skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is that there is no economic case for ferrying stuff to and from Mars. There is nearly nothing on Mars that anyone on Earth will pay a premium that will pay the costs of colonization off. It's the ultimate exercise of ditch-digging, and ditch-filling, with the justification that doing so accelerates the technological development of ditch-digging instruments. Which is both technically correct, and also completely insane.
It will be difficult to displace the restaurant in search results as well as popular culture, especially for a US-based startup.
To each her own, but I see the complex browser such as Chrome, Edge and Mozilla as part of the problem. Javascript too. Neither is inherently problematic, but both are too often used to create problems for users (to serve advertisers' interests) rather than to solve them. For example, without Chrome/Edge/Mozilla plus Javascript, "paywall" does not work. Yet I can still read the WSJ article just fine with either Chrome/Edge/Mozilla nor Javascript.

Much like a tech company that wants www readers to believe it is working to solve a problem www users are having that the tech company itself created (which, it just so happens, is not a problem at all for advertisers).
Probably because of this: https://forum.f-droid.org/t/signal-wickr-on-f-droid-2021/122....
Doing DOM modifications is still much more verbose than using jquery.
A 2018 study [1] showed that kids conceived via IVF had abnormal arterial development. IIRC, teenagers had arteries that were as stiff as an average 40-year-old.

1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815705/
Aaaw, thanks Apple. You're a mensch.

-_-
While the sentiment is generally understood, you should really mention that the type B didn't fix the main issue of Type A, in that it didn't recess the face and/or extend the prongs with a protective sleeve.
> Although low resolution image uploads doesn't seem very useful

They are still very high resolution. They're just not the original 50 MB file. It worked perfectly well for the overwhelming majority of people.

Pixel offered unlimited storage even for uncompressed photos, but that option was also discontinued a few years ago.
The value behind that attitude is that it is a problem to think that women are the ones expected to choose staying-at-home, when culturally this expectation should be distributed equally among genders.
Red Balloon Security | New York, NY | Full time and Interns | Onsite | Visa welcome | Undergraduate, Masters, PhD| Rolling start dates/application deadline|redballoonsecurity.com

About Us:
Red Balloon Security is a venture backed startup cyber security company headquartered in New York City. Our mission is to provide embedded device manufacturers with strong host-based firmware security. We believe all embedded devices require strong protections against malware and intrusions, and seek to provide these protections to our customers.

Our key markets include enterprise equipment, automotive, medical, unified communications, SCADA, Internet-of-Things, network infrastructure and more. There is a vast universe of vulnerable embedded devices deployed around the world that need security.

We have created a means to inject our Symbiote host-based security technology onto any device, regardless of CPU type, regardless of functionality, regardless of operating system and without changing the performance and functionality of the device. We do not require access to customer source code, nor do we require manufacturers to change their product design to accommodate our security solution.

Red Balloon Security offers a full benefits package, 401k, a generous vacation policy, and paid health and dental plans. The company is located in Midtown West in New York City. We are an Equal Opportunity Employer of minorities, women, protected veterans, and individuals with disabilities.

Open Positions:

Security Researcher / Security Software Engineer
Software Engineer
Business Development Strategist
Security Intern
Business Development Intern

More detailed job descriptions: https://redballoonsecurity.com/jobs/
To apply, email the following addresses:

• Security Researcher/Security Software Engineer/Security Intern: jobs-researcher@redballoonsecurity.com
• Software Engineer: jobs-software@redballoonsecurity.com
• Business Development Strategist/Intern: jobs-business@redballoonsecurity.com
Links:

https://open.spotify.com/track/2in7T2TWPkJW6Z6Ih9P4Ew?si=7e6...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTcl20dgHSM

Sounds identical (and very noisy) on Spotify and Youtube on my very crappy laptop speakers. I don't own the CD.
Not necessarily. For one, most fMRI studies will have a resting state scan to establish a baseline of what an individual's brain is doing in an MRI setting when it's not really doing anything in particular (typically having the subject stare at a fixation cross and letting their mind freely wander). Then, for the actual task, stimuli are presented and responses are recorded at very specific times with that fixation cross in between with enough time for the brain activity to return to that resting "baseline" before the next stimuli.

There's a lot of signal processing theory, regression analysis, etc. that goes in to it. With that said, the issue that arises is that only the strongest correlates may surface or be observed. There may be a lot of brain activity that overlaps or looks identical between that resting state (baseline) and the stimulation state, but can't really be included because a distinction can't be made, which goes back to your final point. That, however, doesn't mean that there aren't actual subsets of brain activity that we can attribute to a specific activity.

For example, if you're in an fMRI and I show you nothing but a fixation cross, then show you a sad image at a specific time for a specific interval, then went back to the fixation cross, and also showed you a scrambled version of that same image, I can (oversimplified) run a diff check to see what's different between the three. From there, I can remove the overlap between the three from normal baseline activity and activity specifically related to visual processing (scrambled image) to reveal what's specifically different with that sad image. If I see that the amygdala has much higher activity during that sad image compared to the fixation cross and the scrambled image, I can conclude that it has some role in emotional processing (well not really in this example because you'd also need a ton of images, including neutral images, with different orderings of each to really be confident; also really couldn't make that conclusion, just present the correlation because...science).

The point is that there are methods to isolate activity related to a specific activity/stimuli/response/etc. However, it's currently very difficult, if not impossible, to make distinctions in those overlapped areas.

Note: this is obviously an oversimplification of neuroimaging research and analysis
More like, "If I do anything that hurts them, the thousands of employees in my district vote against me next November"
I started making my own editors with React/next.js and settled on this library for the knobs: https://github.com/eskimoblood/rc-knob

I like it mostly because I want to be very specific with the knob design (trying to match the pedals as much as I can) but it also handles the data side brilliantly.
Doesn't this license defeat itself?

> The Katharos License is based on the premise that the full 66 books of the Holy Bible are 100% true and inspired by God and that He alone is the ultimate authority for what is good and just.

vs.

> hate speech or discrimination based on age, gender, gender identity, race, sexuality, religion, nationality

Just think about "Thou shalt have no other gods before me".
>Well, that's not what I, as a layman, meant. What I meant was Orch-OR and it is at least a good starting point.

Very well, I shall look again, but color me (extremely) skeptical. Are you able to propose a mechanism by which quantum mechanics can explain qualia?

I have yet to see even a partial mechanism. The issue is that qualia specifically involves something non-mechanistic. You would have to first qualify what the substance of qualia is (it's ontology ... and good luck with that!), how it emerges from quantum-mechanical phenomena, and whence it comes (where is the stuff of qualia when it's not manifesting?).

Again, I don't (yet?) see how any mechanistic explanation can explain this.

>Please let me know If i'm talking nonsense :).

It's not nonsense per se, but none of it addresses the key criticism. You must explain how that causal chain (microtubules -> mitochondria -> neurotransmitter) produces qualia.

Your argument is effectively that microtubules can influence the creation of thought. Great! So can neurons! So can drugs! So can a blow to the head! Why insist on microtubules?? Why not elsewhere?

>You've given up already.

I've also given up on proving the existence of God!

Less facetiously: phenomenology has the advantage of being self-evident. We're all pretty much convinced that it exists, contrary to God. Given that, and given the advances in materialist philosophy, it's not prima facie crazy to suspect that phenomenology is a physical process, and therefore amenable to scientific explanation. In this, you have a point.

However, I don't think science (or philosophy for that matter) currently has the ability to propose an explanation for how some process p implements qualia. We don't even know what such a theory would look like. As such, the quantum-mechanical argument really does seem like the pituitary gland of the 21st century.

>The mainstream theory is an absolute non-explanation

Which mainstream theory? Are you referring to access consciousness? If so, then you are basing your argument on a false premnise, namely that these scientists are investigating the same thing as you. They are not. They are interested in another thing we call consciousness, which may or may not be related to the phenomenological consciousness that you are interested in. It's still an interesting question.

If you're referring to mainstream theory of phenomenology (e.g. sensorimotor theory), it is at the very least no more absurd than quantum-mechanical theories.

>Yes, the HN crowd surely loves to downvote these type of posts.

Respectfully, have you considered the possibility that your ideas just don't add up? I mean no disrespect, and again will take another look (links welcome), but I notice that you have not addressed the central question of how a mechanism (let alone yours, specifically) can produce a qualia. I suspect this is what motivates the downvotes.
SaaS billing build vs. buy
We can all stop using Chrome.

That'd help.
They even have a wikipedia page!
that sucks. I will miss their flaming unicorn. Wishing Bryce the best in his next ventures.
I can't help but be reminded about this open source software license comic: https://burntsushi.net/stuff/wtfpl-strip.jpg
Points are flawed. Whether you have them grow linear, exponentially, or fibonacci doesn't make a difference. The fundamentals are flawed. They cover it in their videos and in more depth their talks/books.
Having children isn't easy. Having children near peak fertility is relatively easier than later. If a woman has the foresight to know that she would like to have a family first, and then work on her career, she could focus on finding a husband who can provide the resources necessary to both have children between 18-25, and support starting a business later.

This used to be common knowledge, and it was so for a reason. If someone doesn't want to go this route, they obviously have every right not to.. but they should understand the tradeoff.
I remember noticing this on my first frontend job 5 years ago. How are in hell are they accurately measuring any kind of performance? I'm sure it can actually be done but enterprise half-asses even that, likely because keeping it all slightly arbitrary allows for more ambiguity to leverage against workers (keeps them paranoid rather than certain, elites don't like safety amongst workers).
And how long did they keep those jobs?
Wow what a genius conclusion. I agree which is why I'm against nuclear. Our society always screws up. When the aviation industry fails in its regulations a few hundred people die- a tragedy to be sure but recoverable.
> I honestly wonder why single people without children in my line of work aren't millionaires just based upon the compensation of their day jobs.

I'm not sure that people who never have children necessarily end up with more wealth than people who do have children, due to psychological impacts.

Having a kid can inspire parents to get their shit together and succeed financially and think about the future, compared to a single person just spending on their hobbies and playing video games.
I agree with much of what you say except that "women have different needs". I would say each person has different needs and to divide into the male/female binary is a fairly restrictive definition of gender as I have come to understand it.

My wife and I have twins a little less than 2 years old, we are both ~35, but we live in rural-ish NH not SV. She has taken the last 2+ years off for the pregnancy and to function as primary caregiver while I continue to work. While I don't feel a need to work (perhaps a "need to project" would be closer) I do feel a need to provide for my kids while being with them as much as possible. As such I have chosen a low-stress, 9-5 SWE role optimizing for family time over career advancement. At least for the foreseeable future.

From what we can tell she seems to be the only woman from her MBA class that has taken so much time off from career to have children. I don't want to speak for my wife but my impression is that she feels torn by desires to have a high-power career and to spend all the time with the kids (though pandemic parenting in NE with no third spaces available means that some days it would be an easy choice). Maybe that is society having an outsize impact on her internal valuation of family rearing, but I am not sure.

The point I am making is that kind of gender bifurcation doesn't fit the mold that I (a cis-gendered, white man) fit so I find it less plausible that a less-represented person would match it either as my "group" [more accurate term requested] has largely set the social norms.

I acknowledge I could be an outlier.
I really don't agree and I don't think creating a product in the same category is "me-too".

Borland had some truly great products back in the day. Quattro Pro had innovations that surpassed the incumbent 1-2-3's. Paradox had innovations that superseded dBASE. Turbo Pascal was a popular product on its own merit (UCSD Pascal, Quick/MS Pascal never caught on commercially). Turbo C and Quick C were competitors, and many applications back in the day used the Turbo Vision text UI.

In the 1980s and early 90s, the marketplace was full of competing office products before Microsoft Office came around and dominated then scene (folks might remember Lotus SmartSuite and Corel WordPerfect Office).

Spreadsheets weren't always synonymous Excel, nor word processors with Word.
The experiments we conducted emphasize that the effective capacity of several successful neural network architectures is large enough to shatter the training data. Consequently, these models are in principle rich enough to memorize the training data.

So they're fitting elephants[1].

I've been trying to use DeepSpeech[2] lately for a project, would be interesting to see the results for that.

I guess it could also be a decent test for your model? Retrain it with random labels and if it succeeds the model is just memorizing, so either reduce model complexity or add more training data?

[1]: https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2011/06/21/how-to-fit-an-elep...

[2]: https://github.com/mozilla/DeepSpeech
>So needed to something to correct? So you made obvious small issues?

Exactly.

The tall nail gets the hammer. The shop that passes all the shitboxes gets the audit.

They don't want that audit and if that audit comes they want the paper trail to make them look like they're hard-asses about everything just like the auditor wants to see so they don't lose their license. The deal is that safety inspections are basically guaranteed work for the shops and exchange they get an incentive to not fudge emissions inspections. I dunno if that's still how they present it but that's what the 3rd party that runs the state training was telling everyone years back and the rules haven't changed since then (other than some more increased reporting requirements that are either to reduce odometer fraud or lay the groundwork for a mileage tax depending on who you ask).
I guess Coq/Lean standard libraries fit this definition.
I've used the lite version for years.
> I'd like to see (like counties with large cities in them) without these smaller experiments first.

New Zealand gives money to everyone over 65 and it’s not means tested. Is this different to what you are suggesting?

I don’t get why we wouldn’t apply the same to a younger group, at least as a test.
Did anyone else read the subject line and think of a particular blonde journalist, his puppy, and his alcoholic, sea-faring friend?
The article also has this weird notion that the only source of evidence of the Triune brain theory are brain scans. We also have evidence Wilder Penfield's work stimulating parts of the brain. We also have evidence from damage to the brain, from physical injury, lesions, tumors, surgeries, strokes, etc.

While that data shows that brain functions aren't strictly fixed and neuroplasticity is a thing, it does show that locations in the brain do have disproportionate impact on certain functions.
But you don’t understand google engineers know best, they know what’s good for you my sweet summer child, you’re just a toddler who needs to be cradled and kept from ever being able to make decisions.
Here's a simple test I always use when figuring out if a name is good and not confusing: Google it. If you search for "Alinea", what do you get?
The lite version reminds me of the original Google search results.
Install WordPress Automatically on Ubuntu 20.04 Using WordOps
Poe’s law applies. A software licences job isn’t to encode “morality”. It just there to specify what rights are being granted.
The vast majority of things don't matter. If you see someone nice at a bar, say hi. Ask for her or her number , and actually set up a time to meet. Don't waste your time minelessly chatting with someone via text, or God forbid snapchat.
Live in the real world, delete your social media. Don't take anything personally, not everyone's going to like you, and occasionally someone will say something really f*** up to you. This can even be a co-worker, it can be best to shug it off and if the behavior continues to just find another job. A boss demeans you, time to work somewhere else. Life is too short to deal with bad bosses

Also, take time to expand your Social circle. The bigger your Social circle is, the more friends invite you out to social gatherings, the easier it is to find a partner. And if not you made some great friends along the way. All the time I spent clubbing with Friends, was more enjoyable in that I got to enjoy some of their best years. Occasionally I'd meet a girl, but it was a nice bonus on top of an already good night. Likewise I'd go to concerts all the time and I find this works very well for meeting people. But I don't feel ripped off if I went to see one of my favorite bands and I didn't meet my future wife. Life can be best summed up as being happy with where you're at. I've been evicted twice, and with that in mind as long as I got a roof over my head my life is pretty good. I celebrate when I pay my rent, I'm aggressively saving my income up right now to build a nice little cushion in case the economy isn't so hot next year.

The other thing, is you need to be at a healthy weight for people to find you attractive. All this crap about methods, attitudes, whatever crap apps and dating books want to sell you , it's all garbage.

Plus once you lose weight you'll be healthier, happier, there are so many rewards to being at a healthy weight. But it takes work, looking through my fridge dumping out all the soda, and keeping my daily carb intake to around 50 g is very very hard. But it's much harder to be morbidly obese, that was my life up until my early twenties.

To end this, don't waste time on regrets. Just be aware you can't control other people, you can only control who you're around. Most regrets involve meeting someone who wasn't the best person, take a mental note to never be friends with someone like that again. Surround yourself with people who you'd like to become more like. For example if you have one friend who's running an exciting software company, that's a positive influence. If another friend is 35 years old, lives with his mom and doesn't have a job, you need to distance yourself from him fast.
And some headers have their own exceptions to this.

The Set-Cookie header (sent by the server) should always be sent as multiple headers, not comma separated as user agents may follow Netscape's original spec.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2880047/is-it-possible-to-set-more-than-one-cookie-with-a-single-set-cookie

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie

On the other hand in HTTP/1.1 the Cookie header should always be sent as a single header, not multiple. In HTTP/2, they may be sent as separate headers to improve compression. :)

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16305814/are-multiple-cookie-headers-allowed-in-an-http-request
If you are within BLE range you can "track" someone, but that is already the case with wifi/bluetooth in general.

Even known the public key, you can download the encrypted reports from Apple, but since you don't have the private key you can't decrypt the location messages.
I pay for the following:

- HBO

- YouTube Music

- JetBrains Goland license

- Weekly vegetable delivery service

- AWS (S3 mostly)
I think the biggest hurdle to a piece of software like this would be what database technology to use. /s

In all seriousness, the idea is very interesting.

I haven’t given this much thought, and maybe I don’t fully understand the proposed idea, but how would you deal with improvements/advancement to already solved things? Like when the fenwick tree was invented

Or how do you deal with competing solutions to a problem like quicksort vs mergesort?
Gold prices aren't highly correlated with inflation so that would be a poor indicator. If you look at the actual historical data, gold isn't a very effective inflation hedge.
Mind you, Google's free plan gives only 15GB space. Purchasing larger space requires unnecessary monthly expense. Periodic backup to hard disks seems like the only permanent solution.
Subways, roads, water, electrical, government systems, education, and recycling are generally government run. "Immediate profits" isn't the excuse, because that isn't part of the equation. It's the fundamental inefficiency of government.

If your description was accurate, Ford would still be trying to sell their Model T rather than continuously investing in the future at a cost of today's profit. Obviously, this hasn't happened.
The Politics of the Absurd in the Age of LARPing
maybe if it was discovered by a "Snerwy" :P
in the meantime,
https://github.com/icloud-photos-downloader/icloud_photos_do...
has been pretty reliable for me.
Please add the (still) to the HN post title. The original version of the paper without (still) in the title is several years old.
I'm a huge fan of nuclear power, but I took away a different lesson from Fukushima.

When it all went wrong (and it inevitably will), there was literally nothing we could do to stop it. People could not get close and we had no robots that could help. All we could do was pump as much water in and hope for the best, knowing full well that contaminated water was going straight into the ocean.

We literally built a machine capable of immense destruction that - given the right series of events - we become unable to control.

It was a HUGE stroke of luck that it didn't go much, much worse.