skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Founder here. AMA. Our goal was to build a serverless experience on top of k8s that felt like a PaaS but still provided the flexibility for teams to grow into their own private cloud k8s environment, as they scale. We're big fans of Cloud Native and k8s so we're hoping to ease adoption of these tools for smaller teams who don't have as much DevOps available on day 1 or larger teams who want to give their developers a really agile delivery flow on top of their private k8s infra. We've also done some interesting things with measuring workflow events to automatically calculate Delivery Insights (using DORA) to help provide stakeholder viability into operational cadence and stability. Happy to answer any questions or hear feedback! Be gentle!
I've yet to see any voice chat app work as well as cellular calls. Until then, it's still a phone with a computer attached.
it gave me a very zoomed in view of what I assume is Null Island (GPS coordinates 0, 0). Zooming out several times eventually reveals map elements.
This isn't really true. My parents build a house with a large fireplace in the living room. True enough it actually sucked warm air out of the house (tall chimney) and made the whole house colder.

My folks simply bought a really nice fireplace insert. It works extremely well. These are not uncommon, even in the south, and my parent's place is far from 'off grid'. They absolutely do use it to 'heat the house', and we only supplement with radiant heaters in the far bedrooms.
Ok, but SpaceIQ also provides IOT integrations, way finder and some other features. But I understood the direction. Thank you for the comments and best of luck !
This is a complete aside, but last year I purchased a keychain YubiKey 5, that supported USB-C and Lightning.

I attached it to my key ring, and within about 8 weeks, the device was destroyed through the general wear and tear of being in my pocket. The plastic started chipping at one end of the device, and before the long the entire plastic shell shattered off completely exposing the board underneath.

Was a pretty big bummer, and kept me with going back to Authy. Are there any other hardware key/tokens that are maybe a bit more rugged?
>There are other viable assets that have well studied and well documented track histories.

can you expand on that?
This is not how power grids work. Renewables have priority over dirtier peaker plants. If you turn off bitcoin mining, the average CO2 per kw emitted by the grid goes down.
For SSH, use native U2F/FIDO2 OpenSSH support instead:

https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-8.2

https://cryptsus.com/blog/how-to-configure-openssh-with-yubi...

TOTP with a PAM module is insecure since it's not cryptographically tied to the session like public key auth and can be phished. The author's suggestion to use it for passwordless login is dangerous when applied to SSH sessions!
Not sure how I missed that on mobile.

Then this is my dream framework
Sean is looking into higher-level features for NN - it will likely be a separate library on top of Nx. For general direction, I briefly discuss that at the end of the article above. :) If something is unclear, please let me know!
The overwhelming majority of hacks are dragnet, not targeted.
TIL "cellular" refers to the imagined interconnecting shapes when mapped, not the battery technology as previously thought. unsure why this term was popularised over the pre-existing "mobile" but there we go
> DFV never said a think about short squeezing.

But did Keith Gill?

All the argument here tends to treat "/u/DeepFuckingValue" as the sole authority of what this guy did, and in context that seems outrageously naive.

Accounts all over WSB were pushing this stock like crazy, and this guys Just So Happens to have been a huge beneficiary, when he was absolutely expert enough to have understood the bubble (and importantly, how the bubble was driven by the WSB community misunderstanding short trading)?

Again, his expertise and the incentives just don't line up here. That's not proof, but it's pretty good justification for suspicion. Occam's favorite explanation has to be that this guy ran a pump and dump.
With an estimated 178TWh/a electric energy dissipation for bitcoin mining and 0.416kg CO2 released for every kWh electric energy produced in the USA and 15500kg CO2/a per capita released (total, not just for electricity) in the USA, the CO2 released from bitcoin mining corresponds to the release of about 27 million citizens of USA. Not sure why the residents of Tampa would release so much more.
I've seen this take quite a bit lately with respect to cancel culture and I'm a bit confused about it.

Since HN is amazing, I'm hoping someone here can help me understand without it turning into a flamewar.

I don't understand how "cancel culture" is substantially different from what we used to call "boycotts", just with the internet for more social lubrication.

I suppose theres a risk that the allegations at the center of the boycott are incorrect, but isn't that what defamation laws are meant to combat?
Most financial advisors, like this person, do not day trade and certainly don't mess with options. Aside from the risks involved, I think you'd have a hell of a hard time finding insurance for your firm if that was the case. No one wants to be stuck by themselves when they fat-finger an extra zero and lose someone else's $50k.
You think blizzard has the resources, know-how, marketing, and brand recognition to build and successfully launch a phone that competes with the iPhone? That is just short of delusional. You really have no idea what you're talking about. But I'm glad you like the iPhone.
Taleb made money in 2008 by buying options that were way out of the money and hoping for a crash. All other years, his fund lost money.
That strategy would have lost money over the last decade, because there wasn't a crash.

Whether that strategy is a net win over a business cycle isn't known. Taleb's funds never published their full results.
This are PKI tokens, like smartcards. I would like something tied to a certificate and private key on the device. That would be unforgeable
Fair use (or i guess fair dealing in australia) isn't totally about not negatively impacting other people's businesses. It helps your fair use argument if you don't impact, but there are plenty of clear cases where its fair use despite negative business impact. For example writing a scathing negative review of something that has quotes for context.
>If you want to live in the walled garden, you of course can do so, just as many people do on Android.

I've had both device types through the years. I've had to support both device types in different form factors. As a developer I love Android. I've learned to code some Java and lightweight game development for Android due to that openness of the platform. But the pros of the walled garden concept do not shine through on Android as they do with Apple due to the lack of how tightly integrated and compatible the hardware & software are from being developed together and approved by a sole source.

As a purchaser of an Apple product, I feel fairly confident that I am Apple's customer. With Android, the customer is the manufacturer\carrier combo that runs my phone, and I am their customer. That distinction carries an important difference and it shows through the development tracts of both companies and how they deal with issues.

Let's be honest here. If this goes through to force Apple to allow competitors to their app store, that decision will go further than developer sideloading (which is already possible). It will not happen in a vacuum and as soon as the courts hand down such a decision the carriers will be next in line to shovel as much horse manure down the line as possible.

I've never purchased an Apple phone with pre-loaded software as part of a deal with a carrier, aka Bloatware. I have from Android manufacturers on several occasions. Lower standards of entry from 3rd party sources often mean lower standards for bugs, resource usage, and privacy concerns. Higher risk of malware. Lower chance of software to OS compatibility. Apple phones with whole disk encryption made the news when the feds couldn't break it as easily as Android devices.

>Macs are so popular amongst developers is the similarity to Linux

Then I rescind the poor choice of analogy and go straight to fundamentals. These two different tools are purpose built for different things from different principles and that is ok. Homogenizing the mobile space in a way that would detract from those differences would be a net negative in my opinion.
I don't believe the author knows what the hell he's talking about about any of these things.

You barely get any power from the size of the solar panel to make a difference with anything in the car.

Bit coin requires tons of cpu processing power to be profitable, even if it's part of a pool. I'd be surprised if you got more than a dollar over the entire life of the car.

You need a decent reliable network connection, otherwise you can't mine new blocks. I'm assuming teslas have some sort of network already, but I can't imagine it would be efficient for this.

We're already reaching the point where anything but a super computer can make a bitcoin.

Unless it's for pure marketing purposes, this is a horrible idea that can be picked apart with a few seconds of critical thinking.

Please tech websites, stop writing dumb articles.
The only problem I have with this requirement is that it requires giving only news organizations access to this information. Your concerns can adequately be addressed by ensuring everyone has even access to that information.

Google and Facebook's algorithms should be required to be publicly disclosed. As a society, we should demand that we are able to see the algorithms that every web property lives and dies based on, that lives are built and destroyed by.
That URL now redirects to bloomberglaw.com home page for some reason, but now there's this story:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/securities-law/roaring-kitty-s...
I think there's something to the idea that given google should pay to link, they should not be able to sidestep the regulation through monopoly power.

That said, I strongly disagree with the premise.

I guess Google decided market share was worth more than the cost. I have to admit, I think it would be satisfying to see Australia face consequences for what seems like a pattern of hostility to the open digital world.
Yes, your max gain is whatever premium you collect from the sale.

Your max loss is infinite, as the plaintiff has now discovered.
I have seen a lot of protests defending Gill.

I think there is another side to the story though with many people who lost money buying the stock (selling options is different) based on his advice. Gill is held to a much higher standard than a normal person as he is a licensed security broker.

If you look at my comment history on HN, you will see at the time I was pointing out a lot of Redditors were engaging in a pump and dump scheme. Pump and dumps are illegal and regulated by the SEC. If Gill, a licensed security broker, is found to have been a part of this he could end up losing.
Feels like a bit of a no-mans land size wise. Too small to be good menu boards or art displays, too big and expensive to be most of the other options I can think of.
> OK, but that's very far from the quote you originally made.

I don't think so. I mean I guess you'd have to ask the_local_host whether I'm accurately representing the thrust of the quote, but the operative word here is indeed "expect" as opposed to desire or encourage.

Rephrasing the original quote in my own language I'd say something like:

Employers and employees can use purely transactional language to talk about employment and it's fine. Employers and employees can use emotional and moral language such as "passion" to talk about employment and that's fine too. But which language to use should depend on what forms the bedrock of the relationship. If the transactional needs form the ultimate bedrock of the relationship, an expectation of "passion" is no bueno.

There is a difference between encouragement and expectation. And I think employees would chafe under the expectation of e.g. eating healthy food or using the gym (probably not vacation time though, although a select few might, in the same way that I don't think, absent flight concerns, employers would be terribly offput by employees refusing raises).

In the same way that team activities, team meals, happy hour, providing materials about the mission etc. can all be viewed as perfectly fine encouragement for passion for both the mission and the company, that is not the same as expecting passion.

Expectations are two way streets. You get things if you meet them. You don't get things or have things taken away if you don't meet them.

Desires and encouragement are not.

> I absolutely disagree that employers shouldn't "talk" about it in general terms.

Talk is indeed too strong of a word on my part in the sense you're using it, but the point I was trying to get across is that if transactional needs ultimately dominate the relationship then those are the ones that should be emphasized.

I would prefer employers tell employees upfront that they're expected to work long hours and nights for deadlines or similar things in that vein, rather than leave it implicit and then tut-tut them for a lack of passion.

And because of that that's why I emphasize the word "expect" rather than "desire."
Social Media as Social Control
Thanks for sharing the Andy Jassy video. In most companies with office workers, the hybrid model as a better way of working is becoming the mainstream view. We hope we can help simplify the experience.

The per active employee pricing model was driven by the level of uncertainty from companies on how many employees will use the office on a regular basis. For some of our clients who have opened their offices only 10-20% of their employees are using it. Customers would prefer not to pay for all their desks when only a small fraction are actually being used.

Good points on the cost accounting and predictability of costs. We haven't gotten pushback on that so far. But we'll keep an eye out.
Not in the states, national TV almost never has sports. It's entirely politics.
I don’t want it, but I’ll tolerate it given the benefits.
Not sure you can compete with the low cost of 24/7 hydro-electric in parts of the US and China.

Running mining equipment off solar will leave the equipment out-of-use for more than half the day. Mining equipment is a significant cost factor for crypto. Even if energy is free, less than 50% utilization is a no-go for mining crypto.
Looks like it starts at 0,0 - zoom out on the map to find land
The day will come when we can think an image and then send it. It might change things.
> How does this hold up in courts?

Surprised they went for the courts instead of arbitration. Securities arbitration is notoriously biased towards the client. And even an allegation makes it onto the individual’s permanent regulatory record.

Smells like a PR stunt.
He didn't "come forward", other Reddit users made him their god (especially the 6 million new users of the sub), he was just posting his positions and commentary so others could learn. He became famous because he was in it long before anyone else and thus his gains got big.
CV Writing for Web Developers
First, Cloudrover's link has nothing to do with the law, nor on linking to news content. It's about showing news content inline in some new app that nobody has heard of, nor will use.

Second, the Australian law does not apply to all companies. It just applies to the companies the current government decides it applies to. (It's not that it will even be selectively enforced. It literally only applies to a specific set of companies, which is currently FB and Google.)
OTOH see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_9
That reminds me, a friend and I made a pact when we were teens. Hopefully he doesn't remember.
No worries I am pretty stoic when it comes to such things, great to see you made the best of it. Gives me a little hope for humanity and it's experiment with the internet : )
> No, the whole point of a capitalist business is to produce returns for the business’s owners.
Acquiring and retaining customers is valuable insofar as there is more value to be profitably extracted from the customer; it is instrumental, not an independent goal.

This is completely wrong. You can’t have returns without customers.

> Extracting maximum value at minimum cost (maximizing return on investment) is what business is about. Everything else is about techniques to achieve that goal.
You've apparently been distracted by the techniques to acheive the goal and missed the actual goal.

Creating customers is not a “technique”. It is the essential act. You can have a business that’s not profitable. You can have a business that doesn’t attract much investment. You can have a business that doesn’t maximize profit.

But you can’t have a business if you have no customers.

You’re so distracted by profit and investment that you’ve convinced yourself it’s possible to have a successful or profitable business with no customers.

> “practical monopoly” is One whose existence is evidenced empirically through behavior in 5he market and absence of competitive substitution rather than by arbitrary, non-empirically grounded description of market categories.

In other words, “I know it when I see it”.
It was never true the pretty ones put out and the uglies were good at there jobs. The less good looking probably put out more where the more beautiful could get by on a bosses hope.
Panduan Menang Bandar Ceme Memakai Modal Kecil
Pada kali ini kami akan memberi beberapa saran mengenai cara memperoleh uang di agen judi online dengan handal dan aman dengan bermain bandar ceme.
Prominent Python Features You Should Know
Just having that choice though includes a cost. When everyone is forced onto the app store, Apple can censor as you point out, it can demand high percentages on in app transactions, and plenty of other negative things. But it can also demand certain behavior standards, easily deplatform people who abuse (in Apple's eyes) things like tracking (like when they revoked Facebook's cert in 2019), etc.

The minute you open up to multiple stores, much of that control is gone or reduced. Or at least limited. After all Apple also nuked Zoom's webserver off all OS X boxes in 2019 so I'm sure they could kill things via iOS updates.

As a more mundane issue, if now content is segregated across N store fronts, that's now N passwords I need to track, N potential places that my credit card can be stolen from, N stores I need up install, log into, and download apps from when I get a new iOS device, etc. I as a user do lose a lot of quality of life tweaks the moment balkanization of store fronts can occur. I as a consumer do feel I benefit from Apple being able to tell app providers "We have about 40% of the market on our devices and if you want to interact with them, it's our way or the highway. So if you want to sell to them, you will meet or exceed these standards, there are no other options."

Ideally this standard setting would be set by a neutral entity like say a government and applied equally across all personal devices, but US privacy regulations are a joke so basically I'm stuck hoping that Apple continues to see value in branding themselves as the more secure and private phone (I'm suddenly nostalgic for Blackberry).

You always have the recourse of buying an Android and side loading if you want total freedom.
You understand that publishers control the distribution of their content, right? Facebook users merely pass around links. Publishers can block page loads from Facebook or put up a paywall anytime they want to. Some (like WSJ) chose to do so and others do not. This is basically a decision as to whether they receive more in value from those links than they do from blocking the links.

Thus the publishers have already revealed whether they benefit or not, by choosing to allow or disallow the traffic. There is no rational argument that they were being "hurt" by the traffic.

Of course Tech is now politically unpopular, and if you are Australian then it is foreign tech -- even more unpopular -- so why not use this political environment to try to extract some cash payments? Everyone wants to receive cash payments, and I can understand why a for-profit Industry would want cash payments, but what is harder to understand is why the public would view them as victims if they didn't get those payments, as they have already made it clear that they are benefitting from the tech traffic by allowing it and by setting up marketing accounts in Facebook and promoting/ sharing links to their stories there. Yet in addition to that they want to receive cash from Facebook. Well, that's a bit of a fantasy, now, isn't it?
> Why is he always referred to as 'Roaring Kitty' from youtube when he is undoubtedly better known as DeepFuckingValue from reddit?

Makes sense for this case. Public messaging versus publicly visible but arguably private conversation.
how do they distinguish between different black holes? isn't it "just Waves"?
Video game industries kinda get away with lower salaries, longer hours than rest of the "tech standard".
Not true - for the most part social media and the other types of ads, etc you mention are about reinforcing already-held beliefs, or otherwise giving them direction. Persuasion is about actually changing someone's mind.

This is why a given political ad can reinforce the beliefs of two people who believe opposing ideas: One says "See, I KNEW it was true." and the other says "See! I knew the media/platform/community was biased this way!"
I posted an eerily similar comment to this on Reddit.

Yeah, the suit is BS, but the fact that he's a licensed broker really shifts the narrative a bit and makes you start to question things. It's no longer "Johnny Everyman finds Picasso painting at yard sale", it's now "Museum curator finds Picasso painting at yard sale".

I've been an active member of WSB for more than 5 years now and I've followed this story since the beginning. Based on his YouTube channel and some other things, I still think DFV is just a dude who stuck to his convictions and got insanely lucky, but I'm less certain of that than I was last week.

I don't think this suit will go anywhere, but I wouldn't be surprised theres a few twists left in this story.
The premium is the fixed gain. Naked means you’re not covered by already owning the stock so your losses become infinite.
Yes. The initial cost of the trade is a credit equal to the price per call multiplied by the number of calls you sold. This is the maximum you can make. Your risk on the other hand is theoretically unlimited, because the price of the underlying is theoretically uncapped.

That's when you sell a naked call. If you instead sell a covered call, you keep 100 * the number of calls sold in your account as collateral. Then you still only receive an exact credit at the time the position opens, but your risk is capped and defined as the price of the collateral at the time the position opened.
I think it came down to personal preferences. I tried to use RSS but it's yet another app that I cannot form a habit to check it. Plus I like the personal look and feel of each email newsletter I got.

I instead of relying on email as a real time news feed. But getting too many emails I have to category and make miss some exciting development news.

I though of this, why not combine all of the newsletter and display them on a single page, easy to remember URL that I can check anytime.

And make this:

https://hanami.run/channel/devnews

The idea is I can have many channel, each channel subscribe to a bunch of newsletter and I just read them from here. Example my morning news:

https://hanami.run/channel/news
I find that experience to be persuasive, as well. It persuades me about the kindness of your friends.