skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
EDIT: you completely changed your comment. My original response is below the line, but I'll also respond to your new one above it.

I don't actually understand grammatically what you're asking for or saying in this comment. Rust, Cargo, and a bunch of Rust applications are packaged in Debian today, from Buster onwards.

I think what you're saying is that rustc head should be able to be built with the llvm that lives in Debian stable? That is a choice that could be made, I'm sure, but then you're talking about supporting five API-incompatible releases of LLVM. The folks from Debian aren't even asking for that level of compatibility, and it would be quite a bit of work, for unclear benefit.

--------------------------------------------

There are lots of demands, from lots of people. Managing a project requires prioritizing different demands of all of your different users.

> When will the problem mentioned in the article

The article talks about many more things than one single problem. Some range from easy, like the "we already do let you use stock llvm" I mentioned above, and some are difficult and take a long time, like "define a Rust ABI." The needs of packagers need to be balanced with the needs of other folks as well. "define a Rust ABI," specifically, for example, would help some packagers, but it may harm other users. It also may be something that's good to have, but we aren't quite ready for it yet.

A willingness to work together to solve issues, and to find solutions that help as many different kinds of folks as possible, is what matters here. We have had folks from other distros pitching in to help make things better for their distros, and I can't imagine we wouldn't accept the help of the OP either.
Nelson's "Computers for Cynics" is also an interesting take https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTI2Kz0V2OFlgbkROVmzk...
How does the gender of the person who watched/recorded this matter so much that the author had to put it in the title?
Wow, from Aug 2004: "And people don't learn [Python] because it will get them a job; they learn it because they genuinely like to program and aren't satisfied with the languages they already know."

What would be today's equivalent? Elixir? Rust?
> do you need them to hide the components?

Yes for now. Though I might get them down in size as I iterate on the hardware...

> Is this just about the lighting or is the display not very high-contrast?

To be honest I'd say it's both.
Which means extra maintenance work to check for every piece of software that anyone uses whether it uses another library that it needs to be recompiled against and, if it fails, how to use the new version.

If there are automatic updates, at least it either works and is more secure, or it breaks automatically and unsafe software stops working.

Whether you prefer people to use MSIE6 because "it just works" or whether you prefer old sites that only worked with MSIE6 to break because it's no longer maintained, that's the trade-off you have to choose between.

As a security person, I'm obviously biased, I can only advise what I see from a professional perspective. All I was saying above is that automatic updates being considered a security risk is on the same scale of odds as considering vaccines dangerous -- in regular cases, that is: of course the advice is different if you're a special (sensitive) organisation or a special (immunocompromised) person.
EDPS Opinions on the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act
I believe the parent means that MathJax uses MathML internally:

> MathJax uses MathML as the basis for its internal format for mathematical expressions, so MathML support is built into MathJax at a fundamental level.

https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/output/mathml.html

I seems a requirement for accessibility.
Nobody cares how secure my code is if it doesn't work.
If artificial intelligence is a religion, it is the only religion with a plausible mechanism of action.

Building something that is more powerful and intelligent than any human does not look to violate any law of physics; calling such a thing a god does not make it any less possible. We have proof it can exist (as humans are just machines).

Both the top AI companies in the world (Deepmind and OpenAI) explicitly are trying to build AGI;

The fact that it can be built and people desire to build it makes informed speculation about it useful.
Argentina's economy supports the life and livelihoods of some 45 million people.

Bitcoin supports the degenerate gambling habits of some nerds.
"It's no longer cost competitive" is just the tip of the financial iceberg. Nukes are no longer price competitive, if they ever were, even with all the unpaid externalities: Waste containment and storage is a public sector megaproject. Nuclear plants are not insurable. Set-asides for decommissioning are gamed by selling plants nearing EOL.
> In the App. I should make that clearer on the website for sure.

I would only want this if I can use it without yet another app. Please consider using a simple web interface etc.
Crystals Go to War (1943)
It's valid to choose to use strict standards-conforming software. It's quite arguable that such lenient mail servers are broken in this fashion, since the spec requires a domain (and thus IP addresses are not valid in MX records).
>The US government provides 27% of things in the US (budget vs GDP)

This is silly. Budget vs GDP is not how you measure how much a government provides. You're not controlling for waste.
Would you write “person” instead?
> Is iCloud sync even possible?

There are ways to make it work but it's not yet the way I'd like it to be.
Um, even if it's mature technology that doesn't negate the costs of operating two different databases which is a large part of what the original presentation is about.
You can't just call use-cases you don't like a "fallacy". Like I said, the tech is still early, but there are decentralized exchanges where you don't need an ID to use them.

> People don’t think about the environmental consequences because most people don’t think about that anyways.

They don't think about that because:

A. They're not the cause of the environmental damage (check with the military and large industry there).

B. They're concerned about paying rent, buying food...

Money is at top of mind for most people.

> All of that said, Bitcoin is a failed experiment.

If this is failure to you, I hope Bitcoin keeps failing! By any metric you look at it, Bitcoin is reaching all time highs with exponential growth.
I have to confess a little sympathy even though I agree it’s dishonest.

Most schools are struggling to evolve in an environment they weren’t set up for. And in parallel, parents with money and/or education for it definitely try to game the system as well. Hence a bit of sympathy on my part.

I attended a private school that did the opposite: no “GPA” (just letter grades, no average nor class rank computed), its own curriculum, no designated “AP” courses (you could take the exam if you liked). And all the graduates did fine at university. It was very clear to me that they could get away with this because they had spent centuries educating kids. They strongly discouraged gaming the system...because they had gamed it at a deeper level already.
I am sorry to tell you that comments have never been helpful for me to meet a deadline. They have ever been a signal that the commenter was not willing to engage intensely enough so that his contribution would have been of immediate value. Instead it remained on a meta-level, expecting me to carry half-baked and barely understandable thoughts out.

But guess what? Bosses comment, workers write. That's the fate. Don't know why. Some is to attribute to Peter principle but not all.
This comment is in clear violation of the site's rules. Please don't be deliberately rude to others here and try to interpret comments in good faith rather than as some sort of veiled attack.
"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure".

That's not to say anything about any beneficial side-effects, though.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law#Generalizatio...
The artificial bandwidth and encryption limitations really reduce the use cases.

My brother is a HAM, but it is so boring. People making contact, but no content. Its basically metadata only. "Can you hear me now? Good".

It's one thing if you have another hobby it enables, like off-roading or back-country stuff. But radio for the sake of radio I do not understand.

TL;DR - I'm a huge nerd but I just can't get into amateur radio because it bores me terribly.
I respectfully disagree to an extent. I think most/all documentation ends up rotting and being ignored. If you take the time to write it down, it doesn't mean that others will take the time to read it or refer to it.

I think it's better to just continually verbalize any "core values" with your team as you go day-to-day. Thinking that you've written it down inside of an organized GDocs is not much different than having sent it via email (the location to retrieve it just changes).
Is this supposed to be some reductio ad absurdum? Shut down bitcoin and social media. Humanity is better off without either.
> Agreed. Surprised there are so many Bitcoin lovers on HN and in the startup scene, which is supposed to consist of smarter-than-average people. Bitcoin is basically shitty gold, because unlike gold, it has no intrinsic value and can go to zero, it's all based on fragile sentiment.

Being "smart" often doesn't translate into making good decisions or having good judgment. Sometimes intelligence only amounts to better capabilities at rationalizing whatever harebrained thing you already wanted to do, instead of giving up on it.

I think Bitcoin hits a bunch of special-interest buttons in some people that make it very difficult to put aside, for instance: truly innovative technology, startup thinking/wanting to be in on the "ground floor" of a big success, sci-fi made real, libertarianism, etc.
Hospitals turn to artificial intelligence to help Doctors’ poor bedside manners
> streaming is not copying data to a different frame buffer

That's exactly what streaming means as a technical term:

Examples:

https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_TextureAccess

https://community.khronos.org/t/streaming-texture/60774

https://www.khronos.org/opengl/wiki/Buffer_Object_Streaming
LOL, no.
It was dnscache.

* http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/djbwares/guide/commands/dnscache....

* http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/dnscache.html

And it wasn't to do with bailiwick at all. It was to do with the fact that many softwares allowed users to enter either IP addresses or domain names; but either left recognizing IP addresses up to the DNS client libraries, some of which would in turn fail to do so and just treat them as domain names, or recognized IP addresses in a form that users would forget to use, such as having them enclosed in square brackets. M. Berstein's own DNS client library, and several others, do the same thing that dnscache did, in the client library itself, implementing this same defence at multiple layers of the system.

* https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/dns.html

A related scenario: Some Unix/Linux softwares allow one to specify users by either ID or name, but fail to take advantage of the fact that the colon is prohibited in account names, and so can be used as a syntax for unequivocally distinguishing between the twain. As a result, strings like "0" can potentially be mapped to something other than the superuser if someone goes and creates a user account with the name "0" (whereas ":0", as in the syntax for some tools, is unequivocally user ID zero and "0" generates an error unless there is actually an account by that name). This in turn leads to people arbitrarily banning account names with digits, and security holes resulting when the action upon encountering attempts to use such a name is to just ignore them. Recall the "User=0pointer" kerfuffle in systemd.
I didn't really mean that it was never coming out just that it was still extremely early in development, lots of steps left between engine and a landing rocket.
Taking NFL Concept Helmets to a New Level
But you don't have to sign up for an exchange in your own country.
If you know the sequence number ahead of time then you can attach any transaction to it, including two conflicting. The point of hardware counter is that you (your device, actually) sings a counter along with a transaction. You couple them together in a way, that you can't counterfeit, because you can't tamper the device.
> In a shared environment, it's not acceptable for applications to change shared system components.

That era is long gone on Windows (literally since XP I think). In fact I've had to do this far more on Linux than on Windows in recent memory... the latest instance ironically being the glibc CLOCK_REALTIME mess on WSL. Right now programs bundle whatever they need, and these go into the app directory (like \Program Files). e.g., I have maybe ~20 sqlite3 DLLs on my system besides the system ones.

Your larger point about the culture might still be correct though, I don't know.
Miners are interesting in extracting the cheap energy from the market. There's literally no incentive for any of that benefit to fall to anyone else, and in fact using up low-carbon electricity for cryptocurrency PoW "mining" takes away the benefits of the low-carbon investment from everyone else.
Do you mean "robust for people using Gentoo" or "robust for everybody"? Isn't the latter responsibility of the Clojure developers rather than packagers?
Tesla navigation crashes when set to a certain POI (in Taiwan)
Outsider's question: is it likely that projects like Lean and Coq will ever feed into stuff that applied researchers find useful? By applied researchers I don't mean "applied mathematicians" but scientists who use maths in their field.

As an economist, I sometimes want to prove things that a real mathematician could do in their sleep. There's Mathematica and friends, but they have their limitations, i.e. they can do what you tell them but can't typically "find their own way" to the proof of a theorem. Might these systems ever come down to my level?
This is the second time you posted this in a couple hours. Please don't do that. Repetition adds noise, and obviously this material is flamebait.

Maybe in some narrow context it would make specific sense to add, but randomly sprinkling it across various threads is negligence if not vandalism.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
How does the island residency of the person matter so much either.
While it is harder to make than to comment, the sort of attitude that leads to environments where one can't "criticize without having an alternative" is unbelievably counterproductive.
I smell an account ban in your future...
Interested in setting up a clubhouse on this topic?
Hehe, those are really important questions you're asking.

I'm looking at the EU and the US market. I know I need to get CE and RoHS and a bunch of other certificates. I know this won't be easy.

If you know somebody who has experience with that, ideally in a boutique/startup environment, I'd love to hear the advice they have to give.
What do you do if you have to shut down the nuclear power plant in bad weather for some reason? Build a new one as a backup? There's always a weak link if you want to find one, nuclear, wind or whatever.
AIs most powerful feature might be a lens into human behavior and psyche. Who knows how it will turn out.

I think an AI might run meetings better than humans, it might even make a better manager.
I was trying to be quite careful in my comment to not suggest that rich San Francisco were funding public schools, but it seems I wasn’t careful enough.
Could you explain to me why someone would offer their hashing power on NiceHash vs. just directly working for a pool?

The main cases I image are:

1. The miner doesn't want to deal with price fluctuations and wants to prevent arbitrage risk

2. It might be more profitable to outsource smallish coins that have to buy hashing power to stabilize their network (though that would probably also be covered by the profit switcher)

3. Money laundering <--- Which I assume is the biggest portion
The destination is "開元路土(𩵚)魠魚羹", a street and a restaurant name in Tainan [1]. It seems to be recognized correctly from the speech but then the system crashes before the waypoint is set.

Nobody seems to know what exactly causes this issue. According to the associated article (in Chinese), [2] the person tried several similar phrases, which all work fine ("台北土魠魚羹", "中正路土魠魚羹", "台南開元路", "台南土魠魚羹", "台北開元路土魠魚羹", "開元路 [...] 羹"). One of these ("台南土魠魚羹") also points to the same location. Tesla is aware of the problem.

1. https://goo.gl/maps/oyLsFUYwefbMpomU8

2. https://www.ddcar.com.tw/article/18581
It's been a while since I looked, but the cheapest US paygo plans are still at least $3/mo (eg H2O wireless), and probably double that if you want more convenient billing. Have you found something better, or are you deriving that much utility from scaling to many devices or what? I'd think if the goal is signing up a bunch of accounts, one would be content with a single plan or maybe two, and just periodically swapping their phone numbers.

It seems like it would be easy enough to change your setup to hide your actual location by locating the gateway elsewhere and backhauling with its own IP connection.

BTW are there any standard interoperable formats for transmitting/presenting/archiving text messages, akin to Maildir for email or SIP for voice? If not, maybe Maildir is the right answer.
> The distribution / maintainer / package manager approach has proven to be an extremely reliable way to get trustworthy software. Many of us love it and want to see it stick around.

I disagree, it's proven to be inadequate for modern software development and that's why these new languages/ecosystems are springing up. The least reliable way to package and distribute software is by relying on traditional package managers.

> Do what you can to give their applications the ability to easily split dependencies and support system provided libraries

This is unrealistic. I do not trust system provided libraries to function with my applications because I've been burned so many times in the past.

> how can I make this program as easy for maintainers to distribute as possible

By statically linking everything as much as possible and shipping everything else in a self contained bundle with a launcher that overrides any symbols that might inadvertently be pulled in from the system.

The universe I'd like to live in is where the only use case for dynamic linking are OS vendor APIs and cryptographically secure functions like TLS. My dream package manager would whitelist those system librarie and forbid distribution for any bundle that does contain the shared objects with the symbols it needs.
I guess it doesn't, but it is useful for English pronouns later on. I'm curios what's idiomatic in languages without gendered pronouns. It'd be different if it called out her race.

Also, "Florida man" is a meme.
For anyone curious, I found the Python (first) method to be the easiest way to get this up and running. Also it hit a few false positives for my (not the one you see me using now) username.

Edit: Also you can't Ctrl-C to kill it midway through running so don't fat-finger it if you don't want to waste 30 seconds waiting for it to finish.
Data is cherry-picked. For example, if 60 000 people die because of Chornobyl radiation to 2005 (estimation from video) doesn't mean that they will stop dying after 2005. How many people will die after 2005? Video gives no answer.

Also, the video indirectly suggests that we can replace flood protection with nuclear energy. :-/ Dams are built mainly to protect population from floods, so they SAVE millions of lives every year, while also generating electrical energy, which is used to upkeep dams.

Banqiao incident is pictured like Chornobyl`, but, in reality, a bunch of people lives was SAVED by lower dam. The flood broke 62 dams. Just imagine what may happen when 10 nuclear reactors and/or nuclear waste sites will be flooded instead.
How does the flight number matter so much either.
this is with the release flag! normal compiling is a good bit quicker - sorry, should've mentioned that!
Banning CFCs globally via the Montreal Protocol.
I don't have a particularly strong viewpoint on this, but I find it noteworthy that in your example the user themselves is asking for a specific version of the software. You don't seem to be intending for users to ask for simply the latest version and have that work, but a specific one, and you want that specific version to work exactly as it did whenever it was published.

I can see some instances in which this expectation is important, and others where it is likely not or else certainly less important than the security implications.

For the extremes, I see research using spaCy has a very strong interest in reproducibility and the impact of any security issues would likely be minimal on the whole simply due to the relatively few people likely to run into them.

On the other extreme, say some low-level dependency is somehow so compromised simply running the code will end up with the user ransomware'd after just-long-enough that this whole scenario is marginally plausible. Then say spaCy gets incorporated into some other project that goes up the chain a ways and ultimately ends up in LibreOffice. If all of these projects have pinned dependencies, there is now no way to quickly or reasonably create a safe LibreOffice update. It would require a rather large number of people to sequentially update their dependencies, and publish the new version, so that the next project up the chain can do the same. LibreOffice would remain compromised or at best unavailable until the whole chain finished, or else somebody found a way to remove the offending dependency without breaking LibreOffice.

I'm not sure how to best reconcile these two competing interests. I think it seems clear that both are important. Even more than that, a particular library might sit on both extremes simultaneously depending on how it is used.

The only solution - though a totally unrealistic and terrible one - that comes to mind is to write all code such that all dependencies can be removed without additional work and all dependent features would be automatically disabled. With a standardized listing of these feature-dependency pairs you could even develop more fine-grained workarounds for removal of any feature from any dependency.

The sheer scale of possible configurations this would create is utterly horrifying.

At any rate, your utter rejection of the article's point seems excessively extreme and even ultimately user-hostile. I can understand your point of view, particularly given the library you develop, however I think you should probably give some more thought to indirect users - ie users of programs that (perhaps ultimately) use spaCy. I don't know that it makes sense to practically change how you do anything, but I don't think the other viewpoint is as utterly wrongheaded as you seem to think.
Local news always reports this.
There's very little doubt that investments in wind and solar are beneficial. It may not get to the point that it takes the place of everything else but it is definitely a good ancillary source. As in the solar panels on your house might not be enough to subvert traditional power sources, but it will take some of the stress off the grid. It may not be helpful to the current situation in Texas, but it definitely helps a place like Texas in the summer.
Now I wonder how many of these might have the ability for users to create subdomains ... shades of being able to make "webmaster@" addresses for email sites and get an SSL cert or whatever.