officials taking wildly different stances according to their own self-interest. They talk of a ban, and then of national cryptocurrency, and then of nationalized mining. Everyone is looking for safe harbor but pulls in a different direction.

Focusing on controlling onramps and offramps to cryptocurrency, like controlling goods import/export, is a relatively straightforward compromise to this internal dilemma and allows the government to be a player in the space without much direct oversight, even if some folks are slipping through the cracks. A sloppy, haphazard enforcement is likely to prevail.

And there's another way to reassert state control within that framework. If the bad cryptocriminals come for your stuff, the government can bail you out - if you play by their rules. The loss compensation mechanism is a simple plan to mitigate dangers, since it's easy for governments to create and redistribute credit internally and doing so can build consent.

Submitting to this framework does mean that the government is truly in competition with decentralisation to provide a better, more trustworthy service to handle central credit, and has to massively step up security efforts in the process. Everyone started "asleep at the wheel" on this, with individual tech firms all building out their own insecure house-of-cards fiefdoms and relying on the intellectual property law framework to keep them up. But everyone knows it's flawed - of course you can copy, what's important is if you can get credit, and that part is also changing with the crypto sector - assignment of credit is the whole thing of NFTs in a nutshell. The nation that can grasp this the quickest and turn it into a coherent part of their economic framework will cruise ahead.
I don't think RMS is "the devil", but we do allow him to frame the debate and priorities, and I don't think this is a good thing as I feel his priorities are all wrong. The more mindshare RMS takes up, the less there is for things that do matter.

Why aren't we using some Free Software platform to develop our software on? No really, if we can't get our own tooling together then what does that say about the movement as a whole? People use GitHub simply because it's the best platform out there; I did a review of many alternatives a while ago, and GitHub was the best by far. It's as simple as that really. The problem with the "RMS mindset" is that "it's Free Software" is enough of a "feature" that will make people use it, and turns out it's not except for quite a small group of people.

Imagine an alternative universe where the FSF had invested significant time an resources in developing a Savannah that actually, you know, worked well. Not only would people use it, and it would have been a great platform to spread the word about Free Software and why it matters. Instead, Stallman writes polemics about how SaaS is evil and you shouldn't be using these "Service as a Software Substitute". Okay, nice... But also missing the point and that's just not how software works today, or will ever work again. The 80s have come and gone.

I don't work for a big corporation btw; I've actually been work full-time on Free Software for the last 2 years, making about €700/month or so. At least I put my money where my mouth is :-)
What do you mean? The goal of that subscription option is to allow the user to pay a custom amount. I guarantee you the custom amount cannot be less than the yearly membership.
"Very desolate" is an understatement. It feels like a set from a fantasy or sci-fi movie.
Oh gee, what a shame that he died of Covid, at the young age of 33. A tragic coincidence
There are so many 'good fits' as you can fit almost any narrative in a ppt

Potential acquirers I could think: Roblox, Elic, SalesForce (Slack), Twilio (Segment CRM), Twitter, Zoom, Peloton (?)
One thing that is an indispensable lesson of graduate research: actually trying to make a cutting edge measurement and pick signal from noise is INCREDIBLY hard. It's easy to underestimate just how noisy frakking everything is. Every thing looks complex and uncertain and it's only through extremely hard work and careful measurement that you can know ANYTHING.

So complexity is actually the norm. The irreducible complexity of noise.
High risk to never really work though — it makes SpaceX and Raptor look conservative.
I assume it's an intentional feature (pay what you want, as long as its above the "standard" price, to give the author additional support).