skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There is no ethical way to ever know.
>That's like saying isn't death a healthy outcome for a cancer patient? ... But getting cancer in the first place is not "healthy", and so death caused by cancer is not "healthy".

What if your analogy is right and marriage is really not healthy in the first place? At least it cannot work for all people?

>If marriage is nothing more than a legal contract - which sadly for many people it is, then why even bother making vows such as "until death do us part"?

It could be a legal contract with such timing: “until death”
why not? Wasn’t it always has been like this by definition?

>All for show?
If contract is not taken seriously then any contract become ‘for show’

>Why not just put a time-clause for when the contract expires so that you can decide whether to sign a new one?

Because it would make it opposite to what it meant to represent? Anyway, why to bother if many people consider it
breakable at any moment already? Much more comfortable for those who do not intend to keep own promises.

>A highly utilitarian, and in my opinion, tragically sad view of marriage, but that is essentially what it has become for many people.

Has become? What if it always has been like this by design And many attempts to make it something else have failed?
LineageOS as an alternative os?
I’d start by just taking a good 3-6 months off then reassess your options. You need some time to recover from burnout before diving into something new.
Never is a long time.
Why did Cherry shut down?
The girl will perceive it as unfair and will react accordingly.

Also, father needs to make sure he is protecting her from actual danger rather then imaginary. For example, if you are controlling your daughter "for her own good" against imaginary dangers and teaching her to accept control like that, you are priming her for controlling abusive relationship.

And the actual danger to her is exactly that - a guy who is controlling and later abusive. If she interprets early warning red flags as "caring" or "protection", she will get exactly that.
I agree they were cutting corners, but comparing it to a laptop isn't that useful because as far as I understand it the main issue with screens in cars is the high temperatures they can be regularly exposed to.
If you're super super serious, can you even trust Tor? I personally give it better than 50% chance that some consortium of goverments control the majority of tor exit points but won't reveal it for small cases so as not to reveal this trick.
That is defacto reality. If every kid at least knows a kid from a divorced family the damage to the sense of permanence of the family unit has already been done.
Even with ICE cars there's been a long history of manufacturers attempting to lock out third-party repairs and modifications, yet there are plenty of companies who specialise in hacking around those limitations.

In the case of an electric car, which is simpler in a lot of ways, it seems more likely that parts will just be replaced with third-party compatible equivalents; which might naturally lead to a Ship of Theseus situation...
A nice, I do the same but I convert all books, papers and powerpoints to pdf files with a rondom name or i use a hash of the content as name. Then in use ripgrepall with fzf to search for the information i'm looking for.
Online Sumo Robot Competition 2021
I've been working on a diy atomic force microscope for a few months.

Here's the page on it (not too much there yet): https://charted.space/afm-updates.html

Unfortunately, I don't have a huge amount of time between school and other things right now, but I plan to plod along nonetheless.
Working on getting more familiar with Gatsby - thinking of moving my and my brother's substack onto our own static site so we have more control over it. Mainly don't like all the trackers that substack adds to the newsletter.

Another reason I'm considering a custom site is that I'm interested in adding 3D visualizations and tools to our articles (which are mostly technical breakdowns of our engineering projects).
Ethics aside, I think the parent comment was referring to weird additives and oils in things like the Impossible Burger.

That being said, I think it's only fair to compare that to all the antibiotics, hormones, and fertilizers that your average low-grade ground beef has been exposed to or fed.
Extraordinary Patient Offers Surprising Clues to Origins of Coronavirus Variants
Fascinating article. But I struggle with this kind of writing:

> In other words, perhaps, the coronavirus virus uses long-term infections as a mutational testing ground. While inside one person, they can try out all these different combinations of mutations and figure out, through trial and error, which ones are best at evading the immune system or helping the virus become more infectious.

Viruses don’t have agency. They don’t choose to try out combinations of mutations. I think it’s quite misleading to suggest any form of intelligence or decision making as an analogy for how viruses evolve.
On the other hand, it's likely that thousands of people will die due to the delay in approving the AstraZeneca vaccine. There are always tradeoffs, and it's not at all clear that the FDA is operating at the optimal level of caution.
So, you actually mean that you hope not to see equations. But it's the equations that are the real meat of these things. Pictures are pretty, but they are generated from the equations, and the equations capture the understanding and the modelling. The equations are the content, it's the equations that let us do calculations, predictions, and quantitative analysis.

What would you hope to see instead?

I don't understand what you're asking for. Are you asking to understand these things without doing the actual mathematics? That would seem rather ambitious, so I'm guessing I don't know what you're asking for.

I see elsewhere you've pointed here:

https://github.com/barbagroup/CFDPython

That amounts to an entire course on the subject. So if you're asking to have that sort of thing instead of a page that shows the equations and the maths, then you're asking that someone produce an entire course on the subject, instead of just a primer. That feels like someone complaining that an overview page isn't a degree level textbook.

So I guess I still don't understand what you're asking for.
I don't know of any EU country in which ministers are elected as ministers. Many are elected as MPs and then appointed ministers, but this is typically not a requirement, and you can easily have unelected ministers. Even if 100% of all ministers were always elected as MPs, you couldn't just argue "was elected for position X, must therefore automatically be considered democratically legitimized for position Y".
NASA offers $500k in prizes for Moon, Mars cooking tips
> I would imagine the average person on the street would expect to see a service life of >20 years.

For a car? Are many people driving around in a car from 2000 or earlier? When I search for cars that old or older it's 0.4% of the used market. Clearly the vast majority of cars do not last this long and I think you have an unreasonable expectation.
I like to use Pop!_OS for this. :D
It should be illegal to make a gear selector with no tactile feedback. People have died from poorly designed gear selectors. Having the car guess the direction you drive in also sounds like the most braindead thing ever. It won't be long before someone dies from this.
Irrational overreaction? I've posted elsewhere that I vote R but I had never heard of Qanon until the left started freaking out about it and made it news.
It's better than Watson, shrug.
This still requires an antenna tuned to the appropriate wavelength, and for matching you cannot have all antennas connected at the same time, they must be switched, so this would be unable to receive all frequencies at the same time.

The paper also indicates this is a heterodyne technique, so you have to tune to a center frequency like a radio, and the receptivity looks very narrow.
Ibuprofen was already a huge step up from Paracematol, which is another step up from Aspirin. The fact that ibuprofen is also much better tolerated, has fewer side effects, and has to be dosed less often means you're taking the best non-opioid painkiller we know of as your first-line option.
I'm concerned if you're buying any product that's just labelled "meat" without further clarification. That doesn't sound good for you.
> If I, as a (non-practicing) scientist (physicist), look at the evidence for something in vogue

You felt the need to identify your field of expertise there. Does this not imply that you actually do believe it matters? There is body of knowledge shared by the experts in a field that help facilitate the process by focusing efforts on productive discourse. Sure every now and then som crazy theory needs to be entertained to advance the field. But it would be a colossal waste of energy to give credence to every amateur with a dissenting view point no?
> It's one thing to be out of a personal computing device due to vendor policy

IMHO, the only reason people tolerate that is because the culture was habituated to it in the 90s/00s, when personal computers were improving so quickly that you'd likely want to replace yours even if it wasn't broken.

Cars are so expensive and the culture has been habituated to them having increasing life and reliability that I don't think a car company could pull off shortening their usable lifespan without burning their reputation. Until full self-driving capability gets to a deployable state, I don't really see any technological advancement that could ease people into a faster refresh cycle.
What is it with this topic and people being intentionally obtuse?

"Hey, that's not actually meat!" Yeah, and almond milk isn't real milk, and peanuts aren't actually nuts. Who cares?

Are people looking at food from Beyond and Impossible and thinking it's for-real animal flesh? As long as it's labeled properly, what's the problem?
Google's, I think. It's an address referring to the main gate of an area.

Actually it's pretty darn accurate from what I can tell. Maybe my Chinese just isn't very good, but I don't think I can do much better.
i remember there was some study. men prefer sons while women have no preference. i don’t remember the percentage.

btw once your baby is born you might not feel the same way. reality kicks in. and it kicks in even harder at puberty.
It's possible you're just shopping at more upmarket places?
The world is more dangerous in many ways for women.

Women have something of a tendency to live longer than men. Men are more likely to take dangerous jobs, like fire fighter or infantry member. Men are more likely to go to jail. Women are more likely to attempt suicide and survive it. Men are more likely to succeed at killing themselves when they attempt suicide.

There are lots of shitty things that go on in the world and the world likes to sexually harass women, sexually assault women, treat them like whores who were "asking for it" when they end up raped, pregnant out of wedlock, etc. etc. But it's questionable logic to claim that the world is more dangerous for women.
I think it's at least conceptually possible to pre-load a machine with software that doesn't pass any plaintext between you and it, and which the software image can't be modified without you knowing it.

I don't know about obscuring the fact of the connection between you and it though. Tor isn't enough by itself.
Ah, yes, putting it into a single database is something I have in mind!

Basically so far I was solving the 'data import/scraping' part, but now finally starting to connect it elsewhere now that it's somewhat unified and normalized.
If parents are getting divorced because they are arguing about the upbringing of girls, why is this risk only materializing when the girl is the first child? Why would the dynamics be different if the girl was not the first child? Ergo, the conclusion is not thought through and likely to be false.
So you can test the code that your users actually run
> With an impending global financial recession

He didn't word it as "likely", or "may be". This reads to me as it will definitely happen. While I am not completely against the idea and certainly feel the real possibility of happening. It doesn't give a hint as to why.
> Do you have a reliable source you can cite to back up your claims?

For my first claim: The "smoking gun email" and its DKIM signature are publicly available, and can be verified regardless of their original sources. I can guide you through the process if you wish.

For my second claim: The fact that a PDF compilation of emails is not an original email file: http://www.pscs.co.uk/manual/email-file-types.html

For my third claim: Given Wikpedia's claim is already contradicted (or at the very least, not supported) by their cited article, I don't see why it's included in the first place. As far as I can tell it's just been made up by some editor. The original NYP article includes: https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Comput...

For my fourth claim: Again I feel it's a matter of the original source not supporting the claims made. I have no source for, and can't claim with certainty, that Mac Isaac has never said anything contradictory in any interviews (since that's akin to proving a negative) but I can point out that the original source presents no inconsistencies.

> Wikipedia is the article anyone can edit, and, yes, they will embrace any point of view which comes from a reliable source.

My IP range (and VPNs) are blocked, and the article is protected. If you have an existing account that meets the requirements then I'd appreciate if you could correct the article, at least on the matter of the third claim.
EU parliament members maybe? Does that sound a ring to you?
Euh, no it doesn't...
I think it’s ok to spend an unboxed amount of time doing stuff that energises you. You can decide what that is, art? volunteering at puppy rescue centres? Teaching on YouTube. Whatever. Do it and make it not too goal oriented. You want it to feel free and the opposite of the corporate oppression. In short: take an unbounded break, and trust you’ll find your next big thing to do in time.
> I wonder what Tesla think is the expected service life of their vehicles? I would imagine the average person on the street would expect to see a service life of >20 years.

I've wondered about that myself. Because comments I've made that an electric drive train should have an expected service life of 30 years seems to draw a lot of ire from somewhere. Probably the automotive equivalent of found the google engineer.
Zurich here. I noticed something is off after waking up. The light seemed.. Dirty? Went online to check what was happening. Strongly dislike this weather phenomenon.
This is a really interesting example. I can't read Chinese but I'm assuming the input is an address or location?

Such domain knowledge would be vital in providing a good translation and sanity checking the output. But a straight sequence to sequence machine translation would not capture that context. It looks like thay is what is happening with the first two translations, while Google's may have actually realized its and address (but maybe not as you say the answer is wrong, maybe their ML is just better).

Your example highlights the point that naked ML models can only ever be so good, and that it's really as part of a system that they can be truly effective. You can imagine in the translation some combination of a classifier or NER that identifies an address, a translation model, and an english model that detects a sensible answer.
> I have had the conversation of the horrors of meat production many times at the dinner table with a spectrum of people, and nobody changed their habits.

This doesn't mean that people don't care about the horrors of the animal industry. It just means that they don't care enough to change their habits. Huge difference.

Which is why meat alternatives are so important, because they allow people to stop eating meat without changing their habits!

Neither you nor the GP really eat meat, which means that neither of you belong to the target group for this product! You are not the consumer! You clearly do not understand the whole point of these plant-based meat alternatives! Your thoughts and opinions on the product development and marketing of these are 100% irrelevant, because they're not competing for your dollars! This product is not for you.

This product is for people who want meat, who love meat, people who wants to eat greasy, tasty, juicy, meaty burgers, and who don't want to substitute that for a "delicious" salad.

> and encourage people to eat those instead

No!

First you need to develop meat alternatives so that everyone can replace most of the meat in their diets without hassle, without sacrificing anything, without changing their diet. Then you can encourage people to branch out into other vegetarian dishes, since they're actually already practically vegetarians.
Disinformation is only dissent in a society where the "belief" in science depends on one's political leanings.
More than just legend! Knuth wrote:

>My last will and testament for TeX and METAFONT is that their version numbers ultimately become $\pi$ and $e$, respectively. At that point they will be completely error-free by definition.

https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/abcde.html
I mean you can already get a single-use steak maker that comes with a very sophisticated self-regulation system and only costs a few hundred dollars plus feedstock - it's called a feeder calf
Interesting, so it has different names in different contexts(NMOS vs CMOS.0 I'm familiar with the "pass transistor" nomenclature and have read about that in at least one of your previous posts. Good to know. Cheers.
It cites a relative risk of only around 0.5-1% in the background literature, and only in the US. Although an interesting aggregate finding, for anyone considering their own relationship here it's likely to be lost in the noise of individual variation.
Ironically, that was when computers would come with schematics and repair manuals.
He has seen his parents go through the same process.
Yes , I agree. I think Fauci was well intentioned and had his reasons, but there must be a cost to wilfully deceiving the public. I can understand it in wartime when the deception is really aimed at the enemy, but this isn’t that.

The fact is though, people are willing to accept being lied to by people they otherwise view favourably. For example a lot of the people decrying Fauci as a liar support Trump, who at the beginning of the pandemic was telling a journalist in private how the coronavirus was deadly and more dangerous than the worst flus, but in public at the same time was saying it was a hoax and nothing to worry about, and obstructing efforts to prepare for it.

People will choose the truths they care about. That’s why integrity in public life is so important. I don’t think it can be an absolute in practice, politicians, even scientists are only human. But there must be a cost to knowingly deceiving the public, and there must be contrition, it can never be considered an acceptable practice. It can never be good enough to just point to an ideological opponent and say, well, they do it too. That’s not an argument.
Modern techniques don't necessarily need this for NMT.
I don't really see much value in debating the procedural aspects (Nature review process etc).
I see a lot of value discussing the research and its content.
We think the results shown in the paper are significant and of some importance, and so do others who reviewed our work.
This is where I think the focus should be.

Please read our paper and not only the blogs criticizing it:)
There is a link to access it here: https://rdcu.be/ceH4i
Isn't it funny that the same country is both promoting vegetarianism and the death penalty - and features the biggest military force in the world? Just to say.
Nanotechnology allows chemical signals from spinach to send emails
> News organizations have an obligation to report on what they believe to be true.

Please..... harden and sharpen the edge of your critical thinking skills. News organizations are business entities first. The idea of "just the facts" news reporting idealism is a curiously mid-20th century American idea, and even then was only a facade.

Historically, news organizations have always had a point of view. And advertisers to please -- or at the very least maximize the audience that their advertisers could reach.

News organizations have an obligation to pay the rent and make payroll, just like any other business. Beyond that... I remain skeptical.
CNN first broadcast on June 1, 1980. Fox News Channel didn't exist until October 7, 1996. Many of the most pervasive problems with all cable news started with CNN. It's hard to fill 24 hours with pure news, so opinion got added to the mix, such that now primetime is all about the opinion. As a sibling comment stated, Fox just beat them at their own game in that sense.

It seems like public discourse is by and large worse off due to the way news media is structured. In the drive for viewers and ratings, the media has become extremely polarizing. People make it a badge of pride that they don't watch X or Y network. You expose that a bit as well when you assume that the words I wrote should only apply to Fox. All cable news media is problematic in this day and age.
I don't think being religious is so relevant. Plenty of atheists view marriage as a life-long commitment.
How about grad school and an academic career?
I actually agree from my experience working with complex implementations of web analytics architecture in Adobe Launch. Especially the fact that nearly every rule (tags are called rules there) can contain custom JS code makes it sometimes hard to know when a specific change to the data happened between the data layer in the DOM and the tracking request being sent to the Adobe endpoint.

I had a client with custom code shortly below 7k LOC.

Split into many different rules.

To make a long story short: Now that I know the map (the architecture) I can find my way quite fast and am currently in the process of simplifying things as far as possible.
Any disambiguation is still not covered by your stated definition, that definition is simply wrong.
A Study Explain How the Fast Migration of Titan Increased Obliquity of Saturn
Off-topic but notice you’re a Loom user from the demo video you created. Just wanted to say thank you for recording with us! (co-founder)
Yes. Unfortunately the society as a whole still dont recognise it as a problem. I am generally MUCH more worried about my boys in the modern world than my girls.
Are You an Illusion?
Is the problem meat diets? Or capitalism and the food industry? Locavorism seems to be a much better idea than vegetarianism - in terms of human ethics and of benefits for the planet at least.
> Trying to keep a perfect record of where every single dose is in the country rather than just injecting them in anyone who wants a vaccine is expensive overhead and wasted effort.

I hear this and I also think there’s value in mechanisms preventing abuse at scale.

Also, bean counters gonna bean count and they happen to allocate resources so bean counting is always a priority. That’s a human / perspective issue built into the system of prioritizing bean counting.
This is interesting, 0.4% in numbers or value?
It's a fair comparison when you take into account what they are designed for - a laptop isn't designed to be used in a place where it can get to the temperature that can kill.

A screen in a car needs to be designed to take into account the environment, and it looks like in this case it wasn't.
I think looking at the used market might not be a good way to measure, because 20+ are worth essentially nothing, so they don't get sold a lot :) but that doesn't mean they don't continue working. Think that many people cannot afford changing car, even more so when the current car is worth nothing on the market.