skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not familiar enough with closed loop control theory to make a statement if the analogy is appropriate. But a quick skim is definitive not enough to get an understanding of Foucault. However these two quotes from the plato article should make a good starting point:

> The key idea of the archaeological method is that systems of thought and knowledge (epistemes or discursive formations, in Foucault’s terminology) are governed by rules, beyond those of grammar and logic, that operate beneath the consciousness of individual subjects and define a system of conceptual possibilities that determines the boundaries of thought in a given domain and period.

> On Foucault’s account, the relation of power and knowledge is far closer than in the familiar Baconian engineering model, for which “knowledge is power” means that knowledge is an instrument of power, although the two exist quite independently. Foucault’s point is rather that, at least for the study of human beings, the goals of power and the goals of knowledge cannot be separated: in knowing we control and in controlling we know.
All philosophy is pseudophilosophy if you ask enough philosophers.
> I do wonder if there's some way to hide parts of the standard library with the Rust "edition" mechanism. It'll stay there, technically, for backwards compatibility, but any one who opts in to the new edition wouldn't see deprecated stuff exported from the std prelude.

Maybe in the future one could introduce pub(< ed2018) to indicate that an item is available only before edition 2018
Yes, and the point is that this post assumes their audience to be US-only with this. When dealing with a global audience, try to use GMT/UTC reference, a lot of people will appreciate it.
This. sdf.org is awesome.
Yes I'll concede I was generalizing, my comment is directed at the "popular internet" if that makes sense. I have spent a huge portion of my life active in gaming and gaming communities though, so I've seen the full spectrum of possibilities. I'm still active in a few communities with more mature discourse.

To stand by my statement, I've never seen a sewing subreddit send death threats and hate mail to employees just trying to keep a job, or stalk a CEOs wife out of the public eye, just because a video game has some bugs. It's not just one or two edge cases either, it's a bandwagon of hatred on the popular internet. You're right that it's platforms like Twitter, Reddit, Imgur et al, that enable it, but I don't think that diminishes the issue. There's enough of the "noisy minority" to be harmful.
Tips on Preparing for a [Great] Failure
So basically its random. Just send the same resume/letter to as many companies as possible to increase your chances.
We run "trips" to Paris, if you want to bring your team to the city of lights! Live footage from Paris, cheese and wine delivered, the whole nine yards!

https://www.woyago.com/
Few interesting things in this comment, thanks! What you say makes sense; it sounds like Haskell can't literally hold my hand for me which is fair enough.

I've just started my Haskell journey and the undefined paths through partial function implementation caught me by surprise.

Just skimming Wikipedia it looks like I would want to use "total/strong functional programming" but apparently "total functional programming is not Turing-complete"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_functional_programming

Also found this on the Haskell site after some more googling:

https://wiki.haskell.org/Partial_functions
HAR Analyzer
Just bc this one person didn’t see it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. They’ve definitely taken my negative reviews down or made them invisible so I stopped using them
The project isn't even public yet, has been under development for only a few months, hasn't had the opportunity to get wider academic eyeballs on it yet, and you're already calling it DOA. Nice.
It's better to get something even free like AwardSpace (https://www.awardspace.com)
Semen impairment and occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in semen after Covid-19
I don't think Senna had an unusually "speed at all costs" attitude. He was known for arguing that tracks enforce safe practices because racing drivers will inherently choose a faster route if it's less safe, therefore the fastest route needs to be a safe one. But that was hardly unique to him - he wasn't even the first driver to die at Imola in '94. And the only death since then, after major safety reforms, was a freak accident under a yellow flag. Other serious injuries have been exceptionally rare. Clearly he had a point.
Thanks.
You make an interesting point. That is actually something we are constantly asked by our users. I guess our approach would be to prioritise developing of integrations based on community demand, and as we mature as a project - we would possibly have integrations contributed by community also.

Though one thing which is making things a bit simpler for us is the increasing maturity of opentelemetry ( https://opentelemetry.io/ ) It is an instrumentation library which supports many languages and frameworks, and by supporting Opentelemetry we get at least instrumentation for many languages and framework in one go.
Prince Charles vetted laws that stop his tenants buying their homes
I think the counterpoint is that, while everybody receives the same amount, people contribute differing levels so the net benefit is very different for individuals.

I think this is an affront to some people's ideas of fairness even though it aligns with progressive tax schemes.
A lot of people get confused about this with p2p type stuff. At ZeroTier we constantly have to explain to people that it is not Tor, and we get bug reports about how "people can see my IP!" Of course they can see your IP. You are communicating directly with them.

End-to-end encryption means content privacy but not necessarily meta-data privacy or anonymity.
I mean, literally the term "pinning" is setting the exact version.

If you're setting just constraints but not a specific version, then you're not pinning.
Ironically, I now find industry drama to be more engaging than many high-profile games.

>On the other side of the war, a very vocal subset of the gamers is treating gaming as the only purpose their lives have, and will viciously attack developers personally with death threats and doxxing, or review-bomb even unrelated games into oblivion if the game publisher did something wrong. Which will hardly affect the giants at all (what will you do, not buy the next game from a popular series?), but can crush indie developers. Not to mention the whole work culture that expects any game developer to work 80h per week for less pay because you "love gaming".

It bothers me that so many dysfunctional people occupy so much space in gaming culture, but it is a fundamental feature of the hobby given its structure, consequences, and accessibility.

That said, there has never been as much absolute human activity focused on making high quality games in positive settings. It's just that there are so many projects around that just getting an understanding of the market and which games would give you memorable experiences requires hours of research and discovery. Don't let the negative aspects that get disproportionate air-time color your perception exclusively.
This is a great argument to not use Go. This could all be implemented way more efficiently, easily, and correctly using ADTs (sum types).
To be clear, what we refer to as "science" is the discipline formerly known as "natural philosophy" in the European canon. And there was some connotation that as such, it was pseudo-philosophy for dealing with mere appearances rather than true essences and for eschewing morality and eternal truths for empirical reasoning about ordinary things.
Here's a few online games I've enjoyed playing with my team:

https://codenames.game/
https://boardgamearena.com/gamepanel?game=sechsnimmt
https://www.jackboxgames.com/split-the-room/
Freedeck – Open-Source Streamdeck
I think the point is that they are fighting but they are losing. Some 1st world countries are really bad at seemingly basic human rights for the poor. Doesn't mean they shouldn't fight, just an observation.
I'm certainly not equating one SMT core to two physical cores. But if you're an average laptop user (which you would be at the price point of my example) you're probably running a bunch of browser tabs, maybe Spotify, and some work stuff (Excel, Sublime Text, pick your poison) on the side that you're procrastinating while watching videos of space launches or cats or whatever. Much of the memory (re: your comment about bottlenecked computation structures) is just kind of waiting for later rather than being simultaneously mutated. While I'm writing this I'm running 319 processes with 1673 threads yet I'm loading my CPU 11% according to Activity Monitor on a fairly outdated 22nm Haswell chip. So I think for a consumer laptop you'd look at "more cores" in the context of "more price" and if there's some money to be saved, go with the SMT variant.

In my case it turned out to be a moot point because I couldn't get the AMD version anyway; it was available on Amazon from a third-party retailer but that's always sketchy and it was more expensive. But I think the "AMD laptops have more cores" argument deserves an asterisk because that's not really the whole story. (And to your point, having more cores doesn't necessarily guarantee superior execution if there are other aspects of the computation structure that bottleneck your workload.)
Snoyberg on GSuite – Fastmail Transition
Why must "take the X world by storm" be the goal?
Pensions in the US are backed by the pension benefit guaranty corporation https://www.pbgc.gov/.

Which despite the "corporation" in the name, is just another government agency tasked with dealing with failed pensions.

Sort of the pension version of the FDIC.

edit: And to add to this, the funding of the pension is required to be a separate pot of cash from the operation of the business. There were a number of companies in the 1990's/etc that got in a lot of legal trouble for using their pensions as financing for the business.
Both of the passages you quoted read as coherent and even convincing.

Sure, terms like "epistemic" or "unconscientiousness" may be a bit unfamiliar, but they have specific meanings that are clear in the passage, and are used to make a salient argument.

The use of jargon does not equate to obfuscation! For example, these two statements are very different:

"Making the world a better place through canonical data models to communicate between endpoints." (Silicon Valley season 1 episode 6)

"And then there are other aspects of complexity that come into programming with any of these more commonly used statically typed languages, which have to do with the complexity in the language space." (Rich Hickey talk)

If you aren't familiar with the jargon, they're both unintelligible, but if you are, one sounds silly and the other does not.
Giftcard Method – Xbox, Playstation
there was a quote that said the site runs off of 1 core, which is a feat in scaling....

need moarr details!
I keep wanting to get into Go, and I pick it up on and off over the years but just can't. It brings so much good, but it has actually removed too much.

It needs sum types and pattern matching. Once you have used them, not having them is a huge gray void. Const expr, interfaces, sum types and pattern matching get you 85% of the way there.
I'd agree that we tend to frame things in a reductionist way, but I don't think that's peculiar to Western thought so much as it is endemic to humans and their limitations. Given limited resources of time and knowledge the vast majority of people either attempt to limit the scope of the problem domain or opt for satisficing behaviors to achieve "good enough" results. It is rare that when confronted with a problem that a person has the luxury of time, creativity, and/or attention to derive first principles. It is doubly difficult when examining systems because the failings of most systems are not immediately obvious but instead the result of unintended consequences or the complexity of multiple conflicting behaviors resulting in perverse incentives... and if at the creation of the original system such problems were not foreseen what guarantees that the replacement system does not create worse results? Most people are cautious in proceeding when they are facing unknown (or unknowable) obstacles.
>He’s explicitly listing objections that he expects to hear, not contradicting himself.

I misunderstood. My mistake.
Lots of VCDs were legitimate releases from the production studios - certain markets made VHS, dvd, BluRay untenable.
What's interesting is my company hired a bunch of ex-ruby/rails people who transitioned over to Python. A year later, we tried to explore elixir and all those ex-ruby devs were adamantly against adopting it - they figured async python would be better. Very odd, since I figure it would be easier to adopt if you come from Ruby... but perhaps the Ruby community isn't that into functional programming?

It was very interesting experience being a long-time Pythonista having to be like "Isn't this awesome language with a Ruby-like syntax great???" and being told nah, let's just use async python by people who had spent years writing Ruby code.
Not OP but here,
> I don't think the article was making a claim about philosophy being a science.

How I understood it, is not as saying the article says the opposite but as an statement to introduce the idea that people disagree on what 80% is worth reading and that all fine because is not science.
It would be interesting to see an update on this article, especially how the conversation has evolved, and its quality preserved, with moderation from @dang and others since 2014.

https://blog.ycombinator.com/meet-the-people-taking-over-hac...
Code generators don't solve the problem of the language being too verbose/boiler plate. Instead of expressing a concept in a simple fashion, you have to generate 100s of lines of code that needs to be maintained across versions of golang and your data model.
Thanks! Credit should also go to my employer Datadog. They allowed me to spend some time on this and make it available to the public!
Show HN: A permanent home for your model’s interface
> frequently exploited

Do you happen to have a source for this? There’s lots of speculation out there, but I’ve never seen anyone claiming to have proof of this being frequently exploited.
Review invitations can be sent on basic plan. Only 100, though, but you can choose internally which customers to invite. I don't see that as a problem, because people do need to be reminded (or asked) to write positive reviews, because when everything is working as customers expect, many won't be bothered to venture onto review sites to write about that. So they must be asked while hot.
And it's much better than offer any incentives to reviews - many companies aren't shy to do exactly that, but that's where the line gets crossed..
I used to subscribe to the boglehead ideology - I.e. there's no way to beat the institutional investors.

Then, I encountered about a decade of real-world experience and actually tried my hand at investing in things that made a lot of sense to me, not based on historical pricing or other ridiculous voodoo, but based upon my knowledge of those securities relative to my experience in the technology sector. At no point do I screw with day trading or options. Simple long positions gets the job done. Risk still must be managed, even if we decide we are OK with more of it.

I will absolutely grant you that the boglehead methodology makes sense if you dont want any stress at all regarding your investments, or otherwise have concerns that actively managing your money would devolve into a gambling addiction. For most people, this is probably the best path.

If you consider where the incentives and power lie in the system, you might come to the realization that these ideologies might be based upon ulterior motives which are at your expense. If you are managing trillions of dollars in 401k assets, the last thing you want is for everyone to take full ownership of their portfolios and divest from managed funds.
Maybe this is interesting to you as well? https://github.com/cksystemsteaching/selfie
Tesla isn't Gamespot. Gamespot is a company selling physical video games. And we're in the middle of a pandemic which will probably impact that industry for a couple more years. Not that it wasn't dying already.
Making Hotwire and Devise play nicely
Doesn't change my overall point.

Asking for Z to sue X has a number of issues:

1. Z doesn't know Y's policy towards X. Is the problem truly Y's fault or X's fault? "Z sues Y" doesn't necessarily implicate Y as the root cause, it just proves that Y was "along the way" towards the root cause.

2. Y sues X is a totally separate question. Consider the case where a car-parts company creates a suspension ("X"), who sells their suspensions to Ford (aka: Y). Sometime while customer "Z" was driving, the suspension fails. Z sues Y for a million bucks to cover the cost of back surgery or something. Y then has to argue with X to figure out who was responsible for the suspension failure. Depending on the agreements / contracts Y could be the root cause, or X. (Maybe it's Y's fault: if Y was using the suspensions incorrectly and X can prove it, then the Y-sues-X case will fail).

In this #2 case: if Z sues X directly, Z will fail (because X is not at fault). Its safer for Z to sue Y... and its also the morally sound way to move things forward.

----------

For better or worse, Z (the typical user) has a relationship with Facebook (Y). Cambridge Analytica is X. Whether X or Y is at fault is still ambiguous from Z's perspective (no reason for Z to come up with legal arguments and determine the "right person to sue").

All Z has to prove is someone wronged him, and that Y is the next person up the chain. Let Y's lawyers figure out if Y or X is responsible. Z just needs compensation for Z's issues alone.
This is not particularly original but I built a little social game for work teams a while ago (before the pandemic): https://live.jubiwee.com/ - We enjoy using it with my team from time to time. The goal is to bring back social interaction even if we all work from home (for what it worth).
If you don't like the 'branch of' terminology, then what about :
chemistry needs foundations based on physics and physics need a foundation based on mathematics/philosophy ?

P.S.: We used to do particle physics and cosmology long before 'computer' became a name for a machine rather than a job.
I don't disagree that headlines matter. I don't think it's a good headline. But I was simply stating that I don't believe the headline was written in service of an alarmist agenda to use "misinformation" as boogeyman to push for moderation of private messaging platforms (as the GP stated). I believe it was just written to get more clicks. Even if the result is the same, the intent matters because we need to understand the intent in order to de-incentivize the behavior. (We also need to understand who actually writes the headlines, which the GP missed, which was my other point.)
Jira v1 used to be sold AUD 800 a copy, one-time fee
Vantage has acquired ec2instances.info
Certainly. I just wanted to present a real-life example that crossed my path a couple of weeks ago.
There are papers that do validation of TrueAllelle. I don't know the product well enough to know if it is the same one used in the article, but there isn't info in the article to know if independent validation was done or not.
I looked into this more and the IRS apparently sets an "Employee compensation limit for calculating contributions", which is currently $290k. So 4% of your salary on a match ends up being $11.6k, which is slightly better for highly compensated employees than the max $9.75k for a 50% match, but of course is significantly worse for people making way under $290k (i.e. most people).

Also worth pointing out that the all-source IRS 401k contribution limit is currently $59k/yr, so even with an insane 500% no limit match or something that manages to pass the safe harbor test, there still is a limit you'll hit eventually. It's high though.
I inherited TypeORM and I've used Sequelize in the past. I looked at Prisma out of curiosity. My main concerns were:

1. Focus on integrating with tech I don't care about (e.g Next.js, GraphQL).

2. Don't understand the business model. Seems like you want to lock folks into your ecosystem and then start charging for the surrounding products (e.g. Studio, Migrate).
Hmm. I think evolution should be more widely known.

It seems most people's conception and understanding of the topic is quite different from its actual biological understanding.

Eg, the number of people who think that there is a "gene" or biologically selected reason for almost everything, or that evolution has a direction is quite high, and results in erroneous metaphors used as the basis for, for example, policy decisions like "social Darwinism".

And I don't know how to understand that topic through my reading of Russell Conjugation.
Browser Fuzzing at Mozilla
>But McWhorter claims that third-wave anti-racism is mainstream (his word) and so far I have seen zero evidence of that.

Read the damn books if you actually care.
Ah thanks, I'm used to this being called a "complete function".
The OP addresses your question, saying he is not advocating for removing laziness, but does have some specific suggestions.

> I'm not advocating for removing laziness in Haskell. In fact I'm not really advocating for much of anything in this series. I'm just complaining, because I like complaining.

> But if I was to advocate some changes:

* Deprecate partial functions
* Introduce a naming scheme for partial functions to be more obvious
* Introduce a compiler warning to note partial function use (with a pragma to turn off specific usages)
* Warn by default on partial pattern matches
* Advocate strict data fields by default
They added lazy loading of fonts a couple years back, which took a chunk out of startup time.
An interpreter with a JIT is obviously faster than one without. Especially when dealing with CPU bound work.

I'm not sure this is entirely noteworthy unless you somehow think CPython has a JIT. Would be much more interesting to compare to pypy.
Non-joking: it's probably about on par with Windows 98 when it comes to stability.

There was a day people accepted that sort of thing... but not anymore.