skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's actually the worst though. I use selecting to highlight text that I'm reading as an aid. Copy-on-select is a huge dealbreaker for me because it clobbers my clipboard when I don't want it to.
Maybe it wouldn't be so easy to accurately simulate an organism made of trillions of cells, each containing millions to billions of proteins which oscillate, diffuse, and interact with each other millions of times a second.

I don't think we are anywhere close to having exhausted the lessons we are learning from mouse models. They must always be taken with the caveat that mice and humans have significant differences in biology. But if we want to understand how complex organisms work, there isn't much better than an cohort of actual organisms to manipulate and observe in controlled environments. This gives insight and helps us to understand other species, including our own, by analogy.
ci also can take a number for nesting level. For example, c2i( will change within the second level of surrounding parens rather than the innermost
No, you're looking at it in too black and white a way. It's not a decision between "no limits to speech at all" and "any limit is fine because free speech doesn't exist".

The line, at least in the US, is that all speech is free unless it "incites imminent criminal behavior". And no, the criminal behavior doesn't include criminal speech (that's just circular logic).

Yes, the line the US draws favors free speech far more than almost any other country. And that's a part of the ethos of our country. Other countries are free to do whatever they want.

And no, Alex Jones shouldn't have been censored (by the government). We don't allow the government to arbitrarily deny citizens rights unless they have been given a fair trial. In his case, a judge decided his speech fell into the realm of defamation and thus his victim was due restitution.

And that's how it should work. We don't need "speech police" and we don't need to create new laws to further remove people's rights. If someone oversteps the bounds of free speech then a judge can decide what to do, not Facebook.
Cannabis is not physically addictive and no reasonable LD has ever been found.

The only downside of pot is whatever you’re missing out while couched-in
https://gab.com/realDonaldTrump

edit: should have done my own research better, the profile reads:

>Reserved for the 45th President of the United States of America🇺🇸 This account is an uncensored Twitter archive and shares email statements sent by The Office of Donald J. Trump.

AFAIK Trump isn't on gab.
1200$, which were not squandered but invested.

You should do something about your financial situation if that seems like a lot of money to you.

Edit: how is it controversial that if you are poor, you should try to do something about it? To claim it is impossible to escape poverty is madness (unless you are sick or handicapped). Obviously the only way to escape is if you do something about it.

Even if you just earn 5$ per hour, you can try to save something. 1000$ would be 200 hours, not impossible. A better strategy would be to try to find a job that pays better, though.
No, I actually love CSS variables. But they invariably will be abused in the long term. What you called medium padding might suddenly be decreased to be a value lower than small padding, and that’s the point where it all starts to go to hell.

The point of Tailwind is that it’s a straightforward way to handle all the CSS complexity and put the moving parts into a single config file that works the same everywhere.
Freedom of information is about the activities of public authorities, and that includes private sector bodies performing public functions. A person could access aggregate data and other non-personally identifying information this way but it would likely require a court to rule on the public activities of the company. This happened with privately run care homes which were deemed to have public functions.

However, you don't want that: you want a subject access request. This covers data from private sector companies too. Not responding is illegal and you can take them to the Information Commissioner and eventually the Information Tribunal.

This is the information commissioner's office's guide to making a request:

https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters/your-right-to-get-copie...

Source: trained as a journalist and am quite good at media law stuff. Not a lawyer, but have had substantial training and think this is worth a punt.
Whatever the massez do, it'll be while force-fed soma. If we do have a huge privileged class who doesn't need to work we can't risk them getting uppity and continually demanding more so we'll keep them on a short leash.

And even if something like UBI ever happened, don't imagine that the productive will share power. It'll be a box, VR helmet, drugged soylent, and you'd happy with it.

It can't be anything else, and everyone should realize it. There's no UBI-topia out there for people, should they simply come to consensus and demand it from their pols. It's wishful thinking and the simple concept hurts more than it helps.

Be afraid of the person who offers you this nonsense.
Most of the methods I've mentioned apart from FIRRTL can be used for analog design. In fact, the JITX's product in particular only support ML-accelerated analog based design mainly circuit board level at the moment but nothing stopping them for doing it for both analog and digital design later on.

Don't get me wrong I'm not dismissing your work, I'm just dismissal of the outrages 1000x claim, as they say "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"(ECREE). I believe Chris Lattner and Patrick Li will probably cringe to hear the 1000x claim ;-). Like I've mentioned before, I love to be proven wrong.

Regarding OpenBLAS, it will be very good to have native Julia alternative as you've claimed. It is nothing new to be better than OpenBLAS since D language has done it with probably less than 10x (100x?) man power compared to Julia several years back[1].

[1]http://blog.mir.dlang.io/glas/benchmark/openblas/2016/09/23/...
Just curious: these are (mostly, weighted by cost) zoom lenses, right? Or did you invest a lot into very fast prime lenses?
To be pedantic X11 has a copy on select feature which works on virtually all applications. This means you get by default 2 different clipboards although some environments/applications have an option to sync them among other additional features like being able to select from the last n pastes which may be optionally persisted through reboots for example.
If the code compiles sometimes the bug is pretty obvious!
I need to get in the habit of using those. I tend to do ct<space>
Jean-Paul Sartre, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Paul_Sartre

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
OT but it this decade not more about types than tests?

Edit: Since this seems to be an unpopular opinion why stop here, haha: The more one stresses tests the more he/she signals that he must have missed years of advancements in software engineering. If you do this with peers, ok, but publicly? Even Ruby added types, not the kind of types we hoped for but still, it's a strong signal. If your lang has a mature type system you don't need half of your tests anymore and might not be into such write-ups. Praising and writing gazillions of tests don't make you look smarter, very much the opposite.
He spent it on a project that would potentially earn him more money.

Perhaps that you can not understand it is part of the reason why you can't afford it.
> Over time, as goalie equipment changed, so did the way that goalies covered the net and stopped goals.

Can you go into more detail about this for someone who doesn’t followed hockey that closely?
> is anybody really buying?

An NFT sold for $69 million just today:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/11/arts/design/nft-auction-c...

Aside from that eye-popping headline, the same article mentions other sales hitting $7.6 million (CryptoPunks), $6.6 million (another Beeple piece), $382k (Banksy-derived piece), $100k+ (CryptoKitties), etc. Whatever this phenomenon is, big money definitely is getting spent for real – to the extent you consider spending cryptocurrency "real," anyway!
But the pinnacle of journalism, the gold standard, the One True Way that's taught to every journalist - and then promptly forgotten when they go to work - is the Inverted Pyramid. The LOD/mipmapping equivalent for words: start with a very short summary of most important things. Then expand the details. Then expand them more. Repeat recursively.
Dissecting the conformism to understand the nature of conflicts
Then again you can take the design to any carpenter and it won’t be too expensive to have one made. Judd who is famous first and foremost as an artist always had his works manufactured by others, I think he liked the idea of removing the artist’s personal ‘handwriting’. Ironically, he still played within the gallery system, where the gallery and the artist get to mark certain pieces as “authentic” and create limited editions.
Hope you learned your lesson, buddy.
> impl Trait is an existential type, not a subtype relationship. And it doesn't really mean "Liskov substitutable" either. After all, it names a single type, just un-named.

Well, "impl Iterator<Item=i32>" is clearly not the same thing as "Vec<i32>", but "Vec<i32>" is Liskov-substitutable for it. AFAICS it meets every definition of a subtype unless you take the position that "impl Iterator<Item=i32>" isn't a type at all, which begs the question of what "impl Iterator<Item=i32>" is - certainly it's something more than syntax sugar for "Vec<i32>", and it looks like a type and largely quacks like a type AFAICS.
We are talking about people with internet access, not some rural farmers in the third world.

Nobody says those rural farmers should embark on an emoji project.
Wasn't all of this caused by people not knowing how to manage money rather than not being able to save?
Of course I read the article. See the paragraph beginning: "Really, the biggest reason for a goalie to get off his knees is that if he doesn’t, people might notice.", and the two paragraphs preceding it.
That's not proof that any one actual person was deradicalized, which was the metric.

Mr. Davis has 200 examples. I'm only asking for one. His method works. The deplatformers' citation of their own platforms only proves that they control their own platforms, not that any extremist view was changed.
The AfD called to shoot migrants at the EU border. They retreated to the "only one person's personal opinion" after a harsh backlash.

QAnon representatives are calling for the murder of Democrats. The same group advocates for brutal treatment of migrants, restrictions of freedom of choice for women, direct violence against muslims.

I don't see any of this on the left side of the political spectrum. Also, when someone in a group voices radical opinions and calls for violence it represents the groups view when said group is not distancing itself from these views. Because if the group doesn't, the one person is just the group trying to find out how far they can go.
I enjoyed using Primer CSS (Github) recently. Another interesting one is Spectre.css
Because making a living gambling is a morally dubious thing to do. For every win, someone else loses.

Instead of playing zero-sum games, do something productive and useful with your life.
Same here! I've used it for a year and I barely ever go on any social media except hackernews.
What are your monthly costs of living? Where do you get your money from?

I would expect 1000$ is a common cost of living for a month, so that would be "one month of living expenses".

If you can live for less money, perhaps it is you who is privileged.
I have realized something similar recently.

When building a website I would use bootstrap or similar to design the website as I implemented it.

Recently I have been designing the website in figma some days, and implementing said design other days, and my productivity had skyrocketed.

For me, it simulates a boss giving me requirements. I can focus on the task at hand without context switching all the time (or that is my rationalisation)

Edit: typos
Cognitive dissonance?? Do you see how full of yourself you are being? Other people like something different than what you like - deal with it!
>They can’t go about and say things like “all Mexicans are rapists” (a Trump quote) because it would lend them in jail

First of all. I intensely dislike Donald Trump and I'm glad he's gone. I hope its for good. That being said that's not a quote from him. Its an unnecessary and dishonest embellishment of what he actually said. Unnecessary because what he said is bad enough to make the same point.

Finally, if a person simply said the exact quote you listed, and the result is that they were imprisoned, the most offensive thing in this story would be the government that thinks someone saying something nasty and untrue alone is enough to warrant time in jail.
> There’s no such thing as "Mac GNU", since the userland and outermost kernel interface is of BSD lignage.

first thing I install on my macs are the gnu coreutils. bsd are so useless in comparison
In no way does he argue that the goalie should always be on his knees. He says it’s common for some to be, then explores the reasons why that might be the case. That is called good, nuanced writing.

It’s an article in the The Atlantic, not a formal proof.
>Nazi censored. Stalin censored. Xi censors. Seems hard to explain if censorship doesn't work.

Nazis also killed the speakers. Stalin killed the speakers. Xi kills the speakers.

Citing mass genociders as "censorship works" is hilariously bad evidence of censorship working when terminating the speaker most definitely works.
F1 is a team sport, car engineering is part of the competition.
Oh I remember when video games used to be shipped in that they had to finish everything. No patches later. It’s going to get burned on the ROM and off it goes sailing to their customers.

Now a days, shipping to me evokes “Fuck it, ship this shitty MVP to customers because ship ship ship” and then they wonder “Gee, why didn’t my app take off?”.

I understand the need to ship, but I never see anyone daring to challenge the frantic broken shitty app philosophy and maybe wondering if they built them with care, maybe... just maybe customers with actually come? Has anyone tried to go against the grain since the SEGA days? It’s high risk.

Thanks for a great perspective.
> For a lot of people in the world, it's a tremendous amount of money.

And for a lot of people it is a pocket change.

> Congrats on being someone without that concern.

> Take that up with the person you've imagined you're talking to.

Gee, someone being able to afford something really crawls under your skin.
Unfortunately this won’t tell you if the ISP is storing extra data in compliance with the Snooper’s Charter because legal compliance can override the GDPR. Basically, the law saying “you’re not allowed to tell anyone you hold this data” overrides an SAR and a legal case to force compliance would likely fail on these grounds.
You are right, but the CET is as wide as EST according to this map:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/World_Ti...
Absolutely not!

But OP seems to think so
The result was that opposing players became
hesitant to get too close to the net, thus
solving the problem somewhat.

Hahaha this was my solution too in floor/street hockey. I was not the best goalie in terms of sheer athleticism, to put it extremely mildly.

So I took advantage of my size and the goalie equipment and got good at throwing my body into scrums around the net. I didn't even hit opposing players per se. But if there was a loose puck/ball I took advantage of the fact that I could make a beeline for it and if there happened to be an opposing player in my way... well, unfortunate for them!

A possible solution could be to expand the
goalie-only area around the net. That would,
in theory, force opponents to focus more on
shooting and not on piling around the goalie.

This is a very surprising conclusion given that they tried this already in the 90s and it was a total disaster. Culminating in the infamous Cup-winning goal (against Hasek, from your clip above) no less.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/343121-one-final-thought...

It was a boon for the goalies, not the scorers, and it turned every goal into a controversial mess. As a fan you couldn't even celebrate a goal -- you had to wait until the refs and/or replay decided if it was okay or not minutes later.

Part of the problem is that attacking players can't really control their position in a precise way in a scrum, given all of the contact and the fact that everybody's, well, wearing ice skates. Half of the time the goals were called off for a player being in the goalie crease it wasn't their fault.

And then there was Martin Brodeur, who absolutely broke the game for about a decade by skating around like an "invulnerable third defenseman nobody was allowed to touch." Effective, but really contrary to the spirit of the game and about as much fun as watching paint dry.

I really cannot think of a solution besides larger nets.

4-on-4 makes for really exciting hockey but that feels like fundamentally changing the sport too much. It would also IMO place too much emphasis on penalties. A 5-on-4 advantage for two minutes is one thing but 4-on-3 is quite another. Refereeing in a mass action sport will always be highly imperfect and that would really put the game in the refs' hands.
You must be mis-understanding me. I am implying that the basic necessities are covered by the common budget.

10 Euro buys you a coffee in a nice cafe a couple times a month. When you're poor, that's something!
What I don’t get is this: our governments - “ours” being the group of parliamentary democracies - routinely diss authoritarian ones such as China - and rightfully so - for their violations against human rights, among which that to habeas corpus, privacy, and reasonable suspicion.

To the point that we agonized over and sabotaged contact tracing apps, which could have helped a lot in fighting COVID, over claims to privacy and government control.

Now this shit. Fuck it.

You either are or you’re not. So if my privacy is to be made sausages, chopped and sold at the market for FB, ad-tech and spooks, then give me at least some upside! As it is, we’re just bovines with ear tags...
It can become boring when one team is very dominant, as has been the case for a number of years now. Absent that though, differences between the cars can make the sport more interesting. The engineering competition is a part of it. As are the adaptations the drivers and teams need to make to take into account their cars' relative strengths and weaknesses compared to others. Plus, if the disadvantage isn't too great, it can be fun to cheer for an underdog who overcomes a disadvantageous car and still manages to win.

Spec racing certainly has its place, and it is indeed also nice to see drivers pitted against each other on skill (and luck) alone. But that's never been Formula 1.
"Stop being poor"

That's how what you are saying sounds like.

EDIT: Even when you aren't poor, blowing 1K on a crazy project that might or might not pay off is something that a lot of couples would discuss first.
I'm down in Waikiki, Oahu. If someone wants to do a meetup on a weekend, I'll try to make it.
Yes! I discovered the same thing, but with Sketch. I think it's because you can explore the problem space, and converge on solution, much faster when you don't have to bother with code.

Going further down that line of thought, pen and paper really works. You don't have to bother with colours, fonts and rounded edges.

A fun exercise I do, when solving a creative problem, is this:

1. Divide a sheet of paper into 8 squares

2. Set a timer for 40 to 60 seconds

3. For each square, start the timer, and attempt to draw a different solution in each box

This forces you to stop worrying about the individual ideas, and focus on generating lots of them. It also gets you past the "immediate solution" thoughts you have, and into more interesting ones.

At the end, you can collate the ideas, and pick the best parts from each one.
Another step closer for a families web history to affect their life insurance policies. How long until this information is repackaged and sold on?
How long can you continue to spend more each month than you make?

I don't fully trust that story. Maybe many of the people who have "no savings" have a mortgage to pay off? Technically they have a debt and all spare money goes to the bank, but really they own a house that is worth more than the debt?

In such cases I'd say it is more of a mindset issue.
I see here obvious misunderstanding of what fact-checking is in media biz. F-c is not some sort of tool, or pre-requisite for truth. Neither it's a part of imaginary high standard for reporting. It's a corporate defence line to reduce the risk of an unscrupulous, or just stupid employee damaging corporate brand. In one-man gig such as a Greenwald does, he himself cares for his reputation because unlike majority of journos employed by big media who are names in bylines covered by ad-propelled brand identity, he is brand himself, and cannot make an oopsie, and then find a job in other place after a short vacation.
Expanding the crease is an interesting idea
but I’m not a fan of it for one reason: it
would likely lead hockey down the path of
baseball, where so much of the game is “reviewed”.

We don't have to imagine what this would be like. The NHL tried this in the 90s and the result was exactly what you're talking about, and it was absolutely horrible, for the reasons you say. You are completely correct.
Why did the rules change? Twitter, and any other private company, has never been under any legal obligation in it's business to provide a public space and it's not clear how you'd even define them as providing one (seeing as how the servers are in Twitter's datacenters, using Twitter's network, paid for by Twitter's revenue).

Literally everything on Twitter is Twitter's property other then where governed by intellectual property law agreements and even then it's still someone's private property they have a right to control!

A country club being very popular doesn't suddenly make it a public space.
Recently, I too tried making the switch from vim to Emacs via the Spacemacs route. The effort didn't last long. I found that Spacemacs, without installing any extra "layers" than what comes out of the box, consumes too much RAM. Over 1GB of it. Don't know if this was expected or if it was something specific to just my machine.
I lived in South London (England) for many years.

There is the famous 'Covent Garden Market' and a more industrial 'New Covent Garden Market' a few mile away.

Occasionally I'd see very nicely dressed American tourists (imagine, a father in cargo shorts with a map in hand. And a wife and kids with brightly coloured tourist-clothes). All heading towards the industrial area. The first few times this happened, I actually pointed them to where I thought they wanted to go... the warehouses.

I guess we all try to fit information as best as we can with the current context. So if someone says take me to down-town-San-Fransisco... and the last part seems like non-sense... we would often just point them to whatever downtown is nearby.