skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, this was what immediately came to my mind as well.

For an interesting, albeit slightly unrelated read, see:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chip_art

>"Prior to 1984, these doodles also served a practical purpose. If a competitor produced a similar chip, and examination showed it contained the same doodles, then this was strong evidence that the design was copied (a copyright violation) and not independently derived."
You know the federal government of the biggest world economy who also finances the world's largest military have their own ponzi scheme going on right?
I'm pretty sure they can knock at any bitcoin billionaire door at night and fly them to a 5 star resort in Guantanamo whenever they want.

The Emperor mints the coin. It has and always will be like that. No amount of crypto wishful thinking will change that.
Also this: https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/
I’m guessing “misuse” means people who posted videos on YouTube.
We are speaking about languages, not which implementations are available.

Are there are free tools for becoming a mechanic? No, they got to be paid, either new or used in some form.

And yes, nowadays there is a community version for the free beer crowd.
The wedge used to drive home even more draconian privacy infringement like the Intel Management Engine.
Soups and OpenDoc have no actual relation. Soups is a object file system and OpenDoc was a component system. CoreData is a poor successor to NeXT's EOF. I so miss EOF.

The only connection to editing someone else's data was the ability to add fields to soups for things like Contacts which allowed an easy expansion. Given how many programs on UNIX can alter each other's data, I don't agree with Conway in the context of the file system or soup.
Why would anyone go through the pains of forgery to create a copy of an original in their possession? Just sell the original if you're in or for quick money, show off your original (and sell clean copies) if you're out for status.
That's not improper source citation. That's how newspapers work.

Wait until you hear about the Associated Press.
Not that I know of, medications make their way onto the Pharmaceutical Benefits schedule (PBS) schedule, so some new drugs aren't available for a short time - as someone else mentioned the government negotiates a fixed price for the drugs. You have to pay for drugs but there's a yearly cap of a few hundred dollars last time I was involved in it and you can claim that back, pensioners have a special low price per drug.

There are some drugs that require the doctor to make a case for it - but thats a fairy routine matter. You do hear of people flying overseas for a special treatment (mainly experimental) thats not yet here, that isn't covered.

Edit: an example - I had a checkup last year, got a bunch of tests done - total out of pocket for me was $30 or so, all the blood tests are free. The $30 was for the doctor, if I wanted to shop around there are free doctors that just charge the schedule price. I had to get an MRI about 7 years ago, now I could have waited, or got it in the hospital, but I chose to get it at a clinic, cause I wanted to get out of the hospital (which was free) - out of pocket was $800 for that.
Heartbreaking. I've been a long time user of DHCPD but (as I think many of us) never knew or think about all the people and hard work behind it. Thanks for everything.
I'm impressed that AWS supports torrent, however that won't reduce S3 hosting costs, as each new download would only increase it.
Hi! I’m the one who wrote this code. My ZeRO-3 implementation is currently not working, but I’ve spoken with DeepSpeed devs and they’ve explained to me what I’ve been doing wrong. I haven’t had time to implement the fix but I don’t see any reason to assume it won’t work.

https://github.com/microsoft/DeepSpeed/issues/846

Also, the specific problem described in that Issue was due to a bug I found in DeepSpeed that has since been corrected.
I've had many years where a short nap after lunch dramatically increases my productivity.
You can use Azure Arc[1] to run Citus on AWS EKS without having to manage everything yourself. Even though it's not quite as managed as Citus on Azure, it's still a quite lot easier than setting up a whole production cluster yourself.

1: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-arc/data/what-i...
What is an example of a string that can be matched which does not meet the first or second description?
For those wanting to try this out without paying for Creative Suite, Pixelmator Pro on the Mac ($40) has something similar[1]. The iPad version ($8) also has this feature now[2].

[1] https://www.pixelmator.com/blog/2019/12/17/all-about-the-new...

[2] https://www.pixelmator.com/blog/2020/09/15/pixelmator-photo-...
This is great to see. It would be nice to play switch games on something at least as powerful as a modern phone
Theres a lot of energy usage in China that eclipses btc energy usage by several orders of magnitude (factories, etc). Much of the mining is from small operations. Locating and coordinating thousands or tens of thousands would be very difficult and also pointless. This has been a topic for 8ish years and goes along with the people who talk of a global power outage.
That is glorious and horrifying. Sounds like it protects your business from counterfeits and hobby hackers at the same time :)

Also, I have a Sonos system and it works great!
The OBGYN director taught me this during a lecture at my hospital (I'm a medical student). He's also a PhD.
It was casual conversation, so I don't have the sources.
Contact lenses with gold nanoparticles can help correct colour blindness
For example, Signal uses Intel SGX's remote attestation to attest to the privacy of your contact and social graph data: https://medium.com/@maniacbolts/signal-increases-their-relia...
Yup, and it was built in an interesting way, if I remember correctly. Using the continuation-based Smalltalk Seaside framework.
Fight to Repair
Ahh maybe repl.it could do this! Hadn't checked. Thanks for the idea!
I'm openly a skeptic, and this is a great mental reframe for me.

I knew about bitcoin since it was shared at defcon as a 30/40 minute presentation in the middle of an afternoon. I want to guess around 2010, sub $1 for sure. As I have watched it be a bad buy(in my opinion) year after year and repeatedly being wrong to the tune of multiple retirement opportunities, I still think it is a bad buy.

Why? Not anger, but fear. Fear not that I've been wrong, but that I've been right. I don't want to be left holding the bag, and the $20k I might or might have thrown at bitcoin I would sell shortly after making a 20% profit, same as I would have regardless of the price.

I just don't get it. I probably won't ever get it. And I hope those making fortunes with it put the money behind things more worthwhile than NFTs and other energy intensive proofing "products."

I saw you were downvoted, but thanks for helping me better understand, and in the future articulate, my no-coiner stance.
He provides a paypal link for donations in the post, and for most people $64k is a non-insignificant amount (i.e. would be worth the effort of claiming).
You can push it to the extreme and have two persons on each and every coding task. That's pair programming [1], which is said to be less productive, although it is argued you trade productivity for quality and other benefits.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_programming
That's Java running on a console, not Java emulating a console.
Because they don’t need to justify their insane stock price valuation by becoming a software platform, Tesla does or the stock crashes.
I had to share this. This is awesome!
I think op might be referring to online learning [1].

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_machine_learning
short commutes are better than working in a pajama straight from the bed.

I worked from home before the pandemic hit and been doing it on and off for 15 years, but I took the habit of going out for a walk before starting to work, it actually wakes me up for real and sharpens my thoughts.

It also forces me to dress and take care of my hygiene.

A thing that many home workers I know, adults like me, don't do everyday.
Which is, IMO, a set back.

Now that due to the pandemic I am confined at home, I feel tired all day and my productivity has gone down, to the point that I have to work 7 or 8 hours a day, while 5 were enough before.

Suffering for waking up early for a commute is only a symptom of not being a morning person, I negotiate comfortable starting work hours in all my contracts and never had to wake up early in the past 10 years.

And you know the main reason the employer accepted it as a reasonable argument?

because out of the rush hour commuting is easier (which is actually true)

they never heard from me "I am late because the bus/subway/train/whatever was full"

In my experience distracting coworkers are a lot worse when you are online all day remotely: you can close the door, but can't block them on teams.

Finally: consider that the majority of people all over the World have much better work spaces than home offices.

Usually home offices for regular people suck and/or people live in small homes.

Especially in Japan or Europe.

one last bit: WFH workers that are less experienced have harder times getting a promotion than in presence.
I see the support excuse all the time, but I don't understand why it needs to be that way and I don't really believe it to be honest. Sell me a small business version that includes per-incident support. If someone has a problem and balks at the idea of paying fair value for the support they need, then I agree they're not worth having as a customer.

If the goal is to ignore or be actively hostile towards the bottom 80%, I guess a lot of SaaS companies are succeeding. To me though, they're building poorer quality products that aren't going to capture enough up and coming businesses and the long term impact is going to be a bunch of bloated garbage with a ton of half baked features where everyone is competing for the "enterprise" dollars.

> It lowers your average user value, impacts your valuation

To me, that's what it's really about. It's pump and dump quality SaaS that's built for an IPO, not for the users.
Link to paper: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsnano.0c09657
> Okay, but if I do this everywhere, then I de facto don't have memory safety.

No, that's not how this works. You write the unsafe code in one place and make sure it's correct (just like you'd do in C or Jai), and then you wrap it in a function signature that lets the compiler apply its memory safety checks to all the places that call it (this is what Rust gives you over C).

This is still a meaningful improvement to memory safety over C. The compiler checks the majority of your program; if you still see memory bugs now you only have a small subset to think about when debugging them.

This is also not very different from a hypothetical language with your "actual" memory safety- in that case, you still have to consider the correctness of the compiler checks themselves. Rust just takes a more balanced and flexible approach here and moves some of that stuff out of the compiler. (In fact this simplifies the compiler, which increases confidence in its correctness...)

Rust has been very clear about all this from the beginning. If you are still reading people's claims about Rust memory safety a different way, that's on you.

> Why wouldn't I use a lower-friction language with a faster compiler?

That's totally up to you! I don't have a problem with people using other languages for these kinds of reasons. My goal here is not to convert you, but to cover more accurately what Rust is and isn't capable of. (At the root of this thread, that's things like "writing fast software with effective memory management styles.")
We heard about it a lot when it was new and unknown. Now it's better understood, not so much.
it is Hebrew, just in a now defunct script. I didn't see anything majorly informative in the transcription, in case you were wondering.
This is blogspam written by someone who lacks the credentials to write it. Let's assume success pertains to careers, or achievements in the real world. Your judgment, decisions, timing and environment determine your success. There are an exceptional amount of folks with foul attitudes who are immensely successful. There are also an exceptional amount of folks with great attitudes who remain destitute and unsuccessful.

So to imply any kind of causal link stronger than a weak one between attitude and success is self-help nonsense. Having a workable attitude is a necessary but not sufficient condition. It does nothing to help you service the actual hard work and growth necessary to reach success.

EDIT: My, how this once mighty forum has fallen to the internet marketers, huh? Downvote away. I am happy to burn my internet points criticizing this dreck.
author here - thanks for the share!
Uniqueness does not really relate to my point.

If coronavirus is contained in South Korea, it is due to smart government, if it is contained in New Zealand, it is due to good policies... but if we are discussing Japan, suddenly we are talking about a "collectivist society" with face masks explanations extrapolating to some daimyo actions 400 years ago.

This makes it quite hard to reach the central points of anything that happens here - there's always a random cultural sidetracking. Maybe when a government official is caught lying and apologizes, he is just trying to save himself, and a shame oriented collectivist society is not the central point - a lying politician is.
I don't believe you either it happens on quite a few games. I've even seen proton devs discuss it being a problen.
Petro-masculinity. A nice turn of phrase...
Simon Baron-Cohen the autism researcher is brother of Sacha Baron Cohen the comedian.
They already make that? FSD is an optional upgrade.

While I would agree the FSD path is a dangerous one, if they crack it they also instantly justify their share price.
You’d be surprised. Those users come from sales more than self serve. Very different business model.
The investors approved blueprints showing the correct dimensions and only 4 floors.

This would have easily been prevented by basic due diligence from the investors. Possibly that is why the courts ruled against them.
Well I have a really bad attitude about everything, and I still am successful. Just saying.
It's in a better state because Chrome, at least, is actively developed, whereas IE was lagging behind.

But in many other respects, it's quite similar. A better baseline for comparison would be circa 2010, when Firefox was still popular enough, and "best viewed in Chrome" wasn't really a thing yet.
I feel that if you reject or ignore the critics and the elaborate descriptions, you can appreciate art as you like. (And by extension consider whatever you like as art.)
There are no fixed limits at the individual level.

There is a government advisory committee called PBAC which advises the government on whether to pay for certain drugs. There have been cases where PBAC refuses to fund a new drug because it doesn't see the benefit as worth the cost. For example, suppose there is a new cancer drug which costs $100,000 a patient, and on average extends the patient's life by 3 months. PBAC will likely say it isn't worth it for taxpayers to pay $100,000 to extend a person's life only by 3 months.

To give another example, in the public health system, there are a certain number of ECMO machines available. Given the limited number, they can't just leave patients on ECMO indefinitely. Sometimes they will take a patient off because the probability of survival is low and there is another patient needing one with a higher probability of survival. But, if you look at patients with low survival probability, most of them will die even with treatment, but a small minority may have nonetheless survived yet now that you are withdrawing treatment they won't. However, we cannot know who will be in that small minority, and society isn't willing to spend unlimited resources on trying to save people's lives against the odds.
Xbox, Azure, Office365 and Hotmail, C# are all good as far as I know. I've heard Bing search is good in some areas (supposedly it's actually made to be the best at searching for adult content…)

I'm surprised at some of their products that don't get enough criticism. Like Windows is still bad of course, you can't expect anything out of a PC with any 3rd party system software on it, but also Bing Maps is worse than Apple Maps, and nobody complains because nobody uses it.
> Consolidated industry + strategic sourcing = low resilience.

This happens everywhere in all industries. Incentives problem. Also agency problem at work.

Current American-style capitalism absolves responsible leadership from low-incidence, high-impact events. The Overton Window has continuously shifted the low-incidence rate from 1 in every extremely-high-number-of-years (sometimes measured in centuries), to in some instances 1 in every single-digit years. They aggressively tout returns to shareholders in the past, then throw up their hands and yell, "Hoocoodanode!?!?!".

To compound matters, there is a malignant, Karen-style American management trend I see where those who do plan ahead and execute on that plan are actively punished when the plans fall short in any way. The response should be: "Wow, I'm sure glad we saved/profited/benefited during that adverse event/period from planning ahead and setting aside, let's work together to figure out how to improve those cards even more because it is obvious it is a winning hand."

Instead, these Karen managers jump down the throats of those who made the hard decisions. First, at the time they made the decisions, for "wasting shareholder resources" on "long shot, unprofitable, black swan" events. Then again when those decisions pay off, they don't sit down and shut up, much less help everyone learn from their error in judgement by admitting to it. They double down to hide their judgement error, by finding flaws in planning ahead, harrumphing indignantly, "Well...you should have known it would turn out like this!"

This is how 3M leadership, despite committing funding towards entire factories and their attendant staffing and logistics chains in mothballs for manufacturing PPE in a crisis, for years, despite successfully onlining them during the pandemic, despite that entire product line hardly being a blip on their 10-Q's, still got raked over the coals by backseat drivers who wanted nothing to do with that entire process when it was being set up but during the pandemic demanded perfect execution.

That kind of "summer soldier and sunshine patriot" leadership of being scarce when the hard decisions are made and being loud to be perceived as "in the know" when reality doesn't mesh perfectly with the results of hard decisions taken many years in the past is extraordinarily toxic to American business, and is a massive cultural failing of American boards to recognize and excise these negative leadership styles.

This also is why ebullient, optimistic, positive leadership styles are so coveted by long-term, sustainable, effective leadership teams. Such teams are in the minority (though ever-so-slowly growing), which is why the adverse dynamics are found in so many industries.
Note to self: still need to learn to write a sonnet.
Tesla doesn’t care what you (the individual) want. They care about increasing the size of their addressable market (elderly folks who can’t drive don’t buy cars - but they might if the cars could drive themselves). They care about driving up the average transaction price (not everyone spends every penny they can on their car - but they might if they could sleep in it while commuting/roadtripping). They care about creating recurring revenue sources. Once you buy a traditional car that’s that. But if your car gets rented out as a robotaxi on Tesla’s network, then Tesla gets a cut.

I agree though. At the moment I’d rather just have a solid car with good adaptive cruise control.
The computer as a tool for an individual to use is a perspective that comes naturally to us now, but note that this article was written before even the Alto and the Apple II, and a decade before the IBM PC. Interactive computing was a fringe idea that only a relatively small set of people were thinking about. Computing meant batch computing.
The FDA won't allow convalescent plasma collection from vaccinated people (https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidan...), on the grounds that their antibody response might be different than the response from a natural infection. (I don't know enough to judge whether or not this could be expected to cause practical issues.)
Those are solicitations for donations. Wikipedia isn’t selling anything.
Would you please stop posting unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments? You've been doing a lot of it and it's not what this site is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I'm pretty sure you can make art purely for yourself and never show it to anyone else.
Directory of developer blogs
> If not, why mention it?

More hate, more clicks. People hate Trump. Therefore editors want more clicks.
>Annual YoY revenue growth is flat too at around $500m.
2018: $154M
2019: $267M
2020: $421M
2021: $590M
Source: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MDB/financials?p=MDB
Autism is the effect of vaccines.
Yes, and he seems to be there to stay. :(
That certainly doesn't explain an awful lot of cases. Two of the most fit women I knew had autistic kids in their early 20s. And "blame the mother" has a really bad history for autism.
> Why is this happening in the SasS world?

Because it works for them. I mean, they likely have customers for that $15k plan. And if they do, why would it be worth their time discussing <$24 plans that require extra dev time with you? (I don't mean it as a complaint - just awareness that for-profit companies will do for-profit things)
Memory safety is not some sort of binary thing which you either have or you don't. All memory safe environments are built on a foundation of unsafe code. For example, Java being memory safe assumes the JVM or JNI code doesn't have any memory safety bugs.

What Rust does is reduce the amount of code that's memory unsafe, that needs to be triply reviewed and audited. Reduction of the scope of high-scrutiny code is the single most leveraged thing that can be done to improve code quality in a large, long-running project. Why? Because it lets you do careful, time-consuming analysis on a small part of your codebase (the bits that are marked unsafe), then scale the analysis up to the rest of your code.

> These stories are mutually inconsistent. Either you have memory safety or you don't.

This is... what can I say. This is simply incorrect. It pains me to say this as a fan of your games but you really don't seem to have any idea what you're talking about.
The classic “it’s not enough if it’s better, it needs to be perfect”.
It really is different. The existence of unlimited pay-as-you-go care means that you could possibly raise the funds. In systems where all care is state-administered and an attempt to pay for more care would be criminalized as bribery, you'll die of a treatable disease if some bureaucrat decides that the treatment isn't cost effective for a person like you. The details of choices vary, but go something like this: "treatment X for disease Y is not cost-effective (considering quality-adjusted years of life) for people over age X, so provide only pain relief".
I’ve been a coder on-and-off since the 1990’s, and an attorney for >10 years, in litigation. I actually disagree. I think legal writing is closer to programming in a lot of ways than it is to creative writing. They are all different things, but I’ve always found the parallels kind of interesting.
I needed a reminder to never work at a large company again, so this was very helpful.