skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That period during the New Horizons mission where every new image represented a major advance in our quantum of knowledge of Pluto was absolutely remarkable.

The situation with Mars is different: the planet's close enough for reasonably good telescopic investigation from Earth, we've had landers on the planet for 50 years (the Soviet Mars 2 lander beat Viking by 5 years), high-resolution orbiters for ... nearly as long? And since 1996, rovers, which have transected paths of varying lengths exploring specific regions of the plant. We've got a very strong overview (something still not complete for Pluto --- New Horizons got detailed close views of only about 60% of the surface), and several very-high-detail pictures.

Astronomical time and distance are both huge relative to human scale. That we (or our robot agents) can cross the solar system in a decade or two is remarkable. A few months to Mars is nothing. The Earth was once as large or far larger (to us).
Who's to say it wasn't in a support ticket?
New nation-state cyberattacks – Microsoft On the Issues
Does anyone have an intuition for why Presburger arithmetic is decidable, but once you introduce x, it is not? If + can be rewritten as repeated succ, (which is decidable) and x can be rewritten as repeated +, then it seems logical that x should be decidable, but as any undergraduate CS student knows, Peano arithmetic is undecidable. What is so special about x exactly?
It doesn't make education more difficult to access, jut expects you to pay if it benefits you later in life.
I think it does. If all publicly funded research is published open-access, and none of it is published in traditional paywalled journals, the signalling value of publishing in traditional journals will go away by necessity.

As less and less high quality modern research ends up behind paywalls, the bargaining power of traditional journals diminishes.
Awesome. I look forward to these being obnoxious whenever I'm outside, trying to enjoy nature or any sort of attractive site.
So what are you proposing? All brokerages must put up the collateral no matter what? Surely it is up to the individual businesses whether they can afford to, want to take the risk, etc.
Is this lack of information in itself unusual enough to imply the origin is being covered up?
Flvto YouTube Downloader 1.5.11.2 License Key 2021 (APK)
It is a general thing.

Back when being atheist was a tough choice and being some kind of religious was the default choice I think there was more thoughtful people in the atheist camp.

Today as the tides turn one finds that the same annoying thoughtless people are atheists if that is the default.

Im the same way it doesn't surprise me at all that one find some of the healthiest people are vegerarians (or mostly meat), I think there's a huge overlap between those groups and those that generally think carefully about what they eat instead of just eating whatever processed food is cheap.

Going forward I think we'll see more unhealthy vegetarians.
They don't have "that" box in the application (whether you have a conviction). They have a different box in the application (whether you have a conviction for fraud or similar) that according to the story, ICANN agree Sunde did not need to check.
Long Covid Patients Say They Feel Better After Getting Vaccinated
There is no free market. Just copyrights / patents alone show that. If I had invented something or way more likely came up with something obvious I should not be looking over my shoulder and waiting for some corporation to sue me for rounded corners or button placed on the form. Suddenly those big corps run crying to their daddy for protection.
>First of all, I'm happy that as a matter of course ryml is already expected to be faster than alternatives by at least 10x, to the point that a mere 3x speedup is considered an issue!

Lol just say thank you
> the ones who attempted illegal shorts

[citation needed]; is this actually true or is this just part of the WSB sales pitch?
It is also questionable whether the newsroom @ NYT, WSJ give much quality to begin with.

That being said, there is value depending on what topics you're interested in. The value of NYT for me is the Arts & culture section. But I'd happily pay for Matt Stoller's content,Taibbi, Siskin or Gwern if he had one.

There is risk that's been highlighted of creating bubbles but seeing how news media has reinvented itself over the last decade, I can't see how that can be avoided, except this bubble is self-curated and more specific, which one can argue is better.

[Edit: clarification on last line]
Improving open rates with a creative subject line
Well then what is the reason? I've not seen anything else. The CEO was cagey when asked about liquidity, but every official release has suggested that the collateral requirements were the problem.
This is exactly why The Richest Man in Babylon has been a best seller for 100 years.

A handful of core rules presented as friendly parables.
Los Angeles.
Also, whatever stuff is there in the cheap meat. Antibiotics and co. Very cheap food they got. Stress hormones ...
1. Not always

2. Obviously mostly yes, but in hn people just assume that you're a somewhat good person who wouldn't knowingly restraint internet access to people with disabilities
Curious if you can share some examples of this bad advice?
The UK’s last lighthouse keepers can teach us about isolation
The unity and dedication "amongst people" was due to inter-national political competition and fear. The overall purpose of these inventions was to threaten mass murder.
Yeah, overall Europe disincentivizes being above average through heavy taxation. Sort of explains absence of a local silicon valley.
So you can save your eyes the strain of trying to read A4 pages at A5 size? Wasn’t that what the original issue was?
Indeed, if the drafters had forseen corporatism many things might have been different. And then there is the organized persecution of peers for their horribly offensive (read differing) opinions that is allowed by our modern communication tools. Is freedom of speech freedom to persecute? Maybe having really bad ideas should become a protected class? I say that only half jokingly, I have no answers.
Road to EU Climate Neutrality by 2050 [pdf]
How to make data exploration faster and easier
Someone could write a viewer, or converter for this format? Should be simpler than writing a new creation app.
If someone needs 32GB then they need 32GB.

The M1 is Apple’s low-end chip, currently available only on their cheapest computers. It’s like complaining that a Corolla can’t keep up with a Ferrari on a race track. The most charitable interpretation is that the person doesn’t understand the market position of the two items.
Maybe a stupid question, but couldn’t they put there something “cutting-edge” next to the existing system? Then if that fails then whatever, the rest of the system is still functional as expected, but at least they know that in the future what they would need to change to be able to use the new technologies in that environment.
Although I can imagine that even the smallest weight increase could cause issues, so probably that’s the reason.
> so 'biweekly' as 'fortnightly' is certainly to be proscribed, in my book.

Except that's literally the dictionary definition of the word. And "biennial" and "biannual" are synonyms.
never checked out web dev with dotnet, but maybe I will check out blazor I keep hearing cool things
It may be wrong, but it is good enough to run all of our computation at the transistor level :)

The fascinating thing is that now these transistors are helping make new math proofs beyond human comprehension.... how does that come out of addition?
There are cars that charge up to 350KW but that's not realistic for large scale deployments since the infrastructure development doesn't seem poised to keep up with the EV purchase boom. A gas station can easily service 20 cars simultaneously every couple of minutes. Charging 20 cars at 150-350KW for every charging station brings us to some mind boggling numbers today.

EV will have to be able to do both though. Slow charge for constant parking charging - one charger for every parking spot, and quick charging at dedicated stations which would presumably be equipped with everything needed to cover the potentially huge demand.
You bring up the point that really pisses me off in these studies. They treat a mcdonalds big mac as the same quality of meat as a grass fed steak or free range chicken breast. While grain free and free range is always best, even commercially produced grain fed cooked healthy is miles better than mickey d chicken nuggets. Lumping all these together as "meat consumption" is incredibly misleading. Most of these anti meat studies seem to still rely on the idea the "food pyramid" is still gospel.
No, I fully understand their nonsensical argument and my comment was constructive, although with a less serious approach. Things are called by whatever is convenient. If something is intended as a meat/dairy substitute, it is perfectly natural to draw similarity to the thing it is replacing. Nobody is going to call it "oats soaked in water and then blended to a consistency and taste that you can use in your tea". It's just oat milk.
>> In Comments

>> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.

>> Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

As a personal recommendation not endorsed by the HN guidelines, I suggest responding to the point a commenter is actually making, rather than a point that is often made on the same "side" of an issue, but that that particular comment is not currently making. Specifically, the comment above said nothing about product naming "fooling" anyone.
This only works if you read all pages one by one. But if you have 100+ pages document and want to jumt to page 63 you gona have a bad time.
> there isn’t an alternative to AC that uses six orders of magnitude less energy.

There are many alternatives to AC which can solve the same problems - but they are less effective and convenient.

As it stands right now, there are alternatives to proof of work. However, they are not nearly as time-tested, and many of them compromise on security in order to score that big eco win.

Comparing proof of work and proof of stake, as if they are 1:1 comparisons, is not accurate in the slightest. One is clearly inferior in terms of its carbon footprint, but when the function of the technology is transacting and storing value that should not be the primary concern.
Is this a fair restatement: “Models (and systems) that accurately reflect reality with a high fidelity due in part to their accurate assignment of values to a larger number of parameters are fragile”?

I agree that that's true, but my point (and I think part of what the article is saying) is that most “optimized” systems/models are not in fact doing that. In which case, the point I'd take (if I read you correctly) is that even once you _have_ managed to accurately set the parameters (which is harder to do and validate than it looks), you still have a fragile model/system.

Alternatively [edited to add]:

Define a model as a system that is attempting to match another system in behaviour. And so now you have two problems:
① a complicated model is itself fragile (by analogy to the system it's modelling)
② a complicated system has more ways to diverge from the system it's trying to model

Hmm, in which case it's kinda the same thing after all, except one is about making the model in the first place, and the other is maintaining it, maybe?
Transfer Learning Guide
Whether in REM or not, I feel less rested the more I lucid dream.
Can transfer of value be done with much less power spent (especially if decentralized)? If it there is a superior alternative, wouldn't you be referencing it by name?
Infosys wins $500M all digital deal from Google
It's a variable number of addition operations.
That's funny given all the scammers they have accredited, ie. when your domain expires and goes under "infinite lock" because 2 registars lock it for as long as they can and then transfer it to the other.
Namecheap just snaked another domain off me
> What if don't drink, don't smoke, do regular exercise, not obese... and eat lots of high quality meat? I haven't seen anything that comes close to showing that this would be unhealthy

I think the documentary "the game changers" addresses precisely that.
This mission is an incredible achievement. The images are as advertised (stunning) and I'm sure all the sciences - and even art - will benefit from the data.

What I find a little sad is that we seem incapable of doing this without leaving a particularly human signature wherever we go.

We arrived on Mars with jets of pollution
https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/25672/black-and-white-smoke-...
followed by the dumping of the two pieces of trash required to enable the landing.

For all the data we have gained, we have lost a pristine planet - which makes me wonder if we are doing this at the right time.
Wonder how much of this is psychosomatic and the vaccine for them, with regards to their long covid symptoms, is acting like a placebo?
> It should be noted that should you have the right kinds of connections, bitcoin mining itself lets you launder. The miner is given the dirty money as capital, energy subsidies, etc, then creates clean bitcoin, which appears in some anonymous wallet and is then sold.

The government could just look at your electricity bill and ask how you paid for it and then ask where you got all those mining rigs without a loan. If you can't find an explanation where that money came from you are in a bad spot. It's actually harder than laundering cash since cash can be spent directly without depositing it somewhere where your identity is known.

>The actual conclusion I think is most relevant is the nilhilistic one: "None of these tokens really matter!"

Yes, it's always the same boring old answer. If you could wave a magic wand and make it impossible to pay with euro it would suffer from the same problem. The value in the euro doesn't lie in itself, it lies in the ability to exchange for a service or good. Because I value the good or service I value anything that grants me access to the good or service, the euro grants me access to goods and services, thus I value the euro. Foreign currencies are worthless to me since I cannot use them to buy things, unless I want to import something denominated in a foreign currency, then the currency suddenly gains value for me.

It's laughable that Bitcoin exclusively being a store of value is somehow lauded as a benefit, as if being able to purchase goods with Bitcoin would be a bad thing for Bitcoin. It gets worse now because people insist that it is merely a settlement layer. As the price of Bitcoin goes up its value proposition is somehow getting worse over time. How is this even possible?
Caveat: UK citizens all of them. Not the best country for an healthy diet.
Actually it is the reason they stated
You can see that in table 6ff in the "additional file 1" (it's a docx file). For example, before adjustement for the BMI, the increase of ischemic heart disease per 70g/daily red and processed meat consumption is 1.26 (model 2). With BMI adjustment (model 3) it's 1.15.
Also, most of the time icons should instead fall back to nothing (and should be hidden from screen readers). The main exception that one will observe in reality is a toolbar of icons only with no labels; it’s well understood in usability circles that that’s a dangerous pattern at best—text labels and icon-and-text labels both almost always simply work better.

I deem the ligature approach bad because it encourages leaving something in the document and accessibility tree that shouldn’t be there, and most commonly in a non-semantic way (e.g. a send button might end up showing something like “paper airplane”, which is terrible, or with this specific font, “Learn more →” might become “Learn more arrow_right_alt”), or with semantics that you’ll definitely break at some point (e.g. report_problem is , but if you use that for an alert icon it’ll mislead anyone that ends up reading report_problem; in short, any new semantics you desire for an icon, you need to create a new ligature for it if the user can possibly ever be exposed to it).
But the argument is about due process: are we actually sure that an Bob is a a Nazi, or did him neighbour create a fake twitter account to impersonate him? Is it his namesake that he never met?

What if Steve is Bob's conpetitor and conveniently accused Bob of being a Nazi?

Suppose Bob is a nazi but hasn't commited any crimes, how far can we go, what else can we deny, can we refuse them a website? A mobile phone connection? electricity and running water? School for his child?
Flipside we rolled out over a dozen powerapps and they work great. Our Engineers can now focus on solving bigger/tougher problems instead of being tasked with making simple crud apps 24/7
Yep, just add those lines in there and save.
That's just how it seems to work. Maybe it's a deterrent?

"Low key" names like "Big Brother"... could they be more evil.

Honestly though, if they called it something like peacekeeper maybe that would have worked.
Even some kind of 'splitter' for 3d vision like Panasonic had on their handheld videocamera range (VW-CLT2) would work I think...
Do you actually use peanut butter as a substitute for butter?
>I feel like Toyota is wasting its money. Maybe I'm missing something

Maybe. Maybe not. It's hard to get any idea of what's going on.

It's impossible to get good analysis of whatever any Toyota is doing because they have so much upper middle class mind-share and fanboys that you get analysts/journalists pandering to them for confirmation bias clicks with "look how Toyota is doing everything right" content and fishing for rage clicks with "Toyota is doing X and it will never work" content and the noise drowns out any real analysis and the comments are no better.
It's the ideologues referencing terrible observation studies, along with the health food industrial complex tapping into that arguably relatively irrational demand.

One problem is there isn't enough high quality meat available - high fat red meat in particular - however there are trends developing including ketogenic, carnivore diets, etc - as well as people buying half or full cows (much much cheaper) and then freezing it; plus then you can actually meat [freudian slip pun, I'm leaving it] the cow and see how it's cared for, etc - tying into the benefits, value of local.
Yeah, I spent about $60 worth and the transaction fee was $0.0000113.

That, combined with the privacy makes it seem really usable. I’d love a way to make cheap, private, digital payments
Can you link to the part of Wellcome being against meat consumption? They look like a charity about vaccination or such?

I couldn't find anything here about meat consumption:

https://wellcome.org/about-us
Don’t researchers generally try to control for such factors when making a study like this? I am at work so I’m a little too busy to pick through this one right now, but it sounds like you’re concerned about this, so it’s worth checking before drawing any conclusions
>This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust, Our Planet Our Health (Livestock, Environment and People - LEAP) [grant number 205212/Z/16/Z]; Cancer Research UK [grant numbers C8211/A19170 and C8211/A29017]; and the UK Medical Research Council [grant number MR/M012190/1]. AP-C is supported by a Cancer Research UK Population Research Fellowship [grant number C60192/A28516] and by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the WCRF International grant programme [grant number 2019/1953].

And cancer research. But you didn't bring that up.

edit: Also not "An arm of WHO", they partner with them cause priorities (public health) are aligned.
He has been punished for his wrong doing, which had nothing to do with DNS. The least ICANN could do it tell Sunde exactly what they are affaird he’ll do to misuse an accreditation. Some one with an accreditation sold Sunde and team piratebay.org, so they can’t be worried that he’ll register a ton of pirate domains, he can easily get those elsewhere.

People shouldn’t be punished for life, especially not by excluding them from areas that are completely unrelated.
I'm not sure if it is/would be a good or bad policy, but I can see benefits and issues on both sides
It's definitely possible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_short_selling
Peter Schiff FUD has traditionally been a buy signal. Funny that you can buy gold from him on SchiffGold.com with crypto. I wonder what he does with it.
Wait, if I crossed a street on red signal, I now have a stigma for life for not following rules?
The vast majority of services that allow you to pay with Bitcoin merely convert it back to your local currency. That's like saying you can pay with euros in the united states.
The low demand definitely leads to higher prices but the other aspect is all of the additional testing involved for every chip. There's standard testing at every level of the manufacturing process and there will be further environmental testing at the package level. They will even run radiation tests on the wafer to characterize any quirks.
Almost all studies of this kind are extremely confounded because food survey data is close to universally bad. It is especially bad on this topic in the US and UK, because many people's idea of a serving of meat is actually closer to fried breaded bread, with condiment levels of meat on top. It would be crazy to lump those people in with the "steak and eggs for dinner 3 times a week" crowd, but they always are.

Results are different, often opposite, in countries that have a better relationship to meat, like the big Austrian food survey study from 2014: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917888/

> Moreover, our results showed that a vegetarian diet is associated with poorer health (higher incidences of cancer, allergies, and mental health disorders), a higher need for health care, and poorer quality of life.

Other survey data across several countries often replicate the meatless = lower mental health claims, eg: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2020.1...

(This should come as no surprise to people who have read about B12 and mental health, which is a relationship so extraordinary that I'm surprised its not more front-and-center.)

But again, food survey data is generally bad. Some are okay, when they are very focused, like the Swedish studies on dairy product consumption. But most of them are bad, and the more general, the worse they are.
Step 1: assign blame.

ugh.
It should but no, the opposite is true with most large observational studies - they don't refine the questions or give enough options to account for nuance.
I wonder what is a good way to love sedentary obese smokers who eat poorly.
So far, no one took salary. Everyone would start having similar salaries at the same time
So if factory farms reduce or disappear - animal welfare will get worse?

I don't quite follow.
If rental prices are rising faster than 4% a year than certain landlords are losing profit aka bearing the cost.

It's absurd to make certain individuals pay for others housing in a random way.
SoilGrids: A system for global digital soil mapping
That box said fraud or similar in the last 10 years. Even if you agree that his TPB charges fit the "and similar" part, he wasn't charged with anything in the last decade, since 2008 is over 10 years ago.
My favourite way of thinking about these operations comes from category theory:

* addition: the cardinality of the disjoint union of two sets

* multiplication: the cardinality of the direct product of two sets

* exponentiation: a^b is the cardinality of the set of maps from B to A where B is a set of cardinality b and A is a set of cardinality a