skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Congratulations! Will add your OpenAPI definition to the APIs.guru OpenAPI Directory.
You should be able to use CSS (incl. grid, flex, etc) within an SVG context though.
because i understand it's not perfect, and probably never will be. so i adapted. i think all of the positive experiences that i had outweighed all of the negative. that's all there really is to it for me. it also allowed me to meet my now gf.

something i've noticed from people that didn't have much luck on these apps is that they fall into two buckets. unfortunately for some, it's really tough since they might not have the social skills/looks that dating apps really select for which i truthfully have no answer to. hopefully one day someone smart will solve for this. there's a reason that most of /r/tinder (or at least 4 years ago they did) subscribes to the "two steps" aka "1. be attractive 2. don't be unattractive" ... unfortunately that's just how these sites operate. i would argue, however, that's how real life tends to work a large percentage of the time. good news is you can do some really really basic stuff to look better even if you're not "conventionally attractive." I currently work for a major dating app and we are trying to help people from posting pictures that are honestly just really really bad. mirror selfies, blurred pictures, low light ones, in their cars neck up looking at a camera, etc.

the other bucket are people who have looks to get matches but don't get any luck because they have little experience interacting in a flirtatious/interesting way and therefore just give up or become extremely jaded/salty and start creating a negative persona which provides even worse results. for this group, which i think i fell into for a period of time, i can say that the only way out is to just play the game and put on a fake smile until you start seeing results. you can moan and groan and complain all you want, and it's your prerogative but don't expect any results if that's the path you want to go down in the dating app world. broken? sure. no ones forcing you to join these apps, but my hypothesis is this: a very not insignificant distribution of the people complaining and having 0 success on the apps probably also fall into the type of person that wouldn't have much success in real life scenarios as well.
If you don't lie to children you confuse and discourage them. I know because my own internal desire for precision often is to the detriment of my pedagogy.
Do you not see the irony in the fact that you had to grab a tiny snippet of a response several posts prior to 'prove' your counterpoint to a criticism made towards you in regards to practically every response you've had in this thread thus far?

I'm going to give this thread a break since it seems as though you're simply looking for arguments where none exist.
I would really really hope that kind of acquisition would get killed by the DoJ (FTC?) on anti-trust concerns. But who knows...
"Split" means that you have defined division, which implies having rational numbers.

In the beginning there were only Natural numbers.

-1 appeared the moment one decided to define complementary operation to addition. -1 in reality is only a shorthand for "0-1", 0 comes here as neutral element of addition.
Addition is well defined on Natural numbers. Subtraction generates Zahl numbers.

Similarly multiplication is well defined on Zahl numbers. It's the complementary operation - division - that generates Quotient/rational numbers.
It looks like splitting hairs, but I also think it makes a difference to state upfront that it’s an oversimplification.

Kids actually understand the point, and they can decide if they care enough to ask more questions or if it’s good enough for them.

We faced that when teaching divisions. Saying upfront we’d explain falsehoods for the sake of simplicity helped set aside the more difficult questions (infinity, etc.) that came right after. We just say it’s the complicated parts and move on.

The best aspect is they are more receptive to have their mental model broken afterwards, instead of clinging to what you explained as fully true.
So is all that crap you buy from China that you dont need which is manufactured using dirty power. BTC is mostly renewables and will transition completely as it becomes cheaper.
Google enhances the lives of billions by making information more accessible. So far cryptocurrency facilitates crime and gambling.
More than energy issues, what is sad is that Bitcoin is kinda becoming what it was started against - huge amounts of bitcoin is in the hands of whales. Most ordinary people have zero interest in practical usage of btc, their only interest is greed ("when moon?"). Companies are pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into BTC, hoping to make huge profits. Just like an ordinary person can't afford to buy shares/houses, he can't afford to buy BTC either.

In other words, concentration of wealth in the hands of a tiny group of people.

Crypto is here to stay, it will take a few years, but they will be useful in some form or another. Hopefully it is useful for everyone, not just the 1%
The collected action scenes in Enthiran made the rounds of the internet during the four months I was living in Austin. And so naturally they got a print and screened it. Gotta love the kind of brilliance behind that move. Where else would you ever have the chance to see it on the big screen?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rDHnJvboy0c
Though perhaps not all that well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_C...
Perfect timing, was just looking for something similar to this
Set up a regulatory project on github and allow people to post annonymous "issues" to be addressed in a public forum?
Btw, the game Euclidea on iOS is fun for that. You "discover" and prove concepts and progress through higher-orders of geometry proofs.
Maybe I am comparing it to typical accounting software, which usually has shockingly bad UI/UX.
The president can simply order IRS to give taxpayers itemized list of taxes and income information they have and the taxes for the year.

If the taxpayer agrees, they can just sign and get refund or pay additional taxes.

If taxpayer disagrees, they can submit additional information.

The Democratic president can do this right now, for this tax year.
I get so busy I rip out query builders to SQL concat strings all the time. /s

That’s like going 120mph and telling the cop you were just “distracted”.

You’re correct that we often make mistakes when we’re busy, but this isn’t that. This is OWASP #1 and the most plain example of it.

This is not a “mistake” that engineers make, this is unethical to allow this to go into production. He even has a stackoverflow answer where he explains this exact problem: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11554015/syntax-sql-wher...

If you think I’m wrong, then what could an engineer be responsible for? Literally nothing ever?
Cmd | Vancouver, BC + Boston | Onsite or Remote within Canada | Full Time | https://www.cmd.com

We're a cybersecurity startup transforming the way businesses secure their cloud-first Linux environments. Our mission is to help companies reliably log, understand, predict, and control user behaviour in their Linux environment.

What matters to us?
- You're naturally curious, interested in expanding your knowledge
- You're willing to step in and help a teammate
- You thrive in ambiguous situations
- You take the lead, gathering the information you need in order to get your job done

Open Roles:

- Backend Golang Developer: https://bit.ly/cmd_godev

- Full stack Developer: https://bit.ly/cmdfullstack
Yeah, that's fair— once the queries are anonymized and stripped of any locale information, there isn't too much more to go on. And while there may be technical reasons to want to cache popular searches, then you're mostly just denying your upstream analytics which are fairly reasonable for them to want to have.

OTOH, Debian deliberately provides the technical means for third parties to host verifiable mirrors of their package repository, and then makes the analytics an opt-in thing (popcon).
Unless it was written by a contractor who then gave the copyright to the IRS. This is a very common situation. The federal government is not barred from having copyrights.
G wagon? wow, get a load of this rich guy over here.
It was set up for Hasan Minhaj's show, and the show was cancelled. Since it was set up right before previous "tax season" I'm assuming they'd just paid for a year.

It's in archive.org, though, e.g. [1], and it's just a static site with a bunch of links.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20210130180334/https://www.turbo...
I was talking to a kitchen hand in New Zealand in an area with Kea. He described the escalating battle to keep kea out the rubbish bins. It started with a rock on the lid which they solved fast, and then various other hinderances to keep them out.

The kea sit and watch and learn over s day or 3 and then they are back in, causing chaos.

The kitchen staff were trying to solve each puzzle with time pressure, a job to do and bad weather. The kea looked to find it funny whole the poor worker was frustrated.
> [...] and I wouldn’t count out the possibility that it is junk science published to drive down stock prices of psychedelic health companies.
What's the supporting empirical support for this very complex claim?

One one hand I'm inclined to believe the study because it confirms the placebo effect. (Which is very well established, plus the theory and the data are simple. The result is completely in concordance with the regular ineffectiveness of most low-dose not-really-psychoactive medications - meaning how SSRIs and other anti-depressants are about as effective as placebo.) On the other hand it's also possible that the study is junk, like most studies.

> How many of the participants tested that their drugs actually contained the correct amount of the correct compound?

https://elifesciences.org/articles/62878

"The inclusion criteria were: >18 years of age, good understanding of English, intention to microdose with psychedelics, previous experience with psychedelics (either micro- or macrodosing), no use of psychedelic drugs from a week before the start until the completion of the post-regime timepoint (other than the study’s microdoses), and willingness to follow the study protocol."

Of course it's still citizen science. So who knows really.
Haha, ok in general you’re right. Maybe a poor choice of words. But also, in general, I believe we have vastly underestimated the intelligence of most other animals. Even ones that are demonstrably not that smart.
Australia is even worse.
Pursue an orthogonal interest instead of studying things that you can only wish were part of your job.

Even better if the interest is in something at which you will be a beginner...something you will be bad at...an area where you will lack expertise.

A job exists to pay the bills. A person can make a career out of paying the bills. A person can exploit the freedom having a job provides. It's a choice. The career is not in their control. The freedom is.

Good luck.
I think I'm somehow in the same situation, trying to avoid industrial farming in benefit of local, small farming. I can know for sure (for some of them) that the animal was well treated from the beginning of its life to the very end.

I am asking myself if it is better for the animal to live a decent life even if it is to be killed and ate at the end or not to live at all.
Well, Bitcoin was the first of its kind, it’s time and battle tested and technically it might still be the most reliable of all cryptos. Part of the reason for that is “Bitcoin script” not being Turing complete unlike Ethereum’s virtual machine and less prone to software bugs.

People, especially newbies trust it much more than other blockchains. That’s why everybody buys Bitcoin, currently.

I believe Bitcoin’s going to take on an important role in a value storage once it’s market value stabilizes. Essentially, it will become digital Gold. As the gold price didn’t “crash” to zero when it lost its utility as a currency, I believe we will never see a complete crash of the Bitcoin value. It will serve a niche application and, hence, keep having value. But it’s continued growth of its value will flatten over time in the future, I am sure. So I wouldn’t worry too much about its energy usage.
Is there a difference between private.sh and using a VPN?
It’s not going to matter. What do you think the gay frog experiments were for? It’s a continuation of MK Ultra which turned Ted Kaczynski transgender, but nobody ever talks about that part.
There’s zero hard evidence that red meat consumption leads to bad health outcomes. It’s all epidemiological fud.

Why are people so comfortable with billionaires telling them how to live?
One of the big items in Chapter 11 is terminating expensive long-term leases. Since Alamo probably has this as their #1 or #2 expense, they can close locations without being on the hook for future rent.
Another way is how they have two "free" sites: One called "IRS Free File Program by Turbotax" and one called "Turbotax Free Edition". The free file version of Turbotax is only accessible from the IRS free file webpage (they block it from search engine results) and has a limit on annual income, but (as far as I know, I file on paper) it does not have as many upsells as "Turbotax Free Edition", which has a different (higher) annual income limit and gets advertised like crazy by Turbotax. This obviously creates customer confusion and people get tricked into using the wrong version.
I agree with the idea that ICANN seems to be in a reasonable way. They are based on the idea of control over companies/groups that MUST work by an agreed upon set of rules if the system is to work. Peter has proven over the years that he is comfortable breaking whatever rules he decides to. Choosing not to work with someone with that mindset seems reasonable for ICANN.

However, I do think they should come out with a clear, public statement of why those chose not to work with him.

On a tangent...
I am really uncomfortable with the fact that your comment was downvoted (enough to be noticeable). I get that people may disagree with the opinion you are expressing with it, but I was under the impression that downvotes on HN are supposed to be for comments that are off topic / do not move the conversation forward / inappropriate / etc. Your comment very clearly does not fall afoul of those rules; it's an opinion to be discussed.
No, they can't. They can't use customer funds for DTCC deposit requirements. It's just not allowed.

IIRC the deposit requirement was raised to 100%.

Even if the customer funds were settled, and the customer wanted to buy 1 share of GME for $300, Robinhood would have to post $300 of it's own money, just in case. Now would Robinhood get that money back? Most likely, but that doesn't mean they don't have to have it to deposit in the first place.
They dont want it. But the incentive structure that determines if they get elected or not is set up in a way that makes supporting wealth creation a disadvantage
Maybe not in the quote above but the full Dawkins piece it was taken from is dark enough https://dizzynomics.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/money-as-a-form...
It seems a wrong version was uploaded.

https://twitter.com/FredericJacobs/status/136717279911944601...
Coincidence? https://seekingalpha.com/news/3668882-google-wont-sell-ads-b...
No they haven't. Quotes have always worked like the previous poster described.
> to put it another way, all that "show a person who just bought a car an ad for another car" targeting was not really working.

Boy that sure is true for me and has been for a long time. I'm often bewildered not by how accurate my ads are, but rather by how braindead they seem to be. I'm not convinced algorithm-based ads work at all.

In fact I would hypothesize that ads are often more effective when they are unexpected, for something the viewer has never considered buying before. A targeted system would hide such ads.
D Language is an official part of GCC
>>Google plans to stop selling ads based on individuals’ browsing across multiple websites
>> to target ads without collecting information about individuals from multiple websites

Key words:

Individual: They might still track persons by group, by placing people into pools of like-minded internet users and track the browsing trends of this group.

Browsing: Geographic location, sleep cycles, or media streaming/viewing preferences are still on the table.

Multiple: Tracking within one website is still a thing. YouTube habits are still a go.

Websites: Apps, and everything we do with them, are not "websites".

While I think this is a step in the right direction, I don't see this statement as very limiting. It only addresses a very narrow type of tracking.
Confirms my thinking that everyone wants to live in the middle and there isn't enough supply and really not enough space for new supply.

From my anecdotal experience, if all listed rents were double the rent cap, all apartments would still be filled, but lots of people would be locked out of the market.

Classic gentrification problem. I don't know the solution.

I think for foreigners it just means paying a ton more, and just accepting that the value-for-money trade-off when seeing cheaper but more desirable places is not real - because they are mostly unattainable.
Apple seems to be doing that just fine and with huge success. They are exceedingly good at silencing every single employee to not speak about any kind of internal dissent or HR issues like this.
Apparently, Adobe deliberately allowed pirating of photoshop, to maintain its status as a standard. Deny oxygen to competitors.

Adobe has always struck me as a company that understood software economics really well and really early on. They'd make money from proprietary stuff, then give it away before it made an opportunity for a competitor.

Actually, it's probably less the understanding, than the actual acting on it.
This requires non-free JavaScript[0] to even post a search query, doesn't it?

The FF add-on[1] specifies "Custom License" without specifying which one.

[0] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/private-sh-pr...
IANAL, so all that goes (and doesn't) with that.

Before I accept a clients money I always build a proper business around the project to box the liability and structure it as a business. This also helps me because there are real costs (minor but they exist) to doing it, and it forces me to see it as a real thing not just a side project etc.

If you accept money as an individual you become liable personally for any legal suits etc. At least as a business your personal life & assets (assuming you follow the business structure & rules) isn't really touchable by a disgruntled client. Of course, there are some points where you could still get sued personally even if you have a business but it likely wouldn't stick without extenuating circumstances that warrant it.
I think that might be way off. Most adds are skipped. And 18/1000 is 1.8 cents not 18 cents.

"On Average the YouTube channel can receive $18 per 1,000 ad views. This equates to $3 - $5 per 1000 video views."

I.e. 0.3 to 0.5 cent per video of which Google pockets 68%:32% which gives about 0.2 cent per video for Google per video view.

The first stats site says about 9 views per visit and day, so 9 videos a day is about 1.8 cent, times 30 days is 54 cents.

A year would be 6.5USD for the average user - about half a month of Premium.
TLDR: "We use Rust. We will do stuff. It'll be great!"

No offense to Niko, but this is a completely vacuous post without a single concrete promise.

I don't really see the point, except for PR, recruiting or internal signaling.
Cable in the 1980s comes to mind:

https://www.nytimes.com/1981/07/26/arts/will-cable-tv-be-inv...

Short answer: Yes, there will be ads eventually, even if you pay for it.
I don't see anything above like a statement that Bitcoin will "destroy the planet". But the claim that its comparatively large energy footprint contributes to that destruction seems perfectly reasonable - the common comparison is that Bitcoin currently "uses more electricity than Argentina"[1]. Not surprisingly lots of mining is colocated with hydropower or geothermal power generation, but mainly because that's cheaper - I could imagine the power demands for mining reaching a level where they'd underwrite solar or wind farms (apparently we aren't there yet...), or just become economically unfeasible altogether.

1: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56012952
> I'm quite surprised to see that the leading theories in many of these studies revolve around competing forms of entertainment.

Really? If there's anything Game of Thrones kept reminding us of, its that males find defeating/killing other men in battle (and the "in battle" part is important, human warfare is very ritualistic just like Chimpanzee warfare) and fucking women equivocal if not related activities. Our ape brains don't appear to make much difference between virtual and physical, at least not enough to make one a lot less addictive than the other.
CNN is literally citing the previous content marketing piece you posted. Are all your citations circular, to the same article that is encouraging people to put their extra cash in useless savings accounts? The vast majority of Americans keep their extra cash in a checking account for convenience, and less commonly a money market account, all of which is explicitly excluded from "savings" in that article. Savings accounts only profit the banks, people don't have a use for one these days.

Meanwhile, you ignore US Federal Reserve surveys, US BLS statistics, etc that are detailed, authoritative, and provide the basis for most economic modeling. Probably because they obviously and transparently contradict your assertion in considerable detail.
Happy to connect for showing a product demo or suggesting a few potential ideas for your product. https://calendly.com/divya-themangojelly/intro
For radiation-hardened semiconductors sometimes you use specialized processes like silicon-on-insulator. Even if you're using a more conventional process, you're probably using specialized upset-resistant gate designs and layout. And even your gate-level or HDL-level design might have changes to make it possible to detect and recover from some kinds of bitflips. It really affects the whole technology stack.
How do I verify that my query is being encrypted in the browser?

And is the proxy a service under your control?
The Anti-Vitiligo Cookbook (TM)
Exactly, it's like with the Cable providers "competition". They theoretically "compete" because they sell the same, but in reality, geographical availability is set in a way that they are focused on servicing different demographies
One of the strengths of Alamo is that they do showings for indie films and have weekly nights of older films. So cheaper to screen these and they make bank on the food and drinks.

And the biggest part for me is they have ZERO commercials while you're waiting for it to start. They show silly bumpers, youtube clips and internal promos.
A hydrogen fuel cell car is basically an electric car + a hydrogen fuel cell, because:

1) The energy from the fuel cell has to be temporarily buffered in a battery, which is capable of finely modulating the power output needed for driving vs a fuel cell.

2) To absorb energy from regenerative braking. Hydrogen fuel for automotive applications don't work in reverse (convert energy back to H2)

Granted, this battery in a fuel cell vehicle can be smaller than in a pure EV, but now you have 2 very expensive energy management systems in the car, which makes the whole thing very expensive.
Democrats had filibuster proof senators when Obama was president. They had way more than 50%.

Why did this not happen then?
Germanium transistors: logic circuits in the IBM 1401 computer