skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It depends on which shelf in the store you look for them. In the snacks section, they will be roasted and salted or sweetened or both. But you can find pure nuts in other sections, often among baking goods or close to the fresh vegetables section.
I realise that ISO 8601 is behind a paywall but using

> 2-26-21

as a date format is just wrong.
Don't get confused between Projects and Operations. What you are describing is actually akin to operational projects (albeit at the risk of bespoke designing and building each car).

Projects in the traditional sense produce new assets with new value with new benefits meant to be operationalized. You need to segregate associated costs so that you can depreciate the value of the asset once it's operational. Usually the cost is considered an investment and funded by separate finance.

Operational Projects support, extend, enhance existing business assets. This is the assembly line mentality and is more aligned with continuous improvement for which there is usually a fixed budget for the year and is completed during the normal course of business.

Yes there is some grey area but both are necessary.
When you demo some tech to 5 year old and he mistakens it for magic, I think it’s revolutionary enough. In current state of art, Atari RL, AlphaGo, AlphaFold, GPT3, GANs, Pix2pix, CLIP, DeepFakes etc are very very revolutionary. You can take any of these and go back in time even just 15 years ago, people won’t believe what was accomplished.

However, I do believe we are far and away from generalized intelligence.
And in most KDE and Gnome file explorers and open/save dialogs, Ctrl+L shows the whole path in plain text.
I'll add the disappearance of sidewalks, too. I can't walk a simple mile here to go to the store because there isn't a safe way of doing so. There is part of a sidewalk, but it doesn't extend all the way down a 35 MPH road. There are parts where one has to walk on the road to continue the journey.

Sidewalks used to be part of a normal subdivision, but I haven't seen a new subdivision here that has a single foot of a sidewalk.
You're welcome. DM on Twitter if you have questions.
> Perhaps focus on why you live in a society where people feel like they need to steal low value things (necessarily, as you have said it was the fruit of a minimum-wage worker) to survive.

“Need” is rarely why people steal. The calculus is, “I want this thing, I don’t have an ethical problem taking it, I think I can get away from it.”
"I have a hammer, where are the nails?" - specialist
"Here in the West, we have moral superiority, and will bribe poor countries with unfathomable wealth to behave as we think they should".

Now, where have I heard that before?

I see very little difference in the "altrusitic" actions in developing countries currently popular with big US companies, and the actions taken by the big European trading companies in centuries past. After all, it's good all round, right? Yes, it is good for business, but also the poor folks get to better themselves! (heavy sarcasm present).

Edit: I also see the money is mostly going to NGOs, which will allow a select handful of people to live in huge wealth and (non-democratic) power in the countries in question, and a few pennies handed out in "grants". It doesn't take long to find the kinds of abuses that NGO employees get up to, given that much power.
The only boot on the neck of most people in the West is their society that convinces them they will never stand up.
A desktop computer is not a mobile device though; there are different sensibilities involved because pretty much everything is different. A lot of UX regressions from the last years come from this mistake.

What is more "natural" is a pointless discussion anyway IMO; I regret phrasing it like that and I wish I could edit it. As I said, the key is to put things where people's eyes and mouse cursor will go, and that's rarely a "jump" to an entirely different place on the screen (on mobile this problem exists less because the screens are small). While it doesn't matter too much on narrow forms (less of a jump), on wide forms it's a bigger issue (or if it's placed to the right of the form inputs take).
It used to be even sooner, but the kids health ended up compromised too much as result of training. They changed rules so that the peek happens later.
Same thing in GNOME files if you press ctrl+l. Just like you would to get to Firefox's URL.
I'm not sure if it's ironic or intentional, but I find it funny that they talk about these points while not having HTTP redirect to HTTPS on their own site, presumably because it's using a self signed certificate.
It's pretty different. If nothing else, it's playful with Feynman—almost done in jest as an aspect of the rogue part he often played, and largely innocuous. Others have already written about the issues with e.g. New Kind of Science at length so I won't go into it, but if you look at the specifics there and ask whether they're things Feynman might also have done, it's easy to see the resemblance is pretty superficial. Feynman's non-autobiographical writing was pretty down to earth imo.
Show HN: RiteLinked – LinkedHashMap and LinkedHashSet in Rust
The organ piece is really good (Mäntä), sounds like it was live recorded?

Very nice!
Yeah, it would be a cool demo for a pick-and-place machine.
There's clearly no such red team, as otherwise they would have blocked various Spectre attacks too, being as they are all variants of the same problem. AMD were taken by surprise like every other vendor, they just got "lucky" with Meltdown.
If by that you mean preventing free software from being more widely used, I agree it does. However, I disagree with that aim.
You might be surprised to learn that those things are very often processed, even if you get them from your local markets.
While I agree, people are unpredictable. Second, even when they are paying attention they may still react too slowly. Even when there's a competent driver at the wheel paying attention, crash prevention systems can still outperform them.

Anyway, I don't think the goal is to prevent accidents entirely; that would be ideal, but it'll be really hard. More important is to prevent injury and death. A car is just hardware, that's what insurance is for in the end. In that regard, even without automation, cars have gotten safer over the decades with roll cages and airbags everywhere.
This is a good example. In this situation you’d actually prefer to lightly rear end the car in front of you and deal with those consequences than possibly lose your life because someone asleep at the wheel hit you from the side.
Well, not really. See my comment here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26306733
I've always been interested in creating random soundscapes. For this purpose I built a SuperCollider[0] application[1] that does the job - at least for my tastes!

Some tracks are available on Soundcloud[2]

[0]=https://supercollider.github.io
[1]=https://github.com/gorenje/randomcomposer
[2]=https://soundcloud.com/user-47380021
> In this scenario there isn't really the "known from elsewhere" info— knowing that certain groups of messages are returned together in response to sets of queries is unlikely to be meaningful if you don't have anything else to map that info to.

If the service knows the upload date of the message (presumably same as send date), and does this for a lot of users to cross correlate, that's actually quite a bit to go on to figure out who you are talking to.
The follow up about gmail icons is equally true + cutting. I've always just ignored all those icons having had no idea what most of them do.

https://blog.plover.com/tech/ui-2.html
American Sign Language grammar is subtle and complex.
And then the user loses the certification, as you said in another reply[1] the “user” you're talking about are other companies, so I don't see why they would decide to break the certification they got from their supplier just for fun.

Edit since the parent was in fact speaking about the end-user, which I misunderstood: I don't see the problem either. The manufacturer has no obligation to prevent the end user from updating his car's software. There is no locks that prevents the car owner to just disable his airbag[2], or remove the safety belt. It's illegal to do so in most countries, and if the user do do and injure himself or somebody else because of that modification, they are on their own. I don't think it should be any different for software actually.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26397176
[2] Edit: in fact, this is a bad example, because you need to be able to disable the airbag to put an infant car seat next to the driver.
> I looked and looked on Amazon for protein powder that was not sweetened. Couldn't find any.

I'm surprised to hear that. Unsweetened, unflavoured, pure whey protein is a standard product for most supplement sellers. A search for "unflavored protein powder" on Amazon finds all sorts of things (many out of stock, some actually flavoured, but some suitable):

https://www.amazon.com/Unflavored-protein-powder/s?k=Unflavo...

I doubt you'll find flavoured but unsweetened protein powder, though. For some reason, savoury flavours of protein powder is not a thing.
Slightly offtopic: both "Drag and drop" and "Embed on page" examples at https://www.uploader.win/docs/ do not work.
> It will be nearly impossible for interested parties (such as insurance companies) to get a hold of your personal information on the Bristle platform and use it as leverage for their pricing

How is it nearly impossible?

From what I understand, this oral "profile" is stored and then provided to the user on demand.

Isn't the general premise that overall health is causally linked to this profile? If the data was monetized differently in the future, couldn't the association between user and this oral profile possibly give insurance companies something to base pricing decisions on?

How could the report itself be anonymized? Send the user a link to a stored report devoid of any and all personally identifiable data and then destroy any and all personally identifiable data associated with the link?

How can anyone trust someone to actually do what they "promise" with their data without extremely punitive regulation?
Music Software and Bad Interface Design: Avid’s Sibelius
Full self commenting feature by Tesla maybe?
Thanks, I'll look into hidden variables.
(re)connecting SourceTree with your GitHub Account
yes, so as a general rule for any publishing scenario where hyphenation is important you have an automated solution, for example for a small company / single person you might set up something using https://github.com/bramstein/hypher or find a similar tool.

Also this tends to be sort of overkill for what most people want so - as with most tech - gotta evaluate if it's worth the time and effort.
If there's a skill element don't you just need to be able to outplay the edge?
> Cars have been pervasive for over a century and virtually none of the actual improvements in safety have come from "hoping humans do better".

I disagree, given how standards for getting a driver's license are different between countries and getting more and more tighter.

In the US, unless things are different from TV, you can get trained by someone else with a license in a regular car and do an exam.

Over here, you need a driving instructor in an adapted car (dual controls), and depending on how well you pick it up, spend anywhere between 15 and 50 (or sometimes more) hours practicing driving and traffic rules. There's a written / theoretical exam you have to study for (traffic rules), then a practical exam with an examiner.

In my case, it cost me about €2500 in lessons to get my driver's license. Then I spent another €1500 or so on top of that to get my motorcycle driver's license, where there's even more emphasis on personal safety and safe driving.

With that in mind, I'm confident in my claim that Dutch drivers are better than American ones.
Not a lawyer, but I don't think that's true.

GPLv3 says that manufacturers have to release all the information needed to run modified software on the device, it doesn't mean that there is one (and one only) certified version that can legally run on the device for safety reasons.

GPLv3 in this case would force manufacturers to release the information so that the owner of the car could run modified software, but legally if you do it, you, the user, not the manufacturer, are violating the law.

It's the same thing that happens with electronic blueprints, you can modify the HW, it will void the warranty if you do it.

--------------------------------------------

Protecting Your Right to Tinker

Tivoization is a dangerous attempt to curtail users' freedom: the right to modify your software will become meaningless if none of your computers let you do it. GPLv3 stops tivoization by requiring the distributor to provide you with whatever information or data is necessary to install modified software on the device. This may be as simple as a set of instructions, or it may include special data such as cryptographic keys or information about how to bypass an integrity check in the hardware. It will depend on how the hardware was designed—but no matter what information you need, you must be able to get it.

This requirement is limited in scope. Distributors are still allowed to use cryptographic keys for any purpose, and they'll only be required to disclose a key if you need it to modify GPLed software on the device they gave you. The GNU Project itself uses GnuPG to prove the integrity of all the software on its FTP site, and measures like that are beneficial to users. GPLv3 does not stop people from using cryptography; we wouldn't want it to. It only stops people from taking away the rights that the license provides you—whether through patent law, technology, or any other means.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html
Yeah, and we need to change that. This can't be a status quo.
I just wish someone would RIIR Gnu make.

I use it heavily and think it's extremely underappreciated, so instead of reinventing it, I would like to build on it. But - trying to extend the old C codebase is daunting. I'd even be happy with a reduced featureset that avoids the exotic stuff that is either outdated or no longer useful. The core syntax of a Makefile is just so close to perfect.

(I wrote about some of this in the remake repo: https://github.com/rocky/remake/issues/114 )
Nice old school Brutal Death vibes here, good mixing, good job!

My brother has been working on a Black album for the better part of 10 years, these things are cathedrals XD
> defaults write com.apple.finder _FXShowPosixPathInTitle -bool YES

THANK YOU!
I both hate and love both of Android and iOS. Currently I'm on iOS has the hardware is nicer but damn if the UX isn't confusing and downright dangerous sometimes (looking at you CarPlay).

I also looked into getting some of my own programs into my iPhone but rather than getting stuck on not being able to keep it there for a long time, I got stuck on how to even get the program into the phone. Turns out you need Apple hardware to push the code, so I'm stuck before even being able to try it.
This film called “That Sugar Film” changed my life. I lost 15kg, kept it off (4 years now) and regained stability of thought, mood and energy.

That Sugar Film

https://youtube.com/watch?v=6uaWekLrilY
> We've been eating bread for millenia

According to wikipedia [0]: approximately from 10,000 to 30,000 years ago. Let's take an average reproduction age of 25y and you've got roughly 1000 human generations eating bread.

But, also according to wikipedia [1], the oldest Homo Sapiens that we can date range from 200,000 to 300,000 years ago. That's 70-90% of our direct ancestors' natural selection process not having been exposed to bread (widespread grains, in fact).

And, if we dare to argue that human metabolism have mainly not changed since Homo Erectus, then we are in another world in terms of comparison, because Wikipedia trace the oldest signs of Erectus as far as 2,000,000 years ago [2], which represent 80,000 generations, and that's ~1% of our ancestors having evolved exposed to grains.

So, all in all, "we've been eating bread for millenia" is clearly not all that there is to say on that matter.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_bread
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_modern_human
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo
I've learned a trick using the knuckles of the hand to remember the days of the months: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuckle_mnemonic
I've been doing mainly improvised (experimental) music for the past 20 years. My instrument / sound source are the magnetic fields emitted by hard drives (hdd), signal generators and for the last year the cheapest synths you can find. I've always been very bad at documenting what I do, so there is not much to look at or listen to. also, I have always thought of my music to be for live audiences and so there are only a few releases I did over the years.

here's my ancient website hosted by klingt.org - a platform for musicians of the experimental / jazz / new music genre originally from vienna, now international:
https://rossi.klingt.org
it has a jukebox that lets you listen to hours of copyleft material by the platforms users:
https://jokebux.klingt.org/

and my long time trio "das fax mattinger" has a website and a short (~17min.) video of a gig we did last year. don't skip through, let it unfold. no hdds have been harmed this time.
https://dasfaxmattinger.klingt.org/
https://youtu.be/qZHTaHLQfFk

and a little (1min.) teaser I did (sry its instagram):
https://www.instagram.com/p/CEQ1EbrhipT
Fair enough. My point is that there are open hardware available, and that there wouldn't be if there wasn't an actual market for it. :)
I really like the layout of your website and the way you present your art on it.
> Melodic ambient. Electronic instrumental sounds. Mostly calm, often weird, stimulating the imagination.

https://merelysounds.bandcamp.com/album/album-200226

> Merely Sounds is a one-person minimal music project, you'll find here some strange melodic ambient sounds.

http://merely.xyz
The community here has a heavy prejudice on a few subjects, cryptocurrencies are one of them. I wouldn't take a discussion here as something that should inform your opinion, more as an entertaining pastime.
Yeah, maybe calling them pow3, pow5, pow7 would be a bit clearer? But a 10s search for a comment cleared it up, so I don’t really see the problem...
The extension to matrix-matrix is trivial, since a matrix is just a concatenation of columns.
Not sure if the checks of all loads are done at instruction retirement, but yes they are done after the (speculative) execution of the load.

We can also talk about the Store-to-Load Forwarding involving a partially check physical address, exploited by the Fallout attack, which is an optimization patented by Intel since 2006 [1].
All these Intel optimizations are old, and sometimes patented (which reduces the chance that IBM, ARM or AMD will do the same) and are totally valid and safe as long as it's assumed that it is impossible to recover data used during the speculative execution.

The recovery of this data becomes possible only when the side channel Flush+Reload is discovered in 2014 [2] (which originally didn't target speculative executions). It is only 3 years later that Meltdown attack use Flush+Reload as a covert channel to exfiltrate data during speculative execution.

It seems to me that this timeline shows that it was not possible in 2006 to anticipate this issue. So it's not just a lack of education.

Perhaps a lack of security research at Intel to continuously challenge their optimizations?

But please note that there is no theory to simply determine whether these optimizations are a good idea or not.
Criticism is easier afterwards when you know how the attacks are produced. But in 2017 this type of attack was something new.

That said, some of Intel's responses to the flaws (partial correction of vulnerabilities, lack of dialogue with researchers, etc.) are very worrying and I think these criticisms are much more legitimate.

[1] : https://patents.google.com/patent/US20080082765A1

[2] : https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/448.pdf
I make some tracks with my wife, a strange admixture of Greek, Turkish music with electronic vibes.

Here I am playing saz and drew the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3YlBzeXApo

Here we're improvising with synths: https://youtu.be/Wys66VBWbus

Piano and Baglama:
https://youtu.be/5nJc0-_O7EU
All those Apple apologists should go and take a look at the world; I live in Iran, and here Iranian apps just use a business profile to install. There are even alternative app stores using device management profiles. And these apologists keep bullshitting that the monopolist walled garden actually keeps people safe. The walls don’t keep out anyone powerful, they just enforce rents.
Why certifying specific version of software would conflict with GPLv3?
'Tragic optimism': The antidote to toxic positivity
There's definitely luck with teeth! My dad and grandpa are both dentists so my family had access to every kind of tooth care on a regular basis.

I don't know anyone who gets more cavities than me and my mom. Seriously every time we go to the dentist we're either getting a new filling or replacing an old one.

I even spent 3 years (for non-dental reasons) eating no sweets and not much changed. We just have "weak teeth". I could maybe take better care of mine but my mom is an obsessive brusher/flosser and it hasn't helped her much.
Get Your Free Keto Cookbook
Show HN: List of 70 open-source clones of sites like Airbnb, TikTok, Netflix
> That is quite interesting, but since one can modify one's car to begin with to make it unsafe, it is also rather futile.

In France, if you want to modify your car (in a significant way, not specified by the car manufacturer) you need to send your car to a specific administration were engineer will inspect your vehicle before you can get it a plate number. This is called [Passage aux Mines](«https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passage_aux_Mines»). You typically have to do it when you decide to repurpose a cargo van as a camping van.

That would shock me if you had to do the same after updating the embedded software of your car.
No, the user that matters for GPL is the car owner. The point in the linked comment is that given how the market works, there is little incentive to work towards changing regulation (or even just interpretation of or belief about the regulation, I have clue if there are actually countries where this is impossible, but know for sure it's a widespread belief in the industry), because the company applying for certification is not the one getting annoyed by having to avoid GPLv3.
I agree with you overall, but felt the need of commenting as I thought "Settings do not change spontaneously" was true as well but it is not! I just discovered the other day that you cannot turn off WiFi or Bluetooth. If you do try to disable either of them, they will be turned off but only for a day. The next day they enable themselves automatically.

So much for not changing settings by themselves :)
> Access to hardware acceleration has absolutely nothing to do with the standards of the formats themselves.

I have implemented accelerated video playback myself https://github.com/Const-me/Vrmac/tree/master/VrmacVideo and I disagree. Needed a lot of these standards, not just for containers and audio, for video decoding too.

> since open implementations exist, open source developers know how the formats function.

These formats are way more complicated than you think they are. Just because open source implementations decode/encode something doesn't mean the implementation is standard-compliant. My one certainly is not.
If you pay your apps will expire once a year rather than once every couple days.