skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Most of my skills didn't ever get far beyond newbie level.

This is the best test for whether a game really allows freedom in player interaction. If players can have fun and build characters without ever relying on game-mechanical progression, they have true freedom. I made more money in UO running dice games next to the bank than running dungeons.
We're onto NewSQL now.
To clarify, priority is browsing, copying and moving stuff on same remote server, not copying data between machines. Thanks, will try these anyway. Trying this too https://cloudcmd.io

Edit: Cloud Commander works, gives you two-pane webgui with a row of Fx buttons below. F5 copies files locally.
I’ve heard lots of pols call out “fight like hell” mostly on the dem side, but you hear it from both. During the summer riots we also heard “burn the motherf$&@er down!” etc.
I'm a containers early adopter and have 38 containers (just counted them) that are highly configured. There are many extensions that not only honor containers but allow for detailed customization.

That said, even just the "built-in" Multi-Account Containers will allow you to pin a domain to a particular container - i.e. amazon.com will always open in a Shopping container, wellsfargo.com always in Banking, slack, github, netlify always in Work, twitter only in Social Media, Gmail and YouTube in Google, etc.

Containers themselves are effectively just a label and a (limited) privacy sandbox. So far I have experienced no performance hit nor other issues so I create new Containers at will. Thus if you have 6 gmail accounts you can create Google1, Google2, and stay logged into all of them all of the time.

Additionally, I use the Cookie Auto Delete extension to only persist specific cookies to specific containers while all other cookies are wiped. I can maintain my YouTube subscriptions in a container that stays logged in my primary gmail account while being able to also watch other random videos in my Random container without polluting my real account history.

For work I have about 6 different accounts that I can be actively logged-in with; each tab is a different user with an entirely different role (for testing) and all can exist side-by-side.

As other have mentioned, you can always right click on any link from any container and open that link in a different container.

For me there is no going back to "standard" browsing. I can remain independently logged in to whatever I choose and feel confident those cookies are segregated from any other browsing activity. (obviously my IP is the same and some forms of fingerprinting surely still manage to track me in some manner)

Recently I added the Containerise extension which allows for even greater granularity with the always-open-in-a-container feautre: it allows for subdomain & even regex-based url rules. So, for example, console.aws.amazon.com can open in an AWS container (logged in my work email) while amazon.com can open my Shopping container (logged in with my personal email).

TLDR - containers plus extensions are extremely flexible and powerful
> It’s honestly just basic professionalism. Don’t publicly trash your employer.

I'm sure the fine folk at Project Zero didn't get this memo.
No offense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJv2-_--EY4
No love for the Alice and it's loving clones?
Hmm.

While closing tabs recently I stumbled on a particularly interesting (to me) HN discussion (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25506007) from a couple months ago.

I'm taking the following comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25506951) out of the context it was posted in, but I don't believe this particular case takes liberties with the original intent:

---

> analog31

> ... Economics is largely about an emergent phenomenon, thus falling squarely on the "is" side of things.

> Emergence is a relatively recent concept in the linguistic timeline. For most of human history, everything seemed to be either of human action and human intention (turning on a light), or neither of human action nor of human intention (the weather). As such, languages did not emerge (ha!) that easily expressed emergent behaviors, things that were of human action but not of human intention (traffic jams).

> Similarly, one can see this with the subject of biological evolution (another emergent phenomenon). It's been nearly two centuries since Darwin got that ball rolling, and still almost any discussion about evolution is rife with inaccurately implied intention.

> One other consequence of this linguistic difficulty is that it leads people to propose solutions to perceived problems as if they were just about human action/human intention...

---

I think emergence is perhaps the most intuitively accessible way of reasoning through the impact of bureaucratic network effects. We've simply never before in history had to deal with human social cohesion at the scale we do today, so we've never reached the point where we've *had* to understand the dynamics correctly in order to make any progress.
There's a very quick fix for this -- install firefox :-D
I think the key is to just be sincere and honest. Different people will interpret the apology one way or another, good or bad, under/over apologized. But if you're sincere and honest, you've done your job.
What makes science great is the scientific method. Far too many people seem to forget it.

Coming up with a hypothesis and then finding some evidence isn’t science any more than alchemy is a form of science. Neither is cherry picking data and then retroactively creating a hypothesis (There was a big scandal surrounding this a few years ago). Even if you are right you need strong evidence of reproducibility for scientific claims to have any credibility. You need extremely strong reproducibility if you expect to make claims that may have implications for the health and safety of others.
Agreed, but depression in modern wealthy countries could potentially be less due to objectively comparable misery and pain on average and more due to a combined physiological, neurological, and psychological stagnation effect. It's very common to feel a profound dearth of meaning, purpose, higher goals, terminal goals, interpersonal connection, physical ambulation, sunlight, fresh air, or any idea of anything they should be doing but mindlessly scrolling some stream of text and projected imagery like a drug addict taking their 9th hit of the day while not actually feeling anything from it.

I know it's a tired trope to throw around at this point, but it just shows there are countless variables that factor into one's mood and disposition and sense of motivation even before you dig down to the neurological and biological levels. Leave a healthy, well-fed, "rich" rat or chimpanzee alone in a low-stimuli, not very large room for long enough and they'll often become depressed. Embed someone born in a wealthy country into an indigenous group and they often report feeling more alive and not depressed. Do the reverse and you often get the reverse.

And of course many people feel all these things not due to any sort of stagnation they have any personal control over but due to neurological systems which may be difficult to alter. Or both.

I think the original reply post may have partly misinterpreted what the commenter was trying to say. The hypothesis being discussed is something like that even if you reintroduce the rat back to its previous happy environment, their potential predictive processing dysfunction may cause them to not be able to do anything but treat all stimuli the same: not worth caring about or trying to derive enjoyment from.
> It's also not clear if MLK ever believed in enforced equality of outcomes (as opposed to just equality of opportunities).

"Equality of outcome" is a popular straw man for many who take the highly incredulous position that equality of opportunity exists today.

Simply ending the use of rhetorical racism would do little to remove structural racism that gives rise to the inequality of opportunity that persists.
I couldn't touch-type until I got a Microsoft Natural Keyboard (the very first version listed). Eventually I got its successor, the Elite, then the 4000. Interestingly enough, the touch-typing skills that I didn't develop until getting the MS Natural Keyboard translate back just fine to regular keyboards.
> To fix that, you need to start supporting error polymorphism.

> map :: List a -> (a -> b -[err]) -> List b -[err]

FWIW, Haskell has this already; it's called[0] Traversable:

ghci> :t mapA
mapA :: (Traversable t,Applicative f) => (a -> f b) -> t a -> f (t b)
ghci> :t mapA @(Error ||) @[]
mapA :: (a -> Error || b) -> [a] -> Error || [b]

0: The default prelude calls it `traverse` instead of `mapA` (which is terrible for reasons that should be obvious[1]) and `Either Error a` instead of `Error || a` (which is a matter of taste).

1: Especially if you rename the method of Functor from `fmap` to:

map :: Functor t => (a -> b) -> t a -> t b
-- for comparison:
mapA :: ... => (a -> f b) -> t a -> f (t b)
The real question is why would you join an ethics team that's obviously for PR purposes, then complain about it being for PR purposes.

These resigned/fired researchers might be good in their field, but they're pretty dumb when it comes to their jobs.
I wonder if anyone shares my setup. I lie horizontally with a monitor suspended 3ft directly above. I use a logitech trackball on my right hand at my side. I find this position comfortable for long hours and don't experience the backpain that I did for years.

One wrinkle is the keyboard - it rests on my upper thighs, and I find I'm rolling my shoulders forward to type which is less than ideal. I experimented with split keyboards but haven't found an ideal solution yet. A major problem is switching from the trackball back to the keyboard. Also needing to keep the trackball out wide to allow space for the split keyboard on my right side.
There is a non-zero chance that out there somewhere is a Google team using the number of times someone clicked that setting off as a drinking game.
Meritocracy works!
Echo is also a name...
“After conducting a review of this manager’s conduct, we confirmed that there were multiple violations of our code of conduct, as well as of our security policies, which included the exfiltration of confidential business-sensitive documents and private data of other employees,” a Google spokesman said in a statement.

This feels pretty cut and dry to me. Meg exported business material from the company. That a fire-able offense at any company.

I feel bad for her but I honestly don’t understand why she is even surprised she got fired.
https://archive.is/eoPWJ
Agreed. As long Pinboard is alive and profitable, he gets to keep trolling inflated SV egos and they can't even hit back with their usual tactic of, "what do you know, you don't even run a startup". That's worth the annual fee by itself.
Lets assume they solve all the math challenges with the routing: The on-boarding is still a challenge as it demands one initial on-chain transaction.

If 10% of the current facebook users want to get on lightning and we can make 6 transactions per second it will take 17 months before all are on board - and this is assuming no other types of transactions (so any payment made with BTC will delay this)
You'd think people might've cottoned on by now that selling "yourself" (or, more likely, your product) is a skill, that it can be learnt, and it should be learnt.

If there's sleaze involved or dirty tricks that's not right, but if you've a good idea or product and you can't persuade someone to back you then I'm not sure why the complaint should be against those who can, especially with allegedly inferior ones.
I mean, if you want to make something useful - you can't go wrong by adding drawers to it.
Yep, though I knew even at the time that most companies' mission statements were BS. Google seemed different. I think at some point they still actually were different, but also were themselves naive about what being successful and transforming into a large corporation would do to them.
I think you're asking a perfectly valid question. IMHO authentication is still an enormous mess and new standards like OAuth did nothing to improve it on the server side.

On your phone app store there's a strong and trusted source of identity coming from Apple or Google. They know who you are, what you're allowed to do, etc. and can delegate that authority to your apps.

On the server though... welcome to the wild west. How does your server know the person on the other end of a TCP connection is really you, or the person you shared a document to view, etc? You can put your trust in a third party authority like Google, Facebook, Auth0, Okta, etc. but that usually comes with a financial cost. You can roll your own auth or self-host an auth server, but then you're taking on a huge security burden and it's a big leap in complexity to manage something like Keycloak, an LDAP server, etc. It's just not an easy problem to solve with the tools the web gives us today.
I'm a little conflicted on this one. On the one hand, it seems like a clear case of 'live by the sword, die by the sword'. On the other hand, maybe a bunch of gun-toting conspiracy theorists speaking up for these professional ethicists would be the hand of friendship that could breach a deep but narrow chasm in public life.

But realistically, I imagine if a gun-toting conspiracy theorist showed up, someone like the article subject would scapegoat them for another month of comfortable employment, so she's probably exactly where she needs to be.
Many great examples, for psychology the Freudian Cabal vs Jung and other formulations, the bullying Bohr did to Heisenberg in the interpretation of quantum mechanics[0], and you'll read many accounts from Haidt and Pinker about the social sciences.

The consensus that materializes due to the various pressures at the time might not always be the best for advancement, and at worst it may take decades to overcome.

[0] https://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/quantumdrama.htm
Social Chemistry
Computing and Ethics was a very important class in my CS program. Just because you can should you?
...are you saying you've had the setting turn itself back on? That hasn't happened to me.
Here's a pretty interesting read regarding Lisp at JPL.
http://www.flownet.com/gat/jpl-lisp.html

I think the "safety" of "familiarity" vs pushing the envelope of what we can do technically are different things. We used to build brand new computers and operating systems from scratch specifically for these types of things.

The risks are indeed high for managerial staff. I worked at a large quasi-government place. "you won't ever get fired for using Microsoft, Oracle, etc" was a tagline we heard often in non-critical systems, so I imagine there would need to be some major technical reason to switch.

Now drones on the other hand... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93U.S._RQ-170_incid...
Venus atmosphere is hot and corrosive
Yes - residential customers don't pay wholesale price (which is what I, and gp was referring to). I'm not sure why you're injecting residential pricing into the discussion.

Energy companies absorb the fluctuations, except for that one company that thought it was a great idea to pass-though prices to the customers. It was a great idea when the prices were low, but many of their customers will likely experience sticker shock on their next bill.
> Is it time to say goodbye to Chrome in favor of [other frontends for Blink where you can keep helping Google shore up their ability railroad the web standards process]?

For real, how is Firefox not on the list of browser options?
You're describing 'science the method'. GP is describing 'science the community'.

Scientific method (mostly) works and bears fruit at longer timescales (40, 60, 100 years, or longer). In the meantime, over short to medium term, a handful of outcast scientists have to face ridicule, be sidelined, be shunned, be mocked, by pretty much the whole scientific community, a massive circle-jerk that exists for the purpose of citing each-other, giving each other awards, sucking up to, networking, and clinking champagne glasses with the handful of agencies doling out the pitiful amount of funding, most of which goes to waste. More often than not those outcasts can't go any longer and their work either disappears, or is usurped in the form of "You did this? ... I did this."
I'm very interested. Can you point to specific examples?

And did the original contributors fork the project to a new successful initiative? Or if not, why not?

I'm also curious why companies feel the need for this -- if the data is all open in the first place, why do the companies even need to bother? Why don't they just use the data directly?

Without specific examples it's hard to understand.
Show HN: Share your workstation setup and earn with Amazon Affiliate links
Out of curiosity, do you feel antidepressive qualities from other dopaminergic substances? (Part of modafinil's mechanism of action is thought to be dopaminergic.) Also, do you feel like you might have ADHD?

Just asking this out of curiosity, because I'm also someone who consistently experiences antidepressive effects from modafinil. Though for me it's typically more of a feeling that lasts for about 1 - 4 hours after use rather than a steady, stable mood lifting effect.
I don't think you can pay in Euros either, you'd have to convert them to good ole USD first, just like BTC.
Much like other fundamental mistakes in the article it makes one relevant to the nuclear triad you're discussing as well.

> 3,800 warheads [..] for practical purposes, after the first few, they quickly grow redundant. “Once you've dropped a couple of nuclear bombs on a city, if you drop a couple more, all you do is make the rubble shake,”

I'm frankly not sure if this is deliberately disingenuous, intended to be hyperbole, or a fundamental lack of understanding of the situation or some combination of all three, but, this is exceptionally wrong.

The reason you have 3,800 warheads isn't to aim them all at one city. Remember just as the soviets target our nuclear missile silos we must target theirs. Moreover, having such an extensive fleet of missiles ensures that even if we were caught entirely off-guard and the soviets did an impossibly good job of targeting our nuclear forces, and say took out 90% of nuclear strike capabilities we would still have sufficient capabilities to utterly devastate them.

This is why the nuclear triad exists.

How effective would a soviet first strike be at targeting our SSBNs? Can they really track and destroy them at will? Maybe.

How effective would it be against our missile silos? Do they know where they all are? Probably. Can they get their bombs on the ground before we can get ours into the air? Maybe.

How effective would a soviet strike be against our bomber fleets? Do they know where to strike? Perhaps. Can they disable or destroy our bomber fleets before we can get them into the air? Maybe.

But, what are the odds that they can do ALL three simultaneously? Very, very unlikely.

And therein lies the truth of deterrence and nuclear detente. If the enemy understands that even in their best case 99% victory scenario you still possess enough capability to utterly devastate them they can and will not risk it.
The people using the dishonest tactics will tend to win out, same reason almost everyone in sports uses steroids. Being dishonest is just far, far too advantageous, which is why the "selling yourself" game is disgusting to many.
That is interesting, I have had the exact opposite experience. People saying that genes and their regulatory circuits are all that matter and that proteins are boring byproducts of that. I guess it is a matter of what sub-community you find yourself in.
The experiment would have to be flawed to an absurd degree for the findings to not be an indication of bias in favor of black suspects.

Even multiple minor/medium sized flaws in the experimental design that produce black favoritism not reflected in real world behavior wouldn't in the aggregate account for producing a 25 times exaggeration of bias.

The bias is undoubtedly there.
^This comment right here. This is what it was like to live through 1999.
Is there a pdf available or just the abstract?
Yes, for servers! Hard failures are much easier to deal with than soft-not-dead-but-still-useless states.

echo 1 > proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom
This seems staggeringly unlikely.

If you want to change what people in everyday life call you, then yes, that's not paperwork, that's just a polite request/conversation with various people (and, hopefully, they respect it).

If you want to change the name by which organizations, including the government, refer to you, then that is _by definition_ paperwork. I simply don't believe that you could have done that without submitting forms or other types of paperwork, at any point in recent history - pre- or post-9/11.

What am I misunderstanding?
No- even if the case happens to be about a federal jurisdictional matter (navigable waterway, or waters of the US, or USCOE jurisdictional wetlands, or direct government ownership/agency of included or adjacent property), this one is covered by original jurisdiction to SCOTUS, since both parties are state governments.
I've played many rouguelikes over the years. My current favorite is Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup. But the adrenaline rush just does not compare, probably because it lacks the real time interface.
Congrats on your launch Adam!

What deployment scenarios do you foresee? (given the license is GPL, which is infamous in the business world)
I think you mean Druid instead of Barbarian :)
This doesn’t explain why the interstitial fluids and cells themselves in a birds feet avoid freezing. Presumably, either their feet can simply be maintained at slightly above freezing or they use some form of antifreeze.

Does anyone know?
Path of Exile is the best ARPG ever made, i don't game that much anymore, but when i feel the need to play a game, it's PoE, every 3 months they release an new "league" where they reset the economy and add bunch of new content! It's just a great game, ton of theorycrafting and items to collect, give it a try!(
How’s that nonsense? They do have great UI/UX.
Let me ask you another question.

If I was to write another article, "Breaking the chains of POSIX," where do you think I should focus?

POSIX job control was a soft target, and I had imagined my next focus to be the "local" keyword in shell functions.

Do you have suggestion on a better weakness in POSIX to encourage improvement?

Microsoft's powershell is evolving, and the POSIX shell is ossified. I think the POSIX shell standard must evolve to remain competitive.

If you agree, where should this improvement be encouraged?
Good riddance, work is work, political agendas outside the office space please.
The fact that Hooke posted this makes me even more curious about the temptation to consider Cybernetics as an alternative to "modern" science. (Modern like the art)

I think cybernetics has a far stronger theoretical grounding than artificial intelligence (a term literally invented to be useful in grant applications). But Cybernetics is uncomfortable because it brings purpose and teleology back to science. It also harkens to the pre-symbolic information flows that govern so much of the world and confound our rational minds.
I think you are undervaluing the global market. Photoshop was $500+ one time fee. In many countries that’s a monthly salary. Most of those countries pirated Adobe products.

By switching to subscription they made the barrier to entry lower and unlocked a greater market.

I was very happy with that switch, even though I have a subscription fatigue and general dislike of subscription model misapplication.

But we can’t run away from it. This model is here to stay and more and more businesses will switch if they can.

Best is to adapt your own processes, budgets than to fight or reject.