skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> While present day Youtude might not have that much data, I'm sure when the 16K, 32K, and 64K videos come along the space will be filled up.

I can't imagine how long it will be until we see 16K, considering 4K caught on in around 2014/15. 8K video exists, but is still exceptionally rare, at least for consumers.

> Besides wouldn't it be cool to host an entire copy of the Youtude in your closet? ;)

As long as you're not still hamstrung by Xfinity's 1 TB data cap...

How about some napkin math on the cost of that data overage? hah
Yup, the doc seems to merely make optional recommendations, without enforcement, and only apply them to new devices (not ones already in the field). This is the USA’s way to “get serious” about something. It’s a nothingburger.
The people responsible for the damage causes by the herbicides will be long gone and their decedent's wealth safe before anyone will ever get held responsible.

Chevron (Texaco) killed and poisoned hundreds and when they finally lost in court they went after the laywer which is currently still under illegal house arrest in NY. [1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5RZLyLCTo0
Hi Andrea (right?),

IIUC, you're saying the fib benchmark gets optimized out at speed 3 (and thus run faster than all the implementations discussed here).

But what about speed 2, which is the current default? If we're 15 times slower on this benchmark, does that mean that Node has much cheaper function calls, or something like that?

Because we have to keep Emacs Lisp functions advice-able (which I agree is a good thing)?
Actually, the effort that started towards this blog post started weeks ago, easily several weeks before the blog post you're referencing.
Microservice-by-default architecture is, IMHO, neatly rebutted by the same argument.
I know it's a parody of Outer Limits and the Twilight Zone, but it always made me think of the "Lost room" (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0830361/)
Kraken's maker feea are about 0.16%. They are quite liquid too.
You download an ISO, put it on a USB key or burn it to a CD, and install it like you would Windows10 or any other OS.

If only it was that easy all the time.

I have an old laptop (2017) that I wasn't for anything else, using so I tried putting Linux on it. Nope. I went through five distributions before I found one that would finally work. And then, it was not really useable.

The whole reason people use MacOS is because they know what to expect. Linux is still a crapshoot.
Meta: I really dislike the style of console.dev, the article is shunted to the left and leaves the rest of the screen real estate to be taken up by an - albeit pretty - but unnecessary piece of digital artwork. This - https://ibb.co/nzbFxjW - is what the article looks like on my ultrawide which made for very uncomfortable viewing
Thank you!

Definitely, Altium is a very capable tool for electronics design. I totally agree the features like commenting, BOMs, component library is in Altium 365.

With regards to differentiator, first being we support same tools and utilities for all formats (Eagle, Altium, KiCAD, PADS, OrCAD and Allegro). The Altium 365 is tied to just their ecosystem is specific to just managing single file PCB projects. Whereas, with inventhub you have flexibility to manage data however you want, it let you go beyond storing designs or components or visualizing in the web (e.g. adding specs documentation, instruction manuals in the project, or attaching more data to components like your internal stock for reference)

- Inventhub let you have consistency in the process of development and gives you a single space to manage all kind of data.

- Secondly, its all in the cloud, today it gives you single source to maintain data (for all ECADS). With inter-portability between formats we take reusability of trusted designs and assets a step ahead.

- With our version control the collaboration is effective and it coupled with the the utilizes let's you focus on just the design and development vs. figuring out how to configure.

Do let me know if this answers your question and give you the understanding of differentiating factor. I would be happy to jump on a call to walk you through the platform with use-case as well.
Yet even microcars can do it. Like the Toyota Yaris and VW Up!.
Thanks for the kind words! I wrote most of the enhancements and thought the static and dynamic example support was crucial to have.

Our schema is not as big as yours, but I could see how things could get a bit unwieldy on the navbar. Come on over to the repo and we can work on a solution together - I'm sure there's something we can figure out if we put on our design + product + engineer hats.
Surgical procedure vs non surgical procedure always seems like a higher risk to me. Sure we will build systems to lower those risks but removing it entirely is currently well beyond our capabilities.

Sure I can make up miracle solutions but given the data we have today removing abortion and saying “just have it surgically removed and implanted in this tube” seems less than great.

I still ignored the obvious questions of who pays for that given it likely ends up more expensive than abortion (ongoing costs) and that it really doesn’t solve the moral issues given there’s still be the shaming that happens around abortions, the usual crap about “irresponsible women”.

I think this is all a great option but I don’t see it replacing abortion for multiple reasons.
Philip K Dick wrote about being out of the heat of God's light, not feeling the scorching heat of the palm tree garden upon us. I believe it was from one of the VALIS novels but I haven't gone back to dig it up, and could be wrong.

Personally, I find I sometimes have trouble accepting good enough solutions. I want more structure, a better defined start. At night I can drop into a productive flow state with much less resistance, ignore many of the day-time wants. The hours run short; let's seize what we can from the waking hours. As well that "inspiration," I think there is probably a physiological barrier lowering that happens as we go into the night. As we recede from the gods' light, as it were.
So much this. Specifically (for me), it's the simple understanding that I will not be disturbed for as long as I care to focus, so it's worth the "effort" to get in the zone. Which of course means it only takes 30 seconds to get there.

But the screwed up sleep cycles from years and years of this are starting to take their toll, so I've been trying everything I can to replicate that peace of mind during daylight hours. No silver bullet yet.
Yay! Now I can trust everything again!
Show HN: Yuks – Discover comedians, for comedy fans
Agreed. However, I smirked a bit when I read your comment, since this is ultimately coming from Microsoft. Let's hope some of this mentality seeps into other Microsoft projects
This looks incredibly cool.

Just make sure you don't pull a stunt like Cricut recently has and piss off your entire userbase ;P
Has glyphosate or pesticides ever been linked to prions?
I'm struggling to easily configure new subdomains that easily using GKE. The managed certificates system in GCloud is straight user-friendly hostile.
I'll have a look at that.
k3s is absolutely production ready. It's intended for IOT and edge devices, but if you want to use it in a data center, it'll work. What you lose is the failover of Kubernetes itself that you get from a proper HA etcd setup where the control plane for your cluster is itself also clustered, but you really don't need that if your entire application is a single node anyway.
Ah the mix of sadness and joy in remembering her reading the posts here, she will certainly be missed by everyone that ever enjoyed driving and motoring shows I believe
NIST cannot write and enforce law. They can only make recommendations.
Didn't Ansible/Puppet/Salt/Chef already do this?

I don't even know what Kubernetes is (because I refuse to look it up) but somehow all these people have heard of it and apparently not any of the previous simpler solutions.
It’s worth reading the rest of the interview, I find Rob Pike has a very interesting/unique take on the current landscape given his involvement with Plan 9:

> Now everything isn't connected, just connected to the cloud, which isn't the same thing. And uniform? Far from it, except in mediocrity. This is 2012 and we're still stitching together little microcomputers with HTTPS and ssh and calling it revolutionary.
I mean they are stereotypes about a particular minority group. Of course they don't read the same when you replace them with phrases that are not stereotypes about the majority group.
Not sure why you couldn’t just resize the window here?
> He's definitely the most prolific 3D artist, ever.

That is either false, or it's true in a way that is meaningless.

There are artists who have spent every day creating art. Daily art exercises and sketchbooks are commonplace. Some work in 3D, some have been working far longer than Beeple has.

If you mean "Beeple has been publishing a discrete piece of art, publicly, every day for longer than others", then I dunno, maybe? I'm not sure why that's anything to be proud of, or why anyone would aim to do that, but it might be true.

If you mean "he's created more pieces of 3D art than anyone else", then no, he's outstripped by literally thousands if not tens of thousands of people. The "winner" is probably some unknown previz animator working in an outsourced animation studio in India or China somewhere. :)

...of course, you might say "that doesn't count, I don't CARE about the stuff those guys do. Well, maybe I don't care about the stuff Beeple does.

> It's not a coincidence that he, of all people, managed to sell 69 million dollars worth of cookie-cutter crap.

It very likely isn't a coincidence. https://amycastor.com/2021/03/14/metakovan-the-mystery-beepl...

> most of them are busy creating escapist stuff that will never get the attention of the art scene. To that end, skill just doesn't matter.

And I don't think the art scene thinks very much of Beeple, so I'm not sure what that proves.
> The show that watches back

Well, that was prescient, given how smart TVs send screen content data back to the manufacturers these days.
Well articulated! And exactly right. We hope to accelerate the democratization of capital access and think we're solving the key bottleneck to achieving that.
Hard drive only have a handful of different rates of spinning (rpm). The diameter of the platters are also limited to a couple options. The number of platters varies a bit, but there are numbers that are too stupid-low and ones that are too high to fit into the case, so there are maybe 3-5 varieties?

If you have two drives with the same number of platters, the same diameter, and the same rotation speed, the one with the highest storage can only do that by increasing storage density - making the bits smaller. Smaller bits means more tracks, but also more bits per track. So in a single rotation (1/7200 of a second, for instance), the read head sweeps across more data. If it reads it as fast as it sees it (which they do), then that means a higher transfer rate.
I think I've got a good handle on it now. Basically I don't get as angry anymore, and I don't get as depressed anymore, and I don't work as hard anymore. Using terms like "rage" is off-putting to alot of people, but the reality is that I set all my personal records in exercise when I was super pissed off about something that happened in my life.

The softer approach now is that I understand that the "I am not good enough" mindset is a powerful one that is behind many successful people's motivation. It's kinda a paradox, because you basically think "I am the best", but also "I am not good enough"... Putting it together into something cohesive is more like "I am capable of being better than I currently am".

The emotional stuff is kinda like "I will suffer more if I don't do this". Like self imposed suffering caused by dissapointment.
Eh, i very much prefer fixed lampposts that aren't going anywhere
Static HTML pages might be the only safe way to keep a blog running; my experience running Wordpress is if you leave it up long enough someone will drive by, hack it, and Dreamhost will block your site.
I wonder if open sourcing their code would even be a problem for them now. I don’t think the code is worth much vs the brand name and scale.
I’m very impressed by the level of detail provided in this post mortem, but it leaves me with a few questions.

What we know based on this report:

- This bug was live in production for at least 3 days.

- It was common enough to happen numerous times in the wild.

- GitHub says that they identified some specific user sessions that may have been impacted by this bug by analyzing their logs.

What we do not know:

- How many leaked user sessions were identified in the followup investigation?

- Is GitHub confident that they identified all leaked user sessions?

- Was there any evidence of malicious use of these sessions?

- Did GitHub notify the users whose sessions were leaked?

- How long/for how many requests could these sessions have been valid between their leak and when they were definitively revoked on the 8th?

- Is it possible that any private user data was leaked? If so, what data?
This is the kind of multithreading bug that Rust’s borrow checker can prevent: the compiler would have complained that the background task and the main request handler have write access to the env object at the same time, which is not allowed.
Roger Stone would be proud.
> Not sure if Excel is the best environment for this

I suppose VisiCalc would be more era-appropriate, but Excel/LibreOffice has better programming support.
For me, I'm just fighting rural networking. Ever since I setup control master for my ssh, I have not had too much issue with the ssh.

I still like running emacs locally.
David Sinclair to co-chair $200M biotech SPAC – Longevity.Technology
Oil firms knew decades ago fossil fuels posed grave health risks, files reveal
Those lights are blinding as hell at night. The only reason a person wouldn't have hit the car is because it's the only thing you can see when trying to pass one.
GitHub is owned by Microsoft but as far as I know it operates pretty independently. Let’s hope it stays that way.
Some discussion is on Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/m7qq7b/rust_in_linuxn...
I feel such attempts at 'logic' just apply people's biases and make a mess.

Unless there is solid evidence they should not be withholding lighting.

Some folks want to drink outdoors or chillin the park, and they will with or eithout light, but like this a lot more people will break their nose or leg
Not quite. With kubernetes, you have the only choice, it's declarative yml.

With Ansible, you can easily shoot yourself in the foot with imperative shell command.

The point is, Kubernetes is very opinionated (for good reason) on how it's hard for you to break your system.
Once ZoL hits in 13 are you planning to give users direct access to ZFS for encrypted filesystems? My goal is to have a remote ZFS host I can push my snapshots to without loading the keys remotely. That would give me emergency access to the files if I load the key (less preferable), but mostly the ability to receive all the remote filesystems+snapshots to local storage with the flexibility of ZFS tooling. Right now I encrypt the incremental snapshot streams and archive them on traditional backup systems which doesn't allow the same flexibility or assurance.

I'd be happy with a socket/pipe to 'zfs recv zpool/benlivengood/data' that I could throw send-stream data at once a day or so.
You are missing a big part of the problem space as it pertains to copyright law. That application is fingerprinting a portion of the audio and looking it up for a match in an existing database of copyrighted works for a match. This is the same thing that Content ID does, and it's exactly why it has false positives.

Knowing whether portions of audio in a recording match other existing recordings is not enough to determine whether or not something breaks copyright law.

You can demonstrate this with Shazam (/whatever the Google one is called). Live performances of any decent quality will often match recording fingerprints in their DB and give you a result of a particular artist/album.

The law is simply more complicated than `if(audioMatches) then {illegal}`

Sometimes a match on audio is not an illegal copyright infringement.

Sometimes audio that doesn't match is illegal copyright infringement.

Let's say you play a song from the year 1200 on the violin. You have the copyright to that performance. Now, let's say I play the same song, and I play it relatively well. I have the copyright to my performance. Likely, the audio fingerprints match, and Shazam/Google/Content ID will all say that my recording matches yours -- even though my performance was entirely legal, and we both own copyrights to our respective performances.

The information Google is missing is:

1. it doesn't know that the sheet music we were both reading was authored in 1200. It doesn't have this information, it just has the audio.

2. it doesn't know that a different human physically performed the work. It just knows that the audio is the same.
The size of data which "must" be stored always increases to fill the storage space available.

At the moment, I'm content with 14T drives for personal use, which is about 4x bigger than what I was using just a few years ago.

But if I had 120T, I would just start hoarding every bit of data I could get my hands on. I'm not quite https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/ level yet, but I could totally see myself heading in that direction.

And at $DAYJOB we need to store data in the order of magnitude of a petabyte. This also seemed huge just a few years ago, but now feels restrictive. 30x 120T drives to shove into a rack in the data centre would totally be considered if it were possible.

I remember in the 90s I heard someone ask how you could ever fill a 1GB hard drive ...
Why do we have to "need" privacy? That's completely backwards. It boggles my mind how people keep insisting on this argument. It's the government who needs an incredibly good excuse to even consider violating anyone's privacy. Authorities think they're justified in everything they do and are developing increasingly entitled attitudes towards personal information. They can't be trusted so we absolutely should lock them out and make it impossible to violate our boundaries.

Who cares if criminals use it? It doesn't matter at all. Technology doesn't choose its users. Governments wants to catch criminals? They need to send people out there to do real investigative and police work. We're not obligated to make it easy for them by making everything we do part of some public record.
I can, however I don't think having to resize your browser window to comfortably view an article is a very good UX, especially when it could be rectified by positioning the content in the middle of the screen.
Thanks for the feedback! Yeah I can see how it could get out of hand with that many types and mutations. The single page situation would probably break down in that scenario too. We'll think about how it might be able to scale. Feel free to open an issue on the repo and we can work it out together.
I hate this narrative of "a pyramid scheme was set up by people who were bad at math and/or knew they would be dead before the consequences hit; now you must produce babies to feed the monster they created".

There are so many other ways of stabilizing retirement systems. If by "Social Security" you specifically mean the US system, there is this interesting fact: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States... "If workers and employers each paid 7.6% (up from today's 6.2%), it would eliminate the financing gap altogether." (Also, the payroll ceiling is ridiculously low, and why does it even exist anyway?)
Made of modular panels, not printed on site. The article didn't mention building code, which, while important, is a frequent limiter of innovation.
*snap snap snap snap snap*
This is a fascinating project. How do you actually generate a hogel? Are you positioning a reference surface? An SLM?
That's actually a terrifying and seemingly feasible dystopian future
Thank you and everyone who has responded.
LibreCAD Static Analyzer Reports
EY in June 2020 might have tried to nudge Wirecard to ditch KPMG forensic audit
This is what I'm going to be digging for later... I'm wondering if puma also shares `env` objects across requests.
"Luck of the Fryish" has always been a favorite of mine. Not quite as tear-jerking as Jurassic Bark, but still a little sad with a somewhat somber ending.
I like the approach that steps back and looks at usage scenarios. Not everything has to be solved by changing the language itself; it may be a matter of better tooling or teaching materials.

For example, the recent "async doesn't work" blog post was centered around confusion between `fn()` pointer and `Fn()` trait, and misuse of temporary `&mut` where `Arc<Mutex>` was required. If the compiler was smart enough to suggest these fixes, then the whole blog post could have been "async works fine, just needed a couple of lines changed as indicated".
> Because ultimately you are drawing a line between two for-profit corporations and asserting that one of them is exploitative and selfish (Amazon) and one of them is not (Elastic).

There is obviously a difference between a monopolistic corporations like Amazon that is actively crushing any competition with its control of the market and a bigger tech company like Elastic that is mostly driven by technological innovation (for now).

Does not mean that one is more morally evil than the other. In fact monopolistic corporations can offer their workers much better working conditions because of the extra profits they make from abusing their position. Well Amazon is not exactly known for that but in general they do. I guess Developer are treated pretty well at least.

So again, the point is not a moral failure but the economic position and the system that creates such a situation. While the creation of big monopolies is more or less inevitable it is still a good idea to be critical of the social and economic dangers.
I would like a term that is inclusive of CC0.
I wish I had a personal use case where the pricing of rsync.net made sense. It looks like a great service. For now, I use Backblaze Unlimited. I realize they are not the same service, but Backblaze works for my personal stuff and the price is great.
I just tried to use it this morning. I had an if with [[ ]] and one with [ ] so I hoped for advice. No errors or warnings. Then I didn't bother using it anymore. Furthermore, I switched the script to use deno!
The important thing to take away from those references is that the term "open source" (not followed by the word "code") wasn't ever used in a consistent way, and that a bunch of people putting the word "open" to in front of "source code" is not the same thing. Open Source is something invented by and defined by the OSI, and I always capitalize it to sidestep the argument.

If you were talking about "opening your source code," or developing new versions of your product with "open source code," no one would be confused, or if they were confused, they'd ask a follow up. The claim isn't that "open" and "source" were not words with meanings, the claim is that "open source" didn't describe anything specific until OSI made it. This argument is like complaining that people had windows in their houses before MS Windows.
Linus Torvalds on how AMD and Intel are changing how CPU interrupts are handled
> just because for some reason we wanted to be inclusive of licenses where the source is viewable but not open for use

This is not true. Recent licenses trying to protect the business built on the open source code are in general, open for use:

- Sentry: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21466967

- Elastic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25833781

I see these sorts of licenses becoming increasingly common in the future, which is why I think it's silly to continue excluding them from being called open source.