skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
the plaintext c# one actually only sets a content length manually since without it it would be a streaming response (Transfer-Encoding: chunked), which would not make the server slower, but the client, because of buffers (also as far as I know the Content-Length needs to be set in this benchmark). btw. go does not do that when calling w.Write without wrapping the responsewriter inside a buffer (which is probably also the case why it is slower, since it needs to know the size of the written response before it goes over the network and btw. only go-std is slow because it's written for simple use cases, there are others like fasthttp who do stuff a little bit more like c# and thus are faster (even inside ;-) go-std never cared about being the fastest.)
GLP-1 Drugs – The Treatment for Diabetes
bobthebuilders’ comment was marked dead, GP responded to the same parent comment as the dead comment. If you turn on showdead you'll be able to see what they're talking about.
We don’t live in a hyper capitalist system. This hyperbole is harmful to any conversation about making positive change.

This is the intellectual equivalent of burning coal. Your emissions have a cost that others have to pay.
A $2k computer can do billions of hashes a second. 2^30

You're off by about 20 orders of magnitude (the joy of binary exponents).
You can install any application on both (Android will not let you have root access, though). You can write your own software for Android and install it on your phone, but it is difficult to write software on your phone for your phone. Microsoft does have a huge app store and they do charge a percentage (although for non-games, it's just 5% which seems like a bargain).
Get that newfangled SVGA outta here. VGA (640x480) is the One True Resolution™.
You may know this, but your motor will likely (should) be certified separately from the aircraft.
They almost certainly have zero decision making power so whistleblowing and then quitting is the obvious course of action.

>“It was Thanksgiving weekend,” one source recalled. “We were killing ourselves working on it, but every person associated with the software rollout begged (Deputy Director) Profiri not to go live.”

>But multiple sources involved in the rollout said they were instructed by department leadership to “not say a word” about their concerns. “We were told ‘We’re too deep into it — too much money had been spent — we can’t go back now.’”
> You the taxpayers are the people who would prefer these people stay in prison than release them.

That's a rather broad blanket statement bordering on collective punishment (which BTW is classified as a war crime by the UN). The status of taxpayer makes you a victim of the state, not necessarily someone with influence over its behavior and certainly not an ardent supporter of all its policies. The vast majority of the taxpayers had nothing to do with the situation and might well be opposed to keeping these people in prison if the facts were explained to them.

Perhaps the matter should be put to a general vote—those actually in favor of keeping the inmates in prison can split the cost of any wrongful-imprisonment suit in the event the state loses.
It's great I can go to New York and watch many of the original cast but it is also great I can find them in London, Toronto, Vegas, probably Toyko.

Who they are can change as long as they look and act the same. It brings down costs and allows the creator to scale.

It's better than plays because shows in different cities will have different actors and everyone knows.

But you do lose the ability to promote based on individual people. And for plays that can be a huge draw. Stars will bring people.

Think of how much bigger blueman group coull be if each had a different personality. Perhaps a cartoon could have been made.
What is the root cause?
If they reply with anything other than ACK tell them they are breaking protocol
Ah, I thought it's a JS library used on a server side. But am I correct that they still pass the derived master-key to server side in a plain form?

Citing the OP:

>Sure, you might tolerate a longer unlock time, but is the security gain really worth the cost to your battery?

I think the battery concern is over-blown. How often do you login into a service? I think that for typical use-cases, amortized battery-cost of a login is negligible. And for other use-cases you can let users choose.
Yes, iNat is worldwide and that's the first place I'd try.

That said, I wouldn't necessarily expect a whole lot. I'm not even an amateur arachnologist, but my sense is that spiders are about as complicated as hymenopterans, if not more so; especially outside well-known families like the salticids, it seems like it's not rare to find difficult identifications.
They're not grid-reactive, but for $20 you can get a programmable T-stat already. That's a huge part of the peak demand in cooling-dominated climates. (Heating demand peaks tend to hit overnight, of course.)
A coworker of mine used Griddy before this event for about a year, but left it 6-9 months ago.

To answer your question 2/3, when I tried to congratulate him on getting out of it before the storm, he was still pretty down on it. He's an analytical type but his conclusion was that he lost $600 by being on it and wished he'd left it sooner.

When I looked around in Texas for power, my findings were that A) pricing averaged about 11cents/kWh, but if you looked to find the best rates, you could get about 6 cents/kWh. Which, post-storm, seems not that different from the wholesale rates with no tail risk.
This interesting to me. I spent the last 4 years teaching programming full time, and also have a decently high SO reputation. I've recently gone back to full time software development, and miss teaching. The main problem is that at $0.75 / min, it's not worth my time. I generally have at least one contract side job making several times that much, and I'm not unusual in that respect.
I don't even know what this would entail. Reality is continuous and subjective; computers are not. And there's no reason that "legal APIs" would be any more cleaned up, consistent, simple or logical than our current legal system.
Because people like GP see "Boeing" and "engine failure," assumes Boeing was at fault, and sells or shorts. It makes sense if you don't realize Boeing doesn't make the engines for these planes.
It depends on performance requirements. Either ask them to retrieve the entire objects, or expose a new endpoint to retrieve the filtered list in an optimal way.

API consumers definitely aren't the ones who should be thinking about something like joining behavior, since GraphQL doesn't give nearly enough control to achieve performant joining.

Basic filtering can also be easily achieved with ad-hoc methods, such as query params. No need for a full-blown GraphQL language server in front of all your services.
FCC Commissioner Carr: House Dems Are Trying to Censor Newsrooms
Don't forget my racism.
Colorful connection found in coral’s ability to survive higher temperatures
It's a big deal because, while it has some downsides, being stalkless means they can have next to no overhead, meaning it can be performant to use coroutines to write asynchronous code for even very fast operations. The example given https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9tlJAqMV7U&t=13m30s is that you can launch multiple coroutines to issue prefetch instructions and process the fetched data, so you can have clean code that issues multiple prefetches and process the results. Whereas in Python (don't get me wrong, I love Python) you might use a generator to "asynchronize" slow operations like requesting and processing data from remote servers, C++ coroutines can be fast enough to asynchronously process "slow" operations like requesting data from main memory.
Shouldn't have happened but really not a big deal and was never a problem in practice.

You obviously don't have much experience of NI politics.

There are plenty who are just waiting for the opportunity to make it a big deal of it. In fact, this is exactly happening at the moment, with a very hard Unionist party (TUV) making significant gains at the expense of moderates, using it as collateral.

It is why the Irish PM was one of the first to contact von der Leyen about it. No British involvement there. The Irish know all too well what happens when you kick the wasps' nest.
When someone says "you didn't lockdown enough", I hear “you didn’t destroy enough people’s livelihoods”.
GitLab team member here. One thing that stood out to me in this release is the strength of contributions from the wider GitLab community.

Among the 299 community contributions in this release:

- GPU and smart scheduling support for GitLab Runner [1]

- The ability to follow other GitLab users [2]

- 1 line installer for the GitLab Kubernetes Agent [3]

- An activity filter on Vulnerability Reports [4]

1 - https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2021/02/22/gitlab-13-9-rel...

2 - https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2021/02/22/gitlab-13-9-rel...

3 - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cluster-integration/gitlab-age...

4 - https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2021/02/22/gitlab-13-9-rel...
TX is __slightly__ different in that its fully deregulated and there's simply more knowledge about REPs/ESCOs and their pricing (because they customers HAVE to choose a REP). Also in what other state do you see billboard ads for REPs?

What is genuinely sad is that Griddy has a "price-lock" (ie a fixed rate) for the summer, which is exactly what you're talking about regarding tail risk. They just don't have it for the winter, which is normally the cheapest time in TX and clearly couldn't set up a decent fixed rate quickly after they understood the implications of the polar vortex. What they should have done is sent an email to their customers offering a fixed rate for the month even if it was expensive.
Damned if you do, damned if you don’t
This is awesome and love the site. Especially with Amazon’s fake reviews issue, this is very much needed
Math doesn't age. Cheers.

bcrypt and scrypt, the successors to PKDF2, are both more than a decade old.

RSA is half a century old and it's still up to date by modern standards. In fact nobody has came up with anything better.

Edit: Actually, bcrypt might be as far as 1999, possibly older than PBKDF2.
Wow. I know firsthand from family how this can severely destroy someone's mental health in what may not be so obvious; it is extremely heavy on someone every moment past the first hour they go past their release time, then the first day followed by a variety of things that will then be taken advantage of by other inmate and guards while one's defenses are down. The fun poked at by other jealous inmates and cruel guards constantly will also weigh down hard on another human being. Arizona penal system puts you into almost always into very nasty and dangerous places of incarceration. frompdx made a statement that truly made my gut feel as if I was at the top of a roller coaster I did not want to get on in the first place.
well, that comic is seven years old, if anything it'd been accurate :)
That's pretty neat. I wasn't aware that Daft Punk's One More Time was based on small segments of someone else's song.

If someone can find a good subsample beat from an original song, then I bet ML can iterate and do something similar. We'll soon have augmented music producers presented with 100's of sequences and then they can simply curate to find what's pleasing. It'll be an interesting side-project.
A few questions for you, because I think you make a good point about it being a mimic network (where each person puts a slight spin on it).

1. Have you heard of the belief of "Human Design"? That belief / theory / spiritual guide has a similar distribution to what you're talking about. I'm just curious if your thinking was independent to that or if you've ever heard of it. (https://www.jovianarchive.com/Human_Design/Types)

2. How do you define originality? Is it something where "you know it when you see it", or is it something else?

3. Thinking of probabilities, wouldn't it also make sense that the default for people is to be un-original? We only have so many elements and so many places, I have to imagine that people being 'incapable of [doing anything creative or original]' is less a value statement and more just a logical progression of probability.

4. I've also come to a feeling that a person doing something that they've seen before, but do not see right at that very minute, is 'non-internet brain thinking'. We didn't have visual records so prevalent until just recently in humanity's lifetime. Repetition of behavior (lately sometimes called 'holding space for X') is a useful function for social networks, giving validity to someone's creativity.

Again, not trying to invalidate anything you're saying (and I noted your 'cue the outrage' comment, hence why I'm over specifying this too)

Super interesting take on the article, I've been wondering similar things for a while.
These clips are wild and literally out of this world! Funny that a shout of "Tango Delta" precedes "touchdown confirmed". Both indicate a TD, but I'm not sure why the former needs to use the phonetic code. I also thought the quality was much better when I set it to 1080p, the browser default must be much lower. It gets grainy right during touchdown, but I haven't heard if a higher quality version is coming or not.
As incredible as this footage is, it's even more mindblowing to realize we've been doing this for 50 years now. We know how to land on mars. Time to do it with people.
Nice! Bit confused on link to TSP but cool!
I've been using https://flights.google.com as an indicator on what airlines and datetimes to look for.
Perseverance Rover's Descent and Touchdown on Mars: Onboard Camera Views
Without links ready, and not being the OP, I have seen many articles saying that "this ML recognition/analysis system has racial bias because the targets it finds are more {insert trait} than average." It struck me how such an unscientific thing made it to so many articles. It's a symptom of a cause that a specific group has greater representation in something, e.g. crime. You can't call factual observations, racist. You should rather find the root cause and solve it.
An update on the model of Ambrose Bierce's "Devil's Dictionary":

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/972/972-h/972-h.htm
And of course, any post that goes against the libertarian-ish hivemind immediately gains downvotes with no comments
That's what I thought at first too. But it's a new/fun product and it's way too risky for them to do that.

Story: I learned recently we're "doubling down" and "going hard" on a space. What that meant was 4 years of internal discussions to finally decide to commit to building a feature Facebook has had for 5 years already.

No way they're going to move fast enough or commit hard enough to make a team out of this. At best VP wants to advance their own career by showing up with interesting ideas.
The idea behind the second dose being delayed in the UK was it was better to give 24 million and 80% coverage to the most vulnerable people with 1 dose over 12 weeks (assuming 2 million per week), then to give 2 doses to 9 million and 1 dose to 3 million over 12 weeks

.8 * 24 = 19.2m covered in scenario 1

.959 + .83 = 10.95m covered in scenario 2

Even if it were 60% with 1 dose and 95% with 2 it would be

.6 * 24 = 14.4m covered in scenario 1

.959 + .83 = 10.35m covered in scenario 2
Are you suggesting that in 1939 (when WW2 started) the US knew about concentration camps? I would very interested in seeing some sources for that.

Regardless, even if they did, I said most people did not know. The president, some higher ups and some people in the military wouldn't account for most people.

Even if the general population knew, not focusing on the camps does not mean they did not care. It means ending the war (which would end the camps) was a more important goal than liberating the camps. Why focus on one thing when you can kill two birds with one stone?
The CDC's website lists specific long-term complaints.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects....

This one gives a number of 50% that exhibit long term symptoms, but I don't believe that 50% number is what I was referring to in my earlier comment. I believe the 20-25% number I was referencing was for specifically long term physical damage, not just symptoms.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/what-...

Highlights from the article:
- "Some previously healthy people who survived COVID have been left with evidence of injury to the heart and kidneys"

A close friend of mine caught COVID-19 in November and still can't climb a flight of stairs without serious effort and labored breathing. They were an otherwise perfectly health mid-20s male with no other health issues. It absolutely thrashed their lungs and lung capacity.

- "[...] doctors around the world were reporting various brain conditions in people with COVID."

A non-trivial amount of people who catch COVID have developed seizures. Whether it's because of COVID or just exacerbated by the virus is unclear yet, but there is a clear relationship between the two that will probably become clearer with more time and data.

- "There also are people who survived COVID and have no evidence of injury to the heart, kidneys, or brain — but who nevertheless have not returned to full health. They still have fatigue, body aches, shortness of breath, difficulty concentrating, inability to exercise, headache, and trouble sleeping. Some studies find that more than 50% of people who "recovered" from COVID remain hobbled by these symptoms three months later."

Even if you do recover with no discernible damage to your body, there are people who maintain symptoms for months afterwards. There are reports of some people having 103+ degree fevers for weeks on end after catching it.

Morbidity of the virus is decreasing, and with the vaccine in full swing we're getting a grip on things, but people really do downplay how serious catching the virus was.

It's not just a flu, y'all.
> As a thought experiment, assume that the abundance model is here to stay

this is a dangerous assumption. The feds are poised to raise interest rates this year and it will have ripple effects, in particular the abundance period of capital is slowly being reigned in to avoid a loss of faith in the dollar and slow down inflation.
What a ridiculous statement. You can be excited by new tech and realize how it can solve your problems.
Why would anyone agree to sell you power at cost, unless the cost goes too high, and then sell it below cost?
Netflix can now automatically download shows or movies based on your tastes
This is one of those "bugs" that is a feature for the prisons. Of course no one wants this fixed.

Also, proof that things that are newer aren't better.

> “We have a couple modules they spent millions of dollars on that we can’t use at all,” a department source said.

> The ACIS software system replaced an older program called AIMS that had been in operation for more than three decades.
When I read descriptions like yours, Rust sounds like the language delivering on the promises of Haskell in the Real World.
But the planner sums each step in the plan so isn’t a more complex plan already more expensive? Or is the addition of another step not adequately considered in that cost?
The problem with GraphQL is on the front end. Suddenly, the FE team becomes responsible for understanding the entire data model, which resources can be joined together, by what keys, and what is actually performant vs what isn't.

Instead of doing a simple GET /a/b/1/c and presenting that data structure, they now need to define a query, think about what resources to pull into that query etc. If the query ends up being slow, they have to understand why and work on more complex changes than simply asking the BE team for a smaller response with a few query params.
Happy to see my last round of devices (S10e, Tab S5e) are getting grandfathered in.

That'll be a few more years where I get to hold onto the last major Samsung flagship to include a headphone jack and an SD card...
Yeah, I don't disagree. My question was targeted more at folks that specifically find the WSJ Op-Ed to be objectionable; in my experience those same people tend to consider the NYT's Op-Ed to be less objectionable (caveat: I'm operating on an N of like 4).

The most internally consistent position, IMO, is that Op-Eds are all partisan and should all be abolished, in every paper. They once served a useful purpose, but are arguably no longer necessary in a world where everyone can post an opinionated blog post on Medium/Substack/etc and broadcast it out to the world via Twitter/Mastodon/etc more or less for free.

This article we're commenting on is just an interesting (if potentially dubious) blog post by a surgeon, and nothing more than that.
Ask in reddit.com/r/ece
This depends on information I don't have access to.

In Chinese, one may of course indicate the gender of a third party, but this isn't mandatory, where in Romance languages, it is.

If evidentiary particles are mandatory grammar, and that is the claim, then uttering a sentence without including those particles would just sound wrong, the way the Russian tendency to leave off the article of a noun when speaking English sounds wrong to us. Native speakers simply wouldn't do so.
The "right" bureaucratic system isn't one with humans doing calculations (which we're bad at); nor is it one where computers on their own make decisions (which they're bad/inflexible at.)

Instead, it's one where computers do calculations but don't make decisions; and then humans look at those calculations and have a final say (and responsibility!) over inputting a decision into the computer in response to the calculations the computer did, plus any other qualitative raw data factors that are human-legible but machine-illegible (e.g. the "special requests" field on your pizza order.)

Governments already know how to design human-computer systems this way; that knowledge is just not evenly distributed. This is, for example, how military drone software works: the robot computes a target lock and says "I can shoot that if you tell me to"; the human operator makes the decision of whether to grant authorization to shoot; the robot, with authorization, then computes when is best to shoot, and shoots at the optimal time (unless authorization is revoked before that happens.) A human operator somewhere nevertheless bears final responsibility for each shot fired. The human is in command of the software, just as they would be in command of a platoon of infantrymen.

You know policy/mechanism separation? For bureaucratic processes, mechanism is generally fine to automate 100%. But, at the point where policy is computed, you can gain a lot by ensuring that the computed policy goes through a final predicate-function workflow-step defined as "show a human my work and my proposed decision, and then return their decision."
Isn't this the basis of the book "IBM and the Holocaust"[1] where the author lays out how IBM's technology helped facilitate the wide scale of Nazi genocide?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
Love what they are doing. I would consider them one of the leaders in the pack right now. Val has a practical vision to get to market on a timeline that is very compelling. Hydrogen FC is very promising for long-range flight applications due to its high energy density so I think they are focusing on the right things.
Sure, but solar won't be enough to power us forever, and doesn't scale like fusion eventually will.

We will have energy needs orders of magnitudes more than we do right now within the next 20 years. I'm all for solar, but fusion will be necessary just in terms of dealing with climate change and the energy needs that alone will bring with it. Carbon sequestration, water desalination, etc... are all going to need serious energy behind them and will be knocking on humanity's door before the 2050s.
I'm sorry that it has turned into a nightmare for you.

It's easy to quote someone how was directly opposing the socialist movement and socialism and communism is not really the same thing, is it ?