skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Proof: The derivative of x^2 is x.

x^2 = x * x = x + x ... + x (x times)

Therefore,

d/dx(x^2) =

d/dx(x * x) =

d/dx (x + x + ... + x (x times)) =

d/dx(x) + d/dx(x) + ... + d/dx(x) (x times) =

1 + 1 + ... + 1 (x times) =

x
I've come to expect news/media copyright mistakes to fail on the side of copyright interests - and not the public's.
Study finds politics is playing an ever-greater role in Americans' self-identity
Brave's cryptocurrency is the only reason millions of people use it.
It's not that bad: https://blog.privacytools.io/relisting-startpage/.
COTS: Commercial off the shelf, stuff you can buy easily.

RCS: Radar Cross Section - how big of a reflection an object makes at radar wavelengths.
I cringed on every third sentence in the Google post.

E.g. "People shouldn’t have to accept being tracked across the web in order to get the benefits of relevant advertising."

This sounded a lot like: "Chickens shouldn't have to accept lower-quality feed in order to get the benefits of a more efficient slaughterhouse."

I don't want the "benefits" of relevant advertising.

I hope Google's moves are too little too late to avoid regulation. We really need regulation.
Man, we're back full-circle to OG Twitter, I suppose :D

This is delightful, I really like it.
Regarding testing, that sounds like a great use case but I had trouble locating information on your website about it.
Was literally thinking the Rick & Morty tie-in would be that Morty gets a pet cuttlefish who not only speaks, but insists that even though he is stuck in this aquarium, he says it is preferable to the pathetic existential prison of their inferior human minds, and he uses his mesmerizing persuasive power to turn the rest of the house into a hippie comumune of drifters who do whatever he wants, and ultimately directs them to attack celebrities. The cuttlefish's name is Charlie.

Recurring villain, probably gets his own show.
Afaik, no. Before contraception, sex meant babies. Babies meant someone to feed and work for. Kids were always an expense for years, it takes at least 7-8 years till they sorta kinda can earn for themselves.

Traditional cultures would do a lot to control the sex of their unmarried daughters, because that would mean babies to care for and that means a lot of additional troubles.
I would expect it to get worse, over time, too. When the block reward was high, it meant that the (strictly financial) cost of actually operating the Bitcoin network was covered by Bitcoin dilution, which meant that everyone was paying it pro rata based on how much Bitcoin they actually own. As the block reward decreases, though, it increasingly has to be covered by transaction costs. That's going to progressively price people out of participation in the direct Bitcoin economy.

I can see using Bitcoin as a primary wealth store, similar to gold. I agree, it would have most the same social features, which seems problematic since none of that is really in line with Bitcoin's original political vision, but I'm not sure Bitcoin's original political vision is anything more than a piece of nostalgia cherished by people sitting on the periphery of the contemporary Bitcoin economy, anyway, so maybe that's no big deal.

The bigger problem I see with Bitcoin relative to something like gold is that it has some troubling practicalities. It's theoretically much easier to steal vast sums of Bitcoin in one go (because 1,000,000 BTC wouldn't be quite as subject to conservation of momentum as a tonne of gold bars would be), and it's definitely much easier for vast sums of Bitcoin to accidentally poof off into a crypotgraphic pocket universe where nobody can reach it anymore.
I know. But these are not as fundamentally important as the complex numbers.
So teaching multiplication ends up as "whatever the calculator does when I press this button"?
Yes, very clever social signaling of assumed smartness.

However, both set theory and category theory are canonical examples of synthetic purely abstract theories, which include paradoxes, while repeated addition (which is just merging together) is deeply grounded in reality.

Putting an abstract theories first is the same flaw as with Froidian psychology, Marxism, and all the other abstract bullshitting, from Hegel onwards.
Right: in a world of similar market participants short selling is super valuable.

But what about when a market actor has enough wealth to massively short sell and enough media pull to be able to create a self-fulfilling prophecy about a company being in bad shape? (And enough pull with regulators to be let off the hook with the lightest of penalties?) This is when the market is no longer healthy nor free.
COTS -> Commercial off-the-shelf

RCS -> Radar cross section
> Serious question, why?

IIRC, mobile Wikipedia has a bigger font, is less information dense, and the navigation doesn't work as well.

> If you're on a phone, does the non-mobile link redirect to mobile?

Pretty sure they do, but the reverse isn't true.
Just for those who don't know Russian: the name can be read as "I'm the dick".
> Happy to answer more questions...

Does these kind of solutions work for every cryptocurrencies? For example does is support Bitcoin? Or is this something that needs some kind of smart contract like those provided by Ethereum?

And another question: what about optionally fully anonymous transaction as in ZCash, does the scheme work to sign tx done using ZK proofs too? Or fully anonymous ones, like David Chaum's upcoming "xx coin"?
> "Let us know which of these categories apply to you, so we can tailor your browsing to your interests"

This prompt will never happen. The last thing Google wants is any additional association between their brand and advertising.

Google's mode of operation has always been to sneak in the back door and count how many boxes of cereal you have while you are looking at underwear. Knocking on the front door and to ask if they can come in would likely never occur to them.

There is no mention of Chrome being an ad supported product anywhere when you install it. They want that association completely out of people's heads.
What if it's less profitable to run a paid search engine? Will they run both free/paid side-by-side? And how can one be certain they won't profit off the query data on the backend anyways?

Is there any reason I should think Brave won't prioritize profit motives first in 5, 10 years when investors or markets expect returns?
Given the budget deadlocks, the government shutdowns, the constant temporary budgets, I'm not sure that I would say that the US is "able" to write a check for much of anything, at least not without a multi-year debate and an election or two to decide the issue.
You're on the right track with that comparison but need to connect the dots. Humanity's next stage of evolution is to Oneness imo.
Interesting to me how communities form ideas around this. While “piracy is not theft”, you’ll see people talk about how some repost “stole my content” with lots of support for the supposed victim.

Simultaneously, some people will say that they are contributing by using a product and telling their friends while others will post on /r/choosingbeggars to mock the exposure argument.

This implies we are somewhat short of universal agreement on this subject: perhaps far enough that we cannot determine that just because “piracy is not theft”, it does not mean it is acceptable.
Yeah, we got it as bonus homework, to derive it ourselves.
Theft is relevant to cash, but murder isn't.
Interesting!

If any puppeteer developers would also find it useful, let us know - it's always good to know something is wanted before you make it.
Boy isn't that the truth. I actively avoid them but sometimes you just can't like with signal-desktop. I actually have to keep it running because I don't want to reach for my phone every 10 minutes. Something as simple as that interface doesn't need electron but oh well. Maybe a lite version with just text and contacts would be acceptable. I don't need stickers, gifs and emojis.
I use the CLI command (php spider.php -u <url> -f (full) -l (leave domain) -r (re-crawl)

that is How I crawl.
I crawl websites that I use on a daily basis, I also target websites that are for open source projects and the likes, but once I start my spider on a website it will just keep going and going and going hopping different websites. and if you want you can submit a url to nate.sturtz@sturtz.cf it just has to be a SFW website.
I hope this answered your question.
Lord Ruler!
The Cliqz Tech blog : https://0x65.dev contains many informations about how their constructed their private search engine.
Or better to https://yacy.net or SearX.
> It is necessary, but not sufficient

Doesn't DDG contradict that?
>They just want to see hedge funds lose money

more accurately, they wanted to see one hedge fund lose money, others, and plenty of private equity firms like Silver Lake have made a killing because of the spectacle. And I'm sure Jim Cramer loves the attention too even if he has to play the enraged TV personality for a while.
The Cliqz Tech blog : https://0x65.dev contains many informations about how their constructed their private search engine
Cloudflare Pages open beta
They are better. Maybe not to you but there's a reason Google is as big as it is. DDG, Bing, etc. are just awful.
Microsoft Unveils Mesh, a Mixed-Reality Platform to Connect People
Show HN: The Scarf Gateway – Container download analytics, registry decoupling
Nano Digital Currency Under DDoS: 1,2M tx and holding 0.27 avg Confirmation time
There are arguments that the Amazon is pushing down warehouse worker salaries [0,1] (i.e. $15/hr is certainly not the highest warehouse worker wage).

I read this campaign mainly as a public relations move in attempt to undermine union bargaining for substantial material demands, and am happy to hear other views.

[0]: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-12-17/amazon-am...
[1]: https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3gj87/why-amazon-is-floodin...
"https://nanolooker.com/

It appears someone is testing out the Nano network with a spam attack, so far there have been over 1,000,000 transactions in 24 hours and they have an average confirmation time of 0.27 seconds.

While this is happening, you can test the network and everything is still instant.

Edit: Now over 1,200,000 and counting.

If you want to compare transaction number to Bitcoin:

https://www.nano-fountain.com/

Btc fountain:

https://www.bitcoin-fountain.com/

Here are some other Nano network traffic visualisers.

https://snow.somenano.com/

https://plinko.somenano.com/

https://nanonv.com/"

Vía:

- https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/lwom5z/1000...
> without having read the article due to paywall,

https://archive.vn/qlvcE
Multi-sig for retail is great, and I use it myself. But you're held to a completely different standard in term of security and compliance as a financial insitution. And this applies to: software, hardware, operations, ceremonies, business continuity (what if the business goes bankrupt, what if country 'xyz' gets nuked etc..).
> You don't have to be some 6ft tall hunk to land a woman. It definitely helps but it isn't required.

This is true, but what you do need is access to women so that you can learn what they want.

If those women have a low incentive to spend time with less physically (or financially) attractive men, it’s going to be hard for the less attractive ones to develop the necessary capacities.
This is a good point - we haven't put it in our marketing yet, the use-case is new. Here's a non-public landing page though!

https://axiom.ai/automate-testing

We also have this public recipe:

https://web.axiom.ai/recipe/test-user-interactions
> We've seen billion dollar IPOs on hype alone.

Can you give some examples?

I would expect a company of this magnitude to have done a proper research before paying out half a billion dollars for an acquisition that's not based on hype alone.
Yeah but throw in firefox or chrome and some electron apps and your processor will be crying and your memory starting to overflow.
Misbehavior manifests even on x86, see the tracking https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27060 for examples. If you have more information, please leave a comment there.
I guess we could come up with a number of reasons; some unlikely, some very scary. My point was different, i.e. that nobody knows for sure yet.
Are you saying that because they aren't actively coming to your house and holding your hands away from the keyboard, the fact that they sell closed source hardware is neutral?
Also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26328758
Because they're so dominant they can make changes to the system that make it worse. Haven't you noticed the decline in quality of Google search results over these past few years?
You can choose what DuckDuckGo uses for search, including anonymous proxying of search queries to Google.
$500m to hedge a $300b business. Could it be done cheaper? Perhaps. But this seems like a pretty obvious transaction. In 5 years if crypto is just a flash in the pan, nobody will even remember $500m. If however crypto is the future, then Paypal remain relevant and $300b of market cap is defended.
The Spanish Flu wasn't Spanish at all
Most nutrition research is bad. Everybody gets a chance to espouse their favorite theories in the comments. How could it be otherwise? Doing good research in this space is expensive.
You could, just a different kind of risk/chance. I guess most people want better odds than the lottery gives.
Competing with Google is going to be difficult. I have a question: What is the consensus on forwarding any search "terms" to Google and then "scraping" the results back into the user - sort of a "proxy" search.

I mean - Google built their business on searching the internet, why can't there be a business that starts by searching Google?
Speaking of “lies to children”, and since you are a physicist, it was only in my last year studying EE that Feynman’s QED came my way and just imagine my surprise on finding that photons do not travel in a straight line.

(I do agree with your pedagogical position.)
Amazon Tweaks Their New iOS App Icon
Like my children’s m of n trust fund hopefully I didn’t typo the priv key amirite. That might suck for them after I die.
To add, it is hard for companies to resist double dipping. Why have one revenue stream when you can have two? So you do sign up and you come to find out you were still being tracked, you still have ads, etc. You are paying and you are the product. And since services on the internet are currently very centralized, the few big players have little incentive to offer a true paid service without worrying that anyone else can break into the game and really disrupt their market share.
Follow-up question, can I screenshot webpages that it visits?
Agreed, but I've found that when discussing these things logic isn't often taken into account anymore due to matters of sensitivity and bias. It's frustrating.
It's not an advertisement and it's not about "savings account." It specifically uses wording to avoid that.

CNN: Only 39% of Americans can afford a $1,000 emergency expense

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/11/success/1000-emergency-expens...
Crypto has been around for 12 years and has gone from zero to well over $1 trillion mcap. I doubt it will go back to zero.
*according to someone on twitter.
I think you’re missing the key component of payment. They cost very little, and, they work extra hours for free. It’s not really a myth. Some of the most successful companies in my region is doing exactly this sort of thing. The quality isn’t as good, and your know-how leaves once they “grow up”, but it’s proving to be a really good business model.

Which from a management perspective can be explained as the following: In non tech you buy software and development time, and projects almost always fail to deliver on time or within budget regardless of which company you go with. At the same time, the biggest note on your budget is the upfront cost. Even if you end up spending more by going with these junior exploitative companies in the long run, it’s still easier to justify picking them when you’re talking up the latter, because they charge 3-40% less an hour.

On top of that there are different kinds of productivity. There’s the senior developer who does things right, but non-tech clients don’t give a shit about that, they just want something that works most of the time. Which again is more expensive in the long run, but nobody in management is around for long enough to realise, and or, learn from past experiences based on real data. No, in management you learn with how much praise your project gets, and it doesn’t really have to be sound technically to get that.
I rather dislike this way of saying things. A matrix is a matrix, its a table of numbers, and one can usefully define operations like addition and multiplication on them.

A linear map is a linear map, it maps between vector spaces and it obeys some nice axioms. You can define addition and composition as operations on them.

It is a quite interesting and non-trivial theorem that if you fix a particular choice of basis then you get "for free" a bijection between linear maps and matrices. The bijection between matrices and linear maps is completely dependent on the basis you choose, however, and there certainly isn't a canonical way to choose the basis.

Often it is natural to change basis to make it easier solve some particular problem, and then the matrix that represents a particular linear map will change, but the properties of the linear map won't change (for example its rank, kernel, eigenvectors/values etc).
Speaking as a senior software engineer, where I develop software to bring food to my table, Amazon is a monopoly and should be broken up under anti trust rules.

Amazon as a business is about rent seeking and taxing internet commerce and engages in predatory monopoly behavior. They are actively suppressing tech competition and free market activity in e-commerce space.

The Amazon workers union should expand to cover he entire country.

Anyone that thinks this is about free market and Amazon is just a private company doesn’t have a clue. Amazon is quasi government actor now, where they are the only game in some small company towns. Jeff Bezos owns Washington Post and exerts undue influence on many politicians. Amazon has contracts with CIA and military.

As a software engineer, do you want a future where Amazon is the only employer and can undercut the salary to their liking?
Google Fonts used to have this great feature where I can select a number of fonts and view them all on a single page. It was super useful because I can type in any text and preview the text in these selected fonts.

However, I can't seem to find this feature any more. Right now if I select fonts, they just show up in the sidebar. But I can preview them in any way.

There's gotta be something that I missed?
AWS faulty UX cost our business $7k and they refused to do anything about it
Good question: you can define m↑↑n as:

\m n -> n (exp m) 1'

where `exp` is Church exponentiation, `flip id`, and `1'` is the Church numeral for 1, that is, `id`. According to pointfree.io this expands to:

flip flip id . flip id . flip id

Which isn't particularly illuminating. Pentation isn't much worse, though:

flip flip id . flip id . flip flip id . flip id . flip id
WordPress 5.7 Field Guide
Updating Snap Bases
tab discard extensions go a long way toward keeping browsers under control, just pin the tabs that you absolutely can't wait 3 seconds for them to reload or because you need notifications from them.
Hedge funds make money by having better information than their opponents. When buy and HODL appears on national news, you know that hedge funds are accounting for this in their strategy. It's naive to assume that activist investors could hurt them at this point.
Python is not a great programming language.
I have no interest in cryptocurrencies and I don’t own a single cent in any of them. But the continual barrage of hostile comments in every single HN article looks mostly like groupthink to me.

Clearly cryptocurrency will continue to play a growing role in the future. Denying this seems simply delusional.
This statement is correct, but doesn't address the problem with the OP's calculation.

This fund is up basically entirely on the strength of TSLA being up 700%. OP is basically considering two possibilities:

1. TSLA stock is a driftless geometric Brownian motion with a volatility matching that of the general market, and happened to get a 700% return purely by chance, or

2. The fund manager, due to his exceptional skill, knew that TSLA was going to be up 700%.

The OP is rejecting option (1) and then concluding that option (2) must be the case.

Of course in reality neither is the case and the OP's calculation is totally irrelevant.
> What is the upside to a publisher of publishing a book widely (though not universally) considered offensive?

Gosh! Now that I think of it, I honestly can't see any! Publishers are directly responsible for giving a platform to thought, and therefore, for giving that thought legs.

I only regret not thinking of this centuries ago, and using it to cen^H^H^H decide not to publish many of the things today that are considered normal, back when they were considered widely offensive!
Transformer Modifications Fail to Transfer Implementations and Applications
Ah, thats a bummer. I'd thought about trying out Pi-hole to block ads on our mobile devices and smart TV.
A lot of casual sex before pill means a lot of babies out of wedlock. So, you can count prevalence of out out of wedlock babies to have estimate on hidden casual sex.
You're assuming a 1 to 1 relationship, which isn't the case. A minority of men have sex with many women, and many men have sex with no women.
It's just that matrix multiplication is not the same thing as scaler multiplication. I think you need to understand that no matter how you define or think of scaler multiplication.
Do you have a source on Marissa Mayer getting bad performance reviews? I wasn't able to find anything on that.
The US Government spent approximately $5 trillion in 2020 and will spend between $5 trillion and $7 trillion in 2021. Roughly $5 trillion of that is committed and generally not up for debate. That's the relevant range.
It’s the entire product.
Oh we're talking real money. JPL will destroy 78 production grade parachutes to find all the ways they can break. There is tremendous energy poured into eliminating risk, because launch is so expensive. As it becomes cheaper, perhaps these measures won't be as necessary.
No, productive means profitable. It’s the only thing that counts.
I design websites that are to be used with primarily desktop screens. If you want to use an unsupported configuration such as a tiny screen or with no screen then it is not my fault if it does not work well.

It's good that you're this steadfast in your righteousness. That way you know why so many businesses don't consider hiring you.