skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Take a look at Australian Football... there isn’t really any stoppage even when there is a stoppage. It’s an action packed game all around.
Because turnovers are catastrophic in American football, and lateral passes have a high failure rate.
So most of these application including SharpApp are now being effected by Microsoft's choice to prevent blocking their telemetry in the host file.

Basically, if you attempt to add any of their IPs or Domains, to the host file, when you attempt to save, windows defender prevents you from saving and claiming malware or virus.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/windows-10-h...
A Man Who Made Data Sing – 4th Anniversary Tribute
That’s a fair observation! In my defense, rust-analyzer is a deep and complex project, so there’s a lot of stuff to describe. It’s closer to the 200k end.
Those statistics don't seem particularly meaningful. I know a lot of people with divorced parents who remarried/repartnered and the kids now have two sets of parents. They're... fine? Hell, as long as the parent-groups can get along, 4 parents sound better than 2...

But if they can't get along, I'm sure it's terrible. Just like if the parents stay together?
I mean look at all the sensors we can pack into a phone nowadays

Mobile phones used to include a FM receiver but more recent ones have stopped including it because it wasn't deemed useful enough.
Happily, firefox defeats this.
Offense, defense, special.
For me almost all sports and esports are painfully boring to observe. I don't feel any attachment to the teams and the gameplay carries out pretty much the same every time. I'd much rather be playing the sport or game.

The exception is for this are things that are very novel. I'll happily watch a video of someone mtb riding down some insane trails or someone playing a video game in a crazy way I haven't seen before. But once its no longer new its no longer interesting to me.
Counter intuitively: get rid of all the protective gear, specifically the solid helmet.

Rugby doesn’t seem to have the problem NFL has here.
Why is what you are registered with in some database in some government database more of a real name than what your friends call you? If I know you under one name and your kids calls you something else, which name is the real one?

People have different roles and behaviors in different situations including being called different names.

This may be inconvenient for states and other large organisations.
What's the difference between this app and the built-in interactive transcript feature that youtube already has for videos with captions?
Yes. Does it annoy you that we use our own dialect with its own meaning of certain words? If so, why? There’s some irritated comment like this practically every time (American) football is discussed online.
Conversely, they might just leave home and feel joy at the freedom to finally live how they want to live.

There's also something to be said for learning from the mistakes of others. I saw what smoking did to my grandfather. It destroyed his lungs and he slowly lost the ability to breathe. It robbed him of his strength, then his mobility, then his life. It made a stronger impression on me than a good role model ever could.

Perhaps you particularly appreciate the value of a good habit specifically because you saw the consequences of the opposite.
special teams - punting, kick receiving, etc. it's a valid claim.
They are catastrophic in rugby too. They built an entire game around it. They have a high failure rate in NFL because they clearly aren’t practiced.
It looks like someone ripped-out the section you're referencing.

Here's a link to a previous version of the linked Wiki article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Raspberry_Pi_OS&d...
Has anyone noticed that Ford and GM have made commitments to EV just after the change of administration?

Given that the new administration has already committed to moving the Federal fleet to EVs and is going "all in" on full commitment to reducing emissions, this is positioning by the auto manufacturers.

There is also now alignment between the Californian emission standards and the Federal government, which means that there is going to be downward pressure on the auto manufacturers overall emission profile. CAFE standard excluded "trucks" which is why the F150 etc are the "best sellers". If there was a move to include them in the overall emission standards, the move to EV would be substantially accelerated.

Just like Shell and others in the oil/energy markets are realigning, so to are the primary manufacturers of emissions generating technology.
> Once you're in that mode, where you don't have it together to work it out and grow together, sure divorce is happier than eternal rancor and abuse, but it's super-down the line.

This might be a bit of a trope, but it is at this exact moment that some couples have kids (like my parents did).

Having not been born yet, that was not very down the line from my point of view at all.
You forgot the giant tax credit that costs citizens a lot of money yet ends up not helping the cause
I don't understand the racism here. Millions of white kids, consisting of every position in football, would kill to get a chance to play professionally. You're acting like only black kids are allowed to be linemen.
these are similar approaches but different from a cursory glance, the nile red video is based on a paper from 2016, this was published in 2021 and they are treating 1m lengths of wood and have a 10cm transparent piece that looks far more promising than the 2016 version, or Nile Reds
Didn't it just happen like a year ago? I looked outside and my mind immediately jumped to Saharan desert sand for some reason.
Lexan (polycarbonate) is actually used for that purpose. Plexiglas (acrylic) is also transparent, but not as resistant to impacts.
Historically, governments would operate grains silos and be an intermediate purchaser, to control the cost of grain - keep it slightly higher in good years, and keep it stable in bad years by dipping into reserves.

IIRC a lot of countries were forced to abolish these price controls by the WTO, and then were screwed over when they got a bad harvest and poor people had no food.
Personally, I was super interested in reviewing memory virtualization and memory paging.

The bulk of my effort went into a very focused two day push.
200 pages in total: Chapters 1-6, 11-16, 18-24. Postponing all the homework.

I did all this reading on an ipad, highlighting everything in different colors, and adding blank pages every now and then for personal notes.

I then built and booted xv6 under emulation and started hacking. I would then look up areas of interest from my exploration of XV6 in the Linux 1.0 sources (super easy if you use something like [bootlin]) and tried to find the corresponding concepts. Then I slowly stepped forward through the linux releases. 2.4, 2.6, etc. until I had some ideas about how those concepts manifest in the current Linux kernel.

[bootlin]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/1.3.100/source
Diamorphine is already very safe, has few side effects, and is commonly used as a stronger version of morphine in cancer treatment.

What is diamorphine? Well, it's the scientific name for heroin. However, it differs from the drug in being far purer, being used in a clinical setting, and with carefully controlled dosages. Other than that, it's identical to heroin.

This means we can conclude that the negative aspects of heroin come from impurities, addiction, mental health issues of the users, unsafe injection practices, and unknown strengths resulting in overdose.

You can, with access to medical grade heroin, use it occasionally with no negative side effects. We know this because it is used daily in hospitals around the world.
Would it even be possible to properly staff a monitoring operation for “kind of phase 3” testing on the general public?
The idea that meat needs to eaten in the quantity and frequency that it’s currently eaten in the west to maintain a healthy diet is a recent idea. For my grandparents growing up most meat, especially things like chicken was a luxury reserved for special occasions. It’s also always interesting to me that when this argument comes up people are suddenly very interested in standing up for “the poor”, there are a whole host of other, more important ways inequality can be addressed at it’s root.
There's pictures of Matterhorn here: https://www.blick.ch/schweiz/blick-wetterticker-id8443729.ht...
Even for its day though, Star Trek was notably utopian.
Yeah, this really sounds to me like a sunset of x86 hegemony with such arguments. Not to belittle the game market, of course. It's huge. The hybrid chips they're planning to release are unlikely to be cheap. We'll see.

Also, not every x86 software needs to be ported, given the available alternatives and cross-compile features.

Interesting times. :)
The codebase is probably not that good to begin with and quite frankly doesnt need to be

I think programmers have a chip on their shoulder about the importance of the work they do. You are not painting the sistine chapel

Most programming is what you refer to as "workaday"
I’d use this to easily share emails with team members and discuss them over Slack - but I won’t do it without security.

I’d want to introduce the tool across the company but I don’t trust people to remember that it shouldn’t have sensitive information sent to it.
This article was AI generated, right?
What? NFL players are currying their brains for millions and millions of dollars. Not for their fanbase.
I don't think it actually makes that good of an argument against real names. For instance it shares a link to a study that found accounts with feminine names got more malicious messages in IRC rooms [1]. However, the people sending said messages didn't have to use their real name. That doesn't mean a real-names policy would make things worse. It could be that people, when forced to use their real name, are less likely to send harassing messages.

I certainly think there's places for pseudonymous or anonymous discussion. That link talks about how people may face social repercussions for deviant interests: sure I wouldn't expect a real names on e621 and the like. At the same time, real names provide a level of accountability that's beneficial in a lot of contexts.

1. https://phys.org/news/2006-05-female-name-chat-users-malicio...
> I’m not sure we’ve proven either one is definitely true.

Then you don't know what you're talking about. Both are definitely true, despite the meat industry's best efforts to delude you.
I am assuming it is still like the old days. A sysadmin drops an ftp server onto some box/vm at a company and no one notices
Merkle Trees and Bitcoin
A visual guide to SSH tunnels
https://github.com/froggey/Mezzano/blob/f0eeb2a3f032098b394e...

I'm not sure what I was expecting, but 110 lines of keyword arguments was a surprise.
why do we still not mandate concrete aggregates must be recycled material?

surely industry will find ways to reprocess recycled material to fit requirements??? or use more concrete or more rebar or something?

can the folks who mine river or marine sand be tasked to put desert sand back to replace what they mined?
I also use such hierarchical style, with lower level REAODMEs refferring iddividual source files. So that user continues from READMEs to code comments.

Example: https://github.com/cl-test-grid/cl-test-grid#system-architec...

On every level I first explain the task solved by this module and then go into the implementation details. Knowing the purpose first helps reader to understand impl details.
Replying to my own comment because there’s more to it. I’m paying more attention to the issue, and sometimes Spyder just context switches, quite often with very annoying timing, and often for no reason I can pinpoint. It just wants to be in one window right after I click in a different window.
This does not make easy to diagnose or complain about, but it is driving me away rapidly.
Oh for sure, any ML framework worth its salt should do some amount of graph rewriting / transformations.

I was (perhaps poorly) trying to explain how while yes AD (regardless of implementation in Enzyme, PyTorch, etc) _can_ avoid caching values using clever tricks, they can't always get away with it. The cache-reduction optimizations really depend on the abstraction level chosen for what tools can do. If a tool can only represent the binary choice of whether an input is needed or not, it could miss out on the fact that perhaps only the first element (and not the whole array/tensor) is needed.

Regarding Enzyme v JaX/etc, again I think that's the wrong way to think about these tools. They solve problems at different levels and in fact can be used together for mutual benefit.

For example a high-level AD tool in a particular DSL might know that algebraically you don't need to compute the derivative of something since from the domain knowledge it is always a constant. Without that domain knowledge, a tool will have to actually compute it. On the other side of the coin, there's no way such a high level AD tool would do all the drudgery of invariant code motion, or even lower level scheduling/register allocation (and see Enzyme paper for reasons why these can be really useful optimizations for AD).

In an ideal world you want to combine all this together and have AD done in part whenever there's some amount of meaningful optimization (and ideally remove abstraction barriers like say a black box call to cudnn). We demonstrate this high and low level AD in a minimal test case against Zygote [high level Julia AD], replacing a scalar code which is something Zygote is particularly bad at. This thus enables both the high level algebraic transformations of Zygote and the low level scalar performance of Enzyme, which is what you'd really want to do.

It looks like the discussion of this has dropped off for now, but I'm sure shoyer would be able to do a much better job of listing interesting high-level tricks JaX does [and perhaps low level ones it misses] as a consequence of its choice of where to live on the abstraction spectrum.

Also thanks for reminding me about matrix decomposition, I actually think there's a decent chance of doing that somewhat nicely at a low level from various loop analyses, but I got distracted by a large fortran code for nuclear particles.
I think you're over simplifying the wiki article:

> According to self-proclaimed "crackpot historian" Adam Gorightly, Discordianism was founded as a parody religion. Many outside observers still regard Discordianism as a parody religion, although some of its adherents use it as a legitimate religion or as a metaphor for a governing philosophy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discordianism

Although I doubt many people consider it a religion, it's certainly an interesting philosophical view and makes as much (or as little) sense as many other schools of philosophy or theology.
The goal is to fix the current phenomenon where human activity dumps enough co2 (and other greenhouse gases like methane) into the atmosphere to significantly alter the global climate and cause massive problems.

By the way, deer are not a meaningful contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas levels.
Agreed, live on the 37th floor of a 45 floor building - it's not exactly high by these standards, but still decently high. Never hear side neighbours, every now and then I hear something quiet from upstairs.

I used to rent here, the owner was selling, so we bought it instead of moving.
There hasn't been a fatal crash of a US commercial airliner since 2009. Even for the 737 Max debacle Boeing deserves at least as much blame the FAA.
>I'm not sure why you think that.

Because this started with your objection to me saying religious persecution is wrong, and within three posts you had called Jesus gay and Muhammad a pedophile just to see what kind of reaction I gave. If you disagree, explain what you're hoping to get out of this interaction.
Crudely, think reason is that the father subconsciously becomes sexually attracted to daughter after a while and only option is to search for a replacement.
Understand this will get banned, but think it's closer to the truth. (not due to daughters more difficult to handle etc)
It’s just a different sport. In American football, the plays are highly orchestrated and many players are travelling near top speed out of pre-arranged formations and in tightly constrained routes. The forward pass is available, has a much higher success rate when thrown at a specialist player and a bigger payoff. Many of the team (the offensive line) aren’t eligible for such passes and therefor have been optimised by body type for blocking. The lateral pass is practiced in high school as part of the “option” offense because the difference between position players in high school is much lower and there may not be huge standout talent at quarterback (the passer) and wide receiver (the specialist recipient). The offense is sometimes run at the college level by schools with a low level of talent, such as those with high academic admissions standards and the military service academy. Running the option also generally involves jeopardising the health of your best player, the quarterback. This matters less in high school and bad programs where the drop off isn’t as significant. At better programs there are just better strategies with lower risks.
Define healthy.

It's explicitly the outcome almost every married couple agrees they don't want upfront. So something has failed by that point.

It's not unhealthy in the sense that no one gets sick or physically injured I suppose?

This is definitely one of the more bizarre things I've ever seen written on here.
Not addressing the moral relativism of the article, but I’ve seen arguments over dungeons and dragons and Tolkien that share so much in common with religious and political arguments, to the extent that I now suspect political and religious arguments as equally about fictions. Further, once you consider that businesses, money and property are termed “legal fictions,” it is both alarming and impressive how little time and space concrete reality takes in our minds and affairs, comparatively. The rampant falsities flying around the last few years and their diehard adherents made me wonder what percentage of an average persons beliefs are strictly false, but for which there are no negative consequences. In a lot of ways, brains seem to prefer false things, and societies insulate from reality and protect individuals from their false beliefs.

Anyway, I suppose the title made me hope for something even more Neo-meets-Morpheus mind-bending.
Maybe I overlooked it, but I missed a mentioning of ladder logic [1] that was often used in process control devices (even in those for homes, I've seen some of those still in use).

There's an obvious translation from the ladder logic to a MC14500B program, so it's easy to replace those devices with a simpler MC14500B device.

I even think I've seen ladder logic mentioned in some of the MC14005B documentation (but it's been some time since I looked at that).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladder_logic
That's just because of the TV timeouts and greedy network deals. It wasn't always like that. You may have a better experience if you watch a sport like hockey, where there are only 2 or 3 TV timeouts per period, and all of the games are finished within 2.5 hours.
I don't think GP's point was a "rich vs poor" argument, but more "the populace is stupid, we have to lie to them so they won't go do stupid things".

This to me resonates with what happened in France during 2020. Many were complaining about how the government was treating the people "like babies" instead of treating them "like adults". Nothing came up related to the "rich vs poor" strife which, usually, comes up very, very quickly here.

I think this whole crisis shed some light on the communication skills required from the various authorities. I sympathise with people not liking to be treated like kids, I don't either. But then, looking at people's actual behavior [0], it did make me wonder what the actual, correct, communication should have been.

It's clear to me that "the people" is not one homogenous blob made of identical individuals. People will interpret a message differently and will behave differently when faced with the same exact situation. I guess the whole difficulty of this is that the government and various authorities implicated in managing this crisis can't have the message wrapped in different packages, each targeted to a certain group of people.

---

[0] I'm thinking of an episode in early March 2020, right before the lockdown, when the message was "let's all try to take measures to prevent the spread, namely let's stop all bunching up". This was a message from the President, broadcast on public TV, at the time one of the most widely viewed ones. Can't remember the day, but it was during the week. The very next Sunday, so less than one week later, people swarmed the parks in Paris with no attempt whatsoever at distancing.

Was everyone out there? Of course not. Was it even a majority? I don't know, probably not. But those same people would then take public transportation with hundreds of thousands of other people to go to work with other people and so on. All when we were concerned about a virus that was easily spreading through air.
Thunderf00t 'busted' this in September.

I guess one person can be more agile than the monolithic scientific community. But I don't really buy into that theory.

https://youtu.be/yO2mVHcSDCo
I'm not sure I'd consider regulatory capture and artificial barriers to entry by existing industries to be a good outcome, which is what this is; they rules aren't implemented to protect customers.
Hello, Hacker News! I'm new to the community. I just saw this and thought it'd be fun to solve in Haskell. The first solution I thought of was done in under a couple minutes. The second solution (I wanted to implement `group` myself) took a lot longer because I messed up a pattern match!

https://gist.github.com/hyperrealgopher/19730725804ba8825d50...
If you wanna go down that route selling this to the “free market” crowd, than Id love to let the free market settle itself out in healthcare too and pretty much everything else that the government controls pricing on.
It's their cognitive dissonance at work. People, especially the type of folks here, will find anything to say that pushes the discussion away from the mass-slaughter of animals, because they know it's not justifiable, healthy, or sustainable.

I know how it is, I ate meat at one point too. I had thought that as an elite athlete it was necessary to do so, but now five years without any meat I am stronger than ever. I have never had one of these weird "meat" burgers though.

Americans... eat tofu, tempe, soybeans, long beans, mushrooms, seitan, nuts, kale, seeds, and more for protein and otherwise consume a lot of fruits and vegetables. American food culture is broken and if you live there you need to do everything possible to break away from it, otherwise you'll end up fat and sick like most Americans are.
One thing about football is that one play can have a huge impact on the game, but the overwhelming majority of plays do not. This gives you a contest where every new event could be meaningful and is worth watching, but doesn't become chaotic.

Compare this to tennis, where missing an individual shot can lose you the game but each failed attempted has roughly the same impact. Football (and soccer and baseball) are more like chess where one catastrophic play can essentially end the game, no matter what plays preceded or follow it.

This dynamic is about the difference between focus and consistency. Games like football and chess prioritize the focus not to make a disastrous mistake at any point. Games like basketball and scrabble emphasize performing with a high level of consistency and are more forgiving of rare large errors.