skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks! Good question - the FOV with macro lenses would not be anywhere near 180°, though I'm sure you could distort the video to wrap around you.

Stereo macro seems to be a thing with stills, at least - https://www.flickr.com/groups/2158359@N23/pool/with/35314464...
I'm pretty sure he didn't mean everyone had to share the same red shirt, passing it on between presentations.

I for one would not have liked to wear it after Ballmer.
yes. Figuring out the size thing is a technical problem. Then you can put the resulting script into a desktop-iconifiable format where she can just drag-and-drop her image onto. No website needed and just as simple as the website.
The links should go to the same style page now, thanks!
Is this how Mickey Mouse is so freaking big IRL and has been around since the early 20th century?

Nevermind; that’s probably not the type of mouse model you were talking about.
They can be, for sure, but in my experience it's hit and miss. For instance, I believe the CD reissues of Living Stereo records (from the master tape) are very good. On the contrary, I once bought the integral of Hector Lavoe, remastered, and the sound was very disappointing, with excessive highs giving an unnatural quality to the sound. Whereas my experience with vinyl records from Decca/London pressed in the 70s is consistently good. If you're willing to experiment and take risks, you can probably find good and bad everywhere. I was suggesting a disappointment-minimizing path...
> The racists on the right know they're racists. They admit it.

Not necessarily.

Even Richard Spencer, proud Hitler-saluting Neo-Nazi, essentially the founder of the "alt-right", denies being racist.

People know that racism is bad, but a lot of racists will deny being racist while very explicitly saying they don't want to live next to a black person or will call the police just because they saw a black man walking through the neighborhood.
Five Ghanaian police women punished for ‘sexy dressing’ [video]
I use IceCatMobile, a fork of the Firefox browser, by GNU folks if I'm not mistaken, and it allows installing add-ons.
Also, it's important to note that for Alzheimer's, the quality of the mouse models is suspect because the causation of the disease is still a mystery.
>If you cannot censor away opinions, if suppression of ideas doesn't work then why in exactly these kinds of articles do people bemoan it as dangerous?

Because instead of treating the disease (terrible dehumanizing ideologies) it treats the symptom (them talking about it).

Instead of a fire, it creates a bomb.

>It worked for centuries to maintain familial control and enforce sexual monoculture in many countries. Information control works so well, it prevents people from even understanding themselves or what they really want in the face of ideologically imposed values.

It worked before the Internet.

>controlling the conversation, its constraints and determining the status quo are profoundly powerful tools.

In the short term. Determining the status quo isn't up to censors. It's up to society. And while censors have some power, they're not omniscient, so they always get circumvented eventually.
I've been a professional game programmer for the last 16 years and this is a pretty wrong headed and naïve point of view.

Let's preface things by saying there is nothing wrong with raylib or the approach where you write everything yourself. But vanishingly few games were made without other tools in particular tools to help with spatial layout and data entry. Have you tried setting up a moderately complex set of blend trees in a state machine for animation in text? This is more significant the more data driven your engine, in particular with modern composable entities a text only view of the world becomes very hard to understand quite quickly.

All more featured IDEs give you is a set of modifiable tools that you don't need to write yourself.

The view that there is a distinction between scripters and programmers is also poisonous. It's antagonistic and sows division when making a game is a team sport.

"Scripting" is also nothing new and scripting languages for game development are almost as old as games themselves. We're all just laying out logic to get the computer to do things. Whether that's using a visual language to setup game levels and AI, or text to sort and submit render jobs. Some of the better gameplay engineers I know actually started programming in scripting languages for games. Building tools at the right level for people to do their jobs is basically a good 80% of a programmers job in game development.
I sent a GDPR request to Barclays a year or so ago. It took them a while (not within the 30 day deadline), but eventually they got back me. One day a heavy overnight shipped package arrived, and inside were A5 print outs of all previous communications they had ever sent me. Around 500 pages in total.

It didn't actually have information about what data they store in the databases, so they didn't actually fulfil my request. I figured it's not worth the trees to try and chase it up more....
The Chinese model works, and it's what every government wants. The rest is marketing.
See, I never understood these tips. If I use Vim a lot I will build muscle memory. If I build the muscle memory with these adjustments I’ll just keep tripping over myself whenever I edit a file on a station without those adjustments. And simply foregoing the shift key isn’t even that much of a time or effort save.
Great! I just search for a way to do this in Autohotkey a couple of months ago(not going very well, of course) Thanks for shameless plug! :)
864h.com+$99
This quote does not support your argument.
Squirt.io – Readability Meets Spritz Speed Reading (2014)
According to one of the author's other comments, they are also licensed as AGPL. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26428460
doesn't that make the information essentially useless? iknowwhatyoubutpossiblysomeotherblokedownload.com
One suggested improvement is to make the game 4-on-4 instead of 5-on-5. Less players on the ice typifies more offense, and less bodies covering the net causing chaos.

In some ways the game is already moving towards this, by changing overtime and the All-Star Game to be 3-on-3 a few years ago.
I know of a group of Penn State students that were meeting for Spring Break in Ocean City. Most went to MD, but at least one car-full went to NJ by mistake.

A couple of decades ago I ran into a girlfriend that I used to see. I was working out of Pittsburgh, and I told her I was moving to Glendale, a neighborhood off the Parkway. She excitedly told me that she was also. But she was moving to California (and not the California in Pennsylvania).
When you spend hours in your editor, day after day, you aren’t a beginner for long
This is factually false, cannabis is addictive and you do experience withdrawal if you stop using it after habitual long term use (anxiety, depression, among other withdrawal symptoms).

I'm not saying this is an argument for making it illegal, caffeine is physically addictive and certainly you experience withdrawal if you stop using it suddenly, etc.

However, saying cannabis is not addictive at all is just propaganda. If any chemical does something measurable in your body, you will almost certainly experience withdrawal symptoms if you suddenly stop using it after long term use. Withdrawal symptoms being unpleasant is basically the definition of physical addiction.
Open Thread 162.5
I'm a hockey goalie, too. I think we have to think about non-NHL goalies too. Not every adult is 2m high and if we make net size bigger we will effectively make the game unplayable for "average" goalies. When a shooter shoots on you from 3-4 meters, there is not enough time to react too much and you play mostly angles and block. I can imagine that kids playing in a much larger net would lead to a very different game where shooting is much more beneficial than any other option.
Yes, NHL is what most people watch on TV, but there are millions of people playing the game that would have it ruined.
I think this article is pretty light on alternate solutions. It proposes rationally and intellectually trying to make the other side see why you are right and they are wrong, and makes a kind of snarky claim that somehow that CAN more easily be done, where I'm only seeing a normative idea here, it should be done, but can it?

I'm not so sure it can personally.

I think it forgets that most people are just whatever their surrounding makes them. That's why "trends" are so powerful influencers. That's why you have clear pockets, areas where the people in the same geographic areas all vote mostly similar and share similar values and ideas.

The people who think their way unbiased through value, moral and ideas are rare.

What we're left with in my opinion as viable solutions are two approaches:

1. Censorship
2. Propaganda

Of the two, I think Propaganda is the best. I think we've seen that on both side now, left or right, it's the "trending" messages, tweets, memes, and all that which work best to convince and influence others. Propaganda creates culture, and culture defines peoples viewpoint.

The issue today is all about Propaganda and the powers behind them. What is being most promoted? Retweeted? Recommended?

When you have legitimate bots and troll farms participating in these efforts, and when you have extremists on all sides actively pushing messaging online, it creates new "trends" and it slowly plants seeds in people's head one way or another.

Whichever side I'd be on, I'd focus my effort there to win. Publish messaging, memes, photos, clips, headlines that discredit the other side at every turn, adds haze and confusion, throws shades. And fill every channel with an abundance of your own messaging, values, ideas, alongside catchy positives.

Now do this well, and it also results in censoring the other as a side effect. If you're the thing trending and being recommended, it means the other messages won't reach as many people. If you flood things, the other messages are less likely to be seen.
This is so true. Chairs are fantastically difficult to make well, and especially to design. A successful chair has to deal with hundreds of pounds of stress on small joints for decades on end, typically using only traditional joinery and glue. The proportions and fit have to be just right, the surfaces have to be durable.

There are lovely and comfortable plywood chairs, like Eames' -- https://www.hermanmiller.com/products/seating/side-chairs/ea... Donald Judd is, like, a god to my architect friends. But none of them own his chairs.
Why isn't this called Vim Diesel?
Careful, that talk in these times will get you downvoted, it's not approved by the Ministry of Approved Thoughts. You don't want to get put on the critical revaluation of bias education list, do you?
You're right. Oof, I need to stop reading HN late at night when I can't even read units wrong or have any intuition. Apologies.
Yes. Humans make mistakes, humans with computers make mistakes faster. Computers without humans make mistakes even faster.
I think like the article says, the way you reduce the pileup around the goalie is to make it possible to score from places other than the pileup around the goalie.

Just as the viability of 3-point shooters opened up the floor in the NBA, making it viable to score from the blue line in the NHL would open the ice as well.

When I was a kid in the 80s players would score from the blue line all of the time.

They were still relatively low percentage shots but a guy could absolutely score with a slapper from the blue line. Enough that you had to respect the threat. Not unheard of for a d-man to score 20 or 30 in a year.

As a fan that was fun too! Not as fun as a magical "sexy" Gretzky goal. But you could hear the anticipation in the building when the puck went back to some guy who had a cannon from the blue line. Al Iafrate, etc.

Today, if a defensemen actually scored from the blue line, the team would probably immediately release the goalie and fire the goaltending coach lol. Only reason to shoot from long range is so you can get the puck into the scrum in the slot and hope some something happens from there.
A handwired QMK keyboard would work fine: https://docs.qmk.fm/#/hand_wire

If you have only one or two switches, you can use the DIRECT_PINS configuration to directly put one switch per input pin rather than the more conventional switch matrix approach. You can use the XD002 code as a starting point (https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/tree/master/keyboards/xd..., https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/blob/master/keyboards/xd...). It uses a DigiSpark rather than the more common Arduino Pro Micro. The DigiSpark is a bit fiddly and has very little program memory, but it is very cheap and simple.
It's not uncommon for a compiler to be partially written in its own language, so therefore this may as well be the first C compiler.
I loved this stuff. All those people on architects drawings, premade trees, fixtures on plans.. grown up versions of my d-day letraset rubdowns.

The fonts were amazingly easy to use. Kerning marks and alignment marks.

All designed to DIN scale with your drawing.
When i read about observations like this, it makes me realize what a small jewel our planet is.
Why do they need to strive? They don't. They totally could be happy as you describe. But you know they won't be. They aren't wired to be happy with a little because they won't value it because they didn't work for it.

For a depression-era farmer even a little success was still survival and so it mattered. But for someone who doesn't do anything to produce their own goods and so never feels accomplished because of skill or effort, anything less than what the other guy has will be intolerable. They won't work for anything, so they won't accept hard work as a reason why the other guy deserves to get to keep what he produced, and they'll steal it, killing the goose that laid the golden eggs.
Durgod K320 works nicely with macOS. You can get replacement key tops from eBay for about $20 to get cmd/opt back etc
Give some respect. You sound like a hater and jealous of game devs.
>Like most of these rants against "censorship" they skip over people's rights to restrict speech as a form of speech itself: there is no moral (or legal) right to give people you disagree with a forum or audience to express their view.

I don't disagree with this as stated. But the reality is different. When the tech-oligopoly has a mono-ideology and they all censor the same people, and then pull the rug (hosting) out from under competing platforms, and then rip up the signs (dns) pointing to alternatives, and then siege the opposing cities (payment processors ban them) it becomes a much worse problem. That moves from the theoretical to the practical.

> Are powerful monopolies (or near monopolies) wrong to censor? No, because they have the same speech rights as others, the problem there lies in the market power of the monopolies, not their speech.

Yes, because it's not just websites. It's infrastructure and finance colluding with the presentation layer. At what point do we all agree that it's a problem, and admit that the powerful aren't always right?
Thanks for trying it and for such a detailed response!

That host check prompt is a SSH security feature, it will only ask you the first time to accept the key and after that it will only check that the key hasn't changed, to verify no one is impersonating my ssh server, and allow you in without a prompt if it is ok. It's kind of like how your browser expects a valid certificate signed by a certificate authority when visiting https sites, but without the certificate authority.
In most cases accepting the first time means you will never be asked again. Certainly the check can be skipped as you described tho if preferred tho.

for port 2000 try this:
ssh -R 80:localhost:2000 localhost.run
The first port number needs to either be 80 or 443, and for most people 80 is the port they will use. the second port number is the port your local app runs on. https://localhost.run/docs/http-tunnels explains what 80 does and https://localhost.run/docs/tls-passthru-tunnels 443, but 443 is for very specific use cases.

Butterfly looks awesome! If i'm understanding what you're after you want to be able to run butterfly locally and give someone else an internet URL to connect to your butterfly server, right? I'm not clear on how authentication in butterfly works, I'd need to read more, but certainly you could do client x509 authentication with a TLS passthru tunnel (that's the 443 advanced use case I mentioned), altho I'm not sure if someone like letsencrypt does client certs, so you might need to live with a certificate warning in your browser unless you can get a CA signed client/server cert. Maybe butterfly allows other authn/authz methods tho, like username/password over http, in which case you could use a normal http tunnel and connect it to the internet. If I get a chance to try it I'll reply back, and you get it working before me pls let me know!
Exactly, that's what I'm talking about. Batteries are good for just storing electricity, LAES should be even better when you have heat you already need to get rid of (like those big cooling chimneys). In many generators you need to actively get rid of lots of heat, usually it's just dumped. Cogeneration should be much more common.
Then criminals should focus on what that non interesting stuff is likely to be and exploit that.

Terrorists (as well as a CIA director) have for years used a simple trick to communicate without leaving suspicious looking metadata: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/11/12...

I find this type of legislation works like DVD copy protection: the innocent and non tech savvy will be disproportionately affected and it won't do anything to deter those with sufficient knowledge.
Whilst most devices may use DC internally that may not be true of consumption. You still have electric showers, cookers, hobs, washing machines, dryers, heaters, air-conditioning, vacuum cleaners and kitchen appliances like blenders.
Will probably be used for nefarious reasons
I think it’s fair if they stop the account sharing.

But I think it will have the opposite effect. I have a friend who shared his account with me sometime back and out of courtesy I got Hulu and shared it with him.

I watch Netflix maybe an hour a month, and I can’t even remember the last time I watched Hulu.

If they put an end to sharing, it is very unlikely that I will get my own account. And will stop paying for Hulu too.

But on the other hand, I doubt if they care much about such low usage accounts.
The removal of hookings and slashings from the game still makes it a much more open affair than it was back when goalies did acrobatic saves in smaller pads.

The speed and skill allowed now is completely different. The composite sticks means players can release shots without warning, that would take a full second to prepare back when everyone had a moustache. Goalies had a chancee because the guy with the moustache and wooden stick was getting slashed or cross checked while taking his shot. It was way less enjoyable than the game is now. The SV% and GAA is also mostly unchanged because of this. If the hookings were removed, players had the speed and composite sticks of late 2000's but goales looked and played like in 1980 - it wouldn't really be watchable.

Also, I love that a hockey article is at the front page of HN.
Banker, princess, warlord: the many lives of Asma Assad
They literally could have if the technology and motivation was there, that's why they were considered a monopoly and broken up by act of the state: because the lack of a viable competitor service means that sort of consumer hostile action was possible.

Of course, in reality phone company's exchange the right to monitor what you say for common carrier status which makes them legally immune to the fact you are saying it, and credit card companies do in fact ditch whoever they want because they have no such burden.

The solution in one case is obvious (protect net neutrality) and the solution in the other case would line up with the calls for US Post to be extended to offering basic banking services to ensure an appropriate floor on the transaction market, and as a government entity would have to allow everyone to transact.

It's not clear to me what you seem to think Google, Twitter or Facebook should get in response for becoming a "public plaza" style arrangement which would be detrimental to their business model and wouldn't destroy the rest of the internet in the process? After all is a DDOS attack also free speech? A botnet? What are we going to obligate them to carry and on what basis?
Yes, apparently not.
Carefully.
May I advise to give a try to Doom instead? It has less ambitious objectives [1] and feels much snappier while providing a similar experience (vim-like, out of the box)

Also, if you enjoy the experience provided by emacs + evil, giving a try to the native compilation branch of emacs 28 gives noticeable improvement in terms of speed.

[1] Spacemacs "it's a sophisticated and polished set-up, focused on ergonomics, mnemonics and consistency" VS being focused on speed, https://github.com/hlissner/doom-emacs#introduction
A long time ago in cricket there were no limit on bat sizes. So the entrepreneurial minded players started using bats that were wider than the combined width of the stumps.

Eventually laws were introduced to set limits.
Fast track in covid-19 times:

1. Start a chat channel upfront and announce it here (discord, matrix riot element, signal, etc...) With dedicated and announced times for project e-meetup

2. See which hacker space are active if any

3. Maybe plan physical meet up in outdoor setting, easy for HI as it's hot weather. Don't become the next covid-19 cluster

It's always random how some communities work and some other don't. So start one and see if it works
How did that even happen? Did they not notice getting into the tiniest plane, possibly even a prop plane.
When a goalkeeper is given a penalty, one field player is going to the penalty box instead of the goalie.
There's a somewhat better article, with more sources, about the company here.[1] They pivoted from cars, which had become a mass-produced item, to bus bodies and other specialty bodies. Those could be custom-built in small quantities. They supposedly made the transition from wood to metal, but had more trouble competing in metal, which is less about craftmanship and more about heavy machinery.

[1] http://www.coachbuilt.com/bui/p/patterson/patterson.htm
This sounds fun! We could do something social distanced, maybe surfing
This. I really like the pedal idea but I won't ever get it cause I don't want to have to move around with it.
Humans can explain their reasoning when you ask them. The best we have with NNs is a fancy version of first-order sensitivity analysis.
I know, but I’m genuinely puzzled by this. It just doesn’t seem to make sense to me.
Critical infrastructure has never been regarded as a public platform.

No one has been prevented from buying their own internet connection or DNS names and running their own site over the "common carrier" status internet backbone infrastructure.

It's just a lot less useful when your goal is radicalization and you need to hit the widest possible audience to get conversions.
We started https://rational.app exactly for this reason.

If you’re interested then join the project
> Trivial to bypass: Check

For you and me, yes. For Joe Public no. I think it's fair for people to expect a modicum of privacy inside their own home.

Is constant surveillance of a nation's citizens OK? I don't think so.
It looks like a really cool project. Great job!

I’m curious if it’s possible to proxy the network requests so for example it would use the browsers IP address instead of the server?
You still have your passport from your original country no?
Isn't that what editorial journalism is about? Injecting some drama and sentiment into otherwise flat events: "mainstream journalists are being hypocritical".