skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm absolutely not offended, it's just the first time I hear about this and I can't find any supporting information about it. Even in the last link you provided, americanoverseas.org, I still can't find any mention of owing taxes to the US, 10 years after relinquishing your green card.

The only thing that pops up time and time again is the expatriation tax which only applies if you had your GC for 8 years.

I'm really sorry about your neurological diseases, it's such a shame US healthcare is in shambles for the general populace.
I'm about a month into my first full time dev job. I know that in my job search the activity on github played a role. It is likely much less important or noted for someone with more experience.
If such a technology existed, it would definitely require intense mental training and preparation before it could be used. One would have to become the most detached buddhist in order to be the sort of person who, when cloned, did not flip their shit over discovering that the rest of their short time alive will only to further the master branch of their own life.

It would change everything about your personality, even as the original and surviving copy.
> Inflation is already happening, that is why housing and equities are so high.

"Inflation" is the cost of a basket of goods and services. Is you wish to talk about rising asset prices please do not use "inflation" as it just confuses the issue, especially since we already have a term for that:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_bubble
This made me nostalgic for a 1990s Sony shortwave radio that I had as a kid. It replaced a much larger probably 1980s era radio that my grandfather passed on to me. By comparison this 1990s one was magically miniature - and very similar design to book reader:

https://swling.com/blog/2016/09/the-sony-icf-sw100-a-minitur...
Is it possible to use tree-sitter to generate parsers in languages other than C? How hard would it be to modify it to create parsers in e.g. Java?

Edit: sorry, I just saw that you had answered that below.
>The people who know the domain should be able to maintain (and really, create) any automation of that domain themselves.

This is a recipe for disaster 100% of the time. One needs to know both the domain and software to change software in the domain. People who 'know the domain' but not software, when given the tools to modify software within the domain inevitably create an unmaintainable rats nest of more difficult to change rules, almost invariably in some proprietary WYSYWIG tool that creates more problems than it solves.
I don't think this is a fair characterization of why containers are a killer app. Full-OS virtualization was a killer app for hosting providers because it enabled multi-tenancy, allowing you to oversubscribe physical resources knowing that most applications you host aren't going to be experiencing anywhere near peak load 100% of the time. Containers allow you to take this a step further by allowing multiple applications with different versions of the same dependencies to run together on the same physical or virtual server without needing to worry about symbol clashes and without having to install one application's dependencies into some different than expected location while manipulating LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PATH.

This solved a huge problem for us in the geointelligence ground processing community. The various product generation algorithms tend to all be native code, but they're produced by different contractors, on different delivery schedules, some of whom are no longer on contract at all to provide updates. What do you do when four of them all depend on libxerces-c but all four depend on a different version? Tell them to stop pinning dependencies and update? How, if they're not on contract to do it? Tell the US Congress to get off their butts and award more money to the backing agencies so they can get their developers back on contract? Good luck. In practice, what we ended up doing, without wanting to stripe certain applications to only run on specific servers when some of them are used a ton more than others, was to install dependencies on an NFS mount shared by all the fast compute hosts, into application-specific subdirectories, and then set PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH before calling the executable that did all the work.

This system was terrible! But before containers, it was the best we could do. Now we just deploy each individual processing algorithm in its own container, and they can depend on whatever they want, all using standard system path under the illusion they have an entire OS and filesystem all to themselves. and never clash with each other.
This isn't the case for Proof of Work cryptocurrencies. Many newer networks are moving away from the POW model.
Typical HN comment I know, but how is this blog generated? It looks fantastic.
Is this only Markdown + Pandoc?
Funnily, Igor (Ingvar, originally, I think) is a Scandinavian name brought to Russia by the vikings :)
guns people own, bought legally, are now "shoot without warning" illegal machineguns. nifty.
And this is where we see how Western values are forced on non-Western cultures. As you point out, women there do not want to work if they can get by on a single household salary. Aggressive capitalism has forced women into the workplace to increase supply, thereby reducing salaries. It's just astounding how the ideology is that only the Western values are the "best" for all time and space, and others haven't seen the light, we'll show em.
(unofficial) Android version of Clubhouse
Agreed with both. I hope someone can eventually put an estimated 3D model of something familiar, like a person or a school bus or something, for scale in the image video.

And this is one of the coolest videos I've ever seen. I had a huge smile watching all of it. I can't even fathom how elated the whole JPL team must have been as these videos came in.
You have to know how to parse the response. This usually requires to know what you will receive, which limits the usefulness of generic link responses somehow
> I know of a researcher that held a multimillion dollar informatics grant for 3 years. In that 3 years they literally did nothing except collect money.

I wonder if a whistleblower payout similar to the one that SEC is doing for 1M+ fines (10-30%) would help in cases like this. The host organization would potentially be on the hook as well, so there is going to be a significant incentive to not let that happen (especially with all the associated reputational damage).
It seems more likely we'll call them heroes while laying them off.
Sorry, I realized and would have deleted that if you hadn't been so quick.
Ancient Greek words did that. For example, the word "know" has various forms:

Verbs:
Ginosko, oida, epiginosko, proginosko, epistamai, sunoida, agnoeo, gnorizo

Nouns:
Gnosis, epignosis, agnosia

https://sweeterthanhoneyministry.com/2016/02/25/greek-words-...
I believe what you're asking about is covered in table 1 and figure 2.

They're reporting hazard ratios after propensity score matching with people who had the flu during the same time period.
Probably like most government purchases, lowest bidder wins as long as they show on paper that they can do the job. Whether they execute on that is another matter, and some times the subpar work is accepted because of contract issues, sunk cost fallacy, politics/reputations, or schedule.
Most light sport aircraft are day VFR only, with an altimeter and airspeed indicator being the primary instruments. Some ultra lights don’t even have those, and you use visual cues and the “feel” of the craft to judge your energy/speed/height - and our perceptions are not the most reliable.
ayyy my boi going hard, go akash
Woman running after Model 3 mid-summon thinking it was a runaway car
I was in KS and I was just paid "highly" eg. $12+/hr although I was multi-role

edit: maybe less was making $11-12/hr and not full time, my math was off. I was freelancing on the side though before I got into the industry but yeah $20K range was my figure at that time eg. just over 3 years ago(it did suck, I was mad broke still am but working on it).
So, the minimum delay between Mars and Earth is around 11 minutes, usually higher. And the bandwidth is something like 60 MiB/Sol. This is just totally unrealistic with any known tech for the foreseeable future
FT dictionary of business jargon and corporate nonsense
I don't think this is particularly an issue with the way NFTs work - except in regard to their choice of Ether, and Ether's current issue with gas prices. I think there's a lot of potential in the existing markets. It's really specifically a problem with the economics of trading them, caused by the inflation in transaction costs of Ether.

Article you linked the artists issue is that he couldn't find a market for his art. Which kind of misses the point.

"Then I asked around if anyone wanted to buy it. The boys in the groupchat weren't interested. Neither were any of my twitter followers. Damn."

Sure you could get lucky with being early into a highly speculative market, but by and large this is like patreon or kickstarter or anything else online. If there's a potential market for what you're making or doing, it's a new (and potentially lucrative) way to tap into it. It doesn't generate a new demand for work that doesn't have (or can't generate) an audience on its own. NFTs aren't a form of advertising, certainly not a particularly effective one.

Also the artist initially used Zora (which I've never heard of), rather than Rarible or Opensea, or Mintable or Snark or any of the better known open markets.

On rarible he set his royalties to 25% (rather than the usual 10%) which obviously discourages speculative investment. He also set the cost of his first art piece to 1 ETH! Crazy high for an unknown artist.

The article kind of seems like a snarky joke, but if it is one I'm not sure what the punchline is, given he really did spend the money and really does seem to want to sell the NFTs. I think it's more likely a case of irony employed as a defence mechanism.

We have someone who self confesses he doesn't understand the market, making a remix piece quickly and half assedly, selling it at a high rate across multiple markets, without an audience or any interest in what is popular there. I mean I get it, who wants to miss the gold rush? But it's not a useful barometer of NFTs.

Currently all the real money is being made by selective services who primarily work with digital artists who have an existing following, or make work they think will reach an audience - sites like niftygateway.com or superrare.co

The work that's selling well is generally excellent. And sure, there is something inherently ridiculous in the idea of 'owning' a piece of digital art. But no more so that owning a numbered print or piece of video art by a renowned artist, or hell a cardigan owned by Kurt Cobain. All of which have real, established and ongoing value.
This was recorded by a computer running Linux, using ffmpeg. Embedded Intel system with fairly stock cameras.

"the first open source linux box running on the surface of Mars"

"thank you to the open source community for allowing us to use your amazing software"

Per their press conference today, in the Q&A section.
https://youtu.be/gYQwuYZbA6o?t=4025
That was alluded to in this old xkcd commic, though it doesn't go into the details: https://xkcd.com/1972/

I kind of assumed that "the one thing you instinctively do to escape a stall" is to push forward on the stick. Some answeres here seem to confirm that: https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/49865/why-does-...
Some neighborhoods around Boston had a Portuguese option at their ATMs. Got ripped out and replaced with Spanish when the banks upgraded their software at some point, but since the neighborhoods were still heavily Brazilian that didn’t make sense.
I don't think one could claim mining bitcoin is the killer app of bitcoin. That's a reason why people would support bitcoin.
Yup, I'll consider that.
Despite this outrage, what makes this country a sustainable country is it is a country based on the rule of law.

There should be a class action lawsuit filed and those who let it slide should be responsible, including compensation for those held beyond their sentence / early release. Yes it's easy to say and there are few champions for prisoners in our society. But it is how we fix these types of issues (i.e., petitioning for harm in court), regardless of the origin (software or otherwise).

Perhaps there should be more class-action lawsuits on behalf of convicted prisoners in general.
the "but not limited to" is the important part
Not strange at all!
Yeah a little a snobby
Oh cool! Happy to hear :)
Python Font Tools
I am just glad ISC gave up on 'the DNS server written in Python and C++, formerly know as "BIND 10"', now spun off as Bundy (like Ted), and in deep hibernation mode.
Digital Automation of Security Assurance Work-Flows
I still use this site occasionally. Used it way more when I worked in Consulting. Has actually been useful.
I don't believe any company without a big brand or insane salaries can really reject candidates because of bad Github profile pictures or bad code from years ago when the candidate was still a student.
most malware infra uses AWS these days. amazon is terrible at preventing it, and in my experience make it nearly impossible to report.
> it can act as an OAuth2 provider and drive SSO, login, etc. for all kinds of other apps or services.

Can I get a link to documentation/discussion on that?
No. First, how do YOU explain Australia having 900 deaths for 25m people, and the US having OVER FIVE HUNDRED TIMES THAT (499k) for 328m?
Really well done. What are you using as a target for GPT-3? I see where you got the reviews, but where do you get the bulleted lists to learn from?
To my mind, we're having a disagreement on a fundamental point:

I believe that just because some forms of speech has consequences, that doesn't inherently restrict speech.

What I'm reading of your stance is that since there are consequences for some forms of speech, this forms an implied and mandatory restriction on speech.

The difference is subtle, but it's leading to us talking past each other, particularly when it comes to discussing technology that enables free speech.

Unfortunately, this difference is not something I feel I can resolve on this forum.

Good luck!
Reminds me of "The Knowledge", pitched on Dragon's Den (UK's shark tank) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf4zNLxJZnY
Attributing the rise and fall of it to "christmas", "super bowl", "sturgous rally" or "beachgoers" is a fools errand. It's a monument to the arrogance of humankind.

I think future civilizations are going to study this period and laugh at how foolish and naive we are thinking we have any kind of real control over this virus. The idea that outside pharmaceutical interventions mankind can somehow control a respiratory virus will be mocked by future generations the same way we mock past civilizations that sacrificed goats to appease the rain gods.

The truth is the virus is gonna do what virus do: Virus. It's just part of mother nature and we don't really have any say over its behavior. Outside vaccines and treatments we can control it just about as much we can control earthquakes, tornadoes or volcanos.
Isn't this clearly defined false imprisonment under Arizona law?

Here's the relevant statute:

13-1303. Unlawful imprisonment; classification; definition

A. A person commits unlawful imprisonment by knowingly restraining another person.

B. In any prosecution for unlawful imprisonment, it is a defense that:

1. The restraint was accomplished by a peace officer or detention officer acting in good faith in the lawful performance of his duty; or

2. The defendant is a relative of the person restrained and the defendant's sole intent is to assume lawful custody of that person and the restraint was accomplished without physical injury.

C. Unlawful imprisonment is a class 6 felony unless the victim is released voluntarily by the defendant without physical injury in a safe place before arrest in which case it is a class 1 misdemeanor.

D. For the purposes of this section, "detention officer" means a person other than an elected official who is employed by a county, city or town and who is responsible for the supervision, protection, care, custody or control of inmates in a county or municipal correctional institution. Detention officer does not include counselors or secretarial, clerical or professionally trained personnel.

https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/01303.htm

Assumption being that a detention officer is not acting in good faith if they have a list of people who should no longer be detained under state law.
So I actually think the flip side of this is that the founders finding success tend to be much older — in their late 30s or early 40s — because the green space that’s available for SaaS focuses on niche problem sets with mastery of a field required to even define a product.

This path to success is becoming the norm, but it happens quietly because “guy leaves director-level role at a global bank to build a billion dollar fintech startup” isn’t as appealing of a story to the media. This kind of founder is much less of a risk in many ways than a younger one, but while the founder may be willing to live off savings for a year or two, the talent they would need to surround themselves with is also more experienced, with domain knowledge themselves. So why bother with a $500k seed round when it’s going to take $5M at a minimum to take a real crack at it? Now that we’re out of the “SaaS all the things” phase of this economy, you can’t just throw a bunch of overachieving 20 year olds at every problem.
Everyone had this experience, that's why after years and years they finally changed that behaviour.
> It would be unambiguously good if the international community (including the US) held itself to a higher standard on human rights.

Sure, then prosecute XJ for what it is, not what it's not. Use XJ as opportunity to formalize conventions and punishments for crimes against humanity and cultural genocide. The genocide strategy is not designed to do that, it's a reach designed to undermine China while explicitly not setting the standards higher for everyone else. More cynically, it's partisan domestic politics (from several countries) because curtailing is not realistic. It's feasible to pursue a credible human rights strategy, but this isn't it. It's exaggerations and propaganda for theatre. If international community wanted accountability they'd start sanctioning Canada for self professed cultural genocide. They can do that right now. Then move to XJ, a system smaller on relative terms, on absolute terms smaller than US prison complex. It affects less than 0.5% of Chinese population. It's not a small issue, but also not a huge one.

> I have a black friend

This is not token "I have a black friend" say so but lopsided "almost everyone in the black community" say so. XJ is counter-insurgency the same way US overreaction to 911 was in the middle east. Except ME countries identify with terrorism from religious extremism, hence their endorsement of Chinese narrative _and_ observes China's effort at systematic solution. That can't be handwaved away into China is genociding for lulz, nor dismissing the plurality opinion as not in good faith. Domestic security trumps human rights, always. Pompeo calling XJ genocide while removing ETIM from terror watch lists at the same time pretty much says it all. There's no credibility to human right lectures from wealthy, safe countries that atrocitied their way to wealth and secure borders. The reason why current human rights frameworks are DOA is because they can't reconcile between sins and security.
Those Somalian kids that might not know (gasp!) about Lollapalooza sure are sheltered then.

If only they had the courage to get out of their comfort zone of war and poverty, and just witness a mediocre first-world yuppie music festival, then they would realize how relevant Ariane Grande is to their human condition! "Can you stay up all night", Burhan? "F* me till the daylight. Thirty four, thirty five", Burhan. Come on.

Or those 6 billion non-English speakers, who don't have the common decency to just learn English and our culture! From however those countries are called.

It's all that sheltering! And we are being polite here, by stretching the word "sheltered", and not calling them out for so stupidly not conforming to our anglo-saxon-centric world view!
> Once velocity increases

Let us prayer that it does.

I'd much rather deal with an economy that is "too hot" than with one in which millions of people are unemployed.
I did a much better optimization for musl/freebsd, about 10x smaller, with binary search into a single table of ranges and single exceptions, for both cases, lower and upper. A few ifs are better than wasting lots of cache.

https://github.com/rurban/musl/commit/7bcdc7e6e1ed2c4424d706...

But I'm also trying the automatic data optimization route, because Unicode I'd changing every year. Case mapping is easy, but the changing normalization tables cause minor data structure hickups every year. Working in that here: https://github.com/rurban/optdata
FWIW during my PPL pulling back during (un?)expected situations instinctually was very much discouraged.

edit: this parent comments makes more sense if instead the author meant push on the stick, as another pointed out.
Serious question - if we are being recommended anything to watch, shouldn't we have some sort of idea of what the algorithm does?

I would love to see advocates for openness in algorithms, as we have advocates for open source software. We have no idea what filters are applied by tiktok, youtube, etc. If I knew what they were, would I agree with them?

Questions that arise for me, are:

* What are the value judgements behind the algorithmic recommendations?

* Is it ok for corporations to entrain their users with specific content, if that it is not based on a neutral algorithm?

* There is surely interest on the part of corporations to promote or constrain certain ideas, that do not suit them. These would play out in the political, economic, legal domains. If the algorithm does not let you know, this would be a lie by omission, and therefore immoral IMO.

Etc.

I don't think I have seen any discussion on this, albeit I think it is a hugely important issue.
Care to explain how this is a social problem? Enduring cultures and civilizations have survived on a single source of income (mostly by the male) for a long, long time. Yet we have the audacity to claim that others have it wrong all along because they have non-Western hyper capitalistic values.
Yeah, making sure we have capacity to treat anyone sick is certainly one of the highest priorities (and the reason there was such a scramble trying to contain the virus from wreaking havoc if we went past that). And I get that there are other "costs" to the virus and lockdown and a holistic, balanced view is useful. Heck, I have two young children who have been remote schooling for almost a year now while both parents work full-time.

I just object with the parent's following statement:

> With the vaccines now available, it seems like our goal should still be be to maintain the highest level of sustainable medical system occupancy.

If we are still trying to maintain the highest level of sustainable medical system occupancy while the percentage of population that has been vaccinated is slowly increasing, it would actually mean we are doing a horrible job in trying to limit preventable deaths when a fully vaccinated populace + herd immunity is not too far away. Maybe when a much larger percentage of the population is vaccinated, the spread and rate of deaths will be low enough that this may change, but we are still nowhere near that stage.
At GitHub, we're in the process of building a more precise code navigation system on top of Tree-sitter, that models language-specific name-resolution rules in detail.

Our currently-available code navigation system also uses Tree-sitter, but it is pretty simple; it just matches up references and definitions by their name.