skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Also JBP is simply quoting the research in the social and psychological and psychometric fields that already exists

He isn't, that is the main criticism. He usually uses actual research, yes, but then extrapolates widely and without empirical support.

For example he uses observed gender differences in the Big Five traits (which are actually there, though keep in mind the Big Five traits by themselves are already about 50% society, not genes), but then postulates differences in e.g. natural sciences, which cannot reasonably derived from this base.

His postulations often also actually stand in contrast to empirical evidence. For example in eastern Germany, the area of the former GDR, where gender equality was officially mandated and thus stronger than it is even now in Germany, girls had on average better math grades than boys in the 90s and early 2000s (see the national TIMSS data for these periods. This effect only disappeared in generations born after German reunification.

All this isn't surprising as Peterson is a Jungian (which is quack psychology), and to my knowledge has no empirical background.
It's a fair point and probably partially true. But I'm pretty certain the only way an iPhone will survive for a century is if someone removes the battery and places it into a locked vault. With regular, or even just occasional use, it's unlikely to last past a decade.
Ordering is not the only concern here. std::set actually provides a logarithmic worst-case guarantee, whereas std::unordered_set does not. This is a factor to consider depending on the application, regardless of whether ordering is necessary. Whichever one prefers in any case, though, is beside my point—I'm merely trying to use trees and hashtables to illustrate a far more general CS phenomenon that can occur in lots of data structures and languages.
Another interesting problem with the weather sometimes is "high" temperatures, negatively impacting the friction characteristics of the blue ice runway.
Oh interesting, from wiki

56 - seksoghalvtreds(indstyve) - six and [two score plus] half [of the] third (score)
That's not really enough as you depend on libraries you don't own. All the sudden in order to update a small library you use you need to update to a new version of Python. So, yeah, new syntax is always disruptive. My utopia has new syntax being added very seldomly with loads of notice period and a `from __future__ import newsyntax` phase before the syntax is considered "production ready". So, hopefully, by the time people start using it, all relevant version of Python supports it.
We use Okta at work.

I have to re-log-in to everything, virtually every time I use it. Okta seems to have no ability to remember who I am, or even that I've used this browser 10000 times before and don't need to be Two-Factored for the 10th time today.
Tips for Shipping Data Products Fast
> Strings are immutable, so in theory it could easily be the case that any two equal Strings must share their machine address, even if you got them from user input.

Hey, and now you have two problems: String hashing and finding all strings which are equal to each other in memory
That incident is 15 years old. I think it's about time we stopped wheeling it out as an exhibit whenever this topic is mentioned. Executable code viruses are not such a big deal these days, when everything is based around web technologies anyway.
have you actually tried it? its ecosystem provides all of that
My urban planning teacher used to say, as a synthesis, that rent control does more damage to a city than bombing..

Why? Buildings will degrade. Fast forward some years and rents will not justify any building maintenance by landlords. History is full of examples that ideology recurrently ignores.
Upvoted for trying something that I think most people would dismiss as a solution to a problem no one has. The best ideas are the ones most people think are bad.

I had a similar idea almost a decade ago — straight to voice-mail messaging. I never tried implementing it because everyone started using text messaging, which is faster and more efficient than any other medium except (maybe) face-to-face conversation.

I say “maybe” because a face-to-face (or voice-to-voice) conversation is actually inefficient in terms of signal to noise. Conversations meander unless everyone involved has strong communication skills, or there is an excellent facilitator. But where voice-communication shines is in its very tight feedback-loop — tighter than any other method. No waiting for an email response. No waiting for the slack or IM “so and so is writing” to turn into a message. No interpreting the tea-leaves of text to figure out intent, emotion, and tone. Voice-to-voice is slow in terms of raw information transmission, but it is the fastest method of identifying the signal in the noise and then focusing everyone’s attention upon that signal.

This is to say that voice-communication’s greatest value is in being a synchronous feedback loop.

Now, if you can figure out how to keep that feedback-loop while moving to async, then I think you’ve got a killer product.

There’s actually a hack that people currently resort to when async voice-communication is a requirement: middle management. Middle managers talk to upper management enough to be able to then speak as if they are upper management to the individual contributors. Although C-Suite execs can send an email to the whole company, it generally works better to talk with the managers enough so that the managers can then speak to their teams. An email can be misunderstood. It can’t answer questions. It can’t elaborate on varying tropics of interest to varying teams and individuals. Good managers almost always have excellent communication skills, in that they serve as a medium of asynchronous voice-communication.

So transcription isn’t really what is needed. What’s needed is the ability to get a brain dump from someone (voice is best for this), parse and integrate that dump into some kind of knowledge-base, and then enable interactive human-level voice-communication with that knowledge-base. If you could pull that off, then you’ve essentially made a super-middle-manager that talks to every single person in the company all the time, never forgets anything, and is capable of getting the right information to the right person at the right time.

So basically, a Siri for a company that listens as much as it talks, and actually works.

Just my two cents, but congrats on tackling a quite interesting problem, and best of luck!
Seems to me that there are no “move” operations in S3, only copy and delete (which mean exactly what they say). So copy still means copy, and if you implement your own “move” you have to make sure it does what you want.
What is Web Application Penetration Testing? All you need to know
>I'm not sure what the relevance of it either way.

The subject of this sub-thread discussion is that it's about "Brave has a long way to go to build real trust." and so it's not limited to functionality, it's about trust. Therefore a leader who is seen to be "misguided" in some parts is relevant to trust in the project they lead.

I agree it's not relevant to functionality but this sub-thread is about trust which is more of softer issue.
They also don't have the pasture they would expect. Nor the gut biome to digest it.

A living organism is also an entire context. Just look at the trouble we have getting wild animals to thrive in a zoo, where we can control the environment. The idea that an extinct megafauna could be released into whatever environment and survive, is unlikely.
FSF was never a movement or an organization. It's a fact that its influence has been waning in the last two decades becase it was nothing more than a echo chamber to RMS's own image.

I'm not sure they can part ways with that.
Elon Musk wants to create a new city called ‘Starbase’ at SpaceX’s Texas site
Show HN: Gleek diagram maker – UML class, Sequence, ER diagrams, Flowcharts
Or you could use Apple arcade and not worry about it I guess?
Well that's emplace_back() or push_back() when you pass them a r-value reference basically.
Go and Buy Yansh from Nengi- Fans Advice Actress Regina Daniels. – I Too Talk
Global mortality from outdoor fine particle pollution
This directly solves a problem a maintainer might have faced:

1. You have been asked to implement a feature.

2. Recognise that the feature really only has benefit for a particular segment of the market.

3. You don't agree with the motivation of that segment, but you want to provide the features your user-base requires.

4. You provide a satirical nod to your opposition, but also implement the feature.

It seems reasonable to me.

--

Edit: typo
As a millennial who is allergic to voicemail, the thought of having to listen to long messages from a boss makes my toes curl

The benefit of the written word is that it can be scanned, searched, cut, copied etc.
Now you're pulling a single sentence out of an entire context and dismissing that particular context. That's not how it works.

The next parts of that piece are equally important:

> But what if someone were to find a way to edit the saved games and
assign the items and currency without effort? That would be terrible,
because it would help players consume the content much faster, and therefore
run out of it sooner than expected. If that happens, they will have
nothing that prevents them from thinking, and the tremendous agony of realizing
their own irrelevance would again take over their life.

> No, we definitely do not want that to happen, so let's see how to
encrypt savegames and protect the world order.

Clearly "protect the world order" is hyperbole. It is clearly signalling that none of the above is to be taken literally.

Moreover, the "prevents them from thinking" is another form of signalling. It's meant to say "Think about who you're buying from, and what you're buying into." What is absolutely not meant to say is this: "your experience as a gamer is invalid because you buy into a questionable product/service/business model."

The entire piece is satire. It's self deprecating. Satire asks that the reader takes a step back, self deprecates for a minute... and then reflects on what's actually being said.
Exactly. Currently at 7% SSD wear after 2 months of normal frontend work (16gb RAM, and 1TB SSD).
Lion: A formally verified, 5-stage pipeline RISC-V core
The Guide to Angular User Login and Registration (Cookies, JWT)
I'd rather have a Europe-wide application of the French approach of forcing manufacturers to disclose repairability scores at the point of sale (and let consumers decide who important repairability is to them) rather than bureaucrats getting involved with engineering and microeconomics.
The Brown M&M's Principle
Rust's push is a `move_back`. Curiously, it doesn't have any equivalent of emplace or placement new. It does memcpy on push, and relies on the optimizer to remove it.
Thanks Michael, appreciate your thoughts.

And I agree. I too doubt BTC will become the medium of exchange it was originally envisaged to be.

As to whether it will retain our confidence as a store of value remains to be seen.

I will continue to follow the heated discussion on HN with much interest. It's great to be able to read the consolidated thoughts of individuals who clearly understand this technology far better than I do.
tl;dr I am saying the right to repair is good. however, I guarantee we over estimate how many have been impacted and in which categories it most occurs and more than a few here are aiming for right to upgrade. right to repair laws need to exist to ensure going forward we don't go backward and that authorized individuals can secure the parts that could be replaced.

we live in a world where anything from a phone to big screen tv can be made anywhere in the world and sold anywhere else. a lot of that comes from reducing manufacturing to as few components as possible leaving only large assemblies as being replaceable. Now these laws need to leave open the ability to use 3rd party replacement parts and re manufactured parts

Let us look at our phones. Even if the case could be opened easily you have at most four to five truly discreet components that could fail and be replaced. Front glass, rear panel, circuit board, battery, and ?. I would love to see failure rates of each component, just want are companies fixing under warranty? Having that published would be very valuable.

Now I took our phones as an example but even laptops are not that far off. Being able to repair is not the same as being able to upgrade and many want the later. However that could put you straight outside of any warranty in the first place. So playing with a modern day no moving parts except at most a fan you have the system case, display panel, battery, and logic board. Even if a manufacturer made it so you could replace memory and drive it could all be limited to only the capacities they sell for that sku. hell they could use non standard connectors internally to thwart it and ease manufacturing.

as for appliances and big ticket house hold items from stoves, refrigerators, to TVs what do we get? what breaks in appliances? burners, circuit boards, compressors, pumps, and such.

note : I work in the automotive parts industry and the right to repair vehicles is very important to us and others. I truly believe the laws are needed but I think people's expectations of what can be repaired in the realm of small electronics is unrealistic as many items are outside of the case four or five discreet assemblies
So you would equate a digital blackjack game without real money involved to actual casino blackjack? I don't know if it's an expression in english, but it seems to be a case of "degrees in hell". Contributing to video game addiction isn't great, but intentionally siphoning money out of the wallets of whales is downright evil.
I think these kind of things get caught in an organization with technically competent people that can give feedback to the product process. People who can understand from first principles how long something should last, and don't tolerate it lasting ten times as much.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-weather-typically-so-much-b...

It's actually more complicated than that - the Gulf Stream contributes not to warming Europe but to cooling the eastern seaboard of the US:

https://www.livescience.com/13573-east-coast-colder-europe-w...
I asked for a trial login for Okta a few years ago. They sent it to me, but it didn't work. Not great for an authentication company. Made a point to avoid them based on that experience.
Building SaaS Web Applications Using WordPress for Startups – Use Cases Included
Hello HN,

my friends and I made Gleek.io - a diagram maker focused on speed
- typing code is much faster than drag-and-drop
- for developers, it is more natural to write than to draw
- generate a diagram with connections

The features of Gleek.io include:
- 16 different shapes to use
- Various connections based on the diagram type
- Diagrams saved locally in a browser as well as on Gleek.io servers
- Dashboard with the overview of your diagrams with the option to search
- Free Templates (type /) and Syntax help to make it easier to start
- Rotation of the diagram, SVG download of a diagram, diagram link sharing, fit to screen layout

Create your first diagram in Gleek.io & write your feedback

Example to try:
Type "Shape1-->Shape2" for your first diagram
I don't know what I'd do without the feeling of security I get from my comprehensive ketchup warranty.
This is simply not possible on bitcoin unless you have wallets holding money from many people. At which point you no longer own your wallet.

There is no way Tx of average humans would significantly cancel out within the time of a block.
Thats why LN just makes the time to settlement "infinite" and that's why it partially increases centralization again to cancel out more Tx. If that was the goal it could have been implemented in layer 1.

Anyway all that aside, lets just assume LN would work as perfectly as the devs hope it will do one day. Its sill way worse than existing FBA solutions that can handle most of this on layer 1 directly and already have fully working second layer (payment channels) implemented. Even if bitcoin and LN could eventually provide a similar good solution, whats the point if it already exists and why would anyone assume the existing solutions stop evolving while bitcoin and LN slowly catches up?
If we assume LN has reached all its goals in 10 years it also means the goals are outdated by 10 years.

We can arguing about what LN may be capable of doing one day but its never gonna be a valid argument against solution that deliver today.
Thank you for your comment. This inspired me to try to take another stab at studying category theory. I'll start with this lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8LbkfSSR58&list=PLbgaMIhjbm...

Are there any good books you can recommend on the subject?
Yes, but I'm not sure how it relates to the discussion
You believe there's a conspiracy against racists and promotion of racist ideas in science?
Well, no, the whole point of this discussion is that solving the second problem means the first problem never comes up.

And this isn't exactly some exotic approach; how often do you think people write Hashes in Ruby where the keys they use are all symbols? It's so common that there's dedicated syntax for it.
We used ORY fosite to write our auth service, and I have so far really enjoyed working with the lib. Feels like they aren't as focused on external users of the fosite lib though so much as their hydra solution which consumes it. The overall ORY ecosystem seems nice though, though I have not delved into it in detail past fosite.
actually lolled
> A week from now, someone will prove P=NP because all the problems we thought were NP were just running strlen() on the whole input.

You owe me a keyboard!
> "Boldness" is very subjective and thus not something I'd choose as a basis for my argument.

Like I said, I'm not making an argument, I'm expressing an opinion, a matter of taste. If you don't get why the idea behind things like Soylent are repulsive to some people, I don't really have the words to explain it either.
You may want to read this summary of the arguments pro and con SPIR-V, made by Kvark a gfx engineer at Mozilla, so you have a more balanced view of the topic :

The summary exists in two variants: a graphic summary[1] and a textual one[2].

[1] https://kvark.github.io/webgpu-debate/SPIR-V.component.html

[2] https://kvark.github.io/webgpu-debate/SPIR-V.html
Fbot Botnet Targets Traffic and Transportation Smart Devices
perhaps. now that i think about it i was buying my kids $50 androids when they came of age, but with the last two that didn't seem to cut it. i spent more like $100 with an extra $20 for an extra SD card.

for myself i paid under $250 for my android and i'm a professional full stack developer with android as part of that stack. (essential ph-1 phone on clearance sale on ebay).
I can understand an asyncornous voice messaging platform,
basically telephone answering machine 3.0.

If transcripts are auto generated then I can just read
them and not bother with the voice bit?

It is sold as "Asynchronous voice messaging for small teams",
Farhter down it says:

"No more second-guessing who said what in a meeting: transcripts, without the hassle. "

That confused me in the beginning, but I saw that it is
also live voice meetings.

I think that should be spelled out better.

"Async and sync platform, you get what the others have
with the added benefit of async"?

Yeah yeah I am not in marketing. Far from it.
Thankfully.
It's actually over 11%, as stated on your link, isn't it? The US was the biggest contributor with 20% (on paper, it didn't actually wire all this money to the WHO, only signed the contracts), which is now zero.
I never seem to get CT or what other people get from it. If you told me there is such a thing as geometric algebra where you have a language to talk about multidimensional spaces and that to solve certain practical problems it worth the effort to ask the question if there might be a space where the answer to that problem is trivial.

CT on the other had always struck me as a long list of if expressions with if expressions inside at infinitum.
Linked lists become really powerful and performant when implemented as intrusive containers, such containers do not need to live on heap and can be embedded directly into another data structures, so an element can be linked into multiple containers at the same time, this gives great flexibility and compactness (especially when indices are used to form the links instead of pointers).
The author explains that people he's worked with when seeing a message from the compiler telling them to use emplace_back() instead of push_back() just replace "push_back" by "emplace_back" without changing the function arguments. And since the result makes the compiler happy they don't realize that this is not what the message told them to do.
> “oh that could be because women are interested in people and men are interested in objects”

In a free societies with free education like most West-Europeans are, this is indeed the best explanation up to date. At least way more convincing than conspiracy theories in which a sexual minority is purposely oppressing the majority.
Several few decades ago, pointer chasing was much cheaper because the difference between an arithmetic operation and a memory access was far lower. CPUs in those times didn't even have caches (because they weren't needed). That made linked lists a reasonable choice. But CPU and memory speeds have been diverging -- both are growing at an exponential pace, but with different exponents, so the gap is also growing exponentially! So now we have a huge memory hierarchy and random accesses into memory are really slow and linked lists rarely make sense.
Welcome to democracy :D
DivideBuy Compromised
Unfortunately, I am writing to you to let you know that earlier this week we discovered that DivideBuy and its customers (including you) have been the victims of a cyber incident, which involved some of your personal data being accessed. I wanted to write to you as soon as I could, to let you know what we have discovered so far, and how we are going to protect you against any consequences of this attack.

Details of the Data Breach

In the last few days, since becoming aware of the incident, we have been working hard, together with external specialists, to make sure that all data is secure and that an attack of this kind cannot happen again.

We have also established that within the information that was accessed it may be possible to identify:

Name
Date of Birth
Address
Telephone Number
Email address
Associated Alias

Although some credit report information was also contained within the material that was accessed, this was not stored in a readable format and so is not likely to be able to be used by the person or persons who accessed it.

Source: received an email from them earlier

-----------------------

This is the third service provider in the last two years that got compromised, that I was using! I am getting sick of these incompetent companies not knowing or not caring how to do security properly! I thought I learned my lesson but I didn't. I guess I will just have to avoid everything that I can't purchase on Ebay or Amazon. I can't avoid risk, but I can minimise it.
What difference does it make? WebGPU runs natively.
Resource extraction industries in Canada will always take a bulk of the engineering talent, that is where the money is. Venture capital for mining is well established in Canada. As for real estate, everyone uses floating mortgages, so prices will stay high until interest rates go up.
Salaries in Canada are structured differently. Because taxes on income over $80,000 a year are very high, deferred compensation such as pensions and real estate gains are more important. Barter or cash jobs are another important source of income. Americans would never tolerate the rationing that Canadians go through for health care.