skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, so much of forensic "science" is notoriously flawed, that this seems like a likely addition the usual junk-science pantheon of "gunshot analysis, footprint analysis, hair comparison and bite mark comparison" - https://innocenceproject.org/forensic-science-problems-and-s...

Personally, I think one reason we still do this has a lot to do with detective shows being so ridiculously popular that people think that it's some sort of scientific process, when it's not. As a thought experiment, we'd probably have flat-earther-ism be the dominant belief if was like 15/20 broadcast TV shows are dedicated to glorifying flat-earther-ism. This means the most dangerous thing about "Super Resolution" is the public has already been "primed" with cop shows having the "enhance" feature.
> And you can make them tls-end for you.

Nothing says end-to-end security like terminating TLS at a network choke point so intruders can easily snoop all traffic.
Yeah. I think the downside is that you end up even further into the "shut-up and compute" paradigm of physics that we are already in.

But if you get predictions from the theory that turn out to be true in the end (like entanglement, Bell's inequality, etc) then it gives you a lot of confidence in your theory.

I don't know how it'll turn out. At this point people are throwing stuff against the wall to see what sticks to get physics out of the local minima it seems to have found itself in.

I don't think Carroll or anyone else is naively wandering into this endeavor from a philosophical standpoint though.
If a billion Earthlings want to roam around Mars once in their life, that's the basis for several permanent tourist settlements there.

I also bet many would enjoy the low gravity on Mars and the Moon. It might even be very health beneficial for some.

Again, that's the basis for permanent medical facilities there.
It’s a reasonable theory but step one required to trigger this bug is an unauthenticated request. It’s unclear if their logs indicated that or they got lucky trying to repro that someone thought to try with an unauthenticated request first when the back to back session didn’t repro.
Correct. There were two recorded performances, one in December, 1613, the second in January, 1614. I went ahead and described the second because it's better documented. I got the exact date from a journal article by a garden historian. [0] These are the kind of things that footnotes are helpful for - if I were writing this up as an academic paper, I'd get into the weeds with these details, but unfortunately it just doesn't work when you're writing it as a straight-ahead narrative without footnotes. That's especially true because it was basically just an introductory anecdote, not the focus of the piece.

I agree though, digging deep into historical sources, I think, should make us all uncomfortable. As you said, historians should never claim to have direct access to historical truth. It's all mediated and all potentially corrupted by the bias of observers/recorders. That's just a fact of doing history, and it's why we're not humanists, not scientists. It's also why I find it so endlessly interesting.

[0] https://www.jstor.org/stable/25472393?seq=2#metadata_info_ta...
That argument doesn't hold water when my Pixel can hear a piece of classical music and identify the particular performer/album, not just the title of the music itself.

If my phone can do that on its own (Google claims they aren't sending any audio to the cloud), then Content ID can surely do just as well, if not better, and not flag someone's church choir's performance as some recorded, copyrighted work.
Ha. It's fun to throw these estimates around. While 16EB is a lot, let's see where a back of envelope estimate gets us. Assume that storage mostly follows Moore's law of doubling capacity in every 18 months. That is 2^6.667=97 in 10 years; let's say about 100X capacity in 10 years.

So in 10 years we will have 100x120TB = 12PB per disk. Put 8 of these disks in a 2-U unit and we'll have a 100PB box. Stack 10 of these units together in a rack and we'll get an 1EB storage rack.

Remember some file systems use couple bits off the 64-bit addressing space for other purposes. Shaving 4 bits off and we get 1.15EB. That's within the 10-year storage capacity estimate.

While present day Youtude might not have that much data, I'm sure when the 16K, 32K, and 64K videos come along the space will be filled up. Let's not forget the voluminous 3-D Lidar scan data generated by every iPhone when people start recording 3-D VR-Holodeck from their phones. Besides wouldn't it be cool to host an entire copy of the Youtude in your closet? ;)
> Kyle Evans has even decided to step away from maintaining wireguard-freebsd

That is not true. Everyone acknowledges the code is not up to the required standard so it is being removed but Kyle and others will continue to work on it with the aim of adding it back.

Edit: as @asmr below linked to, he has has since announced that he is quitting.
> We believe that transparency is key in earning and keeping the trust of our users and want to share more about this bug.

I find it ironic that the largest repository of open source code is closed source and and owned by the largest closed source software company on the planet, yet they somehow still "believe in transparency."

That's like McDonald's "transparently" recalling burgers because of a chemical contamination, and then when you ask what else is in the burgers they tell you it's a secret.
Obsidian for me
full image backups that rotate out of multiple machines and phones would be an ideal usecase
I wonder why episode 96 has the message 100. Is the numbering off?
Hi, Thank you for reviewing and giving such valuable feedback. I am glad you feel this way about the space.

With regards to IP, we definitely ran into this concern couple of times. To address this we are in the process of getting SOC 2 Security Audit and post its report on the platform. Definitely agree on the identity part, will definitely have it up soon. We have the on-premise version in our roadmap for Q2 this year.

This is an interesting insight about iterative fabrication. We are thinking along these lines, for manufacturer space e.g. generating and translating the BOM and design files fabricator anticipated formats within Inventhub from source files.
- Adding manufacturers directly into the partner space for placing order could be an added revenue source. We can probably come up with a utility that facilities manufacturers with their work and have them connect with our user-base. (Like cost estimation utility from source files etc). Agreed on the part of generating revenue from connecting customers and manufacturers within the platform.

- We did build a basic supply chain integration in the BOM to help user find parts from multiple component dealers, compare prices and choose the best one. Will definitely look into the rare stock supply.

- I agree, we did consider building an add-on to github or gitlab, but overtime we have ran into some engineering problems that made us realize it has to be done ground up. Also, the future vision we have does make more sense for us to host data on our platform. We did engineer the architecture in a way to port the utilizes to any git under-base to keep this acquisition door open. This is not a priority though with where we see ourselves headed though.

Thank you so much again for sharing your feedback.It is indeed really helpful.
Cyber anything isn't the solution.

The solution is best practices, succinctly expressed, regularly updated, and loosely expressed but tightly enforced over years.

Because tomorrow's device environment is not bought today. It's bought today-and-every-day-for-the-past-30-years.

And securing the entire environment is the key goal.
That, and bodges can be easily applied to already-assembled boards in inventory, repair centers, and the field.
It's possible to browse the before-changes-started version of the FreeBSD code, through either CVS or the FreeBSD Git mirror. To save people the effort of finding the right git revision and the path, the kernel module starts here: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/tree/95331c228a39b44c...

On a casual inspection, there are at least kernel printfs in crypto code in __chacha20poly1305_decrypt (in module/crypto/zinc/chacha20poly1305.c) that were not in the original version of this from Linux.
The smartest engineers in the world are not smart enough to write bug free multithreaded code.
Cool, thanks for doing that.
You called it! Just another race condition that uses shared objects without protecting them.
Movavi Video Converter 21.2.0 Crack with Activation Key Download 2021
I could think that they also wanted to increase engagement on the site. People better respond to music they know, so they were milking sweet ad commissions as long as they could. Maybe labels realised YT is taking a mickey and had a strong conversation with the execs.
Schrödinger equation does not even account for relativistic effects (even though the author pointed out the opposite in the text)... anyone who has read basic texts on philosophy of science knows that this kind of proposition, "it explains reality", is completely "out of reality". it cannot be done by the simple fact that we do not know if any theory will remain as the best explanation for a bunch of experimental facts in the future (in a way, the equation mentioned did not predict even spin or antiparticles). there is just no way to prove this, it is a futile and useless exercise of futurology masked as complex linguistic mumbo-jumbo and not at all impressive physics knowledge...
RNNoise: Learning Noise Suppression (2017)
It doesn’t. The issue here seems like a more vanilla logical data race + object reuse that Rust can’t really do anything about. Rust only makes sure that only one thread at a time writes and other reads don’t race that write. It can’t make guarantees that the relative ordering of reads and wires makes sense for your use-case.

It can simplify certain abstractions of course so that you can provide easier tools for devs to avoid footguns.
This consistency is what the right-wing provocators who reposted the tweets were counting on.
We think we have it so hard with our 9-5 jobs and 2 weeks vacation.

Meanwhile, atoms have been working without as much as a fucking smoke break for literally billions of years! >_<
Your only response to the well known fact that the data has flaws [0,1] is more unspecified statistics. Why should I put any trust in those if I know the death count statistic has clear flaws?

I'd rather our society not be directed based on easily manipulated statistics. It cloaks hidden agendas behind the guise of science and math which is dishonest.

[0]: https://www.denverpost.com/2020/05/15/colorado-covid-coronav...
[1]: https://www.fox35orlando.com/news/fox-35-investigates-questi...
Show HN: Regular Expressions in JavaScript – Interactive Course
Distributed computing is not super useful for video encoding (although it's certainly kind of useful) because there's overhead to ship all the raw video around and put it back together again. If you have multiple files to encode, you might as well just run one on each machine.
"but it also lets that phone number restore backups" - is this true? I use Authy and can use a phone number to connect a new device to my account, but to restore access to credentials on the new device I need to enter a passphrase. I don't think there's a way to restore credentials with just a phone number, but will need to check.

Edit: the following article appears to confirm my beliefs: https://support.authy.com/hc/en-us/articles/360036580453-Rec...

Without the backup password, you won't be able to restore a backup.
You can never make people like this more comfortable. They are professional victims, and they will always find more things to be offended by.
How does china defeat america's F-35s and F-22s.

With a significantly smaller defense budget.

Someone enlighten me how this happens.
I love these kinds of projects.

We are layering AI on top of all kinds of problems. It feels like the sync problem when latency is introduced is something that you could solve with some dumb AI.

Is AI solving sync part of the third wave for musicians composing over the internet in real time?
The people have decided that "open source" means OSI open source. Therefore that is its effective definition. Which means

Exactly. In common, everyday usage, when people talk about "Open Source" this is what the majority mean. It's not a "de jure" definition, but it is a "de facto" definition. Open Source means compliance with the OSD. There are terms for those other licenses - "shared source", "source available", etc. Use them if that's what you mean.
Eh? The national law is literally written down.

"Guesswork" doesn't seem like a good way to do anything without stumbling into a lot of confusion and miscommunication.
A pity that website looks very outdated.
It's more descriptive, but usually you design UIs for the user, not for the developer writing the CSS
Did anyone actually try to make that run in practice? I don't think GTK supports that. You can't just magically hot-swap Cairo backends externally. Using the GL backend means you provide GL surfaces to Cairo instead of memory.
The argument I am pondering over here is very similar to the one about human population, you might have heard about it, it goes something like this: "human population is now likely highest it will ever be and will be drastically reduced in the future, because if we were to be born as any human randomly we would likely be born during a period where there are highest number of people alive".

Sadly I don't remember the name of it, but this argument about consciousness is in the same fashion. Except the odds are a _lot_ more surprising when compared with the population argument.
Ok I actually understand what you mean. You are defining "consciousness" to be the "essence of being" in that case I agree it exists but as you mention

>[Essence of being] is impossible to describe. It is neither hot nor cold, it has no size, and it experiences no passage of time as it is always now, eternal. There are no sides to it and no parts. It has no extent. It cannot be pointed to.

Therefore it is not amenable to scientific or logical study. Study of essence of being is a spiritual quest for the individual and the Universe as a whole.

Maybe some "enlightened" or "adept" can use their insight or gifts but it is not a general technology that can be studied, measured, classified, boxed, etc.
https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2021-March/00652...
Yes, clearly documenting the configurations is an execllent step in transparency. Including price in those would have been nice, but that's asking a lot.

"More than the usual stretching" applies to the "touch bar only," and "limited" vs "unlimited" creation applications, etc. The Air has no touch bar but performs just about the same as the MacBook Pro - yet they lump it all under "Mac M1." And there are some great content applications that don't run on non-Apple hardware at all, and perform better on the M1 Macs than the Intel ones. Maybe that's just the usual stretching, but it's pretty inaccurate.
There were four direct-to-DVD movies between the Fox era and the Comedy Central era. I suppose they are counting those as four episodes (even though they were later cut up for broadcasting into a full season of over a dozen episodes).
Am I the only one who absolutely hate these low-density touch based apps?

I'm asking it seems to be getting worse every day. This "padding" they added to Windows Explorer. It's awful.

Why couldn't they just make the address bar less tall instead? Is this a UWP limitation?
Sounds too good to be true so it probably is not. If that is the case why didn't this 'basic hygiene' eliminate or curb the coronavirus?
As expensive as it is, datadog provides the required level of insight via, among other drill-down methods, detailed flamegraphs, to get to the bottom of problems like this one.

No, not affiliated with datadog, and not convinced the cost/benefit ratio is positive for us in the long run.
> Using the term "open source" without any definition is useless. If we can't agree on a definition, it's impossible to know if we're actually talking about the same thing.

Get with the program, dude. It's 2021, and the prevailing sentiment is that all definitions are now fluid. #GoForWoke #GoWokeOrGoHome
Agreed on 4TB to be a reasonable upper limit for RAID1 if URE rate is 1e-14. However, why would 1 in 20 rebuilds fail? And if it did, why would there be a data loss? The data is OK as long as the remaining disk is alive, you can retry the rebuild.
I hope we are going to see an old web resurgence in the coming years and personal blogs will once again populate the hn frontage. If we can't keep the old web, nobody can. We are a niche, a tech niche, but we have to stop visiting medium or other centralized services.

Crop tops are everywhere when nobody expected then 30 years later after all.
"should not" and "does not" are not equal statements.
Purely a guess, but I've sometimes been able to work backwards from the content length (very often included in HTTP server logs) to figure out what the body had to be.
The first 3D-printed housing community in the US is being built in the CA desert
>For all the flak the DMCA gets, its claim/counterclaim process is way better for creators than Google's system is.

I suspect this is the crack in the YT foundation that will allow for real competition to emerge. Several YouTube creators have formed a competing network specifically because of the BS they deal with regarding ContentID being so anti-creator.
> Is this not literally the distinction between an interface and an implementation?

No. e.g. Java interfaces are just as nominal as classes.

> But are test mocks and stubs not literally the prime use case for interfaces at the syntax level?

Also no. If your language has structural interfaces it is often preferred to inheritance as a tool for polymorphism. Even in C++ where templates are not the easiest tool to wield it's often still preferable to inheritance for many reasons.
So it is the might filter and pre-cursor of preventive censorship in the EU. Marvellous.
No, that didn’t contain any transputers, but it might have been a Parsytec GigaCluster

http://www.geekdot.com/category/hardware/transputer/parsytec...
VRay 5.00.03 Crack for SketchUp 2021 Full License Key {Latest Version}
The Milky Way
7000x1300 pixels
Netgate's Take on the WireGuard Debacle
Ruroowwww!! i used ubiome sad to see it was a fraud. Wasn’t a bad idea, lazy bums could have made it work.
Your recommendation then? WD? What?
> On an unrelated note, are you the same Dragontamer that I've met and played with at PDXLAN? Or do you just happen to use the same alias?

Unlikely me. We must have the same online alias (it is a very common alias in my experience...)
I find I can enter a flow state with work more easily when I feel like the world is asleep.
Has been explored in Altered Carbon ( the book ). Digitised conscience loaded into computer simulation and torture for practically infinite amount of time
A unified command is different than an actual branch of the military
One of the best THC infused edibles experiences
Socially liberal societies, in their current form, are literally not sustainable. And what sustainability they appear to have is actually propped up by socially conservative natives, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/republicans-more-kids-democra... and immigrants from socially conservative countries.

This isn’t related to modern society, necessarily. The US total fertility rate was well over 3.0 in the 1960s, but even then most women worked outside the home. It’s also not necessarily preference. The average number of children women say they want is 2.7, while the fertility rate is now well under 2.0. I strongly suspect it’s the result of the sexual revolution in the 1960s and 1970s, which made it socially acceptable for men not to commit to raising families.

[1] This is actually a fairly new phenomenon, appearing in the last few decades.
Thanks for the suggestion. Could be nice to have, but then there must be a visual feedback for the user. Issues/PRs are welcomed in the GH repo.
> Given that OSI is the only body I know of with a clear definition

If this is the only definition you're aware of, then apologies, but you're not the right person to be attempting to drive this discussion.

If you're aware of the many others but do not consider them 'clear', then there is something else going on here, and I am starting to wander about agenda.
You cant protect from a DDoS with a hardware firewall, a DDoS consists of so much bandwidth that your network hardware is not able to simply handle the incoming traffic before any filtering happens. Your expensive hardware firewall can protect from DoS attacks, but they don‘t happen anymore as DDoS attacks are really cheap.
IoT, the S stands for security.
> the only evidence we do have available indicates that monopoly abuse of power is a tactic Apple has deliberately used before.

Yes, they fell foul of anti-trust law in Ebook pricing.

> Even if this is, as RileyJames posits, just the head of one team asking another for a favor in pursuit of an acquisition,

That’s just a made up explanation. It’s not ‘evidence’.

> it speaks to the corporate culture at Apple.

There is no evidence for this at all.

Remember, it’s just something a commenter made up. It’s not information about Apple, so it can’t ‘speak to Apple’s culture’.

> Regardless, given the balance of actual evidence, it seems more absurd to extend the benefit of the doubt to the corporation that has abused market power in the past.

At least you are clear about what you are actually saying:

You are going to assume Apple is guilty of this because they violated antitrust law over ebook pricing*, and that is your only evidence.

We have no evidence that they are guilty of this.

Maybe something will show up in court.
That's fun. I've coded this useless tool based on your comment: "What's Your HTML Color ?"[0]

[0]: https://onivers.com/color.html
Do you suppose neurons consider the super organism they are part of? No. So why should humans. Yes "we" are all fragments of the unified human experience, but our role, as individuals is to live as individuals.
> Using the term "open source" without any definition is useless. If we can't agree on a definition, it's impossible to know if we're actually talking about the same thing.

Which is why you should call them "OSI Licenses" if you are referring to OSI licenses.

> let's use theirs and move on to more substantial topics.

This just isn't how English works. It isn't prescriptive. English is descriptive by nature and permits multiple uses, which have been around before OSI ever existed and are still valid.
No, no, no. Strong static typing is an unmitigated win. A stitch in time saves nine: with static typing you can check for type constraint violations at compile time that would otherwise throw runtime errors, eliminating a large class of bugs before your program even runs.

What's more, with static typing your IDE can provide you with more helpful guidance by immediately showing you the valid method names associated with an object, type-checking their parameters as you use them, and suggesting possible parameters of the required types from the variables currently in scope.

With dynamic/duck typing, you give all that up -- for no clear advantage.

Use static typing in a project of significant size. Always.
Don’t Feel Sorry for the Airlines (2020)
The "Buy the book (EU)" link is broken.
Only Had a quick glimpse on Decrypting Rita and Parallax, but wow what a ride and the colors!
Because covid is considerably more contagious than most flu strains.
One idea is to average out a bunch of small trades to one made up large trade with the same overall gain. I think it's very unlikely if investigated they'd say we're doing you because you declared a £10k gain when really you made a £10k gain but with slightly different details. At least in the UK. Other places may be more uptight.