skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I can buy organic, grass-fed, no-GMO, sustainably pasture-raised beef.

No, actually you probably can't [1]:

> Is there such a thing as a climatically-guilt-free steak? Are grazing livestock climate villains or climate saviours? A new report by an international research collaboration led by the Food Climate Research Network (FCRN), part of the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, provides an authoritative answer to these questions.

> The new report Grazed and confused? helps add clarity to the debate around livestock farming and meat and dairy consumption.

> 14.5% of all human made greenhouse gas emissions come from the livestock sector as a whole. There is however some confusion and disagreement in the debate about the climate impacts of grazing livestock (and particularly grass-fed beef).

> Some commentators have argued that well-managed grazing can remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and sequester it in soils, and that these removals can substantially compensate for, or even exceed, all other emissions from the livestock that are doing the grazing. In this way, grass-fed beef has been offered by some as a climate solution, rather than a problem.

> Written by FCRN’s Dr Tara Garnett in collaboration with Cécile Godde of CSIRO and a team of international experts, this report dissects claims made by different stakeholders in the debate, and evaluates them against the best available science. This report finds that better management of grass-fed livestock do not hold a solution to climate change as only under very specific conditions can they help sequester carbon. This sequestering of carbon is even then small, time-limited, reversible and substantially outweighed by the greenhouse gas emissions these grazing animals generate. Dr Garnett explains the key takeaways from this report:

> “This report concludes that grass-fed livestock are not a climate solution. Grazing livestock are net contributors to the climate problem, as are all livestock. Rising animal production and consumption, whatever the farming system and animal type, is causing damaging greenhouse gas release and contributing to changes in land use. Ultimately, if high consuming individuals and countries want to do something positive for the climate, maintaining their current consumption levels but simply switching to grass-fed beef is not a solution. Eating less meat, of all types, is.”

[1]: https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/news/2017-news-grazed-and-...
Actually, it definitely can, if used right
Appeal process for being designated a “Terrorist Group” (Canada)
> I think consumers don't realize how much they actually care about the used market.

I think consumers care very much about the value of what is typically their 2nd most valuable asset. They see it when they discuss trading in a car for a new one. Or when shopping for a used car. The information is very readily available.

The people not caring about it consciously prioritizing luxury over resale value.
> We need to remember we were like them once.

To be honest I'm just barely hanging in trying to pretend I'm different now at 33.
Are you being sarcastic?

People say similar things a lot in seriousness, but I don't think they know what they mean by "simpler".

Is EFI simpler than a carburetor?
While praising Nissan, you know that they’re basically owned by Renault?

And didn’t Renault start selling cars with batteries, without forcing you to lease them, years ago? Or are there still some markets where they don’t do it?
FYI @madengr, almost all of your recent comments - going back a few months, are in [dead] state. Not sure if you've been shadow-banned or what, but you might want to contact the mods or something.
Tesla’s are famous for not being repairable by 3rd party shops. You lack documentation, software, getting parts is PITA, and Tesla will happily disable features in your car, if you repaired it in a way they don’t agree with (like disabling supercharging on salvaged cars).
I think you misinterpreted. It's not that more programmers know Java; it's that more programmers know a language with a syntax similar to Java.

I don't really know Java. But I know C, and Java looks enough like C that I can get what Java code is trying to do.

Personally, I've never learned any language with similar-enough syntax to BASIC, to understand what a (real, non-trivial) BASIC program is trying to do. Would I recognize a BASIC subroutine if I saw one? Probably not.

And it's not about a language having "less" syntax, either, but rather about it having very few syntactic features that're unfamiliar. Smalltalk is a rather large novelty the first time you see it. (`ifTrue`? You mean I've got to use closures to branch?)
If you would like to summarize I suggest to add an on-demand generated word cloud of the transcript
> But ONLY if externalities are also fully priced & included for all other products - cars, plastic crap shipped from China, aircon, ... otherwise that kind of legislation is simply discrimination against meat-lovers.

Meat has a victim [1]. Respectably, how would you price in the cost of death?

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQRAfJyEsko
I've been a car guy since my teens, and have nearly everyone around me be some sort of mechanic but I've wondered a couple things about why electric vehicles will have mass appeal.

Most electric vehicles seem to have their value based in the battery pack, but these batteries packs have a life span of 10~ years, right? Do these vehicles have zero value after ten years (assuming the batteries are bad then), high mileage or not?

I managed to save thousands of dollars in high school/university just driving a beater and fixing it as stuff broke, but an electric vehicle isn't something that can be casually repaired right? Even if in 20-30 years when parts are cheap and plentiful, you need to be a skilled engineer (or at least highly trained) to do these repairs right?

When the world is swapped to electric vehicles, can our grid handle that? and if so, why wouldn't our local governments be increasing our electric bills? I cannot see how it would be cheaper than gas, sure some charging stations are free now because it niche, but it wont be in the future.

I'm not against electric vehicles, but I just see this hurting low-income people.
There Is Nothing Natural About the Way We Work
Aptera seems like it could be pretty interesting in this regard.
>Silver was a complete pump and dump carried out by the media at the behest of Citadel

I think citation is needed for the Citadel connection.

I'll agree that something incredibly weird happened with silver. It wasn't just medium-obvious reddit bots pushing it on WSB, but major outlets like CNBC and drudgereport suddenly going all in with silver coverage too.

Honestly I'd prefer someone investigate the silver angle more than gamestop, even though it was wildly less successful that GME manipulation. It looked better coordinated.
Cookie.AI | Remote | Full time

Cookie.AI is an early-stage startup (stealth stage) headquartered in Silicon Valley, operating with a remote-first mindset - we have teams across US continental states and in Europe. We are building a market category defining cloud security company for the dynamic world of cybersecurity. We are well-funded (Series-A), backed by top-tier VCs, and CEOs / Security Leaders as our angel investors. The founding team consists of serial entrepreneurs and early engineers from startups and veterans from big companies. We are looking for system engineers (Golang), fullstack developers (React), and DevOps engineers (CI/CD, Grafana, K8s, etc.) with hands-on experiences with cloud-native and SaaS products. You will play a critical role in building products working closely with our early customers, founders, and collaborating with senior engineers who have built and shipped $1B+ products (alumni from Nutanix, Rubrik, ZScaler, Netskope, Data Domain, Amazon, etc.). You will gain hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies (Presto, Kafka, Docker, K8s, etc.) and many others from the open-source world. We are looking for characteristics such as ambition and agility, commitment to build an enduring company, passion to build products, self-driven and self-motivated, diverse and growth mindsets, and intellectual curiosity to innovate! Location is open to anywhere in the world where you are at your best. Please reach out: hello AT cookie.ai.
This is a terrible argument. Of any car most people don't buy the base version. People wont buy the base version of an F-150 either.

And just because Tesla once didn't offer a car with the price they said doesn't mean its some inherent law of nature. Tesla now is a very different company compared to 2017 when they built their first mass manufactured car.

Fact is that Electric F-150 will not be able to compete with the Cybertruck on specs. Tesla will bring its now batteries and new packs and will reach range and performance that F-150 can't match.
https://aktu.io is a news aggregator / rss reader that does just that. It automatically categorizes your feed items (politics, science, tech, etc...), extract topics and aggregates your feed items to news stories. You can then browse/filter your feeds by categories/topics.
I'm extremely skeptical that will ever make it to production.
Unless I’m mistaken, that law is for new cars being sold, not existing cars, which just means that they need to have transitioned by then. Obviously it can’t be left to the last minute, but it also doesn’t have to be the next two years (at least for those specific legal issues).
This is trivial for me to solve, sitting here at my computer. Would I be a me to solve it on a whiteboard in front of a group of interviewers? Maybe not. The stress and anxiety may get the best of me.
I've been using logseq.com and it is great.

It has bidirectional references like you discussed, and sentence level referencing, and embedding.
Within 4 years, Tesla is going to be selling EVs for $25k. The Cybertruck is 18-24 months out. Rivian is going to be launching their electric truck in the next 18 months as well. That puts Ford's front line vehicle squarely in the headlights.

If Ford can't mass produce EVs at a reasonable price in the next 2 years, things are going get increasingly ugly for them. Not end of line in 2 years, but it's just going to get harder to catch up as Tesla and the rest ramp up manufacturing capacity and capture the market.

The big problem for Ford/ GM/ Dodge, and all the rest of the latecomers is sourcing batteries. Tesla has spent most of the past 10 years building up capacity and looking in supply while the rest of the auto-makers need to outsource supply in an increasingly competitive market.
No. Those two drugs were used for different things.
Can not agree more with you on this. In reality quite a lot of "smart" people with science or engineering degree are not very scientific in their heart. They just blindly be trained to use scientific methodology to do their daily job. A lot of academically competitive people don't understand a very simple fact: Those who are already deceived can not find they themselves are fooled. So anything that's controversial need to be resolved by the approaches other than reasoning based on their own strong beliefs while considering the opposite side are evil.

Even on HN, quite a lot of HNers can not differentiate their strong beliefs, which might be generated from indirect sources like MSM or activists, from solid facts. i.e. something can reach consensus of normal people by verification. The Massive Weapon of Deception can be effectively used again and again if that matches the majority belief.
Very interesting to hear about that arb, and the reasons it comes about and persists makes a lot of sense.

In addition to the reasons you mention (retail cluelessness, margin requirements, risk systems), these are some other reasons I can think of as to why the arb persists over time:

- Perps are popular on Bitmex/Bybit, and futures are popular on Ok and Huobi (even though the latter has perps, they're relatively illiquid). So there's a cross-exchange dimension which adds more difficulty and risk in performing the arb.

- Counterparty risk of keeping funds on an exchange increases the required compensation for performing the arb, which allows it to persist.
If you mean a car without a driver and outside of a geofenced area, you definitely have not seen one before.
> The fears of a Chinese invasion are palpable on Nangan.

I wonder how likely this is. It would be an absolute disaster for the Western world if China were to invade Taiwan. Prices for many electronics including computers and mobile phones would skyrocket, and stock markets would crash. AAPL alone is 7% of the S&P 500.
#(mapv (juxt (comp str first) count)
(partition-by identity %))
Clerihew
I saw earlier parts before but I have to say, I really like this as a "service" kind of thing. Not only do they rescue dead boards where they hopefully get satisfied customers using them, but the proceeds go to fund more pis for disadvantaged kids? That is just all kinds of awesome.
Myanmar: Anti-coup protests met with internet blackout
Holy sh*t. It is so obvious. Yet I have been deceived by the media that the evil autocorps jam our roads to save a few bucks. It is very tiring that at this point we have to be sceptical about every statement that is dealt to us and peel it apart from first principles. I thought that would be the job of proper journalists...
Notion-Components – Building a React Component Library
I don't understand the claim in the first sentence, and I don't understand how the linked thread supports it.
Tesla's base Model 3 has solid range. Maybe that's not "entry level", they are working on a lower priced car too.

Regardless, few people with electric cars are waiting 40 minutes every week. Most charge at home and only hit charging on long trips.
Maybe for Tesla (I own one), but this is pretty convincing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAZ6tJSj9T4
As someone who works in the healthcare industry I agree. I think the FDA does a very good job all things considered. They have approved drugs that were desperately needed (Avastin for breast cancer) based on little evidence, only to later pull them when the data didn’t support approval. They appropriately balance risk versus benefit.

And there is more at stake than most people realize. Approve a vaccine that isn’t safe and people will lose trust in general and will refuse any vaccine. Then what?

Lots of Monday morning armchair drug regulators in this thread.
That far into the future cars will most likely be autonomous. there isn't really any point to speculating that far out, who knows what could happen. Look at 2020....
people should be cautious and imho more importantly, people should be informed and adding processed soy, oils, sodium etc to meat alternatives in hope of reducing price is a horrible solution. If that's the only way we're going to get people offsetting meat consumption its a sad state of affair.
That is about business model, not about the car. Saying the car is not made for repairs is inaccurate.

And for a lot of repairs the Tesla model is actually great, the mobile service will go to where your car is and fix most things.

The problem of time is usually when have a crash and need body repair.
So I claim an inaccuracy... how do we decide whether I get rewarded? How do we be sure that process isn't abused/gamed/influenced? Why can't we wire that process up to production of news in the first place? The gamification seems redundant.
> my answer to the animal cruelty argument is just to buy the top-shelf, pasture-raised meats. It's better for my health and much better for the animals.

No it isn't. [1]

It really isn't. [2]

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtnlwqEii2I

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQRAfJyEsko
I think we've got a pretty fundamental difference on what we're looking for in a community. But we seem to agree on one thing - the political dimension has worsened things (well beyond the point that I'd have thought would occur before a general outcry for a return to sanity curtailed the destruction). And to further extend that thought, I would certainly agree with anyone who suggested that commercial or otherwise centralized platforms are not only uniquely vulnerable to political shenanigans - but magnify the 2nd order damage. Things are going to be getting a lot worse on that front before they get any better. As someone who was involved with bitcoin when the community was 90% crypto-anarchists, I'm keenly aware of what a community looks like when it is tearing itself apart - and what it looks like when it is under assault. It'll be interesting to see how much further things go, because few people outside of the early crypto community have experienced de-banking, and socially conscious market indexes are being rolled out...
I simply don't agree. What the old companies have are billions of man hours of experience and engineering. Tesla has cool new tech, but keeps falling apart on things Ford or GM solved 40 years ago.

I'm not saying one or the other is better, but it's not like buying some dead useless company.
Of course not. Unless you’re raising a deer herd, and claiming ownership over them, in which case sure.
> Parent comment reiterates that USA should have no jurisdiction over bitmex... But they do

The article is about a US citizen being arrested, in the US, for failing to obey US laws.

You can't simply circumvent the laws of a country by declaring your business to be operated in another country. That's not unique to the United States.
It went far beyond merely proposing.

Nuclear-armed B-29's were flown to Guam and Japan. I think Truman even delegated the decision to drop them to Ridgeway, meaning Truman pre-authorized their use based on a common understanding it was a last resort.

Truman's public statements were that all weapons were on the table, including nuclear.
I haven't seen any studies putting the prevalence of father-daughter incest as low as 0.6%. I believe that a quick google scholar search will lead you to guesstimate a figure about 10x higher than that (at the low end) but it depends on how the populations have been sampled, what the definition of incest is, and how surveys are worded.

But in any case, sounds like GP is saying that the difference in prevalence of incest between boys and girls could lead to a difference of 0.6% in divorce rates. Which is quite a different hypothesis.
I'm not an expert but there is data for your question. They don't have 0 value. Tesla's usually still have above 90% capacity at 250,000 km [0]. That's still a usable car. Further tesla has stated old car batteries are still useful for grid electricity.

[0] https://electrek.co/2020/06/06/tesla-battery-degradation-rep...
In the wake of Parler, etc., "If you don't like it, build your own X" is no longer a valid argument.
The browser would presumably send the ETag in an If-None-Match in the GET request though.
EV batteries don't instantly die. After ten years, it'll probably be down 10-20% of its original capacity, which is still drivable but might not work for everyone's commute. In that case, the battery can be potentially refurbished or repurposed for energy storage.

Cars, not just electric ones, have gotten more complex and have software that may need special equipment to diagnose. EVs are simpler and more robust in a number of ways, and might eventually be cheaper to maintain than gas cars once there's enough of them on the road.
If there is a cash takeout, the IV will go down. If there is a share component to a hypothetical acquisition, the IV will potentially increase. However, I'm not sure how likely that is. Just be aware that your Vega p&l could be negative, so extremely long dated calls with a lot of Vega may need a big gap between a cash takeout price and spot in order to be profitable.
There’s some issue with storage - long term storage of food leads to the nutrients decaying.
Hi, How is it going?

ARC
https://arc.dev/@michaeljindev

LINKEDIN
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikejindev/

CODERANK
https://profile.codersrank.io/user/codegitpro/

GITHUB
https://github.com/codegitpro

For over 7 years, I have worked as a full-stack web developer in several companies and achieved lots of success.

I have expertise in the following frameworks and languages.
- JavaScript: React, Next, Gatsby, Angular, Vue
- Python: Django, Flask, Tensorflow
- PHP: Laravel, Symfony, WordPress, CakePHP, CodeIgniter
- Database: MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, DynomoDB, Redis
- Mobile: React Native, Ionic, Kotlin, Swift, Object-C
- DevOps/Service: AWS, Azure, Firebase, Google Cloud BigQuery, Analytics, Docker, Kubernetes, Travis CI/CD,
- Project Management: Trello, Slack, Jira, Scrum, Agile, Kanban, GitHub, GitLab

Most of the requirements are very matching with my skills and experience. I am available for a full-time job now and ready to have an interview for more discussion.

Looking forward to hearing from you
Thanks
Can you cite any car company that makes the cheapest version of a product available before the more expensive one? It makes good business sense to start with the more profitable model I’m not sure why you bring this up as if it is bad.
For the curious:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botts%27_dots (named after Elbert Dysart Botts)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raised_pavement_marker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumble_strip
Quick review: Hope this guy doesn't code like he writes.
I had Remzi as a professor. He is one of the best educators I’ve encountered.
Tintagel hackers represent!
*tumbleweed
> I managed to save thousands of dollars in high school/university just driving a beater and fixing it as stuff broke, but an electric vehicle isn't something that can be casually repaired right? Even if in 20-30 years when parts are cheap and plentiful, you need to be a skilled engineer (or at least highly trained) to do these repairs right?

People will train themselves. In the world of science fiction, ordinary people fix spaceships and other futuristic vehicles all the time. The same thing will happen (will have to happen) in reality if we're going to have a futuristic society.
No need to ditch glass for that reason. Use triple pane windows, they also block noise and have perfect seals.
I recently listened to an interesting episode about those reflectors on the 99 Percent Invisible podcast. This [1] is an associated article on their site that seems to have similar content to the episode I listened to.

[1] https://99percentinvisible.org/article/decoding-cats-eyes-gl...
EV batteries degrade over time, they generally don't just die. There are some batteries which have 300,000 miles on them. Not sure how they degrade over time without as much driving.

Right now, replacing a Tesla battery pack is $16,000. That puts a pretty hard bottom on the resale value of old cars.

It's really hard to say what the market will look like for older EVs. Battery prices come down every year so it feels like in 10 years the $16k battery pack will be a lot less expensive. You might be able to pick up an older Tesla with a run down battery that has really shitty range.

It's hard to say, for the moment cheap used EVs are mostly LEAFs. Used Teslas, even older ones tend to be pricey.
Or 1894 when people predicted the death of urban cities due to horse manure:

https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Great...
Aren’t China incentivised to keep running these businesses? Why the doomsday sentiment?
> Automakers being relative nobodies on the lithium market, they are paying retail for it and passing the mark-ups to you, the consumer.

Automakers are already huge players in the metals markets and it seems unlikely that they would pay retail for any component, raw or finished.