skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Grumman LLVs only have a 120 mile range. This is already double. And sure, maybe you’ll want an RV style outlet (also pretty cheap) in case of 5% of vehicles where 120V wouldn’t be enough.
The Signal client may be open source, but it's not free. It purports to be distributed under the GPL, but if you actually try to avail yourself of the primary benefit of the GPL -- the right to modify the software and distribute your modified version -- you get what you see in your own [1].
Thanks for the call out. I took a look at the modals in our dashboard and by default they have a super-subtle, barely visible shadow on top of an overlay, which looked fine.

I exaggerated the shadow a lot and this is what it ended up looking like: https://imgur.com/a/ustLofp

Definitely not pretty, but also probably not the end of the world. I can see this becoming problematic if we have more than a single additional layer, but we generally try to keep layering to a minimum so it hasn't been a problem for us yet.

Definitely something for folks looking to try this to keep in mind though.
Containers allow you to choose your resolver, libc, etc.

Python 4.3 should definitely run in a container.
The context here is in adversarial fights. The more important insight is that both you and your opponent are executing the same loop, so there may be an advantage to be had by completing it faster (or multiple times) before your opponent can act.

Naming the process is just letting you think about decision making explicitly. I can't see it being a complete general framework for decision making.
Small correction:

More like, city imposes a variety of luxury taxes dedicated to fill the gap left by private businesses in providing homes. While the public building program never made up a major share of the total, it still provided housing to the poor and working class and also provided a base line for the market.
K1sslinux – New URL and BDFL
AWX (and Tower) have a different use case than the base apps. And I think you'd be surprised how heavy it is in the enterprise. You don't need to pay thousands to get battle-tested tools.
Oh that's a shame that it won't make it into 13.0 after all that effort. I'll upgrade for sure when the release version comes out in 2 weeks.
Show HN: Privacy-centric, international, remote-only job board
I bought a copy at Borders, took it home, read two chapters and returned it. Hype and tripe IMO.
The motivation behind using algorithms that optimise for engagement is to build massive networks with billions of users. So, ultimately it does come down to what is the business objective for the network in the first place because that forces you to make these choices.
At least the majority I see around here are relatively standard European chassis-cabs (recently Mercedes-Benz Sprinter) with a custom body. While yes, that's more custom than just having a custom fitting inside a van, it's much less extreme than a custom vehicle.
Mcdonalds and other fast food burgers are the same kind of burgers people buy at the grocery store. The patties are 100% beef, not soy filler and chicken and whatever else makes something a burger like product
I was reading some systemd docs the other day, was stunned at how much it can do now
They can certainly accept any cryptocurrency without creating their own, and especially without creating one that looks like an unregistered security.
These vehicles ARE being phased in slowly. And installing 100-200 Amps of commercial service is cheap, and I actually think would largely be unnecessary as they can be set to charge at night when office demand is super low.
What I have observed over and over is the conspicuous lack of the question “is this the right tool for the job right now?”
I find C++ is much more simpler and productive than Go and Rust even TypeScript.
What's the COVID-induced death rate among children again?
> We don't have to worry about complications like systemd init scripts

Setting up a systemd unit file (it's not even a script) doesn't even come close to the complexity of wrapping, maintaining, and potentially orchestrating software within containers.

> refusing to use industry tools

like systemd?
I dearly wish this could be an actual norm.
Well, UPS vehicles look regular here: https://fastly.4sqi.net/img/general/600x600/5543516_Ag-wE02m...

But I guess these don't really count as these are suncontractor vehicles...
> I certainly do not miss Rajoy, but I whole-heartedly believe that a social-communist government...

Dude, stop reading La Razón and listening to Marhuenda/Inda/Losantos, the "social-communist" bullshit is beyond ridiculous.
Language lawyers
That's not a relevant number.

The only relevant fact to justify $80K is -- would slow loading times have resulted in at least $80K of lost sales going forwards? Or at $50 a copy, then starting today would there be 1,600 people who would buy GTA V, but won't because they know loading times were slow? Maybe because a friend or reviewer mentions that as a con? (And you can also add lost DLC revenue from people who gave up playing earlier than they would have otherwise.)

Honestly, that's an incredibly hard question to answer. But it is in no way obvious that it is "absolutely worth that much and more".

In contrast, $10K is a nice round number that demonstrates gratitude for their charitable work. And keep in mind this was probably a weekend's worth of investigation or so. Not many months of dedicated work, which is what $80K buys on the job market.
Lemme know when the catfight between systemd and docker is over.

I'm a bit busy with chroot and freebsd-jails over here.
> We get a single binary.

Docker gives you a single container that can do 50 times more things. It's version controlled, it's IaC, immutable, automated, adds resource limits, networking flexibility, lets you run your build system and your production system on anything, etc. All of that and more is baked in. Literally nothing is baked into your solution other than your code.

> Note, we did get a little more complicated and create a SystemD script to launch it at startup.

Anyone who thinks using SystemD is less complicated than using Docker isn't familiar with either.

> Total time to create our build and deploy system was so small we don’t even know how to measure it.

Why would you brag about this? It's like bragging that you don't use Git because it's too complicated, and you just use cp --backup=t main.go archive/ a whole lot. Simple!

> Now, think about how much time you’ve spent learning docker. Deploying docker. Troubleshooting docker. Even if you love it, it changed your life, it’s better than sliced bread and it solves world hunger… in the end can you really say it’s simpler than what we’ve got for free built in to golang?

You've got nothing built into golang. Nothing.

I can build a single binary in a half dozen languages. That doesn't give me implicit network abstraction. It doesn't give me version controlled delta diffs of build images. It doesn't remove the need for Configuration Management. It doesn't give me the ability to expose different filesystems to the app when I run it, or secrets, or users, ora specific environment with specific other applications. It doesn't give me... Jesus, like a million other features. Go is just a static app.

I'm sorry, but as clickbait goes, this one was rather embarrassing. If you aren't comfortable running production services with Docker, that's fine! But this reads like your solution is almost better than using Docker. If you all knew how to use Docker you'd have a lot more useful functionality for free.

4 years ago, Docker was a shit show; it's pretty stable now. I really recommend spending the time to get the team comfortable with it.
This is why I typically avoid eating fast or prepared food. One has no idea how many times the ingredients or dish have contacted harmful plastics, or which plastics they have contacted, or at what heat level the contact was sustained at, or for how long.
> Nobody cares

I have stimulated many people to switch to Telegram because it is the best and all you have is to try it, realize that and motivate your friends to switch with you. Obviously many of these people will go with me once I find a better alternative. The situation probably is the same for many other people.
I agree that it's completely unsolved. I work in mobile robots and it's just maddening the number of solutions which either won't work if you're headless or won't work if you'll need kernel upgrades, or won't work if you'll need seamless rollbacks, or won't work if you'll want OTA updates or won't work if you'll need to be able to reconfigure the network in-band (not by exiting your app for some outside management GUI).

We ended up with a mostly hand rolled system based on kexec, grub chainloading, and deploying rootfs images as big tarballs. It works, but I really wish there was something we could have just taken off the shelf.
I like emacs, and I'm not a lisp wizard, but it's an amazing editor and sure it has problems (long lines can grind you, although I've never halted emacs even with gb single line files - I did have to kill buffers though, and there's probably other things, on the other hand, I did grind plenty of other editors with much less) but...

> Emacs also calls "files" "buffers", and calls "windows" "frames" and "frames" "windows"

Well, as someone pointed out, buffers are buffers, files are files, why would your editor try to fool you regarding the fact that what you have in front of you is in a buffer (that might be persisted into a file) and not exactly a file? Every buffer tells you if it's pointing to some file...

Frames aren't windows. Like tabs in a browser aren't browsers or windows either?

> It has weird keyboard shortcuts.

Yeah, the worse part of it all is you can't even change them, right?

> Oh, but if you press another key in between, you get lost in clipboard madness.

Yeap sometimes that happens, on the other hand the times it doesn't and you can cycle through things in ways that are not easy to do in other editors is great.

> Emacs also has an "undo", but no "redo" command

This ties back to the ring design? You can switch the direction you're going with two key-strokes. Granted, if you change the buffer (outside of just navigating the ring or copying into buffer, save, etc) then it does get weird, but it's usually pretty consistent and useful. It's like having a step by step git to your inputs into the buffer.

But `this`, this, this:
> I agree that using a JS runtime makes more sense that Emacs's weird e-lisp runtime, with all of its dynamic-scope weirdness.

If the JS runtime, with the million of hours and $ poured into it to make it performant at the runtime engine, libraries and general language improvement, when compared to others created decades ago (and mostly voluntarily kept) didn't have an edge in some things, it would probably be the biggest facepalm in programming history ever.

Having said all this, I'm happy people keep experimenting and building stuff for others to use, even if in JS, or Rust, or Zig, or brainfuck.
> First off, my comment wasn't legal advice.

?! I'm not sure what you mean by that, but that's exactly what it looked like, every word of it. I guess you know that.
People click products with reviews on them.

Products with reviews convert to purchase better.

The Amazon algo favors products that gets clicks and purchases.

Very few people will leave reviews for products without being asked.

All of your competitors solicit reviews.

Therefore, if you don't solicit reviews, your product languishes at the bottom of the search results page, regardless of quality.
By the way, that is not a negative statement towards design or designers. I think it's just our nature playing out.
What is an ‘unsuccessful hack’?
Apologies, I should have acknowledged there are ways to get around that today. My guess is most folks writing javascript are not aware of BigInt. And will only become so when it bites them.

Granted, this is also true of fixednum in common lisp. At least "biting you" with that should only be performance. (I can't think of many other ways for that one to get you.)

Edit: I should further ack that "getting around" it is as simple as adding "n" to one of the constants. So, it is nicely done.
curious, is there a reason not to use rustlings?
Demolition derbies are going to have lots of new crush stock.
ECS is just clusters of EC2 instances running the ECS agent and docker server...
I did not say "press charges". I specifically said "press for charges" deliberately. In that context meaning to attempt to persuade someone (in this case a prosecutor/police/etc) to actually press charges.

Most of the time when people simply use "press charges" this is what they mean. I specifically used "press for charges" to try to avoid such pedantry. I guess I failed.
I think I agree, but what do you mean exactly? Just keep getting beefier servers as opposed to serverless junk?
CSS property usage in the wild updated by Google every 24 hours
Oh yeah, I also agree n believe that's the reason. Although having a key active does not mean the super secure government level threat protection, if one activates that threat from state protection, many of the account recovery options become unavailable.

I assume the number of account recovery options diminish with increasing levels of protection.
I've gotten incredibly far with packer-generated amis, a few build scripts and systemd to keep everything humming along. The only part I'm not a fan of is re-building amis due to the amount of time it takes to bake them.
Personally I'm using the latter, I forgot all about SPDIF. There are splitters on Amazon that take HDMI in and output HDMI video plus SPDIF audio, but they seem to all be in the $25 range, so may not be worth it.
Wolfram also allows this with with

CopyFile["/path/to/file",CloudObject["your.file"]]

I use it all of the time.
It's odd to me that so many of this kind of thing takes a moral stance and uses comments like "making someone pay" for things like concert tickets or gaming consoles.

I'm not for scalping, by any means, but to claim that it harms the consumer is just weird. The vendor is clearly leaving money on the table, but if you're willing pay 4x to not have to wait a few months...that's just market forces.

The exceptions are forced buyers--but we're not talking critics meds here.
Even locally?
You might get away with it for some time, but sooner or later all psychedelics will put you in an uncomfortable place where you have to deal with yourself, cannabis included.

I wouldn't recommend self medicating anxiety/depression though, not without a VERY experienced mentor. Most likely not dangerous in itself, but it could potentially turn up the volume for a while which might become unbearable.
It comes from the general principle of describing the requirements of the implementation, without describing the implementation itself.
You would type in the code from the listing at the end of the article.
> any product is harmful to hair on a daily basis

Wait, really? I shower twice a day... is water fine? How do you keep your hair clean?
A couple of years ago they regulated reselling of concert (etc.) tickets here in Norway. If you purchase a ticket for more than retail price, you can actually take the seller to small-courts, and get back the difference. Not sure how well the system works - but there are mechanisms that can make it really expensive for the seller, if they just ignore such laws. (i.e sending your claim to debt collectors that will pile on fees for every missed invoice)
Same in India too. And the reply SMS contains a code that needs to be given to the destination provider, for the MNP process to proceed.
They have to at some point. Hosting terabytes of data for free isn't cheap.
I just am starting to move off node/docker into deno/compiled binary and its great just having a binary run with no other dependencies. compile and start as service. rsync files up and you're good to go. I also am using sqlite and nedb instead of mongo or maria.
The Family That Always Lives on Daylight Saving Time
We run it (Docker Swarm) extensively inhouse at $dayjob, it runs loads of core services that are critical to operations. It's never given us any grief and is very easy to manage and maintain.

If the complexity ever gets to the point that k8s is justified we'll move there, but you can get a lot of work done with the much simpler Swarm.
If only there was some body of regulation that could help sort this stuff out without influence from industry. (not sarcasm)
Ask HN: How to maintain a productive Todo List
Let me give you a background. I have tried few todo apps but they all want me to go and add. Is there a simpler way to add and have them synced up across devices. If there is a best practices or share something you do to maintain a running todo list. It will be helpful. sometimes it is overwhelming
> and consider the fact that these numbers are what we see after a war-sized effort to prevent more damage

Which doesn't seem to have worked - infection rates are dropping off all around the world, regardless of the vaccination levels. It looks more like we hit natural herd immunity at about the same time in different places whether or not masks and lockdowns were used.
Psilocybin content varies strongly from species to species. More problematically, it can also vary a lot in individual mushrooms in the same batch.

I would say that the best bet at consistency is to grind your whole batch to average the potency, then try a small dose to get a feel of your particular batch before proceeding.
Not quite the same thing, but I've found loading binary files in Audacity (with dithering turned off of course) is useful for distinguishing structured data from random noise in a corrupted file (though a hex editor with an entropy measurement might help as well), as well as splicing together two files, one incomplete, another corrupted, by eyeballing the sections that match.
I once texted a presenter who was explaining something for the 12th time to a slow coworker, “I’m sorry you have to do this.”

Thankfully it only showed my phone number and not my name, and it was ambiguous enough not to be totally obvious. But still....
It’s built in to Safari, Chrome, Edge and other browsers, apps can easily integrate with system libraries for Windows Hello or Touch ID as they would anyway.

As for estate planning, set up a spare key that you can keep at a relative’s place, or add others’ accounts to your “Family” in Google/Microsoft/Apple/etc. Either they have their own keys and the company is aware of the handover or they have a copy of yours — such as you logging in on their device or keeping a FIDO2 key at their house and they can pretend to be you. A service like 1Password Family could also be of use here.
It might apply to 99% who have specific requirements, but the vast majority of internet companies need more. Deployments, N+1 redundancy, HA etc... are all valuable, even if some resources are going to waste.
I'm an 18+ year non-stop Firefox user and have always routinely checked out the competition (once every few years). Just did my latest comparison last night in fact. What I appreciate about a browser has changed over the years, I'm less of a privacy expert or some sort of Gecko diehard, and more about features and performance.

Brave- no dedicated search bar option (important for privacy / prefetching and not having to continually retype your search query). Didn't get to mobile support and crossplatform sync.

Opera- dedicated search bar, with no way to set a hotkey to focus it. Disqualified as that makes it a non-power user's browser for me right off the bat. This browser's closed source and Chinese ownership does give me pause.

Vivaldi- dedicated search bar and hotkey (yay!), but no way to sync tabs with iOS.

I've already determined for a while now that Firefox (best on features) and native browsers, Edge and Safari (best on performance) were my 3 browsers of choice, and that remains unchanged. Edge on Windows 10 is truly great, and has a decent start at sync, even if it doesn't come close to how well Firefox does there. It just needs fleshed out more.

To answer your question on what the sell is, it's really dependent on the user, and native browsers have huge advantages (most people should probably just use Edge/Safari IMO), but I see Firefox as the only non-native browser worth using due to the best-in-class feature set. I'm not going to draw this post out further detailing all of them, but it wouldn't be hard for me to demonstrate how much Firefox outclasses the competition there. It's a very mature browser.
ICE firewalls are designed to deflect the enginedown and under in a head on collision. Vans with engine sitting between the driver and passenger in a doghouse, or worse engine in back makes their knees first on the scene of impact with little protection. The more bodywork and chassis/monocoque between you and the crumple zone the better.
Agree. But for fucks sake, Firefox I'll still use you, but each update I'm more disappointed. I still use you due to a lack of a better option. That's it.
> current US legal system

To clarify, this is part of the US Constitution (Supremacy Clause).

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI_C2_1_1_...
I will add to this, that I also have no reason to forbid something like this. It is scratching an itch for those involved. Kudos on that, and best of luck with it. I just can't pretend this is solving a problem I have. :D
Those windscreens look expensive
Yes, it actually is. Modern crumple zones on US market passenger cars are designed for 40mph crashes. The IIHS performs crash tests at speeds faster than any other crash worthiness program on the planet: 40mph. Every (routine) crash test video you've ever seen was at 40mph or less.
I guess $25 might not be cheap enough either, but there are some HDMI->(HDMI+SPDIF) splitters on Amazon for that price.
Right. I'm not saying eval(their net behavior)>0; I'm saying that if your response function is always negative, you lose the ability to influence their response.

Have you heard the one about the country with the death penalty for all crime? It just leads criminals to maximally try not to get caught, without regard to damage done [i.e. removing all witnesses to even the smallest crimes]. This isn't what you want; even within "negative" relationships both sides lose when you don't have a gradient of responses.
Most phones you can use your space bar to scroll left and right. Drag your finger across.
> I disagree. A terminating type checker is much more valuable than a possibly non-terminating one.

I don't think that's true at all, and I think there are two extreme examples that drive the point home:

Consider on the one hand a language where typechecking is entirely terminating so long as you don't use one particular feature; however, that feature is also not very useful in practice (even notwithstanding the potential nontermination) and so it doesn't actually get used by real people writing real code. Adding that feature doesn't improve the language, but I contend that it doesn't make the type checker "much [less] valuable."

On the other hand, consider a language where type checking provably terminates in all cases, but based on subtleties sometimes completes in seconds and sometimes takes decades. I don't think this provides "much more [value]" than a similar system that sometimes fails to terminate only in some of the cases where the other would take (say) more than a week.
I remember vaguely New Yeqrs eve 2000 in Amsterdam. I want to spare you the details.

What I actually wanted to say is, that MMs are not allowed for sale any more in Amsterdam.

Thinking again of Y2K, I would suggest to not allow them to be sold to drunk customers.