skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Various cuts of pork, tougher cuts of beef, and until recently, chicken thighs (which can still occasionally be fund on sale for under $2 a pound), are dirt cheap. In college bone in skin on chicken thighs were more my go to than pre-made ground beef.

> Ideally, the government should be subsidizing a variety of healthy vegetables for human consumption

I agree with you in general, but for pure sake of "being alive" the government is going to subsidize something that has calories. Kale may be good for people in the general sense, but even at 25 cents a bunch, it isn't going to fill any bellies.

Starches or protein, one or the other. Getting people to eat vegetables is largely cultural, though $ is certainly part of it, and a part that needs to be addressed.
I know this might sound like I'm pro Trump but I'm really not BUT I find it hilarious how it was bad with Trump's MAGA but when Biden wants to strengthen the US in similar ways it's suddenly very different. It's a one-party system. Right versus extreme right when watching from over here in the EU.
Not an academician but it seems to this layman technologist like maybe a step towards the long awaited apology for Aaron.
Scaling Reporting at Reddit
It was extremely misguided and the local government campaign was so focused on how much 'for the people of the city' it is that it never even mentioned things like the very significant chance it can't get cleared or that it will slow down building even more or that many of our flats will be put immediately on sale (which mine now is, along with graffiti by other tenants against it and declarations of 'war').
But SEMRush says this, right there in their report

> We do not know if we will be able to achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

This is a little different than Amazon running at a deficit to avoid taxes while they're consistently growing YoY.

Taken at face value, this is them admitting they haven't been profitable for years and don't know if they ever can be profitable.
I’ve had similar thoughts, but walked them back to “oh, they’d probably keep it to themselves or drop it in the NSA’s amnesty box.”
>> Pigs and other animals do lots of things you would presumably not do.

Yes, but they also do this thing that I would do. This is why this debate exists in the first place, yes? Because some animals eat other animals and we're that kind of animal. It doesn't matter if some aninmals would, e.g., eat their own excreta, because that is not something that humans do anyway and so there is no reason to discuss whether we should do it too or not.

>> A pig would also not keep you in a farm to eat later (among many other industrialized things we do to livestock).

I am arguing that if pigs were more intelligent than we are they would do to us exactly what we do to them, including keeping us in farms to eat later etc.

>> We have the capacity to choose not to eat them and to reduce suffering as a result.

Most animals, particularly pigs, would get eaten by something anyway. By not eating them we are not reducing suffering, we are simply shifting the blame.
Title should be updated to add ‘(2020)’.
> They have to deal with NAT, mobile OSes, etc.

Does this imply that the user-space TCP/IP-over-WireGuard trick described here wouldn't work through NAT, or on a mobile OS (assuming you can get a Go toolchain up and running)?
I used to use Roam before the $15/mo pricing (might be more than any subscription I have today). I've tried using a bunch of different notetaking apps: notion, obsidian...but I keep returning to my Apple notes. Looking forward to trying this out. Thank you!!
Isn't this the same Coindesk that banned some people from their service, or am I mistaken somewhere?
> Sometimes I like to imagine being able to run a unikernel OS where applications are written in something like safe Rust, everything runs in the same address space,

Better than that, static allocation. Embedded typically doesn't allow malloc anyway, so give me a platform that has the world's simplest MMU, static bounds checks that are put into write once read many memory upon boot. :-D
That's great! I'm glad they are doing this.

I can't wait for Elsevier to follow suit. /s
According to RSA Factoring Challenge 829 bits were broken recently [0]. The total computation time was roughly 2700 core-years [1].

I would consider 1024 bits risky in the following 10 years. 2048 bits probably won't ever be broken without significant algorithmic breakthrough or quantum computers.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge

[1] https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/202...
Looks like it's Dieter Rams inspired, not actually his palettes: https://twitter.com/cgpov/status/1214612422956371968
I'll be there!

P.S. Please don't bring Cooty.
Who decided that web 3.0 is built on crypto? I know some in the crypto community like to call it web 3.0, but I am still thinking web 3.0 is something different and built more on web 2.0
If you define natural laws as the things that happen when you remove actual laws, then I would say people being forced to move would be exactly what happens.
The only people that care about this sort of thing here, on hacker news. Or similar tech forums.

My mom isn't going to care, she's going to get something because she thinks it looks cool and the brand is eco-friendly or some shit.

There is a demand for bulletproof cars and blackout curtains, but judging by what I see in my neighborhood, I wouldn't invest heavily in a company that makes those things. But the latest fashions, made sustainably, in POC & women owned business, OMG SO AWESOMEMMEMEME
The analogy of less water and more Pepsi is terrifying and potentially accurate.
Testing HashiCorp Terraform
This is an extremely uncharitable reply. Where did anyone try and equate the suffering of animals and humans? Accusing your opponents of anthropomorphizing because of concern about non-human suffering is a ridiculous response. The fact that farm animals would not exist without our intervention has no bearing on what we owe them morally. Finally, one can work to alleviate the suffering of both humans and non-humans. Not only does one not preclude the other, but I find more often than not those working towards ending one are working towards ending the other.
Who's doing the "allowing" in your question? No one has that kind of power except for the state, and suggesting that the government should step in and make "asshole" a protected class seems silly.
Be careful, cypherpunks is a fascinating rabit hole; you can easily fall in and forever alter your perspective.
I would say that gravitational waves break the idea that empty space is symmetrical
It's not that hard to learn what one shouldn't say in public.

If anything, the most significant change the Internet has brought upon us is that people lose track of whether they're in public. Hacker News for example? Very public space; everything here is searchable and indexed.
We’re in America. No one is getting fired for being a libertarian or a socialist. Were not jailing flat earthers or people who marry sex dolls.

We’re taking about incitement to violence. That’s not something we tolerate as free speech.
Native apps definitely have advantage in some areas.

But web apps give the ability to ship an app to more platforms and not be restricted by app store border control. Spotify had an Ubuntu client which never worked well, but as their web app improved I got almost the same experience as I would have on OS X or Windows web app. This gives equal chance to other platforms and to app developers as well as they don't have to play by rules like 30% cut.

As long as we can ensure web browsers can be kept open on major platforms(the only exception right now is iOS), it gives more freedom and choice to non platform developers. I would be really happy if PWA support in web browsers keeps improving going forward and need for dedicated apps gets eliminated for most things.
Are you finding it hard to consume enough calories??
I mean, for a start 'Austrian' economics is a joke.

There's plenty of literature out there about the end of gold standards in various countries. The upshot of it is that economies get warped by constrained currency supply and those who already have tend to get more, over those who produce or invest.
Ingredients

ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, AND FOLIC ACID), WATER, LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZARELLA CHEESE (CULTURED PART-SKIM MILK, SALT, ENZYMES), TOMATO PASTE, COOKED SEASONED PIZZA TOPPING MADE WITH PORK AND CHICKEN, BHA, BHT AND CITRIC ACID ADDED TO HELP PROTECT FLAVOR (PORK, MECHANICALLY SEPARATED CHICKEN, WATER, TEXTURED SOY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE, SPICES, SALT, SUGAR, SODIUM PHOSPHATES, PAPRIKA, NATURAL PORK FLAVOR [MODIFIED CORNSTARCH, PORK FAT, NATURAL FLAVORS, PORK STOCK, GELATIN, AUTOLYZED YEAST EXTRACT, SODIUM PHOSPHATES, THIAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE, SUNFLOWER OIL, PROPYL GALLATE], SPICE EXTRACTIVES, BHA, BHT, CITRIC ACID), PEPPERONI MADE WITH PORK, CHICKEN AND BEEF (PORK, MECHANICALLY SEPARATED CHICKEN, BEEF, SALT, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF SPICES, DEXTROSE, PORK STOCK, LACTIC ACID STARTER CULTURE, OLEORESIN OF PAPRIKA, FLAVORING, SODIUM NITRITE, SODIUM ASCORBATE, PAPRIKA, PROCESSED WITH NATURAL SMOKE FLAVOR, BHA, BHT, CITRIC ACID TO HELP PROTECT FLAVOR), COOKED BEEF PIZZA TOPPING (BEEF, WATER, TEXTURED SOY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE, DEHYDRATED POTATOES WITH SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF SALT, HYDROLYZED CORN PROTEIN, SOY PROTEIN AND WHEAT PROTEIN, CORN SYRUP SOLIDS, MALTODEXTRIN, SPICE, NATURAL GRILL FLAVOR [FROM SUNFLOWER OIL], GARLIC POWDER, COOKED IN PORK FAT OR BEEF FAT OR VEGETABLE OIL), SUGAR, WHEAT GLUTEN, 2% OR LESS OF VEGETABLE OIL (SOYBEAN OIL AND/OR CORN OIL), DEGERMINATED WHITE CORN MEAL, YEAST, SALT, DEGERMINATED YELLOW CORN MEAL, DATEM, BAKING SODA, SPICES, WHEAT FLOUR, ENZYMES, DRIED GARLIC, ASCORBIC ACID (DOUGH CONDITIONER).
> 1. Crypto has too much volatility and hence poor risk-adjusted returns compared to stocks.

Can not get enough volatility. Compare a 5% chance of a 1000% return versus 95% chance of a 15% return. If you pick the latter, you pay a high price for your risk-avoidance.

> crypto tends to zig and zag unpredictably.

Crypto market incredibly inefficient and predictable manipulation happens on unregulated markets.

> 2. No options market with crypto.

Don't need to. Shorting badly is how beginning traders lose it all.

> 3. Too hard and cumbersome to deposit and withdrawal large sums of and crypto and or fiat.

Depends on your returns and when and where you made these. But right now, indeed cumbersome.

> 4. Too small of position sizes. On /r/wallstreetbets it is not uncommon to see traders in their 20s or 30s make bets of ten thousand dollars or more on a single option trade.

/wallstreetbets is degenerates and show-boating. You can easily divide all numbers there by 10 and get more reasonable estimates. Crypto traders don't post their trades on reddit, at most in a Telegram group with other traders forming a pump-and-dump group. These don't want attention.

> Stocks tend to ‘trend’ which means that past price movement predicts future direction.

Bitcoin follows a nice trend too, just look passed the variance. Opposed to stocks, crypto price actually still slightly predictable using simple trend features.

> 6. As discussed earlier, crypto is more like a commodity than a stock. [...] Inflation 2-5%.

Win 5% extra on your stocks, add 5% with buybacks and earnings. Still does not beat a 5% chance of a 10x.

> Where are the millionaires? Surely there must be some.

Just look at the wallets of early Ethereum investors (when the price was around 50 dollarcent). Look at transaction sizes. Then do the math. Regardless of fear of getting hacked, you really think these people are posting about their tendiez on wallstreet bets, or bragging about 50k+ trades on /r/crypto?
You should have stopped after the first sentence. Your lack of design knowledge does not invalidate an entire field of practice.
Those articles seem to be advocating against the idea (popular in the paleo community) that carbs are unhealthy or wouldn't have been part of our ancestral diets. I agree that idea seems mistaken, and agree that fruit, tubers, and honey are all foods we've likely been eating since aproximately forever.

But I don't think it's true we weren't also eating a lot of animals, and in many cases, getting most of our calories from animals.

Separately, the existence of modern hunter-gatherer groups like the Hadza that eat a lot of meat and are healthy suggests eating meat is healthy.

(Of course, you have to be careful, since there are potentially large differences between the Hadza's nose-to-tail fresh, wild kills, and what you might get at the supermarket. Meat is a broad category.)
I meant it as trial results that don't show meaningful gains from vegan diets.
NOPE - He was after the proof that Pedos and Sadists were on roster - not stupid tech data... That is why he was killed.
Why would or should your salary ever be a fixed proportion of either of those things?

Your labour certainly isn't.
Great now donate to the suicide prevention foundation.
Send me $500k and we can talk again.
With the coming ubiquity of QUIC, its seems natural to have a QUIC based analog to OpenVPN using packet based QUIC instead of OpenVPN’s UDP/TLS.

It also seems rather obvious to extend WireGuard to run over QUIC in addition to UDP. But the movement on that front has been very limited.
It's a request, not an interdiction ;o). I find it occasionally illuminating to discuss meta-aspects but as a general rule the site guidelines are sensible.
I mean, given a choice between "an incompetent programmer with seven years work experience exists", and "Gab as a whole is some sort of weird honeypot", Occam's razor probably suggests the incompetent programmer.
I hope there is a link. Aaron did not die in vain, his ideas and spirit live on.
People like to slag on other people's programming skills, but are you sure that all code you wrote doesn't have some absolutely boneheaded mistake in it?

I like to think I'm pretty good, but I would never claim that and certainly wouldn't put money on it. I'm sure I've got boneheaded mistakes scattered through my code. Sometimes you're having a bad day. Sometimes the reviewers are a little pressed for time. It doesn't take much for really stupid code to slide through as long as it appears to work.

Glass houses and all that ...
How do you think banks became centralized?
Because your information is still getting stolen. Isn't this obvious? There is no lesser evil much less so than a country that doesn't comprehend concepts like "privacy" and "human rights".
Author here. Thank you for pointing this out! I actually did not know that this phrase had such a specific meaning. I had incorrectly inferred from other usage that the phrase meant that the fact in question was supported by evidence to a degree that warranted no further debate. I feel a little embarrassed for the misuse. However I'm all the better off for having been educated on its proper use! Thank you.
This is one reason I hate the common labels "vegetarian" and "vegan". People have this twisted "OHH! GOTCHA!" mentality if you're not perfectly consistent. And by that same token, I think it's common be be all-in or none-in. It's not at all uncommon for (especially Americans) to eat meat for every meal every day of the week. Cutting back is a good goal, even if you're still not "veg*"
Integer factoring is in a fairly sparse in-between zone between polynomial and NP Hard problems. This is why quantum computers can have a near exponential speedup from them (disregarding this claimed result) and only a polynomial speedup for NP Hard problems. So even if this result holds it can't be converted into a fast solution for all NP Hard problems.
We need Elsevier's revenue to decrease enough so that some benevolent billionaire can buy it and make everything open access.

Elsevier's has plenty of ways to reinvent itself make money. Scopus is a good search engine and libraries would be wiling to pay for it unbundled from journal access.
Emphasis on the "a bit" part. I had to deal with it for the first time in years recently, and the most recent version is still a nightmare in every way.
@perl4ever: "I don't have experience with dieting or diet pills per se"

If you need to go on a "diet" then your eating too much for the amount of physical excercise you engage in.

People who are morbidly overweight don't seem to have a "I-am-Full" switch. Or have a "I-am-always-hungry" switch that's stuck in the on position. They eat too much, the body responds by burning off the excess. They soon feel more hungry and so on. There's also a psychological component involved, comfort eating etc.

All medications come with side-effects, taking such for long periods is not wise. Certanly not to combat weight-gain. Go for a five-mile run Weekdays and on Sunday. You can have Saturday off.
Aka, the Simons in Chern-Simons theory.

(Albert Schwarz formulated Chern–Simons theory, a topological quantum field theory, using the Chern-Simons form)
The blind enthusiasm for factory meat is concerning.

Any farm suggestions?
Ranges are a pretty big part of it for me, but what really gets me is the ease of creating useful new types. Having to destructure a new type to use it, or create a bunch of pass-through functions kinda ruins the point. I haven't seen any language really have a strong cultural focus on types like Ada does, and I think the ease of creating and using new types is the cause.

I think the best I've actually seen in this regard is actually Haxe, with some decent macros for automatically getting pass-through functions. It doesn't even make you list them all out explicitly (as I've seen others do), IIRC.
> I mean, for a start 'Austrian' economics is a bit of a joke.

More specifically, Austrian economics is overtly and proudly ideological rather than empirical; it is about advancing an agenda not describing reality.

It's worth taking seriously, but as a particular group’s body of theology and religious propaganda, not as science.
Why not just put it somewhere far away instead? You could even double up the benefits by picking a cold place to help keep your equipment temps down https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Xkeyscore-worldmap.j...
>So then if a mugger is attacking someone, you think that we should tip our hat at the mugger, and walk by?

Do you not see that the symbolism you are building here correlates with you joining the mugger in their current actions (mugging), then possibly somewhere down the road betraying the mugger? How does that make you better than them?

I feel like you are trying to justify a selfish decision.
Am I supposed to feel sorry for the American vulture and REIT funds who are bumping the property (rental and sale) prices sky high in European cities and American ones???? The Humanityyyyyy
Interesting article, echoing both “The scandal of money” and “Life after google” by George Gilder
Ah, bummer. For some reason I thought it was NP-hard; thank-you for the correction.
Go only supports semantic versions, and has created quite a bit of friction if you want to use any other sort of versioning scheme (especially if it kinda looks like SemVer, such as vYEAR.WEEK.BUILD).

Pushing it even further, Go puts a gun in your mouth and makes it so that you cannot use any other version scheme but SemVer. So you either pull the trigger and deal with the pain of SemVer, or you do what growing number in the community are doing: taking the gun from their mouth and using v0 forever.
And lions spend 20 hours a day sleeping... what's your point?
Teachers already might have a flower spray can with soap and a cloth for the board.

One-use prewet papertowelsheets might be overengineering the issue.
honestly, use prepared statements...

You get the same benefit of "template literals" but the data and query are separated at the DB level. The DB knows what is data and what is query therefore any attempt at escaping from SQL will be quashed there.
Offering alternatives to people who prefer to eat plant based meals rather than meat based ones is hardly a "crusade against meat". I understand you would feel attacked if these corporations were going out and saying "no more meat" in reality, they are just putting 1 or 2 options on the menu which allows people who don't want to eat meat to still eat unhealthy takeaway. No one is trying to force you to not eat meat. But the status Que you are trying to desperately defend has people choosing a vegans or vegetarian diet completely unwelcome at mainstream fastfood restaurants because there is nothing for them on the menu, not even the french fries are vegetarian. And for what purpose? KFC and McDonald is just as happy taking your money and slinging over a burger without a patty as one with one. So why shouldn't they offer plant based alternatives?
Not at all! SST is built on CDK. So anything you can do in CDK, will also work in SST.
uhm... i'm not against this thing per se, but last time i tried a beyond meat burger... it didn't taste like meat at all.

at least, not the kind of meat that usually goes in a burger. it tasted more like entrails/chitterlings/pluck (not sure what the correct word would be, i'm not a native speaker of english).

we'll see, I guess.
Not from the US, but thanks for wishing me luck anyways.
I’ve never heard this?
...and anti-human trafficking foundations too.
I think you mean "empathy"?
Leave it to the bitcoin maxis to make the term "scam" meaningless. If bitconnect and nano are both scams, then the word has no meaning.
If you don't annotate the return value you open yourself up to another class of mistakes because the compiler can't check that each branch returns the correct type, especially if type inference decides the function returns `any` which swallows `undefined` in type hints, while also losing the self-documenting aspect without an IDE.
Are you talking about minced beef? I buy that at 5% fat in the UK, and that’s not anywhere fancy.
>> I don't have to resort to dreams and plans. They're simply _not human_ and so as someone who doesn't anthropomorphize them it's easy to simply not care whatsoever about their emotional state. It doesn't noticeably impact the quality of the meat.

I don't understand this. Why not care about the emotional state of the animal? You're going to kill it to eat it, there's no reason to cause it suffering too.

In any case, it's impossible to not care about the emotional state of an animal you grow and care for, including the ones you grow for food. But this is not something one learns living away from farmed animals and leaving someone else do all the dirty work of growing them and the bloody work of slaughtering them.

I think the above is at the root of both opinions like yours, and the other extreme, of abstaining from eating meat for nebulous ethical reasons. People eat other animals for very good reasons, but there is no good reason to make them suffer, or ignore their suffering, or not try to alleviate and minimise their suffering beyond what is absolutely necessary.
> "I am arguing that if pigs were more intelligent than we are they would do to us exactly what we do to them, including keeping us in farms to eat later etc."

I don't think this is necessarily true. Throughout our own history humanity has done things we regret and decided were wrong (or are actively fighting against). Slavery, genocide, kings, torture - while struggling towards more just societies based on rule of law and more democratic government.

It's quite possible that raising and killing other animals with lots of suffering is something we will regret.

It's quite possible that another imaginary species of hyper-intelligent pigs would reach the same conclusion.

> "Most animals, particularly pigs, would get eaten by something anyway. By not eating them we are not reducing suffering, we are simply shifting the blame."

This is a different argument. Just because other animals that are not humans and don't have the capacity for choice would eat a pig, doesn't mean that humanity contributing to this suffering is the same. I'd also argue we do it at such a scale that it's much worse.