skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because the only things it does tangibly effect are your mood and mental perspective, things that are entirely subjective and do not have concrete metrics that can be used for measurement, especially when comparing that between different subjects.

The only really noticeable effect of microdosing is at the end of the day you might notice you feel it was a really good day and you're happy. The thing is though this isn't distinguishable from someone simply having a good day and feeling happy. The data collected in this study would have essentially been irrelevant noise, based more on the aggregate of day-to-day experiences of the subjects rather than whether or not they received a placebo.

Microdosing inherently is indistinguishable from a placebo effect as far as empirical measurements go. If the participants who received a microdose were able to somehow measure their experience with a different result to those in the control group, then they weren't microdosing, they were actually tripping.
They don't get silage unless the farmer makes a point of it. Most of the time the stalks and chaff and spit out the back of the combine and tilled under. Furthermore they'd get penalized for it in weighing if its mixed in with the corn so there's little to no incentive for the extra work of it. If the farmer has a small enough herd though they may let them roam on the field afterward, but the big lots don't do that.
Forgive my ignorance but is this similar to SAM, from their docs:
> 'Use SAM CLI to step-through and debug your code. It provides a Lambda-like execution environment locally and helps you catch issues upfront. '
Maybe over the weekend if I can carve out a few hours I'll put together an open source site and share here.
Been happening for years if not decades
Advanced research is happening all over the country (even in your very own backyard in Silicon Valley). You just aren't looking for these types of jobs or are too distracted by the shiny compensation packages
Don’t be lazy, you can confirm the post with a quick search.

What are you trying to say anyway? Cool, so you don’t know what’s going on, and don’t particularly care. So what?
Are you telling me that we've built a whole sewer system for human poop, but we'll be screwed by a few million pounds of decomposable horse manure?
Most people (at least retail investors) don't measure doing "well" against a benchmark. i.e everyone can be doing well in a bull market.
The risk section of an S-1, should be taken with a grain of salt. Half the items there are simply cookie cutter templates that simply provide protection if their stock goes to 0 and they get sued. Here's is the exact same line from coinbase's S1

> Due to our limited operating history, it may be difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects, and we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability in any given period. [1]

[1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1679788/000162828021...

You will also find "risks" such as "if we fail to add new customers, our business will fail."
This is not a timeline, but it states the objectives of the helicopter and contains a check list of them.

https://mars.nasa.gov/technology/helicopter/
Interesting. Do your trading strategies still work, or has the market become too efficient? Did you ever trade in a bear market, and by how much did you beat returns on holding just BTC and ETH?
Note that it’s unclear which regions this could be because this was only a string found when deconstructing the release.
they refuse to explain why "so people dont game the system"

Like being accused of a crime, but not told which crime, so you "don't game the legal system".
"move fast and break things"

More like "move fast and break yourself."
Surely it would be a horrible idea to distribute radioactive materials to the general population.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goi%C3%A2nia_accident
People are probably going to answer “safety”.

But it’s also hideously expensive. Plutonium is, apparently, one of the safer ways to build these things, because it is easy to shield, and the power density is good. But plutonium, as it’s not naturally occurring, is stratospherically expensive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_ge...
In the U.S. the phrase is "a person having ordinary skill in the art".[1] In other jurisdictions where this isn't explicit, it's usually implied that the benchmark is ordinary, average, or similar.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/103
Economies of scale would surely change that though?
Exactly, you purchase BTC instead of watching the value of your fiat drop every day. Apps like Celsius offer far superior APY than traditional savings accounts. Also, look at all the institutional BTC purchases near BTC ATH. Are they all wrong?
I would have though so, but this paper made me reconsider that.

Fungi are eukaryotes, but very special - neither animal nor plant, while they have some properties of each (ex: can store glycogen like animals)

Maybe the last common ancestor was closer to bacteria than archaea, and from that point significant properties were not gained (nuclei, mitochondria...), but lost (ex: no more glycogen for plants!) - a mind blowing thought!!
These nano shills are getting annoying.
I meant a carrot is something that would probably be more individualized than say a strawberry. So I get your point about eating from plants that grow back, but I guess a carrot wouldn’t fall under that categorization.

Also, what about animals that regrow limbs? Would you eat the arms of a starfish every so often?
Yup, we'll be working on it soon. Interestingly, we get more request for Go than Python!
> Lmao, that's not how AGPL works.

The GPL family, including the AGPL, defines source code that must be provided as “the preferred form for making changes”; if the form the distributor uses is a VCS repository with full history, publishing either static snapshots or a repository with an expurgated history could arguably be a violation of both the letter and the spirit of the licenses. The language of the licenses makes the requirement dependent on actual development practices, not fixed, and that's not an accident.
How does this compares to AutoHotKey?
The inner game of tennis
Fast Video Object Segmentation Using the Global Context Module
> can run on pretty much any modern platform under the sun

Which is why web apps shine. Near-universal reach.
Not giving money to Google if you buy used.

Also, not weird in the context of Google actively maintaining their position as a a top security firm these days, with Project Zero.
Google privacy is 0%, security is high 90s%
Great idea. The ability to send to multiple destinations is convenient.
I am not sure that I want to get reminded every code review that I am from a country without boulders or mountains
thank you, I am sure you save a lot of time for a lot of people. There is an interesting conversation in the movie
"wall street". Bud Fox tries to make a sale pitch to Gordon
Gekko. After awhile, Gordon says: Now tell me something
I don't know.
How would this affect Uipath, Automationanywhere and other windows only RPA providers?

Now that RPA is pretty much free and part of the operating system, would companies still pay for RPA?
Precursor to the Gorgon Stare systems? [1]

I assume 70 years of tech has only resulted in surveillance that is cheaper, lighter, with longer loiter times, on a smaller plane, farther away, and a clearer, faster image.

And since politicians never listen to me, I feel helpless to vote it down.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgon_stare
Then why don’t we just anesthetize animals before slaughtering them? Seems like it would take care of your concern.
If you click through to his Ebay page, he has quite a few interesting things for sale.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/abeja/m.html
Huh, interesting. Reminds of an "enterprise" version of Apple's Automator tool. I always wished Apple had taken the premise of Automator and blended it with the UI of Quartz Composer.

It looks like Microsoft is a few steps closer to that kind of thing with Power Automate.
This reminds me of the old school press releases from IBM research. But now look how far they have fallen:
https://www.jamf.com/resources/press-releases/ibm-announces-...
False, smart contracts have so much demand that Ethereum gas prices have skyrocketed in the past year
Do these phones even have boot security?
Your comparison of his investing style to the broad market is incredibly far off. If you want to make calculations at least do it off a more accurate benchmark and not the S&P 500. Something like ARKK or at least QQQ.
For years WebGL has been exposed to every website you visit with no permission prompt, and WebGPU soon will be too. It is possible to expose GPUs securely and the WebGPU API is designed with sandboxing and security in mind.

Edit: I believe the bug you linked below (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=20...) can't be exploited through WebGL or WebGPU in the browser because all GPU access is remoted to a separate process with a special GPU sandbox. I don't know if Deno does this but it should.
Fascinating. They claim to have data from respectable sources and yet don't link them. They only link news stories of people talking about negative effects of climate change and an Amazon link to their book.
Probably an edge case. From what i've seen these edgecase errors are quickly fixed/intervened by a human and fixed.

(i have no personal experience with popular sites personal/free-tier sites sadly)
I used https://github.com/nekobato/deno-xml-parser which worked fine for my use-case. It's 1 TS file with no dependencies.
https://www.amazon.com/UNIX-Systems-Programming-Communicatio...

Has several small projects, it is not a book for complete beginners though.

There is also an old book which re-implements several Unix commands, but I cannot remember it's name and google is not helping.
> We shouldn't call out and shame individuals for making a mistake like this.

Yes we should. This individual is the company. He's the CTO. "Chief" Technology Officer. The buck has to stop somewhere. How can you possibly suggest with a straight face that he should not be held professionally responsible for the code that:

A) He personally wrote
B) He is responsible for professionally as the CTO
I doubt it's worth writing this into the core of Deno to support a dying markup language.
Assume it's a false positive for fraud. If you have false positives in your fraud detection and refuse to explain the situation to customers so they can refute the claim, how do you ever fix your broken detection system? Do you simply claim you're batting 1000 and call it a day?

I just logged in to PayPal a couple days ago using my residential IP (unchanged for 2 years), a random (strong, unique) password, and a Yubikey only to be told suspicious activity on my account required me to change my password. From my point of view they randomly picked something they think is suspicious and it triggered something somewhere I guess? Is it suspicious login activity / attempts or suspicious activity like the person here is describing? Am I doing something suspicious or is a nefarious 3rd party doing something suspicious?

Thankfully I don't really use PayPal for anything important and I never will given the terrible stories I've hear for most of my adult life.
Carrier unlocked Pixel 3+ on Swappa.com, GrapheneOS.org.

Web install takes moments these days, can be done by any 8th grader with a GrapheneOS phone, or PC with any major browser and a USB C cable.
Matt Levine’s Bloomberg column applies a similar savvy dry humor to finance topics, I don’t actually care much for finance but I read it because it’s great writing and illustrates how to make dense and uninteresting topics approachable and engaging.
No measurable effect is not the same as volunteer's perception of it's effect. A comprehensive psychiatric evaluation uses a series of smaller evaluations that includes a self assessment as well as other assessments for memory, speech etc [0][1].

[0]: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-t...
[1]: http://www.brooklynlearningcenter.com/services/what-it-consi...
Then go to the same engine and see autocompletes for "ground beef smells". Given enough sample, there would be some people complaining about random weird things, and those are the people typing such searches in search engines.
No, throughout this entire thread I have been specific about:

- Cities/metros, not the entire US.

- I was also specific about cities/metros that are experiencing a housing crisis, and not making an argument that all metros are in a housing crisis.

- I then cited my sources, and once again was specific about wage growth in top metros and how many have failed to grow their housing supply along with wages. That 86% of the U.S. is urbanized and growing 1% faster than average is not the issue here, it's that where growth is happening, supply is not keeping up.

- I then argued that restrictive policies are constraining supply. In the case of this article pertaining to Berlin, it's rent control. Metros in the U.S. with supply constrains (Like the SF Bay) also use rent control and limit supply.

Despite being specific, you keep conflating my arguments, or steering away from my core argument: Constrained housing supply is not keeping up with demand. I'm also arguing that it isn't impossible to build enough supply to keep up with demand.
HTTP: //www.theredfork.org/optimum-blood-pressure-drops/
Optimum Blood Pressure Drops =>>This creative recipe will uphold dealing with your blood pressure and blood sugar levels better when contrasting different items that you can find in the disconnected or online store.
This triple-activity recipe will do the best to help individuals with100% uncommon common fixings at the correct dose to advance in general solid blood levels.

http://www.theredfork.org/optimum-blood-pressure-drops/
The one I have meant was "jQuery in action", at the time that left a bigger impact as far learning is concerned. The jQuery team had promises and other things long before they became part of the standard API, he explains how they made it work.

However, secrets of a js ninja is very good as well, touches newer things like generators and es6, es7 features.
JavaScript apis for browsers can do a lot now. It’s great! I built something similar recently with Mozilla’s PDF library. It’s for diffing PDFs but everything happens locally. https://parepdf.com
Sure, as soon as I can de-apple my iPhone, and side-load apps. Apple is even worse than Google.
I used that method early on after some magazine published it. Was either BYTE or Creative Computing.

Was a teen at the time.

And it worked!

Back then, one could either display to screen, or dump to a printer, or file.

The paper was where this method shined.

And the beauty of it was having a plan and compartmentalizing the problems.

Start with program flow. And on 6502, 6809, which were the chips I was learning on, that was branch, jump, jump to subroutine, and a few other tricks, like pushing addresses on to the stack, then returning from subroutine. RTS.

I used colored pencil though. Highlighters were too big of a commit. Otherwise, yeah. Just start finding where program flow changes.

Structure just kind of happens! You are going along and insight hits. Early on, it hit over and over too. Small programs printed and in a binder became a sort of library. Examples, snippits, notes, tricks.

From there, one just peels back the onion. Loads, stores, program, data, math, compares as math...

Was very empowering frankly.

Also learned about the power of commenting.

Many attempts other peers and I did before checking out Lancaster, boiled down to literal descriptions.

LDA sprite, X 'Load A with contents of address, plus X
STA (screen), Y. 'Store A to address pointer, plus Y

The better way was to talk about what was happening!

LDA sprite, X 'get sprite data
STA (screen), Y. 'write to display

After a time, things like the Apple ROM listing made sense. Soon after that, our programs made sense to one another.

The other benefit of these two things combined was coding on paper. Thinking through printed out listings helped when writing programs out.

And often, I would start with an ORG statement, some EQU (equates) to define important values and addresses and then just write the comments.

If it reads well and each line contains one action, it translates into assembly language pretty well, maybe taking two or a few instructions. No big. Just work the problem a line at a time and before one knows it, a routine is done.

On the more fancy computers, we had sprites and sound chips. Writing values in places did a lot.

On the Apple 2 computers, there was none of that. But also pretty much everything needed software.

People made bits. Blitter, math, sounds, etc...

That simple (well, screen memory excepted) system, coupled with how Lancaster tended to think and communicate, proved effective. I left High School in the 80's basically fluent in 6809 and 6502 assembly and machine language and able to write non trivial programs, and or use them in tandem with high level languages to make applications.

I am not saying Lancaster's work was responsible. We all had magazines, teachers (who varied in what they could speak to), mentors, books and one another.

But, how he approached problems was a definite influence and I would argue a definite multiplier on progress.

Good times. Interesting character. Great influence.
No, my complaint is, as said, hat for-loops in Python do not create a block scope as they do in about any other language. The closure is simply a way to illustrate that but there are many other problems such as this one:

x = something
# some lines of code
for x in iterator:
# something
# try to use x again here
# x has been re-assigned by the loop

In about any other language, the loop would create it's own scope, and thus shadow the existence of the outer `x`, rather than re-assigning it.
Plutonium-238 can only be made via Uranium-238. Per the Seaborg process, you must bombard U-238 with deuterons to get Neptunium-238, which then further decays into Pu-238. The Pu-238 then decays into U-234 with a half life of ~88 years. U-234 has a half life of ~200,000 years, btw.

It is very unlikely that the production of Pu-238 would cost less to produce than the container and the apparatus that harvests the energy.

Let alone the issues with the waste products of U-234 hanging about in the kitchen or basement. If you think climate change is bad as is, add in what people will do when faced with surplus uranium waste removal costs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-238
> oh, theys a bawd bawd company

wow is that what I sound like
The reason for that high of a price tag is that the engineering costs are spread over a very few units. If they made 100,000 of them, the costs would be much closer to the materials cost.
I really don't think you should use C as a teaching language. There are way too many pitfalls, and using libraries is quite cumbersome.
Don't worry about feeling bad for me, I'll do so for you instead.

To lack self-awareness so badly to leave the comments you've left here... You must be truly sheltered, and I apologize for that.
This smells like early testing, not something that’s gonna be triggered imminently. macOS doesn’t even have reliable locale detection, it relies on users to supply their own preferences. Abruptly removing Rosetta 2 for any reason would cause a huge backlash. There’s no way they’re just gonna slip that into a point release.
Facebook has had multiple injection exploits, including SQL and JS RCEs. It's possible no senior were the git blame behind them, but it's absolutely impossible that no seniors reviewed and then maintained that code.

WhatsApp had a raw JavaScript RCE literally last year.

Also, blaming colleagues for making a mistake is extremely toxic behavior. I've fixed dozens of >9.0 CVSS vulnerabilities at multiple billion-dollar organizations. I'd say senior engineers were involved in their introduction at least half of the time.
You also seemed to miss this part of the article, which is very telling beyond just shaming someone

> Besides the commit raising questions about Gab’s process for developing secure code, the social media site is also facing criticism for removing the commits from its website. Critics say the move violates terms of the Affero General Public License, which governs Gab’s reuse of Mastodon, an open source software package for hosting social networking platforms.

Gab is likely breaking license agreements by performing this sort of cover up. So yes, this is newsworthy.
I assume if you had consistent success you were doing more than time series forecasting on prices. Any chance you can elaborate a bit about what were the model inputs and outputs?
From Merriam-Webster: "a situation in which a public figure (such as a political leader) is deliberately presented to the people of a country as a great person who should be admired and loved". Wikipedia mentions the use of mass media, propaganda, spectacle, etc. "to create an idealized, heroic, and worshipful image of a leader, often through unquestioning flattery and praise". I see nothing there about splitting the party and revenge. Remember these?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJFC1qFCgyA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTm5rp8r6fE&feature=emb_logo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOtGr1JFCnE&feature=emb_imp_...
The link never loads for me.
Yes - the ESP32 is capable of Bluetooth Low Energy to talk with your phone. But, you're responsible for implementing the functionality you want yourself.
I got fired from people.ai for having a bug slip into production. I had put it behind a feature flag so only our employees could see. Still got fired.
What are the "dark spot anomalies" that appear to be floating in the air in some images (1, 2)? Dust on the camera lens? I've never looked at any rover images so I assume someone knows.

Also, whay are the images fairly low resolution compared to a phones camera. Does it have to do with image data transmission error?

Finally (then I'll shut up), when do we get to see the stereo images? I want to see these on my Vive.

1.) https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/multimedia/raw-images/NLE_000...

2.) https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/multimedia/raw-images/SI0_001...
No they don't. If you do something as blindingly stupid as this, you don't deserve commit access.
> he’s well known for his TTL Cookbook and CMOS Cookbook.

Those two books were my best purchases back in the day, they helped immensely to grasp the technology. I see they're now free for download at Don's page, and they're still relevant today. I would highly recommend them to all newcomers to electronics.
Yeah it's a little confusing to describe the difference. But what most of the tools currently do is, locally mock a Lambda function execution. You cannot test anything beyond that.

For example, if your Lambda function publishes to a SNS topic that invokes another Lambda function. You can only test this locally my mocking the inputs for the first one, testing that. And repeating it for the second one.

With SST, it deploys this stack to AWS. So when you trigger this workflow, both the Lambda functions get invoked on your local machine. You don't need to mock anything. It is as if they were invoked live.
You can be clever in personal files, say ~/.bash_profile — for your user personally.

But never in scripts used in production that must be maintained by a group.

That rule served me well for many years. YMMV
Plutonium is fairly rare, so I'm not sure it could be scaled up easily, even if there was a demand for it. Not to mention we probably don't want the raw material for nuclear bombs to be inside easily accessible home appliances...
Can you do the math on how much land you would need to have all the cattle in the world graze? To save you time, it does not compute with our Earth.

Suggesting any solution which is not scalable to the whole world is not a solution at all. For example Joe Rogan is talking about how hunting as being ethical way to get meat. But what would happen if 7 billion people hunted their meat?