skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There is pretty illustrative TV series for the management consulting, House of Lies [1]
Of course there is some comedy and all, but surprisingly solid and realistic picture of that business.

[1] https://www.sho.com/house-of-lies
Spitballing possibilities -- in a brainstorming session, someone thought it'd be cool and drive up user engagement to have an online status, so users could talk to each other. Or an engineering team trying to preserve its function presented this idea. It then gets built, but business owners know that it will never get used if it's off by default, so they set it to on.

Either way, the mechanisms of a platform drive its culture. After people get used to this, people will respond to the ones who are online more than those offline. So people will stay online because they want replies to their comments. This will indeed drive up engagement, but as with Facebook's like button and YouTube's video recommendation algorithm -- this is not a feature that drives up engagement by making people want to stay. It's one that feeds on a person's psyche to make them feel like they can't leave.
The bias is born from the pay to win. How many of these games simply put players against an exponential cost curve for marginal benefits?

What this does is ruin the intent and legitimacy of the game.
Nope. Whilst that's how TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA works, this not how Forward Secrecy enabled suites like TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 work. Most sites (and certainly any sites that think they're "secure") thus are not affected in this way.

In TLS 1.3 all suites (such as TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) have forward secrecy so it isn't even explicitly called out.

In these modern modes (and in other modern protocols like SSH) the two peers agree random ephemeral keys (these days with Elliptic Curve Diffie Hellman) and long term private keys are only used to sign things to prove who you're talking to over the resulting securely encrypted connection.

So if you break RSA you can forge those signatures but you can't decrypt messages sent to and from the legitimate owner of the keys, those were, as your parent explained, secured with AES and not RSA. You would need to perform a live active attack, a MitM to interpose between the real server and its clients so as to decrypt all messages in transit.
>I don’t know how this “memory on the SOC” thing became a narrative.

Yes it has been spreading like plague. And I had to post something similar [1] not long ago. And many more before that.

The M1 could have an Off package Quad Channel DDR4 Memory and still be as fast. The performance improvement ( from a memory perspective ) is coming from Same Memory Address Space and other similar optimisation.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26225007
> The satire being removed is a leftist criticism of capitalism

maybe. it could very well have been written by Red Skull or Thanos. Re-read in their voice and it works.

Liberals, Anarchists, and Fascists actually share a lot of the same criticisms of society regarding anti-consumerism. They just have very different ways of addressing it.
Yes, it's part this and part "let's get rid of the noisy neighbour issue by making everyone whisper" design philosphy. This just arrogantly pushes the scaling challenges back down to the customers who are then forced to buy more AWS services to build workarounds for the scaling limitations in front of them. For Amazon it's a win-win though and they'll keep doing this as long as c-suite fools keep buying.
Is this the one by Steve Blank and Bob Dorf? Must have dismissed it due to all the other junk in the "Startup Entrepreneur" space. Does it have a good section on Finance/Funding?
Author of the post here, Ask me anything!
Obligatory: it is flabbergasting that this is a quality of language that is still in active use.
For example, if you require email / password auth without SSO, then we do not use open ID connect or any of the oauth flows - because those are not needed in a simple setup.
The article mentioned a mathoverflow question.

I was curious to see if it got closed, so I clicked the link

https://mathoverflow.net/questions/43690/whats-a-mathematici...

Yes, it's closed
High energy solar particles could threaten Earth
They're both deliberate, and they both use the same mechanisms to accomplish the devaluation/depreciation. The only real difference is that one is fast and one is slow.
Grover Norquist has had Republicans sign "the Pledge" opposing tax increase since 1986. Reportedly, he also wants filing taxes to be painful so you hate the government and he opposes these measures.

In 2005, California had a pilot program called ReadyReturn where they mailed you prefilled forms. It was popular. TurboTax lobbied against it and it died.
But you'll lose so much time doing that! Realizing there's a bug and investigating it is a huge amount of work compared to never writing it in the first place.
Pretty impressive, indeed on stable Safari I get: 1022.61 GFlops
Because it get the message across. Within the first 15s one can see that Amazon do have some questions to answer.
They’re related but not competitors. Ink is a generalized story tool, handling a lot of the organization and management of different storylines, and is meant to be embedded into a larger project.

IF languages tend to incorporate more of the actual interactivity of the story, and build for their specific interpreter.
Please read the orange triangle warning you scrolled past.

When you did the glacier operation, the GUI was telling you that it was COPYING the files to glacier. Those files also existed elsewhere, in normal S3 space. There's ways to cure this issue at the command line, primarily a list of all attributes per file - and there you can see the respective storage plans.

Secondly, do you have billing alerts set up, at 1.25x per average day's accrual? (30$/mo would be around $1.25/day, as not to email-bomb you). Billing alerts would NOT have solved the issue of improper storage class, but you would have seen a massive spike in costs. It probably would have cost you maybe $100-$200 to solve it early on.

Thirdly, how much of the 5 Pillars of Well Architected Framework are you following? ( https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/the-5-pillars-of-the-aws-we... ) Admittedly some of these are "pay AWS double and get disaster prevention" style rules. However... pillar 5 is all about cost optimization. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound (or $7k) of cure.
Management. Isn't. A. Promotion. It's. A. Different. Job. Entirely.
Yes, back in 2009, I was a student and I thought "easy money!" :)

It was in very high demand, and I could get some, so I figured, let the great material continuum provide to those who need it and have the money to pay for our efforts!

Unfortunately the customs hassled the customers for paperwork (the health market is so overregulated!) who then hassled me.

I was just in for a quick buck, and the vaccines were legit with all the barcodes and stuff, new in a manufacturer box, still sealed, so I didn't understand why!

Still, I did a few rounds giving the required documentation each time, until I realized the customs agents were just finding excuses to block the parcels, and more likely to keep the content for themselves or their family instead of my clients who had paid for it, or maybe for reselling themselves, as one dose was reselling for over 400 in some markets! So I gave up and issued refunds, even if it was not my fault that the parcel didn't reach the customers.

I should have lied about the content! Little did I know back then, I was young and naive and I thought the laws in the West meant something.

Still, it taught me some good lessons: don't deal with physical goods whenever possible! Don't deal with stuff that's full of regulations!

In a way, it helped define me, as the next schoolyear I got into crypto.
I haven’t had goats (really want some) but with chickens we would keep em until they stopped laying eggs and then we’d eat them. Some chickens that were more pet like would survive into old age, but most chickens are stupid and not really pets.
You can offset your str_t by creating a new str_t that subtracts offs from the length and adds offs to the pchar. There is no need to keep track of the offset separately.
NG is the previous generation to the MAX.
It doesn't. As has been corrected time and time again.

The M1 has pretty high memory latency at around 100 ns [1], which is significantly higher than either AMD or Intel for typical systems. Note that physical distance between CPU and memory is rather less important for latency, as DRAM is high latency in itself, so adding a few ns at most due to wiring is not going to matter.

[1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/16252/mac-mini-apple-m1-teste...
What's not funny about a teenager on a rant?
PD can poke fun at this because their customers probably wouldn’t even check Amazon for the products they’re looking for in the first place. At least, I suspect they tend to sell to people who specifically don’t want the kind of garbage you tend to find on Amazon these days. As a result it’s more or less a great opportunity to show off what makes them stand out. The contrast between the two products is crazy.

Thousands will buy the Basics version and never hear of PD in their lives though and that’s fine. They were never going to be PD customers.

For many people that might be alright, too. They might not care to have a better sling. It might mean nothing at all to them. Like... People who can’t tell the difference between Miracle Whip and fresh mayonnaise.

I have their 30L everyday backpack and some pouches (tech and wash) and they really are spectacular. If I lost any of them I’d be ordering replacements the same day. The attention to details and overall quality make their gear literally “buy it for life” category products. I hope I’m right and that this kind of shit Amazon Basics pulls doesn’t hurt PD’s bottom line.
No one would think twice if this document contained something truely offensive or hateful and the maintainers refused to remove it. But the fact is people have taken this so far to the point that it’s not a means to an end, it’s a hobby. And now we have harmless jokes being taken down.
I’m not familiar with category theory in depth, but homotopy type theory uses category theory for its semantic model and HoTT’s a big deal in the automated reasoning world.

> Others thought it was pretty and useful for identifying similar structures in different fields but wasn’t much use for making significant new mathematical discoveries. A sentence in Emily Riehl’s book—“The category-theoretic perspective can function as a simplifying abstraction, isolating propositions that hold for formal reasons from those whose proofs require techniques particular to a given mathematical discipline”—seems to align with the latter opinion.

Two points:

1. Being able to “lift and shift” techniques is a big deal in mathematics — so the two cases are the same. A lot of recent innovations are along those lines, where techniques in one area were applied to a new area. In that sense, category theory is wonderful because it gives us a map for how to move techniques around. You could even go so far as to say the algebra-geometry correspondence is category theory’s first “big win”, as it came about as a way to formalize that body of work.

2. Category theory is the native language of data fusion, while categorical syntax is easy to represent in an image-completion kind of way... so category theory is useful for labs working on using machine learning to fuse data and extract semantically meaningful information. Or labs working on an AI model which can suggest improvements to itself.
An Engineer Redesigns the Company Homepage
SoundCloud Pays Artists Fairly
More importantly, Rabin would be used in a hybrid cryptosystem, including message authentication codes, so you could calculate MACs using all 4 possible keys. Though, it would be much lower overhead and safer to use OAEP[0] to encode the symmetric cipher/MAC key(s) and then encrypt with Rabin. There's very low probability that more than one of the 4 possible plaintexts has all zeroes for padding after OAEP decoding.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_asymmetric_encryption_...
Thanks for taking the time. It's an interesting argument that many people live past the point that they enjoy life, but I doubt you are really suggesting we would be right to kill those people without their direct consent. Euthanasia, where it is at all accepted as moral, typically requires consent. If you think you can get the consent of an animal to kill it, well... let's cross that bridge when we come to it! Regardless, 'death' in this instance is still not necessarily a pleasure -- it may just be the option with the least suffering, and even if there are exceptions to death as a form of suffering, it doesn't seem far off base. As living beings, we value life.

Next, I agree that "natural" could mean a lot of things. In this case, understanding that we're discussing moral involvement, I'm speaking about whether or not you have moral involvement in causing the death.

Paying for a burger from McDonald's is indirectly asking for the death of the cow. They wouldn't kill it if no one bought burgers, but we all know that people do buy burgers, so the blame is diffuse. We all share. But you, in eating it, still profit by the being's death, and it was ultimately a deed done for your benefit when you chose to pay them. Of course it is more direct if you pay a butcher to slaughter a cow, and far more direct if you wield the knife. Hit a deer with your car by mistake? Maybe that's like manslaughter levels of culpability.

As a sidebar, is a cow killed by a wolf a natural death? It happens 'in nature', and the wolf couldn't live without killing other things, so it is natural for a wolf to kill a cow. But... is the death a natural death? I do not feel it is. I cannot blame the wolf (as it does not know better and does not possess other actual options, like we do), but I do not think the cow exists for the wolf. To paraphrase Kant I think, each being is an end unto itself. The cow's most natural death is one of old age, i.e. what we would legally call 'natural causes'. Suppose that health care could have extended its life, well sure, but there's a limit of practicality.

Last, it would be possible to justify literally any act from the position of "maybe this is just how the world works and we have to accept it" -- so, again, sure. But slavery was 'just how the world worked' for a long time, and I feel I am better off, and I can think of a hell of a lot of other humans who are better off, for us eventually having not just accepted it. There are similarities.

Veganism is really the only choice that's morally consistent, intellectually honest, and doesn't rely on special permission. It is ultimately not really arguable that it is a terrible thing for us to do to breed them, to keep them, to manipulate them, to harvest their products, and to kill them, especially in the ways we do. One must rely on ideas like 'might is right', 'we are inherently special for reasons that must be taken on faith', or 'nothing really matters anyway, everything is relative', which are exactly the arguments that have been used to justify all past atrocities of our doing.
We wanted to roll out SSO for our web app and used WorkOS.. we looked at Okta, Auth0 and others, but found the out-of-the-box nature of WorkOS really compelling. Aligned with flexibility and support for a wide-range of services, it made our life pretty easy. Recommend
There is a standard, sure. But there are also a lot of compilers out there and I would bet that all but a few has either a "this compiles c11 except for [list of unimplemented features]" caveat or non-standard extensions.
Soothes the soul. Thank you.
Here are some benchmarks:

https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...

The Dart implementation seems much slower than the NodeJs implementation and it doesn’t bring anything new to the table? It added null safety today.

Anyone that knows if it has any feature beyond for example what Ocaml has?
Ah shit, here we go again.
In the early 2000s the US noticed most other countries started having an e-file option. President Bush thought the best way to "catch up" was to have a public/private partnership and created a system where "blessed" companies could e-file with the government. They must offer a free version for low-income people and the government couldn't offer a competing product.
I think what’s so impressive about M1 though is the increase in (at least perceived) single threaded performance. We know core counts scale and that’s been the industry focus for some time. So yeah I am not expecting a huge perceived speed up from M1x/M2...but hey M1 feels nearly instantaneous I’m not really sure how big a difference a faster cpu would actually have.
An older article on the same topic (2019)

https://www.vice.com/en/article/pajkkz/its-almost-impossible...
If the current trend continues we will have a chip the size of a plank unit with a 2020 level computing capacity the size of the Jupiter.

Chat applications will be even slower then today
It didn't make me feel safer for the MAX flights :)

I guess I have to wait for the number of flights with MAX to go over 1-2M flights to feel safe enough to fly on.
60 fps on a 2016 macbook.
Maybe you don't have GPU acceleration enabled?
This is an interesting pairing with the "Piracy is not theft"[1] post that is also currently on the front page.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26329144
The problem is the lack of precedent or due process, which creates a chilling effect. You can fairly easily have a happy life under an actual codified set of rules about how to behave - even an oppressive one. When people's lives are destroyed on a seemingly arbitrary whim, when someone who was targeted by accident has no recourse, that's a sword of Damocles hanging over everyone's head.
Yeah, that's what got me. Doubling the length of the key only requires a single order of magnitude more work?. If that turns out to be true, I'm going to need to revise my beliefs about how the universe works. In particular, information theory and thermodynamics, because multiplying two numbers together doesn't preserve information about what the factors were. Or at least pretty much everyone thought so. (Caveat: if the values of primes turn out to have a predictable pattern, that could provide the needed information. However, that would mean that the Riemann Hypothesis is false, and that'd be an even more astounding result.)
This sounds distressingly similar to the Therac-25 failures. A radiotherapy machine who's software was (blindly?) copy-pasted from a previous version of the system which had hardware interlocks to prevent unsafe configurations of the radiation emitter.

The new one did not have these interlocks, instead doing everything in software. The result of this was a few people being fatally irradiated when a certain race condition was triggered.
Provided their user knows what they are doing and never do the mistake to lie to the compiler.
They've unfortunately conflated "must have" and "spelled exactly", which aren't the same thing.
> commutativity

yes my mistake
Yeah. I take up the key exchange problem (and Diffie-Hellman) as well as difficulty of achieving true randomness.
I was there. I have been following spacex for a decade. I watched all the most important launches on livestream. I watched the first dragon cargo mission launch live. But this was the first time actually being present at the launch. Despite all my experience, it was totally unexpected. I had no idea how surreal it feels to watch something that big float slowly towards the sky. The sound physically shakes you. It was one of the most impressive things I’ve ever seen.
Slighlty OT for this forum, but the "left" isn't monolithic either. Especially on twitter, there's a lot of left-leaning people who despise the "dirtbag left" that user refers to.
Heeeeeeeeh?!?

Well I appreciate the novelty for sure. It's interesting enough because evolution seems to take place on multiple scales in the Universe. Looking forward to more feedback on it.
The developer must also be smart enough not to do the mistake to lie to the compiler, by actually doing aliasing with restricted variables as it is UB and nasal dragons beware.

C compilers don't validate correct use of restrict.
It's also possible the government did get all the technical data and then lost it. It has to be somebody's job to archive and catalog that stuff, and the cost of archiving comes out of somebody's budget. The pressure to just toss old dusty paper files to cut costs can be enormous. It might have happened because "Joe Smith was the archivist and he retired 10 years ago and we needed the space."

If the data was classified (very likely) it costs a lot more to store it and audit it, and the pressure to "just burn it" is that much greater.
You would. But not every input comes from you :-)
That's very similar to what's described in other countries. The government provides you with prefilled forms. In the basic scenario you sign and return. In a more complex scenario you amend it, sign it and return.

As a bonus, they could make it software and offer a way to file/check online--but I'd be happy if they at least did it via the mail with paper.
Wow, it is actually shocking how disgusting the CEO's comments are.
F-14 as well. In all of those cases, it was decided that the cost to secure and account for the tooling to prevent them from falling into the wrong hands was more than they wanted to spend.
Why can't a joke be a joke? In the original thread mentioned by _obviouslynotme_ [0] it starts out with saying they hate how mobile gamers are always the target of mockery. This note does not target mobile gamers as target of mockery, but as victims of engagement strategies to make you addicted. And then it fails to understand the sarcasm of the overall text.

What is humor allowed to do? It's a big question of our time, and I'd say everything that is immoral, but nothing that is unethical.

Should humor be kept out of _professional setting projects_. My take: No. If we do that, we humans are just machines.

David Graeber said in Bullshit Jobs (p. 213 of the German version; sentence-by-sentence translation by me):

> You can call this mockery of justice. It exists in many forms. The right-leaning version judges those that believe the world owes them [...] equality before the law. But there also exists a version of the left-wing: It consists of telling people that they should check their privileges, if they had the impression they had the right to anything that poor or more opressed people don't have. With this benchmark even the person receiving a beating by the police and is imprisoned without reason can only then complain about injustice after naming every other category of men that is more likely to be a victim of it.

[0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26338268
Out of curiosity, do you also believe the official number of Chinese cases, which is around 89,000?

Or to answer your question directly, I believe the media isn't reporting them. Just like they don't want to report Cuomo, along with governors in multiple states, knowingly stuffed nursing homes with covid cases. It all comes out eventually, but right now is the "fog of war" so to speak. We won't hear about the deaths caused by the shot until later.
Fair point. Interesting that human beings can keep those separated.
There's been lots of previous discussion, such as: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26319649

I'm not surprised. Parler and Gab were just thrown together, and made themselves hugely attractive sites to attack.