skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s 60 active airplanes, solely operated by United in the US and some others outside the US. Seems like a smaller problem than the 737, and this doesn’t seem to be Boeing’s fault.
no but from what I read Samsung uses their own hardcoded DNS on their TVs to bypass DNS filtering
Address records are very much not considered private. Yellow pages only stopped being printed in 2019. The information is still accessible.
64GB is available on the current-gen 64GB, so not offering it would be a step backwards.
Got it. Although I’m not sure what “no overhead” means if the instances have to live way far away on the heap. That means you’ve got an alloc (including a mutex lock), then the value lives far away, then the garbage-collection overhead then the delete. When I think sum-type I think a flag plus storage for the maximum size and alignment type, and all of the above bookkeeping and cache misses go away.
Until they realize that handling plastic garbage becomes a noticeable health problem and health insurances are no longer willing to pay for this externality.
I got blocked from posting on Twitter about 6 months ago. After a couple complaints and a couple weeks, they reinstated. No idea why. I don't even post mild political stuff.

>"Just don't use Twitter", some say.

And, yeah, it's one of the main ways I interact with a lot of people professionally. Losing access would be a major inconvenience and probably even somewhat professionally damaging.
It is suicide, though, and therefore seems to be against the rules as they're stated
Did you mean EU? Ukraine is on the European continent.
>> When inspection frequency gets too high, airlines and authorities decide to save money, leading to less frequent inspections.

More often such aircraft are just retired. One defining difference between upstart airlines and "legacy" airlines is that the upstarts generally have new aircraft with lower inspection requirements. An interesting paper would address the inevitable evolution of new airlines as as their airframes age. When do they first try to transition to higher-profit services? When do they hit their first period of labor unrest? I theorize it is a function of aircraft age.

At least a few airlines don't ever buy aircraft. Instead they lease them with the intention of returning them moment they require more frequent inspections.
then they'll spin off the division, add it to a SPAC and go public as another $1bn unicorn.
I’m guessing it has most to do maintenance training and supply chains.

If x carrier standardized on PW or Rolls engines, it makes sense to try and keep their fleet on that engine. It simplifies maintenance, what parts need to be kept in stock etc.

If you have a fleet of rolls engines and one batch of planes running PW then you have to set aside entire storage, training and supply chains for a single batch.

From Boeing’s perspective, they can sell more airframes with a modular setup that allows the carriers to choose their powerplants. Especially in a worldwide setup where a rolls Royce may be cheaper in one market and a PW cheaper in another across a pond
The Go team’s recommendation (from Effective Go) is exactly what you’re suggesting. One letter variables should only be used in short functions, a couple lines away from where they’re created. The further you get from where a variable is created the longer and more descriptive its name should be. Some people just take it too far or don’t read the whole guide I guess.
Reproducibility is a major principle of the scientific method.

Yet computer scientists consistently fail to achieve reproducibility with a tool that is the most consistent at following instructions - the computer.

Even private business is on the DevOps movement, because they see the positive effects of reproducibility.

If the academic world is truly about science, then there is no more excuse, the tools are out there, they need to use them.
Learn Python the Right Way
This will be a good case study to find out how real "Cancel Culture" concerns are. Because if you are looking for a reason to be offended, the Muppets will give you one.
Females being portrayed as pigs, Swedish chefs with speech impediments, depiction of mental disease for laughs, etc.
Article also refers to situations such as Johnny Cash singing in front of confederate flag.
Yet, there is not one ounce of malice or meanness anywhere to be seen. It is one big wacky party to which everyone is invited.
We'll see what happens.
JSON with Commas and Comments
94% reduction in hospital admissions at four weeks after first AstraZeneca jab
> Also, a question. If you publish a paper with a repo, what would be the best way to handle the version in the paper matching the repo in the future?

You can include the hash of the commit used for your paper.
Denmark has a narrower version of that for driving licences and national ID cards. The rest of the information, the police would have access to anyway.

https://en.digst.dk/news/news-archive/2020/december/denmark-...
Aladdin and the Muppet Show are both great. Maybe Disney’s warning system can be used as a filter for finding the best content on the platform?
One difference is that Twitter, Facebook, Google, are not governments and have no real authority over you. They only have the power you give them by choosing to stay in their ecosystem. Therefore it's a strain to refer to them as officials.

If you're worried about them _becoming_ officials, then act now. Leave these platforms and convince others to do the same.
Marco Barginger's Slime Screencast (2005)
Lots of reasons that I can think of, including:

1. Disabled person not the one who controls what gets run.

2. Disabled person not the one who controls what is installed on device.

3. Joint use by two people of the same app.

4. Disabled person wants to be able to ask someone for help who can interact with the app "fully".
Depends...

Take for instance a Webbrowser. You could implement one using ncurses, etc. like links, lynx, etc. But for the screen reader this is just a terminal window with a bunch of text.

A Gui can help the screen reader to know which part to read when and how it releats to other parts of the GUI.

Also as a blind person, you live in a world of people that see. You cannot expect every developer to take care and cater to your needs. A GUI that takes care about this automatically for the developer means the dev can just continue doing their thing. While the blind people, can benefit from it as well.
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/38156/why-bothe... might be helpful
64GB was available on the previous Mac Mini, but they took a step backwards and capped the new one at 16GB, no reason they won't do the same with the MBP.
Requiring heap allocation for coroutines was extremely contentious to say the least. But because C++ does not have a borrow checker, all the other allocation-less designs proved to be very error prone.

C++ coroutines do support allocators [1], so it is not a huge issue, but it does complicate the design further.

[1] the compiler is also allowed to elide the allocation, but a) it is not clear how this is different from the normal allocation elision allowance that compilers already had, and b) it is a fragile optimization.
So here is simple fact.

It does not make sense to judge any piece of code that does not meet "highest standard" to be a tangled mess.

There are valid reasons to have varying quality of code and also the idea of quality might be changing from problem to problem and project to project.

A quality of code that governs your car's ECU should be different from quality of code that some research team threw together to demonstrate an idea.

A coding project should achieve some kind of goal or set of goals as efficiently as possible and in many valid cases quality is just not high on the list and for a good reason.

Right now I am working on a PoC to verify an idea that will take a longer time to implement. We do this because we don't want to spend weeks on development just to see it doesn't work or that we want to change something. So spending 2-3 days to avoid significant part of the risk of the rest of the project is fine. It does not need to be spelled out that the code is going to be incomplete, messy and maybe buggy.

There is also something to be said for research people to be actually focusing on something else.

Professional developers focus their careers on a single problem -- how to write well (or at least they should).

But not all people do. Some people actually focus on something else (physics maybe?) and writing code is just a tool to achieve some other goals.

If you think about people working on UIs and why UI code tends to be so messy, this is also probably why. Because these guys focus on something else entirely and the code is there just to animate their graphical design.
I think this topic is not very considered in the ambientalists field, so to speak. But it should be, we are talking about a mindset of continuous upgrades, be it a laptop, a smartphone, dresses, cars,bikes, etc
This mindset has a huge environmental impact.

It has also another outcome: you never put the commitment it is required to master a tool if that tool changes constantly, which is 90% of what matters.
I really hate this outcome.
Why would it have to be one person? I would assume that the proof can be presented as mostly modular based on compositing results from the related published work
In well designed software, data ingestion should be easily separable from the core logic of the application. Which is the point the parent comment is making. Some basic best practices would allow you to share your core code without implicating HIPAA. Even if it’s just basic stats, sharing the code makes it easier to reproduce your results and to check your logic.

Although I agree with your analysis that enabling competitors in science is not common, it really, really should be. That’s kinda the point of publication, at least in theory. Sharing knowledge and methods.
>So no actual evidence of anything.

Yes, you have correctly identified the paper as a review on current theories.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype_threat#Criticism

Yes, there is debate about these things, as there often is in the social sciences. This is from the same criticism section on wikipedia:

"In a 2009 meta-analysis, Gregory M. Walton and Steven J. Spencer argued that studies of stereotype threat may in fact systematically under-represent its effects, since such studies measure "only that portion of psychological threat that research has identified and remedied. To the extent that unidentified or unremedied psychological threats further undermine performance, the results underestimate the bias."[23] Despite these limitations, they found that efforts to mitigate stereotype threat significantly reduced group differences on high-stakes tests.[23]"

Please also note that nobody is claiming that stereotype threat is the only factor in STEM performance.

I'm no expert in the field either, and I welcome discussion. But I would prefer a better faith argument than copying the most "gotcha" paragraph from the criticism section of wikipedia.

If you could verbalize your skepticism more clearly I think this discussion would be more fruitful.

EDIT: I see you have edited your comment and added a lot. The above was my response to your first draft.

>As a feminist, I also can't get on-board with a view of women as such delicate fragile flowers that such perceptions would prevent them from doing something they like, and it doesn't match the women in my life...but maybe I have been blessed with unusually non-delicate women, who knows?

This feels especially in bad-faith. These are statistical effects, at society scale. Considering how clear the effectiveness of repeated messages is at a social level (e.g. marketing, religion, fake news, ideology), it should not surprise you that ideas of stereotypes influence people's behaviour. Humans fall for marketing as a society, are we all "delicate fragile flowers"?
OSS sounds like a terrible idea.

Little human interaction, lots of toxicity from entitled developers.

Development could be a nice hobby but it's not easy on the eyes and doesn't make you move.

Get him into stretching / light fitness / bodyweight training: it can definitely become a passion / hobby and will keep him healthy (within limits)
What does it mean to have a "negative depiction"? Would that be a depiction that is viewed by the majority as negative, or is it assessed by some objective function?

Sometimes I hear people talking about "negative depictions" and "negative stereotypes" I'm either not convinced they're negative (Apu from The Simpsons) or other times I find a stereotype being depicting as overtly negative yet seemingly it's acceptable because (I assume) it's a negative stereotype about some group society doesn't care so much about (the white police officer stereotype, the useless dad stereotype, etc).
Apple has been on the CPU fight for years now - It's just that Intel, like IBM before them, couldn't provide a CPU with the performance/watt they wanted for their macOS lineup.

The developer preview Minis they sold with an iPad Pro CPU were already well past midrange Intel desktop chips.
The line “it’s barbaric but hey it’s home. “
Cost, supplier redundancy, antitrust laws
> The International Labour Organisation says that only a fifth of adult women had a job or sought one in 2019.

The key point being the majority didn't even seek one.

> Dropping out of the labour force is a status symbol for upwardly mobile households, showing they are able to get by on the husband’s earnings alone.

> The best thing the government can do to increase the supply of female workers is to increase the demand for labour in general.

This is where the author is completely wrong. It's a cultural issue. Women who have been groomed all their lives to lead a life of house wife can't suddenly find employment even if they want to due to lack of training. The training won't occur unless there is cultural push for women to work.
I've been looking at this from a slightly different level. React may be the best choice for a UX on the web but I think it's still far worse than any native app. It's one of the reasons I get so disappointed after hearing about something cool and new and then finding out it's an Electron app.

I'm stuck on this idea that the best UX is a native app for performance reasons (responsiveness, memory, CPU, battery), aesthetic reasons (assuming your like your native platform) and longevity. On my desktop I often run applications that are a decade or more old. How many web apps rolling out today can sit untouched for the next decade and continue to do useful work?
That’s kind of like my “banned from Twitter” filter for deciding who a cultural leader is. (Not necessarily a good leader, but a leader nonetheless.)
A quick Google found me:
"It mispronounces Arab words including “Allah,” depicts nonsense scribble instead of real Arabic script, and codes its characters to reinforce racist and Islamophobic tropes. Main characters that the audience is meant to admire, like Aladdin and Jasmine, have Western features, lighter skin, and American accents, while nefarious or impoverished characters like Jafar and shopkeepers have beards, hooked noses, and thick, Middle Eastern accents."
It's a half-joke in Catholic media circles that making comments like this is likely to receive some kind of punishment on social media... I say "half-joke" because it happens extremely frequently and those writers in that world all know it happens and try to laugh about it.

As someone in the tech world, I spend most of my time interacting with more "liberal" people. I don't hear about this happening with any frequency, accidentally or otherwise, to those on the left. At the same time "diversity of thought" is something I only read about in right-leaning circles. Events like the one shown in this article are why diversity of thought matters. This is clearly an important debate, and Twitter, willfully or systematically, is shutting down a legitimate, notable voice in the debate, and Twitter is ill-equipped to even understand that the point made by the bishop is reasonable (if not universally shared).
>To make a concrete example, imagine writing an application where requirements changed unpredictably every day, and where the scope of those changes is unbounded.

That sounds like software development, alright. It takes a while for domain experts to learn that if programmer ask "is X always true/false", they mean that there are no exceptions from that rule.

I would like for researchers to just name variables sensibly. Even that would improve code quality a lot.

Still the key problem is that there are zero incentives for researchers to even make their code readable! It does not improve any of the metrics they are judged by.
But the key difference between Mizar style proofs and Coq/Lean style proofs is just that the former is declarative and the latter is procedural. They're both ultimately just tactics based. Sure, a declarative style is nice when reasoning about equations, but otherwise the proofs simply degenerate into awkwardly written procedural tactics proofs.
Try ordering 120 new airliner engines. It will take a while. There is no real surge capacity for these things. You would probably have better luck buying used.
If the study is true, you might be an extremist (doesn't matter left of right).
I think the argument that private business is going to be the death of free speech is a strawman argument of the right. Typically this demographic goes out of its way to ensure a healthy free market with little obstructions.

However they seem to lack the technical experience to launch a (successful and secure) competing social network of their own. So instead of achieving technological parity and becoming valid competition, they instead aim to impose regulations on the entire industry. It's ironic and disappointing.
Hey, didn't Disney make those war-time toons where they made fun of Germans? I guess they'll probably slap a warning on them now...
There are two ways you can restart with the standard interface:

- create a new task (start over) and maybe delete the old task

- implement the task as a generator that can repeatedly yield values

I think this is as good as you can hope for without lots of other interfaces (and since you can implement all the promise types yourself, you can do that too).
What makes Emacs not a GUI IDE?
Why not turn organic waste into charcoal/carbon and bury that? It would be considered CO2 sequestration.
The project README does not say that. Instead, it says:

> It was designed as a simple embeddable user interface for application

so, at least rhetorically, it is more generic/general than for video-game use.
It's probably a frontend project to put up a mobile app or something similar, integrating with an existing backend.
This might not advance the state of the discussion any further, but have you and/or your father had the chance to see the film "Knives Out"? It's a mystery/dark comedy, and explores somewhat-related ideas in a good-natured way.
Considering that Apple ditched Intel for their own Apple Silicon chips it makes more sense comparing them (for now).
Point 1 is so true, I think it’s why I like Golang without generics so people can’t go crazy with abstractions.
Sorry you had to deal with this bullshit.

The way some people feel they are entitled to demand stuff off of hobbyist open-source project maintainers is absolutely infuriating.
I would bet it could. YouTube definitely benefits from Google infrastructure. Especially since a lot of their cost is video transcoding and batch pipelines which can easily be slotted into unused CPU around the world. YouTube almost certainly also gets very cheap storage not only because Google has optimized storage cost for them but also because of the similar flexibility that they have on where videos are stored. Furthermore they use Google's CDN which is likely the best in the world hand has many relationships with ISPs to get caches close to eyeballs.

However as I understand it the product itself isn't tied to the Google infrastructure. YouTube's main value is the user base, both of viewers and of publishers. It would be a technical marvel to move it off of Google's infrastructure however I don't think that there is any feature that they wouldn't be able to provide anymore. It would certainly be more expensive, but at YouTube's size you could probably work out similar deals with other providers (or with GCP) so I'm not sure that the prices would rise that much. (IDK, maybe 15% increase in cost between provider cut and raw cost increase?)
Yeah but you spend more time debugging, that if you write it once with a good architecture and unittests let’s say
"...Just weird little scenes!"

Does this not describe YouTube too?
Obviously fake. The CPU Monkey "benchmarks" are just the M1 values multiplied.
Well, we can't expect every hacker to know what they're looking at...

> Game List

>> GLOBAL THERMONUCLEAR WAR
This is a mistake. Of course it is a mistake. But we should understand that mistakes happen disproportionally to views Twitter consider acceptable but only barely so, and that mistakes are not harmless. People are risk averse, and this will many other people will seal their lips. People with their whole life on twitter, who cant afford to take risks. And lets not forget the trouble for this particular bishop.
The Intel Mac Mini is still sold. If you need, you can get it with 64GB of RAM and 2TB of PCIe SSD.

Granted you'll feel bad if this leak is wrong and Apple shows an M1x with more than 16GB of RAM.
I wonder if this incident was the result of the plane being in storage for an extended amount of time and recently returning to service.

These Aircraft are designed to be in flight constantly maximizing revenue. With the pandemic grounding so many planes for such extended amounts of unplanned time, I wonder if we are beginning to see gaps in maintenance procedures for aircraft returning to service after extended downtime.
http://archive.is/gwyni
> Go was clearly designed with GUI IDE tooling in mind.

I would like to see what happens if you say this to Rob "syntax highlighting is for children" Pike's face.
>Typically this demographic goes out of its way to ensure a healthy free market with little obstructions.

You are kidding right ?
Private businesses goes out of their way to obstruct the market.
Google being exemplary proof of this.
I wonder if the shorter bus won't somehow reduce the error rates.
Don't be so quick to judge the issues of developing country's societies through the lens of western cultures. What appears similar at surface level, might have completely different root causes and effects. The other replies here have added some interesting points.
Tech Industry is looking to Replace smartphone with Augmented reality technology
"If it says Pratt and Whitney on the engine, it better say Martin-Baker on the seat!" -Unknown

(Martin-Baker is an ejection seat manufacturer.)
I wonder how this compares with what's currently used in FOSS games. For example... what does Wesnoth use?

More generally - is this really something that's missing? I mean, hasn't something very similar already been implemented (as FOSS, I mean)?
Yes, I actually deleted my Twitter account and joined ADN. I was gone from Twitter for 4 years. But this accomplished nothing, it only hurt me professionally, and ADN eventually shut down.

Individuals can't win in this scenario. Like it or not, the big social networks have captured the masses.
> And I have since then always arrived to the conclusion that Facebook cannot interpret irony, satire, sarcasm and reflection.

Sarcasm has to be the least effective possible way to communicate anything, anywhere. You are absolutely begging to be misinterpreted or misunderstood, either legitimately or even deliberately. And you can't really defend yourself because 'it was sarcasm' won't cut it as a defence with many people - it sounds like 'it was a prank bro'.

Why would anyone choose to communicate about a complex issue this way?

> I posted "All lives matter, arbeit macht frei."

This seems positively suicidal - I can't imagine what good you thought could come of this!