skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Oh, cool – I understand! My first thought was that if you're already familiar with a language like PHP why not use that to build a webapp.
Yeah, but innocent people have to take pleas all the time because of it.
I have no idea; this is not my field. Just pointing out it's quite possible people are just talking through each other.

Human language is like that, full of ambiguity, of implicit baggage.

If you feel "memory" means a recording of an event, or a photo book, then faced with the discovery that brains actually don't work like that you may want to state "neurons don't store memories!".
Ask HN: What was it like to be an individual contributor before SCRUM?
I see the value that scrum brings (in certain very narrow cases) but I personally do not enjoy working under such a model as an individual contributor. If I was a manager or a stakeholder I'd have a different perspective.

For the older techies, how was life like before scrum?
I don't even know where to begin with this comment.
Interesting. I live in a similar climate with fluctuating temperatures and I haven't had this issue but maybe the charge port on my PHEV is heated and I didn't realize. I have had the problem though where sometimes the charge port door is frozen shut during cold temperatures.
High performance WinForms grid rendering engine: DynamicGrid
Sadly, I believe the money that will go to the states will help finance the incarceration of those very opioid users.
Also the stock price at this point is entirely decoupled from profitability.
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Multiple Dispatch – Julia (2019)
Nope, they absolutely don't! And Reddit's SPA is a good example that is markedly worse than their old website. I was thinking of Facebook.

Twitter (and things like Instagram and TikTok) in particular is something where an SPA makes it easier to handle the different sections like the main feed, DMs, lists while keeping it responsive, but for those cases tools like LiveWire and Hotwire help make the gap between sites and SPAs much smaller and are an asset for avoiding having to rewrite websites into SPAs just for those smaller things.

But then you have cases like YouTube, where you could've argued that the initial case was a perfect fit for a website, and then as it has incorporated features like notifications, livestreaming with live chat, live donations with payment flows on top of the video and smaller things like the mini-player... you would end up with a huge amount of imperative JS sprinkled around your templates and carefully managed around your LiveView-equivalent's state updates; or you could just go with an SPA, vastly simplify your backend to be concerned on handling your data efficiently, and just having a frontend that makes managing complex state updates not-as-horrible.

It's trade-offs all the way down.
Why was this study titled in a way that would lead a person to presuming the opposite of what the conclusion actually is?

I get that technically the title does not actually imply there is an “association”, but why not name it something that doesn’t lead the mind as much in the wrong direction? For example: “Effects of Egg Consumption on the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases”
We want structural change with laws and government regulation!

No, you can't have that, the market must decide, it's most efficient!

Ok, then when people do things we don't like, we will boycott them since we can only use market based solutions.

No, that's cancel culture!

Hmm.... seems like these two ideas together is basically just a long way of saying that those with power should be immune from society at large.
That's right, no association was found.

Perhaps the title should be changed to "No Association Between Egg Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease."
I don't think it's the bandwidth that was being opposed but the latency. The cell can run multiple transcriptions at a time just like we can increase the number of memory channels, but each one of those molecules is still waiting around for the random chance for their next molecule to physically appear on the reaction stage.
Yeah, well I have done similar thing.

I bought a games that I pirated in the past.

I am not saying piracy is great everyone should be doing it.

My argument is: I am sometimes lazy and tired after a long day. I want to watch a movie i heard was good. I can spend 15 mins trying to figure out where to watch it or I can pirate it after it doesnt come up in netflix search.

but i am not going to pay for 10 subscriptions just soo I can occasionally watch a show.
So the VP's job is to be disingenuous to everyone except the consultants? He's already made up his mind about what to do, knows he can't get buy-in from employees, so he hires an external firm to generate the data he has already decided is correct.

I feel like all the comments talking about a breakdown of trust seem even more poignant now after reading your comment.
Traditionally, the repercussion for lying was loss of reputation/business/relationships. It didn't always work that way, of course, but it was a moderately effective dynamic overall.

What's new now is that everyone's ability to create a network (and leverage network effects) via social media is tremendously amplified. That means both a reward system for embracing lies as long as the lies agree with in-group beliefs, and a greatly increased ability to spread them.

Congress can't legislate that media (or Karen on Twitter for that matter) has to tell the truth -- that's a pretty well established point of law and you'd likely need to amend the Constitution if you wanted wholesale, mandated change. Against the backdrop of that not-gonna-happen-in-our-lifetime heavy lift, the boomlet in deplatforming is actually a pretty good (although I personally dislike it) and organic solution. Private-sector actors are doing what Congress and the Court cannot.

Now, does it solve for the dopamine drip and self-reinforcing vitriol that caused our current problem? No. But it does, at least partially, quarantine it.
Consensus on How to Activate Bitcoin's Taproot Upgrade Is Close
if this were reddit, I'd be throwing gold at you.
I would like to see more than the summary. Is there a way to get access?

I’m interested because I was on a low-carb high-fat diet where I ate 3 eggs a day – that was until I got a blood test that showed very high cholesterol. Now I’ve cut dietary cholesterol and I’m on statins. It’s much harder to maintain weight loss this way.
would the oral transmission of information be what's called in other industries training?
If the brain is physical, and you think it doesn't entirely determines your actions, then we disagree on the point it makes to say the brain is physical, as a lot of people reading this think there is something extraphysical about what our brains do.

As for Nazi Germany, all those Germans chose to either resist or go along with putting millions of people into concentration camps because they were enemies of their goals. That was there choice to see others as inferior to them. They still believed Jews had free will, and they most certainly all Christians, which it's fundamental tenants are about free will. You choose to accept Jesus as your saviour. Also, I'm pretty sure their industries were privately owned, ala capitalism. Or are you trying to redefine what terms mean again?

Oh, so it's only OK to talk about the death and destruction left in the wake of other countries you paint as the bad guy, but anyone mentions the atrocities committed by systems you taut as superior rubs you the wrong way? Do you even begin to understand how brainwashed you are? You can't even contemplate the evils your world views have perpetuated on societies as you pretend to claim the moral high ground.
> I don't want the language to become more complex

Is the biggest reason for me. If I were the only one using a language I wouldn't care. But working on a team and having to deal with other people's towers of abstraction is awful. Without generics I wouldn't have to deal with it.
Curious, could the voices also be altered / deep faked so that they sound similar to the actors' voices?
Yes, it's always someone else's fault when Communist policies inevitably fail and murder millions.
I was really hoping that would be about using this ant swirling phenomenon to drive machinery.
The way you retrospect about past positions suggests a general misunderstanding of the nature of market exposure. Noobs like OP have an irrational notion that it's somehow a "feat" to have taken on a btc position as if only a chosen few were given the opportunity to do so. It's a lot like telling your buddies "There was this hot flight attendant, and I almost asked her out." Almost doing it = Not doing it.
It is not laughable. EVERY point you have tried to make has been demonstrated to be false or misleading.
Nutritionists HATE This trick!
Related discussions:

- https://www.reddit.com/r/KyleTaylor/comments/jowlt2/open_sou...

- https://github.com/greatsuspender/thegreatsuspender/issues

and the forks do not wait..

https://github.com/aciidic/thegreatsuspender-notrack
I don’t think the problem is that nutrition science is in its infancy, it’s more that modern science incentivizes pumping out flashy results cheaply, and as fast as possible.
Do you have any examples of sufficiently thorough documentation?

I've basically never been happy with the documentation I've been provided with, whether for internal company code or 3rd party OSS stuff or 3rd party paid stuff...
Far simpler cat location method: Shake a box of dried cat food around and then pick the cat which is yours.
It's questionable whether the Fairness Doctrine was ever an issue. It was originally established because the government owned the airwaves and leased them to broadcasters -- like a landlord, they could have standards.

But the doctrine never applied to print publishers because the government didn't have a similar stake in that medium. Given that cable companies and the wires they use are all private, it seems unlikely they could be restricted under a revised Fairness Doctrine without running into 1A issues.
This is the site where humor goes to die. I feel your pain.
Ditto CS:GO, when I was playing with a friend in Sweden (vs Australia), we’d all have to increase our max allowed ping to the server, or the game would never find us a party.
But to compose something large you begin to need hundreds of these small tools interacting.

Do you build slightly larger tools that integrate the small tools? Even these larger tools my need to be composed into another level of abstraction to build the final system.

This is essentially the same architecture that you would build with a layered set of abstractions and interfaces.

It's really just a matter of how the different bits communicate that is different.
Your theoretical and well contexted overview of the Web, your mininal formatting overhead (no googles and 5000 cubicles), (single person in charge of content and formatting) view is essential not trivial.
I think your advice comes from a good place, but it really depends on the doctor.

I’ve worked closely with bunch of primary care doctors and would only trust 1 in about 10 of them to give good nutrition advice. My work involved careful review of their clinical treatment of patients in a primary care settings.

My anecdotal experience with cardiologists is no better.

The overall issue is that they have grown tired of really challenging patients to change much of their diets. Even if the diet is what is really killing them. And I don’t blame them, but I also think that many doctors don’t see nutrition as part of their job.
While an interesting idea, I think you’ve greatly understated the problem. First, lasers and coherent light beams diverge, light cannot stay perfectly collimated and it’s not really possible to collimate well over such long distances. So the receiver, >10,000km away, will “see” only a small cross-section of beam. The efficiency of this is defined by something called the overlap integral between the areas of the beam and the detector. Think of it like the amount of light from a flashlight that gets through a pinhole in a sheet of paper. This reduces the available signal power significantly. If you introduce mirrors you have the mirror loss plus the vignetting losses for each bounce. This is likely much worse.
In the future even your RAM will have firmware; and the subject of POWER10 blobs
I sincerely cannot comment on technical matters of RA, I wish I could. I’m just the guy that needs to balance the budget :)
This view is really bad.

The only logical thing to do is to follow current scientific consensus the best we can. Adjust ourselves as those views adjust.

Anything else is just pure ego saying that you know better than experts. Random examples where you were "right" or the scientific consensus was "wrong" are irrelevant.

Edit: I'm just saying that the scientific method is the best tool we have for this kind of stuff, even with the bias and flaws of the studies. It's miles and miles better than Facebook-esque anecdotes about rednecks eating bacon.
This is the only benefit that comes to mind when weighing against obscuring the night sky. Heck even freeing Australians from Telestra's Iron grip would be an accomplishment.
Perhaps the market currently overvalues Tesla?

This isn't a very convincing argument.
Code reviews have become a social thing, and bagging on someone with a litany of issues in front of a group is never acceptable behavior. If they've done ten things wrong, you have to pick 3 of them and let the rest go, or decide to kick them out of the group entirely.

There was a period for me when I 'solved' this code review problem the way many of us solved class participation in grade school - it's not a competition, it's a learning environment. It doesn't matter to the class if you know the answer, but it's really awkward if nobody knows the answer. So you say the answer in your head, wait to see if anybody else volunteers that information, and then put your hand up if they don't. Or you count to five. (I suspect based on hands and grades, at least a couple of my classmates knew all the answers but were too shy to say anything, and this also appears to be true in code reviews.)

Code reviews are typically but not always asynchronous, so you can choose to wait for someone else to point out the obvious stuff and then just mention the things nobody else saw. The danger there is if an argument starts about one of these issues and distracts from others. Like a real conversation, you can run out of time for it before the issue you cared about gets sufficient airtime.
While you are on it. There is a similiar easy to use docker-compose file for setting up a tor bridge :)
https://community.torproject.org/relay/setup/bridge/docker/
Follow the money. The FDA is a political organization.
I personally think eggs are good for you and eat at least one a day, but there have been studies that have shown results that might lead you to believe otherwise like the following:

https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/87/4/964/4633437

". In addition, consumption of ≥7 eggs/wk was associated with a modestly but significantly greater risk of total mortality in this population. In contrast, egg consumption was associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality in a dose-response fashion among physicians with diabetes (2 times the risk of death in people consuming ≥7 eggs/wk than in those consuming <1 egg/wk). Furthermore, our data provided suggestive evidence for a greater risk of MI and stroke with egg consumption among male physicians with diabetes. In contrast, baseline hypercholesterolemia status did not influence the relation between egg consumption and CVD or mortality."

The same study admits that the finding was not conclusive though and that there have been other studies that have contradicted their results.
This is in line with the results of Canada's early UBI experiments; substantially nobody left the workforce except to pursue liberal arts or stay-at-home parenting, both of which have intrinsic value. People are motivated by a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including their social group at work, finding meaning in their lives through their work, and so on.

UBI and unemployment isn't provide enough for a lavish lifestyle, you can achieve that through work.

> The ambitious won't want to stay there; the unambitious may "unfairly" get their basic needs met, but they're hardly living the high life, and the lost -useful- labor to society is negligible.

Certainly true, and of course, automation will replace the missing labor in the pool, and the continued march of development will lead to even lower birth rates (already well below replacement rate of 2.1 is almost every developed nation), and there will be fewer and fewer of these folks in time.

Canada's most recent UBI experiment, cancelled recently (2020) by Ford & co, was showing excellent results [1], and so did the earlier one in 1974 [2].

[1] https://newatlas.com/good-thinking/canada-basic-income-exper...

[2] https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200624-canadas-forgot...
so you only need a thermometer and machine learning to solve the task? ;)
Dystopian futures where you exist as only as much as your can afford. It's cheapest to download yourself into a computer and slow down your computation speed than to continue to pay have a flesh and blood body.
A Simple Framework for Digital Marketing: Guidance for Small Businesses
An alternative to this is AngelList’s Recurring Transfers: https://angellist.com/blog/recurring-transfers
Poll: What jobs do we have on Hacker News?
DevOps / Operations
Machine Learning specialist
Retail worker
Food worker
Truck Driver
Educator/Teacher/Professor
This seems like an inevitable end to globalization and the inevitable consolidation. You can see the trends over recent human history; lots of things that were once localized were aggregated into a single service that served a whole county, and then into one that served the state, then region, country, etc.

We all reap the benefits of that as the economies of scale drive down costs for consumers, thus making more advancement possible. We don't talk about the downsides, though.

This is one of the major ones. If there are 1,000 people in your town, each of them is .1% of the vote, and is probably .1% of the revenue for each business. If a business does something you don't like, you can ding them for .1% of their revenue. If you get upset and convince 9 other people, that's a 1% decrease in revenue. If you can convince 500 other people, you have a majority, and can pass legislation to ban what that business is doing. We're talking numbers of people where you can launch a grassroots campaign with posterboard in yards; you could probably run a successful campaign for less than $1,000.

If you have to change a county-level company, now you're suddenly 1 out of 100,000 people. Getting 500 people to agree with you does nothing. It's 0.5% of their customers, the same impact as if you, your SO, and 2 children stopped visiting the shop. Go up to the state level and you're no longer even a blip.

The money you need in order to conduct a campaign goes up exponentially as well. I don't know what a statewide campaign costs, but I'm fair confident it's far, far beyond what any individual or small group of individuals can come up with.

The end result is that this isn't a feeling, this is a reality. We, individually, wield less power over our communities than we ever have in the past because our communities have grown to be far larger than they were in the past. That dilutes the control we have, as the percentage of the revenue or votes you constitute goes down.

I think we would do better with smaller communities that have more control. I think the weed laws are an okay example of that. The federal government has gone hands off and delegated that choice to the states. States where they choose to allow it typically don't force it; they allow local communities to keep it illegal if they would like. If some small town think it's going to be bad for them, they can choose to keep it illegal. I disagree with them, but I respect that that's what they want for their community.
There is no consistent presentation of progress or organization. Is my scrolling doing anything? How much content is there? Does the content have a logical structure? Is this the end?
Which is kinda a half measure too. My body has been responding amazingly to a vegetarian diet (w/vegan flex days) and anywhere between 16-20 hours of fasting a day. I combat the horrors of factory farming and what's done to these poor animals and gain all the incredible benefits of fasting, all the while still enjoying a normal lifestyle of 2 tasty meals a day. Meat seems like this weird socially acceptable yet dangerous extravagance, a bit like smoking, to me. I'm working my way to cutting out eggs and am glad to be doing so considering all the negative outcomes other studies have revealed about egg consumption.

If you look at all the studies uncritically and average out their findings, then the safe amount of eggs, imho, per week is between zero and two.

The study of the health outcomes of egg consumption, in general, is a bit out there. A 2009 study claimed the opposite, that 7+ eggs a week increased the odds of cardiovascular disease. There's a strong anti-vegetarian pop-culture under-current right now fueled by the alt-right, keto types, and 'masculinity' experts so small single studies like these will get a lot of attention, but I'd wait for someone to try to replicate it, or at least see it as one data point in hundreds of reputable egg studies that mostly seem to contradict themselves. The egg industry is a $10bn industry and politically very well connected. Some of these studies may be influenced by that. Evolution didn't seem to design us to regularly eat the eggs of other animals and we seem poorly adapted to do so.

Fun/depressing fact: There's one caged egg laying hen for every American.
Tariffs have nothing to do with quality.
Not sure how he overlooked: https://material.io/
It’s sad how far behind health science is. Why don’t we have devices constantly monitoring us for health problems? Why can’t I easily browse through the data that doctors have on me, and transfer it between doctors? Why do I have to prep and cook and measure to get the optimum amount of nutrients for my body, why isn’t there a product that offers that for me? These things should be a higher priority as a society than social media apps or video games.
Yeah, my first thought after reading that anecdote was that the new COO should have been fired.
eggs have about ten times the cholesterol as butter or cheese so cooking the eggs in some butter is probably fine.
Upon inspecting the data, your theory doesn't hold up. Ford's problem isn't demand, it's supply. Light truck sales data (including F-150) show that sales are at an all-time high:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LTRUCKNSA

Vehicle-miles were down 10% for Nov 2020 (most recent month from FHWA) vs Nov 2019, that is true.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/travel_monitoring...

However, people are still buying new and used cars.

New car sales in Dec were strong:
https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/usa-auto-industry-total-sales-...

Used car prices last year spiked astronomically:
https://www.npr.org/2020/10/28/927971920/a-pandemic-sticker-...
Yet at the same time, a recent study [1] concludes:

> The results suggested that higher egg consumption was positively associated with the risk of diabetes in Chinese adults.

However, it also states:

> The association between egg consumption and diabetes is inconclusive.

These statements seem contradictory to me, but maybe someone can shed more light on this?

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33028452/
Happy to spin up a proxy, but now what?

how do I offer it to others for use if I don't use twitter?
Just for completeness, can you add vasectomy to the list?

I think it's an under-utilized option given its effectiveness and the fact that most insurances cover a huge portion (often 100%) of the costs.