skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
At first I thought this was going to be about looping a tractor fed printer's paper back into itself to print double sided.

This is an interesting way to do present something if you are reading it once and don't need it for reference material. Needing to find a specific page only to have topics interleaved might make searching disorienting.

A side note, boxed sets of 78 RPM records used to come like this. At the time, stacking record changers were more common. You would load a stack of records in, play one side of each as they dropped down, remove the entire stack, flip it, and play all of the other sides. 78's didn't hold a lot so this could drastically increase the time between needing to interact with the player.
Why does this matter if the claim is that the availability of space in a country seriously affects housing prices? I agree that in very very constrained countries like Singapore this is the case, but the space available to a country does not matter for housing prices beyond a certain point.

The original claim was that it does. Why does it matter that Canada sees more foreign money flowing in? The space is essentially limitless, so prices should drop to zero. Except they don't, because it's not about space. It's about living in small, pleasant regions with a good economy where others also want to live. That drives up the prices, be it Toronto or Stockholm. It doesn't matter that both countries have essentially limitless land elsewhere.

Edit: Also, the claim that Sweden is "more hermetic" is also a bit silly. You are aware of freedom of movement in the EU, right?
AFAIK hardware multipliers are not quite as dumb and work more like this though:

5*11 = 5*(8+2+1) = 5*8 + 5*2 + 5*1 = (5<<3) + (5<<1) + (5<<0)

...and then doing all this in parallel.

Instead of:

5*11 = 5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5

;)
Mazeless – Enterprise SEO
Mazeless is a Software As a Service. It handles large websites having thousands of pages. At Mazeless we manage website migrations, identify and solve Technical SEO issues. We provide professional Website Audit Reports on how you can improve your rankings and usability.
> You are basically paying people to shit on your own products. Makes no sense.

It's good to be critical of your own products to make them better. But you have to actually be willing to do that for it all to work.
Transaction clearance between customers at the same bank don’t involve any central authority. In fact banks are reporting their net transactions between each other aka if A has 100,000 transactions for 100$ each with B that sum to zero net transfer they don’t need to report anything.

This is needed as otherwise banks could claim to have unlimited funds.

Bank notes provide privacy and are created on demand. Having 1:1 bank notes to M1 money supply would simply be wasteful.
If the goal was to find out the keywords, it would feed the beast, but if the goal was to bump their expenses in hopes they turn it off, you'd need a serious amount of domains for them to autobuy!
To further this point, I know someone (who had little to no code exp) who at the start of this pandemic built an entire app to help his company deal with processing attendance and all the other things that suddenly appeared out of no where, using nothing but PowerApps and other O365 products.
Except in this case the prejudice is spot on. That is where the absurdity starts. These comments have no right to be correct and yet they are. When you do your own research you will reach the same conclusions as them.

>I fear all the ways Prejudice is pushing us apart, and away from fact, understanding, and compassion.

As said, it's absolutely defying expectations. It's driving people toward fact, understanding and compassion.
Definitely true in the EU and most of Europe in general.

Not sure about other parts of the world, though.
It's possible; it's called naked short selling. The only reason people actually think it might have happened is because of widespread accusations on reddit. These accusations are financially illiterate and deluded conjecture, but they're stated with utter conviction so a lot of people find them convincing.

There isn't actually any evidence the named hedge funds were engaged in naked short selling. For the most part, people seem to misinterpret short interest and failure to deliver data as an indication naked short selling occurred.
It could be in anything. I’m nobody and I’ve had death threats uttered about me on Gab; it’s the only thing the site is good for, talking about who to kill. If this guy’s only had one it’s frankly perplexing.
Thanks for the info.

It is apparent to me from living life that meat is a big part of a healthy diet. But it can be frustrating seeing studies such as this one come out and not knowing what to believe.

I recently started dating a vegetarian and am really realizing how much harder it is to eat a healthy vegetarian diet. Since no one actually wants to eat nothing but greens / veggies all day, many of her meals are carb heavy to fill up, with little protein. I'm not saying you can't be a healthy vegetarian - but it's harder. There are no good meal analogues for something like grilled chicken with a sweet potato/veggies on the side.
> The most concerning thing is knowing to write that in the first place

This is something you learn from reading the docs / book on the feature. This applies to all language features.

> Even if you get it right when writing it, what you've written is vastly more verbose

Slightly more verbose, but also more consistent with the rest of Python syntax. Python syntax already has `if` clause that's well understood, while you're proposing a special-case syntax. I believe language consistency beats brevity, and explicit is better than implicit.

BTW the ? syntax looks to me very similar to optional / null-aware / error-aware dereferencing operator used in some other languages (Kotlin, Groovy, Rust).
I would love to have the time to dig into those numbers, but for now I'm going to take the sources "Plant Based News" and "The Sentience Institute" with a big grain of salt.
Robinhood deserves negative attention, but not for restricting trades to closing-ony. That appears to not have been much of a choice.

They do deserve a lot of negative attention for running a brokerage in a way that invited a lot of risk-ignorant retail traders to instantly trade into leveraged positions for which they should never have been qualified in the first place. Robinhood has the valuation it does because it brought leveraged day trading to the masses. As someone who worked at a brokerage and designed trading tools, leveraged day trading isn't for the masses.
From what I know: This is still an open question.

Here's a list of some approaches.

https://mathoverflow.net/questions/310004/categorifications-...
Not algorithms. There will be infinite addition involved, and algorithms are finite.

Thinking of multiplication as repeated addition also won't explain anything about it. It's a separate operation. Deal with it. For similar reasons, you can't calculate x-th power of a number, when x is irrational, by decomposing it into exponentiation and roots.

This metaphor is just training wheels. At some point you should lose it.

Together with the notion that "multiplication is repeated addition" comes the notion that numbers are quantities. Only some of them are, and this isn't really what makes them numbers. Now what exactly gets repeated, when you don't have quantities?
Indeed I did - thanks for the correction!
From this article: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2018/08/16/silk-road-founde...

"his family opened a Twitter account for him in June, and they’ve been posting his tweets ever since."
I was mostly answering the first half of your comment, about the poor subsidising the middle class.

The UK system is fine, I think subsidies are better, as poor people might feel discouraged to take on more debt, and student debt isn't really desirable for anyone. I don't think people should be in debt by default, neither do I think they should be uneducated by default.

That said in Sweden we actually have a combined system of subsidies and special student loans that very much resemble the UK system you describe.
If you wouldn't mind providing some research to support your agenda that would be great. Here's a list of reference research done at Harvard Medical around the health benefits of fiber and in other cases where it showed no positive improvement [0].

A statement like:

> Calling fiber essential seems wrong on it's face.

...to me seems rather ignorant given your prior claims.

[0] https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/carbohydrates/f...
They did this exact thing with the helicopter — it's using a Snapdragon SoC that runs Linux.
I like the attitude of author of this gist. Just make it work.

My own practical practice is to use both a very fine System76 Linux laptop and also a super fast, if constrained, M1 MacBook Pro. Depends on what I am doing, or sometimes just what I feel like using.

To be perfectly open though, I had considered switching to just using Linux until the M1 was released. The thing that held me back was spending $3500 on a commercial Common Lisp implementation 11 months ago. Going all in on Linux would have cost me more money.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but the Wellcome Trust is a large organization with an endowment worth tens of billions of dollars and a variety of funding sources. Your link shows a number of moderately sized grants for mostly infectious disease projects.
I've never had this happen in 20 years of buying hundreds of domains and searches for thousands. I've been exclusively using NameCheap for 5ish years now, too.

The business model doesn't even make sense. How many domains would Namecheap be rolling the dice on if they did this after a single search?

If billions of domain searches happen every year, we're going to see quite a few coincidences like this. An anecdote is not proof, and it's not like this domain (dnd.quest) was incredibly unique.
That you can import a module that needs authentication to access, like a private github repo etc.
The study’s funding is included in the study:

Funding

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust, Our Planet Our Health (Livestock, Environment and People - LEAP) [grant number 205212/Z/16/Z]; Cancer Research UK [grant numbers C8211/A19170 and C8211/A29017]; and the UK Medical Research Council [grant number MR/M012190/1]. AP-C is supported by a Cancer Research UK Population Research Fellowship [grant number C60192/A28516] and by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the WCRF International grant programme [grant number 2019/1953].
Yep, it is a clickbait
I ate an 8oz bag of potato chips and an 8oz can of onion dip for dinner last night.

Just wanted to throw out there how healthy my vegetarian dinner was.
From the readme:

> We are in the process of extracting the language from that product so that we can use it in more Microsoft Power Platform products and make it available here for you to use. That's going to take some time and we will report on our progress here and on the Power Apps blog.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=htt...
I think the author's argument becomes more clear when you consider multiplication in rings other than the integers, for example (square) matrices. The product of two matrices A*B does not correspond to repeated addition, and it is not commutative (A*B does not equal B*A in general).

I can see that having an engrained belief that multiplication is defined via addition becomes problematic at some point when learning about mathematics. However, this is true for a lot of basic properties that hold over the integers and not in other domains, so I'm not really convinced that it's actually wrong to teach kids about multiplication this way.
This was exactly my thought, I don't understand why those two word exist since it's commutative. Perhaps all this confusion is purely semantic.
VPS Showdown – DigitalOcean vs. Lightsail vs. Linode vs. UpCloud vs. Vultr
i lost ftuff.com over them (just skip a renewal) and they're trying to sell it back for 10k
> These articles bring back memories of teachers telling me I was wrong, because I didn't use the quadratic formula, but completed the square instead.

That's hilarious, since the quadratic formula is just what you get by solving ax^2 + bx + c = 0 by completing the square.

In fact, I have a high school textbook that makes that derivation.
I'm fairly certain that very much of this feeling is psychosomatic, the human mind is very powerful in that sense. Only thinking about that something is about to get better makes you instantly feel better.
In theory. In practice space isn't that limited. As housing gets more expensive it becomes economical to build taller which brings things back down. A 200 sq meter house (not small, though there are plenty larger) could be 1 floor, or 5 floors 40 sq meters for only slightly more money. The latter can fit on a much smaller lot, and so we can fit 5 times as many people in single family houses if we wanted. (at that density public transit works well so the amount of car infrastructure needed is about the same either way, with the later only needing cars for delivery and maintenance)

You can go taller as well, but above about 5 floors the standard house construction isn't strong enough and so there is an additional cost to better engineering to account for.
It comes with a wowser. EWW stands for Emacs Web Wowser.
Sugars are far verse than meet, and for some reasons in the UK, it is an ingredient of most processed foods. (even the salty ones like cans, ready meals, pastries, pasta, sometimes they are sweetening salads...)

I guess sugar does not create CO2 while it grows so (it binds Carbon), so political idea is to create a narrative that will decrease usage of meat/dairy. But even if we all stop eating meat/dairy sheer number of people and population growth will again create CO2 emission in some other way.
It's worth noting that this happened on the very day that .quest became generally available[1].

I think it's a case of first-day demand, not somebody picking good domains from Namecheap's logs.

[1] https://icannwiki.org/.quest

Edit: technically the next day UTC, but the same day where I am.
It might be if the Gates Foundation had funded the study.

https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s1291...
Indeed. I find this to be a rather strange opinion; in terms of the language itself, I can’t really say one is better than the other for expressing mathematics.
YT-DLP: Fork of YouTube-dlc with SponsorBlock Integration
This is one can I'm OK with kicking down the road :-)

(I'm joking; the article is interesting, and I'm not trying to frame it as trying to portray this as an urgent threat)
ETH cannot be described as a hybrid. The 2.0 chain is currently independent of the existing chain. The plan is to dock the existing chain as a shard of the new one, at which point it immediately becomes 100% proof of stake.
Eating more calories than you burn make you overweight. Not the type of calorie. This has been proven (wish I could find the research paper) and was funded by Gary Taubes' research group.

Refined sugar and carbs are high in calories and low in nutrients. If you eat 2000 (or appropriate for you expenditure) calories of brocoli, you ain't getting overweight.

Additionally, most people are addicted to sugar and refined carbs. Half the problem with diets is getting over that. It is likely the problem defined as satiety--but really just cravings.

We are just starting to get more Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials on diets and such. Will never be perfect, but there is just not enough highly controlled research as it is very hard to implement. But I think with keto, carnivore, vegan, paleo, all fighting to claim to be most healthiest diet, there are folks starting to put money into researching them on equal footing. So we will see.

I think to summarize Michael Pollan, eat whole food, not too much and mostly plants is probably a good bet on healthy diet.
"Only"
This varies a lot - legacy media, sure. But the New York Times is doing extremely well!
I've been teaching my 5 year old multiplication and division for the last couple of weeks. I'm at a loss how you would teach it without explaining that it is repeated addition.

For example, the other day I asked her how many fingers and toes the three kids at the table had, and she came up with "20 fingers and toes each times 3 kids means there are 60 fingers and toes." I think the units are intuitive in most cases and all of the more advanced concepts the author (and the related articles) discuss can be taught later.
I also just don't want the mental overhead of deciding which of my 20 subscriptions I'm getting value from. Yes, I used to have that to some degree with magazine subscriptions. But most Internet subscriptions actually tend to be pricier for less content--probably in part because so few people pay you need to charge those who will a fair bit to make it work.

I also observe that I do get some free newsletters and my usual pattern is I read them regularly for a bit and then they go into being read less and less frequently. (Which was admittedly often my pattern with magazines as well.)
That doesn't make sense. A cargo ship does not pick up food from a farm or slaughterhouse and does not deliver food products into my fridge.

So, it's a truck and a freight train and a ship and a truck for foreign produced food, and only a truck for locally produced food.
> Next-level deplatforming. From a non-profit. That essential controls the internet. Yay.

And it’s pretty rich coming from ICANN after they eliminated .org price caps (coincidentally) before their associates tried to usurp the registry for private equity interests.

It’s almost funny to see these multi billion dollar grifters disparaging someone for theft (copyright infringement).
What is the issue?

It's a fire hazard. At least in Sweden (and I think Norway) building codes require that all bedrooms have a window large enough for you to fit through.
Can this perspective accommodate fractional exponents, like 2^(0.5)?
He lied on the form, everything else is anecdotal.
It sounds like maybe you are aware of how silly your argument is now: the fact that these happen to arbitrarily share a common word in English, does not make them a substitute for each other. If you still don't understand, you should try sautéing some shallots in peanut butter.

Edit: this is clearly different from a company marketing a product alternative, such as margarine (for butter) or Impossible Burgers (for ground beef).
If I understood correctly they were optimizing for color difference which is a typical goal. I’m ready to be blown out of the water with an objective 10-“emotional slider axis” representation of color theory kind of like you describe.
Someone who claims to work at NC responded down that thread saying "Hi - I'll look into this further as I work with Namecheap, but we don't have a history of doing this as you state."

https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/lwgrkz/namecheap_ju...

Based on the account history, it does look like they work there.

https://www.reddit.com/user/tamar
It doesn't. Satoshi simply failed (as you can see in this response) to imagine a world where full nodes and miners would be disjoint entities, and as a result full node receive no reward whatsoever (and the biggest miners don't even bother to verify that the blocks they mine are correct).

The reliability and independence of the bitcoin blockchain runs on top of the shoulders of benevolent people running full nodes. Increasing the block size, means increasing the cost for those essential people. Not a good idea at all.
The bit about a vegetarian diet being associated with a higher incidence of cancer is kind of jarring to me. As I've always heard that leaning more towards whole/raw foods and more vegetables were better for avoiding cancer.

Now that may be because of your top point, most of the meat consumed in the US is processed in some way. I think the biggest culprit of meat-related cancer (?) is preserved meats.

I don't know. I just wanted to admit to being a little shocked at the whole vegetarian/cancer link. You often hear the opposite of that.
Certainly for atomic clocks (nearly the very definition of precision), but the vast majority of lab work isn't anywhere near that level of precision. So yes, you may need to factor in GR if your goal is to measure the smallest possible thing, but for general work with macroscopic items, it's such a small difference it is completely unnecessary.
But now you’ve added weight and need to remove something else.

As a tangent, I remember a talk from Grady Booch where he put software cost in terms of mass that needed to be added to your rocket. So every new feature cost weight by requiring more chips and more fuel.
>free range is always best

Source?
I cannot agree with you enough. Our company hired a new manager that had a background "familiarity" with PowerApps. He requested that I (a software developer) create a PowerApp that would be used by the company, essentially a ticketing system. I figured with my ~decade experience in developing complex web applications from the ground up, this would be a piece of cake.

What an abysmal way of developing applications. Everything (containers, widgets, etc.) is basically SVG's and your application looks like your designers couldn't use anything but MS Paint. Creating more complicated interactions with buttons and other UI elements was a pain to develop and making the UI responsive was a nightmare. The generated HTML was insanely ugly and the application was very slow/sluggish feeling. After fighting for a couple weeks, I began to (behind the scenes) build out a quick web application alternative to pitch. Long story short, he LOVED the web app version and that is what we are still using today company wide.
My inner devil opened this discussion just to read the comments. The comments on the linked article filled my lunchtime fun quota instead.

You can also read about the sale on The Guardian¹ without a paywall.

¹ https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/mar/03/daily-mail-...
I'm not going to defend Khronos, IMHO they are the definition of the "designed by committee" philosophy. But a simple internet search yields:

https://www.khronos.org/ktx/documentation/libktx/index.html

But for cross-platform code it makes more sense anyway to use an independent cross-platform image loader library, instead of depending on the platform-specific utility APIs provided by D3DX or MetalKit.
As software developers we can defenetly point the many flaws in this article:

1. IS A CLICKBAIT

2. Course you can decopose multiplications in a series of repeated additions.

3. Extra points for the flawed argument of adding different, well you can't because they are different.
Just like the #MeToo movement, such predatory behavior sets equality back years. Equity is ultimately a regressive ideology, both in practice and in theory.
China public video surveillance guide: from Skynet to Sharp Eyes
At $1299 this is a lot more affordable than I imagined it would be.
60 million is a drop on the bucket compared to how many cows humans raise for the purpose of food. This is a dumb take.
I would pay more for a subset of the current NYT. The website is full of imo prominently displayed clickbait that I consider negative value.

I'm a previous subscriber of NYT and Bloomberg online. I've kept my WSJ subscription partly because its easier to consume only the useful content.

I also subscribe to a couple of email lists where the author absolutely provides value in their niche over and above the larger newsrooms. They are usually great complements to each other and it tells you something that the journalists are also reading the newsletters.
If he's a minority, he could maybe accuse them of being discriminatory/racist, which would force them to defend via revealing the true cause? The "is it because I'm black" "argument". It's completely assholish, but they were the assholes first - i.e. if you want to win win a psychopath (or a psychopatic organization), you have to behave like one yourself.