skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Having been through all that myself for years, and now happily programming for grad school on a thing that IS JUST A THING, I totally sympathize. (One program, two languages, that's it. Ahhhhhh, it's fun again!) WebAssembly may be somewhat of an escape hatch. I was interested to see in a diligence I was conducting how well Microsoft Razor was working for a firm we examined, so that all their frontend is C#, using the same backend code they already developed, and one build pipeline. It is making them happy and productive, can't fault them on that. I've done the whole thing on the front end, dating back to the old days of Dojo and Ajax through pixels, though NG, React, Reframe, etc, and even now, it's such a gong show. Just try mentoring a brand new dev and you realize the stack of elephants for tooling is such a stupid, awful situation.
Who knows what benefits Tesla employees get. In the U.S.A., retirement matching is not a requirement but a perk.

Rolex does a 300% matching, doesn't mean that all Swiss companies do the same.
Wow, where do you work with a 50% no limit match?
Obviously it’s the result of stupid users, but you can get rid of the APIs, you can’t get rid of the stupid users.
Or it could make them less cautious about taking on large debt.
Got it. Strange, that's the link google search gives me. Also, it shows me price for Ukraine (where I am)
So don't work there. But why criticise hard working people who want to work there or imply that they are victims of exploitation?

Maybe they believe in the mission? Is anyone forcing them to work at Tesla? As far as I know Tesla doesn't use slave labour (not sure about China).
Generally, yes, but the thing you're looking for is called "self-directed" and is supported by most major providers. The nicest one if you really want to do this is probably Schwab.

The problem with GP's scheme isn't that there's a good reason you can't hold whatever security you want in your retirement account: it's that you can't make the contribution in-kind from a taxable brokerage to your tax-advantaged 401(k)/IRA.

It's true that that's rare: but that's because your employer is giving you a shitty 401(k). Ask me about the Latacora 401(k) one day.
Wow ... what a mess ... I guess they'll need to disband and reform under a different name. They're over.
It’s a private company, they can do whatever they want.

Most people want to work for Tesla, Spacex for many reasons. 401k match is not in top 10 list.

People can vote with their feet and move to another company, if 401k match is deal breaker.
I am thoroughly confused. When I click on the link above, it takes me to an Electronic Frontier Foundation donation page. If I go to dzombak.com I get to the home page of Chris Dzombak. Then going to the blog, there is a blog post titled "Securing my personal SSH infrastructure with Yubikeys" which takes me to the article which I believe is the one posted, which appears to be identical to the link above. What the hell is going on???
Long time customer as well and found out about this here on HN. I had $4 or $5 left as well but I guess it’s gone. My site is still up for the moment so if I care to save it I’ll move it.

Might just be the end of the road for that site as I’m not about to spend more than $12/year to keep it going.
I may be mistaken, but I understood that "stupid users" allowed access to their friends/contacts as well.

I guess I'm stupid too if I have a stupid friend or relative.
Reality is subjective and so should philosophy be. Nobody knows what is going on here and anyone that thinks they do is lying. What is right for me may not be right for you. Learn what is right for you through trial and error. Failure is the best teacher to find out something will not work. Nobody should follow anyone else. You should be the leader of your own life as it is your experience. The goal is not self indulgent thinking, the goal is to stop thinking. To go with the flow. To trust in yourself and believe that you can do what you set your mind to. To remove the fear of I cant and the fear of failure. It is as simple as that, no philosopher or book can tell you that. Only experience can. You can read all the books in the world, but you do not gain any true understanding until you put words into action and actually experience it.
Addictive for games can just be shorthand for "you want to play it again and again". I don't see anything wrong with it when there isn't a more appropriate shorthand to use, except when used with games that are designed to make you pay more and more to play.
“I agree that the headline is alarmist, but it's probably just written to be clickbait-y, as far too many headlines now are.”

I think the time for this excuse is long past. There is research showing that headlines matter.
Where does their recent purchase of $1.5 billion in Bit Coin fit into this view?
A company can match 401k contributions with company stock. If you were receiving a rapidly appreciating stock as part of your compensation package, it would make sense to want to have the option (but not the obligation) to receive your Tesla stock in your 401k to shield it from income taxes in the short term.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2004/200423/200423p...

http://www.pensionrights.org/issues/legislation/company-stoc...
Bracketing acronym's on first use is a totally separate issue.
I agree with you. I also thought it was odd that this piece's author specifically called out "the humanities and social sciences" as the main purveyors of "pseudophilosophy" before directing all his fire at Foucault, a philosopher. And then he concludes that the solution to pseudophilosophy is a philosophical education but I'm not sure who in their right minds would argue that Foucault didn't have one of those? Or Sartre, for that matter, who he also called out as a pseudophilosopher.

It starts to make one wonder if his idea of "pseudophilosophy" is really just a new coat of paint over some already well-worn critiques of postmodernism.
mainly I'm curious why chollida1 specifically thinks there ought to be a capital requirement to buy a call. I can see why you might not want to let a 20yo buy calls on margin (or anything on margin for that matter), but that wasn't specified in the original post. chollida1 seems to be a lot more experienced than me, so perhaps there is something to learn here.

in the unfortunate case of this guy who took his life, robinhood apparently gave him access to a large amount of margin and the ability to write options. that seems crazy to me. I doubt schwab would let me do that, and I've been trading with them for years.
[Author of the piece here]

This is technologically out of date, I'm afraid.

You appear not to have read about Intel 3D Xpoint and related tech.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_XPoint3

This is retail tech now, under the brand name Optane:
https://www.storagereview.com/news/intel-optane-dc-persisten...

SSD is cheaper than RAM. Optane is orders of magnitude cheaper, faster and longer-lived than SSD.

It is here now.

The value is discussed in the talk; I suggest reading the script.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wM1-c7euvQaRaCL4hKCaE8VR...
Same here, but I didn't get redirected a few minutes ago.
I might say that Pension plan are the most effective ways to encourage long-term savings among employees.
SSH agents are generally insecure by default and they don't present any useful information for auditing. Not only that but there's probably a half dozen different SSH agents installed and running on your Linux desktop right now. GNOME starts its own, GPG agent (oh god...) can act as one, openssh starts one, and if you try to disable one or any of them sometimes there's a fallback CLI agent that tries to start and run.

All of them have insanely insecure defaults: aggressively cache every unlocked key and present every unlocked key to anyone who asks (which is anyone who can connect to the agent) without even so much as asking the user if some rogue process should be permitted to access the key.

You can't uninstall the agents either. It's a non-optional part of each of those packages. You won't find all of them, anyone can start one, and any client will try to connect to it by default. If you mark it as non-executable then it will be re-marked as executable on the next package update. You can't put it as a symlink to /dev/null. Even truncating it and using SELinux to mark it as a file isn't guaranteed to keep the damn thing off after a system update.

It's a f!@#$ing virus symptom.

All because some users are too lazy to type their SSH passphrase more than once.
What are some pain points you faced trying to build a company?
Let's talk! I would love to hear from you! I've plenty of them, and am going about my day with little sleep now as I spend my time coding, fund raising, strategizing, learning about my users, talking to users, understanding marketing, product develop (Have I mentioned this already?), hiring, networking, and trying to have a normal social life.

Would love to hear about your stories!
CD Projekt Hacked – Hackers say they stole source code for Cyberpunk 2077
I don't pay anything for support at AWS, and I had <24h response every time I needed them, despite having a ridiculously low monthly invoice.

That is in stark contrast to other providers to which I give a lot more money, and who can't be bothered to answer in a week... And when they do ally do answer, it takes another full week to do finally have a solution.
If you remove the "gp" it defaults to wherever it thinks you are. If you instead type "us" instead, it shows the US price in dollars
getting strong 2006 Habbo vibes
This is kinda non-news. Stock price is up an incredible amount, so employees vesting stock have done extremely well. Were I in their position, I would also forgo 401k matching.
Its depressing the way a lot of contracts are written to fuck over employees. Look at your employment agreement. I bet your company is allowed to choose not to pay out 401K matches as well.
> This strikes me as so naïve. By which mechanism does swiping through YouTube, TikTok or whatever the newest fad is, confer knowledge about technology. Some kind of brain osmosis?

A lot of very powerful people in technology (who have a vested interest in selling something) have been stating this as fact for so long that many people have just accepted it as truth.
[Author of the piece here]

Ignore the slides. The slides are decoration.

Read the script, or listen to the talk.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wM1-c7euvQaRaCL4hKCaE8VR...
Looks like the author set up a redirect to EFF if you're coming from HN. It was showing the article for me earlier.
Agree, that MS is working on performance and can show it on TechEmpower benchmarks is great. I also think some top performers are using special ways to be that fast but if you move down a bit in the list there are probably more realistic implementations.

I also got a bit suprised over this other benchmark showing how fast C# can be:
https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
Yeah moxie is the #1 reason I don't promote signal to my friends as an alternative to WhatsApp. His attitude to third party clients I find very bad too. They could have added a lot of usability too the signal ecosystem

If I move to something else it had to be fully open, not just the source of the app but the network too. Movie is just creating another walled garden. A lot less microphones hanging in the trees than WhatsApp but still a walled garden.
Musk has stock options that he has to buy and he doesn't get a salary. He said he doesnt own houses or yachts and he works all the time. He's spending it on making humans interplanetary. Of all the billionaires to bitch about, Musk is clearly many standard deviations more industrious and capable than any of us, surely if there is financial allocation it should go to those who merit it the most? Would you prefer to have our lives set up in any other way?
the official ethereum client is not one of their main repo?

what is?
I feel that the current law would have worked just fine if it was enforced properly - current law (at least in EU where I live - as far as I understand, SEC guidelines in USA are similar, but I may be mistaken) expects that unsavvy investors should be prohibited to make such trades, partly because we know well from historical experience that often it leads to sad consequences such as this case.

As the circumstances show, this young man did not have a proper understanding of what his trades (including the not-yet-settled part) meant and what the actual financial consequences and risks were at that point of time when he (mistakenly) felt that they are horrific enough to take his life. Robinhood should have tested for that capability and, given the absence of it, ensured that he can not trade options on their platform and be limited to simpler, more understandable investment products. If they intentionally make this verification superficial so that they can get more unsophisticated investors trading tricky products on their platform, that is praying on investors and should be prohibited.
> Facebook is allowing people to grant access to their data to third-parties and Facebook should somehow be faulted for that.

It's not clear to me that they shouldn't be faulted. How many people read terms and conditions? How many people lack the technological literacy to understand what it means to share their facebook data with third-parties?

It seems to me like we should make our systems robust to the average user, especially systems as big as Facebook.

> Facebook should not be forced to somehow be the arbiter of this.

I kind of agree, but at the same time Facebook has some moral responsibility as the holder of the data. Perhaps it's not on Facebook to implement regulatory mechanisms, but if these mechanisms are implemented (e.g. by the "State") then it should probably be on Facebook's dime.
[Author of the piece here]

Thanks!

I should have expected that so many people wouldn't listen or read it, just look at the pictures... >_<
Does Flutter (Dart) generate native binaries like Go?
At this point, a clear demonstration of how Signal's current design fails to keep users safe forwarded to the New York Times, WaPo, and Fox News would be a lot more valuable than shitposting via the Github PR system.
After reading the TOS, I never understood why people were okay with even using it. To this day I still don't know what exactly Facebook even is or what the point of it is. People always gave me the same line of "It's the only way I can keep in touch with family and friends." That sounded like nothing beyond a bogus excuse to me, I call and message my friends and family and for my whole life the only thing to change was going from mail to email to messengers.
Of course, I used the US as a reference.
In a previous post, the author responded to this concern: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18808010

It seems like he will include a subset of solutions in a later edition, whenever he has time to publish it.
>"I'd also directly challenge you on the assertion that young people have more free time and are more obnoxious than older people."

I'm generally talking about teenagers to people in their 20's. I made this observation based on my own experience, where my friends who are in their mid 20's to early 30's have started participating way less often in group chats and social activities because they are raising children now. They also have less free time because they're rising up the corporate ladder and have taken on more responsibilities. I have also noticed my own energy levels decline as I age, so that's where I am coming from. I think if you combine all those factors together you get people with much less time and energy than college aged or fresh out of college aged people.

As for the obnoxious part, you can absolutely take that with a grain of salt. I was making that assertion with adolescents and people in their early 20's in-mind. Basically, the prime age for being rebellious, raunchy, and irreverent towards authority. I don't have any scientific evidence to give you, but anecdotally that attitude seems to mellow out with time.
[Author of the piece here]

No, they did not. They discontinued the SSDs. The NVDIMMs are not affected.
That's because it is usually perfectly legal to lie about someone in the US and just call it "hyperbole" or something. Our libel laws are incredibly permissive in the US.

See Elon Musk calling a guy a "pedo" repeatedly with zero evidence, because he pissed him off online. Although there were other issues in that case.

The UK has way more strict libel laws than the US. If you lie about someone it's a LOT easier to get a civil judgment against you. Hency why a ton of magazines/newspapers have been successfully sued over libel whereas in the US this almost never happens.
If your friend has view access to your profile, why shouldn’t he be able to extract that information via an API as well?
When you click a link, your browser sends the URL of the site where you clicked the link to the server that hosts the link you're clicking. This is called 'Referer' (sic)[0] and can be disabled in your browser [1].

Now, the owner of that blog set it up in a way that people coming fon HN (who send a Referer) are redirected. (Another user figured that out a few minutes ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26078619 )

[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Re...

[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Referrer
I wholeheartedly agree. It's also more addictive than Facebook or Instagram, and (for me at least) it's a more negative mental experience. Probably because of all the dopamine.

I don't remember it being like this in the beginning. Not sure if it was because I wasn't hooked on it yet, or because they changed their algorithms. Also, since Trump in 2015, it went even more downhill pretty fast. I am pretty sure they intentionally made it such that you get angry at "the other side" - it was so easy to do that with Trump.
I think that is a fair assessment.

Many in the rocket industry, believe Starship could work reasonably well. If any other company even country had announced Starship, nobody would take it seriously.

History of success gives credibility for the next stage.
What do you want to record as feedback? I can see it helping to show how a UI component behaves or even how to use an IDE's features to fix a class of problems you identified. It might help showing the code being written?

However, for any process you might want to record, remember people are used to inferring the process from end results, so it's probable diffs and before/after screenshots are easier for people to digest compared to screen recordings.
This entirely depends on the plan agreements. I’ve had hospital 401ks that use fidelity and have access to brokeragelink which lets you trade individual stocks.
> Cambridge Analytica used the Facebook API to ask users to share data about them & their friends. Stupid users agreed to that.

Not reading a 1000 page EULA doesn't make users stupid. It makes Facebook predatory.
This is what happens when the social media world collides with the trading world. People have extremely unrealistic expectations of performance these days.
Having said that, the crypto world is pretty insane - it's totally uncharted waters where anything can happen. Winners are winning big (FTX CEO is worth $10bn after only 3 years, for example).
[Author of the piece here]

Up to a point, yes. Also, Multics.

But this is a different take.
My Mum and Mister Rogers (2020)
With shared hosting still being a thing, I think that's a pretty saturated market.
Mapping which coronavirus variants will resist antibody treatments
> As far as I'm aware you can however look at the leaked source code and use those insights to fix

You can, but if your solution is at all like theirs the onus will be on you (what-ever legal team you can afford against their 800lb gorilla) to prove that you didn't copy it.

It is far safer not to look at all, and IIRC ReactOS's developer guidelines prohibit their devs from doing so for the avoidance of doubt.

> or write documentation about the behavior of the APIs and general behavior.

What Compaq did to implement the behaviour of IBM's BIOS (the only part of the original PC that wasn't off-the-shelf) was to double-clean-room. Two completely separate teams were on the job: in one "clean room" they analysed the chip's behaviour in detail and documented everything significant, and in the other a team implemented a design that mimicked said behaviour.

I doubt the ReactOS team have the resources to properly pull this off for something as large as the Windows source code though, and even if they did that still wouldn't get close to their target of Win2003 & later compatibility (there have been some significant changes to parts of the driver model since the XP days).
I mean... Gimp works. And if your first job is CAD, Programming, or something non-artistic, Gimp is what I'm willing to pay for.

I'm willing to pay $4000+ for my profession's tools. But when it comes to a hobby, cheap or free is better.
fruit trees mostly also, air cleaning + food (and great food), double win. Figs, clementines, mandarines (currently I'm finding so many around, just on the ground, in more or less abandoned gardens), persimmons, medlars..
In theory it is a security boundary. But the attack surface is so big, and local privilege escalation bugs so common, that you should not rely on it to isolate different untrusted users.
A simple 11.2 GHz radio telescope (Hardware) (2020)
> I liked cyberpunk, if only because of the story. I like games with decent - excellent stories. Sure, I wish cyberpunk could’ve been even better but it was enjoyable.

Same, I'm glad I opted out of the pre-buy despite having looked forward to the game for the better part of a decade now, I'm a massive fan of genre and heard about it early on and fan boyed about the art renders from back in the day despite having given up on gaming years before.

But, I stopped watching the youtube videos after a few missions and now I'm waiting until they get things sorted and the features they promised as well as some others that will only be possible for Online play--there was talk about it including space exploration as the launch site is not currently accessible but looks likely to be as things develop with time.

Anyhow, I'm just glad they didn't use Bitcoin ransomware, and I hope they got their backup/image settings on before this hack.
Can't the Secret Santa problem be solved just by shuffling an array of participants, and assigning a person A[i] to give a gift to a person A[(i+1)%N]?

I have a feeling that this is not correct, but cannot determine why.
I wouldn't say so. The TR series have many more bus lanes than the desktop variants, and support >= 128GB ram, iirc official EEC support, and iirc quad channel memory.
For those reticent to click on their work computers but morbidly curious, can someone describe the image?