skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The answer to that isn't putting all stores but one out of business, it's having a single-sign-on provider.

Also, I doubt you would criticize an embedded OS for only having process scheduling and hardware access, because that's probably all it was designed to do. Similarly, a low-cost store may want to skip on providing all those extra features so they can keep prices down.
Is your post meant to be ironic?
Pfffffffff. Give me what he is smoking.
Why do you think that? I'm pretty sure that the cole's notes series of books do not share revenue nor do the summaries on good reads.

Straight up copying of course would be different.
I think one thing that I've noticed is that defamation laws seem really hard to enforce on people speaking on the internet, especially when one can hide behind a pseudonym or straight anonymity.

I guess overall for "cancel culture", I see it similar to boycotts, but often boycotts edit are /edit of a specific individual, and also without the stipulation that the boycott will stop if a behavior changes. AFAIK, the civil rights bus boycotts wanted a specific policy to change and once that policy changed, they stopped their boycotts. Much of "cancel culture" I guess wants an organization's policy to change, but often that policy is to excommunicate an individual and there doesn't seem to be much that the individual can do to seek redemption—but I may be wrong on this.

Would love to hear your thoughts in response.
The problem referenced by the GP is worse on consoles in my experience. Did the system software get updated today? Well, no network features for you until you download it.

What about that video streaming app? Well, there's a new version, so you have to download that right now or you can't watch. Oh, and we logged you out. Get out your phone or computer and type in this link. Then log in there and type this code. Make sure you enable all javascript because otherwise this won't work. Also, there will be an awkward pause after the computer tells you you've activated where the console won't indicate the same and you'll wonder if it even worked.

Granted, some consoles handle this better than others.
If you have a license, you have responsibilities as defined by the regulations involved, regardless of whether the people you interact with know you have those responsibilities or not.
I mean incentivizing private companies to do R&D...
OK, thanks for that. I was wondering whether there was a way to break out the 5G from 4G in the visualisation. Also, I'd thought (perhaps wrongly) that many more 5G stations were necessary for coverage in a given area than 4G/3G because of the shorter physical range.
If you watched r/wallstreebets during this whole thing there was a lot of stuff going on; people saying things, people buying advertisements and billboards, people explicitly encouraging market manipulation... there was a lot going on which could easily be marked as securities fraud.
Jonesforth.S: A Forth Compiler Tutorial
How much is it? Retail price?
Wasn't it blatantly obvious to pretty much everyone that the whole situation was just totally crazy and a horrible thing to get involved with on either side of the trade? I mean, this guy was on reddit with stupid memes, not in an office in a suit and tie being paid to give people advice.
I once got a flat tire where INDOT was clearly at fault (or their contractors). I contacted them to warn them about the very dangerous situation[1], and they offered to pay my expenses, although I had road hazard coverage on the tires so it wasn’t necessary.

[1]: If anyone’s curious, I was compelled to drive over a mile on a tire rapidly losing air because of a pothole that should have been patched before they started highway construction that day. Both shoulders were blocked by barriers, the busy highway had been narrowed to two lanes, and the very deep/sharp pothole was just past an exit, so I could do nothing but speed (carefully) through a construction zone to get to the next exit before my tire went completely flat.
Even given the bad UI form, the error, and likely many others like it, could easily have been avoided by a more verbose confirmation. Rather than a simple warning, "money will be sent out of our accounts" a warning showing a brief synopsis of the totals and where they will be sent would be much more helpful.
Apparently it's in the process of being implemented today yes
A safer form of water even if you can't make use of the nutrition?
Boycott is me (or you) choosing not to spend your money or do business with a particular entity due to perceived notions about that entity.

This cancel culture stuff is about not just "not reading the article and not going to the site", its an active attack against someone that you don't like.

A boycott is me saying "buzz feed sux, i won't goto one of t heir urls". Cancelling would be me saying Gina Carano sux, i'm gonna call disney over and over until she gets fired.
Did Gill represent himself as a licensed security broker to his audience?
> I mean there isn't even any research on it. No one talks about it.

Neither of these statements can be true, as I've seen multiple examples of both. For what it's worth, one of the search terms you are looking for is "time theft" (as opposed to "wage theft"), the literature on this is also well developed as you might expect. And of course there are various types of related fraud (both in favor of employer and employee) which have been studied.

> I've never heard or read anyone make the point aside from myself.

This is plausible, but doesn't tell us much about anything but your own exposure.
How do you know that? There are plenty of opportunities for favoritism. For example, listing position on the name of assistants on research papers.
A key part of the design is the way environments are implemented. An environment in Kernel consists of two parts: A local map of bindings from symbols to expressions, and an ordered list of references to parent environments. Importantly, the references to parent environments may not be accessed directly, and the parent list is immutable.

When a symbol is looked up in an environment, it first checks the local bindings, and if not found, it will then look through the bindings of the parents, in order. This forms a depth-first search through a potential DAG of environments, with the current environment at the root.

The constructor (make-environment) takes an optional list of parents. The order specified is the order in which they will be searched when a lookup occurs.

Mutation is only possible for the local bindings of the root environment. You cannot mutate the bindings of a parent environment. This is one of the key improvements over fexprs, which would be able to mutate anything in the dynamic environment. Since it is only possible to mutate the local bindings, and you can only do so if given a direct reference to an environment, this places a constraint on the potential side-effects an operative could perform. An operative can only mutate the local bindings of its caller, unless explicitly given reference to some other environment.
It is at best extremely unclear that there was a serious pump-and-dump scheme going on Reddit. To qualify as a pump-and-dump you have to deliberately inflate prices through false or misleading statements. That wasn’t really happening; everyone knew what was happening.

People off r/wsb may not have had as clear a picture (and I imagine many of the people who quadrupled the size of the sub in a week may not either), but it’s incredibly hard to blame Gill for other peoples reporting of him. By the end of things he wasn’t even really posting text, just portfolio shots.
I don't think this case will go anywhere but those are good points. It does sorta look like this was a "kind of" pump and dump market manipulation but I don't know if they will be able to pin it all on him. He's allowed to "give advice" but I don't know if misrepresenting himself as a novice trader would affect that. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I am split between thinking it will go nowhere and a judge "making an example" out of him.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210217192404/https://shopkits....
Obligatory reference to the Unix Koan "Master Foo Discourses on the Graphical User Interface", after reading this post:

> Master Foo said nothing, but pointed at the moon. A nearby dog began to bark at the master's hand.

> “I don't understand you!” said the programmer.

http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/unix-koans/gui-programmer....
The Citadel That Is Still Cisco Systems
I pour a baking soda slurry on my hair in showers instead of shampoo, sometimes exfoliate my face a bit right after. Rinse it out with some diluted white or apple cider vinegar. Most shampoos had me developing horrible neck and scalp pimples and gave me dry skin.

Now if you want to really kick up the cleaning potential you put on gloves and bake the baking soda turning it into Sodium Carbonate which is an adequate replacement for lye in many household uses from cleaning to making pretzels.
Publicly disclosing the algorithms would drastically increase the pace of gaming them and resulting in pay to play system where the fanciest SEO wins.

Google and Facebook partially relies on the obscurity to keep the fighting the spam battle. IMO we don't have the technology yet to have fully open ranking algorithms that are not quickly broken.

To think of it - similar to crypto around WW2.
They should have used his real name, if they don't like fucking.
I also believe any algorithm that isn't human-readable should be banned. If it can't be understood, nobody can validate that it isn't racist, sexist, or slanted towards encouraging violence and harm.

The fact that technology companies have been grossly negligent and irresponsible isn't a reason to not regulate them: It's proof regulation needs to be much, much stronger.
PHP is weakly typed but it has a strict type option nowadays, and class properties can also be typed.

Combined with function parameters typehinting (which easily beats typespecs) it's a great and productive developer experience I must say.
A transaction where the terms are fully disclosed with enforceable clauses and which has a clean starting and ending completion state is very different from what is being described in the article or what you are fantastically proposing.

A sexual assault tied to an entertainment career paths has indefinite terms, consists of unagreed upon jeopardy in terms of what is being exchanged, and for how long. It's nothing like an "opportunity".
Actually, in a human hierarchical society, power is all about sex.
Curve: An automatic market maker for stablecoins
Yes, freedom is such an encumbrance. Life is so much easier when someone makes all the decisions for me.</sarcasm>
I went into your history and ALL of your comments are for defending Apple on Apple related stories or defending Apple on non-apple related stories. You are clearly an Apple shill. How much are you getting paid?
People getting fired for an allegation that doesn't pan out, but by then their reputation and career are already destroyed.

Or comments taken out of context or missing nuance.

Or punishment out of proportion to the offense.

In the past, boycotts were aimed at corporations. Not buying or consuming a specific product, or protesting that company. Cancel culture is more aimed at individuals.

Suing for defamation can be expensive and risky, and doesn't necessarily restore reputational damage even if you win.

Obviously, some people clearly guilty of the accusations against them and deserve the consequences being meted out against them.

But there is also a long history of "witch hunts" and people being punished in ways that don't deserve. Social media is enabling a new form of that, which is what we call "cancel culture".
This is roughly what I do. Unsubscribe is for things I was interested in, but am not anymore (out of the hobby, getting too many emails to manage, etc).

Spam is for any kind of email I haven't opted in to receiving. That includes mail from organizations I have never requested contact with, as well as any emails I get as a result of UX dark patterns. I try to opt out, but some of them sneak past, and I don't feel bad dinging it as spam. That's the risk you take with opt-out mailing lists.
Fully Living?
This assumes that everyone views integrity in the same way. Not everyone views sex as a sacred rite that a lot of cultures make it out to be. Regardless of my views or your views using sex for gain isn't wrong or immoral to everyone. I don't support or think it's right for anyone to have no other option but some people would argue that having the option is better than not and I shouldn't enforce my morals on them.

Note: I'd never use sex in a bargain, vows and dealing with peoples emotions is a very serious thing to me. I'm not everyone though.
It's been a long time since I've used an RSS reader. I've moved to a read-it-later app like Pocket. Do any RSS readers provide all of the following functionality:

-Let me highlight / add notes.
-Randomly add things not in my usual RSS feeds, i.e. from some website I'm browsing.
-Listen to articles via text to speech.
-Work well across web, iOS and Android.

I've been less and less happy with Pocket as it's clear that it's become less of a priority for Mozilla.
I'm curious how this advance update thing is supposed to work. What does disclosing those details look like, actually?

The reason I'm asking is that as these things grow in complexity, it's quite possible that even if you join the team that works on these systems it will probably take you a pretty long time to understand how they really work. Their actual behaviour is likely to still be mysterious a lot of the time because they're driven by data.

Is a high-level description in english OK? Do we need to see pseudocode? The source code code? Do they have to open source it? What parts, if it's tied to internal frameworks? If there is ML, do they have to disclose all their sauce there? The trained network / weights? The training data, if the alg alone is useless without a data set?
Of course. But the law will not allow for that.

If FB allows any news content (e.g. from news orgs that want their content to be listd for free), they must allow all news content (e.g. from news orgs that will want to be paid unrealistic amounts for it).
What do you mean a founders child was involved? Was that the person who skipped the senior rank?
If he had sock puppets and unreported holdings, it is substantially different.

Also, he apparently misrepresented his qualifications in such a way that it makes the story that much more attractive to investors who could pump his holdings up.
But as someone who recently bought a Quest 2, it really is an amazing product, so some things there must have been very right. In retrospect, do you know what those things were?
I wonder if FB ever offered or considered letting users link without previews (e.g., choose a word or words of their post to become the link text). It would defuse the way users scan headline/preview/image on the feed (instead of going to the publisher and reading the content). Not sure Australia would have accepted this but I believe it addresses some of their concerns.
What are these platitudes? Of course they have a legal and moral right to do so, otherwise it wouldn’t be put into law.
This excuse has been used to protect Google and Facebook for decades, but considering disinformation campaigns, civil unrest, and outright genocide has been the cost... I think the price of using obscurity to prevent SEO tactics is way too high.
These conversations always rapidly devolve into the same old generic iOS versus Android nonsense. But I'd like to try to keep a super narrow scope here. The specific problem Epic and others are fighting here is "App Store payment system and control over app downloads"

Now to be fair, as far as 'App store payments' goes, both Google & Apple charge the 30% fee on all transactions. The reason Epic is battling Apple here mostly has to do with the 'walled garden', and the fact Apple's 'control over app downloads' is totally locked down. Epic avoids the Google play 30% fee by having users side-load the APK, so that's a fight for another day I suppose.

Now, for the 30% fee problem. Does anyone really think that is fair an equitable? Come again? They hover up 3/10ths of all business transactions? It just seems so obvious to me that the answer is absolutely not. There is no way I can twist my brain to believe there is any justification for that. If the issue is that it costs Apple (& Google) a lot of money to maintain servers and infrastructure to provide the app store services, then there are other ways to charge developers to cover this cost, and even make some profit.

Apple charges $100 a year for the 'Apple Developer Program'. This yearly fee model is the fair way to do this I think. You could add more tiers too this that scale with usage. $100 for the entry level package, and that covers 'X' amount of usage. There could be enterprise tiers for huge customers like Epic. They are using more of the resources of the app store, then they should pay more. I'm sure Epic would be happy to pay, IDK I'm just making up a number, something like $500K a year for their developer license instead of 30% of every transaction.

I'm just spitballing here, I've not fully formed all these ideas, and I don't know what fair pricing for tiers & usage would exactly look like. But I think most of us can agree a system like that would be much more fair and equitable. I have just never heard a convincing argument of why Apple & Google deserves to own 3/10ths of all the business on their platforms.
And in the process lost a significant portion of trust in public health measures. Saying the don't work is very different than saying they are short in supply and blocking sales temporarily or something. Second one is much easier to reverse without teaching public to second guess every public health directive from there on.
It is your position that the existing laws and regulations against certain kinds of pump-and-dump shouldn't exist, because instead everyone should just be smart enough to know that it happens pervasively?
> I can hardly wait to use Amazon App Store to install Amazon ...

This doesn't happen on Android.

> My gaming computer is already filled with like 8 different app stores

This is because game companies want to be middlemen in games distribution. Games have communities, chat, matchmaking, patches, DLC, DRM, sales and pricing engines, analytics, online gaming, and a lot more complexity than your AirBNB or CashApp.

It's also happening with streaming. Once game steaming gains adoption, you'll see it there too.

You're not going to stop this by defending Apple's moat.

Forcing Apple to open up lets small developers get around the Apple tax and draconian and arbitrary review process that hinders their growth. It also lets people control the devices they purchased, and defends software freedoms broadly by discouraging the Apple behavior across the board.
There are alternative stores on android but no one forces you to use them. The same will apply to iPhone
There used to be, you could hide all from certain sources when you looked at the options on a given post but they sunset that feature. The sources I hid then still don't show up in my feed, though.
Who is deciding what laws are just? Hopefully not Google or Facebook, as they are amoral profit-motivated behemoths who will annex your home and life if they're allowed.
People won't stop consuming news and they will go where they need to to get it. With FB out of the running I think that means they will likely end up on some mixed diet like a forum (like HN) and getting it from various sources (local,national,etc.) Essentially, I'm less worried about people being uninformed than I am about them being misinformed and I'm afraid that FB has shown to enable misinformation at unprecedented scale thus far. If we can't agree that FB has uniquely played a large role in that then our discussion is rather moot I'm afraid.

Also, that's why I said it "sounds like". I was inferring while being fully aware of your ability to clarify.
Nintendo's online services are, and always have been, a disaster.
I've often played with these concepts in my head, completely oblivious that someone had coined them and developed them. Thank you for linking this!
Yagni. Lesson for startups. Planes won't land just because you built a runway
I’ve said this elsewhere, but because he had been readily deanonymized I expect everyone to target him instead of any other Reddit account.
Scott Siskind believes scientific racism is “probably partially correct”
> Gill is held to a much higher standard than a normal person as he is a licensed security broker.

> ...many people who lost money buying the stock (selling options is different) based on his advice.

Out of academic curiosity, how does this work?

Mr. Regular Joe wants to buy some stocks for an investment. He worries he doesn't know enough about the market, so he looks for advice from Mrs. Licensed Broker.

Mrs Licensed Broker says "Hello Mr. Joe, right now, GME is undervalued. It should be around $20, it is now at $4. By my estimates, it is a good buy. Look, I have put my own money into it because I think it's a good idea".

So, Mr. Regular Joe buys GME.

Mr. Regular Joe's wife buys GME.

Mr. Regular Joe's neighbor buys GME.

Mr. Regular Joe's grandmother's pet squirrel buys GME.

All of this buying has pushed the stock above $20.

Whose actions are Mrs Licensed Broker responsible for?

Or do we want to live in a society where every licensed broker who writes opinion pieces on seeking alpha and Wallstreet Journal suddenly realize that reddit could read their article, go crazy and expose them to legal trouble? In such a world, Mr. Regular Joe has to gamble with his money and pick stocks on random, because nobody who understands the market will share information with the Plebeian class.
Even with asexual people, it's all about sex... or the lack of thereof. Asexuality is a sexuality.
If you have a good recursive version of Fibonacci for R, I'd love to swap it out for what I currently have.

For the languages I don't know, I looked at the code people posted on rosettacode.org
> And all for what? A mapping application having features which really don't save lives 99% of the time.

Are you saying you aren't willing to sacrifice your well-being to increase the value of this manager's portfolio? /s
As a user, I'm free to buy Android if I want to. I buy iPhones specifically because software developers are forced to go through Apple's more strict guidelines (see the Apple/Facebook fight for a recent example of why I personally like it). I can trust the software I use much more on Apple's platform.

I want to have the freedom to buy and use such a platform, and Apple wants the freedom to sell and maintain such a platform. The entire process falls apart if Apple is forced to allow other App Stores. Why should the court restrict those freedoms and break this consumer benefit?
Downvoting because this isn't the case in the US at least. It's still legal to install internally vented gas burning fireplaces.
> Why?

Because it adds no value when shorting is nothing more than a predatory model to extract wealth from the useful (entrepreneurs) to the useless (speculators). Consider the World's riches man only became so when the speculators made Tesla the most shorted company.

I think this shows, once more, that the Capital Markets as we're forced to believe are anything that and more a massive casino with reckless gamblers with connections to central banks endless money printing. And that's my problem with this more than anyting else, it's not fair, its not efficient it's a forced construct by the entrenched powers to create even more entrenched and systemic gaps in wealth and Society.

Do I really need to talk about 2008?
I would imagine he would appear under his real name. It would be weird to hear his username in Congress, especially when there are no longer concerns about anonymity now that his name is publicized.