skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If Google scraping your sites is a bad thing, you want to set "nosnippet" tags on your page [0].

If Google scraping your sites is a good thing, then why are you complaining?

I hope Google never starts paying for the links. Once there is a precedent, this becomes an effective blocker for the new search engines, visualizers, and other exciting web search startups. A new search engine startup is not going to be able to establish a commercial relationship with every site on the web like Google could.

[0] https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/appearanc...
Wow thanks that helps a lot!

Not really automatic price-setting, at least not by default! I would personally like to have control over the knobs in my product.

It would give you a dashboard where

A) You would be able to set the prices manually (with suggestions, of course, and with taking into account things like extra Stripe fees, rounded estimations so you don't wound up with £28.837 in the UK).

You'd set them manually based on country, so you won't leave money on the table by not charging less in India, for instance.

I'm always mentioning India because Apple is the widest example that comes to mind: Apple one is £15 and £25 in the UK, whilst $1.5 and $3 in India

B) Run tests that you set manually on prices. $19 vs $29 — see, with metrics, which one brings your company more revenue. Or perhaps same revenue, but more users, so more word of mouth — who knows what the test will show?

You'd be able to either schedule (e.g. $19 for week 1, $29 for week 2) or run tests at the same time (show 50% of ppl $19 , show 50% of ppl $29 // OR show ppl in the Uk $19, show ppl in the US $29)

RE: your last comment — the best part would be that it'd be a flat fee per month, no percentages! So every extra cash that you receive from ppl on top of the flat fee is yours to keep for... well for as long as your "LT" in LTV!

How does that sound, you think?
Because there is a bunch of shared code behavior and data between the services and his idea was "just copy and paste". We devised a library that gets shared as a dependency, but managing that dependency is PITA and not everything can go into the shared library still. Which means we still copy/paste some code, which is okay with this bozo somehow. I can stomach splitting things into microservices that don't actually talk to each other, though I don't see the need day one, but why not run it as a monorepo and split it out in the CD pipeline so I don't have to open four PRs for one fucking task?

Because the goof couldn't figure it out and just gave up and said here you go. This is before I knew the guy was completely useless. I had to do a whole presentation and get the favor of every single developer just for him to succumb to FACTS about moving to a monorepo that then splits the code out to his beloved CV fuel on build. Trust me, there is a lot more wrong here if you are getting any of this. As for team size we are small. Six warm bodies, three actually moving.

Personally I say go monolith (for most small/medium projects) but design it with an eye towards splitting it into services down the line, that is unless something is smacking you in the face to go all in on micro. For monolithic that means a logical separation today, that can easily be split out in a single sprint tomorrow. That means less pain and more features today and a path towards some dudes wet dream in the future.

Yeah I'm salty.
> It is so annoying to have to type long sequences of digits without one.

I can't remember when was the last time I had to type more than 8 at any time.
> Why would anyone want Swift on other platforms?

Myriad reasons. If—for whatever reason—someone likes to program in Swift, having high-quality implementations available on various platforms is a win.

> Other platforms tend to allow you much better choices.

This assumes an objective measure of programming language goodness. Whether a language is better than Swift is an opinion. Opinions vary.
I see this journalist (Cade Metz) everywhere these days it seems: this article, a NYT article about the Google ethical AI debate, and the article about Slate Star Codex..
> Consider a case where person A builds widget X, and person B builds widget Y, and they trade with each other. Automation takes over, they lose their jobs. If they continue getting the widgets they used to trade for (which are now created automatically), they simply have the same wealth as before but more time. If they don't have the widgets, they're now detached from the new automated widgets both in production and consumption. There's no reason they couldn't carry on the same work as before and continue to trade with each other. This might require societal and political will (they might need some sort of support to reach their previous arrangement), but if the desire for their old work is there and not being met, then there is work to be done.

I mean, sure this arrangement can happen. But why would it? Why would person A want to trade with person B when they can get their goods made by a robot cheaper and better?
When you are doing crystal ball voodoo based on stuff that has no connection to the defendant's choices and no direct connection to criminality like whether or not their parents were separated and whether their parents were ever arrested, then you're damn right there should be a blanket rejection of any inequitable outcome.

I'm not even convinced that you should be allowed to make a decision based on stuff like that even if it is somehow equitable.
After a bit more research I'm going to say "none", since developers can't use the San Francisco font outside of iOS apps for anything but prototyping.
How would somebody reading the emails game the system? The only effective moves are to pass if the price is too high, or bid the minimum increment if you think it is still cheap enough. Passing when the price is lower than your threshold is obviously losing. Raising more than the minimum has no value.

You could drive up the price by continuing to bid even when past your threshold, but only after an opponent also bids. But first, that does not get you any benefit, it just inconveniences a rival. And second, this will lead to a tie, which presumably has 50/50 odds of you ending up the winner.

I had a similar question about the backpack: they thought they could open it and find out what Baidu’s bidding strategy was. But that knowledge would have had no value to them. The outcome would not change.
| Like 50 Shades of Grey

No, of course not. Is that what you think people are referring to when they suggest you consider the difference between YA literature and literature intended for adults?
I think it's useful to distinguish between types of trust. You might trust a mill operator with $5 million worth of automated equipment that has a well-documented UI backed with years of training and industry support. However, you might not trust that same operator with unfettered control of a $2000 general-purpose networked computing device that can silently leak company secrets and offer a foothold to attackers inside your firewall _even if the operator does nothing obviously wrong_.
>or glyphs that are substantially or confusingly similar

In the image on the linked page, they use glyphs that are so common, some might consider them "standard". It's reprehensible that Apply might try and consider the "undo arrow" their own intellectual property. As a matter of fact, I don't see a single icon in that screenshot that I'd consider belonging to Apple. Those are all pretty much Font Awesome/IcoMoon staples.
For me napster was a game changer that got me into music period. Before that discovering and learning what music I liked was tedious and low signal/noise along with high cost that I never developed any interest in music until napster existed.
Maybe I don't understand the question, but you can see that in population statistics - certain populations reproduce at an above replacement rate, some below. In a lot of the developing world, however, and no different 150 years ago in the developed world, you'd have a lot of kids because you'd expect several to die early. Once a certain level of prosperity and peace is reached, this doesn't become as much of a biological imperative.
Finish being putting it to some productive use like turning it into a battery given the solar farm going up nearby and the substation hub is there.
Great. I need 4 speakers for my quadrophonic music files! ;-)
The polyamory "community" is generally a hotbed of misogyny and transphobia. Of course it's perfectly possible that this particular app has nothing to do with that. But always do your own research before you choose to amplify a message - you never know who else might be working alongside you.
I want to do a side project but not have web development be part of it. Any ideas?
Horse population peaked? So what? That assumes the population number is an indicator on their quality of life. However, as the allegory indicates, a horse's quality of life today is leagues better than what it once was. Better feed, better health care. A good barn is a harder to come by, but what "good barn" means is a raising bar by the day. Pretty good odds of making it into your late 20's.

There's fewer horses now, but it's not like they were taken en masse out back and shot in the head (though that certainly happened to some). They just aren't bred as much. I don't think anyone (horses included) bemoan that.

If horses are the comparison, then I don't think humans have a thing to worry about.
Why People Continue to Play Online Games| CyberPsychology
I don't think he intends to be patronising, but he certainly comes off that way.
For hot topics, search engine wants to scrap every minute, not daily, now wikimedia will provide them with such feed.

Also, they need to have team of engineers, who support infobox extractor, now this work will be done by wikimedia.
There isn't a lot. I don't know an automatic way to find active groups. The best way to find people is to post in a group you care about and see if anyone responds.

edit: I tried to post in alt.flamewars but at least eternal-september doesn't carry it. I post on alt.cyberpunk and alt.startrek occasionally.
you mean... it tingles your nethers?
You underestimate Trump supporter's perception of the existing government's corruption. So long as he existed outside the beltway consensus, and was shaking things up, some nepotism and profiteering was a small price for them to pay.

It's also important to note that Trump supporters and 'Republican Republicans' don't really intersect as much as a lot of people assume.
Don't forget "Brubaker" (excellent) and of course "The Running Man".
We must have received a very different version of nvidia.ko if yours updates with no fuss.. either that, or you are using intel/amd in which case lucky you :)
Its all exciting until you see the accountant's 10 key hanging off the side. :(
Can we rename this? The title isn't at all accurate. This is just a system font on iOS and Mac OS?
When it lands you a well paying job
Excellent idea! Then you can reposition it so that the useless numpad doesn't force the main keyboard to be off-center. ;-)
I'd suggest changing the title from "for free" to "for iOS apps".
Also: different NAS hosts, RAID cards, etc. Those have correlated failure modes too.

My personal backup strategy of buying a different backup drive every time seems wiser the more I learn.

At work we have two different NAS setups, each full of a different brand of near-identical drives. But what we have been doing is buying a few new drives every quarter and rotating them in to the NAS boxes. So they're all WD 6TB Black or whatever, but of 12 drives we now have 4 original ones, then a pair 3 months newer than that, a pair 6 months newer and so on. The "old" drives go into random stuff round the office because we employ engineers and they seem to all like to have their own little 2-4 drive NAS boxes for "important stuff" (which is in many ways fine, we just have to regularly coach them on making sure the stuff they're actually working on is on our NAS where it gets backed up. We host a gitlab instance, for example, so their code and project docs are in that).
No, I'm pretty confident I'm talking about Air Conditioning, considering that's what I was responding to.
A land value tax doesn't really change the market dynamics of housing. That is to say, living in desirable locations will still cost more, and will still be allocated via a market to those who can pay the most.

The key thing is that the rent you pay for locations will go to the commons, rather than private landowners, which makes sense, since locations are valuable because of all of society.

So some people will still be unable to afford to live in desirable locations, just as they can't afford to live there right now. The key difference is that even if they can't afford to live there, they will still share in some of the wealth created there, through the land value tax. Effectively, those who can afford to live in the desirable locations will pay some of their rent to those who can't (indirectly).
This article completely disregards the existence of EKS.
“The future is already here – it's just not very evenly distributed.” ― William Gibson
I do think it's fair for Apple to say, "Hey, we can't ensure this device is properly repaired unless we are the ones to repair it." Maybe some sort of "Apple-certified repair place" program... I think that exists today. I don't think Apple should be forced to sell raw parts; it's not part of their business model. You're free to buy more modular hardware... things you can easily repair. That's a selling point, right? But Apple should be free to do business however they want to do business. You're free not to buy Apple products, but you shouldn't be free, as a consumer, to insist they make schematics and parts available. You can choose to support companies that sell parts if you want! (=

EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leFuF-zoVzA - seems about as good as you can hope for. Pretty sure Apple isn't keen on "DIY" for their brand.
We Don't Accept Military Coup T Shirts Products from Military Coup T Shirts
But if you cut a mature tree it needs to be replaced with a tree of similar age, not a seedling. That's the whole point why it can be a so expensive mistake.
Right. I "know" how tree recursion scales up. It is still neat to "see" the impact on the speed.

That is, knowing all of these facts, it is still impressive how fast you can get (fib 1000000) using iteration and bignums.
You can probably assume they do not in fact consider "the undo arrow" to be Apple intellectual property.
I'm working on Archivy [0] - a knowledge management system built around extensibility.

[0]: https://archivy.github.io
Military Coup T Shirts
> All SF Symbols shall be considered to be system-provided images as defined in the Xcode and Apple SDKs license agreements and are subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein.

https://developer.apple.com/sf-symbols/

> The system-provided images and symbols owned by Apple and documented as such in Apple's Human
Interface Guidelines for iOS, watchOS, iPadOS, tvOS, and/or macOS (“System-Provided Images”) are
licensed to You solely for the purpose of developing Applications for Apple-branded products that run
on the system for which the image was provided. You agree that you shall not use or incorporate the
System-Provided Images or any substantially or confusingly similar images into app icons, logos or
make any other trademark use of the System-Provided Images. Your use of the System-Provided
Images shall also be subject to any specific use restrictions with respect thereto as set forth in the Apple
Software or Apple’s Human Interface Guidelines. Apple reserves the right to review and, in its sole
discretion, require modification or discontinuance of use of any System-Provided images used in
violation of the foregoing restrictions, and you agree to promptly comply with any such request. Upon
termination of this Agreement, You may continue to distribute the System-Provided Images as used
within Applications You developed using the Apple Software.

https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/xcode.pdf
,,no plans to sell'' is the worst thing a company can say, as it just reminds me of WhatsApp and friends.
Most of those cities are filled up or filling up, so maybe there is something more to building new cities when WfH becomes even more viable.
That logic only works because we have no issue with slaughtering horses en masse. It'll take 100+ years of economic deprivation for the human population to balance out.
This is an absolutely horrible idea. As Raoul Pal always says: "Capital will find a way. It always does.". Let's take a look at some examples with real estate:

George owns a flat, he lives in it. He owns no other properties and he works a low-wage job What will happen? He'll pay the 2.5% for a while then he'll be forced to sell.

Jane owns 5 houses and lives in one. She doesn't have a job, he lives off of the rent payments. What will happen? Jane will raise the prices by 2.5% every year.

Plot twist: George is now renting from Jane. Since George works a low-wage job he'll have to move out after a few years to an even smaller apartment, and at some point he'll be practically homeless.

The same is true for companies. They'll just raise the prices by 2.5% creating a price inflation that will hit __everybody__ who doesn't have a company or real estate.

Real life example: where I live there is a government program that will let certain kinds of people (newly wed couples) to get their VAT back from buying a house. What happened to the market? Real estate prices went up by 5% and everybody who is not in this bracket now suffers.
My best guess is they slowly become less valuable until IBM buys them for the name recognition
Marketing needs features to sell the higher end products on. Its easier to bullshit it and artificially limit than to come up with things that physically can only work on the high end sku.
>they are literally collections of human wants and needs.

And humans are literally just collections of cells, does that mean you have no wants and that your pancreas is running the show?

It's very arrogant to think that only humans have desires. Nations have desires, institutions have desires, and capital itself has a lot of desires. Lots of scary entities out there that have desires.

When capital is unhappy with capital owners it's prone to fire all of them, reconfigure entire industries, eliminate entire sectors of human activity, redraw nation-states and in the not so distant future probably reconfigure human bodies.

Of all the firms in human existence maybe a fraction of a percent are still around. You think the 'owners' of capital wanted that to happen? Capital keeps tagging along, individual actors, not so much. Give it another few decades and you may interact with a lot of firms that have no human working for it at all, and possibly not even one owning it.
Read my reply further up, they have a lot in common. We had to build a shared library that goes in as a dependency and even with that we have to still copy/paste code between services. Because a data structure change in one must often be reflected in another HELLO multiple PRs for one task.
Looks interesting, but for a company the size I work at it’s a non-starter. $1 / user / month means we’re paying hundreds of dollars a month for what amounts to a slight automation perk. We already have bots that respond to keywords by pinging users in a channel for the respective channel / department they represent. We have a check-in / check-out function built into the bot. It would be trivial to have to ping users on a rotations / scheduled basis (@channel fatigue is t a huge problem since most of the employees are good about managing workload).

Drop the price and you might pick up a larger company that may not have the talent to program some Python bit for Slack.

Good luck though! It definitely looks polished and well thought out.
I used Dr. Bronner's as a shampoo for about ten years. No noticeable dry hair problems. It doesn't feel exactly the same as using a commercial shampoo with lots of softeners, etc.
Go tell all those startup founders that they shouldn't grow!
Keep in mind that the legalese is intended for legal people to word-fight each other for lots of money. It generally turns this type of text in to vague yet usable terminology so you can defend or attack at will.
> real hardware got added to improve ray-triangle and ray-AABB intersection performance.

Isn't that the whole point? I was doing raytracing in the CPU in 2002 for a university project. Doesn't mean I could use it in a game.
Then that person can use the app store, and another person using their own iPhone could use some other method. Apple allowing users a choice wouldn't prevent them from choosing the App Store.
I always get amused by D-Wave, the 22 year-old "startup" that is now on its 19th funding round: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/d-wave-systems/compa...
Hello...thanks for your comment. We seem to be experiencing issues with new account registrations and email confirmations. We are working to resolve now. Thank you for your interest in the service and your patience. -Ron
Does anyone sell an OLED laptop display? I thought it was just in phones and giant TVs still. The standard today is pretty much that good laptops are IPS and bad laptops are TN
All parents worry.

It will turn out ok.

The web is no longer dominated by amateurs and DIY projects.

But Youtube and TicTock and Facebook and Instagram are...not that those are what the kids are on much.

Creative opportunities abound and are more accessible than ever before...an iPhone shoots 4k stabilized video, has a linear editor, and GarageBand. Of course it can't compete with today's Hollywood. And that's how the web has become...except that we haven't had a century of people finding a non-corporate aesthetic for web content....we haven't had a century to develop a cultural eye for non-professional websites in the way we have for moving images.
It should be a bit simpler because it is intended not to change in value. If you sell it for what you get it for you may not need to file a pub544. Not sure.
Presumably the energy that would normally go into deforming the wood is converted to electricity. The wood would spring back less or be less warm or make less sound, etc.
This is a brilliant idea. Where were you back then? I would've benefitted immensely from a Xanga or LiveJournal post about this.
They can't revoke the math that makes the signature valid. As long as the card is unable to get a network connection to work out the driver is revoked, there is no going back on this.
The whole stock shares / TRU score thing is quite cool, I think this has potential.
That's great except there's no such thing as generate electricity. It's move electrons.
I'm not too surprised. I think it's in Nvidia best interest both to claim that the hash limit is unbreakable, but at the same time also make it breackable
Micron Abandons 3D XPoint Memory Technology
I really think the closest thing we have these days is the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Vegas every winter.

At some point in the last twenty years or so, it became less about companies demoing next year’s products and more about really grand visions of the future (of course, where the company in question was the centerpiece of this grand vision). I believe it was Panasonic in 2020 who had a huge booth showing off a flying car concept, accompanied by a wall-to-wall LED display showing a video of families in the future taking it to work/school/etc.

Once I realized that CES is less of a marketing event and more of a modern World’s Fair, I really started to enjoy it a lot more. Even with the corporatism. Can’t wait to (hopefully) go again next year!
That would still be a damning statistic given how tiny a portion of overall transactions are done through crypto.